DOCSLIB.ORG

STEPPING BACK from the DANGER ZONE Conlt4h~-J ------SPRING 2009 No

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
STEPPING BACK from the DANGER ZONE Conlt4h~-J ------SPRING 2009 No Spring 2009 No. 62 $5US $6CAN A HARSH NE~ REALITY TRANSFORMS THE ARCTIC REINVENTING WHAT IT MEANS TO BE INUIT S SSED OUT WILDLIFE FACE MASSIVE OIL DEVELO - STEPPING BACK FROM THE DANGER ZONE Conlt4H~-j --------------- SPRING 2009 No. 62 Dear Reader ARCTIC he facts aboutthe recent warming A HARSH NEW REALITY TRANSFORMS THE ARCTIC 3 "DRILL, BABY, DRILL: STRESSED OUT ARCTIC WILDLIFE FACE MAS- of Earth's north pole, as described SIVE NEW OIL DEVELOPMENT .•••••....•.••......••..•. 14 Tin chis issue of Cascadia Times, are ,_THE ARCT1C0S DISAPPEARING SEA ICE 3 truly frightening. Journalists who report • THE WALRUS' FATAL REACTION TO GLOBAL WARMING •........ 16 the facts about global warming arc often ARCTIC WARMING "DRAMATIC" AND "WIDESPREAD" 4 accused of fear-mongering, as if reporciing INCREASED INTEREST IN ARCTIC SHIPPING ROUTES POSES NEW the facts about climate change is some• how a crime. It would be a crime not to ARCTIC TEMPERATURES RISING TWICE THE RATE AS THE ENTIRE RISKS TO FRAGILE ECOSYSTEMS ....••••....•....••..... 19 do so. PLANET ..••.•............•......•................ 5 We also believe chat it is much worse SOLUTIONS: STEPPING BACK FROM THE DANGER ZONE •...... 20 to deny· the truth about these facts. REINVENTING WHAT IT MEANS TO BE·INUIT: INDIGENOUS PEOPLES Global warming is not just a theory. It is ADAPT TO CLIMATE CHANGE . • . • . 10 UNPRECEDENTED COMMERCIAL FISHING BAN SEEN AS BIG STEP already happening. TOWARD CONSERVATION OF THE ARCTIC ..•••..•.......... 22 What frightens us most is that global POSIER THE ARCTIC~W HERE POLAR BEARS. OILDRILLERS MEET .• 11 warming is arriving with unexpected REFERENCES .................••.•.••.•.....•..... 23 speed and ferocity. The United Nations RUSSIAN OIL FIELDS COLLIDE WITH REINDEER HERDING TRADnlONS .12 lncernacional Panel on Climate Change, has underestimated global warming. Ics models did not take into account several important factors, The IPCC did 111oc expect the late-summer sea ice in rhe Arctic Ocean to melt as thoroughly and as rapidly as it has. Nor did the IPCC factor in the vase quantities of methane chat are already seeping from the permafrost as it melts under the Arctic Ocean floor. Methane is 60 times more efficient as a greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide. COz is far more abundant in the atmosphere than methane, but scientists say this methane gets into the atmosphere, the results could be staggering. For every fact, it seems there will always be someone who is a denier. Walrus head to land in Chukotka, Russia, as the sea ice melts, "Global warming is a gigantic hoax, above (photo by Vladimir Gorbunov). On the cover, polar bears pure and simple," Philip Brennan, a in Alaska's Beaufort Sea thrive on the sea ice while it lases (photo writer for the conservative news site Newsmax.com, cold me in December courtesy NOAA). 2008. "Baby it's getting cold out there - and it's going to gee worse, much worse!" People who dispute the facts ab-out global warming may be making it harder than it needs co be to implement a solu• tion. They can paralyze political leaders who need to be taking action before it's 2004 John B. Oakes Award too late, if it's not coo late already. Some Nation's Best Environmental Journalism experts say there's already a chance the planet will never return tO a climate most Editor/Publisher Paul Koberstein of us would consider normal. Nothing could be more frightening [email protected] BOARD OF than chat. Operations Manager/Publisher Robin Klein ADVISORS Cascadia Times wants to thank many [email protected] Hilary Abraham McCormick, Portland, Ore. people for their financial help in produc• Design Cascadia Times Eric Allen, Portland, Ore. ing this report, including Oceana, the ISSN 1939-2672 (Print edition) 1939-2680 (times.erg) Peter Chilton. Pullman, Wash. Ocean Foundation, Mark Spaulding, Hilary Abraham McCormick, John Coscodio Times is published by Cascadia Times Publishing Co., Ellen Chu, Seattle, Wash. McCormick, Jeanne Norton, Samantha 25-6 Northwest 23rd Place, No. 406, Portland OR 97210- David James Duncan, Lolo, Mont. Campbell and the Campbell Foundation. Pat Ford, Boise, Idaho 3534. Subscriptions are $30 per 5 issues, $56 for IO issues. We appreciate their support very much. The entire contents of Coscadio Times are copyright© 2003 Michael Freme, Bellingham.Wash. Cascadia Times and may not be reproduced in whole or in Ian Gill, Vancouver, B.C. ....00 part without permission of the p.ibltsher; The publisher John Haines, Portland, Ore. .::::E encourages unsolicited manuscripts and art, but cannot be James Karr. Seattle, \'.'lash. held responsible for them. Manuscripts or material unaccom• Ken Margolis, Santa Fe, N.M. c Cascadia Times is not si~ply abpu( panied by a self-addressed stamped envelope will not be Christopher Peters, Arcata. Calif. c =c., returned. Coscodio Times encourages electronic submissions Catherine Stewart, Vancouver, B.C. furry animats and remote forests. 00 c u to e-mail box [email protected] .. We reserve the right to print Jim Stratton, Anchorage, Alaska !t"s also about j~e P.;~Pi/who li~e letters in condensed form. Sylvia Ward, Fairbanks.Alaska . in this regio( their communities Printing by Signature Graphics Charles Wilkinson, Boulder, Colo. and the.idjualil"( of life. ~dia . k .I Founded /995 by Poul Koberstein, Robin Klein, and Kathie Durbin. Original designs by Bryon Potter. 7itmes ma es. connecti- ons How to Reach Us across the West. with a broad. 25-6 NW 23rd Place, No. 406, Portland OR 97210 • (503) 223-9036 • www.times.org • [email protected] bio-regional outlook. A HARSH NEW REALITY TRANSFORMS THE ARCTIC By Paul Koberstein The Arctic's disappearing sea ice ramatic climate changes in the Arctic are sending an unmistak• he satellite images below illustrate the volume because the ice sheet is getting D able signal chat global warming recent decline of Arctic sea ice. In thinner. Most of the thinning is occurring is advancing much more rapidly on Earth than scientists thought. Many now T2007, the area of sea ice coverage along the Siberian and North American say that the time to deal with the crisis is receded to a record low - 24 percent less rapidly running short. coast, from the Chukchi Sea to Greenland. The Arctic, which plays a viral role in area than the previous low set in 2005. Ice These data illustrate the dramatic keeping the Earth cool, is having trouble keeping its own cool. Scientists have is now disappearing at a -rate of 11. 7 per• changes occurring in the Arctic, where assembled a mountain of incontrovert• cent per decade. In 2008, the sea ice cov• people and ·wildlife area adapting to the ible evidence chat warming is funda• mentally, rapidly changing the Arctic, ered a slightly greater area but had less harsh new reality of global warming. none clearer than the retreat of its lace• summer sea ice, triggered by air temper• atures chat have been rising at twice the rate as the rest of the planer. And the retreat is accelerating. Until recently, climate models pub• lished by the U.N. International Panel on Climate- Change (IPCC) have pre• dicted a complete retreat of the lace• summer sea ice by the end of chis centu• ry. Bue the IPCC's models may need drastic revision, as a number of scientists now think the ice could disappear as soon as the next decade. Species chat depend on the ice for their subsistence September 21, 1979 September 5, 1980 September 10, 1981 and survival - including humans, polar bears, walruses and ice seals - are fac• ing significant disruptions in their lives. As ice pack retreats, stressed ouc wildlife and humans must also adapt co another significant development in the Arctic - a gold rush by industry