Alteration to East Ayrshire Local Plan 3

EAST AYRSHIRE COUNCIL

ALTERATION TO EAST AYRSHIRE LOCAL PLAN FINALISED DRAFT

SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL BACKGROUND INFORMATION PAPERS

VOLUME 3

APPENDIX 13C: DETAILED SEA OF GLASGOW LINK CORRIDOR DEVELOPMENT SITES

APPENDIX 13D: DETAILED SEA OF M74 LINK CORRIDOR DEVELOPMENT SITES

BACKGROUND INFORMATION: APPENDIX 13C: SEA OF GLASGOW LINK CORRIDOR SETTLEMENT SITES

DUNLOP

Ref. No. Site Location Site Suggested By

004(e) Land to West of Westview Terrace Hope Homes Scotland, Watson Terrace, Drongan KA6 7AB

081(s) Land off Newmill Road Alexander Morton Homes, High Langmuir Farm, Kilmaurs, KA3 2PG

081(t) Land off Lugton Road Alexander Morton Homes, High Langmuir Farm, Kilmaurs, KA3 2PG

081(u) Land to West of Westview Terrace Alexander Morton Homes, High Langmuir Farm, Kilmaurs, KA3 2PG

086(j) Land at Hapland Farm Hope Homes Scotland Ltd, per McInally Associates Ltd, 6 Newton Place, Glasgow G3 7PS

163 Land to South of Dunlop Howie of Dunlop, per Lawrence McPherson Associates, The Atrium, 6 New Road, Ayr KA8 8EX

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

004(e) and + +/- o o + o o + o o ? - o + + - - + 081(u)

Nature of Impact General positive and neutral environmental impacts.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. Consequently, development would have a positive environmental impact in so far as landform is concerned. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

The site is located to the west of Dunlop, directly adjacent to the settlement boundary and the northern boundary of the Dunlop Outstanding Conservation Area. With the site being limited in size and scale, it is considered that any sensitive residential development of the site would respect and be in keeping with the existing urban form of the village, its settlement pattern and identity. Positive environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in regard to this issue.

It is considered that, although the site is in a peripheral location, it is within relatively close proximity to the centre of the village and most local services and facilities. It is therefore considered that, while development of the area would not reduce the need for travel or journey length, such development should help promote, encourage or facilitate walking or cycling. Being located in close proximity to Kilmaurs railway station, the development will also encourage and facilitate the use of public transport. Positive environmental impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

It is considered that a sensitive residential development of the site could possibly be effected without damage or detriment to the area and without exceeding environmental capacity.

Mitigation Required None

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

081(s) + +/- o o + o o + o o ? - o - + - - +

Nature of Impact General positive and neutral environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints There is a public Right of Way running through the centre of the site.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study commissioned by the Council, the area of land in question is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as part of a larger area of higher landscape sensitivity to development. However, this larger area is also identified as an ‘Area with Limited Potential for Development’. In principle, the development of the site for residential purposes is considered acceptable in landscape capacity terms.

The site is located to the north of Dunlop, directly adjacent to the settlement boundary. With the site being limited in size and scale, it is considered that any sensitive residential development of the site would respect and be in keeping with the existing urban form of the village, its settlement pattern and identity. Positive environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in regard to this issue.

It is considered that, although the site is in a peripheral location, it is within relatively close proximity to the centre of the village and most local services and facilities. It is therefore considered that, while development of the area would not reduce the need for travel or journey length, such development should help promote, encourage or facilitate walking or cycling. Being located in close proximity to Dunloprailway station, the development will also encourage and facilitate the use of public transport. Positive environmental impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

It is considered that a sensitive residential development of the site could possibly be effected without damage or detriment to the area and without exceeding environmental capacity.

Mitigation Required The right of Way running through the site should be retained and not disrupted by any new development proposed.

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

081(t) + +/- o o - o o + o o ? - o - + - - +

Nature of Impact General positive and neutral environmental impacts.

