Annexure – I: ToR compliance is not adequate and needs to be resubmitted.

1.1. Compliance of ToR The compliance of the ToR set out as Annexure – I and additional ToR as per scoping clearance given by the MoEF consequent to the 11thMeeting held on 25th to 27th September 2013 is given Table 1.4.

Table 1.4 : Compliance of ToR S. Terms of Reference (TORs) Cross Ref. in EIA Report No.

1. Year-wise production details In the light of the interim relief granted by the Hon’ble Apex Court in its order dated since 1994 should be given, 25.11.2013, 24.2.2014 and 27.3.2014 and temporary working permission granted clearly stating the highest by Joint Secretory, Government of , Khan(Group-2) Department, production achieved in any one Rajasthan vide its letter no. P.8(6)Khan/Group-2/2013, dated 19.12.2013, the LoI year prior to 1994. It may also holder has executed the mining operation and during period 2013-2014 and 2014- be categorically informed 2015, has won 405706 metric tonne, the yearly production details are given below: whether there had been any (Section 2.8.5) increase in production after the EIA Notification, 1994 came S. No. Period Quantity (tonne) into force w.r.t. the highest production achieved prior to 1 2013-2014 85232 1994 2 2014-2015 320474

Total 405706

2. A copy of the document in Letter of Intent issued by the Govt. of Rajasthan is enclosed as Annexure-I support of the fact that the Proponent is the rightful lessee of the mine should be given

3. All documents including Yes chapter 1 and 2 provide project details from which it is manifest that data approved mine plan, EIA and regarding mine lease area , production levels and waste generation and its public hearing should be management etc are in line with approved mine plan (Volume-II). compatible with one another in terms of the mine lease area, production levels, waste generation and its management and mining technology and should be in the name of the lessee

4. All corner coordinates of the The mine lease area, with all corner coordinates, has been marked in mosaic of mine lease area, toposheets in Figure 3.1 and satellite view is shown in Figure 3.2 superimposed on a High Resolution Imagery/Toposheets should be provided. Such an Imagery of the proposed area should clearly show the land use and other ecological features of the study area (core and buffer zone)

5. Does the company have a well The project proponent has environment polity of its own (Annexure-VIII A). laid down Environment Policy approved by its Board of The PP shall comply with the environmental norms and conditions set forth in the Directors? If so, it may be spelt main Environmental Clearance of the project and shall submit compliance to the out in the EIA report with MoEF periodically as warranted under the EC letter. description of the prescribed The applicant has well defined procedures to bring out any infringement / deviation operating process/procedures of the environmental/forest regulations and norms (Annexure-VIII B) to bring into focus any infringement/deviation/violation The hierarchical system of the company and the system for reporting non- of the environmental or forest compliances has been covered under Section 6.6 and its sub-section. (Annexure- norms/ conditions? The VIII C) hierarchical system or administrative order of the Company to deal with the environmental issues and for ensuring compliance with the EC conditions may also be given. The system of reporting of non-compliances / violations of environmental norms to the Board of Directors of the Company and/or shareholders or stakeholders at large may also be detailed in the EIA report.

6. Issues relating to Mine Safety, The issues related to safety of opencast riverbed mining and safety of river and including subsidence study in nearby structures have been eloquently made out in Section 2.1 and the slope study case of underground mining for failure of pit slope shows that the safety factor is more than 1.5 (Section 7.5) and slope study in case of open cast mining, blasting study etc.  There will be no subsidence as the mining is not underground. should be detailed. The  No blasting study is required as drilling and blasting are not required. proposed safeguard measures  To prevent excess to excavation area by unauthorized persons safety measures will be implemented as per Mines Act, 1952, MMR 1961, Mines in each case should also be Rules 1955 and MCDR 1988. provided.  Sides of excavation shall be properly benched and sloped as per regulation 106 of MMR 1961 to prevent slides.  The bench width shall be kept higher than height of bench (max. 3m) for ease of operation.  The safety factor against slope failure has been worked out as under by adopting Taylor’stability curve for stability number N=0.035 for angle of slope of 400. 7. The study area will comprise of The study area falling within the domain of the tehsil is shown in Figure 3.1. 10 km zone around the mine lease from lease periphery and The waste generation for the entire lease period has been worked out. (Section the data contained in the EIA 2.8.10 and Table 2.5) such as waste generation etc., should be for the life of the mine / lease period. 8. Land use of the study area Landuse map of study area comprising 10 km and 2 km zone around Mine Lease delineating forest area, and Lease Periphery is shown in Figure 3.9 and Tabulated in Table 3.5. agricultural land, grazing land, wildlife sanctuary, national 10 kmZone around the mine lease Landuse /Landcover park, migratory routes of fauna, area Class water bodies, human Area(Sq.km) Percentage (%) settlements and other Agricultural land 2082.36 65.53 ecological features should be Agri fallow land 538.84 16.96 indicated. Land use plan of the Settlement 35.00 1.10 mine lease area should be Water body 9.47 0.30 prepared to encompass preoperational, operational and Dry river bed 41.77 1.31 post operational phases and Open scrub land 440.29 13.86 submitted. Impact, if any, of Vegetation 30.00 0.94 change of land use should be Total 3177.73 100 given. The Landuse pattern of the ML Area at present and at the end of 3rd and 5th year is shown in Table 3.6.

S. Present land At the end of Particulars No. use (ha) 5th year (ha) 1 Pit area 9.66 266.67 2 Dump area 0.0 - Bridge 202.5 202.5 Safety Permanent 89.1 89.1 3 zone Roads Wells 45.35 45.35 Infrastructure (office, - - 4 temp, shelter etc) 5 Mineral Storage - - 6 Plantation - 88.0 7 Un worked 3512.39 3167.38 Total 3859.00 3859.00

9. Details of the land for any Over Overburden Dump :There shall be no waste generation due to mining thus there will Burden Dumps outside the be no development of external / internal overburden dumps (Section 2.8.8 of the mine lease, such as extent of EIA report) land area, distance from mine lease, its land use, R&R issues, R&R Issue: No R&R is involved as the entire ML Area is govt. land, Gair Mumkin if any, should be given Nadi Nala as per revenue record, thus neither any private land nor asset acquisition is involved. (Section 7.10)

10. A Certificate from the The ML Area does not involve any forest land inasmuch as the lease area, covered Competent Authority in the under several Khasra numbers of different villages, is classified as Gair Mumkin State Forest Department Nadi Nala in the revenue records and not as forest. should be provided, confirming the involvement of forestland, if Besides this mining department granted the LoI after ascertaining from the any, in the project area. In the forest department through inter-departmental clarification that the lease event of any contrary claim by being free from encumbrance of forest department the Project Proponent regarding the status of forests, the site may be inspected by the State Forest Department along with the Regional Office of the Ministry to ascertain the status of forests, based on which, the Certificate in this regard as mentioned above be issued. In all such cases, it would be desirable for representative of the State Forest Department to assist the Expert Appraisal Committees

11. Status of forestry clearance for Not applicable, as no diversion of forest land for non-forestry purpose is envisaged the broken up area and virgin under the approved mine plan. Therefore, there is no case for deposition of any forestland involved in the NPV / CA amount. Project including deposition of net present value (NPV) and compensatory afforestation (CA) should be indicated. A copy of the forestry clearance should also be furnished.

12. Implementation status of Not applicable as neither any forest land is involved in lease area nor any settlement recognition of forest rights habitated by ST and other traditional forest dwellers exists. under the Scheduled Tribes and other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006 should be indicated

13. The vegetation in the RF / PF The taxonomic diversity and the phyto-sociological characteristics of the plant areas in the study area, with species in buffer zone covering forested area (Madri PF) has been provided in detail necessary details, should be (Section 3.9.1) given

14. A study shall be got done to No Schedule-I & II species, under WPA 1972, have been sighted in the project ascertain the impact of the area i.e. core zone. However, a few mammals and avi-fauna included in Schedule I Mining Project on wildlife of the (Common Peafowl) & II (Jungle Cat, Indian Fox and Rhesus Monkey) of WPA Act, study area and details 1972 are stated to be present in the buffer zone and these wild animals sometimes furnished. Impact of the project also frequent the area nearby the river banks and thus need to be protected and on the wildlife in the conserved. surrounding and any other protected area and accordingly Impact on Wildlife : Section 4.8.2. detailed mitigative measures  The influx of labours and noise generation due to running of mining required, should be worked out machinery and transportation has an adverse impact on terrestrial fauna with cost implications and and avi-fauna during mining hours. submitted.  Intervention in the riverbed will impact butterflies and birds which are quite sensitive to noise and human presence.  The traffic noise has detrimental effect on the survival rates and breeding success of such fauna which reside in the small habitats along riverbank road side communicating using acoustic signals.  Sometime as a result of habitat loss and physical disturbance, the fauna shall move from the habitat along road side/ riverbank.  The project area does not constitute part of any wildlife migratory routes and mining activities won’t affect animal movement. Mitigation Measures: Section 4.8.2.

 Progressive afforestation will create favorable conditions and good habitat for fauna in the area.  Measures shall be adopted to curb pollution due to air, water, land and noise environment.  Access shall be aligned without encroaching into the riparian zones.  Sand mining shall be totally avoided in vegetated riparian areas in the lease area.  Creating and developing awareness for nature and wildlife among the mine workers and in the adjoining villages.  Implementation of conservation plan for Wildlife reported in buffer-zone and listed in Schedule – I & II 15. Location of National Parks, No Protected area like National Parks, Sanctuaries, Biosphere Reserves, Wildlife Sanctuaries, Biosphere Corridors, Tiger/Elephant Reserves, exist within 10 km of the mine lease. (Section Reserves, Wildlife Corridors, 2.1) Tiger/Elephant Reserves/(existing as well as The nearest protected area is Todgarh Raoli WLS (54 km) and Kumbhalgarh WLS proposed), if any, within 10 km (55 km). of the mine lease should be

clearly indicated, supported by a location map duly authenticated by Chief Wildlife Warden. Necessary clearance, as may be applicable to such projects due to proximity of the ecologically sensitive areas as mentioned above, should be obtained from the State Wildlife Department/Chief Wildlife Warden under the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 and copy furnished

16. A detailed biological study of Detailed biological study for flora of core and buffer zone has been conducted and the study area [core zone and shown in Section 3.9.1 and for terrestrial and aquatic fauna under Section 3.9.2. buffer zone (10 km radius of the Conservation Plan for specific species covered under Schedule I & II has been periphery of the mine lease)] provided under Section 9.2.5. shall be carried out. Details of flora and fauna, duly S. ITEM Amount authenticated, separately for No. (Rs. Lac) core and buffer zone should be 1. Conservation of Soil and Water furnished based on such 1.1 Improvement of existing water sources 1.00 primary field survey, clearly (Small Ponds) indicating the Schedule of the 1.2 Development of new water sources (Water 1.00 fauna present. In case of any Holes) scheduled I fauna found in the 1.3 Construction of Anicut / Check Dams on 2.00 study area, the necessary plan small Nalas / Balas for their conservation should be 2. Habitat Improvement prepared in consultation with State Forest and Wildlife 2.1 Plantation / Pasture Development 2.00 Department and details 2.2 Burning regime, seeding and grass cutting 0.50 furnished. Necessary 2.3 Improvement of Escape cover 0.50 allocation of funds for 2.4 Improvement of Reproductive cover 0.50 implementing the same should 3. Creation of Conservation Awareness 0.25 be made as part of the project 4. Provision of Salt Licks 0.25 cost 5. Incentives to informers of illegal game / poaching 0.50 6. Fencing of Natural Habitat to check the 0.75 encroachment 7. Strengthing of trans location centers in the 0.75 district by one time financial aid Total for five years 10.00

17. Proximity to Areas declared as The certificate from RSPCB to the effect that the lease area does not fall under ‘Critically Polluted’ or the critically polluted area is enclosed as Annexure-IX of EIA. Project areas likely to come under the ‘Aravali Range’, The mine lease area does not fall under Aravalli Range Notification (Certificate of (attracting court restrictions for Competent Authority enclosed as Annexure IV). The mine plan has been approved mining operations), should also by the State Mining Department. be indicated and where so required, clearance certifications from the prescribed Authorities, such as the SPCB or State Mining Dept. Should be secured and furnished to the effect that the proposed mining activities could be considered

18. Similarly, for coastal Projects, Mining Project is in Rajasthan which is a non-coastal area, thus there is no A CRZ map duly authenticated requirement of furnishing CRZ map. by one of the authorized agencies demarcating LTL. HTL, CRZ area, location of the mine lease w.r.t CRZ, coastal features such as mangroves, if any, should be furnished.