chat is likely to include offshore oil and gas drilling, circumpolar shipping and com• mercial fishing made possible by ice• free conditions. This combination of cli• mate change and industrialization, with its human intrusions and likely oil and chemical spills, would compound the September 10, 1996 injury, posing a double jeopardy for the September 19, 1997 September 14, 2004 people and wildlife of the Arctic. Taken alone, any of these changes would add substantial stress to Arctic ecosystems. Bue many are likely to be concurrent, and could have synergistic effects on the health of the ecosystem and opportunities for the subsistence way of life. Ten years ago, scientists were just beginning to document the warming of the Arctic. Today thousands of scientists are making significant progress toward understanding how and why the Arctic September 21, 2005 September 14, 2006 September 14, 2007 _ ( Continued 011. Page 5) Annual minimum extent of Arctic sea ice 100 % Pacific Ocean f 8.0 QI ....QI Alaska Siberia 80 % E Chukchi Sea 2 7.0 Beaufort Sea ...~ QI 60 % Canada n,... North Pole ::I CT 6.0 .....Ill 40% Greenland 0 Ill c 5.0 0 20 % Finland Atlantic Ocean -- i:= 4.0 1979 1982 1986 1990 1994 1996 2000 2004 2008 0% September 12, 2008 Arctic sea ice covered 4.28 million square kilometers in 2007, increasing to 4.67 Percent of ocean So11n;es: CryosphtreToday , Universityo f Illinois 'million in 2008, the lowest and second lowest. respectively, since the satellite covered by ice Scie11tiji,·Vis uaiixatio»Studi o, GoddardS paceFli ght Center, N.!\Sil rP.cord bega11 in 1979. Sor1ra: National Snow and lee Data Center. e Arctic warming Narwhal Whales marine mammals to climate-induced 11 Polar bears, bowhead whales, narwhal habitat change, by Kristin Laidre of the dramatic" and whales, walruses and several species of ice Greenland Institute of Natural Resources, and seals - top predators in the Arctic ecosys• others. "widespread" tem -are Mghly vulnerable to climate No other cetacean spedes occupies such en years ago, scientists were just change.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Second Norwegian Polar Expedition in the “Fram,” 1898–1902
    Scottish Geographical Magazine ISSN: 0036-9225 (Print) (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rsgj19 The second Norwegian Polar expedition in the “Fram,” 1898–1902 Captain Otto Sverdrup To cite this article: Captain Otto Sverdrup (1903) The second Norwegian Polar expedition in the “Fram,” 1898–1902, Scottish Geographical Magazine, 19:7, 337-353, DOI: 10.1080/14702540308554276 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14702540308554276 Published online: 30 Jan 2008. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 6 View related articles Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=rsgj19 Download by: [University of Sydney Library] Date: 07 June 2016, At: 04:10 THE SCOTTISH GEOGRAPHICAL MAGAZINE. THE SECOND NORWEGIAN POLAR EXPEDITION IN THE "FRAM," 1898-19022 By Captain OTTO SVERDRUP. UPON learning that Messrs. Axel Heiberg and Ringnes Brothers were willing to defray the costs of a Polar expedition under my guidance and direction, I petitioned the Norwegian Government to lend me the Arctic vessel Fram. The Government at once placed her at my service, while the Storthing generously granted 26,000 kroner (2 £1445)for the renovation of the ship and the construction of a new saloon forward, two working-cabins, and six berths for the officers and scientific staff. The Fram was a first-rate boat before these alterations were made. Prof. Nansen had asked Mr. Collin Archer to make her strong, and strong she unquestionably was. But now she was better than ever; and though she was not so severely tried on the second occasion as she was on the first, still she did not escape without two or three pretty severe tussles.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of a Pan‐Arctic Monitoring Plan for Polar Bears Background Paper
