DOCSLIB.ORG

Lake Sidney Lanier Economic Impact Analysis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lake Sidney Lanier Economic Impact Analysis Lake Sidney Lanier Economic Impact Analysis December, 2010 Prepared for the 1071 Coalition Prepared by Bleakly Advisory Group, Inc. Bruce A. Seaman, Ph.D. PBS&J, Inc. MISSION STATEMENT 1071 Coalition is a non-profit organization comprised of citizens, civic groups, businesses and other entities dedicated to maintaining water levels in Lake Sidney Lanier that sustain water supply, recreation, and economic prosperity through the advocacy of appropriate, science- based water releases necessary for the ACF river basin. The research reported here was funded in part by a grant from the Appalachian Regional Commission. Final Report LAKE SIDNEY LANIER ECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Table of Contents Table of Contents .................................................................................................................................... i Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................ 1 I. Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 15 A. Study Purpose and Objectives ..................................................................................................... 15 B. Economic Effects of Lake Management Policies .......................................................................... 16 1. Overview .................................................................................................................................. 16 2. Economic Impact Analysis ........................................................................................................ 17 3. Regional versus National Economic Effects ............................................................................ 18 C. Study Scope and Methodology .................................................................................................... 19 D. Organization of the Report .......................................................................................................... 20 II. Background and Trends ................................................................................................................... 22 A. Study Area Context ...................................................................................................................... 22 B. Overview of ACF Basin Management .......................................................................................... 24 C. Historical Lake Lanier Water Levels ............................................................................................. 26 Summary ...................................................................................................................................... 27 D. Visitor Trends ............................................................................................................................... 28 Summary ...................................................................................................................................... 32 E. Marina Sales ................................................................................................................................. 33 F. Boat Sales and Ownership ............................................................................................................ 34 1. Personal Property Value .......................................................................................................... 34 2. Boat Registrations .................................................................................................................... 36 G. Real Estate Values ....................................................................................................................... 40 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 40 2. Calculation of Lakefront Real Estate Value Premiums ............................................................. 41 3. Short-Term Impacts of Low Water Levels on Lakefront Property Sales .................................. 45 H. Marina Slips and Private Docks ................................................................................................... 46 I. Summary Conclusions ................................................................................................................... 48 III. Impacts of Lake Levels on Recreational Spending .......................................................................... 50 A. Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 50 B. Survey Findings ............................................................................................................................ 50 Table of Contents i Final Report LAKE SIDNEY LANIER ECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSIS 1. Resident and Visitors Survey .................................................................................................... 51 2. Business Survey ........................................................................................................................ 53 3. Summary of Survey Conclusions .............................................................................................. 56 C. Estimation of Direct Economic Impacts ........................................................................................... 