DOCSLIB.ORG

A Chemical Approximation to the Modal QAPF and Normative Q' (F')-ANOR Classification of the Igneous Rocks Based on Their Sio2-Ca

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Chemical Approximation to the Modal QAPF and Normative Q' (F')-ANOR Classification of the Igneous Rocks Based on Their Sio2-Ca GEOGACETA, 66, 2019 A chemical approximation to the modal QAPF and normative Q' (F')-ANOR classification of the igneous rocks based on their SiO2-CaO-K2O content Una aproximación química a la clasificación modal QAPF y normativa Q' (F')-ANOR de las rocas ígneas, basada en su contenido en SiO2, CaO y K2O Pere Enrique and Sergi Esteve Departament de Mineralogia, Petrologia i Geologia Aplicada. Facultat de Geologia. Universitat de Barcelona. C/ Martí i Franquès s/n, 08028 Barcelona, España; [email protected], [email protected] ABSTRACT RESUMEN Magmas can form plutonic or volcanic rocks of the same chemical com- Los magmas pueden dar origen a rocas plutónicas o volcánicas de la position. The modal composition of the plutonic rocks can be quantified but misma composición química. La composición modal de las rocas plutónicas in the case of volcanic rocks this is not always possible, because of its puede ser cuantificada pero en el caso de las rocas volcánicas no suele ser aphanitic texture and presence of glass. These characteristics prevent a min- posible por su textura afanítica y presencia de vidrio. Estas características eralogical classification in equivalent diagrams for both types of rocks. To re- impiden una clasificación mineralógica en diagramas equivalentes para solve this problem, the IUGS recommends the use of chemical TAS diagram ambos tipos de rocas. La IUGS recomienda el uso del diagrama químico TAS in cases where obtaining the modal composition is not possible, in an at- en los casos en que la obtención de la composición modal no sea posible, tempt to adjust its nomenclature to that represented in the QAPF modal di- tratando de ajustar su nomenclatura a la del diagrama modal QAPF. Una agram. A best approximation is obtained with the normative diagram mejor aproximación se consigue con el diagrama normativo Q'(F')-ANOR en Q'(F')-ANOR in which the anorthite and the orthoclase are used as a dis- el que se usa la relación anortita-ortosa como factor discriminante. En este criminating factor. In this work, the chemical SiO2-100·CaO/(CaO+K2O) di- trabajo se presenta el diagrama químico SiO2-100·CaO/(CaO+K2O) que agram is presented, which largely reproduces the aforementioned normative reproduce en gran parte la clasificación normativa citada pero de forma sim- classification but in a simplified form since it uses only three discriminating plificada, utilizando solamente tres componentes químicos discriminantes chemical components (SiO2, CaO and K2O). (SiO2, CaO y K2O). The delimitation and nomenclature of the fields has been undertaken La delimitación y nomenclatura de los campos se ha realizado de forma empirically using as an example the normative diagram and plotting the empírica tomando como ejemplo el diagrama normativo y la representación analyses of typical igneous rocks. The approximate limit of silica saturation de análisis de rocas ígneas características. El límite de saturación en sílice has been drawn as a straight line joining the feldspathic compositions, be- aproximado se ha dibujado como una recta que une las composiciones fel- tween orthoclase and anorthite despáticas, comprendidas entre la ortosa y la anortita. Key-words: classification of igneous rocks, SiO -100·CaO/(CaO+K O) diagram, 2 2 Palabras clave: Clasificación de rocas ígneas, Diagrama SiO2-100·CaO/(CaO+K2O), QAPF diagram, Q'(F')-ANOR diagram, igneous petrology. Diagrama modal QAPF, Diagrama normativo Q'(F')-ANOR, petrología ígnea. Geogaceta, 66 (2019), 91-94 Recepción: 1 de julio de 2018 ISSN (versión impresa): 0213683X Revisión: 25 de abril de 2019 ISSN (Internet): 2173-6545 Aceptación: 24 de mayo de 2019 Introduction to determine the exact composition of the to their modal mineral content that could rock through the usual microscopic study. be represented in the double QAPF triangle. Since