Application

Eliwana Mine Mobile Crushing and Screening Facility– Licence Application Supporting Document

Eliwana Iron Ore Project

September 2019 751EW-1000-AP-EN-0001_B

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION ...... 7 1.1 Project Background ...... 7 1.2 Purpose and Scope of the Application ...... 7 1.3 Applicant/Occupier Details ...... 15 1.4 Prescribed Premises Boundary Details ...... 15 1.5 Stakeholder Consultation ...... 17 1.6 Schedule ...... 18

EXISITING ENVIRONMENT ...... 19 2.1 Climate ...... 19 2.2 Landforms, Geology and Soils ...... 20 Land Systems ...... 20 Soils ...... 20 Geology ...... 20 2.3 Hydrology and Hydrogeology ...... 21 Surface Water ...... 21 Groundwater ...... 21 2.4 Flora and Vegetation ...... 21 Significant Vegetation Communities ...... 23 Conservation Significant Flora Species ...... 23 Introduced Flora Species ...... 23 2.5 Fauna ...... 23 Fauna Habitats...... 24 Conservation Significant Fauna Species ...... 24 2.6 Areas of Significance ...... 24

MOBILE CRUSHING AND SCREENING FACILITY DESIGN AND OPERATION ...... 25 3.1 Key Characteristics ...... 25 Eliwana Mine Mobile Crushing and Screening Facility– Page 3 of 37 Licence Application Supporting Document 751EW-1000-AP-EN-0001_B

3.2 Inputs and Outputs ...... 25 Power and Fuel Supply ...... 26 Water Supply ...... 26 3.3 Location and Area of Disturbance ...... 26 3.4 Mobile Crushing and Screening Facility Description ...... 26 3.5 General MCSF Site Layout ...... 26

EMISSIONS, DISCHARGES, POTENTIAL IMPACTS AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ...... 27 4.1 Dust Emissions Management ...... 27 4.2 Noise Emissions Management ...... 27 4.3 Surface Water Management ...... 27 4.4 Groundwater Management ...... 28 4.5 Chemical and Hydrocarbon Management ...... 28 4.6 Waste Management ...... 28 4.7 Fauna and Flora Management ...... 29

REFERENCES ...... 30

Eliwana Mine Mobile Crushing and Screening Facility– Page 4 of 37 Licence Application Supporting Document 751EW-1000-AP-EN-0001_B

List of Tables

Table 1: MCSF Verification Checklist – Submitted 7th August 2019...... 9 Table 2: Applicant Contact Details ...... 15 Table 3: Prescribed Premises Boundary (MGA 94 Zone 50) ...... 15 Table 4: Prescribed Premises Category ...... 17 Table 5: Key stakeholders for the Eliwana Mine Project ...... 17 Table 6: Vegetation Community’s Intersecting Prescribed Premises Boundary .. 22 Table 7: Priority flora the Prescribed Premises Boundary ...... 23 Table 8: Priority fauna within nearby vicinity of proposal area...... 24 Table 9: Description of the Mobile Crushing and Screening Facility...... 25 Table 10: Inputs and Outputs of the MCSF ...... 25

List of Graphs Graph 1: Climate Averages (Tom Price and Paraburdoo)...... 19

Eliwana Mine Mobile Crushing and Screening Facility– Page 5 of 37 Licence Application Supporting Document 751EW-1000-AP-EN-0001_B

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1: Eliwana Mine Project Location Map ...... 31 Figure 2: Coordinates of the Prescribed Premises Boundary ...... 32 Figure 3: Ashburton River Catchment and Duck Creek Sub-Catchment Location and Major Watercourses ...... 33 Figure 4: Vegetation Communities Map ...... 34 Figure 5: Fauna Habitats Map ...... 35 Figure 6: PPB and Tenements ...... 36 Figure 7: Sensitive Receptor Distance ...... 37

Eliwana Mine Mobile Crushing and Screening Facility– Page 6 of 37 Licence Application Supporting Document 751EW-1000-AP-EN-0001_B

INTRODUCTION

1.1 Project Background

Fortescue Metals Group Limited (Fortescue) operates a number of iron ore mines and supporting infrastructure in the region of .

Fortescue is currently developing the Eliwana Iron Ore Mine Project located approximately 90 km north-west of Tom Price in the Pilbara region of Western Australia (Figure 1).

A Mobile Crushing and Screening Facility (MCSF) was constructed under Works approval (W6233/2019/1) to support the Eliwana Minor or Preliminary Works (MPW) which were provided consent by the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA). The EPA have now approved the implementation of the Eliwana Mine Project (Ministerial Statement 1109) subject to the conditions. These conditions are included as controls where relevant.

The MCSF is required to remain operational during the early phase of construction at Eliwana Mine. As a result, Fortescue will apply for a license to operate the MCSF.

1.2 Purpose and Scope of the Application

This Licence application provides information with regards to the proposed operation of the MCSF that will produce construction material within the Eliwana Mine Project Area. Fortescue is licenced under Works Approval (W6233/2019/1) to crush and screen extracted rock material at four separate demarcated locations which together form the Eliwana Mine MCSF Prescribed Premises Boundary (PPB) (Figure 2).

Planned extraction within the MCSF is estimated at 250,000 tonnes of rock material for construction purposes. Construction is expected to be completed over a 12 hour per day (1 shift/day), 7 days per week. However, considering potential delays, possible excess material requirements and allowing for waste material, the overall production capacity being applied for is 1 Mtpa (million tonnes per annum).

This Licence application requests the MCSF be allowed to operate past the three month period authorised under the Works Approval to support the construction of the Eliwana Mine (MS1109).

The components of the MCSF that will be included in this application are:

 Material is fed into the MCSF by excavator and bucket;

Eliwana Mine Mobile Crushing and Screening Facility– Page 7 of 37 Licence Application Supporting Document 751EW-1000-AP-EN-0001_B

 Material is crushed to size via either a Jaw Crusher (600 t/hr (tonnes per hour) maximum capacity) or Cone Crusher (400 t/hr maximum capacity) and then screened via a Double Deck Screener (600 t/hr maximum capacity);

 Crushed material is discharged onto a conveyor; and

 Conveyor deposits material in a stockpile or otherwise straight into a truck. If stockpiled, the crushed material is picked up by front end loader or excavator and loaded into a truck. Construction material stockpiles will be managed as per the Mine and Rail Dust Management Plan (45-PL-EN-0030) and Surface Water Management Plan (100-OL-EN-1015) and located within previously cleared areas of the Mine footprint were possible.

