DOCSLIB.ORG

SRS Vol Add4

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SRS Vol Add4 SUSSEX RECORD SOCIETY DIGITAL EDITIONS SUSSEX RECORD SOCIETY VOL ADD4: WINCHELSEA COURT RECORDS 1765-1866 Edited by Malcolm Pratt This edition was first published on the Society’s website in 2020 and is copyright © Sussex Record Society and Malcolm Pratt. Copies of this edition may be downloaded free of charge for personal use. Extracts may be copied and reproduced provided appropriate acknowledgement is given © SUSSEX RECORD SOCIETY © SUSSEX RECORD SOCIETY WINCHELSEA COURT RECORDS 1765-1866 © SUSSEX RECORD SOCIETY © SUSSEX RECORD SOCIETY PROCEEDINGS OF THE COURTS OF THE ANCIENT TOWN OF WINCHELSEA IN SUSSEX 1765-1866 EDITED BY MALCOLM PRATT SUSSEX RECORD SOCIETY VOLUME ADD4 © SUSSEX RECORD SOCIETY Digital Edition published 2020 by Sussex Record Society Barbican House, High Street, Lewes, East Sussex, BN7 1YE. © Sussex Record Society, Malcolm Pratt © SUSSEX RECORD SOCIETY Contents v CONTENTS Introduction ............................................................................................................... vii Editorial Notes ......................................................................................................... xxi Acknowledgements ................................................................................................ xxv Proccedings of the Winchelsea Courts 1765-1815 .................................................. 1 Proceedings of the Winchelsea Courts 1816-1866 ............................................. 133 Appendix 1: Oaths taken on their appointment by the Mayor and other Officers etc .......................................................................................................... 305 Appendix 2: Oaths of Allegiance, Supremacy and Abjuration etc .................... 311 Appendix 3: Instructions received requiring the holding of a Parliamentary Election in Winchelsea ...................................................................................... 313 Appendix 4: 1835: Report of Commissioners investigating the circumstances of Winchelsea Corporation ................................................................................... 315 Indexes ...................................................................................................................... 323 © SUSSEX RECORD SOCIETY vi Winchelsea Court Records 1765-1866 © SUSSEX RECORD SOCIETY Introduction vii INTRODUCTION The documents transcribed here cover most of the final years of the legal jurisdiction exercised from medieval times by the Winchelsea Corporation. During the century they cover, the Mayor, Jurats and Commonalty of the Ancient Town of Winchelsea continued to exercise the local government and judicial responsibilities required of the town since medieval times as a Head Port of the Confederation of the Cinque Ports. These responsibilities extended not only within the Ancient Town itself but also throughout its Liberty. The Liberty was an adjoining area, roughly triangular in shape, with the town at its apex, stretching from the Kent border to a point a little inside the Parish of Pett. This included a sea boundary of between six and seven miles. Winchelsea had elected two members to the House of Commons since the time of Edward III. To these seats were originally returned leading town residents. Later they came under the influence of the Treasury, which promoted the election of those who would support the government of the day. Eventually Winchelsea’s seats were purchased by patrons who alone nominated the candidates who were then dutifully voted in by the very small electorate of freemen. It was not until Reform in 1832, by which time control had passed to the Duke of Cleveland, that Winchelsea lost its two members when the duke, a committed supporter of the Whig government, instructed them to vote for the abolition of their own seats. ‘Winchelsea Causes’ Many of the early documents here [1.2 – 1.10] describe contested votes for the appointment and removal of freemen and the election of Winchelsea’s Mayor. From this it is clear that in the 1760s two factions were vying for control of the corporation’s affairs. In essence these disputes involved who was and who was not on appointment legally entitled to the freedom of the Town and thus have the right to vote in parliamentary elections. In medieval times a man could claim the freedom by living in Winchelsea, paying the required taxes and engaging in an approved occupation for twelve months. Such claims were no longer permitted and appointments were usually made at the whim of those in control. However, it was still generally accepted that freemen had to be resident when elected. The first of the patrons was Arnold Nesbitt. He had in fact earlier been Winchelsea’s agent for the treasury, with responsibility for ensuring that Winchelsea’s members would