DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix C South Tyneside Local Plan Character Area Profiles

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

South Tyneside Sustainability Appraisal (Scoping Report): Appendix C South Tyneside Local Plan Character Area Profiles August 2018 1 South Tyneside Local Plan Character Area Profile: Inner South Shields Character area Inner South Shields comprises the Beacon and Bents ward. South Shields town centre is the largest in South Tyneside and provides the principal commercial, size: 318 ha retail, leisure, community and tourism location. This is flanked by the riverside and foreshore areas, with surrounding residential and employment areas to the north and south. It is a key location in Tyne & Wear and benefits from good accessibility, including metro/bus public transport interchange and direct ferry link Population: to North Tyneside. 10,504 Landscape Town Centre - South Shields Centre includes the central business district of the town and principal commercial area. Shops are focused along King Street, with Character Study: retail parks and industrial estates extending south. There is also extensive car parking on the edges of the town centre. townscape/ Riverside - South Shields Riverside a mix of industrial, commercial, cultural, residential and vacant land. Ongoing large-scale redevelopment will substantially landscape alter the character of the area. qualities Residential - The Lawe and Ocean Road is predominantly residential with a commercial strip extending from the town centre to the foreshore with a distinctive concentration of curry houses and B&Bs/Guest Houses. Westoe is also predominantly residential with the Westoe Bridges district shopping centre. Open Space – Key areas of open space are situated along the riverside and coastal areas. South Shields Foreshore provides registered historic parks, recreation grounds, beaches and the northern parts of the Coastal Leas. There is a major new park at Harton Quay being developed with views along the river. What is the policy context? The Local Development Framework Core Strategy (2007) and South Shields Town Centre & Waterfront Area Action Plan (AAP) (2008) set out that the spatial strategy for the Inner South Shields area and are supported by the South Shields Regeneration Plan and SPD8: the South Shields Riverside Regeneration Area. Policies seek to: Strengthen and promote the growth of the town centre Support South Shields as the principal centre for shopping, entertainment and leisure. Establish the foreshore as a destination of choice for visitors and tourists Redevelop the riverside as a high quality location for urban living, leisure and employment Conservation Area Management Plans (SPD 19 & 20) for the Mariners Cottages and Mill Dam Conservation Areas, set out the guidelines for the management and protection of the historic assets in these areas. The ‘South Shields 365 town centre vision’ document (2013) outlines ambitious plans to creating an expanded retail and leisure offer in a vibrant town centre. Opportunities include a new retail and high quality family-friendly leisure developments with improved access in the ‘Town Centre’. The ‘Riverside’ has potential for new leisure, cultural and commercial activity, as well as residential at ‘Holborn’. The ‘Foreshore’ has the opportunity to increase its visitors and extend the season. What is the baseline situation? Biodiversity: Flora & Fauna SA Issue Baseline Information Comparator or target Source Comment Implications for Local Plan European Sites Northumbrian Coast SPA & Ramsar Site N/A JNCC The coastline in this character area is designated as part of The biodiversity value of the Number of SSSI’s and Durham Coast SSSI – 140.99 ha There are 5 SSSI’s in South Tyneside Natural England (2013) the Northumbrian Coast SPA and Ramsar site. It is also Inner South Shields character Area (ha) covering 158.8 ha identified as a SSSI’s which is recorded to be in ‘favourable’ area is an important asset to Condition of SSSI’s Durham Coast SSSI : Favourable 96% favourable condition in South condition. There is also 2 Local Wildlife Sites in this the borough. The Local Plan Tyneside character area. should seek to protect and Number and Area (ha) 1. South Marine Park Lake (0.9 ha) There are 52 Local Wildlife Sites in South Tyneside Council enhance these assets. of Local Wildlife Sites 2. South Shields Dunes (12.1 ha) South Tyneside Human Health SA Issue Baseline Information Comparator or target Source Comment Implications for Local Plan Life Expectancy Beacon & Bents M: 74.5 F: 81 South Tyneside : M 77.2 F 81.7 JNSA 2012 Life expectancy for both males and females and the Seek to improve life Obese Children Reception Year (4 -5 yrs) : 10.2% South Tyneside: 10.9% Public Health England percentage of adults eating healthily is lower than the expectancy Year 6 (10-11 yrs): 22.4% South