DOCSLIB.ORG

Geological and Mineralogical Sciences

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Geological and Mineralogical Sciences 42 Geological and Mineralogical sciences This method of geometric correlation makes it to the Present Time. The author uses this scale in possible: lectures on historical geology for students and in 1) to get information about level of investiga- a geological museum. tion of the oil fi eld structure and about construction For the description PreArchean chronology of deposit without well-drilling; of events of formation of the Earth, the Solar 2) to identify little-studied area for building of System, method representation about “continu- the qualitative model of deposit; um” [6, 4] is used. 3) to identify area for well-drilling which re- The time scale continued in area of PreGeo- quired for building of the models deposit and for logical events of the past, possible to interpret as refi nement reserves oil; “a GeoAstronomical scale” for events PreArchean 4) to ascertain the moment in chronologies of well- time down to the moment of formation of the Our drilling, which make it possible to cut material costs; Universe [8, 1]. 5) to create the algorithm an information han- Attempts of construction of a calendar PreAr- dling on computer chean time were undertaken earlier [2, 3]. References The Principle of Stenon (for the stratigraphi- cal and the geochronological scales) illustrates 1. Bukrinskiy V.A. Geometrization of depths. – М.: MSU, stratigraphical continuum (“geocontinuum”). For 2004. – 333 р. construction of “a General Scale of Stages of Geo- 2. Gubina A.I. The Geophisical methods of stratigraphical correlation. – Perm, 2010. – 201 р. Astronomical Chronology” it is offered to use of the Principle Stenon as events-and-time, not only 3. Myagkov V.F. Geochemical method of paragenic analy- sis of ore. – M.: Nedra, 1984. – 126 р. straton-and-time. 4. Trofi mov A.A. Fundamentals of mining geometry. – M.: In this case the common geochronological scale MSU, 1980. – 224 р. becomes is a part of “Common Scale of Stages of GeoAstronomical Chronology” of events at the A COMMON SCALE OF THE STAGES Universe and at the Earth. OF A GEOASTRONOMICAL Representation of events-time (chronological), CHRONOLOGY and not just only stratigraphical geocontinuum al- Ozhgibesov V.P. lows to consider Archean-Cenozoical a stage as a component of an interval of time from formation The Perm State National Research University, of the Our Universe (13,72 ± 0,12) milliard years Perm, e-mail: [email protected] [1, 7] up to «Present Time». In this case the general For the fi rst time on the basis of a “Geocontinu- geochronological scale becomes a part of “the Gen- um” and a “Geoastronomical” continuum “A Com- eral Scale of Stages of geoastronomical chronolo- mon Scale of Stages of Geoastronomical Chronol- gy”. The geoastronomical scale allows to order and ogy” is сonstructed. Is offered new Common Scale describe chronology of events from the Big Bang to of Geoastronomical Chronology from the Big Bang the Present Time (Table). A Common Scale of the Stages of a GeoAstronomical Chronology From beginning Stages GalaYear Gelion Acron Eon Era Period (in milliard years) 12 345678 23 Retrospective Qrcnt 0 Galactic Year № 1 Q 0,018 KZ N 0,023 E 0,065 22 RGY № 2 Mesozoic К 0,15 MZ J 0,20 T 0,25 21 RGY № 3 Hertsynian P 0,30 Neozoic (NZ) С 0,35 PH Phanerozoic Geozoic (GEOZ) D 0,40 PZ 20 RGY № 4 Caledonian S 0,45 O 0,50 Є 0,54 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NATURAL HISTORY № 2, 2016 Geological and Mineralogical sciences 43 End Table 12 345678 19 RGY № 5 Vendian ED 0,63 V CRG 0,85 TON 1,0 (BKL) 18 6–7: Baikalian RGY2 KRT (RF3) – 1,2 Baikalian 17 8–9: Baikalian RGYPR YUR (RF2) – 1,4 16 10–11: Baikalian RGY BRZ (RF1) – 1,6 15 12–13: .Late Karelian RGYProterozoic (NZ) PRt KRL2 – 1,9 14 14–17: Late Karelian RGY (KRL) KRL1 – 2,5 13 18–21: Belomorian RGY AR Early Geosyncline 2 3,15 (BLM) Stage 12 22–27: Saamian RGY(AR) AR Geozoic (GEOZ) 1 Archean Nuclearian Stage 4,2 (SMS) 11 28–29: Regolitian RGY Regolitian Regolitian Stage. 