JWA Single-Sided Report Template

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

JWA Single-Sided Report Template Nunavut Wildlife Resource and Habitat Values Amendment Section 1: Introduction 1 INTRODUCTION The Nunavut Land Claims Agreement (NLCA) established the Nunavut Planning Commission (NPC) which is responsible for developing land use plans, policies and objectives. The NPC emphasizes the current and future well-being of the residents and communities of the Nunavut Settlement Area (NSA). The NPC is initiating a land use planning process to ensure the sustainable development of the lands, waters, wildlife and offshore areas of the NSA. This process includes compiling and analyzing information on key aspects of Nunavut’s environment. This will facilitate discussions with communities and planning partners and ensure land use decisions are based on the best available information. Wildlife is a fundamental component of land use planning given its importance to Inuit culture and economy, to the ecology of the region and for its tourism value. This report compiles wildlife resources and habitat values in Nunavut and includes the most current spatial database on Nunavut wildlife. The spatial information and issues identified can be used to determine appropriate zoning and terms for development. 1.1 Objectives The primary objectives of this study are to identify wildlife species important for ecological, social, cultural and economic reasons, review their current status, habitat needs, and challenges and present potential solutions to those challenges. This amendment includes updates to figures from the 2010 Arctic Marine Workshop, recent published literature on the marine mammal, caribou, and muskox focus species, and has included the two proposed national parks and proposed Lancaster Sound Marine Conservation area. February 2012 Project No. 1231-10328 1-1 Nunavut Wildlife Resource and Habitat Values Amendment Section 1: Introduction THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. February 2012 1-2 Project No. 1231-10328 Nunavut Wildlife Resource and Habitat Values Amendment Section 2: Methodology 2 METHODOLOGY 2.1 Identification of Focal Species and Species Groups A comprehensive list of all fish, birds, aquatic (freshwater and marine), and terrestrial species currently present in Nunavut was compiled. This report contains general descriptions of species groups, and summarizes the number of species, status, distribution, general ecology, habitat requirements, issues, and considerations for land use planning. A short list of culturally, ecologically, and commercially important species was then developed. The focus of the short list is on species of importance for Inuit subsistence use, commercial harvest and harvest viability, species important for outfitting, ecologically sensitive species, and species with special status (e.g., special concern, threatened, endangered, or subject to protection or special commitments) at territorial, federal and international levels. 2.2 Literature Review For each short-listed species, information on current status, distribution, general ecology, key habitat requirements, population status and trends, issues or pressures, and considerations for land use planning was compiled and reviewed. Information was obtained from research reports and progress reports from technical and scientific studies. Additionally, individuals known to be actively completing or undertaking research related to species on the short list were contacted. Sources of information for this report include: Federal Government agencies (e.g., Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO), Canadian Wildlife Service (CWS) (Environment Canada), Environmental Protection Branch (Environment Canada), Indian and Northern Affairs Canada (INAC), Natural Resources Canada Federal research institutes (e.g., Bedford Institute, Institute of Ocean Sciences) Government of Nunavut (GN) agencies (e.g., Department of Environment, Wildlife Research Group, Parks) Territorial research organizations and institutes (e.g., Nunavut Research Institute (NRI), Prince of Wales Northern Heritage Centre, Beverly and Quamanirjuaq Caribou Management Board, Bathurst Caribou Management Planning Committee) Nunavut Wildlife Management Board (NWMB), Regional Wildlife Organizations (RWO) and local Hunter and Trapper Organizations (HTOs) Universities and Colleges (e.g., ArcticNet, Canadian Arctic Shelf Exchange Study (CASES), Nunavut Arctic College, Arctic Science and Technology Information System (ASTIS) database, International Polar Year and Arctic Institute of North America) The Inuit, through generations of observations, group animals and plants using practical characteristics such as appearance, behaviour, and relevance to the Inuit. In some cases, Inuit classification is fundamentally different from scientific taxonomy, often including an animal in more February 2012 Project No. 1231-10328 2-1 Nunavut Wildlife Resource and Habitat Values Amendment Section 2: Methodology than one category. For example, ptarmigans (aqiggit), form part of the group of ukiuqtait because they stay in the North all winter; but as herbivores they also belong with the nunatuqtiit. This grouping shows an appreciation by the Inuit for two distinctive features in the ecology of the ptarmigan. In an Arctic environment, these features are more important than the species’ genetic relatedness to other species. The Inuit classification system has been incorporated into the description of short listed species and is included in the spatial database. Each short listed species can be characterized based on traditional Inuit classification in addition to standard scientific classification. By adopting this approach, both western and Inuit perspectives are incorporated into the database and map products. This facilitates the utility of the products during the land use planning process and community planning meetings. 2.3 Spatial Database All spatial data are supplied in both ESRI Shapefile and Geodatabase format. An exception to this is the 1:250,000 scale contour files. The size of the contour files (1GB) makes it impractical to have multiple copies. Therefore, this dataset is provided in Shapefile format only. Spatial data resides in six ESRI personal geodatabases: “NTDB_250K_Base_Date.mdb”—1:250,000 scale contour data acquired from NPC and National Topographic Data Base (NTDB) downloads “Nunavut_Base_Data.mdb”—1:7,000,000 scale base data acquired from Geogratis Atlas of Canada Base Maps “Nunavut_Birds.mdb”—bird spatial data “Nunavut_Fish_Invertebrates.mdb”—fish and invertebrate spatial data “Nunavut_Marine_Mammals.mdb”—marine mammal spatial data “Nunavut_Terrestrial_Mammals.mdb”—terrestrial mammal spatial data. 2.3.1 Metadata and Projection Federal Geographic Data Committee Content (FGDC) compliant metadata are provided for all spatial layers, either in the .xml file in the case of the shapefile or contained within the geodatabase and viewed through ArcCatalog in the case of the feature class data. The metadata are also available in the “Data Dictionary” for all spatial layers. All internally created feature classes are accompanied by metadata created by Jacques Whitford AXYS (JWA). In addition to the “Data Dictionary”, there is an “ArcMap project (.mxd) Dictionary” summarizing each spatial layer used in each ArcMap project. All spatial data are projected to Canada Lambert Conformal Conic, North American Datum 1983 (NAD83). For a listing of Lambert Conformal Conic data parameters, please refer to the spatial metadata information. February 2012 2-2 Project No. 1231-10328 Nunavut Wildlife Resource and Habitat Values Amendment Section 2: Methodology 2.3.2 Spatial Data Creation and Processing 1:250,000 NTDB Base Data The 1:250,000 feature data classes were merged into three feature classes. The first two feature classes contain all NTDB data provided by NPC and were broken down to ease handling due to file sizes. The third feature class contains all NTDB data downloaded by JWA. This version cannot be easily merged into the earlier version due to structural differences. JWA Captured Spatial Data The majority of Nunavut wildlife studies are available in hard copy and do not contain digital data files. As a result, JWA undertook the following process to capture these data: The figure in the report was scanned, creating an image file The image file was loaded into ArcMap and georeferenced The features were captured within ArcMap using heads-up on screen capture techniques Attributes were assigned to each feature The appropriate metadata were created. The process used for data capture is included with the metadata for each file. 2.3.3 Mapping and Figure Production Digital information used to create report maps are included in the accompanying data files. All final map documents (mxds) are included and organized within the structure of the folders. This report includes the following maps (with accompanying digital files): The range and important habitat of each short-listed wildlife species Identification of herds or subpopulations as appropriate Seasonal information (dates, importance) related to range and critical habitat of short-listed species where known and appropriate Range and critical habitat for other species, as appropriate Locations of current commercial wildlife harvesting operations, and potential areas for expansion of existing activities The spatial extent of wildlife data/information used to create each map The spatial extent of wildlife research coverage and gaps in Nunavut. Two 11 x 17” landscape map templates were created in ArcMap; a regional map at the 1:11,000,000 scale and a detailed map