Tyneside: 22.9% (2016) borough average. However childhood obesity and reported Seek to promote and Obese Adults Beacon & Bents: 26.1% South Tyneside: 27.4% http://www.localhealth levels of binge drinking are lower than the borough encourage opportunities for Binge drinking adults Beacon & Bents: 27.4% South Tyneside: 28.7% .org.uk average. healthy lifestyle choices Healthy eating adults Beacon & Bents: 19.4 % South Tyneside: 19.8% through the Local Plan. 1 Natural Assets SA Issue Baseline Information Comparator or target Source Comment Implications for Local Plan Area (ha) Inner South Shields: 318 ha South Tyneside area: 6,443ha South Tyneside Council The Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA) (2010) Protect the Inner South Flood Risk Zones Sea front and the riverside: identifies that there are a range of flooding issues in Inner Shields Character area from Functional and tidal Flood Risk Zone 3 and Flood Risk Zone 2. South Shields, predominantly along the sea front and the the risk of surface water Critical Drainage Areas Critical Drainage Areas 3a: This area has numerous historical flooding events and is at riverside, comprising functional and tidal Flood Risk Zone 3 flooding and any potential risk from surface water flooding. and Flood Risk Zone 2. There are various flood defences to risk of coastal flooding Historic Flood Risk South Shields Town Centre: 152 Flood Risk incidents in South address these issues with a current project being exacerbated by climate Ocean Road – 7 reported events. Tyneside. implemented at Littlehaven Beach, together with the change Westoe Road – 5 reported events realignment of the sea wall defences, promenade and car Continue to protect parks along Harbour Drive. There are also areas of varying Geodiversity Sites There is 1 geodiversity site in the Inner There are 6 geodiversity sites in South geodiversity sites in this vulnerability to surface water flooding. South Shields Character area: Tyneside – Total Hectares: 36.8 ha character area. Consider any landscape South Shields Dunes (12.1 ha) The South Shields Dunes, measuring 12.1ha, provide the designations in this area. Green Belt There is no Green Belt in the Inner South South Tyneside Green Belt area: 2,396 only geodiversity site in the character area. The coastal Shields character area. (ha) area is also identified as the Limestone Coast designation Landscape Local Development Framework: None identified. Limestone Landscapes by the Limestone Landscape partnership. Designations Landscape Character Study: None identified Partnership Limestone Landscape Designations: Limestone Coast South Tyneside Council Air and Climatic Factors SA Issue Baseline Information Comparator or target Source Comment Implications for Local Plan Air Quality There are no AQMA’s in the Inner South There are 2 AQMA’s in South Tyneside South Tyneside Council The expected impacts of climate change are increased Consider potential climate Management Areas Shields character area. flood risk due to increased precipitation and sea level rise. change risks and deliver The coastal and riverside areas of this character area may relevant adaptations and Any known predicted See Baseline Information Topic- Climatic Factors, Sustainability and Energy be more susceptible to these risks. Furthermore, increase mitigation measures. climate change risks? wind speeds and storms in coastal areas may also pose a risk to buildings and infrastructure. Material Assets and Infrastructure SA Issue Baseline Information Comparator or target Source Comment Implications for Local Plan Key Infrastructure Key Infrastructure assets within the Inner South Shields character area include: South This area has good transport links with a public transport Consider the key assets and Assets South Tyneside’s principal commercial, retail, leisure, and tourism location. Tyneside Council interchange including metro and bus provision, the Shields functions of the character Transport The Inner South Shields character area is served by: Ferry, existing and proposed cycle routes and the A183 area. road infrastructure. Specific road infrastructure Infrastructure A183 Cycle routes South Shields bus Retain and where possible improvement requirements have been identified at the 1 metro station Shields Ferry station improve all forms of A194 Western Approach/A194 Crossgate/B1303 Station transport provision and Green Infrastructure See Baseline Information Topic- Green Belt & Green Infrastructure Road junction and the A1018 Westoe Road and its junction highway issues in this Allotment Provision There are no allotment sites n the Inner There are 23 Council owned allotment sites at Westoe Bridges. character area. South Shields Character Area. in South Tyneside providing 1347 plots. If possible seek to provide Quality of Children’s
Recommended publications
  • Contents. Proceedings at the Nomination. Page Polling Districts

