Women Artists to Victims of War" - the First Exhibition of the Moscow Union of Women Painters and Its Reception by the Contemporary Press

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Women Artists to Victims of War Artl@s Bulletin Volume 8 Issue 1 Women Artists Shows.Salons.Societies Article 7 (1870s-1970s) 2019 "Women Artists to Victims of War" - the First Exhibition of the Moscow Union of Women Painters and its Reception by the Contemporary Press. Natalia Y. Budanova CCRAC, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/artlas Part of the Fine Arts Commons, and the Women's Studies Commons Recommended Citation Budanova, Natalia Y.. ""Women Artists to Victims of War" - the First Exhibition of the Moscow Union of Women Painters and its Reception by the Contemporary Press.." Artl@s Bulletin 8, no. 1 (2019): Article 7. This document has been made available through Purdue e-Pubs, a service of the Purdue University Libraries. Please contact [email protected] for additional information. This is an Open Access journal. This means that it uses a funding model that does not charge readers or their institutions for access. Readers may freely read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles. This journal is covered under the CC BY-NC-ND license. "Women Artists to Victims of War" - the First Exhibition of the Moscow Union of Women Painters and its Reception by the Contemporary Press. Cover Page Footnote This essay is an extended version of the paper the author presented at the symposium "WAS(Women Artists Shows-Salons-Societies) organised by the research laboratory Artl@s École normale supérieure, PSL, Labex TransferS) and by AWARE, with the collaboration of Jeu de Paume in December 2017. The uthora also would like to express her gratitude to Z. P. Shergina, Director and other members of the stuff of the rT etyakov Library, Moscow for their support in locating primary sources for this research project. This article is available in Artl@s Bulletin: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/artlas/vol8/iss1/7 W.A.S. (1870s-1970s) Women Artists to Victims of War – The First Exhibition of the Moscow Union of Women Painters and its Reception by the Contemporary Press Natalia Budanova * Cambridge Courtauld Russian Art Centre (CCRAC, UK) Abstract A few surviving visual and documentary sources related to the exhibition Women Artists to Victims of War organised by the Moscow Union of Women Painters in winter 1914 represent a useful primary material for piecing together fragments of the history of this short-lived female art group. The Union exemplified impressive gender changes in edu- cational and professional spheres of Russian art. Yet, it failed to attract strong member- ship and disintegrated a few years after its institution. By analysing available evidence, this essay seeks to uncover and assess the causes of the Union’s defeat in establishing a prominent public profile. Résumé Les quelques éléments visuels et documentaires qui subsistent à propos de l’exposition Women Artists to Victims of War, organisée par l’Union moscovite des femmes peintres à l’automne 1914, représentent une source primaire de documentation utile pour recons- tituer les fragments de l’histoire de ce groupe artistique féminin éphémère. L’Union at- teste les changements importants concernant les questions de genre au sein des sphères professionnelles et académiques de l’art russe. Cependant, elle a échoué à susciter une forte adhésion et fut dissoute quelques années seulement après son institution. En analy- sant les témoignages disponibles, cet essai s’attache à mettre au jour et à évaluer les causes de l’échec de l’Union à établir sa légitimité auprès du public. * Dr Natalia Budanova, MA (Cambs), MA (Courtauld), PhD (Courtauld) is a UK-based independent art historian and a member of CCRAC (Cambridge Courtauld Russian Art Centre) advisory board. Her research and publications engage in investigating the role of women in Russian art of the late Impe- rial and early Soviet periods, patterns of artistic exchange between Russia and the West, and the art of the Great War. 108 ARTL@S BULLETIN, Vol. 8, Issue 1 (Spring 2019) Budanova – Women Artists to Victims of War Introduction introducing and analysing primary documentary and visual material concerning the society’s first On 5 January 1915 the Moscow-based newspaper exhibition, Women Artists to Victims of War, which Russkie Vedomosti (Russian Journal) informed its the author discovered in the Library of the State readers that the Moscow Union of Women Painters, Tretiakov Gallery in Moscow and until now has a recently established art society, opened its first remained largely disregarded. In doing so it also exhibition, entitled Women Artists to Victims of War. endeavours to evaluate the story of the Moscow According to the article’s anonymous author, the Union of Women Painters in relation to gender- Moscow Union of Women Painters was set up in sensitive attitudes at work in the Russian art world Moscow in May 1914 by the constituent assembly, of the late Imperial period. although its first