Monitoring Architecture for Public Cloud Computing Data Centers

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Monitoring Architecture for Public Cloud Computing Data Centers J Grid Computing (2016) 14:283–297 DOI 10.1007/s10723-015-9357-4 IaaSMon: Monitoring Architecture for Public Cloud Computing Data Centers Juan Gutierrez-Aguado · Jose M. Alcaraz Calero · Wladimiro Diaz Villanueva Received: 2 June 2014 / Accepted: 23 November 2015 / Published online: 4 March 2016 © The Author(s) 2016. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract Monitoring of cloud computing infrastruc- control and data planes of OpenStack, a well-known tures is an imperative necessity for cloud providers stack for cloud infrastructures. As a result, our new and administrators to analyze, optimize and discover monitoring architecture is able to extend the exiting what is happening in their own infrastructures. Current Nagios functionalities to fit in the monitoring of cloud monitoring solutions do not fit well for this purpose infrastructures. The proposed architecture has been mainly due to the incredible set of new requirements designed, implemented and released as open source to imposed by the particular requirements associated to the scientific community. The proposal has also been cloud infrastructures. This paper describes in detail empirically validated in a production-level cloud com- the main reasons why current monitoring solutions puting infrastructure running a test bed with up to do not work well. Also, it provides an innovative 128 VMs where overhead and responsiveness has been monitoring architecture that enables the monitoring carefully analyzed. of the physical and virtual machines available within a cloud infrastructure in a non-invasive and trans- Keywords Cloud computing · Monitoring · parent way making it suitable not only for private Distributed monitoring · Network management · cloud computing but also for public cloud comput- Infrastructure-as-a-service ing infrastructures. This architecture has been vali- dated by means of a prototype integrating an existing enterprise-class monitoring solution, Nagios, with the 1 Introduction Cloud computing is changing radically the way in J. Gutierrez-Aguado · W. Diaz Villanueva Departament d’Informatica,` Universitat de Valencia,` Avda. which businesses, governments, researches and con- De la Universitat, s/n 46100 Burjassot, Valencia, Spain sumers are using computational power. Cloud Compu- J. Gutierrez-Aguado ting enables them to make better use of their own com- e-mail: [email protected] putational resources (private cloud) and to rent com- putational resources to third-parties on-demand (pub- W. Diaz Villanueva e-mail: [email protected] lic cloud) to satisfy their constantly changing compu- tational requirements. Public cloud infrastructures are J. M. Alcaraz Calero () associated to scenarios where cloud users do not have School of Engineering and Computing, University any control over the management of the physical of the West of Scotland, Paisley Campus, Paisley, PA1 2BE, Scotland topology of the infrastructures where they are renting e-mail: [email protected] virtual machines (aka VMs), i.e. virtual topologies. 284 J. Gutierrez-Aguado et al. However, users have control over their rented VMs a transparent monitoring of the customer s VMs, and and what services are being executed therein. at same time, an agent-based monitoring of the rest of From the point of view of the cloud provider, it the resources such as physical machines, hard disks, is imperative to analyze, optimize and discover what etc. The following list of requirements summarizes the is happening in their entire infrastructure. To do so, key and unique features and requirements that make monitoring tools are essential to identify anomalies, the monitoring of public cloud computing infrastruc- analyze behavior, optimize infrastructure resources, tures a challenge. Some of these items are already provide feedback to consumer, check infrastructure available in almost all the current monitoring solu- healthy, perform auto-scaling of resources [11], allo- tions; however, some others are simply not supported cate resources in multi-clouds [9, 15], or monitor nowadays: Service Level Agreement [3]. The vast majority of monitoring tools available in the market do not fit – R1. To perform a transparent monitoring of VMs for the purpose of monitoring cloud infrastructures. (no