DOCSLIB.ORG

29 Newgate and Westminster 1820

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
29 Newgate and Westminster 1820 678 December 14th 1819-December 31st 1820: Newgate, Cato Street, and the Trial of Queen Caroline 1820: Newgate Diary, the 1820 Westminster Election, Byron’s ballad My Boy Hobby, O, the execution of the Cato Street Conspirators, and the Trial of Queen Caroline December 14th 1819-December 31st 1820 Edited from B.L.Add.Mss. 56540 and 56541. In the notes, “I.G.” indicates assistance from Ian Gilmour, to whom I’m grateful. In 1819 Hobhouse contested the parliamentary seat of Westminster, which had become vacant on the suicide of Romilly. He stood as a radical, supported by his father and by Burdett, but was defeated on March 3rd by George Lamb. Riots followed, and a breach opened between him and the Holland House Whigs. Westminster was an unusual constituency. It extended from Temple Bar to Hyde Park, from Oxford Street to the Thames, and three-quarters of its voters were middle-class: shopkeepers, skilled artisans, printers, tailors, and so on. It was the only constituency in the country in which each of its 17,000 rate-paying householders had the vote, which fact made it a headache to any administration, Whig or Tory, which was based upon, and served, as all administrations were and did, the landed gentry. At Westminster, candidates had to stand on the hustings and speak deferentially to people whom they’d normally expect to speak deferentially to them . At this time Hobhouse wrote several pamphlets, and an anonymous reply to a sarcastic speech of Canning’s, written by him and some of his friends in the Rota Club, attracted attention. In 1819 he published another anonymous pamphlet, entitled A Trifling Mistake in Thomas Lord Erskine’s recent Preface . Shortly noticed and respectfully corrected in a Letter to his Lordship, by the author of the Defence of the People. To the question “What prevents the people from walking down to the House, and pulling out the members by the ears, locking up their doors and flinging the key into the Thames?” he answered that “their true practical protectors ... are to be found at the Horse Guards, and the Knightsbridge barracks” ( A Trifling Mistake pp. 49-50). The Commons ignored the answer (which in itself asked for trouble), read the question as rhetorical, and found Hobhouse guilty of breach of privilege … 679 December 14th 1819-December 31st 1820: Newgate, Cato Street, and the Trial of Queen Caroline The diary of one falsely imprisoned by a bullying administration – even though in relatively luxurious conditions, allowed to exercise on the jail roof, free to receive and dine almost anyone he likes – is bound to excite our sympathy, and Hobhouse’s succeeds. His stoicism is admirable. He gets up early for a change, and works non-stop at researching his defence and writing protests, though to no avail. It is only the prorogation of parliament which frees him. The friendship he receives from so many people contrasts with Byron’s mistimed and irrelevant ballad (which gives this website its name). Byron does not understand Hobhouse’s politics, and his jokes miss the mark. Hobhouse, as we can see, is as hostile to “the Mob” as Byron, and the idea (shared by Wellington), that he is a follower of Tom Paine, is foolish. Byron is, perhaps, jealous at seeing his friend suffering in a good English political cause, while he (Byron) stays away, playing the empty games of the Carbonari. Extra drama is provided in the diary by the departure from England of Scrope Davies, and by the so-called “Cato Street Conspiracy”, about the true nature of which no-one has any doubts. As the year progresses and the events of the first half give way to the “Trial” of Queen Caroline, Byron fades from Hobhouse’s mind. It’s sad to think, given their co-operation here, that by the mid-1830s Francis Place was referring to the by-now-reactionary Hobhouse as “live lumber”. Tuesday December 14th 1819: I saw by the papers this morning what a sad mistake Ellice 1 had committed – Kinnaird 2 agreed something should be done, so he drew up a letter to the Speaker. Whilst he was drawing, in came Bickersteth 3 with a petition to the House, or rather a remonstrance, stating the case simply, 1: Edward Ellice (1781-1863) friend of Burdett, H. and B. – a radical Whig. The “sad mistake” he has made is to suggest to the Commons that H. “… should be spared the annoyance of an interrogation at the Bar, and that whatever [is] to be done on the occasion should be done at once” ( Recollections , II 115). He did not realise at the time that this would involve H.’s arrest: he does now. 2: Douglas Kinnaird (1788-1830) friend of B., whose banker and literary agent he was during the poet’s exile, and of H., whose 1813 journey round Europe he had in part shared. Now MP for Bishop’s Castle, a seat he loses in March this year when a select committee declares him “not duly elected”. Had offered himself as Westminster candidate in 1818, but stood down in favour of H. Loses his temper a lot. 3: Henry Bickersteth (1783-1851) afterwards Lord Langdale and Master of the Rolls, was a close friend of H. who shared his radical views. He married Lady Jane Harley. 