DOCSLIB.ORG

Volume 3 (2001

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Journal of the Scottish Parliament Volume 3: 3rd Parliamentary Year, Session 1 (12 May 2001 – 11 May 2002) SPJ 1.3 Foreword The Journal is the central, long-term, authoritative record of what the Parliament has done. The Minutes of Proceedings, which are produced for each meeting of the Parliament, do that in an immediate way, while the Journal presents essentially the same material but has the benefit of hindsight to allow any errors and infelicities of presentation to be corrected. Unlike the Official Report, which primarily records what is said, the Minutes of Proceedings, and in the longer term the Journal, provide the authoritative record of what was done. The Journal is required under Rule 16.3 of Standing Orders and contains, in addition to the Minutes of Proceedings themselves, notice of any Bill introduced*, notice of any instrument or draft instrument or any other document laid before the Parliament; notice of any report of a committee, and any other matter that the Parliament, on a motion of the Parliamentary Bureau, considers should be included. (* The requirement to include notice of Bills introduced was only added to Rule 16.3 in January 2003. However, such notices have in practice been recorded in the Annex to the Minutes of Proceedings from the outset.) Note: (DT), which appears throughout the Journal, signifies a decision taken at Decision Time. Chamber Office Directorate of Clerking and Reporting Journal of the Scottish Parliament Volume 3: 3rd Parliamentary Year, Session 1 (12 May 2001 – 11 May 2002) Contents Page Journal 1 Annex A Bills Introduced 269 Annex B Subordinate Legislation— 1. Affirmative Instruments 277 2. Negative Instruments 282 3. Instruments Not Subject to any Parliamentary Procedure 301 Annex C Other Documents 305 Annex D SPCB Papers 329 Annex E Committee Reports 331 Journal Index 347 Annex Index 1. Subordinate Legislation— a. Negative Instruments 369 b. Instruments not subject to any parliamentary procedure 379 2. Other Documents 381 3. Committee Reports 395 No. 1 Wednesday 16 May 2001 The meeting opened at 2.30 pm. 1. Time for Reflection: Sister Maire Gallagher, Convener of Action of Churches Together in Scotland, led Time for Reflection. 2. Architecture and the Built Environment: The Deputy Minister for Sport and Culture (Allan Wilson) moved S1M-1929—That the Parliament acknowledges the social, cultural, environmental and economic benefits that good architecture and a well designed built environment can bring to Scotland and further acknowledges the benefits of a national policy on architecture. After debate, the motion was agreed to (DT). 3. Suspension of Standing Orders: Mr Tom McCabe, on behalf of the Parliamentary Bureau, moved S1M-1936—That the Parliament agrees that Rule 9.5.3B is suspended for the purpose of taking Stage 3 of the Regulation of Care (Scotland) Bill. The motion was agreed to (DT). 4. Decision Time: The Parliament took decisions on items 2 and 3 as noted above. 5. Rural and Islands GPs: The Parliament debated S1M-1897 in the name of Tavish Scott—That the Parliament notes the particular pressures relating to the delivery of primary health care in rural, remote and island areas of Scotland; supports the work of the Remote and Rural Resource Centre based at Raigmore Hospital in Inverness, encourages consideration of the particular challenges of recruitment and retention of GPs in areas such as Shetland given the high on-call commitment made by GPs in small rural practices, recognises the importance of equity in the remuneration of GPs and encourages the further development of proposals to assist in their recruitment and retention in rural, remote and island areas. The meeting closed at 5.52 pm. 1 No. 2 Thursday 17 May 2001 The meeting opened at 9.30 am. 1. Special Educational Needs: Irene McGugan, on behalf of the Education, Culture and Sport Committee, moved S1M-1931—That the Parliament notes the 3rd Report 2001 of the Education, Culture and Sport Committee, Report on Inquiry into Special Educational Needs (SP Paper 264). After debate, the motion was agreed to (DT). 2. Suspension of Standing Orders: Euan Robson, on behalf of the Parliamentary Bureau, moved S1M-1940—That the Parliament agrees that Rule 5.6.1(c) of the Standing Orders be suspended for the duration of the Meeting of the Parliament on Wednesday 23 May 2001. The motion was agreed to. 3. Business Motion: Euan Robson, on behalf of the Parliamentary Bureau, moved S1M-1939—That the Parliament agrees the following programme of business— Wednesday 23 May 2001 2.30 pm Time for Reflection followed by Parliamentary Bureau Motions followed by Standards Committee Debate on a Proposal for a Committee Bill to Establish a Standards Commissioner followed by Members' Business - debate on the subject of S1M-1935 Nora Radcliffe: Maternity Services in Gordon followed by Members' Business - debate on the subject of S1M-1926 Duncan McNeil: Local