The components were constructed under Works Approval (W6233/2019/1) verification checklist from the Work Approval is included as Table 1.

Fortescue has identified new pavement requirements for the airstrip which will now include a top dressing of a finer crushed rock, producing this requires a second smaller cone crusher and a second set of smaller screens. In summary the crushing circuit for the new product will be in addition to the existing equipment:  Jaw Crusher x 1  Cone Crusher x 2  Screening x 2  Stacker (where required)

These components will not change the emissions of the MSCF and will be located within the PPB.

Eliwana Mine Mobile Crushing and Screening Facility– Page 8 of 37 Licence Application Supporting Document 751EW-1000-AP-EN-0001_B

Table 1: MCSF Verification Checklist – Submitted 7th August 2019

Verification Checklist: Eliwana Mine Mobile Crush and Screen Facility Works Approval (W6233/2019/1) The following checklist details evidence of compliance with the Works: (a) Specified in Column 1

(b) To the requirements specified in Column 2

(c) At the location specified in Column 3

Of Table 2 within Works Approval W6233/2019/1.

Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Verification Comments Evidence

Infrastructure/ Requirements (design and construction) Site plan reference Equipment

MCSF Infrastructure will be  See Photograph 1: The components of the Mobile Crushing and Screening The MCSF has been constructed located within the 4 Infrastructure/ Facility (MCSF) include: demarcated areas within location 2 of the four areas Equipment shown in Schedule 1: identified in Schedule 1: Maps –  See Photograph 2:  Hopper Maps – Premises map. Premises map. Infrastructure/ Equipment – Double  Front End Loader Deck Screener Construction design parameters for (Spare) the MCSF have been met for the  Jaw Crusher (600 tonnes per hour (t/hr)  See Prescribed maximum capacity) following equipment types: Premise Boundary with Operational Mobile Crushing and  Cone Crusher (400 t/hr maximum capacity)  Front End Loader Screening Facility  Double Deck Screener (600 t/hr maximum  Jaw Crusher capacity)  Cone Crusher  Conveyor.  Double Deck Screener

 Conveyor.

Eliwana Mine Mobile Crushing and Screening Facility– Page 9 of 37 Licence Application Supporting Document

751EW-1000-AP-EN-0001_B

A departure from the requirements specified in Column 2 of Table 2 has occurred for the following equipment types:

 Hopper.

The departure was required to reduce dust emissions from the material loading process. Rather than loading material into the Hopper, an Excavator and Bucket is used to directly feed the material into the MCSF, resulting in a significant reduction in dust emissions generated from the material loading process.

As required under Condition 2, Fortescue confirms the departure from the requirements prescribed in Table 2 Column 2 of the Works Approval will not increase risks to public health, public amenity or the environment.

Eliwana Mine Mobile Crushing and Screening Facility– Licence Application Supporting Page 10 of 37 Document 751EW-1000-AP-EN-0001_B

Stormwater Stormwater infrastructure include: Infrastructure will be Construction design parameters met.  See Photograph 3: infrastructure  MCSF positioned away from major watercourses located within the 4 Stormwater demarcated areas Infrastructure –  Windrows to direct stormwater runoff away from shown in Schedule 1: Settling Sump (East) work areas Maps – Premises map.  See Photograph 4: Stormwater  Site graded to contain and direct all stormwater, Infrastructure – wash-down and spillages to the collection and Settling Sumps (Central and West) settling sump.  See Photograph 5: Stormwater Infrastructure – Site Windrows and Grading

Eliwana Mine Mobile Crushing and Screening Facility– Licence Application Supporting Page 11 of 37 Document 751EW-1000-AP-EN-0001_B

Photograph 1: Infrastructure/ Equipment

Photograph 2: Infrastructure/ Equipment – Double Deck Screener (Spare)

Eliwana Mine Mobile Crushing and Screening Facility– Page 12 of 37 Licence Application Supporting Document

751EW-1000-AP-EN-0001_B

Photograph 3: Stormwater infrastructure – Settling Sump (East)

Photograph 4: Stormwater Infrastructure – Settling Sumps (Central and West)

Eliwana Mine Mobile Crushing and Screening Facility– Page 13 of 37 Licence Application Supporting Document

751EW-1000-AP-EN-0001_B

Photograph 5: Stormwater Infrastructure – Site Windrows and Grading

Eliwana Mine Mobile Crushing and Screening Facility– Page 14 of 37 Licence Application Supporting Document

751EW-1000-AP-EN-0001_B

1.3 Applicant/Occupier Details

The applicant and occupier of the premises for which this application is made are stated in Table 2:

Table 2: Applicant Contact Details

Physical Address Postal Address Australian Company Australian Business Number Number Fortescue Metals Group Ltd Fortescue Metals Group Ltd 002 594 872 57 002 594 872 Level 2/87 Adelaide Terrace GPO Box 6915 East Perth, WA, 6004 East Perth WA 6004

All correspondence should be addressed to the key contact for this application:

Matt Dowling Senior Environmental Advisor Ph: (08) 9230 1301 Email: [email protected].

The proposed Prescribed Premises Boundary (PPB) sits within Mining Act Tenements M47/1523 and M47/1524. The tenement holder for these tenements is FMG Pilbara Pty Ltd, a wholly owned subsidiary of Fortescue Metals Group Ltd.

1.4 Prescribed Premises Boundary Details

The location of the proposed infrastructure and the proposed PPB is shown in Figure 2 and also described by the coordinates in Table 3.

Table 3: Prescribed Premises Boundary (MGA 94 Zone 50) Polygon Vertex Easting (mE) Northing (mN) 1.1 486074 7513650 1.2 486006 7513640 1.3 486001 7513640 1.4 485927 7513640 1.5 485748 7513670 1.6 485474 7513640 1.7 485419 7513690 1.8 485417 7513700 1.9 485416 7513700 1.10 485367 7513750 1.11 485230 7513790

Eliwana Mine Mobile Crushing and Screening Facility– Page 15 of 37 Licence Application Supporting Document

