Degas, Cassatt, Pissarro and the Making and Marketing of the Belle Épreuve

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Degas, Cassatt, Pissarro and the Making and Marketing of the Belle Épreuve DEGAS, CASSATT, PISSARRO AND THE MAKING AND MARKETING OF THE BELLE ÉPREUVE A Dissertation Submitted to the Temple University Graduate Board In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY by Whitney Rebecca Kruckenberg December 2014 Examining Committee Members: Dr. Therese Dolan, Advisory Chair, Art History Dr. Ashley West, Art History Dr. Gerald Silk, Art History Dr. Suzanne Singletary, College of Architecture and the Built Environment, Philadelphia University © Copyright 2015 by Whitney Rebecca Kruckenberg All Rights Reserved ii ABSTRACT Focusing on the prints of Edgar Degas, Mary Cassatt and Camille Pissarro, my dissertation explores the development of the belle épreuve , or the fine print, in relation to the Impressionist movement. I firstly consider the commercial tactics of the Impressionists in the face of the evolution of the modern art market and the decreasing relevancy of the Salon and expound on previous scholarship by demonstrating how the Impressionists’ modes of presentation proved especially conducive to showcasing works on paper and how we might apply observations about the speculative nature of the Impressionists’ formal innovations to their prints. Additionally I highlight contemporaneous observations about the heterogeneity of the Impressionist exhibitions that reveal meaningful insights into the nineteenth-century perception of the artists’ relationships to each other, thus questioning the tendency to divide the exhibitors into two groups, the Degas-led realists and the Monet-led colorists. Then I consider the printmaking practices of Degas, Cassatt and Pissarro individually, elucidating how each artist’s attitudes toward work, craft and business manifest formally in a small selection of examples from their printed oeuvres intended for exhibition or publication. Among the core members of the Impressionist group, Degas, Cassatt and Pissarro represented those most enamored with printmaking, even collaborating to create prints for a never-realized journal during the winter and spring of 1879 and 1880. I posit that the artists’ shared compulsions for regular work, fascination with artistic processes, technical flexibility and curiosity and forward-thinking disregard for the traditional hierarchy accorded to media rendered them particularly suited for making rarified, laborious prints. iii A final factor that connects Degas, Cassatt and Pissarro is that all three artists had complicated relationships with the business of art or the need to sell. The dichotomy of art making versus art marketing manifested itself in their prints. While printmaking as a process implies multiple pulls of an original image for commercial reasons, by emphasizing handicraft through idiosyncratic techniques, Degas, Cassatt and Pissarro accentuated the artistry and labor of their prints. Because of the complicatedness of their practices, printmaking did not turn out to be particularly lucrative for any of them, yet the artists’ efforts correlate to a concurrent vogue for intimate exhibitions and works, in terms of both size and technique, and Degas, Cassatt and Pissarro seemingly undertook printmaking with the progressive clientele already established for Impressionism in mind. I thusly connect my discussions of biography and personality to a consideration of Impressionism’s relationship to the changing art market of the late nineteenth century, in which facture, as a record of artistic temperament, became a sought-after commodity for collectors of avant-garde art. Despite superficial differences with regard to their subject matter and approaches, an examination of Degas, Cassatt and Pissarro’s printmaking practices reveals the assumed draftsmen and the colorists of the New Painting as kindred spirits, for whom the how of art-making proved just as significant as the what and for whom marketing was important but making was vital. The artists’ uses of combinations of etching, softground, drypoint and aquatint demonstrates concerns for both design and tone, and each artist accordingly strove to achieve in their prints a balance of personal sensations and decorative artifice. iv For Gretchen v ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Firstly I thank my advisor and dissertation chair Dr. Therese Dolan for over nine years of faith, support and encouragement, personally as well as professionally. Thank you to Dr. Ashley West for serving as my second reader. Your careful reading and extensive feedback truly pushed me to improve as a writer and produce the best document possible at this point. Thank you to Dr. Gerald Silk and Dr. Suzanne Singletary for agreeing join my committee this semester and for your support and encouragement over the years. I am grateful to the entire graduate art history faculty at Temple University for shaping my development as an art historian, in particular Dr. Tracy Cooper for pushing me to think critically and Dr. Marcia Hall for prompting my fascination with finding meaning in the making of works of art. A big thank you as well to Michele Gudknecht for your help with submitting all of the necessary paperwork remotely. I am further grateful to the Graduate School at Temple University for their invaluable financial assistance in the form of a Summer Research Opportunity Program grant. Finally thank you to my husband Caleb Kruckenberg for being a constant source of support throughout my entire graduate career and taking care of our daughter on the weekends, so I could finally finish this thing. vi TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT ....................................................................................................................... iii DEDICATION .................................................................................................................... v ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .................................................................................................. vi LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS .............................................................................................. x CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 1 2. FRAMING THE IMPRESSIONIST PRINT .............................................................. 