Producing Publicness

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Producing Publicness Producing Publicness Investigating the Dialectics of Unintended Consequences in Urban Design - Practices in Stockholm and Malmö ELAHE KARIMNIA Doctoral Thesis in Planning and Decision Analysis Stockholm, Sweden, 2018 KTH Royal Institute of Technology School of Architecture and the Built Environment Department of Urban Planning and Environment SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden Title: Producing Publicness: Investigating the dialectics of unintended consequences in urban design - practices in Stockholm and Malmö Author: Elahe Karimnia KTH Royal Institute of Technology School of Architecture and the Built Environment Department of Urban Planning and Environment Division of Urban and Regional Studies © ELAHE KARIMNIA 2018 Cover: the author Photographs that are not given a source in the captions are taken by the author. Printed: US-AB Universitetsservice, Stockholm TRITA-ABE-DLT-1815 ISBN 978-91-7729-788-8 Akademisk avhandling som med tillstånd av KTH i Stockholm framlägges till offentlig granskning för avläggande av teknologie doktorsexamen fredagen den 8 juni kl. 09.00 i Kollegiesalen, KTH, Brinellvägen 8, Stockholm. Abstract The creation of public space is highly intentional, since it is intended to contribute to the civic infrastructure of a city. The conventional dichotomy of intentions versus outcomes in urban design practice posits that, while intentions (as embodied by policies, plans, and visions) represent more abstract thinking about the various facets of publicness, outcomes (as embodied by a three-dimensional built environment) are the manifest realizations of those intentions in public spaces. This study grounds itself in an in-depth exploration of this intention- outcome gap. The overall aim of this study is to explore how urban design can facilitate the production of publicness, by means of which public spaces can enable appropriations, i.e., the practices of togetherness, encounters, and expressions of different publics. To achieve this aim, this study de-layers two major processes and engagements that merit consideration: first, the process of planning and design, by which publicness is produced through larger strategies of urban development and physical construction; second, the process of use, by which publicness is socially experienced and contested. This study treats the appropriation of public space as a consequence of the relationship between these two processes. Elaborating on the theories discussing the socio–spatial and temporal characteristics of appropriations in public spaces, the research identifies the challenges and opportunities in urban design thinking and practice. To understand the dynamics of appropriations in everyday practice, and the mechanisms by which public space can enable or resist appropriations, this research applies a comparative case study approach. The two cases are examples of brownfield developments in two cities in Sweden: the Liljeholmstorget Transit Hub in Stockholm and the Western Harbour Waterfront in Malmö. Both case studies are meant to embody the Swedish urban design and planning discourses of ‘sustainable development’ and producing ‘city-like’ (stadsmässighet) urban environments. Empirical evidence from primary and secondary sources focuses on three sets of key actors identified in these case studies: local authorities (i.e., municipal planners), designers (i.e., architects working with builders on public land and private property), and users (i.e., observed in space, with regard to the traces of absent users). The data come from interviews with key actors, the analysis of planning documents, official reports, and newspaper articles, as well as visits conducted for direct observation, and spatial analysis. The Stockholm study examines local authorities’ negotiations of land uses and trade-offs with market actors while being consistent in their intentions to create a liveable urban centre as a transit hub. The Malmö study reveals a designed and determined process to promote the city’s economic growth and image while taking account of individuals’ spatial experiences and well-being. However, characterizing the publicness of these spaces are the emergent actions and unplanned appropriations. The analysis of design and appropriation processes reveals that public spaces were designed without