tools installed in the customer s VM) On the one hand, their architectural design usually – R2. To perform an agent-based monitoring of the imposes the installation of a software agent in the management VMs resources to be monitored to extract metrics. However, – R3. To perform an agent-based monitoring of the cloud users are especially reluctant to run any kind physical machines of services/software in their rented VMs for providing – R4. To enable correlation between metrics from information to third parties so that this requirement VMs and physical machines where they are allo- is simply not acceptable in cloud environments. On cated. the other hand, current monitoring tools do not deal – R5. To quickly adapt against frequent changes in efficiently with the new life-cycle associated to vir- the virtual topology using efficient auto-discovery tual topologies. For example, current monitoring tools protocols. assume that monitored resources will remain always – R6. To quickly adapt against IP address re- with the same IP address. Then, if such address is not assignation. responding, it is assumed that resources are shutdown – R7. To quickly adapt against changes in VM state or failing. However, this is not true at all in cloud (VM life-cycle). infrastructures where IP addresses are being highly – R8. To integrate the monitoring architecture with reused and dynamically assigned to different VMs in the management plane of the cloud stack to keep a matter of seconds. Traditional monitoring solutions continuously synchronized the status of the cloud will not realize of this re-use of IP addresses and will stack and the monitoring tool. consider the monitored resource always to be same – R9. To integrate the monitoring architecture with one even when they are now monitoring a completely the data plane of the cloud stack to keep continu- different resource. These facts make difficult for cloud ously synchronized the status of the VMs and the providers to implement effective monitoring solutions monitoring tool. for their infrastructure and it is required the design – R10. To be high scalable, suitable for monitoring of novel non-intrusive monitoring solutions running large amount of resources efficiently. in a transparent way from the point of view of the cloud users whereas they provide accurate informa- More than 50 different monitoring solutions have tion for the cloud provider. This is exactly the main been analyzed in this work. None of them meet all motivation of this research work. Our contribution these requirements simultaneous. It is not our purpose is, to the best of our knowledge, the first attempt to to provide a completely new monitoring framework integrate both the control and data planes of a cloud designed from scratch. An analysis of existing moni- computing infrastructure with an existing monitoring toring tools has been done (lately explained in detail tool to fit in the monitoring of the completely new in Section 2) to select a good candidate to be extended life-cycle associated to virtual cloud infrastructures. and adapted to fulfill all these requirements and thus This novel integration provides an effective monitor- making it suitable for the monitoring of cloud infras- ing solution for public cloud infrastructures allowing tructures. According to a recent study performed by IaaSMon: Monitoring Architecture for Public Cloud Computing Data Centers 285 Dataloop,1 Nagios is the dominant monitoring tool for design of the monitoring architecture proposed. Then, cloud infrastructures in the market even if it has not yet Section 6 provides implementation details of the pro- completely being adapted for such purpose. Nagios posed architecture. Section 7 describes the different has been selected as a base monitoring software to test beds carried out and the intensive testing done be extended in this research work due to its flexibil- in order to validate both the architecture and proto- ity, world-wide acceptance, suitability for large-scale type presented. And finally, Section 8 describes some deployments, due to the incredibly large number of conclusions about this contribution. extensions available and specially due to the fact that auto discovery algorithms of new resources is completely customizable. 