016 Biodiversity Offset Monitoring Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

016 Biodiversity Offset Monitoring Report 016 BIODIVERSITY OFFSET MONITORING REPORT Liddell Coal Operations FINAL February 2017 016 BIODIVERSITY OFFSET MONITORING REPORT Liddell Coal Operations FINAL Prepared by Umwelt (Australia) Pty Limited on behalf of Liddell Coal Operations Project Director: Rebecca Vere Project Manager: Chloe Parkins Report No. 3122O/R18/V3 Date: February 2017 Brisbane Level 11 500 Queen Street Brisbane QLD 4000 Ph. 1300 793 267 www.umwelt.com.au This report was prepared using Umwelt’s ISO 9001 certified Quality Management System. Disclaimer This document has been prepared for the sole use of the authorised recipient and this document may not be used, copied or reproduced in whole or part for any purpose other than that for which it was supplied by Umwelt (Australia) Pty Ltd (Umwelt). No other party should rely on this document without the prior written consent of Umwelt. Umwelt undertakes no duty, nor accepts any responsibility, to any third party who may rely upon or use this document. Umwelt assumes no liability to a third party for any inaccuracies in or omissions to that information. Where this document indicates that information has been provided by third parties, Umwelt has made no independent verification of this information except as expressly stated. ©Umwelt (Australia) Pty Ltd Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction 1 2.0 Background 4 3.0 Methods 7 3.1 Floristic Monitoring 9 3.1.1 Photo Monitoring 10 3.1.2 Habitat Assessment 10 3.2 Fauna Monitoring 11 3.2.1 Diurnal Woodland Bird Surveys 11 3.2.2 Micro-Bat Surveys 11 3.2.3 Diurnal Herpetofauna Surveys 12 3.2.4 Spotlighting Surveys 12 3.2.5 Call Playback Surveys 12 3.2.6 Baited Remote Camera Traps (Including Spotted-tailed Quoll) Monitoring 13 3.3 Nest Box Monitoring 13 3.4 Landscape Function Analysis Monitoring 13 3.5 Regeneration Assessment 14 4.0 Results 16 4.1 Local Weather Conditions 16 4.2 Floristic Monitoring 17 4.2.1 Floristic Diversity 17 4.2.2 Habitat and Structural Diversity 19 4.3 Fauna Monitoring 25 4.4 Site Specific Details 33 4.4.1 Mountain Block 33 4.4.2 Bowmans Creek Riparian Corridor 37 4.4.3 Mitchell Hills South 44 4.5 Offset Regeneration Outcomes 49 4.5.1 Mountain Block Regeneration 53 4.5.2 Bowmans Creek Riparian Corridor Regeneration 54 4.5.3 Mitchell Hills South Regeneration 56 5.0 Discussion 58 5.1 General Outcomes of 2016 Monitoring 58 5.2 Comparison of Results against Performance Indicators and TARP 59 6.0 Management Recommendations 88 6.1 Weed Management 88 016 Biodiversity Offset Monitoring Report 3122_R18_2016 BOMP Monitoring_V3 6.2 Ripping and Seeding 91 6.3 Supplementary Plantings and Seeding 91 6.4 Habitat Augmentation 92 6.5 Feral Fauna Management 93 6.6 Redundant Feature Removal 94 7.0 Conclusion 95 8.0 References 96 Figures Figure 1.1 Locality Map 2 Figure 1.2 Liddell Coal Operations 3 Figure 3.1 BMP Area Ecological Monitoring Sites 8 Figure 3.2 Regeneration Assessment Locations 15 Figure 4.1 2016 Threatened Species Locations 27 Figure 4.2 Occurrence of Regeneration in Mountain Block 50 Figure 4.3 Occurrence of Regeneration in Bowmans Creek Riparian Corridor 51 Figure 4.4 Occurrence of Regeneration in Mitchell Hills South 52 Plates Plate 4.1 Informational Spotted-tailed Quoll Signage at Mitchell Hills South 49 Plate 4.2 Recruitment occurring in the North of Mountain Block 53 Plate 4.3 Recruitment occurring in the South of Mountain Block 54 Plate 4.4 Recruitment occurring in the approximate centre of Bowmans Creek Riparian Corridor 55 Plate 4.5 Regeneration Occurring in Mitchell Hills South 57 Graphs Graph 4.1 2016 Floristic Monitoring Results 19 Graph 4.2 Comparison of Fauna Composition between Monitoring Sites 32 Graph 4.3 Comparison of Native and Introduced Fauna Composition