DOCSLIB.ORG

Modification to the Second Infantry Division Memorial

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Modification to the Second Infantry Division Memorial The Second Infantry Division Association Memorial Foundation CFA SUBMISSION - NOVEMBER 19, 2020 Second Indianhead Division Association Memorials Foundation Aves Thompson, Chair Architect Beyer Blinder Belle Landscape Architect Oehme, van Sweden | OvS Structural Engineer Silman Geotechnical Engineer Geo-Concepts Architectural Lighting MCLA Civil Engineer Gordon DC SECOND INFANTRY DIVISION MEMORIAL MODIFICATION 19 November 2020 Page 2 CONTENTS Introduction 4 Project Report 5 Proposed Design 12 SECOND INFANTRY DIVISION MEMORIAL MODIFICATION 19 November 2020 Page 3 Introduction and Description structure to the National Mall Historic District, Proposed Design listed in the National Register of Historic Places. Located within the open lawn at the southwest The proposed design option maintains the design corner of the Ellipse facing Constitution Ave The pink granite walls and platform of the integrity of the memorial by emphasizing the NW, the Second Division Memorial was originally memorial create three distinct zones. The three zones. However, the central part of the constructed in 1936 to honor those of the central zone is defined by the monumental platform is extended and distinguished by two Second Army Division who gave their lives in tripartite granite panels that frame the sword and stone plinths aligned with the point where the World War I. The memorial was designed by commemorate lives lost in World War I. The east wing walls meet the central tripartite panel. renowned sculptor James Earle Fraser and and west zones are defined by the granite wing This maintains the hierarchy of the memorial architect John Russell Pope and consists of walls that commemorate lives lost in World War composition, provides more surface area for a monumental tripartite granite wall with a II (on the west wall) and the Korean War (on the inscriptions, and meets the full purpose and need rectangular opening that frames the central focal east wall). The wing walls express a welcoming of the project by extending the platform of the element: the flaming sword, an eighteen-foot- gesture and are punctuated by end granite memorial, creating a welcoming space for visitors high gilded bronze sculpture of a hand grasping pedestals with flagpoles. and an enlarged space to accommodate public a flaming sword designed by Fraser. The hilt ceremonies. of the sword is decorated with the insignia of In summary, the carefully designed memorial the Second Division, which features a head of a establishes a hierarchy between the central panel Native American chief on a star. The memorial framing the sword and the complementary wing In addition, this design provides an opportunity is most directly accessed from the path at the walls and flag poles that define the east and west to ensure the memorial is accessible for all corner of 17th Street NW and Constitution Ave spaces. visitors. The proposed path is a curvilinear design NW. that maintains the language of other curvilinear paths in the surrounding area. The path will be The architectural granite panels feature wreaths Purpose and Need constructed using the same materiality found on carved in relief and engraved V-cut recessed The Memorial Modification Project seeks to existing walkways adjacent to the memorial site. inscriptions filled with gold leaf listing the battles modify the existing memorial design to allow fought by the Second Division. The memorial is for future inscriptions that honor the courage elevated on a granite platform three steps above and sacrifice of the Second Division in military The selected design scheme would affect the grade. The tripartite wall is further distinguished campaigns since the Korean War. Currently, no existing planting beds in front of the memorial. by a stepped base and molded cornice above. panels are available for such inscriptions. The The 1975 NPS Landscape Development Plan for intention is to provide panels for the recognition the memorial calls for floral displays to be placed An addition to the memorial by architects Otto of three known military campaigns with the around the base of the monument, which may be Eggers and Daniel Higgins was completed in opportunity to accommodate inscriptions for recreated following the memorial modification. 1962. Eggers and Higgins designed two similarly future campaigns. There is also a need for an inscribed granite wing walls on either side of the expanded platform that can accommodate public central panel to honor the men of the Second ceremonies and encourage visitors to walk up Division who died in World War II and the Korean onto the memorial to view the inscriptions. War. Four design options are proposed that allow for additional inscriptions to be carved at two new The memorial is architecturally and historically plinth stones standing on the platform of the significant as a commemorative memorial memorial. designed by sculptor James Earle Fraser and architect John Russell Pope and is a contributing SECOND INFANTRY DIVISION MEMORIAL MODIFICATION 19 November 2020 Page 4 Project Report Description of Agency/Mission: The NPS Historic Preservation and Natural Resources: is the applicant submitting the proposed The NPS will adhere to the National THE ELLIPSE project on behalf of the Second Indianhead Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and Section Division Association Memorial Foundation. 