Challenges & Compromises in Spike Lee's Malcolm X

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Challenges & Compromises in Spike Lee's Malcolm X Critical Studies in Media Communication Vol. 18, No. 4, December 2001, pp. 452–465 Challenges & Compromises in Spike Lee’s Malcolm X J. Emmett Winn ᮀ—This study looks at Spike Lee’s Malcolm X as an important text in understanding Afrocentric perspectives that challenge the ideological stereotypes of mainstream Hollywood film. Malcolm X intervenes between Lee, the filmmaker, and the powerful media industry and is emblematic of the larger discussion of hegemonic and counter-hegemonic views in media culture. This film is not only an interesting case study but a significant part of an ongoing cultural discourse that is as relevant now as when Malcolm X lived. The relevance of this essay lies in its contribution to the discussion of media perspectives with a focus on furthering media literacy. It aids the viewer in understanding the social discourse surrounding a mediated racist ideology and the ongoing cultural work of social equality in the United States. This research finds that in the continuing struggle over media representation, Lee’s film is an instrument of media politics, controversy, and commercial- ization. INCE the media are sites of struggle ing director Spike Lee’s Malcolm X Sover power and meaning in our (1992), a text that has been both hailed culture, media communication research as offering a black perspective counter is often concerned with racial represen- to the racist portrayals of African tations in film and television (Hall, Americans in film and criticized for 1980). Gray (1989) argues that the “con- being too conventional and commer- stant quest for legitimacy and the need cial (Bogle, 1996; Boyd, 1994; Dyson, to quell and displace fears at the same 1995; Ebert, 1992; hooks, 1996). Mal- time as it calls them forth are part of colm X presents a view of African the complex ideological work that takes Americans that diverges from and chal- place in [media] representations of lenges the racist views that have been a race” (p. 378). This essay elucidates foundation of cinema from the earliest issues and conflicts involved with strug- days of filmmaking (Bogle, 1996; Di- gling media perspectives by examin- awara, 1988; Hall, 1981; Rhodes, 1993). “This struggle,” states Rhodes (1993), “between the transmission of J. Emmett Winn is an Associate Professor in racist ideology and dogma, and the the Department of Communication, Auburn efforts of oppressed groups to claim University, University, AL 36849-5211. An earlier version was presented at the National control over their own image, is part of Communication Association convention, Novem- the legacy of the American mass me- ber 1998. The author acknowledges the insight- dia” (p. 185). The relevance of this ful criticism of Navita James, Gil Rodman, research lies in its contribution to the Susan Brinson, and M. H. Brown in writing discussion of media perspectives with this essay. a focus on furthering media literacy. It Copyright 2001, National Communication Association 453 CSMC WINN aids the viewer in understanding the trayals. Finally, Lee’s film was ulti- social discourse surrounding a medi- mately released within the mainstream ated racist ideology and the ongoing Hollywood establishment and was not cultural work of social equality in the as radical, controversial, or challeng- United States. In the battle over media ing to that system as some critics would portrayals, Malcolm X is an instrument have preferred (Bogle, 1996; Dyson, of media politics, controversy and com- 1995; hooks, 1996). This essay does mercialization. not judge whether Malcolm X is contro- Furthermore, Condit and Lucaites versial enough but, instead, shows how (1993) point out that in the 1980s the Malcolm X is an exemplary cultural arti- leadership of the struggle to define “the fact that illuminates the struggle over American dream of equality” was representation in the media. joined by “public intellectuals, includ- Hall (1981) explains that “the media ing scholars and filmmakers” (p. 180). are not only a powerful source of ideas Lee’s Malcolm X, although not appear- about race. They are also one place ing until 1992, is an interesting part of where these ideas are articulated, this struggle. Lee presents a cinematic worked on, transformed and elabo- version of The Autobiography of Malcolm rated” (p. 35). Lee’s Malcolm X commu- X, framing it between a prologue and nicates his perspective, one that he epilogue that situates the life story considers strongly informed by black within the current struggle for equality cultural politics. The questions of eth- in the United States and the broader nic/racial, gendered and class based international struggle. views of the world are significant inquir- In discussing media representations, ies, and there are, at any one time, the polysemic nature of texts allows for many views struggling for