between Monitoring Sites 33 016 Biodiversity Offset Monitoring Report 3122_R18_2016 BOMP Monitoring_V3 Tables Table 2.1 Monitoring Sites, Types Frequencies and Seasons Required 4 Table 3.1 Locations of 2015 Biodiversity Offset Monitoring Sites 7 Table 3.2 Modified Braun-Blanquet Crown Cover-abundance Scale 10 Table 4.1 Temperature and Rainfall Data during lead up to 2016 Monitoring (BOM 2016) 16 Table 4.2 2016 Floristic Monitoring Results 18 Table 4.3 Comparison of Vegetation Structure of the Mountain Block Sites 19 Table 4.4 Comparison of Vegetation Structure of Bowmans Creek Riparian Corridor Sites 21 Table 4.5 Comparison of Vegetation Structure of Mitchell Hills South Sites 22 Table 4.6 Mountain Block 2016 Subplot Results 23 Table 4.7 Bowmans Creek Riparian Corridor 2016 Subplot Results 24 Table 4.8 Mitchell Hills South 2016 Subplot Results 25 Table 4.9 Mountain Block 2016 Fauna Species Diversity 28 Table 4.10 Bowmans Creek Riparian Corridor Fauna Species Diversity 29 Table 4.11 Mitchell Hills South Fauna Species Diversity 31 Table 4.12 Introduced Flora Species Requiring Management at Remnant Site W05 34 Table 4.13 Introduced Flora Species Requiring Management at Regenerating Site WR04 35 Table 4.14 Introduced Flora Species Identified in Remnant Site W06 Considered to Require Management 38 Table 4.15 Introduced Flora Species Requiring Management at Remnant Site W07 39 Table 4.16 Introduced Species Identified Requiring Management at Regeneration Site WR07 41 Table 4.17 Introduced Flora Species Requiring Management in Rehabilitation Site WR09 43 Table 4.18 Noxious Flora Species Identified in Remnant Site W09 45 Table 4.19 Introduced Flora Species Requiring Management in Regeneration Site WR11 47 Table 4.20 Results of Regeneration Site WR11 2016 LFA Monitoring 48 Table 5.1 Comparison of 2016 Monitoring Results against Performance Indicators from the BOMP* 60 Table 5.2 Comparison of Monitoring Results to BOMP Checklist and Implementation Schedule 77 Table 5.3 Comparison of 2016 Monitoring Results to Biodiversity Triggers Identified in the BOMP*8 Table 6.1 Introduced Flora Species Requiring Management and Recommended Actions¹ 89 Table 6.2 Recommended Supplementary Plantings 91 Table 6.3 Recommended Habitat Augmentation 92 Appendices Appendix 1 Year 2016 Performance Indicators Appendix 2 Biodiversity Triggers Identified in the 2015 BOMP Appendix 3 Flora Species Lists Appendix 4 Flora Sub-Plot Monitoring Appendix 5 Fauna Species Lists Appendix 6 Photographic Monitoring 016 Biodiversity Offset Monitoring Report 3122_R18_2016 BOMP Monitoring_V3 1.0 Introduction Liddell Coal Operations (LCO) is an established coal mining operation in the Hunter Valley of New South Wales (refer to Figure 1.1). The LCO holdings are divided by the boundary between the Singleton and Muswellbrook local government areas (LGAs). LCO received approval for the extension of Liddell Open Cut coal mining operations under the State Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EPA Act) on 1 December 2014 (DA 3015-11-01 Modification 5) and under the Commonwealth Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) on 24 December 2014 (EPBC Approval 2013/6908). As part of this approved modification, LCO was required to prepare a Biodiversity Offset Management Plan (BOMP) (Glencore 2015) to guide ongoing management of the LCO biodiversity offset areas to maintain and enhance biodiversity values, particularly those relating to threatened species and threatened ecological communities (TECs). The LCO biodiversity offset areas comprise the Mountain Block, Bowmans Creek Riparian Corridor and Mitchell Hills South Offset Areas (Figure 1.2). The objectives of the 2015 BOMP are to provide direction for the short to long term management and enhancement of the biodiversity values of the LCO biodiversity offset areas, as well as to