Recommended publications
  • C S a S S C C S
    C S A S S C C S Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat Secrétariat canadien de consultation scientifique Research Document 2010/066 Document de recherche 2010/066 Ecosystem status and trends report: Rapport de l’état des écosystèmes et Arctic Marine Ecozones des tendances : écozones marines de l’Arctique Andrea Niemi, Joclyn Paulic and Don Cobb Fisheries and Oceans Canada / Pêches et Océans Canada Central & Arctic Region / Région du Centre et de l’Arctique 501 University Crescent / 501, University Crescent Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N6 This series documents the scientific basis for the La présente série documente les fondements evaluation of aquatic resources and ecosystems scientifiques des évaluations des ressources et in Canada. As such, it addresses the issues of des écosystèmes aquatiques du Canada. Elle the day in the time frames required and the traite des problèmes courants selon les documents it contains are not intended as échéanciers dictés. Les documents qu’elle definitive statements on the subjects addressed contient ne doivent pas être considérés comme but rather as progress reports on ongoing des énoncés définitifs sur les sujets traités, mais investigations. plutôt comme des rapports d’étape sur les études en cours. Research documents are produced in the official Les documents de recherche sont publiés dans language in which they are provided to the la langue officielle utilisée dans le manuscrit Secretariat. envoyé au Secrétariat. This document is available on the Internet at: Ce document est disponible sur l’Internet à: http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/csas/ ISSN 1499-3848 (Printed / Imprimé) ISSN 1919-5044 (Online / En ligne) © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2010 © Sa Majesté la Reine du Chef du Canada, 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS / TABLE DES MATIÈRES ABSTRACT................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Of the Inuit Bowhead Knowledge Study Nunavut, Canada
    english cover 11/14/01 1:13 PM Page 1 FINAL REPORT OF THE INUIT BOWHEAD KNOWLEDGE STUDY NUNAVUT, CANADA By Inuit Study Participants from: Arctic Bay, Arviat, Cape Dorset, Chesterfield Inlet, Clyde River, Coral Harbour, Grise Fiord, Hall Beach, Igloolik, Iqaluit, Kimmirut, Kugaaruk, Pangnirtung, Pond Inlet, Qikiqtarjuaq, Rankin Inlet, Repulse Bay, and Whale Cove Principal Researchers: Keith Hay (Study Coordinator) and Members of the Inuit Bowhead Knowledge Study Committee: David Aglukark (Chairperson), David Igutsaq, MARCH, 2000 Joannie Ikkidluak, Meeka Mike FINAL REPORT OF THE INUIT BOWHEAD KNOWLEDGE STUDY NUNAVUT, CANADA By Inuit Study Participants from: Arctic Bay, Arviat, Cape Dorset, Chesterfield Inlet, Clyde River, Coral Harbour, Grise Fiord, Hall Beach, Igloolik, Iqaluit, Kimmirut, Kugaaruk, Pangnirtung, Pond Inlet, Qikiqtarjuaq, Rankin Inlet, Nunavut Wildlife Management Board Repulse Bay, and Whale Cove PO Box 1379 Principal Researchers: Iqaluit, Nunavut Keith Hay (Study Coordinator) and X0A 0H0 Members of the Inuit Bowhead Knowledge Study Committee: David Aglukark (Chairperson), David Igutsaq, MARCH, 2000 Joannie Ikkidluak, Meeka Mike Cover photo: Glenn Williams/Ursus Illustration on cover, inside of cover, title page, dedication page, and used as a report motif: “Arvanniaqtut (Whale Hunters)”, sc 1986, Simeonie Kopapik, Cape Dorset Print Collection. ©Nunavut Wildlife Management Board March, 2000 Table of Contents I LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES . .i II DEDICATION . .ii III ABSTRACT . .iii 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 RATIONALE AND BACKGROUND FOR THE STUDY . .1 1.2 TRADITIONAL ECOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE AND SCIENCE . .1 2 METHODOLOGY 3 2.1 PLANNING AND DESIGN . .3 2.2 THE STUDY AREA . .4 2.3 INTERVIEW TECHNIQUES AND THE QUESTIONNAIRE . .4 2.4 METHODS OF DATA ANALYSIS .