(Note: The Mining Projects falling under CRZ would also need to obtain approval of the concerned Coastal Zone Management Authority)

19. R&R Plan/compensation The project, conceived totally in a govt. land, does not involve acquisition of any details for the Project Affected private land or asset or shifting of village and thus there shall be no project affected People (PAP) should be persons (PAP). Therefore, neither any R&R issue is involved nor any social impact furnished. While preparing the assessment is thus warranted. (Section 7.11 of the EIA report) R&R Plan, the relevant State/National Rehabilitation & Resettlement Policy should be kept in view. In respect of SCs /STs and other weaker sections of the society in the study area, a need based sample survey, family wise, should be undertaken to assess their requirements, and action programmes prepared and submitted accordingly, integrating the sectoral programmes of line departments of the State Government. It may be clearly brought out whether the village located in the mine lease area will be shifted or not. The issues relating to shifting of Village including their R&R and socio-economic aspects should be discussed in the report.

20. One season (non-monsoon) The baseline data for winter season (October - December 2013) has been collected primary baseline data on in respect of air quality (Section 3.5); Water Quality (Section 3.6); Noise (Section ambient air quality (PM10, SO2 3.8); Soil (Section 3.7); Flora & Fauna (Section 3.9); Site specific meteorological and NOx), water quality, noise data (Section 3.4). One or more than one monitoring stations in the pre-dominant level, soil and flora and fauna wind direction have been fixed within 500 m of the area. shall be collected and the AAQ and other data so compiled Parameters Description Permissible Value presented date wise in the EIA 3 and EMP Report. Site specific Ambient Air PM10 – 65.0 - 100 μg/m 3 3 meteorological data should Quality 107 μg/m 80 μg/m 3 also be collected. The location Monitoring SO2 – 6.5 – 7.8 80 μg/m 3 of the monitoring stations μg/m should be such as to represent NO2 – 25.2 – 3 whole of the study area and 28.7 μg/m justified keeping in view the pre Noise Level Leq Day Time – Time Comm. Resi. dominant downwind direction Monitoring 48.2 – 64.1 db(A) (dB(A) (dB(A) and location of sensitive Leq Night Time – Leq) Leq) receptors. There should be at 42.4 – 54.3 db(A) least one monitoring station Day 65 55 within 500 m of the mine lease Night 55 45 in the pre dominant downwind direction. Surface pH – 7.4 – 7.7 6.5-8.5 The mineralogical composition Water TDS – 471 – 662 500 mg/l of PM10, particularly for free Sampling mg/l 6 mg/l silica, should be given. DO – 6 – 7 mg/l 250 mg/l Chloride – 124 – 400 mg/l 192 mg/l 1.5 mg/l Sulphate – 16 – 19 mg/l Fluoride – 0.7 - 0.8 mg/l

Ground pH – 6.9 – 8.1 6.5-8.5 Water TDS – 394 – 2000 mg/l Sampling 3755 mg/l 600 mg/l 1000 mg/l Total Hardness – 400 mg/l 244 - 1857 mg/l 1.5 mg/l Chloride – 26 – 1020 mg/l Sulphate – 10 – 215 mg/l Fluoride – 1.15 – 2.0 mg/l

Soil Texture – Sandy - Sampling to Sandy Clay Loam; pH – 7.48 - 8.18; Organic Matter – 0.12 – 0.42

21. Air quality modelling should be Model Used : Lakes Environmental Aermod View Ver. 6.2 (Air Dispersion Modelling carried out for prediction of Software) an interface based on ISCST-3 used for predicting the GLC for open-pit impact of the project on the air excavation as well as for line source due to movement of vehicles on haul roads. quality of the area. It should Caline 4 version 2.1 was used for estimation of vehicular emission.. (Section 4.7) also take into account the impact of movement of vehicles Station Maximum Total Resultant for transportation of mineral. Name/Code Background Incremental concen- NAAQS Concentration concentration tration The details of the model used (µg/m3) due to and input parameters used for of PM10 for 3 proposed modelling should be provided. (µg/m ) PM10 mining The air quality contours may be for 24 activity and shown on a location map hrs. clearly indicating the location of haul road the site, location of sensitive transportation receptors, if any, and the Busi 82 8.81 100 habitation. The wind roses 90.81 showing pre-dominant wind Riverbed

direction may also be indicated (A-5) on the map Busi market 81 0.90 81.90 100 (A-4)

Gandoj (A- 67 11.90 78.90 100 3)

Kherwa (A- 73 10.46 100 2) 84.46

22. The water requirement for the Water requirement for human consumption, plantation and dust suppression shall Project, its availability and be 39 Kld which shall be met from ground water resource from nearby tube wells on source should be furnished. A payment basis (Section 2.7.4) Water Balance is shown in Figure 2.1. detailed water balance should also be provided. Fresh water requirement for the Project should be indicated

23. Necessary clearance from the Pali block does not fall under notified area as per latest list of notified blocks for Competent Authority for drawl control and regulation of ground water. No NOC from the CGWA shall have to be of requisite quantity of water for obtained for abstraction of ground water in terms of CGWA No. 21- the Project should be provided 4/Guidelines/CGWA/2009-832 dated 14.10.2009, as the proponent does not want to erect his own water abstraction structure. Moreover the PP shall take supply from private agency (tubewell owner).

24. Description of water The mining pits can be construed as the recharge structure having adequate conservation measures capacity for impounding surface run-off. These pits cause quick recharging of the proposed to be adopted in the ground water through percolation (Section 4.5), besides this water conservation Project should be given. Details provision has been made under CSR (Section 9.2.6) of rainwater harvesting proposed in the Project, if any,  The project does not need any process water other than for drinking, dust suppression and plantation. should be provided.  The mining pits can be construed as the recharge structure having adequate capacity for impounding surface run-off during monsoon.  At the end of 6th year, through percolation these pits can recharge 10.8 MCM against which 0.055 MCM water shall be abstracted to meet water requirement. (Section 4.5, Table 4.1 and Table 4.3),  Besides this conventional water conservation measures have been proposed under CSR activities (Section 9.2.6.1 of the EIA) After Year 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th Total Total Depth of 3.00 4.70 6.40 8.10 9.80 8.50 40.50 Water in Mined out pit (m) Volume of 1.60 2.51 3.41 4.32 5.23 4.53 21.60 water in Pit (MCM) Recharge @ 0.80 1.25 1.71 2.16 2.61 2.27 10.80 50% of the volume in Pond as per GEC-97 (MCM)

25. Impact of the project on the Impact on Surface Water Quality: water quality, both surface and groundwater should be  No waste water will be generated from the mining activity except sanitary waste water which will be treated in septic tank /soak pits. assessed and necessary  Loose soil spread on upper terraces can find way into the river section due safeguard measures, if any to run-off from upper banks and also due to formation of rills, to increase required, should be provided. the silt rate to smaller extent as the river flow during flash floods carry considerably high sediment and suspended load as compared to the former.  No impact on surface water quality of the rivers where the mining is proposed is anticipated. (Section 4.5.2 and Section 4.5.3)

Mitigation Measures

 The mining in the flooded pits shall be allowed only after the water level has receded.  Sufficient time should be allowed for settling of sediment in the pits Impact on Ground Water Quality

As the mining activities do not intersect the ground water table there shall be no impact on the quality of ground water.

26. Based on actual monitored  The ground water table shall not intersect with the bottom of mining pit as data, it may clearly be shown ground water table varies from 5m to 11m below ground level (Section 2.9) whether working will intersect  Neither any mining below GWT is envisaged in the approved plan nor any groundwater. Necessary data dewatering shall be warranted. Thus no permission for CGWA for working and documentation in this below ground water is required. regard may be provided. In

case the working will intersect groundwater table, a detailed Hydro-Geological Study should be undertaken and Report furnished. Necessary permission from Central Ground Water Authority for working below ground water and for pumping of ground water should also be obtained and copy furnished

27. Details of any stream, seasonal No temporary diversion of discharge of main rivers or any of their interlacing is or otherwise, passing through warranted for facilitating mining (Section 4.2.2) the lease area and modification / diversion proposed, if any, and the impact of the same on the hydrology should be brought out.

28. Information on site elevation, Combined Schematic View showing average natural surface level, pit bottom level working depth, groundwater and GWT for each of the river involved is shown in Figure 2.2 and 2.3. table etc. Should be provided both in AMSL and bgl. A schematic diagram may also

be provided for the same

29. A time bound Progressive Progressive greenbelt development plan mentioning the plant species and time Greenbelt Development Plan frame has been submitted in Tabular form under Sub-Section 9.3.4.As per plan shall be prepared in a tabular every year plantation shall be carried out in 17.6 ha area with 8800 no. plants /year. form (indicating the linear and Considering the mortality factor in all 53725 plants will be planted in 5 years with quantitative coverage, plant total cost Rs. 11.0 lac. Local indigenous species shall be planted. species and time frame) and submitted, keeping in mind, the S. No. Name Scientific Name same will have to be executed 1 Bordi Zizyphus nummularia up front on commencement of 2 Churel Holoptelia integrifolia the project. 3 Farash Tamarix articulata 4 Israeli Babool Acacia tortilis 5 Kala Siris Cassia Siamea 6 Khejdi Prosopis cineraria 7 Kumat Acacia senegal 8 Kunali Dichrostachys glomerata 9 Neem Azadirachta indica 10 Shishum Dalbergia sissoo 11 Siris Albizzia lebbek

30. Impact on local transport Detailed transportation study has been carried out under Section 4.10 infrastructure due to the Project should be indicated. Projected The lease area under the Tehsil is well connected with the good network of increase in truck traffic as a NH/SH/MDR/ODR and other link roads. Since the mining activities shall be carried result of the Project in the out in different blocks in sequential manner the transportation vehicle shall not present road network concentrate at a single point due to movement in different directions. The level of (including those outside the service of the roads in post project scenario shall not become adverse. Project area) should be worked out, indicating whether it is Volume / capable of handling the Design Capacity Ratio incremental load. Arrangement Name Service Traffic Details (PCU/Day) and LOS for improving the infrastructure, of Volume Pre- Post- if contemplated (including Road (PCU/Day) Existing Envisaged Cumulative Project Project action to be taken by other 0.28 15000 4241 1800 6041 0.4 (B) agencies such as State SH-67 (B) Government) should be 0.39 0.42 15000 5944 366 6310 covered. NH-65 (B) (C) 0.18 0.19 35000 6243 240 6483 NH-14 (A) (A)

31. Details of the onsite shelter and Proper site services such as First Aid, Rest Shelter, and Drinking Water will be facilities to be provided to the provided to the mine workers (Section 2.8.13) mine workers should be included in the EIA report

32. Conceptual post mining land Reclamation and Restoration of mined out area (Section 2.8.9 of EIA): use and Reclamation and The reclamation and restoration of mined out area in the riverbed is neither required Restoration of mined out areas nor it is envisaged under the management plan. The mined out area in riverbed shall (with plans and with adequate be left as such for being aggraded in following monsoon season. number of sections) should be given in the EIA report Post Mining Landuse (Table 3.6 EIA)

S. No. Particulars At the end of 5th year (ha) 1 Pit area 266.67 2 Dump area - Bridge 202.5 3 Safety zone Permanent Roads 89.1 Wells 45.35 Infrastructure (office, temp, shelter - 4 etc) 5 Mineral Storage - 6 Plantation 88.0 7 Un worked 3167.38 Total 3859.00

33. A time bound Progressive Detailed greenbelt development plan mentioning the plant species and time frame Greenbelt Development Plan has been has been dealt with under Section 9.3 and under ToR Point No. 29. No shall be prepared in a tabular plantation has been carried out yet. form (indicating the linear and quantitative coverage, plant species and time frame) and submitted, keeping in mind, the same will have to be executed up front on commencement of the project. Phase wise plan of plantation and compensatory afforestation should be charted clearly indicating the area to be covered under plantation and the species to be planted. The details of plantation already done should be given.