provide a description of the measures to be implemented to achieve this over the next three years. Biodiversity monitoring surveys of the following is required under this 2015 BOMP: • Terrestrial flora and vegetation communities • Habitat • Diurnal woodland birds • Targeted winter birds (undertaken as part of a separate report) • Micro-bats • Diurnal herpetofauna • Nocturnal fauna • Spotted-tailed quoll (Dasyurus maculatus maculatus) • Nest boxes and • Landscape function (via Landscape Function Analysis (LFA)). This monitoring is required to track progress of biodiversity and habitat values against performance indicators specified in the 2015 BOMP. The 2015 BOMP prescribes that an annual Biodiversity Offset Monitoring Report must be prepared to compile and analyse results of monitoring completed each year and compare results against the 2015 BOMP performance indicators. This Biodiversity Offset Monitoring Report has been prepared to fulfil the requirements of the 2016 monitoring period. This 2016 monitoring event provides the second event for this monitoring program which will compared to the 2015 baseline data. 016 Biodiversity Offset Monitoring Report Introduction 3122_R18_2016 BOMP Monitoring_V3 1 2.0 Background The three LCO biodiversity offset areas are located in the vicinity of the Liddell mine (Figure 1.2). The Bowmans Creek Riparian Corridor runs in a north/south direction on the eastern boundary of the LCO and is 182 hectares (ha) in size. Mountain Block is 166 ha in size and is located to the immediate north of the LCO. Mitchell Hills South is located approximately three kilometres north west of Mountain Block and is 37 ha in size. The three LCO biodiversity offset areas provide protection to a variety of key ecological values, including: • threatened ecological community (TEC) and endangered flora population habitat • potential habitat for threatened flora species • habitat for threatened fauna species and • strategic positioning within the Hunter landscape. The 2015 BOMP requires that monitoring of 16 sites across the biodiversity offsets will be undertaken for the life of mine or until the sites are deemed redundant. Monitoring undertaken during 2015 comprised baseline monitoring of all 16 sites. However, from 2016 the monitoring program has been split across two years (Year A and Year B), with monitoring of half (eight) the sites occurring in alternate years (as provided in Table 2.1).
Recommended publications
  • Australian Endangered Orchid, Microtis Angusii: an Evaluation of the Utility of Dna Barcoding
    Lankesteriana International Journal on Orchidology ISSN: 1409-3871 [email protected] Universidad de Costa Rica Costa Rica FLANAGAN, NICOLA S.; PEAKALL, ROD; CLEMENTS, MARK A.; OTERO, J. TUPAC MOLECULAR GENETIC DIAGNOSIS OF THE ‘TAXONOMICALLY DIFFICULT’ AUSTRALIAN ENDANGERED ORCHID, MICROTIS ANGUSII: AN EVALUATION OF THE UTILITY OF DNA BARCODING. Lankesteriana International Journal on Orchidology, vol. 7, núm. 1-2, marzo, 2007, pp. 196-198 Universidad de Costa Rica Cartago, Costa Rica Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=44339813040 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative LANKESTERIANA 7(1-2): 196-198. 2007. MOLECULAR GENETIC DIAGNOSIS OF THE ‘TAXONOMICALLY DIFFICULT’ AUSTRALIAN ENDANGERED ORCHID, MICROTIS ANGUSII: AN EVALUATION OF THE UTILITY OF DNA BARCODING. 1,3,5 1 2 2, 4 NICOLA S. FLANAGAN , ROD PEAKALL , MARK A. CLEMENTS & J. TUPAC OTERO 1 School of Botany and Zoology, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia. 2 Centre for Plant Biodiversity Research, GPO Box 1600 Canberra ACT 2601, Australia. 3 Genetics & Biotechnology, University College Cork, Ireland 4 Dept. de Ciencias Agricolas, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Palmira, Valle, Colombia 5 Author for correspondence: [email protected] KEY WORDS: Species diagnosis, barcoding, practical outcomes, clonality, Internal Transcribed Sequences (ITS), Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) As species are the common currency for conserva- to the endangered Australian orchid, Microtis angusii tion efforts, their accurate description is essential for (Flanagan et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Relationships of Discyphus Scopulariae