    [Show full text]
  • Willows of Interior Alaska
    1 Willows of Interior Alaska Dominique M. Collet US Fish and Wildlife Service 2004 2 Willows of Interior Alaska Acknowledgements The development of this willow guide has been made possible thanks to funding from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service- Yukon Flats National Wildlife Refuge - order 70181-12-M692. Funding for printing was made available through a collaborative partnership of Natural Resources, U.S. Army Alaska, Department of Defense; Pacific North- west Research Station, U.S. Forest Service, Department of Agriculture; National Park Service, and Fairbanks Fish and Wildlife Field Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Department of the Interior; and Bonanza Creek Long Term Ecological Research Program, University of Alaska Fairbanks. The data for the distribution maps were provided by George Argus, Al Batten, Garry Davies, Rob deVelice, and Carolyn Parker. Carol Griswold, George Argus, Les Viereck and Delia Person provided much improvement to the manuscript by their careful editing and suggestions. I want to thank Delia Person, of the Yukon Flats National Wildlife Refuge, for initiating and following through with the development and printing of this guide. Most of all, I am especially grateful to Pamela Houston whose support made the writing of this guide possible. Any errors or omissions are solely the responsibility of the author. Disclaimer This publication is designed to provide accurate information on willows from interior Alaska. If expert knowledge is required, services of an experienced botanist should be sought. Contents
    [Show full text]
  • Cuticle and Cortical Cell Morphology of Alpaca and Other Rare Animal Fibres
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Chota The Journal of The Textile Institute ISSN: 0040-5000 (Print) 1754-2340 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tjti20 Cuticle and cortical cell morphology of alpaca and other rare animal fibres B. A. McGregor & E. C. Quispe Peña To cite this article: B. A. McGregor & E. C. Quispe Peña (2017): Cuticle and cortical cell morphology of alpaca and other rare animal fibres, The Journal of The Textile Institute, DOI: 10.1080/00405000.2017.1368112 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00405000.2017.1368112 Published online: 18 Sep 2017. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 7 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=tjti20 Download by: [181.64.24.124] Date: 25 September 2017, At: 13:39 THE JOURNAL OF THE TEXTILE INSTITUTE, 2017 https://doi.org/10.1080/00405000.2017.1368112 Cuticle and cortical cell morphology of alpaca and other rare animal fibres B. A. McGregora and E. C. Quispe Peñab aInstitute for Frontier Materials, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia; bNational University Autonoma de Chota, Chota, Peru ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY The null hypothesis of the experiments reported is that the cuticle and cortical morphology of rare Received 6 March 2017 animal fibres are similar. The investigation also examined if the productivity and age of alpacas were Accepted 11 August 2017 associated with cuticle morphology and if seasonal nutritional conditions were related to cuticle scale KEYWORDS frequency.
    [Show full text]
  • Northwest Passage Trail
    Nunavut Parks & Special Places – Editorial Series January, 2008 NorThwesT Passage Trail The small Nunavut community of Gjoa Haven Back in the late eighteenth and nineteenth is located on King William Island, right on the centuries, a huge effort was put forth by historic Northwest Passage and home to the Europeans to locate a passage across northern Northwest Passage Trail which meanders within North America to connect the European nations the community, all within easy walking distance with the riches of the Orient. From the east, many from the hotel. A series of signs, a printed guide, ships entered Hudson Bay and Lancaster Sound, and a display of artifacts in the hamlet office mapping the routes and seeking a way through interpret the local Inuit culture, exploration of the ice-choked waters and narrow channels to the the Northwest Passage, and the story of the Gjoa Pacific Ocean and straight sailing to the oriental and Roald Amundsen. It is quite an experience lands and profitable trading. The only other to walk the shores of history here, learning of routes were perilous – rounding Cape Horn at the exploration of the North, and the lives of the the southern tip of South America or the Cape of people who helped the explorers. Good Hope at the southern end of Africa. As a result, many expeditions were launched to seek a passage through the arctic archipelago. Aussi disponible en français xgw8Ns7uJ5 wk5tg5 Pilaaktut Inuinaqtut ᑲᔾᔮᓇᖅᑐᖅ k a t j a q n a a q listen to the land aliannaktuk en osmose avec la terre Through the efforts of the Royal Navy, and WANDER THROUGH HISTORY Lady Jane Franklin, John Franklin’s wife, At the Northwest Passage Trail in the at least 29 expeditions were launched to community of Gjoa Haven, visitors can, seek Franklin and his men, or evidence of through illustrations and text on interpretive their fate.