56 1. Visitor Spending ....................................................................................................................... 57 2. Marina Slip Renters and Private Dock Owners ........................................................................ 59 3. Estimated Impacts attributable to Lake Levels versus Other Factors ..................................... 60 4. New and Used Boat Sales......................................................................................................... 61 5. Real Estate Impacts .................................................................................................................. 62 6. Summary Conclusions: Direct Impacts ..................................................................................... 65 IV. Economic Impacts ........................................................................................................................... 67 A. Overview ...................................................................................................................................... 67 B. Impact Analysis Findings .............................................................................................................. 69 C. Summary Conclusions: Economic Impacts .................................................................................. 77 V. Water Supply and Other Issues ....................................................................................................... 80 A. Comparative Downstream Populations and Employment ......................................................... 81 1. Overview .................................................................................................................................. 81 2. Population and Employment ................................................................................................... 83 3. Selected Industries ................................................................................................................... 87 4. Summary .................................................................................................................................. 97 B. Municipal and Industrial Water Supply ...................................................................................... 98 1. CDM Study Summary and Conclusions .................................................................................... 98 2. Georgia Water Task Force Study Summary ............................................................................. 99 3. Summary Conclusions ............................................................................................................ 100 VI: Appendix ....................................................................................................................................... A-1 Table of Contents ii Final Report LAKE SIDNEY LANIER ECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Executive Summary In 2009, the 1071 Coalition funded a study to calculate the economic impacts arising from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ (USACE) management of water levels at Lake Sidney Lanier, located in Northwest Georgia. The goal of the study is to provide a quantitative measure of the economic impacts of low lake levels on the economies of the counties bordering the Lake, the Metro-Atlanta Region and the State of Georgia. The scope of research included an extensive literature review, collection of background information and primary research in the form of web-based surveys. The Consultant team was able to assemble and analyze extensive historical data on lake levels, visitation, recreational spending, boat registrations, marina incomes, property values and related information. These findings are reported in Chapter II. That information was used to estimate the direct and indirect economic impacts associated with documented reductions in visitor spending during the period of historically low lake levels in 2008. Economic impacts are addressed in Chapters III and IV. The final Chapter V of the report addresses economic impacts associated with broader water
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Stream-Temperature Characteristics in Georgia
    STREAM-TEMPERATURE CHARACTERISTICS IN GEORGIA By T.R. Dyar and S.J. Alhadeff ______________________________________________________________________________ U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 96-4203 Prepared in cooperation with GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION Atlanta, Georgia 1997 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles G. Groat, Director For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Branch of Information Services 3039 Amwiler Road, Suite 130 Denver Federal Center Peachtree Business Center Box 25286 Atlanta, GA 30360-2824 Denver, CO 80225-0286 CONTENTS Page Abstract . 1 Introduction . 1 Purpose and scope . 2 Previous investigations. 2 Station-identification system . 3 Stream-temperature data . 3 Long-term stream-temperature characteristics. 6 Natural stream-temperature characteristics . 7 Regression analysis . 7 Harmonic mean coefficient . 7 Amplitude coefficient. 10 Phase coefficient . 13 Statewide harmonic equation . 13 Examples of estimating natural stream-temperature characteristics . 15 Panther Creek . 15 West Armuchee Creek . 15 Alcovy River . 18 Altamaha River . 18 Summary of stream-temperature characteristics by river basin . 19 Savannah River basin . 19 Ogeechee River basin. 25 Altamaha River basin. 25 Satilla-St Marys River basins. 26 Suwannee-Ochlockonee River basins . 27 Chattahoochee River basin. 27 Flint River basin. 28 Coosa River basin. 29 Tennessee River basin . 31 Selected references. 31 Tabular data . 33 Graphs showing harmonic stream-temperature curves of observed data and statewide harmonic equation for selected stations, figures 14-211 . 51 iii ILLUSTRATIONS Page Figure 1. Map showing locations of 198 periodic and 22 daily stream-temperature stations, major river basins, and physiographic provinces in Georgia.
