DOCSLIB.ORG

Agriculture in Uganda

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Agriculture in Uganda ENHANCING AGRICULTURAL RESILIENCE AND SUSTAINABILITY IN EASTERN AND SOUTHERN AFRICA Key Findings and Recommendations for Uganda Drake N. Mubiru, Jalia Namakula, William Nanyeenya, James Lwasa, Godfrey Otim, Joselyn Kashagama and Milly Nakafeero 1 Contents Agriculture in Uganda A New Approach to Agriculture 4 Project Overview 5 SIMLESA-Uganda 6 Strategic Approach 6 Project Sites 7 Partners 7 Key Findings 8 Smallholder Farmers’ Food Security, Productivity, and Incomes Levels 9 Strategies to Improve Resilience, Reduce Risks and Protect Natural Resources 9 Gender and Equity 10 Supporting Mechanisms and Partnerships 10 Achievements Farmer Reach and Adoption 11 Improved Varieties Released 11 Capacity Strengthening 11 Opportunties for Integrating the New Approaches into Maize Farming Systems 12 Packages for Farmers 12 Factors Preventing the Widespread Adoption of CASI Technologies 14 Successes to Date 16 A Sustainable Future for Farming and Food Systems 17 Scaling the New Approaches 17 What is at Stake? 15 Conclusion 15 References 16 2 List of Figures 1. Conservation agriculture based on sustainable intensification 4 2. SIMLESA-Uganda project sites: Lira and Nakasongola districts and the cattle corridor 7 3. The impact of different tillage practices on bean grain yields, with and without fertilizer 10 4. The impact of different tillage practices on maize grain yields, with and without fertilizer 10 List of Tables 1. Summary of CASI options for two of Uganda’s agroecological zones 13 List of Acronyms ACIAR Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research AIP(s) agricultural innovation platform(s) CASI conservation agriculture-based sustainable intensification CIAT International Center for Tropical Agriculture CIMMYT International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center FAO Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations GDP gross domestic product ICRISAT International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics ILRI International Livestock Research Institute MAAIF Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Industry and Fisheries (Uganda) NARO National Agricultural Research Organisation (Uganda) NGOs nongovernmental organizations QAAFI Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, University of Queensland, (Australia) SIMLESA Sustainable Intensification of Maize-Legume Cropping Systems for Food Security in Eastern and Southern Africa 3 AGRICULTURE IN UGANDA Agriculture is vital to the development goals of and variability — including severe drought, flooding, promoting growth and reducing poverty in Uganda. The storms, and epidemics of pests and diseases [4] — have sector contributes 25 percent to gross domestic product increased the risks associated with farming and left (GDP), and provides employment for about 72 percent rural households highly vulnerable to food insecurity of the working population [1]. In addition, about 73 and poverty [3]. According to a report by the Food and percent of households primarily derive their livelihoods Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), from agriculture [2]. In absolute terms, of a population about 4 million Ugandans are severely food insecure of 35 million people, about 6 million Ugandans engage [5]. Although Uganda has the capacity to produce in smallholder/subsistence agriculture [1]. sufficient food, much of the population faces the threat of hunger, and 70–80 percent of children survive on Despite its importance, agriculture in Uganda is a diet of limited nutrients and inadequate diversity. characterized by low production and productivity With a diverse agricultural production system, Uganda due to poor land management, depleted soils and produces a variety of crops, including bananas, root total dependence on rainfall [3]. The production crops, cereals and legumes [6]. As primary staples for system is predominantly small scale and is limited much of the population, maize and beans are major by rudimentary production tools and low use of contributors to food and nutrition security. improved seed, agrochemicals and fertilizer. These factors, coupled with the impacts of climate change Agriculture contributes It provides employment And for about 25% 72% 73% to gross domestic of the working of households primarily product population derive their livelihoods from agriculture 4 A New Approach to Research Organisation (NARO); CGIAR centers, such as the