What Type of Organizational Structure Is Best for You?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

What Type of Organizational Structure Is Best for You? YOUR STRUCTURE • What type of organizational structure is best for you? • How much formality do you want? • Who will serve as your fiscal agent? • Do you have legal protection for your byway members? Making the Grassroots Grow: Building and Maintaining Effective Byway Organizations YOUR STRUCTURE Various types of organizational structures have evolved to meet the needs of many different byways. For example, the byway organization for the Ashley River Road (South Carolina) grew out of local efforts to preserve the region’s historic and scenic character. In 1995, the National Trust for Historic Preservation listed the Ashley River Historic District as one of the “Most Endangered Places.” A community workshop held in 1996 chartered the Ashley River Conservation Coalition (ARCC), a private nonprofit corporation, to design and coordinate a community-based comprehensive growth management plan for this threatened area. ARCC prepared the corridor management plan and nomination for the 2000 designation of the Ashley River Road as a National Scenic Byway. Visitors can tour Drayton Hall, the oldest preserved plantation house in America that is open to the public. YOUR STRUCTURE: YOUR Types of Organizational Structures: Several Models Work for Byways hat do scenic byways have in common with lemonade STRUCTURES TYPES OF ORGANIZATIONAL W stands and Egyptian pyramids? Each requires some level of organization. Of course, most eight-year-olds can Keep the get a roadside beverage enterprise up and running in a matter TIP! Law on of hours while the pyramids took lifetimes to create. Still, Your Side the key is finding the structure that serves you without getting in your way. The same can be said of assembling a byway organization. As you evaluate your organization’s structure Fortunately, you don’t need to study lemonade stands or and recruit volunteers, it is pyramids to successfully create a byway organization. In fact, very important to inform there are several basic organizational models that can be volunteers of any legal risk personalized to fit most byway situations. Each model has its own characteristics, strengths and limitations. or liability they assume in associating with your Choosing the Right Organization for You organization and the actions There are many valid forms of organization for byways. In fact, they should take to avoid there may be more than one structure that will meet your liability. (See Appendix B.) needs. The key is to pick the one that best serves your interests and best reflects the group that you have gathered. This guide introduces basic organizational structures. You may find that your byway is best served by more than one of these basic models. When it comes to byway organizations, there are very few “purebreds.” Most groups are “hybrids;” they have selected a mix of organizational pieces that fit their specific needs. In addition, many groups find that their organizations evolve and change over time. As the needs of the byway change, an organization recreates itself to meet new and different corridor needs. Select a structure that meets your current needs and understand that it is a “work in progress.” Every so often, it’s a good idea to evaluate your organizational structure to make sure it is working for you. Making the Grassroots Grow: Building and Maintaining Effective Byway Organizations 65 YOUR STRUCTURE: YOUR Common Structures Organizational Models TYPES OF ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURES TYPES OF ORGANIZATIONAL A. Citizen Group D. Government Agency as Lead The simplest model is the citizen’s group, Another fairly simple format is when a a collection of community members or single government entity agrees to be concerned citizens who gather together the lead agency for the group, allowing to accomplish a goal. the group to utilize its legal status and B. Nonprofit Organization administrative structure. An individual organization, usually a E. Joint Powers Entity nonprofit corporation, is also made An organization made up of governments up of private citizens, though the act that can include public entities such as of becoming a legal organization municipalities, the USDA Forest Service and carries specific requirements, benefits the State Department of Transportation. and obligations. F.Customized Structure C. Cooperative Agreement An organizational hybrid created to meet This is an agreement between organizations unique byway needs. interested in working together in a relatively formal manner. 