DOCSLIB.ORG

That Delicate Balance II: Our Bill of Rights. Instructor's Guide

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

DOCUMENT RESUME ED 374 074 SO 024 561 AUTHOR Kaplan, Howard, Ed. TITLE That Delicate Balance II: Our Bill ofRights. Instructor's Guide. INSTITUTION American Bar Association, Chicago, Ill. Special Committee on Youth Education for Citizenship. SPONS AGENCY American Historical Association, Washington,D.C.; American Political Science Association,Washington, D.C.; Pew Charitable Trusts, Philadelphia,PA. REPORT NO ISBN-1-57073-023-7 PUB DATE 94 NOTE 53p. AVAILABLE FROMAmerican Bar Association, Youth Education for Citizenship, 541 North Fairbanks Court, Chicago,IL 60611-3314 ($10). The five-part videotape series is available from the Public Broadcasting Service,1320 Braddock Road, Alexandria, VA 22314($350). PUB TYPE Guides Classroom Use Teaching Guides (For Teacher)(052) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC03 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Citizenship Education; Civics; *Constitutional Law: Controversial Issues (Course Content); Critical Thinking; Instructional Materials; *Law Related Education; Secondary Education; SocialStudies; Teaching Guides IDENTIFIERS *Bill of Rights; *United States Constitution ABSTRACT This instructor's guide assists secondarysocial studies educators in making effective useof the five-part video series, "That Delicate Balance II: OurBill of Rights." In the tradition of "The Constitution: ThatDelicate Balance," the series introduces students to the Bill of Rights andthe controversies that have arisen over these rights. Led bymoderators using the Socratic method of inquiry, the series featurespanels of experts engaging in lively debate about the constitutional,ethical, and social issues arising from a number of hypotheticalscenarios. The programs enrich secondary civics, government, andhistory courses that examine the Constitution, Bill of Rights, civilliberties, or contemporary issues. The instructor's guide openswith a summary of the topics of the five units in the series. Theunit topics are Roe v. Wade; the First Amendment and hate speech; a rapetrial; equality and the individual; and criminal justice, from muider toexecution. A section on each unit providesteachers with an overview of theissue presented, background materials thatteachers may copy and distribute to their class, and discussionquestions based on these materials that students can debate prior toviewing the video. Each section likewise presents discussion questions forthe class to debate following the video as well as suggestionsfor further research, reports, and essays. At the back of theguide, teachers are provided with a convenient list of teaching resourcesrelated to the Bill of Rights. (JD) U 5 DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Office of Educational Research and Impi,,ement EDUCa,TIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) his document has been reproduced as received from the person or o.ganization originating it Cr Minor changes have been made to improve reproduction quality Points of view or opinionsstated in tnisdoCu went Jo not necessarily represent official OE RI position or policy PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE THIS MATERIAL HAS BEEN GRANTED BY 41/4JL-s-r_. Me./(mneo TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) Oti,'.46'1`9 , t. ' /IA American Bar Association Special Committee on YouthEducation for Citizenship BEST COPYAVAILABLE 9 CREDITS John Paul Ryan, Director Editor Mary Louise Williams, Educational C' ilege & University Programs Howard Kaplan Consultant American Bar Association Assistant Director Project Crossroads Chicago, Illinois American Bar Association Santa Fe, New Mexico Special Committee on Youth Stephen Wasby, Professor of Political Education for Citizenship Reviewers Science Chicago, Illinois Diane Geraghty, Professor Loyola University School of Law State University of New York at Albany Coraributors Chicago, Illinois Bill of Rights Education Margaret Armancas-Fisher, Director Collaborative Liaisons University of Puget Sound Institute for Douglas Kmiec, Professor John Patrick Citizen Education in the Law Notre Dame Law School Member, BREC Governing Board Tacoma, Washington South Bend, Indiana Director, Social Studies Development Center Frank Kopecky, Professor of Legal Paul Murphy, Professor of History Bloomington, Indiana Studies University of Minnesota Sangamon State University St. Paul, Minnesota Claudia Collier-Seiter Springfield, Illinois Karen O'Connor, Professor ofPolitical Member, BREC Governing Board Teacher, Layton High School Richard Roe, Professor of Law Science Layton, Utah Georgetown University Law Center Emory University Washington, D.C. Atlanta, Georgia American Bar Association Special Committee on Youth Sharon Tucker, Assistant Professor Anita Richardson, Editor, Preview of Education for Citizenship History and Political science United States Supreme Court Margaret