It is considered that, although the site is in a peripheral location, it is within relatively close proximity to the centre of the village and most local services and facilities. It is therefore considered that, while development of the area would not reduce the need for travel or journey length, such development should help promote, encourage or facilitate walking or cycling. Being located in close proximity to Dunlop railway station, the development will also encourage and facilitate the use of public transport. Positive environmental impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

It is considered that a sensitive residential development of the site could possibly be effected without damage or detriment to the area and without exceeding environmental capacity.

Mitigation Required None

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

086(j) + +/- o o + o o + o o ? - o - + - - +

Nature of Impact General positive and neutral environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints There is a public Right of Way running through the centre and along the northern boundary of the site.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study commissioned by the Council, the area of land in question is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as an area of higher landscape sensitivity to development. However, this area is also identified as an ‘Area with Limited Potential for Development’. In principle, the development of the site for residential purposes is considered acceptable in landscape capacity terms.

It is considered that, although the site is in a peripheral location, it is within relatively close proximity to the centre of the village and most local services and facilities. It is therefore considered that, while development of the area would not reduce the need for travel or journey length, such development should help promote, encourage or facilitate walking or cycling. Being located in close proximity to Dunlop railway station, the development will also encourage and facilitate the use of public transport. Positive environmental impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard. The existence of a public Right of Way running through the centre and along the northern boundary of the site may also facilitate walking and cycling, especially for recreational purposes.

It is considered that a sensitive residential development of the site could possibly be effected without damage or detriment to the area and without exceeding environmental capacity.

Mitigation Required The right of Way running through the site should be retained and not disrupted by any new development proposed.

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

163 + +/- o o + o/- o + o o ? - o - + - - +

Nature of Impact General positive and neutral environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints None

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the area of land in question is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as an area of low landscape sensitivity to development and as an area identified as an ‘Area Most Suitable for Development’. It is considered that residential development of the site could take place without detriment to landscape character, local distinctiveness and the scenic value of the area.

The site is located to the south of Dunlop, directly adjacent to the settlement boundary. It is considered that a sensitive residential development of the site would respect and be in keeping with the existing urban form of the village, its settlement pattern and identity. Positive environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in regard to this issue. The southern half of the site comprises the former cricket ground which has potential for continuing recreational use. Development of that portion of the site will have an adverse environmental impact, damaging an area of green space important for recreation and amenity purposes.

It is considered that, although the site is in a peripheral location, it is within relatively close proximity to the centre of the village and most local services and facilities. It is therefore considered that, while development of the area would not reduce the need for travel or journey length, such development should help promote, encourage or facilitate walking or cycling. Being located in close proximity to Dunlop railway station, the development will also encourage and facilitate the use of public transport. Positive environmental impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard. The existence of a public Right of Way running through the centre and along the northern boundary of the site may also facilitate walking and cycling, especially for recreational purposes.

It is considered that a sensitive residential development of the site could possibly be effected without damage or detriment to the area and without exceeding environmental capacity.

Mitigation Required

FENWICK AND LAIGH FENWICK

Ref. No. Site Location Site Suggested By

021(a) Land to West of Hallhouse, Laigh Fenwick James Barr, 226 West George Street, Glasgow G2 2LN

021(b) Land to West of Waterslap Road, Laigh James Barr, 226 West George Street, Glasgow G2 2LN Fenwick

043 Land to North West of Fenwick Mrs Marie Macklin, The Klin Group, 27 John Finnie Street, Kilmarnock KA1 1BL

080 Land to North of Waterside Road, Fenwick Taylor Woodrow Developments Ltd., per James Barr, 226 West George Street, Glasgow G2 2LN

081(n) Land to South East of Fenwick Alexander Morton Homes, High Langmuir Farm, Kilmaurs, KA3 2PG

081(o) Land to North of Fenwick Alexander Morton Homes, High Langmuir Farm, Kilmaurs, KA3 2PG

081(p) Land to West of Waterslap Road, Laigh Alexander Morton Homes, High Langmuir Farm, Fenwick Kilmaurs, KA3 2PG

095(g) Land to North of Hallhouse, Laigh Fenwick Mr. Andrew Walters, Atkins, Clifton House, Clifton Place, Glasgow G3 7YY

104(a) Land to West of Hallhouse, Laigh Fenwick Mr Richard Webster, Fenwick Community Council, 7 Waterslap, Laigh Fenwick, KA3 6AJ