general meeting had not taken place until October 1914.1 This piece of news remains one of the few known direct references to The Predecessors the Union and its activities. The Moscow Union of Women Painters was not the No file containing constitutional or any other first female art organisation to be founded in Russia documents related to the Moscow Union of Women as it was preceded by two other societies, both Painters has yet been discovered in archives or based in St Petersburg, then the capital of Russian elsewhere. Therefore, piecing together coherent Empire. The oldest, called the First Ladies’ Art chronicle of the group represents a considerable Circle (Pervyi damskii khudozhestvennyi kruzhok), challenge. In point of fact, the Moscow Union of was set up by a group of aristocratic women in Women Painters has been very rarely, if ever, February 1882 and aimed at “artistic development mentioned in modern art historical literature in in general, while also offering assistance to needy Russia or abroad. The only available account is a artists and their families.”3 The main drawing force short entry in the book The Golden Age of Art Unions in establishing the Ladies’ Art Circle was its first in Russia and the USSR (1820-1932), published in Chairwoman Pelageia Kuriar (1848-1898), a Russia in 1992.2 According to this authoritative landscape painter of noble background, who was a survey, the Union accepted both professional regular participant in the Imperial Academy’s and amateur women artists, numbering 36 full annual exhibitions and held the title of the members by 1915. The same year it set up a Academy’s honorary associate. studio, which ran art classes twice a week. It also organised a series of lectures on art history and The Ladies’ Circle acted under the patronage of the held family evening parties each Friday. Regret- Imperial Family, and the majority of its members tably, the only historical source of reference, were women of St Petersburg’s high-society, whose provided by the authors of the book, Dmitrii artistic skills and tastes were cultivated as an inte- Severiukhin and Oleg Leikind, was the above- gral part of a gentlewoman’s proper upbringing. mentioned article in Russkie Vedomosti, wherefore The Circle held weekly meetings with painting and it remains unclear where the factual information drawing classes under the supervision of promi- came from. nent male professional painters. It also organised annual exhibitions, usually at Easter time, inviting This essay aims to extend art historical knowledge up to 100 contributors to take part. Five percent about the Moscow Union of Women Painters by of all exhibition proceeds were donated to the Note on translation and transliteration. Unless otherwise indicated, all translations are mine. The transliteration of Russian names and words observes the form used by 1 Anon., ‘Zhenskaia vystavka’ (Women’s exhibition), Russkie vedomosti (Russian the Library of Congress. However, the spelling of some famous names follows long- Journal), 5 January 1915 (#4). established tradition—for example, Mayakosky (not Maiakovskii), Olga (not Ol’ga), 2 Dmitrii Severiukhin, Oleg Leikind, Zolotoi vek khudozhestvennykh ob”edinenii v Rossii and Tretyakov (not Treti’akov) Gallery. Surnames of foreign origin are transliterated i SSSR (1820–1932) (The Golden Age of Art Unions in Russia and the USSR, (1820-1932)) here on the bases of their Russian form, including Aleksandr Benua (not Alexander (St Petersburg: Izdatel’stvo Chernisheva, 1992), 132. Benois), Princess Evgeniia Ol’denburgskaia (not Eugenia of Oldenburg), Emilia Shanks 3 Statute of the First Ladies’ Art Circle, 2 March 1884. (not Emily Shanks), and the Lemers’e Gallery (not the Lemercier Gallery). W.A.S. (1870s-1970s) 109 ARTL@S BULLETIN, Vol. 8, Issue 1 (Spring 2019) Budanova – Women Artists to Victims of War society’s charitable fund. The participation in these Imperial patronage, did nothing to sooth the exhibitions was not limited to only amateur traditionally vexed question of women as valid art women painters and members of the circle. Some creators. If anything it ultimately served to add prominent professional artists—men as well as further controversy to the problem. While reports women—were also invited to contribute their of its annual exhibitions were duly released in the works. Among the affirmed women painters who contemporary press, the amateurish quality of regularly participated in the Circle’s annual works produced by the Circle’s fellow members exhibitions, to name just a few, were Elizaveta Bem was often sharply criticised by art professionals, (1843-1914)—a painter and prolific illustrator thus reinforcing prejudices against the “lady artist” of children’s books; Elena Samokish-Sudkovskaia as an idle wealthy woman engaging with visual arts (1863-1924)—a successful illustrator and poster for the own amusement. For instance, Aleksandr artist; and Princess Maria Tenisheva (1858-1928) Benua (1870-1960), a prominent artist, art critic —an enamel artist, patron, educator and art and founding member of World of Art Group, collector.
