CLASSIFICATION, PHTLDSOilY A'MD ZDDffiDSRAPHY Df T-HE
AMERICAM ARAOilllOS OF THE DIDO SCfllZDMIDA
!by
JON WM. KDWLATO, B.S.
A iSISSERTATIUN
ITkl
Subiritted to tte firadiats Faculty of Texas Tecti UniveTsi'ty in Partiiail Fiuilfillment ©f tte Iteqiuiiiirenffiimts for tltne !Die§ree ©f
Accepted
©ecenlber, 1575 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Great appreciation is expressed to Dr. Robert W. Mitchell who, by his consistant example of excellence, has constructed and
shaped me as a zoologist, and thus shall share credit for production of this dissertation. The remainder of my committee afforded me
generously of their time and advice and are here thanked: Dr. Russell
W. Strandtmann, Dr. John S. Mecham, Dr. John E. George, and Dr. David
E. Foster. Additional advice was provided by Dr. William R. Atchley.
I am further indebted to the Society of Sigma Xi for awarding this
study a Grand-in-Aid of Research. Fellow students who have
contributed significantly to my dissertation are William R. Elliott,
Jerry W. Cooke, and D. Craig Rudolf. Mr. James R. Reddell has given
freely of his advice and time, and has in all areas contributed his
remarkable knowledge of faunistic zoology in general and schizomids
in particular. Dan, Verlee, and Phyllis Brashier Rowland saw this
venture to completion.
n TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ii LIST OF TABLES iv LIST OF FIGURES vi LIST OF MAPS ix I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. MATERIALS AND METHODS 16 III. CLASSIFICATION 22 IV. PHYLOGENETICS 315 V. ZOOGEOGRAPHY 374 BIBLIOGRAPHY 406
111 LIST OF TABLES
TABLE Page
1. Comparisons of the species groups of the American members of the genus Schizomus , 39
2. Measurements of the members of the Protoschizomidae 49
3. Comparisons of the members of the cubanicus group . 52
4. Measurements of the members of the cubanicus group . 95
5. Comparisons of the members of the simonis group . . 101
6. Measurements of the members of the simonis group . . 125
7. Comparisons of the members of the brasiliensis group 130
8. Measurements of the members of the brasiliensis group 161
9. Comparisons of the members of the mexicanus group 166
10. Descriptive statistics for S^. portoricensis . . . 205
11. Measurements of the members of the mexicanus group 229
12. Comparisons of the members of the pecki group . . 234
13. Measurements of the members of the pecki group . . 253
14. Comparisons of the members of the goodnightorum group 257
15. Measurements of the members of the goodnightorum group 268
16. Comparisons of the members of the briggsi group . . . 271
17. Measurements of the members of the briggsi group . . . 297
18. Measurements of the species of Schizomus not assigned to groups 313
19. Characters, character states and assigned codes of the major lineages of Schizomida 342
20. Data matrix of the genera 344
21. Characters, character states and assigned codes of the non-briggsi American species groups 347
TV TABLE Page
22. Data matrix of the non-briggsi American species groups . . 348
23. Characters, character states and assigned codes of the members of the cubanicus group 351
24. Data matrix of the members of the cubanicus group .... 353
25. Characters, character states and assigned codes of the members of the simonis group 356
26. Data matrix of the members of the simonis group 357
27. Characters, character states and assigned codes of the members of the brasiliensis group 360
28. Data matrix of the members of the brasiliensis group . . . 362
29. Characters, character states and assigned codes of the members of the mexicanus group 365
30. Data matrix of the members of the mexicanus group .... 367
31. Characters, character states and assigned codes of the members of the briggsi group 370
32. Data matrix of the members of the briggsi group 371 LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE Page
1. Male and female Agastoschizomus lucifer from Sotano de Yerbaniz, San Luis Potosi 9 2. Male and female Schizomus pentapeltis from near Palm Springs, California, during courtship. Male S^. mexicanus from Sotano de la Tinaja, San Luis Potosi . 11
3-6. Generalized schizomidan anatomy 13
7-13. Generalized schizomidan anatomy 15
14-19. Parts of protoschizomids 47
20-28. Dorsal views of male's flagella of the cubanicus group 79 29-33. Dorsal views of male's flagella of S^. viridis from various localities 81
34-44. Male's flagella of the cubanicus group 83
45-57. Parts of male schizomids of the cubanicus group ... 85
58-60. Lateral views of male's right pedipalps of the cubanicus group 87 61-68. Lateral views of male's right pedipalp of the cubanicus group 89
69-73. Male's right pedipalps of the cubanicus group .... 91
74-86. Female's spermathecae of the cubanicus group .... 93
87-94. Dorsal views of male's flagella of the simonis
group 119
95-106. Parts of schizomids of the simonis group 121
107-118. Female's spermathecae of the simonis group 123
119-125. Dorsal views of male's flagella of the brasiliensis
group 153 126-136. Male's flagella of the brasiliensis group 155
137-145. Parts of schizomids of thVI e brasiliensis group .... 157 FIGURE Page
146-154. Female's spermathecae of the brasiliensis group . . . 159
155-163. Dorsal views of male's flagella of the mexicanus
group 215
164-170. Parts of schizomids of the mexicanus group 217
171-182. Lateral views of male's flagella of the mexicanus
group 219
183-190. Female's spermathecae of the mexicanus group .... 221 191-198. Female's spermathecae of the mexicanus group .... 223
199-211. Parts of schizomids of the mexicanus group 225
212-215. Male's pedipalps of S.. mitchelli 227
216-221. Parts of schizomids of the pecki group 247
222-228. Female's spermathecae of the pecki group 249
229-234. Parts of schizomids of the pecki group 251
235-240. Parts of male schizomids of the goodnightorum group . 264
241-247. Parts of schizomids of the goodnightorum group . . . 266
248-253. Male's flagella of the briggsi group 289
254-259. Parts of schizomids of the briggsi group 291
260-265. Female's spermathecae of the briggsi group 293
266-272. Parts of male schizomids of the briggsi group .... 295
273-279. Parts of male schizomids 309
280-284. Parts of schizomids 311
285. Schematic diagram of the probable cladistic
relationships of the flagella of schizomidans .... 330
286-287. Cladograms of the genera of schizomidans 346
288. Cladogram of the non-briggsi groups of American schizomids vn 350 FIGURE Page
289. Cladogram of the members of the cubanicus group 355
290. Cladogram of the members of the simonis group 359
291. Cladogram of the members of the brasiliensis group . . . 364
292. Cladogram of the members of the mexicanus group 369
293. Cladogram of the members of the briggsi group 373
vm LIST OF MAPS
MAP Page
1. Distribution of schizomids of the cubanicus group 54
2. Distribution of schizomids of the simonis group . 54
3. Distribution of protoschizomids 168
4. Distribution of schizomids of the pecki and goodnightorum groups 168
5. Distribution of schizomids of the mexicanus group . 168
6. Distribution of schizomids of the briggsi group . . 132
7. Distribution of schizomids of the brasiliensis group 132
8. Evolutionary zoogeography of the cubanicus group . 381
9-11. Evolutionary zoogeography of the brasiliensis group 386
12-14. Evolutionary zoogeography of the mexicanus group . 392
15-17. Evolutionary zoogeography of the briggsi group . . 399
IX CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
The purposes of this research were: (1) to provide a classification of generic and familial taxa of the arachnid order
Schizomida on a world-wide basis, including a list of all species and a bibliography containing the entire primary literature; (2) to describe and classify the complete New World fauna as far as available material would allow; (3) to perform phylogenetic studies on the
World genera and familial taxa, and New World species; and (4) to analyze the zoogeographical relationships of taxa wherever evidence allowed. Phylogenetic and taxonomic considerations and results are
highly interdependent and were developed simultaneously, but are discussed separately herein.
The order Schizomida, like a few other minor arachnid orders, encompasses a manageable number of species of surprisingly few adaptive types. Though morphologically conservative, they have a
nearly complete pan-tropical distribution and are often abundant, and hence probably ecologically very important in certain areas.
These arachnids have received little attention, however, aside from
descriptive works, since the first was described in 1872. The first
critical study of the known species was that of Hansen and Sorensen
(1905) and aside from the taxonomy in this paper the anatomical
information is still quite useful. Lawrence (1969) produced a
revision of African fauna, which stands as the only regional
treatment. Millot (1949) gave the only detailed account, and Savory
1 (1964) gave a general account of all aspects of schizomid biology.
The works of Gravely (1915), Rowland (1972), Beck (1968a, 1968b), and Sturm (1958, 1973) offer all the information on behavior. The only major works on descriptive internal anatomy are those of Borner
(1902a, 1902b, 1904), Modder (1960), and Rowland (in preparation).
Post embryonic development of most schizomids probably consists of five instars over a period of two or three years. The nymphal instars resemble the adults but are smaller and lack, in varying degrees, the cuticular sclerotization of the adults. The sexual differences manifest in the flagellum, pedipalps and primary sexual organs occur at the last molt, although penultimate males are sometimes recognizable by the shape of the flagellum. The general breeding habits of schizomids were originally assumed to be similar to that of the uropygids. Subsequently, Hansen and Sorensen (1905) described a spermatophore attached to the venter of a female, confirming a similarity. Sturm (1958) published an account of his observations of the entire courtship and sperm transfer. Later
Sturm and Kraus (1973) and Beck (1967) added further behavioral data.
My personal observations on mating behavior concur with these sources.
After a few minutes of preliminary, mainly tactile, courtship, the male presents his flagellum to the female, which she envelops with the pedipalps and perhaps chelicerae. This action precedes the male's forward advancement which pulls the female over a spermatophore; the female then lowers herself onto it. In a few minutes the couple breaks but may remain in close proximity for some time. The spermatophore remains attached to the female for an unknown time but is expelled before oviposition. Oviposition has been documented only by Gravely (1915) and Rowland (1972a). They reported that females, kept in small terraria, constructed earthen chambers and that eggs were oviposited and attached to the venter of the parent. In the latter case young had emerged and were active in about three months.
Some species, contrary to the above observations, are known to carry eggs while roaming at large (R. W. Mitchell, J. R. Reddell, personal conmuni cation).
Schizomids are extremely sensitive to dessication and are most frequently found under rocks in mesic environments and where ample leaf litter is available to support an adequate arthropod fauna upon which they presumably prey. The sifting of deep, moist leaf litter may also produce schizomids, but generally not in the numbers sometimes encountered when turning over partially buried objects in moist, undisturbed soil. Two reports of sweeping schizomids from brush come from C. J. Goodnight and S. B. Peck (personal communications), which gives evidence that very much is still to be learned about the habits of this group of arachnids.
Anatomically, schizomidans may be considered the most generalized of all arachnids. The body consists of three major regions: prosoma, opisthosoma, and telson, or flagellum. The prosoma is dorsally divided into three transverse regions, each with one or two plates. The carapace, or propeltidium, overlies the first section, the paired mesopeltidia overlie the second section, and the entire or paired metapeltidium overlies the third section. Ventrally, the prosoma is composed of the five pairs of coxae and an anterior and posterior sternum. The opisthosoma is covered dorsally by nine terga and ventrally by nine sterna. The last three abdominal segments are not divided into terga and sterna, but are entire and compose the pygydial segments, that is, segments X-XII. The flagellum inserts on the posterior face of the last abdominal segment. The appendages of the prosoma are the chelicerae of two articles, the pedipalps of six articles, and legs I-IV each composed of seven articles. The tarsus of leg I is composed of six tarsomeres, the other legs of three tarsomeres. Leg I is not ambulatory, but functions as a tactile organ. Legs II-IV are ambulatory, the fourth always being the longest, the third always the shortest. The fourth
leg differs nost noticably in the great expansion and muscular development of the femur in most species. The central nervous system
is composed of a superesophageal ganglionic mass and a subesophageal ganglionic mass formed by the union of post-cheliceral pedal ganglia and the first four abdominal ganglia. An abdominal ganglionic mass
is located in abdominal segments III and IV and is composed of eight neuromeres. The breathing system is composed of one pair of book
lungs, communicating outside by a spiracle on the posterolateral margin of each side of abdominal segment II. The heart is limited
to the second to seventh abdominal segments, and has five pairs of ostia. The cephalic end of the heart leads into a dorsal blood
vessel, which extends to the subesophageal ganglionic mass; however. no abdominal arterial system is present. The digestive system is provided with two prosomal midgut diverticulae and a few large opisthosomal diverticulae. The anus opens just below the insertion of the flagellum. The coxal glands open at the base of leg I, but originate in the sixth prosomal segment. No definite saccule exists.
Defensive organs, as in the uropygids, consist of a pair of anal glands which produce and emit an acetic acid spray. The male's genital system is composed of four major parts: the paired testes, the dorsal tube system, the vasa seminala, and the gonopore. The female's genital system is simpler. It is composed of two ovaries which are fused into a single mass provided with two short oviducts.
These lead into a simple uterus, which in turn opens directly to the outside.
Only 170 species, including those described herein, of a probably vastly larger World fauna are known. This study of Mexican species shows that there are few wide ranging species, most being highly localized. They lack any secondary means of travel, such as phoresy, ballooning, resistant eggs, parasitism, or other means employed by arachnids, and are thus relatively non-vagile. It appears, for example, that only one New World species has a distribution that is continuous for more than one hundred miles.
Intrageneric sympatry in epigean habitats occurs, as far as is known, only in tropical areas. Sympatry in subtropical areas is limited to caves, and is unknown in temperate areas. Members of this order have sometimes been combined with the larger whip scorpions, the Uropygida, into a single order. Most
American and English tastes tend toward separation of the two, though nothing of great consequence is achieved in either view. Most importantly, no doubt has been raised that the members of the order
Schizomida represent a monophyletic assemblage with unique evolutionary tendencies, and are a result of an ancient dichotomy from common Uropygida-Schizomida stock. The age of dichotomy lies hidden in antiquity, but must considerably predate the appearance of fossil uropygids in the Carboniferous, which are practically indistinguishable from modern forms. Moreover, the schizomidans form a unique assemblage of species which most probably will never form a morphological continuum with the uropygids through discovery of extant organisms. Rowland (in preparation) reviews the comparative anatomy of these groups.
These animals are commonly called "schizomids," but other
English common names are "tartarides" and "micro-whip scorpions."
In this work I have used, for purposes of clarity, the word "schizomids" only in a restricted sense, namely to designate members of the family
Schizomidae as opposed to the members of the Protoschizomidae. The collective term for members of both families, hence the order, is here "schizomidans." It is not my intent nor my wish to change the vernacular, but to minimize confusion in this text. The Bibliography contains all of the primary literature on schizomidans and additional works not concerning schizomidans,
The latter titles bear an asterisk. Fig. 1.--Above, male and below, female, Agastoschizomus lucifer, from Sotano de Yerbaniz, San Luis Potosi.
Fig. 2.—Above, male (left) and fanale (right) Schizomus pentapeltis from near Palm Springs, California, during courtship.
Below, male S. mexicanus from Sotano de la Tinaja, San Luis Potosi.
Figs. 3-6.--Generalized schizomidan anatomy: 3, dorsal view of male; 4, lateral view, right pedipalp; 5, lateral view, right leg I;
6, lateral view, right leg II. A, apical carapacal setae; E, eyespot;
D, dorsal carapacal setae; CA, carapace; MS, mesopeltidial plate;
MT, metapeltidial plate (in the split condition); Tl, abdominal
tergum I; T2, abdominal tergum II; T9, abdominal tergum IX; AP,
posterodorsal abdominal process; FL, flagellum; T, trochanter; F,
femur; P, patella; Tl, tibia; TB, tarsus-basitarsus; S, tarsal-
basitarsal spur; C, claw; B, basitarsus; TA, tarsus. Scale: 1 cm =
.25 mm. 13 Figs. 7-13.—Generalized schizomidan anatomy: 7, 8, mesal views of right chelicerae: 7, Schizomus sp.; 8, Agastoschizomus
lucifer; 9, mesal view of moveable finger of right chelicerae of
Megaschizomus mossambicus; 10-13, lateral view of left leg IV:
10, Schizomus sp.; 11, Megaschizomus mossambicus; 12, Protoschizomus
pachypalpus; 13, Agastoschizomus lucifer. 8, brush; F, fixed finger;
S, serrula. Scale: Fig. 7, 1 cm = .12 mm; Figs. 8, 9, 1 cm = .25 mm;
Figs. 10, 12, 1 cm = 3 mm; Figs. 11, 13, 1 cm = .8 mm. 15 -y?^ CHAPTER II
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This study was based on examination of approximately 1,000 specimens of schizomidans from the New and Old World. The vast majority of these were from the New World and formed the basis of my revisionary work for that area. A small part of these collections was private, but will be deposited in various permanent collections.
Public collections were borrowed from the following institutions.