34. Occupational Health impacts of Impacts have been anticipated and measures spelt out (Section 7.9), and detailed the Project should be occupation health management plan provided (Section 9.5) anticipated and the proposed preventive measures spelt out Occupational Health Impacts : Allergic rhinitis and asthma,; Skin diseases; Noise in detail. Details of pre Induce Hearing Loss; Allergic conjunctivitis of eyes placement medical Schedule of Medical Checkup examination and periodical medical examination schedules should be S. 1 2 3 4 5 6 incorporated in the EMP. No. Particular yr yr yr yr yr yr Total Initial medical checkup of employees for lung function, audiometric test, tuberculosis and pulmonary disease at the 1 time of appointment 80 29 - - - - 109 Periodical Medical Checkup of the employees (Audiometic Tes, Eye – Check-up, Lung 2 function and respiratory test) - - - 40 40 29 109 Cost Estimate

S. Particular Amount No. (Rs. lac) 1. Initial medical check-up for all workers for 1/5th of the 0.13 workers i.e. 22 workers/year 2. Periodical check-up for all workers for 1/5th of the 0.13 workers i.e. 22 workers/year 3. Provision for free medicines for all workers @ Rs. 0.22 200/year 4. Provision for personal protection equipment like ear 2.18 plug, dust mask, shoes, goggles etc., for 109 workers 5. Provision for First Aid facilities 0.20 6. Provision for fire extinguisher and its regular refilling 0.10 Total 2.96

35. Public health implications of the Public Health Implications : Project and related activities for the population in the impact  The dust generated due to excavation, loading and movement on Katcha/riverbed haul road creates air borne dust. The dust is the main zone should be systematically pollutant of concern for the local population residing near the project site. evaluated and the proposed  The most significant health impacts are allergic rhinitis and asthma due to remedial measures should be inhalation of dust. detailed along with budgetary  In extreme windy conditions the dust particles forcing way into the eyes can allocations. create itching as well as allergic conjunctivitis of eye Mitigation Measures:

The impact zone was identified based on incremental GLC for PM10. It was found to be 0.5 to 1 km around the mineral transportation route on unpaved surface. To minimize the impact due to fugitive dust following precautions should be taken:

 Transportation route shall bypass the villages falling in the impact zone  No haul road should pass through villages  To control vehicle exhaust, the vehicles with valid PUCC and fitness certificate shall be used  The speed limit shall be strictly followed and the vehicles shall be covered tarpaulin  Arranging Health Checkup Camps for locals for which a provision of Rs. 8.0 lac has been earmarked  Sprinkling of water on surface of haul roads near the settlements located close to river banks as a measure of dust suppression by increasing the moisture content of the unpaved surface of the haul roads. A sum of Rs. 1.75 lac has been earmarked as recurring expenditure under air pollution control measures 36. Measures of socio economic The positive and adverse impact on socio-economic aspect to the local community significance and influence to has been discussed under Section 4.9. During the operational phase by the the local community proposed implementation of certain CSR activities amounting Rs. 20 lac (livelihood and to be provided by the Project entrepreneurship, women empowerment, education, health, agricultural Proponent should be indicated. improvement, sanitation and drinking water facilities and creation of traditional water As far as possible, quantitative harvesting structures etc.) indirect employment will also generate. (Section 9.26) dimensions may be given with time frames for implementation

37. Detailed environmental The environmental plan to mitigate environmental impact have been formulated management plan to mitigate (Section 9.2 through Section 9.6) the environmental impacts which, should inter alia include the impacts of change of land use, loss of agricultural and grazing land, if any, occupational health impacts besides other impacts specific to the proposed Project

38. Public hearing points raised Issues raised and the commitment of the project proponent alongwith action plan and commitment of the project has been incorporated after conducting Public and receiving of minutes (Annexure- proponent on the same along III) with time bound action plan to implement the same should be provided and also incorporated in the final EIA/EMP Report of the Project.

39. Details of litigation pending There are no litigations/court cases pending against the project as informed by the against the project, if any, with project proponent. (Section 1.4.3) direction /order passed by any Court of Law against the project should be given.

40. The cost of the project (capital Capital Cost and Recurring cost for implementation of EMP have been provided cost and recurring cost) as well under Section 9.7, Section 9.8 and Table 9.7 as the cost towards implementation of EMP should S. No. Name of Plan Capital Cost Recurring annual clearly be spelt out. Rs in Lac Cost Rs in Lac 1. Environment Monitoring Plan for - 3.00 Air, Noise, Water, Soil, etc. 2. Air Pollution Control- - 1.75 Management of Haulage Roads including Sprinkling. 3. Plantation / Green belt 11.00 development plan 4. Disposal and spreading of - 2.67 Silt/clay as per Mining Plan 5. Occupational Health Measures 2.18 0.78 Provision of PPE and other Miscellaneous expenditure 6. Soil Conservation works - 0.60 (Engineering) 7. Cost under Corporate Social - 4.00 Responsibility Initiatives for five years is Rs. 20 lac. Thus cost per year is Rs. 4.0 lac 8. Conservation Plan for Wildlife - 2.00 (Schedule I & II, WPA, 1972) Total 2.18 25.80

Additional ToR 41. Details of Replenishment Detailed computation of silt rate on the basis of various methods has been studies assessed. (Table 7.2 and Section 7.2)

 The CAZRI after studying the discharge rate for run-off and the sediment concentration for 16 years on 34 G&D sites on tributaries of Luni and analyzing for computation of sediment yield developed a relationship for sediment yield as function of effective rainfall.

 The developed relationship is Es=3.68ER0.99,

Where, ER is effective rainfall (mm) and Es is sediment yield.

 The computation of sediment yield of 0.67 MMT/year is based on the above relationship developed by CAZRI. The annual deposition rate is about 30% of the annual mineral abstraction rate. (2.24 MMT)

42. Details of transportation of Study has been conducted for the impact due to transportation on carrying capacity mined out materials as per the of the Highway (Section 4.10.1); due to increase in vehicular emissions due to Indian road Congress for both mineral transportation. (Section 4.10.2) and noise due to increased traffic (Section the ways (loaded as well as 4.11). The point is also covered under ToR point 30. unloaded trucks) load and its impact on Environment

43. Proper species specific Conservation Plan, amounting for Rs. 10 lac, for specific species for Schedule – I & conservation plan for II has been formulated (Section 9.2.5) and detailed plan shown in compliance to Schedule-I and II species ToR Point 16.

44. Impact of mining on plankton The impact on plankton is totally ruled out as there shall be no water column during period of mining (Section 4.8.4)

45. Details of mining activity to be  The project is necessarily a linear project so the principal of working from provided w.r.t block wise/ piece meal to the whole has been adopted in context of its planning and calendar wise / Zonal wise, as implementation. the mine lease area is having a long stretch  For facilitating easy operation, supervision and safety the lease area has been subdivided into 5 blocks (A to E).

 For achieving the annual targeted production 53.33 ha area shall be mined out in toto from the five blocks. The mining shall be from u/s to d/s in each block.

Block-wise / Year-wise Excavation Schedule (ha)

Year Block –A Block –B Block –C Block –D Block –E Total I 9.52 10.95 10.95 10.00 11.90 53.33 II 9.29 10.24 10.71 10.00 13.10 53.33 III 8.81 10.00 11.43 10.48 12.62 53.33 IV 9.52 10.00 10.95 9.52 13.33 53.33 V 9.52 9.76 10.00 10.71 13.33 53.33 Total 46.67 50.95 54.05 50.71 64.29 266.67

46. Details of Gradient of river bed Details of gradient of riverbed has been provided (Section 3.2.3.4 and Table 3.3) to be provided S. Name of Length River bed elevation Total fall Average No. River traversed (head bed slope by the At the At the exit loss) in (m / km) river in start point in river bed Tehsil point in tehsil with in (km) tehsil tehsil

1. Somesar 23 262 222 40 1.74 2. Khari 20.5 250 220 30 1.46 3. Sukri 28.5 225.2 190 35.2 1.24 4. Bandi 31.5 227.5 195.3 32.2 1.02 5 Ungti 9.5 209.5 195.1 14.4 1.52 6 Mithri 10 240 228 12 1.2 7 Khardi 9 244 228 16 1.78

47. Details of excavation schedule Details covered under Section 2.8.7 and Table 2.3 and 2.4 and as provided against & sequential mining plan Compliance of ToR Point 45.

48. Mining Plan shall be prepared  The mining plan with progressive mine closure plan has been formulated carefully dividing lease area by RQP under the provision contained in Rule 37 (E) of MMCR, Rajasthan, into manageable blocks to 1986 and 2nd amendment, 2012 for winning minor mineral of river sand in river. ensure scientific and  Mine Plan has been approved by SME Jaipur vide systematic mining of minor SME/JO/CC//MINOR/BAJRI/ML No. 544/2012 dated 4.12.13. minerals

49. The baseline data shall be Baseline data was collected in 10km distance of the lease area as per CPCB norms collected so as to represent the representing the whole mine lease area. The location for ambient air quality whole mine lease area monitoring and Noise level monitoring in ambient air and sampling for water and soil have been shown in Figure 3.16 of the EIA.

50. As the area falls in the critically The certificate from RSPCB to the effect that the lease area does not fall under polluted area, the comments critically polluted area is enclosed as Annexure-IX of EIA. from Rajasthan SPCB shall be obtained.