    Phytotaxa 173 (2): 127–139 ISSN 1179-3155 (print edition) www.mapress.com/phytotaxa/ PHYTOTAXA Copyright © 2014 Magnolia Press Article ISSN 1179-3163 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.173.2.3 Phylogenetic relationships of Discyphus scopulariae (Orchidaceae, Cranichideae) inferred from plastid and nuclear DNA sequences: evidence supporting recognition of a new subtribe, Discyphinae GERARDO A. SALAZAR1, CÁSSIO VAN DEN BERG2 & ALEX POPOVKIN3 1Departamento de Botánica, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Apartado Postal 70-367, 04510 México, Distrito Federal, México; E-mail: [email protected] 2Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana, Departamento de Ciências Biológicas, Av. Transnordestina s.n., 44036-900, Feira de Santana, Bahia, Brazil 3Fazenda Rio do Negro, Entre Rios, Bahia, Brazil Abstract The monospecific genus Discyphus, previously considered a member of Spiranthinae (Orchidoideae: Cranichideae), displays both vegetative and floral morphological peculiarities that are out of place in that subtribe. These include a single, sessile, cordate leaf that clasps the base of the inflorescence and lies flat on the substrate, petals that are long-decurrent on the column, labellum margins free from sides of the column and a column provided with two separate, cup-shaped stigmatic areas. Because of its morphological uniqueness, the phylogenetic relationships of Discyphus have been considered obscure. In this study, we analyse nucleotide sequences of plastid and nuclear DNA under maximum parsimony
    [Show full text]
  • ACT, Australian Capital Territory
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Orchidaceae: Genera and Species (12/1/2004)
    AUSTRALIAN ORCHID NAME INDEX (21/1/2008) by Mark A. Clements Centre for Plant Biodiversity Research/Australian National Herbarium GPO Box 1600 Canberra ACT 2601 Australia Corresponding author: [email protected] INTRODUCTION The Australian Orchid Name Index (AONI) provides the currently accepted scientific names, together with their synonyms, of all Australian orchids including those in external territories. The appropriate scientific name for each orchid taxon is based on data published in the scientific or historical literature, and/or from study of the relevant type specimens or illustrations and study of taxa as herbarium specimens, in the field or in the living state. Structure of the index: Genera and species are listed alphabetically. Accepted names for taxa are in bold, followed by the author(s), place and date of publication, details of the type(s), including where it is held and assessment of its status. The institution(s) where type specimen(s) are housed are recorded using the international codes for Herbaria (Appendix 1) as listed in Holmgren et al’s Index Herbariorum (1981) continuously updated, see [http://sciweb.nybg.org/science2/IndexHerbariorum.asp]. Citation of authors follows Brummit & Powell (1992) Authors of Plant Names; for book abbreviations, the standard is Taxonomic Literature, 2nd edn. (Stafleu & Cowan 1976-88; supplements, 1992-2000); and periodicals are abbreviated according to B-P- H/S (Bridson, 1992) [http://www.ipni.org/index.html]. Synonyms are provided with relevant information on place of publication and details of the type(s). They are indented and listed in chronological order under the accepted taxon name. Synonyms are also cross-referenced under genus.