Recommended publications
  • A Legacy Regained: Niko and the Russian Avant-Garde
    A LEGACY REGAINED: NIKO AND THE RUSSIAN AVANT-GARDE PALACE EDITIONS Contents 8 Foreword Evgeniia Petrova 9 Preface Job de Ruiter 10 Acknowledgements and Notes to the Reader John E. Bowlt and Mark Konecny 13 Introduction John E. Bowlt and Mark Konecny Part I. Nikolai Khardzhiev and the Russian Avant Garde Remembering Nikolai Khardzhiev 21 Nikolai Khardzhiev RudolfDuganov 24 The Future is Now! lra Vrubel-Golubkina 36 Nikolai Khardzhiev and the Suprematists Nina Suetina 43 Nikolai Khardzhiev and the Maiakovsky Museum, Moscow Gennadii Aigi 50 My Memoir of Nikolai Khardzhiev Vyacheslav Ivanov 53 Nikolai Khardzhiev and My Family Zoya Ender-Masetti 57 My Meetings with Nikolai Khardzhiev Galina Demosfenova 59 Nikolai Khardzhiev, Knight of the Avant-garde Jean-C1aude Marcade 63 A Sole Encounter Szymon Bojko 65 The Guardian of the Temple Andrei Nakov 69 A Prophet in the Wilderness John E. Bowlt 71 The Great Commentator, or Notes About the Mole of History Vasilii Rakitin Writings by Nikolai Khardzhiev Essays 75 Autobiography 76 Poetry and Painting:The Early Maiakovsky 81 Cubo-Futurism 83 Maiakovsky as Partisan 92 Painting and Poetry Profiles ofArtists and Writers 99 Elena Guro 101 Boris Ender 103 In Memory of Natalia Goncharova and Mikhail Larionov 109 Vladimir Maiakovsky 122 Velimir Khlebnikov 131 Alexei Kruchenykh 135 VladimirTatlin 137 Alexander Rodchenko 139 EI Lissitzky Contents Texts Edited and Annotated by Nikolai Khardzhiev 147 Nikolai Khardzhiev Introductions to Kazimir Malevich's Autobiography (Parts 1 and 2) 157 Kazimir Malevieh Autobiography 172 Nikolai Khardzhiev Introduction to Mikhail Matiushin's The Russian Cubo-Futurists 173 Mikhail Matiushin The Russian Cubo-Futurists 183 Alexei Morgunov A Memoir 186 Nikolai Khardzhiev Introduction to Khlebnikov Is Everywhere! 187 Khlebnikov is Everywhere! Memoirs by Oavid Burliuk, Nadezhda Udaltsova, Amfian Reshetov, and on Osip Mandelshtam 190 Nikolai Khardzhiev Introduction to Lev Zhegin's Remembering Vasilii Chekrygin 192 Lev Zhegin Remembering Vasilii Chekrygin Part 11.
    [Show full text]
  • The Arts & Letters of Rocky Neck in the 1950S
    GLOUCESTER, MASSACHUSETTS TheArts & Letters of Rocky Neck in the 1950s by Martha Oaks have received the attention they deserve. Four Winds: The Arts & Letters of Rocky With this exhibition, Four Winds, the Cape Neck in the 1950s is on view through Sep- ocky Neck holds the distinction as Ann Museum casts the spotlight on one of tember 29, 2013, at the Cape Ann Mu- R one of the most important places in those interludes: the decade and a half fol- seum, 27 Pleasant Street, Gloucester, American art history. Since the mid-nine- lowing the Second World War. Not so far Massachusetts, 01930, 978-283-0455, teeth century, its name has been associated in the past that it cannot be recollected by www.capeannmuseum.org. A 52-page soft with many of this country’s best known many, yet just far enough that it is apt to cover catalogue accompanies the exhibition. artists: Winslow Homer, Frank Duveneck, be lost, the late 1940s and 1950s found a All illustrated works are from the Cape Theresa Bernstein, Jane Peterson and Ed- young and vibrant group of artists working Ann Museum unless otherwise noted. ward Hopper. From the mid-1800s on the Neck. through the first quarter of the twentieth Although it is one of Cape Ann’s painter William Morris Hunt and his pro- century, the heyday of the art colony on longest-lived and best known art colonies, tégé, Helen Mary Knowlton. Hunt was Rocky Neck, the neighborhood was awash Rocky Neck was not the first. One of the one of the first art teachers to welcome with artists.