specific consideration of the consequences for the publics’ socio–spatial appropriations. Liljeholmstorget has i different types of public spaces and a strong spatial order, yet its publicness is transformed through informal togetherness and passive encounters in relation to collective routines of commuting and consumption. The Western Harbour Waterfront was planned for the well-being of a specific type of public, which was later contested by unexpected users and their unplanned expressions and togetherness. Comparative analysis of these urban development projects in Stockholm and Malmö arrives at the following insights. First, it demonstrates that while intentions are drivers for achieving socially and physically accessible public spaces, they are not enough to enable diverse types of appropriations. Second, the study reveals the potentials of accessible public spaces to stimulate users’ perception of publicness and to provide opportunities for them to practice their rights and desires. However, such potentials are only partially and uncritically applied in planning and design processes. As a third and final point, unplanned appropriations should be regarded as welcome phenomena in urban design, because they emphasize the dynamic and contingent characteristics of publicness, which requires constant becoming. This study – Producing publicness – is an effort to show that our cities’ public spaces require an ongoing conversation between urban actors, in order to support meaningful togetherness, encounters, and expressions for all members of the public. Keywords: Urban Design Process, Publicness, Public Space, Appropriation of Space, Intentions and Outcomes, Unintended Consequences, Stockholm, Malmö. ii Sammanfattning på svenska Skapandet av det offentliga rummet sker alltid med avsikter, eftersom offentliga rum är avsedda att vara en del av en stads offentliga, gemensamma infrastruktur. Vanligtvis uppfattas motsättningen mellan avsikter och utfall inom stadsbyggandet som den mellan abstrakt tänkta intentioner (beskrivna i policies, planer och visioner) beträffande olika aspekter av offentlighet och det fysiskt manifesterade utfallet av dessa intentioner (den tredimensionella byggda miljön). Föreliggande studie tar sin utgångspunkt i en mer djupgående undersökning av denna motsättning. Det övergripande syftet är att utforska hur stadsbyggande (urban design) kan stöda utvecklingen av ett rikare offentligt rum genom att underlätta människors ianspråktagande av rummet i form av olika gruppers gemenskap, möten och uttrycksformer. För att uppfylla detta syfte undersöks i studien två viktiga processer och intresseområden; för det första, planerings- och projekteringsprocessen som producerar det offentliga rummet genom övergripande strategier för urban utveckling och fysiskt byggande; för det andra, ianspråktagandeprocessen, genom vilken det offentliga rummet upplevs och prövas socialt. Denna studie behandlar ianspråktagandet av det offentliga rummet som ett resultat av förhållandet mellan dessa två processer. Med stöd av teorier som behandlar socio-spatiala och temporala aspekter av ianspråktagande av rummet söker studien identifiera problem och möjligheter inom stadsbyggandets teori och praktik. För att förstå de underliggande krafter som påverkar det vardagliga ianspråktagandet av miljön samt de mekanismer som gör att offentliga rum underlättar eller förhindrar olika gruppers ianspråktagande och användning, tillämpas här jämförande fallstudiemetodik. De två studerade fallen är exempel på omvandling av före detta industriområden i två svenska städer: Liljeholmstorget i Stockholm och Västra hamnen i Malmö. I båda fallen hade man uttalat målsättningen att förkroppsliga den svenska planeringsdiskursen om uthålligt stadsbyggande och stadsmässighet. Empiriska data från primära och sekundära källor samlades in med tre grupper av nyckelaktörer i fokus: lokala planeringsmyndigheter (t. ex. kommunala planerare), projektörer (t. ex. de arkitekter som projekterade de byggda miljöerna på uppdrag av entreprenörerna) och de människor som använder miljöerna (enligt observationer, också omfattande eventuella tecken på frånvarande användare). Data har samlats in genom intervjuer med nyckelaktörer och dokumentstudier av planeringsdokument, officiella rapporter och tidningsartiklar, samt genom besök på platsen för direkta observationer och spatial analys. Stockholmsfallet visar hur