Manual for the Michigan Test Methods (Mtm)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

MANUAL FOR THE MICHIGAN TEST METHODS (MTM) CONSTRUCTION FIELD SERVICES DIVISION Last Revised: October 2020 FOREWORD This manual has been prepared by the Michigan Department of Transportation to describe the procedures used in testing certain materials, equipment, or operations. The Department generally uses test methods developed by national organizations, such as AASHTO or ASTM. In some cases, no method promulgated by a national organization has been found suitable, so a Michigan Test Method (MTM) has been written in its entirety. In other cases, certain provisions of a national method have been modified by an MTM to meet Department needs. Each Michigan Test Method has a unique designation shown in the bottom right corner of each page. General classification is indicated by the first digit of the sequential number (1, Aggregates; 2, Concrete; 3, Hot Mix Asphalt; 4, Soils; 5, Metals and Welds; 6, Chemicals and Coatings; 7, Miscellaneous). The number following the dash indicates the year of original adoption, or, in the case of revision, the year of the last revision. Thus, an MTM adopted or revised in 2004 will have as its final number, 04. A letter following this number indicates that an editorial change has been made since the last revision; 04a for the first change, 04b for the second change, etc. Editorial changes include corrections of typographical errors, changes in contact information, business unit names, or formatting changes. PROCEDURES FOR WRITING AND ADOPTING TEST METHODS Any work unit in the Department may prepare a Michigan Test Method. In general, the format should conform to that used by AASHTO for test methods and recommended practices, although substantial abbreviation is permissible when the method is only to provide limited modifications to a national standard. The test method must start with a paragraph on the scope to define the use of the method. Each new or revised (major change) test method is reviewed by the Construction Field Services (CFS) Division prior to submittal to the Engineering Operations Committee for final approval. New test method designations will be assigned by the Pavement Operations Engineer at CFS. All MDOT quality assurance procedures are reviewed and updated by the area that owns the procedure. Procedures are posted on the Department website. It may be necessary to retain superseded pages for reference on projects which have been advertised prior to the date revisions are implemented. The values stated in either inch-pound units (English) or SI units (metric) are to be regarded as the standard; within the text and tables, metric units are shown in parentheses. The values stated in each system may not be exactly equivalent; therefore, each system must be used independently of the other. Combining values from the two systems may result in nonconformance with the specification. MDOT MISSION STATEMENT Providing the highest quality integrated transportation services for economic benefit and improved quality of life. For copies of this manual, contact the MDOT Publications Office Telephone: (517) 636-0650 MICHIGAN TEST METHODS TABLE OF CONTENTS Part 1. AGGREGATES MTM 101 Michigan Test Method for Water Asphalt Preferential Test MTM 102 Michigan Test Method for Abrasion Resistance of Aggregate by the Los Angeles Machine MTM 103 Michigan Test Method for Determination of Insoluble Residue in Carbonate Aggregates MTM 104 Michigan Test Method for Petrographic Analysis of Aggregates MTM 105 Michigan Test Method for Determining Specific Gravity and Absorption of Coarse Aggregates in Petrographic Analysis Samples MTM 106 Michigan Test Method for Determining Adsorption of Coarse Aggregates in Petrographic Analysis Samples MTM 107 Michigan Test Method for Sampling Aggregates MTM 108 Michigan Test Method for Materials Finer than No. 75 μm (No. 200) Sieve in Mineral Aggregates by Washing MTM 109 Michigan Test Method for Sieve Analysis of Fine, Dense Graded, Open Graded and Coarse Aggregates in the Field MTM 110 Michigan Test Method for Determining Deleterious and Objectionable Particles in Aggregates MTM 111 Michigan Test Method for Determining an Aggregate Wear Index (AWI) by Wear Track Polishing Tests MTM 112 Michigan Test Method for Determining An Aggregate Wear Index (AWI) From Sample Petrographic Composition and Wear Track AWI Factors MTM 113 Michigan Test Method for Selection and Preparation of Coarse Aggregate Samples for Freeze-Thaw Testing MTM 114 Michigan Test Method for Making Concrete Specimens for Freeze-Thaw Testing of Concrete Coarse Aggregate MTM 115 Michigan Test Method for Testing Concrete for Durability by Rapid Freezing in Air and Thawing in Water MTM 116 Michigan Test Method for Identifying Aggregates That Produce Calcium Carbonate Precipitate MTM 117 Michigan Test Method