Bush Wilson, Chair Albany State College Cases Mabel C. McKinney-Browning, Director <- Albany, Georgia American Bar Association Division for Public Education Seva Johnson, Editorial Director Chuck Williams, Reporter Adjunct Professor, John Marshall Chicago Daily Law Bulletin Law School Chicago, Illinois; Chicago, Illinois Irk *0-74 INSTRUCTOR'S GUIDE SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON Yot4Ethiweim, 6.410/72ef4ship AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION 4( * Support for the guide has been grant- not be construed as representing the eCI from the Bill of Rights Education policy of the American Bar Collaborative, a joint project of the Association, nor do they represent the c 1994 American Bar Association, American Historical Association and official position or policies of the 541 N. Fairbanks Court, Chicago, IL the American Political Science American Historical Association, the 60611-3314 Association, with funding from The American Political Science Association, Pew Charitable Trusts. or The Pew Charitable Trusts. ISBN 1-57073-023-7 The views expressed in this docu- ment are those of the authors and To order a copy of this guide, contact PC 497-0052 have not been approved by the House the American Bar Association, YEFC, of Delegates or the Board of 541 N. Fairbanks Court, Chicago, IL Governors of the American Bar 60611-3314; 312/988-5735. Association and, accordingly, should $10.00 4 ABOUT THE SERIES Introduction Columbia University Seminars on of downlinking C-Band transmissions. ,eceive a copy of this guide, Media and Society and the American For further information (including contact the American Bar Association, Bar Association present That Delicate licensing), contact PBS Adult Learning YEFC, 541 N. Fairbanks Court, Chicago Balance II: Our Bill of Rights, a Service at 800/257-2578. IL 60611-3314; 312/988-5735. five-part series of hour-long programs That Delicate Balance ll is also Support for the guide has been grant- on critical Bill of Rights issues con- available from PBS Video ed from the Bill of Rights Education fronting Americans. (800/344-3337). The cost is Collaborative, a joint project of the American Historical Association and Produced under the guidance of $350/series or $79.95/program. You the American Political Science former CBS News president Fred may also want to contact your local Association, with funding from The Friendly, the series is in the tradition PBS affiliate to see when it will Pew Charitable Trusts. of The Constitution: That Delicate rebroadcast the seriesor to encour- Balance and other Friendly-produced age the station to do so. For educa- Teaching notes are organized into series. Led by moderators using the tional use, broadcasts may be taped the following sections: Socratic method of inquiry, the series off-air without charge within PBS Before Viewing the 2'ogram offers features panels of experts engaging in guidelines. teaching suggestions to use prior to lively debate about constitutional, eth- using the program. ical, and social issues arising from a Overview of the Program provides number of hypothetical scenarios. valuable background information, a ABOUT THIS INSTRUCTOR'S summary of the program's content, Participants and special terms. This section can be Program moderators include trial GUIDE duplicated for classroom use. attorney /Court TV anchor John Ford This instructor's guide to That Delicate and Harvard Law professors Arthur Balance II: Our Bill of Rights is While Viewing the Program presents Miller, Charles Nesson, Charles designed to help secondary social activities for student investigation of Ogletree, and Kathleen Sullivan. The studies educators make effective use the topic and related concepts. These many eminent panelists include Yale of each of the five programs in their pages are also formatted to duplicate Law School Professor Stephen Carter; classrooms. It has been prepared by for classroom use. the American Bar Association Special former U.S. Appeals Court Judge After Viewing the Program contains Committee on Youth Education for Robert Bork; U.S. Supreme Court responses to questions and alternative Justice An':onin Scalia; Yale University Citizenship (ABA/YEFC). teaching suggestions to develop the President Benno Schmidt; U.S. These programs will enrich and topic further. Solicitor General Kenneth Starr; New extend units in secondary civics and York Times columnists Anthony Lewis government classes examining the and Anna Quindlen; and ACLU Constitution, Bill of Rights, civil rights President Nadine Strossen. and civil liberties, individual rights, "justice and the law," or contemporary Availability issues. Relevant Supreme Court cases Off-satellite taping rights for the cited in this instructor's guide empha- five-part series cost $125 for ALSS size recent judicial decisions. The pro- Associates (includes many universities, grams
Recommended publications
  • Winter 2009 Licata Lecture: Michael Novak Calls for Conversation About God