kommunens aktörer förhandlar fram olika typer av markanvändning genom marknadsmässigt kompromissande med för- och nackdelar, samtidigt som de strävar efter att hålla fast vid sina uttalade mål att skapa ett lokalt centrum och transportnod av hög kvalitet. Malmöfallet påvisar en medvetet planerad process för att påverka stadens ekonomiska utveckling och rykte, samtidigt som man var uppmärksam på tänkta boendes upplevelser och iii välbefinnande. Gemensamt för utvecklingen av de offentliga rummen i respektive fall var de oplanerade handlingar och ianspråktaganden som visade sig. Analysen av planering/ projektering och ianspråktagande visade att de offentliga rummen inte planerats med hänsyn till konsekvenserna för människors sociala och rumsliga användning av dem. Liljeholmstorget omfattar flera olika typer av offentliga rum inom en tydlig
Recommended publications
  • CITYWIDE SPECIAL EVENTS CD Estimated Cost 1 Central
    CITYWIDE SPECIAL EVENTS CD Estimated Cost 1 Central American Parade & Festival $ 15,300 1 Chinese New Year Golden Dragon Parade $ 3,000 1 Chinese New Year’s Festival $ 1,000 1 Dia De Los Muertos $ 10,000 1 Dia del Salvadoreno $ 14,000 1 Echo Park Holiday Parade $ 5,000 1 Feria Augustina $ 13,800 1 Firecracker Run $ 15,000 1 Glassell Park Tree Lighting Ceremony $ 2,000 1 Greek Festival $ 6,000 1 HP Car Show $ 5,000 1 HP Christmas Parade $ 5,000 1 LA Dodgers Opening Day $ 30,000 1 La Guelaguetza $ 5,000 1 LGBTQ Event $ 5,000 1 Lincoln Heights Fireworks Show $ 2,000 1 Lincoln Heights Holiday Parade $ 2,000 1 Lotus Festival $ 2,500 1 Lummis Day $ 800 1 MacArthur Park Fireworks Show $ 2,000 1 Northeast Jazz Festival $ 5,000 1 Philippine Festival/Independence Day $ 5,000 1 Sharing Festival $ 5,000 . SUBTOTAL CD 1 $ 159,400 2 Lit Crawl $ 2,500 2 NoHo Summer Nights $ 2,500 2 Songkran Festival $ 8,000 2 Studio City Winter Festival $ 6,752 2 St. Anne Annual Community Festival $ 7,000 2 Valley Village Family Festival $ 7,000 2 Vegan Fair $ 5,000 2 NoHo Cinifest $ 2,000 . SUBTOTAL CD 2 $ 40,752 . 3 4th of July $ 20,000 3 Councilmember Blumenfield’s Regional . Community Event $ 5,000 3 Dia De Los Muertos $ 8,404 CITYWIDE SPECIAL EVENTS CD Estimated Cost 3 Grateful Hearts $ 1,826 3 JHA Walk of Ages $ 4,775 3 Light the Night Walk for Leukemia $ 4,500 3 Memorial Day Parade $ 14,989 3 Motor4Toys Charity Car Show $ 2,500 3 Reseda Art Walk $ 15,000 3 Still Saving Lives Car Show $ 2,000 3 Walk of Hearts $ 2,200 .
    [Show full text]
  • A Bid for Better Transit Improving Service with Contracted Operations Transitcenter Is a Foundation That Works to Improve Urban Mobility
    A Bid for Better Transit Improving service with contracted operations TransitCenter is a foundation that works to improve urban mobility. We believe that fresh thinking can change the transportation landscape and improve the overall livability of cities. We commission and conduct research, convene events, and produce publications that inform and improve public transit and urban transportation. For more information, please visit www.transitcenter.org. The Eno Center for Transportation is an independent, nonpartisan think tank that promotes policy innovation and leads professional development in the transportation industry. As part of its mission, Eno seeks continuous improvement in transportation and its public and private leadership in order to improve the system’s mobility, safety, and sustainability. For more information please visit: www.enotrans.org. TransitCenter Board of Trustees Rosemary Scanlon, Chair Eric S. Lee Darryl Young Emily Youssouf Jennifer Dill Clare Newman Christof Spieler A Bid for Better Transit Improving service with contracted operations TransitCenter + Eno Center for Transportation September 2017 Acknowledgments A Bid for Better Transit was written by Stephanie Lotshaw, Paul Lewis, David Bragdon, and Zak Accuardi. The authors thank Emily Han, Joshua Schank (now at LA Metro), and Rob Puentes of the Eno Center for their contributions to this paper’s research and writing. This report would not be possible without the dozens of case study interviewees who contributed their time and knowledge to the study and reviewed the report’s case studies (see report appendices). The authors are also indebted to Don Cohen, Didier van de Velde, Darnell Grisby, Neil Smith, Kent Woodman, Dottie Watkins, Ed Wytkind, and Jeff Pavlak for their detailed and insightful comments during peer review.