for Determining Percentage of Crushed Particles in Aggregates MTM 118 Michigan Test Method for Measuring Fine Aggregate Angularity MTM 119 Michigan Test Method for Sampling Open-Graded Drainage Course (OGDC) Compacted In Place MTM 120 Michigan Test Method for Preparing Concrete Pavement Cores to Be Tested For Durability by Rapid Freezing in Air and Thawing in Water MTM 121 Michigan Test Method for Testing Concrete Pavement Cores For Durability by Rapid Freezing in Air and Thawing in Water MTM 122E Michigan Test Method for Determination of the Drainability Characteristics of Granular Materials (English) MTM 122M Michigan Test Method for Determination of the Drainability Characteristics of Granular Materials (Metric) MTM 123 Michigan Test Method for Field Determination of the Dry Unit Weight (Loose Measure) of Coarse Aggregates MTM 124 Michigan Test Method for Determining Aggregate Freeze-Thaw Durability by Unconfined Freeze-Thaw Testing MTM 128 Michigan Test Method for Determination of Iowa Pore Index of Coarse Aggregates MTM 129 Michigan Test Method for Leachate Determination of Iron Blast Furnace Slag Used for Lightweight Aggregate Fill Part 2. CONCRETE MTM 201 Michigan Test Method for Determination of Pavement Thickness and Depth of Steel Reinforcement in Concrete Pavement by the Coring Method MTM 203 Michigan Test Method for Testing Concrete Blocks Used for Precast Concrete Slope Paving MTM 205 Michigan Test Method for Consolidation Method of Concrete Cylinder Test Specimens MTM 206 Michigan Test Method for Use of Unbonded Caps in Determination of Compressive Strength of Hardened Concrete Cylinders MTM 207 Michigan Test Method for Testing Concrete MTM 208 Michigan Test Method for Shotcrete Core Evaluation Part 3. HOT MIX ASPHALT MTM 306 Michigan Test Method for Air and Water Method of Determining the Actual Specific Gravity by Single Operator for a HMA Mixture MTM 308 Michigan Test Method for the Asphalt Immersion Method (Beaker Method) for Determining the Theoretical Maximum Specific Gravity of HMA Paving Mixtures MTM 309 Michigan Test Method for HMA Marshall Mix Design Procedure MTM 311 Michigan Test Method for Determining Aggregate Gradation for HMA Mixture MTM 313 Michigan Test Method for Sampling HMA Paving Mixtures MTM 314 Michigan Test Method for Theoretical Maximum Specific Gravity and Density of HMA Paving Mixtures MTM 315 Michigan Test Method for Bulk Specific Gravity and Density of Compacted HMA Mixtures Using Saturated Surface-Dry Specimens MTM 319 Michigan Test Method for Determination of Asphalt Content From Asphalt Paving Mixtures By the Ignition Method MTM 320 Michigan Test Method for Determining Specific Gravity and Absorption of Coarse Aggregates MTM 321 Michigan Test Method for Determining Specific Gravity and Absorption of Fine Aggregates MTM 322 Michigan Test Method for HMA Mix Design Procedure MTM 324 Michigan Test Method for Sampling HMA Paving Mixtures Behind the Paver MTM 325 Michigan Test Method for Quantitative Extraction of Bitumen from HMA Paving Mixtures MTM 326 Michigan Test Method for Quantitative Measurement of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) Pavements Part 4. SOILS MTM 401 Michigan Test Method for Transverse Shearing Resistance of Cohesive Soils MTM 403 Michigan Test Method for Determining the Liquid Limit of Soils MTM 404 Michigan Test Method for The Moisture-Density Relations of Soils Using a 5.5 pound (2.5 kg) Rammer and a 12 inch (305 mm) Drop MTM 405 Michigan Test Method for Unconfined Compressive Strength of Cohesive Soil MTM 406 Michigan Test Method for Natural Moisture-Density Determination of Undisturbed Liner Samples MTM 407 Michigan Test Method for Natural Moisture Content Determination of Disturbed Soil Samples MTM 409 Michigan Test Method for Magnetic Particle Determination for Soils or Aggregates MTM 410 Michigan Test Method for Electrochemical Testing for Mechanically Stabilized Embankments MTM 411 Michigan Test Method for Compressive Properties of Prefabricated Drainage Systems MTM 412 Michigan Test Method for Hydraulic Bursting Strength of Nonwoven Geotextile Fabrics - Diaphragm Bursting Strength Tester Method MTM 413 Michigan Test Method for the Moisture-Density Relations of Recycled Mixtures Using a 10.0 Pound (4.5 kg) Rammer and an 18 Inch (457 mm) Drop Part 5. METALS AND WELDS MTM 501 Michigan Test Method for Turn-of-Nut Part 6. CHEMICALS AND COATINGS MTM 601 Michigan Test Method for Epoxy Coated Dowel Bars for Load Transfer in Concrete Pavement Joints MTM 605 Michigan Test Method for Determination of Chloride Ion Content in Hardened Concrete MTM 613 Michigan Test Method for Determining the Amount of Zinc and Clear Coat on a Fence Post with a Multi-Coated System MTM 614 Michigan Test Method for Bond Release Agents for Epoxy Coated Dowel Bars Part 7. MISCELLANEOUS
Recommended publications
  • Forestry Materials Forest Types and Treatments