66 Making the Grassroots Grow: Building and Maintaining Effective Byway Organizations 46 YOUR STRUCTURE: YOUR How Much Formality? If non-governmental entities (citizens and private organizations) are the primary members of the group, then Far and away decide how formal an organizational structure needs to be. “ If you are just starting to pursue byway designation, you may not the best prize need a very formal organization and may do fine with some well-organized and committed individuals. If you have secured life offers is the TYPES OF ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURES TYPES OF ORGANIZATIONAL designation and are now looking to implement a corridor management plan that will impact a variety of communities, chance to work the effort it takes to create a formal organization is probably well worth the effort. Remember, an organizational structure hard at work should meet the needs and goals of the individual byway group. Strength does not always flow from structure if the structure is worth doing. not right for the organization. ” Theodore Roosevelt Eventually, your group may consider the more formal structure of incorporation. A legal designation, incorporation carries certain benefits, but the creation and maintenance of a corporation requires efforts that may take time away from your primary focus. Again, there are no absolutes. If you are not planning to have paid employees, grants, contracts or cash donations, you may be able to set up a citizen group without pursuing formal incorporation. You can have another agency (private nonprofit or some kind of public entity) serve as your fiscal agent and act as your financial administrator. You still make the decisions, but the fiscal agent carries out receiving, tracking, and disbursing of funds on your behalf. This service may cost money. For those groups who lack financial background or a legal structure to handle financial matters, a fiscal agent may be a good option. Making the Grassroots Grow: Building and Maintaining Effective Byway Organizations 67 YOUR STRUCTURE: YOUR Are Government Agencies Involved? Organizational A single governmental agency may take leadership responsibility TIP! Growing for the byway. This can often be a very simple arrangement, Pains especially when a large portion of the corridor runs through federal or state land. If it seems that most or all of the players at the table are TYPES OF ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURES TYPES OF ORGANIZATIONAL Organizations move through representatives of government entities, then it may be life cycles, just as people do. worth forming a joint powers entity. This is a formal way for Author Judith Sharken Simon government agencies to work cooperatively through the formation has identified “5 Life Stages of of a joint, yet separate entity. This new organization—the Nonprofit Organizations”: joint powers entity—allows participating members to transfer Stage One: Imagine and Inspire authority to the joint powers entity for specific roles or services. Doing so can reduce duplication of services and increase continuity. (“Can the dream be realized?”) If not all of the primary players are government entities and/or Stage Two: Found and Frame you don’t need or want to transfer authority, then a cooperative (“How are we agreement (also called a memorandum of understanding or interagency agreement) may be the answer. Cooperative going to pull agreements can involve public (government) and/or private this off?”) entities. A cooperative agreement outlines how two or more Stage Three: Ground and Grow entities will relate in a particular setting. # (“How can we build this to be viable?”) Stage Four: Produce and Sustain (“How can the momentum be sustained?”) Stage Five: Review and Renew (“What do we need to redesign?”) It may be helpful to recognize your byway’s stage of development. 68 Making the Grassroots Grow: Building and Maintaining Effective Byway Organizations YOUR STRUCTURE: YOUR COPY AND DISTRIBUTE Key Organizational Questions Keep these questions in mind as you select among organizational structures. • WHAT is your byway’s purpose? What organizational structures will best meet your needs? TYPES OF ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURES TYPES OF ORGANIZATIONAL • WHO is interested in, or impacted by, what happens to the byway corridor? How will the diversity of interests be represented? • WHERE is the corridor located? State, federal, or private lands? • WHO will provide human and financial support? Citizen volunteers? Government employees? Local businesses? SIDE A Center Resource Byways America’s by Created Making the Grassroots Grow: Building and Maintaining Effective Byway Organizations 69 YOUR STRUCTURE: YOUR COPY AND DISTRIBUTE Key Organizational Questions (continued) • WHAT are your funding sources? Federal? State? Local? Private? Corporate? Individual? TYPES OF ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURES TYPES OF ORGANIZATIONAL • HOW will finances be handled? Fiscal agent? Incorporation? • WHAT needs are not being met by your current organizational structure? SIDE B Center Resource Byways America’s by Created 70 Making the Grassroots Grow: Building
Recommended publications
  • The Naming, Identification, and Protection of Place in the Loess Hills of the Middle Missouri Valley