support the government in power, but he acquired so much property tenanted by voting freemen that he was able to © SUSSEX RECORD SOCIETY viii Winchelsea Court Records 1765-1866 wrest that control from the treasury and use it in his own interests. Nesbitt’s control was eventually sold to Richard Barwell. As the documents show, both these men ensured that their requirements were followed by taking an active part in the corporation’s proceedings. As a result of Arnold Nesbitt’s actions, disputes over the right to freedom of the Town were eventually submitted for a ruling to the Court of King’s Bench. There, hearing a case which became known as the Winchelsea Causes, Mr Justice Mansfield ruled that no such complaint could be justified where the complainant had long been a corporation member alongside the person of whom he complained. Unfortunately, Lord Mansfield then went on to make some inconsistent decisions about individuals so resentment festered and nothing was really sorted out. The relevance of all this to the records edited here is that the court books from which the records are taken were sent to London to be used in evidence. Following Lord Mansfield’s generally unsatisfactory and indecisive findings the books were put away in a London solicitors’ attic and only rediscovered there in 1952. Unfortunately, one which had covered the years 1734 to 1768, the key period in the case, was found to be missing. It has been possible, through the use of other sources in Winchelsea’s archive, to reach back as far as 1765 but basically this edition begins at the point where the gap in the records ends. Four courts The courts through which the Corporation’s responsibilities were exercised, all presided over by the Mayor who was ex-officio senior justice of the peace, and all sitting in Winchelsea’s Court Hall, were four in number. The Hundred met annually on Easter Monday for the appointment of the Mayor, the jurats, the Town Clerk, the chamberlain who was the treasurer, and all the more junior officials. The records of its sittings became standardised by 1770 [1.25] and, with minor variations and additions, appear each year thereafter. Crucially the Hundred was also the court which met for the election of members of parliament. The first example here is [1.23] where a deceased member was replaced. As in virtually all such cases, this was by unanimous vote of a limited electorate given their instructions by the patron. The Assembly met more regularly for occasional elections; for the appointment of freemen; for the auditing and approval of accounts submitted by the chamberlain; to administer the corporation’s land © SUSSEX RECORD SOCIETY Introduction ix holdings and rental income; and to resolve problems associated with general administrative affairs. The Quarter Sessions dealt routinely with the appointment of the Grand Jury, comprised of those who were contemporarily described as ‘the upper class of tradespeople and such householders as are thought fit’ (see Appendix 4). This body reported to the magistrates matters which in its opinion needed to be put right. The nature and variety of these problems is made clear in the subject index. Most commonly these reports concerned the condition of roads and their obstruction, but many other complaints feature. On one occasion [1.246] the Grand Jury even had the effrontery to accuse the Justices of not taking sufficient action in response to their complaints. With effect from 1823 [2.40] the Quarter Sessions also regularly set the town rate, which was levied within the town and the liberty. The Quarter Sessions, of course, also heard criminal cases. The Court of Record fell out of use during the period covered here. It dealt with the sale and tenancy of land, disputes between individuals and with all aspects of property, particularly ownership. A number of cases in Part I, [for example 1.96-1.99], give details of allegations regarding unpaid debts. The very few property cases heard within the period of this study have not been included because the way in which they were recorded gives no indication of the identity of the property concerned. All four courts received professional guidance from the Town Clerk who was usually a Rye solicitor. His service was common to the four and so, at his appointment and sometimes elsewhere, he is referred to as the common clerk. The considerable complexity of Winchelsea Corporation’s circumstances meant that a large amount of work was required from the many people, both salaried and unpaid, who served Winchelsea Corporation. Officials and officers Numerous officials were required and, as already mentioned, the Easter Monday Hundred Court was the occasion on which most were appointed or elected. The word ‘elected’ might be considered
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 29 Newgate and Westminster 1820