attention. However, looking at the media and wide ranging readings (Hall, 1980), and critically arguing that specific views this essay does not suggest that its views are both presented and challenged si- are the only interpretations of the film. multaneously is possible. Malcolm X is However, Kellner (1995) argues, “there one such site of struggle. are limits to the openness...ofany text...andtextual analysis can expli- cate the parameters of possible read- ings” (p. 11). Therefore, there are pre- Lee and Warner Bros. ferred readings that are useful in Kellner (1995) suggests the views pre- discussing Malcolm X in terms of the sented in entertainment programs are struggle over media representations. often the result of the organizational Specifically, Malcolm X can demon- structure of the media. Hollywood film- strate three aspects of the struggle over making, as popular culture, can be the representations in the media. First, it site of struggle between the views of characterizes how Lee struggled with the filmmakers and the demands of the his distributor, Warner Bros., to make film industry. The plight of the film- Malcolm X and was forced to borrow maker’s fight against a system that cares money from prominent African Ameri- little for an auteurist vision and too cans in order to finish the film. Sec- much for the profitability of a product ondly, Lee’s presentation of African is the stuff of countless Hollywood leg- American characters is, in general, di- ends and is an issue with which artistic vergent from traditionally racist por- creators struggle in nearly every form 454 CHALLENGES & COMPROMISES DECEMBER 2001 of popular art. However, the film- when the film is perceived as a black maker is only one part of the film film, the unease can become gut- industry organization. This system con- wrenching angst” (p. 25) as race and trols the production, distribution, and ethnicity make the relationship even exhibition of a film; many people and more problematic. interests must be brought together to From this vantage point, the relation- make a Hollywood film. In short, the ship between Lee and his distributor, creative conflict inherent to filmmak- Warner Bros., part of Time-Warner ing should not be simplified to a lone Inc., bears investigation. Lee struggled visionary versus a profit-driven con- with Warner Bros. for the necessary glomerate. The system needs the film- budget to make the film as he envi- maker’s creative product in order to sioned. However, Warner Bros. was exist, and the filmmaker, in most cases, never receptive to Lee’s vision. Lee, needs the system for financing and dis- quoted in Wiley (1992), explains: tribution. Warner Bros. and I never saw eye to eye Filmmaking as a collaborative effort on the scope of this film. They don’t know requires the combined talents and re- who Malcolm X is. The film ends with sources of producers, writers, direc- Nelson Mandela in Soweto, and they’re tors, talent, a host of technical crew like, “What does Nelson Mandela have to members, and other personnel. This do with Malcolm X?” (p. 96) creative side of cinema is itself only one part of the organization. Other Warner Bros. disagreed with Lee con- industry representatives are needed for cerning the content and length of the film. Lee wanted additional funds to a film to receive the funding, advertis- finish the film as he had planned. As ing, and distribution that it requires to Lee fought with executives at Warner be completed and exhibited. Bros. the Los Angeles riots broke out, Movies are distributed by major dis- an event that seemed to highlight the tribution companies. Many of these importance of Lee’s vision for his film organizations are the remnants of the as part of a public discourse on equal- major studios of Hollywood’s Golden ity. Wiley (1992) explains: Age of filmmaking (e.g., MGM, Para- mount, and Warner Bros.). However, On Thursday, April 30, [1992] as sections with changes in corporate ownership, of [Los Angeles] burned across national it makes more sense to refer to these television, Spike Lee screened Malcolm X distributors as parts of large conglomer- again at the Warner’s lot, telling those ates. Understandably, the distribution assembled in the screening room, “this company is crucial to the overall finan- movie is needed now more than ever.” (p. 128) cial success of the film and, therefore, has substantial influence on the mak- Lee believed that his film would make ing and release of the film. Thus, the an important contribution to the ongo- filmmaker is often financially depen- ing discourse concerning equality for dent on the distributor. Sharkey (1989) African Americans. sees this creator/organizational rela- Yet, Lee was unable to convince tionship as precarious, “the alliance Warner Bros. to supply the additional between filmmaker and film-marketer funding. Lee believed he needed the is uneasy and often a source of conflict money to make his film a testament to under the best of circumstances.
