An analysis of elemental and PAH concentrations in soils due to vehicular traffic along the Manali-Leh Highway, northwestern
Himalaya, India
A thesis submitted to the Graduate School
of
The University of Cincinnati
in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of
Master of Science
in
Department of Geology
of
McMicken College of Arts and Sciences
by
Rajarshi Dasgupta
B.Sc. Honours (Geography), University of Calcutta, Kolkata, India, 2005
M.A. (Geography), Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India, 2008
March 2014
Advisory Committee:
Dr. Brooke E. Crowley (Chair)
Dr. J. Barry Maynard (Member)
Dr. Aaron F. Diefendorf (Member)
Dr. Lewis A. Owen (Member) ABSTRACT
Vehicles constitute one of the most important sources of environmental pollution. Most studies on roadside soil pollution have been carried out in urban areas, where the main fuel used is petrol. These studies indicate that the concentrations of heavy metals associated with vehicular movement decrease with increasing distance from the highway and with depth in the soil profile. In contrast, most of the vehicles that travel
along the Manali-Leh Highway in northwestern Himalaya, India are fueled by diesel. The present study
assessed the concentrations of the heavy metals (Al, Fe, Cr, Cu, Pb, Ni, Co, Zn, V and Ba), total organic
carbon (TOC), total sulphur and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) concentrations along this
highway. Soil samples were collected from four sites at incremental distances from the highway (0m, 2m,
5m, 10m, 20m and 150m) and from three depths in the soil profile (3cm, 9cm and 15cm). The concentrations
of the various elements were measured using X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometry and an Elemental Analyzer,
while those of the PAHs using Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry. Results suggest that heavy metal
concentrations are generally very low compared to those in other published studies. There is no clear
relationship between concentrations of heavy metals and either distance from the highway or depth within
the soil profile. However, elevated concentrations of sulphur are found in the soils. Cluster analysis was
applied to determine the association of various elements in the soil. There are six main clusters, which are
interpreted to be the organic, clay, carbonate, iron oxides, sand and silt and windblown deposited fractions
of the soil. This indicates that most of the metals are associated with the natural fractions of the soils.
Sulphur is found to be clustered with the organic fraction of the soils. PAHs are also found, albeit in very
low concentrations compared to other published studies on highways. The main conclusion of this study is
that at present, the amount of heavy metals in the soils along the Manali-Leh Highway is very low, but there
are elevated sulphur concentrations. High sulphur concentrations can increase soil acidity, which can have
important edaphic implications. The strong association of sulphur with TOC, Pb and Zn, as well as a strong
correlation between sulphur and PAHs suggests that the regular use of the road by an increasing number of
vehicles can contaminate the soil further with metals and PAHs, which may then move up the food chain
i and directly affect human health. The results of this study imply that monitoring of heavy metals alone suggests that there is no contamination of the soils, but by measuring sulphur, it has been shown that that there is, in fact, considerable human impacts along the highway. Therefore, both inorganic and organic pollutants should be regularly monitored in the soils along this highway.
ii
iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I would like to mention about a few individuals without whose continuous and endearing support, this thesis would not have seen the light of the day. First and foremost is my advisor, Dr. Brooke Crowley, who decided to take me under her tutelage, and supervised a thesis on a topic that was totally new to me. She has spent countless hours discussing my (often crazy!) research ideas, refining funding applications and reading many drafts of the thesis. Thank you very much Dr. Crowley. It was a pleasure to work with and learn from you. I particularly enjoyed learning the nuances of doing and communicating science. In the same vein, I wish to extend my sincere appreciation to the other members of my advisory committee, namely Dr. Barry Maynard, Dr. Aaron Diefendorf and Dr. Lewis Owen. In particular, Dr. Maynard was like a second advisor to me and provided many crucial inputs and suggestions at various stages of this project; Dr. Diefendorf taught organic and isotopic geochemistry to a complete newbie in the field, while
Dr. Owen chipped in with his expertise on the physical environment of the study area. Thank you gentlemen- I gratefully acknowledge your support.
Thanks are also due to the other faculty and staff members of the Department of Geology, University of
Cincinnati (UC), especially to Dr. Tom Algeo for allowing me to work in the Fisk Laboratory, Drs. Warren
Huff and Yurena Yanes for always maintaining an interest in my research, Drs. Aaron Diefendorf and Andy
Czaja for organizing the weekly colloquiums on Fridays, which helped me (and I am sure, all of us) to unwind a bit at the end of the week, and Mrs. Krista Smilek for taking care of the administrative nitty-gritty of pursuing graduate studies at UC.