15 The Impressionist Print and the Evolving Art Market .......................................... 17 Prints in the Early Impressionist Exhibitions: Sources of Inspiration .................. 30 Degas, Cassatt and Pissarro in 1879: Connections ............................................... 40 Le Jour et la Nuit ................................................................................................... 45 Objectives of Le Jour et la Nuit ................................................................. 52 The Character of Le Jour et la Nuit .......................................................... 55 The Project’s Failure ................................................................................ 69 Degas, Cassatt and Pissarro in 1880-86: Further Connections ............................. 73 Conclusion ............................................................................................................. 88 3. DEGAS AND THE AESTHETICS OF PROCESS .................................................... 90 Formation of Attitudes Toward Making and Selling Art ...................................... 95 Working Practice ................................................................................................. 102 Works of Mary Cassatt at the Louvre ................................................................. 107 vii The Famille Cardinal Monotypes ....................................................................... 116 Degas and the Business of Art in the 1880s and 1890s ...................................... 130 1892 Landscapes ................................................................................................. 133 Conclusion ........................................................................................................... 152 4. CASSATT AND THE INDUSTRY OF ARTIFICE ............................................... 155 Formation of Values and Early Artistic Career ................................................... 159 Impressionism and Prints from 1879-80 ............................................................. 168 1890 Drypoints .................................................................................................... 179 The Color Prints .................................................................................................. 188 Late Printmaking Activity ................................................................................... 203 A Few Notes on Cassatt’s Values, as Expressed in Her Late Work ................... 207 Conclusion ........................................................................................................... 210 5. PISSARRO AND THE STRUGGLE FOR UNITY ................................................. 212 Formation of Values and Working Practice ........................................................ 216 Artistic Ideology and Printmaking Practice ........................................................ 223 Ontological Implications of Work ........................................................... 224 Variability ................................................................................................ 228 Unease about the Privatization of Impressionism .................................. 231 Self-conception as an Artist-Worker ......................................................
Recommended publications
  • Downloaded from Brill.Com10/04/2021 08:07:20AM This Is an Open Access Chapter Distributed Under the Terms of the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 License
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR HISTORY, CULTURE AND MODERNITY www.history-culture-modernity.org Published by: Uopen Journals Copyright: © The Author(s). Content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence eISSN: 2213-0624 L’Art pour l’Art or L’Art pour Tous? The Tension Between Artistic Autonomy and Social Engagement in Les Temps Nouveaux, 1896–1903 Laura Prins HCM 4 (1): 92–126 DOI: 10.18352/hcm.505 Abstract Between 1896 and 1903, Jean Grave, editor of the anarchist journal Les Temps Nouveaux, published an artistic album of original prints, with the collaboration of (avant-garde) artists and illustrators. While anar- chist theorists, including Grave, summoned artists to create social art, which had to be didactic and accessible to the working classes, artists wished to emphasize their autonomous position instead. Even though Grave requested ‘absolutely artistic’ prints in the case of this album, artists had difficulties with creating something for him, trying to com- bine their social engagement with their artistic autonomy. The artistic album appears to have become a compromise of the debate between the anarchist theorists and artists with anarchist sympathies. Keywords: anarchism, France, Neo-Impressionism, nineteenth century, original print Introduction While the Neo-Impressionist painter Paul Signac (1863–1935) was preparing for a lecture in 1902, he wrote, ‘Justice in sociology, har- mony in art: same thing’.1 Although Signac never officially published the lecture, his words have frequently been cited by scholars since the 1960s, who claim that they illustrate the widespread modern idea that any revolutionary avant-garde artist automatically was revolutionary in 92 HCM 2016, VOL.