4,3 (RGL) Lunar images 10 30–31: Accrecian RGY Accretion Stage Accretsia (PRS) of meteoric bodies, 4,5 Prisconia n (ACC) forming of the Earth 9 32–36: ProtoSolarian Proto- Forming Solarin 5,6 of ProtoEarth (PRS) 8 37–43: ProtoGalaxian Forming of Pro- Proto- toSolar System, Galaxian 7,2 axian (PGL) Galaxes. Beginning Protoplanet-Gal- (PGL) Geliozoic (GELZ) de Sitter’s Epoch 7 Epoch of formation of the fi rst Stars, Galaxies; forma- from 150 millions to 12,7 tion C, O, N, Fe 1 milliard of years 6 Epoch of formation of the fi rst atoms. Universe is fi lled 380000 years to 13,55 H, He, relic radiation of H on wave 21 sm. Stars are absent 150 millions of years 5 Epoch of beginning of forming He, deuterium, Li-7 (20 min) 3 min – 380000 years 13,70 4 Fridman’s Epoch of expansion of Our Universe; forma- 10–34 s – 3 min 13,70 tions of protons and neutrons 3 Epoch of beginning of fast expansion of Our Universe 10–43 s – l0–34 s 13,70 2 Planck’s Epoch. The fi rst instants of formation of Our from 0 to 10–43 s 13,70 Uni verse, birth of particles 1 Epoch of Singularity. The Big Bang (13,72 ± 0,12) 0 (the Beginning (13,72 ± 0,12) milliard years in the past of Histoiy of Our milliard of years Universe) Duration of the «events» located on a scale of scales PreCambrian, the analysis of cyclicity and periodicity of chronology is not criterion of ranks for the “stages” of events). – Petrozavodsk. 1997. – 93 р. geoastronomical chronology. Attributes of division of 4. Ozhgibesov V.P. General Scale of Geological time and a scale of stages, are defi ned by qualitative specifi city of a events-time GeoContinuum // Geology and minerals of the Western Urals Mountains: Materials of regional conf. (Perm events at the Earth and at the Universe [1, 5]. Duration Univ., May, 17–18th 2005). – Perm: Publishing House Perm. of a stage is not criterion of the size of division’s rank. 2005. – P. 25–28. Criterion of allocation of a separate stage is its qualita- 5. Sobotovich E.V. Isotope cosmohemistry. – M., 1974. – 208 р. tive attributes and specifi city of corresponding events. 6. The philosophical encyclopedic dictionary. – М., 1983. – 839 р. For example: three minutes of Fridman’s Epoch and 7. Hinshaw G., Weiland J.L., Hill R.S., Odegard N., Larson D., 50 millions of years for the Period of Paleozoic. Bennett C.L., Dunkley J., Gold B., Greason M.R., Jarosik N., References Komatsu E.. Nolta M. R, Page L., Spergel D.N., Wollack E., Halpern M., Kogut A., Limon M., Meyer S.S., Tucker G.S. 1. Kaku Michio. The parallel worlds. М.: Publishing House and Wright E.L. Five-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy “Sofi a”, 2008. – 416 р. Probe Observations: Data Processing, Sky Maps, and Basic Re- 2. Kulikova V.V., Kulikov V.S. A Galactic Calendar of His- sults // The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. – 2009. – tory of the Earth. – Petrozavodsk: the Karelian Center of the Vol. 180, № 2. – P. 225–245. Russian Academy of Science, 2000. – 14 р. 8. A Geologic Time Scale 2004 / by F.M. Gradstein, 3. Kulikova V.V., Kulikov V.S. Universal a Galactic Chron- J.G. Ogg, A.G. Smith et. al. // Cambrige University ometric Scale (Experience of comparison of world and regional Press. – 2004. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NATURAL HISTORY № 2, 2016.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Zerohack Zer0pwn Youranonnews Yevgeniy Anikin Yes Men