    Contents. Proceedings at the Nomination. Page Polling Districts

    E S CONT NT . i Proceedings at the Nominat on . PAGE Polling Districts Castle Eden 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Gateshead Heworth Hetton - le -Hole J arrow Lanchester Seaham Harbour Shotley Bridge South Shields Sunderland Winlaton Analysis of the P011 A nalysis o f Districts A l o f n na yses Tow ships O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Index of Townships RE F E RE N CE S l l f ll made to Doub e Entries in the Voting Co umns , where the o owing ‘ evi ations are used to denote other Districts CE for Castle Eden L for Lanchester CS Chester -le - Street SH Seaham Harbour D Durham SB Shotley Bridge G Gateshead SS South Shields H Heworth S Sunderland HH Hetton -le - Hole Wh Whickham J J arrow Wn Winlaton are l l Doub e Entries occur in the same District, the numbers on y are a—m PROCEEDING S AT THE NOMINATION . The Nomination for the Northern Division of the County o f Durham . l l ook p ace in the Market P ace , Durham , (the County Courts being i 2 oth o f 1 8 6 8 . nder repair) , on Friday, the November, . U ff Of . W E WOOLER, ESQ IRE , Under Sheri , Returning ficer _ SIR WI IA O of ll HEDWORTH LL MS N , BARONET , Whitburn Ha , was - of Elemore ll proposed by Henry John Baker Baker, Esquire , Ha , of f and seconded by Joseph Laycock, Esquire , Low Gos orth, l - - Newcast e upon Tyne .
  • BRI 51 1 Shorter-Contributions 307..387

    BRI 51 1 Shorter-Contributions 307..387

    318 SHORTER CONTRIBUTIONS An Early Roman Fort at Thirkleby, North Yorkshire By MARTIN MILLETT and RICHARD BRICKSTOCK ABSTRACT This paper reports the discovery through aerial photography of a Roman fort at Thirkleby, near Thirsk in North Yorkshire. It appears to have two structural phases, and surface finds indicate that it dates from the Flavian period. The significance of its location on the intersection of routes north–south along the edge of the Vale of York and east–west connecting Malton and Aldborough is discussed in the context of Roman annexation of the North. Keywords: Thirkleby; Roman fort; Roman roads; Yorkshire INTRODUCTION The unusually dry conditions in northern England in the summer of 2018 produced a substantial crop of new sites discovered through aerial photography. By chance, the Google Earth satellite image coverage for parts of Yorkshire has been updated with a set of images taken on 1 July 2018, during the drought. Amongst the numerous sites revealed in this imagery – often in areas where crop-marks are rarely visible – is a previously unknown Roman fort (FIG.1).1 The site (SE 4718 7728) lies just to the west of the modern A19, on the southern side of the Thirkleby beck at its confluence with the Carr Dike stream, about 6 km south-east of Thirsk. It is situated on level ground at a height of about 32 m above sea level on the southern edge of the flood plain of the beck, which is clearly visible on the aerial images. A further narrow relict stream bed runs beside it to the south-east.
  • Vol. 11 No. 1 the JOURNAL of the NORTHUMBERLAND & DURHAM

    Vol. 11 No. 1 the JOURNAL of the NORTHUMBERLAND & DURHAM

    THE JOURNAL OF THE NORTHUMBERLAND & DURHAM FAMILY HISTORY SOCIETY Vol. 11 No. 1 Spring, 1986 CONTENTS Editorial ...............................................................................................,.............................. 2 News in Brief ........................................................................................................................ The Autumn Meetings ............................................................................................................ 3 Durham Group ...................................................................................................................... 3 South Tyneside Group . .......................................................................................................... 4 Formation of new Group........................................................................................................... 4 Data Protection Act 1984 . .......................................................................................... Bob Vine 4 Future Programme . ................................................................................................................ Following the Trail . .......................................................................................................... 5 Conference News ................................................................................................................... 6 Letters to the Editor ..............................................................................................................
  • Yorkshire GREEN Corridor and Preliminary Routeing and Siting Study