    [Show full text]
  • AN ANALYTICAL STUDY of P. A. RENOIRS' PAINTINGS Iwasttr of Fint Girt
    AN ANALYTICAL STUDY OF P. A. RENOIRS' PAINTINGS DISSERTATION SU8(N4ITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIfJIMENTS FOR THE AWARD OF THE DEGREE OF iWasttr of fint girt (M. F. A.) SABIRA SULTANA '^tj^^^ Under the supervision of 0\AeM'TCVXIIK. Prof. ASifl^ M. RIZVI Dr. (Mrs) SIRTAJ RlZVl S'foervisor Co-Supei visor DEPARTMENT OF FINE ART ALIGARH MUSLIM UNIVERSITY ALIGARH (INDIA) 1997 Z>J 'Z^ i^^ DS28S5 dedicated to- (H^ 'Parnate ALIGARH MUSLIM UNIVERSITY CHAIRMAN DEPARTMENT OF FINE ARTS ALIGARH—202 002 (U.P.), INDIA Dated TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN This is to certify that Sabera Sultana of Master of Fine Art (M.F.A.) has completed her dissertation entitled "AN ANALYTICAL STUDY OF P.A. RENOIR'S PAINTINGS" under the supervision of Prof. Ashfaq M. Rizvi and co-supervision of Dr. (Mrs.) Sirtaj Rizvi. To the best of my knowledge and belief the work is based on the investigations made, data collected and analysed by her and it has- not been submitted in any other university or Institution for any degree. Mrs. SEEMA JAVED Chairperson m4^ &(Mi/H>e& of Ins^tifHUion/, ^^ui'lc/aace' cm^ eri<>ouruae/riefity: A^ teacAer^ and Me^^ertHs^^r^ o^tAcsy (/Mser{xUlafi/ ^rof. £^fH]^ariimyrio/ar^ tAo las/y UCM^ accuiemto &e^£lan&. ^Co Aasy a€€n/ kuid e/KHc^ tO' ^^M^^ me/ c/arin^ tA& ^r€^b<ir<itlan/ of tAosy c/c&&erla6iafi/ and Aasy cAecAe<l (Ao contents' aMd^yormM/atlan&^ arf^U/ed at in/ t/ie/surn^. 0A. Sirta^ ^tlzai/ ^o-Su^benn&o^ of tAcs/ dissertation/ Au&^^UM</e^m^o If^fi^^ oft/us dissertation/, ^anv l>eAo/den/ to tAem/ IhotA^Jrom tAe/ dee^ o^nu^ l^eut^.
    [Show full text]
  • Camille Pissarro Letters to His Son Lucien Ebook, Epub
    CAMILLE PISSARRO LETTERS TO HIS SON LUCIEN PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Lionel Abel | 432 pages | 15 Mar 2007 | Kessinger Publishing | 9781432592974 | English | Whitefish MT, United States Camille Pissarro Letters to His Son Lucien PDF Book People love only the mediocre. He claims that the worst is over. Add to Basket Used Condition: good. We shall see. It features fresh and spontaneous brushwork along with a pleasant analogous color scheme. Thus Pissarro found himself almost completely isolated. As for Durand, it is impossible to separate him from a single penny. It is only by drawing often, drawing everything, drawing incessantly, that one fine day you discover to your surprise that you have rendered something in its true character. I am at the moment reading about the terrible explosion in Victoria Station, 2 and I am beginning to think there is no security for anyone in London now, it would be wiser, my boy, to come home and work with me, — don't you think so? Send me word about the family and about the catastrophe in London. Some, like Cezanne, sought refuge in total solitude, others, like Renoir and Monet, abandoning their comrades, tried to exhibit at the official Salon, still others like Gauguin, hoped to find new inspiration in far off countries, while Pissarro turned to the new generation, anxious to guide it and ready to accept in exchange a share of its ideas. One has only to read such or such a newspaper to be suspected and put on the index. I am going to look at houses at Meaux.
