DOCSLIB.ORG

California State University, Northridge Quaternary

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, NORTHRIDGE QUATERNARY EVOLUTION ~ AND SEISMIC STRATIGRAPHY OF THE SAN PEDRO MARGIN, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA A thesis submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Geology By Juhani Henrique Rudat January, 1980 The Thesis of Juhani Henrique Rudat is approved: ~ Dr./Martin L. Stout California State University, Northridge ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This author is indebted to Dr. Peter J. Fischer for his help, endless patience, and numerous ideas and suggestions, not to mention his invaluable experience in marine sciences. The numerous students of the CSUN Geoscience Department, whose enthusiasm and cooperation continues to be a source of support, provided assistance in data collecting and drafting. In particular, thanks to Calvin Lee who, from the earliest trials and tribulations, spent many hours with the author, including stints on various offshore platforms and assorted vessels. Funding for this project was obtained from Shell Oil Company, Houston, Texas, and from NOAA Sea Grants No. 04-5-158-20 and 04-6-158- 44021. The author is grateful to Scripps Institute of Oceanography and Dr. F. P. Shepard for providing boat time on the M/V GIANNA, and to Mr. Arne Junger for providing reproducible copies of R/V KELEZ data, as well as valuable discussion of the local seismic stratigraphy. Through the efforts of Mr. D. Clarke of the California State Lands Division, the author obtained microfilms of all R/V KELEZ data. This thesis is dedicated to my wife, Jane, for her support and understanding. iii CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iii TABLE OF CONTENTS iv ABSTRACT vi 1. INTRODUCTION 1 General Statement and Previous Work 1 Physiographic Setting 7 Geologic ?etting 8 2. METHODS AND PROCEDURES 12 California State University, Northridge (CSUN) Surveys 12 Instrumentation 12 Navigation 13 "Beta Platform Sites" Survey 13 USGS (R/V Kelez) Survey 13 Data Reduction and Basis of Interpretation 14 3. MESOZOIC TO MID-PLEISTOCENE SEISMIC STRATIGRAPHY 18 Basement Rocks 21 Miocene Rocks 27 Pliocene Rocks 31 Pleistocene Rocks 37 4. SEISMIC-STRATIGRAPHIC MODEL, WILMINGTON GRABEN LATE PLEISTOCENE AND SHELF HOLOCENE UNITS 46 Introduction 46 Seismic-Stratigraphic Model 47 Late Quaternary Chronology 57 iv CHAPTER PAGE Late Pleistocene to Holocene Seismic Stratigraphy 67 LP IV 67 LP III 68 LP II 71 LP I 75 Holocene 83 5. STRUCTURE 94 Faults 94 Folds 101 6. EVOLUTION OF THE SAN PEDRO BASIN MARGIN 105 Pre-Quaternary Events 105 Qua ternary Evolution 108 Early Pleistocene 108 Middle Pleistocene (Oxygen-Isotope Stages 11 to 7) . 109 Pleistocene and Holocene (Oxygen-Isotope States 6 to 1) 110 San Gabriel Submarine Canyon 116 7. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 123 REFERENCES CITED 128 LIST OF FIGURES 134 LIST OF TABLES 136 LIST OF PLATES 137 v ABSTRACT QUATERNARY EVOLUTION AND SEISMIC STRATIGRAPHY OF THE SAN PEDRO MARGIN, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA by Juhani Henrique Rudat Master of Science in Geology '~he San Pedro basin margin is a relatively wide platform located southeast of the Palos Verdes Peninsula and the Los Angeles-Long Beach Harbor. A departure from the normally narrow Southern California inner basin margins, the configuration of this area is the result of the Neogene evolution of two tectonic elements: the Palos Verdes uplift and the Wilmington graben. The interrelationships of tectonic events, sedimentation dominated by the Los Angeles, San Gabriel, and Santa Ana Rivers, and glacioeustatic sea level fluctuations, are critical factors in explaining the evolution of this area; Exposed and near-surface ~ocks on the outer San Pedro shelf (Palos Verdes uplift) include basement rocks (Catalina Schist?), folded Miocene (Monterey Formation) and Pliocene (Repetto Formation) strata (Mohnian vi to Repettian benthic stages), Pleistocene San Pedro Formation(?) and slope deposits. These are partly covered by Holocene sediments. A thicker post-Miocene stratigraphic section in the Wilmington graben is inferred from oil fields onshore. The interpreted seismic reflection data reveals the presence, near the edges of the graben, of middle Pleistocene (?) deposits ("unnamed upper Pleistocene deposits" of Poland and others, 1956) and the San Pedro (?) Formation:j tthe upper Quaternary section in the Wilmington graben is based on '---- a seismic-stratigraphic model of an upper Pleistocene slope unit (LP I), and the Holocene shelf sediments. Analogous older units (LP II-IV) are defined by unconformities and paleo-shelf breaks:, They are termed seismic-stratigraphic sequences and as such have chronostratigraphic significance. ('fhese units are believed to reflect glacioeustatic sea level fluctuations~ and are provisionally correlated with stages in the marine oxygen-isotope