Dinosaur Footprints from the Khorat Group, Northeastern Thailand

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Dinosaur Footprints from the Khorat Group, Northeastern Thailand Dinosaur Footprints from the Khorat Group, Northeastern Thailand July 2017 Shohei KOZU Dinosaur Footprints from the Khorat Group, Northeastern Thailand A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, the University of Tsukuba in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Science (Doctoral Program in Earth Evolution Sciences) Shohei KOZU Contents Page Contents i Abstract iii List of Figures and Tables vi 1. Introduction 1 1.1 The History of Dinosaur Footprint Ichnology 1 1.2 The History of Dinosaur Footprint Ichnology in Thailand 2 2. Geological Setting of the Khorat Group 5 2.1 The Khorat Group 5 2.2 Dinosaurs from Thailand 5 3. Methodology; how to study dinosaur footprints 7 3.1 Measuring Methods of Footprints, and Estimation Methods of Hip Height 7 and Moving Speed of Trackmaker 3.2 Replica Producing Methods 9 4. Results; description of dinosaur footprints at each location 11 4.1 Huai Hin Lat Formation 11 4.1.1 Site Nam Nao 12 4.2 Nam Phong Formation 15 4.2.1 Site Tha Song Khong 16 4.2.2 Site Non Tum 19 4.3 Phra Wihan Formation 30 4.3.1 Site Phu Kao 31 4.3.2 Site Phu Faek 32 4.3.3 Site Hin Lat Pa Chad (Phu Wiang) 35 4.4 Phu Pan Formation 43 4.4.1 Site Phu Luang 44 i 4.5 Khok Kruat Formation 47 4.5.1 Site Huai Dam Chum (Tha Uthen) 47 5. Discussions 57 5.1 Reconstruction of the dinosaur ichnofauna in the Khorat Group and its 57 significance 5.2 Comparison of the dinosaur ichnofauna in the Khorat Group with East Asia 58 5.3 Footprint assemblage and its quantitative analysis 63 6. Conclusion 69 Acknowledgements 71 References 72 Figures 1 - 59 95 Tables 1 - 13 161 ii Abstract Late Triassic to Early Cretaceous terrigenous sedimentary rocks, traditionally called the Khorat Group, are widely distributed in northeastern Thailand. This Group is subdivided into eight formations, in the following stratigraphic order; the Huai Hin Lat, Nam Phong, Phu Kradung, Phra Wihan, Sao Khua, Phu Phan, Khok Kruat, and Maha Sarakham formations. Many fossils such as dinosaurs, fishes, crocodilians, turtles, bivalves and palynomorphs have been reported from the Khorat Group. In particular, abundant dinosaur fossils including footprints, teeth and bones have been known from the northeastern part of Thailand. To date, many tetrapod footprints including dinosaurs have been reported from the Huai Hin Lat, Nam Phong, Phra Wihan, Phu Phan and Khok Kruat formations. On the other hand, only two ichnogenera and one ichnospecies have been described in systematic ichnology in Thailand. During my field works for my Doctoral Course study, I visited eight footprint sites in northeastern Thailand, including Nam Nao, Tha Song Khon, Non Tum, Phu Kao, Hin Lat Pa Chad (Phu Wiang), Phu Luang and Huai Dam Chum (Tha Uthen). In this thesis, on the basis of the detailed measurement data, I describe the dinosaur footprints in ichnological taxonomy, and also reconstruct the dinosaur ichnofauna in Thailand. Additionally, I discuss the paleontological significance of Thai dinosaur footprints in East and Southeast Asia. In this study, I have identified 877 tetrapod tracks including 151 trackways in a total of eight tracksites from the Khorat Group, northeastern Thailand. I have also classified some kind of tracks of theropoda, ornithopoda, sauropoda, crocodilian, non-dinosauriform archosauromorpha, and didactyl tracks of tetrapoda from the Khorat Group. The ratio of the occurrence of theropod tracks in dinosaur footprint iii proportion exceeds more than 90 % and the ratio of each geologic age is so high. Additionally, I newly described five ichnogenera of dinosaur footprints, Eubrontes isp., Gigandipus isp., Carmelopodus