680 December 14th 1819-December 31st 1820: Newgate, Cato Street, and the Trial of Queen Caroline and calling upon them not to persevere in their injustice. The whole enormity became more apparent the more we thought of it – we agreed on the petition as dignified and proper. We sent to have it engrossed and transmitted to Burdett 4 at the House tonight, immediately after my arrest. About four o’clock, a dreary evening, came Bruce 5 and Ellice, and then Burdett. What Ellice had said had made it necessary that I should give myself up. He very generously said that if I chose to go, 6 he would take the blame upon himself, and say he had exceeded his commission. Burdett advised me again to go, but I recollected how in his own matter 7 his note to the Serjeant-at-Arms had been misconstrued. All I could do was to let Ellice tell the Serjeant-at-Arms where he might find me, but at the same time to let him know that I should yield to force alone – he must come with men – I would not yield to one person. I left Kinnaird’s then, not to return. This night I had a sort of shyness about telling my boy Richard 8 to take my clothes to Newgate , and I did not tell him. Walked to No 1 New Street – Ellice’s – shook hands with Burdett and Kinnaird – Burdett still pressing me to go to France. Went into Ellice’s with Bruce – there sat ourselves down – this was about five o’clock. We chatted and talked in his little room – Ellice went down to the House to tell the Serjeant where I was – the interval was about an hour. I felt as if waiting for a dentist coming to take my tooth out – every now and then fancied the people came. At last Ellice’s butler came and said, “Some persons from the House of Commons, Sir!” – “Show them up”, said I, and rose up. In came a short man. 9 He knew Bruce, and addressed me as “Mr Hobhouse.” He said he was sorry to come on so unpleasant a business – he had a warrant from the Speaker to apprehend me – with that he pulled out the warrant and the copy. I took both – read the warrant – and said “I cannot obey this – had I been called to the bar, I should have 4: Sir Francis Burdett (1777-1844) very rich radical Whig MP. To be H.’s partner in several Westminster elections. H. will propose without success to two of his daughters. Place found him snobbish and distant. 5: Michael Bruce (1787-1861) traveller, friend of H., with whom he witnessed the Hundred Days, sometime lover of Lady Hester Stanhope, Lady Caroline Lamb, and of the widows of both Marshal Ney and Admiral Sir Peter Parker. 6: That is, fly the country (as, for example, John Wilkes had, in not entirely dissimilar circumstances, in 1763). 7: In 1810, on Burdett’s release from the Tower, where he too had been confined for breach of Parliamentary privilege, he had tried without success to bring an action against the Commons Serjeant-at-Arms. 8: H.’s valet. 9: H. pleased to be arrested by a man shorter than he is. 681 December 14th 1819-December 31st 1820: Newgate, Cato Street, and the Trial of Queen Caroline demurred to the tribunal – I now object to the warrant – it is not a legal instrument – I shall not go without force – I presume you are not come alone?” – The messenger said he wished to know what force meant. “I do not mean a regiment of dragoons,” – “Of course,” said the messenger – “well then, I have two men with me below.” – I answered, “I shall not go with you – take back the warrant to the Speaker, and tell him so”. – “Sir” said the little fellow, “I cannot do that – now I have seen you I cannot quit you.” – “Very well,” said I, “then use force – I shall not go without”. The messenger went out, and soon appeared with two tall fellows having certain badges on their breasts, they being other messengers. They waited in the other room – he came in again, and asked me if I should go – “Not without force.” – He seemed to hesitate, and not know what to do.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A St. Helena Who's Who, Or a Directory of the Island During the Captivity of Napoleon
    A ST. HELENA WHO'S WHO A ST. HELENA WHO'S WHO ARCHIBALD ARNOTT, M.D. See page si. A ST. HELENA WHO'S WHO OR A DIRECTORY OF THE ISLAND DURING THE CAPTIVITY OF NAPOLEON BY ARNOLD gHAPLIN, M.D. (cantab.) Author of The Illness and Death of Napoleon, Thomas Shortt, etc. NEW YORK E. P. DUTTON AND COMPANY LONDON : ARTHUR L. HUMPHREYS 1919 SECOND EDITION REVISED AND ENLARGED PREFACE The first edition of A St. Helena Whos Wlio was limited to one hundred and fifty copies, for it was felt that the book could appeal only to those who were students of the period of Napoleon's captivity in St. Helena. The author soon found, however, that the edition was insuffi- cient to meet the demand, and he was obliged, with regret, to inform many who desired to possess the book that the issue was exhausted. In the present edition the original form in which the work appeared has been retained, but fresh material has been included, and many corrections have been made which, it is hoped, will render the book more useful. vu CONTENTS PAQI Introduction ....... 1 The Island or St. Helena and its Administration . 7 Military ....... 8 Naval ....... 9 Civil ....... 10 The Population of St. Helena in 1820 . .15 The Expenses of Administration in St. Helena in 1817 15 The Residents at Longwood . .16 Topography— Principal Residences . .19 The Regiments in St. Helena . .22 The 53rd Foot Regiment (2nd Battalion) . 22 The 66th Foot Regiment (2nd Battalion) . 26 The 66th Foot Regiment (1st Battalion) . 29 The 20th Foot Regiment .