751EW-1000-AP-EN-0001_B

Polygon Vertex Easting (mE) Northing (mN) 1.12 485229 7513790 1.13 485264 7513810 1.14 485373 7513890 1.15 485494 7513970 1.16 485517 7513990 1.17 485537 7514030 1.18 485937 7513880 1.19 485941 7513880 1.20 486166 7513790 2.1 487148 7520080 2.2 489808 7519620 2.3 489801 7519570 2.4 489862 7519560 2.5 489842 7519450 2.6 489781 7519460 2.7 489774 7519420 2.8 488472 7519650 2.9 488401 7519240 2.10 488082 7519290 2.11 486996 7519490 2.12 487067 7519890 2.13 487115 7519880 2.14 487121 7519920 2.15 487060 7519930 2.16 487080 7520050 2.17 487141 7520040 3.1 481869 7521870 3.2 481925 7521840 3.3 481934 7521840 3.4 481943 7521860 3.5 481969 7521840 3.6 482000 7521830 3.7 482018 7521840 3.8 482049 7521710 3.9 481827 7521820 3.10 481845 7521860 3.11 481852 7521880 4.1 482052 7522110

Eliwana Mine Mobile Crushing and Screening Facility– Page 16 of 37 Licence Application Supporting Document

751EW-1000-AP-EN-0001_B

Polygon Vertex Easting (mE) Northing (mN) 4.2 482026 7522030 4.3 481695 7522140 4.4 481722 7522220

A description of the prescribed premises categories relevant to this application are provided in Table 4.

Table 4: Prescribed Premises Category Category Description of category Production or number design capacity 12 Screening etc. of material: premises (other than premises within category 5 or 8) 50 000 tonnes or on which material extracted from the ground is screened, washed, crushed, more per year ground, milled sized or separated.

1.5 Stakeholder Consultation

Stakeholder consultation for Eliwana Project has formed part of the broader stakeholder engagement programme for Fortescue projects undergoing environmental approvals. Fortescue commenced consultation for the Eliwana Mine and Railway Projects in early 2017 by a combination of face to face meetings, presentations and letters to key community stakeholders. The stakeholder consultation has not been specific to this works approval, however, the feedback from the key stakeholders has been considered in the design of the overall project footprint therein. The overarching objectives of the program are:

 To inform stakeholders about the Project and its impacts to the environment and to describe the outcomes of consultation on project design; and

 To establish relationships with key stakeholders that enable ongoing dialogue though implementation and regulation of the Proposal.

Key stakeholders have been identified through Fortescue’s experience in the Pilbara. Fortescue has also adopted previous recommendations from State government agencies on stakeholders that should be included in the program. Key stakeholders identified to date are listed in Table 5.

Table 5: Key stakeholders for the Eliwana Mine Project Stakeholder Type of Consultation Department of the Environment and Energy (DoEE) Quarterly meeting Department of Water and Environmental Regulation Monthly meeting (DWER) Department of Mines, Industry Regulation and Safety Quarterly meeting (DMIRS) Department of Jobs, Tourism, Science and Innovation As required or at request (DJTSI) Shire of Ashburton One annual meeting Eliwana Mine Mobile Crushing and Screening Facility– Page 17 of 37 Licence Application Supporting Document

751EW-1000-AP-EN-0001_B

Stakeholder Type of Consultation Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions As required or at request (DBCA) Department of Planning, Lands and Heritage (DPLH) As required or at request Pilbara Development Commission As required or at request Tom Price Community As required or at request Puutu Kunti Kurrama Pinikura People (PKKP) At the request of FMG or PKKP through the regular working group meetings (during 2018 there have been 4 meetings, with this number being expected for future years) Conservation Council of WA As required or at request Wildflower Society of WA As required or at request Wilderness Society of WA As required or at request Rio Tinto Iron Ore (RTIO) As required or at request Mt Stuart Pastoral Station Fortnightly email outlining the proposed works for the next fortnight and as needed consultation from FMGs Pastoral Liaison Officer Rocklea Pastoral Station Fortnightly email outlining the proposed works for the next fortnight and as needed consultation from FMGs Pastoral Liaison Officer Cheela Plains Pastoral Station As required or at request

1.6 Schedule

The crushing and screening of material commenced under the Works Approval W6233/2019/1 and is expected to continue under licence once all relevant legislative approvals have been obtained. Condition 5 of W6233/2019/1 authorises the MCSF to operate for a period of three months from the date of submission of the compliance report. This compliance report was submitted on 7 August 2019.

Eliwana Mine Mobile Crushing and Screening Facility– Page 18 of 37 Licence Application Supporting Document

751EW-1000-AP-EN-0001_B

EXISITING ENVIRONMENT

2.1 Climate

The Project area is located within the Pilbara region, which includes two broad climatic zones. Coastal areas, as well as some higher rainfall inland areas, have a semi-desert tropical climate, which experience between 9 and 11 months of dry weather, with hot humid summers and warm winters. The remaining inland areas have a dry desert climate, typically with higher temperatures and lower rainfall, and often experience up to 12 months of dry weather, with hot dry summers and mild winters (van Vreeswyk, et al., 2004). The Project area is situated within the drier inland area.

The monthly rainfall and temperature averages for the Tom Price (BoM, 2019a) and Paraburdoo (BoM, 2019b) Bureau of Meteorology (BoM) stations, located 95 km and 115 km south-east of the proposed PPB, respectively are shown in Graph 1. Monthly maximum temperatures range from an average of 23°C in July to 41°C in January, whereas minimum temperatures range between 7°C in July and 26°C in January (BoM 2019a; 2019b).

Annual rainfall in the Pilbara has a substantial yearly variation. Tropical cyclones, many of which originate in the Timor Sea, along with local thunderstorms, produce much of the summer and early autumn rainfall. The driest months are in spring (September to October), and the wettest in summer (January to March) (BoM 2019a; 2019b).

45 120 40 100 35 30 80 25 60 20

15 40 Rainfall (mm) 10 Temperature Temperature (degrees C) 20 5 0 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Month

Mean Rainfall Tom Price Mean Rainfall Paraburdoo Mean Maximum Temperature Tom Price Mean Maximum Temperature Paraburdoo Mean Minimum Temperature Tom Price Mean Minimum Temperature Paraburdoo

Graph 1: Climate Averages (Tom Price and Paraburdoo)

Eliwana Mine Mobile Crushing and Screening Facility– Page 19 of 37 Licence Application Supporting Document

751EW-1000-AP-EN-0001_B

2.2 Landforms, Geology and Soils

Land Systems

Reoccurring patterns of topography, soils and vegetation are described as land systems. The West Australian Department of Agriculture mapped the land systems and identified 105 different systems within the Pilbara bioregion.

The MCSF Works Approval application intersects both the Newman and Rocklea land systems. The Newman land system is described as: Rugged jaspilite plateaux, ridges and mountains supporting hard spinifex grasslands. The Rocklea land system is described as: Basalt hills, plateaux, lower slopes and minor stony plains supporting hard spinifex and occasionally soft spinifex grasslands with scattered shrubs.