I was fortunate to be part of a very vibrant and extremely diverse research group, and my lab mates were a source of joy and support. So thumbs up to you Jani Sparks, Stella Mosher, Eric Baumann, Matt Vrazo and
Bevin Kenney. I acknowledge also the camaraderie of other graduate students in the department, especially
Gary Motz, Julia Wise, Kelsey Feser and Chris Aucoin. Gary and Jules, I can never forget or thank you both enough for all that you have done for me ever since I arrived in Cincinnati; Kels, I really appreciate your general support and especially your words of wisdom on all things statistical when I was stuck and
iv did not know what to do; Chris, I know I spent very little time as your ‘office’ mate, but I really enjoyed our conversations whenever I was in the office and will miss them.
The University of Cincinnati provided me with not only the resources to carry out my research, but also financial support to sustain myself, in terms of a graduate assistantship. Funding for this project was obtained through a UC Research Council faculty research grant to my advisor and a Sigma Xi grant-in-aid of research (No. G20131015322038) to myself.
No words are ever enough to thank my parents for being the biggest source of inspiration and support in my life. I know it would sound cliché, but Mum and Bapi, believe me- you two are THE BEST!! I also want to thank my best friends, Sumanta Chakraborti and Dipanjan Mukherjee, for showing me the signs of positivity even when things were a bit down.
Finally to the Almighty for keeping me in good health and providing me with this opportunity to study in the United States.
v
CONTENTS
ABSTRACT ...... i
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ...... iv
LIST OF FIGURES ...... viii
LIST OF TABLES ...... x
1. INTRODUCTION: ...... 1
1.1. Heavy metals in roadside soils: ...... 1
1.2. Elemental characteristics of petrol (gasoline) and diesel exhaust: ...... 3
1.3. Sulphur in roadside soils: ...... 4
1.4. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in roadside soils: ...... 6
1.5. Study aim and objectives: ...... 7
2. MATERIALS & METHODS: ...... 8
2.1. Study area: ...... 8
2.2. Sample collection and preparation: ...... 9
2.3. Analytical methods: ...... 10
2.3.1. X-Ray Fluorescence: ...... 10
2.3.2. Carbon-Sulphur Analysis: ...... 10
2.3.3. PAH Analysis: ...... 11
2.4. Data processing and analyses: ...... 11
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: ...... 14
3.1. Concentrations of heavy metals: ...... 14
3.2. Relationship between heavy metals and TOC: ...... 16
vi
3.3. Concentration of total sulphur: ...... 17
3.4. Relationship between TOC and TS: ...... 18
3.5. Association of various elements: ...... 19
3.6. PAH concentrations: ...... 20
3.7. Significance of the study: ...... 22
4. CONCLUSIONS: ...... 24
REFERENCES: ...... 25
vii
LIST OF FIGURES
Fig. 1 Map showing (A) location of the study area within India, and (B) the Manali-Leh Highway. The sampling sites, towns on either end of the highway, mountain passes and major mountain ranges are labeled.
...... 39
Fig. 2 Photographs of the study sites: Kothi, Jispa, Killingsarai and Rumtse. All photographs except the one
at Jispa taken standing on the Manali-Leh Highway. The photograph at Jispa was taken from the agricultural
field across which the transect lay...... 40
Fig. 3 A schematic diagram of sampling protocol for each transect along the Manali-Leh Highway.
Distances and depths are not to scale...... 41
Fig. 4 Bivariate scatter plots of heavy metal concentrations at varying distances from the highway. Only
metals that have a significant relationship with distance are plotted. The error bars represent ± 1 standard
deviation...... 42
Fig. 5 Bivariate scatterplots and power regressions for total sulphur concentrations at varying distances
from the highway for each site. The points represent mean values of each distance and the error bars
represent ± 1 standard deviation. The roadside sample at Rumtse (0m) was excluded from regression
analysis...... 43
Fig. 6 Dendrogram showing cluster analysis of 10 heavy metals, total organic carbon (TOC) and total
sulphur (TS) in soils along the Manali-Leh Highway. The text on the left mentions the most likely soil
fraction with which the various clusters are associated...... 44
viii
Fig. 7 Percentage composition of different ringed PAHs at each site...... 45
ix
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1 Description of the sampling sites...... 46
Table 2 Descriptive statistics of heavy metal concentrations (n=15 samples from 0, 2, 5, 10, and 20 m at each site). The local baseline values were calculated using samples collected at 150 m distance from the highway (based on Dudka, 1993). All values are reported in parts per million (ppm) except Al and Fe, which are reported in percentage (%)...... 47
Table 3 Results for linear regression and Pearson correlation between heavy metal concentrations and distance from highway. Asterisks (*) denote significant relationships at α = 0.05...... 48
Table 4 Comparison of average metal concentrations in soils along the Manali-Leh Highway with other localities discussed in the text...... 49
Table 5 Results for Pearson correlation between total organic carbon and distance from the highway.
