DOCSLIB.ORG

Equality, Diversity and Prejudice in Britain Results from the 2005 National Survey

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Equality, Diversity and Prejudice in Britain Results from the 2005 National Survey Centre for the Study of Group Processes Equality, Diversity and Prejudice in Britain Results from the 2005 National Survey Dominic Abrams & Diane M Houston Report for the Cabinet Office Equalities Review October 2006 Centre for the Study of Group Processes Equality, Diversity and Prejudice in Britain Results from the 2005 National Survey Dominic Abrams & Diane M. Houston Report for the Cabinet Office Equalities Review October 2006 Equality, Diversity and Prejudice in Britain Acknowledgements This research was originally commissioned by the Women and Equality Unit which forms part of the Department for Communities and Local Government. It is a DCLG contribution to the work of the Equalities Review. The work was also guided and stimulated by contributions from representatives from the DRC, CRE, EOC, Age Concern England and Stonewall at meetings and seminars held at the WEU during 2004. The empirical part of the project involved several stages. Andrew Harrop, Sujata Ray (Age Concern England), and particularly Leslie Sopp (Age Concern Research Services) were closely involved in development of a prior survey focusing on ageism (ACE, 2005, Sopp & Abrams, 2004), and the development work for that contributed to some of the material in the present survey. A team from the Centre for the Study of Group Processes at the University of Kent was involved in extensive preparatory work for the survey. We are indebted to Katerina Tasiopoulou, Tendayi Viki, Anat Bardi, Adam Rutland, Georgina Randsley de Moura, and Mario Weick, for their assistance and guidance with the item development and pilot research for this survey. This included detailed and lengthy discussions about the conceptual framework, as well as the practical structure, form and wording of the items, and a trial with over 400 participants which enabled us to reduce and select some measures. We were also able to test an electronic version of the extended survey and are grateful to the technical staff (Gary Samson and William Sonnen) for their work in preparing the on-line version. The fieldwork was conducted by TNS. We are grateful to Joanne Kilpin and Anita Emery for management of the data collection and preparation of the dataset and for working closely with us in the pilot and preparatory stages of the survey and in the organisation of the data file. Equality, Diversity and Prejudice in Britain ii Contents Page Chart index iv Executive Summary 1 Chapter 1 Introduction 6 Equality, diversity and prejudice in Britain 7 Aims of the research 11 Issues to be examined 11 What is new about the approach? 13 Chapter 2 Methodology and Definitions 16 Definitions and terminology 16 Versions of the survey 20 The sample 21 Chapter 3 Equality and Human Rights 24 Core values 25 Equality for all? 28 Summary and Conclusions 30 Chapter 4 Expressions and Experiences of Prejudice 32 Feelings towards different groups 32 Experiences of prejudice 36 Do different minorities suffer from different 38 prejudices? Summary and Conclusions 45 Equality, Diversity and Prejudice in Britain iii Page Chapter 5 The Conditions for Prejudice 48 A culture of prejudice? 49 Political correctness 52 Summary and Conclusions 56 Chapter 6 Social Stereotypes that Underpin Prejudice 58 The Stereotype Content Model 58 Warmth and competence 59 Competition and status 60 Emotions about different groups 62 Summary and Conclusions 63 Chapter 7 Together or Apart? 65 Social distance 65 Threat 66 Common identity 68 Choices 69 Summary and conclusions 77 Chapter 8 Conclusions 79 Equality and other values 79 Being a target of prejudice 79 Expressing prejudice 80 The media 80 Stereotypes and emotions 80 Threats and Inclusion 80 Selective prejudice 81 ‘Hostile’ and ‘benevolent’ forms of prejudice 81 The future 83 Equality, Diversity and Prejudice in Britain iv Page Appendices 84 Questions asked in the survey 85 References 99 Biographical details 105 Equality, Diversity and Prejudice in Britain v Table and Chart Index Page Table 1 Numbers and percentages of respondents from different social categories 23 Figure 1 Percentage who say different values are ‘like me’ or ‘very like me’ rank ordered according 26 (value and value types in parentheses) Figure 2 Percent who agree or strongly agree with social attitudes about individualism, equality, diversity 27 and work ethic. Figure 3 Percent who believe it is important to satisfy the needs of different groups in society. 