    [Show full text]
  • Shanghai, China Overview Introduction
    Shanghai, China Overview Introduction The name Shanghai still conjures images of romance, mystery and adventure, but for decades it was an austere backwater. After the success of Mao Zedong's communist revolution in 1949, the authorities clamped down hard on Shanghai, castigating China's second city for its prewar status as a playground of gangsters and colonial adventurers. And so it was. In its heyday, the 1920s and '30s, cosmopolitan Shanghai was a dynamic melting pot for people, ideas and money from all over the planet. Business boomed, fortunes were made, and everything seemed possible. It was a time of breakneck industrial progress, swaggering confidence and smoky jazz venues. Thanks to economic reforms implemented in the 1980s by Deng Xiaoping, Shanghai's commercial potential has reemerged and is flourishing again. Stand today on the historic Bund and look across the Huangpu River. The soaring 1,614-ft/492-m Shanghai World Financial Center tower looms over the ambitious skyline of the Pudong financial district. Alongside it are other key landmarks: the glittering, 88- story Jinmao Building; the rocket-shaped Oriental Pearl TV Tower; and the Shanghai Stock Exchange. The 128-story Shanghai Tower is the tallest building in China (and, after the Burj Khalifa in Dubai, the second-tallest in the world). Glass-and-steel skyscrapers reach for the clouds, Mercedes sedans cruise the neon-lit streets, luxury- brand boutiques stock all the stylish trappings available in New York, and the restaurant, bar and clubbing scene pulsates with an energy all its own. Perhaps more than any other city in Asia, Shanghai has the confidence and sheer determination to forge a glittering future as one of the world's most important commercial centers.
    [Show full text]
  • Successful Partnerships (PDF)
    Successful Partnerships for Parks Collaborative Approaches to Advance Equitable Access to Open Space — Contents — The Power of Partnerships — Partnerships in Action — Notes — Acknowledgments Successful Partnerships for Parks Collaborative Approaches to Advance Equitable Access to Open Space — Contents — The Power of Partnerships — Partnerships in Action — Notes — Acknowledgments ON THE COVER: Yanaguana Garden at Hemisfair is a 4.1-acre (1.7 ha) community gathering place in downtown San Antonio. The park is owned in partnership by Hemisfair Park Area Redevelopment Corporation and the city of San Antonio, with additional partners supporting park development and operation. Billy Hustace Photography © 2020 by the Urban Land Institute 2001 L Street, NW | Suite 200 | Washington, DC 20036-4948 Printed in the United States of America. All rights reserved. Reproduction or use of the whole or any part of the contents of this publication without attribution or written permission of the copyright holder is prohibited. Recommended bibliographic listing: Urban Land Institute, Successful Partnerships for Parks: Collaborative Approaches to Advance Equitable Access to Open Space (Washington, DC: ULI, 2020). ISBN: 978-0-87420-455-1 — Contents — The Power of Partnerships — Partnerships in Action — Notes — Acknowledgments ABOUT ULI ULI BUILDING HEALTHY Public Land (TPL), in partnership with the National Recreation and Park Association (NRPA) and the The Urban Land Institute is a global, member-driven PLACES INITIATIVE Urban Land Institute and with support from organization comprising more than 45,000 real estate Around the world, communities face pressing health The JPB Foundation, 10 Minute Walk is working to and urban development professionals dedicated to challenges related to the built environment.
    [Show full text]
  • And Builders' Guide. Grand Park
    hi AND BUILDERS' GUIDE. VOL. V. NEW YOEK, SATURDAY, JUNE 25, 1870. No. 119. DEI'AUT.MENT oy PcBiiic WORKS, J SUBURBAN HOMES COURTLANDT PALMER & SOiA\ No. 2.17 Broadway. f O CONTRACTORS.—PROPOSALS ENCLOSED IN T a sealed envelope, endorsed with the title of tho work and the name of the bidder written thereon <n'Ko the nnm* Eeal Estate Agents, ber of the work ns in the advertisf-nient), wiL be received GRAND PARK, at this oHicc until Monday, June 27, 1870, at 11 o'clmik, A.M. 858 BROADAVAY, NEAR UTII STREET. No. 1. For paving Ijnfayette place, from Great Jonea [COX.SISTIKG OF streft to Astor place, with stone blocks. No. 2. For paving Delancey street, from Bowery to East 2,000 Acres of First-Class Lands 1^1. A. J. IJYN€M, river, with stonn blorfcs. Xl). 3. For paving South street, from Mmtgomery stieet IN OXK nODYOX THE UEA.UTIPUL to Catlinrine street, with stone blocks. HIGHLANDS OP WESTCHESTER COUNTT, N. Y. REAL ESTATE BROKER, Xo. 4. For paving Second avenue, from Eighty-si.xth street P to One Hundred and Twenty-fifth street, with .stone blocks. TO BE SOI.I) AT NO. 72 CEDAR STREET, Xo. .5. For paving Ninth avenue, from Fourteenth street to Twenty-third street, with stone blocks. PUBLIO AUTOTION', NKW YORK, No. C. For paving Eleventh avenne. from Thirty-third II-: bet. Broadway and Nassau Street. street to Thirty-fourth street, witii stone bldcks. IN SUBDIVISIONS, INCLUDING ELEGANT VILLA Xo. 7. For paving Attorney street, from Division to Riv­ SITES, DESIRABLE VILLAGE LOTS AND ington street, with st<jnc blocks.