Newspaper Week, 14 to 20 May 2001 5.00 pm Decision Time Thursday 24 May 2001 9.30 am Scottish National Party Business followed by Parliamentary Bureau Motions followed by Business Motion 2.30 pm Question Time 3.10 pm First Minister's Question Time 3.30 pm Ministerial Statement 5.00 pm Decision Time 2 followed by Members' Business - debate on the subject of S1M-1921 Kay Ullrich: School Swimming Lessons Wednesday 30 May 2001 2.30 pm Time for Reflection followed by Parliamentary Bureau Motions followed by Stage 3 Debate on the Convention Rights (Compliance) (Scotland) Bill 5.00 pm Decision Time followed by Members' Business - debate on the subject of S1M-1927 Des McNulty: Chester Street Insurance Holdings Ltd Thursday 31 May 2001 9.30 am Parliamentary Bureau Motions followed by Stage 3 Debate on Regulation of Care (Scotland) Bill followed by Business Motion 2.30 pm Question Time 3.10 pm First Minister's Question Time 3.30 pm Continuation of Stage 3 Debate on Regulation of Care (Scotland) Bill 5.00 pm Decision Time followed by Members' Business - debate on the subject of S1M-1932 David McLetchie: Proposed Cuts to The Scottish Regiments The motion was agreed to. 4. Question Time: Questions were answered by the First Minister and other Ministers and junior Scottish Ministers. 5. Scottish Local Authorities (Tendering) Bill – Stage 1: The Deputy Minister for Finance and Local Government (Peter Peacock) moved S1M-1843—That the Parliament agrees to the general principles of the Scottish Local Authorities (Tendering) Bill. Mr Keith Harding moved amendment S1M-1843.1 to motion S1M-1843— Leave out from “agrees” to end and insert— “does not agree to the general principles of the Scottish Local Authorities (Tendering) Bill because it believes that the Executive should give priority to the drafting of a Bill on Best Value so that it can be placed before the Parliament before the end of this year, and therefore calls upon the Executive to make an early announcement of its proposals, together with a timetable, for the publication of a draft bill to introduce a statutory framework for Best Value.” After debate, the amendment was disagreed to ((DT) by division: For 14, Against 80, Abstentions 0). 3 The motion was then agreed to ((DT) by division: For 81, Against 13, Abstentions 0). 6. Approval of SSIs: Euan Robson, on behalf of the Parliamentary Bureau, moved S1M-1933—That the Parliament agrees that the following instruments be approved— the draft Justices of the Peace (Tribunal) (Scotland) Regulations 2001; the draft Part-Time Sheriffs (Removal Tribunal) Regulations 2001; and the draft Sex Offenders (Notice Requirements) (Foreign Travel) (Scotland) Regulations 2001. The motion was agreed to (DT). 7. Motion without notice: Mr Tom McCabe, on behalf of the Parliamentary Bureau, moved without notice that, under Rule 11.2.4, Decision Time be taken at 4.44 pm. The motion was agreed to. 8. Decision Time: The Parliament took decisions on items 1, 5 and 6 as noted above. 9. National Breastfeeding Awareness Week: The Parliament debated S1M- 1859 in the name of Elaine Smith—That the Parliament notes the importance of National Breastfeeding Awareness Week from 13-19 May 2001; recognises that breastfeeding is the best form of nutrition for babies and is good for mothers’ health too; notes with concern that the Guthrie Statistics from 1999 indicate that the two main hospitals serving constituents from Coatbridge and Chryston had the lowest percentage of breastfeeding mothers in Scotland, and believes that a national campaign is required to increase public acceptance that “breast is best” in an attempt to change attitudes to mothers breastfeeding in public places and encourage more mothers to breast-feed their babies. The meeting closed at 5.35 pm. 4 No. 3 Wednesday 23 May 2001 The meeting opened at 2.30 pm. 1. Time for Reflection: The Reverend Alan G M Paterson, United Reformed Church, East Kilbride, led Time for Reflection. 2. Designation of Lead Committees: Euan Robson, on behalf of the Parliamentary Bureau, moved S1M-1955—That the Parliament agrees the following designations of Lead Committee— the Justice 1 Committee to consider the European Communities (Service of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents) (Scotland) Regulations 2001 (SSI 2001/172); and the Justice 2 Committee to consider the Sex Offenders (Notification Requirements) (Prescribed Police Stations) (Scotland) Regulations 2001 (SSI 2001/173). The motion was agreed to (DT). 3. Proposal for a Committee Bill to Establish a Standards Commissioner: Mr Mike Rumbles, on behalf of the Standards Committee, moved S1M-1901—That the Parliament agrees to the proposal for a Committee Bill under Rule 9.15 contained in the Standards Committee’s 2nd Report 2001, Proposals for a Standards Commissioner Committee Bill (SP Paper 312). After debate, the motion was agreed to (DT).
Recommended publications
  • This Thesis Has Been Submitted in Fulfilment of the Requirements for a Postgraduate Degree (E.G

