31295015067076.Pdf (11.66Mb)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
CLASSIFICATION, PHTLDSOilY A'MD ZDDffiDSRAPHY Df T-HE AMERICAM ARAOilllOS OF THE DIDO SCfllZDMIDA !by JON WM. KDWLATO, B.S. A iSISSERTATIUN ITkl Subiritted to tte firadiats Faculty of Texas Tecti UniveTsi'ty in Partiiail Fiuilfillment ©f tte Iteqiuiiiirenffiimts for tltne !Die§ree ©f Accepted ©ecenlber, 1575 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Great appreciation is expressed to Dr. Robert W. Mitchell who, by his consistant example of excellence, has constructed and shaped me as a zoologist, and thus shall share credit for production of this dissertation. The remainder of my committee afforded me generously of their time and advice and are here thanked: Dr. Russell W. Strandtmann, Dr. John S. Mecham, Dr. John E. George, and Dr. David E. Foster. Additional advice was provided by Dr. William R. Atchley. I am further indebted to the Society of Sigma Xi for awarding this study a Grand-in-Aid of Research. Fellow students who have contributed significantly to my dissertation are William R. Elliott, Jerry W. Cooke, and D. Craig Rudolf. Mr. James R. Reddell has given freely of his advice and time, and has in all areas contributed his remarkable knowledge of faunistic zoology in general and schizomids in particular. Dan, Verlee, and Phyllis Brashier Rowland saw this venture to completion. n TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ii LIST OF TABLES iv LIST OF FIGURES vi LIST OF MAPS ix I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. MATERIALS AND METHODS 16 III. CLASSIFICATION 22 IV. PHYLOGENETICS 315 V. ZOOGEOGRAPHY 374 BIBLIOGRAPHY 406 111 LIST OF TABLES TABLE Page 1. Comparisons of the species groups of the American members of the genus Schizomus , 39 2. Measurements of the members of the Protoschizomidae 49 3. Comparisons of the members of the cubanicus group . 52 4. Measurements of the members of the cubanicus group . 95 5. Comparisons of the members of the simonis group . 101 6. Measurements of the members of the simonis group . 125 7. Comparisons of the members of the brasiliensis group 130 8. Measurements of the members of the brasiliensis group 161 9. Comparisons of the members of the mexicanus group 166 10. Descriptive statistics for S^. portoricensis . 205 11. Measurements of the members of the mexicanus group 229 12. Comparisons of the members of the pecki group . 234 13. Measurements of the members of the pecki group . 253 14. Comparisons of the members of the goodnightorum group 257 15. Measurements of the members of the goodnightorum group 268 16. Comparisons of the members of the briggsi group . 271 17. Measurements of the members of the briggsi group . 297 18. Measurements of the species of Schizomus not assigned to groups 313 19. Characters, character states and assigned codes of the major lineages of Schizomida 342 20. Data matrix of the genera 344 21. Characters, character states and assigned codes of the non-briggsi American species groups 347 TV TABLE Page 22. Data matrix of the non-briggsi American species groups . 348 23. Characters, character states and assigned codes of the members of the cubanicus group 351 24. Data matrix of the members of the cubanicus group .... 353 25. Characters, character states and assigned codes of the members of the simonis group 356 26. Data matrix of the members of the simonis group 357 27. Characters, character states and assigned codes of the members of the brasiliensis group 360 28. Data matrix of the members of the brasiliensis group . 362 29. Characters, character states and assigned codes of the members of the mexicanus group 365 30. Data matrix of the members of the mexicanus group .... 367 31. Characters, character states and assigned codes of the members of the briggsi group 370 32. Data matrix of the members of the briggsi group 371 LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE Page 1. Male and female Agastoschizomus lucifer from Sotano de Yerbaniz, San Luis Potosi 9 2. Male and female Schizomus pentapeltis from near Palm Springs, California, during courtship. Male S^. mexicanus from Sotano de la Tinaja, San Luis Potosi . 11 3-6. Generalized schizomidan anatomy 13 7-13. Generalized schizomidan anatomy 15 14-19. Parts of protoschizomids 47 20-28. Dorsal views of male's flagella of the cubanicus group 79 29-33. Dorsal views of male's flagella of S^. viridis from various localities 81 34-44. Male's flagella of the cubanicus group 83 45-57. Parts of male schizomids of the cubanicus group ... 85 58-60. Lateral views of male's right pedipalps of the cubanicus group 87 61-68. Lateral views of male's right pedipalp of the cubanicus group 89 69-73. Male's right pedipalps of the cubanicus group .... 91 74-86. Female's spermathecae of the cubanicus group .... 