curve of Shackleton and Opdyke (1973). Periods of incision and aggradation of the Newport-Inglewood zone fluvial gaps are correlated with isotope stages 1 through 5, and with units LP III through Holocene·~, The lowest (first) marine terrace of the Palos Verdes Hills is correlated with unit LP II. LP III correlates with the lowest terrace in the town of San Pedro, and the fourth and possibly the third and second terraces of the Palos Verdes Hills. C!he high-angle reverse and right-lateral Palos Verdes fault separates the Palos Verdes uplift from the Wilmington graben. Slightly oblique-trending folds are suggestive of convergent dextral shear along the faultj Its late Quaternary seismic activity is shown by offsets of units LP IV through LP I. Activity appears to have diminished since vii the deposition of LP III (possibly starting about 140,000 years B.P.), the youngest horizon commonly disrupted on all splays. However, some seismic activity has continued until the present, as indicated by epicentral data and numerous offsets of the basal Holocene surface and the seafloor. [~n area off the Palos Verdes Peninsula is markedly bowed over the fault zone. The shoreward edge of the Wilmington graben is defined by another active fault zone, portions of which also offset the base of the Holocene interval. Abrupt upward tilting of LP IV and older strata, pinch out of LP III and LP II, and areas of no Holocene sediments on the upthrown side further delineate this fault;; viii Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION GENERAL STATEMENT AND PREVIOUS WORK The last decade has seen a revolution in knowledge about the geo­ logy of continental margins. In California, the use of seismic reflec­ tion techniques from the initial work of Moore and Shumway (1959) and Moore (1960) to efforts by universities and the U.S. Geological Survey, as well as the extensive work by the private industry sector, has brought the continental margins to the forefront in current geologic research. It has become increasingly evident that the submerged por­ tions of the continents will play a vital role in man's search for energy and resources. The region underlying San Pedro Bay (The San Pedro Basin Margin Figure 1), has been the focus of a great deal of academic research and economic interest. A progressive development in geophysical application to marine geology is chronicled by studies of this basin margin, particularly the shelf area. Moore (1954) contributed the first report on the area, including a discussion of surface sediments and foraminif­ eral and lithologic correlation of in-situ rock samples. The only geophysical data used for this study were fathograms. In his assess­ ment of the structure of the continental borderland, Moore (1960, 1969) utilized newer seismic systems, which produced subbottom penetration. The evaluation of an area immediately seaward of Balsa Chica Beach (Figure 2) for a proposed nuclear power plant involved a detailed survey of local structure and stratigraphy (Bechtel, 1967). Part of this project included several drillholes and numerous arcer seismic- 1 Figure 1 Index map 3 w a: :::> (!) LL 0 -a) .co .... + .. II 1: lit II .. 0 Dl 'D _, 1: co oC w a:: "'w > "'z <( ....a:: Figure 2 Location map SH-Signal Hill, RH-Reservoir Hill, All-Alamitos Heights, LH-Landing Hill, BCM-Bolsa Chica Mesa, HEM-Huntington Beach Mesa, NM-Newport Mesa ·:-- ..... ~ .. ' t '"'·----.. ..,.,.,,,1/lfllltl•ll,. 118 1 !} .,~-···/~ \i .... ""\I\IU~ ....,.,,hl'lolll/.t9~ ~ \ \":. \~··-. SH ,...... ... \ ''fiiNII,IH ,,,,, r··, ~ ,.~ ~ \ "••• RH "-. ,w""··· t~"' ~ or\ ~ NM i' •, (/'........ ,.J \ ., (. ........ ~ ............. ., ... ,............ l l 1; \ ~-. f ........ ,.,••'"' / / HBM \ ~\ i \ •. 0 ~- BCM i j ~- ~ ··~ \':~.... LONG { ! ~ ' \\ \ BEACH \.,.,,.,."'+•/ { \ '.,\-:.,.~~~~ i '·~·.... 8 1 NEWPORT 01 \~~ m-t-~n:-j " •• ch; ~ \ ·, \ (BEACH 0 \ ·- 1-·-.J Stotoe ih HUNTINGTON \ '•,,,, , .... ~' ,e....... ,,,,,,, ....... ,., BEACH.... ~ ,i '.. \ "'"'•"' BECHTEL CORP. ~ • "BOLSA ISLAND" ,--.c SURVEY AREA • • (f' ~· __,.,.,o ~.,o ---~sa, ~ ----- X . ..,..,,·"' \ q•o•• <;,.~ '\ 0 10km 33.30' FIGURE 2 6 reflection profiles. Junger and Wagner (1977) published a series of maps of the San Pedro and Santa Monica basins and surroundings based on several types of seismic profiling data, some of which provide rela­ tively more resolution and quality than systems used in previous studies of this area. Some of their work was incorporated in a USGS open-file report (Greene and others, 1975) discussing environmental aspects of selected continental borderland areas; also in a symposium volume (Howell, ed., 1976) on the geologic history of the borderland as a whole. Most recently, Nardin and Henyey (1978) published a study of the Palos Verdes uplift based on air-gun and magnetometer records, and bedrock samples.
Recommended publications
  • * Geology of the Los Angeles Basin California—An Introduction