Besides the above, the below mentioned general points will also have to be followed:

a) All documents to be properly Documents have been numbered in continuation and properly referenced w.r.t. referenced with index and Table of Contents (Index). continuous page numbering.

b) Where data are presented in Compliance made the report especially in tables, the period in which the data were collected and the sources should be indicated

c) Where the documents provided Compliance made are in a language other than English, an English translation should be provided.

d) The Questionnaire for The relevant questionnaire has been enclosed separately. Environmental Appraisal of industrial projects as devised by the Ministry shall also be

filled and submitted

e) While preparing the EIA report, All instruction mentioned in the relevant O.M. dated 4th August, 2009 have been the instructions for the complied. proponents and instructions for the consultants issued by MoEF vide O.M. No. J- 11013/41/2006-IA.II (I) dated 4th

August, 2009, which are available on the website of this Ministry should also be followed

f) Changes, if any made in the No changes, other than modification arising out of Public Hearing process, has been basic scope and project incorporated in the basic scope and project parameter. parameters (as submitted in Form-I and the F.R for securing the TOR) should be brought to the attention of MoEF with reasons for such changes and permission should be sought, as the TOR may also have to be altered. Post Public Hearing changes in structure and content of the draft EIA/ EMP (other than modifications arising out of the P.H. process) will entail conducting the PH again with the revised documentation.

g) As per the circular no. J-11011/ Not applicable in case of new project. 618/ 2010-IA.II (I) dated 30.05.2012, you are requested to submit certified report of status of compliance of the conditions stipulated in the environmental clearance for the existing operations of the project by the Regional Office of Ministry of Environment & Forests, if applicable

Annexure – II: Detailed traffic study needs to be conducted for evacuation Route for transportation of sand.

4.10. Impact due to Transportation of Mined out material on environment The mining in a tehsil shall be carried out along different rivers which for the have been divided into different blocks The collective stretch of the lease area for each river has been sub-divided in to five blocks for ease of operation, supervision, management and safety. The daily production has been envisaged as 8000 metric tonne. The quantity of daily production of mine shall significantly vary reach-wise and block-wise. The maximum production in Tehsil Pali has been envisaged in Somesar river at Busi. At this place about 500 MT daily production is stipulated for the transportation of which 25 tripper/trucks (20T) shall be required. The increased traffic load due to transportation of mineral shall not be concentrated in a particular segment of the road as the material shall be dispatched to different destination and in different directions. The impact due to transportation shall be on carrying capacity of the State Highway/ National Highway and also due to increase in vehicular emissions due to mineral transportation.

4.10.1. Impact on the carrying capacity of SH and NH due to proposed transport activities The bulk of mineral mined out from river Somesar, Khari, Bandi and upto Hemawas Dam shall be transported through SH-67 (Pali – Dessuri - Gomti Nagar). The mined out material from d/s of Hemawas dam (from villages Jawariya, Kerla and Muliyawas, Rupawas and others) shall be mostly transported through NH-65 (Pali - Jodhpur). The mined out material from Khardi and Mithri river shall be transported through NH-14. About 1.68 million tonne material / annum (75%) shall be transported through SH-67; 0.34 million tonne / annum (15%) shall be transported through NH-65 and balance 0.22 through NH-14 (10%). The transport plan for movement of trucks is shown in Figure 4.4. The study for carrying capacity has been carried out for these roads by undertaking traffic volume counts at the prominent inter-junction of these roads as per guideline of IRC:9-1972 and IRC:SP 19-2001 and the PCU factors adopted for analysis has been taken as per IRC:64-1990.

Figure 4.1 : Transport Route Map

 Classified Volume Count Traffic Survey The traffic survey is essential to realistically and accurately assess the prevailing traffic volumes and travel characteristics by undertaking classified volume count. The objective of traffic volume count survey is to assess the traffic intensity on the most vulnerable section of the road under question. Two – days, 24 hrs., continuous volume counts were manually undertaken during October 2013 at Mandli Khurd on SH-67, CARZI on NH-65 and Pali on NH-14 for capturing the realistic picture of the current volume and composition of traffic motorized i.e. passenger vehicles (two-wheeler, three-wheeler, bicycle, passenger car); utility vehicles (Jeep, Van, Mini Bus, Standard Bus); Goods vehicles – LCV (Freight), MCV (2 axle rigid chasis), MCV (3 axle rigid chasis), MAV and tractor trailer and non-motorized like animal driven cart. The survey work was conducted by engaging educated people familiar with traffic characteristics. Before the start of survey the enumerated engaged were briefed and trained by an expert supervisor about the task. The analysis of traffic counts provides an estimate of average daily traffic (ADT). In order to convert recorded vehicles into a common scale, the passenger car units (PCU) equivalent factor as per IRC:64 -1990 has been adopted. The Table 4.7 reveals that the total ADT at Mandli Khurd on SH-67 were 3867 in terms of number which translates into 4241 in terms of PCU. The Table 4.8 reveals that the total ADT at CARZI on NH- 65 were 3601 in terms of number which translates into 5994 in terms of PCU. The Table 4.9 reveals that the total ADT at Pali on NH-14 were 4218 in terms of number which translates into 6243 in terms of PCU. It is thus evident that the number of PCU / hour at Mandli Khurd, CARZI and Pali 177, 250 and 260 respectively.

Table 4.1 : Traffic Volume Counts at Mandli Khurd on SH-67 No. of Vehicles / S. No. Nomen Clature of Vehicle PCU factor day No. of PCU / day 1 Car / Jeep / Van 1.0 637 637 2 Two-Wheelers 0.5 1861 931 3 Three - Wheelers 1.0 251 251 4 Mini- Bus 1.5 17 26 5 Bus 3.0 58 174 6 Tempo / LCV 1.5 124 186 7 Two Axle Truck 3.0 528 1584 8 Three Axle Truck 3.0 29 87 9 More than three Axle Truck 4.5 8 36 10 Tractor 1.5 153 230 11 Cycle 0.5 201 101 Total 3867 4241

Table 4.2 : Traffic Volume Counts at Pali on NH-14 S. No. Nomen Clature of Vehicle PCU factor No. of Vehicles / day No. of PCU / day 1 Car / Jeep / Van 1.0 1272 1272 2 Two-Wheelers 0.5 1218 609 3 Three - Wheelers 1.0 125 125 4 Mini- Bus 1.5 76 114 5 Bus 3.0 196 587 6 Tempo / LCV 1.5 123 185 7 Two Axle Truck 3.0 682 2046 8 Three Axle Truck 3.0 237 711 More than three Axle 9 Truck 4.5 78 352 10 Tractor 1.5 138 207 11 Cycle 0.5 74 37 Total 4218 6243

Table 4.3 : Traffic Volume Counts at CARZI on NH-65 S. No. Nomen Clature of Vehicle PCU factor No. of Vehicles / day No. of PCU / day 1 Car / Jeep / Van 1.0 832 832 2 Two-Wheelers 0.5 580 290 3 Three - Wheelers 1.0 22 22 4 Mini- Bus 1.5 15 23 5 Bus 3.0 38 114 6 Tempo / LCV 1.5 226 339 7 Two Axle Truck 3.0 614 1842 8 Three Axle Truck 3.0 633 1899 More than three Axle 67 302 9 Truck 4.5 10 Tractor 1.5 44 66 11 Cycle 0.5 530 265 Total 3601 5994

 Impact on Carrying capacity of SH-67, NH-65 and NH-14 About 1.68 million metric tonne of material / annum shall be transported through SH- 67, this tantamount to 6000 metric tonne / day for transportation of which 300 trucks (20 tonne capacity) shall be deployed. The trucks shall make one loaded and unloaded journey every day. It is thus apparent that the additional traffic load due to mining shall be 1800 PCU/day or 75 PCU/hour. As per IRC: 64-1990, the design service volume for a two lane rural road in plain terrain for low curvature is 15000 PCU / day or 625 PCU / hour. The ratio of traffic volume to capacity and consequent level of service (LOS) in pre and post project scenario is evaluated and shown in Table 4.4 which manifests that there shall be an incremental rise of 0.12 in V/C Ratio and the level of service shall continue to be ‘B’ under both scenario.

Table 4.4 : Computation of Volume Capacity Ratio and LOS in Pre and Post Project Scenario (SH-67) Design Cumulative Volume / Level of Service Service Envisaged Traffic Traffic Capacity Ratio Volume Existing Daily Movement Due Movement at SH- for SH- Traffic Data at to Mining 67 - Post Project 67 SH-67 Activities Scenario PCU / PCU / PCU / PCU / PCU / PCU / PCU / Pre- Post- Pre- Post- Day Day Hour Day Hour Day Hour Project Project Project Project 15000 4241 177 1800 75 6041 252 0.28 0.40 B B

About 0.34 million metric tonne of material / annum shall be transported through NH- 65, this tantamount to 1214 metric tonne / day for transportation of which 61 trucks (20 tonne capacity) shall be deployed. The trucks shall make one loaded and unloaded journey every day. It is thus apparent that the additional traffic load due to mining shall be 366 PCU/day or 16 PCU/hour. As per IRC: 64-1990, the design service volume for a two lane rural road in plain terrain for low curvature is 15000 PCU / day or 625 PCU / hour. The ratio of traffic volume to capacity and consequent level of service (LOS) in pre and post project scenario is evaluated and shown in Table 4.5 which manifests that there shall be an incremental rise of 0.03 in V/C Ratio and the existing level of service ‘B’ shall change to ‘C’ in post-project scenario.

Table 4.5 : Computation of Volume Capacity Ratio and LOS in Pre and Post Project Scenario (NH-65) Cumulative Volume / Level of Service Design Envisaged Traffic Capacity Ratio Service Traffic Movement at Volume Existing Daily Movement NH-65 - Post for NH- Traffic Data at Due to Mining Project 65 NH-65 Activities Scenario PCU / PCU / PCU / PCU / PCU / PCU / PCU / Pre- Post- Pre- Post- Day Day Hour Day Hour Day Hour Project Project Project Project 15000 5944 250 366 16 6310 266 0.39 0.42 B C

About 0.22 million metric tonne of material / annum shall be transported through NH- 14, this tantamount to 786 metric tonne / day for transportation of which 40 trucks (20 tonne capacity) shall be deployed. The trucks shall make one loaded and unloaded journey every day. It is thus apparent that the additional traffic load due to mining shall be 240 PCU/day or 10 PCU/hour. As per IRC: 64-1990, the design service volume for a four lane rural road in plain terrain for low curvature is 35000 PCU / day or 1458 PCU / hour. The ratio of traffic volume to capacity and consequent level of service (LOS) in pre and post project scenario is evaluated and shown in Table 4.6 which manifests that there shall be an incremental rise of 0.01 in V/C Ratio and the level of service shall continue to be ‘A’ under both scenario.

Table 4.6 : Computation of Volume Capacity Ratio and LOS in Pre and Post Project Scenario (NH-14) Design Envisaged Cumulative Volume / Level of Service Service Traffic Traffic Capacity Ratio Volume Existing Daily Movement Due Movement at for NH- Traffic Data at to Mining NH-14 - Post 14 NH-14 Activities Project Scenario PCU / PCU / PCU / PCU / PCU / PCU / PCU / Pre- Post- Pre- Post- Day Day Hour Day Hour Day Hour Project Project Project Project 35000 6243 260 240 10 6483 270 0.18 0.19 A A

Annexure – III: Replenishment study of Sand needs to be conducted.

7.2. Replenishment Studies 7.2.1. Sediment Yield From Watershed The rate of gross or absolute silt production (erosion) in the watershed and the ability of the stream system to transport the eroded material in a river and then to a reservoir has the direct relation with the quantity of sediment delivered into a reservoir. The rate of gross erosion is dependent upon many physical factors live climatic conditions, nature of soil, slope of the area, topography and the land use. Hydro-physical conditions of the watershed govern the capability of transporting the eroded material. It has been observed that the average rate of sediment production decreases as the size of drainage area increase and the larger watershed the lesser is the variation between the rates. The larger watershed presents more opportunity for deposition of silt during its traverse from the point of production. The watershed with maximum land use class of forest generate very low rate of production unless the forest are degraded or open forest. The cultivated watersheds with unscientific farming produce very high rate of silt production. The total amount of eroded material, which reaches a particular hydraulic control point, is termed as sediment yield. The sediment control of inflow is governed by Character of run-off; Susceptibility of soils; the extent and density of vegetative cover in the area; and The hydraulic efficiency of the drainage system.