    The Naming, Identification, and Protection of Place in the Loess Hills of the Middle Missouri Valley David T. McDermott B.A., Haverford College, 1979 B.S., State University of New York, 1992 M.A., University of Kansas, 2005 Submitted to the graduate degree program in Geography and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. _________________________________ James R. Shortridge, Ph. D., Chair _________________________________ J. Christopher Brown, Ph. D. _________________________________ Linda Trueb, Ph. D. _________________________________ Terry A. Slocum, Ph. D. _________________________________ William Woods, Ph. D. Date defended: October 22, 2009 The Dissertation Committee for David T. McDermott certifies that this the approved version of the following dissertation: THE NAMING, IDENTIFICATION, AND PROTECTION OF PLACE IN THE LOESS HILLS OF THE MIDDLE MISSOURI VALLEY Committee: _________________________________ James R. Shortridge, Ph. D., Chair _________________________________ J. Christopher Brown, Ph. D. _________________________________ Linda Trueb, Ph. D. _________________________________ Terry A. Slocum, Ph. D. _________________________________ William Woods, Ph. D. Date approved: October 27, 2009 ii It is inconceivable to me that an ethical relation to land can exist without love, respect, and admiration for land, and a high regard for its value. By value, I of course mean something broader than mere economic value; I mean value in the philosophical
    [Show full text]
  • Missouri Master Naturalist a Summary of Program Impacts and Achievements During 2017
    Missouri Master Naturalist A summary of program impacts and achievements during 2017 Robert A. Pierce II Syd Hime Extension Associate Professor Volunteer and Interpretive Programs Coordinator and State Wildlife Specialist Missouri Department of Conservation University of Missouri 1 “The mission of the Missouri Master Naturalist program is to engage Missourians in the stewardship of the state’s natural resources through science-based education and community service.” Introduction Program Objectives The Missouri Master Naturalist program results 1. Improve public understanding of natural from a partnership created in 2004 between the resource ecology and management by Missouri Department of Conservation (MDC) developing a pool of local knowledge that and University of Missouri Extension. These can be used to enhance and expand two organizations are the sponsors of the educational efforts within local communities program at the state level. Within MU Extension, the Missouri Master Naturalist 2. Enhance existing natural resources Program has the distinction of being recognized education and outreach activities by as a named and branded educational program. providing natural resources training at the The MU School of Natural Resources serves as local level, thereby developing a team of the academic home for the program. dedicated and informed volunteers The program is jointly administered by state 3. Develop a self-sufficient Missouri Master coordinators that represent the MDC and MU Naturalist volunteer network through the Extension. The state program coordinators Chapter-based program. provide leadership in conducting the overall program and facilitate the development of An increasing number of communities and training and chapter development with Chapter organizations across the state have relied on Advisors representing both organizations as these skilled volunteers to implement natural interest is generated within a local community.
    [Show full text]
  • Frontier Settlement and Community Building on Western Iowa's Loess Hills
    Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science Volume 93 Number Article 5 1986 Frontier Settlement and Community Building on Western Iowa's Loess Hills Margaret Atherton Bonney History Resource Service Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy Copyright ©1986 Iowa Academy of Science, Inc. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uni.edu/pias Recommended Citation Bonney, Margaret Atherton (1986) "Frontier Settlement and Community Building on Western Iowa's Loess Hills," Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science, 93(3), 86-93. Available at: https://scholarworks.uni.edu/pias/vol93/iss3/5 This Research is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa Academy of Science at UNI ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science by an authorized editor of UNI ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Bonney: Frontier Settlement and Community Building on Western Iowa's Loes Proc. Iowa Acacl. Sci. 93(3):86-93, 1986 Frontier Settlement and Community Building on Western Iowa's Loess Hills MARGARET ATHERTON BONNEY History Resource Service, 1021 Wylde Green Road, Iowa City, Iowa 52240 Despite the unique Loess Hills topography, Anglo-European settlement in the Loess Hills followed a well established pattern developed over two-hundred years of previous frontier experience. Early explorers and Indian traders first penetrated the wilderness. Then the pressure ofwhite settlement caused the government to make treaties with and remove Indian tribes, thus opening a region for settlement. Settlers arrived and purchased land through a sixty-year-old government procedure and a territorial government provided the necessary legal structure for the occupants.