    This Thesis Has Been Submitted in Fulfilment of the Requirements for a Postgraduate Degree (E.G

    This thesis has been submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for a postgraduate degree (e.g. PhD, MPhil, DClinPsychol) at the University of Edinburgh. Please note the following terms and conditions of use: This work is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights, which are retained by the thesis author, unless otherwise stated. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. Recovering the Meaning of Baptism in Westminster Calvinism in Critical Dialogue with Thomas F. Torrance John Andrew Scott Doctor of Philosophy University of Edinburgh 2015 Declaration I declare that this thesis has been composed by myself, and that the work herein contained is my own. I, furthermore, hereby indicate that this thesis does not include work submitted for any other academic degree or professional qualification Signed Rev Dr John Andrew Scott January 2015 Abstract This thesis examines and critiques the doctrine of baptism in the theology of Thomas Torrance and utilises aspects of Torrance’s doctrine to recover and enrich the meaning of baptism in Westminster theology. Torrance’s doctrine of baptism has suffered from misunderstanding and has been widely neglected. This arises from Torrance introducing a new soteriological paradigm, that is claimed by Torrance, to be both new, and at the same time to be a recovery of the work of the early church fathers and Calvin.
  • New College Bulletin 2017

    New College Bulletin 2017

    New College Bulletin 2017 New College News Remembering Prof. Duncan Forrester Spotlight On Research Reading Matters In this issue… Contents This year’s New College Bulletin highlights the international scope of our students, staff, New College News 3 and activities. Deeply rooted in Edinburgh and In memoriam, Prof Duncan Forrester 6 Scottish history, New College is a centre of Staff, Student and Alumni news 8 excellence known for attracting students and supporters from around the world. Staff interview 12 Spotlight on Research: In the current year, we have students from all corners of the world including Ethiopia, Jordan, Cyprus, the Wode Psalter 14 Australia, United States of America, Canada, Italy, Reading matters: staff publications 16 England, Hungary, India, Scotland, Romania, Scholarships update 18 Netherlands, Cameroon, Hong Kong, China, Zimbabwe, France, Denmark, South Korea, Norway, Upcoming events 20 Indonesia, Taiwan, Sweden, Singapore, Brazil, Greece, Guatemala, Poland, Japan, Slovakia, and Switzerland. Many of you asked for interviews with academic and support staff. So, in this year’s Bulletin we hear from Dr Naomi Appleton, Senior Lecturer in Asian Religions. In the last couple of years, some of our major developments have been in the area of Science and Religion, which include both degree programmes and a more recent academic animal called a ‘MOOC’! We also feature information on our scholarships, which are increasingly important as fees and living costs continue to rise. As you’ll see elsewhere in these pages, we are able to offer a significant number of scholarships each year. Thanks to the ongoing philanthropic support of our alumni and supporters we have been able to grow existing scholarship funds and establish new ones.
  • WASHINGTON LETTER from the VICE-CHANCELLOR, PROFESSOR LOUISE RICHARDSON

