Grade 6-12 Mathematics SLO Sample (2 Total Slos)

Grade 6-12 Mathematics SLO Sample (2 total SLOs)

 Students will demonstrate growth in numeracy and/or achieve mastery. Indicators (3-5 per SLO)

 By June 2016, 90% of students will reach their growth target and selected items on the September to June Benchmark Assessment.

 By June 2016, the number of students at needs improvement will decrease by 50% from the September to June Benchmark Assessment.

 By June 2016, 75% of students will be proficient on 5 of the MAP Post Assessments from September to June Baseline & Trend Data

 In September 2015, 50% of students scored below grade level target.

 In September MAP assessment, 40% of students scored below the target.

 On SAT in 2015, 52% of students scored at level 1. Student Population

 20 students (15 EL Students, 2 Special Education Students, 3 New Arrivals) Alignment

 This goal is aligned to the CCSS, the district’s Strategic Plan School Improvement Plan, and Curriculum Maps. Assessment

 Benchmark, Unit Maps, Dipsticks Instructional Support and Strategy

Implementing the Curriculum Maps Data Teams

Coaching Interactive Smart Board

Scaffolding techniques Academic vocabulary

Identify similarities and differences Provide prompt and relevant feedback Professional Learning Needs

 District-wide PD Grade 6-12 ELA SLO Sample (2 total SLOs)

 Students will demonstrate growth in reading comprehension and/or achieve mastery Indicators (3-5 per SLO)

 By June 2016, 90% of students will reach their growth target and selected items on the September to June Benchmark Assessment.

 By June 2016, the number of students at needs improvement will decrease by 50% from the September to June Benchmark Assessment.

 By June 2016, the number of students at below standard on analyzing a range of complex literary and informational text will decrease by 25% on Claim 1 Baseline & Trend Data

 In 2015, 50% of students scored below standard on Claim 1

 In September MAP assessment, 60% of students scored 4 out of 10 on MAP Assessment

 In 2015-16, 45% of students did not meet the grade level target on DIBELS

 In 2016, 38% scored at Level 1 Student Population

 20 students (8 EL Students, 2 SPED Students, 10 students with Lexile scores below grade level) Alignment

 This goal is aligned to CCSS, District Strategic Plan, School Improvement Plan, and Maps. Assessment

 Benchmark, Unit Maps, Dipsticks Instructional Support and Strategy

Implementing the Curriculum Maps Data Teams Coaching Interactive Smart Board Scaffolding techniques Academic vocabulary

Identify similarities and differences Provide prompt and relevant feedback Professional Learning Needs

 District-wide PD