DOCSLIB.ORG

Class & Group Actions 2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Class & Group Actions 2018 ICLG The International Comparative Legal Guide to: Class & Group Actions 2018 10th Edition A practical cross-border insight into class and group actions work Published by Global Legal Group, in association with CDR, with contributions from: Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP J. Sagar Associates Baker Botts L.L.P. Josh and Mak International Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP Lin & Partners Attorneys-at-Law Clayton Utz Linklaters LLP Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr Mori Hamada & Matsumoto Clifford Chance Munari Cavani Studio Legale De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek N.V. Norton Rose Fulbright Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP Russell McVeagh Eversheds Sutherland Ltd. Squire Patton Boggs Fangda Partners Yigal Arnon & Co. The International Comparative Legal Guide to: Class & Group Actions 2018 General Chapters: 1 EU Developments in Relation to Collective Redress – Alison Brown, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP 1 2 International Class Action Settlements in the Netherlands since Converium – Contributing Editors Jan de Bie Leuveling Tjeenk & Dennis Horeman, De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek N.V. 5 Ian Dodds-Smith & Alison Brown, Arnold & Porter 3 Deal or No Deal? Increased Judicial Scrutiny of Class Action Settlements in the U.S. – Kaye Scholer LLP Bradley J. Andreozzi, Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP 13 Sales Director Florjan Osmani Country Question and Answer Chapters: Account Director Oliver Smith Sales Support Manager 4 Australia Clayton Utz: Colin Loveday & Andrew Morrison 18 Toni Hayward Editor 5 Belgium Linklaters LLP: Joost Verlinden & Michiel Vanwynsberghe 26 Caroline Collingwood Senior Editors Suzie Levy, Rachel Williams 6 Canada Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP: Jill Lawrie & Daniel Szirmak 31 Chief Operating Officer Dror Levy 7 China Fangda Partners: Frank Li & Rebecca Lu 38 Group Consulting Editor Alan Falach 8 England & Wales Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP: Alison Brown & Ian Dodds-Smith 45 Publisher Rory Smith Published by 9 France Squire Patton Boggs: Carole Sportes & Valérie Ravit 55 Global Legal Group Ltd. 59 Tanner Street London SE1 3PL, UK 10 Germany Clifford Chance: Burkhard Schneider 63 Tel: +44 20 7367 0720 Fax: +44 20 7407 5255 Email: [email protected] URL: www.glgroup.co.uk 11 India J. Sagar Associates: Ananya Kumar & Pragya Chauhan 72 GLG Cover Design F&F Studio Design 12 Israel Yigal Arnon & Co.: Barak Tal & Ruth Loven 78 GLG Cover Image Source iStockphoto 13 Italy Munari Cavani Studio Legale: Raffaele Cavani & Bruna Alessandra Fossati 85 Printed by Stephens & George Print Group 14 Mori Hamada & Matsumoto: Daisuke Oda & Aruto Kagami 92 October 2017 Japan Copyright © 2017 Global Legal Group Ltd. 15 New Zealand Russell McVeagh: Chris Curran & Andrew Butler 100 All rights reserved No photocopying ISBN 978-1-911367-78-9 16 Pakistan Josh and Mak International: Aemen Zufikar Maluka & Pir Abdul Wahid 107 ISSN 1757-2797 Strategic Partners 17 Russia Baker Botts L.L.P.: Ivan Marisin & Vasily Kuznetsov 113 18 South Africa Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr: Pieter Conradie & Anja Hofmeyr 119 19 Switzerland Eversheds Sutherland Ltd.: Peter Haas 125 PEFC Certified 20 Taiwan Lin & Partners Attorneys-at-Law: Robert H. Lou & Joey Kao 132 This product is from sustainably managed forests and controlled sources 21 USA Norton Rose Fulbright: Daniel M. McClure & Matthew A. Dekovich 137 PEFC/16-33-254 www.pefc.org Further copies of this book and others in the series can be ordered from the publisher. Please call +44 20 7367 0720 Disclaimer This publication is for general information purposes only. It does not purport to provide comprehensive full legal or other advice. Global Legal Group Ltd. and the contributors accept no responsibility for losses that may arise from reliance upon information contained in this publication. This publication is intended to give an indication of legal issues upon which you may need advice. Full legal advice should be taken from a qualified professional when dealing with specific situations. WWW.ICLG.COM EDITORIAL Welcome to the tenth edition of The International Comparative Legal Guide to: Class & Group Actions. This guide provides corporate counsel and international practitioners with a comprehensive worldwide legal analysis of the laws and regulations of class and group actions. It is divided into two main sections: Three