North Korea's Organization and Guidance Department

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

North Korea's Organization and Guidance Department North Korea’s ORGANIZATION AND GUIDANCE DEPARTMENT The Control Tower of Human Rights Denial ROBERT COLLINS North Korea’s ORGANIZATION AND GUIDANCE DEPARTMENT The Control Tower of Human Rights Denial Committee for Human Rights in North Korea By Robert Collins Copyright © 2019 Committee for Human Rights in North Korea Printed in the United States of America All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying, recording, or other electronic or mechanical methods, without the prior permission of the Committee for Human Rights in North Korea, except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical reviews and certain other noncommercial uses permitted by copyright law. Committee for Human Rights in North Korea 1001 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Suite 435 Washington, DC 20036 P: (202) 499-7970 www.hrnk.org Print ISBN: 978-0-9995358-3-7 Digital ISBN: 978-0-9995358-4-4 Library of Congress Control Number: 2019950052 Dedicated to Steve Bradner. The Control Tower of Human Rights Denial Board of Directors Gordon Flake, Co-Chair Nicholas Eberstadt Katrina Lantos Swett, Co-Chair Carl Gershman John Despres, Co-Vice-Chair Robert Joseph Suzanne Scholte, Co-Vice-Chair Stephen Kahng Helen-Louise Hunter, Secretary David Kim Kevin McCann, Treasurer Robert King Roberta Cohen, Co-Chair Emeritus Jung-Hoon Lee Andrew Natsios, Co-Chair Emeritus Debra Liang-Fenton Morton Abramowitz Winston Lord Jerome Cohen David Maxwell Rabbi Abraham Cooper Marcus Noland Jack David Jacqueline Pak Greg Scarlatoiu, Executive Director Robert Collins Table of Contents About the Committee for Human Rights in North Korea (HRNK)............. IV About the Author: Robert M. Collins..................................... V Acknowledgements....................................................... VI Acronyms.............................................................. VII Terms.................................................................. IX Foreword ............................................................... X Executive Summary ................................................... XIII Section 1: Introduction ................................................ 1 Section 2: Historical Background ....................................... 7 Section 3: Mission & Tasks of the Organization and Guidance Department................................................ 13 A. Ideology ......................................................... 13 B. Missions ......................................................... 15 C. Tasks ............................................................ 17 Section 4: Organization ............................................... 22 A. Overview ......................................................... 25 B. Party Headquarters Committee ..................................... 26 C. Mass Party Directorate ........................................... 28 D. Party Life Guidance Section ...................................... 29 E. Supreme Leader’s Personal Secretariat ............................ 34 F. General Affairs Section ........................................... 35 G. Cadre Section .................................................... 36 H. Inspection Section ............................................... 39 I. Party Member Registration Section ................................ 40 I NORTH KOREA’S ORGANIZATION AND GUIDANCE DEPARTMENT The Control Tower of Human Rights Denial J. Petitions Section ................................................ 41 K. Reports Section .................................................. 41 L. Section 65 ....................................................... 42 M. Military Directorate ............................................. 44 N. Seventh Section .................................................. 48 O. Other Sections ................................................... 49 Section 5: Comparative Perspective of the OGD ......................... 50 Section 6: Korean Workers’ Party ...................................... 55 A. Party Congress ................................................... 56 B. Central Committee ................................................ 59 C. Executive Policy Bureau .......................................... 62 D. Politburo ........................................................ 64 E. Central Military Committee ....................................... 66 F. Korean Workers’ Party Political Committees ....................... 67 G. Party Cells ...................................................... 70 H. Policymaking Process ............................................. 71 Section 7: Propaganda and Agitation Department ........................ 77 A. Key Personnel .................................................... 81 Section 8: Party-Military Relations ................................... 85 A. Kim Jong-il & Military-First Politics ............................ 86 B. Overview ......................................................... 87 C. Central Military Committee ....................................... 89 D. Korean People’s Army Party Committee ............................. 90 E. General Political Bureau ......................................... 92 F. Military Security Command ........................................ 96 Section 9: Regional Roles ............................................ 100 A. Regional Party Structure ........................................ 100 B. Local Organization Departments .................................. 