28 Figure 4 Percentage of people who believe attempts to give equal employment opportunities to each group in Britain have gone too far/much to far, 29 are about right/don’t know, or have not gone far enough/ not gone nearly far enough. Figure 5 Percentage of respondents that expressed negative, positive or neutral feelings to different 34 groups in Britain Figure 6 Percentage who have ever in the last year personally suffered from prejudice or discrimination on the basis of each type of 36 group membership Figure 7 Percentage who report having personally suffered from prejudice or discrimination on the 37 basis of any type of group membership Figure 8 Percentage of men and women who have personally suffered from prejudice or discrimination on the basis of each type of 39 group membership Equality, Diversity and Prejudice in Britain vi Page Figure 9 Percentage of heterosexual and non- heterosexual people who have personally suffered from prejudice or discrimination on the 40 basis of each type of group membership Figure 10 Percentage of people under 31, 31-60 and over 70 who have personally suffered from prejudice or discrimination on the basis of each type of 41 group membership Figure 11 Percentage of Christians, Muslims, other religions and no religion who personally suffered from prejudice or discrimination on the basis of 42 each type of group membership Figure 12 Percentage of ‘white’, ‘black’ and ‘Asian’ people who have suffered from prejudice or discrimination on the basis of each type of 43 group membership Figure 13 Percentage of non-disabled and disabled people who have personally suffered from prejudice or 44 discrimination on the basis of each type of group membership Figure 14 Percentage of people who think media coverage of each group has been negative or almost all 49 negative in the last year. Figure 15 Percentage who believe members of different ethnic or racial groups living in Britain are mostly or completely accepted as British by the 50 majority of people in Britain. Figure 16 Percentage who believe followers of different religions in Britain are mostly or completely accepted as British by the majority of people in 51 Britain. Table 2 Political correctness: Percentage with personal 52 and social motivations to be unprejudiced Equality, Diversity and Prejudice in Britain vii Page Figure 17 Percentage who claim no prejudice or who feel but do not express prejudice, or who are willing 54 to express prejudice against each group Figure 18 Perceived stereotypical warmth (friendliness) and competence (capability) of different social 60 groups. Figure 19 Perceived stereotypical competitiveness and economic status of different social groups 61 Figure 20 Percentage that believe each group attracts each kind of emotion (very much or extremely) 62 Figure 21 Percent who say they would feel comfortable or very comfortable if a member of the relevant minority was close to them as an in-law, boss or 65 neighbour. Figure 22 Percent who perceived ‘threats’ of different types from different minority groups within 67 Britain. Figure 23 Perceptions of individuality and collective group membership between members of contrasting categories in Britain (Percentage choosing each 68 option) Figure 24 Preferences for which two charities would receive £5 donation (Percent nominated). NB: Grey = presented in all versions, other colours 70 = presented only in subset of the survey Figure 25 Charitable choices within version A of the survey (gender and sexuality). 71 Figure 26 Charitable choices within version B of the survey (age and religion). 71 Equality, Diversity and Prejudice in Britain viii Page Figure 27 Charitable choices within version C of the survey (ethnicity and disability). 72 Figure 28 Percentage of different group members that would donate to different charities unrelated to 73 their own membership Figure 29 Percentage of men and women, heterosexual and non-heterosexual people who chose to give 74 to charities for women, gay people or others. Figure 30 Percentage of people of different ages and faiths who chose to give to charities related to 75 age or Muslims. Figure 31 Percentage of people of different ethic background and disability who chose to give to 76 charities for Black people and disabled people. Executive Summary 1 Executive Summary Britain is an increasingly diverse and multifaceted society. Consequently, manifestations of inequality, prejudice and discrimination are potentially becoming more varied and complex. The meaning of equality itself is a matter of considerable debate. Perceptions, attitudes, stereotypes and emotions permeate social relationships between groups, whether conflictual or harmonious. How