    CAFF Monitoring Series Report No. 1 January 2011 DEVELOPMENT OF A PAN‐ARCTIC MONITORING PLAN FOR POLAR BEARS BACKGROUND PAPER Dag Vongraven and Elizabeth Peacock ARCTIC COUNCIL DEVELOPMENT OF A PAN‐ARCTIC MONITORING PLAN FOR POLAR BEARS Acknowledgements BACKGROUND PAPER The Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna (CAFF) is a Working Group of the Arctic Council. Author Dag Vongraven Table of Contents CAFF Designated Agencies: Norwegian Polar Institute Foreword • Directorate for Nature Management, Trondheim, Norway Elizabeth Peacock • Environment Canada, Ottawa, Canada US Geological Survey, 1. Introduction Alaska Science Center • Faroese Museum of Natural History, Tórshavn, Faroe Islands (Kingdom of Denmark) 1 1.1 Project objectives 2 • Finnish Ministry of the Environment, Helsinki, Finland Editing and layout 1.2 Definition of monitoring 2 • Icelandic Institute of Natural History, Reykjavik, Iceland Tom Barry 1.3 Adaptive management/implementation 2 • The Ministry of Domestic Affairs, Nature and Environment, Greenland 2. Review of biology and natural history • Russian Federation Ministry of Natural Resources, Moscow, Russia 2.1 Reproductive and vital rates 3 2.2 Movement/migrations 4 • Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Stockholm, Sweden 2.3 Diet 4 • United States Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Anchorage, Alaska 2.4 Diseases, parasites and pathogens 4 CAFF Permanent Participant Organizations: 3. Polar bear subpopulations • Aleut International Association (AIA) 3.1 Distribution 5 • Arctic Athabaskan Council (AAC) 3.2 Subpopulations/management units 5 • Gwich’in Council International (GCI) 3.3 Presently delineated populations 5 3.3.1 Arctic Basin (AB) 5 • Inuit Circumpolar Conference (ICC) – Greenland, Alaska and Canada 3.3.2 Baffin Bay (BB) 6 • Russian Indigenous Peoples of the North (RAIPON) 3.3.3 Barents Sea (BS) 7 3.3.4 Chukchi Sea (CS) 7 • Saami Council 3.3.5 Davis Strait (DS) 8 This publication should be cited as: 3.3.6 East Greenland (EG) 8 Vongraven, D and Peacock, E.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Arctic Tide Measurement Techniques and Results
    International Hydrographie Review, Monaco, LXIII (2), July 1986 CANADIAN ARCTIC TIDE MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES AND RESULTS by B.J. TAIT, S.T. GRANT, D. St.-JACQUES and F. STEPHENSON (*) ABSTRACT About 10 years ago the Canadian Hydrographic Service recognized the need for a planned approach to completing tide and current surveys of the Canadian Arctic Archipelago in order to meet the requirements of marine shipping and construction industries as well as the needs of environmental studies related to resource development. Therefore, a program of tidal surveys was begun which has resulted in a data base of tidal records covering most of the Archipelago. In this paper the problems faced by tidal surveyors and others working in the harsh Arctic environment are described and the variety of equipment and techniques developed for short, medium and long-term deployments are reported. The tidal characteris­ tics throughout the Archipelago, determined primarily from these surveys, are briefly summarized. It was also recognized that there would be a need for real time tidal data by engineers, surveyors and mariners. Since the existing permanent tide gauges in the Arctic do not have this capability, a project was started in the early 1980’s to develop and construct a new permanent gauging system. The first of these gauges was constructed during the summer of 1985 and is described. INTRODUCTION The Canadian Arctic Archipelago shown in Figure 1 is a large group of islands north of the mainland of Canada bounded on the west by the Beaufort Sea, on the north by the Arctic Ocean and on the east by Davis Strait, Baffin Bay and Greenland and split through the middle by Parry Channel which constitutes most of the famous North West Passage.