Curators are also acknowledged and abbreviations for institutions are given where I have indicated deposition of material. American Museum of Natural History, New York (AMNH), J. A. L. Cooke, N. I. Platnick;
Bernice P. Bishop Museum, Honolulu, Hawaii, J. Tenorio; British
Museum (Natural History), London (BMNH), K. H. Hyatt, F- R. Wanless;
California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, California (CAS), R.
X. Schick; Institut royal des Sciences naturelles de Belgique,
Brussells (ISB), N. Leleup; Institute of Zoology, Uppsala (IZU), A.
Holme; Instituto de Zoologia, Academia de Ciencias, La Habana, Cuba
(IZC), L. F- de Armas; Los Angeles County Museum, Los Angeles,
California (LACM), C. L. Hogue; Musee National d'Histoire Naturelle,
Paris (MNHN), M. Vachon; Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard
University, Cambridge, Massachusetts (MCZ), H. W. Levi; Natal Museum,
Pietermaritzburg, South Africa, B. H. Lamoral; Naturhistoriska
Riksmuseet, Stockholm, Sweden (NRS), T. Kronestedt; Naturhistorisches
Museum, Wien, Austria, M. Beier, J. Gruber; Natur-Museum und
Forschungs-Institut Senckenburg, Frankfurt, West Germany (SMF), M.
16 17
Grasshoff; San Diego Natural History Museum, San Diego, California,
A. Ross; South Australia Museum, R. V. Southcott; Koninklijk Museum
Voor Midden Africa (KMMA), P. L. G. Benoit, N. Leleup; The Museum,
Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas (TTU), R. W. Mitchell, J. R.
Reddell; Universitetets Zoologiske Museum, Copenhagen, Denmark
(UZMK), S. L. Tuxen; United States National Museum, Washington, D. C.
(USNM), R. Crabill. Individuals contributing private collections are as follows: T. S. Briggs, C. J. Goodnight, K. Hom, W. Icenogle,
B. J. Kaston, W. Lum, W. B. Muchmore, S. B. Peck, W. B. Peck, B.
Phillips, W. B. Shear, I. Shimojana, M. E. Thompson.
Observational methods. An M-5 Wild dissecting microscope was used for general observations, measurements, and drawings of all anatomical parts other than the female's spermathecae. Measurements were made at lOOX with lOX oculars and a 2X objective boost.
Drawings of the pedipalps and whole views were accomplished by use of the M-5 Zeichentubus, a camera lucida. Other drawings were made by the grid method using a Wild, 20 square grid micrometer and one half inch square grid paper. For work with the dissecting scope specimens were observed while in 80% ethyl alcohol in a Syracuse watch glass using fine, clean silica sand as a substrate. All specimens were stored in 80% ethyl alcohol, unless previously preserved otherwise by the lending institution.
To observe and illustrate the female's spermathecae it was necessary to dissect the second (genital) and third abdominal sterna by use of instruments fashioned from minute pins. The female's 18 spermathecal structures are closely associated with the internal surface of sternum II and come free with it. The entire piece, consisting of the spermathecae, sternum II and III, the book-lungs, and various muscular tissue, was then carefully cleaned to remove extraneous materials. The cleaned piece was then immersed in three drops of clove oil on a slide and allowed to heat for three minutes at 75 °C. A cover slip was then applied to flatten the entire
structure. The details of the spermathecae were then drawn using an
AO Spencer phase-contrast binocular microscope using an ocular micrometer at 200X and one-fifth inch square grid paper. The
spermathecae and associated pieces were then washed in several changes
of alcohol and stored in small vials with the remainder of the
specimen.
Descriptive statistics. Accompanying each description is a
set of descriptive statistics given in tabular form which I provide
for all species. In the case of S^. portoricensis the range, mean,
standard deviation, and coefficient of variation are given for
several populations. All other species are represented by the range
of measurements only. The sample size of most species is so low
(usually two or three specimens) that a comprehensive set of
statistics measuring variation is impossible. The statistics are
intended only for general comparisons and species recognition.
Relative lengths given in ratios of certain pairs of anatomical parts
are used only as a convenient method of indicating rough body
proportions. The variates are as follows: 1, length of carapace; 19
2, length of flagellum; 3, width of flagellum; 4, length of femur I;
5, length of patella I; 6, length of tibia I; 7, length of tarsus-
basitarsus I; 8, length of femur II; 9, length of patella II; 10,
length of tibia II; 11, length of basitarsus II; 12, length of
femur III; 13, length of patella III; 14, length of tibia III; 15,
length of basitarsus III; 16, length of femur IV; 17, length of
patella IV; 18, length of tibia IV; 19, length of basitarsus IV.
Criteria for taxonomic judgments. Since very few specimens of most species were available for study, and since most species are
known from a single locality or even a single collection, almost no
understanding of the morphological and geographical limits of species
and populations is forthcoming. Thus, the biological species concept,
as in most taxonomic works, has no relevance. I have used the
classical, arbitrary morphological species concept because no other
definition is workable within this poorly known group.
In cases where morphologically distinct, yet closely related,
forms occur without known morphological or geographical continuity,
they were given separate specific status. This was done because it
is probably best to risk indicating spurious variation within a taxon
than to risk erroneously hiding it. I have not used the subspecies
category since the materials available to me do not facilitate such
judgments. Species groups were given loose and arbitrary limits based
mainly on morphological, but also on distributional, data. The use
of species groups and complexes serves well in foundation of
polythetic categories of monophyletic or at least paraphyletic 20 origins, and serve equally well as subgenera, but have the advantage
of not carrying with them any of the legalistic problems of formal
taxonomy.
I defend my use of generic, subfamilial, and familial
categories only in that in my judgment they reflect discrete phyletic
entities which are typified by correlated sets of characters. These
taxa will probably not show continuity with contemporary forms of
equal rank, due to long and unique evolutionary histories in which
intermediate forms have become extinct or have themselves changed
by evolutionary gradualism. My philosophies concerning the
construction of hierarchies and development of the taxa, are
discussed in the section on phylogeny.
The characters upon which taxonomic and phylogenetic judgments
are made are discussed, when necessary, in the section on phylogeny.
Recognition of taxa. Recognition of the various taxa treated
in this work is facilitated by use of comparisons tables. Keys seem
inappropriate for use in this study for various reasons. It is my
estimation that future efforts will produce considerable numbers of
new species within the groups delineated here. Keys are best
employed where the fauna is completely, or nearly completely, known
and where the chance of encountering undescribed taxa is relatively
small. Thus, I have provided only comparisons tables which are
equally as useful as keys in distinguishing described taxa, but which
are perhaps not as expedient. Comparisons tables have the added 21 advantage of presenting considerably more contrasting information than a key, and facilitate placing undescribed taxa.
I do not expect that any large species groups, genera, or familial taxa will be discovered in the New World; therefore, keys may be fairly safely used for taxa above the species level. Again
I have refrained from using keys, but for the reason that there are so few taxa to recognize. The two family group and three generic taxa are described only in contrasting characters and are essentially key couplets in themselves.
Upon studying the criteria for placement of taxa into family categories the user will, in the case of the family Schizomidae, refer to the comparisons table for species groups. This will direct him to the appropriate species group under which he will inspect the comparisons table for those species. Augmenting the table with examination of the illustrations of appropriate taxa, the user will be able not only to identify known species, but may also arrive at some idea of the relationships of undescribed taxa to species treated herein. CHAPTER III
CLASSIFICATION
Systematic History. Currently there are seven familial and
13 generic names applied to extant organisms and two familial and three generic names applied to extinct organisms within the order
Schizomida. The main purpose of this section of this chapter is to examine the applicability and usage of the names of extant taxa.
Calcitronidae and its two monotypic genera are wholly extinct and known only from Pliocene calcite deposits in Arizona. The works of Petrunkevitch (1945a, 1955), Pierce (1950, 1951), and Rowland
(1973b) provide all the information available on these taxa.
Calcoschizomus latisternum Pierce, is apparently also extinct, known only from the same deposits as the Pliocene calcitronids, but has been included in the Schizomidae. I have examined all of these types, but I have not been able to confirm many of the observations made by the original authors. These specimens are interesting, but of limited use since critical observations cannot be made. I have chosen not to integrate the taxonomy of the extinct and extant taxa here. In
Rowland (1973b) I included the fossil material and gave diagnoses which were repeated from the original sources. I have little hope now that these fossils were accurately described, or that they can ever be properly interpreted.
Cambridge (1872) described the first schizomid and created for it the family Tartarides, genus Nyctalops, and trivial name crassicaudata. In this work he also described j^. tennuicaudata. The
22 23 latter name was subsequently moved to synonymy of Pocock (1900) on the basis that N^. tennuicaudata was actually the female of H_. crassicaudata. Evidence is convincing that this revision is sound, although Pocock
(1893) had earlier assigned N^. tennuicaudata to another genus. Cook
(1899), by authority of first revisor, designated crassicaudata as type of the genus.
Previous to Pocock's work Thorell (1888) elevated Cambridge's family Tartarides to tribal status (tribal rank was then superior to family rank) and introduced the new family name Schizonotoidae. He proved that the name Nyctalops is a junior homonym and had been previously occupied (Hagler, 1832). In its place he provided
Schizonotus, the nominate genus of Schizonotoidae. The spelling of the latter name was emended to Schizonotidae by Pocock (1893). The work of Cook (1899) shows that the name Schizonotus is also a junior homonym, being preoccupied (Ratzeburg, 1852). In its place he used the name Schizomus. For the family name Schizonotidae, which was based on the junior homonym, he substituted the new name Hubbardiidae, which contained a new nominate genus Hubbardia; however the type genus remained Schizomus.
Thorell (1899) erected the new genus Tripeltis on the basis of two new species, J_. grassii and X- cambridgei, the former being originally designated as type species of the genus. The work of
Cook (1899), however, shows that Tripeltis is a junior homonym, being preoccupied (Cope, 1886). For Tripeltis he provided the name Triplomus.
Cook's revision does not stand, however, since Kraepelin (1899) 24 offered the name Trithyreus for Tripeltis for similar reasons, just one month before Cook.
Cook (1899) described the new genus and species Hubbardia pentapeltis; however, Hansen and Sorensen in 1905 synonymized this genus with Trithyreus. Cook (1899) also mentioned a new animal which he had presented at a meeting of the Entomological Society of Washington two years previously as Artacarus liberiensis. A printed description of this species never appeared under his authorship and, consequently, it was treated as a nomen nudum by Kraepelin (1897) and Hansen and
Sorensen (1905). Kraus (1960) located the original type series and described the species and placed it in Schizomus.
The original classification of Cambridge (1872) included the family name Tartarides; there was no nominal genus, but the type genus
Nyctalops was fixed by monotypy. Thorell (1888) elevated Tartarides to tribal status, but did not use a nominate family name. He used the new name Schizonotoidae, which is invalid because the nominate genus Schizonotus was later shown to be a junior homonym. Family
Hubbardiidae, which Cook (1899) offered to replace Schizonotidae was not allowed because its nominate type genus was later decided to be a junior subjective synonym of Schizomus. The family name Schizomidae has been erroneously attributed to Chamberlin (1922). Hansen and
Sorensen (1905) offered the name Schizomoidae to replace Hubbardiidae.
The original spelling was emended to Schizomidae by Gravely (1915).
The family name Tartarides should have been conserved from the start by Thorell and given its proper suffix, but since the name has been 25 out of general usage, the name Schizomidae should be used (Rowland,
1973b). In the latter work I introduced the subfamily Megaschizominae for reception of Megaschizomus Lawrence, 1969 and Agastoschizomus
Rowland, 1971. In Rowland (1975) I introduced Protoschizomidae for
reception of Agastoschizomus and Protoschizomus Rowland, 1975, and revised Megaschizominae, leaving it monobasic within the Schizomidae.
In the same publication that Chamberlin made his revision of family names he also described a new genus and species from Puerto
Rico. This genus, Stenochrus, was appropriately synonymized with
Schizomus in Rowland (1973b) and S^. portoricensis, in fact, later proved to be synonymous with some other rather well known species.
Lawrence (1969) synonymized African schizomids of the genus
Schizomus and Trithyreus. Unfortunately, Lawrence apparently missed the earlier revision of a similar nature by Mello-Leitao (1931).
Mello-Leitao reasoned that the two genera should be reduced to subgenera and that only the genus Schizomus should stand. While I agree with Lawrence in uniting the two genera, it seems he, like
Mello-Leitao, picked the younger generic name to survive. Trithyreus
Kraepelin dates to March, 1899, whereas Schizomus Cook dates to April,
1899.
After considering the Trithyreus-Schizomus dilemma for a few years I have decided to let Trithyreus stand. I do not recognize the genus as it was originally, or even as it recently has been conceived.
The split metapeltidium may occur erratically within a single species, or species group, and should never be used by itself to distinguish 25 out of general usage, the name Schizomidae should be used (Rowland,
1973b). In the latter work I introduced the subfamily Megaschizominae for reception of Megaschizomus Lawrence, 1969 and Agastoschizomus
Rowland, 1971. In Rowland (1975) I introduced Protoschizomidae for reception of Agastoschizomus and Protoschizomus Rowland, 1975, and revised Megaschizominae, leaving it monobasic within the Schizomidae.
In the same publication that Chamberlin made his revision of family names he also described a new genus and species from Puerto
Rico. This genus, Stenochrus, was appropriately synonymized with
Schizomus in Rowland (1973b) and S^. portoricensis, in fact, later proved to be synonymous with some other rather well known species.
Lawrence (1969) synonymized African schizomids of the genus
Schizomus and Trithyreus. Unfortunately, Lawrence apparently missed the earlier revision of a similar nature by Mello-Leitao (1931).
Mello-Leitao reasoned that the two genera should be reduced to subgenera and that only the genus Schizomus should stand. While I agree with Lawrence in uniting the two genera, it seems he, like
Mello-Leitao, picked the younger generic name to survive. Trithyreus
Kraepelin dates to March, 1899, whereas Schizomus Cook dates to April,
1899.
After considering the Trithyreus-Schizomus dilemma for a few years I have decided to let Trithyreus stand. I do not recognize the genus as it was originally, or even as it recently has been conceived.
The split metapeltidium may occur erratically within a single species, or species group, and should never be used by itself to distinguish 26 any taxon. Since the type and only known specimen of X- grassii, the species which originally was the basis for creation of Trithyreus, has apparently been lost in a flood, no subjective evaluation can be made until the species is recollected. It is possible, however, that this species may best be contained in a genus apart from Schizomus, because
Hansen and Sorensen (1905) made mention of several characters which they deemed ^ery distinctive.
Whatever the situation with X- grassii, I am at this point reluctant to synonymize Trithyreus and Schizomus, but I limit my use of the former genus for its type species, and remove all other species once assigned within Trithyreus to Schizomus. Until a study of X- grassii is made no further species should be assigned to Trithyreus.
For the sake of clarity I have provided a list of all schizomids, within their proper genera, as now conceived.
Order Schizomida
Protoschizomidae Rowland, 1975
Protoschizomidae Rowland, 1975:1.
Description.--Carapace without eyespots; mesopeltidia large, separated by about 1/3 to 1/10 their greatest dimension; metapeltidium entire or divided. Abdomen with eight pairs of dorsoventral muscles.
Flagellum segmented in females. Cheliceral serrula absent, but represented by a row of blunt, nearly hemispherical knobs; no row of closely situated setae at base of fixed digit (brush). Two teeth on 27 fixed digit, basal one arising at an angle from ventral surface of basal segment. Ratio of pedipalpal claw length to dorsal length of tarsus-basitarsus 1:.5 or 1:1; basitarsal spurs symmetrically placed, long, about 1/3 to 1/2 dorsal length of tarsus-basitarsus; "true spines" present. Trochanter IV about 2.2 times longer than wide; femur IV from about three to five times longer than deep.
Di stri buti on.--Mexi co.
Protoschizomus Rowland, 1975
Protoschizomus Rowland, 1975:2. Type: Agastoschizomus pachypalpus
Rowland, 1973 (orig. desig.).
Description.--Carapace about one millimeter in length.
Mesopeltidial plates separated by 1/3 their length; greatest length to width ratio of metapeltidial plates about 1.3:1. Abdominal sterna
IV to VII about six times wider than long. Pedipalpal claw shorter than dorsal length of tarsus-basitarsus. Femur IV about three times longer than deep.
Distribution.--Tamaulipas and Colima, Mexico.