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Park's Spring Programming to Celebrate
    Contact: Lisa Ducore 213-972-3328 direct [email protected] GRAND PARK’S SPRING PROGRAMMING TO CELEBRATE OUR L.A. VOICES THROUGH PERFORMANCES, CONCERTS AND MEETUPS Springtime Events Provide Community Platforms for Angelenos to Share Their Stories Through Music, Dance, Creative Writing and Spoken Word LOS ANGELES (November 17, 2016) – The Music Center today announced Grand Park’s spring programming -- Grand Park’s Our L.A. Voices -- designed to highlight the voices of Angelenos through various mediums and artistic genres. Celebrating the artist within each individual, Grand Park’s spring event line-up includes performances by L.A. artists and provides platforms for communities to gather and share stories about life experiences and the common threads that unite the County. The season’s highlights include lunchtime concerts featuring performances by young artists from the Los Angeles County High School for the Arts, Grand Park’s Downtown Bookfest and Portals Project at Grand Park, among many other events and activities. “Grand Park offers Angelenos many opportunities to celebrate the richness of our community and the diversity of Los Angeles County by inviting people to gather, share their individual stories and learn more about their neighbors,” said Rachel Moore, president and CEO of The Music Center. “The park’s spring line-up includes programs that highlight what makes each of us unique and ways to experience how the arts can unify us all.” Lucas Rivera, vice president of Grand Park, offered, “This spring we are excited to provide programs in Grand Park that are inspired by the many voices that make Los Angeles great.
    [Show full text]
  • Fourth Annual Grand Park + the Music Center's N.Y.E.L.A. to Provide A
    Contact: Lisa Ducore Grand Park + The Music Center 213-972-3328 direct [email protected] FOURTH ANNUAL GRAND PARK + THE MUSIC CENTER’S N.Y.E.L.A. TO PROVIDE A PLATFORM FOR ANGELENOS TO SHARE HOPES AND DREAMS FOR 2017 AT THE WEST COAST’S FLAGSHIP NEW YEAR’S EVE CELEBRATION – Light Projections Throughout the Highly Popular Free Event Lead Up to 3D Animation on City Hall for a One-of-a-Kind Countdown to Midnight – [Calendar Information on Page 2] LOS ANGELES (December 8, 2016) – Los Angeles will put its mark on New Year’s Eve celebrations around the world as Angelenos join together with friends and family to share their hopes, dreams and resolutions for 2017 at the fourth annual Grand Park + The Music Center’s N.Y.E.L.A. The West Coast’s flagship New Year’s celebration will feature three stages with live music, DJs and dancing throughout the night; large scale inflatable art; and 3D digital video mapping on City Hall along with an integrated light show to count down to the new year in true L.A. style. The free family-friendly event, which attracts thousands from all over Southern California and beyond, reinforces Downtown Los Angeles as a destination for a grand-scale New Year’s Eve experience. Grand Park + The Music Center’s N.Y.E.L.A. takes place from 8:00 p.m. on December 31, 2016 to 1:00 a.m. on New Year’s Day, and will cover 90 acres from The Music Center Plaza to City Hall (Hope Street to Spring Street) and from Temple Street to 2nd Street.