    [Show full text]
  • Hampton Village Consultation Material
    Hampton Village INTRODUCTION TO VILLAGE PLANNING GUIDANCE FOR HAMPTON What is Village Planning Guidance? How can I get involved? London Borough of Richmond upon Thames (LBRuT) wants residents and businesses to help prepare ‘Village Planning There will be two different stages of engagement and consultation Guidance’ for the Hampton Village area. This will be a before the guidance is adopted. document that the Council considers when deciding on planning During February and March residents and businesses are being asked applications. Village Planning Guidance can: about their vision for the future of their area, thinking about: • Help to identify what the ‘local character’ of your area is and • the local character what features need to be retained. • heritage assets • Help protect and enhance the local character of your area, • improvement opportunities for specific sites or areas particularly if it is not a designated ‘Conservation Area’. • other planning policy or general village plan issues • Establish key design principles that new development should respond to. Draft guidance will be developed over the summer based on your views and a formal (statutory) consultation carried out in late The boundary has been based on the Village Plan area to reflect summer/autumn 2016 before adoption later in the year. the views of where people live, as well as practical considerations to support the local interpretation of planning policy. How does Village Planning Guidance work? How does the ‘Village Planning Guidance’ relate to Village Plans? The Village Planning Guidance will become a formal planning policy ‘Supplementary Planning Document’ (SPD) which The Planning Guidance builds on the ‘Village Plans’ which were the Council will take account of when deciding on planning developed from the 2010 ‘All in One’ survey results, and from ongoing applications, so it will influence developers and householders consultation, including through the engagement events currently in preparing plans and designs.
    [Show full text]
  • Itinerary of Prince Charles Edward Stuart from His
    PUBLICATIONS OF THE SCOTTISH HISTORY SOCIETY VOLUME XXIII SUPPLEMENT TO THE LYON IN MOURNING PRINCE CHARLES EDWARD STUART ITINERARY AND MAP April 1897 ITINERARY OF PRINCE CHARLES EDWARD STUART FROM HIS LANDING IN SCOTLAND JULY 1746 TO HIS DEPARTURE IN SEPTEMBER 1746 Compiled from The Lyon in Mourning supplemented and corrected from other contemporary sources by WALTER BIGGAR BLAIKIE With a Map EDINBURGH Printed at the University Press by T. and A. Constable for the Scottish History Society 1897 April 1897 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE .................................................................................................................................................... 5 A List of Authorities cited and Abbreviations used ................................................................................. 8 ITINERARY .................................................................................................................................................. 9 ARRIVAL IN SCOTLAND .................................................................................................................. 9 LANDING AT BORRADALE ............................................................................................................ 10 THE MARCH TO CORRYARRACK .................................................................................................. 13 THE HALT AT PERTH ..................................................................................................................... 14 THE MARCH TO EDINBURGH ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Lands and Their Owners in Galloway