are different groups perceived? How do images of different groups map onto prejudice? To what extent do people experience prejudice directed against themselves? There is increasing interest in whether Britain is becoming a more or less tolerant, accepting or indeed coherent society. This report describes the findings of a survey which employed social psychological methods and measures to assess a range of different aspects of prejudice towards six significant groups in British society – defined by gender, age, ethnicity, sexuality, disability and religion. The report examines the values people espouse, their experiences, and their expressions of prejudice, the extent that ‘political correctness’ may affect expressions of prejudice, the social stereotypes underpinning prejudice, whether prejudice is expressed differently towards different types of group, and the extent to which British society is perceived as a cohesive whole or as being formed of distinct and separate groups. It also explores whether prejudice is predominantly an issue of personal attitudes or whether it is rooted more in the relationships between particular social groups.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Science of Diversity and the Impact of Implicit Bias
    The Science of Diversity and the Impact of Implicit Bias Hannah Valantine, MD NIH Chief Officer for Scientific Workforce Diversity ~ National Institutes of Health ~ / Office of the Director Scientific Workforce Diversity Use of This Module • This presentation presents information about scientific workforce diversity and factors that contribute to limiting diversity, including implicit bias • Viewing this presentation is not a substitute for broader efforts to reduce implicit bias and its negative outcomes on scientific career advancement • Please contact us with questions: [email protected] Presentation Outline • Why diversity? – Diverse is a driving force for excellence and innovation – Defining diversity – Lack of diversity in science: the evidence • Hurdles to diversity: Implicit bias – Pervasiveness of implicit bias – Evidence – Strategies for overcoming bias Why Diversity Matters Capitalizing on the Opportunity • Excellence, creativity, innovation • Broadening scope of inquiry - solutions to complex problems of health and disease • Impact of workforce diversity on health disparities • Ensuring fairness – Changing demographics – Leveraging the entire U.S. intellectual capital Capturing the Benefits of Diversity Identity is a Proxy for Cognitive Diversity *Underrepresented Thinking Populations in U.S. Language Ethnicity*Ethnicity Religion Style Biomedical, Clinical, Behavioral and Social Science Research Perspectives ExperiencesNationality* Nationality GeographyGender* Physical RaceRace* Culture Skills SocioeconomicGender Status*
    [Show full text]
  • The Issue of Diversity and Multiculturalism in Japan
    Jie Qi & Sheng Ping Zhang The Issue of Diversity and Multiculturalism in Japan THE ISSUE OF DIVERSITY AND MULTICULTURALISM IN JAPAN Jie Qi Utsunomiya University, Japan Sheng Ping Zhang Meijo University, Japan Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association March 24-29, 2008 New York In Session: Internationalization and Globalization in the Curriculum 1 Jie Qi & Sheng Ping Zhang The Issue of Diversity and Multiculturalism in Japan THE ISSUE OF DIVERSITY AND MULTICULTYRALISM IN JAPAN The purpose of this paper is to problematize that which has been taken for granted about the notion of multiculturalism in Japan. Multiculturalism is a novel issue in Japan. As the Japanese government started to promote “internationalization” since 1980’s, slogans such as “international exchange,” “cultural exchange,” “understanding of other cultures,” etc, have become the most popular hackneyed expressions among policy maker and educators. This paper demonstrates that the notion of multiculturalism in Japan is intricately and deeply embedded in Japanese society, Japanese culture and the Japanese educational system and that this type of multiculturalism excludes ethnic groups which have lived in Japan since old times. Firstly, the intention in this study is to interrupt the assumptions about homogeneous nation in Japanese educational discourse as have been accepted since the end of World War II. I assert that Japan is not homogeneous nation rather a society with diverse cultural groups. Secondly, this paper traces the path of the past notion of multiculturalism as embodied in the Japanese political, social and cultural conditions. In undertaking this I first look at the way cultural studies emerged in the 1980’s which created a new image of cultural studies.
