School Improvement Plan s9

School Improvement Plan

School Name: Jenkins County Middle School System Name: Jenkins County

Principal Name: Randy Dailey School Year: 2010-2011

Title I Schoolwide Program: X Targeted Assistance:

Needs Improvement NI NI-AYP 0 1 2 3 4 5 Status:

6 7 8 9 10 11

Sanctions Implementing (Select all that apply): School Improvement Plan (The school improvement plan is submitted to the system per system guidelines. Needs Improvement X schools will submit plans to the system for approval in October of each year).

Public School Choice

Supplemental Educational Services (SES) Corrective Action Addendum (The corrective action addendum is completed by the system by the end of January of each year.)

Corrective Action Tier

State Directed Improvement Contract

Principal’s Signature: Date:

Title I Director’s Signature: Date:

Superintendent’s Signature: Date:

117 School Improvement Plan

6 7 8 9 10 11

Supplemental Educational Services (SES)

School Improvement Plan (continued)

Principal Name: Randy Dailey School Year: 2010-2011 Measurable Goals: Measurable Goal #1: TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ MATH SKILLS AS DEMONSTRATED BY SCORES ON THE CRCT.

ANNUAL MEASURABLE OBJECTIVE: The percentage of students meeting and exceeding standards on the 2010 CRCT will increase from 69.7% to 77% to exceed the Annual Measurable Objective (AMO) in math for the school year 2011 (75.7%).

SPECIFIC ACADEMIC AREAS WITHIN CONTENT AND SUBGROUPS TO ADDRESS:

6 7 8 9 10 11

A) Black Students: Percentage meeting/exceeding standard in Math in 2009-10: 57.6%: Goal: Percentage of students meeting/exceeding Math standard in 2010-2011: 63% (Safe Harbor of 10%) SWD: Percentage meeting/exceeding standard in Math in 2009-10: 14.3%: Goal: Percentage of students meeting/exceeding Math standard in 2010-2011: 17% (Safe Harbor of 10%) Hispanic: Percentage meeting/exceeding standard in Math in 2009-10: 81.8%: Goal: Percentage of students meeting/exceeding Math standard in 2010-2011: 90% EDD: Percentage meeting/exceeding standard in Math in 2009-10: 69.7%: Goal: Percentage of students meeting/exceeding Math standard in 2010-2011: 77% White: Percentage meeting/exceeding standard in Math in 2009-10: 82.5%: Goal: Percentage of students Math meeting/exceeding standard in 2010-2011: 91% B) The following identified domains of weakness will be addressed:

6 7 8 9 10 11

Supplemental Educational Services (SES) 1) 6th grade – measurement (65% correct) and data analysis (67% correct). 2) 7th grade – number and operations (43% correct), and data analysis and probability (59% correct). 3) 8th grade – number and operations (59% correct) and algebra (59% correct). **Percentages in parenthesis reflect the current groups’ average correct on each domain for the spring 2010 CRCT.

Measurable Goal #2: TO INCREASE THE PERCENTAGE OF STUDENTS EXCEEDING STANDARDS IN READING ON THE CRCT.

Annual Measurable Objective: (to be measured on 2011 CRCT) -The current 6th grade group, which had 11% in the exceeding category (5th grade 2010 CRCT), will show an increase to 15% in the exceeding category. -The current 7th grade group, which had 24% in the exceeding category (6th grade 2010 CRCT), will show an increase to 28% in the exceeding category.

6 7 8 9 10 11

Supplemental Educational Services (SES) -The current 8th grade group, which 16% in the exceeding category (7th grade 2010 CRCT), will show an increase to 20% in the exceeding category.

Specific academic areas within the content and subgroups to address: A) the following domain of weakness will be addressed: Literary comprehension - current 6th grade group 67% - current 7th grade group 66% - current 8th grade group 68% B) The percentage of students with disabilities meeting and exceeding standards will increase from 54.3% (2010 CRCT) to 59%.