    H.E NTIL , 4 Pfiffifinfi:-fit,mnuuugm‘é’r§ms,­ ».IVI\ ‘!{5_&mM;PAmnsox, _ V‘ V itbmnvncn. if,‘4ff V, f fixmmum ‘xnmonasfimwini cAa'1'm-no17t§1[.As'. xmgompnxenm. ,7’°':",*"-‘V"'{";‘.' ‘9“"3iLfA31Dan1r,_§v , qyuwgm." “,‘,« . ERRATA. Page 1, seventeenth line. For “jzim—g1'é.r,”read "j2'1r11—gr:ir." 16. Skaar, “had sasiik of the lands of Barskeoch, Skar,” has been twice erroneously printed. 19. Clouden, etc., page 4. For “ land of,” read “lands of.” 24. ,, For “ Lochenket," read “ Lochenkit.” 29.,9 For “ bo,” read “ b6." 48, seventh line. For “fill gici de gord1‘u1,”read“fill Riei de gordfin.” ,, nineteenth line. For “ Sr,” read “ Sr." 51 I ) 9 5’ For “fosse,” read “ fossé.” 63, sixteenth line. For “ your Lords,” read “ your Lord’s.” 143, first line. For “ godly,” etc., read “ Godly,” etc. 147, third line. For “ George Granville, Leveson Gower," read without the comma.after Granville. 150, ninth line. For “ Manor,” read “ Mona.” 155,fourth line at foot. For “ John Crak,” read “John Crai ." 157, twenty—seventhline. For “Ar-byll,” read “ Ar by1led.” 164, first line. For “ Galloway,” read “ Galtway.” ,, second line. For “ Galtway," read “ Galloway." 165, tenth line. For “ King Alpine," read “ King Alpin." ,, seventeenth line. For “ fosse,” read “ fossé.” 178, eleventh line. For “ Berwick,” read “ Berwickshire.” 200, tenth line. For “ Murmor,” read “ murinor.” 222, fifth line from foot. For “Alfred-Peter,” etc., read “Alfred Peter." 223 .Ba.rclosh Tower. The engraver has introduced two figures Of his own imagination, and not in our sketch. 230, fifth line from foot. For “ his douchter, four,” read “ his douchter four.” 248, tenth line.
    [Show full text]
  • Huguenot Merchants Settled in England 1644 Who Purchased Lincolnshire Estates in the 18Th Century, and Acquired Ayscough Estates by Marriage
    List of Parliamentary Families 51 Boucherett Origins: Huguenot merchants settled in England 1644 who purchased Lincolnshire estates in the 18th century, and acquired Ayscough estates by marriage. 1. Ayscough Boucherett – Great Grimsby 1796-1803 Seats: Stallingborough Hall, Lincolnshire (acq. by mar. c. 1700, sales from 1789, demolished first half 19th c.); Willingham Hall (House), Lincolnshire (acq. 18th c., built 1790, demolished c. 1962) Estates: Bateman 5834 (E) 7823; wealth in 1905 £38,500. Notes: Family extinct 1905 upon the death of Jessie Boucherett (in ODNB). BABINGTON Origins: Landowners at Bavington, Northumberland by 1274. William Babington had a spectacular legal career, Chief Justice of Common Pleas 1423-36. (Payling, Political Society in Lancastrian England, 36-39) Five MPs between 1399 and 1536, several kts of the shire. 1. Matthew Babington – Leicestershire 1660 2. Thomas Babington – Leicester 1685-87 1689-90 3. Philip Babington – Berwick-on-Tweed 1689-90 4. Thomas Babington – Leicester 1800-18 Seat: Rothley Temple (Temple Hall), Leicestershire (medieval, purch. c. 1550 and add. 1565, sold 1845, remod. later 19th c., hotel) Estates: Worth £2,000 pa in 1776. Notes: Four members of the family in ODNB. BACON [Frank] Bacon Origins: The first Bacon of note was son of a sheepreeve, although ancestors were recorded as early as 1286. He was a lawyer, MP 1542, Lord Keeper of the Great Seal 1558. Estates were purchased at the Dissolution. His brother was a London merchant. Eldest son created the first baronet 1611. Younger son Lord Chancellor 1618, created a viscount 1621. Eight further MPs in the 16th and 17th centuries, including kts of the shire for Norfolk and Suffolk.