    [Show full text]
  • The State of Racial Diversity in the Educator Workforce 2016
    THE STATE OF RACIAL DIVERSITY IN THE EDUCATOR WORKFORCE 2016 THE STATE OF RACIAL DIVERSITY IN THE EDUCATOR WORKFORCE JULY 2016 POLICY AND PROGRAM STUDIES SERVICE OFFICE OF PLANNING, EVALUATION AND POLICY DEVELOPMENT U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION i U.S. Department of Education John B. King, Jr. Secretary Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development Amy McIntosh Delegated Duties of Assistant Secretary Policy and Program Studies Service Jennifer Bell-Ellwanger Director July 2016 This report is in the public domain. Authorization to reproduce it in whole or in part is granted. While permission to reprint this publication is not necessary, the citation should be U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development, Policy and Program Studies Service, The State of Racial Diversity in the Educator Workforce, Washington, D.C. 2016. This report is available on the Department’s website at http://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/highered/racial-diversity/state-racial-diversity- workforce.pdf. Availability of Alternate Formats Requests for documents in alternate formats such as Braille or large print should be submitted to the Alternate Format Center by calling 202-260-0852, or by contacting the 504 coordinator via e-mail at [email protected]. Notice to Limited English Proficient Persons If you have difficulty understanding English you may request language assistance services for Department information that is available to the public. These services are available free of charge. If you need more information about interpretation or translation services, please call 1-800-USA-LEARN (1-800-872-5327) (TTY: 1-800-437-0833), or e-mail us at [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Issues of Racial, Ethnic, and Gender Diversity in Preparing School Administrators Carolyn Ridenour University of Dayton, [email protected]
    University of Dayton eCommons Educational Leadership Faculty Publications Department of Educational Leadership 2001 Issues of Racial, Ethnic, and Gender Diversity in Preparing School Administrators Carolyn Ridenour University of Dayton, [email protected] Patricia F. First University of Dayton Angela Lydon University of Dayton Michelle C. Partlow University of Dayton Follow this and additional works at: http://ecommons.udayton.edu/eda_fac_pub Part of the Educational Leadership Commons, Gender and Sexuality Commons, Gender Equity in Education Commons, Higher Education Commons, and the Race and Ethnicity Commons eCommons Citation Ridenour, Carolyn; First, Patricia F.; Lydon, Angela; and Partlow, Michelle C., "Issues of Racial, Ethnic, and Gender Diversity in Preparing School Administrators" (2001). Educational Leadership Faculty Publications. 83. http://ecommons.udayton.edu/eda_fac_pub/83 This Book Chapter is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Educational Leadership at eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Educational Leadership Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Issues of Racial, Ethnic, and Gender Diversity in Preparing School Administrators Carolyn S. Ridenour, Patricia F. First Angela Lydon, and Michelle C. Partlow There are very real differences between us of race, age, and sex. But it is not those differences between us that are separating us . It is rather our refusal to recognize those differences, and to examine the distortions that result from our misnaming them and their effects upon human behavior and expectations. -Audra Lorde (1995, p. 285) The four of us teach in the Department of Educational Leadership at the Uni­ versity of Dayton.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards Implementing the Truth and Reconciliation Commission's Calls to Action in Law Schools: a Settler Harm Reduction Ap
    TOWARDS IMPLEMENTING THE TRUTH AND RECONCILIATION COMMISSION’S CALLS TO ACTION IN LAW SCHOOLS: A SETTLER HARM REDUCTION APPROACH TO RACIAL STEREOTYPING AND PREJUDICE AGAINST INDIGENOUS PEOPLES AND INDIGENOUS LEGAL ORDERS IN CANADIAN LEGAL EDUCATION SCOTT J. FRANKS A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF LAWS GRADUATE PROGRAM IN LAW OSGOODE HALL LAW SCHOOL YORK UNIVERSITY TORONTO, ONTARIO August 2020 © Scott J. Franks, 2020 Abstract Many Canadian law schools are in the process of implementing the Truth and Reconciliation Commission’s Call to Actions #28 and #50. Promising initiatives include mandatory courses, Indigenous cultural competency, and Indigenous law intensives. However, processes of social categorization and racialization subordinate Indigenous peoples and their legal orders in Canadian legal education. These processes present a barrier to the implementation of the Calls. To ethically and respectfully implement these Calls, faculty and administration must reduce racial stereotyping and prejudice against Indigenous peoples and Indigenous legal orders in legal education. I propose that social psychology on racial prejudice and stereotyping may offer non- Indigenous faculty and administration a familiar framework to reduce the harm caused by settler beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors to Indigenous students, professors, and staff, and to Indigenous legal orders. Although social psychology may offer a starting point for settler harm reduction, its application must remain critically oriented towards decolonization. ii Acknowledgments I have a lot of people to acknowledge. This thesis is very much a statement of who I am right now and how that sense of self has been shaped by others.
