Add Performed Procedure Step Comment to Module Definition

DICOM Correction Proposal

STATUS Assigned Date of Last Update 2014/01/09 Person Assigned Ulrich Busch ([email protected]) Submitter Name Ulrich Busch ([email protected]) Submission Date 2013/12/20

Correction Number CP-1360 Log Summary: Add Performed Procedure Step Comment to Module Definition Name of Standard PS 3.3 2011 Rationale for Correction: The attribute 'Comments on the Performed Procedure Step (0040,0280)' is part of PS 3.4, section CC.2.5.1.3 UPS Attribute Service Requirements. In that table, it is included in the Unified Procedure Step Performed Procedure Information Module. However, in module definition in PS 3.3, C.30.3 Unified Procedure Step Performed Procedure Information Module, that attribute is missing. In case of Modality Worklist it is also part of the module definition in PS 3.3, C.4.14 Performed Procedure Step Information. This CP adds the attribute to the module definition in PS 3.3, C.30.3 for consistency. Correction Wording:

In PS 3.3 Section C.8.8.8 RT ROI Observations Module, Table C.8-44 RT ROI Observations Module Attributes, make the following updates to Type and Attribute Description of ROI Physical Property Value (3006,00B4):

C.30.3 Unified Procedure Step Performed Procedure Information Module Table C.30.3-1 specifies the Attributes that describe the performance and results of a Unified Procedure Step (UPS).

Table C.30.3-1 Unified Procedure Step Performed Procedure Information Module Attributes Attribute Name Tag Attribute Description Unified Procedure Step (0074,1216) Details of the Procedure Step as performed. Performed Procedure Zero or one item shall be included in this Sequence sequence. >Actual Human Performers (0040,4035) Human performers that are/were actually Sequence involved or responsible for performing the Procedure Step. Zero or more Items shall be included in this sequence. Note: Initially this list will be empty. Items may be added to the list at or after the status transition of the Procedure Step State (0074,1000) to “IN PROGRESS”

>>Human Performer Code (0040,4009) Human performer that is involved or responsible Sequence for performing the Procedure Step. Only a single Item shall be permitted in this sequence. >>>Include Code Sequence Macro Table 8.8-1 No Baseline Context ID is defined. >>Human Performer’s (0040,4037) Name of the human performer. Name >>Human Performer’s (0040,4036) Organization to which the human performer is Organization accountable for the activities in the Procedure Step. >Performed Station Name (0040,4028) Names within the enterprise of the equipment Code Sequence that performed the Procedure Step. This name may be the same as the AE Title, but does not have to be. Zero or more Items shall be included in this sequence. >>Include Code Sequence Macro Table 8.8-1 No Baseline Context ID is defined. >Performed Station Class (0040,4029) Classes of the equipment that created the Code Sequence Procedure Step. Zero or more Items shall be included in this sequence. >>Include Code Sequence Macro Table 8.8-1 No Baseline Context ID is defined. >Performed Station (0040,4030) Geographic locations of the equipment that Geographic Location Code created Procedure Step. Sequence Zero or more Items shall be included in this sequence. >>Include Code Sequence Macro Table 8.8-1 No Baseline Context ID is defined. >Performed Procedure Step (0040,4050) Date and Time at which the Procedure Step Start DateTime started.

>Performed Procedure Step (0040,0254) Institution-generated description or classification Description of the Procedure Step that was performed. >Comments on the (0040,0280) User- defined comments on the Performed Performed Procedure Step Procedure Step. >Performed Workitem Code (0040,4019) A sequence that conveys the type of procedure Sequence performed. Zero or more items shall be present in this sequence. >>Include Code Sequence Macro Table 8.8-1 Baseline Context ID is CID 9231 Note: This CID has generic workitems. An implementation may choose to define more specific, detailed workitems. …