Recommended publications
  • Untimely Meditations: Reflections on the Black Audio Film Collective
    8QWLPHO\0HGLWDWLRQV5HIOHFWLRQVRQWKH%ODFN$XGLR )LOP&ROOHFWLYH .RGZR(VKXQ Nka: Journal of Contemporary African Art, Number 19, Summer 2004, pp. 38-45 (Article) 3XEOLVKHGE\'XNH8QLYHUVLW\3UHVV For additional information about this article http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/nka/summary/v019/19.eshun.html Access provided by Birkbeck College-University of London (14 Mar 2015 12:24 GMT) t is no exaggeration to say that the installation of In its totality, the work of John Akomfrah, Reece Auguiste, Handsworth Songs (1985) at Documentall introduced a Edward George, Lina Gopaul, Avril Johnson, David Lawson, and new audience and a new generation to the work of the Trevor Mathison remains terra infirma. There are good reasons Black Audio Film Collective. An artworld audience internal and external to the group why this is so, and any sus• weaned on Fischli and Weiss emerged from the black tained exploration of the Collective's work should begin by iden• cube with a dramatically expanded sense of the historical, poet• tifying the reasons for that occlusion. Such an analysis in turn ic, and aesthetic project of the legendary British group. sets up the discursive parameters for a close hearing and viewing The critical acclaim that subsequently greeted Handsworth of the visionary project of the Black Audio Film Collective. Songs only underlines its reputation as the most important and We can locate the moment when the YBA narrative achieved influential art film to emerge from England in the last twenty cultural liftoff in 1996 with Douglas Gordon's Turner Prize vic• years. It is perhaps inevitable that Handsworth Songs has tended tory.
    [Show full text]
  • Co-Produced with the Black Film Institute of the University of the District of Columbia the Vision
    Co-produced with the Black Film Institute of the University of the District of Columbia the vision. the voice. From LA to London and Martinique to Mali. We bring you the world ofBlack film. Ifyou're concerned about Black images in commercial film and tele­ vision, you already know that Hollywood does not reflect the multi- cultural nature 'ofcontemporary society. You know thatwhen Blacks are not absent they are confined to predictable, one-dimensional roles. You may argue that movies and television shape our reality or that they simply reflect that reality. In any case, no one can deny the need to take a closer look atwhat is COIning out of this powerful medium. Black Film Review is the forum you've been looking for. Four times a year, we bringyou film criticiSIn froIn a Black perspective. We look behind the surface and challenge ordinary assurnptiorls about the Black image. We feature actors all.d actresses th t go agaul.st the graill., all.d we fill you Ul. Oll. the rich history ofBlacks Ul. Arnericall. filrnrnakul.g - a history thatgoes back to 19101 And, Black Film Review is the only magazine that bringsyou news, reviews and in-deptll interviews frOtn tlle tnost vibrant tnovetnent in contelllporary film. You know about Spike Lee butwIlat about EuzIlan Palcy or lsaacJulien? Souletnayne Cisse or CIl.arles Burnette? Tllrougll­ out tIle African cliaspora, Black fi1rnInakers are giving us alternatives to tlle static itnages tIlat are proeluceel in Hollywood anel giving birtll to a wIlole new cinetna...be tIlere! Interview:- ----------- --- - - - - - - 4 VDL.G NO.2 by Pat Aufderheide Malian filmmaker Cheikh Oumar Sissoko discusses his latest film, Finzan, aself­ conscious experiment in storytelling 2 2 E e Street, NW as ing on, DC 20006 MO· BETTER BLUES 2 2 466-2753 The Music 6 o by Eugene Holley, Jr.