Asterisks (*) denote significant relationships at α = 0.05...... 49
Table 6 Results for Pearson correlation between of 4 heavy metals (Chromium, Lead, Zinc and Barium)
concentrations and total organic carbon. Asterisks (*) denote significant relationships at α = 0.05. Double
asterisks (**) denote significant relationship at α =0.01...... 50
Table 7 Comparison of traffic volume along the Manali-Leh Highway with other localities discussed in the
text...... 50
x
Table 8 Descriptive statistics of total sulphur concentrations (n = 15 samples from 0, 2, 5, 10, and 20m at each site). The local baseline values were calculated using samples collected at 150 m distance from the highway (based on Dudka, 1993). All values are reported in parts per million (ppm)...... 51
Table 9 Concentrations of 16 EPA-prioritized polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and soil toxicity in each sample. PAH analysis was carried out on a composite sample at a distance of 2m from the highway at each site. ND denotes concentration not detected by GC-MS. All values are reported in micrograms per kilogram
(µg/kg)...... 52
Table 10 Correlation matrix showing the relationship between total organic carbon and the 16 EPA- prioritized polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Asterisks (*) denote significant relationships at α = 0.05.
Double asterisks (**) denote significant relationship at α = 0.01...... 53
xi
1. INTRODUCTION:
Contamination of the physical environment is one of the most common side effects of economic development. In urban or rapidly urbanizing areas, this contamination takes many forms, including atmospheric, terrestrial, aquatic and marine pollution. Within terrestrial settings, soil contamination by various organic and inorganic pollutants has become a major issue for environmental sustainability. These pollutants, including heavy metals and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), have multiple sources, namely vehicular emission, industrial discharge and domestic waste (Christoforidis and Stamatis, 2009).
Eventually these pollutants are accumulated in surface soils through long and short distance transport of aerosols, which settle down due to gravity and by means of precipitation (Martin, 2003). Some pollutants may also accumulate in soils via surface and groundwater transport.
Roads are the arteries of modern societies. They are used for travelling as well as transport of goods from one place to another. Apart from their socio-economic uses, roads and the traffic travelling on them have important influences on abiotic components of ecosystems including hydrology, sediment transport and water and air chemistry (Forman and Alexander, 1998; Coffin, 2007). These effects are felt during the construction of a road as well as during its lifetime of use (Spellerberg, 1998).
1.1. Heavy metals in roadside soils:
Roadside environments are frequently adversely affected by vehicular traffic (e.g. Vandenabeele and
Wood, 1972; Hewitt and Candy, 1990; Turer et al., 2001; Chen et al., 2010). Vehicles that travel on roads produce exhaust that contains significant amounts of lead (e.g. Turer and Maynard, 2003; Christoforidis and Stamatis, 2009; Walraven et al., 2014). Additionally, car bodies, brake linings, paint, tyres and asphalt can all release significant amounts of metals, including zinc, copper, chromium, nickel and cadmium
(Lagerwerff and Specht, 1970; Horner, 1996; Hjortenkrans et al., 2006; Harrison et al., 2012). Some of these metals, specifically Cu, Cd, Cr, Pb and Ni, are either carcinogenic or neurotoxic (Hayes, 1997; Järup,
2003).
1
Over time, metals released from vehicles accumulate in surface soils along roads (Lagerwerff and
Specht, 1970; Turer et al., 2001). The rate of their accumulation is dependent on factors such as traffic volume, distance from the road, depth of the soil profile, age of the road, and vehicle speed (reviewed in
Falahi-Ardakani, 1984). Factors like type of paving material (dirt or asphalt), prevailing wind direction, amount of runoff, local terrain, snow cover, and amount of organic matter in the soil are also important determinants of the degree to which these metals accumulate in soils. Metal contaminants are typically concentrated within 15-20 m from roads (Vandenabeele and Wood, 1972; Ward et al., 1975; Hewitt and
Candy, 1990; Munch, 1993; Turer et al., 2001; Chen et al., 2010), and within the top 10-20 cm of the soil profile (Chow, 1970; Milberge et al., 1980; Wilcke et al., 1998; Imperato et al., 2003; Wei and Yang, 2010).