isp., Irenesauripus isp., and cf. Asianopodus isp., and one ichnogenus of archosauromorpha, cf. Apatopus isp. in ichnotaxonomy. As a result of the comparison between dinosaur fauna based on the bone fossils and dinosaur ichnofauna, both of them do not show the “true dinosaur fauna” in Thailand. However, dinosaur ichnofauna compensates for lack of dinosaur fauna based on the bone fossils will lead to reconstruct more precise dinosaur fauna, and it shows the paleontological significance of dinosaur footprint ichnology. As a result of comparison with the Early Cretaceous dinosaur faunas in East and Southeast Asia, there is a possibility that the origins of ornithopoda and allosauria is in the region of Southeast Asia from the ichnological point of view. As a result of comparison between the Khorat ichnofauna and Chinese and Korean ichnofaunas in East Asia, there is partial common point between the Early Cretaceous Khorat Ichnofauna and the ichnofauna of the region C3 (Inner Mongolia) in China. However, the tracksites are few in number in the Khorat Group, and there is few report describing dromaeosaurids tracks, large sauropod and ornithopod tracks, pterosaur, turtle, bird tracks in Thailand compared with East Asian tracksites. The Khorat Group has a little different ichnofauna with East Asia while sharing the partial ichnofauna which is characterized as non-avian theropod track (like Asianopodus) rich. FI described the dinosaur footprint assemblage in ichnotaxonomy for the first time in Thailand. As a result of the quantitative analysis of dinosaur footprint assemblage in the site Huai Dam Chum, the footprint assemblage of the theropod tracks referred to cf. Asianopodus isp. is estimated to be imprinted by probably gregarious iv ornithomimosaurs. The tracks are mainly separated into two groups, Group A and Group B, and indicate the accurate herd behaviour and its idiosyncratic group composition. In particular, the histogram of size-frezuency measurements of Group A shows the anomalous bimodal distribution. I consider that there are two hypotheses; the first one is due to the male-female difference, and the second is a result of the different growing stage. Key words; dinosaur, footprint, the Khorat group, Mesozoic, northeastern Thailand v List of Figures and Tables Figures Page Figure 1. Index map showing the distribution of the Khorat Group and 95 footprint sites. Figure 2. Lithostratigraphic column and dinosaur ichnofauna of the 96 Khorat Group. Figure 3. Diagrams of footprints and trackways, showing measurement 97 methods. Figure 4. Photograph of making silicon mold (process 3). 98 Figure 5. Photograph of making silicon mold (process 4). 99 Figure 6. Photograph of making silicon mold (process 7). 100 Figure 7. Photograph of making plaster mold (process 2). 101 Figure 8. Photograph of making plaster cast (process 5). 102 Figure 9. Photograph of the outcrop and sketch of a trackway at the site 103 Nam Nao. Figure 10. Sketch of the trackway of archosauromorpha phytosaur at the 104 site Nam Nao. Figure 11. Photograph and sketch of left manus and pes impressions at 105 the site Nam Nao. Figure 12. Size comparison of a human and an archosauromorph, 106 possible phytosaur at the site Nam Nao. Figure 13. Comparison chart of archosauromorpha tracks. 107 Figure 14. Photograph of the outcrop at the site Tha Song Khon. Each 108 arrow shows footprints. vi Figure 15. Sketch of the trackway at the site Tha Song Khon. 109 Figure 16. Photographs of footprints at the site Tha Song Khon. 110 Figure 17. Size comparison of a human and a theropod at the site Tha 111 Song Khon. Figure 18. Comparison chart of theropod tracks. 112 Figure 19. Locality map and outcrop photograph of the site Non Tum. 113 Figure 20. Lithostratigraphic clumn at the site Non Tum. 114 Figure 21. Photographs and sketch of tracks at the site Non Tum. 115 Figure 22. Mesh maps at the Non Tum site. 116 Figure 23. The trackway and photographs of didactyl tracks. 