    [Show full text]
  • How Would You Define Diversity? Open-Ended Responses from Student-Conducted Survey, 28 April 2010
    How would you define diversity? Open-ended responses from student-conducted survey, 28 April 2010 A wide range of interests, backgrounds, experiences. Differences among groups of people and individuals based on ethnicity, race, socioeconomic status, gender, exceptionalities, language, religion, sexual orientation, and geographical area. Diversity of experiences, viewpoints, backgrounds, and life experiences. Tolerance of thought, ideas, people with differing viewpoints, backgrounds, and life experiences. Diversity can be measured across many variables -- age, race, sex, economics, geography, religion, philosophy, etc. variation in race, gender, sexual orientation, religion, political leanings, professional and personal background Diversity in graduate school includes a group of people from different backgrounds (this can be many things not just racial). People with different skills and career interests and hobbies. People with different political points of view. Anything that sets one individual apart from another. However, often it is used to specifically reference gender, race, ethnicity, and more recently sexual orientation differences. Diversity is differences in racial and ethnic, socioeconomic, geographic, and academic/professional backgrounds. People with different opinions, backgrounds (degrees and social experience), religious beliefs, political beliefs, sexual orientations, heritage, and life experience. dissimilar My definition of diversity would include openness to differences among people, cultures and perspectives. Having a multitude of people from different backgrounds and cultures together in the same environment working for the same goals. difference in students' background, especially race and gender. variability of perspectives, people, backgrounds, skin color, language, age, sex in a group or community. Diversity involves having people from a variety of cultural, ethnic and racial backgrounds consortium of different perspectives Differences in characteristics of humans.
    [Show full text]
  • Examining the Effects of Contact on Non-Aboriginal People’S Attitudes Toward Aboriginal People
    CAN CONTACT MAKE A DIFFERENCE?: EXAMINING THE EFFECTS OF CONTACT ON NON-ABORIGINAL PEOPLE’S ATTITUDES TOWARD ABORIGINAL PEOPLE A Thesis Submitted to the College of Graduate Studies and Research For the Degree of Master of Arts In the Department of Political Studies University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon By Erin Lashta Copyright Erin Lashta, April 2015. All rights reserved. Permission to Use In presenting this thesis/dissertation in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a Postgraduate degree from the University of Saskatchewan, I agree that the Libraries of this University may make it freely available for inspection. I further agree that permission for copying of this thesis/dissertation in any manner, in whole or in part, for scholarly purposes may be granted by the professor or professors who supervised my thesis/dissertation work or, in their absence, by the Head of the Department or the Dean of the College in which my thesis work was done. It is understood that any copying or publication or use of this thesis/dissertation or parts thereof for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. It is also understood that due recognition shall be given to me and to the University of Saskatchewan in any scholarly use which may be made of any material in my thesis/dissertation. Requests for permission to copy or to make other uses of materials in this thesis/dissertation in whole or part should be addressed to: Head of the Department of Political Studies University of Saskatchewan 9 Campus Drive Saskatoon, Saskatchewan Canada S7N 5A5 OR Dean College of Graduate Studies and Research University of Saskatchewan 107 Administration Place Saskatoon, Saskatchewan Canada S7N 5A2 i Abstract Utilizing survey data collected through the City Planning and Indigeneity on the Prairies (CPIP) Project in the summer of 2014 this thesis examines what, if any, affect contact between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal people has on non-Aboriginal people’s racial attitudes.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity at Work: MAKING the MOST out of INCREASINGLY DIVERSE SOCIETIES  1