6 7 8 9 10 11

Supplemental Educational Services (SES) Measurable Goal #3: TO INCREASE THE PERCENTAGE OF STUDENTS SCORING IN THE EXCEEDS CATEGORY BY 5% AS MEASURED ON THE 2011 8TH GRADE WRITING ASSESSMENT.

6 7 8 9 10 11

Measurable Goal #4: TO IMPROVE STUDENT’S KNOWLEDGE BASE IN SCIENCE AS DEMONSTRATED BY SCORES ON THE CRCT.

ANNUAL MEASURABLE OBJECTIVE: (to be measured on the Spring 2011 CRCT and quarterly using Data Director, as it becomes available.)

SPECIFIC ACADEMIC AREAS WITHIN CONTENT AND SUBGROUPS TO ADDRESS: The 6th grade overall objective will be an 8.1% improvement on the 814 average CRCT score. The subgroup percentages will be determined as data becomes available. The 7th grade overall objective will be an 8.0% improvement on the 808 average CRCT score. The subgroup percentages for all subgroups will be 7.9% improvement on the 785 average CRCT score. The 8th grade overall objective will be an 8.2% improvement on the 817 average CRCT score. The subgroup percentages for all subgroups will be 7.9% improvement on the 787 average CRCT score.

6 7 8 9 10 11

Supplemental Educational Services (SES) Measurable Goal #5: TO IMPROVE STUDENT’S KNOWLEDGE BASE IN SOCIAL STUDIES AS DEMONSTRATED BY SCORES ON THE CRCT.

ANNUAL MEASURABLE OBJECTIVE: (to be measured on the Spring 2011 CRCT and quarterly using Data Director, as it becomes available.)

SPECIFIC ACADEMIC AREAS WITHIN CONTENT AND SUBGROUPS TO ADDRESS: The 6th grade overall objective will be an 8.1% improvement on the 807 average CRCT score. The subgroup percentages will be determined as data becomes available. The 7th grade overall objective will be an 8.1% improvement on the 807 average CRCT score. The subgroup percentages for all subgroups will be 7.9% improvement on the 777 average CRCT score. The 8th grade overall objective will be an 8.2% improvement on the 820 average CRCT score. The subgroup percentages for all subgroups will be

6 7 8 9 10 11

Supplemental Educational Services (SES) 7.7% improvement on the 771 average CRCT score. These scores are based upon the CRCT scores from the 2010 5th, 6th, and 7th grade tests. s

y Evaluation of Implementation s e d

K of Strategies and

n Actions, Strategies, and Estimated Costs, Funding Person(s) l a

o Timeline Impact on Student Learning r o

t Interventions Sources, and Resources Responsible h S

c Artifacts Evidence S

6 7 8 9 10 11

Supplemental Educational Services (SES) Curriculum

1.1 Use the Oncourse Lesson August Oncourse $27.48/user x 24 Content Area Posted Lesson Benchmark 1.2 Planning Program to 2010- = $659.52 Teachers Plans Assessments 1.3 electronically record lesson plans May CRCT results 2.1 2011 Agendas Student Work 3.1 Establish content meetings for Minutes Progress Reports vertical alignment Gizmo’s Website $1800.00 Pacing Guide Report Cards Student Work Plan horizontally by grade for Curriculum- interdisciplinary curriculum Maps

6 7 8 9 10 11

Supplemental Educational Services (SES) Utilize Curriculum maps to align Quia subscription each GPS to Frameworks teacher 39.00 per user x 10 users= $390.00 Prepare pacing guides for lesson Supplemental review and lesson guidance instructional materials- consumables $500.00 All subject teachers use CRCT test preparation books to provide students with test practice

Utilize STEM lab resources and activities STEM GRANT STEM

6 7 8 9 10 11

Supplemental Educational Services (SES) Projects/Reports Reflect alignment with Academic GPS across the curriculum; 25- Science, social studies, and facilitators; book reading standard across the math periodicals $900; content curriculum $1000 books for classroom teachers (classroom libraries in content libraries, $250 schoolwide areas; periodicals) book circulation