International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), A New Approach to Agriculture Agriculture the International Crops Research Institute for the Semi- Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), and the International Livestock Sustainable Intensification of Maize-Legume Cropping Sustainable Intensification of Maize-Legume Cropping Research Institute (ILRI); and the Queenland Alliance Systems for Food Security in Eastern and Southern Systems for Food Security in Eastern and Southern for Agriculture and Food Innovation (QAAFI) of the Africa (SIMLESA) was a project implemented between Africa (SIMLESA) was a project implemented between University of Queensland, Australia. 2010 and 2018 in five African countries (Ethiopia, Kenya, 2010 and 2018 in five African countries (Ethiopia, Malawi, Mozambique and Tanzania) and two spillover Kenya, Malawi, Mozambique and Tanzania) and countries (Rwanda and Uganda). The project’s goal Project Overview two spillover countries (Rwanda and Uganda). The was to increase African smallholders’ food security, SIMLESA undertook onfarm research in different agro- project’s goal was to increase African smallholders’ productivity and income levels by integrating sustainable ecological zones to assess the benefits of conservation food security, productivity and income levels by intensification practices to increase productivity, agriculture-based sustainable intensification and to de- integrating sustainable intensification practices to while simultaneously protecting the natural resource velop appropriate technology packages for smallholder increase productivity, while simultaneously protecting base. The particular mix of technologies developed farmers. The project succeeded in increasing the range the natural resource base. The particular mix of by SIMLESA are known as “conservation agriculture- of maize, legume and fodder/forage varieties available, technologies developed by SIMLESA are known based sustainable intensification,” or CASI (Fig. 1). By and involved farmers in seed-selection trials so they as “conservation agriculture-based sustainable utilizing these technologies, SIMLESA sought the dual could identify their preferences. SIMLESA helped es- intensification,” or CASI (Fig. 1). By utilizing these outcomes of sustainably raising yields by 30 percent, tablish agricultural innovation platforms (AIPs) to prog- while decreasing the risk of crop failure by 30 percent. ress members — including farmers, seed producers, In short, SIMLESA focused on and promoted maize and agro-input dealers, nongovernmental organizations legume cropping systems to improve food and income (NGOs) and extension workers — along the value chain. security and resilience to climate change on African The platforms serve farming communities, help mobi- farms. lize resources, and support up- and out-scaling. SIMLE- SA also provided training and capacity strengthening The project — financed by the Australian Centre for for national agricultural research systems and worked International Agricultural Research (ACIAR) — was led with government, business and civil society organiza- by the International Maize and Wheat Improvement tions to provide an enabling environment for the bene- Center (CIMMYT) in collaboration with numerous fits of the newly introduced technologies to be realized partners, including national agricultural research by farmers. institutes (NARIs), in this case, the National Agricultural Figure 1. Conservation agriculture based on sustainable intensification Note: Improved agronomy includes the use of fertilizer and herbicide; crops and livestock include fodder and forage. The project — financed by the Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR) — was led by the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) in collaboration with numerous Conservation Sustainable partners, including national agricultural research institutes (NARIs), in this case, National Agricultural Research Organisation (NARO); CGIAR centers, such as the International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), the Agriculture Intensification International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), and the International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI); and the Queenland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation (QAAFI) of the • Reduced tillage • Improved agronomy University of Queensland, Australia. • Intercropping/rotation CASI • Improved varieties • Residue and mulch • Crops and livestock