    [Show full text]
  • Lady Caroline Lamb and Her Circle
    APPENDIX Lady Caroline Lamb and her Circle Who’s Who Bessborough, Lord (3rd Earl). Frederick Ponsonby. Father of Lady Caroline Lamb. Held title of Lord Duncannon until his father, the 2nd Earl, died in 1793. Bessborough, Lady (Countess). Henrietta Frances Spencer Ponsonby. Mother of Lady Caroline and her three brothers, John, Frederick, and William. With her lover, Granville Leveson-Gower, she also had two other children. Bruce, Michael. Acquaintance of Byron’s who had an affair with Lady Caroline after meeting her in Paris in 1816. Bulwer-Lytton, Edward. Novelist and poet, he developed a youthful crush on Lady Caroline and almost became her lover late in her life. Byron, Lord (6th Baron). George Gordon. Poet and political activist, he had many love affairs, including one with Lady Caroline Lamb in 1812, and died helping the Greek revolutionary movement. Byron, Lady. Anne Isabella (“Annabella”) Milbanke. Wife of Lord Byron and cousin of Lady Caroline’s husband, William Lamb. Canis. (see 5th Duke of Devonshire) Cavendish, Georgiana. (Little G, or G) Lady Caroline Lamb’s cousin, the elder daughter of Georgiana, Duchess of Devonshire. Later Lady Morpeth. 294 Lady Caroline Lamb Cavendish, Harriet Elizabeth. (Harryo) Lady Caroline Lamb’s cousin, the younger daughter of Georgiana, Duchess of Devonshire. Later Lady Granville. Churchill, Susan Spencer. Illegitimate daughter of Harriet Caroline Spencer, a relative of Lady Caroline’s, who became the ward of William and Lady Caroline Lamb. Colburn, Henry. Publisher of Lady Caroline’s most famous novel, Glenarvon (1816). Colburn ran a very active business that published a great quantity of British women’s fiction of the early nineteenth century.
    [Show full text]
  • James Perry and the Morning Chronicle 179O—I821
    I JAMES PERRY AND THE MORNING CHRONICLE- 179O—I821 By l yon Asquith Thesis submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the University of London 1973 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract 3 Preface 5 1. 1790-1794 6 2. 1795-1 805 75 3. 1806-1812 (i) ThB Ministry of the Talents 184 (ii) Reform, Radicalism and the War 1808-12 210 (iii) The Whigs arid the Morning Chronicle 269 4. Perry's Advertising Policy 314 Appendix A: Costs of Production 363 Appendix B: Advertising Profits 365 Appendix C: Government Advertisements 367 5. 1813-1821 368 Conclusion 459 Bibliography 467 3 A BSTRACT This thesis is a study of the career of James Perry, editor and proprietor of the Morning Chronicle, from 1790-1821. Based on an examination of the correspondence of whig and radical polit- icians, and of the files of the morning Chronicle, it illustrates the impact which Perry made on the world of politics and journalism. The main questions discussed are how Perry responded, as a Foxite journalist, to the chief political issues of the day; the extent to which the whigs attempted to influence his editorial policy and the degree to which he reconciled his independence with obedience to their wishes4 the difficulties he encountered as the spokesman of an often divided party; his considerable involvement, which was remarkable for a journalist, in party activity and in the social life of whig politicians; and his success as a newspaper proprietor concerned not only with political propaganda, but with conducting a paper which was distinguished for the quality of its miscellaneous features and for its profitability as a business enterprise.