Previous research has indicated that there is usually an inverse relationship between metal concentrations and distance from the road and depth. (Ward et al., 1975; Hewitt and Candy, 1990; Turer et al., 2001). However, studies conducted in snow-covered or mountainous areas indicate that declining metal concentrations with depth and distance may not be universal. For example, a number of studies conducted in areas receiving seasonal snow cover have found that deicing salts used to keep roads clear in winter have an important influence on the way metals behave in the soil (e.g. Norrström and Jacks, 1998; Amrhein,
1992; Howard and Sova, 1993). In such areas, the Na2+ and Cl - ions produced from deicing salts may cause metals to percolate downwards and also increase in concentration away from the highway. Local topography also has an effect on how metals accumulate in roadside soils. Panek and Zawodny (1993) made an assessment of heavy metal concentration along a roadside in the mountainous terrain of the Sierra
Nevada, Spain. They found that while Pb and Zn declined with distance from the highway, Fe, Mn, Cu, Ni and Cr did not. They also found that on rising slopes, the concentrations of these metals showed a clear decrease but on descending slopes, the concentrations either remained the same or increased with distance from the highway. More recently, Zhang et al. (2012) conducted a study examining the concentrations of heavy metals in agricultural soils along a highway in the vicinity of Kathmandu, Nepal. They found that
2 the concentrations of metals did not decrease consistently with distance away from the highway and attributed this to farming activities, crop growth and the complex terrain of the area.
1.2. Elemental characteristics of petrol (gasoline) and diesel exhaust:
All of the abovementioned studies were carried out in areas where vehicles generally use spark-ignition engines that rely on petrol as fuel. Petrol contains a number of toxic metals, but lead (Pb) is the most intensively studied. Until recently, tetraethyl lead was added to petrol as an anti-knock additive to increase the octane number (i.e. fuel efficiency). An increase in octane number causes better combustion by decreasing detonation or knocking of the engine (Scherzer, 1990). Following fuel combustion, the lead is released into the atmosphere as soluble halides, less soluble oxides, and insoluble sulphates and carbonates
(Olson and Skogerboe, 1975), and eventually settles into roadside surface soil. Once accumulated, lead can persist in soils for more than 100 years (Erel, 1998). Therefore, although the use of leaded petrol has been phased out around the world since the 1970s, petrol-derived lead may still constitute a measurable health threat in many locations (Tong et al., 2000; Nevin, 2007). Consequently, lead is the most intensely studied heavy metal in urban and urbanizing areas.
In some countries, including India, most vehicles have compression-ignition engines that use diesel.
Roughly 70% of the automobiles running on Indian roads use diesel (Murugesan et al., 2009). In diesel engines, dimethyl ether is added as an anti-knock additive. Consequently, the lead content of exhaust from diesel engines is low compared to petrol engines (Parekh et al., 2002). However, diesel engines emit as much as 50-200 times more particulate matter than petrol engines (McClellan, 1986). These particles range from 50-1000 nm in size and they contain high amounts of solid carbonaceous materials, volatile organic compounds like PAHs, ash from heavy metals, and sulphur compounds (Kittelson, 1998). Very little research has been conducted on the elemental concentration of diesel exhaust. Available data indicate that in general, metal concentrations are low in diesel. However, the concentrations of metals that are naturally abundant in the Earth’s crust (i.e. Al, Ca, Fe, Mg and Si) are higher than concentrations of metals that are mostly produced by anthropogenic sources (i.e. Pb, Cu, Cr, Ni, Co and V; Wang et al., 2003; Sharma et al.,
3
2005). Indian diesel contains very little metals but is 1-2% sulphur by weight, which is amongst the highest
in the world (Reddy and Venkataraman, 2002).
1.3. Sulphur in roadside soils:
Sulphur (S) is an important component of soil organic matter and is necessary for growth and metabolism in plants and animals (Freney et al., 1962; Jamal et al., 2010). The total S content of unpolluted soils varies 0.002% to 10%; the highest levels are present in saline and organic soils (Germida et al., 1992).
Sulphur occurs in both organic and inorganic forms in soils and is cycled between these two forms by mobilization, mineralization, immobilization, oxidation and reduction (Krouse et al., 1996; Scherer, 2009).
More than 95% of soil sulphur is in organic form and is concentrated in the upper (O and A) horizons
(Eriksen et al., 1998). Inorganic sulphur is more mobile than organically-bound sulphur and is found at
lower depths. Sulphides, elemental sulphur and sulphates are the main forms of inorganic sulphur; sulphates
being the most important form for plant growth (Germida et al, 1992; Scherer, 2009).