    678 December 14th 1819-December 31st 1820: Newgate, Cato Street, and the Trial of Queen Caroline 1820: Newgate Diary, the 1820 Westminster Election, Byron’s ballad My Boy Hobby, O, the execution of the Cato Street Conspirators, and the Trial of Queen Caroline December 14th 1819-December 31st 1820 Edited from B.L.Add.Mss. 56540 and 56541. In the notes, “I.G.” indicates assistance from Ian Gilmour, to whom I’m grateful. In 1819 Hobhouse contested the parliamentary seat of Westminster, which had become vacant on the suicide of Romilly. He stood as a radical, supported by his father and by Burdett, but was defeated on March 3rd by George Lamb. Riots followed, and a breach opened between him and the Holland House Whigs. Westminster was an unusual constituency. It extended from Temple Bar to Hyde Park, from Oxford Street to the Thames, and three-quarters of its voters were middle-class: shopkeepers, skilled artisans, printers, tailors, and so on. It was the only constituency in the country in which each of its 17,000 rate-paying householders had the vote, which fact made it a headache to any administration, Whig or Tory, which was based upon, and served, as all administrations were and did, the landed gentry. At Westminster, candidates had to stand on the hustings and speak deferentially to people whom they’d normally expect to speak deferentially to them . At this time Hobhouse wrote several pamphlets, and an anonymous reply to a sarcastic speech of Canning’s, written by him and some of his friends in the Rota Club, attracted attention.
    [Show full text]
  • Rodney Stone
    RODNEY STONE PREFACE Amongst the books to which I am indebted for my material in my endeavour to draw various phases of life and character in England at the beginning of the century, I would particularly mention Ashton’s “Dawn of the Nineteenth Century;” Gronow’s “Reminiscences;” Fitzgerald’s “Life and Times of George IV.;” Jesse’s “Life of Brummell;” “Boxiana;” “Pugilistica;” Harper’s “Brighton Road;” Robinson’s “Last Earl of Barrymore” and “Old Q.;” Rice’s “History of the Turf;” Tristram’s “Coaching Days;” James’s “Naval History;” Clark Russell’s “Collingwood” and “Nelson.” I am also much indebted to my friends Mr. J. C. Parkinson and Robert Barr for information upon the subject of the ring. A. CONAN DOYLE. HASLEMERE, September 1, 1896. CHAPTER I - FRIAR’S OAK On this, the first of January of the year 1851, the nineteenth century has reached its midway term, and many of us who shared its youth have already warnings which tell us that it has outworn us. We put our grizzled heads together, we older ones, and we talk of the great days that we have known; but we find that when it is with our children that we talk it is a hard matter to make them understand. We and our fathers before us lived much the same life, but they with their railway trains and their steamboats belong to a different age. It is true that we can put history-books into their hands, and they can read from them of our weary struggle of two and twenty years with that great and evil man.
    [Show full text]
  • Huguenot Merchants Settled in England 1644 Who Purchased Lincolnshire Estates in the 18Th Century, and Acquired Ayscough Estates by Marriage
    List of Parliamentary Families 51 Boucherett Origins: Huguenot merchants settled in England 1644 who purchased Lincolnshire estates in the 18th century, and acquired Ayscough estates by marriage. 1. Ayscough Boucherett – Great Grimsby 1796-1803 Seats: Stallingborough Hall, Lincolnshire (acq. by mar. c. 1700, sales from 1789, demolished first half 19th c.); Willingham Hall (House), Lincolnshire (acq. 18th c., built 1790, demolished c. 1962) Estates: Bateman 5834 (E) 7823; wealth in 1905 £38,500. Notes: Family extinct 1905 upon the death of Jessie Boucherett (in ODNB). BABINGTON Origins: Landowners at Bavington, Northumberland by 1274. William Babington had a spectacular legal career, Chief Justice of Common Pleas 1423-36. (Payling, Political Society in Lancastrian England, 36-39) Five MPs between 1399 and 1536, several kts of the shire. 1. Matthew Babington – Leicestershire 1660 2. Thomas Babington – Leicester 1685-87 1689-90 3. Philip Babington – Berwick-on-Tweed 1689-90 4. Thomas Babington – Leicester 1800-18 Seat: Rothley Temple (Temple Hall), Leicestershire (medieval, purch. c. 1550 and add. 1565, sold 1845, remod. later 19th c., hotel) Estates: Worth £2,000 pa in 1776. Notes: Four members of the family in ODNB. BACON [Frank] Bacon Origins: The first Bacon of note was son of a sheepreeve, although ancestors were recorded as early as 1286. He was a lawyer, MP 1542, Lord Keeper of the Great Seal 1558. Estates were purchased at the Dissolution. His brother was a London merchant. Eldest son created the first baronet 1611. Younger son Lord Chancellor 1618, created a viscount 1621. Eight further MPs in the 16th and 17th centuries, including kts of the shire for Norfolk and Suffolk.