117 Figure 24. Comparison chart of didactyl tracks. 118 Figure 25. Meshmap of the Trackway T1 in the northern part of the 119 outcrop at the site Non Tum. Figure 26. Photographs and sketches of theropod tracks T1 which consist 120 of T1n1 to T1n6. Figure 27. Size comparison of a human, a theropod, and a sauropod at 121 the site Non Tum. Figure 28. Photograph of possible sauropod pes and manus impressions. 122 Scale bar is 10 cm. Figure 29. Comparison chart of the trackway, Eosauropus, Brontopodus 123 and Non Tum specimen T4. Figure 30. Photograph of the outcrop at the site Phu Kao. 124 Figure 31. Sketch of the outcrop and a photograph and a sketch of the 125 track T7n1. vii Figure 32. Lithostratigraphic clumn at the site Phu Faek. 126 Figure 33. Sedimentary structures in the sandstone, including parallel 127 and trough cross-laminations (in the upper part of the study section). Figure 34. Photograph of the outcrop at the site Phu Faek. Red arrow 128 shows T1n1, and blue arrow shows T3n4. Figure 35. Sketch of the tracks T1 to T4 at the site Phu Faek. 129 Figure 36. Size comparison of a human and a theropod. 130 Figure 37. Photograph of the track T2n2. 131 Figure 38. Photograph of the trace fossils Thalassinoides sp. which 132 imprinted on the same upper surface with dinosaur tracks. Figure 39. Meshmap of the outcrop at the site Hin Lat Pa Chad. 133 Figure 40. Photograph of the trackway T4 Neoanomoepus isp., showing 134 detail of the region outlined by the square in Fig. 39. Figure 41. Size comparison of a human, a small-sized ornithopod, and a 135 small-sized theropod at the site Hin Lat Pa Chad Figure 42. Photographs of the outcrop and the trackways T1 and T2. 136 Figure 43. Photograph of the trackway T10 Carmelopodus isp. at the site 137 Hin Lat Pa Chad. Figure 44. Photographs of the well preserved tracks T10n2 and T10n3 at 138 the site Hin Lat Pa Chad. Scales are 5 cm.
Recommended publications
  • Back Matter (PDF)
    Index Figures are shown in italic font, tables in bold Acrodontinae 99, 101–102 Buddha’s cortege 245 Actinopterygii 127, 130 burial temperature 63 adocid 143–144, 147, 148 Adocus [turtle] 166, 167 comparison, Basilochelys 155–158, 163–165 calc-alkaline volcanism 61 amber locality 86,88 calcrete 77 Ameghinichthys [fish] 129 Callialisporites [palynomorph] 72, 75, 77, 79, 80, 81 ammonites 48, 52 Carettochelyidae 166, 167 amphibian remains 2–3 Cathaysia Divide 10–12 anhydrite 70 Cathaysialand 8, 9, 15, 20 Anomoeodus [fish] 136 fauna 12–14 Anomoepodidae 264, 265, 266 flora 16 Anomoepus [ichnofossil] 256, 258, 261, 262–264 Ceno-Tethys 8, 12, 19,20 comparison 264, 265–267 Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Ao Min, fish locality 98, 99 (France) 190 apatite 63 Champon Formation 50 Appendicisporites [palynomorph] 76,77 Chelomoidea 166, 167 Araucaria [tree] 85, 88, 92, 93 Chelonia 274, 293 Archaeornithomimus [theropod] 237–240 Chelydridae 166, 167 archosaur trackway 247 chert 18, 20 Argoland 12, 13 Chondrichthyes 98–99 Aruacariacites [palynomorph] 74 Chong Chad, oxygen isotope analysis 272, Asteracanthus [elasmobranch] 99–101 274, 275, 276, 277 comparison 101–102 Chong Chat, fish locality 127, 130, 131, 137 Asterodermus [elasmobranch] 107 Chuiella, distribution of 15 Cicatricosisporites [palynomorph] 75, 76, 77, 79 Cimmerian continent 8, 12, 15, 16, 18, 20 Baenidae 166, 167 Cimmerian Event 44, 46, 47, 51, 64 Ban Khok Sanam locality 272, 274, 276 cladistic analysis Ban Na Khrai, sauropod site 189, 190, 192, 195–214 actinopterygians 130 Ban Na
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Note on a Small Ornithopod Dinosaur from the Phu Kradung Formation (Terminal Jurassic – Basal Cretaceous) of Phu Noi, North-Eastern Thailand
