<p>Grade 6-12 Mathematics SLO Sample (2 total SLOs) </p><p> Students will demonstrate growth in numeracy and/or achieve mastery. Indicators (3-5 per SLO) </p><p> By June 2016, 90% of students will reach their growth target and selected items on the September to June Benchmark Assessment.</p><p> By June 2016, the number of students at needs improvement will decrease by 50% from the September to June Benchmark Assessment.</p><p> By June 2016, 75% of students will be proficient on 5 of the MAP Post Assessments from September to June Baseline & Trend Data</p><p> In September 2015, 50% of students scored below grade level target.</p><p> In September MAP assessment, 40% of students scored below the target.</p><p> On SAT in 2015, 52% of students scored at level 1. Student Population</p><p> 20 students (15 EL Students, 2 Special Education Students, 3 New Arrivals) Alignment</p><p> This goal is aligned to the CCSS, the district’s Strategic Plan School Improvement Plan, and Curriculum Maps. Assessment</p><p> Benchmark, Unit Maps, Dipsticks Instructional Support and Strategy</p><p>Implementing the Curriculum Maps Data Teams</p><p>Coaching Interactive Smart Board</p><p>Scaffolding techniques Academic vocabulary</p><p>Identify similarities and differences Provide prompt and relevant feedback Professional Learning Needs</p><p> District-wide PD Grade 6-12 ELA SLO Sample (2 total SLOs) </p><p> Students will demonstrate growth in reading comprehension and/or achieve mastery Indicators (3-5 per SLO) </p><p> By June 2016, 90% of students will reach their growth target and selected items on the September to June Benchmark Assessment.</p><p> By June 2016, the number of students at needs improvement will decrease by 50% from the September to June Benchmark Assessment.</p><p> By June 2016, the number of students at below standard on analyzing a range of complex literary and informational text will decrease by 25% on Claim 1 Baseline & Trend Data</p><p> In 2015, 50% of students scored below standard on Claim 1</p><p> In September MAP assessment, 60% of students scored 4 out of 10 on MAP Assessment</p><p> In 2015-16, 45% of students did not meet the grade level target on DIBELS</p><p> In 2016, 38% scored at Level 1 Student Population</p><p> 20 students (8 EL Students, 2 SPED Students, 10 students with Lexile scores below grade level) Alignment</p><p> This goal is aligned to CCSS, District Strategic Plan, School Improvement Plan, and Maps. Assessment</p><p> Benchmark, Unit Maps, Dipsticks Instructional Support and Strategy</p><p>Implementing the Curriculum Maps Data Teams Coaching Interactive Smart Board Scaffolding techniques Academic vocabulary</p><p>Identify similarities and differences Provide prompt and relevant feedback Professional Learning Needs</p><p> District-wide PD</p>