    [Show full text]
  • 2009 Volume XXI, Number 1 Association, Inc
    Lake Hartwell Winter, 2009 Volume XXI, Number 1 Association, Inc Letter from the President Inside this issue Submitted by Joe Brenner LHA’s Annual Fall Meeting 2 Lake Hartwell reached a record low level in October, and there’s no relief Drew Much Attention in sight. If the current drought continues, the entire conservation pool (625 LHA Represented at Historical 3 MSL) will be consumed by the end of 2009. The effects of climate change Water Conference are upon us. Though no one is sure how overall average rainfall will be affected in the southeastern U.S., all the climatologists I’ve heard from Hartwell Lake Level Projec- 4 tions (or, When will the lake have projected greater weather extremes, i.e. longer and more severe fill up again?) droughts. Ask the Corps 6 The existing Corps Drought Contingency Plan clearly cannot handle the 2008 Hartwell Lake Clean Up 7 weather patterns that we are experiencing. It is based on historical events Campaign a Success and decades old operational approaches. There must be a greater under- standing by all stakeholders within the Savannah River Basin that the reserves in the lakes must be Let’s Get Ready for Boating 8 Next Year maintained in order to protect the entire basin through severe drought situations. It must also be recognized that an appropriate drought plan will promote a “share the pain” approach throughout Proposed Nuclear Power 9 the basin. It is absurd to be holding boat races on the river in Augusta while our businesses suffer, Plant Expansion On The Savannah River our boat ramps are closed, the lake is not navigable and our docks sit on dirt.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Character of Surface Waters of Georgia
    SliEU' :\0..... / ........ RO O ~ l NO. ···- ··-<~ ......... U )'On no l~er need this publication write to the Geological Sur»ey in Washlndon for ali official maillne label to use In returning it UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR CHEMICAL CHARACTER OF SURFACE WATERS OF GEORGIA Prepared In cooperation wilh the DIVISION OF MINES, MINING, AND GEOLOGY OF 'l'HE GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 889- E ' UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Harold L. Ickes, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. E. Wrather, Director Water-Supply Paper 889-E CHEMICAL CHARACTER OF SURFACE WATERS OF GEORGIA BY WILLIAM L. LAMAR Prepared in cooperation with the DIVISION OF MINES, MINING, AND GEOLOGY OF THE GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Contributions to the Hydrology of the United States, 19~1-!3 (Pages 317- 380) UN ITED STATES GOVEHNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1944 For sct le Ly Ll w S upcrinkntlent of Doc uments, U. S. Gover nme nt Printing Office, " ' asbingtou 25, D . C. Price 15 ce nl~ CONTENTS Page- Abstract ___________________________________________ -----_--------- 31 T Introduction __________________ c ________________________________ -- _ 317 Physiography_____________________________________________________ 318 Climate__________________________________________________________ 820 Collection and examination of samples_______________________________ 323 Stream flow __________________________ --------- ___________ c ________ . 324 Rainfall and discharge during sampling years_____________________
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Apalachicola-Chattahoochee
    Georgia: Upper Apalachicola- Case Study Chattahoochee-Flint River Basin Water Resource Strategies and Information Needs in Response to Extreme Weather/Climate Events ACF Basin The Story in Brief Communities in the Apalachicola-Chattahoochee-Flint River Basin (ACF) in Georgia, including Gwinnett County and the city of Atlanta, faced four consecutive extreme weather events: drought of 2007-08, floods of Sep- tember and winter 2009, and drought of 2011-12. These events cost taxpayers millions of dollars in damaged infrastructure, homes, and businesses and threatened water supply for ecological, agricultural, energy, and urban water users. Water utilities were faced with ensuring reliable service during and after these events. Drought of 2007-2008 and 2012 Impacts Northern Georgia saw record-low precipitation in 2007. By late spring 2008, Lake Lanier, the state’s major water supply, was at 50% of its storage capacity. The drought, combined with record-high temperatures, caused an estimated $1.3 billion in economic losses and threatened local water utilities’ ability to meet demand for four million people. Similar drought conditions unfolded in 2011-2012, during which numerous Water Trends Georgia counties were declared disaster zones. The Chattahoochee River, its tributaries, and Reduced rain affected recharge of the surface-water- Lake Lanier provide water to most of the dependent reservoir. It reduced flows, dried tributaries, “There is nothing simple, nothing one sub-basin Atlanta and Columbus metro populations. The and caused ecological damage in a landscape already river is the most heavily used water resource in affected by urbanization, impervious cover, and reduced can do to solve the problem.
