West Pilbara Iron Ore Project Stage 2 Hardey Referral Form and Proposal Overview
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
West Pilbara Iron Ore Project Stage 2 Hardey Referral Form and Proposal Overview Prepared by API Management Pty Ltd Environmental Protection FORM REFERRAL Referral of a Proposal by the Proponent to the Environmental Protection Authority PROPONENT EPA under Section 38(1) of the Environmental Protection Act. 1. PURPOSE OF THIS FORM Section 38(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986 (EP Act) provides that where a development proposal is likely to have a significant effect on the environment, a proponent may refer the proposal to the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) for a decision on whether or not it requires assessment under the EP Act. This form sets out the information requirements for the referral of a proposal by a proponent. Proponents are encouraged to familiarise themselves with the EPA’s General Guide on Referral of Proposals [see Environmental Impact Assessment/Referral of Proposals and Schemes] before completing this form. A referral under section 38(1) of the EP Act by a proponent to the EPA must be made on this form. A request to the EPA for a declaration under section 39B (derived proposal) must be made on this form. This form will be treated as a referral provided all information required by Part A has been included and all information requested by Part B has been provided to the extent that it is pertinent to the proposal being referred. Referral documents are to be submitted in two formats – hard copy and electronic copy. The electronic copy of the referral will be provided for public comment for a period of 7 days, prior to the EPA making its decision on whether or not to assess the proposal. CHECKLIST Before you submit this form, have you Yes No Completed all the questions in Part A (essential) Completed all applicable questions in Part B Included Attachment 1 – location maps Included Attachment 2 – additional document the proponent wishes to provide West Pilbara Iron Ore Project Stage 2 Hardey Proposal Overview West Pilbara Iron Ore Stage 2 Hardey Proposal Supporting Information Included Attachment 3 – confidential information (if applicable) NA Enclosed the CD of all referral information, including spatial data and contextual mapping but excluding confidential information. pg. 2 Following a review of the information presented in this form, please consider the following question. (A response is Optional) DO YOU CONSIDER THE PROPOSAL REQUIRES FORMAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT? YES NO NOT SURE IF YES, WHAT LEVEL OF ASSESSMENT? ASSESSMENT ON PROPONENT INFORMATION PUBLIC ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROPONENT DECLARATION (To be completed by the proponent) I, …Piers Goodman…………………………………………., (full name) declare that the information contained in this form is, to my knowledge, true and not misleading. Signature Name (print) Piers Goodman Position Company Manager, Environment & API Management Pty Ltd Community Date 10 July.2012 pg. 3 PART A - PROPONENT AND PROPOSAL INFORMATION (All fields of this Part must be completed for this document to be treated as a referral) 1.1 PROPONENT Name API Management Pty Ltd (API) Joint Venture parties Aquila Resources Limited (Aquila) (if applicable) American Metals and Coal International Inc. (AMCI) Postal Address Level 2 Aquila Centre 1 Preston Street Como WA 6152 Key proponent contact for the proposal Piers Goodman Name Manager Environment and Community API Management Pty Ltd Address Email: [email protected] Phone Ph: (08) 9423 0222 Email Fax: (08) 9423 0233 Consultant for the proposal (if applicable) Name Address Phone Email 1.2 PROPOSAL Title West Pilbara Iron Ore Project (WPIOP) Stage 2 - Hardey Proposal Description API Management Pty Ltd (API) is the proponent for the WPIOP Stage 2 Hardey Proposal (the Proposal), an iron ore mining and haulage operation. The Proposal is located approximately 50 km west-northwest of Paraburdoo in the Pilbara region of Western Australia. Production of up to 15 Mtpa of iron ore is planned for a period of up to 15 years. Ore would be mined by conventional open cut methods and transported via rail, approximately 150 km west-northwest, where it adjoins the southern end of the WPIOP Stage 1 railway. pg. 4 Extent (area) of proposed ground disturbance Up to 3,470 ha would be disturbed as part of the Proposal, comprising up to 650 ha in the mine area, up to 20 ha in the gas pipeline and up to 2,800 ha along the transport corridor. Timeframe in which the activity or development is Construction and commissioning would occur proposed to occur. (Include start and finish dates from 2015 to 2017. where applicable) Operations would occur from 2017. Details of any staging of the proposal No staging. Is the proposal a strategic proposal? No Is the proponent requesting a declaration that the No proposal is a derived proposal? If so, provide the following information on the strategic assessment within which the referred proposal was identified - Title of the strategic assessment Ministerial