93 87-94. Dorsal views of male's flagella of the simonis group 119 95-106. Parts of schizomids of the simonis group 121 107-118. Female's spermathecae of the simonis group 123 119-125. Dorsal views of male's flagella of the brasiliensis group 153 126-136. Male's flagella of the brasiliensis group 155 137-145. Parts of schizomids of thVI e brasiliensis group .... 157 FIGURE Page 146-154. Female's spermathecae of the brasiliensis group . 159 155-163. Dorsal views of male's flagella of the mexicanus group 215 164-170. Parts of schizomids of the mexicanus group 217 171-182. Lateral views of male's flagella of the mexicanus group 219 183-190. Female's spermathecae of the mexicanus group .... 221 191-198. Female's spermathecae of the mexicanus group .... 223 199-211. Parts of schizomids of the mexicanus group 225 212-215. Male's pedipalps of S.. mitchelli 227 216-221. Parts of schizomids of the pecki group 247 222-228. Female's spermathecae of the pecki group 249 229-234. Parts of schizomids of the pecki group 251 235-240. Parts of male schizomids of the goodnightorum group . 264 241-247. Parts of schizomids of the goodnightorum group . 266 248-253. Male's flagella of the briggsi group 289 254-259. Parts of schizomids of the briggsi group 291 260-265. Female's spermathecae of the briggsi group 293 266-272. Parts of male schizomids of the briggsi group .... 295 273-279. Parts of male schizomids 309 280-284. Parts of schizomids 311 285. Schematic diagram of the probable cladistic relationships of the flagella of schizomidans .... 330 286-287. Cladograms of the genera of schizomidans 346 288. Cladogram of the non-briggsi groups of American schizomids vn 350 FIGURE Page 289. Cladogram of the members of the cubanicus group 355 290. Cladogram of the members of the simonis group 359 291. Cladogram of the members of the brasiliensis group . 364 292. Cladogram of the members of the mexicanus group 369 293. Cladogram of the members of the briggsi group 373 vm LIST OF MAPS MAP Page 1. Distribution of schizomids of the cubanicus group 54 2. Distribution of schizomids of the simonis group . 54 3. Distribution of protoschizomids 168 4. Distribution of schizomids of the pecki and goodnightorum groups 168 5. Distribution of schizomids of the mexicanus group . 168 6. Distribution of schizomids of the briggsi group . 132 7. Distribution of schizomids of the brasiliensis group 132 8. Evolutionary zoogeography of the cubanicus group . 381 9-11. Evolutionary zoogeography of the brasiliensis group 386 12-14. Evolutionary zoogeography of the mexicanus group . 392 15-17. Evolutionary zoogeography of the briggsi group . 399 IX CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION The purposes of this research were: (1) to provide a classification of generic and familial taxa of the arachnid order Schizomida on a world-wide basis, including a list of all species and a bibliography containing the entire primary literature; (2) to describe and classify the complete New World fauna as far as available material would allow; (3) to perform phylogenetic studies on the World genera and familial taxa, and New World species; and (4) to analyze the zoogeographical relationships of taxa wherever evidence allowed. Phylogenetic and taxonomic considerations and results are highly interdependent and were developed simultaneously, but are discussed separately herein. The order Schizomida, like a few other minor arachnid orders, encompasses a manageable number of species of surprisingly few adaptive types. Though morphologically conservative, they have a nearly complete pan-tropical distribution and are often abundant, and hence probably ecologically very important in certain areas. These arachnids have received little attention, however, aside from descriptive works, since the first was described in 1872. The first critical study of the known species was that of Hansen and Sorensen (1905) and aside from the taxonomy in this paper the anatomical information is still quite useful. Lawrence (1969) produced a revision of African fauna, which stands as the only regional treatment. Millot (1949) gave the only detailed account, and Savory 1 (1964) gave a general account of all aspects of schizomid biology. The works of Gravely (1915), Rowland (1972), Beck (1968a, 1968b), and Sturm (1958, 1973) offer all the information on behavior. The only major works on descriptive internal anatomy are those of Borner (1902a, 1902b, 1904), Modder (1960), and Rowland (in preparation). Post embryonic development of most schizomids probably consists of five instars over a period of two or three years. The nymphal instars resemble the adults but are smaller and lack, in varying degrees, the cuticular sclerotization of the adults. The sexual differences manifest in the flagellum, pedipalps and primary sexual organs occur at the last molt, although penultimate males are sometimes recognizable by the shape of the flagellum. The general breeding habits of schizomids were originally assumed to be similar to that of the uropygids. Subsequently, Hansen and Sorensen (1905) described a spermatophore attached to the venter of a female, confirming a similarity.