Chapter 25: Background Paper: Fire in Southern Forest Landscapes 607 Chapter 25: Background Paper: Fire in Southern Forest Landscapes John A

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Chapter 25: Background Paper: Fire in Southern Forest Landscapes 607 Chapter 25: Background Paper: Fire in Southern Forest Landscapes John A Chapter 25: Background Paper: Fire in Southern Forest Landscapes 607 Chapter 25: Background Paper: Fire in Southern Forest Landscapes John A. Stanturf, Dale D. Wade, Thomas A. Waldrop, Deborah K. Kennard, and Gary L. Achtemeier Southern Research Station, USDA Forest Service and temporal variability of fire and These fires tend to have low intensity Fire as a its effects, descriptions of fire regimes because fuels are less flammable than Landscape Process are broad (Whelan 1995). The fire in ecosystems with a substantial regimes used in this chapter follow conifer component. The low-intensity the descriptions used in Brown and presettlement fires that wounded or Other than land clearing for urban Smith (2000). They include the killed many trees did not cause enough development (Wear and others 1998), understory, mixed, and stand mortality (greater than 80 percent) no disturbance is more common replacement fire regimes. to be considered stand replacement in southern forests than fire. The regimes (Wade and others 2000). pervasive role of fire predates human Fires in the understory fire regime activity in the South (Komarek 1964, generally do not kill the dominant In the stand replacement fire regime, 1974), and humans magnified that vegetation or substantially change its fires kill aboveground parts of the role. Repeating patterns of fire structure. Approximately 80 percent dominant vegetation, changing the behavior lead to recognizable fire or more of the aboveground dominant aboveground structure substantially. regimes, with temporal and spatial vegetation survives fire (Brown 2000). Approximately 80 percent or more of dimensions. Understanding these The understory fire regime occurs the aboveground dominant vegetation fire regimes is essential to examining primarily in southern pine and oak- is either consumed or dies as a result of the importance of fire in southern hickory forests, which support pine and fires (Brown 2000). Several vegetation landscapes and integrating fire into pine-oak associations such as Kuchler’s types in the Eastern United States are forest management. This chapter southern mixed forest, oak-hickory- represented by stand replacement fire has six sections: pine, and oak-hickory associations. regimes, including oak-gum-cypress (bay forests), sand pine, Atlantic white- 1. Fire regimes and fire types The severity of fire in the mixed fire regime either causes selective mortality cedar, and spruce-fir. Table Mountain 2. Fire history in the South in dominant vegetation, depending pine usually is regarded as having 3. Fire regimes of southern forests on tree species’ susceptibility to fire, a stand replacement fire regime, but a mixed regime may be more accurate 4. Prescribed fire or varies between understory and stand replacement (Brown 2000). The mixed as it produces the seedbed conditions 5. Smoke management fire regime best represents the needed for survival of seedlings. 6. Restoring fire into southern resettlement fire history for several ecosystems hardwood- and conifer-dominated Fire Types ecosystems. The conifers include pitch Three kinds of fires burn in forests Fire Regimes pine and Virginia pine of Kuchler’s when weather and fuel conditions oak-pine association (Kuchler 1964) permit ignition and sustained and Fire Types and pond pine, a dominant tree of the combustion: surface fire, ground fire, pocosin association. The conifer types and crown fire. Surface fires burn the fit the mixed fire regime because fire upper litter layer and small branches Fire Regimes intensities are generally greater than that lie on or near the ground. Surface Fire regime refers to the long-term in the understory fire regime and fires usually move quickly through an nature of fire in an ecosystem (Brown cause mortality ranging from 20 to area, and do not consume the entire 2000), including both frequency and 80 percent of the overstory. The hard- organic layer. Moisture in the organic severity of effects. The interval between wood ecosystems include mesophytic horizons often prevents ignition of the fires in southern forests may be as short hardwood, northern hardwood, and humus layer, and protects the soil and as a year or as long as centuries. The elm-ash-cottonwood forest types. soil-inhabiting organisms from heat. intensity of fire and severity of effects Although the hardwoods are prone The heat pulse generated at the burning FIRE can vary in scale from benign to to fire injury, many survive numerous front of these fast-moving fires does not catastrophic. Because of the spatial fires before eventually being girdled. normally persist long enough to 608 Southern Forest Resource Assessment damage tissue beneath the thick bark in America about 14,000 BP (before of large trees. However, it will girdle present). Hunting and gathering the root collar of small trees and Fire History of characterized their progressively more shrubs, and reduce small-diameter