Andrea Cremaschi* Parrrole: Berio’s Words and Francesco Giomi† *Via Michelangelo 2 on Music Technology 27058 Voghera (PV), Italy
[email protected] †Centro Tempo Reale Villa Strozzi-Via Pisana 77 50143 Florence, Italy
[email protected] Numbers in music, from Aristotle to the Giomi et al. (2003). Further historical and biograph- late Middle Ages, were inhabited by ical information can be found online at the Univer- heaven and earth, by the entire universe. sal Edition Web site (www.uemusic.at) and in some Nowadays, numbers are uninhabited, or comprehensive studies about the composer, includ- rather, inhabited at will; sometimes ing Stoianova (1985), Osmond-Smith (1991), and they are metaphors, or alibis, or some- Restagno (1995). thing else. It is perhaps still too early to take stock of Be- —Luciano Berio rio’s musical and theoretical contributions to the (Rizzard and De Benedictis 2000, p. 164) field of electroacoustic music. Given the variety of solutions, techniques, and aesthetics Berio used, a For fifty years, Luciano Berio (1925–2003) (see Fig- comprehensive examination of his work is likely to ure 1) worked with music technology, beginning be somewhat disorienting. Nonetheless, it is possi- with the now distant concert on October 28, 1952, ble to trace certain hypotheses and lines of research where he heard his first piece of tape music, and that characterized Berio’s language from the very extending to the recent works Ofanı`m, Outis, beginning. Cronaca del Luogo, and Altra voce. It was not al- One of these is surely the centrality of the act of ways a steady relationship; moments of extraordi- creation and its absolute preeminence in his tech- nary creativity were mixed with moments of nological inquiries—the centrality of the music it- apparent disinterest in technology resulting from self in comparison to its productive mechanisms.