    [Show full text]
  • Memoirs of the Life of Sir Samuel Romilly, Written by Himself, Ed. By
    This is a reproduction of a library book that was digitized by Google as part of an ongoing effort to preserve the information in books and make it universally accessible. https://books.google.com 4c 102,1 MEMOIRS THE LIFE OF SIR SAMUEL ROMILLY, WRITTEN BY HIMSELF; WITH A SELECTION FROM HIS CORRESPONDENCE. EDITED BY HIS SONS. IN THREE VOLUMES. VOL. III. LONDON: JOHN MURRAY, ALBEMARLE STREET. MDCCCXL. 1031. London : Printed by A. Spottiswoode, New- Street- Square. CONTENTS THE THIRD VOLUME. DIARY OF THE PARLIAMENTARY LIFE OF SIR SAMUEL ROMILL Y — {continued). 1812. Slave trade ; Registry of slaves Bristol election; candidates; Mr. Protheroe. — Resolution of the Independent Club, and letter respecting it Mr. Protheroe; Hunt Address to the electors. — Mr. Rider's motion, police of the metro polis ; increase of crime. — Abuses in Ecclesiastical Courts ; Sir Wm. Scott. — Bristol election ; letter to Mr. Edge. — Reversion Bill. — Bill to repeal 39 Eliz. — Transportation to New South Wales. — The Regent's determination to re tain the ministers; his letter to the Duke of York. — Colonel M'Mahon's sinecure. — Delays in the Court of Chancery ; Michael Angelo Taylor. — Master in Chancery not fit mem ber of a committee to inquire into the delays of the court. — Expulsion of Walsh from the House of Commons. — Local Poor Bills; Stroud. — Military punishments; Brougham. — Bill to repeal 39 Eliz. ; Lord Ellenborough. — Abuses of charitable trusts ; Mr. Lockhart. — Visit to Bristol, reception, Speech second address to the electors. — Military punishments. — Cobbett's attack. — Committee on the delays in the Court of Chancery. — Disqualifying laws against Catholics.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Notes Introduction 1.Peter Mandler, Aristocratic Government in the Age of Reform: Whigs and Liberals, 1830–1852 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990), 14. 2.Roy Porter, English Society in the Eighteenth Century (Harmondsworth, England: Penguin Books, 1990), 112. 3. Byron, ‘Don Juan’, Canto 11; John Cannon, ‘New Lamps for Old: the End of Hanoverian England’ in The Whig Ascendancy: Colloquies on Hanoverian England, Cannon, ed. (London: Edward Arnold, 1988), 115. 4.Robert Stewart, Henry Brougham, 1778–1868: His Public Career (London: Bodley Head, 1985), 43–4, 120. 5.Donald Read, The English Provinces c. 1760–1960: A Study in Influence (London: Edward Arnold, 1964). 6.Brougham, ‘Rights and Duties of the People’, Edinburgh Review (November 1812):424, Dror Wahrman, Imagining the Middle Class: The Political Representation of Class in Britain c. 1780–1840 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995), 255. 7. J.C.D. Clark, English Society, 1660–1832: Religion, Ideology and Politics During the Ancien Regime (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), 513. 8. T.A. Jenkins, The Liberal Ascendancy, 1830–86 (New York: St Martin’s Press, 1994), 19. 9. Jonathan Parry, The Rise and Fall of Liberal Government in Victorian Britain (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1993), 3–4. 10.Walter Bagehot, The English Constitution (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1966), 152. 11. Ibid., 28. 12.Richard Brent, Liberal Anglican Politics: Whiggery Religion and Reform, 1830–1 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990), 28, 37, 39. 13. James Abercrombie to George Tierney, 1818, Tierney MSS. 14. Horner to Francis Jeffrey, 15 September 1806, Horner Papers 427. 15. Chester H. New, The Life of Henry Brougham to 1830 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1961), 2–3; David Hackett Fisher, Albion’s Seed: Four British Folkways in America (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989), 647–8.
    [Show full text]
  • English Female Artists
    ^ $525.- V ^ T R /S. / / \ * t {/<•/dti '/’rlk- Printed lor Hob'.Saryer.N?^ in Fleet Street ■ ENGLISH 'EMALE ART < rn us. Ei.LSK C. G) aYXO v A' £HOR Of •' QUi'JBKir OF 80N0 ' !,'TO. • • • VOL f. LONDON; ! OTHERS, S CATHERINE ST.. SXRAN I) 187C. (A'ii *1 ijkti r ;,d) * ENGLISH FEMALE ARTISTS. lBY ELLEN C. CLAYTON, AUTHOR OF “QUEENS OF SONG,” ETC. IN TWO VOLUMES. VOL. I. I- LONDON: TINSLEY BROTHERS, 8 CATHERINE ST., STRAND. 1876. (All rights reserved.) TO (gHsabftlt Sltompisian THIS BOOK, A ROLL CALL OF HONOURABLE NAMES, is BY PERMISSION INSCRIBED, IN TESTIMONY OF ADMIRATION FOR HER GENIUS. CONTENTS. CHAPTER I. PAGE Susannah Hornebolt. Lavinia Teerlinck ... ... ... 1 CHAPTER II. Anne Carlisle. Artemisia Gentileschi. The Sisters Cleyn 14 CHAPTER III. Anna Maria Carew. Elizabeth Neale. Mary More. Mrs. Boardman. Elizabeth Creed ... ... ... ... 35 CHAPTER IY. Mary Beale ... ... ... ... ... ... 40 CHAPTER Y. Susan Penelope Rose ... ... ... ... ... 54 CHAPTER VI. Anne Killigrew ... ... ... ... ... ... 59 CHAPTER VII. Maria Varelst ... ... ... ... ... ... 71 VI CONTENTS. CHAPTER VIII. PAGE Anne, Princess of Orange. Princess Caroline. Agatha Van- dermijn. Sarah Hoadley 78 CHAPTER IX. Elizabeth Blackwell 91 CHAPTER X. Mary Delany 96 CHAPTER XL Frances Reynolds 146 CHAPTER XII. Maria Anna Angelica Catherine Kauffman 233 CHAPTER XIII. Mary Moser 295 CHAPTER XIV. Maria Cecilia Louisa Cosway 314 CHAPTER XV. Amateurs: Temp. George the Third 336 CHAPTER XVI. The Close of the Eighteenth Century 359 CHAPTER XVII. The Earlier Years of the Nineteenth Century ... 379 CHAPTER XVIII. Mary Harrison. Anna Maria Charretie. Adelaide A. Maguire 410 LIST OF THE PRINCIPAL AUTHORITIES CONSULTED FOR THE FIRST VOLUME. Annual Registek. Abt Joubnal.