Soils

The Pilbara Rangelands Index incorporates a regional soil characterisation based on land system delineation (van Vreeswyk, et al. 2004). The majority of the land systems present in the Eliwana PPB are associated with the ‘stony soil’ Western Australia Soil Group. The Boolgeeda Land System is the exception to this, and is associated with the red/brown non-cracking clay and red shallow loam Western Australia Soil Groups.

A soil characterisation study undertaken by SoilWater in 2017 for the Eliwana Project identified two main soil groups being (1) the Boolgeeda and Platform Land Systems; and (2) the Newman and Rocklea Land Systems. There is a general absence of differentiating features between the two soil classes and there was no notable differentiation in soil profile characteristics for each soil type.

Geology

The Project occurs within the Hamersley Province which covers an approximate area of 80,000 km2. The Hamersley Province contains late Archaean to Lower Proterozoic age sediments of the Mount Bruce Supergroup (SoilWater, 2017). This Supergroup contains the Fortescue, Hamersley and Turee Creek Groups, which are overlain by remnants of the Wyloo Group. The Fortescue Group is a sequence of basalts, inter-bedded clastic sediment, minor chemical sediment and doleritic intrusions. This Group contains the following Formations: the Mount Roe Basalt, the Hardley Formation, the Kylena, Boongal, Tumbiana and Maddina Formations, and the Jeerinah Formation.

The Hamersley Group overlies the Fortescue Group, and is approximately 2,500 m thick containing a sequence of banded iron formations (BIF), dolomites, pyroclastic/hemipelagic shale,

Eliwana Mine Mobile Crushing and Screening Facility– Page 20 of 37 Licence Application Supporting Document

751EW-1000-AP-EN-0001_B

and acid volcanics. The Hamersley Group contain the two dominant iron ore bearing formations of the region; these being the Brockman Iron Formation and the Marra Mamba Iron Formation. The Turee Creek Group is the youngest geologic unit of the Mount Bruce Supergroup, and is not considered to contain significant quantities of iron ore (SoilWater, 2017).

2.3 Hydrology and Hydrogeology

The proposed PPB falls within the Ashburton River catchment and the Duck Creek sub- catchment (which encompasses Caves Creek and Boolgeeda Creek). Duck Creek and Caves Creek are located to the north of the proposed PPB and Boolgeeda Creek to the south. Duck Creek/Caves Creek and Boolgeeda Creek flow west to the Ashburton River, which runs north- west and reaches the coast just west of Onslow (Figure 3).

Surface Water

The PPB is located in the Hamersley Ranges within the Duck Creek catchment, a tributary of the Ashburton River. The Duck Creek catchment area covers approximately 6,800 km2 at the confluence with the Ashburton River. The Ashburton River basin has a total area of 78,777 km2 (Fortescue, 2017).

There are no permanent surface water features within the PPB area. The natural drainage features of the landscape will largely be unaffected by the proposed disturbance and hence the natural flow and dispersion of surface water will be largely unaffected.

Flood events are most likely to occur in the summer months when the remnants of tropical cyclones can pass inland and continue to precipitate large volumes of water onto the landscape. No Surface Water flows have been previously recorded by surveys within the proposed PPB.

Groundwater

Groundwater within the broader Eliwana area occurs within both deep, fractured rock aquifers and near the surface along dissected creeks and within gorges. The main aquifers relevant to the PPB are likely to be fractured rock aquifers or minor alluvial aquifers in surface creeks. Clearing of small amounts of vegetation of a wide range will have no impact on groundwater levels or quality.

2.4 Flora and Vegetation

The PPB lies in the Pilbara biogeographic region of the Interim Biogeographic Regionalisation for Australia (IBRA). The Pilbara biogeographic region incorporates 17,928,700 ha and includes four

Eliwana Mine Mobile Crushing and Screening Facility– Page 21 of 37 Licence Application Supporting Document

751EW-1000-AP-EN-0001_B

subregions: Chichester, Roebourne, Hamersley, and Fortescue Plains. The Proposal is located entirely within the Hamersley subregion of the Pilbara bioregion.

Broad scale vegetation mapping of the Pilbara region has been completed by Beard (1975). The PPB is located entirely within the Fortescue Botanical District in the Eremaean Botanical Province of Western Australia. The vegetation of this province is typically open and frequently dominated by spinifex, wattles and occasional Eucalypts. The PPB covers two of Beard’s mapping units, being Hamersley 82 – Eucalyptus isolated trees/Tridoia open hummock grasslands and Hamersley 567 – Hummock grasslands, shrub steppe; mulga & kanji over soft spinifex & T. basedowii.

A level 2 flora survey of the Eliwana area was conducted in 2017 by Biota Environmental Services. The proposed PPB contains 10 mapped vegetation types as depicted in Figure 4 and Table 6.

Table 6: Vegetation Community’s Intersecting Prescribed Premises Boundary

Veg Type Code Description

AanTwTe Acacia 'aneura' low woodland over wiseana, T. epactia low sparse hummock grassland AiTw/ElTa MOSAIC: Acacia inaequilatera tall sparse shrubland over Triodia wiseana low open hummock grassland / subsp. leucophloia low open woodland over Triodia angusta, T. longiceps, T. wiseana low open hummock grassland ChAiTw/ElAbTlo Mosaic: Corymbia hamersleyana and/ or Eucalyptus leucophloia subsp. leucophloia low isolated trees over Acacia inaequilatera and/ or A. bivenosa mid-tall sparse shrubland over Triodia wiseana low hummock grassland / Eucalyptus leucophloia subsp. leucophl EgAatTe Eucalyptus gamophylla mid sparse mallee shrubland over Acacia atkinsiana, A. bivenosa, A. exigua tall sparse shrubland over Triodia epactia, T. wiseana mid hummock grassland ElAarTwTspr Eucalyptus leucophloia subsp. leucophloia mid isolated trees Acacia arida mid open shrubland over Triodia wiseana, T. sp. Robe River (M.E. Trudgen et al. MET 12367) mid hummock grassland ElAmTw Eucalyptus leucophloia subsp. leucophloia and/ or Corymbia hamersleyana mid open woodland over Acacia maitlandii mid sparse shrubland over Triodia wiseana low hummock grassland ElTa Eucalyptus leucophloia subsp. leucophloia low open woodland over Triodia angusta, T. longiceps, T. wiseana low open hummock grassland *EvAcCcERIt Eucalyptus victrix low-mid open woodland over Acacia citrinoviridis and/ or Melaleuca glomerata tall open shrubland over *Cenchrus ciliaris, Eriachne tenuiculmis mid open tussock grassland *EvAcMgERIt Eucalyptus victrix low-mid open woodland over Acacia citrinoviridis, Melaleuca glomerata tall sparse shrubland over Eriachne tenuiculmis mid sparse tussock grassland ExAcTHtTe Eucalyptus xerothermica low open woodland over Acacia citrinoviridis, A. bivenosa, A. pyrifolia tall sparse shrubland over Themeda triandra, Chrysopogon fallax mid tussock grassland over Triodia epactia mid hummock grassland

Please note that the disturbance to the above communities is approved under Ministerial Statement 1109.