P.. pachypalpus (Rowland), 1973 - Tamaulipas
P.. occidental's Rowland, 1975 - Colima
Agastoschizomus Rowland, 1971
Agastoschizomus Rowland. 1971:13. Type: Agastoschizomus lucifer
Rowland, 1971 (monotypy); Rowland, 1973a:202; Rowland, 1975:5. 28
Agastoschizomus Rowland, 1971
Agastoschizomus Rowland, 1971:13. Type: Agastoschizomus lucifer
Rowland, 1971 (monotypy); Rowland, 1973a:202; Rowland, 1975:5,
Description.--Carapacal length about two to three millimeters in length. Mesopeltidial plates separated by 1/10 their greatest dimension; greatest length to greatest width ratio of metapeltidial plates about 1:1. Abdominal sterna IV to VII about three times wider than long. Pedipalpal claw longer than dorsal length of tarsus-basitarsus, ratio of about 1.1:1; tarsal-basitarsal spurs about 1/2 dorsal length of tarsus-basitarsus. Femur IV about five times longer than deep.
Distribution.--San Luis Potosi, Mexico.
A. lucifer Rowland, 1971 - Tamaulipas, San Luis Potosi
A. huitzmolotitlensis Rowland, 1975 - San Luis Potosi
Family Schizomidae Hansen and Sorensen, 1905
Tartarides Cambridge, 1872:410 (nom. obi.).
Schizonotidae Thorell, 1888:358 [nom. correct. Pocock, 1893 (ex
Schizonotoidae Thorell, 1888, nom. imperf.)] (name based
on junior homonym).
Hubbardiidae Cook, 1899:429 (nom. obi.) (name based on junior
subjective synonym).
Schizomidae Hansen and Sorensen, 1905:4 [nom. correct. Gravely, 1915
(ex Schizomoidae Hansen and Sorensen, 1905, nom. imperf.)] 29
Schizomidae Chamberlin, 1922:11 (jun. prim. hom,).
Type: Nyctalops crassicaudatus Cambridge, 1872.
Description.--Carapace with or without eyespots, mesopeltidia small, separated by about 1/2 to 2/3 their greatest dimension; metapeltidium entire or divided. Abdomen with seven pairs of dorsoventral muscles. Flagellum segmented or unsegmented in females.
Cheliceral serrula present, a row of closely situated setae also present at base of fixed digit (brush). Three or five to nine teeth present on fixed digit, basal one arising gradually from ventral surface of basal segment. Ratio of pedipalpal claw length to tarsal-basitarsal length from about 1:4 to 1:1.2; tarsal-basitarsal spurs asymmetrically placed, medium to short, about 1/4 to 1/5 dorsal length of tarsus-basitarsus; "true spines" present or absent.
Trochanter IV about 1.4 or 2.2 times longer than wide, femur IV from about 2.6 to 4.1 times longer than deep.
Distribution.--Present in all tropical and certain subtropical and temperate areas.
Schizominae Hansen and Sorensen, 1905
Schizomidae, Hansen and Sorensen, 1905:4.
Schizominae, Rowland, 1973a:200 [nom. transl. Rowland, 1973a (ex
Schizomidae Hansen and Sorensen, 1905)]; Rowland, 1975:11.
Type: Nyctalops crassicaudata Cambridge, 1872 30
Description.--Carapace with or without eyespots; mesopeltidia divided by about equal to their greatest dimension; metapeltidium entire or divided. Flagellum unsegmented in females. Fixed digit of chelicerae with five to nine teeth. Ratio of pedipalpal claw to tarsal-basitarsal length about 1:4 to 1:1.2; tarsal-basitarsal spurs asymmetrically placed, short, about 1/5 dorsal length of tarsus-basitarsus; "true spines" absent. Trochanter IV about 1.4 times longer than wide, femur IV about 2.6 times longer than deep.
Distribution.--Same as for the family.
Schizomus Cook, 1899
Nyctalops Cambridge, 1872:410. (jun. hom.) Type: N^. crassicaudata
(sub. des.. Cook, 1899).
Schizonotus Thorell, 1888:358. (jun. hom.) [nom. subst. pro Nyctalops
(non Nyctalops Wagler, 1832)]; Kraepelin, 1897:50; Kraepelin,
1899:233.
Tripeltis Thorell, 1889:554 (jun. hom.). Type: X- q'^assii (orig. des.)
Trithyreus Kraepelin, 1899:234 [nom. subst. pro Tripeltis (non
Tripeltis Cope, 1886)] in part.
Triplomus Cook, 1899:250. (jun. obj. syn.) [nom. subst. pro Tripeltis
(non Tripeltis Cope, 1886)
Hubbardia Cook, 1899:250. (jun. subj. syn.). Type: H.. pentapeltis
Cook (monotypy).
Artacarus Cook. 1899:254. (jun. subj. syn.) Type: A. liberiensis
Cook (monotypy). 31
Schizomus Cook, 1899:249 [nom. subst, pro Schizonotus (non Schizonotus
Ratzeburg, 1852).
Stenochrus Chamberlin, 1922:11 (jun. subj. syn.) Type: S^,
portoricensis Chamberlin (monotypy),
Heteroschizomus Rowland, 1973:1 (jun, subj, syn,) Type: h[,
goodnightorum Rowland (monotypy), NEW SYNONYMY
Description,--Same as that for the subfamily.
Distribution,--Same as that for the family.
S^. crassicaudatus (Cambridge), 1872 - Ceylon
S^. cambridgii (Thorell), 1889 - Burma NEW COMBINATION
S^. liberiensis (Cook), 1897 - Liberia
S^. pentapeltis (Cook), 1899 - California
S^. suboculatus (Pocock), 1900 - Ceylon
S^. dispar Hansen and Sorensen, 1905 - Martinique
S^. flavescens Hansen and Sorensen, 1905 - Venezuela
S^. insignis Hansen and Sorensen, 1905 - Martinique
^. simonis Hansen and Sorensen, 1905 - Venezuela i- ^atipes Hansen and Sorensen, 1905 - Seychelles i- africanus (Hansen and Sorensen), 1905 - Sierra Leone i- claviger (Hansen and Sorensen), 1905 - Malaysia i. luzonicus (Hansen and Sorensen), 1905 - Philippines i. modestus (Hansen and Sorensen), 1905 - New Guinea i, procerus (Hansen and Sorensen), 1905 - Malaysia
S_. siamensis (Hansen and Sorensen), 1905 - Thailand 32
S^. montanus Hansen, 1910 - Tanzania
S^. sauteri Kraepelin, 1911 - Vietnam
S^. bagnallii (Jackson), 1911 - England (introduced)
S^. lunatus (Gravely), 1911 - India
S^. peradeniyensis (Gravely), 1911 - Ceylon
S^. vittatus (Gravely), 1911 - Ceylon
S^. cavernicola Gravely, 1912 - Burma
S.. greeni (Gravely), 1912 - Ceylon NEW COMBINATION
S^. kharagpurensis (Gravely), 1912 - India
S^. similis Hirst, 1913 - Seychelles
S^. buxtoni Gravely, 1915 - Ceylon
S^. perplexus Gravely, 1915 - Ceylon
S^. breviCauda (Hansen), 1921 - Portuguese Guinea
S^. parvus (Hansen), 1921 - Equitorial Guinea
S^. portoricensis (Chamberlin), 1922 - New World tropics
S^. guatemalensis Chamberlin, 1922 - Guatemala
S^. sijuensis Gravely, 1924 - India
S^. hanseni (Mello-Leitao), 1931 - Zanzibar
S^. antilus Hilton, 1933 - Cuba
S^. ghesquierei (Giltay), 1935 - Zaire i. wessoni (Chamberlin), 1939 - Arizona NEW COMBINATION i- davisi Gertsch, 1940 - Tamaulipas i- mulaiki Gertsch, 1940 - Texas i. centralis Gertsch, 1941 - Panama i- sawadai Kishida, 1943 - Bonin Islands (Japan) 33
S. peteloti (Remy), 1945 - Vietnam NEW COMBINATION S^. schoutedeni (Roewer), 1954 - Zaire S^. formicoides Fernando, 1957 - Ceylon S_. belkini (McDonald and Hogue), 1957 - California NEW COMBINATION S^. cumbalensis (Kraus), 1957 - Columbia NEW COMBINATION S.. sturmi (Kraus), 1957 - Columbia NEW COMBINATION S.. macarensis (Kraus), 1957 - Columbia NEW COMBINATION S^. machadoi Lawrence, 1958 - Angola S^. gladiator Remy, 1961 - Surinam S^. surinamensis Remy, 1961 - Surinam S^. vanderdrifti Remy, 1961 - Surinam ^. borregoensis (Briggs and Hom), 1966 - California NEW COMBINATION S. brasiliensis (Kraus), 1967 - Brazil NEW COMBINATION S^. vadoni Lawrence, 1969 - Madagascar S^. mediocriter Lawrence, 1969 - Tanzania S^. madagassus Lawrence, 1969 - Madagascar S^. tenuipes Lawrence, 1969 - Rodrigues Island (Mauritius) i. virescens Lawrence, 1969 - Rodrigues Island (Mauritius) S^, pauliani Lawrence, 1969 - Madagascar S^. vinsoni Lawrence, 1969 - Mauritius i- lemzi Lawrence, 1969 - Reunion Island i. milloti Lawrence, 1969 - Madagascar S^, benoiti Lawrence, 1969 - Somalia S^. nidicolous Lawrence, 1969 - Zaire i- mexicanus Rowland, 1971 - Tamaulipas 34
!• mitchelli Rowland, 1971 - Tamaulipas
S^. cookei Rowland, 1971 - San Luis Potosi
S^, reddelli Rowland, 1971 - Tamaulipas
S^. joshuensis (Rowland), 1971 - California NEW COMBINATION
S., briggsi (Rowland), 1972 - California NEW COMBINATION
S^. shoshonensis (Briggs and Hom), 1972 - California NEW COMBINATION
S.. goodnightorum (Rowland), 1973 - Yucatan NEW COMBINATION
S^, orthoplax Rowland, 1973 - Chiapas
S^, bartolo Rowland, 1973 - Nuevo Leon
S^. firstmani Rowland, 1973 - Veracruz
S.- pecki Rowland, 1973 - Tabasco
S^. sbordonii Brignoli, 1973 - Veracruz
S^. arganoi Brignoli, 1973 - Chiapas
S^. stewarti Rowland, 1973 - Oaxaca
S^, moisii Rowland, 1973 - Oaxaca
S^, lukensi Rowland, 1973 - Tamaulipas
S^. negreai Dumitresco, 1973 - Cuba
S^. rowlandi Dumitresco, 1973 - Cuba
S^. lanceolatus Rowland, 1975 - Veracruz i, trilobatus Rowland, 1975 - Tabasco
S^. pallidus Rowland, 1975 - Veracruz i. lacandonus Rowland, 1975 - Chiapas i- infernal is Rowland, 1975 - Chiapas i- cubanicus, new species - Cuba
S^. cubanicoides, new species - Costa Rica 35
S^. brevi patellatus, new species - Haiti
S_. longipalpus, new species - Haiti
S^. primibiconourus, new species - Jamaica
S^. cousinensis, new species - Jamaica
S^. subiconourus, new species - Cuba
S^. desecheo, new species - Puerto Rico
S^. monensis, new species - Puerto Rico
S^. biconourus, new species - Cuba
S^. peckorum, new species - Jamaica
S^. viridis, new species - Jamaica
S^. drakos, new species - British Guiana
!• trinidanus, new species - Trinidad
S^. acrocaudatus, new species - Trinidad
§.' tobago, new species - Tobago
S. mumai, new species - Costa Rica
S^. cuenca, new species - Ecuador i- pallipatellatus, new species - Costa Rica
S^. silvino, new species - Guatemala i- armasi, new species - Cuba
S^. troglobius, new species - Jamaica
Trithyreus Kraepelin, 1899
Tripeltis Thorell. 1889:554, in part.
Trithyreus Kraepelin, 1899:234, in part; Hansen and Sorensen, 1905:34,
64, in part. 36
Description.--Same as that for Trithyreus grassii (Thorell),
1889.
Di stri buti on.--Tei nzo, Burma.
X- gi^assii (Thorell), 1889 - Burma
Megaschizominae Rowland, 1973
Megaschizominae Rowland, 1973b:202; Rowland, 1975:20.
Description.--Carapace without eyespots; mesopeltidia separated by about 2/3 their greatest dimension; metapeltidium entire.
Flagellum segmented in females, Chelicerae with three teeth on fixed digit. Ratio of pedipalpal claw length to dorsal tarsal-basitarsal length about 1:2; tarsal-basitarsal spurs slightly asymmetrical, medium sized, about 1/4 dorsal length of tarsus-basitarsus; "true spines" present. Trochanter IV about 2.2 times longer than wide, femur IV about 4,1 times longer than deep.
Distribution.--Southeastern Africa,
Megaschizomus Lawrence, 1969
Megaschizomus Lawrence, 1969:257, Type: Schizomus mossambicus
Lawrence, 1958 (orig. des.).
Description.--Same as that for the subfamily.
Distribution.--Same as that for the subfamily.
M. mossambicus (Lawrence), 1958 - Mozambique
M. zuluanus (Lawrence), 1947 - South Africa 37
The American Schizomida
The order Schizomida is represented in the New World by the two genera of the Protoschizomidae, which include only four species, and by the nominate subfamily and genus of the Schizomidae, which include the remainder of the 79 OTU's treated in this study. The only superspecific taxa not occurring in the New World are the
African subfamily Megaschizominae and the genus Trithyreus, which, as previously discussed, is only maintained on a nominal basis.
The genus Schizomus is by far the dominant group throughout the range of the order.
I have been able to make only a cursory examination of relatively little Old World material. The African species have been treated by Lawrence (1969), but the remainder of the Old World fauna remains largely untreated beyond original descriptive work.
The New World members of the genus Schizomus have been found to constitute several distinct lineages, six of which are here hypothesized to stem from an ancient New World stock and one of which seems to represent a more recent invading lineage from the Old
World. With the exception of four species, which I have not assigned to categories below that of genus, the New World Schizominae are placed in the following groups: the mainly Antillean cubanicus group, the middle and South American simonis group, the mainly middle and
South American brasiliensis group, the mainly Mexican mexicanus group, the Mexican and middle American pecki and goodnightorum groups, and the Californian and Arizonan briggsi group. Species within the above Table 1 .—Comparisons of the species groups of the American members of the genus Schizomus. For explanation of the characters see Phylogeny. 39
cuba brasil- mexl- CHARACTER simonis "::::,•; •:::;.; pecki 9°°^;;:^ briggsi nicus 1 ens Is canus
DORSAL 2-3 2-3 3-4 2-3 2-3 3-4 3-4 SETAE
METAPEL TIDIUM entire entire ^^lILo'entire " ent^i'e entire entire ^P!ientir< °*e "
brown or brown or brown or brown or (,rown brown '""Ow t"* COLOR green green green green orown green
SPERMA THECAE M
ART. FEM. FLAGELLUM
CARAPACE LENGTH .96-1.37 1.07-1.34 .91-1.48 .98-1.37 1.31-1.74 .89-1.42 1.18-1.52
ABDOMINAL none present none none none present ELONGATION present
ABDOMINAL present present present absent absent absent present PROCESS
PEDIPALPAL slight to slight to none to none to DIMORPHISM strong strong strong none none strong
long or SHAPE MALE bulbous long bulbous bulbous bulbous long FLAGELLUM bulbous 40 taxa have been been further grouped, where expedient, into complexes for purposes of discussion in the zoogeography section.
Table 1 presents the polythetic basis for each group and functions in taxa recognition. For the latter the user is directed to Contents, where location in the text of the treatment of each group is given.
For each of the following OTU's I have provided a reference to appropriate figures; tables; maps; a complete synonymic list, with corresponding bibliographic citations; the origin and disposition of all known type material; a description and further relevant statements. The measurements and illustrations are of the type material, unless otherwise stated.
Protoschizomus pachypalpus (Rowland), 1973
(Figs. 15, 18, 19; Table 2; Map 3)
Agastoschizomus pachypalpus Rowland, 1973:8-10,
Protoschizomus pachypalpus, Rowland, 1975:2-4,
Holotype.--An adult female, taken at Nacimiento del Rio Frio,
3 mi S Gomez Farias, Tamaulipas, Mexico, on 12 March 1969 by James
Reddell (AMNH, examined),
Paratypes,--Two adult females and one juvenile taken at
Arroyo Nacimiento del Rio Frio, Tamaulipas, Mexico, on 16 February
1970 by R. W, Mitchell (AMNH, examined); an adult female taken at
Gomez Farias, Tamaulipas, Mexico, on 6 January 1964 by J, Reddell, 41
D. McKenzie, and L, Manire (AMNH, examined); and one juvenile taken with the holotype (AMNH, examined),
Male,--An adult, taken 51,5 mi E Ciudad Victoria, Tamaulipas,
Mexico, on Highway 70, on 17 October 1972, by B. L. Firstman and
V, D. Roth (AMNH, examined).