    FOCUS ON Diversity at work: MAKING THE MOST OUT OF INCREASINGLY DIVERSE SOCIETIES 1 September 2020 http://www.oecd.org OECD societies and workforces are becoming more and more diverse. Over the past two decades, the labour market participation of women has increased strongly; the population shares of migrants and their children are growing in almost all OECD countries; and more LGBTI people are open about their sexual orientation. Ensuring that groups that historically have been under-represented or disadvantaged in the labour market and society can participate fully is now more essential than ever. Preliminary evidence suggests that the COVID-19 crisis has had a disproportionate impact on some diverse groups, especially migrants and ethnic minorities. The death of George Floyd and the global “Black Lives Matter” movement have placed at the centre of the policy debate long-standing issues of discrimination and disadvantage against ethnic minorities. Full participation of diverse groups is not only an ethical imperative, it makes great sense also from an economic and social cohesion perspective. The economic case to justify measures promoting diversity and inclusion thus supplements the social justice obligation to promote inclusion and equal opportunity. There is a clear need to better understand under what conditions governments and employers can ensure inclusion, thereby harnessing the potential of a diverse populations more effectively. This policy brief assesses how OECD countries can be equipped to make the most out of diversity and ensure equality of opportunity. Key findings OECD societies and workforces have become increasingly diverse over the past decades; women’s participation in the labour market has increased significantly, the numbers of immigrants and people from ethnic minorities have increased virtually everywhere and more LGBTI people are open about their sexual orientation.
    [Show full text]
  • We Have a Problem with Political Diversity”
    “We Have a Problem with Political Diversity” THE PROBLEM We are a political monoculture that’s intolerant of different views. We claim to welcome all ​ perspectives, but are quick to attack—often in mobs—anyone who presents a view that appears to be in opposition to left-leaning ideology. We throw labels that end in *obe and *ist at each ​ ​ ​ ​ other, attacking each other’s character rather than their ideas. We do this so consistently that employees are afraid to say anything when they disagree with what’s around them politically. HR has told me that this is not a rare concern, and I’ve ​ personally gotten over a hundred messages to that effect. Your colleagues are afraid because they know that they — not their ideas — will be attacked. They know that all the talk of “openness to different perspectives” does not apply to causes of “social justice,” immigration, “diversity”, and “equality.” On this issues, you can either keep quiet or sacrifice your reputation and career. These are not fears without cause. Because we tear down posters welcoming Trump supporters. We regularly propose removing Thiel from our board because he supported Trump. We’re quick to suggest firing people who turn out to be misunderstood, and even quicker to conclude our colleagues are bigots. We have made “All Lives Matter” a fireable offense. We put Palmer Luckey through a witch hunt because he paid for anti-Hillary ads. We write each other ad-hoc feedback in the PSC tool for having “offensive” ideas. We ask HR to investigate those who dare to criticize Islam’s human rights record for creating a “non inclusive environment.” And they called me a transphobe when I called out our corporate art for being politically radical.
    [Show full text]
  • Stand with Our Asian-American Community Against Hate!