Although sulphur is a naturally occurring and important element for biological processes, excess sulphur in soils can have negative consequences. For example, excess sulphur decreases soil pH, particularly during oxidation, thereby mobilizing toxic metals, and making them more available to plants (Knabe, 1976; Helyar and Porter, 1989; Bolan and Hedley, 2003). Mobilized metals can also percolate downwards to contaminate groundwater. Sulphur-induced soil acidification is also known to reduce activities of microbes and macroinvertebrates in the soil (e.g. Cárcamo et al., 1998), which further affects the soil chemistry. Plants and animals may be exposed to excess sulphur from geological sources like volcanism and sea spray, though in contemporary times, such sources account for only a small portion of the total sulphur in the biosphere
(Rennenberg, 1984). Today the majority of sulphur found in the environment comes from anthropogenic sources, such as sulphur dioxide emissions from combustion of fossil fuels and metallurgical processes like smelting. Sulphur released by these processes is deposited on leaves, and accumulates in surface soils by dry deposition or precipitation (Moss, 1978).
4
While a relatively large volume of literature exists on the sulphur content of agricultural and forest soils
(e.g. Nyborg et al., 1977; Stanko and Fitzgerald, 1990; Eriksen, 1997a, 1997b, 2009; Prietzel et al., 2004;
Rodríguez-Lado and Macías, 2006; Koptsik and Alewell, 2007; Larssen et al., 2011), only four studies so far have investigated the total sulphur content (sum of both organic and inorganic components) of roadside soils. Iqbal (1988) measured concentrations of total sulphur in plants and soils at four sites in downtown
Karachi, Pakistan, an area where the consumption of diesel had increased since the early 1970s (Ahmed et al., 2001). He found that the sulphur content of soils near roads was 3-6 times higher than that in the control site, which was situated away from the downtown area. Iqbal and Mahmood (1992) also measured total sulphur in plants and soils at incremental distances from a highway on the outskirts of Karachi. The concentration of sulphur (36-77 ppm) in this study was much less than that in downtown Karachi (91-565 ppm; Iqbal, 1988) due to the low volume of traffic on this highway. Nevertheless, the concentration of sulphur in soils declined with distance from the highway, thereby implicating vehicles as the source of sulphur. In the USA, where petrol has historically been the most popular automobile fuel, the impact of vehicles on sulphur concentrations in roadside soils is less clear. Turer et al. (2001) measured total sulphur concentrations in roadside soils of Cincinnati, Ohio. These authors did not examine the relationship between sulphur concentrations and distance from road. However, they did show that the concentrations declined with depth. On average, sulphur in surface soils along the road was 1000 ppm and the concentration declined by a factor of two to three with depth in the soil profile, from 0 cm to 30 cm. Turer and Maynard
(2003) measured total sulphur in roadside soils at two sites in Corpus Christi, Texas and found that average concentration was 1200 ppm at both sites. However, they found that at one site, sulphur concentration declined with distance from the road while at the other, the concentration increased with distance. Depth- wise, the concentrations declined by two to four times in one site and there was a haphazard relationship in the other. This was likely because the second site had a considerable number of oil refineries and diesel- operated trucks that affected the distribution of various elements, including sulphur, in the soil. Although these studies are not unanimous in the patterns that they report, they indicate that like metals, sulphur
5
content typically declines with distance from the road and depth in the soil profile, particularly in areas that
rely on diesel fuel.
1.4. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in roadside soils:
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are a group of compounds that contain two or more fused
benzene rings. They are extremely toxic compounds that are known to be carcinogenic and mutagenic
(Edwards, 1983). Because of their strong carcinogenic and mutagenic properties, the United States
Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) has classified sixteen of them as priority pollutants (Keith and
Telliard, 1979).
PAHs are produced through incomplete combustion of biomass or fossil fuels. Although vegetation
burning and volcanic eruptions can produce PAHs, these sources are negligible compared to anthropogenic
sources like burning of wood as a cooking fuel and vehicular and industrial emissions (Baek et al., 1991;
Mastral and Callén, 2000; Srogi, 2007). Once released, PAHs travel through the atmosphere and eventually settle on soils through aerosol deposition (Wilcke, 2000).
Since they were first reported by Blumer (1961), PAHs in soils have been routinely investigated.