    Winter 2009 Licata Lecture: Michael Novak Calls for Conversation About God

    WINTER 2009 LICATA LECTURE: MICHAEL NOVAK CALLS FOR CONVERSATION ABOUT GOD And yet, he told his Pepperdine audi- ence faith is a “real knowledge—a practi- cal kind of knowledge worth trusting one’s life to.” Faith was the sustaining hope of those who struggled against totalitarian- ism in the 20th century. It is the basis for a compassionate society. Rather than con- tradicting the sciences, faith is a firm sup- Victor Davis Hanson port on which reason may flourish. 2009 William E. Simon As men and women continue to ask ques- Distinguished Visiting Professor tions about faith and secularism, people in both camps may become more tolerant of Scholar of classical civilizations, author, each other. Novak echoed the prediction columnist, and historian Victor Davis Hanson of the German philosopher Habermas that is serving as the Spring 2009 William E. we are at the “end of the secular age.” Simon Distinguished Visiting Professor at the Now, “believers and unbelievers will have School of Public Policy. He is teaching the to take each other much more seriously seminar in international relations: Global Rule than they did before.” of Western Civilization? In an era when our public discourse Hanson is a Senior Fellow in Residence in “VIRTUALLY ALL THE WORLD seems to lack civility, Novak foresees “the Classics and Military History at the Hoover end of the period of condescension” and Institution at Stanford University and IS IN THE GRIP OF QUESTIONS “the beginning of a conversation that rec- Professor Emeritus of Classics at California ABOUT GOD,”… ognizes each others’ inherent dignity.” State University, Fresno.
  • Pro-Life Law Professor Stunned by Priest's Refusal of Communion

    Pro-Life Law Professor Stunned by Priest's Refusal of Communion

    Pro-life law professor stunned by priest’s refusal of Communion WASHINGTON – For Pepperdine law professor Douglas Kmiec, a constitutional lawyer who often writes on religion in the public square, the situation had uncomfortable echoes of the last presidential election cycle – a priest was refusing to give Communion to someone on the basis of the man’s support of a candidate. This time, though, the surprised Massgoer turned away by a priest was Prof. Kmiec himself. The former dean of the law school at The Catholic University of America in Washington is an architect of the Reagan administration’s stance against abortion whose pro-life credentials include serving as keynote speaker at the March for Life’s annual Rose Dinner a few years ago. When the priest upbraided the law professor from the pulpit for his endorsement of presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois and then refused to give him Communion, Prof. Kmiec was stunned, he told Catholic News Service June 4 in a telephone interview. (Since 2002 Prof. Kmiec has been a columnist for CNS.) The incident occurred at a Mass preceding the meeting of a Catholic business group in California at which Prof. Kmiec was the featured speaker. Sen. Obama, now the presumptive Democratic nominee for president, has voted to support legal abortion and opposed legislation that would restrict abortion. In endorsing him, Prof. Kmiec has explained that he was drawn to Sen. Obama’s “remarkable ‘love thy neighbor’ style of campaigning, his express aim to transcend partisan divide, and specifically, his appreciation for faith.” At the event, Prof.
  • Educating Artists