    [Show full text]
  • Population Study of Greater Snow Geese on Bylot Island (Nunavut) in 2003: a Progress Report
    POPULATION STUDY OF GREATER SNOW GEESE ON BYLOT ISLAND (NUNAVUT) IN 2003: A PROGRESS REPORT Gilles Gauthier Département de biologie & Centre d'études nordiques Université Laval, Québec Austin Reed Canadian Wildlife Service Environment Canada, Québec Jean-François Giroux Département des sciences biologiques Université du Québec à Montréal Dominique Berteaux Département de biologie, chimie et sciences de la santé & Centre d’études nordiques Université du Québec à Rimouski Marie-Christine Cadieux Département de biologie & Centre d’études nordiques Université Laval, Québec 18 November 2003 Gauthier, Reed, Giroux, Berteaux & Cadieux • 2003 progress report of Bylot Island goose project 2 INTRODUCTION In 2003, we continued our long-term study of the population dynamics of Greater Snow Geese (Chen caerulescens atlantica) and of the interactions between geese, plants and their predators on Bylot Island. Like many goose populations worldwide, Greater Snow Geese have increased considerably during the late XXth century (annual growth rate of ~10%). The exploding population of snow geese has imposed considerable stress on its breeding habitat, while extensive use of agriculture lands provides an unlimited source of food during winter and migratory stopovers for them. Remedial management during autumn, winter and spring has been undertaken since 1999 to curb the growth of this population. The long-term objectives of this project are to (1) study changes in the demographic parameters of the Greater Snow Goose population, and especially the effects of the recent spring conservation hunt, (2) determine the role of food availability and fox predation in limiting annual production of geese, and (3) monitor the impact of grazing on the vegetation of Bylot Island.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstracts Annual Scientific Meeting ᐊᕐᕌᒍᑕᒫᕐᓯᐅᑎᒥᒃ ᑲᑎᒪᓂᕐᒃ
    Abstracts Annual Scientific Meeting ᐊᕐᕌᒍᑕᒫᕐᓯᐅᑎᒥᒃ ᑲᑎᒪᓂᕐᒃ 2016 Réunion scientifique annuelle 5-9/12/2016, Winnipeg, MB ASM2016 Conference Program Oral Presentation and Poster Abstracts ABSTRACTS FROBISHER BAY: A NATURAL LABORATORY complete habitat characterization. This recent sampling FOR THE STUDY OF ENVIRONMENTAL effort recorded heterogeneous substrates composed of CHANGE IN CANADIAN ARCTIC MARINE various proportions of boulder, cobbles, gravel, sand HABITATS. and mud forming a thin veneer over bedrock at water depths less than 200 metres. Grab samples confirm Aitken, Alec (1), B. Misiuk (2), E. Herder (2), E. the relative abundance of mollusks, ophiuroids and Edinger (2), R. Deering (2), T. Bell (2), D. Mate(3), C. tubiculous polychaetes as constituents of the infauna Campbell (4), L. Ham (5) and V.. Barrie (6) in the inner bay. Drop video images captured a diverse (1) University of Saskatchewan (Saskatoon, Canada); epifauna not previously described from the FRBC (2) Department of Geography, Memorial University of research. A variety of bryozoans, crinoid echinoderms, Newfoundland (St. John’s, NL, Canada); sponges and tunicates recorded in the images remain (3) Polar Knowledge Canada (Ottawa, Ontario, to be identified. Habitat characterization will allow us Canada); to quantify ecological change in benthic invertebrate (4) Marine Resources Geoscience, Geological Survey of species composition within the habitat types represented Canada (Dartmouth, NS, Canada); at selected sampling stations through time. Such long- (5) Canada-Nunavut Geoscience Office, Natural term studies are crucial for distinguishing directional Resources Canada (Iqaluit, NU, Canada); change in ecosystems. Marine Geological Hazards (6) Marine Geoscience, Geological Survey of Canada and Seabed Disturbance: Extensive multibeam (Sidney, BC, Canada) echosounding surveys have recorded more than 250 submarine slope failures in inner Frobisher Bay.