    Original Preliminary note on a small ornithopod dinosaur from the Phu Kradung Formation (terminal Jurassic – basal Cretaceous) of Phu Noi, north-eastern Thailand Eric Buffetaut1*, Suravech Suteethorn2, Varavudh Suteethorn2, Uthumporn Deesri2, Haiyan Tong2 Received: 30 July 2013; Accepted: 15 October 2013 Abstract The lower jaw of a small ornithopod from Phu Noi, a rich fossil locality in the lower part of the Phu Kradung Formation (terminal Jurassic - basal Cretaceous) of Kalasin Province, north-eastern Thailand, is briefl y described. This the best ornithopod specimen hitherto recovered from the Phu Kradung Formation and it shows a combination of characters suggesting that it belongs to a new taxon. Keywords: Ornithopoda, mandible, Phu Kradung Formation, Late Jurassic, Thailand Introduction abundant and diverse vertebrate fauna, comprising The Phu Kradung Formation of north-eastern Thailand hybodont sharks5, bony fishes6, turtles, teleosaurid contains abundant dinosaur remains, among which crocodilians, sauropods (including mamenchisaurids), mamenchisaurid sauropods are especially well represented1. theropods7 (including sinraptorids) and pterosaurs. Sinraptorid theropods have also been found2. Few The age of the Phu Kradung Formation is still ornithischian remains have hitherto been reported from the relatively uncertain. It was long considered as Late Phu Kradung Formation. They include a stegosaur vertebra3 Jurassic, but on the basis of palynological evidence Racey and a femur of a small ornithopod4. In the present preliminary and Goodall(2009)8 consider that most of it belongs to the paper, we report the discovery of a new specimen from Early Cretaceous, with the lower part possibly being Late the Phu Noi fossil locality, which provides important Jurassic. The Phu Kradung Formation probably covers new evidence about the small ornithopods from the Phu a relatively long time span and in all likelihood the fossil Kradung Formation.
    [Show full text]
  • Valérie Martin, Varavudh Suteethorn & Eric Buffetaut, Description of the Type and Referred Material of Phuwiangosaurus
    ORYCTOS, V ol . 2 : 39 - 91, Décembre 1999 DESCRIPTION OF THE TYPE AND REFERRED MATERIAL OF PHUWIANGOSAURUS SIRINDHORNAE MARTIN, BUFFETAUT AND SUTEETHORN, 1994, A SAUROPOD FROM THE LOWER CRETACEOUS OF THAILAND Valérie MARTIN 1, Varavudh SUTEETHORN 2 and Eric BUFFETAUT 3 1 Musée des Dinosaures, 11260 Espéraza, France 2 Geological Survey Division, Department of Mineral Resources, Rama VI Road, 10400 Bangkok, Thailand 3 CNRS (UMR 5561), 16 cour du Liégat, 75013 Paris, France Abstract : The type specimen of P. sirindhornae Martin, Buffetaut and Suteethorn, 1994 is an incomplete, partly articulated, skeleton discovered in the Phu Wiang area of northeastern Thailand). Most of the abundant sauropod material from the Sao Khua Formation (Early Cretaceous), collected on the Khorat Plateau, in northeastern Thailand, is referable to this species. Phuwiangosaurus is a middle-sized sauropod, which is clearly different from the Jurassic Chinese sauropods (Euhelopodidae). On the basis of a few jaw elements and teeth, P. sirindhornae may be considered as an early representative of the family Nemegtosauridae. Key words : Sauropoda, Osteology, Early Cretaceous, Thailand Description du type et du matériel rapporté de Phuwiangosaurus sirindhornae Martin, Buffetaut et Suteethorn, 1994, un sauropode du Crétacé inférieur de Thaïlande Résumé : Le spécimen type de Phuwiangosaurus sirindhornae est un squelette incomplet, partiellement articulé, découvert dans la région de Phu Wiang (Nord-Est de la Thaïlande). Phuwiangosaurus est un sauropode de taille moyenne (15 à 20 m de longueur) très différent des sauropodes du Jurassique chinois. La majeure partie de l’abondant matériel de sauropodes, récolté sur le Plateau de Khorat (Formation Sao Khua, Crétacé inférieur), est rap - portée à cette espèce.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origin and Early Evolution of Dinosaurs