102 C. Implementation Committee ........................................ 105 II Robert Collins Section 10: Societal Control ......................................... 107 A. Party Organizational Life ....................................... 108 B. Saenghwal Chonghwa (Self-Criticism) Sessions .................... 111 C. Societal Control ................................................ 107 Section 11: Life as an OGD Cadre ..................................... 116 Section 12: Organization and Guidance Department Leadership, Past and Present.......................................... 121 A. Supreme Leaders, Kim Family, and the Organization and Guidance Department ............................ 122 B. Organization and Guidance Department Leaders: 1940s–1950s ..................................................... 132 C. Organization and Guidance Department Leaders: 1960s–1970s ..................................................... 134 D. Organization and Guidance Department Leaders: 1980s–1990s ..................................................... 137 E. Organization and Guidance Department Leaders: 2000–2011 ....................................................... 144 F. Organization and Guidance Department Leaders: 2011–Present .................................................... 148 G. Other Organization and Guidance Department Leaders About Whom Little is Known ...................................... 165 Section 13: The Future of the Organization and Guidance Department .................................................. 166 Bibliography ......................................................... 173 A. Books, Journal Articles, and Official Sources .................... 173 B. Press and Online Articles ....................................... 178 III NORTH KOREA’S ORGANIZATION AND GUIDANCE DEPARTMENT The Control Tower of Human Rights Denial About the Committee for Human Rights in North Korea The Committee for Human Rights in North Korea (HRNK) is the leading U.S.- based nonpartisan, non-governmental organization in the field of North Korean human rights research and advocacy, tasked to focus international attention on human rights abuses in that country. It is HRNK’s mission to persistently remind policymakers, opinion leaders, and the general public that more than 20 million North Koreans need our attention. Since its establishment in October 2001, HRNK has played an important intellectual leadership role in North Korean human rights issues by publishing more than 35 major reports (available at https://www.hrnk.org/publications/hrnkpublications.php). Recent reports have addressed issues including political prison camps, the dominant role that Pyongyang plays in North Korea’s political system, North Korea’s state sponsorship of terrorism, the role of illicit activities in the North Korean economy, the structure of the internal security appara- tus, the songbun social classification system, and the abduction of foreign citizens. HRNK is now the first non-governmental organization that solely focuses on North Korean human rights issues to receive consultative status at the United Nations (UN). It was also the first organization to propose that the human rights situation in North Korea be addressed by the UN Secu- rity Council. HRNK was directly and actively involved in all stages of the process supporting the work of the UN Commission of Inquiry (COI) on North Korean human rights. Its reports have been cited numerous times in the report of the COI, the reports of the UN Special Rapporteur on North Korean human rights, a report by the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, a report of the UN Secretary-General António Guterres, and several U.S. Department of State Democratic People’s Republic of Korea Human Rights Reports. HRNK has also regularly been invited to provide expert testimony before the U.S. Congress. IV Robert Collins About the Author: Robert M. Collins Robert M. Collins completed 37 years of service as a soldier and U.S. Department of the Army civilian employee. He served 31 years in
Recommended publications
  • Preparing for the Possibility of a North Korean Collapse
    CHILDREN AND FAMILIES The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that EDUCATION AND THE ARTS helps improve policy and decisionmaking through ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT research and analysis. HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE This electronic document was made available from INFRASTRUCTURE AND www.rand.org as a public service of the RAND TRANSPORTATION Corporation. INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS LAW AND BUSINESS NATIONAL SECURITY Skip all front matter: Jump to Page 16 POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Support RAND Purchase this document TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY Browse Reports & Bookstore Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore the RAND National Security Research Division View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non-commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND electronic documents to a non-RAND website is prohibited. RAND electronic documents are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see RAND Permissions. This report is part of the RAND Corporation research report series. RAND reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for re- search quality and objectivity. Preparing for the Possibility of a North Korean Collapse Bruce W. Bennett C O R P O R A T I O N NATIONAL SECURITY RESEARCH DIVISION Preparing for the Possibility of a North Korean Collapse Bruce W.