igneous rocks are constituted by In order to unify criteria in the classifi- In the case of volcanic rocks, the first mineral matter, their study and classification cation and nomenclature of igneous rocks, problem was to decide whether their clas- have been based on the precise determina- an international commission (IUGS Subcom- sification should be based on mineralogy or tion of the minerals and their textural rela- mission on the Systematics of Igneous chemistry given the difficulty, or even the tionships. However, a large number of rocks, Rocks) was created and began its work in impossibility, of obtaining a representative especially volcanic and hypabyssal, are lar- 1970 (Le Maitre et al. 2002). As regards modal composition. It was also considered gely made up of glass. This characteristic plutonic rocks it was agreed that they complex to obtain a calculated mineral prevents the quantification of the minerals should be named and classified according composition that reproduced a realistic Copyright© 2019 Sociedad Geológica de España / www.geogaceta.com 91 GEOGACETA, 66, 2019 P. Enrique and S. Esteve composition of the rocks. Finally, a consen- elements that serves to obtain an appro- turation line on silica is approximate. All the sus was reached on the basis of two princi- ximation to the QAPF nomenclature of granitoids and rocks with quartz are above ples: a) if modal compositions can be common igneous rocks is proposed. The this line, whereas the rocks with feldspa- obtained, volcanic rocks should be classified underlying idea is to take directly the dis- thoids and olivine are located below it. and named according to their position in criminating major elements used in the The delimitation of the lines of the the QAPF diagram; b) if modal analyses are normative diagram Q'(F')-ANOR and ana- fields was carried out empirically using a li- not available, chemical parameters that give logous parameters to obtain an empirical mited number of analyses of characteristic a result comparable to the mineralogical compositional equivalence, maintaining, rocks taken from the bibliography. QAPF classification should be used. After as far as possible, the original modal no- The provenance of the samples used considering several chemical diagrams, it menclature. The major components used is as follows: a) Cox et al. (1979, pp. 402- was decided to use the TAS (alkalis-silica) are SiO2, CaO and K2O. Unlike the TAS dia- 406), some characteristic plutonic and diagram of Le Maitre (1984), slightly modi- gram, which uses SiO2, Na2O and K2O, this volcanic rocks; b) Carmichael et al. (1974, fied by Le Bas et al., (1986). However, this diagram takes into account the calcium p. 499), East African alkaline rock series; diagram does not strictly comply with the that is part of all the plagioclase in the c) Wager and Brown (1967), plutonic tho- second principle agreed by the commission modal QAPF diagram and avoids sodium, leiitic intrusion from Skaergaard, East Gre- itself since neither the fields obtained nor which is part of both plagioclase and al- enland; d) Enrique (1990), Ferrés and the nomenclature are consistent with those kali feldspar. Enrique (1996), hercynian batholith from of the QAPF classification. Thus, terms such Catalan Coastal Ranges, NE Iberian Penin- as basaltic andesite, trachydacite, tephri- Methodology sula; e) Ferré and Leake (2001), plutonic phonolite, picrobasalt, etc. do not have an Mg-K series from Corsica; f) Carmichael et equivalent nomenclature in the modal QAPF In order to establish the classification al. (1974, p. 405), alkaline volcanics from diagram. For these reasons, volcanic rocks fields of the igneous rocks (non-ultramafic) Tenerife, Canary Islands; g) Carmichael et (classified in the TAS) cannot be translated simulating the normative diagram Q'(F')- al. (1974, p. 414), Hawaiian lavas; h) Car- to a simulated QAPF classification and com- ANOR, a new diagram was constructed in michael et al. (1974, p. 400), Galapagos pared with the plutonic rocks of equivalent which the silica is placed on the ordinate tholeiitic lavas; i) Enrique and Toribio composition. In