    Forestry Materials Forest Types and Treatments

    -- - Forestry Materials Forest Types and Treatments mericans are looking to their forests today for more benefits than r ·~~.'~;:_~B~:;. A ever before-recreation, watershed protection, wildlife, timber, "'--;':r: .";'C: wilderness. Foresters are often able to enhance production of these bene- fits. This book features forestry techniques that are helping to achieve .,;~~.~...t& the American dream for the forest. , ~- ,.- The story is for landolVners, which means it is for everyone. Millions . .~: of Americans own individual tracts of woodland, many have shares in companies that manage forests, and all OWII the public lands managed by government agencies. The forestry profession exists to help all these landowners obtain the benefits they want from forests; but forests have limits. Like all living things, trees are restricted in what they can do and where they can exist. A tree that needs well-drained soil cannot thrive in a marsh. If seeds re- quire bare soil for germination, no amount of urging will get a seedling established on a pile of leaves. The fOllOwing pages describe th.: ways in which stands of trees can be grown under commonly Occllrring forest conditions ill the United States. Originating, growing, and tending stands of trees is called silvicllllllr~ \ I, 'R"7'" -, l'l;l.f\ .. (silva is the Latin word for forest). Without exaggeration, silviculture is the heartbeat of forestry. It is essential when humans wish to manage the forests-to accelerate the production or wildlife, timber, forage, or to in- / crease recreation and watershed values. Of course, some benerits- t • wilderness, a prime example-require that trees be left alone to pursue their' OWII destiny.
  • SEABIRD TISSUE ARCHIVAL and MONITORING PROJECT: Protocol for Collecting and Banking Seabird Eggs

    SEABIRD TISSUE ARCHIVAL and MONITORING PROJECT: Protocol for Collecting and Banking Seabird Eggs