SIMLESA undertook onfarm research in different agroecological zones to assess the benefits of conservation agriculture-based sustainable intensification and to develop appropriate technology packages for smallholder farmers. The project succeeded in increasing the range of maize, legume Source: SIMLESA-Uganda. Note: Improved agronomy includes the use of fertilizer and herbicide; crops and livestock include fodder and forage. and fodder/forage varieties available, and involved farmers in seed-selection trials so they could identify their preferences. SIMLESA helped establish 5 agricultural innovation platforms (AIPs) to progress members — including farmers, seed producers, agro- input dealers, nongovernmental
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bigwala Mus Ic and Dance of the Bas Oga People
    BIGWALA MUSIC AND DANCE OF THE BASOGA PEOPLE written by James Isabirye 2012 Background The Basoga are Bantu speaking people who live in southeastern Uganda. They are neighbors to the Baganda, Bagwere, Basamia, Banyoli and Banyoro people. The Basoga are primarily subsistence agricultural people. "Bigwala” is a Lusoga language term that refers to a set of five or more monotone gourd trumpets of different sizes. The music of the trumpets and the dance performed to that music are both called “Bigwala”. Five drums accompany “Bigwala” music and they include a big drum “Engoma e ne ne ”, a long drum “Omugaabe,” short drum “Endyanga”, a medium size drum “Mbidimbidi” and a small drum “Enduumi ” each of which plays a specific role in the set. Bigwala heritage is of significant palace / royal importance because of its ritualistic role during burial of kings, coronations and their anniversaries and stands as one of the main symbols of Busoga kingship. When King Henry Wako M uloki passed away on 1st September 2008, the "Bigwala" players were invited to Nakabango palace and Kaliro burial ground to perform their funeral function. 1 During the coronation of late king Henry Wako Muloki on 11th February 1995; the Bigwala players performed their ritual roles. It is important to note that Busoga kingdom like all others had been abolished in 1966 by the Ugandan republic government of Obote I and all aspects its existence were jeopardised including the Bigwala. The Kingship is the only main uniting identity which represents the Basoga, offers them opportunity to exist in a value system, focuses their initiatives to deal with development issues with in the framework of their ethnic society and connects them to their cherished past.
    [Show full text]
  • Adoption of Conservation Agriculture in Uganda: a Case Study of the Lango Subregion
    sustainability Article Adoption of Conservation Agriculture in Uganda: A Case Study of the Lango Subregion Sara Kaweesa 1,* , Saidi Mkomwa 2 and Willibald Loiskandl 3 1 Centre for Development Research, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Peter-Jordan-Strasse 76, 1190 Vienna, Austria 2 African Conservation Tillage Network (ACT), P.O. Box 10375, Nairobi 00100, Kenya; [email protected] 3 Institute of Hydraulics and Rural Water Management, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Muthgasse 18, 1190 Vienna, Austria; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +43-676-43-808-26 Received: 8 August 2018; Accepted: 18 September 2018; Published: 20 September 2018 Abstract: Conservation agriculture (CA) is based on three principles: minimum soil disturbance, maintaining a soil cover through mulching with crop residues or planting cover crops, and practicing crop rotations. CA is practiced in many parts of the world for its benefits to soil and ability to improve yields, among others. There is little documented information on the status of CA adoption in the Lango region in mid-Northern Uganda. This study aimed at determining the extent of CA adoption in relation to the socioeconomic status of the farming population and suggesting relevant strategies for accelerating CA uptake specific to this region. A non-discriminative snowball-sampling technique was used to gather data from 417 households spread over three districts. Semi-structured interviews were conducted using household questionnaires. Farmers’ uptake of CA was related to information gained from training and the benefits that were observed in their fields. Some farm-level constraints in the region included the diminutive ratio of shared tools and equipment; the minimum presence and involvement of extension services; and seasonal rural markets that are dominated by middlemen.