2 Related Works The proposed architecture described in this con- tribution provides support for all the above list of Open source monitoring solutions for cloud infras- requirements. To achieve it, the architecture is based tructures are really scarce and only a few proofs of on the integration between the monitoring tool, and concept are available. Brandt et al. [2] provide OVIS, a its resource discovery protocol, and the control and distributed monitoring infrastructure for High Perfor- data planes of the cloud computing infrastructure. mance Computing (HPC). Wuhib and Stadler [18]also This integration is in fact our main contribution. The provide a distributed monitoring framework for large architecture has been prototypically implemented by cloud infrastructures. Kertesz [8] provides an archi- means of the integration between OpenStack, a well- tecture where different cloud providers collect infor- known enterprise-class cloud computing stack used mation to decide where
Recommended publications
  • Josh Malone Systems Administrator National Radio Astronomy Observatory Charlottesville, VA
    heck What the #%!@ is wrong ^ with my server?!? Josh Malone Systems Administrator National Radio Astronomy Observatory Charlottesville, VA 1 Agenda • Intro to Monitoring • Internet protocols 101 • • Nagios SMTP • IMAP • Install/Config • HTTP • Usage • Custom plugins • Packet sniffing for dummies • Intro to Troubleshooting • Tools • telnet, openssl • grep, sed • ps, lsof, netstat 2 MONITORING 3 Automated Monitoring Workflow 4 Monitoring Packages: Open Source • • Pandora FMS • Opsview Core • Naemon • • • • • • Captialware ServerStatus • Core • Sensu All Trademarks and Logos are property of their respective trademark or copyright holders and are used by permission or fair use for education. Neither the presenter nor the conference organizers are affiliated in any way with any companies mentioned here. 5 Monitoring Packages: Commercial • Nagios XI • Groundwork • PRTG network monitor • CopperEgg • WhatsUp Gold • PRTG network monitor • op5 (Naemon) All Trademarks and Logos are property of their respective trademark or copyright holders and are used by permission or fair use for education. Neither the presenter nor the conference organizers are affiliated in any way with any companies mentioned here. 6 Why Automatic Service Monitoring? • Spot small problems before they become big ones • Learn about outages before your users do • Checklist when restoring from a power outage • Gives you better problem reports than users • Problems you might never spot otherwise • Failed HDDs in RAIDs • Full /var partitions • Logs not rotating • System temperature rising 7 Why Automatic Service Monitoring? • Capacity planning • Performance data can generate graphs of utilization • RAM, Disk, etc. • Availability reports - CAUTION • Easy to generate -- even easier to generate wrong • Make sure your configurations actually catch problems • Will also include problems with Nagios itself :( • If you’re going to quote your availability numbers (SLAs, etc.) make sure you understand what you’re actually monitoring.
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring Bareos with Icinga 2 Version: 1.0
    Monitoring Bareos with Icinga 2 Version: 1.0 We love Open Source 1 © NETWAYS Table of Contents 1 Environment 2 Introduction 3 Host 4 Active Checks 5 Passive Events 6 Graphite 2 © NETWAYS 1 Environment 3 © NETWAYS Pre-installed Software Bareos Bareos Database (PostgreSQL) Bareos WebUI Icinga 2 IDO (MariaDB) Icinga Web 2 Graphite 4 © NETWAYS 2 Introduction 5 © NETWAYS 2.1 Bareos 6 © NETWAYS What is Bareos? Backup Archiving Recovery Open Sourced Backup, archiving and recovery of current operating systems Open Source Fork of Bacula (http://bacula.org) Forked 2010 (http://bareos.org) AGPL v3 License (https://github.com/bareos/bareos) A lot of new features: LTO Hardware encryption Bandwidth limitation Cloud storage connection New console commands Many more 7 © NETWAYS Bareos Structure 8 © NETWAYS 2.2 Icinga 2 9 © NETWAYS Icinga - Open Source Enterprise Monitoring Icinga is a scalable and extensible monitoring system which checks the availability of your resources, notifies users of outages and provides extensive BI data. International community project Everything developed by the Icinga Project is Open Source Originally forked from Nagios in 2009 Independent version Icinga 2 since 2014 10 © NETWAYS Icinga - Availability Monitoring Monitors everything Gathering status Collect performance data Notifies using any channel Considers dependencies Handles events Checks and forwards logs Deals with performance data Provides SLA data 11 © NETWAYS What is Icinga 2? Core based on C++ and Boost Supports all major *NIX and Windows platforms Powerful configuration