general chapters. These are designed to provide readers with a comprehensive overview of key issues affecting class & group actions, particularly from the perspective of a multi-jurisdictional transaction. Country question and answer chapters. These provide a broad overview of common issues in class and group actions in 18 jurisdictions. All chapters are written by leading class and group actions lawyers and industry specialists and we are extremely grateful for their excellent contributions. Special thanks are reserved for the contributing editors Ian Dodds-Smith and Alison Brown of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP for their invaluable assistance. Global Legal Group hopes that you find this guide practical and interesting. The International Comparative Legal Guide series is also available online at www.iclg.com. Alan Falach LL.M. Group Consulting Editor Global Legal Group [email protected] Chapter 10 Germany Clifford Chance Burkhard Schneider Act (Wertpapiererwerbs- und Übernahmegesetz, WpÜG). Yet, the 1 Class/Group Actions 2012 amendment has broadened the scope of the Act to include mis-selling claims in which false or misleading public information 1.1 Do you have a specific procedure for handling a series concerning securities is an element of a claim against a broker or or group of related claims? If so, please outline this. dealer in financial products. Thus, not only can parties responsible for prospectuses and ad hoc notices be defendants in model Under German law, there is no specific procedure for handling a proceedings, but also brokers and dealers. series or group of related claims applicable under all circumstances. The basic procedures of the Act, however, remain unchanged. In While the general rules of civil procedure permit groups of claimants essence, the law permits claimants to apply in their pending lawsuits to aggregate their claims into a single action, no specific procedures for a collective action regarding common factual and legal issues exist for handling these aggregated claims. Courts even have, and before a Higher Regional Court. If a sufficient number of claimants often use, discretion to split aggregate actions by multiple claimants apply within a certain time frame, the first trial court to receive an into separate individual proceedings. application will aggregate the applications and submit them to In Germany, claimants also normally only have standing to bring a Higher Regional Court. The Higher Regional Court will then their own claims in litigation. Thus, series or groups of related select a lead claimant to represent all other claimants in the model claims generally cannot be brought by individuals or institutions in a proceedings while all individual actions are stayed. Nevertheless, representative capacity. However, the principle of individual standing all other claimants may still file briefs in the model proceedings, but is softened de jure by procedures that provide for representative or are not allowed to contradict the lead claimant’s submissions. In collective actions in selected areas of law, and de facto by private practice, however, most ordinary claimants in model proceedings efforts to replicate collective procedures, by assigning numerous remain passive. Based on the lead claimant’s and the defendant(s)’ related claims to litigation vehicles established by plaintiffs’ law submissions, the Higher Regional Court will rule on the common firms, often supported by commercial third party funding. issues of fact or law raised in the aggregated applications. Hence, the model proceedings resemble a class action led by one claimant on behalf of all similarly situated claimants who have brought a lawsuit. 1.2 Do these rules apply to all areas of law or to certain The model ruling will bind trial courts in all individual actions affected sectors only e.g. competition law, security/financial by the common issues of law or fact – irrespective of whether a party services? Please outline any rules relating to specific areas of law. in these proceedings was an applicant for the model proceedings. Under the revised Act, instead of bringing a lawsuit, investors are The German Capital Investors Model Proceedings Act alternatively able to register their claims with the Higher Regional (Kapitalanleger-Musterverfahrensgesetz, KapMuG) enables investors Court handling the model proceedings. These investors do not to have elements of pending securities actions adjudicated collectively. become parties to the model proceedings and are barred from pursuing their individual claims while the model proceedings are The Act came into force in 2005, seeking to address the German pending. De jure, the registered claimants only enjoy a tolling of courts’ difficulties with administering large numbers of similar the statute of limitations for the duration of the model proceedings. securities actions, in particular over 13,000 individual actions Yet, one can expect registered claimants to benefit from thede facto brought against Deutsche Telekom. It introduced a unique procedure precedential value of model proceedings in practice. permitting claimants to collectively litigate common issues of law or fact that arise in their individual securities actions before a single higher court. In 2012, the German