    [Show full text]
  • The State of the Polar Bear Report 2020
    STATE OF THE POLAR BEAR REPORT 2020 Susan J. Crockford The Global Warming Policy Foundation Report 48 State of the Polar Bear Report 2020 Susan J. Crockford Report 48, The Global Warming Policy Foundation © Copyright 2021, The Global Warming Policy Foundation TheContents Climate Noose: Business, Net Zero and the IPCC's Anticapitalism AboutRupert Darwall the author iv Report 40, The Global Warming Policy Foundation Preface v ISBNExecutive 978-1-9160700-7-3 summary vi 1.© Copyright Introduction 2020, The Global Warming Policy Foundation 1 2. Conservation status 1 3. Population size 2 4. Population trends 10 5. Habitat status 11 6. Prey base 15 7. Health and survival 17 8. Evidence of flexibility 22 9. Human/bear interactions 23 10. Discussion 28 Bibliography 30 About the Global Warming Policy Foundation 58 About the author Dr Susan Crockford is an evolutionary biologist and has been work- ing for more than 40 years in archaeozoology, paleozoology and forensic zoology.1 She is a former adjunct professor at the University of Victoria, British Columbia and works full time for a private con- sulting company she co-owns (Pacific Identifications Inc). She is the author of Rhythms of Life: Thyroid Hormone and the Origin of Species, Eaten: A Novel (a polar bear attack thriller), Polar Bear Facts and Myths (for ages seven and up, also available in French, German, Dutch, and Norwegian), Polar Bears Have Big Feet (for preschoolers), and the fully referenced Polar Bears: Outstanding Survivors of Climate Change and The Polar Bear Catastrophe That Never Happened,2 as well as a scien- tific paper on polar bear conservation status.3 She has authored sev- eral earlier briefing papers, reports, and videos for GWPF on polar bear and walrus ecology and conservation.4 Susan Crockford blogs at www.polarbearscience.com.
    [Show full text]
  • Qikiqtani Region
    Tuktu 399 e Bay Roch 398 elville West M 499 204 el M 12 k lia id 200 3 Ch laq Qi 209 7 6 OVERVIEW 2015 Turqa Aberdeevnik 2, 9 4 NUNAVUT Baker Basin 5 Coats sel and Man Isl y MINERAL EXPLORATION, MINING & GEOSCIENCEand Ba Isl va a ATLAS ga av Un g 13 'Un 120°W 110°W 100°W 90°W 80°W 70°W 60°W 50°W 40°W 30°W ie d A Ba RC TIC O OC CÉ EA AN N 80°W A Y R el C ver T ton Povungnituk IQ B NP U ay aq Bay E irpa ttin QIKIQTANIQu REGION Kiyuk t N 346 DS i 60° a N r A TH t 8 S L E S B s Y I e BA D A r SON H IS a HUD N L ay N A T É dhild B °N L E - Au N 80 B a N N ) E n E SO A s ER UD E K Z N e SM ' H t I I n ELLE AIE D O a R L E S B R a A E o D R u LAN G n n IS ne / u M d ssiz Ka E N A Aga in D N E L ap Bas N t N 80 E ce C li A °N U DE I A l Q la Dobbin L a /D S ninsu Bay N la K E eim Pe E a ÎL 199 Fosh E K R er Princess Marie Bay A uaq P Müll R ikil e an C a Ice Cap G M S E ry AXEL N B C Buch E h anan Bay E 397 U a EIBERG t Q C n H D Inle E n ÎLE ( ig B e her Ha É l ISLAND RE Belc U y ME Q Ba LES ands and 'EL Isl Str d D M n s u ale a o f W s o S ce s n H e Pri ld a e Pri Ellef Ring y efi n n a c c e k I e s S G s Amund e u s o staf Islan u r A d e dol n u f l Ringnes d E Sea S o y u Island a n B d Bay orwegian h N it m Lough S DS eed Cornwall I.