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Marais Art Colony Residency Series & Studio Access
    Grand Marais Art Colony Residency Series & Studio Access The Art Colony provides artists with independent work space in professional studios amidst the backdrop of a stunning landscape. An environment of creative freedom supports the process and development of new works, allowing for a combination of aesthetic inquiry, creative risk-taking, experimentation, and artistic development. See the options below and contact the Art Colony with any questions. Juried Artists-in-Residence | March 4 – 17 Two concurrent juried residencies are available in 2019, one in the Founders Hall multi-use Studio and one in the Eco-friendly Printmaking Studio. Juried residents are provided with two weeks of independent studio access, lodging, and a weekly stipend. Residents may choose to provide a community engagement component (optional) for an additional stipend. An optional critical response critique session is also available. Eco-friendly Printmaking Studio Founders Hall Multi-use Studio 1 Invited Residencies Invited residencies are granted to an artist who is mature in practice and has experience with residencies and/or working on in-depth independent projects. The artist is selected as part of a committee process and offers a community engagement component, introducing the community to a specific aspect of their expertise and artistic practice. There is no application process for this residency. Independent Residencies Select dates are available for independent residencies or cooperative studio access on a daily, weekly, and monthly basis for Art Colony members. Experience our professional studios (clay, glass, printmaking, and painting/multi-discipline) and find uninterrupted space and time to focus, rejuvenate, and be inspired. Artists are encouraged to call for availability and cost and other media are also welcome, including literary arts, sculpture, mixed media, photography, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • The Futurist Moment : Avant-Garde, Avant Guerre, and the Language of Rupture
    MARJORIE PERLOFF Avant-Garde, Avant Guerre, and the Language of Rupture THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO PRESS CHICAGO AND LONDON FUTURIST Marjorie Perloff is professor of English and comparative literature at Stanford University. She is the author of many articles and books, including The Dance of the Intellect: Studies in the Poetry of the Pound Tradition and The Poetics of Indeterminacy: Rimbaud to Cage. Published with the assistance of the J. Paul Getty Trust Permission to quote from the following sources is gratefully acknowledged: Ezra Pound, Personae. Copyright 1926 by Ezra Pound. Used by permission of New Directions Publishing Corp. Ezra Pound, Collected Early Poems. Copyright 1976 by the Trustees of the Ezra Pound Literary Property Trust. All rights reserved. Used by permission of New Directions Publishing Corp. Ezra Pound, The Cantos of Ezra Pound. Copyright 1934, 1948, 1956 by Ezra Pound. Used by permission of New Directions Publishing Corp. Blaise Cendrars, Selected Writings. Copyright 1962, 1966 by Walter Albert. Used by permission of New Directions Publishing Corp. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago 60637 The University of Chicago Press, Ltd., London © 1986 by The University of Chicago All rights reserved. Published 1986 Printed in the United States of America 95 94 93 92 91 90 89 88 87 86 54321 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Perloff, Marjorie. The futurist moment. Bibliography: p. Includes index. 1. Futurism. 2. Arts, Modern—20th century. I. Title. NX600.F8P46 1986 700'. 94 86-3147 ISBN 0-226-65731-0 For DAVID ANTIN CONTENTS List of Illustrations ix Abbreviations xiii Preface xvii 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Walk May Talk Books