    Educating Artists

    DUKE LAW MAGAZINE MAGAZINE LAW DUKE Fall 2006 | Volume 24 Number 2 F all 2006 Educating Artists V olume 24 Number 2 Also: Duke Faculty on the Hill From the Dean Dear Alumni and Friends, University’s Algernon Sydney Sullivan Medal, awarded annually for outstanding commitment to service. This summer, four Duke law faculty members were Graduates Candace Carroll ’74 and Len Simon ’73 called to testify before Congressional committees. have used their talents and resources in support Professor Neil Vidmar appeared before the Senate of civil liberties, women’s rights, and public inter- Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions, est causes; their recent leadership gift to Duke’s to address legislation on medical malpractice suits. Financial Aid Initiative helps Duke continue to attract Professor Madeline Morris testified before the Senate the best students, regardless of their ability to pay, Foreign Relations Committee regarding ratification of and gives them greater flexibility to pursue public the U.S.–U.K. extradition treaty. Professor James Cox interest careers. Other alumni profiled in this issue offered his views on proposed reforms for the conduct who are using their Duke Law education to make a of securities class action litigation to the House difference include Judge Curtis Collier ’74, Chris Kay Committee on Financial Services Subcommittee ’78, Michael Dockterman ’78, Andrea Nelson Meigs on Capital Markets, Insurance, and Government ’94, and Judge Gerald Tjoflat ’57. Sponsored Enterprises. Professor Scott Silliman, I want to thank all alumni, friends, and faculty executive director of the Center on Law, Ethics and who contributed so generously to the Law School in National Security, was on Capitol Hill three times in the past year.
  • From John F. Kennedy's 1960 Campaign Speech to Christian

    From John F. Kennedy's 1960 Campaign Speech to Christian

    NYLS Law Review Vols. 22-63 (1976-2019) Volume 53 Issue 4 Faculty Presentation Day Article 1 January 2008 From John F. Kennedy’s 1960 Campaign Speech to Christian Supremacy: Religion in Modern Presidential Politics Stephen A. Newman New York Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/nyls_law_review Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, Law and Politics Commons, Legal History Commons, Public Law and Legal Theory Commons, and the Religion Law Commons Recommended Citation Stephen A. Newman, From John F. Kennedy’s 1960 Campaign Speech to Christian Supremacy: Religion in Modern Presidential Politics, 53 N.Y.L. SCH. L. REV. 691 (2008-2009). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@NYLS. It has been accepted for inclusion in NYLS Law Review by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@NYLS. VOLUME 53 | 2008/09 STEPHEN A. NEWMAN From John F. Kennedy’s 1960 Campaign Speech to Christian Supremacy: Religion in Modern Presidential Politics ABOUT THE AUTHOR: Stephen A. Newman is a professor of law at New York Law School. The author would like to thank Joseph Molinari of the New York Law School library for his invaluable assistance in the preparation of this article. 691 At a time when we see around the world the violent consequences of the assumption of religious authority by government, Americans may count themselves fortunate: Our regard for constitutional boundaries has protected us from similar travails, while allowing private religious exercise to flourish. The well-known statement that “[w]e are a religious people,” has proved true.
  • The Legitimation of Religious Ideology in the Same-Sex Marriage Debate Tess Burns Union College - Schenectady, NY

    The Legitimation of Religious Ideology in the Same-Sex Marriage Debate Tess Burns Union College - Schenectady, NY

    Union College Union | Digital Works Honors Theses Student Work 6-2013 Disguising Religious Ideas in Secular Clothing: The Legitimation of Religious Ideology in the Same-Sex Marriage Debate Tess Burns Union College - Schenectady, NY Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalworks.union.edu/theses Part of the Gender and Sexuality Commons Recommended Citation Burns, Tess, "Disguising Religious Ideas in Secular Clothing: The Legitimation of Religious Ideology in the Same-Sex Marriage Debate" (2013). Honors Theses. 639. https://digitalworks.union.edu/theses/639 This Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Work at Union | Digital Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of Union | Digital Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Disguising Religious Ideas in Secular Clothing: The Legitimation of Religious Ideology in the Same-Sex Marriage Debate By Tess Burns ******* Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for Graduation in the Department of Political Science UNION COLLEGE March 2013 Table of Contents Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………1 Chapter 1: Constitutional Legitimation...........................................................................................4 Chapter 2: Legal Legitimation- In re Marriage Cases…………………………………………...20 Chapter 3: Political Legitimation- Proposition 8………………………………………………...54 Chapter 4: Analysis ……………………………………………………………………………...74 Chapter 5: Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………85 Bibliography……………………………………………………………………………………..89 1 Introduction Every weekday morning, religiosity fills the halls and classrooms of public schools across the country, as children and teens stand fixed before the flag and recite the Pledge of Allegiance. Its message is printed on our paper currency and has even found its way into our country‟s official motto. It is widely accepted as a part of American life.
  • President Barack Obama Meets with President's Commission on White House Fellowships & Fellows