the South sophisticated cultures until the advent branches and other fine surface fuels. of settled societies after 3,000 BP in Ground fires smolder or creep slowly the eastern woodlands (Fagan 2000). To appreciate the pervasive role of Beginning about 6,000 BP (Middle through the litter and humus layers, fire in shaping southern forests requires consuming all or most of the organic Holocene), warmer climates and final an understanding of the dynamic wastage of the Laurentide Ice Sheet cover, and exposing mineral soil or response of southern ecosystems to underlying rock. These fires usually (Delcourt and Delcourt 1981, 1983) climate change since the retreat of translated into increased food resources occur during periods of protracted the Laurentide Ice Sheet, which began drought when the entire soil organic and rapid population growth. By around 18,000 years ago, and the 5,000 BP, sea level had stabilized, layer may dry sufficiently. They extent of human influence, which likely may burn for weeks or months until and vegetation patterns were essentially began about 14,000 years ago. Humans as we find them today. precipitation extinguishes them exert an influence by igniting or After this rapid population growth, or fuel is exhausted. suppressing fires. Native Americans more or less permanent settlements Crown fires occur when stand used fire extensively for thousands appeared, primarily in river valleys and structure, weather, and ladder fuels of years. The early European settlers rich bottomland soils from the Coastal (heavy accumulations of understory continued and to a degree expanded Plain to the mountains (Fagan 2000). material such as slash piles, shrubs, the use of fire. In the last century, After 3,000 BP, population pressures led and lower branches of standing trees, however, human influence over fire to cultivation of native plants typical of often draped with fallen needles) allow in the South changed markedly. disturbed habitats. After 1,000 BP, corn surface or ground fires to ignite tree We have divided the long history crowns and spread to other crowns. cultivation was widespread (Hudson of fire since humans arrived in the 1982) and bean cultivation by 800 Crown fires occur in forests during South into five periods: periods of drought and low relative BP (Smith 1994), but hunting and ■ humidity, particularly in areas with a From the earliest appearance of gathering were still prominent activities. dense, volatile understory. Crown fires humans in North America around Population density was probably greater generate tremendous heat that rises in 14,000 years ago (Fagan 2000) until in the southern than in the northern a strong convection column, drawing European contact 500 years ago, part of the eastern woodlands and in surface winds that fan the flames the first period was one of increasing greater on the coast than inland, even more. Heated air blowing across human population level and more but higher densities extended inland the flames warms and dries the fuel extensive use of fire. along major rivers (Driver 1961). ahead of the fire, and releases volatile ■ For the first 400 years after their Judging the extent to which forests gases from vegetation in the path of the arrival, the early European settlers and other vegetation were influenced flaming front. Crown fires kill all trees continued to use fire in much the by Native American use of fire requires and shrubs in their path and consume same way as Native Americans, often knowledge of the typical pattern of land most of the surface organic layers. reoccupying and farming land cleared use and the population levels before The shorter the interval between fires, by Native Americans and expanding European contact (Kemmerer and the more likely that fires kill only small burning of woodlands to provide Lake 2001). Williams (1992, p. 40, fig. trees or particularly susceptible species, forage for livestock (Williams 1992). 2.8) presented a concept of a typical such as thin-barked hardwoods, ■ At the end of the 19th century southern woodland village. Located on resulting in an understory fire regime. and extending into the 20th century, the a stream or river, the clearing for the This regime usually perpetuates fire- remaining southern forests were village and surrounding fields of mostly adapted species (Mutch 1970). As fire extensively logged to support economic corn, beans, and squash extended for frequency decreases, fuel accumulates, expansion; wildfires were common 4 miles. Girdling larger trees and increasing the probability of a fire in the slash left behind. burning the undergrowth cleared this area originally, and burning kept it intense enough to kill nearly all trees. ■ In reaction to these widespread Fires in forests regenerated by a stand open, in much the way that swidden and destructive wildfires, the fourth agriculture occurs in the tropics today. replacement fire regime come at period of fire suppression started in frequencies of 25 to 100 years and The field zone was buffered by a further the early 1900s. 1.25-mile-wide zone that was burned probably maintain high levels of ■ diversity in the landscape (Waring The current period is one of fire annually for defense (visibility), where and Schlesinger 1985).