    Yorkshire GREEN Corridor and Preliminary Routeing and Siting Study

    Yorkshire GREEN Project – Corridor and Preliminary Routeing and Siting Study Report Yorkshire GREEN Project Corridor and Preliminary Routeing and Siting Study (YG-NSC-00001) National Grid National Grid House Warwick Technology Park Gallows Hill Warwick CV34 6DA Final - March 2021 Yorkshire GREEN Project – Corridor and Preliminary Routeing and Siting Study Report Page intentionally blank Yorkshire GREEN Project – Corridor and Preliminary Routeing and Siting Study Report Document Control Document Properties Organisation AECOM Ltd Author Alison Williams Approved by Michael Williams Title Yorkshire GREEN Project – Corridor and Preliminary Routeing and Siting Study Report Document Reference YG-NSC-00001 Version History Date Version Status Description/Changes 02 March 2021 V8 Final version Yorkshire GREEN Project – Corridor and Preliminary Routeing and Siting Study Report Page intentionally blank Yorkshire GREEN Project – Corridor and Preliminary Routeing and Siting Study Report Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Overview and Purpose 1 1.2 Background and Need 3 1.3 Description of the Project 3 1.4 Structure of this Report 7 1.5 The Project Team 7 2. APPROACH TO ROUTEING AND SITING 8 2.1 Overview of National Grid’s Approach 8 2.2 Route and Site Selection Process 11 2.3 Overview of Stages of Development 11 3. THE STUDY AREA 16 3.1 Introduction 16 3.2 York North Study Area 16 3.3 Tadcaster Study Area 17 3.4 Monk Fryston Study Area 17 4. YORK NORTH OPTIONS APPRAISAL 19 4.1 Approach to Appraisal 19 4.2 CSEC Siting Area Identification 19 4.3 Substation Siting Area Identification 19 4.4 Overhead Line Routeing Identification 20 4.5 Combination Options 20 4.6 Screening of York North Options 24 4.7 Options Appraisal Summary of Remaining York North Options 28 4.8 The Holford Rules and Horlock Rules 76 4.9 York North Preferred Option 76 5.
  • Project Orpheus Phase 1B Sift Recommendations

    Project Orpheus Phase 1B Sift Recommendations

    PROJECT ORPHEUS PHASE 1B SIFT RECOMMENDATIONS Report Final 6th March 2003 Prepared for: Prepared by: Nexus Steer Davies Gleave Jacobs Gibb Ernst & Young CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 3 Context 3 Summary of Approach and Recommendations 3 2. ISSUES TO CONSIDER IN APPRAISAL OF PHASE 1A ROUTES 5 Phase 1A Pre-feasibility NATA Assessment 5 Demand and Benefit Estimate Risks and Opportunities 5 Cost Estimate Risks and Opportunities 7 Practicality / Implementability Risks and Opportunities 9 Future Potential Changes in Appraisal Guidance 11 Potential Synergy between Orpheus Extensions and Other Policy Measures Under Consideration in Achieving Local Transport Plan Objectives 11 Potential Impacts 11 Appraisal Issues 12 Metro Financial Performance 13 Indicative Timescales for Implementation of Wider Policy Measures 13 3. RECOMMENDATIONS 15 Summary 15 Asset Renewal Issues 19 Recommended Short-term Phase 1B Actions 19 \\Douglas\Work\Projects\4800s\4884\Outputs\Working Notes\Phase 1B Sift Recommendations _ Final Report.doc 2 1. INTRODUCTION Context 1.1 The purpose of this working note is to present to Nexus and their study partners the recommendations of the Orpheus study team arising from the review process undertaken during the initial stage of the Phase 1B study. The note summarises the potential risks and opportunities in the route-based analysis of the ten shortlisted Orpheus extensions that were identified as being likely to generate significant benefits during Phase 1A, and draws conclusions regarding the case for their continued inclusion in Orpheus. In the final section, two potential approaches to the remainder of the Phase 1B process are set out for discussion, and a number of short-term action recommendations are listed.
  • Sunderland N E