    [Show full text]
  • Pynag Documentation Release 0.9.0
    pynag Documentation Release 0.9.0 Pall Sigurdsson and Tomas Edwardsson July 23, 2014 Contents 1 Introduction 3 1.1 About pynag...............................................3 2 The pynag module 5 2.1 pynag Package.............................................5 2.2 Subpackages...............................................5 3 The pynag command line 85 3.1 NAME.................................................. 85 Python Module Index 89 i ii pynag Documentation, Release 0.9.0 Release 0.9.0 Date July 23, 2014 This document is under a Creative Commons Attribution - Non-Commercial - Share Alike 2.5 license. Contents 1 pynag Documentation, Release 0.9.0 2 Contents CHAPTER 1 Introduction 1.1 About pynag Pynag is a all around python interface to Nagios and bretheren (Icinga, Naemon and Shinken) as well as providing a command line interface to them for managing them. 3 pynag Documentation, Release 0.9.0 4 Chapter 1. Introduction CHAPTER 2 The pynag module 2.1 pynag Package 2.2 Subpackages 2.2.1 Control Package Control Package The Control module includes classes to control the Nagios service and the Command submodule wraps Nagios com- mands. class pynag.Control.daemon(nagios_bin=’/usr/bin/nagios’, nagios_cfg=’/etc/nagios/nagios.cfg’, na- gios_init=None, sudo=True, shell=None, service_name=’nagios’, na- gios_config=None) Bases: object Control the nagios daemon through python >>> from pynag.Control import daemon >>> >>> d= daemon() >>> d.restart() SYSTEMD = 3 SYSV_INIT_SCRIPT = 1 SYSV_INIT_SERVICE = 2 reload() Reloads Nagios. Returns Return code of the reload command ran by pynag.Utils.runCommand() Return type int restart() Restarts Nagios via it’s init script. Returns Return code of the restart command ran by pynag.Utils.runCommand() Return type int 5 pynag Documentation, Release 0.9.0 running() Checks if the daemon is running Returns Whether or not the daemon is running Return type bool start() Start the Nagios service.
    [Show full text]
  • Azure Icinga 2.5 - Client Connection Guide Scope
    Azure Icinga 2.5 - Client Connection Guide Scope The purpose of this document is to provide the steps necessary for connecting a client instance of Icinga 2, version 2.5 or later, to a master node. The steps contained within are sourced from the official Icinga 2 documentation in Section 6, "Distributed Monitoring with Master, Satellites, and Clients" This version of the documentation has been adapted to match the necessary upgrade steps for an instance of the Shadow-Soft Marketplace VHD image. Distributed Monitoring Your Shadow-Soft Marketplace VHD image for Icinga 2 is already configured with a "Master" node. If you have a second Icinga 2 node that you would like to have as a part of your monitoring environment, you can connect the two Icinga 2 daemons together securely using the included icinga2 node wizard commands. This creates an SSL-authenticated tunnel between the daemons over port 5665. This connection will allow configuration to be distributed outward to the satellite, and allow local checks on the satellite node to be executed, then communicated upstream to the master. A master node has no parent node A master node is where you usually install Icinga Web 2. A master node can combine executed checks from child nodes into backends and notifications. A satellite node has a parent node, and may have a child node. A satellite node may execute checks on its own or delegate check execution to child nodes. A satellite node can receive configuration for hosts/services, etc. from the parent node. A satellite node continues to run even if the master node is temporarily unavailable.
    [Show full text]
  • Best Practices in Monitoring