    [Show full text]
  • Missouri Master Naturalist a Summary of Program Impacts and Achievements During 2019
    Missouri Master Naturalist A summary of program impacts and achievements during 2019 “The mission of the Missouri Master Naturalist program is to engage Missourians in the stewardship of the state’s natural resources through science-based education and community service.” Introduction Program Objectives The Missouri Master Naturalist program results 1. Improve public understanding of natural from a partnership created in 2004 between the resource ecology and management by Missouri Department of Conservation (MDC) developing a pool of local knowledge that and University of Missouri Extension. These can be used to enhance and expand two organizations are the sponsors of the educational efforts within local communities program at the state level. Within MU Extension, the Missouri Master Naturalist 2. Enhance existing natural resources Program has the distinction of being recognized education and outreach activities by as a named and branded educational program. providing natural resources training at the The MU School of Natural Resources serves as local level, thereby developing a team of the academic home for the program. dedicated and informed volunteers The program is jointly administered by state 3. Develop a self-sufficient Missouri Master coordinators that represent the MDC and MU Naturalist volunteer network through the Extension. The state program coordinators Chapter-based program. provide leadership in conducting the overall program and facilitate the development of An increasing number of communities and training and chapter
    [Show full text]
  • Missouri Master Naturalist a Summary of Program Impacts and Achievements During 2018
    Missouri Master Naturalist A summary of program impacts and achievements during 2018 “The mission of the Missouri Master Naturalist program is to engage Missourians in the stewardship of the state’s natural resources through science-based education and community service.” Introduction Program Objectives The Missouri Master Naturalist program results 1. Improve public understanding of natural from a partnership created in 2004 between the resource ecology and management by Missouri Department of Conservation (MDC) developing a pool of local knowledge that and University of Missouri Extension. These can be used to enhance and expand two organizations are the sponsors of the educational efforts within local communities program at the state level. Within MU Extension, the Missouri Master Naturalist 2. Enhance existing natural resources Program has the distinction of being recognized education and outreach activities by as a named and branded educational program. providing natural resources training at the The MU School of Natural Resources serves as local level, thereby developing a team of the academic home for the program. dedicated and informed volunteers The program is jointly administered by state 3. Develop a self-sufficient Missouri Master coordinators that represent the MDC and MU Naturalist volunteer network through the Extension. The state program coordinators Chapter-based program. provide leadership in conducting the overall program and facilitate the development of An increasing number of communities and training and chapter
    [Show full text]
  • Preserving Natural Diversity in Iowa's Loess Hills: Challenges and Opportunities
    Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science Volume 93 Number Article 9 1986 Preserving Natural Diversity in Iowa's Loess Hills: Challenges and Opportunities Dean M. Roosa Donald R. Farrar Iowa State University Mark Ackelson Iowa Natural Heritage Foundation Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy Copyright ©1986 Iowa Academy of Science, Inc. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uni.edu/pias Recommended Citation Roosa, Dean M.; Farrar, Donald R.; and Ackelson, Mark (1986) "Preserving Natural Diversity in Iowa's Loess Hills: Challenges and Opportunities," Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science, 93(3), 163-165. Available at: https://scholarworks.uni.edu/pias/vol93/iss3/9 This Research is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa Academy of Science at UNI ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science by an authorized editor of UNI ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Roosa et al.: Preserving Natural Diversity in Iowa's Loess Hills: Challenges an Proc. Iowa Acad. Sci. 93(3): 163-165, 1986 Preserving Natural Diversity in Iowa's Loess Hills: Challenges and Opportunities DEAN M. ROOSA1, DONALD R. FARRAR2, and MARK ACKELSON3 The Loess Hills of western Iowa, due to their extent and depth, are of national importance for geological reasons. They also harbor a large portion of Iowa's remaining biological diversity, the significance of which has been underscored by studies sponsored by the State Preserves Advisory Board during the past several years. A complex of rare species of plants and animals exist in the rugged terrain; many are Great Plains species which find their only Iowa stations in these Loess Hills.