    [Show full text]
  • Friends of Pallisters Reserve Inc
    FRIENDS OF PALLISTERS RESERVE INC. FLORA OF PALLISTERS RESERVE PTERIDOPHYTA Lepidosperma laterale var. majus Adiantaceae Variable Sword-sedge Adiantum aethiopicum - Common Maidenhair Lepidosperma longitudinale - Pithy Sword-sedge Schoenus apogon - Common Bog-rush Azollaceae Azolla filiculoides - Pacific Azolla Hypoxidaceae Hypoxis glabella—Tiny Star Dennstaedtiaceae Hypoxis vaginata - Yellow Star Pteridium esculentum - Austral Bracken Juncaceae Lindsaeceae Isolepis marginata - Little Club-sedge Lindsaea linearis - Screw Fern * Juncus articulatus - Jointed rush Juncus bufonius - Toad Rush GYMNOSPERMS * Juncus bulbosus - Rush Pinaceae *Juncus capitatus - Capitate Rush *Pinus radiata - Monterey Pine Juncus holoschoenus - Joint-leaf Rush MONOCOTYLEDONAE Juncus ingens - Giant Rush Centrolepidaceae Juncus pallidus - Pale Rush Aphelia gracilis - Slender Aphelia Juncus planifolius - Broad-leaf rush Aphelia pumilio - Dwarf Aphelia Juncus procerus - Rush Centrolepis aristata - Pointed Centrolepis Juncus subsecundus - Finger rush Centrolepis strigosa -Hairy Centrolepis Luzula meridionalis - Field Woodrush Convolvulaceae Juncaginaceae Dichondra repens - Kidney Weed Triglochin procera sens.lat. - Water Ribbons Cyperaceae Lemnaceae Baumea articulata - Jointed Twig-rush Lemma disperma - Duckweed Baumea rubiginosa - Soft Twig-rush Lemma trisulca - Ivy-leaf Duckweed Carex appressa - Tall Sedge Wolffia australiana - Tiny Duckweed Carex breviculmis - Common Sedge Liliaceae *Cyperus tenellus - Tiny Sedge Arthropodium strictum - Chocolate Lily Eleocharis
    [Show full text]
  • The 1770 Landscape of Botany Bay, the Plants Collected by Banks and Solander and Rehabilitation of Natural Vegetation at Kurnell
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Hochschulschriftenserver - Universität Frankfurt am Main Backdrop to encounter: the 1770 landscape of Botany Bay, the plants collected by Banks and Solander and rehabilitation of natural vegetation at Kurnell Doug Benson1 and Georgina Eldershaw2 1Botanic Gardens Trust, Mrs Macquaries Rd Sydney 2000 AUSTRALIA email [email protected] 2Parks & Wildlife Division, Dept of Environment and Conservation (NSW), PO Box 375 Kurnell NSW 2231 AUSTRALIA email [email protected] Abstract: The first scientific observations on the flora of eastern Australia were made at Botany Bay in April–May 1770. We discuss the landscapes of Botany Bay and particularly of the historic landing place at Kurnell (lat 34˚ 00’ S, long 151˚ 13’ E) (about 16 km south of central Sydney), as described in the journals of Lieutenant James Cook and Joseph Banks on the Endeavour voyage in 1770. We list 132 plant species that were collected at Botany Bay by Banks and Daniel Solander, the first scientific collections of Australian flora. The list is based on a critical assessment of unpublished lists compiled by authors who had access to the collection of the British Museum (now Natural History Museum), together with species from material at National Herbarium of New South Wales that has not been previously available. The list includes Bidens pilosa which has been previously regarded as an introduced species. In 1770 the Europeans set foot on Aboriginal land of the Dharawal people. Since that time the landscape has been altered in response to a succession of different land-uses; farming and grazing, commemorative tree planting, parkland planting, and pleasure ground and tourist visitation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Genus Microtis R. Br. (Orchidaceae): a Taxonomic Revision with Notes on Biology
    J. Adelaide Bot. Gard. 7(1): 45-89 (1984) THE GENUS MICROTIS R. BR. (ORCHIDACEAE): A TAXONOMIC REVISION WITH NOTES ON BIOLOGY R. Bates 38 Portmamock Street, Fairview Park, South Australia 5126 Abstract A taxonomic revision of Micro lis is presented in which nine species are recognised; M. globula is described as new. M. brownii, M. magnadenia and M. truncata are placed in synonymy with M. rara. M. media is treatéd as a synonym of M. unifolia. The biology, taxonomic affinities and distribution are considered for each species, a key is provided and a detailed description of each species is supplemented with illustrations. Introduction Since Robert Brown (1810) described Microtis there have been numerous taxa added but no complete revision has