    [Show full text]
  • Oral History Interview with Frederick A. Sweet, 1976 February 13-14
    Oral history interview with Frederick A. Sweet, 1976 February 13-14 Funding for the digital preservation of this interview was provided by a grant from the Save America's Treasures Program of the National Park Service. Contact Information Reference Department Archives of American Art Smithsonian Institution Washington. D.C. 20560 www.aaa.si.edu/askus Transcript Preface The following oral history transcript is the result of a tape-recorded interview with Frederick Sweet on February 13 & 14, 1976. The interview took place in Sargentville, Maine, and was conducted by Robert Brown for the Archives of American Art, Smithsonian Institution. Interview February 13, 1976. ROBERT BROWN: Could you begin, perhaps, by just sketching out a bit of your childhood, and we can pick up from there. FREDERICK SWEET: I spent most of my early childhood in this house. My father, a doctor and tenth generation Rhode Islander, went out to Bisbee, Arizona, a wild-west copper-mining town, as the chief surgeon under the aegis of the Company. My mother always came East at pregnancy and was in New York visiting relatives when my father died very suddenly of cerebral hemorrhage. My mother was seven months pregnant with me. Since I was to be a summer baby, she ended up by coming to this house and being a cook and being a cook and a nurse with her there. The local doctor came and said nothing was going to happen for quite a long time and went off in his horse and buggy. I was promptly delivered by the cook and a nurse.
    [Show full text]
  • The Library of Professor Eric G. Carlson
    The Library of Professor Eric G. Carlson Part II: Rare Illustrated Books and Print Portfolios, ca. 1850-1930 405 titles, in ca. 585 physical volumes The Library of Professor Eric G. Carlson Part I: Art of France from the French Revolution to the End of the Third Republic, 1790-1940. General Reference Works and Monographs on Artists, with a special emphasis on prints and printmaking The art historian and art dealer Eric G. Carlson (1940-2016) was a noted specialist in French and American prints and drawings of the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. A mediaevalist by training (Ph.D. Yale University), and professor at the State University of New York at Purchase from 1978 to 2006, Carlson brought a scholar's acumen to his exploration of lesser-known fields and figures of French art. His library reflects this, being exceptionally rich not just on the major artists of the era, but on the many painters and printmakers who remain to this day little known to the general public. Its coverage of the art of Romanticism, Realism, and Post-Impressionism, with very impressive concentrations on Géricault, Delacroix, Courbet, Degas and Gauguin, among others, is matched by a fascinating depth in the Symbolist and Nabi movements and the School of Pont-Aven, and the myriad Academic and Salon artists, illustrators and caricaturists who flourished between the start of the Second Empire and the end of the Third Republic. The library is unusually complete and sophisticated in the documentation and critical study of all aspects of the period, with rare exhibition and auction catalogues, and scarce early monographs, as well as the latest academic scholarship.
    [Show full text]
  • Monet and American Impressionism
    Harn Museum of Art Educator Resource Monet & Impressionism About the Artist Claude Monet was born in Paris on November 14, 1840. He enjoyed drawing lessons in school and began making and selling caricatures at age seventeen. In 1858, he met landscape artist Eugène Boudin (1824-1898) who introduced him to plein-air (outdoor) painting. During the 1860s, only a few of Monet’s paintings were accepted for exhibition in the prestigious annual exhibitions known as the Salons. This rejection led him to join with other Claude Monet, 1899 artists to form an independent group, later known as the Impressionists. Photo by Nadar During the 1860s and 1870s, Monet developed his technique of using broken, rhythmic brushstrokes of pure color to represent atmosphere, light and visual effects while depicting his immediate surroundings in Paris and nearby villages. During the next decade, his fortune began to improve as a result of a growing base of support from art dealers and collectors, both in Europe and the United States. By the mid-1880s, his paintings began to receive critical “Everyone discusses my acclaim. art and pretends to understand, as if it were By 1890, Monet was financially secure enough to purchase a house in Giverny, a rural town in Normandy. During these later years, Monet began painting the same subject over and over necessary to understand, again at different times of the day or year. These series paintings became some of his most when it is simply famous works and include views of the Siene River, the Thames River in London, Rouen necessary to love.” Cathedral, oat fields, haystacks and water lilies.