Load more

Recommended publications
  • REAL ESTATE TEAM of the YEAR Sponsored by Edwards Gibson CLIFFORD CHANCE/EVERSHEDS SUTHERLAND/NETWORK RAIL NICHOLAS BARTLETT, CATHY CRICK, ANGELA KEARNS
    The Project Condor legal team with Jon Vivian of Edwards Gibson REAL ESTATE TEAM OF THE YEAR Sponsored by Edwards Gibson CLIFFORD CHANCE/EVERSHEDS SUTHERLAND/NETWORK RAIL NICHOLAS BARTLETT, CATHY CRICK, ANGELA KEARNS SEAMLESS COLLABORATION ON A GAME-CHANGING TRANSACTION Described by the FT as ‘one of the largest ever UK real estate deals’, lease seen in the real estate market’. Clifford Chance joined in March this trio of legal teams combined seamlessly on Project Condor – 2018 ‘given the complexity of the transaction and the number Network Rail’s sale of its commercial real estate, comprising 5,200 and calibre of bidders interested in the portfolio’ – and led on properties, for £1.45bn to Blackstone and Telereal Trillium. negotiations with bidders, financing and regulatory issues. Cathy Eversheds advised Network Rail, working on Condor for three Crick, general counsel (property) for Network Rail said: ‘Eversheds years designing the structure and template: managing the bidding Sutherland and Clifford Chance proved to be the perfect combination process from 130 interested parties down to one; using AI for of advisers to deliver the most complex real estate transaction in the exchange and completion; and ‘drafting possibly the most complex history of the railway.’ HIGHLY COMMENDED issues surrounding privacy and security TAYLOR WESSING BURGES SALMON/ specific to the PRC. MARK RAJBENBACH TRANSPORT FOR LONDON Advising InTown Group on the acquisition PHILIP BEER, KATIE SULLIVAN FLADGATE of 20 UK hotels and the associated Law firm and in-house team collaborated NICK MUMBY management platform from Apollo fully on the Albert Island regeneration in Advising Hodson Developments on the Global Management for more than The Royal Docks, one of the last big GLA acquisition, financing and development £700m – InTown’s first venture into sites awaiting transformative regeneration.
    [Show full text]
  • The Charter – a Short History
    The Charter – a short history The Mindful Business Charter was born out of discussions between the in house legal team at Barclays and two of their panel law firms, Pinsent Masons and Addleshaw Goddard, along the following lines: The people working in their businesses are highly driven professionals; We do pressured, often complex, work which requires high levels of cognitive functioning; We thrive on that hard work and pressure; In amongst that pressure and hard work there is stress, some of which is unnecessary; When we are stressed we work less productively, and it is not good for our health; and If we could remove that unnecessary stress, we would enable people to work more effectively and efficiently, as well as be happier and healthier. They also recognised that the pressure and stress come from multiple sources, often because of unspoken expectations of what the other requires or demands. Too often lawyers will respond to requests for work from a client with an assumption that the client requires the work as quickly as possible, whatever the demands that may make on the individuals involved, and whatever the impact upon their wellbeing, their families and much else besides. The bigger and more important the client, the greater the risk of that happening. The development of IT has contributed to this. As our connectivity has increased, there has been an inexorable drift towards an assumption that simply because we can be contactable and on demand and working 24/7, wherever we may be, that we should be. No-one stopped to think about this, to challenge it, to ask if it was what we wanted, or what we should do, or needed to do or if it was a good idea, we just went with the drift, perhaps fearful of speaking out, perhaps fearful that if we took a stand, the client would find another law firm down the road who was prepared to do whatever was required.