    * Geology of the Los Angeles Basin California—An Introduction

    *v> & • i LIBRARY? >* (? if !z & (j \j > I I t~ I B R £V v i SPOKANf,. A /i n H 9 i <l I JIN 31971 o . Geology of the (M M enutifi s Q if 8R A S If S.eS Oh eS o Los Angeles Basin 00 co «*=<03 o p-> ' ►» <33 l CQ California—an V -I © <S 523 o Introduction u> o 03 Eh •a GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 420-A 823 <1 3 * • 523 03 TO o//V/i/, 5m', \\70l 3 l-ls / ! t/> /■ r//V>r o \p\ 30 a :i>'U ft- CQ g?p i» n * >i £0*a OQ • < A f j ; &a '" ‘-*sa W K; » 523-3 CQ ® Mb* IS ',:•<,■> r,, i-3 ft? cb ® ®i-3 ' 03 • ©e a© OQ© t-i © GEOLOGY OF THE LOS ANGELES BASIN ms % X.'. f' K mv: xf* X, ^<0 : Y Xj7j Y, : -<x V , / \ *1... *. s few /'X~ ■-is. ~7?\ i\ > ' -XXX >» :.-r. ;■: X^Ti ». Stel • X r Jr / X x' r%-l ,/Y' as \j ; 2^ N \ * »’ .X-Wv" X" . klA rffyX x)/ ; \L /X X; Av :£; /\ X. ' i yyx —X X, Xl j-- >r'\. -i } X£~ :v-'> - -'X'X: ! ~x: [ sXv V -C --X C ~~: *g A-, -•: w •;, ; Xx m P XXX v: A -5 .y ■ O' •“TVx \ \ . -X:X. : X,X .y ,x 1 ./> ft X* r 'r***f~ '' IX' v \X X 'X X; ..X \vs.. X X. Y ix‘1 X X "■ ! , xy -■ ■ X ,/ \ i - X X XX 'X X' X .< xX x„ X X 'X ’X^ '■'X, ■'X T 5fi- X.
  • Symposium on Land Subsidence; Land Subsidence: Proceedings Of