Eliwana Mine Mobile Crushing and Screening Facility– Page 22 of 37 Licence Application Supporting Document

751EW-1000-AP-EN-0001_B

Significant Vegetation Communities

There are no Priority Ecological and Threatened Ecological Communities occurring within the proposed PPB. The nearest PEC and TEC are the Triodia sp. Robe River Assemblages of Mesas of the West Pilbara PEC and Themeda Grasslands on Cracking Clays (Hamersley Station, Pilbara) TEC located ~17 km to the north-west and ~37 km to the north-east of the PPB respectively.

Conservation Significant Flora Species

No Threatened Flora listed under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 or the Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016 has been mapped within 200 km of the PPB

Previous surveys have recorded no conservation significant flora within the PPB, however a number of priority flora species have been recorded within the nearby vicinity (5 km) of the proposal area (Table 7).

Table 7: Priority flora the Prescribed Premises Boundary Species Conservation status

Pentalepis trichodesmoides subsp. hispida P2 Eremophila magnifica subsp. velutina P3 Grevillea saxicola P3 Indigofera sp. Bungaroo Creek (S. van Leeuwen 4301) P3 Triodia sp. Robe River (M.E. Trudgen et al. MET P3 12367) Eremophila magnifica subsp. magnifica P4

Introduced Flora Species

Previous surveys have recorded no introduced flora species within the PPB. A total of three introduced species have been identified within the nearby vicinity (5 km) of the proposed MCSF (common names of Buffel Grass, Mexican Poppy and Speedy Weed), however none are Weeds of National Significance. It is possible that weeds occur within the PPB.

2.5 Fauna

It is not expected that any fauna species will be significantly impacted by the proposal. The PPB is surrounded by a vast expanse of habitat such that the proposed disturbance impact is considered insignificant.

Eliwana Mine Mobile Crushing and Screening Facility– Page 23 of 37 Licence Application Supporting Document

751EW-1000-AP-EN-0001_B

Fauna Habitats

A consolidated level 2 terrestrial fauna assessment was undertaken of the wider Eliwana area as well as a targeted survey for conservation significant species in critical habitat areas. Fauna habitat types within the PPB, as depicted in Figure 5 are:

 Plain (stony/gibber);

 Plain (shrubland);

 Drainage Line/River/Creek (Minor); and

 Lower slopes/hillslopes.

Conservation Significant Fauna Species

Previous surveys have recorded no significant fauna species within the PPB. A total of 5 conservation significant fauna species have been recorded within the nearby vicinity (5 km) of the proposal area. These species are listed in Table 8:

Table 8: Priority fauna within nearby vicinity of proposal area Species Conservation Status Northern Quoll (Dasyurus hallucatus) EN Ghost Bat (Macroderma gigas) VU Pilbara Leaf-Nosed Bat (Rhinonicteris aurantia) VU Western Pebble-Mound Mouse (Pseudomys chapmani) Priority 4 Peregrine Falcon (Falco peregrinus) OS

Based on fauna habitat preference of the species listed in Table 8, the PPB could provide suitable habitat for the following two conservation significant fauna species:

 Western Pebble-Mound Mouse – Plain (Stony/Gibber); and

 Peregrine Falcon – Drainage Line/River/Creek (Minor).

Impacts to the above listed significant fauna species will be managed in accordance with associated management plans listed within section 4 of this supporting document.

2.6 Areas of Significance

Karijini National Park is the closest conservation reserve and is located approximately 100 km to the east of the proposed PPB.

Eliwana Mine Mobile Crushing and Screening Facility– Page 24 of 37 Licence Application Supporting Document

751EW-1000-AP-EN-0001_B

MOBILE CRUSHING AND SCREENING FACILITY DESIGN AND OPERATION

3.1 Key Characteristics

A MCSF is proposed to be operational for the purpose of generating aggregate to support the construction of the Eliwana Mine. Fortescue seeks approval for an annualised production capacity of 1 Mtpa. A description of the proposed facility is contained within Table 9:

Table 9: Description of the Mobile Crushing and Screening Facility Aspect Key Characteristics Location The MCSF will be located on mining tenements M47/1523 and M47/1524 within the PPB as depicted in Figure 6. Inputs Feed Material, Power Supply and Raw Water. Outputs Crushed Aggregate Material. Equipment Front End Loader, Jaw Crusher, Cone Crusher and Double Deck Screener and Conveyor. Planned Product Estimated 1,000,000 tonnes of crushed aggregate material per annual period. Key Environmental Values Dust Emissions Noise Emissions Surface Water Chemicals and Hydrocarbons Waste Fauna and Flora

3.2 Inputs and Outputs

The main inputs and outputs associated with the MCSF are provided in Table 10:

Table 10: Inputs and Outputs of the MCSF Input Feed Material 1 Mtpa (wet) Power Supply Tracked Diesel (mobile re-fuelling using service truck) Raw Water 200 KL/day Output Crushed Aggregate Material 1 Mtpa

The MCSF is expected to process up to 1,000,000 tonnes per annum worth of material for Eliwana Mine construction purposes.

Eliwana Mine Mobile Crushing and Screening Facility– Page 25 of 37 Licence Application Supporting Document

751EW-1000-AP-EN-0001_B

Power and Fuel Supply

The MCSF units (Jaw Crusher, Cone Crusher and Double Deck Screener) are mobile (tracked) diesel fuelled equipment, with re-fuelling occurring via service trucks. Service trucks will be equipped with a designated spill kit as a mitigation measure for chemical and hydrocarbon management on the ground.

Water Supply

Water requirements are expected to be maximum usage of 200 KL/day. Water usage will be through water carts which will source their water from nearby Turkeys Nests fed by raw water borefields and pipelines. It is estimated that when operating the MCSF a water cart will operate 4 – 5 times per day. Fortescue has approval under the RIWI Act to abstract water from designated supply bores to facilitate water supply.