106 of the National Historic Preservation The Association is a non-profit 501 (c)(3) Act (Section 106). The NPS is currently organization. developing design concepts and is determining the appropriate level of NEPA compliance. Description of Project Area: The Project Area The project will likely fall under a categorical surrounds the Second Infantry Division Memorial, exclusion for NEPA. Both the NEPA and Section located within the open lawn at the southwest 106 planning processes are anticipated to be corner of the Ellipse facing Constitution Ave NW. completed by spring 2020. The NPS initiated The area extends from the landscaping behind consultation with the DC SHPO on August the memorial to the sidewalk along Constitution 28, 2019. The NPS will hold a Section 106 Ave NW, representing the maximum extent of consulting parties meeting on October 15, 2019. area potentially effected by the modification The Second Division Memorial is listed as a project and accessible path options. contributing object in the National Mall Historic District nomination. Schedule: Completion Fall 2021 Flooding: The proposed project will not address Project Construction Cost Estimate: the Second Division Memorial’s resiliency to $1,100,000 flood impacts. The modification is to the existing memorial. Public Engagement: Public outreach occurred through the NEPA and Section 106 processes, as Stormwater Management: According on well as opportunities to raise issues or concerns the 2020 DOEE Stormwater Management at NCPC or the U.S. Commission of Fine Arts. Guidebook, a major land-disturbing activity CONSTITUTION AVE Coordination with the local community, including triggers stormwater management. A major land- the relevant ANC and District agencies, occurred disturbing activity is one that disturbs 5,000 through the Section 106 consultation process. square feet or greater of land area and either or both: a) Any portion of the pre-project land Coordination with Federal, State, and Local cover is natural; and or b) 2,500sf or greater of Jurisdictions: The concept of the project was the post-project land cover is impervious or BMP approved by CFA and NCPC, and it undertook a area. Section 106 consultation. There is no pre-project natural land cover on this Second Infantry Division Memorial project N and the anticipated additional post-project PROJECT AREA impervious area will be less than 2,500 square feet, therefore the project will not trigger stormwater management requirements. SECOND INFANTRY DIVISION MEMORIAL MODIFICATION 19 November 2020 Page 5 EXISTING CONDITIONS SECOND INFANTRY DIVISION MEMORIAL MODIFICATION 19 November 2020 Page 6 SECOND INFANTRY DIVISION MEMORIAL MODIFICATION 19 November 2020 Page 7 PROPOSED DESIGN - CURVILINEAR APPROACH Photo of current topographic conditions at the memorial. Land is fairly flat and would not require extensive landscape grading to accomplish an access route. SECOND INFANTRY DIVISION MEMORIAL MODIFICATION 19 November 2020 Page 8 MEMORIAL CHRONOLOGY - ORIGINAL ELEVATION AND PLAN ORIGINAL MEMORIAL, 1936 SOUTH ELEVATION - NTS PLAN VIEW - NTS SECOND INFANTRY DIVISION MEMORIAL MODIFICATION 19 November 2020 Page 9 MEMORIAL CHRONOLOGY - ADDITION TO ELEVATION AND PLAN MEMORIAL ADDITION, 1962 SOUTH ELEVATION - NTS PLAN VIEW - NTS SECOND INFANTRY DIVISION MEMORIAL MODIFICATION 19 November 2020 Page 10 EXISTING MEMORIAL - PERSPECTIVE SECOND INFANTRY DIVISION MEMORIAL MODIFICATION 19 November 2020 Page 11 PROPOSED DESIGN SECOND INFANTRY DIVISION MEMORIAL MODIFICATION 19 November 2020 Page 12 PROPOSED DESIGN - EXPANSION CHRONOLOGY ORIGINAL MEMORIAL CURRENT MEMORIAL ADDITION PROPOSED EXPANSION SECOND INFANTRY DIVISION MEMORIAL MODIFICATION 19 November 2020 Page 13 PROPOSED DESIGN - ELEVATION AND PLAN 29’-2” 12’-2” 23’-6 1/4” 14’-5” 8” 4’-10 3/4” 3’-3” 3’-3” 3’-11” SOUTH ELEVATION - NTS 70’-0” 5’-8 3/4” 2’-9” 14’-2” 20’-8” 10’-6 1/2” 5’-8 3/4” 6’ 4’-10 3/4” 7’-9” PLAN VIEW - NTS 29’-2 3/4 ” SECOND INFANTRY DIVISION MEMORIAL MODIFICATION 19 November 2020 Page 14 PROPOSED DESIGN - PLINTH ELEVATIONS CONCEPT 4’ - 10-3/4” 7’-9” 4’ - 10-3/4” 5” 8-3/4” TO OUR DEAD 2” TO OUR DEAD 6-1/2” TO OUR DEAD 2” 1950 2” KOREA 5-1/2” OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM 2” 6-1/2” DEFENSE AND SECURITY 3’-3” 3’-3” 3’-3” 3-1/2” 1954 2” IRAQ 2003-2010 2” DEMILITARIZED ZONE / COLD WAR 6-1/2” 2” 1965–1991 1’-3 1/4” 6-1/2” EXISTING INSCRIPTION PHOTO 1 AEAST - EAST PLINTH PLINTH WEST WEST FACE FACE PROPOSED PROPOSED INSCRIPTION INSCRIPTION 2021 2021 7’-9” TO OUR DEAD OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM IRAQ 2003–2011 3’-3” EXISTING INSCRIPTION PHOTO 2 BWEST - WEST PLINTH PLINTH EAST EAST FACE FACE PROPOSED PROPOSED INSCRIPTION INSCRIPTION 2021 2021 All proposed inscriptions to match the font, size, and spacing depicted in Photo 2.
Recommended publications
  • During Track Work And/Or Rail Shutdown Events, This Bus Stop Will Also Be Served by Metro Shuttle Buses. NOTE

