Arxiv:1705.05935V1 [Q-Bio.NC] 16 May 2017
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Rise of the humanbot Ricard Sol´e1, 2, 3 1ICREA-Complex Systems Lab, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Dr Aiguader 88, 08003 Barcelona, Spain 2Institut de Biologia Evolutiva, CSIC-UPF, Pg Maritim de la Barceloneta 37, 08003 Barcelona, Spain 3Santa Fe Institute, 1399 Hyde Park Road, Santa Fe NM 87501, USA The accelerated path of technological development, particularly at the interface between hardware and biology has been suggested as evidence for future major technological breakthroughs associ- ated to our potential to overcome biological constraints. This includes the potential of becoming immortal, having expanded cognitive capacities thanks to hardware implants or the creation of intelligent machines. Here I argue that several relevant evolutionary and structural constraints might prevent achieving most (if not all) these innovations. Instead, the coming future will bring novelties that will challenge many other aspects of our life and that can be seen as other feasible singularities. One particularly important one has to do with the evolving interactions between hu- mans and non-intelligent robots capable of learning and communication. Here I argue that a long term interaction can lead to a new class of \agent" (the humanbot). The way shared memories get tangled over time will inevitably have important consequences for both sides of the pair, whose identity as separated entities might become blurred and ultimately vanish. Understanding such hybrid systems requires a second-order neuroscience approach while posing serious conceptual challenges, including the definition of consciousness. Keywords: Singularity, evolution,social interacting robots,major transitions,mind,memory,ageing Can a machine think? Could it have pain? a word associated to mechanical machines, this time em- Ludwing Wittgenstein powered by the rising technology that allowed to com- bine hardware and a new form of engineering inspired -to some extent- by natural devices (Water 1950, 1951; I. INTRODUCTION see also Braitenberg 1984). Those early experiments pro- vided some interesting insights into the patterns of explo- The beginnings of the 21-st century have been marked ration of simple agents that where able to detect edges, by a rapid increase in our understanding of brain organ- respond to light and modify their movements according isation and a parallel improvement of robots as embod- to some simple feedback mechanisms. Although their ied cognitive agents (Steels 2003; Cangelosi 2010; Nolfi simple behaviour was essentially predictable, it was not and Mirolli 2009; Vershure et al 2014). This has taken completely free from surprise (Holland 1997). Later work place along with the development of enormously powerful in the 1990s and afterwards incorporated artificial neural connectionist systems, particularly within the domain of systems as an explicit form of introducing learning and convolutional neural networks (Lecun et al 2015; Kock behaviour largely inspired in biology (Vershure et al 1992; 2015). Two hundred years after the rise of mechanical Edelman 1992; Sporns and Alexander, 2002; Prescott et automata, that became the technological marvels of the al 2006). Enlightnment (Woods 2003) new kinds of automata are emerging, capable of interacting with humans in adap- Nowadays we are rapidly moving towards a new gener- tive ways. The requirements for building an intelligent ation of domestic, human-friendly robots that will proba- or a conscious machine are likely to be still ahead in bly trigger a new technological revolution, similar in some the future, but some advances and new perceptions of ways to the one proposed by the first personal computers. the problem are placing the possibility at the forefront There is a great promise in this revolution. The promise of "what-if" questions (Vershure 2016). To a large ex- of robots helping us, playing with us or simply having tent, today's discussion on what separates humans from some basic support functions is pushing forward software their artificial counterparts is deeply tied to the prob- and hardware companies towards designing cheap robotic lem of how to properly define mind and consciousness systems. For the general public the fascination remains (Zarkadakis 2015). in the humanoids, those who really look like us. We arXiv:1705.05935v1 [q-bio.NC] 16 May 2017 In the 1950s, the development of cybernetics by Nor- are actually witnessing a rehearsal of the mechanical au- bert Wiener and others along with the beginning of the- tomata mania of the 18th century, except that the new oretical neuroscience and Turing's proposal for an intel- automata will be much more autonomous and perhaps ligence test (Turing 1950) were received with a similar closer to us than ever. Not surprisingly, the rise of the interest, triggering a philosophical debate on the limits new robots has come about with a parallel growth of new and potential of man-made imitations of life (Nourbakhsh fields associated to human-robot interactions (Breazeal 2013). The study