    [Show full text]
  • Film & Literature
    Name_____________________ Date__________________ Film & Literature Mr. Corbo Film & Literature “Underneath their surfaces, all movies, even the most blatantly commercial ones, contain layers of complexity and meaning that can be studied, analyzed and appreciated.” --Richard Barsam, Looking at Movies Curriculum Outline Form and Function: To equip students, by raising their awareness of the development and complexities of the cinema, to read and write about films as trained and informed viewers. From this base, students can progress to a deeper understanding of film and the proper in-depth study of cinema. By the end of this course, you will have a deeper sense of the major components of film form and function and also an understanding of the “language” of film. You will write essays which will discuss and analyze several of the films we will study using accurate vocabulary and language relating to cinematic methods and techniques. Just as an author uses literary devices to convey ideas in a story or novel, filmmakers use specific techniques to present their ideas on screen in the world of the film. Tentative Film List: The Godfather (dir: Francis Ford Coppola); Rushmore (dir: Wes Anderson); Do the Right Thing (dir: Spike Lee); The Dark Knight (dir: Christopher Nolan); Psycho (dir: Alfred Hitchcock); The Graduate (dir: Mike Nichols); Office Space (dir: Mike Judge); Donnie Darko (dir: Richard Kelly); The Hurt Locker (dir: Kathryn Bigelow); The Ice Storm (dir: Ang Lee); Bicycle Thives (dir: Vittorio di Sica); On the Waterfront (dir: Elia Kazan); Traffic (dir: Steven Soderbergh); Batman (dir: Tim Burton); GoodFellas (dir: Martin Scorsese); Mean Girls (dir: Mark Waters); Pulp Fiction (dir: Quentin Tarantino); The Silence of the Lambs (dir: Jonathan Demme); The Third Man (dir: Carol Reed); The Lord of the Rings trilogy (dir: Peter Jackson); The Wizard of Oz (dir: Victor Fleming); Edward Scissorhands (dir: Tim Burton); Raiders of the Lost Ark (dir: Steven Spielberg); Star Wars trilogy (dirs: George Lucas, et.
    [Show full text]
  • Ace in the Hole Discussion Guide
    Film C L U B ACE IN THE HOLE The alternate title for Ace in the Hole is The Big Carnival, which tells you a little bit about the movie’s real feelings toward its main character, Chuck Tatum, played by (recently deceased) Kirk Douglas. Tatum is a journalist who’s down on his luck, who once was a star reporter at a big-city paper but has worked his way west, having been fired from 11 different newspapers for a range of transgressions ranging from libel to drunkenness to adultery. What we know about Tatum from the start is that if he ever had any scruples, he doesn’t anymore. Now he’s stuck at the Albuquerque Sun-Bulletin, sure he’s too good for everyone there, and eager to find a foothold that will help him work his way back into the spotlight. One day, he catches wind of a promising local scoop: a man who’s gotten trapped in a cave. Ace in the Hole is set in an era long before 24/7 cable news, but Tatum would fit in well today in our zillion-ring media circus. He immediately figures out how to turn the man’s unfortunate accident into a spectacle that will grab national headlines, and he does it. I don’t take Ace in the Hole to be an indictment of good old shoe-leather journalism. (That’s my profession, after all, and I have enormous admiration for colleagues who make very little money breaking their necks to track down stories that will bring about important change.) But I do think it has something to say to the time we live in, just as it did nearly 70 years ago -- that in the human heart lurks the desire to be recognized and celebrated and praised, to gain power for ourselves, even at the expense of someone else.
    [Show full text]
  • Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X Talk It out 17
    Writing for Understanding ACTIVITY Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X Talk It Out 17 Overview Materials This Writing for Understanding activity allows students to learn about and write • Transparency 17A a fictional dialogue reflecting the differing viewpoints of Martin Luther King Jr. • Student Handouts and Malcolm X on the methods African Americans should use to achieve equal 17 A –17C rights. Students study written information about either Martin Luther King Jr. • Information Master or Malcolm X and then compare the backgrounds and views of the two men. 17A Students then use what they have learned to assume the roles of Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X and debate methods for achieving African American equality. Afterward, students write a dialogue between the two men to reveal their differing viewpoints. Procedures at a Glance • Before class, decide how you will divide students into mixed-ability pairs. Use the diagram at right to determine where they should sit. • In class, tell students that they will write a dialogue reflecting the differing viewpoints of Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X on the methods African Americans should use to achieve equal rights. • Divide the class into two groups—one representing each man. Explain that pairs will become “experts” on either Martin Luther King Jr. or Malcolm X. Direct students to move into their correct places. • Give pairs a copy of the appropriate Student Handout 17A. Have them read the information and discuss the “stop and discuss” questions. • Next, place each pair from the King group with a pair from the Malcolm X group.