Description.--Male. Color brownish. Carapace with five pairs of dorsal and two apical setae. Eyespots absent. Metapeltidium divided medially into two plates. Anterior sternum with 11 entire setae. Abdominal terga I to II with two setae. III to VII with four setae, VIII with 10 setae, IX with four setae. Vestigial stigmata slightly darker than sterna, Flagellum long, club shaped, expanded distally, bearing 22 major setae, Pedipalpal trochanter not produced distally; femur and patella narrow proximally, expanded distally; tibia without mesal, subapical spur. Tarsal-basitarsal spurs about
2/5, claw about 4/5 length of tarsus-basitarsus. Tarsal segments of leg I of the following approximate proportions: 23-7-9-8-8-8-26.
Other leg segment measurements given in Table 2.
Female. Flagellum with five articles.
Comparisons.--See under P_. occidental is. Distribution.--Known from various localities in Tamaulipas,
Mexico.
Additional records.--Two adult females, one juvenile, 60 mi S
Ciudad Victoria, ex bromeliads, 17 November 1948, H, B, Leech (CAS), 42
Protoschizomus occidental's Rowland, 1975
(Fig. 14; Table 2; Map 3)
Protoschizomus occidentalis Rowland, 1975:4-5.
Holotype,--An adult male, taken under a rock, 13 mi SW Colima,
Mexico, on 16 July 1972 by A, Jung (AMNH, examined),
Paratype,--A subadult female, taken with the holotype (AMNH, examined).
Description,--Male, Color brownish. Carapace with four pairs of dorsal and two apical setae, Eyespots absent, Metapeltidium divided medially into two plates. Anterior sternum with 11 entire setae. Abdominal terga I to II with two setae. III to IV with four setae, VIII to IX with six setae. Vestigial stigmata darker than sterna. Flagellum long, club shaped, expanded distally, bearing 22 major setae. Pedipalpal trochanter not produced distally; tibia without mesal, subapical spur. Tarsal-basitarsal spurs about 2/5, claw about 4/5 length of tarsus-basitarsus. Tarsal-basitarsal segments of leg I of the following approximate proportions:
24-7-8-7-8-7-27, Other leg measurements given in Table 2,
Female unknown.
Comparisons,--The two species of this genus can be separated most easily by comparison of the male's flagella. It is distally more expanded in P^, pachypalpus than in P^. occidentalis. The carapace of P_. pachypalpus has five pairs of dorsal carapacal setae whereas P^. occidentalis has four pairs. The eighth abdominal tergum 43 of the former has 10 setae, but only six exist in the latter. Other minor setational differences occur.
Distribution.--P^. occidentalis is known from near Colima,
Colima, Mexico.
Agastoschizomus lucifer Rowland, 1971
(Figs. 1, 2, 16; Table 2; Map 3)
Agastoschizomus lucifer Rowland, 1971:13-14, 15-17; Rowland, 1973a:10;
Rowland, 1973b:197, 200-201, 202; Dumitresco, 1974:282;
Brignoli, 1974:150; Rowland, 1975:9,
Holotype,--An adult male, taken in Sotano de la Tinaja, 10 km
NNE Ciudad Valles, San Luis Potosi, Mexico, on 9 April 1966, by J,
Fish and D, McKenzie (AMNH, examined).
Allotype,--An adult female, taken in Sotano de Yerbaniz,
22.5 km N Ciudad Valles, San Luis Potosi, Mexico, on 28 March 1970,
by W, Elliott (AMNH, examined),
Paratypes,--An adult female taken with the allotype (AMNH, examined); and adult male taken in Sotano de Yerbaniz, on 8 January
1971, by W, Elliott (AMNH, examined).
Description,--Male, Color brownish. Carapace with two pairs
of dorsal and three apical setae, Eyespots absent, Metapeltidium divided medially into two plates by a very narrow suture. Anterior
sternum with nine entire setae. Abdominal terga I to V with two setae,
terga VI to VII with four setae, terga VIII to IX with six setae.
Vestigial stigmata darker than sterna, Flagellum long, cylindrical. 44 apically modified, Pedipalpal trochanter not produced distally; femur and patella bearing several stout spines, tibia without mesal, subapical spur. Tarsal-basitarsal spurs about 2/3, claw about 7/6 length of tarsus-basitarsus. Tarsal-basitarsal segments of leg I of the following approximate proportions: 60-19-18-16-21-56. Other leg segment measurements given in Table 2.
Female. Flagellum with five articles.
Comparisons,--See under A^. huitzmolotitlensis.
Remarks.--See under A. huitzmolotitlensis.
Distribution.--)^, lucifer is known from caves in the southern portion of Sierra de El Abra, San Luis Potosi, Mexico.
Additional Records.--SAN LUIS POTOSI: El Sotano de Matapalma,
21 km N Ciudad Valles; one juvenile, 30 December 1972, R, Fieseler
(AMNH); one juvenile, 29 May 1969, R. Mitchell, F. Abernathy, T.
Albert (Af-INH). El Sotano de la Tinaja, 10 km NNE Ciudad Valles; two males, one female, four juveniles, 18 February 1970, J, A, L. Cooke
(AMNH); 18 February 1970, R. W. Mitchell, two females, one juvenile
(TTU); 16 March 1972, D. Kiser, one juvenile (TTU); one juvenile,
9 April 1966, J. Fish, D. McKenzie (AMNH); one female, one juvenile,
7 January 1970, R. W. Mitchell (AMNH). El Sotano de Yerbaniz, 22.5 km
N Ciudad Valles; one female, four juveniles, 7 January 1970, S. Wiley
(TTU); one male, one female, 7 January 1970, W, Elliott (TTU); one juvenile, 8 January 1970, W. Elliott (TTU); one female, one juvenile,
9 January 1970, W, Elliott (TTU); one female, nine juveniles, 17 45
February 1970, R, W. Mitchell (TTU); four juveniles, 28 March 1970,
W. Elliott (TTU),
Agastoschizomus huitzmolotitlensis Rowland, 1975
(Fig, 17; Table 2; Map 3)
Agastoschizomus huitzmolotitlensis Rowland, 1975:8-10,
Holotype,--An adult male, taken in Sotano de Huitzmolotitla,
2 km SW Tlamaya, and approximately 10 km N Xilitla, San Luis Potosi,
Mexico, on 24 January 1964, by Terry Raines and Tommy Phillips, in mud room 9000 feet from entrance (AMNH, examined).
Description,--Male. Color brownish. Carapace with one pair of dorsal and three apical setae, Eyespots absent, Metapeltidium undivided, slightly emarginate posteriorly. Anterior sternum with
11 entire setae. Abdominal terga I to IV with two setae, terga V to VII with four setae, terga VIII and IX with 10 and six setae, respectively. Vestigial stigmata slightly darker than sterna,
Flagellum long, cylindrical, bearing 18 major setae, apically modified,
Pedipalpal trochanter not produced distally; femur and patella bearing
several stout spines; tibia without mesal, subapical spur,
Tarsal-basitarsal spurs about 2/3, claw about 7/6 length of
tarsus-basitarsus, Tarsal-basitarsal segments of Leg I of the
following approximate proportions: 45-13-14-14-15-13-43, Other leg measurements given in Table 2,
Female unknown. Figs. 14-19,--Parts of protoschizomids: 14-17, lateral views of male's flagella: 14, P^, occidentalis; 15, P^, pachypalpus; 16, A^, lucifer; 17, A^, huitzmolotitlensis; 18, lateral view of right pedipalp of female P^, pachypalpus; 19, lateral view of female's flagellum of P^, pachypalpus. Scale: Figs, 14-17, 19, 1 cm = ,12 mm;
Fig, 18, 1 cm = .25 nrn. 47 Table 2.--Measurements of the members of the Protoschizomidae:
1, one male, P^. pachypalpus; 2, one female, P^, pachypalpus; 3, one male, P^, occidentalis; 4, four males, A^, lucifer; 5, four females,
A, lucifer; 6, one male. A, huitzmolotitlensis. 49
TABLE 2 Taxa
n 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 1,24 1,16 1,16 2.29-2,41 2,84-3,21 1.84 2 ,61 ,46 ,53 1.37-1,40 1,26-1,43 .98 3 ,28 - ,25 ,41-,42 - .26 4 ,97 ,79 1,02 3.36-3,51 3,48-3,76 2.53 5 .80 ,71 ,80 3,99-4.14 3,80-4,16 3.11 6 ,71 ,69 .74 3,24-3,38 2,90-3,30 2,50 7 1.05 ,80 ,99 1.97-2.10 2,04-2,16 1.54 8 1,06 ,70 1,07 2,46-2,66 2,46-3.01 1,83 9 .44 .39 ,48 1.32-1.40 1.38-1.56 1.05 10 ,34 ,34 ,38 1.69-1.86 1,75-1,97 1,35
11 ,52 ,44 ,54 1.18-1,30 1.25-1.33 .87
12 ,95 ,80 .98 2.41-2,62 2.54-2.90 1.88
13 ,53 ,44 ,48 1.13-1.20 1.11-1,43 .96
14 ,37 ,36 ,36 1,68-1.72 1,74-1,92 1,24
15 .77 .66 .70 1,41-1,45 1,51-1.54 1,04
16 .89 ,81 ,83 3,18-3.34 3,32-3.62 2,24
17 .38 ,30 ,35 1.51-1.54 1.57-1.77 1,15
18 .43 ,35 .41 2.61-2.68 2.62-2.86 1,90
19 .63 ,49 - 1.75-1.83 1.75-2.10 1,42 50
Comparisons,--A^, huitzmolotitlensis is somewhat smaller and displays more advanced troglobite facies than A, lucifer. The flagellum in particular is relatively much narrower basally. The latter, while perhaps not directly related to cave adaptation, serves best to distinguish the two species of the genus.
Distribution,--This species is known only from Sotano de
Huitzmolotitla, near Xilitla, San Luis Potosi, Mexico,
Remarks,--The two species of the genus Agastoschizomus are remarkable troglobites. They are extremely large species, without parallel in the rest of the order. Their pronounced morphological similarities lead me to believe that it is highly unlikely that they are derived from an immediate common ancestor morphologically much different from either one of them. This is important in considering the origin of these troglobites. Though the caves which these two species inhabit are proximal, separated by some 70 km, they are of distinctly different geological associations. The common ancestor of A, lucifer and A^, huitzmolotitlensis must have been an epigean species. The extreme size and pedipalpal configurations common to these species and to their hypothetical immediate ancestor are probably not totally due to adaptations to cave environments.
The cubanicus group
Members of this group are characterized by moderate to large
size (,96-1,37 carapacal length). The color varies from brown to Table 3,—Comparisons of the members of the cubanicus group.
For explanation of the characters see Phylogeny, 52
O) to C 3 o .a r— o (A E
+JT3
r- (0 c-o •as 1- 0)
•p +*
1- C O 3 -O •r- in o u 0) C o p r- (Q
tA p
V) U > 0) -3 5-
0) c •— to o) a. C 3 s r- O •r- 0)
r— O
lA M Z3 c O 0) u
1
«CUJ < Z LU Sz z* O UJ t;3 a c/1 a. u. Maps 1-2,—Distribution of schizomids of the cubanicus and simonis groups: Map i , cubanicus group members: 1, S^. cubanicoides;
2, S^. cubanicus; 3, S^, biconourus; 4, S^, subiconourus; 5, S^, cousinensis; 6, S^, primibiconourus; 7, S_, peckorum; 8, S^. viridis;
9, S^, brevipatellatus; 10, S^, longipalpus; 11, S^, desecheo; 12,
S^. monensis; 13, S^, insignis. Map 2, simonis group members: 1,
S_, mumai; 2, S_, central is; 3, S^, simonis; 4, S^, flavescens; 5,
S_, dispar; 6, S^. tobago; 7, S_, trinidanus; 8, S^. drakos; 9, OTU #1,
OTU #2; 10, S^, gladiator; 11, S_, vanderdrifti, S^, surinamensis.
Question marks indicate species doubtfully placed in the simonis group. 54
X 1
V <" c^^^^i^^'"'•
^ •
< .>^ ;>'*»*
'.^.^'^X -o.t'. J-.-/ /
71 55 green. The eyespots vary from irregular to triangular and indistinct to well defined. The carapace may have two or three pairs of dorsal and two apical setae. The arrangement of the setae may be variable and the middle pair may be smaller than the others. The abdomen shows no elongation of posterior segments. The pygydial segments are yery shallow. The males of most species have a well developed posterodorsal abdominal process, which is usually truncate, but may vary within the species from truncate to round. The flagellum, with two exceptions bears a central to subapical median depression.
Several species have bilateral projections arising from above and beside this depression. In some species the flagellum is robust and globose, but is usually small. The female's flagellum is moderate to long (.19-.36), and composed of four articles. The female's spermathecae are characterized by elongation of the laterals and reduction of the medians. In a few species the lateral spermathecae are very large and terminate in a spherical, sclerotized bulb. In other species the median spermathecae are reduced. The pedipalps are always sexually dimorphic. Males of certain species have highly variable pedipalps. The trochanter is usually in some way elaborated, and the femur, patella, and tibia are usually elongate, but the latter has no spur apposible to the tarsus-basitarsus.
Distribution,--Central America: Costa Rica, Antilles: Cuba,
Jamaica, Haiti, Puerto Rico, Martinique, 56
Remarks.--A species which probably belongs in this group, but which I have not seen, is S^, negreai Dumitresco, 1973, On the basis of her description this species appears to be most closely related to
S^, biconourus, another Cuban species. I have also been unable to examine S^. dispar Hansen and Sorensen, 1905, which may also belong in this group. It is known by females only and details of its anatomy are inadequately described. It was taken in Martinique and may be a close relative of S^. insignis.
Subordinate taxa.--Cubanicus complex: S^, cubanicus, S^. cubanicoides; primibiconourus complex: S^. cousinensis, S^. primibiconourus, S^. longipalpus, S^. brevipatellatus; viridis complex:
S^. subiconourus, S^. monensis, S^. desecheo, S^, biconourus, S^, insignis,
S^, peckorum, S^, viridis,
Schizomus cubanicus, new species
(Figs, 21, 37, 58; Tables 3, 4; Map 1)
Holotype.--An adult male, taken at San Antonio de los Banos,
Habana, Cuba, on 4 June 1972, by Luis F. de Armas (IZACC).
Description.--Male, Color brownish. Carapace with two pairs of dorsal and two apical setae, Eyespots indistinct, oblong with irregular margins. Anterior sternum with 13 entire setae. Abdominal terga I-VII with two setae, terga VIII-IX with four setae, segment
XII with slight posterodorsal process. Vestigial stigmata slightly darker than sterna, Flagellum lanceolate, dorsally compressed, with a single median depression subapically. Pedipalpal trochanter much 57 elongate, not produced distally, femur, patella, and tibia all elongate, no segments with additional armature, though single enlarged setae apposes the tarsus-basitarsus, Tarsal-basitarsal
spurs about 1/10, claw about 1/4 length of tarsus-basitarsus.
Tarsal-basitarsal segments of leg I of the following approximate proportions: 39-6-8-7-8-9-22, Other leg segment measurements given
in Table 4.
Female unknown.
Comparisons.--S^. cubanicus is larger and has proportionately
longer pedipalps and first legs than S^. cubanicoides, its closest relative. The variability in pedipalp length in other species,
however, and lack of adequate sample size of either of these species make diagnosis on the basis of pedipalp length questionable. The greater development of basolateral elevations on the flagellum of
S^, cubanicus is probably more reliable. The latter species also
shows a greater development of the posterodorsal process. S^.
cubanicoides lacks the large tibial seta on the pedipalps which
apposes the tarsus-basitarsus in S^. cubanicus.
Distribution,--This species is known only from the type
locality.
Etymology,--The specific name is an adjectival form taken
from Cuba,
Remarks,—While the female of this species is unknown, it
will probably bear distinct similarities to females of S^. cubanicoides. 58
Females of the latter species are notable in that they have four pairs of dorsal carapacal setae, while the males have two pairs as in S^. cubanicus,
Schizomus cubanicoides, new species
(Figs, 20, 38, 60; Tables 3, 4; Map 1)
Holotype.--An adult male, taken at Coto, Costa Rica, on 5
July 1957, by E. Dixon (AMNH),
Allotype,--An adult female, taken with the holotype (AMNH),
Paratypes,--An adult male, female, and two immatures, taken at Coto, Costa Rica, on 4 September 1957, by E, Dixon; an adult male taken with the holotype (AMNH); an adult female and two immatures, taken at Golfito, Costa Rica, on 27 August 1957, by E. Dixon (AMNH),
Description.--Male. Color brownish. Carapace with two pairs of dorsal and two apical setae. Eyespots indistinct, oblong, with irregular margins. Anterior sternum with 10 entire setae. Abdominal terga I-VII with two setae, terga VIII-IX with four setae, segment XII with slight evidence of posterodorsal process. Vestigial stigmata hardly distinct in color from sterna. Flagellum lanceolate, dorsally compressed, with a single median depression subapically. Pedipalpal trochanter much elongate, but not produced distally, femur, patella, and tibia all elongate, no segments with additional armature.
