DOCSLIB.ORG

CNZP Streamlined JMT Reductions.Docx

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CNZP Streamlined JMT Reductions.Docx Symposium on the 2015 Synod on the Family Conscience and the Synod: An Evolving Quaestio Disputata James T. Bretzke, S.J. ERTAINLY UNDER THE FRANCIS PAPACY our Roman teapot is filled to the brim with leaves clamoring to be read and deciphered—too many in fact for even a cursory overview. C Instead I would like to articulate one hypothesis and then probe it by looking at just a couple of the tea-leaves that have collected around contrasting views on the relationship of conscience and Church teaching. First the hypothesis: I believe that a helpful way to read the tea- leaves is by considering them in terms of a major cultural paradigm shift taking place in the Church.1 This shift began with the run-up to Vatican II and we’ve been witnessing something of a protracted tug- of-war ever since. Clearly in the Franciscan papacy the energy has again shifted and this in turn has occasioned a considerable amount of push-back from forces that once enjoyed great influence in the previ- ous two pontificates. One core tension revolves around various understandings of con- science, and especially in connection to its relationship to the Church’s magisterium. For example, in the Instrumentum laboris for the Octo- ber 2015 Synod, the paragraphs on conscience, especially no. 137, came in for considerable critical attention before the Synod opened. The problematic paragraph suggested that couples “under the regular guidance of a competent spiritual guide… [could] make choices which are humanly fulfilling and ones which conform to God’s will” and that these might strike a balance between the “objective moral norm which does not permit considering the act of generation a reality to be de- 1 For a fuller treatment of this paradigm shift in the papacy of Pope Francis, see James T. Bretzke, S.J., “The Francis Effect on the Munus Docendi and Gubernandi of the Church,” Horizons 42, no. 2 (December 2015): 368-403; and “Re-reading the Roman Tea-leaves: The Francis Effect on the Synods on the Family in the Jubilee Year of Mercy,” www.bc.edu/schools/stm/ed events/CampusEvents/PastLectures/2015/11-4- 2015.html. 168 James T. Bretzke, S.J. cided arbitrarily” and seeing that “moral norm as an insupportable bur- den and unresponsive to a person’s needs and resources.” 2 The possi- bility of a married couple discerning a choice that might not be in full objective material conformity with Humanae vitae no. 14 certainly raised more than a few ecclesial eyebrows.3 In discussion during the circuli minores some Relatios called for it to be dropped entirely or modified extensively.4 However, instead of disappearing, conscience more than doubled its appearance in the 2015 Synod Final Report (FR), going from three to seven instances. Of particular note are three instances on Generative Responsibility which actually seem to expand the treatment in the In- strumentum laboris, no. 137: The choice of responsible parenthood presupposes the formation of conscience, which is “the most secret core and sanctuary of a person. There each one is alone with God, whose voice echoes in the depths of the heart” (Gaudium et spes, 16). The more the couple tries to listen in their conscience to God and his commandments (cf. Rom 2:15), and are accompanied spiritually, the more their decision will be inti- mately free from a subjective arbitrariness and the adaptation to peo- ple’s conduct where they live. For the sake of this dignity of con- science, the Church strongly rejects the forced State intervention in favour of contraception, sterilization and even abortion.5 [emphasis added] The final two occurrences come in one of the three most disputed pas- sages of the FR, namely in no. 85, which mustered the two-thirds ma- jority by a single vote and included some, but not all, of a similar par- agraph in Pope John Paul II’s 1981 Familiaris consortio (no. 84). No doubt the sentence in FR no. 85 which caused the most consternation vis-à-vis conscience is the following: Therefore, while supporting a general rule, it is necessary to recognize that responsibility with respect to certain actions or decisions is not the same in all cases. Pastoral discernment, while taking into account a person’s properly formed conscience, must take responsibility for 2 2015 Synod Instrumentum Laboris, no. 137, www.vatican.va/roman_curia/synod/ documents/rc_synod_doc_20150623_instrumentum-xiv-assembly_en.html. 3 See, for example, David S. Crawford and Stephan Kampowski, “An Appeal Re- calling the Teaching of Humanae Vitae (and Veritatis Splendor),” First Things (Sep- tember 9, 2015), www.firstthings.com/web-exclusives/2015/09/ which was endorsed by a considerable number of theologians and philosophers, including some consultors for the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. 