    Walk May Talk A Month of Walking as Artistic Practice Curated by Eylem Ertürk and Bernd Rohrauer Books Shared Walks www.sharedwalks.com 1 Direkter Urbanismus B. Holub 2013 31 Spaziergangswissenschaft in Praxis: Formate in Fortbewegung M. Brauner, B. Weisshaar 2013 2 Artist Book: found, set, appropriated B. Holub 2010 32 Artist Book: Biographie of the walking woman: M. Snow 3 Einfach Losgehen: Vom Spazieren, B. Weisshaar 2019 de la femme qui marche, 1961–1967 2004 Streunen, Wandern und vom Denkengehen 33 The Practice of Everyday Life M. de Certeau 4 Radical Walking Tours of New York City B. Kayton 2003 34 Janet Cardiff - the walk book M. Schaub 2004 5 Walking through Social Research C. Bates, A. Rhys-Taylor (Ed.) 2017 35 The interventionists : users‘ manual for the creative disruption N. Thompson 2005 6 Graue Donau, Schwarzes Meer: Wien Sulina Odessa Jalta Istanbul C. Reder, E.Klein 2008 of everyday life 2004 7 The art of walking: a field guide D. Evans 2012 36 Breathing Cities: the Architecture of Movement N. Barley 8 Lob des Gehens D. Le Breton 2015 37 Gehen nach Abramović (Diplomarbeit) N. Stalzer 2000 9 Urbanografien: Stadtforschung in Kunst, Architektur und Theorie E. Krasny 2008 38 This is not an Atlas orangotango 2007 10 Walking: One Step At a Time E. Kagge 2019 39 Gehen in der Wüste O. Aicher 2018 11 Walking Art Practice: Reflections on Socially Engaged Paths E. Pujol 2018 40 On Walking P. Smith 1998 12 Random Walk E. Weizman, C. Nicolas, M. Cousins 1998 41 Walking artists: über die Entdeckung des Gehens R.
    [Show full text]
  • Spring 2004 Professor Caroline A. Jones Lecture Notes History, Theory and Criticism Section, Department of Architecture Week 9, Lecture 2
    MIT 4.602, Modern Art and Mass Culture (HASS-D) Spring 2004 Professor Caroline A. Jones Lecture Notes History, Theory and Criticism Section, Department of Architecture Week 9, Lecture 2 PHOTOGRAPHY, PROPAGANDA, MONTAGE: Soviet Avant-Garde “We are all primitives of the 20th century” – Ivan Kliun, 1916 UNOVIS members’ aims include the “study of the system of Suprematist projection and the designing of blueprints and plans in accordance with it; ruling off the earth’s expanse into squares, giving each energy cell its place in the overall scheme; organization and accommodation on the earth’s surface of all its intrinsic elements, charting those points and lines out of which the forms of Suprematism will ascend and slip into space.” — Ilya Chashnik , 1921 I. Making “Modern Man” A. Kasimir Malevich – Suprematism 1) Suprematism begins ca. 1913, influenced by Cubo-Futurism 2) Suprematism officially launched, 1915 – manifesto and exhibition titled “0.10 The Last Futurist Exhibition” in Petrograd. B. El (Elazar) Lissitzky 1) “Proun” as utopia 2) Types, and the new modern man C. Modern Woman? 1) Sonia Terk Delaunay in Paris a) “Orphism” or “organic Cubism” 1911 b) “Simultaneous” clothing, ceramics, textiles, cars 1913-20s 2) Natalia Goncharova, “Rayonism” 3) Lyubov Popova, Varvara Stepanova stage designs II. Monuments without Beards -- Vladimir Tatlin A. Constructivism (developed in parallel with Suprematism as sculptural variant) B. Productivism (the tweaking of “l’art pour l’art” to be more socialist) C. Monument to the Third International (Tatlin’s Tower), 1921 III. Collapse of the Avant-Garde? A. 1937 Paris Exposition, 1937 Entartete Kunst, 1939 Popular Front B.