appeared, nor has any flora dealt with all species. Bentham (1873, p. 269) when discussing the difficulty of determining many Australian orchids, including Microtis, from dried material wrote, "It is to be hoped that the revision of these ... vvill be taken on byresident botanists who have the opportunity of studying them in the fresh state". With this in mind the present author has observed, photographed and collected all species of Microtis in the process of completing this revision. Plants were obtained from as many locations as possible and cultivated in Adelaide and populations of all Australian species studied in the field. Endophytic soil fungi on Microtis were isolated and identified by Dr J. Warcup (Waite Agricultural Research Institute). Chromosome counts were attempted but results were inconclusive. Loans were obtained from numerous herbaria (see acknowledgements). Types of all taxa were examined unless otherwise indicated in the text.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Flora of Australia
    L'IBRARY'OF THE GRAY HERBARIUM HARVARD UNIVERSITY. BOUGHT. THE FLORA OF AUSTRALIA, ITS ORIGIN, AFFINITIES, AND DISTRIBUTION; BEING AN TO THE FLORA OF TASMANIA. BY JOSEPH DALTON HOOKER, M.D., F.R.S., L.S., & G.S.; LATE BOTANIST TO THE ANTARCTIC EXPEDITION. LONDON : LOVELL REEVE, HENRIETTA STREET, COVENT GARDEN. r^/f'ORElGN&ENGLISH' <^ . 1859. i^\BOOKSELLERS^.- PR 2G 1.912 Gray Herbarium Harvard University ON THE FLORA OF AUSTRALIA ITS ORIGIN, AFFINITIES, AND DISTRIBUTION. I I / ON THE FLORA OF AUSTRALIA, ITS ORIGIN, AFFINITIES, AND DISTRIBUTION; BEIKG AN TO THE FLORA OF TASMANIA. BY JOSEPH DALTON HOOKER, M.D., F.R.S., L.S., & G.S.; LATE BOTANIST TO THE ANTARCTIC EXPEDITION. Reprinted from the JJotany of the Antarctic Expedition, Part III., Flora of Tasmania, Vol. I. LONDON : LOVELL REEVE, HENRIETTA STREET, COVENT GARDEN. 1859. PRINTED BY JOHN EDWARD TAYLOR, LITTLE QUEEN STREET, LINCOLN'S INN FIELDS. CONTENTS OF THE INTRODUCTORY ESSAY. § i. Preliminary Remarks. PAGE Sources of Information, published and unpublished, materials, collections, etc i Object of arranging them to discuss the Origin, Peculiarities, and Distribution of the Vegetation of Australia, and to regard them in relation to the views of Darwin and others, on the Creation of Species .... iii^ § 2. On the General Phenomena of Variation in the Vegetable Kingdom. All plants more or less variable ; rate, extent, and nature of variability ; differences of amount and degree in different natural groups of plants v Parallelism of features of variability in different groups of individuals (varieties, species, genera, etc.), and in wild and cultivated plants vii Variation a centrifugal force ; the tendency in the progeny of varieties being to depart further from their original types, not to revert to them viii Effects of cross-impregnation and hybridization ultimately favourable to permanence of specific character x Darwin's Theory of Natural Selection ; — its effects on variable organisms under varying conditions is to give a temporary stability to races, species, genera, etc xi § 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Fitzroy River Infrastructure Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement
    Not government policy Commercial in confidence Appendix 1. Vascular plant species recorded from the Lower Dawson River study area. Nomenclature according to Henderson (2002). ACANTHACEAE ARECACEAE Brunoniella australis Livistona decipiens Cabbage palm Dipteracanthus australasicus subsp. australasicus Pseuderanthemum variabile Love Flower ASCLEPIADACEAE *Asclepias curassavica Redhead cottonbush ADIANTACEAE *Cryptostegia grandiflora Rubbervine Cheilanthes sieberi Rock Fern *Gomphocarpus physocarpus Balloonbush Marsdenia viridiflora AIZOACEAE Sarcostemma viminale subsp brunonianum Caustic vine Tetragonia tetragonioides box burr Zaleya galericulata subsp. galericulata ASTERACEAE *Ageratum houstonianum Blue billygoat weed AMARANTHACEAE Bracteantha bracteata Achyranthes aspera Chaff flower *Bidens pilosa Coblers peg Alternanthera denticulata Lesser joyweed Calotis cuneata Blue burr daisy Alternanthera nana Hairy joyweed Cassinia laevis Coughbush Alternanthera nodiflora Centipeda minima var. minima Amaranthus interruptus Chrysocephalum apiculatum Yellow buttons Amaranthus viridus Green amaranth *Cirsium vulgare Spear thistle *Gomphrena celosioides Gomphrena *Conyza canadiensis Fleabane Nyssanthes diffusa Barb wire weed Cyanthillium cinereum Veronia *Emilia sonchifolia Emilia AMARYLLIDACEAE *Lactuca serriola Prickly lettuce Crinum flaccidum Murray lily Olearia sp *Parthenium hysterophorus Parthenium ANACARDIACEAE Pluchea dioscoridis Pleiogynium timorense Burdekin plum Pterocaulon redolens Toothed ragwort Pterocaulon serrulatum *Senecio lautus