    [Show full text]
  • American Prints 1860-1960
    American Prints 1860-1960 from the collection of Matthew Marks American Prints 1860-1960 from the collection of Matthew Marks American Prints 1860-1960 from the collection of Matthew Marks Bennington College, Bennington, Vermont Introduction The 124 prints which make up this exhibition have been selected from my collection of published on the occasion over 800 prints. The works exhibited at Bennington have been confined to those made by ot an exhibitionat the American artists between 1860 and 1960. There are European and contemporary prints in my A catalogue suchasthis and the exhibitionwhich collection but its greatest strengths are in the area of American prints. The dates 1860 to Suzanne Lemberg Usdan Gallery accompaniesit.. is ot necessity a collaborativeeffortand 1960, to which I have chosen to confine myself, echo for the most part my collecting Bennington College would nothave been possible without thesupport and interests. They do, however, seem to me to be a logical choice for the exhibition. lt V.'CIS Bennington \'ermonr 05201 cooperation of many people. around 1860 that American painters first became incerested in making original prints and it April 9 to May9 1985 l am especially graceful to cbe Bennington College Art was about a century later, in the early 1960s, that several large printmaking workshops were Division for their encouragementand interestin this established. An enormous rise in the popularity of printmaking as an arcistic medium, which projectfrom thestart. In particular I wouldlike co we are still experiencing today, occurred at that cime. Copyright © 1985 by MatthewMarks thankRochelle Feinstein. GuyGood... in; andSidney The first American print to enter my collection, the Marsden Hartley lirhograph TilJim, who originally suggestedche topicof theexhibi- (Catalogue #36 was purchased nearly ten years ago.
    [Show full text]
  • James G. Lydon Duquesne University Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
    168 BOOK REVIEWS APRIL and was a major trader in opium smuggled in from the Near East and India. Though some historians have suggested that drug smuggling re- flected racist attitudes, the author concludes rather that it fitted the moral standards of the day. Defense of opium smuggling was defense of free-trade principles. Despite the corruption of government officials which itoccasioned, the Chinese did not have the same antipathy for American traders as they directed toward the British who fought two wars to continue the trade. What Britain attained by war, America gained by diplomacy, without creating hatreds. While they treated Chinese law casually, Americans greatly respected Chinese merchants for their honesty and high ethical standards. Though the outlines of American contacts withAsia have been thoroughly sketched by others, Goldstein makes an important contribution inrelating the social issues connected with the trade to questions of cultural exchange and racist relationships. Some minor carping: the author might have concentrated a bit more attention on the importance of Chinese styles to eighteenth- century Europeans, the era of "Chinoiserie." That Asian culture was in the mode undoubtedly encouraged American interest in the China trade. The archaic spelling used for St. Eustatius (St. Eustacia) was bothersome. Is it George Chinery (illustration opposite p. 36) or George Chinnery (p. 38) ? References to American war vessels as USF Congress and USF Vincennes are confusing. Does the "F" sig- nify frigate ? Ifso, it is a new usage since frigates were ship-rigged ; thus USS serves. Allin all,however, this small study is very well done ;it is well written, very well researched, very nicely and profusely illustrated, very neatly packaged and published.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 1995
    19 9 5 ANNUAL REPORT 1995 Annual Report Copyright © 1996, Board of Trustees, Photographic credits: Details illustrated at section openings: National Gallery of Art. All rights p. 16: photo courtesy of PaceWildenstein p. 5: Alexander Archipenko, Woman Combing Her reserved. Works of art in the National Gallery of Art's collec- Hair, 1915, Ailsa Mellon Bruce Fund, 1971.66.10 tions have been photographed by the department p. 7: Giovanni Domenico Tiepolo, Punchinello's This publication was produced by the of imaging and visual services. Other photographs Farewell to Venice, 1797/1804, Gift of Robert H. and Editors Office, National Gallery of Art, are by: Robert Shelley (pp. 12, 26, 27, 34, 37), Clarice Smith, 1979.76.4 Editor-in-chief, Frances P. Smyth Philip Charles (p. 30), Andrew Krieger (pp. 33, 59, p. 9: Jacques-Louis David, Napoleon in His Study, Editors, Tarn L. Curry, Julie Warnement 107), and William D. Wilson (p. 64). 1812, Samuel H. Kress Collection, 1961.9.15 Editorial assistance, Mariah Seagle Cover: Paul Cezanne, Boy in a Red Waistcoat (detail), p. 13: Giovanni Paolo Pannini, The Interior of the 1888-1890, Collection of Mr. and Mrs. Paul Mellon Pantheon, c. 1740, Samuel H. Kress Collection, Designed by Susan Lehmann, in Honor of the 50th Anniversary of the National 1939.1.24 Washington, DC Gallery of Art, 1995.47.5 p. 53: Jacob Jordaens, Design for a Wall Decoration (recto), 1640-1645, Ailsa Mellon Bruce Fund, Printed by Schneidereith & Sons, Title page: Jean Dubuffet, Le temps presse (Time Is 1875.13.1.a Baltimore, Maryland Running Out), 1950, The Stephen Hahn Family p.
