GLC76715 John Jay, Et Al. To

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

John Jay, et al. to [New York State Legislature] s.l., 11 May 1786. Document, 2 pages. 1786 [cut off] 11 of God, are held in Slavery by the Laws of this State, view with Pain and Regret the additional Miseries which those unhappy People experience from the practice of exporting them like Cattle, and other Articles of Commerce to the West Indies and the Southern States. – That in the course of this inhuman Commerce there have been frequent and very affecting Instances of Husbands being Torn from their wives. Wives from their Husbands; Parents from their Children; Children from their Parents. That there have also been Instances of manumitted Slaves and other Freemen, whose Colour exposed them such Outrages; being Kidnapped and carried to Market in distant Parts- -That it is well known that the condition of the Slaves in this State is far more tolerable and easy than in many other countries; and that Consideration alone, Independent of the many abuses attending it; pleads strongly for prohibiting a Commerce so repugnant to Humanity and so Inconsistent with the Liberality and justice which should distinguish a Free and Enlightened People— Your memorialists therefore humbly Pray that your honorable Body will be pleased to take the premises into your favorable Consideration; and pass an Act to prevent the further exportation of Negro Slaves from this State. And your memorialist shall ever pray— John Jay, Robert R. Livingston, James Duane, Nicholas Fish, Charles McKnight, Robert Harpur, John Lamb, John Alsop, John Daniel Gross, Benjamin Moor, John H. Livingston, John [2]1786, 5 mo. 11 John Gans, Samuel Welldo, Samuel Provost, John Rogers, John Mason, Abraham Beach, David Provost, Melancton Smith, Lewis Scott, John Cortlandt, Robert G. Livingston, Benjamin Kissam, Nicholas Romain, John Cochran, Walter Rutherford, John Bard, Peter Kettletas, James Nicholson, William [S.] Livingston, Robert Gilbert Livingston, William Constable, John Delafield, A. Gilchrist, - [illegible] James Giles, T. Wainwright, T. Atkinson, Comfort Sands, Walter Livingston, Robert Benson, [Balth], [illegible], Samuel Bard, Richard Varick, Andrew Hammersly, Anthony L. Bleecker, Thomas Lawrence, William W. Morris, Brockholst Livingston, Pascal N. Smith, David Gilson, Samuel Ogden, J. Waddington, M. Willet, George GLC76715 Bond, D. Brooks, John Broome, Henry Remsen, Abraham P. Lott, Benjamin Blagge, Ebenezer Crosby, Ebenezer Hazzard, Henry Rutgers, M. Treat, Jeremiah Wool, William B. Smith, Annanias Cooper, F. Chriptic, John Lawrence, William Nelson, William W. Gilbert, George Fisher, William Pitt Smith, G. Duyckinck Junr. John Thompson, James Beekman, Robert Johnston, Cornelius Roosevelt, G. Duyckinck, Richard C. Moore, Charles Duryee, Francis Panton, John Keefe, Daniel C. Verplanck, James, M. Hughes, Jacob Remsen, Cornelius J. Bogert, James Bleecker, Alexander Hamilton, Pierre Van Cortlandt John GLC76715 .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

The Van Cortlandt Family
THE VAN CORTLANDT FAMILY BY L. EFFINGHAM DE FOREST, A.M., J.D., F.I.A.G. THE HISTORICA.L PUBLICATION SOCIETY NEW YORK Copyright 1930 by THE HISTORICAL PUBLICATION SOCIETY NEW YORK NOTE I This account •bf the Van Cortlandt family was prepared as an example of the articles to. be included in the series of volumes entitled THE OLD NEW YORK F.AMILIES . which will be prepared under the editorial super• vision of L. Effingham de Forest and published by The Historical Publication Soc'iety. THE VAN CORTLANDT FAMILY . HE VAN CORTLANDT family was one of the most L"lfluen ,..::::==-.1~91:1.1.:...=:::::::~ tial and prominent in Colonial New York. l11 that small group of families interlocked by marriage and interest which largely controlled th~. Colony, Province and State uritil the decline of aristocracy in the government of N 2w York the Van Cortlandts played a strong hand. In comm~rcial, pol itical and military 6elds their importance contin:i~d ·for generation~. · The founder of this f~ily iµ the sµi,all_ Dutch town of New Amsterdam was one Oloff Stevense Van,.Co~landt. Of ' •. ~' • t ,- • his origin many fanciful tales have been told and frequ~n::l y the story has been printed ,that he was a descendant of the Dukes of Co:irland and came to. this country as an officer of Dutch troops. · Even Burke of the "P .'!erag ./' once published this a.ccount of the Van Cortlandt origin but it was quietly dropped from later editions of that particular work on the British gentry• .,, Little is actually known of tbe origin of OloJf Stev~~e.