    Symposium on Land Subsidence; Land Subsidence: Proceedings Of

    M.N. Mayuga and D.R. Allen Stanford Research Institute (1949): Report on subsidence in the Long Beach-San Pedro area Rept. to the Long Beach Harbor Subsidence Comm. (Unpub.), July, 1949, 295 p. U.S.Coast and Geodetic Survey (1966): Vertical control data, Quad. 351 192: Washington, D.C., U.S.Coast and Geod. Survey, 113 p. WHITTEN,C.A. (1961): Measurement of small movements in the earth’s crust: Acad. Sci. Fennicae Annules, ser. A, vol. 3, Geologica-Geographica,Suomatainen Tiedeakatimia, No. 61, pp. 31 5- 320. WILT,J. W. (1958): Measuredmovement along thesurface traceof an active thrustfault in theBuena Vista Hills, Kern County, California: Seismol. Soc. America Bull., vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 169-176 DISCUSSION Intervention of Dr. Sakuro MURAYA(Japan) Questiob: This morning, Dr. Miyabe mentioned acute subsidence due to the earthquake in Tokyo. I think there were some earthquakes in Long Beach. Do you have any experience about influence of earthquake on the movement of surface? Answer of Mr. YERKES: There has been earthquakes during oil production in Long Beach but the relations are complex and I do not clearly understand. Intervention of Dr. Jose G.MENDEZ (Venezuela) Question: I think there have to be room for certain legal aspects. Who is respensible for the damage? Answer of Mr. YERKES: I am not in the position to answer that. SUBSIDENCE IN THE WILMINGTON OIL FIELD, LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA, U.S.A. M.N. MAYUGAI and D. R. ALLEN2 ABSTRACT The subsidence area is in the shape of an elliptical bowl superimposed on top of California’s largest oil giant, the Wilmington Oil Field.
  • A 3-Dimensional Model of Water-Bearing Sequences in the Dominguez Gap Region, Long Beach, California

    A 3-Dimensional Model of Water-Bearing Sequences in the Dominguez Gap Region, Long Beach, California

    In cooperation with the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works and Water Replenishment District of Southern California A 3-Dimensional Model of Water-Bearing Sequences in the Dominguez Gap Region, Long Beach, California By Daniel J. Ponti, Kenneth D. Ehman, Brian D. Edwards, John C. Tinsley, III, Thomas Hildenbrand, John W. Hillhouse, Randall T. Hanson, Kristen McDougall, Charles L. Powell, II, Elmira Wan, Michael Land, Shannon Mahan, Andrei M. Sarna-Wojcicki U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2007–1013 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark D. Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia 2007 Revised and reprinted: 2007 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Suggested citation: Ponti, Daniel J., Ehman, Kenneth D., Edwards, Brian D., Tinsley, John C., III, Hildenbrand, Thomas, Hillhouse, John W., Hanson, Randall T., McDougall, Kristen, Powell, Charles L., II, Wan, Elmira, Land, Michael, Mahan, Shannon, and Sarna-Wojcicki, Andrei M., 2007, A 3-Dimensional Model of Water- Bearing Sequences in the Dominguez Gap Region, Long Beach, California: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2007-1013, 34 p. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S.