4 See the summary of some of these Relatios offered by Edward Pentin in the National Catholic Register, www.ncregister.com/daily-news/reports-of-the-circoli-minori/. 5 2015 Synod Final Report, no. 63, www.vatican.va/roman_curia/synod/documents/ rc_synod_doc_20151026_relazione-finale-xiv-assemblea_en.html. Conscience and the Synod 169 these situations. Even the consequences of actions taken are not nec- essarily the same in all cases. [emphasis added] While at this writing we are still awaiting the promised Post-Synodal Apostolic Exhortation, the ecclesial teapot continues to bubble, and we note a number of contrasting views of “conscience” as articulated by various documents from the magisterium and interpretation by bishops and theologians. Among these I find the episcopal ping-pong between a suffragan bishop and his metropolitan particularly support- ive of my overall hypothesis on the paradigm shift regarding con- science. Bishop Thomas Paprocki expresses an opinion that the only “rightly-formed” conscience could be that in full alignment with Church teaching, and thus there could never be a valid instance of al- lowing an individual to “follow one’s conscience” if it seemed to de- viate with Church teaching. Paprocki articulates this position in re- sponse to his Metropolitan Archbishop Blase Cupich’s stated position that one must respect an individual’s decision made in conscience, even if that should seem to be in objective non-compliance with offi- cial Church teaching. While Bishop Paprocki does not directly contra- dict his Metropolitan, he does respond to a December 20, 2015 Letter to the Editor from John Freml who had referenced Archbishop Cupich’s position respecting conscience-based decisions of individu- als who may nevertheless be in irregular unions.6 In his response Bishop Paprocki takes issue with a number of Freml’s positions: First off, the Bishop states that genuine formation of a good conscience “means that they will recognize and repent of their sins, resolve to reform their lives in accord with Christ’s teach- ings and receive absolution in the Sacrament of Reconciliation before receiving Holy Communion.”7 Rather than turn to the Catechism, Conciliar documents such as Gaudium et spes and Thomas Aquinas, Paprocki builds his position on his interpretation of Canons 915 and 916. Speaking of Canon 916, His Excellency states: “According to the canon law of the Catholic Church, Canon 916 directs those “conscious of grave sin” to refrain from receiving Holy Communion. Individuals must form their con- sciences in accord with Church teaching. Conscience assesses how a 6 For a report of Archbishop Cupich’s interview remarks on conscience published De- cember 20, 2015, see www.sj-r.com/article/20151220/OPINION/151229997/0/. 7 Bishop Thomas John Paprocki, “‘Conscience’ a complicated matter at Commun- ion,” The State Journal-Register (2015), www.sj-r.com/article/20151226/ OPIN- ION/151229763. Bishop Paprocki’s column, though, was given wide publication on the internet, often with titles such as this from ChurchMilitant.com: “Springfield Bishop Rebukes Chicago Abp. Blase Cupich & His False Notion of ‘Conscience’,” www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/springfield-bishop-rebukes-abp.-blase- cupich-his-notion-of-conscience.. 170 James T. Bretzke, S.J. person’s concrete action in a given situation accords with Church teaching—not to determine whether one agrees with or accepts Church teaching in the first place.”8 However, the actual text of Canon 916 itself leaves out Bishop Pap- rocki’s added proviso about the requirement that conscience be in con- formity with Church teaching.9 Building on his canonical interpreta- tion Bishop Paprocki indicates that in the external forum there should be no opportunity for someone in an irregular union from receiving Communion since Canon 915 excludes “those who ‘obstinately persist in manifest grave sin’. In Catholic tradition, attempting marriage fol- lowing a civil divorce without a declaration of nullity and entering a ‘same-sex marriage’ are examples of the kind of gravely wrong public action that require