    [Show full text]
  • List of TMDL Implementation Plans with Tmdls Organized by Basin
    Latest 305(b)/303(d) List of Streams List of Stream Reaches With TMDLs and TMDL Implementation Plans - Updated June 2011 Total Maximum Daily Loadings TMDL TMDL PLAN DELIST BASIN NAME HUC10 REACH NAME LOCATION VIOLATIONS TMDL YEAR TMDL PLAN YEAR YEAR Altamaha 0307010601 Bullard Creek ~0.25 mi u/s Altamaha Road to Altamaha River Bio(sediment) TMDL 2007 09/30/2009 Altamaha 0307010601 Cobb Creek Oconee Creek to Altamaha River DO TMDL 2001 TMDL PLAN 08/31/2003 Altamaha 0307010601 Cobb Creek Oconee Creek to Altamaha River FC 2012 Altamaha 0307010601 Milligan Creek Uvalda to Altamaha River DO TMDL 2001 TMDL PLAN 08/31/2003 2006 Altamaha 0307010601 Milligan Creek Uvalda to Altamaha River FC TMDL 2001 TMDL PLAN 08/31/2003 Altamaha 0307010601 Oconee Creek Headwaters to Cobb Creek DO TMDL 2001 TMDL PLAN 08/31/2003 Altamaha 0307010601 Oconee Creek Headwaters to Cobb Creek FC TMDL 2001 TMDL PLAN 08/31/2003 Altamaha 0307010602 Ten Mile Creek Little Ten Mile Creek to Altamaha River Bio F 2012 Altamaha 0307010602 Ten Mile Creek Little Ten Mile Creek to Altamaha River DO TMDL 2001 TMDL PLAN 08/31/2003 Altamaha 0307010603 Beards Creek Spring Branch to Altamaha River Bio F 2012 Altamaha 0307010603 Five Mile Creek Headwaters to Altamaha River Bio(sediment) TMDL 2007 09/30/2009 Altamaha 0307010603 Goose Creek U/S Rd. S1922(Walton Griffis Rd.) to Little Goose Creek FC TMDL 2001 TMDL PLAN 08/31/2003 Altamaha 0307010603 Mushmelon Creek Headwaters to Delbos Bay Bio F 2012 Altamaha 0307010604 Altamaha River Confluence of Oconee and Ocmulgee Rivers to ITT Rayonier
    [Show full text]
  • LHA News Fall 05
    Lake Hartwell Fall, 2005 Volume XVII, Number 4 Association, Inc Letter from the President Inside this issue Submitted by Mike Massey 2005 Fall Informational 2 It has been a relatively beautiful summer on the lake. I hope you have all enjoyed it. Meeting The LHA Fall Meeting has been scheduled. Please take a minute to read about it and Anderson Co. Parks 3 when you have finished, mark your calendars to be sure you don’t miss out on this in- Benefit from formative annual event. Bioengineering LHA Annual Fall Meeting. Legislative Committee 4 The LHA Board of Directors is happy to announce that the Lake Hartwell Association Update annual meeting will be held on Thursday, November 10, at the Anderson Civic Center. Boating Safety 4 The meeting will start at 7:00 PM and run for approximately two hours. Request for email 4 The purpose of this meeting is to provide our members, guests and friends of the lake: Addresses • The ability to hear some very interesting and important speakers relating to Hartwell Lake and the Meet the Directors 5 Savannah River Basin • An update of the activities the LHA team has been working for the past year, Safety Alert! for PDFs 6 • The opportunity to meet your officers and members of the Board of Directors, ask questions of News From The Corps 7 them and all speakers and, Lake Level Data 7 • An opportunity to win one of the great door prizes. This year’s keynote speaker is Colonel Mark S. Held, District Commander, Savannah District, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Hartwell Lake News Is FREE! PAID Monroe, GA a Direct Mail out to Lake Front Property Owner on Lake Hartwell and Permit No
    Prsrt Std US Postage Hartwell Lake News is FREE! PAID www.hartwelllakenews.com Monroe, GA A direct mail out to lake front property owner on Lake Hartwell and Permit No. 15 is distributed to over 200 locations around the lake covering two states and six counties. Like us on Facebook www.hartwelllakeproperties.com • Hartwell Lake Properties • 1-800-BUY-LAKE Volume 15, Number 4 • December 27 – April 5, 2014 SERVING SC AND GA: ANDERSON, CLEMSON, TOWNVILLE, FAIR PLAY, SENECA, HARTWELL, LAVONIA AND TOCCOA INSIDE Corps to Reduce Visitor Services FEATURED HOME Page 16 Next Year Due to Declining Federal Recreation Funds SAVANNAH, Ga. – Due to significant communities while achieving the projected budget reductions in fiscal year necessary cost reductions. 2014, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers “We considered altern-atives Savannah District will reduce park to maintaining park operations and 4 Partain Dr. Looking for a Lake Hartwell operations and visitor services at lakes acceptable visitor services within retreat or full time home? This is it! A completely Hartwell and J. Strom Thurmond during the funding limitations, such as complete furnished 3 BD/2BA home located just off Bouy 2014 recreation season. park closures, partial closures, seasonal S21 of the Savannah Main channel of the lake. The Corps will close one campground reductions, and reduced visitor services,” Deep water location with a double deck dock in place & includes a boat lift for your boat. The and five day use areas on Hartwell Lake, and said Peggy O’Bryan, chief of operations home is situated in a very private setting of 1.41 four campgrounds on Thurmond Lake.