[Show full text]
Louisa Wood Ruby
CHAPTER ONE DUTCH ART AND THE HUDSON VALLEY PATROON PAINTERS Louisa Wood Ruby One of the earliest "schools" of American painting, the Hudson Valley patroon painters, has often been considered to have derived from seventeenth-century English portraiture. Portraits of English aristo- crats appealed to Dutch patroons as displays of the kind of social status they aspired to in their new country. British mezzotints after original paintings by Sir Godfrey Kneller and others provided the patroon painters with readily available models on which to base their portraits of wealthy Dutch Americans. Unfortunately, this convincing analysis vastly underestimates the influence of Dutch art and taste on the development of these paintings. Frequently overlooked in the discussion of the appeal of British portraiture to Dutch patroons is the fact that English portraiture of the seventeenth century was, in fact, a direct descendant of the Netherlandish portrait tradition. Kneller, the main source for the mez- zotints that flooded New York, was trained in Amsterdam. Sir Peter Lely was born in Holland, and of course Sir Anthony Van Dyck was from Antwerp. Wealthy Dutch families in New York would have been aware of the Netherlandish tradition through works of art they brought with them from their homeland. Indeed, the first paintings produced in New Amsterdam and early New York were essentially Dutch, since no other tradition existed here at the time. When British mezzotints finally arrived in 17 10, they did indeed appeal to the patroon families, most likely because they were works grounded in the Dutch tradition, then overlaid with elements of British culture and style.
[Show full text]
The Revolutionary Movement in New York, 1773–1777
University of Kentucky UKnowledge United States History History 1966 The Road to Independence: The Revolutionary Movement in New York, 1773–1777 Bernard Mason State University of New York at Binghamton Click here to let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Thanks to the University of Kentucky Libraries and the University Press of Kentucky, this book is freely available to current faculty, students, and staff at the University of Kentucky. Find other University of Kentucky Books at uknowledge.uky.edu/upk. For more information, please contact UKnowledge at [email protected]. Recommended Citation Mason, Bernard, "The Road to Independence: The Revolutionary Movement in New York, 1773–1777" (1966). United States History. 66. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/upk_united_states_history/66 The 'l(qpd to Independence This page intentionally left blank THE ROAD TO INDEPENDENCE The 'R!_,volutionary ~ovement in :J{£w rork, 1773-1777~ By BERNARD MASON University of Kentucky Press-Lexington 1966 Copyright © 1967 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY PRESS) LEXINGTON FoR PERMISSION to quote material from the books noted below, the author is grateful to these publishers: Charles Scribner's Sons, for Father Knickerbocker Rebels by Thomas J. Wertenbaker. Copyright 1948 by Charles Scribner's Sons. The Bobbs-Merrill Company, Inc., for John Jay by Frank Monaghan. Copyright 1935 by the Bobbs-Merrill Com pany, Inc., renewed 1962 by Frank Monaghan. The Regents of the University of Wisconsin, for The History of Political Parties in the Province of New York J 17 60- 1776) by Carl L. Becker, published by the University of Wisconsin Press. Copyright 1909 by the Regents of the University of Wisconsin.