The sediment load comprises of bed load as well as suspended load, the former being the eroded material kept in motion in the bottom layers of the flow due to rolling, sliding and hopping, while the latter being the smaller size particles in saltation being thrown in suspension by the upward component of the turbulent velocity of flow. When the tractive force exceeds the frictional resistance between sand particles the latter are set in motion. The resistance to sediment to motion is directly proportional to the diameter of sediments ‘d’ and the specific weight of sediments in water (G-1), where ‘G’ is the specific gravity of sediments. The equation of critical tractive forces is:-

c = 0.078d

where, ‘d’ is in mm and c is in kg/sqm

7.2.2. Estimation of Sedimentation Rate The scientific survey for determination of soil erosion rate from catchment and deposition rate in reservoirs have been frequently and widely conducted in past in and in other countries. Sedimentation rate on the basis of actual measurement have been arrived for different perennial rivers by stream sampling of sediment load including bed load. Surveys of some of the existing reservoirs was carried out to assess the actual silting experienced by them over

EQMS INDIA PVT. LTD. 1 long period after impoundment. Thus the fundamental method for estimation of sediment is on the basis of actual measurements carried out in the basin.

7.2.2.1 Sedimentation rate on the basis of actual measurement Sediment sampling over a substantially long period is a suitable and logical method of obtaining information of sediment load being carried out by a stream. No sediment load observation have been made in the case of any of the rivers flowing the district/Tehsil as the rivers are seasonal and flow during monsoon alone and that the study period was post monsoon and thus there was no flow in the river. The study of soil erosion and sediment yield in the Indian Arid Zone was conducted by Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Jodhpur (CARZI).

The arid zone of India has been subdivided into three zones. The Zone – I (42900 sq.km) is a humid region and has more dependable irrigation system through perennial rivers. It comprises of part of Punjab and Haryana and is irrigated by Abohar and Bhatinda branch system. Zone-II (148600 sq.km) comprises of sandy plain, interdune plains, sand dunes and isolated hillocks. It covers Ganganagar, Bikaner, Jodhpur, Jaisalmer, Barmer, Churu, Jhunjunu, Sikar and Nagor district in Rajasthan. Zone – III represents the sloping region with intergrated drainage network of ephemeral river channel. In Rajasthan it extends over Pali, Jalore and Sirohi districts. The hydrological zones of arid region of India is shown in Figure 7.1.

EQMS INDIA PVT. LTD. 2 68° 70° 72° 74° 76° N

30° Br. 30° Abohar PUNJAB Br. Sangrur Kotla Br. Bhatinda.Bhatinda. Ganganagar I ESirsaHARYANA N Jind 28° Hisar O 28° Bhiwani Canal Churu Z Bikaner Jhunjhunu Gandhi RAJASTHAN Sikar Jaisalmer Indira ZONE II Nagaur 26° 26° Jodhpur

Barmer ZONE III Jalore Bikaner 24° 24° ZONE II Great Rann of Kuchh GUJARAT Scale 0 100 200 kms Bhuj 50 ZONE III Little Rann of Kuchh

Surenaranagar ZONE -I Region with Major Inputs 22° from more Humid Regions 22° ZONE -II Plainlands with primitive/ no ARABIAN ZONE III SEA stream network ZONE -III Sloping Region with integrated stream network

68° 70° 72° 74° 76°

Figure 7.1 : Hydrological Zones of Arid Region of India The approach of the study was to collect information on the spatial variation of stream discharges and the sediment yield for 34 Gauge and Discharge site (G& D) in the zone on various tributaries of the Luni River. The discharge rate for run-off and the sediment concentration for 16 years was analyzed for computation of sediment yield. Wide variation in the magnitude of annual sediment yield was observed for different physiographic reasons. The results plotted in figure shows skewed frequency distribution. The annual sediment yield results thus obtained are shown in Table 7.1 and the relationship developed between sediment yield and effective rainfall is depicted in Figure 7.2. The relationship developed is

0.99 Es=3.68ER , where ER is effective rainfall (mm) and Es is sediment yield. The annual sediment yields from the other physiographic reasons are in agreement with mean rates reported from the arid regions of Australia, Tanzania and USA (Jones, 1981) under similar rainfall conditions.

EQMS INDIA PVT. LTD. 3 Table 7.1 : Annual Sediment Yield in Indian Arid Zones Physiographic Region Average sediment yield No. of Observations m3/ha/year Ham/sq.km/year Sandy Plain 3.4 0.034 36 Dune Complex 4.8 0.048 18 Younger Alluvial Plain 2.7 0.027 30 Older Alluvial Plain 18.4 0.184 5 Rocky/Gravelly Piedmont 14.3 0.143 11 Source: IAHS Publication No. 236, 1996

10000

Abohar 0.99 2 ES =3.68 ER (R = 0.84,P: 0.01)

1000

100

SEDIMENT YIELD,Es (T/Sq km)

10

1 0 1 10 100 1000

EFFECTIVE RAINFALL, ER (mm)

Figure 7.2 : Sediment Yield as a function of effective rainfall

The effective rainfall has been worked out on the basis of monthly evapotranspiration coefficient and average recent rainfall data for 10 years (2004-13). The computation of sediment yield of Pali tehsil based on the relationship derived for sediment yield as function of the effective rainfall is shown in Table 7.2.

Table 7.2 : Sediment Yield as a function of Effective rainfall Coefficient of Sediment Monthly Average Effective Sediment evapotranspiration Yield in Month Rainfall (mm) Rainfall ER Yield in cubic as per Penman tonne / Period 2004-13 (mm) meter / ha method sq.km January 0.7 0.6 0.28 1.04 0.007 February 2.6 0.6 1.04 3.83 0.027 March 3.2 0.7 0.96 3.53 0.025 April 6.6 0.7 1.98 7.24 0.051

EQMS INDIA PVT. LTD. 4 May 10.8 0.8 2.16 7.89 0.056 June 45.1 0.7 13.53 48.51 0.342 July 127.4 0.6 50.96 180.30 1.273 August 149 0.6 59.6 210.54 1.486 September 66.8 0.7 20.04 71.57 0.505 October 1.7 0.7 0.51 1.89 0.013 November 8.7 0.6 3.48 12.65 0.089 December 0.6 0.6 0.24 0.90 0.006 Total 423.1 7.9 154.78 549.89 3.88

7.2.2.2 Empirical Relation Sediment load remains ungauged for majority of streams for want of setup of GDS sites (Gauge, Discharge and Sediment) in non-classified river basins. Many empirical relations have been evolved for determination of offsite deposition of eroded soil and sediment yield on the basis of analysis of data from different catchments of varying catchment area. The sediment yield has been worked out on the basis of some of such equations as applicable for Indian conditions and

a) Dr. A.N. Khosla’s Findings : y = 0.036 million cubic meter / 100 sq.km of catchment = 3.60 cubic meter/ha

Recent studies carried out in some of the Indian reservoirs suggest that actual silting observed in them is higher than what was postulated in Dr. Khosla’s Findings. The enveloping curve developed by Dr. Khosla had only five points pertaining to data of Indian reservoir while the remaining 33 points related to the reservoirs of other countries. The sediment rate of 3.60 cubic meter / ha is 7.2 % less than 3.88 cubic meter / ha as actually assessed on the basis of relationship developed between sediment yield effective rainfall by CARZI Jodhpur on the basis of actual observation of stream discharges and sediment yield in the zone of various tributaries of Luni river.

b) Dr. D.V. Joglekar Enveloping Curve y=0.597/A0.24 where y= annual silting rate in million cubic meter per 100 sq. km. A= Catchment area in sq. km. For 1sq km catchment area the value of y y = 0.597/10.24 = 0.597 million cubic meter / 100 sq km = 5.97 cubic meter/ ha

EQMS INDIA PVT. LTD. 5 The sediment rate of 5.97 cubic meter / ha is 53.9 % more than 3.88 cubic meter / ha as actually assessed by CARZI Jodhpur on the basis of actual observation of stream discharges and sediment yield in the zone of various tributaries of Luni river. c) Dr. R.S. Varshney’s Regional Enveloping Curves for Northern Indian River For plain rivers with catchment upto 1000 sq.km. y=0.392/A0.202 where, y= annual silting rate in million cubic meter per 100 sq. km. A= Catchment area in sq. km. For 1sq km catchment area the value of y y = 0.392/10.202 = 0.392 million cubic meter / 100 sq km = 3.92 cubic meter/ ha The sediment rate of 3.92 cubic meter / ha is 1 % more than 3.88 cubic meter / ha as actually assessed by CARZI Jodhpur on the basis of actual observation of stream discharges and sediment yield in the zone of various tributaries of Luni river.

d) Garde and Kothyari The author have analysed data from 50 catchment with an area ranging from 43 sq. km to 81880 sq. km and evolved the following equation for meet annual sediment yield.

0.6 1.7 0.25 0.1 0.19 Sam = CP Fe S Dd (P max/P) Where,

Sam = mean annual sediment yield in cum C = A co-efficient depending on the geographical location of the catchment P = Average annual rainfall in cm S = Land slope Dd = Drainage density in km/ sq.km. P max = Average maximum monthly rainfall A = Catchment Area in sq.km. Fe = Erosion Factor defined as under

Fe = (0.8 FA + 0.6 FG +0.3 FF + 0.1 Fw) /A Where,

FA = area of available land in catchment

FG = area occupied by grass and scrub

FF = area of forest land

FW = area of waste land On the basis of analysis of 154 catchment in India Garde and Kothyari produced an ISO- Erosion Rate Map of India (Figure 7.1). In the absence of any other information the erosion

EQMS INDIA PVT. LTD. 6 rates in tonne / sq. km / yr, for planning purposes, can be obtained by using the map. As per the map the study area lies between contours of 350 tonne / sq.km / yr and 1000 tonne / sq. km. / yr erosion rate but it is close to the latter. In any case the average value of 600 tonne / sq.km. or 4.25 cubic meter / ha can be conservatively adopted.

Figure 7.3 : Iso-Erodent Map of India after Kothyari

e) Dandy Bolten Study Dandy and Bolton studied sedimentation data from about 1500 reservoirs, ponds, and sediment detention basins with drainage areas between 1 to 30,000 sq.mile and found that the annual sediment yield per unit area was inversely related to the 0.16 power of the drainage area:

Where, S = Sediment yield in tons per square mile per year;

SR = Reference sediment yield of 1645 tonne/year corresponding to a 1 sq. mile drainage

EQMS INDIA PVT. LTD. 7 area, A = Drainage area in square miles AR = Reference drainage area in square mile

Dandy and Bolton also analysed sedimentation and mean annual runoff data from 505 reservoirs and inferred that annual sediment yield per unit area was increases sharply as mean annual runoff Q increases from 0 to 2 inches and thereafter, it decreased exponentially. This led to the following equations.

For Q<2 inches

- - - - - Eq. 1

For Q >2

inches - - - - - Eq. 2

Where, QR = reference mean annual runoff QR = 2 inches Dandy and Bolton combined Eqs. 1 and 2 into a set of equations to express sediment yield in terms of drainage area and mean annual runoff.