    President Barack Obama Meets with President's Commission on White House Fellowships & Fellows

    President’s Commission on White House Fellowships · Summer 2014 Newsletter President Barack Obama meets with President’s Commission on White House Fellowships & Fellows PRESIDENT’S COMMISSION — This January, the President’s WHITE HOUSE FELLOWS — President Barack Obama met the Commission on White House Fellowships met with President Barack 2013-2014 White House Fellows in the Roosevelt Room and later, in- Obama during its mid-year meeting. It was the first mid-year meeting vited them to visit the Oval Office. In advance of the meeting, the led by the new Chair, Mary Zients, and we welcomed four new Com- President received summaries of the policy proposals the Fellows had missioners. Though the weather was snowy enough to elicit closing written in their White House Fellowship applications, as well as the federal government offices, most of the Commissioners enthusiastical- issues they work on day to day. This year’s class is working together on ly attended. It was a great opportunity for the Commissioners to hear, several projects areas involving cross-agency collaboration, such as directly from the President, the great value the White House Fellow- Strengthening Communities, Technology and Entrepreneurship, Veter- ship holds in enriching this nation’s leadership. The President engaged ans Issue Areas, and the President’s Management Agenda. the Commissioners in a lively discussion about the future of the pro- The President was briefed on their work to strengthen communities, gram, and one of our veteran Commissioners, whose service has which includes Choice Neighborhoods, Promise Zones, the Task spanned several administrations, noted that the meeting was notably Force on Expanding Community Service, and mostly recently, My unique and inspiring.
  • Suing the Prosecutor Jonathan Van Patten, University of South Dakota School of Law

    Suing the Prosecutor Jonathan Van Patten, University of South Dakota School of Law

    University of South Dakota School of Law From the SelectedWorks of Jonathan Van Patten 2010 Suing the Prosecutor Jonathan Van Patten, University of South Dakota School of Law Available at: https://works.bepress.com/jonathan_vanpatten/3/ SUING THE PROSECUTOR JONATHAN K. VAN PATTENt The prosecutor has more control over life, liberty, and reputation than any other person in America. His discretion is tremendous. He can have citizens investigated and, if he is that kind ofperson, he can have this done to the tune of public statements and veiled or unveiled intimations. Or the prosecutor may choose a more subtle course and simply have a citizen's friends interviewed The prosecutor can order arrests, present cases to the grand jury in secret session, and on the basis of his one-sidedpresentation of the facts, can cause the citizen to be indicted and heldfor trial. He may dismiss the case before trial, in which case the defense never has a chance to be heard. Or he may go on with a public trial. If he obtains a conviction, the prosecutor can still make recommendations as to sentence, as to whether the prisoner should get probation or a suspendedsentence, and after he is put away, at whether he is a fit subject for parole. While the prosecutor at his best is one of the most beneficentforces in our society, when he acts from malice or other base motives, 1 he is one of the worst. I. THE PROBLEM The capacity to do great good is accompanied by a corresponding capacity to do great evil.
  • How America Decides. By: Sullivan, Amy, Time South Pacific (Australia/New Zealand Edition), 08180628, 7/14/2008, Issue 27 Database: Business Source Premier

    How America Decides. By: Sullivan, Amy, Time South Pacific (Australia/New Zealand Edition), 08180628, 7/14/2008, Issue 27 Database: Business Source Premier