    Zerohack Zer0Pwn YourAnonNews Yevgeniy Anikin Yes Men YamaTough Xtreme x-Leader xenu xen0nymous www.oem.com.mx www.nytimes.com/pages/world/asia/index.html www.informador.com.mx www.futuregov.asia www.cronica.com.mx www.asiapacificsecuritymagazine.com Worm Wolfy Withdrawal* WillyFoReal Wikileaks IRC 88.80.16.13/9999 IRC Channel WikiLeaks WiiSpellWhy whitekidney Wells Fargo weed WallRoad w0rmware Vulnerability Vladislav Khorokhorin Visa Inc. Virus Virgin Islands "Viewpointe Archive Services, LLC" Versability Verizon Venezuela Vegas Vatican City USB US Trust US Bankcorp Uruguay Uran0n unusedcrayon United Kingdom UnicormCr3w unfittoprint unelected.org UndisclosedAnon Ukraine UGNazi ua_musti_1905 U.S. Bankcorp TYLER Turkey trosec113 Trojan Horse Trojan Trivette TriCk Tribalzer0 Transnistria transaction Traitor traffic court Tradecraft Trade Secrets "Total System Services, Inc." Topiary Top Secret Tom Stracener TibitXimer Thumb Drive Thomson Reuters TheWikiBoat thepeoplescause the_infecti0n The Unknowns The UnderTaker The Syrian electronic army The Jokerhack Thailand ThaCosmo th3j35t3r testeux1 TEST Telecomix TehWongZ Teddy Bigglesworth TeaMp0isoN TeamHav0k Team Ghost Shell Team Digi7al tdl4 taxes TARP tango down Tampa Tammy Shapiro Taiwan Tabu T0x1c t0wN T.A.R.P. Syrian Electronic Army syndiv Symantec Corporation Switzerland Swingers Club SWIFT Sweden Swan SwaggSec Swagg Security "SunGard Data Systems, Inc." Stuxnet Stringer Streamroller Stole* Sterlok SteelAnne st0rm SQLi Spyware Spying Spydevilz Spy Camera Sposed Spook Spoofing Splendide
    [Show full text]
  • Dr. JK Fotheringham
    788 NATURE MAY 8, 1937 Obituary Notices Dr. J. K. Fotheringham, F.B.A. make a valuable correction to the work of Ginzel, OHN KNIGHT FOTHERINGHAM, who died on Nevill and Newcomb on eclipse calculations. He J December 12 of last year, was the greatest was made assistant at the Observatory at Oxford in authority of his time on ancient chronology. The 1918. About 1910 he became interested in Babylonian name Fotheringham is derived from the Manor and astronomy, and I then made his acquaintance; from Castle of Fotheringay, held in the twelfth century that time until his death we collaborated constantly. by the royal family of Scotland as part of the Honour In the meantime, he had been applying astronomy of Huntingdon in Northamptonshire. Mr. Walter de to Greek chronology, and had produced fundamental Fodringaye was one of the executors of Devorgilla, results. He now began to apply Babylonian Lady of the Manor and wife of John de Baliol in astronomy to still earlier chronology and attained 1289, and was appointed by her as the first principal the undisputed position of the greatest living of Baliol (Balliol) College, Oxford. By their close authority in these matters. The University of connexion with the House of Baliol, some of the Oxford, therefore, created for him a post as reader Fotheringay family settled in Scotland at the end in ancient astronomy and chronology in 1925 and of the thirteenth century and the name was changed he was elected to the British Academy in 1932. to Fotheringham. One William Fodringhay had a It will be seen that the mental range of this scholar charter from David II of lands in Aberdeen and probably exceeded that of any one of his contem­ Banff.