    During Track Work And/Or Rail Shutdown Events, This Bus Stop Will Also Be Served by Metro Shuttle Buses. NOTE

    – Bus Service from Union Station Silver Spring Eastern Ave BUS BOARDING MAP BUS SERVICE AND BOARDING LOCATIONS schematic map The table shows approximate minutes between buses; check schedules for full details LEGEND not to scale 16th St BOARD AT MONDAY TO FRIDAY SATURDAY SUNDAY Rail Lines Metrobus Routes t t S ROUTE DESTINATION BUS STOP AM RUSH MIDDAY PM RUSH EVENING DAY EVENING DAY EVENING t S L G d t S n s l Metrobus Major Route 2 80 1 o ARLINGTON-UNION STATION LINE t Frequent, seven-day service on the core i Metrorail H St p H St route. On branches, service levels vary. a 13Y Ronald Reagan Washington Nat’l Airport m -- -- -- -- 30* -- 30* -- Station and Line C B h D6 Metrobus Local Route Alaska Ave t M r F Less frequent service, with some evening o NORTH CAPITOL ST LINE and weekend service available. N G Pl Union Station 80 Fort Totten m 8-15 15 10 30 30 30 30 30 X1 Metrobus Commuter Route Takoma Government EF Printing Office H Parking Peak-hour service linking residential areas Garage 80 Kennedy Center 14-20 30 20-30 30 30 30 30 30 Commuter to rail stations and employment centers. Georgia Ave GN G St G St Railroad Western Ave Bethesda X9 MetroExtra Route 80 McPherson Sq m 14-20 30 20-30 -- -- -- -- -- Transfer National Bureau of GN Limited stops for a faster ride. Days, times Guard Labor Statistics t Q Points S and service levels vary by route. EAST CAPITOL ST LINE Memorial t N s M 1 as E sa 96 Tenleytown-AU m 20 24 21 33 25-30 30-35 30-35 30-35 Map Symbols Routes Operated by ch J us National ett City/County Systems s A Postal 96
  • Second Division Memorial Modification 8120 President’S Park Constitution Avenue, NW & 17Th Street, NW NCPC MAP FILE NUMBER Washington, DC 1.31(73.10)45017