    [Show full text]
  • China Data Supplement
    China Data Supplement October 2008 J People’s Republic of China J Hong Kong SAR J Macau SAR J Taiwan ISSN 0943-7533 China aktuell Data Supplement – PRC, Hong Kong SAR, Macau SAR, Taiwan 1 Contents The Main National Leadership of the PRC ......................................................................... 2 LIU Jen-Kai The Main Provincial Leadership of the PRC ..................................................................... 29 LIU Jen-Kai Data on Changes in PRC Main Leadership ...................................................................... 36 LIU Jen-Kai PRC Agreements with Foreign Countries ......................................................................... 42 LIU Jen-Kai PRC Laws and Regulations .............................................................................................. 45 LIU Jen-Kai Hong Kong SAR................................................................................................................ 54 LIU Jen-Kai Macau SAR....................................................................................................................... 61 LIU Jen-Kai Taiwan .............................................................................................................................. 66 LIU Jen-Kai ISSN 0943-7533 All information given here is derived from generally accessible sources. Publisher/Distributor: GIGA Institute of Asian Studies Rothenbaumchaussee 32 20148 Hamburg Germany Phone: +49 (0 40) 42 88 74-0 Fax: +49 (040) 4107945 2 October 2008 The Main National Leadership of the
    [Show full text]
  • North Korean Refugees in China
    NORTH KOREAN REFUGEES IN CHINA Findings • The Chinese government continued to detain North Korean refugees in China and repatriate them to the Democratic Peo- ple’s Republic of Korea (DPRK). North Korean refugees face se- vere punishments upon repatriation to the DPRK, including torture, imprisonment, forced labor, and even execution. The repatriation of North Korean refugees violates China’s obliga- tions under international human rights and refugee law. The UN Commission of Inquiry on Human Rights in the Demo- cratic People’s Republic of Korea has stated that such repatri- ation may amount to ‘‘aiding and abetting crimes against hu- manity.’’ • Chinese and North Korean authorities continue to impose strict border controls. These controls are meant to deter North Korean refugees from escaping the DPRK, and the South Ko- rean government reported that about 1,047 North Korean refu- gees escaped to South Korea in 2019, compared to the 2009 peak of 2,914 refugees. The majority of North Korean refugees escape to South Korea via China and Southeast Asian coun- tries. • Chinese authorities’ crackdown on and expulsions of South Korean missionaries have undermined refugee rescue work carried out by the missionaries. South Korean missionaries and organizations play a crucial role in assisting and facili- tating the movement of North Korean refugees in China. Addi- tionally, further restrictions placed by Chinese and DPRK au- thorities during the novel coronavirus outbreak indirectly ham- pered missionary efforts to facilitate the movement of refugees in China. • The majority of North Korean refugees leaving the DPRK are women, who are often vulnerable to human trafficking.
    [Show full text]
  • Family, Mobile Phones, and Money: Contemporary Practices of Unification on the Korean Peninsula Sandra Fahy 82 | Joint U.S.-Korea Academic Studies
    81 Family, Mobile Phones, and Money: Contemporary Practices of Unification on the Korean Peninsula Sandra Fahy 82 | Joint U.S.-Korea Academic Studies Moving from the powerful and abstract construct of ethnic homogeneity as bearing the promise for unification, this chapter instead considers family unity, facilitated by the quotidian and ubiquitous tools of mobile phones and money, as a force with a demonstrated record showing contemporary practices of unification on the peninsula. From the “small unification” (jageun tongil) where North Korean defectors pay brokers to bring family out, to the transmission of voice through the technology of mobile phones illegally smuggled from China, this paper explores practices of unification presently manifesting on the Korean Peninsula. National identity on both sides of the peninsula is usually linked with ethnic homogeneity, the ultimate idea of Koreanness present in both Koreas and throughout Korean history. Ethnic homogeneity is linked with nationalism, and while it is evoked as the rationale for unification it has not had that result, and did not prevent the ideological nationalism that divided the ethnos in the Korean War.1 The construction of ethnic homogeneity evokes the idea that all Koreans are one brethren (dongpo)—an image of one large, genetically related extended family. However, fissures in this ideal highlight the strength of genetic family ties.2 Moving from the powerful and abstract construct of ethnic homogeneity as bearing the promise for unification, this chapter instead considers family unity, facilitated by the quotidian and ubiquitous tools of mobile phones and money, as a force with a demonstrated record showing “acts of unification” on the peninsula.