    [Show full text]
  • The Northern Mississippi Valley Loess Hills
    HISTORICAL CHANGES IN SOIL EROSION, 1930-1992 The Northern Mississippi Valley Loess Hills M. Scott Argabright Agronomist NRCS-USDA, Lincoln, Nebraska Roger G. Cronshey Hydraulic Engineer NRCS-USDA, Washington, D. C. J. Douglas Helms Senior Historian NRCS-USDA, Washington, D.C. George A. Pavelis Economist ERS-USDA, Washington, D.C. H. Raymond Sinclair, Jr. Soil Scientist NRCS-USDA, Lincoln, Nebraska Natural Resources Conservation Service Economic Research Service United States Department of Agriculture Washington, D.C. September 1996 gullies and stream bank erosion. At about the same time the U.S. Department of Agriculture WSDA) had established a number of Conservation Experiment Stations across the country, one of which was located at nearby La Crosse, Wisconsin.' Determining how effective individual conservation efforts and public programs for research, technical assistance and cost sharing have been in reducing soil erosion in a broad region like MLRA 105 was a main object ofthis interdisciplinary study. A second object was to illustrate a methodology whereby long-term changes in erosion conditions as determined for this region might also be applied in other regions. The present study was greatly facilitated by the help of others in planning the work and helping access the large body of required documents and data, much of which is archival and not in the published literature. In the Department of Agculture Lane Price and Jeffrey Goebel of the Resources Inventory Division of NRCS helped outline a general strategy for applying the USLE to 1930 conditions and using USLE data from the 1992 National Resources Inventory to approximate current conditions. NRCS Field Oflice Technical Guides and other interpretive data for Wisconsin, Iowa, Minnesota and Illinois were available or provided through Lee Herndon of the National Headquarters Staff of the NRCS by David Breitbach in Minnesota, John Pingry in Wisconsin, and Robert Dayton and Dennis Miller in Iowa.
    [Show full text]
  • LOESS HILLS MISSOURI RIVER REGION Master Plan
    LOESS HILLS MISSOURI RIVER REGION Master Plan ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Plan Sponsors: Harrison County Board of Supervisors Pottawattamie County Board of Supervisors Mills County Board of Supervisors Friends of Lake Manawa Metropolitan Area Planning Agency (MAPA) Golden Hills RC&D We thank the State of Iowa and the Iowa Parks Foundation for partnering with our local sponsors to make this plan possible. We acknowledge the many organizations and individuals who participated in this planning process: Woodbine Main Street City of Council Bluffs Harrison County Soil and Water Macedonia Folk Arts Center Conservation District The Nature Conservancy Harrison County Conservation Board Harrison County Historical Village and Loess Hills Young People’s Farm Welcome Center Carson Business Club City of Emerson Pottawattamie County Conservation Board Indian Creek Museum The Office of Senator Joni Ernst Mills County Trails Board The Office of Senator Chuck Grassley Western Iowa Tourism Mills County Conservation Board Iowa West Foundation Mills County Tourism Loess Hills Preservation Society Southwest Iowa Nature Trails Harrison County Supervisor Friends of Lake Manawa City of Oakland Iowa Department of Natural Resources Consulting team supporting the effort: RDG Planning & Design in partnership with Metro Area Planning Agency (MAPA) TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary .............................................................................................................................. 7 Part One: The Planning Process ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Platte River Watershed Inventory and Assessment
    PLATTE RIVER WATERSHED INVENTORY AND ASSESSMENT This information is based on the Platte River Watershed Inventory and Assessment prepared by Mike Bayless and Vince Travnichek Missouri Department of Conservation St. Joseph, Missouri For additional information contact: Harold A. Kerns Northwest Regional office 701 NE College Drive St. Joseph 64507 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We would like to thank numerous individuals for their assistance in preparing this document. Brian Canaday, Lynn Schrader, and Tom Wilkerson, Jr. compiled much of the base information presented in this basin plan. Mike McGhee and John Olson (Iowa DNR) provided data from fish collections and stream habitat surveys within the Iowa portion of the basin. Missouri Department of Conservation, Kansas City Fisheries Management Region staff collected fish and provided information on stream habitat from the lower portion of the basin. Debbie Banks collected data on stream gradients and channelization within the basin. Thanks to all and to any contributers not mentioned. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Platte River is a low gradient, eighth order river located in southwest Iowa and northwest Missouri. The Platte River originates in Union County, Iowa and flows southward for about 200 miles where it empties into the Missouri River near the town of Farley, Missouri. The watershed contains 2,419 square miles with 786 square miles (32.5%) in Iowa and 1,633 square miles (67.5%) in Missouri and lies within the Dissected Till Plains physiographic region. The average annual discharge for the Platte River at Sharps Station (98% of the drainage basin) is 1,925 cubic feet per second. There are 435 third order and larger streams within the basin, and major tributaries include the 102 River, Third Fork, Honey Creek, Castile Creek, and the Little Platte River.