    [Show full text]
  • Lesson 9. Chronology, Daniel Flaut.Pdf
    Lesson 9. Chronology Learning tasks: by completing this unit of study, the student will be able to: ¾ Define Chronology and to highlight the key moments in its evolution as science. ¾ Identify main elements of timeline (day, hour, week, month, year). ¾ Retain some elementary notions about the calendar. I. Definition; The evolution of Chronology as science Chronology from Latin chronologia, from Ancient Greek χρόνος, chronos = time, and ­λογία, ­logia) is the Auxiliary Science of History which deal with the measuring and dividing of time, therefore with accurate dating of historical events to determine their sequence. Chronology has two major branches: Astronomical Chronology, a technical method of dating events or artifacts that are associated with astronomical phenomena, and Historical Chronology, to achieve timelines: national, universal, of different institutions and of their leaders, of various historical events. There were two systems to highlight the time: the astronomical system and the civil system, of which there were some differences. But, both systems were based on revolution movements of the Earth, the Moon and Sun. In Antiquity, historiography has shown a constant concern for establishing accurate data of events narrated, but made after the dating system used at that time. In XV­XVIII centuries, Chronology make important steps in its evolution as a scientific discipline. The problematic of Chronology began with the controversy between Joseph Justus Scaliger (August 5, 1540, Agen‐January 21, 1609, Leiden) and Denis Pétau (August 21, 1583 – December 11, 1652), which gave to Benedictines the opportunity to undertake the difficult task to clarify the research field of Chronology. They needed a long time until to draft critical chronological lists and to clarify old dating systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Counting Days in Ancient Babylon: Eclipses, Omens, and Calendrics During the Old Babylonian Period (1750-1600 Bce)
    COUNTING DAYS IN ANCIENT BABYLON: ECLIPSES, OMENS, AND CALENDRICS DURING THE OLD BABYLONIAN PERIOD (1750-1600 BCE) by Steven Jedael A thesis submitted to the faculty of The University of North Carolina at Charlotte in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Religious Studies Charlotte 2016 Approved by: Dr. John C. Reeves Dr. Steven Falconer Dr. Dennis Ogburn ii Copyright ©2016 Steven Jedael ALL RIGHTS RESERVED iii ABSTRACT STEVEN JEDAEL. Counting days in ancient Babylon: eclipses, omens, and calendrics during the Old Babylonian period (1750-1600 bce). (Under the direction of DR. JOHN C. REEVES) Prior to the sixth century BCE, each lunar month of the Babylonian calendar is believed to have been determined solely by direct observation of the new moon with the insertion of intercalary months arbitrarily dictated by the king and his advisors. However, lunar eclipse omens within the divination texts of the Enūma Anu Enlil, some which date to the second half of the Old Babylonian period (ca. 1750-1600 BCE), clearly indicate a pattern of lunar eclipses occurring on days 14, 15, 16, 20, and 21 of the lunar month—a pattern suggesting an early schematic structure. In this study, I argue that observed period relations between lunar phases, equinoxes, and solstices as well as the invention of the water clock enabled the Babylonians to become aware of the 8-year lunisolar cycle (known as the octaeteris in ancient Greece) and develop calendars with standardized month-lengths and fixed rules of intercalation during the second millennium BCE. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES vi LIST OF FIGURES vii LIST OFABBREVIATIONS AND SYMBOLS viii LIST OF STANDARD MESOPOTAMIAN MONTHS (SUMERIAN x LOGOGRAPHIC SPELLINGS) CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1 1.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Discussions in Egyptology 33, 1995
    DISCUSSIONS IN EGYPTOLOGY 33 1995 DISCUSSIONS IN EGYPTOLOGY ISSN 0268-3083 © 1995 Authors All Rights Reserved Editor: Alessandra Nibbi Reviews Editor: Angela Tooley TABLE OF CONTENTS Editorial note The Seventh International Congress of Egyptologists, Cambridge, 1995. A. Alcock A Note on the Historical Works of Naguib Mahfouz. 7 J. Goldberg Centuries of Darkness and Egyptian Chronology: 11 Another Look. W. Honig Die 9 Götter von Heliopolis in der Cheopspyramide. 33 E. Iversen Two Suggestions Concerning Obelisks. 41 J. A. R. Legon The Orion Correlation and Air-shaft Theories. 45 O. Ndigi L'expression des cardinaux et des ordinaux en égyptien 57 • et en basaa. P. O'Mara Can the Giza Pyramids be dated Astronomically? Logical 73 Foundations for an Old Kingdom Astronomical Chronology. J. G. Read Placement of El-Lahun Lunar Dates and Resulting 87 Chronology. J Rousseau Metrologie et coudée. 115 G. Takâcs Aegyptio-Afroasiatica II. 123 J. Vercoutter The Unesco 'Campaign of Nubia" in the Sudan. Success or Failure? 133 REVIEWS T. DuQuesne K. Koch, Geschichte der ägyptischen Religion von den Pyramiden bis zu den Mysterien der Isis. (Kohlhammer Verlag, Köln, 1993): also D. Meeks and C. Favard- 141 Meeks, La vie quotidienne des dieux égyptiens. (Hachette, 1993). B. Midant- Reynes J. Crowfoot-Payne, Catalogue of the Predynastic 157 Egyptian Collection in the Ashmolean Museum. (Clarendon Press, Oxford. 1993). L. Morenz G. Lapp, Typologie der Särge und Sargkammern von der 161 6. bis 13. Dynastie, (SAGA 7, Heidelberg, 1993). R. Park S. Bickel. La cosmogonie égyptienne avant le Nouvel 169 Empire. (Orbis Biblicus et Orientalis. 134. Editions Universitaires Fribourg.