    WASHINGTON LETTER from the VICE-CHANCELLOR, PROFESSOR LOUISE RICHARDSON

    8–9 OXFORD comes to WASHINGTON LETTER from THE VICE-CHANCELLOR, PROFESSOR LOUISE RICHARDSON Dear Oxonians and Friends of Oxford, reetings from Oxford! On behalf of my colleagues 8–9 throughout the Collegiate University, I am delighted to G extend this invitation for you to join us at the 2016 Oxford North American Alumni Weekend. OXFORD comes to As you may have noticed, this year’s event will be held in Washington, DC, one of the largest and most dynamic Oxonian communities in the world. This will be the first time in its twenty-five year history © Janet Cairns Photo WASHINGTON that the Alumni Weekend will be held in a city other than New York. To celebrate this move, the Friday night gala, which is open to all alumni and friends of the FRIDAY 8 APRIL University, will be held in one of the iconic buildings within the Capital District: the Library of Congress. This spectacular venue promises to be the ideal setting in which to launch an LIBRARY OF CONGRESS engaging and enjoyable weekend. 10 FIRST STREET SE The ties that bind the US and the UK are famously close. Indeed, both the Chancellor and WASHINGTON, DC 20540 I have written books on the Special Relationship between the two allies. Oxford has long been very much a part of this bond between our countries. The extraordinary education we provide, from the nurturing environments of the Colleges, to the personalized instruction of the tutorials, to the cutting-edge research conducted across a staggeringly SATURDAY 9 APRIL broad spectrum of disciplines, serve as the very foundation for our great democracies, so OMNI SHOREHAM HOTEL we take particular pleasure in hosting this year’s event in the US capital.
  • Spice Briefing

    Spice Briefing

    MSPs BY CONSTITUENCY AND REGION Scottish SESSION 1 Parliament This Fact Sheet provides a list of all Members of the Scottish Parliament (MSPs) who served during the first parliamentary session, Fact sheet 12 May 1999-31 March 2003, arranged alphabetically by the constituency or region that they represented. Each person in Scotland is represented by 8 MSPs – 1 constituency MSPs: Historical MSP and 7 regional MSPs. A region is a larger area which covers a Series number of constituencies. 30 March 2007 This Fact Sheet is divided into 2 parts. The first section, ‘MSPs by constituency’, lists the Scottish Parliament constituencies in alphabetical order with the MSP’s name, the party the MSP was elected to represent and the corresponding region. The second section, ‘MSPs by region’, lists the 8 political regions of Scotland in alphabetical order. It includes the name and party of the MSPs elected to represent each region. Abbreviations used: Con Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party Green Scottish Green Party Lab Scottish Labour LD Scottish Liberal Democrats SNP Scottish National Party SSP Scottish Socialist Party 1 MSPs BY CONSTITUENCY: SESSION 1 Constituency MSP Region Aberdeen Central Lewis Macdonald (Lab) North East Scotland Aberdeen North Elaine Thomson (Lab) North East Scotland Aberdeen South Nicol Stephen (LD) North East Scotland Airdrie and Shotts Karen Whitefield (Lab) Central Scotland Angus Andrew Welsh (SNP) North East Scotland Argyll and Bute George Lyon (LD) Highlands & Islands Ayr John Scott (Con)1 South of Scotland Ayr Ian
  • Ministers, Law Officers and Ministerial Parliamentary Aides by Cabinet