    [Show full text]
  • Yun Mi Hwang Phd Thesis
    SOUTH KOREAN HISTORICAL DRAMA: GENDER, NATION AND THE HERITAGE INDUSTRY Yun Mi Hwang A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of St Andrews 2011 Full metadata for this item is available in St Andrews Research Repository at: http://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/ Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/1924 This item is protected by original copyright This item is licensed under a Creative Commons Licence SOUTH KOREAN HISTORICAL DRAMA: GENDER, NATION AND THE HERITAGE INDUSTRY YUN MI HWANG Thesis Submitted to the University of St Andrews for the Degree of PhD in Film Studies 2011 DECLARATIONS I, Yun Mi Hwang, hereby certify that this thesis, which is approximately 80,000 words in length, has been written by me, that it is the record of work carried out by me and that it has not been submitted in any previous application for a higher degree. I was admitted as a research student and as a candidate for the degree of PhD in September 2006; the higher study for which this is a record was carried out in the University of St Andrews between 2006 and 2010. I, Yun Mi Hwang, received assistance in the writing of this thesis in respect of language and grammar, which was provided by R.A.M Wright. Date …17 May 2011.… signature of candidate ……………… I hereby certify that the candidate has fulfilled the conditions of the Resolution and Regulations appropriate for the degree of PhD in the University of St Andrews and that the candidate is qualified to submit this thesis in application for that degree.
    [Show full text]
  • D2492609215cd311123628ab69
    Acknowledgements Publisher AN Cheongsook, Chairperson of KOFIC 206-46, Cheongnyangni-dong, Dongdaemun-gu. Seoul, Korea (130-010) Editor in Chief Daniel D. H. PARK, Director of International Promotion Department Editors KIM YeonSoo, Hyun-chang JUNG English Translators KIM YeonSoo, Darcy PAQUET Collaborators HUH Kyoung, KANG Byeong-woon, Darcy PAQUET Contributing Writer MOON Seok Cover and Book Design Design KongKam Film image and still photographs are provided by directors, producers, production & sales companies, JIFF (Jeonju International Film Festival), GIFF (Gwangju International Film Festival) and KIFV (The Association of Korean Independent Film & Video). Korean Film Council (KOFIC), December 2005 Korean Cinema 2005 Contents Foreword 04 A Review of Korean Cinema in 2005 06 Korean Film Council 12 Feature Films 20 Fiction 22 Animation 218 Documentary 224 Feature / Middle Length 226 Short 248 Short Films 258 Fiction 260 Animation 320 Films in Production 356 Appendix 386 Statistics 388 Index of 2005 Films 402 Addresses 412 Foreword The year 2005 saw the continued solid and sound prosperity of Korean films, both in terms of the domestic and international arenas, as well as industrial and artistic aspects. As of November, the market share for Korean films in the domestic market stood at 55 percent, which indicates that the yearly market share of Korean films will be over 50 percent for the third year in a row. In the international arena as well, Korean films were invited to major international film festivals including Cannes, Berlin, Venice, Locarno, and San Sebastian and received a warm reception from critics and audiences. It is often said that the current prosperity of Korean cinema is due to the strong commitment and policies introduced by the KIM Dae-joong government in 1999 to promote Korean films.