    [Show full text]
  • Consulting Services)
    Request for Expression of Interests (Consulting Services) FOR ECONOMIC AND SECTOR WORK ON AGRICULTURAL VALUE CHAIN STUDY IN UGANDA Agriculture sector in Uganda is a key sector and also will remain the main economic base of the country. As a result, future rate of poverty reduction, overall economic growth, social development and political stability of the country will depend on the growth trajectory of the sector. The President of Uganda, His Excellency, Yoweri Museveni, has recently called for the transformation of Agriculture in Uganda from subsistence to a commercial oriented sector. The end result of agricultural transformation in Uganda are millions of would be thriving small-, medium, and large-scale agribusinesses in every segment of agricultural value chains. In order to better understand the growth potentials and constraints of the agriculture sector and optimize its intervention in the sector, the Bank aims to conduct agricultural value chain study. The main tasks of the study are to prioritize, select and conduct a detailed value chains analysis of priority agricultural commodities. The findings of the study will serve as a guide to design the Ugandan Agricultural Transformation Agenda (UATA), investment direction of the Bank and other development partners. Promoting agriculture and agro-industry/business is recognized as one of the most effective ways to drive inclusive growth and reduce poverty. The African Development Bank (AfDB) is launching study that will inform the development of competitive regional and global value chains with the potential for advancing Uganda’s economic prosperity, increasing food security, job creation and poverty reduction. The study will also inform the Bank’s public sector operations towards creation of an enabling environment especially relating to land tenure policies and laws, financial inclusion efforts, and Private Public Partnerships in physical infrastructure development.
    [Show full text]
  • PROMOTING AGRICULTURE SECTOR GROWTH and DEVELOPMENT a Comparative Analysis of Uganda’S Political Party Manifestos (2011 -2016)
    PROMOTING AGRICULTURE SECTOR GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT A Comparative Analysis of Uganda’s Political Party Manifestos (2011 -2016) PROMOTING AGRICULTURE SECTOR GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT A Comparative Analysis of Uganda’s Political Party Manifestos (2011-2016) Ronald Naluwairo 1 ACODE Policy Research Series No. 41, 2011 PROMOTING AGRICULTURE SECTOR GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT A Comparative Analysis of Uganda’s Political Party Manifestos (2011 -2016) PROMOTING AGRICULTURE SECTOR GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT A Comparative Analysis of Uganda’s Political Party Manifestos (2011 -2016) PROMOTING AGRICULTURE SECTOR GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT A Comparative Analysis of Uganda’s Political Party Manifestos (2011 -2016) Ronald Naluwairo ACODE Policy Research Series No. 41, 2011 i PROMOTING AGRICULTURE SECTOR GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT A Comparative Analysis of Uganda’s Political Party Manifestos (2011 -2016) Published by ACODE P. O. Box 29836, Kampala Email: [email protected], [email protected] Website: http://www.acode-u.org Citation: Naluwairo, R., (2011). Promoting Agriculture Sector Growth and Development: A Comparative Analysis of Uganda’s Political Party Manifestos (2011 -2016). ACODE Policy Research Series, No. 41, 2011. Kampala. © ACODE 2011 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior written permission of the publisher. ACODE policy work is supported by generous donations and grants from bilateral donors and charitable foundations. The reproduction or use of this publication for academic or charitable purpose or for purposes of informing public policy is excluded from this general exemption. ISBN 978-9970-07-000-8 ii PROMOTING AGRICULTURE SECTOR GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT A Comparative Analysis of Uganda’s Political Party Manifestos (2011 -2016) Table of Contents List of Abbreviations v Acknowledgements vi Executive Summary vii 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Agro Industrialisation in Uganda
    Working paper Agro­ industrialisation in Uganda Current status, future prospects and possible solutions to pressing challenges Martin Fowler Jakob Rauschendorfer November 2019 When citing this paper, please use the title and the following reference number: F-IH-UGA-006-1 Agro-industrialisation in Uganda: Current status, future prospects and possible solutions to pressing challenges Martin Fowler and Jakob Rauschendorfer1 “Commercializing agriculture has the greatest potential for increasing household productivity and incomes, while addressing unemployment in the rural communities (...) the approach will nurture agro- based industries across the country, employing labour that will have been released from primary agriculture”. - Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development, 2019. 1. Introduction This paper seeks to provide a comprehensive review of agro-industrialisation in Uganda with a focus on assessing the feasibility of the national plans to harness agro-industrialisation for inclusive growth. Interest in the topic has grown in the recent past due to a number of factors, possibly the most important one being a study published in 2018 by the Economic Policy Research Centre (EPRC), an influential Ugandan research institute. The report, entitled Fostering a Sustainable Agro- Industrialisation Agenda in Uganda, highlighted the enormous and unrecognised potential of adding value to the country’s significant agricultural output as a means of reducing poverty and transforming the Ugandan economy. Arguably, agriculture is already Uganda’s key economic sector, providing the livelihood for the majority of the population and is the basis for the bulk of manufacturing output. Because of this, industrial development based on the agricultural sector is being promoted as a means to reinforce current efforts to reduce poverty and to bring about inclusive growth through employment creation across all income groups and parts of the country2.