    [Show full text]
  • WAGE Women Under
    WHO WAS WHO, 1897-1916 WAGE and Tendencies of German Transatlantic Henry Boyd, afterwards head of Hertford 1908 Enterprise, ; Aktiengesellschaften in Coll. Oxford ; Vicar of Healaugh, Yorkshire, den : Vereinigten Staaten ; Life of Carl Schurz, 1864-71. Publications The Sling and the 1908 Jahrbuch der ; Editor, Weltwirtschaft ; Stone, in 10 vols., 1866-93 ; The Mystery of Address : many essays. The University, Pain, Death, and Sin ; Discourses in Refuta- Berlin. Clubs : of of City New York ; Kaiserl. tion Atheism, 1878 ; Lectures on the Bible, Automobil, Berlin. [Died 28 June 1909. and The Theistic Faith and its Foundations, Baron VON SCHRODER, William Henry, D.L. ; 1881 ; Theism, or Religion of Common Sense, b. 1841 m. d. of ; 1866, Marie, Charles Horny, 1894 ; Theism as a Science of Natural Theo- Austria. High Sheriff, Cheshire, 1888. Ad- logy and Natural Religion, 1895 ; Testimony dress : The Rookery, Worlesden, Nantwich. of the Four Gospels concerning Jesus Christ, 11 all [Died June 1912. 1896 ; Religion for Mankind, 1903, etc. ; Horace St. editor VOULES, George, journalist ; Lecture on Cremation, Mr. Voysey was the of Truth b. ; Windsor, 23 April 1844 ; s. of only surviving founder of the Cremation Charles Stuart of also Voules, solicitor, Windsor. Society England ; he was for 25 years : Educ. private schools ; Brighton ; East- a member of the Executive Council to the bourne. Learned printing trade at Cassell, Homes for Inebriates. Recreations : playing & 1864 started for with children all Fetter, Galpin's, ; them ; games enjoyed except the Echo the first (1868), halfpenny evening chess, which was too hard work ; billiards at and it for until with paper, managed them they home daily, or without a companion ; sold it to Albert Grant, 1875 ; edited and walking and running greatly enjoyed.
    [Show full text]
  • James Perry and the Morning Chronicle 179O—I821
    I JAMES PERRY AND THE MORNING CHRONICLE- 179O—I821 By l yon Asquith Thesis submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the University of London 1973 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract 3 Preface 5 1. 1790-1794 6 2. 1795-1 805 75 3. 1806-1812 (i) ThB Ministry of the Talents 184 (ii) Reform, Radicalism and the War 1808-12 210 (iii) The Whigs arid the Morning Chronicle 269 4. Perry's Advertising Policy 314 Appendix A: Costs of Production 363 Appendix B: Advertising Profits 365 Appendix C: Government Advertisements 367 5. 1813-1821 368 Conclusion 459 Bibliography 467 3 A BSTRACT This thesis is a study of the career of James Perry, editor and proprietor of the Morning Chronicle, from 1790-1821. Based on an examination of the correspondence of whig and radical polit- icians, and of the files of the morning Chronicle, it illustrates the impact which Perry made on the world of politics and journalism. The main questions discussed are how Perry responded, as a Foxite journalist, to the chief political issues of the day; the extent to which the whigs attempted to influence his editorial policy and the degree to which he reconciled his independence with obedience to their wishes4 the difficulties he encountered as the spokesman of an often divided party; his considerable involvement, which was remarkable for a journalist, in party activity and in the social life of whig politicians; and his success as a newspaper proprietor concerned not only with political propaganda, but with conducting a paper which was distinguished for the quality of its miscellaneous features and for its profitability as a business enterprise.