    [Show full text]
  • A Historical and Legal Study of Sovereignty in the Canadian North : Terrestrial Sovereignty, 1870–1939
    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository University of Calgary Press University of Calgary Press Open Access Books 2014 A historical and legal study of sovereignty in the Canadian north : terrestrial sovereignty, 1870–1939 Smith, Gordon W. University of Calgary Press "A historical and legal study of sovereignty in the Canadian north : terrestrial sovereignty, 1870–1939", Gordon W. Smith; edited by P. Whitney Lackenbauer. University of Calgary Press, Calgary, Alberta, 2014 http://hdl.handle.net/1880/50251 book http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 International Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca A HISTORICAL AND LEGAL STUDY OF SOVEREIGNTY IN THE CANADIAN NORTH: TERRESTRIAL SOVEREIGNTY, 1870–1939 By Gordon W. Smith, Edited by P. Whitney Lackenbauer ISBN 978-1-55238-774-0 THIS BOOK IS AN OPEN ACCESS E-BOOK. It is an electronic version of a book that can be purchased in physical form through any bookseller or on-line retailer, or from our distributors. Please support this open access publication by requesting that your university purchase a print copy of this book, or by purchasing a copy yourself. If you have any questions, please contact us at ucpress@ ucalgary.ca Cover Art: The artwork on the cover of this book is not open access and falls under traditional copyright provisions; it cannot be reproduced in any way without written permission of the artists and their agents. The cover can be displayed as a complete cover image for the purposes of publicizing this work, but the artwork cannot be extracted from the context of the cover of this specificwork without breaching the artist’s copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • Botanical Problems in Boreal America. I Author(S): Hugh M
    Botanical Problems in Boreal America. I Author(s): Hugh M. Raup Source: Botanical Review, Vol. 7, No. 3, Botanical Problems in Boreal America. I (Mar., 1941), pp. 147-208 Published by: Springer on behalf of New York Botanical Garden Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4353246 Accessed: 15-12-2017 21:12 UTC JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://about.jstor.org/terms Springer, New York Botanical Garden Press are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Botanical Review This content downloaded from 128.103.149.52 on Fri, 15 Dec 2017 21:12:58 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms THE BOTANICAL REVIEW VOL. VII MARCH, 1941 No. 3 BOTANICAL PROBLEMS IN BOREAL AMERICA. I HUGH M. RAUP Arnold Arboretum, Harvard University CONTENTS PAGE Introduction ................ ........................... 148 Acknowledgments . ........................................... 150 Exploration .............. ............................. 151 Physiographic History ........................................... 161 Climate ........................................................... 169 Origin and Distribution of the Flora Speciation and Endemism .173 The Theory of Persistence The Darwin-Hooker Concept ............................... 178 The Nunatak Hypothesis .......... .......... 181 Conservatism vs. Aggressiveness ............................. 184 Wynne-Edwards' Criticism of the Nunatak Hypothesis . 186 Discussion of Wynne-Edwards' Criticism .188 Hulten's Studies of Arctic and Boreal Biota Statement of the Problem .198 Plastic vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Connecting Alaska's Fiber Community
    T HE A L A SK A N at UR A L F IBER B USI N ESS A SSOCI at IO N : Connecting Alaska’s Fiber Community Jan Rowell and Lee Coray-Ludden one-and-a-half day workshop in the fall of 2012 rekindled a passion for community AFES Miscellaneous Publication MP 2014-14 among Alaska’s fiber producers and artists. “Fiber Production in Alaska: From UAF School of Natural Resources & Extension Agriculture to Art” provided a rare venue for fiber producers and consumers A Agricultural & Forestry Experiment Station to get together and share a strong common interest in fiber production in Alaska. The workshop was sponsored by the Alaska State Division of Agriculture and organized by Lee Coray-Ludden, owner of Shepherd’s Moon Keep and a cashmere producer. There is nothing new about fiber production in Alaska. The early Russians capitalized on agricultural opportunities wherever they could and domestic sheep and goats were a mainstay in these early farming efforts. But even before the Russians, fiber was historically used for warmth by Alaska’s indigenous people. They gathered their fiber from wild sources, and some tribes handspun it and wove it into clothing, Angora rabbits produce a soft and silky creating beautiful works of art. fiber finer than cashmere. Pictured below is Some of the finest natural fibers in the world come from animals that evolved in Michael, a German angora, shortly before cold, dry climates, and many of these animals are grazers capable of thriving on Alaska’s shearing. Angora rabbits may be sheared, natural vegetation.