addition, to correctly na- axis and the proportion (2009), alkaline lavas from Olot, NE Ibe- ming the rocks in certain fields, it is neces- 100·CaO/(CaO+K2O) on the abscissa axis. rian Peninsula. sary to obtain the CIPW normative The silica content is taken directly from the composition (Le Maitre et al. 2002). By con- analytical result and distributes the rocks in The SiO2-100·CaO/(CaO+K2O) trast, the normative Q'(F')-ANOR diagram acid, intermediate, basic and ultrabasic (Le diagram of Streckeisen and Le Maitre (1979) Maitre et al. 2002). The percentage ratio (Q'=quartz/quartz+feldspars, F'=feldspa- between the CaO and the K2O of the abs- As a result of the study of the graphic re- thoids/feldspathoids+feldspars) constitutes cissas establishes an approximation of the presentation of the samples mentioned a very remarkable approximation to the proportion between the anorthite and the above, a series of compositional fields were QAPF modal classification, both in the sum of normative orthoclase and anorthite. established in the SiO2-100·CaO/(CaO+K2O) choice of discrimination parameters and in The agreement is not identical since in the diagram that largely reproduce the modal terminological equivalence. Its conceptual norm, the calcium of the anorthite is distin- classification of the double triangular QAPF scheme is almost identical, given a) the in- guished from that which is part of the mafic diagram of Le Maitre et al. (2002). The re- compatibility of quartz and feldspathoids, minerals, which it is not possible in the pro- presentation in rectangular form of the and b) the relative proportion between al- posed diagram. However, one advantage of same fields using normative minerals (Strec- kali feldspar (in this case normative ortho- the diagram is that it can classify the rocks keisen and Le Maitre, 1979) is the one that clase) and plagioclase (represented by the with only three oxides of the major ele- has been used as a model in the construc- anorthite).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Unsupervised Classification of Intrusive Igneous Rock Thin Section Images Using Edge Detection and Colour Analysis Note: Published As S
    Unsupervised Classification of Intrusive Igneous Rock Thin Section Images using Edge Detection and Colour Analysis Note: Published as S. Joseph, H. Ujir and I. Hipiny, "Unsupervised classification of Intrusive igneous rock thin section images using edge detection and colour analysis," 2017 IEEE International Conference on Signal and Image Processing Applications (ICSIPA), 2017, pp. 530-534, doi: 10.1109/ICSIPA.2017.8120669. S. Joseph H. Ujir and I. Hipiny Faculty of Computer Science & Information Technology Jabatan Mineral dan Geosains (Sarawak), Universiti Malaysia Sarawak Kementerian Sumber Asli dan Alam Sekitar, Kota Samarahan, Sarawak, Malaysia Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia {uhamimah & mhihipni}@unimas.my [email protected] Abstract—Classification of rocks is one of the fundamental tasks in a geological study. The process requires a human expert It requires a human expert with substantial knowledge and to examine sampled thin section images under a microscope. In experience in combining multiple petrographic and microscopy this study, we propose a method that uses microscope automation, classification criteria, e.g., texture, colour, cleavage, twinning digital image acquisition, edge detection and colour analysis and tartan pattern, to perform the point counting. Due to this, (histogram). We collected 60 digital images from 20 standard thin sections using a digital camera mounted on a conventional we argue that an unsupervised classification of the rock thin microscope. Each image is partitioned into a finite number of cells sections to replace the human operator is therefore necessary. that form a grid structure. Edge and colour profile of pixels inside This paper presents our unsupervised classification method each cell determine its classification. The individual cells then and the classification results using edge and colour as the determine the thin section image classification via a majority discriminating features.