    [Show full text]
  • Fauvism and Expressionism
    Level 3 NCEA Art History Fauvism and Expressionism Workbook Pages Fauvism and Expressionism What this is: Acknowledgements These pages are part of a framework for students studying This workbook was made possible: NCEA Level 3 Art History. It is by no means a definitive • by the suggestions of Art History students at Christchurch document, but a work in progress that is intended to sit Girls’ High School, alongside internet resources and all the other things we • in consultation with Diane Dacre normally do in class. • using the layout and printing skills of Chris Brodrick of Unfortunately, illustrations have had to be taken out in Verve Digital, Christchurch order to ensure that copyright is not infringed. Students could download and print their own images by doing a Google image search. While every attempt has been made to reference sources, many of the resources used in this workbook were assembled How to use it: as teaching notes and their original source has been difficult to All tasks and information are geared to the three external find. Should you become aware of any unacknowledged source, Achievement Standards. I have found that repeated use of the please contact me and I will happily rectify the situation. charts reinforces the skills required for the external standards Sylvia Dixon and gives students confidence in using the language. [email protected] It is up to you how you use what is here. You can print pages off as they are, or use the format idea and the templates to create your own pages. More information: You will find pages on: If you find this useful, you might be interested in the full • the Blaue Reiter workbook.
    [Show full text]
  • 23 League in New York Before They Were Purchased by Granville
    is identical to a photograph taken in 1866 (fig. 12), which includes sev- eral men and a rowboat in the fore- ground. From this we might assume that Eastman, and perhaps Chapman, may have consulted a wartime pho- tograph. His antebellum Sumter is highly idealized, drawn perhaps from an as-yet unidentified print, or extrapolated from maps and plans of the fort—child’s play for a master topographer like Eastman. Coastal Defenses The forts painted by Eastman had once been the state of the art, before rifled artillery rendered masonry Fig. 11. Seth Eastman, Fort Sumter, South Carolina, After the War, 1870–1875. obsolete, as in the bombardment of Fort Sumter in 1861 and the capture of Fort Pulaski one year later. By 1867, when the construction of new Third System fortifications ceased, more than 40 citadels defended Amer- ican coastal waters.12 Most of East- man’s forts were constructed under the Third System, but few of them saw action during the Civil War. A number served as military prisons. As commandant of Fort Mifflin on the Delaware River from November 1864 to August 1865, Col. Eastman would have visited Fort Delaware on Pea Patch Island, located in the river channel between Wilmington and New Castle, Delaware. Channel-dredging had dumped tons of spoil at the northern end of the island, land upon which a miserable prison-pen housed enlisted Confederate pris- oners of war. Their officers were Fig. 12. It appears that Eastman used this George N. Barnard photograph, Fort quartered within the fort in relative Sumter in April, 1865, as the source for his painting.
    [Show full text]
  • My Dearest Watercolourists, I Hope You Are Doing Well. I Could Not Miss The
    My dearest watercolourists, I hope you are doing well. I could not miss the occasion to share some beautiful winter landscapes with you, so for this week’s newsletter we will look at Pissarro’s work! One of the Impressionist artists mentioned two weeks ago, Camille Pissarro was a Danish-French Impressionist and Neo-Impressionist painter born on the island of St Thomas (now in the US Virgin Islands, but then in the Danish West Indies). Pissarro was the oldest of the Impressionist group and a figure younger artists were looking up to. For example, artist Paul Cézanne said "he was a father for me. A man to consult and a little like the good Lord". What is revolutionary about Pissarro’s work is his profound interest in illustrating realist portraits of peasants and workers, the common folk. He decided to approach his subjects without artificial embellishments, in their common setting. For today I chose only wintery landscapes, but I highly encourage you to explore more of Pissarro’s work. Simply google ‘Camille Pissarro- paining ’ and enjoy! You will not be disappointed. Let’s have a look! Below there are three landscapes. The first one is probably the most interesting. It is a cityscape with a very unusual perspective and viewpoint. It shows what would be a fairly high-class part of the city- The Avenue de L'Opera, Paris. However, the moment chosen, the morning, as well as the perspective present a very different demography. What do you think about these choices? The next two images are winter countryside landscapes inhabited by solitary peasant figures.
    [Show full text]