    [Show full text]
  • Aid in Uganda: Agriculture
    by Hai Mettrick 2US Od Overseas Development Institute a Aid in Uganda—Agriculture The crucial nature of agriculture's role in economic development is being recognised more and more. But how can agricultural development be stimulated ? What part can overseas aid donors play ? These problems are considered in the context of a specific country in Aid in Uganda—Agriculture. This study analyses the difficulties facing the Uganda Government in developing agriculture and how it is dealing with them. It then goes on to consider the various programmes of aid to agriculture in Uganda, and discusses how these can be made more effective. Issues which are high­ lighted are the importance of technical assistance, and the need for donors to provide more capital aid for local and recurrent costs if they are to assist agricultural development. This study is the final part of ODI's three-part case study of aid in Uganda. The previous volumes are Aid in Uganda—Programmes and Policies by Ralph Clark, and Aid in Uganda—Education by Peter Williams. The author of Aid in Uganda—Agriculture is Hal Mettrick. 00020881 Overseas Development Institute Aid in Uganda Agriculture by Hal Mettrick Published by The Overseas Development Institute Ltd 160 Piccadilly London W1 England © Copyright Overseas Development Institute Ltd. 1967 The Overseas Development Institute Ltd. is responsible for determining that this work should be presented to the public, but individual members of the Council are not responsible for statements of fact and expressions of opinion contained herein.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 ABRAHAM, KATHLEEN Memoirs of a Medical Officer in Northern Nigeria 1957-1964 Carnforth: 2QT Ltd, 2010 Viii +248 Pp. ISBN: 97
    ABRAHAM, KATHLEEN Memoirs of a Medical Officer in Northern Nigeria 1957-1964 Carnforth: 2QT Ltd, 2010 viii +248 pp. ISBN: 978-190809802-3 (hbk.) ISBN: 978-1-90809-803-0 (pbk.) Reviewed in Overseas Pensioner 2011 101 58-59 (J.G.Harford) NIGERIA MEDICAL ADEBAYO, AUGUSTUS I Am Directed: The Lighter Side of the Civil Service Ibadan: Spectrum Books 1991 iii + 135 pp NIGERIA One Leg One Wing Ibadan: Spectrum Books 2001 134 pp ISBN 978-029140-7 The author was an administrator in the fifties' colonial government; a member of the Nigerian High Commission in London before independence; Permanent Secretary in various ministries in the sixties and seventies; and an academic and government advisor. NIGERIA White Man in Black Skin Ibadan: Spectrum Books 1981 xiii + 125 pp Memoirs of a Nigerian DO, with last 25 pages of reflections on public administration in colonial Nigeria. NIGERIA ADEBO, SIMEON OLA Our Unforgettable Years Lagos: Macmillan, Nigeria 1984 vi + 307 pp ISBN (hardback) 978-132737-5 (paperback) 9 781 32734 0 Adebo (1913-1994) entered Government service as an Administrative Officer cadet in 1942, rising to Assistant Financial Secretary in 1954 and Head of the Civil Service and Chief Secretary in 1961. This is the story of his first 49 years. NIGERIA . Our International Years Ibadan: Spectrum Books 1988 vi + 307 pp ISBN 987-246-025-7 The second half of Adebo’s autobiography describing his time as Nigeria’s Permanent Representative to the United Nations 1962-1967 and as Executive Director of UNITAR 1968-1972. NIGERIA ADU, A L The Civil Service in Commonwealth Africa: Development and Transition London: George Allen & Unwin 1969 253 pp ISBN (hardback) 04-351-0256 (paperback) 04- 351026-4 Adu, a one-time Head of the Ghana Civil Service, became a Deputy Commonwealth Secretary-General.