Recommended publications
  • Strategic Plan 2012‐2017
    U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Ecological Services Asheville, North Carolina Field Office STRATEGIC PLAN 2012‐2017 THE U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, WORKING WITH OTHERS, CONSERVES, PROTECTS, AND ENHANCES FISH, WILDLIFE, AND PLANTS AND THEIR HABITATS FOR THE CONTINUING BENEFIT OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND______________________________________3 STRATEGIC PLAN GOALS AND OBJECTIVES_______________________________8 AFO STAFFING AND DIVERSITY PLAN____________________________________13 APPENDIX A: AFO STRATEGIC PLAN PRIORITY WORK AREA MAP/GIS METHODOLOGY__18 MAP OF AFO STRATEGIC PLAN (FIGURE 2)_______________________________33 APPENDIX B: ENDANGERED AND THREATENED SPECIES FOR WHICH AFO HAS RESPONSIBILITIES__________________________________________________________34 APPENDIX C: REFERENCES AND CITATIONS______________________________38 APPENDIX D: STAFF ACTION PLANS_________________________________________52 APPENDIX E: TABLE OF ACRONYMS_____________________________________79 2 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s (Service) Asheville Field Office (AFO), an Ecological Services facility, was established in the late 1970s. Forty-one counties make up the AFO’s core work area in western North Carolina, which includes many publicly owned conservation lands, especially in the higher elevations, as well as the metropolitan areas of Charlotte, Winston- Salem, and Asheville (Figure 1). This area primarily encompasses portions of the Blue Ridge and Piedmont physiographic provinces. In addition
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of Groundwater Quality Based on Regional Geologic Setting in the Piedmont and Blue Ridge Physiographic Provinces, North Carolina
    Prepared in cooperation with the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality, Aquifer Protection Section Characterization of Groundwater Quality Based on Regional Geologic Setting in the Piedmont and Blue Ridge Physiographic Provinces, North Carolina Scientific Investigations Report 2009–5149 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Front-cover photograph. Walnut Cove Overlook at mile marker 396 along the Blue Ridge Parkway, Buncombe County, North Carolina. Photograph by Jung-Jun Lin, Engineer, Tainan Hydraulics Laboratory, National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan. Used with permission. Back-cover photograph. Groundwater monitoring well cluster at the North Carolina Zoological Park Research Station, Randolph County, North Carolina. Photograph by Kristin McSwain, U.S. Geological Survey. Characterization of Groundwater Quality Based on Regional Geologic Setting in the Piedmont and Blue Ridge Physiographic Provinces, North Carolina By Stephen L. Harden, Melinda J. Chapman, and Douglas A. Harned Prepared in cooperation with the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality, Aquifer Protection Section Scientific Investigations Report 2009–5149 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2009 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1-888-ASK-USGS For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Albemarle County Biodiversity: a Report on Its History, Current Conditions, and Threats, with Strategies for Future Protection
    Albemarle County Biodiversity: A Report on its History, Current Conditions, and Threats, with Strategies for Future Protection Prepared by the Albemarle County Biodiversity Work Group October 2004 Dan Bieker - Ornithologist, Piedmont Virginia Community College Instructor Stephen Bowler, MS – Former Watershed Manager, Albemarle County; Graduate Research Assistant, Virginia Tech Tom Dierauf, Master of Forestry Ruth Douglas, Ph.D. - Invasive Plant Coordinator, Virginia Native Plant Society; Professor Emerita, Piedmont Virginia Community College Michael Erwin, Ph.D. - Research Professor, University of Virginia Department of Environmental Sciences; Wildlife Biologist, USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center Chris French – Former Conservation Technician, Thomas Jefferson Soil & Water Conservation District David Hannah, MS – Piedmont Environmental Council (former staff) John Hermsmeier - Director, Environmental Education Center Kenneth R. Lawless, Ph.D. - Professor Emeritus, University of Virginia Department of Materials Science & Engineering; Ornithologist, Field Botanist, Nature Photographer Tom Olivier, Ph.D. - Green Creek Paradigms, LLC G. Carleton Ray, Ph.D. - Research Professor, University of Virginia Department of Environmental Sciences John Scrivani, Ph.D. – Virginia Department of Forestry; Ivy Creek Foundation Board of Directors Charles E. Stevens - Field Botanist and Ornithologist; Virginia Botanical Associates Coordinated and Edited by Scott Clark - Senior Planner, Albemarle County Community Development Department 1 Acknowledgements
    [Show full text]
  • Estimated Sediment Protection Efficiences for Increasing