    [Show full text]
  • North Korea: a Chronology of Events from 2016 to 2020
    North Korea: A Chronology of Events from 2016 to 2020 May 5, 2020 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R46349 North Korea: A Chronology of Events from 2016 to 2020 Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Chronology ...................................................................................................................................... 3 1994 ........................................................................................................................................... 3 1998 ........................................................................................................................................... 3 2003 ........................................................................................................................................... 4 2005 ........................................................................................................................................... 4 2006 ........................................................................................................................................... 4 2007 ........................................................................................................................................... 5 2009 ........................................................................................................................................... 5 2011 ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • North Korean Identity As a Challenge to East Asia's Regional Order
    Korean Soc Sci J (2017) 44:51–71 North Korean Identity as a Challenge to East Asia’s Regional Order Leif-Eric Easley Received: 9 May 2017 / Accepted: 31 May 2017 / Published online: 9 June 2017 Ⓒ Korean Social Science Research Council 2017 Introduction North Korea presents serious complications for East Asia’s regional order, and yet its identity is subject to frequent oversimplification. The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK or North Korea) is often in the headlines for its nuclear weapons and missile programs and for its violations of human rights.1 Media reports typically depict North Korea as an otherworldly hermit kingdom ruled by a highly caricatured Kim regime. This article seeks to deepen the conversation about North Korea’s political characteristics and East Asia’s regional architecture by addressing three related questions. First, how has North Korea challenged the regional order, at times driving some actors apart and others together? How are these trends explained by and reflected in North Korean national identity, as articulated by the Kim regime and as perceived in the region? Finally, what academic and policy-relevant implications are offered by the interaction of North Korean identity and regional order? To start, measuring national identity is a difficult proposition (Abdelal, et al., 2009). Applying the concepts of national identity and nationalism to North Korea are complicated by analytical problems in separating the nation, and especially the state, from the Kim regime. This study chooses to focus on “identity” rather than “nationalism” because “North Korean nationalism” implies a certain ideology that contrasts to the nationalisms of the Republic of Korea (ROK or South Korea), Japan or China.
    [Show full text]
  • Adam Cathcart, Christopher Green, and Steven Denney
    Articles How Authoritarian Regimes Maintain Domain Consensus: North Korea’s Information Strategies in the Kim Jong-un Era Adam Cathcart, Christopher Green, and Steven Denney Te Review of Korean Studies Volume 17 Number 2 (December 2014): 145-178 ©2014 by the Academy of Korean Studies. All rights reserved. 146 Te Review of Korean Studies Pyongyang’s Strategic Shift North Korea is a society under constant surveillance by the apparatuses of state, and is a place where coercion—often brutal—is not uncommon.1 However, this is not the whole story. It is inaccurate to say that the ruling hereditary dictatorship of the Kim family exerts absolute control purely by virtue of its monopoly over the use of physical force. The limitations of state coercion have grown increasingly evident over the last two decades. State-society relations in North Korea shifted drastically when Kim Jong-il came to power in the 1990s. It was a time of famine, legacy politics, state retrenchment, and the rise of public markets; the state’s coercive abilities alternated between dissolution and coalescence as the state sought to co-opt and control the marketization process, a pattern which continued until Kim Jong-il’s death in 2011 (Kwon and Chung 2012; Hwang 1998; Hyeon 2007; Park 2012). Those relations have moved still further under Kim Jong- un.2 Tough Kim’s rise to the position of Supreme Leader in December 2011 did not precipitate—as some had hoped—a paradigmatic shift in economic or political approach, the state has been extremely active in the early years of his era, responding to newfound domestic appreciation of North Korea’s situation in both the region and wider world.