    Biol. Rev. (2010), 85, pp. 55–110. 55 doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.2009.00094.x The origin and early evolution of dinosaurs Max C. Langer1∗,MartinD.Ezcurra2, Jonathas S. Bittencourt1 and Fernando E. Novas2,3 1Departamento de Biologia, FFCLRP, Universidade de S˜ao Paulo; Av. Bandeirantes 3900, Ribeir˜ao Preto-SP, Brazil 2Laboratorio de Anatomia Comparada y Evoluci´on de los Vertebrados, Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales ‘‘Bernardino Rivadavia’’, Avda. Angel Gallardo 470, Cdad. de Buenos Aires, Argentina 3CONICET (Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cient´ıficas y T´ecnicas); Avda. Rivadavia 1917 - Cdad. de Buenos Aires, Argentina (Received 28 November 2008; revised 09 July 2009; accepted 14 July 2009) ABSTRACT The oldest unequivocal records of Dinosauria were unearthed from Late Triassic rocks (approximately 230 Ma) accumulated over extensional rift basins in southwestern Pangea. The better known of these are Herrerasaurus ischigualastensis, Pisanosaurus mertii, Eoraptor lunensis,andPanphagia protos from the Ischigualasto Formation, Argentina, and Staurikosaurus pricei and Saturnalia tupiniquim from the Santa Maria Formation, Brazil. No uncontroversial dinosaur body fossils are known from older strata, but the Middle Triassic origin of the lineage may be inferred from both the footprint record and its sister-group relation to Ladinian basal dinosauromorphs. These include the typical Marasuchus lilloensis, more basal forms such as Lagerpeton and Dromomeron, as well as silesaurids: a possibly monophyletic group composed of Mid-Late Triassic forms that may represent immediate sister taxa to dinosaurs. The first phylogenetic definition to fit the current understanding of Dinosauria as a node-based taxon solely composed of mutually exclusive Saurischia and Ornithischia was given as ‘‘all descendants of the most recent common ancestor of birds and Triceratops’’.
    [Show full text]
  • Chaiyaphum.Pdf
    Information by: TAT Nakhon Ratchasima Tourist Information Division (Tel. 0 2250 5500 ext. 2141-5) Designed & Printed by: Promotional Material Production Division, Marketing Services Department. The contents of this publication are subject to change without notice. Chaiyaphum 2009 Copyright. No commercial reprinting of this material allowed. January 2009 Free Copy Dok Krachiao (Siam Tulip) 08.00-20.00 hrs. Everyday Tourist information by fax available 24 hrs. Website: www.tourismthailand.org E-mail: [email protected] 43 Thai Silk Products of Ban Khwao Thai silk, Chaiyaphum Contents Transportation 5 Amphoe Thep Sathit 27 Attractions 7 Events and Festivals 30 Amphoe Mueang Chaiyaphum 7 Local Products and Souvenirs 31 Amphoe Nong Bua Daeng 16 Facilities in Chaiyaphum 34 Amphoe Ban Khwao 17 Accommodation 34 Amphoe Nong Bua Rawe 17 Restaurants 37 Amphoe Phakdi Chumphon 19 Interesting Activities 41 Amphoe Khon Sawan 20 Useful Calls 41 Amphoe Phu Khiao 21 Amphoe Khon San 22 52-08-068 E_002-003 new29-10_Y.indd 2-3 29/10/2009 18:29 52-08-068 E_004-043 new25_J.indd 43 25/9/2009 23:07 Thai silk, Chaiyaphum Contents Transportation 5 Amphoe Thep Sathit 27 Attractions 7 Events and Festivals 30 Amphoe Mueang Chaiyaphum 7 Local Products and Souvenirs 31 Amphoe Nong Bua Daeng 16 Facilities in Chaiyaphum 34 Amphoe Ban Khwao 17 Accommodation 34 Amphoe Nong Bua Rawe 17 Restaurants 37 Amphoe Phakdi Chumphon 19 Interesting Activities 41 Amphoe Khon Sawan 20 Useful Calls 41 Amphoe Phu Khiao 21 Amphoe Khon San 22 4 5 Chaiyaphum is a province located at the ridge of the Isan plateau in the connecting area between the Central Region and the North.