For Q <2 in.: - - - - - Eq. 3

For Q > 2 in.: - - - - - Eq. 4

2 Putting values of SR = 1645 tons/mi /y, QR = 2 inches, and AR = 1 sq.mile, Eq. 3 and 4 reduces to the followings set of equations: - - - - - Eq. 5 For Q <2 in.: S = 1280 Q0.46(1.43 – 0.26 log A)

-0.055Q - - - - - Eq. 6 For Q >2 in.: S = 1965e (1.43 – 0.26 log A)

In several cases, local factors such as soils, geology, topography, land use, and vegetation may have greater bearing on sediment yield than either mean annual runoff or drainage area. Nevertheless, these equations provide a first approximation to be regional assessment of sediment yield for watershed planning purposes. Equations 5 and 6 are based on average values of grouped data; therefore, they should be used with caution. Besides Dandy & Bolton themselves has category stated that use of the equation to predict sediment yield for a specific location would be unwise because of the wide variability caused by local factors not considered in the equation development. Actual sediment yield form individual drainage basins may vary 10-fold or even 100-fold from computed yields.

EQMS INDIA PVT. LTD. 8 In the present case for effective catchment of 1210 sq.km and the mean annual runoff corresponding to monthly average of 423 mm for the observed data from 1973 to 2012 has been computed as under.

Estimation of mean annual runoff on the basis of empirical relation as applicable to the study area falling in Rajasthan.

R = (P-175)/2500 X P = 33.1 mm

Since the mean annual runoff is less than 2 inches, Eq. 5 shall be adopted for working the sediment yield.

S = 1280 Q0.46(1.43 – 0.26 log A) = 372.83 metric tonne/km2/yr or 3.73 metric tonne / ha or 2.66 cubic meter / ha.

The annual sediment rate on the basis of Dandy Bolten equation are lower than the rates arrived on the basis of actually assessed by CARZI Jodhpur on the basis of actual observation of stream discharges and sediment yield in the zone of various tributaries of Luni river

7.2.2.3 Conclusion - Annual Sediment Rates to be Adopted The summary of silt rate on the basis of various methods described is presented in Table 7.3.

Table 7.3 : Annual Sediment Rates by Various Methods

S. Method Annual Sediment Rate Total Annual No. Cubic meter / Tonne / ha Sediment Load ha of (million tonne) catchment area 1 Actual discharge and silt 3.88 5.33 0.67 measurement in Luni and its triburaries by CAZRI Jodhpur 2 Dr. A.N. Khsola’s Findings 3.6 5.04 0.61 (Engineering Hydrology, R.S.Varshney, Third ED., P 931) 3 Dr. D.V. Joglekar Enveloping 5.97 8.36 1.01 Curve (Engineering Hydrology, R.S.Varshney, Third ED., P931) 4 Dr. R.S. Varshney’s Enveloping 3.92 5.49 0.66 Curve (Engineering Hydrology, R.S.Varshney, Third ED., P934) 5 Garde and Kothyari 4.25 6.00 0.73 6 Dandy Bolten 2.66 3.73 0.45

EQMS INDIA PVT. LTD. 9 The siltation rate of 3.88 cum/ha is also comparable with the siltation rate of 3.92 cum/ha as deduced from Dr. R.S. Varshney enveloping curves.

7.2.3. Computation of annual Sedimentation load: The major drainage flowing through Tehsil Pali are Khardi, Mithri, Bandi, Somesar, Ugti, Sukri and Khari. These drainages form part of sub-watershed 6A2C3 and 6A2C4 as per Watershed Atlas of India and marked in catchment area map (Figure 3.6). Sediment production occurs in the drainage basin and sediment delivery is limited to major flood flows. When run-off occurs from severe storms or torrential rainfall flash floods of high magnitude flow in the drainage system along with large quantities of sediments which are transported through the rivers and get deposited at depositional or convex banks due to slower velocity of flow. Thus it is apparent that any sediment particle detached from its original configuration shall take time to reach the streams for onwards journey. The lower order streams (1st and 2nd order) generate more sediments due to their higher bed gradient but it is the higher order streams flowing with large discharge responsible for creating high tractive force needed for transportation of bed load and suspended sediments.

With rivers flowing through different tehsils / district it is not feasible to confine the watershed into one tehsil. Depending upon the topography, the area in anyone tehsil could be the catchment for nearby drain/stream flowing in contiguous tehsil/district. Besides this the drainage basin in tehsil/district has been harnessed in the form of reservoir and tanks created across the main rivers and their tributaries the details of which are provided in Table 7.4. During flood the silt ladden discharge is intercepted by the structures and is entrapped in thse reservoirs except for the period of outflow from the dam which is possible only when the inflow into the dam exceeds the reservoir capacity. In case of smaller weirs/sluice/dams the condition of outflow is invariably achieved during good monsoon season. But by contrast this situation is none-to-happy in context of larger dams as in the case of which has been filled to its FRL only in 9 years out of 56 years as is evident from Table 7.5. For transportation of the sediment it is necessary that the rivers flow during monsoon which is possible only in case of smaller tanks and reservoirs. The pictorial view of prominent dam in tehsil is shown in Figure 7.3.

The total catchment area of the rivers flowing within tehsil has been assessed as 1546 sq.km and after accounting for the intercepted catchment by different reservoirs, tanks, weir, anicuts, dams, and the effective catchment area is 1210 sq.km. The sediment yield from this portion of catchment @ 549.89 tonne/sq.km works out to 0.67 million tonne/year. The project envisages annual production of 2.24 million tonne or 11.2 million tonne in 5 years lease period. Thus the annual extraction exceeds the annual deposition by 1.57 million tonne which implies that the

EQMS INDIA PVT. LTD. 10 deposition rate is about 70% lower than the annual extraction rate. The mine pits will get replenished provided there are two to three events of floods in every monsoon. The replenishment takes place faster during the first flood and thereafter the rate of replenishment decreases. For safe replenishment of river bed mine pits it is necessary that the mining activities are carried out in such reaches which are susceptible to deposition like the convex banks. Since the mineable reserves are 126.84 MMT against which 11.2 MMT can be safely extracted during the lease period without taking into account the annual replenishment. The area mined out every year will get replenished after two consecutive good monsoon seasons, reckoned from the end of pre-monsoon season of the year of extraction, provided the free reach of the river receive run-off from three to four events of flood every monsoon. It is therefore assessed that the mined out area within 5 years shall be completely replenished after 13 years reckoned from the cessation of the mining provided every year average annual rainfall during rainy season (423 mm) occurs in the catchment.

Particu lar / 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th 13th 14th 15th 16th 17th 18th Total Year Annual Produc tion 2.24 2.24 2.24 2.24 2.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.20 (MMT) Annual 0.00 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 11.39 Deposi tion (MMT)

EQMS INDIA PVT. LTD. 11

Figure 7.4 : Pictorial View of Hemawas Talab in Tehsil Pali

EQMS INDIA PVT. LTD. 12 Table 7.4 : Tanks under the jurisdiction of Water Resources Department Design Command Area in purpose ( Ht.above Gross Live Length hectares Irrigation , Length Catchment Yield S. Name of River/ Nearest lowest storage storage of Canal Type Water of Dam Area in in No Dam Nallah City foundation capacity Capacity system in of Dam supply , (M) Sqkm Mcft (M) (Mcum) Mcum k.m. GCA CCA ICA power generation etc.) Sardar Irrigation + 1 Sukri pali 35.00 9000 2064 2848 88.17 88.17 64.7 13245 10325 8562 Earthen Samand Water supply

Irrigation + Earthen 2 Hemawas sumer pali 12.00 7924.88 1120 1900 62.55 62.55 33.59 9115 8704 6093 Water supply

Kharda feeder & Irrigation + 3 Kharda pali 7.00 3000 180 240.95 18.8 18.8 17.82 3006 2451 2220 Earthen local Water supply catchment

Irrigation + 1535 1462 899 Earthen 4 Baniawas Khari pali 6.20 6082 600 1273 8.49 7.84 8.4 Water supply

Bandi Irrigation + 5 Giroliya pali 3.65 3960 691 545 4.95 4.2 15.69 2540 2429 1215 Earthen Nalla Water supply

Local Irrigation + 6 Endla pali 4.70 5400 46 98.71 6.37 6.03 3.60 810 688 607 Earthen Nalla Water supply

Local Irrigation + 7 Vayad pali 4.80 3350 800 96.18 1.44 1.44 3.36 368 350 263 Earthen Nalla Water supply

Sali ki Local Irrigation + 8 pali 4.70 3075 98.7 58.57 1.55 1.33 5.13 384 369 259 Earthen Dhani Nalla Water supply

Lordiya feeder & Irrigation + 9 Lordiya pali - 3350 25.8 - 1.23 1.23 0.15 159 138 121 Earthen local Water supply catchment

Bandi Bandi 10 pali 8.75 7200 2693 7.36 6.52 17.65 1456 1452 1162 Earthen Irrigation Nehra Nadi

EQMS INDIA PVT. LTD. 13 Bomadara Khari & Diversion 11 pick up pali 1.92 5029 1254 1500 1.27 1.27 Diversion scheme Earthen Sukri scheme weir

Juna Eathen 12 Local 10. 50 1915.00 18 61.89 1.750 1.680 3750 450.00 319.00 240.00 Irrigation dam Magai Masonary Irrigation & 13 Sadri Sadri 28.44 349.50 54 22.5 5. 80 5. 23 19529 1382.38 1274.12 930.00 River dam Water supply Ghanerao Eathen 14 Kana dam Desuri 12.63 1143.00 53 113.5 3. 05 3.040 10710 812.49 667.34 507.00 Irrigation River dam Eathen Irrigation 15 Muthana Local Desuri 12. 00 1079.00 35 99.55 2.718 2.464 8700 608.38 455.89 367.00 dam Eathen Irrigation 16 Rajpura Local Desuri 12. 50 558.00 23 81.6 2. 54 2.220 4290 720.00 648.00 350.00 dam Eathen Irrigation & 17 Seli ki nal Local Desuri 13. 80 1708.00 94 414 2.265 1.926 5540 511.11 414.32 343.01 dam Water supply Eathen Irrigation 18 47.28 Local Desuri 16.11 1630.00 14 47.28 1.338 1.333 4730 315.88 315.88 260.00 dam Eathen Irrigation & 19 Godadhara Local Desuri 10.62 1348.20 31 107 2.378 2.209 2946 492.60 492.60 379.00 dam Water supply Eathen Irrigation 20 Kesuli Local Bali 10. 70 137.10 77 129 2.420 2.170 2580 587.00 440.00 308.00 dam Eathen Irrigation 21 Dantiwara Local Bali 10. 00 542.50 31 98 2.770 2.630 6270 797.00 784.00 494.00 dam Masonary Irrigation 22 Latara Local Bali 21.00 76. 00 20 70.8 1.410 1.301 2490 422.208 419.948 294.00 dam

Eathen 23 Kot Dam Local Bali 8.10 3930.00 72 116.87 2.860 2.730 9090 283.00 521.00 469.00 dam With Irrigation Face wall

Eathen 299.00 220.00 135.00 Irrigation 24 Dhani Local 8.00 2610.00 14 0.940 0.930 3340 dam Mithri 1129.0 Eathen 25 Mithri Bali 15.70 1545.00 77 292.6 8.710 8.310 4570 1996.00 1930.00 Irrigation River 0 dam Eathen 26 Local Bali 8.60 111.00 2 6.01 0.203 0.186 450 44.00 44.00 26.00 dam Supplimentally Eathen Tank of Mithri 27 Pipla Local Bali 7.10 159.00 3 10.35 0.364 0.326 240m 130.00 79.00 48.00 dam