    [Show full text]
  • Treasured Swords: Environment Under the Byungjin Line
    TREASURED SWORDS: ENVIRONMENT UNDER THE BYUNGJIN LINE by Robert Winstanley-Chesters Sino-NK Director of Research October 2013 TREASURED SWORDS: ENVIRONMENT UNDER THE BYUNGJIN LINE > A party apparatchik informs workers of the key tenets of the Byungjin line Image: Rodong Sinmun The Byungjin Line, not to mention its accompanying framing in developmental and environmental terms, the “minaturized, lightened, diversified, and precise better to understand the place of Sepho in a North Korea nukes,” is everywhere these days. And with good under this new strategic line. reason: ”Byungjin” surely merits examination and reportage, for it marks a vitally important, even definitive, AMPLIFIED LEGACY: KIM JONG-UN AS HOLISTIC change of emphasis at the dawn of the Kim Jong-un era. ENVIRONMENTALIST? Within this paper I plan to delve deeper into the Before examining the historical context for the historical context for this new strategic line, which will developmental approach in which Sepho sits, a rare support the construction of an analytical framework opportunity has been presented to the analyst which through which the place of the environmental in the new might better lay the ground for this context. The arrival theorization can be determined. It is already clear that on April 27, 2012, of Kim Jong-un’s first published one key aspect of this is the Sepho Grassland reclamation work, “On Effecting a Drastic Turn in Land Management project. Emblematic of a shift in developmental paradigms to Meet the Requirements for Building a Thriving of land reclamation and rehabilitation in North Korea, Socialist Nation,” brought with it the intriguing notion Sepho is essential to the environmental narrative of the that a youthful leader would see land management as byungjinist state.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights Without Frontiers International
    Human Rights Without Frontiers Int’l: Willy Fautre By Willy Fautré Wednesday, 14 December 2011 Human Rights Without Frontiers Int’l Commemorating Human Rights Day 2011, Houses of Parliament London, 9 December 2011 Human rights in North Korea: An International Coalition To Stop Crimes Against Humanity Willy Fautré North Korea is ranked in every survey of freedom and human rights as the worst of the worst. An estimated 200,000 people are trapped in a brutal system of political prison camps akin to Hitler's concentration camps and Stalin's gulag. Slave labor, horrific torture and bestial living conditions are now well-documented in numerous reports by human rights organizations, through the testimonies of survivors of these camps who have escaped. Although there is still a shroud of mystery surrounding North Korea, the world can no longer claim ignorance as an excuse. Shocking accounts of the worst possible forms of torture have emerged from survivors of the gulags who have escaped. Lee Sung Ae told the British Parliament about how when she was jailed, all her finger-nails were pulled out, all her lower teeth destroyed, and prison guards poured water, mixed with chillies, up her nose. Jung Guang Il was subjected to "pigeon torture," with his hands cuffed and tied behind his back in an excruciating position. He said he felt as though his bones were breaking through his chest. All his teeth were broken during beatings and his weight fell from 75kg to 38kg. Kim Hye Sook spent 28 years in the gulag and was first jailed at the age of 13 because her grandfather had gone to South Korea.
    [Show full text]
  • Temple Food Ebook
    TEMPLE FOOD PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Janet L. Doane | 208 pages | 03 Apr 2013 | Seed Publishing | 9780964951075 | English | United Kingdom Temple Food PDF Book This is not a place for idle chitchat and boisterous behavior. She has no customers. Flights Vacation Rentals Restaurants Things to do. Temple cuisine forsakes these flavors, as well as the bloat and delirium that are usually associated with the party-down, soju-dizzy, every-dish-comes-at- once mode of Korean feasting. Healthy and Tasty! Is This Your Listing? The Green Monster roll is my favorite. Since Buddhism was introduced into Korea, Buddhist traditions have strongly influenced Korean cuisine as well. New snacks on sale now for a limited time! Murasakino Daitokuji- shitamonzen-cho 53, Kita-ku, Kyoto-shi; , and accepts customers until 6 p. Freebirds World Burrito S. Date of experience: March We have been going to this restaurant since it opened several years ago and were great friends with the owners. It also means a comfortable atmosphere where you can gather with friends, take a break from studying or just hang out and relax. You can try enabling it or visiting the website with a browser that supports Javascript. Whether you want a coffee, some dessert, or a hearty meal, use Uber Eats to order something scrumptious in Temple. At least the light was low. Maximum products to compare. Skip to content. No more stressing over meal time. I sat in one of those low tables on the floor and enjoyed a beautiful traditional Korean dance in the center of the place. Get food delivered.
    [Show full text]