    [Show full text]
  • Estimating Abundance of the Southern Hudson Bay Polar Bear Subpopulation Using Aerial Surveys, 2011 and 2012
    Wildlife Research and Monitoring Section Science and Research Branch, Ministry of Natural Resources Wildlife Research Series 2013-01 Estimating abundance of the Southern Hudson Bay polar bear subpopulation using aerial surveys, 2011 and 2012 Martyn E. Obbard, Kevin R. Middel, Seth Stapleton, Isabelle Thibault, Vincent Brodeur, and Charles Jutras November 2013 Estimating abundance of the Southern Hudson Bay polar bear subpopulation using aerial surveys, 2011 and 2012 Martyn E. Obbard1, Kevin R. Middel1, Seth Stapleton2, Isabelle Thibault3, Vincent Brodeur3, and Charles Jutras3 1Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, 2U.S. Geological Survey, Alaska Science Center, 3Ministère du Développement durable, de l’Environnement, de la Faune et des Parcs du Québec © 2013, Queen’s Printer for Ontario Printed in Ontario, Canada MNR 52766 ISBN 978-1-4606-3321-2 (PDF) This publication was produced by: Wildlife Research and Monitoring Section Science and Research Branch Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources 2140 East Bank Drive Peterborough, Ontario K9J 8M5 This document is for scientific research purposes and does not represent the policy or opinion of the Government of Ontario. This technical report should be cited as follows: Obbard, M.E., K.R. Middel, S. Stapleton, I. Thibault, V. Brodeur, and C. Jutras. 2013. Estimating abundance of the Southern Hudson Bay polar bear subpopulation using aerial surveys, 2011 and 2012. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Science and Research Branch, Wildlife Research Series 2013-01. 33pp. Cover photos (clockwise from top): adult female and yearling at edge of pond; pregnant female in forested area; group of adult males on small offshore island Photo credits: M.E.
    [Show full text]
  • Here and It Is Known That Bears from Other Subpopulations Use the Area (Durner and Amstrup 1993)
    This is a cut and paste compilation of the “details” available via hyperlink from the 2013 PBSG status table http://pbsg.npolar.no/en/status/status-table.html as one searchable document for archive purposes (Feb 26, 2014) by Susan J. Crockford, www.polarbearscience.com I’ve added only the totals to the bottom of the first column of the status table on page 2 and a caption to the subpopulation map below. http://pbsg.npolar.no/en/status/population-map.html The 19 polar bear subpopulations defined by the IUCN Polar Bear Specialist Group for which assessments are provided in the 2013 online table. SB, Southern Beaufort; NB, Northern Beaufort; VM, Viscount Melville; MC, M’Clintock Channel; LS, Lancaster Sound; GB, Gulf of Boothia; NW, Norwegian Bay; KB, Kane Basin; WH, Western Hudson Bay. http://pbsg.npolar.no/en/status/population-map.html SJC Note: the first column adds up to 18,349 (range 13,071-24,238). http://pbsg.npolar.no/en/status/populations/arctic-basin.html Arctic Basin (AB) The population size is unknown. This subpopulation is a geographic catch-all to account for polar bears outside of the polar bear nations’ jurisdictions. Status table outtake Size Trend Human-caused removals 2009–2013 Current 5-yr mean 3-yr mean Last year (approx. 12- Estimate / Relative to historic level yr Year Method 95% CI (approx. 25-yr past) period Potential Actual Potential Actual Potential Actual centered on present) Unknown Data deficient Data deficient See also the complete table (all subpopulations) Habitat quality Not specified. Comments, vulnerabilities and concerns Not specified.