    Ministers, Law Officers and Ministerial Parliamentary Aides by Cabinet

    MINISTERS, LAW OFFICERS AND Scottish MINISTERIAL PARLIAMENTARY AIDES BY Parliament CABINET: SESSION 1 Fact sheet This Fact sheet provides a list of all of the Scottish Ministers, Law Officers and Ministerial Parliamentary Aides during Session 1, from 12 May 1999 until the appointment of new Ministers in the second MSPs: Historical parliamentary session. Series Ministers and Law Officers continue to serve in post during 30 March 2007 dissolution. The first Session 2 cabinet was appointed on 21st May 2003. A Minister is a member of the government. The Scottish Executive is the government in Scotland for devolved matters and is responsible for formulating and implementing policy in these areas. The Scottish Executive is formed from the party or parties holding a majority of seats in the Parliament. During Session 1 the Scottish Executive consisted of a coalition of Labour and Liberal Democrat MSPs. The senior Ministers in the Scottish government are known as ‘members of the Scottish Executive’ or ‘the Scottish Ministers’ and together they form the Scottish ‘Cabinet’. They are assisted by junior Scottish Ministers. With the exception of the Scottish Law Officers, all Ministers must be MSPs. This fact sheet also provides a list of the Law Officers. The Scottish Law Officers listed advise the Scottish Executive on legal matters and represent its interests in court. The final section lists Ministerial Parliamentary Aides (MPAs). MPAs are MSPs appointed by the First Minister on the recommendation of Ministers whom they assist in discharging their duties. MPAs are unpaid and are not part of the Executive. Their role and the arrangements for their appointment are set out in paragraphs 4.6-4.13 of the Scottish Ministerial Code.
  • Police Scotland Custody Update

    Police Scotland Custody Update

    OFFICIAL Agenda Item 4 Meeting SPA Policing Performance Date 8 June 2021 Location Video Conference Title of Paper Police Scotland Custody Update (including Children in Custody & CPT paper) Presented By ACC Kenny MacDonald, Criminal Justice Recommendation to Members For Discussion Appendix Attached Yes Appendix A – CPT Report 2018 Visit Appendix B – UK NPM Report Written Response Appendix C – London Road Custody images PURPOSE This report provides an update on progression against the recommendations made by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) following the visit to the United Kingdom in 2018. Additionally, a custody update regarding children in custody. SPA Policing Performance Police Scotland Custody update (including Children in Custody & CPT) 8 June 2021 OFFICIAL 1 OFFICIAL 1. BACKGROUND 1.1 In 2018 a delegation of the CPT made an ad hoc visit to Scotland to examine the situation in police and prison establishments and to assess the progress made since their previous visit in 2012. A report was published in 2019 which generated twelve recommendations for Police Scotland. (Appendix A) 1.2 Police Scotland have undertaken significant work to address the recommendations within the report and continue to prioritise work in this area ensuring at all times our organisational values of fairness, integrity, respect and human rights are at the heart of our approach. 1.3 In 2020 the UK National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) conducted a desk based review of progress against some of the recommendations made in 2018. It should be noted that this review also included recommendations in relation to the Scottish Prison Service, which are out with the scope of this report.
  • Independent Review of Complaints Handling, Investigations and Misconduct Issues in Relation to Policing

    Independent Review of Complaints Handling, Investigations and Misconduct Issues in Relation to Policing

    Independent Review of Complaints Handling, Investigations and Misconduct Issues in Relation to Policing Final Report November 2020 The Rt. Hon. Dame Elish Angiolini DBE QC Contents Page No. Foreword 9 Acknowledgements 17 Executive summary 21 1. Introduction 42 Terms of Reference and purpose of the Independent Review 42 Methodology 42 Principles that underpin police complaints arrangements 43 Public expectations of police officers and the role of a constable 45 Public expectations of the complaints system 48 2. Background 49 3. Legal and ethical framework 51 Codes of ethics 54 4. Complaints handling process, investigations and misconduct 59 How do I make a complaint about the police? 60 5. Justice Committee Post-Legislative Scrutiny Inquiry 64 6. Themes emerging in evidence 68 Evidence from members of the public 68 Accessibility 69 Lack of independence 70 Failure to investigate or to investigate independently 70 Understanding the process 70 The attitude of police officers 71 Body-worn video cameras 72 Delays 72 Written records 73 Views on the Police Investigations and Review Commissioner 73 1 Apology 74 Mediation 76 Communications 76 Whistleblowing 77 Call for evidence 77 7. Police Scotland 81 Professional Standards Department of Police Scotland 81 Frontline resolution 88 Triage 95 Early intervention 96 Independent investigation 97 Grievance procedure 103 Supervisory ratios and promotion 105 Post-incident conferral 108 The obligation of a constable to assist the investigation of a death or serious incident 113 Malicious, vexatious or frivolous complaints 117 Anonymous complaints 120 Definition of a “person serving with the police” 121 Recommendations in relation to Police Scotland 123 8.
  • The Church: Towards a Common Vision