    OCS Study, MMS 2001-031 NISTIR6735 SEABIRD TISSUE ARCHIVAL AND MONITORING PROJECT: Protocol for Collecting and Banking Seabird Eggs Geoff Weston York Barbara J. Porter Rebecca S. Pugh Da vid G. Roseneau Kristin Simac Paul R. Becker Lyman K. Thorsteinson and Stephen A. Wise e•• •• NlST • ,;) g Nation<:d Institute of Standards and Techn.:>logy Technoio9Y AdminIstration, U.S. Department of Commerce NIST CENTENNIAL. , DCS Study, MMS 2001-031 NISTIR6735 SEABIRD TISSUE ARCHIVAL AND MONITORING PROJECT: Protocol for Collecting and Banking Seabird Eggs Geoff Weston York' Barbara J. Porter Rebecca S. Pugh' David G. Roseneau' Kristin Simac I Paul R. Becker' Lyman K. Thorsteinson" and Stephen A. Wise2 IU.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Alaska Biological Resources Center 2National Institute of Standards and Technology Chemical Science and Technology Laboratory 3U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Alaska Maritime National Wildlife Refuge 4U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Biological Resources Division - Western Office April 2001 ~USGS scilmce tor" challfJing womJ U.S. Department of Commerce Donald L Evans, Secretary National Institute of Standards and Technology Karen H. Brown, Acting Director CONTENTS page List of Tables .iii List of Figures .iii Acknowledgments iv Disclaimer v INTRODUCTION '" 1 Environmental Specimen Banking 1 Project Goal and Objectives................................................................................................. 2 Banking Seabird Eggs 2 MANAGEMENT SySTEM 6 MA TERIALS 8 Materials Required for Collecting Eggs and Shipping them to the Processing Laboratory... 8 Materials Required for Processing Eggs 8 Materials Required for Packaging Samples and Shipping Them to the Specimen Bank. 9 Seabird Data Form 9 METHODS 15 Egg Collection Field Procedures 15 Egg Processing Laboratory Procedures.
  • Installation Tips

    Installation Tips

    Installation Tips Important Please Read Before Going Further! Installation of Kitchen Cabinets is NOT a Do-It-Yourself project for those without extensive experience in finish carpentry. If you are not a professional carpenter please seek help from a trained professional. This guide is meant to be used as a supplement to carpenters who are trained and familiar with cabinetry installa- tion techniques, it is not meant to be a stand alone installation guide. Version 1.0 - 2009 CABINET INSTALLATION TABLE OF CONTENTS Cabinet installation requires special skills and tools. If you are COMMON INSTALLATION TOOLS uncertain of any part of these basic instructions, terms or lack the minimum listed tools, consult with your cabinet supplier For professional results have the tools you need at hand and for recommended professional cabinet installation mechanics. ready. Here’s a tip: save changeover time by having two An error during installation can result in costly repairs and cordless screwguns – one with a drill bit for predrilling screw delays. holes and another with a screw tip. TERMS TO KNOW • Power Drill • Sand Paper • Drill Bits • Block Plane • Terms and Tools Level: A horizontal plane at right angles to the plumb. • Carpenter’s Levels (2’ & 4’) • Clamps • Carpenter’s Square • Caulking Plumb: A true vertical line. If something is “out of plumb” it •Tape Measure (1”x25’) • Chalk Line is not exactly straight up and down. • Step ladder • Mitre Box • Common Construction Details • Nail Set • Marking Tools Square: All lines parallel and at 90° to each other. • Extension Cord(s) • Stud Finder Rail: A horizontal framing member of a cabinet door.
  • Learn the Six Methods for Determining Moisture

    Learn the Six Methods for Determining Moisture

    SCIENCE OF SENSING Learn the Six Methods For Determining Moisture ADVANTAGES, DEFICIENCIES AND WHO USES EACH METHOD CONTENTS 1. Introduction 3 2. Primary versus Secondary Test Methods 4 3. Primary Methods 5 a. Karl Fisher 6 b. Loss On Drying 8 4. Secondary Methods 10 a. Electrical Methods 11 b. Microwave 13 c. Nuclear 15 d. Near-Infrared 17 5. Conclusion 19 6. About the Author 20 7. About Kett 20 8. Next Steps 21 Learn the Six Methods For Determining Moisture | www.kett.com 2 1. INTRODUCTION With three-quarters of the earth covered with water, almost everything we touch or eat has some water content. The accurate measurement of water content is very important, as it affects all aspects of a business and it’s supply chain. As discussed in our previous ebook “A Guide To Accurate and Reliable Moisture Measurement”, the proper (or improper) utilization of moisture meters to optimize water can be the difference between profitability and failure for a business. This ebook, the 6 Methods For Determining Moisture is for anyone interested in pursuing the goal of accurate moisture measurement, including: quality control, quality assurance, production management, design/build engineers, executive management and of course anyone wanting to learn more about this far reaching topic. The purpose of this ebook is to provide insight into the various major moisture measurement technologies and to help you identify which is the right type of instrument for your needs. Expect to learn the six major methods of moisture measurement, the positive aspects of each, as well as the drawbacks.
  • A Treemendous Educator Guide