ministers not to admit to Holy Communion those who ‘obstinately persist in manifest grave sin’ under Canon 915.”10 Similarly, as with Canon 916, Bishop Paprocki’s additional “rider” is not actually contained in the text itself, which reads in its entirety: “Can. 915 Those who have been excommunicated or interdicted after the imposition or declaration of the penalty and others obstinately per- severing in manifest grave sin are not to be admitted to Holy Com- munion.” So to include all of those in irregular unions of whatever type would seem to involve a finding that they are “obstinately persevering in manifest grave sin” and here we have a wrinkle that Bishop Pap- rocki himself seems to acknowledge since “Canon 915, however, in contrast with Canon 916, directs ministers of Holy Communion to withhold the Sacrament, not from ‘sinners’ per se (since no one can read the state of another person’s soul)….”11 In a quite similar vein Archdiocese of Detroit’s noted seminary Professor of Canon Law, Dr.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Restored Order Receiving the Sacraments of Initiation in Their Original Order
    Restored Order Receiving the Sacraments of Initiation in their original order Baptism Confirmation Eucharist Restored Order Recently Bishop Thomas Paprocki promulgated a new norm • restoring of the original order of the Sacraments of Initiation. • “Looking at the question of the sequence and age for the reception of the Sacraments of Initiation, the (Diocesan) Synod voted that the Sacraments of Christian Initiation shall be offered in the proper sequence (Baptism, Confirmation and Eucharist) • for children as well as adults. Restored Order • To promote discipleship and stewardship as a way of life from an early age, • those who are baptized as infants are to receive the Sacraments of Confirmation and Eucharist at about the age of reason, which in this diocese will normally be in their third grade of elementary school, • after they have properly prepared and have made sacramental confession.” (Homily from the Closing of the Fourth Diocesan Synod, November 26, 2017) What is the historical and theological vision for Christian Initiation? • In the early Church the sacraments of initiation were three: Baptism, Confirmation and Eucharist. • They were celebrated together in a single rite, with a bishop as celebrant. • This was the practice of the Roman Rite up until the 5th or 6th century when bishops could no longer be present at all baptisms, leading to a time of separation between baptism and confirmation. • At first the time of separation was short, but as time went on, the delay for the bishop to arrive grew. • Still the Church celebrated the sacraments in the order of Baptism, Confirmation and Eucharist until last century.
    [Show full text]
  • Encyclical Letter Humanae Vitae in the Course of Time
    Philosophy and Canon Law vol. 5 (2019), pp. 23–34 ISSN 2451-2141 https://doi.org/10.31261/PaCL.2019.05.02 Marek Petro University of Prešov in Prešov, Slovakia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2024-9981 Encyclical Letter Humanae Vitae in the Course of Time Abst ract: The content of Humanae Vitae (1968) caused an ongoing debate all over the world. It has also stirred up factual crisis of moral theology. The crisis has caused subjectivity of morality and this has caused further crisis. The most serious feature of the crisis seems to be an effort to accept moral pluralism inside the Catholic Church. The renewal of moral theology the Second Vatican Council talked about has been left blocked. A couple of years after the Second Vatican Council, but before publishing Humanae Vitae, warning of St. Paul VI calls for continuity with moral tradition as a criterion for the autonomy of Catholic moral theology. In spite of much op- position of some bishops, theologians, and laypeople, the teaching of the encyclical letter has priceless value. The truth about marital love and value of life is in its center. It is proclaimed in an overview of the teaching of the Catholic Church from Humanae Vitae to Evangelium Vitae. In its nature, family is invited to fullness of love and, at the same time, it is the heart of civilization of love. Unfortunately, current family has found itself between the two civilizations—civilization of love on the one hand and civilization of death and uncontrolled pleasure on the other. The teaching of the encyclical Humanae Vitae is a constant guide when protecting true marital love and family in the course of time.