    [Show full text]
  • Uganda's Dilemmas in the Transition to Modern Commercial Agriculture
    This research paper was produced under the Future Agricultures’ Early Career Fellowship Programme Uganda’s Dilemmas in the Transition to Modern Early Career Fellowship Programme Reports Programme Early Career Fellowship Commercial Agriculture: Implications for the Poverty Reduction Agenda Leocardia Nabwire1 February 2015 Early Career Fellowship Programme www.future-agricultures.org Table of contents Acknowledgements....................................................................................................................................3 Summary....................................................................................................................................................5 1. Introduction.........................................................................................................................................6 1.0 Background.........................................................................................................................................................................................6 1.1 Agricultural Growth and Poverty Trends/Patterns in Uganda.........................................................................................7 2. Methods and Study Area........................................................................................................................8 3. Related Literature...................................................................................................................................9 4. Key features of Uganda’s Agricultural Modernisation
    [Show full text]
  • LAND, FOOD SECURITY and AGRICULTURE in UGANDA ISBN No
    LAND, FOOD SECURITY AND AGRICULTURE IN UGANDA ISBN No. 978-9970-535-00-2 Published by Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung Kampala, Uganda 5B Acacia Avenue P.O. Box 3860 www.fes-uganda.org Copy Editor: Nangula Shejavali Design: Star: LeoTM The findings, interpretations and conclusions expressed in this volume are attributed to individual authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung (FES) and Makerere University Business School (MUBS). FES and MUBS do not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. FES and MUBS bear no responsibility for oversights, mistakes, or omissions. The sale or commercial use of all media published by the Friedrich-Ebert- Stiftung (FES) is prohibited without the written consent of FES. © This work is licensed under the Creative Commons’ Attribution - NonCommercial - ShareAlike 2.5 Licence. Table of Contents Foreword 1 Land Tenure, Access to Land and Food Security in Uganda by Norah Owaraga 3 Historical Context 3 Land Tenure Systems 4 Land and Food Insecurity 7 Conclusion 9 References 10 Rationale, Successes and Challenges of Uganda’s Legal and Policy Framework on Land by John Kigula 11 1.0 Introduction 11 1.1 The Uganda Land Legal Framework 11 1.1.1 Policies 11 2.0 Rationale of Uganda’s Legal and Policy Framework on Land 12 2.1 Rationale for the Land Act 12 2.2 Objectives of the Land Act 12 3.0 Successes of Uganda’s Legal and Policy Framework on Land 13 4.0 Challenges of Uganda’s Land Legal and Policy Framework on Land 15 4.1 Challenges of the Land Act and Policies 15 4.2 Limitations of the Land Regulations, 2004 17 4.3 The Land Acquisition Act, Cap.
    [Show full text]
  • Uganda: Agriculture Sector Public Expenditure Review
    Republic of Uganda Public Disclosure Authorized Agriculture Sector Public Expenditure Public Disclosure Authorized Review Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized September 2019 STANDARD DISCLAIMER CURRENCY EQUIVALENT This Report is a product of the staff of the International Bank for Exchange rate effective as of May 11, 2018 Reconstruction and Development/ The World Bank. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this Interim Report Currency unit = Ugandan shilling (USh) do not necessarily reflect the views of the Executive Directors of US$1.00 = USh3,700 The World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Republic of Uganda: Agriculture Sector Public Expenditure Review ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This report was produced by a team from the World Bank Group, led by Ladisy Komba Chengula (Lead Agriculture Economist) and comprising Holger A. Kray (Lead Agriculture Economist), Kevin John Crockford (Sr. Rural Development Specialist), Joseph Oryokot (Sr. Agriculture Specialist), Irina Schuman (Sr. Agriculture Economist), Friederike Mikulcak (Jr. Professional Officer), Barbara Kasura Magezi Ndamira (Senior Public Sector Specialis), and Christopher Paul Jackson (Senior Public Sector Specialist). Agnes Yvonne Masaka (Team Assistant), with Janet Christine Atiang and Srilatha Shankar (Program Assistants), provided administrative and logistical support. A team of consultants led by Christian Derlagen and including Alban Mas Aparisi, Leopold Ghins, Paul Cathala, and Lucile Hummel undertook the expenditure analysis from the BOOST database.