    A Treemendous Educator Guide

    A TREEmendous Educator Guide Throughout 2011, we invite you to join us in shining a deserving spotlight on some of Earth’s most important, iconic, and heroic organisms: trees. To strengthen efforts to conserve and sustainably manage trees and forests worldwide, the United Nations has declared 2011 as the International Year of Forests. Their declaration provides an excellent platform to increase awareness of the connections between healthy forests, ecosystems, people, and economies and provides us all with an opportunity to become more aware, more inspired, and more committed to act. Today, more than 8,000 tree species—about 10 percent of the world’s total—are threatened with extinction, mostly driven by habitat destruction or overharvesting. Global climate change will certainly cause this number to increase significantly in the years to come. Here at the Garden, we care for many individual at-risk trees (representing 48 species) within our diverse, global collection. Many of these species come from areas of the world where the Garden is working to restore forest ecosystems and the trees in them. Overall, we have nearly 6,000 individual trees in our main Garden, some dating from the time of founder Henry Shaw. Thousands more trees thrive at nearby Shaw Nature Reserve, as part of the Garden’s commitment to native habitat preservation, conservation, and restoration. Regardless of where endangered trees are found—close to home or around the world—their survival requires action by all of us. The Great St. Louis Tree Hunt of 2011 is one such action, encouraging as many people as possible to get out and get connected with the spectacular trees of our region.
  • Grease Sampling Kit for Pillow Block Bearings MGT-01-008

    Grease Sampling Kit for Pillow Block Bearings MGT-01-008 Directions for sampling with the Grease Thief from Pillow Block Bearings: Enclosed in the kit: • Eight (8) sleeves containing: - One (1) 10cc plastic syringe - One (1) plastic spatula - One (1) Grease Thief with yellow cap - One (1) Shipping Tube - One (1) Blank Equipment Label • One (1) shipping envelopes 1. Remove yellow cap from Grease Thief and place back into bag to keep clean. 2. Remove plunger from syringe and place back into bag to keep clean 3. Use wide end of spatula to remove any dirt or debris. 4. Use narrow end of spatula to sample grease from desired test area 5. Place grease from spatula into plastic syringe. Approximately 1.5 grams of grease or about 2 cc are needed to completely fill the Grease Thief. 6. Inject the grease from the syringe into the Grease Thief to push the plunger to the far end as the grease fills the body. The Grease Thief is completely full when the grease just begins to exit at the relief holes. While grease is being added, it is necessary to slowly withdraw the syringe tip from within the Grease Thief body to completely fill the open end. BODY OPEN END PISTON BODY HANDLE END BARB 7. Prior to placing the yellow cap onto the Grease Thief for shipment, purge a small por- tion of the grease from the Grease Thief into the yellow cap to relieve any pressure build up from placing the cap on the full Grease Thief. 8. Once a small portion of the grease is in the yellow cap, firmly place the yellow cap on the Grease Thief.
  • Advanced Timber Bridge Inspection