    Second Division Memorial Modification 8120 President’S Park Constitution Avenue, NW & 17Th Street, NW NCPC MAP FILE NUMBER Washington, DC 1.31(73.10)45017

    Executive Director’s Recommendation Commission Meeting: November 7, 2019 PROJECT NCPC FILE NUMBER Second Division Memorial Modification 8120 President’s Park Constitution Avenue, NW & 17th Street, NW NCPC MAP FILE NUMBER Washington, DC 1.31(73.10)45017 SUBMITTED BY APPLICANT’S REQUEST United States Department of the Interior Approval of comments on concept National Park Service plans REVIEW AUTHORITY PROPOSED ACTION Commemorative Works Act Approve comments on concept per 40 U.S.C. § 8905 plans ACTION ITEM TYPE Staff Presentation PROJECT SUMMARY The National Park Service (NPS), in cooperation with the Second Indianhead Division Association Memorials Foundation, has submitted concept plans for proposed modifications to the Second Division Memorial, which is located in the southwest corner of President's Park on the Ellipse near Constitution Avenue and Seventeenth Street, NW in Washington, DC. The memorial currently honors the service members who lost their lives in the service of the Second Division of the United States Army during World War I, World War II, and the Korean War. The current design includes an eighteen-foot-high sculpture of a hand grasping a flaming sword that guards an architectural frame of granite. Panels with inscriptions recognize particular campaigns. The Second Division Memorial was dedicated on July 18, 1936. On August 15, 1957, Congress authorized an addition to the memorial to honor the Second Division members lost in World War II and the Korean War. On August 13, 2018, Congress authorized a modification to the memorial under the provisions of the Commemorative Works Act, to allow for recognition of soldiers who lost their lives while serving in Korea on the Demilitarized Zone from 1965-1991, Iraq from 2003-2010, and Afghanistan from 2009-2013.
  • Building Stones of the National Mall

    Building Stones of the National Mall

    The Geological Society of America Field Guide 40 2015 Building stones of the National Mall Richard A. Livingston Materials Science and Engineering Department, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA Carol A. Grissom Smithsonian Museum Conservation Institute, 4210 Silver Hill Road, Suitland, Maryland 20746, USA Emily M. Aloiz John Milner Associates Preservation, 3200 Lee Highway, Arlington, Virginia 22207, USA ABSTRACT This guide accompanies a walking tour of sites where masonry was employed on or near the National Mall in Washington, D.C. It begins with an overview of the geological setting of the city and development of the Mall. Each federal monument or building on the tour is briefly described, followed by information about its exterior stonework. The focus is on masonry buildings of the Smithsonian Institution, which date from 1847 with the inception of construction for the Smithsonian Castle and continue up to completion of the National Museum of the American Indian in 2004. The building stones on the tour are representative of the development of the Ameri­ can dimension stone industry with respect to geology, quarrying techniques, and style over more than two centuries. Details are provided for locally quarried stones used for the earliest buildings in the capital, including A quia Creek sandstone (U.S. Capitol and Patent Office Building), Seneca Red sandstone (Smithsonian Castle), Cockeysville Marble (Washington Monument), and Piedmont bedrock (lockkeeper's house). Fol­ lowing improvement in the transportation system, buildings and monuments were constructed with stones from other regions, including Shelburne Marble from Ver­ mont, Salem Limestone from Indiana, Holston Limestone from Tennessee, Kasota stone from Minnesota, and a variety of granites from several states.
  • Download Brochure