    [Show full text]
  • The Anatomy and Phylogenetic Relationships of Antetonitrus Ingenipes (Sauropodiformes, Dinosauria): Implications for the Origins of Sauropoda
    THE ANATOMY AND PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS OF ANTETONITRUS INGENIPES (SAUROPODIFORMES, DINOSAURIA): IMPLICATIONS FOR THE ORIGINS OF SAUROPODA Blair McPhee A dissertation submitted to the Faculty of Science, University of the Witwatersrand, in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science. Johannesburg, 2013 i ii ABSTRACT A thorough description and cladistic analysis of the Antetonitrus ingenipes type material sheds further light on the stepwise acquisition of sauropodan traits just prior to the Triassic/Jurassic boundary. Although the forelimb of Antetonitrus and other closely related sauropododomorph taxa retains the plesiomorphic morphology typical of a mobile grasping structure, the changes in the weight-bearing dynamics of both the musculature and the architecture of the hindlimb document the progressive shift towards a sauropodan form of graviportal locomotion. Nonetheless, the presence of hypertrophied muscle attachment sites in Antetonitrus suggests the retention of an intermediary form of facultative bipedality. The term Sauropodiformes is adopted here and given a novel definition intended to capture those transitional sauropodomorph taxa occupying a contiguous position on the pectinate line towards Sauropoda. The early record of sauropod diversification and evolution is re- examined in light of the paraphyletic consensus that has emerged regarding the ‘Prosauropoda’ in recent years. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First, I would like to express sincere gratitude to Adam Yates for providing me with the opportunity to do ‘real’ palaeontology, and also for gladly sharing his considerable knowledge on sauropodomorph osteology and phylogenetics. This project would not have been possible without the continued (and continual) support (both emotionally and financially) of my parents, Alf and Glenda McPhee – Thank you.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny and Biogeography of Iguanodontian Dinosaurs, with Implications from Ontogeny and an Examination of the Function of the Fused Carpal-Digit I Complex
    Phylogeny and Biogeography of Iguanodontian Dinosaurs, with Implications from Ontogeny and an Examination of the Function of the Fused Carpal-Digit I Complex By Karen E. Poole B.A. in Geology, May 2004, University of Pennsylvania M.A. in Earth and Planetary Sciences, August 2008, Washington University in St. Louis A Dissertation submitted to The Faculty of The Columbian College of Arts and Sciences of The George Washington University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy August 31, 2015 Dissertation Directed by Catherine Forster Professor of Biology The Columbian College of Arts and Sciences of The George Washington University certifies that Karen Poole has passed the Final Examination for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy as of August 10th, 2015. This is the final and approved form of the dissertation. Phylogeny and Biogeography of Iguanodontian Dinosaurs, with Implications from Ontogeny and an Examination of the Function of the Fused Carpal-Digit I Complex Karen E. Poole Dissertation Research Committee: Catherine A. Forster, Professor of Biology, Dissertation Director James M. Clark, Ronald Weintraub Professor of Biology, Committee Member R. Alexander Pyron, Robert F. Griggs Assistant Professor of Biology, Committee Member ii © Copyright 2015 by Karen Poole All rights reserved iii Dedication To Joseph Theis, for his unending support, and for always reminding me what matters most in life. To my parents, who have always encouraged me to pursue my dreams, even those they didn’t understand. iv Acknowledgements First, a heartfelt thank you is due to my advisor, Cathy Forster, for giving me free reign in this dissertation, but always providing valuable commentary on any piece of writing I sent her, no matter how messy.