    [Show full text]
  • General Counsel Career Track an Eversheds Sutherland Research Report General Counsel Career Track an Eversheds Sutherland Research Report
    General Counsel Career Track An Eversheds Sutherland research report General Counsel Career Track An Eversheds Sutherland research report Contents Foreword 3 Introduction 4 Characteristics of existing General Counsel 5 What the GCs said: advice to succeed 8 The views of aspiring General Counsel 14 The way forward: some suggestions 17 In-house legal competencies framework 18 Profiles illustrating different in-house career paths 20 Acknowledgements 28 General Counsel Career Track An Eversheds Sutherland research report Foreword In the last twenty years the role of General Counsel has become more prevalent and at the same time, it has increased in influence and scope. Much has been written about this pivotal role - the independent voice on, or close to, a company’s board and yet very little has been written about how to reach what some may consider their ultimate career goal. As the role has expanded from managing a legal team As a former General Counsel I have long been an to encompassing secretariat, governance, risk, advocate for the position, recognising the great compliance and potentially a range of other central breadth and variety that the role offers and the functions, the experience and skills required to opportunity to become involved in a broad range of succeed have changed. Identifying the attributes of strategic and commercial activity. However, I have also some of the country’s most successful General witnessed highly competent in-house counsel Counsel will be helpful, but as the role expands to become too specialised either by sector or role and meet a changing work and regulatory environment, miss out on management positions by not being skills and attributes that have been valued and effective sufficiently prepared for their next promotion.
    [Show full text]
  • US PE Lending League Tables
    US PE Lending League Tables Q1 2020 Contents Credits & Contact PitchBook Data, Inc. Introduction 3 John Gabbert Founder, CEO Adley Bowden Vice President, US region 4-7 Market Development & Analysis PE deals 8-10 Content Aria Nikkhoui Data Analyst II Debt 11-12 Madison Bond Senior Research Associate, Debt Industry 13-14 Bhushan Artani Research Associate, Debt Keenan Durham Data Set Team Law firms 15 Lead, Debt Contact PitchBook Research [email protected] Cover design by Kelilah King Click here for PitchBook’s report methodologies. Introduction The US PE Lending League Tables are not only one of our PDF with similar interactive online rankings only. As a few younger editions of quarterly publications, but also they technical kinks remain to be worked out, we are currently represent a unique perspective on the credit markets. still producing the PDF edition of Lending League Tables They also can proffer a pulse on private lending’s health only. overall; for example, tallies have grown considerably more interesting in light of the pandemic that began to impact As always, we welcome your feedback, so do not hesitate transactional volume toward the end of Q1 2020. Future to reach out to [email protected]. editions will offer good indicators of where activity was able to stay most resilient as volatility surged. In addition, at the start of this year, we launched our Garrett James Black first-ever interactive league tables. We are focusing Senior Manager, Custom Research on gathering user feedback and associated data on & Publishing performance
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Full Annual Report and Financial Statements 2020
    DWF Group plc Group DWF Annual report and financial statements 2020 Built for strength and resilience DWF Group plc Annual report and financial statements 2020 DWF Group plc Annual report and financial statements 2020 Our purpose Our purpose is to transform legal services through our people for our clients. That’s why we are transforming our own business, with technological innovation, outstanding sector specialists and advanced working practices. This translates into an entirely new, resilient, business model that benefits from significant recurring revenues from institutional clients in our key industry sectors of Insurance, Financial Services and Real Estate. While the current environment is unprecedented, the Board is confident that the Group is well placed to continue to provide best service to our clients and benefit from future opportunities when the business environment normalises. We are built for both strength and resilience. Strength and resilience are directly interlinked within DWF, throughout this report, this icon highlights examples of how we put this in to practice. For the latest new releases and video presentations please see dwfgroup.com DWF Group plc Annual report and financial statements 2020 01 Highlights Solid performance report Strategic Revenue Revenue per partner1 Cost to income ratio2 Governance £297.2m £784.3k 42.6% +10.9% -9% -0.1ppts Operating Profit Underlying adjusted EBITDA3 Reported PBT statements Financial £22.2m £21.8m £18.2m +46% -22% +40% Underlying adjusted PBT4 Gross profit margin Net debt5 Other information £13.8m 47.9% £64.9m -32% -5.6ppts +£29.6m 1. Revenue per partner is calculated by dividing revenue by the FTE number of partners at the end of the financial year.