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Notes Introduction 1.Peter Mandler, Aristocratic Government in the Age of Reform: Whigs and Liberals, 1830–1852 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990), 14. 2.Roy Porter, English Society in the Eighteenth Century (Harmondsworth, England: Penguin Books, 1990), 112. 3. Byron, ‘Don Juan’, Canto 11; John Cannon, ‘New Lamps for Old: the End of Hanoverian England’ in The Whig Ascendancy: Colloquies on Hanoverian England, Cannon, ed. (London: Edward Arnold, 1988), 115. 4.Robert Stewart, Henry Brougham, 1778–1868: His Public Career (London: Bodley Head, 1985), 43–4, 120. 5.Donald Read, The English Provinces c. 1760–1960: A Study in Influence (London: Edward Arnold, 1964). 6.Brougham, ‘Rights and Duties of the People’, Edinburgh Review (November 1812):424, Dror Wahrman, Imagining the Middle Class: The Political Representation of Class in Britain c. 1780–1840 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995), 255. 7. J.C.D. Clark, English Society, 1660–1832: Religion, Ideology and Politics During the Ancien Regime (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), 513. 8. T.A. Jenkins, The Liberal Ascendancy, 1830–86 (New York: St Martin’s Press, 1994), 19. 9. Jonathan Parry, The Rise and Fall of Liberal Government in Victorian Britain (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1993), 3–4. 10.Walter Bagehot, The English Constitution (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1966), 152. 11. Ibid., 28. 12.Richard Brent, Liberal Anglican Politics: Whiggery Religion and Reform, 1830–1 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990), 28, 37, 39. 13. James Abercrombie to George Tierney, 1818, Tierney MSS. 14. Horner to Francis Jeffrey, 15 September 1806, Horner Papers 427. 15. Chester H. New, The Life of Henry Brougham to 1830 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1961), 2–3; David Hackett Fisher, Albion’s Seed: Four British Folkways in America (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989), 647–8.
    [Show full text]
  • M.I.S from St Peter & St Paul Church, Bromley, Kent†311KB
    KENT ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY -- RESEARCH Studying and sharing Kent's past Homepage Bromley, Kent with Index of names and places at end These webpages are designed to be viewed with the screen resolution set at 800 x 600 and text size at normal. HOW TO Back to Churchyards listed Some Monumental Inscriptions of St Peter & St Paul Church, Noted by Richard Holworthy Published in The British Archivists Vol 1 Sept 1914 to June 1915. Kindly typed up for the website by Pat Tritton Preface. In the "Gentleman’s Magazine" for 1829, Part II, page 201, there appears a long letter, signed "Viator Antiquarius", relating to the restoration of Bromley Church. It reads: "Passing through the town of Bromley in Kent the other day, I found the old church there nearly pulled down, nothing remaining but the well-built Gothic tower and portions of the side walls. The gates of the churchyard were fortified with a palisade, so that it was impossible for an antiquary to enter and satisfy himself what might be the probable result to ancient vestiges in the Church of such desecration and destructive appearances …"/. This same "desecration" – usually called "restoration" – has been the fate of most churches, but many have suffered to a far greater extent than that of Bromley. Certainly, several interesting monuments in the church have disappeared, but the majority were replaced. One very important brass was discovered embedded in the masonry and preserved, though not placed on the wall until 1884, i.e. 55 years after its discovery. This small brass, which is dated 1361, is to the memory of Isabella, wife of Richard LACER, a wealthy merchant and mayor of London.