    [Show full text]
  • COMMUNITY RESOURCE GUIDE for Families/Caregivers of Children Ages 0-5
    COMMUNITY RESOURCE GUIDE for Families/Caregivers of Children Ages 0-5 Serving the communities of: DTLA/Skid Row – Westlake – Koreatown – Chinatown – MacArthur Park – Temple/Beaudry – Hollywood – Atwater Village Funded by First 5 LA. Revised May 2016 INTRODUCTION Choose Health LA Kids is a partnership between the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health and 20 funded agencies throughout LA County working towards reducing childhood obesity among children ages 0-5. Funded by First 5 LA, Choose Health LA Kids’ funded agencies are engaging the community through a variety of activities including grocery store tours, food demonstrations, parent education, and linking community resources to families with children ages 0-5. WHAT YOU WILL FIND The Community Resource Guide for Families/Caregivers of Children Ages 0-5 is a comprehensive publication focusing on Los Angeles County. The Guide is divided into five sections: First 5 LA Resources Nutrition and Healthy Lifestyle Resources Physical Activity Resources Free/Low-Cost Resources for Pregnant/Post-Partum Women Social and Health Services Resources TABLE OF CONTENTS First 5 LA Resources ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ pg 3-6 Perinatal and Parent Support Nutrition and Physical Activity Oral Health Housing Best Start Early Care and Education Health Coverage and 211 LA County Vision Nutrition and Healthy Lifestyle Resources __________________________________________________________________________________ pg 7-10
    [Show full text]
  • Downtown Community Plan
    THE DOWNTOWN COMMUNITY PLAN Maintaining character and vitality at the historic crossroads of community, culture and commerce. Planning and Community Development Department ADOPTED JULY 2017 THE DOWNTOWN COMMUNITY PLAN Dear Friends, After an extensive community • We must maintain our sense of history – historic preservation engagement process, we are excited is important to present the Downtown Community Plan! Based upon direction from the • Let’s keep it local – a preference for small-scale and local City Council, Planning Commission businesses and listening to the many perspectives • It should be easy to get around – people mostly get around and voices that have an interest in by walking, bike, or car and there should be convenient and Downtown Santa Monica, this adopted reliable transportation choices Plan includes: • There are many ideas about height – support for the general • A predictable process to encourage housing, both market- strategy of protecting the historic core and establishing rate and significantly more affordable housing density near the Expo station but divergent ideas about • New protections for historic resources and incentives for exceeding 84 feet their adaptive reuse We would like to thank the thousands of community partners and • Eliminated parking minimums making it easier for local residents that have given their time to attend workshops and discussions, businesses to thrive join walking tours, take a questionnaire, and send us written comments. • A rigorous process for projects on three Established Large Your dedication has undoubtedly resulted in a better Plan. Sites allowing no more than 130’ As planners, it is our job to be a filter for the many voices that have Sincerely, shaped this Plan and it is our responsibility to balance these interest and provide our best recommendation.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Geography (10Th
    c09UrbanGeography.indd Page 288 9/19/11 11:15 AM user-f501 /204/MHBR250/mca25006_disk1of1/0073525006/mca25006_pagefiles CHAPTER 9 Urban Geography Field Note Ghosts of Detroit? 85°W L. S 80°W upe rior 90°W M CANADA I L C . H H u 45°N n r a I o g G n i WISCONSIN h A c i o N ari . Ont M L . L NEW YORK Detroit rie L. E PENNSYLVANIA ILLINOIS OHIO 40°N INDIANA WEST VIRGINIA KENTUCKY Figure 9.1 Detroit, Michigan. The buildings along West Adams Street face Grand Park Circus in Detroit, Michigan. From left to right, the Kales Building, Adams Theater, Grand Park Centre, and Fyfe Apartments have experienced the rise, decline, and revitalization of the neighborhood, which is located in the Central Business District. © Erin H. Fouberg. The semicircular shaped Grand Circus Park in Detroit, Michigan is divided by several streets, making it look like the hub and spokes of a bicycle wheel from above. The grouping of buildings along Grand Circus Park (Fig 9.1) refl ects the rise, fall, and revitalization of the central business district (CBD) in Detroit. The ce n tral business di s trict is a concentration of business and commerce in the city’s downtown. The Kales building is the tall building on the far left of the photograph. It was once the headquarters of the Kresge Corporation, which became K-Mart. 288 c09UrbanGeography.indd Page 289 9/19/11 11:15 AM user-f501 /204/MHBR250/mca25006_disk1of1/0073525006/mca25006_pagefiles Ghosts of Detroit? 289 Aba n doned in 1986 and left to a state of disrepair, the Kales building was renovated at a cost of $15 million in 2005.