    Best Practices in Monitoring Lars Vogdt Team Lead SUSE DevOPS <[email protected]> About Lars Vogdt ● Co-developer of the SUSE School Server (2003) ● Team lead openSUSE Education since 2006 ● Team lead internal IT Services Team 2009 – 2016 ● Team lead DevOPS Team since Sep. 2016 (Main Target: Build Service) • Responsible for Product Generation, Build Service and Package Hub inside and outside SUSE ● Responsible for “monitoring packages” at SUSE 2 Control your infrastructure Optimize your IT resources ? How can you do that without knowing your requirements and your current resources ? Conclusion: Monitoring is a basic requirement before thinking about anything else... Agenda SUSE monitoring packages Tips and Tricks • Generic Tips • Examples High available and/or load balanced monitoring: one possible way to go Demos: • Icinga, PNP4Nagios, NagVis • automatic inventory via check_mk • Pacemaker / Corosync (SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability) • (mod_)Gearman • Salt • … The future of monitoring @SUSE SUSE monitoring packages SUSE monitoring packages Official vs. unsupported Official supported server:monitoring SUSE Package Hub SUSE official repos https://download.opensuse.org/ https://packagehub.suse.com/ Nagios for <= SLES 11 Base repository for ALL New repository with checked monitoring packages packages, provided via SCC (special channel) nagios-plugins <= > 650 packages Contains packages from SLES 11 server:monitoring which saw additional reviews & testing Icinga 1 for >= SLES Newer packages, Stable, but without support. 12 via SUSE Manager including Add-Ons Rollback possible. - no support monitoring-plugins for Used heavily inside >= SLES 12 SUSE, but with no official support Tips and Tricks Monitoring? 1. Monitoring starts before a machine/service goes into production 2. Monitoring without history will not help to think about the future 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Scibian 9 HPC Installation Guide
    Scibian 9 HPC Installation guide CCN-HPC Version 1.9, 2018-08-20 Table of Contents About this document . 1 Purpose . 2 Structure . 3 Typographic conventions . 4 Build dependencies . 5 License . 6 Authors . 7 Reference architecture. 8 1. Hardware architecture . 9 1.1. Networks . 9 1.2. Infrastructure cluster. 10 1.3. User-space cluster . 12 1.4. Storage system . 12 2. External services . 13 2.1. Base services. 13 2.2. Optional services . 14 3. Software architecture . 15 3.1. Overview . 15 3.2. Base Services . 16 3.3. Additional Services. 19 3.4. High-Availability . 20 4. Conventions . 23 5. Advanced Topics . 24 5.1. Boot sequence . 24 5.2. iPXE Bootmenu Generator. 28 5.3. Debian Installer Preseed Generator. 30 5.4. Frontend nodes: SSH load-balancing and high-availability . 31 5.5. Service nodes: DNS load-balancing and high-availability . 34 5.6. Consul and DNS integration. 35 5.7. Scibian diskless initrd . 37 Installation procedure. 39 6. Overview. 40 7. Requirements . 41 8. Temporary installation node . 44 8.1. Base installation . 44 8.2. Administration environment . 44 9. Internal configuration repository . 46 9.1. Base directories . 46 9.2. Organization settings . 46 9.3. Cluster directories . 48 9.4. Puppet configuration . 48 9.5. Cluster definition. 49 9.6. Service role . 55 9.7. Authentication and encryption keys . 56 10. Generic service nodes . 62 10.1. Temporary installation services . 62 10.2. First Run. 62 10.3. Second Run . 64 10.4. Base system installation. 64 10.5. Ceph deployment . 66 10.6. Consul deployment.
    [Show full text]
  • Nagios & Icinga Network Monitoring
    autoscale: true Nagios & Icinga Philippines Network Operators Group, March 2018 Jonathan Brewer Telco2 Limited New Zealand Network Monitoring: Once you have SNMP data Once you have analysed Log data Once you have service performance data It's time to do something with it! Nagios Nagios is an Internet industry standard for monitoring At times it has been the most popular tool Its job is to monitor hosts & services, and alert on problems Alerting is its forte, it can use email, SMS, or API Handling of issues can be as complex as you need Nagios Home Nagios Hosts Hosts are containers for services If a host is unreachable, so are its services If a host is down, so are its services Nagios treats hosts differently from services! Nagios Hosts Nagios Host Groups Many hosts in a network are identical They can be added to a common group Nagios will behave the same way towards all hosts in a group This saves time & effort in adding hosts to Nagios Nagios Host Groups Nagios Services Nagios pre-defines service templates for many common things DNS, FTP, HTTP, HTTPS, SSH Users can define their own services for special cases For example calling a remote application via SSH Nagios Services Nagios Custom Service Nagios Heirarchy All services in Nagios are children of a host All hosts in Nagios are considered in a heirarchy If a host's parent is unavailable, its children are unreachable This prevents Nagios from alerting on unreachable hosts & services Nagios Heirarchy Nagios Contacts Alerting is what Nagios does best! Contacts the basis of alerting How a contact