3.3 Location and Area of Disturbance

The MCSF and associated activities will be located within mining tenements M47/1523 and M47/1524 depicted within Figure 6.

3.4 Mobile Crushing and Screening Facility Description

The MCSF consists of two mobile crushing with a maximum capacity of 400 t/hr for the Cone Crusher and maximum capacity of 600 t/hr for the Jaw Crusher. The anticipated annualised output for the crushed aggregate material is 1 Mtpa.

Extracted raw material will be hauled to the location of the crusher, where it will be fed directly to the crusher, or alternatively, placed onto the feed stockpile from where it will be subsequently reclaimed and fed to the crusher.

Material will be fed by front end loader initially through static grizzlies for sizing of rock material. All material passing the screen will be crushed by either a Cone or Jaw Crusher and then further screened to produce a variety of construction materials.

3.5 General MCSF Site Layout

The general layout of the site is shown in the verification checklist Table 1 and associated photographs. The site will be graded to ensure that all stormwater, wash-down and spillage water run-off is contained and directed to a collection and settling sump from where it can be reused or disposed, as practicable. The MCSF and all supporting infrastructure will remain within the PPB.

Eliwana Mine Mobile Crushing and Screening Facility– Page 26 of 37 Licence Application Supporting Document

751EW-1000-AP-EN-0001_B

EMISSIONS, DISCHARGES, POTENTIAL IMPACTS AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT

An assessment of the potential emissions, receptors and adverse effects relevant to the MCSF and the corresponding management measures are provided in this section and are managed in accordance with the factors and management measures below.

4.1 Dust Emissions Management

There is the potential for dust emissions from the MCSF associated with crushers, screeners and general handling of material. The potential impacts associated with the emissions of dust include:

 Loss of amenity in dust affected areas; and

 Physical impacts on the health of vegetation and fauna habitat.

The operation of the MCSF which may result in dust emissions will be mitigated by implementing the following management measures:

 Where applicable, ensure that operation of the MCSF is managed in accordance with the Mine and Rail Dust Management Plan (45-PL-EN-0030);

 Minimise dust emissions using water sprays and/or water trucks; and

 Enforce speed limits in MCSF work areas to reduce dust generation.

4.2 Noise Emissions Management

The operation of the MCSF which may result in noise emissions will be managed in accordance with the Environmental Protection (Noise) Regulations 1997. Noise emissions will be mitigated by implementing the following management measures:

 Inspection and maintenance of exhaust and silencing systems on machinery, equipment and vehicles will be conducted and the use of low noise equipment, where practicable.

4.3 Surface Water Management

The MCSF will be located and operated in accordance with Fortescue’s Surface Water Management Plan (100-PL-EN-1015) where practicable. Surface water management measures relevant to the MCSF include:

 Position MCSF away from major watercourses;

 Use windrows to direct stormwater runoff away from MCSF work areas; and

Eliwana Mine Mobile Crushing and Screening Facility– Page 27 of 37 Licence Application Supporting Document

751EW-1000-AP-EN-0001_B

 Grade the site as required to ensure that any stormwater, wash-down and spillage water runoff from the MCSF work areas is contained and directed to a collection and settling sump, where it can be treated accordingly prior to reuse or disposal, as practicable.

The PPB do not intercept any surface water features and are a significant distance from any sensitive receptor, with the closest sensitive receptor being Duck Creek, located 2.3 km to the North at its closest point as depicted in Figure 7.

4.4 Groundwater Management

Groundwater levels in the area are greater than 2 metres below ground level. The MCSF is not expected to impact groundwater.

4.5 Chemical and Hydrocarbon Management

Small volumes of hydrocarbons will be used during operation of the MCSF. To prevent spillage to the environment, hydrocarbons will be fully contained in a self-bunded container adjacent to the MCSF.

Chemicals and hydrocarbons utilised during operation of the MCSF will be managed in accordance with Fortescues Chemical and Hydrocarbon Management Plan (100-PL-EN-0011). Chemical and Hydrocarbon management measures relevant to the MCSF include:

 Storing chemical, hydrocarbons, lubricants and greases in bunding in accordance with AS 1940-2004 (The storage and handling of flammable and combustible liquids);

 Positioning of spill kits near areas where the potential for chemical or hydrocarbon spills has been identified; and

 Utilise spill trays and other containment mechanisms during maintenance activities to prevent any discharge to the environment.

4.6 Waste Management

Fines and oversized material resulting from the screening process will be used as construction material. Other waste products will be managed in accordance with Fortescue’s Waste Management Plan (45-PL-EN-0014) and controlled waste will be disposed of in accordance with the Environmental Protection (controlled waste) Regulations 2004. Chemical and hydrocarbon contaminated materials generated will be disposed of in accordance with the Chemical and Hydrocarbon Spills Procedure (100-PR-EN-0014).

Eliwana Mine Mobile Crushing and Screening Facility– Page 28 of 37 Licence Application Supporting Document

751EW-1000-AP-EN-0001_B

4.7 Fauna and Flora Management

To mitigate the potential impacts to conservation significant fauna, the management measures outlined in Fortescue’s Conservation Significant Fauna Management Plan (100-PL-EN-0022) will be implemented during operation of the MCSF.

To mitigate the potential impacts to significant flora and vegetation, the management measures outlined in Fortescue’s Vegetation Health Monitoring and Management Plan (100-PL-EN-1020) will be implemented during operation of the MCSF.

To mitigate the potential impacts from weeds, the management measures outlined in Fortescue’s Weed Management Plan (100-PL-EN-1017) will be implemented during operation of the MCSF to ensure weed management measures are implemented to minimise the introduction and spread of weeds within the project area.

Eliwana Mine Mobile Crushing and Screening Facility– Page 29 of 37 Licence Application Supporting Document

751EW-1000-AP-EN-0001_B

REFERENCES

Beard, J.S. (1975). Vegetation Survey of Western Australia: Sheet 5 Pilbara. University of Western Australia Press, Perth, Western Australia.

Biota, 2017. Eliwana Consolidated Detailed Flora and Vegetation Survey, s.l.: Unpublished Report prepared for Fortescue Metals Group Ltd. BoM. (2019a). Climate Averages - Tom Price. Retrieved February 18, 2019, from: http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/averages/tables/cw_005072_All.shtml

BoM. (2019b). Climate Averages - Paraburdoo Aero. Retrieved February 18, 2019, from: http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/averages/tables/cw_007185.shtml

Fortescue, 2017. Eliwana Mine Project Surface Water Impact Assessment. Perth: Fortescue Metals Group Ltd.