6 7 8 9 10 11

Supplemental Educational Services (SES) Assessment Use of DATA Director to analyze August Data Director Content Area data relating to student 2010- 325 students x $5.50 per performance, assign remediation, May student = $1,788 + $792 tutoring, co teaching, small 2011 (1/3 of training cost) = 1.4 group instruction $2,580 2.1 2.2 DATA Director Classroom Test $1.75 per student x 350 = 2.3 Question Bank $612.50 3.1 Continue to use zones of Teachers Individual Benchmark proximal development and point Renaissance Learning Math GTO & Student Report assessments goals in reading as needed to yearly hosting fee $399; Enrichment Writing to Win CRCT results

6 7 8 9 10 11

Supplemental Educational Services (SES) adjust for remediation and AR/STAR $1900; Teacher Student journals Student Work acceleration 3 student computers Special Ed. and wall charts Progress Reports (Accelerated Reader, STAR (Acree) $2025; Teachers Lesson plans Report Cards Reading, Reader’s Workshop) Classroom libraries Pacing Guides update $500; ELA teachers; Use Study Island online program SPED Status of class STAR testing; for student review and teachers; ELA records; TOPS benchmarks; self-assessment academic reports; AR / CRCT facilitator STAR computer USA Testprep online program USATestprep Website management $600.00 system reports; student reading

6 7 8 9 10 11

Supplemental Educational Services (SES) logs

Administration of 9 weeks test

GA DOE Online Assessment Content, Curriculum Benchmarks; three System utilized to create student Special Ed. maps, units, framework assessments Connection tasks, GPS from assessments; August Teachers gastandards.org CRCT 2010 Writing To Win utilized across May Content Area Wall Posters Mock Writing Test content areas 2011 Teachers Student Journals Scores

6 7 8 9 10 11

Supplemental Educational Services (SES) Mock Writing 8th Grade Writing Test Test Scores Implementation of Math Frameworks from GA DOE www.georgiastandards.org

Instruction Incorporate a READ 180 reading August $3000 yearly support plan; READ 180 Scholastic Lexile scores 1.1 intervention class for each grade 2010- rbooks, novels, and teacher –L. Reading SRI results 1.2 level May audiobooks – resupply as Rhodes; ELA Inventory CRCT 1.3 (teacher will also be a co teaching 2011 needed $300 Academic reports; READ

6 7 8 9 10 11

Supplemental Educational Services (SES) 2.1 teacher for each grade ELA) Facilitator 180 reports; 2.2 Student 2.3 folders/logs for 2.5 Remediation Classes for Pyramid of Interventions Gaskin, reading/ 2.6 Struggling /At-Risk Students in Student data (CRCT, Clemens, computer time 2.7 Math and Reading benchmarks, and student Adams, work) Rhodes Benchmark assessments

Incorporate a direct instruction Supplemental resources Reading Skills Pre and Post End of program reading intervention program for SRA Corrective teacher, S. Tests mastery tests; for reading remediation classes Reading program Adams; 2 placement tests

6 7 8 9 10 11

Supplemental Educational Services (SES) in grades 6 & 7 (SRA Corrective decoding skills B1, B2, & SPED CRCT Results Reading Decoding C $630; teachers; 6th Training cd $64 grade ELA Student Work teacher Progress Reports Teach students test-taking Materials gathered, Content area Student strategies / study skills to use compiled by academic teachers workbooks; mid- Benchmark with standardized testing and facilitators program mastery Assessments daily assignments tests CRCT Results Continue to use technology to Study Island subscription Student Tests Report Cards supplement, support, and $4170; and Grades

6 7 8 9 10 11

Supplemental Educational Services (SES) enhance the curriculum BrainPOP $975; Academy Posted GPS ( ex.Study Island, BrainPOP, of Reading and Math Lesson plans of within classroom Academy of Reading and Math, $2975; edhelper.com $150; connections Online Assessment System, CPS System $2700 teachers for time edhelper.com) frame