Establishing the degree to which PAHs accumulate in soils is crucial because human exposure to PAHs is more from soil than from air or water (Menzie et al. 1992). The mean concentration of soil PAHs in parts of the world that are not affected by anthropogenic activities is 328 µg/kg (Nam et al., 2009). PAH concentrations are substantially elevated in urban areas (as much as five to seven times). Consequently most studies have focused on quantifying PAHs in urban soils (e.g. Wilcke et al., 2005; Aichner et al.,
2007; Jiang et al., 2009; Cachada et al., 2012) and in roadside soils (e.g. Yang et al., 1991; Benfenati et al.,
1992; Amagai et al., 1999; Chu et al., 2003; Agarwal, 2009; Essumang et al., 2011). As expected, most of these studies have found that concentrations of PAHs in soils decline with distance from the source. Such studies are important not only because vehicular emission is a significant source of PAHs, but also because
PAHs emitted from fuels tend to accumulate in soils easily (Tolosa et al., 2004).
6
As mountains represent stark altitudinal and environmental gradients, studying how different organic contaminants like PAHs are distributed in mountainous terrains is especially important as the processes that occur in the mountains may be indicative of the mechanisms that operate in other regions (Daly and Wania,
2005). Studies conducted in the Holy Cross mountains of Poland found that concentrations of several organic contaminants in soils, including PAHs, increased with altitude (Migaszewski, 1999; Migaszewski et al., 2002). Although most human exposure to PAHs is via soil, contamination of drinking water is also of real concern in montane ecosystems because mountains provide drinking water, and these persistent organic pollutants are deposited on glaciers. Monitoring PAH accumulation in the Himalaya is of vital importance because the Himalayan glaciers provide freshwater supplies to more than two billion of the world’s population (Rangwala and Miller, 2012). However, monitoring efforts are rare and the matter needs immediate attention.
1.5. Study aim and objectives:
Major gaps remain in our understanding of elemental and PAH concentrations of soils along roads, particularly where diesel is the main fuel. For example, diesel engines emit twice as many PAHs as petrol engines (Lima et al., 2005). However, only one study has focused on PAH measurement of roadside soils in areas dominated by diesel-fueled vehicles (Agarwal, 2009). Furthermore, very few studies have examined contamination of roadside soils in montane ecosystems (Reiners et al., 1975; Panek and
Zawodny, 1993; Zhang et al., 2012). The Indian Himalaya present an ideal natural laboratory for studying the effects of vehicular pollution. Until relatively recently, communities within these mountains were isolated from the rest of the world. However, since the late 1970s, the Manali-Leh Highway in northwestern
India (Fig. 1) has opened up approximately 480 km of high altitude terrain to vehicular traffic (Owen,
1996). This highway connects Manali, a town in the Kullu valley of Himachal Pradesh to Leh, the capital of the Ladakh district of Jammu and Kashmir (Fig. 1). Although the highway has been in operation for more than 40 years, it first came into prominence during the year 1999, when India and Pakistan were engaged in a fierce battle at Kargil. At that time, the other road to Leh (via Kargil) was under siege.
7
Therefore, the Manali-Leh Highway was used to provide supplies to the Indian Army. Today this highway accommodates about 50,000 vehicles annually. The majority of this traffic carries fuel and supplies for army outposts along the highway, but an increasing percentage transports tourists. Due to heavy snowfall
(e.g. on some passes), the highway is only open to tourists for four months (mid-June to late-September).
However, army vehicles travel along parts of the road throughout the year. In the present study, the concentrations of 10 heavy metals, total sulphur, total organic carbon and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
(the 16 EPA prioritized ones) have been measured in roadside soils along the Manali-Leh Highway. Three specific hypotheses are tested:
(i) Heavy metal concentrations along the highway are elevated due to vehicular traffic.
(ii) Sulphur from diesel exhaust has accumulated in roadside soils.
(iii) The PAH content in soils close to the highway is high.
2. MATERIALS & METHODS:
2.1. Study area:
The Manali-Leh Highway (Fig. 1) is situated at an average elevation of 4000 m above sea level. It traverses the Pir Panjal range in the Middle Himalaya and the Zanskar Range in the Trans-Himalaya. The geomorphology and glacial history of this region have been documented in detail by Owen et al. (1995,
1997, 2001); Taylor and Mitchell (2000); Owen (2010, 2011); Dortch et al. (2011); Hedrick et al. (2011) and Owen and Dortch (2014). In general, the route traverses a rugged landscape comprised of U-shaped valleys, mountainous peaks, slopes developed on massively jointed granites and meta-sedimentary debris deposits of Palaeozoic and Cretaceous eras, and small fluvial and glacial landforms (Steck, 2003; Adams et al., 2009). Despite the varied geology, the soils along the Manali-Leh Highway can all be classified as sandy loams. The sand content in this region varies from 20-68% (Sagwal, 1991) and the pH is neutral to alkaline (Katoch et al., 2012). Four major mountain passes (called ‘La’ in Tibetan language) lie along this route: Rohtang La (3978 m), Baralacha La (4890 m), Lachulung La (5059 m) and Taglang La (5328 m)
8
(see Fig. 1). Landslides are a recurrent phenomenon (Weidinger et al., 2002; Dortch et al., 2009) and cause frequent traffic congestions.