    [Show full text]
  • Guest List for Birmingham
    Guest list for Birmingham Job title Company name Finance director Alsters Kelley HR advisor Anthony Collins Solicitors HR coordinator Anthony Collins Solicitors Resourcing and talent lead Anthony Collins Solicitors Head of HR Anthony Collins Solicitors Bid executive Anthony Collins Solicitors Head of HR Bailey Wright & Co Solicitors Head of BD and marketing Barker Brettell LLP Training and events executive Birmingham Law Society Administrator and events assistant Birmingham Law Society Head of operations Birmingham Law Society Business development manager Blackhams Solicitors Head of HR Brethertons Partner Brethertons HRBP DLA Piper HR business advisor DLA Piper Senior marketing manager DLA Piper Business development manager DLA Piper Marketing and BD manager DLA Piper Senior marketing executive DWF Senior marketing manager DWF Legal PA Eversheds Sutherland Internal recruitment consultant Eversheds Sutherland HR advisor Eversheds Sutherland Internal recruitment consultant Eversheds Sutherland Senior HR business partner Eversheds Sutherland HR business partner Eversheds Sutherland Internal recruitment consultant Eversheds Sutherland Client and marketing lead EMEA Eversheds Sutherland Marketing executive Eversheds Sutherland Senior manager Eversheds Sutherland BD and marketing manager Eversheds Sutherland Videographer Eversheds Sutherland Digital designer Eversheds Sutherland Digital marketing executive Eversheds Sutherland Client communications executive Eversheds Sutherland Communications executive Eversheds Sutherland Digital marketing
    [Show full text]
  • Eversheds Sutherland History Eversheds Sutherland Is One of the World's Largest Corporate Law Firms
    Eversheds Sutherland history Eversheds Sutherland is one of the world's largest corporate law firms. Committed locally, but connected globally, with offices based in the world's major economic centres, with a proven track record of delivering consistently high quality legal services across jurisdictions. EVERSHEDS ESTABLISHED Eversheds established 1988 Eversheds established by Alexander Tatham in Manchester; Broomheads in Sheffield; Daynes Hill & Perks in Norwich and Eversheds & Tomkinson in Birmingham. REGIONAL GROWTH Regional growth 1988 The merger of Ingledew Botterell Roche & Temperley in Newcastle and Derby. REGIONAL GROWTH Regional growth 1989 Merger of Wells & Hind in Nottingham. REGIONAL GROWTH Regional growth 1989 Merger of Philips & Buck in Cardiff. REGIONAL GROWTH Regional growth 1990 Merger of Hepworth & Chadwick in Leeds. REGIONAL GROWTH Regional growth 1991 Merger with Turner Martin & Symes in Ipswich. NAME REBRAND Name rebrand 1992 'Eversheds' added as prefix to each member firm's name. REGIONAL GROWTH Regional growth 1994 Merger of Holt Philips in Bristol. NAME REBRAND Name rebrand 1995 Regional UK firms drop their own names to rebrand as one firm - Eversheds. NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL GROWTH National and international growth 1995 Joining of Jacques & Lewis in London and Brussels. REGIONAL GROWTH Regional growth 1996 Joining of Waltons & Morse in the London office. REGIONAL GROWTH Regional growth 1997 Merger of Wilkinson Maughan in the Newcastle office. INTERNATIONAL GROWTH International growth 1998 Joining of Sandal Lunoe in Copenhagen. NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL GROWTH National and international growth 1998 Joining of Frere Cholmeley Bischoff in London, Paris, Sofia and Moscow. REGIONAL GROWTH Regional growth 1998 Joining of Palmer Wheeldon to our Cambridge office.