Statement number Indicate whether, and in what way, the proposal is The Proposal is a satellite development to related to other proposals in the region. the WPIOP Stage 1 Mine and Rail (Assessment No. 1767, Ministerial Statement 881). Ore would be transported via a railway that extends approximately 150 km west‐ northwest where it would link up with the WPIOP Stage 1 Mine and Rail. The Stage 1 railway would transport ore a further 285 km to a proposed deep-water port at Anketell Point, east of Karratha (WPIOP Anketell Point Port - Assessment No. 1794). Does the proponent own the land on which the Land is not owned by the proponent. Access proposal is to be established? If not, what other rights would be achieved via tenure granted under a State Agreement Act (in process), arrangements have been established to access the Mining Act 1978 and Land Administration the land? Act 1997. What is the current land use on the property, and Low intensity pastoral activities and the extent (area in hectares) of the property? unallocated Crown land. Mine area: The identified iron ore deposits and exploration lease E47/1413 occurs on Rocklea Station. Rocklea Station has a total area of 379,791 ha. Transport corridor: The transport corridor traverses Mt Stuart, Wyloo, Cheela Plains and Rocklea Stations as well as 46 km of unallocated Crown land. pg. 5 1.3 LOCATION Name of the Shire in which the proposal is Shire of Ashburton located For urban areas – street address lot number suburb nearest road intersection For remote localities – The Hardey Proposal is located approximately 50 km west-northwest of nearest town Paraburdoo in the Pilbara region of Western Australia. distance and direction from that town to the proposal site Electronic spatial data - GIS or CAD on CD, geo- Enclosed: Yes referenced and conforming to the following parameters: GIS: polygons representing all activities and named CAD: simple closed polygons representing all activities and named datum: GDA94 projection: Geographic (latitude/longitude) or Map Grid of Australia (MGA) format: ArcView shapefile, Arcinfo coverages, Microstation or AutoCAD 1.4 CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION Does the proponent wish to request the EPA to allow any part of the referral information to be treated as No confidential? If yes, is confidential information attached as a separate document in hard copy. N/A pg. 6 1.5 GOVERNMENT APPROVALS Is rezoning of any land required before the proposal can be implemented? No If Yes, provide details. Is approval required from any Commonwealth or State Government agency or Local Authority for any part of the Yes proposal? If yes, complete the table below - Agency/Authority Approval Required Application Agency/Local Authority lodged contact/s for proposal Yes / No Environmental Protection The proposal may require Purpose of this Mark Jefferies Authority (EPA) approval under Part IV of document. Mining and Industrial the Environmental Assessment Manager Protection Act 1986 (EP Act). Mining and Industrial Assessment Branch, OEPA The Atrium, Level 4, 168 St George's Terrace, Perth 6000. Department of The proposal will require No Environment and Works Approvals and a Conservation (DEC)/ Licence under Part V of the EP Act for crushing facilities, water treatment plants, waste disposal, sewage treatment plant, bulk fuel store and power generation. In the event the removal of declared Rare Flora cannot be avoided, approval to take will be sought under the provisions of the Wildlife Conservation Act 1950 in accordance with any EPA recommendations. No declared Rare Flora have been recorded in the project area to date. Grace Patorniti A permit to clear native Environment Officer Yes (NVCP) vegetation (for feasibility Native Vegetation investigative works) under Conservation Branch the EP Act was authorised Department of on the 26th May 2011. This Environment and authorisation is subject to Conservation the granting of a section 91 Locked Bag 104, Bentley from the Department of Drive Centre, Bentley Regional Development and 6983. Lands. pg. 7 Department of Water Permits will be obtained Bed and Banks Kevin Hopkinson (DoW) from the DoW, under the (pending). Senior Natural Resource Rights in Water and 5C and 26D Management Officer Irrigation Act 1914, for Licences (for Pilbara Region works associated with exploration, PO Box 836 Karratha interference to the bed and construction and 6714. banks of watercourses operations). where structures such as bridges or crossings are proposed. Relevant licences will be obtained for the construction of wells and abstraction of groundwater. Department of Mines and Application for Mining The Environmental Officer Petroleum (DMP) lease. Perth Inspectorate Environment Division Approval will be required No Department of Mines & from DMP to implement a Petroleum mining proposal and programmes of work, under 100 Plain Street the Mining Act 1978. East Perth 6004. Department of Where disturbance to TBA Indigenous Affairs (DIA) Aboriginal Heritage sites PO Box 7770 cannot be avoided, approval will be sought from Cloisters Square DIA under section 18 of the Perth 6850.