Due to the presence of numerous peaks that are higher than 4500 m in the Greater Himalayan ranges, most of the precipitation from the Indian summer monsoon does not reach the study area (Bookhagen et al.,
2005). However, the monsoon still dominates regional moisture transport and precipitation (Mayewski et al., 1984; Benn and Owen, 1998). There is a steep moisture gradient (1000-200 mm/year) from south to north along the highway (Hedrick et al., 2011). In response to this moisture gradient, the lush forested slopes of the Pir Panjal in the south give way to sparse grasses and small shrubs to high altitude desert as one moves northwards from Manali to Leh (Bhattacharya, 1989).
2.2. Sample collection and preparation:
Soil samples were collected from four sites along the Manali-Leh Highway (Figs. 1 and 2). These sites were selected because they occupy relatively flat terrain and have been affected to varying degrees by humans. A description of each collection site is provided in Table 1. At each site, samples were collected from a transect perpendicular to the highway. Soil pits were dug at distances of 0m (roadside), 2m, 5m,
10m, 20m and 150m from the road, and within each pit, soil samples were collected from three depths-
3cm, 9cm and 15cm using a stainless steel hand trowel (Fig. 3). To avoid cross-contamination, the trowel was cleaned with alcohol wipes before and after collecting each sample. The samples were collected in
15ml polypropylene centrifuge tubes, which were pre-washed with 5% HNO 3 and distilled deionized water.
Tube caps were sealed with parafilm tape and kept in a cool, dark place until they were shipped to the
United States. The samples were imported under USDA permit No. P330-13-00060 (to B.E. Crowley).
Upon arrival in the US, the samples were lyophilized to remove moisture. They were then ground to a fine powder using an agate mortar and pestle. Next the samples were passed through a US size 40 (0.400mm) nylon mesh to achieve consistency of particle size. After filtering, samples were stored in ashed glass vials in a cool, dark place.
9
2.3. Analytical methods:
To analyze the concentrations of metals, total organic carbon (TOC), total sulphur (TS) and PAHs, soil samples were subjected to a number of analytical methods. Metal concentrations were quantified using X-
Ray Fluorescence spectrometry, TOC and TS were determined using an Elemental Analyzer and PAHs were quantified by Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry. Each step is briefly described below:
2.3.1. X-Ray Fluorescence:
Three to four g of soil were pressed into pellets under a pressure of 20 tonnes for 3-4 minutes. The pellets were then run on a Rigaku 3070 spectrometer against a US Geological Survey rock standard, the
Ohio Black Shale (SDO-1) to achieve quality control. Concentrations of a suite of elements are normally provided by the spectrometer. The ones that have been considered in this study are Aluminum (Al), Iron
(Fe), Chromium (Cr), Copper (Cu), Lead (Pb), Nickel (Ni), Cobalt (Co), Zinc (Zn), Vanadium (V) and
Barium (Ba) because they are commonly reported in vehicle-related pollution studies (Lagerwerff and
Specht, 1970; Hewitt and Candy, 1990; Turer et al., 2001). The concentrations are reported in percentages for major elements (Al and Fe) and in ppm for trace elements (Cr, Cu, Pb, Ni, Co, Zn, V and Ba).
2.3.2. Carbon-Sulphur Analysis:
Total Sulphur (TS) and Total Organic Carbon (TOC) in the samples were measured using an ELTRA C-S
2000 C/S analyzer. TS was run using 0.1g of dried, untreated samples. For TOC, 0.1g of the samples were acidified with 20mL of 7% HCl. The acidified samples were placed on a hot plate at 60 °C for 7 hours. The solution was then filtered through 47mm glass fibre filters and the residue was rinsed with distilled water to remove all remaining acid. Samples were then dried overnight at 50 °C. Results were calibrated using US
Geological Survey standard Ohio Black Shale [SDO-1] (C = 9.68%, S = 5.35%), internal laboratory standard Devonian Black Shale [DBS-1] (C = 3.5%, S = 1.97%), and the Alpha Resources soil standard (C
= 0.10%, S = 0.11%).