    [Show full text]
  • POLAR BEAR (Ursus Maritimus) in CMS APPENDIX II
    CMS Distribution: General CONVENTION ON UNEP/CMS/ScC18/Doc.7.2.11 MIGRATORY 11 June 2014 SPECIES Original: English 18th MEETING OF THE SCIENTIFIC COUNCIL Bonn, Germany, 1-3 July 2014 Agenda Item 7.2 PROPOSAL FOR THE INCLUSION OF THE POLAR BEAR (Ursus maritimus) IN CMS APPENDIX II Summary The Government of Norway has submitted a proposal for the inclusion of the Polar bear (Ursus maritimus) in CMS Appendix II th at the 11 Meeting of the Conference of the Parties (COP11), 4-9 November 2014, Quito, Ecuador. The proposal is reproduced under this cover for its evaluation by th the 18 Meeting of the CMS Scientific Council. For reasons of economy, documents are printed in a limited number, and will not be distributed at the meeting. Delegates are kindly requested to bring their copy to the meeting and not to request additional copies. UNEP/CMS/ScC18/Doc.7.2.11: Proposal II/1 PROPOSAL FOR INCLUSION OF SPECIES ON THE APPENDICES OF THE CONVENTION ON THE CONSERVATION OF MIGRATORY SPECIES OF WILD ANIMALS A. PROPOSAL: To list the polar bear, Ursus maritimus, on CMS Appendix II B. PROPONENT: Norway C. SUPPORTING STATEMENT 1. Taxon 1.1 Classis: Mammalia 1.2 Ordo: Carnivora 1.3 Family: Ursidae 1.4 Genus/Species: Ursus maritimus (Phipps, 1774) 1.5 Common name(s): English: Polar bear French: Ours blanc, ours polaire Spanish: Oso polar Norwegian: Isbjørn Russian: Bélyj medvédj, oshkúj Chukchi: Umka Inuit: Nanoq, nanuq Yupik: Nanuuk 2. Biological data 2.1 Distribution Polar bears, Ursus maritimus, are unevenly distributed throughout the ice-covered waters of the circumpolar Arctic, in 19 subpopulations, within five range States: Canada, Denmark (Greenland), Norway, Russian Federation, and the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • RANGE-WIDE STATUS REVIEW of the POLAR BEAR (Ursus Maritimus)
    RANGE-WIDE STATUS REVIEW OF THE POLAR BEAR (Ursus maritimus) Prepared and Edited By Scott Schliebe, Thomas Evans, Kurt Johnson, Michael Roy, Susanne Miller, Charles Hamilton, Rosa Meehan, Sonja Jahrsdoerfer 1 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1011 E. Tudor Road, Anchorage, Alaska December 21, 2006 1 I. INTRODUCTION TO POLAR BEAR STATUS REVIEW ..........................................................................5 II. POPULATION ECOLOGY AND CHARACTERISTICS OF TAXON.......................................................6 A. TAXONOMY ..........................................................................................................................................6 B. GENERAL DESCRIPTION.......................................................................................................................7 C. ECOLOGICAL ADAPTATIONS ...............................................................................................................7 D. DISTRIBUTION....................................................................................................................................10 E. MOVEMENTS ......................................................................................................................................12 F. FEEDING HABITS................................................................................................................................16 G. REPRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................17 1. Litter
    [Show full text]
  • State of the Polar Bear Report 2018
    STATE OF THE POLAR BEAR REPORT 2018 Susan J. Crockford The Global Warming Policy Foundation GWPF Report 32 STATE OF THE POLAR BEAR REPORT 2018 Susan J. Crockford ISBN 978-0-9931190-7-1 © Copyright 2019 The Global Warming Policy Foundation Contents Foreword vii About the author vii Executive summary ix 1 Introduction 1 2 Conservation status 2 3 Population size 3 Global 3 Subpopulations by ecoregion 3 4 Population trends 12 The problem of statistical confidence 14 5 Habitat status 16 Global sea ice 16 Sea ice loss by subpopulation 19 Freeze-up and breakup date changes for Hudson Bay 19 6 Prey base 21 Polar bears, seals, and sea ice 21 Seal numbers 22 7 Health and survival 23 Body condition 23 Effect of record low winter ice 25 Hybridization 25 Effect of contaminants 25 Swimming bears 26 Denning on land 26 Ice-free period on land 26 Threats from oil exploration and extraction in Alaska 27 Litter sizes 27 8 Evidence of flexibility 28 Den locations 28 Feeding locations 28 Genetics 29 9 Human/Bear interactions 30 v Attacks on humans 30 Problem bears and attacks in winter/spring 30 Problem bears and attacks in summer and autumn 33 10 Discussion 35 Notes 38 Bibliography 49 Foreword From 1972 until 2010,1 the Polar Bear Specialist Group (PBSG) of the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) published comprehensive status reports every four years or so, as proceedings of their official meetings, making them available in electronic format. Until 2018 – a full eight years after its last report – the PBSG had disseminated information only on its website, updated (without announcement) at its discretion.