    Download Brochure

    Enjoy live narration of the underlying history and significance of the top Zohery Tours offers diversified monuments and main attractions. We offer transportation services to suit individual virtual tours of Washington DC (including and corporate needs. If you’re looking the Grand Tour and African American for transportation services in the DC Heritage), Alexandria and Mt. Vernon, and Metro Area, Zohery Tours is your #1 Treasures of Egypt - all at the comfort of choice! your home! Zohery Tours has been helping teachers take their students on personalized educational Tour Departures fieldtrips across the area for over 30 years. Traveling with us will ensure that you travel All tours depart from in safe and comfortable buses, all while having tons of fun. Student safety is our 400 New Jersey Ave NW number one priority. This is why Zohery Tours is a trusted name in student travel. Washington DC 20001 (2 ½ blocks away from the Union Station Metro) CELEBRATING OVER 30 YEARS OF EXCELLENCE IN SIGHTSEEING Lectured Tours and Transportation 202-554-4200 WWW.ZOHERY.COM Email: [email protected] Itinerary of the Daily Tours (excluding the Mount Vernon Tour) DAILY TOURS Grand Tour of Alexandria & Washington Mount Vernon $79 per person $59 per person (Entrance fee included) Departs at 10:30 AM Departs at 2:00 PM Approx. 3-4 hours Approx. 4-5 hours Washington Full Day Tour After Dark $59 per person $138 per person (Entrance fee included) Departs at 7:30 PM Departs at 10:30 AM Approx. 3-4 hours Approx. 8-9 hours Child: $39 (age 3-11) The Full Day Tour is a combination of the Grand Tour and the PRIVATE TOURS Alexandria & Mount Vernon Tour.
  • Committee Print

    Committee Print

    115TH CONGRESS " 2d Session HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES CONSOLIDATED APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2018 COMMITTEE PRINT of the COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES on H.R. 1625 / Public Law 115–141 [Legislative Text and Explanatory Statement] Book 2 of 2 Divisions G–L U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 29–457 WASHINGTON : 2018 COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS RODNEY P. FRELINGHUYSEN, New Jersey, Chairman HAROLD ROGERS, Kentucky 1 NITA M. LOWEY, New York ROBERT B. ADERHOLT, Alabama MARCY KAPTUR, Ohio KAY GRANGER, Texas PETER J. VISCLOSKY, Indiana MICHAEL K. SIMPSON, Idaho JOSE´ E. SERRANO, New York JOHN ABNEY CULBERSON, Texas ROSA L. DELAURO, Connecticut JOHN R. CARTER, Texas DAVID E. PRICE, North Carolina KEN CALVERT, California LUCILLE ROYBAL-ALLARD, California TOM COLE, Oklahoma SANFORD D. BISHOP, JR., Georgia MARIO DIAZ-BALART, Florida BARBARA LEE, California CHARLES W. DENT, Pennsylvania BETTY MCCOLLUM, Minnesota TOM GRAVES, Georgia TIM RYAN, Ohio KEVIN YODER, Kansas C. A. DUTCH RUPPERSBERGER, Maryland STEVE WOMACK, Arkansas DEBBIE WASSERMAN SCHULTZ, Florida JEFF FORTENBERRY, Nebraska HENRY CUELLAR, Texas THOMAS J. ROONEY, Florida CHELLIE PINGREE, Maine CHARLES J. FLEISCHMANN, Tennessee MIKE QUIGLEY, Illinois JAIME HERRERA BEUTLER, Washington DEREK KILMER, Washington DAVID P. JOYCE, Ohio MATT CARTWRIGHT, Pennsylvania DAVID G. VALADAO, California GRACE MENG, New York ANDY HARRIS, Maryland MARK POCAN, Wisconsin MARTHA ROBY, Alabama KATHERINE M. CLARK, Massachusetts MARK E. AMODEI, Nevada PETE AGUILAR, California CHRIS STEWART, Utah DAVID YOUNG, Iowa EVAN H. JENKINS, West Virginia STEVEN M. PALAZZO, Mississippi DAN NEWHOUSE, Washington JOHN R. MOOLENAAR, Michigan SCOTT TAYLOR, Virginia ————— 1 Chairman Emeritus NANCY FOX, Clerk and Staff Director (II) C O N T E N T S DIVISION G—DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, ENVIRONMENT, AND RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2018 Page Title I—Department of the Interior ......................................................................
  • Washington, D.C. Visitor's Guide