    [Show full text]
  • Title of Thesis
    Additions and Modifications to the Igneous Rock Classification Scheme Senior Thesis Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Bachelor of Science Degree in Geological Sciences At The Ohio State University By Matthew R. H. Dugan The Ohio State University 2010 Approved by Anne E. Carey, Advisor School of Earth Sciences T ABLE OF C ONTENTS Abstract………………………………………………………………………....3 Acknowledgements……………………………………………………….…….4 Introduction……………………………………………………………………..5 Discussion……………….………………………………………………………5 Application……………….……………………………………………………..10 References Cited….……….……………………………………………………18 2 Abstract Igneous rocks as they are currently defined are in a sloppy state. Vague wording is throughout the whole of the definition, and there is not even any clear consensus on what it should be defined as. In this paper, I redefine igneous rocks in such a way as to remove a great deal of imprecision, and I go through some of the logical implications of the refined definition. I do not seek to change the intent of the definition, and I do not believe that I have. The most interesting implication of this change is that water, as it occurs on Earth, is an igneous rock, and I construct a basic classification scheme for it. 3 Acknowledgements I wish to thank Dr. Anne Carey for her intense support of the writing of this thesis, her wonderful edits and her dedication to keeping me on this. I also wish to acknowledge my lab group, also lead by Dr. Steve Goldsmith, for their wonderful feedback and encouragement. Dr. Fritz Graf, Professor and chair of the Department of Greek and Latin, was a great asset to me and he deserves recognition for his help in coining neologisms.
    [Show full text]
  • Diagrams.Pdf
    CLASSIFICATION PLOTS Menu item Module name Scope1 Plot description Details (reference) AFM plot that serves to discriminate between calc-alkaline and tholeiitic AFM (Irvine + Baragar 1971) AFM G (Na2O+K2O) – FeOt – MgO ternary subalkaline series (Irvine & Baragar, 1971). Diagram of Miyashiro (1974) distinguishing between tholeiitic and calc-alkaline SiO2 - FeOt/MgO (Miyashiro 1974) Miyashiro G SiO2 vs. FeOt /MgO binary igneous rocks. SiO2 - K2O Diagram proposed by Peccerillo & Taylor (1976) to distinguish various series of PeceTaylor G SiO2 vs. K2O binary (Peccerillo + Taylor 1976) tholeiitic, calc-alkaline and shoshonitic rocks. Replacement for the previous plot of Peccerillo & Taylor (1976) using less Co - Th (Hastie et al. 2007) Hastie G Co vs. Th mobile elements, designed by Hastie et al. (2007). Diagram to distinguish meta-/peraluminous from peralkaline rocks as well as Molar Na2O – Al2O3 – K2O plot NaAlK G Na2O – Al2O3 – K2O ternary potassic, sodic and ultrapotassic suites. Al2O3/(CaO+Na2O+K2O) vs. Classic A/CNK vs A/NK plot of Shand (1943) discriminating metaluminous, A/CNK - A/NK (Shand 1943) Shand G Al2O3/(Na2O+K2O) (mol. %) peraluminous and peralkaline compositions. The principal variation of the TAS diagram, as proposed by Le Bas et al. (1986) TAS (Le Bas et al. 1986) TAS V SiO2 vs. (Na2O + K2O) binary and codified by Le Maitre (1989). Dividing line between alkaline and subalkaline series is that of Irvine & Baragar (1971). CoxVolc V Variation of the TAS diagram proposed by Cox et al. (1979) and adopted by TAS (Cox et al. 1979) SiO2 vs. (Na2O + K2O) binary CoxPlut P Wilson (1989) for plutonic rocks.