    How America Decides. By: Sullivan, Amy, Time South Pacific (Australia/New Zealand edition), 08180628, 7/14/2008, Issue 27 Database: Business Source Premier Section: CAMPAIGN '08 Catholic Voters in 2008. With the economy and Iraq topping voter concerns, abortion has receded into the political background. That puts Catholics up for grabs--and Obama is winning some converts Douglas Kmiec is the kind of Catholic voter the GOP usually doesn't have to think twice about. The Pepperdine law professor and former Reagan Justice Department lawyer (Samuel Alito was an office mate) attends Mass each morning. He has actively opposed abortion for most of his adult life, working with crisis pregnancy centers to persuade women not to undergo the procedure. He is a member of the conservative Federalist Society and occasionally sends a contribution to Focus on the Family. He is also a vocal supporter of Barack Obama. Kmiec made waves in the Catholic world in late March when he endorsed the Democratic candidate. But Kmiec insists that while he still considers himself a Republican, his choice is clear this election year. "I have grave moral doubts about the war, serious doubts about the economic course Republicans have followed over the last seven years, and believe that immigration reforms won't come about by Republican hands," he says. "Senator McCain would not be the strongest advocate for the balance of things that I care about." A new TIME poll of Catholic voters reveals that Kmiec is part of a broader pattern. Although Obama was thought to have a "Catholic problem" during the Democratic primaries, in which Hillary Clinton won a majority of Catholic votes, he has pulled even with John McCain among that constituency--Obama now polls 44% to his GOP opponent's 45%.
  • Divergent Paths and Making a Difference: Reflections on a Journey To, In, and from Valparaiso

    Divergent Paths and Making a Difference: Reflections on a Journey To, In, and from Valparaiso

    Valparaiso University Law Review Volume 53 Number 4 Summer 2019: Tribute to Valparaiso pp.899-943 University Law School (1879-2019) Summer 2019: Tribute to Valparaiso University Law School (1879-2019) Divergent Paths and Making a Difference: Reflections on a Journey to, in, and from Valparaiso Edward McGlynn Gaffney Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/vulr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Edward McGlynn Gaffney, Divergent Paths and Making a Difference: Reflections on a Journey to, in, and from Valparaiso, 53 Val. U. L. Rev. 899 (2019). Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/vulr/vol53/iss4/12 This Essay is brought to you for free and open access by the Valparaiso University Law School at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Valparaiso University Law Review by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. Gaffney: Divergent Paths and Making a Difference: Reflections on a Journey DIVERGENT PATHS AND MAKING A DIFFERENCE: REFLECTIONS ON A JOURNEY TO, IN, AND FROM VALPARAISO Edward McGlynn Gaffney* The Road Not Taken Robert Frost (1920) Two roads diverged in a yellow wood, And sorry I could not travel both And be one traveler, long I stood And looked down one as far as I could To where it bent in the undergrowth; Then took the other, as just as fair, And having perhaps the better claim, Because it was grassy and wanted wear; Though as for that the passing there Had worn them really about the same, And both that morning equally lay In leaves no step had trodden black.
  • School of Public Policy Celebrates 10 Years

    School of Public Policy Celebrates 10 Years

    WINTER 2008 School of Public Policy Celebrates 10 Years n October 2, 2007, alumni, students, and Ten years ago, Pepperdine University launched a new school of public policy. Its founders designed the unique friends of the Pepperdine community school not only to teach students how to evaluate fed- eral government programs, as most policy schools do, gathered at The Beverly Hills Hotel to but also to create agents of change. Graduates would O be capable of performing technical analysis and also prepared with a philosophical, historical, and moral celebrate the School of Public Policy’s 10th anniver- foundation ready to lead. During the event, speakers recognized the school’s achievements in working to sary. After a brief reception, guests convened for an fulfill its bold mission and looked forward to its great potential that lies ahead. elegant dinner during which Dean James R. Wilburn After Pepperdine University President Andrew K. Benton thanked donors, faculty, and others for their and Jack F. Kemp reflected on the school’s great prog- support, Dean James R. Wilburn reviewed several of the school’s 10-year milestones. He highlighted the bud- ress and keynote speaker former Florida Governor ding careers of four School of Public Policy alumni who exemplify what it means to become agents of change. Jeb Bush discussed the attributes of good leaders. While introducing The Honorable Jack F. Kemp, the dean announced that the school will be establishing SPP celebration continued on page 4 ... 1 ... http://publicpolicy.pepperdine.edu DEAN’S MESSAGE Nothing better demonstrates the awesome opportunities of which Beyond the statistics, as much as any other we are now stewards at the School of Public Policy than the announce- recent national leader, Jack Kemp dem- ment at the 10th Anniversary Dinner of the establishment of the onstrates the kind of joyous, welcoming, Jack F.
  • Tending to Potted Plants: the Professional Identity Vacuum in Garcetti V