    [Show full text]
  • Malevich's Russian Peasant Paintings During the First Five-Year Plan
    The NEP Era: Soviet Russia 1921-1928, 8 (2014), 1-24. ARTICLES / СТАТЬИ MARIE GASPER-HULVAT Proletarian Credibility? Malevich’s Russian Peasant Paintings during the First Five-Year Plan During the years immediately before and after the 1917 October Revo- lution, the prominent Avant-Garde artist Kazimir Malevich (1878-1935) enjoyed renown in Russian art circles for his signature, abstract work. His nonobjective “Suprematist” style constituted one of the first models of purely abstract, non-representational painting in the modernist tradition of Western art. If the primary subject matter that Malevich’s work was con- cerned with is geometric forms, the second most recognizable content of Malevich’s paintings would be the Russian peasant. Not all of his work was abstract, and those paintings which do represent identifiable imagery have a notable tendency to favor rural subject matter, both landscapes and their inhabitants. In fact, Malevich began his career as a painter depicting peasant figures, prior to developing his signature style of abstraction in 1915. After his purely abstract period concluded in the mid-1920s, similar peasant themes reemerged in his work at the turn of the 1930s.1 While peasant imagery from early in Malevich’s career largely reflects the concerns of a young artist grappling with West European art historical precedents adapted to a Slavic context, I contend that his later peasant works engaged with the complex set of historical and political circum- stances of the early Stalinist era. Other scholars have explained how the artist’s motivations for creating the later peasant works were multifaceted and related significantly to his philosophical treatises regarding the essen- tial nature of art and humanity.2 Another set of scholars has read these images as reactions to contemporary political events.3 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Inheriting the Yugoslav Century: Art, History, and Generation
    Inheriting the Yugoslav Century: Art, History, and Generation by Ivana Bago Department of Art, Art History and Visual Studies Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Kristine Stiles, Supervisor ___________________________ Mark Hansen ___________________________ Fredric Jameson ___________________________ Branislav Jakovljević ___________________________ Neil McWilliam Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Art, Art History and Visual Studies in the Graduate School of Duke University 2018 ABSTRACT Inheriting the Yugoslav Century: Art, History, and Generation by Ivana Bago Department of Art, Art History and Visual Studies Duke University ___________________________ Kristine Stiles, Supervisor ___________________________ Mark Hansen ___________________________ Fredric Jameson ___________________________ Branislav Jakovljević ___________________________ Neil McWilliam An abstract of a dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Art, Art History and Visual Studies in the Graduate School of Duke University 2018 Copyright by Ivana Bago 2018 Abstract The dissertation examines the work contemporary artists, curators, and scholars who have, in the last two decades, addressed urgent political and economic questions by revisiting the legacies of the Yugoslav twentieth century: multinationalism, socialist self-management, non- alignment, and
    [Show full text]
  • Read Book Kazimir Malevich
    KAZIMIR MALEVICH PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Achim Borchardt-Hume | 264 pages | 21 Apr 2015 | TATE PUBLISHING | 9781849761468 | English | London, United Kingdom Kazimir Malevich PDF Book From the beginning of the s, modern art was falling out of favor with the new government of Joseph Stalin. Red Cavalry Riding. Articles from Britannica Encyclopedias for elementary and high school students. The movement did have a handful of supporters amongst the Russian avant garde but it was dwarfed by its sibling constructivism whose manifesto harmonized better with the ideological sentiments of the revolutionary communist government during the early days of Soviet Union. What's more, as the writers and abstract pundits were occupied with what constituted writing, Malevich came to be interested by the quest for workmanship's barest basics. Black Square. Woman Torso. The painting's quality has degraded considerably since it was drawn. Guggenheim —an early and passionate collector of the Russian avant-garde—was inspired by the same aesthetic ideals and spiritual quest that exemplified Malevich's art. Hidden categories: Articles with short description Short description matches Wikidata Use dmy dates from May All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from June Lyubov Popova - You might like Left Right. Harvard doctoral candidate Julia Bekman Chadaga writes: "In his later writings, Malevich defined the 'additional element' as the quality of any new visual environment bringing about a change in perception Retrieved 6 July A white cube decorated with a black square was placed on his tomb. It was one of the most radical improvements in dynamic workmanship. Landscape with a White House.