    [Show full text]
  • Newgate Diary, the 1820 Westminster Election, Byron's Ballad My Boy Hobby, O, the Execution of the Cato Street Conspirat
    678 December 14th 1819-December 31st 1820: Newgate, Cato Street, and the Trial of Queen Caroline 1820: Newgate Diary, the 1820 Westminster Election, Byron’s ballad My Boy Hobby, O, the execution of the Cato Street Conspirators, and the Trial of Queen Caroline December 14th 1819-December 31st 1820 Edited from B.L.Add.Mss. 56540 and 56541. In the notes, “I.G.” indicates assistance from Ian Gilmour, to whom I’m grateful. In 1819 Hobhouse contested the parliamentary seat of Westminster, which had become vacant on the suicide of Romilly. He stood as a radical, supported by his father and by Burdett, but was defeated on March 3rd by George Lamb. Riots followed, and a breach opened between him and the Holland House Whigs. Westminster was an unusual constituency. It extended from Temple Bar to Hyde Park, from Oxford Street to the Thames, and three-quarters of its voters were middle-class: shopkeepers, skilled artisans, printers, tailors, and so on. It was the only constituency in the country in which each of its 17,000 rate-paying householders had the vote, which fact made it a headache to any administration, Whig or Tory, which was based upon, and served, as all administrations were and did, the landed gentry. At Westminster, candidates had to stand on the hustings and speak deferentially to people whom they’d normally expect to speak deferentially to them . At this time Hobhouse wrote several pamphlets, and an anonymous reply to a sarcastic speech of Canning’s, written by him and some of his friends in the Rota Club, attracted attention.
    [Show full text]
  • The Campaign in Tirah, 1897-1898
    »-M^i<A",<-i*».'<i»W<;<:J ' <« <^^^ WIwfa^U ! *t'i.M W < TIRAH-M897-98 i^Uim^l3!!<^ UUiZiA^^m.^ CORNELL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY ARTHUR PROBSTHAIN Oriental Bookseller 41 Gt. Rufiell Street LONDO N, W.C. I THE CAMPAIGN IN TIRAH 1897-1898 / I! a Ph,'!o,:^raf<h by Hassan Genf.ral Sir William Lockhart, G.C. B. , K. C.S.I. Commander of the Tirah Expeditionary Force. Frontispiece. Cornell University Library The original of tiiis book is in tine Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924028659575 THE CAMPAIGN IN TIRAH 1897-1898 AN ACCOUNT OF THE EXPEDITION AGAINST THE ORAKZAIS AND AFRIDIS UNDER GENERAL SIR WILLIAM LOCKHART, G.C.B., K.C.S.I. BASED (by permission) ON LETTERS CONTRIBUTED TO 'THE TIMES' BY COLONEL H. D. HUTCHINSON DIRECTOR OF MILITARY EDUCATION IN INDIA AUTHOR OF 'THE STORY OF WATERLOO,' 'THE STORY OF 1812,' 'THE STORY OF CORUNNA,' 'military SKETCHING MADE EASY,' ETC., ETC. WITH MAPS, PLANS, AND ILLUSTRATIONS %antion MACMILLAN AND CO., Limited NEW YORK : THE MACMILLAN COMPANY 1898 AU rights reserved DEDICATED BY PERMISSION TO GENERAL SIR WILLIAM S. A. LOCKHART, G.C.B., K.C.S.I. COMMANDER OF THE TIRAH EXPEDITIONARY FORCE. PREFACE I BELIEVE this narrative of the Tirah Expedition gives an accurate account of the operations, and I hope it will also be found a readable account. Its interest will certainly be enhanced by the reliable maps and plans which accompany it, and by the excellent illustrations, for which I am indebted to my friends Colonel More - Molyneux, Assistant Quartermaster-General for Intelligence, Lieutenant- Colonel C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Indian Frontier War, Being an Account of the Mohmund and Tirah
    THE INDIAN FRONTIER WAR 1897 THE LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES THE INDIAN FRONTIER WAR THE INDIAN FRONTIER WAR BEING AN ACCOUNT OF THE MOHMUND AND TIRAH EXPEDITIONS 1897 BY LIONEL JAMES REUTER'S SPECIAL CORRESPONDENT WITH THIRTY-ONE ILLUSTRATIONS FROM SKETCHES BY THE AUTHOR AND PHOTOGRAPHS. AND TEN MAPS AND PLANS LONDON WILLIAM HEINEMANN 1898 THE AUTHOR DEDICATES THIS VOLUME TO MR. J. O'B. SAUNDERS PROPRIETOR OF "THE ENGLISHMAN" CALCUTTA AS A SMALL RETURN FOR THE GREAT KINDNESS HE HAS SHOWN HIM 3015657 PREFACE FROM the way the public Press has called for ex- planation upon certain points connected with the campaign, it has appeared to me that the public barely appreciate what was asked of their army when it was sent to invade Afridi and Orakzai Tirah. Having been present at the Campaign, I would