    [Show full text]
  • Atlantic Walrus Odobenus Rosmarus Rosmarus
    COSEWIC Assessment and Update Status Report on the Atlantic Walrus Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus in Canada SPECIAL CONCERN 2006 COSEWIC COSEPAC COMMITTEE ON THE STATUS OF COMITÉ SUR LA SITUATION ENDANGERED WILDLIFE DES ESPÈCES EN PÉRIL IN CANADA AU CANADA COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC 2006. COSEWIC assessment and update status report on the Atlantic walrus Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. ix + 65 pp. (www.sararegistry.gc.ca/status/status_e.cfm). Previous reports: COSEWIC 2000. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Atlantic walrus Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus (Northwest Atlantic Population and Eastern Arctic Population) in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. vi + 23 pp. (www.sararegistry.gc.ca/status/status_e.cfm). Richard, P. 1987. COSEWIC status report on the Atlantic walrus Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus (Northwest Atlantic Population and Eastern Arctic Population) in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. 1-23 pp. Production note: COSEWIC would like to acknowledge D.B. Stewart for writing the status report on the Atlantic Walrus Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus in Canada, prepared under contract with Environment Canada, overseen and edited by Andrew Trites, Co-chair, COSEWIC Marine Mammals Species Specialist Subcommittee. For additional copies contact: COSEWIC Secretariat c/o Canadian Wildlife Service Environment Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Tel.: (819) 997-4991 / (819) 953-3215 Fax: (819) 994-3684 E-mail: COSEWIC/[email protected] http://www.cosewic.gc.ca Également disponible en français sous le titre Évaluation et Rapport de situation du COSEPAC sur la situation du morse de l'Atlantique (Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus) au Canada – Mise à jour.
    [Show full text]
  • Caribou (Barren-Ground Population) Rangifer Tarandus
    COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the Caribou Rangifer tarandus Barren-ground population in Canada THREATENED 2016 COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC. 2016. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Caribou Rangifer tarandus, Barren-ground population, in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. xiii + 123 pp. (http://www.registrelep-sararegistry.gc.ca/default.asp?lang=en&n=24F7211B-1). Production note: COSEWIC would like to acknowledge Anne Gunn, Kim Poole, and Don Russell for writing the status report on Caribou (Rangifer tarandus), Barren-ground population, in Canada, prepared under contract with Environment Canada. This report was overseen and edited by Justina Ray, Co-chair of the COSEWIC Terrestrial Mammals Specialist Subcommittee, with the support of the members of the Terrestrial Mammals Specialist Subcommittee. For additional copies contact: COSEWIC Secretariat c/o Canadian Wildlife Service Environment and Climate Change Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Tel.: 819-938-4125 Fax: 819-938-3984 E-mail: [email protected] http://www.cosewic.gc.ca Également disponible en français sous le titre Ếvaluation et Rapport de situation du COSEPAC sur le Caribou (Rangifer tarandus), population de la toundra, au Canada. Cover illustration/photo: Caribou — Photo by A. Gunn. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2016. Catalogue No. CW69-14/746-2017E-PDF ISBN 978-0-660-07782-6 COSEWIC Assessment Summary Assessment Summary – November 2016 Common name Caribou - Barren-ground population Scientific name Rangifer tarandus Status Threatened Reason for designation Members of this population give birth on the open arctic tundra, and most subpopulations (herds) winter in vast subarctic forests.
    [Show full text]