    Advanced Timber Bridge Inspection

    Advanced Timber Bridge Inspection Field Manual for Inspection of Minnesota Timber Bridges Natural Resources Research Institute [This page intentionally left blank] ii Acknowledgements Thank you to the following sponsors and project participants for their valuable input in the production of this document. Primary Lead Authors Brian Brashaw, University of Minnesota Duluth Natural Resources Research Institute James Wacker, USDA Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory Robert J. Ross, USDA Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory Funding Sponsors: Minnesota Local Road Research Board (LRRB), Contract 99008 WO 62 Iowa Highway Research Board (IHRB) Project Team: University of Minnesota Duluth Natural Resources Research Institute Minnesota Department of Transportation Bridge Office Minnesota Department of Transportation Research Office Iowa State University, Bridge Engineering Center USDA Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory HDR, Inc. Technical Advisory Panel: Project Leaders: Brian Brashaw, University of Minnesota Duluth Natural Resources Research Institute (NRRI) David Conkel, Minnesota Department of Transportation, State Aid Travis Hosteng, Iowa State University Bridge Engineering Center Chris Werner, HDR Engineering, Inc. James Wacker, USDA Forest Products Laboratory Committee Members: Ahmad Abu-Hawash, Iowa Department of Transportation, Bridges and Structures Matthew Hemmila, St. Louis County (Minnesota) Greg Isakson, Goodhue County (Minnesota) Art Johnston, USDA Forest Service (retired) Brian Keierleber, Buchanan County (Iowa)
  • Variation Factors in the Design and Analysis of Replicated Controlled Experiments - Three (Dis)Similar Studies on Inspections Versus Unit Testing

    Variation Factors in the Design and Analysis of Replicated Controlled Experiments - Three (Dis)Similar Studies on Inspections Versus Unit Testing

    Variation Factors in the Design and Analysis of Replicated Controlled Experiments - Three (Dis)similar Studies on Inspections versus Unit Testing Runeson, Per; Stefik, Andreas; Andrews, Anneliese Published in: Empirical Software Engineering DOI: 10.1007/s10664-013-9262-z 2014 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Runeson, P., Stefik, A., & Andrews, A. (2014). Variation Factors in the Design and Analysis of Replicated Controlled Experiments - Three (Dis)similar Studies on Inspections versus Unit Testing. Empirical Software Engineering, 19(6), 1781-1808. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-013-9262-z Total number of authors: 3 General rights Unless other specific re-use rights are stated the following general rights apply: Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal Read more about Creative commons licenses: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. LUND UNIVERSITY PO Box 117 221 00 Lund +46 46-222 00 00 Variation Factors in the Design and Analysis of Replicated Controlled Experiments { Three (Dis)similar Studies on Inspections versus Unit Testing Per Runeson, Andreas Stefik and Anneliese Andrews Lund University, Sweden, [email protected] University of Nevada, NV, USA, stefi[email protected] University of Denver, CO, USA, [email protected] Empirical Software Engineering, DOI: 10.1007/s10664-013-9262-z Self archiving version.
  • Methods, Method Verification and Validation Volume 2

    Methods, Method Verification and Validation Volume 2

    OOD AND RUG DMINISTRATION Revision #: 02 F D A Document Number: OFFICE OF REGULATORY AFFAIRS Revision Date: ORA-LAB.5.4.5 ORA Laboratory Manual Volume II 06/30/2020 Title: Page 1 of 32 Methods, Method Verification and Validation Sections in This Document 1. Purpose ....................................................................................................................................2 2. Scope .......................................................................................................................................2 3. Responsibility............................................................................................................................2 4. Background...............................................................................................................................3 5. References ...............................................................................................................................4 6. Procedure .................................................................................................................................5 6.1. Method Selection ...........................................................................................................5 6.2. Method Evaluation & Record .........................................................................................5 6.3. Standard Method Verification .........................................................................................5 6.3.1. Chemistry........................................................................................................
  • Common Forestry Terms for the Forest Landowner