Tarsal-basitarsal spurs about 1/10, claw about 1/3 length of tarsus-basitarsus, Tarsal-basitarsal segments of leg I of the 59 following approximate proportions: 31-5-6-6-8-8-16, Other leg segment measurements given in Table 4.
Female. Carapace with four pairs of dorsal setae. Flagellum with four sections, Pedipalps not elongate. Lateral spermathecae about twice as long as medians, very long recurved, the tips with enlarged, sclerotized bulbs, medians very weak, with no areas of heavy sclerotization.
Comparisons.--See comparisons under S^. cubanicus.
Distribution,--This species is known from Coto and Golfito,
Costa Rica.
Etymology.--The specific name means like cubanicus.
Remarks,--S^. cubanicoides is unique in having a different number of dorsal carapacal setae in the sexes. The fact that males and females have been collected together on two occasions, however, supports the assumption that they actually represent sexes of the same species.
Schizomus cousinensis, new species
(Figs. 24, 41, 79; Tables 3, 4; Map 1)
Holotype.--An adult male, taken in Cousin's Cove Cave #1,
Cousin's Cove, Hanover Parish, Jamaica, on 31 August 1974, by S.
Peck (AMNH).
Allotype.--An adult female, taken with the holotype (AMNH).
Paratypes.--An adult male and female, taken with the holotype
(AMNH), 60
Description,--Male, Color brownish. Carapace with two pairs of dorsal and two apical setae, Eyespots indistinct. Anterior sternum with 11 bifid setae. Abdominal terga I-VII with two setae, terga VIII-IX with four setae, segment XII with slightly rounded posterodorsal process. Vestigial stigmata darker than sterna,
Flagellum spade shaped, with a pair of subdistal depressions flanked by two small, but well defined elevations, Pedipalpal trochanter not produced distally, but it and other palpal segments elongate, but without armature, Tarsal-basitarsal spurs about 1/6, claw about 1/4 length of tarsus-basitarsus. Tarsal-basitarsal segments of leg I of the following approximate proportions: 35-7-8-6-8-8-18.
Other leg measurements given in Table 4.
Female. Carapace with three pairs of dorsal setae, Flagellum with four sections, Pedipalps not elongate. Lateral spermathecae twice length of medians. Laterals terminate in large, highly sclerotized bulbs.
Comparisons,--See comparisons under S^. primibiconourus.
Distribution,--This species is known only from Cousin's Cove
Cave #1, Hanover Parish, Jamaica,
Etymology.--The specific name is an adjectival form taken from Cousin's Cove Cave, meaning belonging to.
Remarks,--See remarks under S^, primibiconourus.
Variations,--The holotype possesses extremely long pedipalps, but those of the male paratype are short and yery much like those of the allotype and female paratype. 61
Schizomus primibiconourus, new species
(Figs. 26, 42, 50, 79; Tables 3, 4; Map 1)
Holotype,--An adult male, taken in Oxford Cave, Auchtembeddie,
Manchester Parish, Jamaica, 4-8 April 1968, by S. Peck and A. Fiske
(AMNH),
Paratype.--An adult male, taken with the holotype (AMNH); an adult male taken in St, Claire Cave, 1,5 mi SW Ewarton, St, Catherine
Parish, Jamaica, on 7 April 1968, by S. Peck and A. Fiske (AMNH),
Description,--Male. Color brownish. Carapace with two pairs of dorsal and two apical setae. Eyespots indistinct. Anterior sternum with 11 bifid setae. Abdominal terga I-VII with two setae, terga
VIII-IX with four setae, segment XII with slight emargination of posterodorsal process. Vestigial stigmata darker than sterna,
Flagellum spade shaped, with distal depression flanked by two small, but well developed elevations, Pedipalpal trochanter slightly produced apically, not elongate, other segments slightly elongate,
but without armature, Tarsal-basitarsal spurs about 1/5, claw about
1/3 length of tarsus-basitarsus, Tarsal-basitarsal segments of leg I of the following approximate proportions: 43-7-8-11-9-10-19. Other
leg segment measurements given in Table 4.
Female unknown.
Comparisons.--This species is most closely related to S^.
cousuiensXs, from which it can be distinguished by its having a
single flagellar depression and three pairs of dorsal setae in the 62 male, whereas S^. cousinensis has a pair of depressions and two pairs of dorsal setae. The latter two species are generally similar to
S^. cubanicus and S^. cubanicoides in size and development of the male's flagellum. S^. primibiconourus and the latter species have well developed subapical median depressions, but S^. primibiconourus is distinct in the development of the elevations lateral to the depressions.
Distribution,--This species is known from Oxford Cave,
Manchester Parish, and St. Claire Cave, St. Catherine Parish, Jamaica,
Etymology,--The specific name is from the Latin primi- meaning first, bX meaning two, the Greek cono- meaning cone and urus meaning tail. This name describes the primitive condition of the pair of cone shaped elevations on the flagellum of the male of this species.
Remarks,--While this species and S^. cousinensis are cladistically closer to S_, longipalpus and S_. brevipatellatus they more strongly resemble members of the cubanicus complex. This is accounted for by the remarkable variation in size and pedipalpal characters in the former species.
The middle pair of dorsal carapacal setae are apparently in a transitional state in S^, primibiconourus, but are absent in S^, cousinensis. Most species in the cubanicus group show a reduction in size of this pair. 63
Variation.--The holotype has a very small seta present on the right side where the middle pair of dorsal carapacal setae occur in other species. A paratype has one on the left side.
Schizomus longipalpus, new species
(Figs. 23, 40, 68; Tables 3, 4; Map 1)
Holotype.--An adult male, taken at La Vestite, Haiti, on
23 September 1916, by Darlington, elevation 6-7000 ft, (MCZ),
Paratypes,--Two adult males, taken at Furey, Haiti, during
1912-1913, by W, M, Mann (MCZ).
Description.--Male, Color brownish. Carapace with two pairs of dorsal and two apical setae. Eyespots vaguely triangular,
irregular, but distinct borders. Anterior sternum with 13 bifid setae. Abdominal terga I-VII with two setae, terga VIII-IX with four setae, segment XII with slight development of posterodorsal
process. Vestigial stigmata darker than sterna. Flagellum spade
shaped, with distomedian depression flanked basolaterally by distinct
elevations. Pedipalpal trochanter extremely long and extremely
produced distally. Other segments elongate, but unarmed, tibia with
a large setae apposible to tarsus-basitarsus. Tarsal-basitarsal
spurs about 1/10, claw about 1/4 length of tarsus-basitarsus. Tarsal
basitarsal segments of leg I of the following approximate proportions:
59-10-13-12-13-13-24, Other leg segment measurements given in Table 4.
Female unknown. 64
Comparisons,--S^, longipalpus is similar in its development of the male's pedipalps to other species of the group, except in the extreme elongation of the trochanter, both proximally and distally.
Its closest relatives are ^, primibiconourus and S^, brevipatellatus,
S^. longipalpus is much larger than S^, primibiconourus, which also has onl'y slightly elongated palpal segments and a better developed median flagellar pit, but smaller lateral elevations, S^, brevipatellatus is somewhat larger than S^. longipalpus and the flagellum lacks the median pit. The extreme elongation of the pedipalps in the latter two species are probably not homologous developments. The trochanter of S^. longipalpus is extremely long, the other segments not being out of the ordinary for the group. The elongate pedipalps of S^. brevipatellatus are achieved by attenuation of the femur and tibia, the patella being extremely short.
Remarks,--As in S^, brevipatellatus the remarkable development of the pedipalps may be related to some unusual food source. The great extension of the trochanter in effect sets the apposible parts of the pedipalps some distance from the body proper.
Distribution,--This species is known from La Vestite and
Furey, Haiti.
Etymology.--The specific name comes from the Latin longi- meaning long, a palp. 65
Schizomus brevipatellatus, new species
(Figs. 22, 39, 64, 65; Tables 3, 4; Map 1)
Holotype.--An adult male taken at Cape Haitien, Haiti, in
January 1913, by W, M, Mann (MCZ),
Description,--Male, Color brownish. Carapace with two pairs of dorsal and two apical setae. Eyespots present, but indistinct.
Anterior sternum with 13 bifid setae. Abdominal tergum I with two setae, II with four setae, III-VI with two setae, terga VII-IX with six setae, segment XII with slight development of posterodorsal process. Vestigial stigmata much darker than sterna. Flagellum lanceolate, slightly dorsally compressed, with a median swelling flanked by lateral pits. Pedipalpal trochanter slightly produced distally, but short, patella short, other segments extremely long, but unarmed. Tarsal-basitarsal spurs about 1/10, claw about 1/5 length of tarsus-basitarsus. Tarsal-basitarsal segments of leg I of the following approximate proportions: 55-9-11-11-14-14-30.
Other leg measurements given in Table 4.
Female unknown.
Comparisons.--See comparisons under S^. longipalpus.
Distribution.--This species is known only from the type locality.
Etymology.--The specific name comes from the Latin brevi- meaning short, and patella. 66
Remarks.--The form of the pedipalps is unique among the schizomids. The patella is extremely shortened, and apparently the joint connecting it with the tibia is inflexible. This unique structure probably reflects a novel function of the pedipalp, at least in so far as the apposition of articles. It may be that these limbs serve to allow the males of these species to utilize a food source which is necessarily held a good distance from the body, such as ants or other relatively defensive arthropods.
The flagellum of S^. brevipatellatus departs greatly from those of the remainder of the group. While this species is similar in other respects to S^. longipalpus I further think that the highly modified pedipalps occurred independently in the two species, since the elongation is accomplished in radically different ways in the two species.
Schizomus subiconourus, new species
(Figs. 26, 43, 51, 62, 77; Tables 3, 4; Map 1)
Holotype.--An adult male, taken at El Marra, Santiago, Cuba, on 22 May 1972, by Luis F. de Armas (IZACC).
Allotype.--An adult female taken with the holotype (IZACC).
Paratypes.--An adult male, adult female, and immature, taken with the holotype (IZACC).
Description.--Male. Color greenish. Carapace with three pairs
of evenly spaced dorsal and two apical setae. Eyespots round to distinctly triangular, well defined. Anterior sternum with 12 bifid 67 setae. Abdominal terga I-VII with two setae, terga VIII-IX with four setae, segment XII with rounded posterodorsal process. Vestigial stigmata slightly darker than sterna. Flagellum triangular, with slight apical depression flanked basolaterally and distally by elevations. Pedipalpal trochanter greatly enlarged and produced distally, femur elongate and produced beyond insertion of patella, patella, tibia, and tarsus-basitarsus elongate. Tarsal-basitarsal spurs about 1/8, claw about 1/3 length of tarsus-basitarsus.
Tarsal-basitarsal segments of leg I of the following approximate proportions: 30-6-6-6-7-8-19. Other leg segment measurements given in Table 4.
Female. No posterodorsal abdominal process. Flagellum with four articles. Pedipalps not elongate. Lateral spermathecae about twice as long as medians, both with terminal sclerotized bulbs.
Comparisons.--This species is most similar in several respects to S^. desecheo and S^, monensis. The latter species possess only a vague apical depression on the male's flagellum; this depression is also poorly, but better, developed in S^, subiconourus. The latter species is unique in the degree of development of the femur of the male's pedipalp which is produced beyond its insertion with the patella. In Cuba S^. subiconourus is distinguished from other males by the reduction of the median apical depression which is well developed in S^. cubanicus and S^. biconourus. Males of S^. rowlandi apparently lack a median pit, but also lack dorsal elevations, as is the case in S. armasi. 68
Distribution.--This species is known only from the type locality.
Etymology.--The specific name is from the Latin sub meaning under, bi_ meaning two, the Greek cono- meaning cone and urus meaning tail. This name describes the underdeveloped condition of the pair of cone shaped elevations on the flagellum of the male of this species.
Remarks,--The articulation of the femur-patellar joint of the pedipalp in male schizomids is probably usually flexible through nearly 180°, The modification of this joint is such that flexure much past a right angle is impossible, S^, longipalpus and S^, brevipatellatus also have unique development of the male's pedipalp.
Variation.--The eyespots of this species may vary from round to triangular. So few specimens are available, however, that the typical condition, if one exists, cannot be ascertained.
Schizomus monensis, new species
(Figs, 28, 45, 78; Tables 3, 4; Map 1)
Holotype,--An adult male, taken in Cueva del Agua, Mona
Island, Puerto Rico, on 3 June 1974, by S, Peck (AMNH),
Allotype.--An adult female, taken with the holotype (AMNH).
Paratypes.--An adult male, four adult females, and an immature taken in Cueva Dona Gena, Mona Island, on 5 June 1974, by S, Peck
(AMNH); an adult female taken in Cueva Negro, Mona Island, on 3 June
1974, by S. Peck (AMNH). 69
Description,--Male. Color greenish. Carapace with three pairs of dorsal and two apical setae, Eyespots indistinct. Anterior sternum with 11 bifid setae. Abdominal terga I-VII with two setae, terga VIII-IX with four setae, segment XII with well developed, truncate posterodorsal process. Vestigial stigmata darker than sterna,
Flagellum spade shaped, thick, with two mediolateral and distal vague elevations, median pit vague or absent, Pedipalpal trochanter produced distally, no segments elongate, Tarsal-basitarsal spurs about 1/6, claw about 1/3 length of tarsus-basitarsus, Tarsal-basitarsal segments of leg I of the following approximate proportions: 37-6-7-7-8-
10-19. Other leg segment measurements given in Table 4.
Female. Flagellum with four articles. Lateral spermathecae about one and one half times as long as medians, laterals terminate in large sclerotized bulbs.
Comparisons,--Males of this species can be told from those of its closest relative, S^. desecheo, by the much thicker flagellum and the less distinct eyespots. The middle pair of dorsal carapacal setae are smaller in S^, monensis. Otherwise the species are very similar.
Also, see comparisons under S^, subiconourus.
Distribution,--This species is known from three caves on Mona
Island, Puerto Rico,
Etymology,--The specific name is an adjectival form taken from Mona Island, meaning belonging to.
Variation.--The female allotype has four pairs of dorsal carapacal setae, whereas the other female paratypes have three pairs. 70
Schizomus desecheo, new species
(Figs, 27, 44, 67; Tables 3, 4; Map 1)
Holotype.--An adult male, taken on Desecheo Island, Puerto
Rico, on 29 March 1961, by J. R. Gorham (MCZ).
Paratype.--An immature, taken with the holotype (MCZ).
Description.--Male. Color greenish. Carapace with three pairs of dorsal and two apical setae. Eyespots distinct, angular. Anterior sternum with 10 bifid setae. Abdominal terga I-VII with two setae, terga VIII-IX with four setae, segment XII with well developed, truncate posterodorsal process. Vestigial stigmata distinctly darker than sterna, Flagellum lanceolate, somewhat dorsally compressed with two mediolateral distinct elevations, median pit vague or absent,
Pedipalpal trochanter slightly elongate, not produced distally, all other segments only slightly elongate, Tarsal-basitarsal spurs about
1/7, claw about 1/3 length of tarsus-basitarsus. Tarsal-basitarsal segments of leg I of the following approximate proportions: 38-8-8-9-
9-10-23. Other leg segment measurements given in Table 4,
Female unknown.
Comparisons,--See comparisons under S^, monensis and S^,
subiconourus.
Distribution,--This species is known from a single collection from Desecheo Island, Puerto Rico,
Etymology,--The specific name is an adjectival form taken
from Desecheo Island, meaning belonging to. 71
Schizomus biconourus, new species
(Figs. 34, 52, 53, 61, 66, 76; Tables 3, 4; Map 1)
Holotype,--An adult male, taken at Cienfuegos, Soledad, Cuba, on 3 September 1972, by Luis F, de Armas (IZACC),
Allotype,--An adult female, taken with the holotype (IZACC),
Paratype.--An adult male, taken in Soledad, Cuba, on 31 July
1933, by J. A. Weber (MCZ).
Description.--Male. Color greenish. Carapace with three pairs of dorsal and two apical setae, the dorsals in a tight basal group,
Eyespots ovoid. Anterior sternum with 12 bifid setae. Abdominal terga I-VII with two setae, terga VIII-IX with four setae, segment XII with well developed, truncate posterodorsal process. Vestigial stigmata lighter than sterna, Flagellum triangular, with distal depression flanked by pair of well developed elevations. Pedipalpal trochanter produced distally, armed with a dorsal spur, other segments elongate, but unarmed, Tarsal-basitarsal spurs about 1/8, claw about
1/3 length of tarsus-basitarsus, Tarsal-basitarsal segments of leg I of the following approximate proportions: 34-6-7-8-7-10-21, Other
leg segment measurements given in Table 4.
Female. Dorsal carapacal setae not grouped tightly.
Flagellum with four articles. Pedipalps not elongate or armed.
Lateral spermathecae somewhat longer than the medians, the origins
closely situated and lobes slightly overlapping in ventral view.