    [Show full text]
  • Filmmaker Spike Lee, Songwriter and Musician Kirk Franklin Headline 2007-2008 University of Dayton Diversity Lecture Series
    University of Dayton eCommons News Releases Marketing and Communications 8-6-2007 Filmmaker Spike Lee, Songwriter and Musician Kirk Franklin Headline 2007-2008 University of Dayton Diversity Lecture Series Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.udayton.edu/news_rls Recommended Citation "Filmmaker Spike Lee, Songwriter and Musician Kirk Franklin Headline 2007-2008 University of Dayton Diversity Lecture Series" (2007). News Releases. 9564. https://ecommons.udayton.edu/news_rls/9564 This News Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Marketing and Communications at eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in News Releases by an authorized administrator of eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. UNIVERSITY o Aug. 6, 2007 Contact: Teri Rizvi [email protected] 937-229-3241 DAITON NEWS RELEASE FILMMAKER SPIKE LEE, SONGWRITER AND MUSICIAN KIRK FRANKLIN HEADLINE 2007-2008 UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON DIVERSITY LECTURE SERIES DAYTON, Ohio - An all-star line-up of acclaimed artists and journalists - including filmmaker Spike Lee and Grammy Award-winning gospel musician Kirk Franklin- will tackle "The Responsibility of Media in a Global Society" during the University of Dayton's 2007-2008 Diversity Lecture Series. The season includes: • Maria Hinojosa, 7:30 p.m., Friday, Sept. 7, Boll Theatre, University of Dayton. Free and open to the public. Part of Hispanic Heritage Month. Award-winning journalist and author Maria Hinojosa is managing editor and host of Latino USA, a weekly program on NPR. She also is the senior correspondent for the Emmy Award­ winning PBS Newsmagazine NOW. Previously, she spent eight years at CNN, where she covered urban affairs.
    [Show full text]
  • It's a Conspiracy
    IT’S A CONSPIRACY! As a Cautionary Remembrance of the JFK Assassination—A Survey of Films With A Paranoid Edge Dan Akira Nishimura with Don Malcolm The only culture to enlist the imagination and change the charac- der. As it snows, he walks the streets of the town that will be forever ter of Americans was the one we had been given by the movies… changed. The banker Mr. Potter (Lionel Barrymore), a scrooge-like No movie star had the mind, courage or force to be national character, practically owns Bedford Falls. As he prepares to reshape leader… So the President nominated himself. He would fill the it in his own image, Potter doesn’t act alone. There’s also a board void. He would be the movie star come to life as President. of directors with identities shielded from the public (think MPAA). Who are these people? And what’s so wonderful about them? —Norman Mailer 3. Ace in the Hole (1951) resident John F. Kennedy was a movie fan. Ironically, one A former big city reporter of his favorites was The Manchurian Candidate (1962), lands a job for an Albu- directed by John Frankenheimer. With the president’s per- querque daily. Chuck Tatum mission, Frankenheimer was able to shoot scenes from (Kirk Douglas) is looking for Seven Days in May (1964) at the White House. Due to a ticket back to “the Apple.” Pthe events of November 1963, both films seem prescient. He thinks he’s found it when Was Lee Harvey Oswald a sleeper agent, a “Manchurian candidate?” Leo Mimosa (Richard Bene- Or was it a military coup as in the latter film? Or both? dict) is trapped in a cave Over the years, many films have dealt with political conspira- collapse.