    [Show full text]
  • Morality of Contraceptives Based on When Personhood Begins Joella R
    Cedarville University DigitalCommons@Cedarville Student Papers Honors Program Fall 2013 Morality of Contraceptives Based on When Personhood Begins Joella R. Gerber Cedarville University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/ honors_program_papers Part of the Bioethics and Medical Ethics Commons, and the Religion Commons Recommended Citation Gerber, Joella R., "Morality of Contraceptives Based on When Personhood Begins" (2013). Student Papers. 2. http://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/honors_program_papers/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@Cedarville, a service of the Centennial Library. It has been accepted for inclusion in Student Papers by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Cedarville. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Morality of Contraceptives Based on When Personhood Begins Joella Gerber The use of contraceptives has been controversial in recent days, especially concerning the government mandate for insurance and health care companies to financially cover contraceptives for their policy holders. The term ‘contraceptive’ includes anything that deliberately prevents conception or impregnation, including condoms, birth control pills, intrauterine methods, and barrier methods (Miriam-Webster, 2013). The morality of contraception largely hinges on the belief of when personhood begins. Throughout history, religious, scientific, and philosophical ideas surrounding the beginning of personhood have created dissention about the moment when a human being becomes a person. This debate has been especially important among Christians, and opposing views have further separated Roman Catholics and Protestant Evangelicals. One view of personhood, largely endorsed by the Roman Catholic magisterium, is that personhood begins at the moment when God thinks of the being.
    [Show full text]
  • Humanae Vitae (1968), by Pope Paul VI [1]
    Published on The Embryo Project Encyclopedia (https://embryo.asu.edu) Humanae Vitae (1968), by Pope Paul VI [1] By: Brind'Amour, Katherine Garcia, Benjamin Keywords: Catholicism [2] Popes [3] Reproductive rights [4] The “Humanae Vitae,” meaning “Of Human Life” and subtitled “On the Regulation of Birth,” was an encyclical promulgated in Rome, Italy, on 25 July 1968 by Pope Paul VI [6]. This encyclical defended and reiterated the Roman Catholic Church’s stance on family planning [7] and reproductive issues such as abortion [8], sterilization [9], and contraception [10]. The document continues to have a controversial reputation today, as its statements regarding birth control [11] strike many Catholics as unreasonable. First, the encyclical acknowledges that there are often circumstances in which a married couple would desire to limit the size of their family. In a thorough discussion of sexual relationships, Pope Paul VI [6] writes that sex is primarily intended to produce offspring but is welcome in marriage even when that is not its immediate aim. The document warns, however, that the sexual act must remain intact for the purpose of procreation [12] and that the “generative process” should never be intentionally interrupted, as doing so would go against the Natural Law and the Roman Catholic Church’s teachings. The encyclical goes on to explain how practicing artificial contraception [10] can negatively affect the balance of life and God’s plan for all people. Among the consequences listed are claims that practicing artificial contraception [10] lowers moral standards and allows men to view women simply as a means of satisfying their own personal sexual desires.
    [Show full text]
  • Humanae Vitae by Greg Witherow
    Humanae Vitae By Greg Witherow The year 1960 was pivotal for contraception. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration had just approved the birth control pill for use by the American public. This act culminated years of labor by Margaret Sanger, the founder of the American birth control movement and Planned Parenthood, who helped provide funding in its development1. The Pill was by no means the first contraceptive. But with its ease and near 100% effectiveness it brought contraception into the mainstream. Yet initially, contraceptives were not universally legal in the United States. It was not until the U.S. Supreme Court struck down a Connecticut law outlawing contraception2 in 1965 and a subsequent 1972 case3 (giving the unmarried access to contraception) that contraceptives were universally available in the United States4. With the ensuing use of contraception, dramatic changes were unleashed in Western civilization, often in ways unanticipated by the public. For the first time in the history of mankind, sexual intercourse had been effectively decoupled from pro creation. The social implications were immense. Women saw the Pill as Liberation. They could now control their destiny and the natural workings of their bodies. No longer would they be burdened with children they didn’t choose to have. Men instinctively saw something different; for them the Age of Unfettered Sex was about to dawn5. No longer would sex have consequences that required additional social obligations. And in the wake of contraception loomed the abortion and pornography industries. While always existing at the periphery, these trades were now moved to the threshold of the mainstream6, with contraception as the necessary stepping-stone.