Provide Enrichment Classroom Instruction for Accelerated Learners Enrichment Teacher Provide GTO Program for Math GTO Data Reports

6 7 8 9 10 11

Supplemental Educational Services (SES) Accelerated Learners

Inclusion Classroom Instruction Regular Ed. provided for cross curricular and Special academic progress and Ed. achievement Teachers

Co-Teaching Classroom Math and La Instruction in Math and L/A content provided for at-risk and teachers, enrichment instruction Rhodes, Clemens

6 7 8 9 10 11

Supplemental Educational Services (SES) Implementation of GPS Development/Implementation of alternative teaching strategies to assist students in jeopardy for not achieving SIP goals in Science.

Utilize supportive instruction for SPED August Provide weekly 20 minute 2010 tutoring classes in content areas May

6 7 8 9 10 11

Supplemental Educational Services (SES) during instruction 2011

Professional Learning ELA Teachers Student Portfolios 8th Grade Writing Utilize Writing Workshop model Workshops -- $1000 SPED Teacher Lesson Test across Language Arts Content Professional Learning Teachers Plans CRCT classrooms Materials -- $500 (Black, Norris, Content Meeting & Daniel) Minutes Academic Registration and Facilitator Conference Materials

6 7 8 9 10 11

$775.00 per workstation x Supplement /Upgrade/Replace 8 workstations = $6200.00 teacher workstations in order to (4 Year Rotational effectively integrate existing and Replacement Program) newly acquired technology in the curriculum design, development, implementation, and evaluation process.

6 7 8 9 10 11

Supplemental Educational Services (SES) Planning and Organization 2.1 Participate in the System August SIT teams and Logs, agendas, Lack of gaps and 2.3 Improvement Team vertical 2010- committees and reports of dips on system- 3.2 planning to align curriculum, May (ES/MS/HS committee wide data analyze and disaggregate data, 2011 representatives meetings (CRCT/GHSGT) and determine trends and patterns in order to plan for Design Team Lesson Plans instruction needs and develop action plan Content Area Agendas Teachers

6 7 8 9 10 11

Supplemental Educational Services (SES) Minutes Implementation and Monitoring Administrators of School Improvement Plan

Student, Family, and Provide Mathematics Newsletter August Learning Village Math Teachers Community to parents for each Instructional 2010- Involvement Unit available. May and Support 2011

6 7 8 9 10 11

2.3 Weekly newsletter sent to Content parents including teachers, grades/behaviors Public Relations Increase opportunities for parent Committee involvement to promote and improve student academic achievement in science.

Parent workshops for M/S science. Ex: astronomy, genetics,

6 7 8 9 10 11

Supplemental Educational Services (SES) simple machines

Professional Develop a professional learning August Professional learning Administration Lesson Plans Unit plans Learning plan supportive of the teaching 2010- funds $1000.00 Academic Pacing Guides Student work of interdisciplinary units May Facilitators PL1.2 2011 Content PL2.1 Schedule professional learning STEM grant funds teachers STEM PL2 opportunities associated with Projects/Reports STEM lab usage

6 7 8 9 10 11

GTO Conference Profession learning GTO Teacher Student Unit plans funding $1400 generated work Student work Use of PD360 for individualized, samples/portfolios small group, or school-wide professional development Math Content Teachers Math content teachers will October Profession learning attend GCTM (Georgia Council 13-15, funding $900 of Teachers of Mathematics) 2010 Math Conference at Rock Eagle.

6 7 8 9 10 11

Supplemental Educational Services (SES) Georgia School Counselors Profession learning Conference funding $800

Faculty & Staff will actively 2010- Administration Sign-ins System collaborate in System 2011 Substitute teachers (Title SIT members Agendas Improvement Plan Improvement Team & System School II-A) CSRA RESA Minutes Content Area teams for vertical Year planning activities including data analysis, goal setting, strategy development, monitoring, and evaluation

6 7 8 9 10 11