SoilWater, 2017. Eliwana Project - Soil Characterisation Study. Unpublished report prepared for Fortescue Metals Group Ltd.

Van Vreeswyk, A.M.E., Payne, A.L., Leighton, K.A., & Hennig, P. 2004. Technical Bulletin 92 - An inventory and condition survey of the Pilbara region, Western Australia South Perth, Department of Agriculture.

Eliwana Mine Mobile Crushing and Screening Facility– Page 30 of 37 Licence Application Supporting Document

751EW-1000-AP-EN-0001_B

Figure 1: Eliwana Mine Project Location Map

Eliwana Mine Mobile Crushing and Screening Facility– Page 31 of 37 Licence Application Supporting Document

751EW-1000-AP-EN-0001_B

400,000 500,000 600,000 700,000 800,000 900,000

LOCATION MAP Port Hedland ^ Mount Goldsworthy ^

Dampier ^ Karratha ^ Roebourne ^ 7,700,000 7,700,000

Marble Bar ^ 7,600,000 7,600,000

Nullagine ^

Auski Roadhouse ^ Eliwana i[

7,500,000 Tom Price 7,500,000 ^

Paraburdoo ^

400,000 500,000 600,000 700,000 ^ 800,000 900,000 LEGEND Requested By: R. Sharp Date: 26-Mar-18 Size: A3L Eliwana Mine Project Data Sources: Drawn By: J. Burke FMG Rail Alignments i[ Eliwana Project Revision: 0 3rd Rail, RTIO, BHPB, RHIO. Revised By: scostello Location Map Confidentiality: 1 BHPB Rail ^ Towns Towns, Landgate. Approved By: P. Mastalir Basemap, GA. ± Scale: 1:1,500,000 Rio Tinto Rail Coordinate System: GDA 1994 MGA Zone 50 Roy Hill Rail 0 20 40 60 80 Document Name: 750EW_MP_EN_0016.001_r0 Kilometres FMG accepts no liability and gives no representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the information provided including its accuracy, completeness, merchantability or fitness for purpose.

Figure 2: Coordinates of the Prescribed Premises Boundary

Eliwana Mine Mobile Crushing and Screening Facility– Page 32 of 37 Licence Application Supporting Document

751EW-1000-AP-EN-0001_B

483,000 486,000 489,000

4.4 1.17 E47/3291 1.16 1.15 4.3 1.18 4.1 1.14 1.12 Node Easting Northing 1.13 1.19 1.20 3.1 481869 7521870 4.2 1.10 3.2 481925 7521840 1.11 3.3 481934 7521840 1.8 1.5 3.4 481943 7521860 1.6 1.4 1.1 1.9 3.5 481969 7521840 1.7 1.2 3.6 482000 7521830 1.3 3.11 3.1 Node Easting Northing Node Easting Northing 3.7 482018 7521840 3.4 1.1 486074 7513650 1.11 485230 7513790 3.8 482049 7521710 3.10 3.5 3.7 1.2 486006 7513640 1.12 485229 7513790 7,521,000 7,521,000 3.9 481827 7521820 3.2 1.3 486001 7513640 1.13 485264 7513810 3.9 3.10 481845 7521860 3.3 3.6 1.4 485927 7513640 1.14 485373 7513890 3.11 481852 7521880 1.5 485748 7513670 1.15 485494 7513970 4.1 482052 7522110 1.6 485474 7513640 1.16 485517 7513990 1.7 485419 7513690 1.17 485537 7514030 4.2 482026 7522030 3.8 1.8 485417 7513700 1.18 485937 7513880 4.3 481695 7522140 1.9 485416 7513700 1.19 485941 7513880 4.4 481722 7522220 1.10 485367 7513750 1.20 486166 7513790

2.16 2.1

2.15 2.17 7,518,000 7,518,000 2.14 2.12 M47/1524 M47/1523 2.13 2.8 2.2

2.3 2.4 2.11 2.6 2.5 2.7 2.10 2.9 7,515,000 7,515,000

Node Easting Northing Node Easting Northing 2.1 487148 7520080 2.10 488082 7519290 2.2 489808 7519620 2.11 486996 7519490 2.3 489801 7519570 2.12 487067 7519890 2.4 489862 7519560 2.13 487115 7519880 2.5 489842 7519450 2.14 487121 7519920 2.6 489781 7519460 2.15 487060 7519930 2.7 489774 7519420 2.16 487080 7520050 2.8 488472 7519650 2.17 487141 7520040 2.9 488401 7519240 483,000 486,000 489,000

LEGEND Requested By: B. Nicholson Date: 19-Feb-19 Drawn By: N. Rappa Size: A3L Layout of the Mobile Crush and Node Data Sources: Revised By: nrappa Revision: 0 Screen Facility and Prescribed Premises Boundary Aerials; FMG and Landgate; 2018 Prescribed Premises Boundary Approved By: P. Mastalir Confidentiality: 1 All other data: FMG. ± Scale: 1:50,000 Mobile Crush and Screen Facility Footprint 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 Coordinate System: GDA 1994 MGA Zone 50 Document Name: 750EW_MP_EN_0015_r0 FMG Tenements Metres FMG accepts no liability and gives no representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the information provided including its accuracy, completeness, merchantability or fitness for purpose.

Figure 3: Ashburton River Catchment and Duck Creek Sub-Catchment Location and Major Watercourses

Eliwana Mine Mobile Crushing and Screening Facility– Page 33 of 37 Licence Application Supporting Document

751EW-1000-AP-EN-0001_B

400,000 450,000 500,000 550,000

MAP AREA

Ashburton River Catchment

OVERVIEW 7,550,000 7,550,000

Prescribed Premise Boundary 7,500,000 7,500,000

Tom Price "

400,000 450,000 500,000 550,000

LEGEND Requested By: B. Nicholson Date: 19-Feb-19 Data Sources: Drawn By: S. Costello Size: A3L Ashburton River Catchment and Prescribed Premise Boundary Tenements sourced from DMIRS, 2019 Road Classifications Revised By: scostello Revision: 0 Duck Creek Sub-Catchment Location Catchments, DoW, 2014. M47/1523 and M47/1524 Approved By: S. Costello Confidentiality: 1 Main Towns and Roads, Landgate. ± Scale: 1:500,000 FMG Tenements SRTM, Geoscience Aus. Minor Coordinate System: GDA 1994 MGA Zone 50 Ashburton Catchment Area " Towns 0 5 10 15 20 25 Document Name: 751EW_MP_EN_0017.001_r0 Kilometres FMG accepts no liability and gives no representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the Duck Creek Sub-Catchment Areas information provided including its accuracy, completeness, merchantability or fitness for purpose.