    Sunderland N E

    Sunderland_Main_Map.qxd:Sunderland 3/12/10 09:14 Page 1 B O To Cleadon To Whitburn, Marsden ET K Supermarket RE 558 E and South Shields A N E and South Shields ST R D R L A P&R M O O D L O RE N R Cornthwaite F . Cineworld N IL Grange 9 O W Park Park 558 N Boldon 26 R 30 I O East Boldon 558.E1 T E D R I V E F R O T 30 H I N T A L A N E E2.E6 30 R D S S T 50 A A C E T R E Boldon H E R R E T 50A R T Business Y (50) O 30 A N 9 A R 9 R X34 D E M O O W 1 Park T A S WAY E Y N W E E D N O T L I 18 R W D 19 35 A G N E BRANSDA S A D LE A 18.19 T N L SOUTH VE. I E . I P R N B D E E EAST A A A D WEST V B R O BENTS E A BOLDON N O N BOLDON W I S Regal Sunderland R D U A D S U Greyhound Stadium SOUTHBENTS AVE. B N T D E 18 I 19 H R L A W N D E N A R O L A D L Supermarket L S I H 9 H I W h i t b u r n N 99 50 E (50) 50A W 26 Boldon L B a y O D D .
  • ST2495 Barton Willmore LVA GBR751.42KB

    ST2495 Barton Willmore LVA GBR751.42KB

    South Tyneside: Landscape and Visual Appraisal and Green Belt Review Prepared on behalf of Church Commissioners For England October 2019 South Tyneside: Landscape and Visual Appraisal and Green Belt Review Prepared on behalf of Church Commissioners For England Project Ref: 29611 29611 Status: Draft Final Issue/ Rev: 01 02 Date: 27 Sept 2019 October 2019 Prepared by: JT/JG JT/JG Checked by: CM CM Authorised by: Barton Willmore LLP 7 Soho Square London W1D 3QB Ref: 29611 Date: October 2019 Status: Final COPYRIGHT The contents of this document must not be copied or reproduced in whole or in part without the written consent of Barton Willmore LLP. All Barton Willmore stationery is produced using recycled or FSC paper and vegetation oil based inks. CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Site Location & Context ............................................................................................... 2 3.0 Green Belt Policy & Guidance Review ............................................................................. 7 4.0 Comparative Landscape and Visual Appraisal & Green Belt Assessment .............................. 14 5.0 Summary ................................................................................................................. 38 ILLUSTRATIVE MATERIAL Figure 1 – Site Context Plan Figure 2 – Topographical Features Plan Figure 3 – Landscape Character Plan Figure 4a – Site 2 Figure 4b – Site 3 Figure 4c – Site 4 Figure
  • South Biddick and the Duke of Perth