  • Geology, Petroleum Development, and Seismicity of the Santa Barbara Channel Region, California A

    Geology, Petroleum Development, and Seismicity of the Santa Barbara Channel Region, California A. Geologic Framework of the Santa Barbara Channel Region B. Petroleum Development in the Region of the Santa Barbara Channel C. Geologic Characteristics of the Dos Cuadras Offshore Oil Field D. Seismicity and Associated Effects, Santa Barbara Region GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 679 Geology, Petroleum Development, and Seismicity of the Santa Barbara Channel Region, California A. Geologic Framework of the Santa Barbara Channel Region By J. G. VEDDER, H. C. WAGNER, and J. E. SCHOELLHAMER B. Petroleum Development in the Region of the Santa Barbara Channel By R. F. YERKES, H. C. WAGNER, and K. A. YENNE C. Geologic Characteristics of the Dos Cuadras Offshore Oil Field By T. H. McCULLOH D. Seismicity and Associated Effects, Santa Barbara Region By R. M. HAMILTON, R. F. YERKES, R. D. BROWN, JR., R. O. BURFORD, and J. M. DENOYER GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 679 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1969 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR WALTER J. HICKEL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. 70-603491 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 FOREWORD Southern California is rich in petroleum and natural gas accumulations both on land and offshore. Over the past century, California has produced more than 8 billion barrels of oil and more than 23 trillion cubic feet of gas. The petroleum industry is one of the major economic factors of the State and involves a capital investment in excess of $7 billion and employs more than 100,000 people.
  • Appendix F Geology Subsidence Reports

    Appendix F Geology Subsidence Reports

    Appendix F Geology Subsidence Reports Prepared for: E&B Natural Resources Management Corporation 1600 Norris Road Bakersfield, California 93308 Subsidence and Induced Seismicity Technical Report E&B Oil Development Project Prepared by: 924 Anacapa Street, Suite 4A Santa Barbara, California 93101 Tel. (805) 897-3800 Fax: (805) 899-8689 www.geosyntec.com Project Number: LA0266 November 9, 2012 924 Anacapa Street, Suite 4A Santa Barbara, California 93101 PH 805.897.3800 www.geosyntec.com November 9, 2012 E&B Natural Resources Management Corporation Attn: Mr. Mike Finch 1600 Norris Road Bakersfield, CA 93308 Subject: Subsidence and Induced Seismicity Technical Report Dear Mr. Finch, Enclosed please find our Subsidence and Induced Seismicity Technical Report for the E&B Oil Development Project, dated November 8, 2012. Sincerely, Mark Grivetti Geosyntec Consultants 924 Anacapa Street, Suite 4A Santa Barbara, CA 93101 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page EXCUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................... ES-1 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 1 2.0 REGULATORY BACKGROUND ...................................................................... 3 2.1 Subsidence ................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Induced Seismicity ...................................................................................... 4 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION .................................................................................
  • Geothermal Energy at Long Beach Naval Shipyard and Naval Station and at Seal Beach Naval Weapons Station, California

    Geothermal Energy at Long Beach Naval Shipyard and Naval Station and at Seal Beach Naval Weapons Station, California

    CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION DIVISION OF MINES AND GEOLOGY DMG OPEN-FILE REPORT 84-32 7 GEOTHERMAL... ENERGY AT --"- -- LONG BEACH SHIPYARD AND1 '-NAVAL_ STATION AND "AT.' -SEAL BEACH NAVAL WEAPONS STATION, LOS ANGELES AND ORANGE COUNTIES, CALIFORNIA 1984 THE RESOURCES AGENCY STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION GORDON K. VAN VLECK GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN RANDALL M. WARD SECRETARY FOR RESOURCES GOVERNOR DIRECTOR DIYISION OF MINES AND GEOLOGY BRIAN E. TUCKER ACTING STATE GEOLOGIST GEOTHERMAL ENERGY AT LONG BEACH NAVAL SHIPYARD AND NAVAL STATION AND AT SEAL BEACH NAVAL WEAPONS STATION, CALIFORNIA by Chris T. Higgins, Geologist Rodger H. Chapman, Geophysicist California Department of Conservation Division of Mines and Geology OPEN FILE REPORT 84-32 SAC 1984 This work was performed under Contract No. DE-AC03-83SFl1720 for the U.S. Department of Energy, San Francisco Operations Office, by the California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology. It was part of a cooperative agreement between the Department of Energy's San Francisco Operations Office and the U.S. Naval Weapons Center, China Lake, California, for joint research and development of geothermal energy at military installations. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARy......................................................... 1 INTRODUCT I ON.
  • 1- STAFF REPORT a 70 04/05/19 W 17166 S 33, 34 E. Tajer CONSIDER ACCEPTANCE of the LONG BEACH UNIT PROGRAM PLAN (JULY 1, 2