Figure 4: Vegetation Communities Map

Eliwana Mine Mobile Crushing and Screening Facility– Page 34 of 37 Licence Application Supporting Document

751EW-1000-AP-EN-0001_B

480,000 483,000 486,000 489,000 492,000

ElAmTw

ElTa

ChAiTw/ElAbTlo 0 0 0 0 0 0 , , 1 1 2 2 5 5 , , 7 7

EvAcMgERIt AiTw/ElTa AiTw/ElTa ElTa ElTa AanTwTe AanTwTe 0 0 0 0 0 0 , , 8 8 1 1 5 5 , , 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 , , 5 5 1 1 5 5 , , 7 7 ExAcTHtTe

ExAcTHtTe ChAiTw/ElAbTlo

ElAarTwTspr

EgAatTe EvAcCcERIt

480,000 483,000 486,000 489,000 492,000 LEGEND Requested By: B. Nicholson Date: 06/03/2019 Prescribed Premises Boundary Vegetation Mapping ElAmTw Data Sources: Drawn By: N. Rappa Size: A3L Pastoral Stations based on source from Landgate. Mapped Vegetation Communities AanTwTe ElTa Revised By: pmastalir Revision: 1 Towns, Roads, Drainage, Landgate. Approved By: P. Mastalir Confidentiality: 1 AiTw/ElTa EvAcCcERIt SRTM, GA. ± Scale: 1:40,000 ChAiTw/ElAbTlo EvAcMgERIt All other data, FMG, 2019. Coordinate System: GDA 1994 MGA Zone 50 EgAatTe ExAcTHtTe 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 Document Name: 751EW_MP_EN_0019.002_r1 FMG accepts no liability and gives no representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the ElAarTwTspr Meters information provided including its accuracy, completeness, merchantability or fitness for purpose.

Figure 5: Fauna Habitats Map

Eliwana Mine Mobile Crushing and Screening Facility– Page 35 of 37 Licence Application Supporting Document

751EW-1000-AP-EN-0001_B

480,000 483,000 486,000 489,000 492,000

Lower slopes/hillslopes 0 0 0 0 0 0 , , 1 1 2 2 5 5

, Lower slopes/hillslopes , 7 7

Lower slopes/hillslopes

Drainage Line/River/Creek (Minor)

Plain (stony/gibber)

Plain (shrubland) 0 0 0 0 0 0 , , 8 8 1 1 5 5 , , 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 , , 5 5 1 1 5 5 , , 7 7

Lower slopes/hillslopes

480,000 483,000 486,000 489,000 492,000

Legend Requested By: B. Nicholson Date: 06/03/2019 Data Sources: Drawn By: N. Rappa Size: A3L Prescribed Premises Boundary Fauna Habitat Mapped Fauna Habitats Towns, Roads, Drainage, Landgate. Revised By: pmastalir Revision: 1 Drainage Line/River/Creek (Minor) SRTM, GA. Approved By: P. Mastalir Confidentiality: 1 Lower slopes/hillslopes All other data, FMG, 2019. ± Scale: 1:40,000 Coordinate System: GDA 1994 MGA Zone 50 Plain (shrubland) 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 Document Name: 751EW_MP_EN_0019.001_r1 Plain (stony/gibber) Meters FMG accepts no liability and gives no representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the information provided including its accuracy, completeness, merchantability or fitness for purpose.

Figure 6: PPB and Tenements

Eliwana Mine Mobile Crushing and Screening Facility– Page 36 of 37 Licence Application Supporting Document

751EW-1000-AP-EN-0001_B

470,000 480,000 490,000 500,000 510,000

SERPENTINE CREEK

CAVES CREEK 7,530,000 7,530,000

DUCK CREEK 7,520,000 7,520,000

M47/1524

M47/1523

DUCK CREEK 7,510,000 7,510,000

BOOLGEEDA CREEK

BOOLGEEDA CREEK

470,000 480,000 490,000 500,000 510,000

Requested By: B. Nicholson Date: 01-Mar-19 LEGEND Layout of the Prescribed Premises Boundary Drawn By: S. Costello Size: A3L Major Drainage Data Sources: Revised By: scostello Revision: 1 - Mobile Crush and Screen Facility Aerials, FMG and Landgate. Approved By: S. Costello Confidentiality: 0 Prescribed Prem ises Boundary – Mobile Crush and Screen Facility All Other Data, FMG. ± Scale: 1:125,000 FMG - M47/1523 and M47/1524 Coordinate System: GDA 1994 MGA Zone 50 0 2 4 6 8 10 Document Name: 751EW_MP_EN_0017.002_r1 Kilom eters FMG accepts no liability and gives no representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the information provided including its accuracy, completeness, merchantability or fitness for purpose.

Figure 7: Sensitive Receptor Distance

Eliwana Mine Mobile Crushing and Screening Facility– Page 37 of 37 Licence Application Supporting Document

751EW-1000-AP-EN-0001_B

475,000 480,000 485,000 490,000 495,000

7,525,000 DUCK CREEK 7,525,000

Distance 2.3 km

Distance 3.5 km 7,520,000 7,520,000 Distance 9.9 km

M47/1524 M47/1523 7,515,000 7,515,000

475,000 480,000 485,000 490,000 495,000

LEGEND Requested By: B. Nicholson Date: 19-Feb-19 Data Sources: Sensitive Receptor distance to Drawn By: S. Costello Size: A3L Duck Creek Tenements, sourced from DMIRS, 2019. Drainage, GA. Revised By: scostello Revision: 0 MCSF Prescribed Premises Boundary Prescribed Premises Boundary – Mobile Crush and Screen Facility ESAs, DPaW. Approved By: S. Costello Confidentiality: 0 ± Scale: 1:60,000 Aerials, FMG and Landgate. Sensitive Receptors Area Coordinate System: GDA 1994 MGA Zone 50 0 1 2 3 4 M47/1523 and M47/1524 Document Name: 751EW_MP_EN_0017.003_r0 Kilometers FMG accepts no liability and gives no representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the information provided including its accuracy, completeness, merchantability or fitness for purpose.