    [Show full text]
  • Astronomical Chronology of Vedic Literature : Some New Arguments
    7. Astronomical Chronology of Vedic Literature : Some New Arguments [This is the text of a paper read at the annual Belgian Indological Conference, Ghent University, 10 March 2006.] Abstract Since the 1780s, Western researchers (Playfair, Bailly, Jacobi) have noticed data in Indian astronomy, both astronomical tables and stray astronomical references in religious and epic texts, which, through the millennial clock of the precession, indicate a surprisingly high chronology for Vedic civilization. The idea that the composition of Vedic hymns started before 4000 BC was perfectly compatible with early Romantic notions of India as the homeland of pre-Christian European civilization (Voltaire, Schlegel), but came in conflict with Max Müller’s far lower chronology, with the Rg-Veda composed only ca. 1500 BC, which became normative from ca. 1870 onwards. The astronomy-based high chronology was picked up by Indians only in 1893 (B.G. Tilak’s Orion) and entered the politically tainted Aryan Invasion debate only in the 1990s,-- so it cannot be dismissed as merely a “Hindu- chauvinist fantasy”. But dismissed it is, mostly in very cavalier rhetoric which betrays the philologists’ unfamiliarity with the cogency of scientific reasoning. We will now look into the recent crop of arguments mustered to neutralize this inconvenient body of astronomical evidence, apparently so in contradiction with the chronologies based on archaeological findings (horse, spoked wheel, bronze, iron) and on comparative-historical linguistics. This will implicitly necessitate a second look at the arguments in favour of a high chronology as well. Finally, we add a little meditation on what to do in scientific research when different bodies of evidence point to opposite conclusions.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr. Johannes Lepsius on the Symbolical Language of the Revelation
    153 DR. JOHANNES LEPSIUS ON THE SYMBOLICAL LANGUAGE OF THE REVELATION. A. INTRODUCTION (continued). As Dr. Lepsius defined his position in the first of his articles on this subject, 1 " I do not assert that I am able to interpret the Revelation of John. Nevertheless I think I may say that in our time the Revelation of John can be read with more understanding than was possible before, for the riddle of the symbolic language of the Apo­ calypse is in the main solved." The whole series (of which this is the second last) is really the Prolegomena to a scientific study of the Revelation, and not the completed theory. The subject of which the articles treat is one which to us at first sight seems to be remote from the range of know­ ledge of the ordinary educated man, and to demand such careful and elaborate study in a library of recondite books as would be inconsistent with the situation of the seer of the Revelation, a prisoner on a rocky and hardly popu­ lated island of the Aegean Sea. This, however, is only a superficial appearance, due to the conditions of modern life. In ancient times not merely was the ordinary man, and especially the rustic, accustomed to regard the heavens as his time-keeper for the day and the year : 2 not merely did general opinion look to the heavens for guidance in difficulties and advice about public affairs : a the more educated man, also, was acquainted with astronomical phenomena and their bearing on chrono­ logy and history to an extent that we can understand only by an effort.