    1- STAFF REPORT a 70 04/05/19 W 17166 S 33, 34 E. Tajer CONSIDER ACCEPTANCE of the LONG BEACH UNIT PROGRAM PLAN (JULY 1, 2

    STAFF REPORT C62 A 70 04/05/19 W 17166 S 33, 34 E. Tajer CONSIDER ACCEPTANCE OF THE LONG BEACH UNIT PROGRAM PLAN (JULY 1, 2019, THROUGH JUNE 30, 2024), AND THE ANNUAL PLAN (JULY 1, 2019, THROUGH JUNE 30, 2020), LONG BEACH UNIT, WILMINGTON OIL FIELD, LOS ANGELES COUNTY GRANTEE: City of Long Beach BACKGROUND: The City of Long Beach (City), as Unit Operator and Trustee for the State, submitted the Program Plan (July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2024) and Annual Plan (July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020) for the Long Beach Unit (or Unit) to the Commission, as required by Chapter 138, Statutes of 1964, 1st Extraordinary Session, Chapter 941, Statutes of 1991 and the Optimized Waterflood Program Implementation Agreement (OWPA). The Field Contractor for the Long Beach Unit is California Resources Long Beach, Inc. The operations for the Long Beach Unit are governed by the Chapter 138 and Chapter 941, the OWPA, the Long Beach Unit Agreement and the Long Beach Unit Operating Agreement. On March 5, 2019, the Long Beach City Council adopted the proposed Program Plan and Annual Plan and authorized submittal to the Commission for its consideration. The Plans were submitted to Commission staff on March 8, 2019. As required by Chapter 941, the Commission has 45 days to review the Program Plan and the Annual Plan; otherwise, the Plans are deemed to be reviewed and accepted by the Commission. Pursuant to Section 3 of Chapter 941, the Commission’s authority is limited to a review of whether the Program Plan: 1.
  • Summary of Geology and Petroleum Plays Used to Assess

    Summary of Geology and Petroleum Plays Used to Assess

    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Summary of Geology and Petroleum Plays Used to Assess Undiscovered Recoverable Petroleum Resources of Los Angeles Basin Province, California By Larry A. Beyer Open-File Report 88-450L This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards and stratigraphic nomenclature. Any use of trade names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the USGS. Geological Survey, 345 Middlefield Rd., MS 999, Menlo Park, CA 94025 1988 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. INTRODUCTION ........................... 1 II. GEOLOGICAL SUMMARY ........................ 1 A. Previous Work. ........................ 1 B. Tectonic History and Basin Evolution ............. 3 v 1. Prebasin Phase ...................... 3 2. Basin Phase. ....................... 5 C. Structural Setting and Stratigraphy. ............. 9 1. Southwestern Block .................... 9 2. Northwestern Block .................... 9 3. Central Block. ...................... 15 4. Northeast Block. ..................... 15 D. Depositional Systems of Reservoir Rocks. .......... \ 19 E. Subsidence History ...................... 21 F. Subsurface Temperatures and Pore-Fluid Pressures ....... 21 G. Petroleum Source Rocks, Maturation and Migration ....... 23 H. Diagenesis of Petroleum Reservoir Rocks. ........... 28 I. Porosity of Petroleum Reservoir Rocks. ............ 28 III. PETROLEUM PLAYS. ......................... 32 A. PLAY I: Northwest Basin Flank Including Adjacent Offshore State Lands ..................... 32 B. PLAY II: Playa del Rey Platform and Adjacent Offshore State Lands ..................... 37 C. PLAY III: Main Los Angeles Basin and Areas to the North, East and South. ................... 39 1. Area South of Central Syncline Axis Including Adjacent Offshore State Lands. ................ 39 2. Area North of Central Syncline Axis Including San Gabriel Valley, Chino Basin and Eastern Shelf .... 39 IV. PETROLEUM DEVELOPMENT. ...................... 42 V.
  • Inglewood Oil Field Hydraulic Fracturing Report