    [Show full text]
  • The Supreme Gift: the Gift of Life Commemorating the 50Th Anniversary of Pope Blessed Paul VI’S Encyclical Letter: Humanae Vitae a Pastoral Letter from Bishop John O
    GETTY IMAGES The Supreme Gift: The Gift of Life Commemorating the 50th Anniversary of Pope Blessed Paul VI’s Encyclical Letter: HUMANAE VITAE A Pastoral Letter from Bishop John O. Barres to the People of God of the Diocese of Rockville Centre A Pastoral Letter to theJuly people 25, of the2018 Diocese of Rockville Centre 1 The Supreme Gift: The Gift of Life Commemorating the 50th Anniversary of Pope Blessed Paul VI’s Encyclical Letter: HUMANAE VITAE My dear Brothers and I. The Historical Context of Humanae Vitae Sisters in Christ: During the papacy of Pope St. John XXIII (1958 to 1963), On October 14, 2018, one of the great issues confronting the Church and the Pope Francis will canonize his modern world was the question of artificial contraception. predecessor, Pope Blessed Paul VI. The Catholic Church had always, throughout her history I write you this pastoral letter from the earliest times, taught that the use of contraception on the occasion of the 50th was morally wrong. But in 1960 the first oral contraceptive anniversary of the Encyclical pill was developed. The question arose as to whether this Letter Humanae Vitae, “On Human form of contraception, being different than previous forms, Life” – authored by this soon-to- might be morally permissible. be-canonized saint. But this teaching of the late Holy So, in 1963, the Holy Father established “The Pontifical Father is in many ways more important today than at any Commission for the Study of Problems of the Family, time before. It reveals how a holy pope, under terrible Population and Birth Rate,”1 in recognition that more and pressure to change the long-standing moral teaching of more Catholics were asking whether the new drugs might the Church, had the courage, strength and love to teach be used in keeping with the moral teachings of the Church.
    [Show full text]
  • The Holy See
    The Holy See IOANNES PAULUS PP. II EVANGELIUM VITAE To the Bishops Priests and Deacons Men and Women religious lay Faithful and all People of Good Will on the Value and Inviolability of Human Life INTRODUCTION 1. The Gospel of life is at the heart of Jesus' message. Lovingly received day after day by the Church, it is to be preached with dauntless fidelity as "good news" to the people of every age and culture. At the dawn of salvation, it is the Birth of a Child which is proclaimed as joyful news: "I bring you good news of a great joy which will come to all the people; for to you is born this day in the city of David a Saviour, who is Christ the Lord" (Lk 2:10-11). The source of this "great joy" is the Birth of the Saviour; but Christmas also reveals the full meaning of every human birth, and the joy which accompanies the Birth of the Messiah is thus seen to be the foundation and fulfilment of joy at every child born into the world (cf. Jn 16:21). When he presents the heart of his redemptive mission, Jesus says: "I came that they may have life, and have it abundantly" (Jn 10:10). In truth, he is referring to that "new" and "eternal" life 2 which consists in communion with the Father, to which every person is freely called in the Son by the power of the Sanctifying Spirit. It is precisely in this "life" that all the aspects and stages of human life achieve their full significance.