[Show full text]
Early New York Houses (1900)
1 f A ':-- V ,^ 4* .£^ * '"W "of o 5 ^/ v^v %-^v V^\^ ^^ > . V .** .-•jfltef-. %.^ .-is»i-. \.^ .-^fe-. *^** -isM'. \,/ V s\ " c«^W.».' . o r^0^ a? %<> **' -i v , " • S » < •«. ci- • ^ftl>a^'» ( c 'f ^°- ^ '^#; > ^ " • 1 * ^5- «> w * dsf\\Vv>o», . O V ^ V u 4- ^ ° »*' ^> t*o* **d« vT1 *3 ^d* 4°^ » " , ô .<4 o îW/^2, , Â ^ ^°^ fl <^ ° t'o LA o^ t « « % 1 75*° EARLY Z7Ja NEW YORK HOVSEvS 1900 EARLY NEW YORK HOVSES WITH HISTORICAL 0^ GEN- EALOGICAL NOTES BY' WILLIAM S.PELLETREAV,A.M. PHOTOGRAPHS OFOLDHOVSES C-ORIGINAL ILLVSTRATIONSBY C.G.MOLLER. JR. y y y v v v v v v v <&-;-??. IN TEN PARTS FRANCIS P.HARPER, PVBLIS HER NEW YORK,A.D.jQOO^ * vvvvvvvv 1A Library of Coi NOV 13 1900 SECOND COPY Oeliv. ORDER DIVISION MAR. 2 1901 fit,* P3b ..^..^•^•^Si^jSb;^^;^^. To the memory of WILLIAM KELBY Iâte librarian of the New York Historical Society f Whose labors of careful patient and successful research w have been equalled by few—surpassed by none. w Natvs, Decessit, MDCCCXU MDCCCXCVIII ¥ JIT TIBI TERRA LEVIJ , ^5?^5?^'55>•^••^•^=^,•^•" ==i•'t=^^•':ft>•' 1 St. Phuup's Church, Centre; Street Page 1 V 2 Old Houses on " Monkey Hill " 3/ 3 The Oldest Houses in Lafayette Place 7 / 4 The Site of Captain Kidd's House ll • 5 Old Houses on York Street 15/ 6 The Merchant's Exchange 19 V 7 Old Houses Corner of Watts and Hudson Streets 23 </ 27v/ 8 Baptist Church on Fayette Street, 1808 . 9 The in Night Before Christmas" was House which "The •/ Written 31 10 Franklin Square, in 1856 35^ 11 The First Tammany Hall 41 </ 12 Houses on Bond Street 49^ 13 The Homestead of Casper Samler 53/ 14 The Tank of the Manhattan Water Company 57 ^ 15 Residence of General Winfield Scott 61 l/ 16 The Last Dwelling House on Broadway, (The Goelet Mansion) 65^ \/ 17 Old Houses on Cornelia Street , n 18 The Last of LE Roy Place 75*/ 19 Northeast Corner of Fifth Avenue and Sixteenth Street .
[Show full text]
Introduction to the Ratification of the Constitution in New York
Introduction to the Ratification of the Constitution in New York During the decade preceding the War for Independence, New York was divided into two large provincial factions—the Delanceys and the Livingstons. When independence neared, the Delanceys were in power and they remained loyal to the king. The opposition to British imperial policy consisted of three groups—the radical elements led by New York City mechanics who advocated independence from Great Britain, a very conservative group that wanted reconciliation, and another conservative group that wanted to delay independence but would not give up key colonial rights. Because conservatives controlled the third Provincial Congress, that body gave no instructions on the question of independence to New York’s delegates to the Second Continental Congress meeting in Philadelphia. Not being instructed, the New York delegation, standing alone, did not vote on independence on 2 July 1776. Earlier, in response to the Continental Congress’ resolution of 15 May 1776, the third Provincial Congress had called on the electors in the different counties to elect a fourth provincial congress which might draft a constitution creating a state government. The election took place and the new Provincial Congress on 9 July resolved unanimously to join the other colonies in declaring independence. The next day it renamed itself the Provincial Convention. On 1 August the Convention appointed a committee of thirteen to draft a state constitution and to report by 26 August. The committee did not report until 12 March 1777. After almost six weeks of debate, the Convention on 20 April voted “in the name and by the authority of the good people of this State” to adopt the constitution.