Apex of lateral and median spermathecae expanded into slightly
sclerotized bulbs. 72
Comparisons,—S^, biconourus has a great development of the elevations proximal to the distal flagellar depressions in the males.
Another Cuban species, S^, negreai Dumitresco, 1973, which I have not seen, seems to possess a lesser, but nonetheless distinct development of these elevations. Illustrations of the latter species show the flagellum to be much less triangular in shape than S^, biconourus.
The spermathecae of the two species are apparently very similar.
Distribution.--This species is known from Soledad, Cuba.
Etymology.--The specific name is from the Latin bi meaning two, the Greek cono- meaning cone and urus meaning tail. This name describes the morphology of the flagellum of the male of this species.
Schizomus insignis Hansen and Sorensen, 1905
(Figs. 36, 47, 54, 59, 82; Tables 3, 4; Map 1)
Schizomus insignis Hansen and Sorensen, 1905:11, 26, 39, 47-49, 50,
74; Mello-Leitao, 1931:18; Giltay. 1935:6; Takashima, 1943:93;
Remy, 1961:506,
Cotypes,--An adult male and immature, taken in Martinique, by
E, Simon (UZM, examined); an adult female, taken in Martinique, by E,
Simon (MNHN, examined).
Description.--Male. Color greenish. Carapace with three pairs of dorsal and two apical setae. Eyespots oval, but indistinct.
Anterior sternum with 11 entire setae. Abdominal terga I-VII with
two setae, terga VIII-IX with four setae, segment XII with well developed, truncate posterodorsal process. Vestigial stigmata almost 73 indistinguishable from sterna, Flagellum spade shaped, with two lateral and a median process separated by a median pit, Pedipalpal trochanter greatly elongate, but not produced distally, other segments elongate and unarmed, Tarsal-basitarsal spurs about 1/10, claw about 1/6 length of tarsus-basitarsus, Tarsal-basitarsal segments of leg I of the following proportions: 36-7-8-8-7-11-18,
Other leg segment measurements given in Table 4.
Female, Flagellum with four articles, Pedipalps not elongate. Lateral spermathecae about four times longer than medians.
Laterals terminate in highly sclerotized bulbs,
Comparisons,--S^. insignis is about the size and has similar pedipalps to those of S^. cubanicoides and S^, cubanicus. The latter species are more primitive, however, and lack the greenish color, the pedipalpal trochanter spur, and the median pair of dorsal setae.
Distribution,--This species is known from Martinique, Lesser
Antilles.
Remarks.--The eyespots are rather hard to see since the types are now quite bleached. Hansen and Sorensen (1905) describe them as
"moderately large, short but broad, whitish." How they compare to other species of the cubanicus group is uncertain. 74
Schizomus peckorum, new species
(Figs. 35, 48, 55, 73, 80, 81; Tables 3, 4; Map 1)
Holotype.--An adult male, taken in Windsor Great Cave,
Windsor, 10 mi. S Falmouth, Trelawney Parish, Jamaica, on 5 April
1968 by S. Peck and A. Fiske (AMNH).
Allotype.--An adult female, taken with the holotype (AMNH).
Paratypes.--An adult female, taken with the holotype (AMNH); an adult male and five adult females, taken in Mosley Hall Cave, near Guys Hill, St. Ann Parish, Jamaica, on 27 December 1972, by
S. and J. Peck.
Description.--Male. Color greenish. Carapace with three pairs of dorsal and two apical setae, the median dorsals very reduced.
Eyespots oval, well defined. Anterior sternum with 13 bifid setae.
Abdominal terga I-VII with two setae, terga VIII-IX with four setae, segment XII with well developed, truncate posterodorsal process.
Vestigial stigmata darker than sterna. Flagellum nearly globose, with two lateral and one median processes separated by median pit.
Pedipalpal trochanter produced distally, other segments slightly
elongate, but unarmed. Tarsal-basitarsal spurs about 1/7, claw about
1/3 length of tarsus-basitarsus. Tarsal-basitarsal segments of leg I
of the following approximate proportions: 50-8-11-10-11-12-23. Other
leg segment measurements given in Table 4.
Female. Flagellum with four articles. Pedipalps not
elongate. Lateral spermathecae about five times length of medians. 75 laterals with extreme development of sclerotized bulbs.
Comparisons.--S^. peckorum is most similar to S^. viridis in several respects. S^. peckorum males have a smaller flagellum, with better defined elevations. The female's spermathecae of S^. peckorum has much larger sclerotized terminal bulbs. In S^. viridis the laterals have small bulbs and the medians are only slightly shorter.
Distribution.--This species is known from caves in Trelawney and St. Ann Parishes, Jamaica,
Etymology,--The specific name is a patronym given for Stewart and James Peck, collectors of this species,
Schizomus viridis, new species
(Figs, 29-33, 49, 56, 57, 69-72, 83-86; Tables 3, 4; Map 1)
Holotype.--An adult male, taken in Abbey Cave, 2,5 mi. SW
Mandeville, Manchester Parish, Jamaica, on 24 December 1973, by
S. and J. Peck (AMNH),
Allotype,--An adult female, taken with the holotype (AMNH),
Paratypes,--An adult male, three adult females, and six
immatures, taken with the holotype (AMNH),
Description,--Male. Color green. Carapace with three pairs of dorsal and two apical setae, the median dorsal pair extremely
reduced. Eyespots triangular and well defined. Anterior sternum
with 13 bifid setae. Abdominal terga I-VII with two setae, terga
VIII-IX with four setae, segment XII with well developed, round to
truncate posterodorsal process. Vestigial stigmata darker than 76 sterna. Flagellum globose, with two lateral and a median poorly defined process, median pit present, but vague. Pedipalpal trochanter produced distally, the other segments elongate. Tarsal-basitarsal spurs about 1/7, claw about 1/3 length of tarsus-basitarsus,
Tarsal-basitarsal segments of leg I of the following approximate proportions: 52-8-11-11-10-12-23. Other leg segment measurements given in Table 4,
Female, Flagellum with four articles. Pedipalps not elongate. Lateral spermathecae two or three times longer than medians, the apex of the medians and laterals with small sclerotized bulbs.
Comparisons.--See comparisons under S^. peckorum.
Distribution,--This species is known from St, Ann, St,
Catherine, St, Claire, Clarendon, St, Elizabeth, Manchester, and
Trelawney Parishes, Jamaica.
Etymology,--The specific name is from the Latin viridi- meaning green.
Remarks,--This species is the most highly advanced cubanicus group member and the widest spread species in Jamaica, It inhabits both caves and epigean habitats and has been cullected with members of S^, portoricensis, S^, primibiconourus, and S. troglobius. As mentioned above, this species may actually represent several geographical isolates.
Variation.--There seems to be substantial geographic variation in the male's flagellum and pedipalps ,ind the female's 77 spermathecae of this species.
Additional records,--St, Ann Parish: one adult male,
Chesterfield Cave, 27 March 1973, R. Norton, R, Zimmerman (TTU); three adult males, one adult female, five immatures. Ken Connell
Hole, 8 mi, S Claremont, 19 August 1974, S, Peck (MCZ); one adult male, one immature male, Douglas Castle, Brambribo Cave, 18 August
1974, S, Peck (AMNH); one adult male, two immatures, Douglas Castle,
Falling Cave, 18 August 1974, S, Peck (TTU); three adult males, one adult female, five immatures, Hutchinson Hole Cave, 27 March 1973,
R. Norton, R. Zimmerman (AMNH); seven adult males, six adult females, five immatures, Thatchfield Light Hole, 28 March 1973, R, Norton,
R, Zimmerman (TTU); two females, Thatchfield Great Cave, 24 October
1973, R. Norton (AMNH); four males, two females, 12 immatures. Cave
River Cave, Aenon Town, 2 September 1974, S, Peck (TTU); one male, four females, four immatures, Mt, Plenty Cave, Goshen, 20 August
1974, S, Peck (AMNH); one female, Goshen, 1500 ft,, 25 December 1973,
S. and J, Peck (AMNH), St, Catherine Parish: three males, one female, two immatures, Swansea Cave, 4 November 1973, R. Norton (TTU); one male, seven females, five immatures, St, Claire Cave, 1,5 mi, SW
Ewarton, 7 April 1968, S, Peck, A, Fiske (TTU). Clarendon Parish: one female, one immature, Jackson Bay Cave, 15 August 1974, S. Peck
(AMNH); one male, one female, one immature, Jackson Bay Cave, Jackson
Bay, 2 August 1974, S. Peck (AMNH); four males, three females, two immatures, Pedro Great Cave, Pedro River, 17 August 1974, S. Peck
(MCZ); three males, one female, one immature, Pedro Great Cave, Pedro Figs. 20-28,.—Dorsal views of male's flagella of the cubanicus group: 20, Schizomus cubanicoides; 21, S^. cubanicus; 22, S^.
brevipatellatus; 23, S^. longipalpus; 24, S^. cousinensis; 25, S_. primibiconourus; 26, S^. subiconourus; 27, S^. desecheo; 28, S^. monensis. Scale: 1 cm = .06 mm.
Figs, 29-33,—Dorsal views of male's flagella of S^, viridis from various localities; 29, the type locality; 30, Pedro Great Cave,
Clarendon Parish; 31, Jackson Bay Cave, Clarendon Parish; 32, Cave
River Cave, St. Ann Parish; 33, Thatchfield Light Hole, St, Ann
Parish, Scale: 1 cm = ,08 mm.
Figs. 34-44,—Male's flagella of the cubanicus group: 34-36, dorsal views: 34, S^, biconourus; 35, S^, peckorum; 36, S^, insignis;
37-44, lateral views: 37, S^. cubanicus; 38, S^, cubanicoides; 39,
S^, brevipatellatus; 40, S^, longipalpus; 41, S^. cousinensis; 42, S^, primibiconourus; 43, S^, subiconourus; 44, S^, desecheo. Scale:
Figs, 34-38, 40-44, 1 cm = ,06 mm; Fig, 39, 1 cm = ,08 mm. 83 Figs. 45-57.--Parts of male schizomids of the cubanicus group:
45-49, lateral views of flagella: 45, S^, monensis; 46, S^. biconourus;
47, S^. insignis; 48, S^, peckorum; 49, S^, viridis; 50-57, dorsal views of posterodorsal abdominal process: 50, S^. primibiconourus; 51,
S^. subiconourus; 52, 53, S^, biconourus; 54, S^, insignis; 55, S^, peckorum;
56, 57, S. viridis. Scale: 1 cm = .06 mm.
Figs, 58-60,--Lateral views of male's right pedipalps of the cubanicus group: 58, S^. cubanicus; 59, S^, insignis; 60, S^, cubanicoides. Scale: 1 cm = .06 mm. 87
^K'^K
>v-r<<^ Figs. 61-68.--Lateral views of male's right pedipalp of the cubanicus group: 61, S^, biconourus; 62, S.. subiconourus; 63, S_, primibiconourus, trochanter and femur omitted; 64, S^. brevipatellatus;
65, S^, brevipatellatus, patella only; 66, S^. biconourus; 67, S^. desecheo; 68, S^. longipalpus. Scale: -igs, 61-63, 65-67, 1 cm =
,06 mm; Figs. 64, 68, 1 cm = .12 mm. //A
-\—r\ Figs. 69-73.—Male's right pedipalps of the cubanicus group:
69-71, lateral views of S^, viridis; 72, mesal view of S^. viridis;
73, lateral view of S^, peckorum. Scale: 1 cm = .06 mm. 91 Figs. 74-86,--Female's spermathecae of the cubanicus group:
74, 75, S^. cubanicoides; 76, S^. biconourus; 77, S^, subiconourus;
78, S^, monensis; 79, S^. cousinensis; 80, 81, S^, peckorum; 82,
S^. insignis; 83-86, S^. viridis from various localities: 83, Pedro
Great Cave, Clerendon Parish; 84, the type locality; 85, Abby Cave,
Manchester Parish; 86, St, Claire Cave, St. Catherine Parish, Scale:
1 cm = .04 mm.
Table 4,--Measurements of the members of the cubanicus group:
1, one male, S^, cubanicus; 2, three males, S^, cubanicoides; 3, two fema 1 es, S^, cubanicoides; 4, two ma 1 es, S^. cousinensis; 5, two females, S^, cousinensis; 6, three males, S^, primibiconourus; 7, three males, S^. longipalpus; 8, one male, S^, brevipatellatus; 9, two males, S^, subiconourus; 10, two females, S^, subiconourus; 11, one male, S^. monensis; 12, two females, S^. monensis; 13, one male,
S^. desecheo; 14, two males, S^. biconourus; 15, one female, S^. biconourus; 16, one male, S^, insignis; 17, one female, S_, insignis;
18, two males, S^, peckorum; 19, three females, S^, peckorum; 20, three males, S^. viridis; 21, three females, S, viridis. 95
TABLE 4 Taxa n 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 1,10 .93-.98 .95-,98 .92-1.18 1.06-1.08 1,01-1.07 2 1.13 .33-.34 ,30 .36-.37 .30-.30 .33-.34
3 ,20 .17-.19 - .19-.22 - .22-.26 4 1,23 .79-.89 ,77-,82 .97-1.26 .90-.94 1.01-1,04 5 1.49 .59-.68 ,61-,62 1 .16-1.56 1,11-1,13 1,28-1,38 6 1.10 .54-.58 ,51-58 .84-1,10 ,80-82 .98-1,03 7 ,82 .82-,89 .82-,86 ,77-,90 ,71-,72 ,80-,83 8 .76 ,98-1.09 ,87-,93 .68-,85 .66-.68 ,69-.72
9 .43 .34-,39 .35-.36 ,40-,52 ,39-,40 ,36-,38 10 .50 ,25-,27 ,25-,26 ,43-,53 ,39-,42 ,39-,40 11 .45 .37-.44 .39-.41 .38-.50 .38-.39 .41-.47
12 .65 .69-,80 .65-.69 .38-.74 .57-.60 .58-.65
13 ,30 ,33-,39 .35-.36 ,25-,35 .25-,28 .30-.38
14 .34 ,27-,30 .25-.26 ,30-,39 ,29-,31 .31-.33
15 .39 ,54-.60 .55-.59 .36-,53 ,36-,39 .39-.46
16 1.05 ,65-,68 .64-.64 .91-1,11 ,91-,97 1.00-1.06
17 .48 ,32-.38 .35-.36 ,42-.56 ,43-,45 .39-.44
18 .76 .32-.39 .36-.36 ,61-,74 ,60-,64 .62-.69
19 .65 .50-,54 .50-.52 ,54-.71 ,54-,54 .56-.62 96
TABLE 4 (conti nued)
Taxa n 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 1.24-1.35 1,36 .92-.93 .99-1,01 1.16 1,22-1,28 2 .44-,47 .55 ,30-,31 ,23-,23 .43 ,33-.33
3 ,26-,27 .27 ,23-,23 - .26 - 4 1,50-1.56 1.60 ,89-.92 ,85-,87 1.32 1.28-1.33 5 1.87-1.96 2,11 1 ,09-1.15 1,02-1,03 1.66 1.59-1.65
6 1.36-1.39 1,59 ,79-,84 ,75-.77 1.26 1,21-1,24 7 1.03-1.12 1,12 ,66-,67 ,66-,68 ,97 .90-.92
8 1.04-1.10 1,21 ,61-.65 ,62-,67 .86 ,86-,89 9 .62-.63 ,66 .33-,36 .34-.36 ,48 ,49-.51
10 .68-.72 .82 ,38-,41 .36-.38 ,55 ,56-,57
11 .61-.65 .67 .33-.37 .32-.33 ,53 ,54-,54
12 .84-.91 1.03 ,52-.53 .54-.54 ,73 ,77-,77
13 .43-.44 .48 .24-.26 .26-.26 ,35 ,36-.37
14 .46-.49 .57 .27-.28 .26-.29 ,44 .46-,47
15 .58-.63 .69 .35-.36 .35-.35 ,55 ,52-,54
16 1.27-1.39 .77 .85-.89 .87-.88 1,21 1.23-1,26
17 .65-.65 .34 .38-.40 .38-.41 ,53 ,53-.55
18 .82-.93 1.09 .55-.61 .58-.58 .81 .86-.88
19 .84-,86 .96 .49-.50 .50-.51 ,72 .77-.79 97
TABLE 4 (contin ued)
Taxa n 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
1 1.16 ,96-1,04 .96 1,01 1,00 1.24-1.31 1.22-1.28
2 .39 ,34-.35 .23 .37 .19 .46-.49 ,33-,37
3 .20 .33-.36 - .23 - .35-.37 -
4 1,10 .94-1,00 .80 1.03 .86 1.34-1.54 1,24-1,35
5 1,28 1,16-1.24 .96 1,26 1,06 1.75-1.86 1.45-1.62
6 1.01 .88-.93 ,75 ,87 ,75 1.19-1.35 1.07-1.13
7 ,82 .72-,72 ,66 ,71 .66 .97-1.09 .83-,87
8 ,77 .64-,70 ,57 ,71 .65 .93-1.07 ,89-,94
9 ,41 ,38-.40 ,33 ,40 .37 .51-.57 ,45-,51
10 ,49 .38-,43 ,33 ,44 .37 .58-.66 .52-,58
11 ,42 .36-.37 ,31 ,40 .33 .64-.68 .51-.57
12 .66 ,55-,56 ,44 .62 .55 .77-.89 .76-.82
13 .31 ,26-,27 ,23 .28 .26 .36-.42 .36-.38
14 .39 ,30-,31 ,26 ,26 .25 .43-.44 ,40-,43
15 .44 ,36-,40 .31 ,40 .37 .58-,65 .52-,55
16 1,07 ,87-,93 .82 ,96 .93 1.30-1,43 1.00-1.24
17 .47 ,39-,48 ,37 ,44 .41 1.09-1.28 .54-.56
18 .75 ,54-,61 .55 ,64 .51 .82-.97 .76-,85
19 - .62 ,50-,55 ,47 .59 .54 .75-.87 ,71-,74 98
TABLE 4 (continued)
Taxa n 20 21
1 1.31-1.35 1.38-1.42
2 ,43-.47 .35-.36
3 ,40-,44 -
4 1,25-1,38 1.20-1.24
5 1,52-1,69 1,36-1.48
6 l.lO-i.21 1.03-1.07
7 .99-1.00 .88-,93
8 .92-.93 .92-.96
9 .51-.56 .53-.55
10 .55-.56 .54-.56
11 ,51-,61 ,50-,54
12 ,78-,86 ,79-,85
13 .35-.41 .33-.39
14 .40-.46 .39-.44
15 .54-.59 .51-.52
16 1.27-1.34 1,27-1,31
17 .58-,63 .58-,62
18 .82-.87 .80-.86
19 .75-.79 .73-.75 99
River, 20 December 1972, S, and J. Peck (AMNH). St. Elizabeth
Parish: one male, three females, one immature, Wallingford Sink
Cave, Wallingford, 27 August 1974, S, Peck (TTU); Peru Cave, 5 mi.