    [Show full text]
  • International Scholarly Conference the PEREDVIZHNIKI ASSOCIATION of ART EXHIBITIONS. on the 150TH ANNIVERSARY of the FOUNDATION
    International scholarly conference THE PEREDVIZHNIKI ASSOCIATION OF ART EXHIBITIONS. ON THE 150TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE FOUNDATION ABSTRACTS 19th May, Wednesday, morning session Tatyana YUDENKOVA State Tretyakov Gallery; Research Institute of Theory and History of Fine Arts of the Russian Academy of Arts, Moscow Peredvizhniki: Between Creative Freedom and Commercial Benefit The fate of Russian art in the second half of the 19th century was inevitably associated with an outstanding artistic phenomenon that went down in the history of Russian culture under the name of Peredvizhniki movement. As the movement took shape and matured, the Peredvizhniki became undisputed leaders in the development of art. They quickly gained the public’s affection and took an important place in Russia’s cultural life. Russian art is deeply indebted to the Peredvizhniki for discovering new themes and subjects, developing critical genre painting, and for their achievements in psychological portrait painting. The Peredvizhniki changed people’s attitude to Russian national landscape, and made them take a fresh look at the course of Russian history. Their critical insight in contemporary events acquired a completely new quality. Touching on painful and challenging top-of-the agenda issues, they did not forget about eternal values, guessing the existential meaning behind everyday details, and seeing archetypal importance in current-day matters. Their best paintings made up the national art school and in many ways contributed to shaping the national identity. The Peredvizhniki
    [Show full text]
  • Emotive Terrains
    Emotive Terrains Exploring the emotional geographies of city through walking as art, senses and embodied technologies Vasileios Psarras Thesis submitted to Goldsmiths University of London for the Degree of Ph.D. in Arts and Computational Technology 2015 Declaration I declare that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Reference to the work of others has been cited and indicated throughout. Vasileios Psarras 2 Acknowledgements I am deeply thankful to my main supervisor Prof. Janis Jefferies for her attentive supervision, significant insights and help along this fascinating and difficult journey. Her distinctive guidance and encouragement of my interdisciplinary writing provided this thesis’s 21st century flaneur with the confidence to keep walking. I also thank my second supervisor and Assoc Prof. Lanfranco Aceti for his helpful feedback on my professional steps and our challenging discussions over these three years. I would also like to thank the AHRC for having awarded me with funding (2013- 2014), the Goldsmiths Graduate School and the Department of Computing (GDS). I would also like to thank a number of people that I have talked and collaborated across different platforms and levels: Asst. Prof. Angeliki Avgitidou (Aristotle University), Prof. Paul Coldwell (Chelsea College of Arts) for listening to my very first intentions, Dr. Eleanor Dare (University of Derby), Daphne Dragona (University of Athens), Dr. Dalila Honorato (Ionian University), Dr. Vicky Hunter (University of Chichester), Rocio von Jungenfeld (University of Edinburg), Dr. Eva Kekou (Athens), Anastasis Maragiannis (University of Greenwich), Christian Nold (UCL), Tadgh O’Sullivan, Stacey Pitsilides (Goldsmiths), Dr. Tina Richardson (Leeds), Dr. Phil Smith ‘mythogeography’ (Plymouth University) and the research-curatorial platforms of The Thursday Club (Goldsmiths) and Something Human (London).
    [Show full text]
  • The Peredvizhniki and West European Art
    ROSALIND P. BLAKESLEY "THERE IS SOMETHING THERE ...": THE PEREDVIZHNIKI AND WEST EUROPEAN ART The nature of the dialogue between the Peredvizhniki and West European art has been viewed largely through the prism of modernist concerns. Thus their engagement - or lack of it - with French modern- ist luminaries such as Manet and the Impressionists has been subject to much debate. Such emphasis has eclipsed the suggestive, and often creative, relationship between the Peredvizhniki and West European painters whose practice is seen as either anticipatory of or inimical to the modernist camp - to wit, Andreas Achenbach and his circle in Düsseldorf; artists of the Barbizon school; certain Salon regulars; and various Realist groupings in France, Germany and Victorian Britain.'I My intention herc is to explore the subtle connections between such artists, but not as part of any wider art historical concern to challenge the hegemony of modcrnism, for the position of Russian artists vis-ä- vis Western modernist discoursc - before, during and after the time of the avant-garde - is of ongoing concern. Rather, my aim is to question the still prevalent interpretation of the Peredvizhniki as "national" art- All translations are my own unless otherwise indicated. 1. These parallcls havc not gone unremarked. Alison Hilton, for example, writes: "Aside from the Russian settings, the work of Perov and his colleagues shows the same general concern for rural and urban poverty, alcoholism, prostitution, and other mid-nineteenth-century problems that troubled many European artists and writers." ("Scenes from Life and Contemporary History: Russian Realism of the 1870s- 1 880s," in Gabriel P.
    [Show full text]