[Show full text]
Naval Documents of the American Revolution
Naval Documents of The American Revolution Volume 4 AMERICAN THEATRE: Feb. 19, 1776–Apr. 17, 1776 EUROPEAN THEATRE: Feb. 1, 1776–May 25, 1776 AMERICAN THEATRE: Apr. 18, 1776–May 8, 1776 Part 7 of 7 United States Government Printing Office Washington, 1969 Electronically published by American Naval Records Society Bolton Landing, New York 2012 AS A WORK OF THE UNITED STATES FEDERAL GOVERNMENT THIS PUBLICATION IS IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN. MAY 1776 1413 5 May (Sunday) JOURNAL OF H.M. SLOOPHunter, CAPTAINTHOMAS MACKENZIE May 1776 ' Remarks &c in Quebec 1776 Sunday 5 at 5 A M Arrived here his Majestys Sloop surprize at 8 the surprise & Sloop Martin with part of the 29th regt landed with their Marines Light Breezes & fair Sally'd out & drove the rebels off took at different places several pieces of Cannon some Howitzers & a Quantity of Ammunition 1. PRO, Admiralty 511466. JOURNALOF H.M.S. Surprize, CAPTAINROBERT LINZEE May 1776 Runing up the River [St. Lawrence] - Sunday 5. at 4 AM. Weigh'd and came to sail, at 9 Got the Top Chains up, and Slung the yards the Island of Coudre NEBE, & Cape Tor- ment SW1/2W. off Shore 1% Mile. At 10 Came too with the Best Bower in 11 fms. of Water, Veer'd to 1/2 a Cable. at 11 Employ'd racking the Lanyards of the Shrouds, and getting every thing ready for Action. Most part little Wind and Cloudy, Remainder Modre and hazey, at 2 [P.M.] Weigh'd and came to sail, Set Studding sails, nock'd down the Bulk Heads of the Cabbin at 8 PM Came too with the Best Bower in 13 £ms Veer'd to % of a Cable fir'd 19 Guns Signals for the Garrison of Quebec.
[Show full text]
Catalogue of the Officers and Alumni of Rutgers College
* o * ^^ •^^^^- ^^-9^- A <i " c ^ <^ - « O .^1 * "^ ^ "^ • Ellis'* -^^ "^ -vMW* ^ • * ^ ^^ > ->^ O^ ' o N o . .v^ .>^«fiv.. ^^^^^^^ _.^y^..^ ^^ -*v^^ ^'\°mf-\^^'\ \^° /\. l^^.-" ,-^^\ ^^: -ov- : ^^--^ .-^^^ \ -^ «7 ^^ =! ' -^^ "'T^s- ,**^ .'i^ %"'*-< ,*^ .0 : "SOL JUSTITI/E ET OCCIDENTEM ILLUSTRA." CATALOGUE ^^^^ OFFICERS AND ALUMNI RUTGEES COLLEGE (ORIGINALLY QUEEN'S COLLEGE) IlSr NEW BRUJSrSWICK, N. J., 1770 TO 1885. coup\\.to ax \R\l\nG> S-^ROUG upsoh. k.\a., C\.NSS OP \88\, UBR^P,\^H 0? THP. COLLtGit. TRENTON, N. J. John L. Murphy, Printer. 1885. w <cr <<«^ U]) ^-] ?i 4i6o?' ABBREVIATIONS L. S. Law School. M. Medical Department. M. C. Medical College. N. B. New Brunswick, N. J. Surgeons. P. and S. Physicians and America. R. C. A. Reformed Church in R. D. Reformed, Dutch. S.T.P. Professor of Sacred Theology. U. P. United Presbyterian. U. S. N. United States Navy. w. c. Without charge. NOTES. the decease of the person. 1. The asterisk (*) indicates indicates that the address has not been 2. The interrogation (?) verified. conferred by the College, which has 3. The list of Honorary Degrees omitted from usually appeared in this series of Catalogues, is has not been this edition, as the necessary correspondence this pamphlet. completed at the time set for the publication of COMPILER'S NOTICE. respecting every After diligent efforts to secure full information knowledge in many name in this Catalogue, the compiler finds his calls upon every one inter- cases still imperfect. He most earnestly correcting any errors, by ested, to aid in completing the record, and in the Librarian sending specific notice of the same, at an early day, to Catalogue may be as of the College, so that the next issue of the accurate as possible.