    [Show full text]
  • Springfield Diocese
    Clerical Abuse and Misconduct: Diocese of Springfield in Illinois by Gene Thomas Gomulka A former North American College (NAC) seminarian, Anthony Gorgia, filed an explosive lawsuit against Cardinal Timothy Dolan and NAC officials, including the NAC rector and Diocese of Springfield in Illinois priest, Father Peter Harman. Filled with graphic details, the lawsuit alleges that Gorgia was reprised against and coerced into leaving seminary after he received word from other NAC seminarians about inappropriate physical behavior toward vulnerable seminarians by the NAC vice-rector, Washington Archdiocese priest, Father Adam Park, which Gorgia himself witnessed. The lawsuit maintains that Gorgia was perceived as a threat to revealing the depth of the secret homosexual lifestyles of NAC officials, including Harman. As such, according to the lawsuit, Harman and Dolan used entirely false and easily disprovable claims as a pretext to extract Gorgia from the seminary without any justification. A priest with decades of seminary experience attested to the fact that no seminarian is discontinued just three months into the academic year after having just received the faculty’s unanimous vote to advance to that year, as Gorgia did, or having a stellar and exemplary record, as Gorgia had, on the basis of absurd reasons. If a seminarian is discontinued in the middle of an academic year, it is either because he has discerned he is not called to priesthood, or because he committed a serious offense. Insofar as neither of these conditions apply to Gorgia, the real motives of Harman, Dolan, and complicit clerics’ actions demand explanation. To understand why Dolan had such an intense interest in covering up misconduct at the expense of causing harm to Gorgia, one needs to consider the ordeal Father Ryszard Biernat suffered in the Diocese of Buffalo.
    [Show full text]
  • On Human Life Humanae Vitae
    ON HUMAN LIFE HUMANAE VITAE Pope Paul VI Foreword by Mary Eberstadt Afterword by James Hitchcock Postscript by Jennifer Fulwiler IGNATIUS PRESS AUGUSTINE INSTITUTE San Francisco Greenwood Village, CO CONTENTS Foreword: The Vindication of Humanae Vitae, byMaryEberstadt................. 7 HUMANAEVITAE................ 45 AHistoricalAfterword, byJamesHitchcock............... 87 Postscript: We’re Finally Ready for Humanae Vitae,byJenniferFulwiler......... 103 ForFurtherReading............... 109 FOREWORD The Vindication of Humanae Vitae by Mary Eberstadt Of all the paradoxical fallout from the Pill, per- haps the least understood today is this: the most unfashionable, unwanted, and ubiquitously de- plored moral teaching on earth is also the most thoroughly vindicated by the accumulation of secular, empirical, post-revolutionary fact. The document in question is of course Hu- manae Vitae, the encyclical letter of Pope Paul VI on the subject of the regulation of birth, pub- lished on July 25, 1968.Now,thatHumanae Vitae and related Catholic teachings about sex- ual morality are laughingstocks in all the best places is not exactly news. Even among believ- ers, everybody grasps that this is one doctrine the world loves to hate. Routine secular reporting 7 On Human Life on the Church rarely fails to mention the teach- ings of Humanae Vitae, usually alongside adjec- tives like ‘‘divisive’’ and ‘‘controversial’’ and ‘‘outdated’’. In fact, if there’s anything on earth that unites the Church’s adversaries, the teaching against contraception is probably it. To many people, both today and when the en- cyclical was promulgated, the notion simply de- fies understanding. Consenting adults, told not to use birth control? Preposterous. Third World parents deprived access to contraception and abortion? Positively criminal.