    [Show full text]
  • An Action Plan for Developing Agricultural Input Markets in Uganda
    An Action Plan for Developing Agricultural Input Markets An in Uganda International Center for Soil Fertility and Agricultural Development An Action Plan for Developing Agricultural Input Markets in Uganda Prepared by IFDC—An International Center for Soil Fertility and Agricultural Development Sasakawa-Global 2000 (SG 2000) and Investment in Developing Export Agriculture (IDEA) Project Sponsored by Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Industry, and Fisheries (MAAIF) Funded by United States Agency for International Development (USAID) i IFDC—An International Center for Soil Fertility and Agricultural Development P.O. Box 2040 Muscle Shoals, AL 35662 (U.S.A.) Telephone: +1 (256) 381-6600 Telefax: +1 (256) 381-7408 E-Mail: [email protected] Web Site: www.ifdc.org IFDC publications are listed in IFDC Publications, General Publication IFDC–G-1; the publications catalog is free of charge. Photo Credit: Outside Front Cover – Johnny H. Allgood ii Preface The Ugandan economy is a predominantly agricultural economy, but the low land and labor productivity in the agricultural sector has resulted in a high incidence of poverty in rural areas. To reduce poverty and hunger, agricultural productivity must be increased. This cannot be achieved without appropriate use of modern tech- nologies based on improved seed, mineral fertilizer, and crop protection products (CPPs). Adequate and timely supply of these inputs is needed at the farm level. However, input supply systems in Uganda remain underde- veloped, and farmers have difficulty in accessing inputs. This study focuses on the functioning of the input markets, constraints affecting their performance, and measures needed to make them more effective and efficient. This assessment and associated action plan is one of several country-specific efforts undertaken by IFDC to promote the development of agricultural input markets (AIMs) in Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • Decisions Paris, 7 December 2012 Original: English/French
    7 COM ITH/12/7.COM/Decisions Paris, 7 December 2012 Original: English/French CONVENTION FOR THE SAFEGUARDING OF THE INTANGIBLE CULTURAL HERITAGE INTERGOVERNMENTAL COMMITTEE FOR THE SAFEGUARDING OF THE INTANGIBLE CULTURAL HERITAGE Seventh session UNESCO Headquarters, Paris 3 to 7 December 2012 DECISIONS ITH/12/7.COM/Decisions – page 2 DECISION 7.COM 2 The Committee, 1. Having examined document ITH/12/7.COM/2 Rev., 2. Adopts the agenda of its seventh session as annexed to this Decision. Agenda of the seventh session of the Committee 1. Opening of the session 2. Adoption of the agenda of the seventh session of the Committee 3. Replacement of the rapporteur 4. Admission of observers 5. Adoption of the summary records of the sixth ordinary session and fourth extraordinary session of the Committee 6. Examination of the reports of States Parties on the implementation of the Convention and on the current status of elements inscribed on the Representative List 7. Report of the Consultative Body on its work in 2012 8. Examination of nominations for inscription in 2012 on the List of Intangible Cultural Heritage in Need of Urgent Safeguarding 9. Examination of proposals for selection in 2012 to the Register of Best Safeguarding Practices 10. Examination of International Assistance requests greater than US$25,000 11. Report of the Subsidiary Body on its work in 2012 and examination of nominations for inscription in 2012 on the Representative List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity 12. Questions concerning the 2013, 2014 and 2015 examination cycles a. System of rotation for the members of the Consultative Body b.
    [Show full text]