    [Show full text]
  • Inferring Body Mass in Extinct Terrestrial Vertebrates and the Evolution of Body Size in a Model-Clade of Dinosaurs (Ornithopoda)
    Inferring Body Mass in Extinct Terrestrial Vertebrates and the Evolution of Body Size in a Model-Clade of Dinosaurs (Ornithopoda) by Nicolás Ernesto José Campione Ruben A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Toronto © Copyright by Nicolás Ernesto José Campione Ruben 2013 Inferring body mass in extinct terrestrial vertebrates and the evolution of body size in a model-clade of dinosaurs (Ornithopoda) Nicolás E. J. Campione Ruben Doctor of Philosophy Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Toronto 2013 Abstract Organismal body size correlates with almost all aspects of ecology and physiology. As a result, the ability to infer body size in the fossil record offers an opportunity to interpret extinct species within a biological, rather than simply a systematic, context. Various methods have been proposed by which to estimate body mass (the standard measure of body size) that center on two main approaches: volumetric reconstructions and extant scaling. The latter are particularly contentious when applied to extinct terrestrial vertebrates, particularly stem-based taxa for which living relatives are difficult to constrain, such as non-avian dinosaurs and non-therapsid synapsids, resulting in the use of volumetric models that are highly influenced by researcher bias. However, criticisms of scaling models have not been tested within a comprehensive extant dataset. Based on limb measurements of 200 mammals and 47 reptiles, linear models were generated between limb measurements (length and circumference) and body mass to test the hypotheses that phylogenetic history, limb posture, and gait drive the relationship between stylopodial circumference and body mass as critics suggest.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pelvic and Hind Limb Anatomy of the Stem-Sauropodomorph Saturnalia Tupiniquim (Late Triassic, Brazil)
    PaleoBios 23(2):1–30, July 15, 2003 © 2003 University of California Museum of Paleontology The pelvic and hind limb anatomy of the stem-sauropodomorph Saturnalia tupiniquim (Late Triassic, Brazil) MAX CARDOSO LANGER Department of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Wills Memorial Building, Queens Road, BS8 1RJ Bristol, UK. Current address: Departamento de Biologia, Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Av. Bandeirantes, 3900 14040-901 Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil; [email protected] Three partial skeletons allow a nearly complete description of the sacrum, pelvic girdle, and hind limb of the stem- sauropodomorph Saturnalia tupiniquim, from the Late Triassic Santa Maria Formation, South Brazil. The new morphological data gathered from these specimens considerably improves our knowledge of the anatomy of basal dinosaurs, providing the basis for a reassessment of various morphological transformations that occurred in the early evolution of these reptiles. These include an increase in the number of sacral vertebrae, the development of a brevis fossa, the perforation of the acetabulum, the inturning of the femoral head, as well as various modifications in the insertion of the iliofemoral musculature and the tibio-tarsal articulation. In addition, the reconstruction of the pelvic musculature of Saturnalia, along with a study of its locomotion pattern, indicates that the hind limb of early dinosaurs did not perform only a fore-and-aft stiff rotation in the parasagittal plane, but that lateral and medial movements of the leg were also present and important. INTRODUCTION sisting of most of the presacral vertebral series, both sides Saturnalia tupiniquim was described in a preliminary of the pectoral girdle, right humerus, partial right ulna, right fashion by Langer et al.
    [Show full text]
  • From the Early Cretaceous of Laos
    Naturwissenschaften DOI 10.1007/s00114-012-0911-7 ORIGINAL PAPER The first definitive Asian spinosaurid (Dinosauria: Theropoda) from the early cretaceous of Laos Ronan Allain & Tiengkham Xaisanavong & Philippe Richir & Bounsou Khentavong Received: 25 November 2011 /Revised: 19 March 2012 /Accepted: 22 March 2012 # Springer-Verlag 2012 Abstract Spinosaurids are among the largest and most spe- from Asia. Cladistic analysis identifies Ichthyovenator as a cialized carnivorous dinosaurs. The morphology of their member of the sub-clade Baryonychinae and suggests a crocodile-like skull, stomach contents, and oxygen isotopic widespread distribution of this clade at the end of the Early composition of the bones suggest they had a predominantly Cretaceous. Chilantaisaurus tashouikensis from the Creta- piscivorous diet. Even if close relationships between spino- ceous of Inner Mongolia, and an ungual phalanx from the saurids and Middle Jurassic megalosaurs seem well estab- Upper Jurassic of Colorado are also referred