    [Show full text]
  • Evangelium Vitae: Some Highlights John J
    The Linacre Quarterly Volume 64 | Number 1 Article 2 February 1997 Evangelium Vitae: Some Highlights John J. Rock Follow this and additional works at: http://epublications.marquette.edu/lnq Recommended Citation Rock, John J. (1997) "Evangelium Vitae: Some Highlights," The Linacre Quarterly: Vol. 64: No. 1, Article 2. Available at: http://epublications.marquette.edu/lnq/vol64/iss1/2 Evangelium Vitae: Some Highlights by John J. Rock, S.J. The author teaches Theology at Wheeling Jesuit University. William Butler Yeats' poem "The Second Coming" was on the syllabus of many a high school and college English literature course. The student, though perhaps not quite entirely sure of its meaning due to youth and insecure grasp of history, nonetheless sensed its ominous profoundity and maybe even found his blood chilling a bit as he read the verse: ... Turning and turning in the widening gyre The falcon cannot hear the falconer. Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold; Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world, The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere The ceremony of innocence is drowned. The best lack of all conviction while the worst are full of passionate intensity. The title "The Second Coming" suggests the final return of Christ at the end of time, but the events described are the penultimate events depicted in the Book of the Apocalypse, that is, the coming of the anti-Christ and evil's final campaign to wrest creation from the Creator. The poem written in 1923 shortly after the First World War and the Russian Revolution describes the brave new atheistic or secular age.
    [Show full text]
  • Exorcist Shortage Has U.S. Bishops Trying to Recruit More
    Exorcist shortage has U.S. bishops trying to recruit more A crucifix and holy water are among the religious items used in the rite of exorcism.Nancy Wiechec, Catholic News Service U.S. bishops are looking for a few good men to become exorcists. In response to growing interest in the rite of exorcism and a shortage of trained exorcists nationwide, the bishops are sponsoring a two-day conference prior to their 2010 fall general assembly Nov. 15-18 in Baltimore. Interest in the Nov. 12-13 Conference on the Liturgical and Pastoral Practice of Exorcism proved great. When registration closed Nov. 1, 56 bishops and 66 priests had signed up. Bishop Thomas Paprocki of Springfield, Ill., chairman of the bishops’ Committee on Canonical Affairs and Church Governance, told Catholic News Service he knows of perhaps five or six exorcists in the United States. They are overwhelmed with requests to perform the rite, he said. “Actually, each diocese should have its own resource (person),” Paprocki said. Only those priests who get permission from their bishops can perform an exorcism after proper training. At Baptism, the rite of exorcism is performed in a simple form. A solemn or major exorcism, according to the Catechism of the Catholic Church, “is directed at the expulsion of demons or to the liberation from demonic possession through the spiritual authority which Jesus entrusted in his Church.” Scripture contains several examples of Jesus casting out evil spirits from people. “We don’t think that’s poetic metaphor,” Paprocki said. Despite the many requests for an exorcism, the actual number of people possessed by a demon is far fewer than people fear, Paprocki said.
    [Show full text]
  • Contraception, Morning After Pill, IVF, and Reproductive Technology
    Contraception, Morning After Pill, IVF, and Reproductive Technology Periodic continence, that is, the methods of birth regulation based on self-observation and the use of infertile periods, is in conformity with the objective criteria of morality. These methods respect the bodies of the spouses, encourage tenderness between them, and favor the education of an authentic freedom. In contrast, "every action which, whether in anticipation of the conjugal act, or in its accomplishment, or in the development of its natural consequences, proposes, whether as an end or as a means, to render procreation impossible" is intrinsically evil: Thus the innate language that expresses the total reciprocal self-giving of husband and wife is overlaid, through contraception, by an objectively contradictory language, namely, that of not giving oneself totally to the other. This leads not only to a positive refusal to be open to life but also to a falsification of the inner truth of conjugal love, which is called upon to give itself in personal totality. The difference, both anthropological and moral, between contraception and recourse to the rhythm of the cycle . involves in the final analysis two irreconcilable concepts of the human person and of human sexuality. CCC 2370. Techniques that entail the dissociation of husband and wife, by the intrusion of a person other than the couple (donation of sperm or ovum, surrogate uterus), are gravely immoral. These techniques (heterologous artificial insemination and fertilization) infringe the child's right to be born of a father and mother known to him and bound to each other by marriage. They betray the spouses' "right to become a father and a mother only through each other." Techniques involving only the married couple (homologous artificial insemination and fertilization) are perhaps less reprehensible, yet remain morally unacceptable.
    [Show full text]