    Washington, D.C. Visitor's Guide

    Washington, D.C. Visitor’s Guide Office of Congresswoman Angie Craig Second District, Minnesota A Note from the Congresswoman Welcome to Washington! I am excited that you have chosen to visit our nation’s capital. My staff and I have put together this guide to help you plan your trip to this historic city. From monuments and museums to restaurants and shopping, there are so many exciting sites to see here in Washington. I encourage you to try to see as much as you can while you are in town. Whether you chose to rent a bike, tour the city by foot, or utilize the DC Metro system, there are a variety of options to help you get around. Some of my favorite attractions are the National Air and Space Museum, the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the Phillips Collection. I also always love catching a game at the Washington Nationals Stadium (though my loyalty will always be with the Minnesota Twins!). Additionally, the Jefferson Memorial, the Washington Monument, and the Lincoln Memorial, are some of D.C.’s most popular attractions. There are also nineteen free Smithsonian museums that have something to capture every interest. It’s also great to make a trip to Arlington National Cemetery where you can pay your respects to our fallen veterans and watch the Changing of the Guard at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier. Washington also has a great food scene. One of my favorite restaurants is Bluejacket, a brewery located in the Navy Yard neighborhood. (need a dish recommendation she likes there or favorite beer).
  • Washington Monument Visitor Security Screening

    Washington Monument Visitor Security Screening

    NATIONAL PARK U.S. Department of the Interior SERVICE National Park Service Washington Monument Visitor Security Screening E N V I R O N M E N T A L A S S E S S ME N T July 2013 NATIONAL PARK SERVICE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL MALL AND MEMORIAL PARKS WASHINGTON, D.C. Washington Monument Visitor Security Screening National Mall and Memorial Parks ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT July, 2013 [This page intentionally left blank.] PROJECT SUMMARY The National Park Service (NPS), in cooperation with the National Capital Planning Commission (NCPC) has prepared this Environmental Assessment (EA) to evaluate a range of alternatives for the enhancement and improvement of the visitor screening at the Washington Monument (the Monument) in Washington, D.C. The National Mall is a highly recognizable space and one of the most significant historic landscapes in the United States, extending east to west from the U.S. Capitol building to the Potomac River and north to south from Constitution Avenue, NW to the Thomas Jefferson Memorial. The Washington Monument is the central point of the National Mall, placed at the intersection of two significant axes between the U.S. Capitol and the Lincoln Memorial to the east-west and the White House to the Jefferson Memorial to the north-south. The Washington Monument is made up of a stone masonry obelisk set within a circular granite plaza and flanked by large turf expanses. As the primary memorial to the nation’s first president, the Monument is one of the most prominent icons in the nation and is toured by approximately one million visitors annually with millions more visiting the surrounding grounds.
  • National Park Service Cultural Landscapes Inventory 2016