    [Show full text]
  • Generic Viagra Online
    The Astronomical Dating of Ancient History Before 700 B.C. By John Brug [1981/1988.] [Author’s Note: This is a working draft. The endnotes need verification and additions. The evidence and arguments need further evaluation.] Introduction Beginning students of ancient history are easily impressed by the beautiful chronological charts which they find in the books which introduce them to ancient history. Each king or pharaoh stands in his place with the years of his reign neatly printed behind his name. However, students soon learn that it is not so neat and simple after all, and that these lists are not at all like a list of the presidents of the United States whose years in office are well established. They find that there is not one established chronology for the ancient Near East, but several competing chronologies to be considered. There are high, medium, and low chronologies for both Egypt and Mesopotamia. Furthermore, for the most ancient times these must be compared with three different radio-carbon chronologies which are based on different uncorrected and corrected half-lives for carbon 14. However, the divergence between all of these systems is relatively minor when we are speaking in terms of millennia. In itself the existence of high, middle, and low chronologies would seem to be an incentive to thorough scholarly research in order to resolve the debate, rather than a cause for grave misgivings about the basic framework of ancient chronology. The very debate about high, middle, and low chronologies implies that the basic framework is well established and that our main need today is to tie up a few loose ends.
    [Show full text]
  • Implications of Astronomical Climate Cycles to The
    ~rJ-tf/ Stuttgart. Februar 2000 Implications of astronomical climate EPICONTINENTAL TRIASSIC cycles to the chronology of the Triassic INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM Halle/S. ~. Germany Dennis V. Kent and Paul E. Olsen September 21 - 23, 1998 with 2 figures and I table Abstract: A high resolution climate record from a thick, continuous ~edimentary sequence in the Newark basin provides the basis for an astronomically calibrated time scale for the Late Triassic. The astronomical vernier, indexed to radiometric dates that indicate an age of 202 Ma for the Triassic/Jurassic boundary, suggests that the Late Triassic was about 31 m.y. long, or constituted about 2/3 of the entire Triassic. A detailed geomagnetic polarity time scale developed in conjunction with the cycle stratigraphy provides a mechanism to extend the astronomical chronology to other sections in the world. Introduction Construction of a numerical geologic time scale for the Mesozoic has tradi­ tionally involved the integration of radiometric dates, biozones and stage bounda­ ries. However, even the most recently compiled inventory of radiometric dates is inadequate to constrain directly the ages of most stage boundaries (Gradstein et at. 1994). Stage boundary ages therefore need to be interpolated using some proxy of time. The Cenozoic time scale is mainly scaled by biostratigraphic correlations to an age-calibrated geomagnetic polarity reversal sequence derived from marine magnetic anomalies (Cande and Kent 1992. 1995. Berggren et al. 1995b). Howev­ er, this unifying interpolation mechanism is available only back to the middle Jurassic (e.g. Channell et al. 1995). In the absence of magnetic anomaly profiles for older parts of the Mesozoic, expedient but not well justified concepts such as equal-duration of stages (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Astronomical Orientation of the IV Dynasty Egyptian Pyramids and the Dating of the Second Giza Pyramid
    On the astronomical orientation of the IV dynasty Egyptian pyramids and the dating of the second Giza pyramid. Giulio Magli Dipartimento di Matematica, Politecnico di Milano P.le Leonardo Da Vinci 32, 20133 Milan, Italy [email protected] 1. Introduction: the simultaneous transit method. It is very well known that the five main pyramids of the fourth dynasty (the main three at Giza and the two Snefru pyramids at Dashur) were oriented with a high degree of precision. It is difficult to fully establish today the original orientation since the casing is almost lost, a part for the so called "bent" Dashur pyramid, the top of the second Giza pyramid, residual blocks in the lowest course of Khufu pyramid, and part of the granite lintel of the third Giza pyramid. However, reasonable data for the orientation can be obtained also from such remains and from accurate measurement of distances between corners. We shall make use here of the data giving the deviation of the est side from true north, since a complete set of data is avaliable. These are: Meidum1 –20’ ± 1.0' [1 ] Bent Pyramid -17.3'± 0.2', [2 ] Red Pyramid -8.7'± 0.2', [2 ] Khufu -3.4'± 0.2', [2 ] Khafre -6.0'± 0.2'. [2 ] Menkaure +12.4'± 1.0' []1 In recent literature (Spence [3] and Belmonte [4]) also the data for two pyramids of the fifth dynasty (Sahure and Neferirkare) are considered. Such data are taken from the work by Zaba [5] and reported with an error of only 10’. However both buildings are so inferior in work and in a so badly damaged state today, that a measurement of orientation looks difficult and claims of having measured it with a great accuracy look extremely unsound.