    Article Estimated Sediment Protection Efficiences for Increasing Levels of Best Management Practices on Forest Harvests in the Piedmont, USA Richard Cristan 1, W. Michael Aust 2,*, M. Chad Bolding 2 and Scott M. Barrett 2 1 College of Agriculture, Communities, and the Environment, Kentucky State University, Frankfort, KY 40601, USA; [email protected] 2 Department of Forest Resources and Environmental Conservation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA; [email protected] (M.C.B.); [email protected] (S.M.B.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-540-231-4523 Received: 9 October 2019; Accepted: 1 November 2019; Published: 7 November 2019 Abstract: In-stream watershed level evaluations confirm that application of recommended forestry best management practices (BMPs) can minimize sedimentation following management, while on-site erosion research shows that BMPs reduce erosion from individual forest operations, thus implying watershed-level sediment reductions. Assessments of forest operations and sediment have developed very few sediment delivery ratios (SDR). Linking BMP levels (low, standard recommendation, high) within specific forest operations to sedimentation could enable managers to evaluate BMP effects. Reported data regarding forest operations, erosion rates and SDR by forest operation, and BMP implementation levels were sufficient within the Piedmont region to allow approximations of sediment delivery and BMP efficiency. Existing United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Forest Service reports and published erosion and sediment research were used to comprise the 1 following method. For regional annual harvests, estimated sediment deliveries (Mg year− ) = annual harvest area (ha year 1) weighted average erosion rate from all forest operations (Mg ha 1 year 1) − × − − SDR (unitless ratio).
    [Show full text]
  • Geology, Hydrogeology, and Groundwater Quality at North Carolina Zoo Groundwater Monitoring and Research Station Asheboro, North Carolina, 2007-2013
    Geology, Hydrogeology, and Groundwater Quality at North Carolina Zoo Groundwater Monitoring and Research Station Asheboro, North Carolina, 2007-2013 By Shuying Wang Piedmont and Mountains Groundwater Resource Evaluation Program North Carolina Department of Environment Quality Division of Water Resources April 6, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ..........................................................................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................3 Background of the Study .........................................................................................................3 Objectives of the Study ...........................................................................................................4 Scope and Purpose of the Report ..........................................................................................4 Previous Studies .....................................................................................................................6 Description of the Study Area .................................................................................................7 METHODS OF INVESTIGATION ..................................................................................................9 Geologic Coring and Well Construction ...............................................................................9 Geologic coring ……...………………………………………………………...10
    [Show full text]
  • THE IMPORTANCE and DISTRIBUTION of HICKORY ACROSS VIRGINIA Anita K
    THE IMPORTANCE AND DISTRIBUTION OF HICKORY ACROSS VIRGINIA Anita K. Rose and James F. Rosson, Jr.' Abstract-The i~nportanceand role of hickory (Cur'yu spp.) in the Oak-Hickory forest coln~nunity complex has been studied over the last 70 years and questioned by several investigators. Until recently, there were virtually no species-level landscape-scale studies that accurately defined the role of hicko~yin these systetns. Data from the USDA Forest Service, Forest Inventory and Analysis Program, were used to describe the distribution and co~npositionalstatus of several hickory species across Virginia. Oak-Hickory was the predominant forest-type group in Virginia, covering 3 859 500 ha and accounting for 78430000 m' of basal area. A total of 1 880 live hickory trues (d.b.h. 2 12.7 cm) occurred and were measured on 5 1 percent of plots. Across all plots in the study, the average basal area of hickory was 1.2 m2 ha-'. On plots where hickory was present, basal area was 2.4 m2 ha-'. Mockernut (Cur-vutomentosu (Poir.) Nutt.) and pignut (C. glabra (Mill.) Sweet) hickory were the most prevalent hickory species measured. Mockernut (basal area = 0.5 m%a-') and pignut (basal area = 0.5 m' ha-') were tallied on 29 and 30 percent of plots, respectively. Shagbark (C. ovata (Mill.) K. Koch) and bitternut (C. cordifirrnis (Wangenh.) K. Koch) hickory were also tallied, but they occurred less frequently. Hickory ranked in the top three species, by importance value, on 25 percent of all plots. This study sheds new iight on the importance and species-level distribution of hickory in the Oak-Hickory forest complex at the landscape scale.