    Tending to Potted Plants: the Professional Identity Vacuum in Garcetti V

    TENDING TO POTTED PLANTS: THE PROFESSIONAL IDENTITY VACUUM IN GARCETTI V. CEBALLOS Jeffrey W. Stempel* As people my age probably recall, Washington lawyer Brendan Sullivan1 briefly became a celebrity when defending former Reagan White House aide Oliver North before a Senate investigation. Senator Daniel K. Inouye (D-Haw.) was questioning Colonel North when Sullivan objected. “Let the witness object, if he wishes to,” responded Senator Inouye, to which Sullivan famously replied, “Well, sir, I’m not a potted plant. I’m here as the lawyer. That’s my job.”2 The episode was captured on live television and rebroadcast repeatedly, making Sullivan something of a hero to lawyers,3 even moderates and liberals * Doris S. & Theodore B. Lee Professor of Law, William S. Boyd School of Law, University of Nevada Las Vegas. Thanks to Bill Boyd, Doris Lee, Ted Lee, Ann McGinley, Jim Rogers, and John White. Special thanks to David McClure, Jeanne Price, Elizabeth Ellison, Chandler Pohl, and Kathleen Wilde for valuable research assistance. © 2011 Jeffrey W. Stempel 1 Sullivan was a partner in the Washington, D.C. firm Williams & Connolly, a firm with a sophisticated practice and prestigious reputation, particularly in the area of white-collar criminal defense. See Brendan V. Sullivan Jr., Partner, WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP, http:// www.wc.com/bsullivan (last visited Mar. 9, 2012). Founding partner Edward Bennett Wil- liams is perhaps best known as a lawyer for his successful defense of Teamster’s Union head Jimmy Hoffa as well as defense of other public figures charged with crimes or corruption. See Firm Overview, WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP, http://www.wc.com/about.html (last vis- ited Mar.
  • AROUND the LAW SCHOOL Faculty Noles 26 Faculty Notes

    AROUND the LAW SCHOOL Faculty Noles 26 Faculty Notes

    from the dean Having completed my first year Law School publications are published electronically, and our as dean of Duke Law School newest law journal, the Duke Law and Technology Review, is I am increasingly in awe of the published only online. Many faculty are making creative use talents and diversity of our of technology in their classrooms to teach students, and community. Thi year's pre idential electronic communication with students outside of clas up­ election provided an occasion to plement face-to-face exchanges, which continue to be the view these qualitie . Alumnus foundation of a Duke Law education. Some tudents are Frank Hunger '65 was in the interviewing for jobs at out-of-state law firms through tele­ thick of the action as one of conferencing; by u ing the ame technology, some faculty are Al Gore's closest advisers. At the bringing international scholars into their classroom to "sit" arne time, the five weeks follow­ at the seminar table as if they were physically here at Duke. ing the Nov. 7 general election And we are communicating increa ingly with you, our alum­ gave law faculty throughout the ni , online. If you have not already subscribed to Duke Law country, including our own E-News, I hope you will do so by visiting professors William Van Alstyne, Christopher Schroeder, JefT II'IIIIV. lalV. duke. edulalumnile-nelvs. hlml. Powell, Thomas Rowe and Robert Keohane, the opportunity As the Law School makes its investment decisions in to help guide the public through an unsettling constitutional technology, it is important to note that it views technology as moment.