    [Show full text]
  • Tools and Workflows for Grassroots Li–Cs–Ta (LCT) Pegmatite Exploration
    minerals Review Tools and Workflows for Grassroots Li–Cs–Ta (LCT) Pegmatite Exploration Benedikt M. Steiner Camborne School of Mines, University of Exeter, Penryn TR10 9FE, UK; [email protected] Received: 22 July 2019; Accepted: 17 August 2019; Published: 20 August 2019 Abstract: The increasing demand for green technology and battery metals necessitates a review of geological exploration techniques for Li–Cs–Ta (LCT) pegmatites, which is applicable to the work of mining companies. This paper reviews the main controls of LCT pegmatite genesis relevant to mineral exploration programs and presents a workflow of grassroots exploration techniques, supported by examples from central Europe and Africa. Geological exploration commonly begins with information gathering, desktop studies and Geographic Information System (GIS) data reviews. Following the identification of prospective regional areas, initial targets are verified in the field by geological mapping and geochemical sampling. Detailed mineralogical analysis and geochemical sampling of rock, soil and stream sediments represent the most important tools for providing vectors to LCT pegmatites, since the interpretation of mineralogical phases, deportment and liberation characteristics along with geochemical K/Rb, Nb/Ta and Zr/Hf metallogenic markers can detect highly evolved rocks enriched in incompatible elements of economic interest. The importance of JORC (Joint Ore Reserves Committee) 2012 guidelines with regards to obtaining geological, mineralogical and drilling data is discussed and contextualised, with the requirement of treating LCT pegmatites as industrial mineral deposits. Keywords: LCT; pegmatite; lithium; exploration; targeting 1. Introduction Over the last four decades research into rare metal Li–Cs–Ta (LCT) pegmatite mineralisation has predominantly focused on the understanding of late-stage magmatic fractionation and hydrothermal alteration processes enriching incompatible elements of potential economic interest in felsic peraluminous melts.
    [Show full text]
  • Neogene Volcanism in Gutai Mts
    STUDIA UNIVERSITATIS BABEŞ-BOLYAI, GEOLOGIA, XLVIII, 1, 2003, 3-16 NEOGENE VOLCANISM IN GUTÂI MTS. (EASTERN CARPATHIANS): A REVIEW MARINEL KOVACS & ALEXANDRINA FÜLÖP* ABSTRACT. Two types of volcanism developed in Gutâi Mts. (inner volcanic chain of Eastern Carpathians): a felsic, extensional/“back-arc” type and an intermediate, arc type. The felsic volcanism of explosive origin, consisting of caldera-related rhyolitic ignimbrites and resedimented volcaniclastics, had taken place during Early-Middle Badenian and Early Sarmatian. The intermediate volcanism, consisting of extrusive (effusive and explosive) and intrusive activity, had developed during Sarmatian and Pannonian (13.4-7.0 Ma). It is represented by typical calc-alkaline series, from basalts to rhyolites. Lava flows of basaltic andesites and andesites are predominant, often emplaced in subaqueous environment. Extrusive domes, mainly composed of dacites, are associated to the andesitic volcanic structures. The intrusive volcanic activity developed contemporaneously with the paroxysm of the intermediate volcanism. The intrusive rocks consist mainly of porphyritic aspects of a compositional series from gabbroes to granodiorites. The geochemical study on the volcanic rocks shows the calc-alkaline character of both felsic and intermediate volcanism and typical subduction zones geochemical signatures for the intermediate one. The felsic volcanism shows affinities with subduction- related rocks as well. The main petrogenetic process in Gutâi Mts. was crustal assimilation, strongly constrained by trace element and isotope geochemistry. Keywords: Neogene, Gutâi Mts., calc-alkaline volcanism, andesites, extrusive domes, intrusions, subduction, crustal assimilation. INTRODUCTION The volcanism and its products are a special attraction for geologists all over the world. Significant progress in decifering the genesis and evolution of magmatism in the Carpathian-Pannonian Region and its inner volcanic arc have been achieved during the last 10-15 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Felsic and Intermediate Rocks