    [Show full text]
  • Facts in Brief on North Carolina. INSTITUTION North Carolina State Dept
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 431 683 SO 030 836 TITLE Student Sampler: Facts in Brief on North Carolina. INSTITUTION North Carolina State Dept. of Public Instruction, Raleigh. PUB DATE 1998-00-00 NOTE 52p. AVAILABLE FROM North Carolina State Department of Public Instruction, 301 N. Wilmington St., Room 540, Raleigh, NC, 27601. PUB TYPE Guides Non-Classroom (055) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC03 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Elementary Education; Geography; Instructional Materials; *Social Studies; *State Government; *State History IDENTIFIERS *North Carolina ABSTRACT This information sampler was compiled to assist students in their study of North Carolina. Every year North Carolina students must complete a special project on their state. The sampler was designed to introduce students to the people, places, and events that have shaped North Carolina's history. Topics in the sampler include state symbols, people, economy, transportation, military installations, state government, travel and tourism, education, land, climate, North Carolina "firsts," geography of North Carolina (coastal plain, Piedmont, and mountains), famous North Carolinians, state flag, state seal, state song, maps, highlights from North Carolina history. Addresses to websites about North Carolina also are provided. (BT) ******************************************************************************** Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. ******************************************************************************** Student Sampler Facts in BriefonNorth Carolina ORY 20 1770 Af111. 1) PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE AND DISSEMINATE THIS MATERIAL HAS BEEN GRANTED BY E. Br umbacK. TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) 1 .. Ca.) ............, . Nefacts U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION cn Office of Educational Research and Improvement EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) 00 er1"1-ffs documenthas been reproduced as received from the person or organization originating it.
    [Show full text]
  • North Carolina Archaeology, Vol. 54
    North Carolina Archaeology Volume 54 2005 North Carolina Archaeology (formerly Southern Indian Studies) Published jointly by The North Carolina Archaeological Society, Inc. 109 East Jones Street Raleigh, NC 27601-2807 and The Research Laboratories of Archaeology University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3120 R. P. Stephen Davis, Jr., Editor Officers of the North Carolina Archaeological Society President: Tom Oakes, 113 Perkins Lane, Coinjock, NC 27923. Vice President: Terri Russ, P.O. Box 81, Hillsborough, NC 27278. Secretary: Linda Carnes-McNaughton, Dept of the Army, Public Works Business Center (AFZA-PW-E) (Carnes), Fort Bragg Garrison Command (ABN), Installation Management Agency, Fort Bragg, NC 28310. Treasurer: E. William Conen, 804 Kingswood Dr., Cary, NC 27513. Editor: R. P. Stephen Davis, Jr., Research Laboratories of Archaeology, CB 3120, Alumni Building, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3120. Associate Editor (Newsletter): Dee Nelms, Office of State Archaeology, N.C. Division of Archives and History, 4619 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-4619. At-Large Members: Jeff Irwin, Dept of the Army, Public Works Business Center (AFZA-PW-E) (Irwin), Fort Bragg Garrison Command (ABN), Installation Management Agency, Fort Bragg, NC 28310. Matt Jorgenson, 2908 Golden Oak Court, Raleigh, NC 27603. Paul Mohler, Archaeology Unit, N.C. Department of Transportation, 1583 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1583. Brian Overton, Archaeology Unit, N.C. Department of Transportation, 1583 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1583. Archie Smith, Town Creek Indian Mound State Historic Site, 509 Town Creek Mound Road, Mt. Gilead, NC 27306. Ruth Wetmore, 110 Tree Haven, Brevard, NC 28712.