10
2.3.3. PAH Analysis:
PAH concentrations were measured in soils collected at 2m from the highway using a composite sample of all three depths for each transect to identify the sixteen priority compounds identified by the USEPA (Table
8). Samples were analyzed by ALS Environmental Inc. in Kelso, WA. About 20g of soil were mixed with surrogate compounds (PAH standards). These standards are similar in structure to the analyzed compounds.
The mixture was extracted using Dichloromethane (DCM) in an automated Soxhlet (USEPA method 3541).
All solvents used were of reagent grade or higher quality. The extracted samples were then concentrated to
5mL using a fine stream of nitrogen gas. Following concentration, the extracts were cleaned using silica
gel column chromatography (USEPA method 3630). Before use, the silica gel was activated by heating to
150 °C for 16 hours. A 1mL aliquot was put into the columns and was eluted four times with 10 mL of 1:1
DCM:n-hexane. The four solvent fractions were combined and concentrated to 1mL under a gentle stream
of nitrogen gas. The samples were then analyzed using Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (USEPA
method 8270D). Briefly, the extract was introduced to the Gas Chromatograph (GC). The GC separated the
analytes, which were then detected by a Mass Spectrometer (MS) attached to the GC. The compounds were
identified by comparing the peaks of the samples to the peaks of the standards and quantified by comparing the peaks of various compounds in the sample to the same peaks in the standards using a five-point calibration curve. To ensure quality control, all the methods were checked for accuracy and precision.
Procedural blanks were run periodically to check for contamination, and recovery efficiency was checked by spiking the samples (Matrix Spike-MS) with a known amount of PAH standard. Recoveries ranged from
60-83%.
2.4. Data processing and analyses:
The X-ray fluorescence spectrometer produces ‘raw’ results in the form of counts per second, which
are in proportion to the concentration of particular elements in the sample. Post analysis, these counts were
converted to concentrations using regression. For trace elements, power regressions were used. The
concentrations of the major elements were determined by multiple regressions.
11
All statistical analyses were carried out using SPSS 22.0. Significance was set at α = 0.05 for all tests. The data were checked for normality of distribution and homogeneity of variances. Most of the elements were found to be positively skewed. Log 10 transformation did not considerably improve the
distribution. Therefore, analyses were carried out on the untransformed data. The homogeneity of variance
was checked using Levene’s tests as well as non-parametric Levene’s tests. In both cases, the variances
were found to be significantly different ( p < 0.05) for most elements. Therefore, it was decided that parametric tests cannot be used with this dataset. Instead, the non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis tests (hereafter referred to as K-W tests) were used. Significant differences were found in the median concentrations of
various elements among transects. Consequently, each transect was treated as a separate entity in all
subsequent analyses.
To determine if there were differences in elemental concentrations among various depths in the soil
profile, K-W tests were used. In cases where the relationship was significant, pairwise posthoc tests were
carried out to find out which depths differed.
To determine the relationship between metal concentrations in soils and increasing distance from
the highway, scatter plots were created and Pearson correlation coefficients (r), coefficients of
determination (R 2), and their associated p values were calculated. For sulphur, power regression was used
to determine the relationship between distance from highway and the concentration of sulphur. The non-
parametric Mann-Whitney U tests were also used to compare concentrations near the highway (i.e. < 5m)
and distant from the highway (i.e. > 5m). Because no geochemical baseline data exists for soils in India,
the local baseline concentration of each metal in each transect was estimated by calculating the geometric
mean of samples from the three depths at a distance of 150 m from the highway (following Dudka, 1993).
Cluster analysis (CA) was applied to determine the association of the various heavy metals, TS and
TOC in the soil. CA is essentially a visual representation of a correlation matrix. It has been used extensively
in previous studies that measured heavy metal concentrations in soils (e.g. Turer et al., 2001; Abollino et
al., 2002; Micó et al., 2006; Christoforidis and Stamatis, 2009). There are two types of cluster analyses-
12 hierarchical and non-hierarchical. In hierarchical CA, each observation is initially placed in its own cluster, but subsequently the clusters are merged until n-1 clusters remain such that finally all n observations are contained in one cluster (n is the number of observations i.e. the various elements in this study). The process is considered to be hierarchical because once two clusters are merged, they cannot be separated at a later stage (Rogerson, 2001). Hierarchical cluster analysis was used in this study. Because the units of the data were not the same and the data were not normally distributed, for the purpose of CA, the data was transformed following Schuenmeyer and Drew (2011):