    UNIT 6 FELSIC AND INTERMEDIATE ROCKS Structure_____________________________________________ 6.1 Introduction 6.7 Diorite Expected Learning Outcome Megascopic Characters 6.2 What are Felsic Rocks? Microscopic Characters 6.3 Granite 6.8 Syenite Megascopic Characters Megascopic Characters Microscopic Characters Microscopic Characters 6.4 Rhyolite 6.9 Summary Megascopic Characters 6.10 Activity Microscopic Characters 6.11 Terminal Questions 6.5 What are Intermediate Rocks 6.12 References 6.6 Granodiorite 6.13 Further/Suggested Readings Megascopic Characters 6.14 Answers Microscopic Characters 6.1 INTRODUCTION In the previous Unit 4, you have learnt the concept of magma, physical properties, and composition of magma, Bowen’s reaction series, and the mechanisms of magmatic differentiation. Further in Unit 5, you have read about the unicomponent and bicomponent systems, application of phase rule and equilibrium crystallisation of magmatic systems. You have also read that the igneous rocks are grouped into four major subgroups, based on their composition, such as: ultramafic, mafic, intermediate and felsic rocks in Unit 1. These terms are used to indicate chemical composition of igneous rocks (Fig. 6.1), the silicate minerals that comprise them, and the magma types through which they were derived or formed. …………………………………………………Block 2 …………………………………………….…...........Igneous Petrology.………….....-II Petrographic description of a rock provides detail about its mineralogical composition and texture, i.e. shape, size and inter-relationship of mineral constituents. The mineralogical composition studies cover both megascopic and microscopic observations. Megascopic description of rocks includes all the characters which are visible in hand specimens by unaided eyes. While, microscopic characters of rocks are studied using thin sections under the petrological microscope.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigation of the Särna Alkaline Complex in Dalarna, Sweden
    UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG Department of Earth Sciences Geovetarcentrum/Earth Science Centre Investigation of the Särna alkaline complex in Dalarna, Sweden John Eliasson ISSN 1400-3821 B1019 Master of Science (120 credits) thesis Göteborg 2018 Mailing address Address Telephone Geovetarcentrum Geovetarcentrum Geovetarcentrum 031-786 19 56 Göteborg University S 405 30 Göteborg Guldhedsgatan 5A S-405 30 Göteborg SWEDEN Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Alkaline systems ............................................................................................................................ 3 1.2 Regional geology ........................................................................................................................... 5 1.3 Särna alkaline complex (SAC) ........................................................................................................ 6 1.4 Cancrinite ...................................................................................................................................... 7 2.0 Methodology ..................................................................................................................................... 8 2.1 Fieldwork ....................................................................................................................................... 8 2.2 Scanning electron microscope (SEM) ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Study of the Classification of Plutonic and Volcanic Rocks Using the Normative Q' (F')-ANOR And
    GEOGACETA, 66, 2019 Comparative study of the classification of plutonic and volcanic rocks using the normative Q' (F')-ANOR and chemical SiO2-100 CaO/(CaO+K2O) diagrams Estudio comparativo de la clasificación de rocas plutónicas y volcánicas en los diagramas normativo Q' (F')-ANOR y químico SiO2-100 CaO/(CaO+K2O) Pere Enrique and Sergi Esteve Departament de Mineralogia, Petrologia i Geologia Aplicada. Facultat de Geologia. Universitat de Barcelona. C/ Martí i Franquès s/n, 08028 Barcelona, España; [email protected], [email protected] ABSTRACT RESUMEN To obtain a classification of igneous rocks, compatible with the QAPF Para obtener una clasificación de las rocas ígneas, compatible con la clasifi- classification, in the absence of modal analyses, a chemical diagram using cación QAPF, cuando no se dispone de análisis modales se ha propuesto un the same discriminating elements as the Q'(F')-ANOR normative diagram diagrama químico que utiliza los mismos elementos discriminantes que el dia- has been proposed. These elements, Si, Ca and K, are essential constituents grama normativo Q'(F')-ANOR. Estos elementos, Si, Ca y K, son constituyentes of quartz, feldspars and feldspathoids. The different proportions between esenciales del cuarzo, los feldespatos y los feldespatoides. Las diferentes propor- these minerals are the basis of the QAPF modal classification but also those ciones entre estos minerales son la base de la clasificación modal QAPF pero of the normative classification Q'(F')-ANOR. The chemical diagram SiO2- también la de la clasificación normativa Q'(F')-ANOR. El diagrama químico SiO2- 100·CaO/(CaO+K2O) uses these same elements but with the important dif- 100·CaO/(CaO+K2O) utiliza estos mismos elementos pero con la importante ference that they are treated as independent variables.