ENE Santa Cruz, one female, 23 December 1972, S. and J, Peck (TTU).
Trelawney Parish: three males, one female, two immatures. Drip
Cave, 1.5 mi. SSE Stewart Town, 2 April 1968, S. Peck, A. Fiske
(MCZ); one immature, Windsor Great Cave, 29 March 1973, R. Norton
(AMNH).
The simonis group
Members of this group are characterized by moderate to great length (1.07-1.34 carapacal length). The color is brownish, Eyespots are present, but are usually indistinct. The carapace may have two to three pairs of dorsal and two apical setae. The male's abdomen is attenuate, the elongation may be limited to the pygydial segments, or may involve segments V-XII, The male's abdominal segment XII has a posterodorsal process, which is usually truncate, but in a few is rounded. The male's flagellum is longer in species with more elongate abdomen, but shorter in species with lesser attenuation, A pair of subproximal flagellar elevations, which are often undercut, are present in males of all species. The female's flagellum is usually long (,37), but may be very long (,61) and is composed of four articles. The female's spermathecae are characterized by the elongation of the lateral pair and a usually slight reduction of the medians. In most females the apex of the spermathecae, at least the T
Table 5,--Comparisons of the members of the simonis group.
For explanation of the characters see Phylogeny, 101
i— o f
1- c •O C f
9, «
§ 15 s •o
V) u S
UJ 5^ _i Z—1 <:r (—UJ . UJ Sid a.t- C9C9 IS tf o OO C9 UJ UJ K z a3 Si < UJ S3 b3 a. u. 102 laterals, have sclerotized bulbs. The pedipalps are not sexually dimorphic.
Distribution.--Central America: Costa Rica, Panama. South
America: Venezuela, Trinidad, Tobago, British Guiana.
Remarks.--Species which may belong to this group, but which
I have not studied include S^. gladiator Remy, 1961, S^. surinamensis
Remy, 1961, S^. vanderdrifti Remy, 1961, and S^. dispar Hansen and
Sorensen, 1905. The latter is from Martinique and all the former are from Surinam. Also see Remarks under S^. drakos.
Subordinate taxa.--Drakos complex: OTU #1, OTU #2, S_, drakos; simonis complex: S^. simonis, S^. trinidanus, S^, acrocaudatus, S^, flavescens; centralis complex: S^. tobago, S^, mumai, S^, centralis.
Schizomus sp,, OTU #1
(Fig. 106; Tables 5, 6; Map 2)
Specimen examined,--An adult female taken at Atkinson Field,
British Guiana, on 8 November 1959 (AMNH).
Description.--Male unknown. Female as follows: Color brownish. Carapace with three pairs of dorsal setae, the middle pair smallest, and two apical setae. Eyespots indistinct. Anterior sternum with 10 bifid setae, posterior sternum with bifid setae.
Abdominal terga I-VIII with two setae, tergum IX with four setae.
Vestigial stigmata darker than sterna. Flagellum missing. Pedipalpal trochanter not produced apically, Tarsal-basitarsal spur about 1/4, claw about 1/2 length of tarsus-basitarsus. Tarsal-basitarsal 103 segments of leg I of the following approximate proportions: 33-4-6-7-
7-7-17. Other leg segment measurements given in Table 6, Median and lateral spermathecae about same size; wide basally to apically; no localized sclerotization; laterals bent outward basally; medians convergent, laterals divergent.
Variation.--Only a single specimen was available for study.
Remarks,--OTU #1 is most closely related to OTU #2 with which it shares a unique development of the spermathecae. The spermathecae are short and wide basally, slightly tapering distally, the medians convergent, the lateral divergent, but of about equal size,
OTU #1 is perhaps best distinguished from OTU #2 by having no sclerotized basal portion under the spermathecae. The shapes and configuration of the spermathecae of these two species is similar.
Distribution.--This species is known only from Atkinson Field,
British Guiana.
Schizomus sp., OTU #2
(Figs. 104, 105; Tables 5, 6; Map 2)
Specimens examined.--An adult female, taken in the Bartica
District, British Guiana, on 6 May 1924 (AMNH), and two adult females, taken in Kartabo 1, British Guiana, in 1919, by A. Emerson (AMNH),
Description,--Male unknown. Female as follows: Color brownish. Carapace with three pairs of dorsal setae, the middle pair smallest, and two apical setae. Eyespots indistinct. Anterior sternum with 11 bifid setae, posterior sternum with bifid setae. 104
Abdominal terga I-VIII with two setae, tergum IX with four setae.
Vestigial stigmata darker than sterna, Flagellum with four sections.
Pedipalpal trochanter not produced distally. Tarsal-basitarsal spurs about 1/4, claw about 1/2 length of tarsus-basitarsus. Tarsal- basitarsal segments of leg I of the following approximate proportions:
35-5-8-8-8-8-17. Other leg segment measurements given in Table 6.
Median and lateral spermathecae similar in shape, but laterals longer, both pair wide basally, slightly narrower apically, ending in a small cleft; no special sclerotization; medians convergent, laterals divergent; medians and laterals basally connected to a basal piece.
Variation,--The spermathecae of the three specimens examined show some marked differences. In the specimen from the Bartica
District the medians are smaller than the laterals and the basal portion is smaller than either pair of spermathecae. The spermathecae of the Kartabo 1 specimens are larger and the medians and laterals are more nearly equal in size, although there is a marked asymmetry in the size of the laterals. The basal portion of the spermathecae is larger than either the laterals or medians.
Remarks,--It is possible that these two collections represent different, though closely related species. Without males of the species in question, or additional females from these and other localities, it is more convenient to consider tham as representing a single species. 105
Distribution.--This species is known from Bartica District and Kartabo 1, British Guiana.
Schizomus drakos, new species
(Fig. 89; Tables 5, 6; Map 2)
Holotype.--An adult male, taken in Kartabo, Bartica District,
British Guiana, on 12 October 1920 (AMNH).
Description.--Male. Color brownish. Carapace with three pairs of similar dorsal and two apical setae, Eyespots oval, indistinct.
Anterior sternum with 12 bifid setae. Abdominal terga I-VII with two setae, terga VIII-IX with four setae; abdominal segments V-XII extremely elongate; segment XII with rounded posterodorsal process.
Vestigial stigmata darker than sterna. Flagellum nearly triangular, with a pair of median pits flanked proximally by a pair of lateral swellings. Pedipalpal trochanter not produced distally.
Tarsal-basitarsal spurs about 1/5 length of tarsus-basitarsus, claw missing. Tarsal-basitarsal segments of leg I of the following approximate proportions: 49-6-9-10-8-11-21. Other leg segment measurements given in Table 6.
Female unknown.
Variation.--Only one specimen of this species is known.
Remarks.--S^. drakos is placed in the simonis group on the
basis of the male's elongate abdomen and its possession of a
posterodorsal abdominal process, though not truncate as in most other males of this group, but round. That this species forms a distinct 106 complex with OTU #1 and OTU #2 is indicated by their geographic proximity and their morphological similarity. Further, these species may be closely related to species which Remy (1961) described from Surinam. The types of these species are not available for study, but his description leads me to believe that S^. surinamensis and S^. gladiator may belong in the simonis group.
Distribution.--This species is known only from Kartabo,
Bartica District, British Guiana.
Etymology.--Drakos is taken from the Greek word meaning dragon, a name which is inspired by the long abdomen of this species.
Schizomus simonis Hansen and Sorensen, 1905
(Figs. 91, 98, 113, 114; Tables 5, 6; Map 2)
Schizomus simonis Hansen and Sorensen, 1905:5, 7, 14, 15, 19, 22,
24, 38, 39, 42-44, 71-73; Chamberlin, 1922:12; Mello-Leitao,
1931:19; Giltay, 1935:7; Gertsch, 1940:3; Takashima, 1943:93;
Remy, 1961:504; Lawrence, 1969:219, 221, 223.
Cotypes.--An adult male, taken at St. Esteban, Venezuela, by
E. Simon (UZMK, examined); an adult female, taken at Colonia Tovar,
Venezuela, by E. Simon (UZMK, examined); an adult male and female
taken at Colonia Tovar, Venezuela, by E. Simon (NRS, examined).
Description.--Male. Color greenish. Carapace with two pairs
of dorsal and two apical setae. Eyespots oblong, indistinct.
Anterior sternum with 11 bifid setae. Abdominal terga I-VII with
two setae, terga VIII-IX with four setae, abdominal segments X-XII 107 elongate, tapering, segment XII with slight development of posterodorsal process. Vestigial stigmata nearly indistinguishable from sterna. Flagellum extended distally, apex acute; dorsal surface with two lateral swellings distally undercut by lateral pits.
Pedipalpal trochanter produced very slightly. Tarsal-basitarsal spurs about 1/6, claw about 1/4 length of tarsus-basitarsus.
Tarsal-basitarsal segments of leg I of the following approximate proportions: 33-5-6-7-9-8-14. Other leg segment measurements given in Table 6.
Female. Abdomen not elongate. Flagellum with four articles.
Six to eight pairs of spermathecae of varying size.
Comparisons,--See comparisons under S^, trinidanus and S^, acrocaudatus.
Distribution,--This species is known from Colonia Tovar and
St, Esteban, Venezuela,
Remarks,--The female's spermathecal arrangement is unique within the group. It is possible, however, that the female of this species has been misassociated with the male and that this is the female of another species. It may be noted in other species that the measurements of the legs are generally the same or fairly proportional between the sexes. This is not at all the case in S^. simonis, which
leads me further to believe the sexes may be mismatched in this species.
Variation.--The figure of the male's flagellum by Hansen and
Sorensen (1905) is much longer than that of the cotype available to me. 108
Schizomus trinidanus, new spo( ies
(Figs. 94, 99, 101, 116-118; Tables '., 6; Map 2)
Holotype.--An adult male, taken in Anma Valley, 8-1200 ft.,
Trinidad, during 10-22 February 1964, by P. Wvjodzinski (MCZ),
Allotype.—An adult female, taken with the holotype (MCZ).
Paratypes,--An adult male and eight >uiult females, taken with the holotype (MCZ),
Description.—Male, Color brownish. Carapace with two pairs
of dorsal and two apical setae, Eyespots in-<>gular, distinct.
Anterior sternum with 11 bifid setae. Abdominal terga I-VII with two
setae, terga VIII-IX with four setae, abdominal segments X-XII
slightly elongate, segment XII with truncate iiosterodorsal process.
Vestigial stigmata darker than sterna. Flagellum lanceolate, with a
pair of median depressions flanked proximal1\ by pair of lateral
swellings, Pedipalpal trochanter not produce-.-, apically, tarsal-
basitarsal spurs about 1/4, claw about 1/2 K-ngth of tarsus-basitarsus.
Tarsal-basitarsal segments of leg I of the following approximate
proportions: 30-5-6-6-7-7-11, Other leg segi-t>nt measurements given
in Table 6,
Female, Abdomen not elongate. Flagc'lum with four articles.
Lateral and median spermathecae short, nearly oqual sized, terminating
in slight sclerotized bulbs.
Comparisons,--Males of S^, trinidanus . like S^, simonis, have
only the pygydial segments of the abdomen elo-.^ate, but the eyespots
are more distinct in S, trinidanus, the post.-'odorsal abdominal 109 process is truncate in S^. trinidanus and is round in S^, simonis. If the female of S^. simonis is correctly assigned, then the longer flagellum in the latter is diagnostic. The multiple spermathecae of
S^. simonis also contrasts greatly with the two pairs found in other members of the group. The single dorsal depression of the male's flagellum in S^, tobago and the long spermathecae of the female will distinguish it from S^, trinidanus. The male of S^, acrocaudatus, which was collected with types of S^, trinidanus, can be distinguished by the very long flagellum and abdomen, the latter involving abdominal segments VII-XII, Unknown variability in the latter characters may leave the deep dorsal depressions more consistantly useful in distinguishing these two species.
Distribution,--This species is known from Arima Valley, Simla, and St, Augustine, Trinidad,
Etymology.--The specific name is an adjectival form taken from the type locality.
Variation,--The spermathecal morphology seems to be fairly consitant even from several localities. The specimen from Arima
Valley shows slightly less distinct apical bulbs, apparently because they are somewhat thicker basally. The three males from St. Augustine show only very slight elongation of the pygydial abdominal segments. This variation in secondary sexual characteristics is common in other species.
Additional records.--Simla: five females, bamboo debris, 26
April 1964, Chickering (MCZ); one female, 23 April 1964, Chickering 110
(MCZ); two females, 18 April 1964, Chickering (MCZ); one female,
20-21 October 1964, Chickering (MCZ); two females, 25 April 1964,
Chickering (MCZ); five females, 16 April 1964, Chickering (MCZ); four females, 28 April 1964, Chickering (MCZ); three females, 12
April 1964, Chickering (MCZ); three females, 19 April 1964,
Chickering (MCZ). Arima Valley: one female, 8-1200 ft., 10-22
February 1964, J. Rosen, P. Wygodzinsky (AMNH); four females, two immatures, 8-1200 ft,, 10-22 February 1964, J. Rosen, P, Wygodzinsky
(AMNH); one female, 10-22 February 1964, J, Rosen, P. Wygodzinsky
(AMNH), St, Augustine: three males, ten females, Weber (MCZ),
Schizomus acrocaudatus, new species
(Figs, 88, 97; Tables 5, 6; Map 2)
Holotype,--An adult male, taken at St, Augustine, Trinidad, by N. A. Weber (MCZ).
Description.--Male. Color brownish. Carapace with two pairs of dorsal and two apical setae, length 1.14. Eyespots irregular, indistinct. Anterior sternum with 10 setae. Abdominal terga I-VII with two setae, terga VIII-IX with four setae, abdominal segments
VII-XII slightly elongate, segment XII with small, truncate posterodorsal process. Vestigial stigmata darker than sterna.
Flagellum extremely long and distally very thin, a pair of median deep pits flanked laterally by pair of swellings, length .86, width .29. Pedipalpal trochanter not produced distally. Tarsal- basitarsal spurs about 1/5, claw about 1/3 length of tarsus-basitarsus. Ill
Tarsal-basitarsal segments of leg I missing. Female unknown.
Comparisons.--S^. acrocaudatus is very similar to S^. simonis males in respect to the development of the male's flagellum. The male cotype illustrated by Hansen and Sorensen (1905), though not the cotype available to me, shows the flagellum to be extremely long, attenuate, and indeed very similar to S^. acrocaudatus. The abdomen of S^. acrocaudatus is elongate from VII through XII, whereas the extension occurs in X through XII in ^. simonis. The flagellum of
S^. acrocaudatus is much thicker basally and the pair of dorsal depressions are clearly visible from directly above. The flagellum
of S^. simonis is flatter dorsally and the pair of depressions are not
clearly visible from above.