    Inglewood Oil Field Hydraulic Fracturing Report

    Plains Exploration & Production Company Inglewood Oil Field Hydraulic Fracturing Report Inglewood Oil Field Hydraulic Fracturing Report 1 CONFIDENTIAL © 2011 Halliburton All Rights Reserved Inglewood Oil Field Hydraulic Fracturing Report July 13.docm Plains E xploration & Productio n Company Inglewo od Oil Field Hydraulic F racturing R eport Prepare d for: Plai ns Expl oratio n & Pr oductio n Company 5640 S. Fairfa x Ave. Los A ngeles, CA 9005 6 Version 5 Submi tted by: Denv er Tech Team Hallib urton July 1 3th , 2012 2 CO NFIDENTIAL © 2011 Halli burton All Rights Re served Inglewood Oil Field Hy draulic Fracturing Repport July 13.docm Plains Exploration & Production Company Inglewood Oil Field Hydraulic Fracturing Report Inglewood Oil Field Hydraulic Fracturing Report Table of Contents 1. Los Angeles Basin .................................................................................................................... 9 1.1. Introduction .................................................................................................................. 9 1.2. Geological Development of the Los Angeles Basin .................................................. 11 1.3. History of Oil Production in Los Angeles Basin ....................................................... 14 1.4. Assessment of Remaining Oil Potential in Los Angeles Basin ................................. 15 2. Inglewood Oil Field ............................................................................................................... 17 2.1. Introduction ...............................................................................................................
  • ·Geology of the Los Angeles Basin California-An Introduction

    ·Geology of the Los Angeles Basin California-An Introduction

    ~ ~ CJBRARW ~ tJ o tf ~ ~ o v.. \,1 , rt~ I t t....18Rt'..t.".•., I ~PO~MH. 11. 11 "Ii~ ; .1 JUN 31971 0 ·Geology of the .. _;_ff' -.,,..,_ J ~ ~ ~UA"S~ lfTUlfi:;a ,.... ~O UBRAll ~ ~ ·~ 0 •.-4= Los Angeles Basin 11.> 00 ~ ,....0 ~ ~ Q;> ~ "00 California-an .J -......5 ~ ·'¢ ~ I z 0 Introduction ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ Eo-1 -~ z GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 420-A .r .. ~z ~ ~ ~ 0 as: 00 ~ ~ 00 ~ ~ ~ t:.t:s Z· ~ 00 Q ~ -~ t:.t:s 0 ~ 0 ·~t:.t:s I· ~ Q;> fl·o q; Q;> ~,.... Q;> -~ GEOLOGY OF THE LOS ANGELES BASIN Isometric block diagram, basement surface of the Los Angeles basin. Contour interval is 1,000 feet; exposures of basement rocks are patterned; fault surfaces are hachured. Geology of the Los Angeles Basin California . an. Introduction By R. F. YERKES, T. H. McCULLOH, J.E. SCHOELLHAMER, and J. G. VEDDER GEOLOGY OF THE EASTERN LOS ANGELES BASIN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 420-A The evolution of a most prolific oil district and the framework for several detailed reports on its geology and gravitational aspects UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTONY: 1965 t:.tBRAR · 8URf AU OF UtM£1 L.IBRARV SPOkANI. WASH. ~ 31971 .-•;ctr~ Hf•Sf QfTfJIN ~0 UBRAR'C UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent o( Documents, U.S. Government. Printing.Office Washington, D.C. 20402 CONTENTS Page Page Al Stratigraphy of the basin-Continued IntroductionAbstract------------------------------------------- ______________________________________
  • Development of the Offshore East Wilmington Oil Field