that my readers should start from as fair a standpoint as possible, for I feel sure that, after really grasping the circumstances of the campaign, they will appre- ciate the reasons why I have abstained from criticism. Be it understood that casualties must occur, and in a mountainous country like the Afridi the casualties must be in proportion to the efficiency of the trans- port. The Government of India chose to equip the force with an inefficient transport, and the General Officers could only do their best with what was served out to them. Those who have no knowledge of frontier warfare can form but the faintest conception of the adverse conditions under which the campaign took place, and it would be well for the public in general to refrain from forming any judgment on the matter till the whole question has been properly threshed viii PREFACE out.
    [Show full text]
  • Mark Pack Submitted for the Degree of Dphil York University History Department June1995 Appendix 1: Borough Classifications
    Aspects of the English electoral system 1800-50, with special reference to Yorkshire. Volume 2 of 2 Mark Pack submitted for the degree of DPhil York University History Department June1995 Appendix 1: Borough classifications ' There are several existing classifications of boroughs by franchise type. I have preferred to construct my own as there are clear problems with the existing classifications, such as inconsistencies and some errors (e.g. see Malton below). In this context, it is more satisfying to delve into the issue, rather than simply pick one of the existing classifications off the shelf. This is particularly so given the existence of a much under-used source of evidence: post-1832 electoral registers (or sources that contain information about them). Under certain conditions pre-1832 franchises were allowed to continue after 1832. As electoral registers listed what qualifications people had registered under, post-1832 registers can reveal the pre-1832 franchise. That at least is the theory; there are some complicating factors. First, the description in an electoral register may be less than a complete description of the pre-1832 franchise. For example, if a register says "freemen" one does not know if there had been additional requirements, such as having to be resident. Second, not all pre-1832 constituencies survived, and so there are no electoral registers for these. Third, compilers of electoral registers may have got the pre-1832 franchise wrong. This is unlikely as when the first registers were being drawn up in the 1830s there was a wealth of local and verbal knowledge to consult.
    [Show full text]
  • The Head Port of Chester; and Liverpool, Its Creek and Member
    THE HEAD PORT OF CHESTER; AND LIVERPOOL, ITS CREEK AND MEMBER BY RUPERT C. JARVIS, F.S.A., F.R.HIST.S. , Read 26 October 1946. T is well known among maritime historians that there is a curious I tendency for ports to go in pairs; Ipswich and Harwich, Poole and Wareham, Exeter (Topsham) and Exmouth, Lostwithiel and Fowey, and so on. We may often watch how one of the pair the lower town becomes a place of shipbuilding, the home of fishermen and seafarers, while the other of the pair the upper town develops into a place of merchants and well-to-do ven­ turers.(1) The interest of the crown in the lower towns would be as places that could supply ships in time of war, and seamen to man them. Its interest in the upper towns would be as sources of revenue, places that could be taxed. It is understandable, therefore, if in the passage of time the one became the home of seadogs, and the other of parliament men. In the nature of the case it would be the parliament men and not the seadogs who would secure the charters, royal recognition, and civil and civic privileges the full "civil signature" of a port, as a later famous Chief Justice said. 121 There were ample grounds for rivalry within each pair, and we know that in some cases these rivalries were from early times fought out in a particularly bitter manner. In some instances it amounted to what might very well be described as a running civil war, and it seems only to confuse matters to say that at one time one was for the barons the other for the crown; at another one was for parliament the other for the king.
    [Show full text]