    [Show full text]
  • POLAR BEAR (Ursus Maritimus) AS a THREATENED SPECIES UNDER the ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT
    BEFORE THE SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR PETITION TO LIST THE POLAR BEAR (Ursus maritimus) AS A THREATENED SPECIES UNDER THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT ©Thomas D. Mangelsen/Imagesofnaturestock.com February 16, 2005 On the Cover: Message on the Wind – Polar Bear ©Thomas D. Mangelsen/Imagesofnaturestock.com Acknowledgments: Many thanks to Thomas D. Mangelsen for the generous donation of the use of his award-winning fine art photography, and to Betsy Morrison, Director, Images of Nature Stock, for her assistance in obtaining the images. Thanks also to Brian Nowicki, Monica Bond, Erin Duffy, Curt Bradley, Noah Greenwald, Shane Jimerfield, and Kieran Suckling of the Center for Biological Diversity and to Michael Finkelstein for their invaluable assistance with this project. The decades of research by so many members of the scientific community whose published work is cited herein are also gratefully acknowledged. Protection of the polar bear would not be possible without the hard and selfless efforts of the researchers and managers who have devoted their careers to the understanding and protection of this magnificent animal. Authors: Kassie Siegel and Brendan Cummings, Center for Biological Diversity Page i – Petition to List the Polar Bear as a Threatened Species; Before the Secretary of the Interior 2-16-2005 Executive Summary Introduction The polar bear (Ursus maritimus) faces likely global extinction in the wild by the end of this century as result of global warming. The species’ sea-ice habitat is literally melting away. The federal Endangered Species Act (“ESA”) requires the protection of a species as “Threatened” if it “is likely to become an endangered species within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range.” 16 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Seasonal Summary North American Arctic Waters Summer 2019 by the Canadian Ice Service
    Seasonal Summary North American Arctic Waters Summer 2019 By the Canadian Ice Service Summary over North American Arctic Waters The early fracture of ice in southeastern Beaufort Sea, northern Baffin Bay and northwestern Hudson Bay led to below normal ice conditions during the first part of the 2019 season. In fact, rapid ice decrease in the southeastern Beaufort Sea area was due to persistent and strong southeasterly winds during the latter part of May. Hence, caused the pack ice to move towards the northwest. Temperatures over the area were also much above normal during the month. Meanwhile over Baffin Bay, Davis Strait and Foxe Basin, temperatures were also much above normal. These milder than normal temperatures conditioned the ice to melt at a faster than usual rate later in the summer. Conversely, certain parts of Hudson Bay as well as Frobisher Bay experienced slower than normal ice melt. In particular, the northwestern part of the Hudson Bay had greater that normal ice conditions due to abnormal southeasterly winds which pushed the ice towards the coast during the early part of the shipping season. Eventually, ice melt trended towards a more normal ice regime so that by the end of July virtually all the ice was gone in the area. A similar scenario developed in the southern part of Hudson Bay during the mid-period of the shipping season where anomalously strong northwesterly winds helped concentrate ice in that area. The impact was to delay the development of open water conditions in the area by about two to three weeks. Meanwhile, Frobisher Bay also saw an episode of southeasterly winds in early July, thus maintained higher than normal concentrations of ice until well into early August, which represented a delay of one to two weeks for bergy water conditions for the area.
    [Show full text]