    The Church: Towards a Common Vision

    ONE IN CHRIST CONTENTS VOLUME 49 (2015) NUMBER 2 ARTICLES The Church: Towards a Common Vision. A Faith and Order Perspective. Mary Tanner 171 Towards the Common Good. A Church and Society Perspective on The Church: Towards a Common Vision. William Storrar 182 Catholic Perspectives on The Church: Towards A Common Vision. Catherine E. Clifford 192 Questions of Unity, Diversity and Authority in The Church: Towards a Common Vision. Advances and Tools for Ecumenical Dialogue. Kristin Colberg 204 Catholic Appropriation and Critique of The Church: Towards a Common Vision. Brian P. Flanagan 219 Communion and Communication among the Churches in the Tradition of Alexandria. Mark Sheridan OSB 235 Squaring the Circle: Anglicans and the Recognition of Holy Orders. Will Adam 254 Ecumenism: Why the Slow Progress? Gideon Goosen 270 REPORTS The Fiftieth Anniversary of the Corrymeela Community. Pádraig Ó Tuama 285 The Hurley Legacy: a personal appreciation. Paddy Kearney 294 Saint Irenaeus Joint Orthodox-Catholic Working Group. Communiqué – Halki 2015 299 A Contribution from the Anglican-Roman Catholic Dialogue of Canada to the Anglican Church of Canada’s Commission on the Marriage Canon. 303 BOOK REVIEWS 317 170 ONE IN CHRIST VOL.49 NO.2 EDITORIAL Most of the articles in this issue are devoted to The Church: Towards a Common Vision (Faith and Order Paper 214, WCC 2013). We are pleased to publish contributions from the Catholic Theological Society of America (Clifford, Colberg, Flanagan), and papers originating in the December 2015 conference of the Joint Commission on Doctrine of the Church of Scotland and the Roman Catholic Church (Tanner, Storrar).
  • A Formal Complaint to Central Scotland Police

    A Formal Complaint to Central Scotland Police

    A Formal complaint to Central Scotland Police (Family Unit Bannockburn) regarding allegations of physical and sexual abuse of pupils at Queen Victoria School Dunblane between 1989 & 1992 Index of Contents, Page 1 (This Page) Bookmark Description (pdf) From page to page. Explanatory note including the background of the complaint 2 3 Submissions to Lord Gill as Commissioner of Q.V.S. 4 12 Terms of Reference 13 13 Report re the Abuse & Bullying of Children at Q.V.S. 14 65 Squire Liddell correspondence 66 75 First letter to Commissioners & Responses 76 80 Second letter to Commissioners & Responses 81 101 Ogilvie, Boal, & Ure Evidence transcripts 102 110 Correspondence with Lord Advocate 111 121 “Cullen Uncovered” 122 127 Lord George Robertson 128 135 Complaint Inchmoan Camp 136 137 Telephone Notes of T. Minogue 138 139 Board of Governors QVS & Correspondence log 140 145 The Grand Lodge of Scotland 146 E-mail Addendum to the Lord Gill complaint 147 150 Letter of response from Lord Gill (6th June 03) 151 Final letter to Lord Gill (7th June 03) 152 153 Formal Complaint to Elish Angiolini, Solicitor General 154 Solicitor General’s rejection of Formal Complaint 155 156 Acknowledgement of Solicitor General’s rejection 157 159 Request that the Solicitor General reconsider the complaint 160 Solicitor Generals’s instruction to take complaint to police 161 Letter advising Solicitor General of my complaint to police 162 163 Thomas Minogue 94 Victoria Terr. Dunfermline FIFE KY12 0LU Tel:01383 729869 E-mail: [email protected] The Officer in Charge Central Scotland Police Family Unit Bannockburn Police Office Stirling Monday 29th September 03 Dear Sir or Madam: Formal complaint regarding the physical and sexual abuse of pupils at Queen Victoria School Dunblane between 1989 and 1992.
  • Communities Committee