[Show full text]
Loyalists in War, Americans in Peace: the Reintegration of the Loyalists, 1775-1800
University of Kentucky UKnowledge University of Kentucky Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2008 LOYALISTS IN WAR, AMERICANS IN PEACE: THE REINTEGRATION OF THE LOYALISTS, 1775-1800 Aaron N. Coleman University of Kentucky, [email protected] Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Coleman, Aaron N., "LOYALISTS IN WAR, AMERICANS IN PEACE: THE REINTEGRATION OF THE LOYALISTS, 1775-1800" (2008). University of Kentucky Doctoral Dissertations. 620. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/gradschool_diss/620 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Kentucky Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ABSTRACT OF DISSERATION Aaron N. Coleman The Graduate School University of Kentucky 2008 LOYALISTS IN WAR, AMERICANS IN PEACE: THE REINTEGRATION OF THE LOYALISTS, 1775-1800 _________________________________________________ ABSTRACT OF DISSERTATION _________________________________________________ A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the College of Arts and Sciences at the University of Kentucky By Aaron N. Coleman Lexington, Kentucky Director: Dr. Daniel Blake Smith, Professor of History Lexington, Kentucky 2008 Copyright © Aaron N. Coleman 2008 iv ABSTRACT OF DISSERTATION LOYALISTS IN WAR, AMERICANS IN PEACE: THE REINTEGRATION OF THE LOYALISTS, 1775-1800 After the American Revolution a number of Loyalists, those colonial Americans who remained loyal to England during the War for Independence, did not relocate to the other dominions of the British Empire.
[Show full text]
ALBION COLLEGE GRADUATING CLASS INDEX Additional Terms and Years Will Be Added As Time Allows
ALBION COLLEGE GRADUATING CLASS INDEX Additional terms and years will be added as time allows. We know some names are missing, so if you see a correction please, contact us. Winter Term Green, Denslow Elmer Pray Jr., Isaac Green, Harriet E. F. Roberts, Richard Ely 1843 Green, Marshall Robertson, George [Attendees not Graduates] Green, Perkins Hatfield Rogers, William Alcott, George Brooks Gregory, Huldah Montgomery Allen, Amos Stebbins Gregory, Sarah Ann Stout, Byron Gray Avery, William Miller Hannahs, George Stuart, Caroline Elizabeth Baley, Cinderella Harroun, Denison Smith Sutton, Moses Barker, Ellen Harroun, Sarah Eliza Timms, Daniel M. Barney, Daniel Herrick, Albert Torry, Ripley Alcander Basset, George Stillson Hickey, Manasseh Torry, Susan Woodbury Baughman, Mary Hickey, Minerva Tuttle, Marquis Hull Elizabeth Holmes, Henry James Tuttle, William Henry Benedict, Mary Elizabeth Ketchum, George Volentine, Nelson Benedict, Jr, Moses Knapp, John Henry Vose, Charles Otis Bidwell, Sarah Ann Lake, Dessoles Waldo, Campbell Griswold Blodgett, Hudson Lewis, Cyrus Augustus Ward, Heman G. Blodgett, Hiram Merrick Lewis, Mary Athalia Warner, Darius Blodgett, Mary Louisa Lewis, Mary Jane Williamson, Calvin Hawley Blodgett, Silas Wright Lewis, Sarah Augusta Williamson, Peter Brown, William Jacobs, Rebecca Wood, William Somers Burns, David Joomis, James Joline Woodruff, Morgan Carmichael, Allen Ketchum, Cornelia Young, Urial Chamberlain, Roderick Rochester Champlin, Cornelia Loomis, Samuel Sured Summer Term Champlin, Nelson Loomis, Seth Sured Chatfield, Elvina Lucas, Joseph Orin 1844 Coonradt, Ann Elizabeth Mahaigeosing [Attendees not graduates] Coonradt, Mary Margaret McArthur, Peter D. Classical Cragan, Louisa Mechem, Stanley Cragan, Matthew Merrill, George Department Crane, Horace Delphin Washington Adkins, Lydia Flora De Puy, Maria H. Messer, Lydia Allcott, George B.