to spinosaurids, lished, very little is known about the transition from a extending both the stratigraphical and geographical range of generalized large basal tetanuran to the specialized morphol- this clade. ogy of spinosaurids. Spinosaurid remains were previously known from the Early to Late Cretaceous of North Africa, Keywords Cretaceous . Savannakhet basin . Theropoda . Europe, and South America. Here, we report the discovery Spinosauridae . Asia of a new spinosaurid theropod from the late Early Creta- ceous Savannakhet Basin in Laos, which is distinguished by an autapomorphic sinusoidal dorsosacral sail. This new Introduction taxon, Ichthyovenator laosensis gen. et sp. nov., includes well-preserved and partially articulated postcranial remains. The spinosaurids are among the most bizarre dinosaurs. The Although possible spinosaurid teeth have been reported morphology of their superficially crocodile-like skull from various Early Cretaceous localities in Asia, the new (Taquet 1984; Charig and Milner 1997; Sereno et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Dinosaur Footprint Assemblage from the Lower Cretaceous Khok Kruat Formation, Khorat Group, Northeastern Thailand
    Geoscience Frontiers 8 (2017) 1479e1493 HOSTED BY Contents lists available at ScienceDirect China University of Geosciences (Beijing) Geoscience Frontiers journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/gsf Research Paper Dinosaur footprint assemblage from the Lower Cretaceous Khok Kruat Formation, Khorat Group, northeastern Thailand Shohei Kozu a,*, Apsorn Sardsud b, Doungrutai Saesaengseerung b, Cherdchan Pothichaiya b, Sachiko Agematsu a, Katsuo Sashida a a Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8572, Japan b Department of Mineral Resources, Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment, Thailand article info abstract Article history: The Khok Kruat Formation is the upper part of the Khorat Group, which consists of upper Lower Received 30 November 2016 Cretaceous non-marine sedimentary rocks in northeastern Thailand. Many dinosaur footprints have been Received in revised form known from the upper Lower Cretaceous (AptianeAlbian) Khok Kruat Formation at the Huai Dam Chum 19 January 2017 (Tha Uthen) site, northeastern Thailand. Approximately 600 tracks occur in thin mudstone layer of the Accepted 3 February 2017 northern part of the outcrop at the Huai Dam Chum track site. Two types of footprints, small-sized Available online 2 March 2017 Handling Editor: X.Q. Wan theropod and crocodylomorph are imprinted with mud cracks and ripple marks on the thin mud layer. Most of footprints are referred to cf. Asianopodus, and are imprinted by small-sized theropoda, Keywords: probably ornithomimosauria. Theropod tracks are mainly separated into two groups, Group A and Group Dinosaur footprint assemblage B. From ichnological viewpoints, the small-sized theropod track assemblage indicates the herd behaviour Cretaceous and its idiosyncratic group composition.
    [Show full text]
  • Preserving Temple Murals in Isan: Wat Chaisi, Sawatthi Village, Khon Kaen, As a Sustainable Model1
    Preserving Temple Murals in Isan: Wat Chaisi, Sawatthi Village, Khon Kaen, as a Sustainable Model1 Bonnie Pacala Brereton Abstract—Wat Chaisi in Sawatthi village, Sawatthi District, located about twenty kilometers from the bustling provincial capital of Khon Kaen, is a unique example of local cultural heritage preservation that was accomplished solely through local stakeholders. Its buildings, as well as the 100 year-old murals on the ordination hall, have been maintained and are used regularly for merit- making and teaching. The effort was initiated by the abbot and is maintained through the joint effort of the wat community, Khon Kaen Municipality, and various individuals and faculties at Khon Kaen University. This paper will examine the role of local leadership in promoting local cultural heritage. Introduction Of the more than 40,000 Buddhist wats in Thailand seventeen percent, or nearly 7,000, are abandoned.2 Of those still in use, many are becoming increasingly crammed with seemingly superfluous new structures, statues, and decorations, funded by people seeking fame or improvement in their karmic status. Still others are thriving because of the donations they attract through their association with what is sometimes called “popular Buddhism,” a hodgepodge of beliefs in magical monks, amulets, saints, and new rituals aimed at bringing luck and financial success (Pattana 2012). Yet countless others are in a moribund state, in some cases tended by one or two elderly, frail monks who lack the physical and financial resources to maintain them. Both situations are related to the loss of cultural heritage, as countless unique 1 This paper is adapted from one presented at the Fifth International Conference on Local Government, held in Palembang, Indonesia, September 17-19, 2014.
    [Show full text]