104(b) Land at Dulselma, Fenwick Mr Richard Webster, Fenwick Community Council, 7 Waterslap, Laigh Fenwick, KA3 6AJ

112(a) Land to North of Fenwick Mr Barrett, Per Graham Jinks Planning and Development, 28 Eriskay Ave, Hamilton ML3 8QB

112(b) Land to North West of Fenwick Mr Barrett, Per Graham Jinks Planning and Development, 28 Eriskay Ave, Hamilton ML3 8QB

132(a) Land to West of Fenwick Mr R Muirhead, R and S Muirhead, 7 Landsborough Drive, Kilmarnock KA3 1RY

132(b) Land to East of Bowling Green, Fenwick Mr R Muirhead, R and S Muirhead, 7 Landsborough Drive, Kilmarnock KA3 1RY

144(a) Land to rear of John Fulton Memorial Hall, James Speirs and Sons, per Montague Evans, 37 Melville Fenwick Street, Edinburgh EH3 7JF

144(b) Land to East of Bowling Green, Fenwick James Speirs and Sons, per Montague Evans, 37 Melville Street, Edinburgh EH3 7JF

174 Land at Laigh Wylieland, Fenwick Mr and Mrs B Dobson, Glencraig, Fenwick KA3 6DA and Mr and Mrs R Loudon, Laigh Wyllieland, Fenwick, KA3 6DA 216(b) Land at Waterslap Councillor Suggestion at Member’s Seminar

CD080 Land to North of Waterside Road, Fenwick Taylor Woodrow Developments Ltd., per James Barr, 226 West George Street, Glasgow G2 2LN

CD095 Land to North West of Fenwick Land Engineering, per John Maddison Planning Services, 2/2, 86 Marlborough Avenue, Glasgow G11 7BJ

CD120(a) Land to West of Fenwick James Spiers and Sons and AWG Property Ltd, per Montague Evans, 302 St Vincent Street, Glasgow G2 5RU

CD120(b) Land to East of Bowling Green, Fenwick James Spiers and Sons and AWG Property Ltd, per Montague Evans, 302 St Vincent Street, Glasgow G2 5RU

CD144 Land to North West of Fenwick The Klin Group, per Mr Ian Gallagher, GVA Grimley, Sutherland House, 149 St Vincent Street, Glasgow G2 5NW

CD183 Land to North West of Fenwick Mactaggart and Meikle / BDMR Partnership, per Mr A Aitken, Colliers CRE, 39 George Street, Edinburgh EH2 2HN

CD187 Land to North of Waterside Road, Fenwick Messrs Morton, per Henderson Chartered Surveyors, East Netherton, Milnathort, Kinross, KY13 0SB

CD197 Land to West of Fenwick AWG Property Ltd, per Ms Lorraine Jones, GL Hearn, St Vincent House, 241 St Vincent Street, Glasgow G2 5QY

CD198 Land to East of Bowling Green, Fenwick AWG Property Ltd, per Ms Lorraine Jones, GL Hearn, St Vincent House, 241 St Vincent Street, Glasgow G2 5QY

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

021(a) + +/- o o +/- o o + o o ? - o - +/- - - +

Nature of Impact General positive and neutral environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints None

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the eastern portion of the area of land in question is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as an area of low landscape sensitivity to development and as an ‘Area Most Suitable for Development’. The western part of the site, lying adjacent to the M77 road, has not been identified in the study as an area where development would be acceptable in landscape capacity terms. It is considered that both positive and negative environmental impacts would be experienced with regard to landscape character, were the whole of the area to be developed.

The site is located to the south east of Laigh Fenwick, directly adjacent to the settlement boundary and extending to the M77 road. With the site being limited in size and scale, it is considered that any sensitive residential development of the site would be in keeping with the existing urban form of the village, its settlement pattern and identity, integrating and linking in with the existing residential development to the east. Positive environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in regard to this issue.