    [Show full text]
  • Sam Pollard Is an Accomplished Feature Film and Television Video
    Sam Pollard is an accomplished feature film and television video editor, and documentary producer/director whose work spans almost thirty years. He recently served as Producer and Supervising Editor on the Spike Lee directed HBO documentary If God Is Willing and Da Creek Don’t Rise, a five year follow up to the Emmy and Peabody award winning When The Levees Broke. His first assignment as a documentary producer came in 1989 for Henry Hampton’s Blackside production Eyes On The Prize II: America at the Racial Crossroads. For one of his episodes in this series, he received an Emmy. Eight years later, he returned to Blackside as Co-Executive Producer/Producer of Hampton’s last documentary series I’ll Make Me A World: Stories of African-American Artists and Community. For the series, Mr. Pollard received The George Peabody Award. Between 1990 and 2010, Mr. Pollard edited a number of Spike Lee’s films: Mo’ Better Blues, Jungle Fever, Girl 6, Clockers, and Bamboozled. As well, Mr. Pollard and Mr. Lee co-produced a number of documentary productions for the small and big screen: Spike Lee Presents Mike Tyson, a biographical sketch for HBO for which Mr. Pollard received an Emmy, Four Little Girls, a feature-length documentary about the 1963 Birmingham church bombings which was nominated for an Academy Award and When The Levees Broke, a four part documentary that won numerous awards, including a Peabody and three Emmy Awards. Mr. Pollard completed as a producer/director Slavery By Another Name a 90-minute documentary for PBS that was in competition at the Sundance Festival in 2012 and also just completed editing the feature length documentary Venus and Serena..
    [Show full text]
  • W Talking Pictures
    Wednesday 3 June at 20.30 (Part I) Wednesday 17 June at 20.30 Thursday 4 June at 20.30 (Part II) Francis Ford Coppola Ingmar Bergman Apocalypse Now (US) 1979 Fanny And Alexander (Sweden) 1982 “One of the great films of all time. It shames modern Hollywood’s “This exuberant, richly textured film, timidity. To watch it is to feel yourself lifted up to the heights where packed with life and incident, is the cinema can take you, but so rarely does.” (Roger Ebert, Chicago punctuated by a series of ritual family Sun-Times) “To look at APOCALYPSE NOW is to realize that most of us are gatherings for parties, funerals, weddings, fast forgetting what a movie looks like - a real movie, the last movie, and christenings. Ghosts are as corporeal an American masterpiece.” (Manohla Darghis, LA Weekly) “Remains a as living people. Seasons come and go; majestic explosion of pure cinema. It’s a hallucinatory poem of fear, tumultuous, traumatic events occur - projecting, in its scale and spirit, a messianic vision of human warfare Talking yet, as in a dream of childhood (the film’s stretched to the flashpoint of technological and moral breakdown.” perspective is that of Alexander), time is (Owen Gleiberman, Entertainment Weekly) “In spite of its limited oddly still.” (Philip French, The Observer) perspective on Vietnam, its churning, term-paperish exploration of “Emerges as a sumptuously produced Conrad and the near incoherence of its ending, it is a great movie. It Pictures period piece that is also a rich tapestry of grows richer and stranger with each viewing, and the restoration [in childhood memoirs and moods, fear and Redux] of scenes left in the cutting room two decades ago has only April - July 2009 fancy, employing all the manners and added to its sublimity.” (Dana Stevens, The New York Times) Audience means of the best of cinematic theatrical can choose the original version or the longer 2001 Redux version.