    National Park Service Cultural Landscapes Inventory 2016

    National Park Service Cultural Landscapes Inventory 2016 President's Park South The White House (President's Park) Table of Contents Inventory Unit Summary & Site Plan Concurrence Status Geographic Information and Location Map Management Information National Register Information Chronology & Physical History Analysis & Evaluation of Integrity Condition Treatment Bibliography & Supplemental Information President's Park South The White House (President's Park) Inventory Unit Summary & Site Plan Inventory Summary The Cultural Landscapes Inventory Overview: CLI General Information: Purpose and Goals of the CLI The Cultural Landscapes Inventory (CLI) is an evaluated inventory of all significant landscapes in units of the national park system in which the National Park Service has, or plans to acquire any enforceable legal interest. Landscapes documented through the CLI are those that individually meet criteria set forth in the National Register of Historic Places such as historic sites, historic designed landscapes, and historic vernacular landscapes or those that are contributing elements of properties that meet the criteria. In addition, landscapes that are managed as cultural resources because of law, policy, or decisions reached through the park planning process even though they do not meet the National Register criteria, are also included in the CLI. The CLI serves three major purposes. First, it provides the means to describe cultural landscapes on an individual or collective basis at the park, regional, or service-wide level. Secondly, it provides a platform to share information about cultural landscapes across programmatic areas and concerns and to integrate related data about these resources into park management. Thirdly, it provides an analytical tool to judge accomplishment and accountability.
  • Foundation Document Overview, the White House

    Foundation Document Overview, the White House

    NATIONAL PARK SERVICE • U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Foundation Document Overview The White House and President’s Park Washington, D.C. Contact Information For more information about The White House and President’s Park Foundation Document, contact: [email protected] or (202)208-1631 or write to: President’s Park, 1100 Ohio Drive, SW, Washington, D.C. 20242 Purpose The purpose of the PRESIDENT’S PARK is to: • Preserve the cultural resources of the White House—its architecture, artifacts, landscape design, gardens and grounds, and the surrounding parklands—in ways that foster and preserve dignity and respect for the office of the presidency, while still allowing for their use. • Provide a dignified transition area from an urban environment to the White House environs. • Interpret the history and significance of the presidency, the White House, and President’s Park, including their relationship to the American public, our republican form of government, and the growth of Washington, D.C. • Preserve existing historic memorials as examples of memorial art. • Provide a large open area associated with the White House for freedom of public expression and assembly activities, as well as for public use and enjoyment. The purpose statements are reprinted from the Comprehensive Design Plan for the White House and • Protect and enhance views to and from the President’s Park (2000). White House and provide a setting for viewing the White House. • Preserve Lafayette Park as open public space in The purpose of THE WHITE HOUSE is to: the foreground of the White House, as a setting for passive activities (reflecting, observing, • Provide a residence that offers privacy, making a personal connection with the protection, and recreational opportunities for presidency), First Amendment activities within the first family.
  • The Shape and History of the Ellipse in Washington, D.C

    The Shape and History of the Ellipse in Washington, D.C

    The Shape and History of the Ellipse in Washington, D.C. Clark Kimberling Department of Mathematics University of Evansville 1800 Lincoln Avenue, Evansville, IN 47722 email: [email protected] 1 Introduction When conic sections are introduced to mathematics classes, certain real-world examples are often cited. Favorites include lamp-shade shadows for hyperbolas, paths of baseballs for parabolas, and planetary orbits for ellipses. There is, however, another outstanding example of an ellipse. Known simply as the Ellipse, it is a gathering place for thousands of Americans every year, and it is probably the world’s largest noncircular ellipse. Situated just south of the White House in President’sPark, the Ellipse has an interesting shape and an interesting history. Figure 1. Looking north from the top of Washington Monument: the Ellipse and the White House [19] When Charles L’Enfant submitted his Plan for the American capital city to President George Washington, he included many squares, circles, and triangles. Today, well known shapes in or near the capital include the Federal Triangle, McPherson Square, the Pentagon, the Octagon House Museum, Washington Circle, and, of course, the Ellipse. Regarding the Ellipse in its present size and shape, a map dated September 29, 1877 (Figure 7) was probably used for the layout. The common gardener’smethod would not have been practical for so large an ellipse –nearly 17 acres –so that the question, "How was the Ellipse laid out?" is of considerable interest. (The gardener’s method uses three stakes and a rope. Drive two stakes into the ground, and let 2c be the distance between them.
  • President's Park South Historic District Nomination