    [Show full text]
  • London, April 26Th–July 30Th 1816 84
    84 London, April 26th–July 30th 1816 Mid-1816 April 26th-July 30th 1816 Edited from BL Add. Mss. 47232 and 56536 There is much variety and interest in this section of the diary, which covers the time between Byron’s departure for the continent on April 25th 1816 and that of Hobhouse on July 30th (for which he is already preparing on June 5th). The events chronicled should climax in Sheridan’s funeral, on July 13th; but that is an anti-climactic affair. They might have climaxed with a successful romantic assignation on June 24th, but Hobhouse is as luckless and inept here as ever he is. The high-point would be Miss Somerville’s delivery of his prologue to Maturin’s Bertram , at Drury Lane on May 9th, if only that were something of which he felt proud. For the rest, Hobhouse is throughout anxious over the sale of his Letters from Paris , a work, it seems, much-praised but little purchased. The success of Caroline Lamb’s shameless Glenarvon , published on May 9th and into its second edition by late June, does his ego no good. His reading in Mungo Park, and the tales of the war with the Nepalese, and of Napoleon, which his brother Henry brings from his travels, add an incidental exotic interest; and there are vivid glimpses of Coleridge, Sebastiani, Kean, Benjamin Constant, and others. Hobhouse’s exit from the country is effected in a very strange and disturbing manner. Friday April 26th 1816: Did little or nothing in the morning. Met Bainbridge, 1 who told me that Cuthbert 2 had told him that he defended Lord Byron, as having separated only on common causes, when Lord Auckland 3 said, “I beg your pardon – Brougham has told me it is something ‘too horrid to mention’”.
    [Show full text]
  • Newgate Diary, the 1820 Westminster Election, Byron's Ballad My Boy Hobby, O, the Execution of the Cato Street Conspirat
    678 December 14th 1819-December 31st 1820: Newgate, Cato Street, and the Trial of Queen Caroline 1820: Newgate Diary, the 1820 Westminster Election, Byron’s ballad My Boy Hobby, O, the execution of the Cato Street Conspirators, and the Trial of Queen Caroline December 14th 1819-December 31st 1820 Edited from B.L.Add.Mss. 56540 and 56541. In the notes, “I.G.” indicates assistance from Ian Gilmour, to whom I’m grateful. In 1819 Hobhouse contested the parliamentary seat of Westminster, which had become vacant on the suicide of Romilly. He stood as a radical, supported by his father and by Burdett, but was defeated on March 3rd by George Lamb. Riots followed, and a breach opened between him and the Holland House Whigs. Westminster was an unusual constituency. It extended from Temple Bar to Hyde Park, from Oxford Street to the Thames, and three-quarters of its voters were middle-class: shopkeepers, skilled artisans, printers, tailors, and so on. It was the only constituency in the country in which each of its 17,000 rate-paying householders had the vote, which fact made it a headache to any administration, Whig or Tory, which was based upon, and served, as all administrations were and did, the landed gentry. At Westminster, candidates had to stand on the hustings and speak deferentially to people whom they’d normally expect to speak deferentially to them . At this time Hobhouse wrote several pamphlets, and an anonymous reply to a sarcastic speech of Canning’s, written by him and some of his friends in the Rota Club, attracted attention.
    [Show full text]