    [Show full text]
  • Anzac Parade Final 20201023
    HERITAGE ASSESSMENT ANZAC PARADE RANDWICK CITY & CITY OF SYDNEY RANDWICK CITY COUNCIL OCTOBER 2020 DOCUMENT STATUS Document Status Date Prepared by Reviewed by Draft Final 12 October 2020 Dr Sue Rosen Dr Rosemary Kerr; Dr Noni Boyd; Georgina Keep Final 19 October 2020 Dr Sue Rosen ABBREVIATIONS AIF Australian Imperial Forces ANZAC Australian and New Zealand Army Corp ICOMOS International Council on Monuments and Sites LEP Local Environmental Plan LGA Local Government Area NPWS National Parks and Wildlife Service NSW New South Wales POW prisoner of war RSL Returned and Services League UNSW University of New South Wales VC Victoria Cross VWA Voluntary Workers Association | 2 | Heritage Assessment of Anzac Parade | Randwick City Council| October 2020 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In February 2017 Randwick City Council resolved ‘… to endeavour to restore and recreate the ANZAC Parade corridor as intended…’ 100 years earlier, in 1917. In that year, the Anzac Memorial Obelisk was constructed at the head of Randwick Road which had been reconstructed, widened and beautified with a flower bed running down the centre through the Moore Park precinct by Sydney City Council. The thoroughfare was renamed ‘Anzac Parade’ and opened in association with the dedication of the Anzac Memorial Obelisk to honour the ANZACs in the aftermath of the Gallipoli campaign and the then ongoing conflict of WWI. It was proposed that the memorial route would eventually run to La Perouse. This heritage assessment was commissioned to inform the restoration and recreation and presentation of Anzac Parade as a memorial route. There are two types of defence-related places associated with Anzac Parade: • places used for defence purposes, ranging from recruitment and training, to actual conflict, to rehabilitation and post conflict welfare, and • places of memorialisation – monuments and reminders in the streetscapes of tragic and pivotal conflicts with a national and international significance.
    [Show full text]
  • October 2016
    OCTOBER 2016 FEATURING: SAN FRANCISCO BALLET PACIFIC NORTHWEST BALLET HOUSTON BALLET Top left: Pacific Northwest Ballet soloist Leta Biasucci in Forsythe’s The Vertiginous Thrill of Exactitude. Photo © Angela Sterling. Top right: San Francisco Ballet Principal Dancers Carlo Di Lanno and Sofiane Sylve in Forsythe's Pas/Parts 2016. Photo © Erik Tomasson. Bottom: Houston Ballet’s Connor Walsh in Forsythe’s In the middle, somewhat elevated. Photo © Amitava Sarkar. NOTE FROM THE THE MUSIC CENTER 16/17 PRESIDENT AND CEO BOARD OF DIRECTORS My first year as president and CEO of The Music OFFICERS Center has flown by, but what a difference a year BOARD CHAIR SECRETARY makes! We just recently completed one of our Lisa Specht Karen Kay Platt most successful summers ever: our DanceDTLA free Friday night dance parties captivated VICE CHAIRS TREASURER more than 15,000 people; our Moves After Dark Robert J. Abernethy Susan M. Wegleitner Michael J. Pagano site-specific dance performances saw sold-out ASSISTANT TREASURER crowds; our multi-sensory Sleepless: The Music PRESIDENT AND AND CHIEF FINANCIAL Center After Hours events introduced thousands to The Music Center; CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OFFICER and our Spotlight arts training and scholarship program provided more Rachel S. Moore Lisa Whitney than 500 students and their families with free art workshops at the Spotlight Academy. In addition, we hosted more than 30,000 people at Grand Park + The Music Center’s 4th of July Block Party. To top it off, MEMBERS AT LARGE the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors recently approved the William H. Ahmanson Darrell D.
    [Show full text]