    [Show full text]
  • Tazekent Vicinity, Diyadin-Ağrı-Turkey*
    Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi European Journal of Science and Technology Özel Sayı, S. 528-551, Nisan 2020 Special Issue, pp. 528-551, April 2020 © Telif hakkı EJOSAT’a aittir Copyright © 2020 EJOSAT Araştırma Makalesi www.ejosat.com ISSN:2148-2683 Research Article The Stratigraphic and Petrographic Properties of the Rocks in Davut – Tazekent Vicinity, Diyadin-Ağrı-Turkey* Gürsel Kansun 1†, Ahmad Omid Afzali 2, Fatih Üçgün 3 1 Konya Technical University, Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Department of Geology Engineering, Konya, Turkey (ORCID: 0000-0002-4581-6076) 2 Afghanistan Academy of Sciences, Department of Geosciences, Kabul, Afghanistan 3 Geothermal Energy Engineering and Consultancy Services, İzmir, Turkey (Conference Date: 5-7 March 2020) (DOI: 10.31590/ejosat.araconf68) ATIF/REFERENCE: Kansun, G., Afzali, A. O., & Üçgün, F. (2020). The Stratigraphic and Petrographic Properties of the Rocks in Davut – Tazekent Vicinity, Diyadin-Ağrı-Turkey. European Journal of Science and Technology, (Özel Sayı), 528-551. Abstract The study is located in vicinity of Taşbasamak, Tazekent, Davut, Boyalan, Kuşburnu and Ulukent villages in the south of Diyadin district of Ağrı city. In the study area, Paleozoic aged Batıbeyli metamorphites which consist of crystallized limestones which contain calc-schist interlevels are observed at the bottom. The Upper Miocene aged Alibonca formation composed of conglomerate, trachyandesitic tuff-agglomerate, sandy limestone, marl, dolomite-dolomitic limestone and lacustrine limestone are located unconformably on these metamorphites. Upper Miocene aged Sekirdağ volcanites consisting of dacitic - rhyodacitic tuffs, agglomerates and lavas are observed by lateral - vertical transition over the Alibonca formation. Higher up, Lower Pliocene aged Solhan volcanites are composed of alkaline basaltic lavas are observed.
    [Show full text]
  • INTRUSIVE IGNEOUS ROCKS, PART 3 (And Friends)
    GLY 4310C LAB 8 INTRUSIVE IGNEOUS ROCKS, PART 3 (and friends) Syenite, Phonolite, Ijolite, Carbonatite, Ultramafic Rocks and Lamprophyre These intrusive rocks correspond to fields 6, 6', 7, 7', 11, and 15 of figure 3-1 in Hyndman. The syenites are on the border between the QAP and the APF triangles. The remaining rocks are in the APF triangle. Phonolite is actually an extrusive or hypabyssal equivalent of nepheline syenite. The ultrmafic rocks and lamprophyre are very rich in mafic minerals. Consequently they cannot be plotted on the main part of the QAPF diagram, although technically they plot in field 16 (Figure 3-1, Hyndman) in a separate rectangle. More information on these rocks is available in Chapters 9, 14, 15, 16, and 17 in Moorhouse. SYENITE - Intrusive igneous, plutonic. The major mineral is feldspar, with greater than 65% alkali feldspar (K-spar or albite). The ferromagnesian minerals are usually # 20%. The K-spar is typically orthoclase, microcline or perthite. In dikes sanidine may be present. Any plagioclase present is generally subhedral and is often zoned (normal or oscillatory). Biotite is often present and is usually brown. Small amounts of feldspathoids, like nepheline and sodalite, may be present. If more than 5% of these minerals are present, the rock is called nepheline (or sodalite) syenite. Sphene, apatite, ilmenite, magnetite, zircon, and monzonite are accessories. In the IUGS classification, 0-5 Q, and P/(A+P) is 10-35. The name is for Syene (near Aswan), Egypt. Pliny the Elder named granite-like rocks from this area for the locality. ALKALI SYENITE - Intrusive igneous, plutonic.