    [Show full text]
  • By Any Means Necessary
    MALCOLM X BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY A Biography by WALTER DEAN MYERS NEW YORK Xiii Excerpts from The Autobiography of Malcolm X, by Malcolm X, with the assistance of Alex Haley. Copyright © 1964 by Alex Haley and Malcolm X. Copyright © 1965 by Alex Haley and Betty Shabazz. Reprinted by permission of Random House Inc. Excerpts from Malcolm X Speaks, copyright © 1965 by Betty Shabazz and Pathfinder Press. All Rights Reserved. Reprinted by permission of Pathfinder Press. “Great Bateleur” is used by permission of Wopashitwe Mondo Eyen we Langa. If you purchased this book without a cover, you should be aware that this book is stolen property. It was reported as “unsold and destroyed” to the publisher, and neither the author nor the publisher has received any payment for this “stripped book.” Copyright © 1993 by Walter Dean Myers All rights reserved. Published by Scholastic Focus, a division of Scholastic Inc., Publishers since 1920. SCHOLASTIC, SCHOLASTIC FOCUS, and associated logos are trademarks and/ or registered trademarks of Scholastic Inc. The publisher does not have any control over and does not assume any responsibility for author or third- party websites or their content. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without written permission of the publisher. For information regarding permission, write to Scholastic Inc., Attention: Permissions Department, 557 Broadway, New York, NY 10012. ISBN 978-1- 338- 30985-0 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 20 21 22 23 24 Printed in the U.S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • X-Men Allegory Allusion Essay
    Pull 1 Pull 2 Sam Pull are hated, feared, and despised collectively by humanity for no other reason than that they are Ms. Ekrofergustitz mutants. So what we have..., intended or not, is a book that is about racism, bigotry, and Language Arts 8 prejudice." In the comics, the X-men and others like them, were often victims of mob violence 31 January 2017 perpetrated by the hate group, “Friends of Humanity.” This is similar to the violence carried out Art Imitating Life against minorities by the Ku Klux Klan. There is no doubt that both groups struggled against “Your humans slaughter each other because of the color of your skin, or your faith or hateful humans. your politics, or for no reason at all. Too many of you hate as easily as you draw breath” Equally important are the characters and people involved. The leader and founder of the -Magneto (Stan Lee). Even though this quote comes from a fictional universe, it can still apply X-Men is Professor Charles Xavier, a telepath who believes in nonviolence. His character is to our world. Stan Lee, the creator of comics like Spiderman and The Avengers , invented an very similar to Martin Luther King, Jr. Xavier’s students even referred to their missions as allegory about discrimination with The X-Men . This comic series was published in 1963 when “Xavier’s Dream,” possibly referencing MLK’s “I Have a Dream” speech. Moreover, Xavier’s the United States was in the middle of the Civil Rights Movement. It is difficult to ignore the antagonist Magneto, who can control magnetic fields and uses a different approach to dealing similarities between the conflicts the X-men experienced and the discrimination endured by with hateful humans, is comparable to the militant civil rights leader, Malcolm X.
    [Show full text]
  • The Contemporary Rhetoric About Martin Luther King, Jr., and Malcolm X in the Post-Reagan Era
    ABSTRACT THE CONTEMPORARY RHETORIC ABOUT MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR., AND MALCOLM X IN THE POST-REAGAN ERA by Cedric Dewayne Burrows This thesis explores the rhetoric about Martin Luther King, Jr., and Malcolm X in the late 1980s and early 1990s, specifically looking at how King is transformed into a messiah figure while Malcolm X is transformed into a figure suitable for the hip-hop generation. Among the works included in this analysis are the young adult biographies Martin Luther King: Civil Rights Leader and Malcolm X: Militant Black Leader, Episode 4 of Eyes on the Prize II: America at the Racial Crossroads, and Spike Lee’s 1992 film Malcolm X. THE CONTEMPORARY RHETORIC ABOUT MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR., AND MALCOLM X IN THE POST-REAGAN ERA A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Miami University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Department of English by Cedric Dewayne Burrows Miami University Oxford, Ohio 2005 Advisor_____________________ Morris Young Reader_____________________ Cynthia Leweicki-Wison Reader_____________________ Cheryl L. Johnson © Cedric D. Burrows 2005 Table of Contents Introduction 1 Chapter One A Dead Man’s Dream: Martin Luther King’s Representation as a 10 Messiah and Prophet Figure in the Black American’s of Achievement Series and Eyes on the Prize II: America at the Racial Crossroads Chapter Two Do the Right Thing by Any Means Necessary: The Revival of Malcolm X 24 in the Reagan-Bush Era Conclusion 39 iii THE CONTEMPORARY RHETORIC ABOUT MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR., AND MALCOLM X IN THE POST-REAGAN ERA Introduction “What was Martin Luther King known for?” asked Mrs.
    [Show full text]