    [Show full text]
  • The (Loess) Hills: Power and Democracy in a "New" Landform Peggy Petrzelka Iowa State University
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 1999 The (loess) hills: power and democracy in a "new" landform Peggy Petrzelka Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Geography Commons, Geology Commons, and the Sociology Commons Recommended Citation Petrzelka, Peggy, "The (loess) hills: power and democracy in a "new" landform " (1999). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 12601. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/12601 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced firom the microfilm master. UMI fihns the text directly fi'om the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter &ce, while others may be fi'om any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. Li the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing fi-om left to right in equal sections with small overlaps.
    [Show full text]
  • Hot–Mix Asphalt
    OHIO HOT–MIX ASPHALT VOL. 11 NO. 2 CURRENT NEWS June, 2002 PERPETUAL PAVEMENT TASK FORCE COMPLETES PAVEMENT BUILDUP & DESIGN The task force set up by the Ohio 1 Specification ness of 16 /4 inches was selected to be used for Department of Transportation to develop spec- a CBR of 4 to 6. Weaker soils will require a Now Ready For ifications and design procedures for the perpet- new calculation or soil modification to achieve Use ual pavement concept reached another mile- a 4 to 6 CBR. This pavement is placed on 6 stone recently. Using mechanistic design mod- inches of 304 aggregate base. els, pavement thickness and buildup have now An AASHTO design for the US 30 pilot pro- 3 been established for the US 30 pilot project and ject would yield a 13 /4-inch pavement on a 6- can be transferred to other projects around the inch aggregate base so the perpetual pavement 1 state. is 2 /2 inches thicker than the AASHTO design. The thickness of a perpetual pavement is Since the thickness of a perpetual pavement calculated to limit the strain at the bottom of does not change with increased volume or axle the pavement so that it is less than the fatigue loadings, this same thickness would be used on limit of the material. This is a totally different a heavy interstate truck route where AASHTO concept than designing the pavement to with- designs are typically 18 to 22 inches. Thus a IN THIS ISSUE: stand a specified number of load repetitions perpetual pavement would be thinner than an Perpetual Pavement ....1-2 before failing as is done today.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3: Plan Development
    Chapter 3: Plan Development 3.1 Congestion Management Plans Introduction A congestion management plan, as defined in federal regulation, is an objective-driven and performance-based process intended to integrate effective management and safe operation of the existing multimodal transportation facilities. The purpose of NOACA’s congestion management plans is to: • Identify the spatial and temporal characteristics of traffic congestion in the region • Measure the congestion severity, duration, extent, and variability • Develop congestion mitigation strategies for enhancing the mobility of people and goods in the NOACA region. Three of NOACA’s regional strategic plan goals have been adopted as the main focus of NOACA’s congestion management plans, as they are in agreement with guidance (or requirements) provided by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) (see Chapter 2 for Regional Strategic Plan Goals, Objectives, and Strategies). The three goals are: • Preserve existing infrastructure • Build a sustainable multi-modal transportation system • Support economic development The congestion management plans establish congestion reduction objectives in five-year increments for 2020, 2025, 2030, 2035, and 2040. Each plan will be evaluated during the third year of its implementation (e.g. 2018 for the 2020 plan). The rest of this chapter offers an insight into the NOACA congestion management plans and includes a discussion and definition of the congestion management objectives for the five-year cycle, and the NOACA methodology for the congestion management process. The methodology explains and analyzes the current and future transportation networks, develops congestion management performance measures, and discusses congestion mitigation strategies. Congestion Management Objectives Congestion management objectives define what the NOACA region intends to achieve regarding traffic congestion management during every five-year cycle.
    [Show full text]