    [Show full text]
  • 11-1 335-6-11-.02 Use Classifications. (1) the ALABAMA RIVER BASIN Waterbody from to Classification ALABAMA RIVER MOBILE RIVER C
    335-6-11-.02 Use Classifications. (1) THE ALABAMA RIVER BASIN Waterbody From To Classification ALABAMA RIVER MOBILE RIVER Claiborne Lock and F&W Dam ALABAMA RIVER Claiborne Lock and Alabama and Gulf S/F&W (Claiborne Lake) Dam Coast Railway ALABAMA RIVER Alabama and Gulf River Mile 131 F&W (Claiborne Lake) Coast Railway ALABAMA RIVER River Mile 131 Millers Ferry Lock PWS (Claiborne Lake) and Dam ALABAMA RIVER Millers Ferry Sixmile Creek S/F&W (Dannelly Lake) Lock and Dam ALABAMA RIVER Sixmile Creek Robert F Henry Lock F&W (Dannelly Lake) and Dam ALABAMA RIVER Robert F Henry Lock Pintlala Creek S/F&W (Woodruff Lake) and Dam ALABAMA RIVER Pintlala Creek Its source F&W (Woodruff Lake) Little River ALABAMA RIVER Its source S/F&W Chitterling Creek Within Little River State Forest S/F&W (Little River Lake) Randons Creek Lovetts Creek Its source F&W Bear Creek Randons Creek Its source F&W Limestone Creek ALABAMA RIVER Its source F&W Double Bridges Limestone Creek Its source F&W Creek Hudson Branch Limestone Creek Its source F&W Big Flat Creek ALABAMA RIVER Its source S/F&W 11-1 Waterbody From To Classification Pursley Creek Claiborne Lake Its source F&W Beaver Creek ALABAMA RIVER Extent of reservoir F&W (Claiborne Lake) Beaver Creek Claiborne Lake Its source F&W Cub Creek Beaver Creek Its source F&W Turkey Creek Beaver Creek Its source F&W Rockwest Creek Claiborne Lake Its source F&W Pine Barren Creek Dannelly Lake Its source S/F&W Chilatchee Creek Dannelly Lake Its source S/F&W Bogue Chitto Creek Dannelly Lake Its source F&W Sand Creek Bogue
    [Show full text]
  • Like No Place on Earth
    Like no Place on Earth Heaven’s Landing, the Middle of EVERYWHERE! - Mike Ciochetti EVERYWHERE Heaven’s Landing is a residential fly-in community located in the Blue Ridge Mountains of northeast Georgia. Immediately surrounded by the pristine EVERYTHING serenity of the Chattahoochee National Forest, one could easily get the impression that Heaven’s Landing is located in the middle of nowhere. After all, virtually every photograph that you see of Heaven’s Landing shows a 5,200 The Races foot runway surrounded by colorful mountain wilderness. To the contrary, however, Heaven’s Landing is only 3.5 miles from the City of Clayton, Georgia, and very much in the middle of EVERYWHERE! Fall Sweeps A seven-minute drive from Heaven’s Landing brings you to downtown Clayton, which has the best of just about EVERYTHING! Four of the top 100 rated Where to Find Us chefs in the U.S. operate restaurants in Rabun County to the delight of gourmet foodies. Rabun County was named the “Farm to Table Capital of Georgia!” This is a testament to the great relationships the chefs have with the Circus Arts local farms, following the practices of the finest eateries, and the abundant availability of farm fresh organic meats and produce. If you don’t care to dine out, shoppers will delight in the finest supermarkets, farmer’s markets, Mark Your organic food co-op’s and old fashioned local butcher shops that you will find Calendar ANYWHERE! So Heaven’s Landing has your fine dining needs covered, what is there to do Events to work up an appetite? Once again the answer is EVERYTHING! Let’s start with Lake Burton, a renowned 2,735 acre crystal clear mountain lake where Concierge you can water ski, jet ski, fish, or just cruise on your boat and sunbathe in an atmosphere that is pure nirvana.