Shivnath Eathen 28 Local Bali 20.10 82.30 4 50 1.410 1.410 900 522.00 421.00 240.00 dam With Irrigation Sagar Face wall

EQMS INDIA PVT. LTD. 14 4903. Eathen 29 Phutia Local Bali 5. 50 2 55.23 1.540 1.370 3480 380.00 348.00 233.00 Irrigation 00 dam Raipur Raipur 1563.0 Eathen 30 Luni Raipur 18.90 341.50 373 50.97 9.22 7.63 22.81 4168.24 2605.15 Irrigation Luni Dam 9 dam River

Giri Eathen Lilari dam & 31 Nanda Raipur 10.67 350.50 102 304 5.66 5.59 11.74 1839.31 1432.60 860.00 Irrigation River Masonary Dam Face wall

Babra Lilari Eathen 32 Raipur 11.00 350.00 372 247.17 3.77 3.56 8.49 598.48 537.02 482.87 Irrigation Dam River dam Tributory Rajsagar 1320.0 Eathen 33 Luni Sojat 4.60 7680.00 113 176.61 8.16 8.04 9.90 2397.00 1670.00 Irrigation Chopra 0 dam River Malpuria Local Eathen 34 Sojat 2.15 1048.00 129 146.35 5.53 5.08 2.72 892.00 877.00 621.00 Irrigation Kanawas Nallah dam

Sukri Eathen Irrigation/Water 35 Gajnai Raipur 10.00 210.00 86 178.14 6.37 6.27 15.62 1418 1255.00 897.00 River dam Supply

Local Eathen 36 Borinada Sojat 2.25 4026 70 79 1.72 1.72 2.1 336 242 Irrigation Nallah dam 842

Local Marwar Eathen Irrigation/Water 37 7.93 250 39 132.63 4.48 4.13 7.44 805 763 591 Nallah Jn. dam Supply

Local Marwar Eathen Irrigation/Water 38 Kantaliya 7 572 81 166.2 5.34 5.18 8.19 838 759 611 Nallah Jn. dam Supply

Local Marwar Eathen Irrigation/Water 39 8.23 735 49 131.04 3.72 3.49 5.19 879 810 498 Nallah Jn. dam Supply

Jograwas I Local Marwar Eathen 40 2.28 1213 77 120 3.36 3.32 3.66 931 842 486 Irrigation & II Nallah Jn. dam

Local Marwar Eathen 41 Chirpatia 2.7 4710 47 91.8 2.13 2.05 0 1828 1502 405 Irrigation Nallah Jn. dam

Local Marwar Eathen 42 Saran 3.5 330 18 66.8 1.87 1.7 3.6 524 509 263 Irrigation Nallah Jn. dam

EQMS INDIA PVT. LTD. 15 Local Eathen 43 Dhani Bali 5.5 27.3 0.94 0.93 3.3 481 347 274 Irrigation Nallah dam

EQMS INDIA PVT. LTD. 16 Table 7.5 : Year wise Maximum Gauge Water Received, Water Utilized from Jawai Dam

Max. Gross Water reserved in Area of Irrigation in Water utilized in mcft. No. of Year gauge Capacity mcft acres Watering in ft. in mcft. Irrigation PHED Irrigation PHED Proposed Actual 1956-57 48.45 4496 - 3454 1957-58 34.4 2431 - 1746.82 18815 1958-59 40.05 3141.5 2249.12 23294 1959-60 51.42 5057.7 2361.7 24818 1960-61 45.7 4066 1000 2368.63 638.85 22669 1961-62 48.9 4577 660 2904.17 614.24 24868 1962-63 37.5 2827.5 600 1660.87 595.95 16629 1963-64 31.86 2176.96 830 740.89 863.5 8895 1964-65 36 2638 461 1765.3 457.28 16502 1965-66 32 2180 390 1213.56 338.4 12560 1966-67 29.3 1949.2 520 898.28 264.67 11816 1967-68 57.57 6364.6 3849.21 327.54 32082 1968-69 48.35 4478 1000 2545.13 638.87 22700 27432 1969-70 16.95 1107.25 1107.25 604 1488 1970-71 48.32 4496.6 1000 3464.2 1000 22407 32421 1971-72 32.02 2189.25 900 805.66 766.67 11000 9982 1972-73 19.4 1232 1200 1321 Nil 1973-74 61.05 7273.5 780 3770.66 388.18 43400 46618 4 1974-75 39 3008 2200 156.48 1800 6402 1 1975-76 55.87 6019.36 100 2892.06 418 43400 36112 3 1976-77 53.4 5627 1000 4087.7 1308.8 40000 39552 4 1977-78 41 3265 800 1992.5 800 23124 3 1978-79 54.45 5679 2300 2500.15 1691 29590 24562 4 1979-80 53.8 5519 1250 3625.8 804 43400 46999 4 1980-81 40.8 3239 660 2000 660 1959 19756 20062 2 1981-82 18.6 1190 Full water reserved 1463 6106 1982-83 21.4 1337 Full water reserved 1546 962 1983-84 61 7260 4650 2000 4610 943.5 43500 57032 5 1984-85 41.5 3229.05 470 2200 670 2495.52 28800 19235 1 1985-86 38.75 2977.25 2829 2390.7 325 1986-87 44 3706 1900 1605 1772 1792.34 21400 28018 3 1987-88 9.9 793.5 Full water reserved 978 Nil 1988-89 46.7 4182.5 2000 2174 1997 1515 21990.41 41287 3 1989-90 29.7 1999.6 1989.06 2072 265 1990-91 61.25 7327.5 4350 3021 4312.4 1958 43500 63679 4 1991-92 49 4595 1710 2367 1608 3260 18801.64 35445 3 1992-93 61.25 7327.5 3550 4200 3476 1745 35550 58700 4 1993-94 60.9 7221.5 3500 3700 3462 3232 60160 4 1994-95 61.25 7327.5 4500 3150 3490 2552 59935 4 1995-96 52.75 5288 2800 2500 2800 2583 42000 24009 3

EQMS INDIA PVT. LTD. 17 1996-97 42.2 3418.2 650 2652 635 2250 30000 58246 1 1997-98 57 6278 4200 2142 3500 2255 50500 4 1998-99 26.6 1726 Nil Full water reserved 1761 1999-00 5.8 657.26 Nil Full water reserved 664.04 00-2001 42.3 3230.3 800 2727.95 709.5 2728 32000 18252.27 1 2001-02 45.3 3880 2050 1830 2125 1755 24600 55714 3 2002-03 11.65 838 838 800 Full reserved for PHED 2003-04 40.1 2765.07 900 1976 825 14447 15410 2 2004-05 27.5 1800 Full reserved for PHED 2005-06 43.4 3591.4 1800 2263 1800 2263 21600 34471 3 2006-07 61.25 7327.5 5200 2363 4621 932.35 43500 66076 4 2007-08 60.75 7195 5112.5 2050 4783 2182.54 42420 66493 4 2008-09 24 1505 Full reserved for PHED 2009-10 25 Full reserved for PHED 2010-11 50.15 5907.63 3425 2482.63 3255.03 2352.6 41100 59431 4 2011-12 6082 3500 2250 42000 4

EQMS INDIA PVT. LTD. 18

Annexure – IV: Cumulative impact or other mines located in the vicinity of the lease area needs to be submitted.

1.1. Cumulative impact of other mines in the vicinity of lease area in Tehsil Pali. The cumulative impact of other mines and the riverbed mine lease area can be two prong viz. the impacts of each other due to mining activities and also on environment; and impact on roads due to transportation. 1.1.1. Description of Present and Existing Mines The present rivebed lease area (3859.0 ha) in Tehsil Pali is constituted by summation of linear area along different ephemeral river(s) like Somesar, Khari, Sukri, Bandi, Mithri and Khardi which cover a longitudinal profile of 23 km, 20.5 km 28.5 km, 31.5 km, 10 km and 9 km respectively in the Tehsil. Besides the riverbed lease area there are 77 other leases with consolidated area of 228.82 ha. These include 28 masonry stone mines of 1 ha each and 49 Granite mines of total area 200.82 ha. which are located in village Kharda Ki Dhani (3 nos.), Kharda (3 nos.), Jawaria (6 nos.), Giradara (2 nos.), Sakadara (27 nos), Dari (6 nos), Bala (1 no.) and Denda (1 no.). The masonry stone mines are located in villages Manihari (6 nos.), Akali (1 no.), Sodawas (1 no.) and Sowaniya (1 no.), Madri (1 no.), Bhanwari (14 nos), Dayalpura (3 nos), Nandan Batan (1 no.). The location map of the existing mines including the riverbed mining in Tehsil Pali is shown in Figure 1.1.

Figure 1.1 : Location of Riverbed lease area and Other Mines 1.1.2. Impact of Riverbed Mining on Existing Mines The semi-mechanized river bed mining in 3m depth (maximum) shall be carried out in the riverbed section of numerous river draining the Tehsil. The lease area is a linear area along different river(s) like Somesar, Khari, Sukri, Bandi, Mithri and Khardi. All these rivers are ephemeral rivers and influenced by nature due to good alluvium material constituting their river bed matrix. During monsoon season and especially during flash flood regime the rivers with significant free draining catchment reach high stage and transport suspended sediment of high concentration and larger amount than the bed load material. The bed load material/sediments which get accredited at such stretch which has wider river width and has concave banks during the passing of the floods while the suspended particles settle on the receding of floods. The mined out area in river bed thus gets partially replenished only in the eventuality of frequent storm events which cause heavy run-off to pass through the river. The existing other leases are not located in the riverbed and are approximately 1.2 km to 3.9 km away from the nearest boundary of mine lease area. Thus any riverbed mining activity which is confined to the river section alone shall not impact any of the other leases either due to channel incision or due to flooding and over toping of flanks of the river and inundating the other lease areas. Based on air quality dust dispersion modelling it has been observed that the fugitive dust emission resulting from the mining activity and the haul road transportation has been found to be insignificant (0.5ug/cum) about 450m away from the mining sites and thus the nearest site which are located about 1.2 km shall not be impacted on this count. As regards the impact due to noise it is evident from the graphical results that the noise level of 85 dB(A) gets highly attenuated to 42 dB(A), 37 dB(A) and 32 dB(A) about 145m, 340m and 440 m respectively from the point source. As the mining activity in riverbed shall not generate any effluent therefore the incidence of its disposal in the nearby other lease areas is a far gone possibility. 1.1.3. Impact of Riverbed Mining on Other Riverbed Mines of Adjacent Tehsils Bandi river and its tributaries originate from the Aravali ranges and flow from East to West in Tehsil Marwar. The upper most extremity of the lease area along these rivers begins after these have debouched from the Aravali range to the plain land of the Tehsil. These rivers after traversing through Tehsil Marwar Jn. with catchment area (1844 sq.km) drain through Tehsil Pali with absolute catchment area (1546 sq. km). Sukri river and its tributaries Lilri and Modiya Nala which also originate from the Aravali ranges and flow from East to West in Tehsil Sojat without flowing through Tehsil Marwar Jn. and has its own catchment area (1824 sq.km). These rivers after draining through Tehsil Sojat enter into Tehsil Rohat and finally confluence with main river Luni. The rivers while flowing through Rohat tehsil has an absolute catchment area (1554 sq. km). Jawai and Sukri rivers originates from Aravali ranges of and flows from South to North-west before confluence with Luni river. Mithri and Ugti rivers after flowing through Tehsil Bali and Rani enters Tehsil. These rivers constitute a combine catchment of 1186 sq.km. The flow course of these rivers is such that they do not drain through Pali / Marwar / Sojat / Rohat Tehsils. The composite map of the catchment areas under different Tehsil is shown in Figure 1.2. Based on the effective catchment areas for different Tehsil and corresponding effective rainfalls the annual sediment yield computed on the basis of empirical formula developed by CAZRI, Jodhpur is enumerated in Table 1.1.