    [Show full text]
  • Network Monitoring Solutions
    NETWORK MONITORING SOLUTIONS Steven Borik Corey Muniz Brandon Irizarry 7/14/2015 PRE-PROJECT PREPARATION - Monitoring PAW - Learning PK - Troubleshooting problems PROJECT INTRODUCTION ResearchResearch MeetingsMeetings withwith StakeholdersStakeholders Implementing/TestingImplementing/Testing TopTop SoftwareSoftware PHASE 1 - RESEARCH Paid Solution Open Source Zenoss Monit Splunk Icinga OpManager Nagios Verax Zenoss Core Sensu Zabbix Munin Server Density Shinken Arturis Monitorix CopperEgg Opsview MindArray openNMS SolarWinds Observium Datadog LibreNMS Pandora FMS Argus-the all-seeing IBM Tivoli Kaseya Traverse PHASE 2 - MEETINGS •• PhilPhil MolterMolter •• MarkMark LaForestLaForest •• GiganewsGiganews RonaldRonald KauffmanKauffman •• LSAsLSAs (Steven(Steven Klestinect,Klestinect, ChuChu Song,Song, ThomasThomas Elrod,Elrod, MattMatt Wash)Wash) •• ClayClay BishopBishop •• BrianCohenBrianCohen DataFoundryDataFoundry •• WilliamWilliam McCormickMcCormick •• ChrisChris MarshMarsh •• ThomasThomas AdamsAdams ITIT PHASE 3 - IMPLEMENTATION ZabbixZabbix IcingaIcinga ArgusArgus ZenossZenoss PandoraFMSPandoraFMS CopperCopper EggEgg ObserviumObservium LibreNMSLibreNMS MindMind ArrayArray NagiosNagios Zabbix, LibreNMS, Zenoss, Nagios SOFTWARE 1: LIBRENMS PROS CONS hensive Compre raphing G ket Comprehensive No Tic tion Graphing Integra riendly Plugin F lity ckNso Q Tuicaket Plugin Friendly La SInutepgproartion c Aestheti Lacks Quality Aesthetic Support SOFTWARE 2: ZABBIX s o r P Highly Minor MiB Customizable Support In-Depth Very Resource Graphing Dependent
    [Show full text]
  • FUJITSU Server Plug-Ins for Nagios Core FUJITSU Server Plug-Ins V3.50 for Nagios Core
    FUJITSU Server Plug-ins for Nagios Core FUJITSU Server Plug-ins V3.50 for Nagios Core Interface Documentation March 2018 Edition Copyright 2018 FUJITSU LIMITED All hardware and software names used are trademarks of their respective manufacturers. All rights, including rights of translation, reproduction by printing, copying or similar methods, in part or in whole, are reserved. Offenders will be liable for damages. All rights, including rights created by patent grant or registration of a utility model or design, are reserved. Delivery subject to availability. Right of technical modification reserved. FUJITSU Server Plug-ins for Nagios Core Page: 3 / 86 Keywords ServerView, Nagios, Icinga, PRIMERGY, Blade, PRIMEQUEST, RAID, CIM, iRMC, RackCDU Copyright 2012-2018 FUJITSU LIMITED All rights reserved. FUJITSU Server Plug-ins for Nagios Core Page: 4 / 86 CONTENTS 1 Introduction ..............................................................................................................................................7 1.1 Change History ..................................................................................................................................8 1.2 Documentation ..................................................................................................................................8 1.3 How to Start .......................................................................................................................................9 1.4 Protocol Overview (SNMP, CIM, REST) .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • For Control Systems at Cern
    Evaluation of standard monitoring tools(including log analysis) for control systems at Cern August 2013 Author: Vlad Vintila Supervisor(s): Fernando Varela Rodriguez CERN openlab Summer Student Report 2013 CERN openlab Summer Student Report 2013 Project Specification The goal of this Openlab Summer Student project was to assess the implications and the benefits of integrating two standard IT tools, namely Icinga and Splunkstorm with the existing production setup for monitoring and management of control systems at CERN. Icinga – an open source monitoring software based on Nagios would need to be integrated with an in-house developed WinCC OA application called MOON, that is currently used for monitoring and managing all the components that make up the control systems. Splunkstorm – a data analysis and log management online application would be used stand alone, so it didn’t need integration with other software, only understanding of features and installation procedure. Abstract The aim of this document is to provide insights into installation procedures, key features and functionality and projected implementation effort of Icinga and Splunkstorm IT tools. Focus will be on presenting the most feasible implementation paths that surfaced once both software were well understood. CERN openlab Summer Student Report 2013 Table of Contents Project specification ........................................................................................................ 2 Abstract ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lucas Nussbaum [email protected]