    [Show full text]
  • Law Firm Climate Change Scorecard 2 Table of Contents
    OCTOBER 2020 THE 2020 LAW FIRM CLIMATE CHANGE SCORECARD CLIMATE SCORES FOR VAULT 100 LAW FIRMS 1 CLIMATE SCORE FIRMS Cozen O’Connor Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton A Schulte Ross & Zabel Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati Arent Fox Irell & Manella Cooley Littler Mendelson Davis Wright Tremaine Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky, & Popeo Drinker Biddle & Reath Pepper Hamilton B Fenwick & West Seyfarth Shaw Fish & Richardson WilmerHale Goodwin Procter Winston & Strawn Ballard Spahr Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner McDermott Will & Emery Debevoise & Plimpton Nixon Peabody Duane Morris Proskauer Rose Foley Hoag Quinn Emmanuel Urquhart & Sullivan C Fox Rothschild Williams & Connolly Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson Willkie Farr & Gallagher Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton Alston & Bird Katten Muchin Rosenman Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer Kellogg, Hansen, Todd, Figel, & Frederick Blank Rome Locke Lord Boies Schiller Flexner Mayer Brown Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft Morgan, Lewis & Bockius Cahill Gordon & Rendell Morrison & Foerster Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton Norton Rose Fulbright Covington & Burling O’Melveny & Myers Crowell & Moring Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe Davis Polk & Wardwell Paul Hastings Dechert Perkins Coie D Dentons Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman DLA Piper Reed Smith Foley & Lardner Ropes & Gray Greenberg Traurig Steptoe & Johnson Haynes and Boone Susman Godfrey Holland & Knight Troutman Sanders Hughes Hubbard & Reed Venable Jenner & Block Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen, & Katz Jones Day Weil,
    [Show full text]
  • Pro Bono Matters
    NYL PB Matters 06 Spg2 4/21/06 6:28 PM Page 1 PRO BONO MATTERS SPRING 2006 NYLPI and Kasowitz Benson Win Compensation for Young Person with Learning Disabilities NYLPI and Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Department of Education (DOE) to listen to Friedman LLP won a significant compen- her pleas. Her son was struggling with his satory award from the New York City disability and failing in school. His negative Department of Education on experiences had taught him to fear academic behalf of Alexander James, a NYLPI environments, further impairing his educa- young man with learning dis- SPECIAL tion. The DOE’s specialists diagnosed him abilities. He will now be able ED as mentally retarded, claiming Alexander to obtain the educational sup- was not capable of advancing in an academ- port he needs to graduate with a high school ic setting. Ms. James knew otherwise, but diploma. could not convince the bureaucracy. Cheryl James, Alexander’s mother, spent “Nobody believed me,” she recalled. “I just four frustrating years trying to get the went running around in circles…running to the school, on the phone, going to meetings.” After years of frustration, Ms. James finally connected with Pamela Hux-Singh, a special education advocate, and Kim Sweet, NYLPI Associate General Counsel and Coordinator of the Education Program. Sweet and Hux- Singh helped Ms. James build a case that Alexander could succeed academically with the intensive support of a residential school. They had him evaluated by a group of inde- pendent experts who agreed with that assessment. ALEXANDER AND CHERYL JAMES AT THE KOLBOURNE SCHOOL (CONTINUED ON PAGE 4) Inside: Pro Bono Models: Bingham McCutchen Partners with Law & Society Award Luncheon 3 Say Yes to Education to Support Harlem Families Associate Matters 4 Pro Bono Models will be a regular series school.
    [Show full text]
  • Drug and Medical Device Litigation Seminar 2019
    Drug and Medical Device Litigation Ensuring Excellence in Defending Life Sciences Companies In addition to our usual first-rate, cutting- edge presentations, we will offer something new! Witness a trial reenactment of a famous immigration case, Chy Lung v. Freeman, 92 U.S. 275 (1876), as a special diversity and inclusion presentation. The cast will feature a prominent federal judge as well as members of the DRI Drug and Medical Device Committee Steering Committee. All attendees will receive general/professional practice CLE credit or diversity and inclusion CLE credit in the relevant states. May 16–17, 2019 Renaissance Washington, D.C., Downtown Hotel Washington, D.C. lease join us in our nation’s beautiful capital for the 2019 Drug and Medical Device Seminar. This seminar Pwill provide more opportunities than ever to network with in-house counsel, leading pharmaceutical and medical device lawyers, and friends old and new. You will also hear an FDA insider’s views regarding issues facing the industry and top appellate attorneys’ thoughts regarding recent and relevant decisions affecting how we defend our clients. These and other top-notch programs make this seminar the “go-to” event year after year for practitioners in the pharmaceutical and medical device defense arena. Register today! Sheila S. Boston Sara J. Gourley Program Chair Committee Chair Erik W. Snapp Gail Rodgers Program Vice Chair Committee Vice Chair Ted J. McDonald III Law Institute PRESENTED BY DRI’s Drug and Medical Device Committee THIS SEMINAR BROCHURE IS SPONSORED BY Register online now at dri.org or complete the form in the back.