    Communities Committee

    COMMUNITIES COMMITTEE Wednesday 13 September 2006 Session 2 £5.00 Parliamentary copyright. Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body 2006. Applications for reproduction should be made in writing to the Licensing Division, Her Majesty‟s Stationery Office, St Clements House, 2-16 Colegate, Norwich NR3 1BQ Fax 01603 723000, which is administering the copyright on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body. Produced and published in Scotland on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body by Astron. CONTENTS Wednesday 13 September 2006 Col. PLANNING ETC (SCOTLAND) BILL: STAGE 2 ..................................................................................................... 3857 COMMUNITIES COMMITTEE 23rd Meeting 2006, Session 2 CONVENER *Karen Whitefield (Airdrie and Shotts) (Lab) DEPUTY CONVENER *Euan Robson (Roxburgh and Berwickshire) (LD) COMMITTEE MEMBERS *Scott Barrie (Dunfermline West) (Lab) *Cathie Craigie (Cumbernauld and Kilsyth) (Lab) *Christine Grahame (South of Scotland) (SNP) *Patrick Harvie (Glasgow) (Green) *John Home Robertson (East Lothian) (Lab) *Tricia Marwick (Mid Scotland and Fife) (SNP) *Dave Petrie (Highlands and Islands (Con) COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTES Chris Ballance (South of Scotland) (Green) Alex Johnstone (North East Scotland) (Con) Christine May (Central Fife) (Lab) Mike Rumbles (West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine) (LD) Ms Sandra White (Glasgow) (SNP) *attended THE FOLLOWING ALSO ATTENDED: Jackie Baillie (Dumbarton) (Lab) Sarah Boyack (Edinburgh Central) (Lab) Donald Gorrie (Central Scotland) (LD) Fiona
  • Meeting of the Parliament

    Meeting of the Parliament

    MEETING OF THE PARLIAMENT Wednesday 23 March 2005 Session 2 £5.00 Parliamentary copyright. Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body 2005. Applications for reproduction should be made in writing to the Licensing Division, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, St Clements House, 2-16 Colegate, Norwich NR3 1BQ Fax 01603 723000, which is administering the copyright on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body. Produced and published in Scotland on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body by Astron. CONTENTS Wednesday 23 March 2005 Debates Col. TIME FOR REFLECTION .................................................................................................................................. 15593 ENTERPRISE CULTURE .................................................................................................................................. 15595 The Deputy Minister for Education and Young People (Euan Robson) .................................................. 15595 Jim Mather (Highlands and Islands) (SNP) ............................................................................................. 15600 Murdo Fraser (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Con) ........................................................................................... 15604 Christine May (Central Fife) (Lab) ........................................................................................................... 15608 Stewart Stevenson (Banff and Buchan) (SNP) ....................................................................................... 15611
  • The Guide Toplanning LAWYERS2013

    The Guide Toplanning LAWYERS2013

    the guide to PLANNING LAWYERS 201314 2 JUNE PLANNING LAWYERS INTRODUCTION Legal brieng rey areas abound in the interpretation The government’s new tax on development pro- of planning legislation and policy. The posals, the Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL), Ggovernment’s ongoing programme of is another growth area for the legal trade. Many planning reform and delays in develop- lawyers are advising clients on how local authority ment plan adoption are among factors creating a CIL charging schedules will affect their schemes. climate of uncertainty in which parties on all sides Others are helping councils ensure their charge see opportunities to press their own interests. rates pass the soundness tests set by ministers. The threat of litigation hovers over almost any These are just some areas where legal expertise major development or infrastructure proposal or is proving essential for parties seeking to realise local authority planning policy. In this climate, their aspirations through the planning system, lawyers have a key role to play in whether they are developers, local authorities or ensuring that schemes and third parties. A clear steer on the best sources of policies are fire-proofed legal advice is vital for anyone trying to nego- Contents against legal challenge. tiate this minefield. The Guide to Planning The government has Lawyers aims to help in two ways. 05 THE PLANNING TEAM taken steps to curtail First, it offers an element of peer re- Solicitors Law firms are Editorial the scope for chal- view via our annual Planning Law T 020 8267 4381 advising on many of the E [email protected] lenge, but these may Survey.