    Supervision - Monitoring Lucas Nussbaum [email protected] Licence professionnelle ASRALL Administration de systèmes, réseaux et applications à base de logiciels libres Lucas Nussbaum Supervision - Monitoring 1 / 51 Administrative stuff I Yes, this course is in English I will speak in French though Goal: get you used to reading technical documentation in English I This module: 6 slots of 3 hours Evaluation: practical work (TPs) + possibly exam Goals: F General knowledge of infrastructure monitoring F Master standard tools of the field F Know about the current trends in this field (e.g. impact of cloud and elasticity) I The other part of this module (Supervision - Annuaire) is totally independent (and with a different tutor: Fabien Pascale) Lucas Nussbaum Supervision - Monitoring 2 / 51 Introduction I Success criteria for sysadmins: infrastructure that just works Avoid incidents if possible If not possible, minimize downtime I How? Well-designed infrastructure Choose reliable technologies and software Add HA (high-availability), failover, redundancy, etc. I Not enough: Murphy’s law (Anything that can go wrong will go wrong) I Monitoring: Collect information about the state of the infrastructure Detect problems (before users have to report them) Predict problems Usual components: ; Probes to acquire data Database to store all measurements Dashboard to show results Notification system (email, SMS, etc.) Lucas Nussbaum Supervision - Monitoring 3 / 51 Example: Icinga https://nagios.debian.org/icinga/ – login: dsa-guest / password: dsa-guest Lucas Nussbaum Supervision - Monitoring 4 / 51 Example: graph from Munin I Disk usage on a server Lucas Nussbaum Supervision - Monitoring 5 / 51 Two sides of the same coin: Metrology Goal: collect lots of metrics about how the system behaves to track performance of the system over time telemetry I Example: collect statistics about; network traffic, HTTP req/s, disk I/Os, ..
    [Show full text]
  • 27Th Large Installation System Administration Conference (LISA '13)
    conference proceedings Proceedings of the 27th Large Installation System Administration Conference 27th Large Installation System Administration Conference (LISA ’13) Washington, D.C., USA November 3–8, 2013 Washington, D.C., USA November 3–8, 2013 Sponsored by In cooperation with LOPSA Thanks to Our LISA ’13 Sponsors Thanks to Our USENIX and LISA SIG Supporters Gold Sponsors USENIX Patrons Google InfoSys Microsoft Research NetApp VMware USENIX Benefactors Akamai EMC Hewlett-Packard Linux Journal Linux Pro Magazine Puppet Labs Silver Sponsors USENIX and LISA SIG Partners Cambridge Computer Google USENIX Partners Bronze Sponsors Meraki Nutanix Media Sponsors and Industry Partners ACM Queue IEEE Security & Privacy LXer ADMIN IEEE Software No Starch Press CiSE InfoSec News O’Reilly Media Computer IT/Dev Connections Open Source Data Center Conference Distributed Management Task Force IT Professional (OSDC) (DMTF) Linux Foundation Server Fault Free Software Magazine Linux Journal The Data Center Journal HPCwire Linux Pro Magazine Userfriendly.org IEEE Pervasive © 2013 by The USENIX Association All Rights Reserved This volume is published as a collective work. Rights to individual papers remain with the author or the author’s employer. Permission is granted for the noncommercial reproduction of the complete work for educational or research purposes. Permission is granted to print, primarily for one person’s exclusive use, a single copy of these Proceedings. USENIX acknowledges all trademarks herein. ISBN 978-1-931971-05-8 USENIX Association Proceedings of the 27th Large Installation System Administration Conference November 3–8, 2013 Washington, D.C. Conference Organizers Program Co-Chairs David Nalley, Apache Cloudstack Narayan Desai, Argonne National Laboratory Adele Shakal, Metacloud, Inc.
    [Show full text]