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity and Conservation Science Annual Report 2019-2020
    Biodiversity and Conservation Science Annual Report 2019-2020 Acknowledgements This report was prepared by the Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions (DBCA). For more information contact: Executive Director, Biodiversity and Conservation Science Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions 17 Dick Perry Avenue Kensington Western Australia 6151 Locked Bag 104 Bentley Delivery Centre Western Australia 6983 Telephone (08) 9219 9943 dbca.wa.gov.au The recommended reference for this publication is: Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, 2020, Biodiversity and Conservation Science Annual Report 2019-20, Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, Perth. Images Front cover main photo: Mt Trio, Stirling Range National Park. Photo – Damien Rathbone Front cover top photos left to right: Swan Canning Riverpark. Photo – Kerry Trayler/DBCA Mollerin Rock reserve. Photo – Val English/DBCA Shark Bay bandicoot. Photo – Saul Cowen/DBCA Shark Bay seagrass. Photo – Luke Skinner/DBCA Back cover top photos left to right: Post fire monitoring. Photo – Lachie McCaw/DBCA Kalbarri yellow bells. Photo – Kelly Shepherd/DBCA Western grasswren. Photo – Saul Cowen/DBCA Dragon Rocks Kunzea. Photo – Kelly Shepherd/DBCA Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions Biodiversity and Conservation Science Annual Report 2019–2020 Director’s Message I am pleased to present our Biodiversity and Conservation Science report for 2019-20 as we continue to deliver on the government’s commitment to build and share biodiversity knowledge for Western Australia. Our Science Strategic Plan and Program Plans articulate how our work contributes to delivery of the biodiversity science priorities for the State as the knowledge generated by our science is essential to ensure we conserve and value add to the unique biodiversity we have around us.
    [Show full text]
  • Farming and Protecting the Critically Endangered Iron-Grass Natural
    October 2011 FARMING AND PROTECTING THE CRITICALLY ENDANGERED IRON-GRASS NATURAL TEMPERATE GRASSLAND Since European settlement, most of the Iron-grass Natural Temperate Grassland of South Australia has been cleared, or degraded by pasture improvement and, in some circumstances, grazing. The small amount of natural temperate grassland of this type remaining in good condition is now protected under Australia’s national environment law—the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act). What does national protection of Iron-grass Natural Temperate Grassland mean for farmers/ graziers? National environment law protects Australia’s unique plants and animals without stopping farm business. In many cases, your supportive farming practices have helped retain remnant native grasslands. You may need Australian Government approval if: • the protected iron-grass grassland (or other protected matters) occur on your property, and • a new, intensified or changed activity could have a significant impact on the ecological community. If you are not sure whether your activity requires Australian Government approval, you can get free advice from the environment liaison officer at the National Farmers’ Federation on 1800 704 520 (or email [email protected]). What and where is Iron-grass Natural Temperate Grassland? Iron-grass Natural Temperate Grassland mainly occurs on the slopes and hills of the Mount Lofty Ranges, west of the River Murray and throughout the mid north. Patches also occur on the eastern side of the River Murray near Tailem Bend, and may occur along the Hummocks Range north of the Gulf Saint Vincent. environment.gov.au This indicative map shows the outer boundary of the area in which the ecological community may occur.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Summary: Wimmera, Victoria
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]