    [Show full text]
  • Open-File Report No. Neigc16c:C3
    DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, CONSERVATION AND FORESTRY Maine Geological Survey Robert G. Marvinney, State Geologist OPEN-FILE REPORT NO. NEIGC16C:C3 Title: Plutonic Rocks from Waldoboro to Richmond, Maine Authors: Amber T.H. Whittaker, Henry N. Berry IV, and David P. West, Jr. Date: October 2016 Reprinted in color, by permission, from: Berry, Henry N., IV, and West, David P., Jr., editors, 2016, Guidebook for field trips along the Maine coast from Maquoit Bay to Muscongus Bay: New England Intercollegiate Geological Conference, 108th Annual Meeting, October 14-16, 2016, Bath, Maine, 326 p. Contents: 28 p. report Recommended Citation: Whittaker, Amber T.H., Berry, Henry N., IV, and West, David P., Jr., 2016, Plutonic rocks from Waldoboro to Richmond, Maine: in Berry, Henry N., IV, and West, David P., Jr., editors, Guidebook for field trips along the Maine coast from Maquoit Bay to Muscongus Bay: New England Intercollegiate Geological Conference, p. 267-294. NEW ENGLAND INTERCOLLEGIATE GEOLOGICAL CONFERENCE 108th Annual Meeting Guidebook for Field Trips along the Maine Coast from Maquoit Bay to Muscongus Bay Edited by Henry N. Berry IV and David P. West, Jr. Hosted by The Maine Geological Survey and The Middlebury College Geology Department October 14-16, 2016 Copies of this guidebook, as long as they last, may be purchased for $25 from the following address: Geology Department Middlebury College 276 Bicentennial Way Middlebury, VT 05753 Cover Credit The cover photograph is by Arthur M. Hussey II, to whom this guidebook is dedicated. Arthur Hussey was an accomplished photographer and his numerous photo collections highlighted many aspects of the natural beauty of southwestern Maine.
    [Show full text]
  • Classification of Igneous Rocks: Diorite Vs. Syenite – a Suggestion to Avoid a Contradiction
    524 524 Forum Classification of Igneous Rocks: Diorite vs. Syenite – a suggestion to avoid a contradiction Maurizio Mazzucchelli Dipartimento di Scienze Chimiche e Geologiche, Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Via Campi, 103, I-41125 Modena (Italy) E-mail: [email protected] (Received: 05/11/2015; Accepted: 19/02/2016) In the recommendations of the Sub-Commission on the plagioclase composition (An06-An07) of these samples is reported in Systematics of Igneous Rocks of the International Union of Geological Weiss et al. (2007). An example of the second case is reported in Yu Sciences, in the volume edited by R.W. Le Maitre (2002), there is an et al. (2011) who describes albite diorite rocks for the Zhongjiu iron evident contradiction in the definition of the dioritic and syenitic deposit, following the quite old quantitative mineralogical plutonic rocks. According to Le Maitre (2002) the parameters used for the modal classification of the plutonic rocks are: Q, A, P, F and M, where: Q = quartz, tridymite, cristobalite; A = alkali feldspar, including orthoclase, microcline, perthite, anorthoclase, sanidine and albitic plagioclase (An0 to An5); P = plagioclase (An5 to An100) and scapolite; F = feldspathoids including nepheline, leucite, kalsilite, analcime, sodalite, nosean, haûyne, cancrinite and pseudoleucite; M = mafic and related minerals, e.g. mica, amphibole, pyroxene olivine, opaque minerals, accessory minerals (e.g. zircon, apatite, titanite), epidote, allanite, garnet, melilite, monticellite, primary carbonate. When a rock is defined as felsic, e.g. M < 90%, the modal classification is based on the QAPF diagram (Streckeisen, 1973, Figs. 1 and 2). To use the QAPF classification, the modal amounts of Q, A, P and F must be known and recalculated so that their sum is 100%.
    [Show full text]