    [Show full text]
  • Min's Historical Calendar of Jesus
    MIN’S HISTORICAL CALENDAR OF JESUS ©2004 Daniel Joseph Min All rights are free Min‘s Free P ress Continental Divide, CO Min’s Google-archived digital edition September 16, 2003. First printed edition published by MFP on July 1, 2004. Contents Preface ................................ ii Introduction ........................ iii Ch 1 – The Hand Of God...... 1 Ch 2 – Course Of Abijah..... 15 Ch 3 – Morning Star .......... 21 Ch 4 – Evening Star ........... 33 Ch 5 – Voice Of One .......... 49 Ch 6 – Coming Of Age........ 56 Ch 7 – At One With God .... 57 Ch 8 – Palm Saturday ........ 61 Ch 9 – Good Wednesday..... 81 Ch 10 – Night And Day...... 84 Ch 11 – The Chronology.. 91 Preface Several years ago I published my first two books. The first was entitled “Book Of Daniel: Fact or Fiction?”, My second book is named “Historical Calendar Of Jesus” since the former work establishes the genuine historicity of the prophet Daniel, and his autograph manuscript as pre- sented in the “Biblia Hebraica”, Leningrad MS.B19A Kittel/stuttgartensia consonantal texts, which are available as freeware in the normal (BHS) and morphological (BHM) format from the “online-bible” website, which text comprises the predominantly Hebrew part of the Old Testament and its few Aramaic portions (Gen.31:47a; Ezra 4:8-6:18; 7:12- 26; Jer.10:11; and Daniel 2:4-7:28). Subsequent to my research of this codex to the sacred scriptures, I’ve since discovered that the editio Vulgata is the principal translation of the Judeo-Xian Bible, because Sophronius Eusebius Hieronymus, bka St. Jerome, was sufficiently adept in the classic astro- logical and mythological basis of the scriptures as to bring both old and new testaments to life — to the degree that western thought can more easily relate herein the 21st century of the Roman calendar.
    [Show full text]
  • Revolution in Common Chronology Time-Slip of 200 Years
    REVOLUTION IN THE COMMON CHRONOLOGY! THE TIME-SLIP OF 200 YEARS IN THE TIME COUNTING OF OUR CALENDAR ZOLTÁN HUNNIVÁRI 200 YEARS, WHICH WILL SHAKE THE WORLD (Hátsó cover) It can easily happen that the intervention of world-wide importance by the Pope Innocent III (1198-1216), that is the creation of the „restored” and reformed Roman Catholic chronology, will not live up to its 806th birthday. Although there was an almost entirely successful manipulation to hide all traces leading to this significant action of the pope in the year of CE 1206, and to make the intervention (the correction of the calendar) unnoticed for future generations, now it is firmly proved that the pope’s action to correct the calendar dating took place in CE 1206 in Rome. The magic mirror of the „scientific chronology” which was meant to project into our past and was created by the laborious efforts of the academic science, had suffered just a single blow with a hammer, which is with the Hungarian Calendar, and this magic mirror had immediately broken up into its constituent mosaic parts. Perhaps the fate willed it so that thanking to strange coincidences, the Hungarian Calendar „was born” in 2002. Since 2002 this Hungarian Calendar is pushing forward with merciless determination, and relentlessly bulldozes away all the negligence’s of the common chronology, which chronology is supposed to be sacred according to the academic science. When the piece of trickery came to light in 2002, and it was shown that the beginning of the Julian calendar was not in the year of BC 45, instead of that, the Julian calendar was introduced 200 years later, no one yet could guess about the persons who made the re-setting of the calendar, and about the time when this re-setting was introduced.
    [Show full text]