    South Biddick and the Duke of Perth

    THE HISTORY AND ANTIQUITIES OF THE COUNTY PALATINE OF DURHAM; COMPRISING A CONDENSED ACCOUNT OF ITS NATURAL, CIVIL, AND ECCLESIASTICAL HISTORY, FROM THE EARLIEST PERIOD TO THE PRESENT TIME; ITS BOUNDARIES, ANCIENT PARISHES, AND RECENTLY FORMED PAROCHIAL DISTRICTS AND CHAPELRIES, AND PARLIAMENTARY AND MUNICIPAL DIVISIONS; ITS AGRICULTURE, MINERAL PRODUCTS. MANUFACTURES, 8HIPPING, DOCKS, RAILWAYS, AND GENERAL COMMERCE; ITS PUBLIC BUILDINGS, CHURCHES, CHAPELS, PAROCHIAL REGISTERS, LANDED GENTRY, HERALDIC VISITATIONS, LOCAL BIOGRAPHY, SCHOOLS, CHARITIES, SANITARY REPORTS, POPULATION, &c., COMPILED FROM PARLIAMENTARY AND OFFICIAL DOCUMENTS, PRIVATE INFORMATION. AND OTHER AUTHENTIC SOURCES. EMBELLISHED BY NUMEROUS ILLUSTRATIONS. “RETINENS VESTIGIA FAMŒ.”—Virgil. VOL II. BY WILLIAM FORDYCE. A. FULLARTON AND Co., 7, WESTGATE, NEWCASTLE, 106, NEWGATE STREET, LONDON, AND LEITH WALK, EDINBURGH. 1857. SOUTH BIDDICK. THIS township adjoins that of Penshaw on the southwest, and borders upon the Wear. It contains 343 acres. Its population, in 1801, was 490; in 1811, it had fallen to 141; in 1821, it had rallied to 167, and, in 1831, to 199; but in 1841, it had dropped to 74; and in 1851, it was only 38, of whom 17 were males and 21 females. In 1841, there were 15 inhabited houses, and 5 uninhabited; but in 1851, there were only 8 houses, all of which were inhabited. The annual value of property assessed to the county-rate in 1853 was 833l. The North-eastern Railway has an extent of 5F. 154Y., and an area of 5A. 2P. in this township. In 1851, it contributed 27l. 3s. 4d. to the local rates, and 28l. 10s. 6d. in 1852; the gross amounts collected in the respective years being 69l.
  • Third Local Transport Strategy 2011 to 2021

    Third Local Transport Strategy 2011 to 2021

    Keep Tyne and Wear Moving LTP3: The Third Local Transport Plan for Tyne and Wear Strategy 2011 - 2021 March 2011 Contents Foreword by the Chair of the ITA 2 Executive Summary Executive Summary i Part 1: Introduction and background Chapter 1 Introduction 2 1.1 About this document 2 1.2 Role of the Local Transport Plan 3 1.3 Building on the achievements of LTP2 3 1.4 Review of document 5 Chapter 2 Statutory assessments of the LTP 8 2.1 Introduction 8 2.2 Strategic Environmental Assessment 8 2.3 Health Impact Assessment 8 2.4 Equality Impact Assessment 9 2.5 Habitats Regulation Assessment 9 Chapter 3 Changes from Draft to Final 12 3.1 Listening to transport users 12 3.2 Summary of responses 13 3.3 Summary of changes 15 Chapter 4 Context 22 4.1 Policy context 22 4.2 Transport geography of Tyne and Wear 27 4.2.1 Overview 27 4.2.2 Tyne and Wear's transport network 30 4.3 Socio-economic background 41 4.4 Sustainability Baseline and Key Issues 47 4.5 Trends and forecasts 49 Part 2: Objectives, key issues and challenges Chapter 5 The Vision 56 Chapter 6 Supporting economic development and regeneration 59 6.1 Regeneration goals 59 Tyne and Wear Local Transport Plan 3 Strategy 2011-21 Contents 6.2 Reduce the gap between Tyne and Wear's economic growth rate and other English regions 61 6.3 Reliability and predictability of journey times 61 6.4 Connectivity and access to labour markets 62 6.5 Housing provision 64 6.6 Resilience 64 Chapter 7 Addressing climate change 67 7.1 Introduction 67 7.2 Targets 69 7.3 Forecasts for Tyne and Wear 72 7.4 Meeting
  • Statement of Common Ground Natural England