    Development of the Offshore East Wilmington Oil Field

    SOCIETY OF PETRCLEUM ENGII’lEERSOF AIME 6200 North Central Expressway &%iR SPE 2562 Dallas, Texas 75206 THIS IS A PREPRINT --- SUBJECT TO CORRECTION Development of the Offshore East Wilmington Oil Field By Downloaded from http://onepetro.org/SPEATCE/proceedings-pdf/69FM/All-69FM/SPE-2562-MS/2069540/spe-2562-ms.pdf by guest on 02 October 2021 John N. Truex and William J. Hunter, THUMBS Long Beach Co. @ Copyright 1969 American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers, kc, This paper was prepared for the bbth Annual Fall Meeting of the Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME, to be held in Denver, Colo., Sept. 28-Ott. 1, 1969. Permission to copy is restricted to an abstract of not more than 300 words. Illustrations may not be copied. The abstract should contain conspicuous acknowledgment of where and by whom the paper is presented, Publication elsewhere after publication in the JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM TECHNOLOGY or the SOCIETY OF PETROLEUM ENGINEERS JCURNAL is usually granted upon request to the Editor of the appropriate journal provided agreement to give proper credit is made. Discussion of this paper is invited. Three copies of any discussion should be sent to the Society of Petroleum Engineers office, Such discussion may be presented at the above meeting and, with the paper? may be considered for publication in one of the two SPE magazines. ABSTRACT 21 miles. The Ranger Petroleum Co., Well No. “Watson” 2, completed January 26, The East Wilmington Oil Field, 1932, for 150 barrels per day of 14 degree comprisinci approximately 5930 productive gravity oil was the first conntercialwell acres, is located just off-shore Long completed in the field.
  • Increasing Heavy Oil Reserves in the Wilmington

    Increasing Heavy Oil Reserves in the Wilmington

    i “Increasing Heavy Oil Reserves in The Wilmington Oil Field Through Advanced Reservoir Characterization And Thermal Production Technologies” Contract #DE-FC22-95BC14939 Annual Report for the Period April 1, 2000 to March 31, 2001 (First Draft - Subject to further correction) Prepared for U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary for Fossil Energy Gary Walker, DOE Project Manager National Petroleum Technology Laboratory 1 West 3rd Street William Center Tower 1 – Suite 1400 Tulsa, OK 74103 P.O. Box 3628 Tulsa, OK 74101 Prepared by City of Long Beach Tidelands Oil Production Company University of Southern California David K. Davies and Associates June 27, 2001 CONTENTS Abstract…………………………………………………………………...…………….…...vi Executive Summary………………………………………………………….………..…viii Acknowledgments………………………………………………………….……………xxv Introduction…………………………………………………………………………..………1 Report Overview Project Overview Development and Production History Geologic Setting Activity 1 – Compilation and Analysis of Existing Data – N/A …………………....21 1.1 Data Compilation 1.1.1 Well Production/Injection 1.1.2 Pressure Volume Temperature / Water Composition Test 1.2 Log Digitization and Normalization 1.2.1 Build Log Data Base 1.2.2 Digitize Well Logs / Directional Data 1.2.3 Normalize Well Logs / Markers Activity 2 - Advanced Reservoir Characterization………………….….……….…....22 . 2.1 Basic Reservoir Engineering – N/A 2.1.1 Material Balance 2.1.2 Flood Response 2.1.3 Steamflood Response 2.1.4 Productivity Problem Analysis 2.1.5 Analysis of Injection Profile 2.2 Obtaining New