Figure 1.2 : Composite Catchment Area Map

Table 1.1 : Tehsil-wise Details of Catchment Area and Annual Sediment Rates Tehsil Catchment Area (sq.km) Annual Sediment Rate Total Effective Tonne / sq.km Cum/ha. Marwar Jn. 1844 1150 582.52 4.11 Sojat 1824 1075 556.37 3.93 Pali 1546 1210 549.89 3.88 Rohat 1554 1215 559.44 3.95 Sumerpur 1186 593 814.40 5.75

The catchment area of rivers flowing through Tehsil Pali is independent of rivers flowing through Tehsil Sojat/Rohat and its disposition is such that it constitutes the lower catchment for river flowing through Tehsil Pali. The flow course of rivers flowing through Tehsil Sumerpur is such that they do not drain through Pali / Marwar / Sojat / Rohat Tehsils. It is thus evident that the mining activity in rivers flowing in Tehsil Pali and consequent replenishment in monsoon seasons shall not be impacted due to mining activities in Tehsil Sojat / Rohat and Sumerpur as the rivers flowing in these Tehsils have different catchment. The catchment area of rivers in Pali Tehsil forms lower catchment for drainage through Tehsil Pali which has adequate and reasonable catchment to produce and transport sediments.

1.1.4. Impact of Existing Mines on Riverbed Mining The existing other leases of masonry stone and other minerals are not located in the riverbed and are approximately 1.2 km to 3.9 km away from the nearest boundary of mine lease area. Thus mining activities, which have been going for years shall be confined to the existing pit(s) alone. Due to bottom pit levels of other leases (Other minerals) being lower than the riverbed levels of nearby riverbed mine lease area, the chances of ingress of surface water into the pits of adjacent mines are ruled out during dry period mining but cannot be precluded during flood season if the mines are located in close vicinity. However, during rainy season, the pits of the existing mines are also inundated with rain water, the difference of free surface level of water of the two may not attract any ingress. This situation shall not arise as the mines are more than 1.2 km away from each other. However, the pumped out water from the pit of other mines discharged into nearby Balas may bring silt laden water which may finally drain into the nearby lease area during heavy precipitation. 1.1.5. Cumulative impact on carrying capacity of roads due to transportation of minerals The annual production of river sand, from different rivers, envisaged from tehsil Pali, Rohat, Marwar Jn., Sojat and Sumerpur shall be to the tune of 2.24 MMT, 2.24MMT, 1.12 MMT, 1.40 MMT and 1.12 MMT respectively. This sums up to 8.12 MMT / annum i.e. 29000 tonne/day for transportation of which 1450 trucks (20 Tonne) shall be required. The increased traffic load due to transportation of mineral shall not be concentrated in a particular segment of the road as the material shall be dispatched to different destination and in different directions. The impact due to transportation shall be on carrying capacity of the State Highway/ National Highway and also due to increase in vehicular emissions due to mineral transportation. The transport plan for movement of trucks through these Tehsils is shown in Figure 1.3 which reveals that bulk of material shall be carried out through NH-14, NH-65, SH-16, SH-58, SH- 61, SH-62, SH-65, SH-67. The traffic survey is essential to realistically and accurately assess the prevailing traffic volumes and travel characteristics by undertaking classified volume count. The objective of traffic volume count survey is to assess the traffic intensity on the most vulnerable section of the road under question. Two – days, 24 hrs., continuous volume counts were manually undertaken during November 2013 at different locations on NH/SH for capturing the realistic picture of the current volume and composition of traffic motorized i.e. passenger vehicles (two- wheeler, three-wheeler, bicycle, passenger car); utility vehicles (Jeep, Van, Mini Bus, Standard Bus); Goods vehicles – LCV (Freight), MCV (2 axle rigid chasis), MCV (3 axle rigid chasis), MAV and tractor trailer and non-motorized like animal driven cart. The analysis of traffic counts provides an estimate of average daily traffic (ADT). The study for carrying capacity has been carried out for these roads by undertaking traffic volume counts at the prominent inter-junction of these roads as per guideline of IRC:9-1972 and IRC:SP 19-2001 and the PCU factors adopted for analysis has been taken as per IRC:64- 1990. The ratio of traffic volume to capacity and consequent level of service (LOS) in pre and post project scenario is evaluated for different highways and different locations and shown in Table 1.2 which manifests that in case of NH – 14 the existing level of service in respect of NH -14 at Sumerpur, Pali and Sojat (Bagawas) being ‘A’ , ‘A’ and ‘B’ respectively shall not change in case of Sumerpur and Pali but it will change to ‘C’ at Sojat (Bagawas) respectively in post- project scenario. In case of NH-65, the existing level of service at CARZI and Rohat being ‘B’ shall change to ‘C’ in post project scenario. The existing level of service in case of SH-64 is ‘A’ which shall change to ‘B’ in post project scenario, whereas the existing level of service for SH-61 being ‘B’ shall change to ‘C’ in post project scenario. There shall be no change in the existing and post project level of LOS in case of SH-16, SH-58, SH-62 and SH-67.

Figure 1.3 : Transport Route Map

Table 1.2 : level of service (LOS) in pre and post project scenario Cumulative Existing Design Envisaged Traffic Traffic Daily Volume / Service Movement Due to Movement - Level of Service Traffic Capacity Ratio Volume Mining Activities Post Project Data Scenario Location of PCU / Pre- Post- Pre- Post- Traffic volume PCU / Day PCU / Day PCU / Day NH/SH counts Day Project Project Project Project Sumerpur NH14 35000 4615 960 5575 0.13 0.16 A A Pali NH14 35000 6243 960+240=1200 7443 0.18 0.19 A A NH-14 Sojat (Bagawas) 35000 13617 960+240+1020=2220 15837 0.39 0.45 B C CARZI 15000 5944 366 6310 0.39 0.42 B C Rohat near 966 (from SH- 15000 0.36 0.52 B C NH-65 SDM Office 5366 64)+1440=2406 7772 Pali (Mandli 15000 1800 0.28 0.4 B B SH-67 Khurd) 4241 6041 Rohat (Kharabera - 15000 966 0.19 0.25 A B SH-64 Purohitan) 2812 3778 Marwar Jn. 15000 0.36 0.43 B C SH-61 () 5327 1080 6507 Marwar Jn. 15000 0.275 0.283 B B (Karmal) 4126 132 4258 SH-62 Sojat (Siyat) 15000 4343 120+66=186 4529 0.29 0.3 B B Sojat (Causeway on 15000 B B SH-58 Sukri) 4228 366 4594 0.28 0.31 Sumerpur 15000 0.19 0.2 A A SH-16 () 2823 120 2943 Sumerpur 2000 0.33 0.39 B B ODR (Puhara) 660 120 780 64345 11922 76367

Annexure – V: Revised action plan on the issues raised during PH needs to be submitted.

Annexure- V : Summary/details of public hearing, held on 12/9/2014 presided by ADM Pali, with Action Plan

Issues raised by the Public Response/Commitment of Action Plan Reference in EIA Doc Project Proponents

Shri Mohan Singh, R/o Thakur The rates of royalty for minor No Action Plan is warranted at the minerals are determined by end of PP as the matter of fixation The rate of royalty of bajri is the state government and the of rate of royalty is a state matter. Rs. 550/tractor trolley which project proponent / lessee has is very high. no locus standii over this exclusive policy matter.

Shree Pankaj Sharma, R/o By resorting to e-auction the No Action Plan is warranted at the Pali letter of intent has been end of PP as the matter of granted to the P.P. for the auctioning of mine is purely a By auctioning lease for single riverbed mining project state matter and is covered under mining of bajri to one person under the tehsil with the view RMMCR 1986 and Amended Rules only, there would be adverse to control the illegal mining 2012 impact to the environment. It and also with the sole objective would have been better if the for carrying out the sustainable lease were granted to 3 to 4 project activity by protecting parties / contractors. the environment.

Shree Ramlal, Sarpanch, R/o At this juncture no lease deed The PP agrees to show the copy of Thakurla has been entered with the P.P. LoI / Lease deed if demanded by However the P.P. can produce the gram sabha. The copy of the lease be the copy of LoI on the asking of make available to the the gram sabha. concerned gram sabha

Shree Shanker Jangaid The plantation shall be carried Yearly 11000 saplings shall be out along upper terraces on planted in 22 ha area (Section 9.3 Where the plantation is both banks of the river, haul of Green Belt Development Plan – proposed and with whom the roads and areas as identified Rs. 11 lac per annum) responsibility of by gram panchayat as per maintenance rests with. Besides this under CSR initiatives green belt development plan plantation shall be carried out in contained in the EMP. The PP village Panchayat for which Rs. 2 shall be responsible for the Lac have been earmarked (Section maintenance of the plantation 9.2.6.1) carried out during the project period.

Shree Raju, R/o Rupawas The transportation of minerals The PP shall install weighbridges shall be carried through at the naka/check-post for No overloading of the trucks covered trucks and avoiding overloading of trucks should be allowed and these overloading avoided beyond beyond stipulated capacity For shall be covered to avoid the stipulated capacity. effective control on overloading of spilling of minerals. Besides it is the responsibility trucks, the Hon’ble High Court of of the state mine department Judicature for Rajasthan at Jaipur and the transport department Bench vide Judgment dated to ensure no overloading of 14.08.2014 has made the P.P. trucks. solely responsible and passed instructions to other departments like mining , transport and police to ensure strict compliance of the order.

(Section 4.12.2)

Shree Sardar Banjara, R/o The work proposed under CSR The work stipulated under the Devaliya initiative shall be carried out management plan shall be Management Plan should be after taking locals into discussed with the concerned made available to the gram confidence. gram sabha and undertaken after sabha. taking them into the confidence Section 9.2.6.1 (CSR Activities – Rs. 20 lac) Shree Mahendra Singh, R/o It is policy matter of the state - Thakur and thus no action rests with The royalty on mineral should the P.P. be dispensed with. Shree Kuppa Ram Lohar, In general the water table of The mining will be executed N.T. Pali neighboring area gets lowered systematically and in sequential By mining in 3m depth the in case of mining in the bed of manner as per approved mining water table shall be lowered influent river which is not the plan and progressive mine closure therefore mining depth should present case as the river(s) in plan (Section 2.10) be restricted to 2 yard question are ephemeral in nature. During monsoon and in post monsoon season the water table rises in comparison to pre-monsoon water depths. The mining upto 3 m is envisaged in the approved mining plan. Shree Shankar R/o Hemawas The local people shall get the The EIA document vouches for Only local people should be employment for executing deployment of manpower employed mining activities as well as indigenously available for mining labour oriented works under the activities as well as labour oriented management plans. works under the management plans during the lease period. Besides this the local people shall also be engaged for carrying out activities under CSR initiatives, like plantation in village Panchayat, creation of water harvesting structures.

(Section 4.9 and 8.3.1)

Annexure – VI: Certificate from the SPCB/CPCB that whether the mine is located in critically polluted area or not