    [Show full text]
  • Rule 391-3-6-.03. Water Use Classifications and Water Quality Standards
    Presented below are water quality standards that are in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. EPA is posting these standards as a convenience to users and has made a reasonable effort to assure their accuracy. Additionally, EPA has made a reasonable effort to identify parts of the standards that are not approved, disapproved, or are otherwise not in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. Rule 391-3-6-.03. Water Use Classifications and Water Quality Standards ( 1) Purpose. The establishment of water quality standards. (2) W ate r Quality Enhancement: (a) The purposes and intent of the State in establishing Water Quality Standards are to provide enhancement of water quality and prevention of pollution; to protect the public health or welfare in accordance with the public interest for drinking water supplies, conservation of fish, wildlife and other beneficial aquatic life, and agricultural, industrial, recreational, and other reasonable and necessary uses and to maintain and improve the biological integrity of the waters of the State. ( b) The following paragraphs describe the three tiers of the State's waters. (i) Tier 1 - Existing instream water uses and the level of water quality necessary to protect the existing uses shall be maintained and protected. (ii) Tier 2 - Where the quality of the waters exceed levels necessary to support propagation of fish, shellfish, and wildlife and recreation in and on the water, that quality shall be maintained and protected unless the division finds, after full satisfaction of the intergovernmental coordination and public participation provisions of the division's continuing planning process, that allowing lower water quality is necessary to accommodate important economic or social development in the area in which the waters are located.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 335-6-11 Water Use Classifications for Interstate and Intrastate Waters
    Environmental Management Chapter 335-6-11 DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT WATER DIVISION - WATER QUALITY PROGRAM ADMINISTRATIVE CODE CHAPTER 335-6-11 WATER USE CLASSIFICATIONS FOR INTERSTATE AND INTRASTATE WATERS TABLE OF CONTENTS 335-6-11-.01 The Use Classification System 335-6-11-.02 Use Classifications 335-6-11-.01 The Use Classification System. (1) Use classifications utilized by the State of Alabama are as follows: Outstanding Alabama Water ................... OAW Public Water Supply ......................... PWS Swimming and Other Whole Body Shellfish Harvesting ........................ SH Fish and Wildlife ........................... F&W Limited Warmwater Fishery ................... LWF Agricultural and Industrial Water Supply ................................ A&I (2) Use classifications apply water quality criteria adopted for particular uses based on existing utilization, uses reasonably expected in the future, and those uses not now possible because of correctable pollution but which could be made if the effects of pollution were controlled or eliminated. Of necessity, the assignment of use classifications must take into consideration the physical capability of waters to meet certain uses. (3) Those use classifications presently included in the standards are reviewed informally by the Department's staff as the need arises, and the entire standards package, to include the use classifications, receives a formal review at least once every three years. Efforts currently underway through local 201 planning projects will provide additional technical data on certain waterbodies in the State, information on treatment alternatives, and applicability of various management techniques, which, when available, will hopefully lead to new decisions regarding use classifications. Of particular interest are those segments which are currently classified for any usage which has an associated Supp.
    [Show full text]
  • Rights of Way Endangered Species Survey for the Northeast Region of Georgia
    RIGHTS OF WAY ENDANGERED SPECIES SURVEY FOR THE NORTHEAST REGION OF GEORGIA. The Northeast Region ofGeorgia includes 24 counties: Banks, Barrows, Clarke, Dawson, Elbert, Fannin, Forsyth, Franklin, Greene, Habersham, Hart, Hall, Jackson, Lumpkin, Madison, Morgan, Oconee, Oglethorpe, Rabun, Stephens, Towns, Union, Walton and White. Based on The Georgia Natural Heritage Inventory records, the following plants and plant community locations were searched for on Georgia Power Company rights ofways: Georgia aster - Aster georgianus Dwarfstonecrop - Sedum pusillum Indian olive - Nestronia umbellulua Silky bindweed - Calystegia catesbiana ssp. sericata Smooth purple coneflower - Echinacea laevigata (Federal Endangered) Ginseng - Panax quinquefolius Pipewort - Eriocaulon koemickianum American Milkwort - Pilularia Americana Granite outcrop (shrub, bare rock, lichen) communities There are three maintenance concerns. Two are minor concerns in Walton county with granite outcrops communities. (See Walton county summary) and one in Stephens county with smooth purnle coneflower (See Stephens county summary). Discussion and recommendations: A few ofthe Northeast Region counties are located in the mountains and foothill region ofGeorgia, but most are in the Piedmont. Much of the Georgia mountain region is owned and managed by the United States Forest Service. Georgia Power has large holdings in this area as well and has been involved with protected species (persistent trillium Trillium persistents and the green salamander aneides aeneus) on company lands at Tallulah Gorge, but these species locations are not close to Georgia Power rights ofways so there are no concerns for right ofway maintenance. The majority oflocations in this region, are within the Piedmont province. Due to a long history ofearly European use (and misuse) for settlement, agriculture and logging, the original Piedmont plant communities ofGeorgia have been altered drastically over the past 2 centuries.
    [Show full text]