    THE CORONAVIRUS DOESN’T DISCRIMINATE AND NEITHER SHOULD WE Stand with our Asian-American Community Against Hate! Do you know Asian Americans are being harassed, injured, and blamed for the Coronavirus pandemic? o “Never come back. Don’t ever come back,” an Indiana gas station store clerk said angrily to an oncologist on his way home from work. The oncologist told the clerk he was born in Kentucky and had not been out of the U.S. for years. o A 26-year-old woman on the way to her gym in San Francisco was spat on the face by a man who screamed after a passing bus, “Run them over!” o A father and his 2- and 6-year old children were stabbed in a retail grocery store by a man who accused them of spreading the coronavirus. o The Stop AAPI Hate Reporting Center 2020 received nearly 1,500 reports of verbal and physical harassment within its first month of opening. What Is A Hate Crime? What is the Emotional Impact of Hate? "Any Unlawful action against the person or property Fear, loss of a sense of safety, avoidance of public of another committed substantially because of the places, post-traumatic stress disorder, fear for one’s victim's actual or perceived race, color, religion, children. They are also called “Message Crimes” ancestry, national origin, disability, gender or sexual because uninvolved members of the target group orientation". thousands of miles away from the original incident (California State Law/City of Davis Website) can feel the contempt of the perpetrator.
    [Show full text]
  • Preventing Race-Based Discrimination and Supporting Cultural Diversity in the Workplace an Evidence Review: Full Report
    Preventing race-based discrimination and supporting cultural diversity in the workplace An evidence review: full report Ms Brigid Trenerry, Ms Hayley Franklin & Dr Yin Paradies © Copyright Victorian Health Promotion Foundation 2012 ISBN: 978-1-921822-07-0 March 2012 Publication Number: P-033-GEN_B Suggested citation Trenerry B, Franklin H & Paradies Y 2012. Preventing race-based discrimination and supporting cultural diversity in the workplace (An evidence review: full report). Victorian Health Promotion Foundation, Melbourne, Australia. Acknowledgements Thanks to Dr Karin Maeder-Han for tabulating data, Dr Reza Hasmath for advice and Associate Professor Santina Bertone for reviewing this report. Creating Healthy Workplaces evidence review series VicHealth commissioned five international evidence reviews to build a body of evidence and knowledge about effective workplace health interventions. Both full and summary reports are available for each of the five evidence reviews: • Preventing race-based discrimination and supporting cultural diversity in the workplace • Preventing violence against women in the workplace • Reducing alcohol-related harm in the workplace • Reducing prolonged sitting in the workplace • Reducing stress in the workplace www.vichealth.vic.gov.au/workplace Preventing race-based discrimination and supporting cultural diversity in the workplace An evidence review: full report March 2012 Ms Brigid Trenerry, Ms Hayley Franklin & Dr Yin Paradies Melbourne School of Population Health The University of Melbourne Contents Executive
    [Show full text]
  • Why Doesn't Diversity Training Work?
    uncommon sense in offering training to faculty and students, and even mandate it (29% of all schools require faculty to undergo training), is par- Why Doesn’t Diversity ticularly surprising given that the research on Training Work? the poor performance of training comes out of academia. Imagine university health cen- The Challenge for Industry ters continuing to prescribe vitamin C for the common cold. and Academia Corporate antibias training was stimu- lated by the civil rights movement of the Frank Dobbin and Alexandra Kalev 1950s and 1960s and legal reforms that movement brought about. Federal agen- cies took the lead, and by the end of 1971, tarbucks’ decision to put 175,000 work- the Social Security Administration had put Sers through diversity training on May 29, 50,000 staffers through racial bias training. in the wake of the widely publicized arrest By 1976, 60 percent of big companies of- of two black men in a Philadelphia store, fered equal-opportunity training. In the put diversity training back in the news. But 1980s, as Reagan tried to tear down affir- corporations and universities have been do- mative action regulations and appointed ing diversity training for decades. Nearly Clarence Thomas to run the Equal Employ- all Fortune 500 companies do training, and ment Opportunity Commission, trainers be- two-thirds of colleges and universities have gan to make a business case for what they training for faculty according to our 2016 called “diversity training.” They argued that survey of 670 schools. Most also put fresh- women and minorities would soon be the men through some sort of diversity session backbone of the workforce and that em- as part of orientation.
    [Show full text]