[Show full text]
Federalism and the Original Meaning of the Second Amendment
Georgia Southern University Digital Commons@Georgia Southern Electronic Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies, Jack N. Averitt College of Spring 2011 Necessary to the Security of a Free State: Federalism and the Original Meaning of the Second Amendment Douglas H. Walker Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/etd Recommended Citation Walker, Douglas H., "Necessary to the Security of a Free State: Federalism and the Original Meaning of the Second Amendment" (2011). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 598. https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/etd/598 This thesis (open access) is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies, Jack N. Averitt College of at Digital Commons@Georgia Southern. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Georgia Southern. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NECCESARY TO THE SECURITY OF A FREE STATE: FEDERALISM AND THE ORIGINAL MEANING OF THE SECOND AMENDMENT by DOUGLAS H. WALKER (Under the Direction of Johnathan O‘Neill) ABSTRACT Interpretations of the Second Amendment‘s original meaning encompass two extremes: an ―individual rights‖ interpretation which argues that it protects each person‘s right to own and use weapons for any non-criminal purpose; and a ―collective rights‖ interpretation which asserts that it protects only the states‘ right to maintain a National Guard force. Both positions cater to contemporary political agendas, display excessive presentism, lack lucid historical analysis, and ignore federalism and its bearing on the Second Amendment‘s original meaning. This thesis uncovers the ideological and historical origins of the right to keep and bear arms and interprets the original meaning of the Second Amendment in the context of the ratification debates and the Bill of Rights.
[Show full text]
Heroes of the Convention
Nation at the Crossroads: Video Transcript The Great New York Debate over the Constitution, 1787-88 Heroes of the Convention Pauline Maier: I think the New York Convention had a couple of heroes. One was John Jay, who was not one of these flashy orators like Robert R. Livingston or Alexander Hamilton, but who was courteous, who treated the opposition with politeness, which . who made an effort not to distort what they were saying but who was very firm that the Convention could not ratify with conditions, and who was working very hard to find some middle way that everybody could agree upon. I donʼt think he could have done it, however, without the man who was the greater hero of the two, and that is Melancton Smith. Smith was a merchant, he came from Dutchess County, had moved actually to Manhattan in the 1780s. He was one of the leading advisors of Governor George Clinton, but he had understood from early on that circumstances were shifting and that if perhaps in the beginning of the ratification controversy it made some sense to say we wonʼt ratify unless the Constitution is changed. After this Constitution had been ratified, you couldnʼt do that anymore. Now many of his colleagues remained adamant and even more so thought that their constituents were unwilling to live under a constitution that had not yet been ratified. Melancton Smith was willing to say circumstances have changed, what made sense then does not make sense now, and we have to modify what we do. And it was he and a handful of like-thinking members of the Antifederalist/Republican delegates who managed to see to it that New York ratified the Constitution.
[Show full text]
Freedom and Unfreedom in the “Garden of America:”
FREEDOM AND UNFREEDOM IN THE “GARDEN OF AMERICA:” SLAVERY AND ABOLITION IN NEW JERSEY, 1770-1857 by James J. Gigantino II (Under the Direction of Allan Kulikoff) ABSTRACT This dissertation examines abolition in New Jersey between 1770 and 1857. It argues that the American Revolution did not lead white New Jerseyans to abolish slavery. Instead, the Revolutionary War and the years following it reinforced the institution of slavery in the Garden State. This dissertation first focuses on the factors that led New Jersey to pass the Gradual Abolition Act of 1804, specifically the rise of Jeffersonian Republicanism and the influence of Quaker abolition activists and then examines the elongated abolition period which followed the enactment of gradual abolition, beginning with the role of the children born under the law, those who I call slaves for a term. The role these children played in early national America challenges our understandings of slavery and freedom. Instead of a quick abolition process, slaves and slaves for a term in New Jersey continued to serve their masters in significant numbers until the 1840s and then in smaller proportions until the eve of the Civil War. The existence of slavery in a free state challenges our understanding of the rise of capitalism in the early republic as well as the role the North played in debates over nationwide slavery issues beginning in the 1820s. This long-standing relationship to slavery helped prevent the formation of a strong abolitionist base in the 1830s and influenced Northern images of African Americans until the Civil War. Abolition in the North became very much a process, one of fits and starts which stretched from the Revolution to the Civil War and defined how Americans, white and black, understood their place in the new republic.
[Show full text]