    President's Park South Historic District Nomination

    Form No. 10-306 (Rev. 10-74) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES INVENTORY - NOMINATION FORM FOR FEDERAL PROPERTIES SEE INSTRUCTIONS IN HOWTO COMPLETE NATIONAL REGISTER FORMS TYPE ALL ENTRIES -- COMPLETE APPLICABLE SECTIONS I NAME HISTORIC President©s Park South AND/OR COMMON The Ellipse and adjacent parkland LOCATION /©,.,.., ...-/©, .-©©..,. u,~,>, /.Ut, STREET & NUMBER Between the White House and Washington Monument grounds-NOTFOR PUBLICATION CITY, TOWN --..-.--. CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT Washington _ VICINITY OF STATE CODE COUNTY CODE D.C. 1 1 nm CLASSIFICATION CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS PRESENT USE y __DISTRICT ±±PUBLIC —OCCUPIED _ AGRICULTURE. —MUSEUM _BUILDING(S) —PRIVATE 3L.UNOCCUPIED —COMMERCIAL X_PARK —STRUCTURE —BOTH —WORK IN PROGRESS —EDUCATIONAL —PRIVATE RESIDENCE X.SITE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE —ENTERTAINMENT —RELIGIOUS _ OBJECT _IN PROCESS —YES: RESTRICTED —GOVERNMENT —SCIENTIFIC _BEING CONSIDERED X_YES: UNRESTRICTED —INDUSTRIAL —TRANSPORTATION _ NO —MILITARY —OTHER: [AGENCY REGIONAL HEADQUARTERS: (If applicable) National Capital Rp.glQTV—National Park Service STREET & NUMBER 1100 Ohio Drive, g.W. CITY. TOWN STATE Washington VICINITY OF LOCATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION COURTHOUSE, REGISTRY OF DEEDS, ETC (same as above) STREET& NUMBER CITY, TOWN STATE 1 REPRESENTATION IN EXISTING SURVEYS TITLE DATE -FEDERAL -STATE -COUNTY -LOCAL DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS CITY. TOWN STATE DESCRIPTION CONDITION CHECK ONE CHECK ONE __EXCELLENT _DETERIORATED _UNALTERED X_ORIGINAISITE JKGOOD _RUINS .XALTERED MOVED DATF _FAIR __UNEXPOSED DESCRIBETHE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL (IF KNOWN) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE The President's Park South includes the acea bounded by State Place, South Executive Avenue, and Alexander Hamilton Place on the north, 15th Street N.W. on the east, Constitution Avenue N.W. on the south, and 17th Street N.W.
  • Commemorative Works Catalog

    Commemorative Works Catalog

    DRAFT Commemorative Works by Proposed Theme for Public Comment February 18, 2010 Note: This database is part of a joint study, Washington as Commemoration, by the National Capital Planning Commission and the National Park Service. Contact Lucy Kempf (NCPC) for more information: 202-482-7257 or [email protected]. CURRENT DATABASE This DRAFT working database includes major and many minor statues, monuments, memorials, plaques, landscapes, and gardens located on federal land in Washington, DC. Most are located on National Park Service lands and were established by separate acts of Congress. The authorization law is available upon request. The database can be mapped in GIS for spatial analysis. Many other works contribute to the capital's commemorative landscape. A Supplementary Database, found at the end of this list, includes selected works: -- Within interior courtyards of federal buildings; -- On federal land in the National Capital Region; -- Within cemeteries; -- On District of Columbia lands, private land, and land outside of embassies; -- On land belonging to universities and religious institutions -- That were authorized but never built Explanation of Database Fields: A. Lists the subject of commemoration (person, event, group, concept, etc.) and the title of the work. Alphabetized by Major Themes ("Achievement…", "America…," etc.). B. Provides address or other location information, such as building or park name. C. Descriptions of subject may include details surrounding the commemorated event or the contributions of the group or individual being commemorated. The purpose may include information about why the commemoration was established, such as a symbolic gesture or event. D. Identifies the type of land where the commemoration is located such as public, private, religious, academic; federal/local; and management agency.