    [Show full text]
  • The Largest Commercial Law Firms in the UK Ranked by Revenue
    UK Top 50 2018-19 The largest commercial law firms in the UK ranked by revenue Rank Rank Revenue Change in Average PEP Change Total Change in total Total equity Change in total Revenue per Profit per lawyer Firm Leverage (2018-19) (2017-18) (£m) revenue (£k) in PEP partners partners partners equity partners lawyer (£k) (£k) 1 1 DLA Piper (1) 2111.0 2.8% 1,395 1.9% 1245.7 3.4% 401.0 -0.7% 570.3 151.0 8.2 2 2 Clifford Chance 1693.0 4.3% 1,620 1.3% 562 0.9% 394.0 0.5% 700.7 263.7 5.1 3 6 Linklaters 1628.7 6.9% 1,690 9.9% 464.2 0.9% 442.5 0.6% 692.7 319.7 4.3 4 4 Allen & Overy 1627.0 3.4% 1,660 1.2% 536 -0.4% 388.0 -0.3% 687.7 271.8 5.1 5 3 Hogan Lovells (1) 1577.0 -0.6% 1,029 2.9% 803 -3.9% 523.0 -5.9% 598.3 204.1 4.0 6 7 Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer 1472.0 4.9% 1,839 5.5% 377 -4.3% 370.0 -5.6% 993.9 464.6 3.0 7 5 Norton Rose Fulbright (1) 1466.0 -3.9% 675 0.7% 1166.3 -3.8% 681.4 -4.6% 434.3 136.3 4.0 8 8 CMS (2) 1204.0 6.2% 582 1.4% 1041.5 -0.5% 601.9 0.7% 325.3 93.2 5.1 9 9 Herbert Smith Freehills 965.7 4.2% 949 11.4% 452 -2.6% 323.0 -0.6% 461.4 146.5 5.5 10 10 Eversheds Sutherland (3) 875.0 8.7% 865 2.4% 739 9.0% 198.8 4.1% 362.6 71.3 11.1 11 n/a Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner (4) 669.0 n/a 627 n/a 544.2 n/a 280.7 n/a 469.6 123.5 4.1 12 12 Ashurst 641.0 13.7% 972 30.8% 392 4.8% 241.0 0.8% 453.0 165.5 4.9 13 13 Clyde & Co 611.0 10.8% 690 4.5% 430 5.7% 219.0 2.8% 355.2 87.8 6.9 14 11 Slaughter and May **(5) 590.0 3.3% 2,300 n/a 109 -2.7% 102.0 -3.8% 1092.6 434.4 4.3 15 15 Pinsent Masons 475.0 5.6% 620 -5.1% 447 4.4% 183.0 2.8% 302.4 71.2
    [Show full text]
  • Your Chance to Get Involved in the Biggest Commercial Conversation in a Generation
    Your chance to get involved in the biggest commercial conversation in a generation. Join us in Manchester – 25th & 26th February 2016 to explore the commercial realities and opportunities of the UK Northern Powerhouse and to determine ways that your business can develop more trade through the UK Northern Powerhouse concept. The event is brought to you by business for business. It is supported by the Chief Executives of all the major cities of the North of England and is backed by the Chairman of the Local Enterprise Partnerships. This will be the largest Come along in February gathering of business and be an opinion shaper leaders dedicated and lead the changes to the Northern necessary to rebalance Powerhouse following the UK economy, secure the government’s the prosperity of the North Autumn Statement on of England and drive 25 November in which the growth of regional the Chancellor of the business. Exchequer will set out government plans for growing the economy of the region. It is the chance for business leaders to respond in kind with practical action to show how business can shape this agenda. Book now for discounted rates online at: www.uk-northern-powerhouse.com @uknorthernpower LinkedIn Key speakers Alex Hynes John Mothersole Professor Nigel Managing Director, Chief Executive, Weatherill Northern Rail Sheffield City Council; Vice Chancellor Liverpool Andy Clarke Jon Lamonte John Moores University; Chief Executive, Chief Executive, TFGM; Robin Phillips ASDA Wal-Mart; Ken O’Toole Finance Director, Andy Koss Managing Director, Siemens;
    [Show full text]