    [Show full text]
  • A Gap Analysis of Georgia
    A GAP ANALYSIS OF GEORGIA August 2003 Final Report A GEOGRAPHIC APPROACH TO PLANNING FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Institute of Ecology and Georgia Cooperative Fish & Wildlife Research Unit University of Georgia Athens, GA 30602 U.S. Geological Survey Biological Resources Division Gap Analysis Program A Geographic Approach to Planning for Biological Diversity U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey The Georgia Gap Analysis Project Final Report 8/10/2003 Elizabeth Kramer, Principal Investigator, Institute of Ecology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602 Michael J. Conroy, Co-Principal Investigator, Georgia Cooperative Fish & Wildlife Research Unit, Warnell School of Forest Resources, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602 Matthew J. Elliott, Project Manager, Institute of Ecology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602 Elizabeth A. Anderson, Institute of Ecology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602 William R. Bumback, Institute of Ecology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602 Jeanne Epstein, Institute of Ecology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602 Contract Administration Through: Georgia Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit Warnell School of Forest Resources University of Georgia Athens, GA 30602 Submitted by: Dr. Elizabeth A. Kramer Research Performed Under: Cooperative Agreement No. 1434-HQ-97-RU-01551 Research Work Order No. 44 ii Natural Resources Spatial Analysis Laboratory Institute of Ecology University of Georgia Athens, GA 30602 U.S. Geological
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrogeologic Setting, Ground-Water Flow, and Ground-Water Quality at the Lake Wheeler Road Research Station, 2001–03
    Prepared in cooperation with the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality Hydrogeologic Setting, Ground-Water Flow, and Ground-Water Quality at the Lake Wheeler Road Research Station, 2001–03 North Carolina Piedmont and Mountains Resource Evaluation Program Scientific Investigations Report 2005–5166 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Front cover. Bedrock core sample from the Lake Wheeler Road research station, North Carolina (photograph by Richard E. Bolich, North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality, Aquifer Protection Section). Back cover. A. Sampling activities, B. drilling (photographs by Charles C. Daniel III, U.S. Geological Survey, retired), and C. monitoring-well cluster 1 and data-collection platform (photograph by Brad A. Huffman, B U.S. Geological Survey) at the Lake Wheeler Road research station, North Carolina. A C Hydrogeologic Setting, Ground-Water Flow, and Ground-Water Quality at the Lake Wheeler Road Research Station, 2001–03 North Carolina Piedmont and Mountains Resource Evaluation Program By Melinda J. Chapman, Richard E. Bolich, and Brad A. Huffman Prepared in cooperation with the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality Scientific Investigations Report 2005–5166 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior Gale A. Norton, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey P. Patrick Leahy, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2005 For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Information Services Box 25286, Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 For more information about the USGS and its products: Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/ Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 53. Inselbergs
    Part XI The Dilemma of Inselbergs I discussed erosional remnants in Chapter 9, but these were mostly of a different type of rock than the surroundings. And many of these are not associated with planation surfaces. For instance, Devils Tower is a basalt-like rock that is very likely the remnant of the conduit of a volcano left over after erosion of the surrounding High Plains. In this part, I will explore erosional remnants associated with planation surfaces or pediments, and that are of the same composition as the surrounding rock. The general term for these erosional remnants is an inselberg. A typical example of an inselberg is a granite tower above a planation surface on granite. Inselbergs are another one of the many mysteries of geomorphology. Chapter 53 Inselbergs Inselbergs rise above many planation surfaces as hills or mountains that for some reason failed to erode during the planing process.1 Any erosional mechanism proposed to plane the land must also account for erosional remnants. An inselberg is defined by the Glossary of Geology as, “A prominent isolated residual knob, hill, or small mountain…, usually smoothed and rounded that rises abruptly from an extensive lowland erosion surface in a hot, dry region (as in the desert of southern Africa and Arabia)…”2 Twidale also included mountain ranges and ridges in his definition.3 The word inselberg is a German word meaning a hill or an island jutting up from a flat sea, or more simply an “island mountain.”4 The hill or island represents the inselberg while the flat sea represents the planation surface.
    [Show full text]
  • Death at the Hands of Persons Unknown: the Geography of Lynching in the Deep South, 1882 to 1910
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1992 Death at the Hands of Persons Unknown: The Geography of Lynching in the Deep South, 1882 to 1910. Mary Elizabeth Hines Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Hines, Mary Elizabeth, "Death at the Hands of Persons Unknown: The Geography of Lynching in the Deep South, 1882 to 1910." (1992). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 5384. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/5384 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand corner and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps.
    [Show full text]