    Statement of Common Ground Natural England

    A19 / A184 Testo’s Junction Improvement TR010020 7.7(1) Statement of Common Ground Natural England Planning Act 2008 Rule 8(1)(e) Infrastructure Planning (Examination Procedure) Rules 2010 Volume 7 March 2018 A19 / A184 Testo’s Junction Improvement Statement of Common Ground – Natural England Infrastructure Planning Planning Act 2008 The Infrastructure Planning (Examination Procedure) Rules 2010 A19 / A184 TESTO’S JUNCTION IMPROVEMENT The A19 / A184 (Testo’s Junction Improvement) Development Consent Order 201[ ] ______________________________________________ Statement of Common Ground – Natural England ______________________________________________ Regulation Number: Rule 8(1)(e) Planning Inspectorate Scheme TR010020 Reference Application Document Reference TR010020/APP/7.7(1) Author: A19 Project Team, Highways England & Jacobs Version Date Status of Version Rev 1 March 2018 Updated for Examination Deadline 5 Rev 0 November 2017 Submitted for Examination Deadline 1 Planning Inspectorate Scheme Ref: TR010020 Application Document Ref: TR010020/APP/7.7(1) (Volume 7) A19 / A184 Testo’s Junction Improvement Statement of Common Ground – Natural England Page Left Intentionally Blank Planning Inspectorate Scheme Ref: TR010020 Application Document Ref: TR010020/APP/7.7(1) (Volume 7) A19 / A184 Testos Junction Improvement Development Consent Order Planning Inspectorate Reference: TR010020 Statement of Common Ground Between HIGHWAYS ENGLAND and NATURAL ENGLAND Document control Document properties Parties Highways England and Natural England Author
  • Research on Weather Conditions and Their Relationship to Crashes December 31, 2020 6

    Research on Weather Conditions and Their Relationship to Crashes December 31, 2020 6

    INVESTIGATION OF WEATHER CONDITIONS AND THEIR RELATIONSHIP TO CRASHES 1 Dr. Mark Anderson 2 Dr. Aemal J. Khattak 2 Muhammad Umer Farooq 1 John Cecava 3 Curtis Walker 1. Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences 2. Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering University of Nebraska-Lincoln Lincoln, NE 68583-0851 3. National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO Sponsored by Nebraska Department of Transportation and U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration December 31, 2020 TECHNICAL REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. SPR-21 (20) M097 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Research on Weather conditions and their relationship to crashes December 31, 2020 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Dr. Mark Anderson, Dr. Aemal J. Khattak, Muhammad Umer Farooq, John 26-0514-0202-001 Cecava, Dr. Curtis Walker 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. University of Nebraska-Lincoln 2200 Vine Street, PO Box 830851 11. Contract or Grant No. Lincoln, NE 68583-0851 SPR-21 (20) M097 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Nebraska Department of Transportation NDOT Final Report 1500 Nebraska 2 Lincoln, NE 68502 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 15. Supplementary Notes Conducted in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. 16. Abstract The objectives of the research were to conduct a seasonal investigation of when winter weather conditions are a factor in crashes reported in Nebraska, to perform statistical analyses on Nebraska crash and meteorological data and identify weather conditions causing the significant safety concerns, and to investigate whether knowing the snowfall amount and/or storm intensity/severity could be a precursor to the number and severity of crashes.
  • Water Hardness

    Water Hardness

    Water hardness Northumbrian Water is responsible for supplying a reliable source of safe, clean, drinking water. The majority of the company supply area is soft to slightly hard. Why some water is hard If your water comes from underground limestone or chalk rocks, or contains a proportion of groundwater, then the chances are that it is hard. The hardness is caused by the presence of minerals dissolved from the ground and rocks by the water. Northumbrian Water is compliant with the appropriate regulations and has no plans to introduce softening to hard water areas. Please find below a PDF document of the water hardness for the Northumbrian Water area, along with the measurement of hardness in degrees Clarke, for use with dishwashers and washing machines. You can check out how hard the water is in your area here by viewing the harness zones. What does this mean for my appliances? If your water is hard you will notice that your kettle and other water heating appliances become furred up with a white scale. You may also find this scale in your bath, sink and shower. It isn't harmful but can be a bit of a nuisance. Hard water can also affect appliances like washing machines, dishwashers and steam irons. If you are installing a new dishwasher, your plumber may ask you for the hardness of your water. If the manufacturer’s instructions show hardness using a different factor, you can convert the values as follows: x 2.5 = calcium carbonate (CaCO3) mg/l x 0.174 = Degrees Clarke Total hardness (as mg/l Ca) x 0.25 = French Degrees x 0.142 = German Degrees We do not change the natural hardness of the region’s water through treatment, it is left to the customer, either domestic or commercial, to decide whether artificial softening is the right choice for them.