of the first "cybernetic machines" made 2003; Fong et al 2003; Dautenhahn 2007) and the ex- by a few pioneers such as Gray Walter generated a great ploration of learning, cognition and evolution potentials expectation. For the first time "behaviour" emerged as of artificial agents (Clark and Grush 1999; Schaal 1999; 2 a b c d Γr Γh Γ FIG. 1 Humans and robots have been interacting in increasingly more complex ways, most of them limited to simple tasks. However, communicating robots (a) could in the future interact in deeper ways both among them and with humans (image courtesy of Luc Steels -the human in the picture- and the Neurocybernetics group at Osnabruck). Fictional stories on future human-robot interactions, including (b) the movie Robot and Frank or (c) TV series Humans have started to consider the relevance of strong emotional ties established between elderly or impaired human beings and (possibly non-intelligent) robots capable of learning and communicating through natural language. Evolving connectomes will inevitably result from HRI (d). The long-term association between a human and a robotic agent, when the later is equipped with both communication skills and learning capacities implies the creation of an association network Γ linking both "brains" through a number of shared memories. The relative importance of this shared connectome will be a function of the cognitive apparatus of each partner and the depth of emotional engagement. Floreano and Mattiusi 2008; Takeno 2013). robot interactions (HRI) and artificial intelligence (AI) Along with the science and engineering of these human- have renewed the interest in the potential consequences like agents, science fiction is also exploring some relevant of advanced cognitive robots (Wallach and Allen, 2009; (and sometimes unexpected) consequences of these near Bradshaw et al., 2004; Murphy and Woods, 2009) and futures. Most early works on robots have been centered in particular the role played by embodiment in commu- on the possibility of intelligent, or even self-aware ma- nicating agents (figure 1a) which is known to play a key chines. Isaac Asimov published the Sci-Fi classic I robot role in the development of complex behavioural traits three years before Turing's landmark paper on intelli- (Steels 2003, 2015). The plots in new Sci-Fi stories have gence, picturing a would-be society where robots become become more subtle, and much more interesting. In the a central part of our lives (Asimov 1947). Perhaps the movie Robot and Frank, for example, we have a moving most interesting reflection of Asimov's tales is the un- story of a declining man (Frank) facing the initial phases expected, the unforeseen consequences of robotic actions of Alzheimer's and a robot companion which, despite a while interacting with their most complex part of the en- lack of real intelligence, shares experiences and memo- vironment: us, the humans. The robots incorporate a set ries with his human partner (fig 1b). At some point, of hardwired rules (the "laws" of robotics) preventing the the robot asks Frank to wipe out his memories. Frank machines from harming humans and harming themselves rejects the idea, while the robot tells him "I am not a per- but in special contexts, when a conflict among the laws son, I am just an advanced simulation" but afterwards emerges, the unexpected should be expected. he uses a number of very personal (Frank-like) sentences to make his argument, resulting from previous learned The scientific progress made in the field of human- 3 talks and experiences. A related situation also shows such novel hybrid system will be discussed. up in an episode of the Sci-Fi series Humans where Dr George Millican, an elderly man and one of the main characters, owns a faulty robot named Odi (fig 1c). The II. THE SPACE OF HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTIONS boy-like robot is an old model that stores memory chunks of shared, unique experiences, some of them related to de- Here we are interested in the problem of how a so- ceased Millican's wife. Because of this, Millican does not cially interacting robot can trigger emotional and even accept the mandatory replacement of old models, thus cognitive changes in the human partner. In order to do hiding Odi inside a closet. so we need to take into account several components of None of the previous examples is related to truly in- this interaction, which is mediated by a complex net- telligent robots. Instead, the subtle ties and their conse- work of exchanges and could be described in the con- quences arise from shared cognition and emotions. Nowa- text of distributed adaptive control theory (see Lallee and days, despite our distance from the sci-fi proposals, robot Vershure 2015). Two major groups of HRI interactions designs are already present in a wide range of situations can be defined here. This first involves those scenarios where they are social partners. This includes house- where interactions are short-lived (the robot companion hold pets, healthcare assistants or even educational com- exchanges take place over a small time window) or pre- panions.