    Common Forestry Terms for the Forest Landowner

    ALABAMA A&M AND AUBURN UNIVERSITIES Common Forestry Terms for the Forest ANR-1373 Landowner ithout a basic understanding of forestry agroforestry terms, it can be difficult to communicate The practice of growing trees and agricultural or W with foresters or buyers of forestland or horticultural crops on the same site. timber. Being well versed in forestry terminology can help landowners feel confident when making • alley cropping management decisions or selling their timber. This The practice of growing crops between rows of glossary is a tool for landowners seeking to define planted trees. ownership objectives, develop management plans, improve their timber stands, or conduct a timber sale. • conservation buffers Using a forestry consultant is highly recommended, The practice of growing trees in rows to alter wind and knowing these terms can help landowners better flow and protect crops, reduce erosion, improve communicate with foresters and understand various irrigation efficiency, improve water quality, and forestry processes. provide habitat for wildlife. • forest farming Forest Management The practice of cultivating or collecting specialty afforestation forest products in the forest environment. Growing trees on land where there were none. • silvopasture Cost-share programs usually require that the land has The practice of grazing livestock among not been in forest for at least several decades. forest trees. ARCHIVE Silvopasture (photo credit: MediaAssociates) www.aces.edu Windrow (Photo credit: Janice Dyer) best management practices (BMPs) overtopping Guidelines to minimize negative impacts on the When trees of undesirable species grow faster than environment, such as soil erosion and water pollution, those of the target species, blocking sunlight and before, during, and after a timber harvest or other slowing their growth.
  • ETA Visible Emissions Observer Training Manual

    ETA Visible Emissions Observer Training Manual

    Eastern Technical Associates Visible Emissions Observer Training Manual June 2013 Copyright © 1997-2013 by ETA i Eastern Technical Associates © Welcome Visible Emissions Observer Trainee: During the next few days you will be trained in one of the oldest and most common source measurement techniques – visible emissions observations. There are more people measuring visible emissions today than at any time in the 100-plus-year history of emissions observations. We have prepared this manual to assist you in your training, certification, and most important, field observations. It is impossible to give proper credit to all who developed and supported the technology that contributed to this manual. The list would probably be longer than the manual itself. We have been working in this field since 1970 and stand in the footprints of many innovators. Much of the material in this manual comes from the contributions of the many visible emissions instructors we have been privileged to work with as well as U.S. EPA documents and the contributions of our staff for more than 30 years. The purpose of this manual is to give you a hands-on, readable reference for the topics addressed in the classroom portion of our training. It should also be useful as a reference document in the future when you are a certified observer performing measurements in the field. Unfortunately, we cannot cover all of the possible situations you might encounter, but the guidance in this document combined with the training you receive in ETA’s classroom and field programs should enable you to make valid observations for more than 90% of the sources you observe.
  • OP10-1003 Qxq

    OP10-1003 Qxq

    WOMEN’S INTERAGENCY HIV STUDY ORAL PROTOCOL FORM OP10: SUBGINGIVAL PLAQUE SAMPLES COMLETING THE FORM GENERAL INFORMATION Affix the Participants ID label in the space indicated. Record the visit number, which should be the same as the WIHS core visit. Be sure the form version is the most current version date. Record your initials. Record the date. SUBGINGIVAL PLAQUE SAMPLES If participant if edentulous (OP 6 #1 is coded as 1). Form OP 10 is left blank. 1. Indicate if specimens were collected for positive gingival banding scores on the facial or lingual aspects. 1a. Record the tooth number from which these samples were collected. 2. Indicate if specimens were collected from papilla sites with scores of 3 or 5. 2a. Record the tooth numbers (i.e., the most mesial tooth bounding the interdental space) from which the sample was collected. 2b. Indicate the Papillary Assessment score associated with the sample by circling the appropriate code. 3. These samples should be taken at all visits. Indicate if samples were taken from sites exhibiting a ≥ 2mm change in attachment since the WIHS Oral visit prior to last. 3a. Indicate the tooth numbers from which these samples were taken. Refer to samples in the appendix section of this manual for the complete and proper way to fill out the laboratory request forms that are to accompany each plaque sample collected and shipped to the lab. All three copies of the triplicate should be sent with the specimen. EQUIPMENT • Fine sterile paper points • Cotton rolls • Sterile curette • Sterile cotton forceps • 4 vials (2 plastic vials for PCR analysis and 2 glass vials with anaerobic medium) for affected site.