Distribution,--This species is known only from a single male
from St. Augustine, Trinidad.
Etymology.--The specific name is taken from the Latin acr-
meaning sharp and caud- meaning tail, describing the morphology of
the male's flagellum.
Remarks.--As in other species with elongate abdomen and
flagella, the degree of elongation can he highly variable. It is not
safe to consider the extreme elongation of the flagellum of this
species as being characteristic, nor diagnostic, rather the basal
configuration of elevations and depressions. 112
Schizomus flavescens Hansen and Sorensen, 1905
(Fig. 112; Tables 5, 6; Map 2)
Schizomus flavescens Hansen and Sorensen, 1905:39, 44-46, 47, 73;
Mello-Leitao, 1931:17; Hilton, 1933:92; Giltay, 1935:6;
Takashima, 1943:93.
Cotypes.--An adult female, taken at Corosul, near Caracas,
Venezuela, by E, Simon (UZMK, examined); two adult females and an immature, taken with the female above (MNHN); an adult female, taken at Corosul, near Caracas, Venezuela, in 1888, by E, Simon (NRS, examined).
Description.--Male unknown. Female as follows. Color brownish. Carapace with two pairs of dorsal and two apical setae.
Eyespots indistinct. Anterior sternum with 11 bifid setae.
Abdominal terga I-VII with two setae, terga VIII-IX with four setae.
Vestigial stigmata not distinguishable from sterna, Flagellum with four articles, extremely long. Pedipalpal trochanter produced slightly distally. Tarsal-basitarsal spurs about 1/4, claw about
1/2 length of tarsus-basitarsus. Tarsal-basitarsal segments of leg I of the following approximate proportions: 43-8-7-8-9-11-22. Other leg segment measurements given in Table 6,
Comparisons,—The female of this species is easily distinguished from others of the simonis group by the extremely long flagellum. The species most closely approaching S_, flavescens in length of female's flagellum is S^, simonis in which the flagellum of the cotype is ,52 113 as opposed to .61 in S^. flavescens. The morphology of the spermathecae is most similar to and, considering unknown possible variation, perhaps not safely distinguishable from S^, tobago and
S^. centralis. The extremely long first legs also distinguish it from S^. tobago, but tend to ally S^. flavescens with S^. drakos which is known, hov;ever, only by a male. The dorsal carapacal setation of the female of S^. drakos, however, probably consists of three pairs of dorsal setae as in the male.
Distribution,--This species is known only from Corosul,
Venezuela,
Remarks,--Hansen and Sorensen (1905) report a close similarity of this species to females of S^, dispar. The latter species was, however, not available for my studies,
Schizomus tobago, new species
(Figs, 87, 100; Tables 5, 6; Map 2)
Holotype.--An adult male taken in Tobago, during April 1916, by Th(omas) M(ortensen) (UZMK),
Allotype.—An adult female taken with the holotype (UZMK).
Description,--Male, Color brownish. Carapace with two pairs of dorsal and two apical setae. Eyespots indistinct. Anterior sternum with 11 bifid setae. Abdominal terga I-VII with two setae, terga VIII-IX with four setae, segments VII-XII elongate, segment XII with slight truncate posterodorsal process. Vestigial stigmata not distinguishable from sterna. Flagellum elongate, lanceolate, with a 114 single median depression undercutting a pair of lateral ridges.
Pedipalpal trochanter produced slightly apically, Tarsal-basitarsal spurs about 1/5, claw about 1/2 length of tarsus-basitarsus,
Tarsal-basitarsal segments of leg I of the following approximate proportions: 36-6-7-7-8-8-18, Other leg segment measurements given in Table 6.
Female. Abdomen not elongate. Flagellum composed of four articles. Spermathecae nearly equal sized, long, terminating in sclerotized bulbs.
Comparisons.--S^. tobago is similar to several species in the simonis group. The male's flagellum is most similar in basal form to S^. mumai and S^. centralis in having a single median depression.
It is, in fact, very similar in form to S^. mumai, but S^. centralis males have much shorter flagella. The flagella of S^. simonis and
S. trinidanus are also similar in form to S^. tobago, but the former
species have a pair of median dorsal depressions. The female's
spermathecae in S^, tobago, S^, flavescens, and S^, centralis are all
very similar, and perhaps not safely distinguishable, S^, mumai females have lateral spermathecae twice as long as the medians,
whereas in S^. tobago they are about equal in size.
Distribution,--This species is known only by a single
collection from Tobago,
Etymology,--The specific name is a noun used in apposition. 115
Schizomus mumai, new species
(Figs. 92, 93, 96, 107-109; Tables 5, 6; Map 2)
Holotype.--An adult male, taken at Coto, Costa Rica, on 28
June 1957, by E. Dixon (AMNH),
Allotype,--An adult female taken at Coto, on 11 September
1957, by E. Dixon (AMNH),
Paratypes.--An adult male taken with the holotype (AMNH); two adult females taken at Coto, on 19 July 1957, by E. Dixon (AMNH); two adult females taken at Coto, on 13 June 1957, by E. Dixon (AMNH); an adult female, taken at Golfito, on 17 September 1957, by E. Dixon
(AMNH); an adult female, taken at Coto, on 4 September 1957, by E.
Dixon (AMNH).
Description.--Male. Color brownish. Carapace with two pairs of dorsal and two apical setae. Eyespots, irregular, but distinct.
Anterior sternum with 11 bifid setae. Abdominal terga I-VII with two setae, terga VIII-IX with four setae, segment XII with well developed, truncate posterodorsal process, segments V-XII elongate. Vestigial stigmata slightly darker than sterna, Flagellum elongate, with a median depression flanked by a pair of proximal elevations, Pedipalpal trochanter slightly produced distally, tarsal-basitarsal spurs about
1/7, claw about 1/2 length of tarsus-basitarsus, Tarsal-basitarsal segments of leg I of the following approximate proportions: 45-7-7-7-
7-9-20, Other leg measurements given in Table 6, 116
Female, Abdomen not elongate, Flagellum composed of four articles. Lateral spermathecae about twice as long as medians, both pairs terminating in sclerotized bulbs, the laterals being much the larger,
Comparisons.--S^, mumai is most similar to S^, centralis in both sexes. In the few males available for comparison, the abdomen is consistantly less attenuated in S^, centralis, involving segments
VII-XII, while in S^. mumai the attenuation involves segments V-XII.
This is probably, however, a variable characteristic in both species.
The flagella of the males are distinct, though variable within the species, S^. mumai males have elongate flagella, whereas flagella of
S^. centralis males are relatively shorter. Flagellar lateral swellings are well defined in S^. mumai, but are undeveloped in S^. centralis. The spermathecae of the species are also similar; however, the laterals are twice as long as the medians in S_. mumai and only slightly longer than the medians in S_. centralis. The males of S_. mumai are most easily distinguished from males of other species known from within its range by its elongate abdomen. Females of S^. mumai are similar to S^. cubanicoides females, of the cubanicus group, but can quickly be distinguished by the number of pairs of dorsal carapacal setae; there are four pairs in S^. cubanicoides and two pairs in S^. mumai.
Distribution.--This species is known from Coto and Golfito,
Costa Rica. 117
Etymology.--The specific name is a patronym given for Martin
H. Muma, who first recognized this species as distinct from existing taxa.
Variation.--The flagellum of the males is considerably different in the two specimens available, the holotype's being very much longer than the paratype's. While the length is different, there seems to be only a very slight difference in the basal portion, or body, of the flagellum.
The female's spermathecae show considerable variation even at the same locality. The sclerotized bulbs all seem to be approximately similar, though the spermathecal tubes vary in configuration.
Schizomus centralis Gertsch, 1941
(Figs, 90, 95, 110, 111; Tables 5, 6; Map 2)
Schizomus centralis Gertsch, 1941:13-14,
Holotype,--An adult male, taken on Barro Colorado Island,
Panama Canal Zone, on 19 July 1938, by E, G, Williams (AMNH, examined)
Allotype,--An adult female, taken on Barro Colorado Island,
on 20 July 1938, by E, G, Williams (AMNH, examined).
Description,--Male, Color brownish. Carapace with two pairs
of dorsal and two apical setae, Eyespots oval, distinct. Anterior
sternum with 11 bifid setae. Abdominal terga I-VII with two setae,
terga VIII-IX with four setae, segments VII-XII elongate, tapering,
segment XII with well developed, truncate posterodorsal process. Figs, 87-94,--Dorsal views of male's flagella of the simonis group: 87, ^. tobago; 88, S^. acrocaudatus; 89, S^, drakos; 90, S^. centralis; 91, S^. simonis; 92, 93, S^. mummai; 94, £. trinidanus.
Scale: Figs, 87, 89, 92, 93, 1 cm = ,08 mm; Figs, 88, 90, 91, 94,
1 cm = ,06 mm.
Figs, 95-106.--Parts of schizomids of the simonis group: 95-100,
lateral views of male's flagella: 95, S^, central is; 96, S^. mummai;
97, S^, acrocaudatus; 98, S^, simonis; 99, S^, trinidanus; 100, S^. tobago;
101, lateral view of female's flagellum of S^, trinidanus; 102, 103, dorsal views of male's posterodorsal abdominal process: 102, S^,
centralis; 103, S^, mummai; 104-106, female's spermathecae: 104, 105,
OTU #1. Scale: Figs. 95, 99, 101-103, 1 cm = ,06 mm; Figs. 96-98,
100, 1 cm = ,12 mm; Figs, 104-106, 1 cm = ,04 mm.
Figs. 107-118,—Female's spermathecae of the simonis group:
107-109, S_, mummai: 107, from Golfito; 108, 109, from the type locality; 110, 111, S^, centralis; 112, S^, flavescens; 113, 114, S. simonis: 113, view from above the perpendicular; 114, viewed from the perpendicular; 115, S^. tobago; 116-118, S^. trinidanus from various localities: 116, St. Augustine; 117, Simla; 118, the type locality. Scale: 1 cm = ,04 mm. 109
114 Table 6,—Measurements of the members of the simonis group:
1, one female, OTU #1; 2, one female, OTU #2; 3, one male, S^, drakos;
4, one male, S^. simonis; 5, one female, S^. simonis; 6, three males,
S^. trinidanus; 7, three females, S^, trinidanus; 8, one female, S^, flavescens; 9, one male, S^, tobago; 10, one female, S^, tobago; 11, two males, S^, mummai; 12, three females, S_, mummai; 13, three males,
5, centralis; 14, five females, S, centralis. 125
TABLE 6
Taxa n 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 1,08 1,29 1.34 .95 1.40 1,07-1,07 1.11-1.14 1.33
2 - ,38 .58 .40 .52 ,43-,45 ,37-,40 .61
3 - - ,38 ,19 - ,22-,23 - - 4 1.11 1,17 1,78 1,15 1.40 1,03-1.10 1,02-1,05 1.48 5 1.30 1,41 2,24 1.44 1.68 1.28-1,35 1,25-1.28 1.78 6 .96 1,06 1.64 1,06 1.22 ,93-,97 .93-,93 1.43 7 .80 .89 1,14 ,86 1.00 ,79-,82 .78-.78 1,08
8 .75 .82 1,04 ,65 .96 ,67-.71 .70-,72 1,00 9 .42 .49 .53 .33 .50 ,39-,40 .41-.44 ,61 10 ,45 ,50 ,65 ,40 ,55 ,39-,43 ,42-,43 ,65 n ,43 ,44 .56 .40 .56 .36-,38 ,37-,37 54 12 ,56 ,70 ,86 ,56 .42 ,58-,60 ,61-.62 .87 13 .31 .35 .37 ,23 ,40 ,25-.26 .28-,29 .42 14 .35 .39 ,49 .26 ,41 .30-.32 .30-,32 .45
15 .45 .47 ,63 .40 - ,35-,36 ,37-,40 .56
16 1.06 1.14 1.41 1.00 1.32 .95-.99 ,97-1,06 .89 17 ,46 ,55 .58 .36 .65 .44-.47 .47-.52 .40 18 ,71 .79 ,93 ,65 .89 .61-.63 ,64-,67 .49 19 ,64 .70 .90 ,53 .83 .54-.57 ,55-.58 .54 126
TABLE 6 (continued)
Taxa n 9 10 11 12 13 14 1 1,23 1,12 1.07-1.24 1,07-1,14 ,92-1,10 1.03-1.12 2 .79 ,41 .59-.87 ,39-,41 ,44-,45 .35-.37
3 ,22 - .23-.23 - ,25-,25 - 4 1,32 1,00 1.05-1.34 ,91-,94 1,00-1,28 .89-.98 5 1,67 1,23 1.31-1.72 1,10-1,15 1,22-1,65 1.05-1.15 6 1.25 ,89 .96-1.23 ,83-.85 .91-1.15 .81-.84 7 .90 ,72 .84-,95 .76-.77 .82-,93 .70-.76 8 .77 .65 .68-.83 .65-.67 .63-,80 ,58-,69
9 .40 .41 ,41-.51 .40-.41 .37-,47 .38-.42 10 ,52 ,40 ,44-,58 .42-.44 .39-.53 .38-.40
11 ,43 ,35 .37-,46 .35-,38 ,35-.36 ,34-,38
12 .68 ,61 ,59-,72 .59-,61 ,55-,65 ,58-,60
13 .31 .27 ,26-,35 ,25-.28 ,25-,35 .26-.28
14 .37 ,30 ,30-,38 ,32-,33 ,28-,36 .28-.31
15 .43 .36 ,37-,44 ,34-.37 ,34-,40 .35-.38 16 1,09 ,93 .93-1.03 .89-.93 .93-1.06 ,91-.96 17 ,55 .45 .49-.58 .43-.48 ,46-.52 ,45-,49
18 ,69 .61 ,64-.76 ,63-,65 .60-.75 ,59-,65
19 .58 .54 ,55-,69 ,54-,55 .52-.65 .53-,56 127
Vestigial stigmata slightly darker than sterna, Flagellum lanceolate, with a distal median depression undercutting a more proximal ridge,
Pedipalpal trochanter produced only slightly, tarsal-basitarsal spurs about 1/6, claw about 1/2 length of tarsus-basitarsus,
Tarsal-basitarsal segments of leg I of unknown proportions.
Female, Abdomen not attenuate, Flagellum composed of four articles. Lateral spermathecae somewhat longer than medians, both terminating in sclerotized bulb of nearly equal size.
Comparisons.--This species is most closely related to S^. mumai. For comparisons see the treatment under that species.
Distribution.--This species is known only from Barro
Colorado Island, Panama Canal Zone.
Remarks.--The holotype lacks the flagellum, abdominal segment XII and nearly all its appendages.
Additional records,--Barro Colorado Island, Panama Canal
Zone: one male, 20-24 June 1924, N, Banks (MCZ); four females,
20-21 May 1964, Chickering (MCZ); two females, July 1969, S.
Lawrence, B, and T. Hlavac (MCZ); one male, 1943-1944, J. Zetek
(MCZ); one female, K, W. Cooper (AMNH).
The brasiliensis group
Members of this group may be small to large sized (.91 - 1.48 carapacal length). The color is brownish to greenish. The eyespots are always distinct, but may vary in shape from irregular to oval to round. The carapace has three or four pairs of dorsal and two apical 128 setae. The abdomen is never attenuated. Males have a very slightly to well developed posterodorsal abdominal process, which can be round, bifid, or truncate apically. The male's flagellum is usually large and nearly globose, with often elaborate dorsal modifications.
The female's flagellum is usually moderate in length (.28), but may be long in large species (.48), and is composed of three articles.
The females usually have two pairs of spermathecae, usually of similar size. The apical portions are sometimes extremely large, almost circular, and highly sclerotized, whereas other individuals have considerably smaller unsclerotized bulbs. The pedipalps are usually highly dimorphic, but variably so. A slight elongation is usually manifest, but more often the segments are heavily developed.
The trochanter is noticeably produced; the femur sometimes has a mesal tooth, as does the patella.
Distribution.--Mexico: Oaxaca, Tabasco, Chiapas. Central
America: Costa Rica. South America: Columbia, Ecuador, Brasil,
Bolivia.
Subordinate taxa.--Trilobatus complex: S^. stewarti, S^.
trilobatus, S^. lacandonus; brasiliensis complex: S^. cuenca, S^,
sturmi, S_, brasiliensis, OTU #7, OTU #8, OTU #9, OTU #10, OTU #11;
gaXlipatellatus lineage within the brasiliensis complex: OTU #12,
S.- macarensis, S^, cumbalensis, S^, pal lipatellatus. Table 7.--Comparisons of the members of the brasiliensis group. For explanation of the characters see Phylogeny. 130
4-) M fll 3 0.-P 1- (O
Id in cns- OJ (0
OJ ra J- r-
cnt-