It is considered that, because of the peripheral location of the site and the distance of the site from local services and facilities, any development of the area will not help reduce distances travelled by local residents and will not promote, encourage or facilitate walking or cycling. However, being located near a bus route, the development could encourage and facilitate the use of public transport. Both positive and negative environmental impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

It is considered that residential development of the site could be effected without damage or detriment to the area and without exceeding environmental capacity. Positive environmental capacity impacts would therefore be experienced in this regard.

Mitigation Required Any housing allocation should be restricted to the eastern portion of the site, with the new housing being enclosed to the west by woodland planting or buffer landscape between the development and the M77.

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

021(b) + +/- o o + o o + o o ? - o - +/- - - +

Nature of Impact General positive and negative environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints The southernmost part of the site which straddles the Fenwick Water is not identified in the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, as an area suitable for residential development.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, the area of land in question, with the exception of the southernmost part of the site which straddles the Fenwick Water, is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as an area of low landscape sensitivity to development and as an ‘Area Most Suitable for Development’. It is considered that residential development of the site could take place without detriment to landscape character, local distinctiveness and the scenic value of the area.

The site is located to the south of Laigh Fenwick, directly adjacent to the settlement boundary. With the site being limited in size and scale, it is considered that any sensitive residential development of the site, excluding that portion of the site straddling the Fenwick Water, would be in keeping with the existing urban form of the village, its settlement pattern and identity. Positive environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in regard to this issue.

Mitigation Required If the site was to be developed, medium to low density housing is recommended with the establishment of a mature urban edge to preserve and enhance the rural setting of the village and the adjacent Fenwick Water Valley.

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

043 and + +/- o o - o o - o o ? - o - - - - - CD144

Nature of Impact General negative and neutral environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints The major part of the site in question, with the exception of the south western part of the site located directly adjacent to the existing settlement boundary, is not identified in the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, as an area suitable for residential development. Development of this major portion of the site is not considered acceptable in landscape capacity terms.

Comment and Recommendations The site is extremely large and has a potential capacity for housing far in excess of anything that may be required to meet housing demand for Fenwick in the period of the local plan and beyond. The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study commissioned by the Council a small area, located in the south western portion of the site and lying directly adjacent to the existing settlement boundary, is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as an area of low landscape sensitivity to development and as an ‘Area Most Suitable for Development’. In principle, the development of this particular portion of the area for residential purposes is considered acceptable in landscape capacity terms. However, the major part of the site is not identified in the Study as an area suitable for residential development. In general terms, the development of the overall site is not therefore considered acceptable in landscape capacity terms and significant negative environmental impacts will be experienced in this regard. The site is located to the north and north east of the existing settlement boundary and it is unlikely that, because of its size and scale, any residential development of the site would respect or contribute significantly in any way to the improvement of the existing urban form of the town, its settlement pattern or identity. Significant negative environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in this regard.

It is considered that, because of the peripheral location of the site and the distance of the site from local services and facilities, any development of the area will not help reduce distances travelled by local residents and will not promote, encourage or facilitate walking, cycling or the use of public transport. Negative environmental impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

It is considered that residential development of the overall site could not be effected without significant damage or detriment to the area and without exceeding environmental capacity. Consequently, in terms of its impact on the environment, the site is not considered suitable for inclusion as a potential housing site in the local plan alteration.

Mitigation Required Not Applicable.

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

080, CD080 + +/- o o +/- o o - o o ? - o - - - - +/- and CD187

Nature of Impact General negative or neutral environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints The eastern part of the site in question is not identified in the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, as an area suitable for residential development. Development of this portion of the site is not considered acceptable in landscape capacity terms. Site constraints include the proximity of higher ground at Wyllielandhill.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study commissioned by the Council, the northern and western portions of the area in question (comprising approximately 2/3 of the area) are identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as an area of medium to low landscape sensitivity to development and as an area identified as an ‘Area with Potential’ for development. In principle, the development of these parts of the area for residential purposes is considered acceptable in landscape capacity terms. The eastern part of the site in question is not identified in study as an area suitable for residential development and development of this portion of the site is not considered acceptable with regard to landscape capacity. Both positive and negative environmental impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

The site is located to the east of the existing settlement boundary and it is unlikely that, because of its size and scale, any residential development of the site would respect or contribute to the improvement of the existing urban form of the town, its settlement pattern or identity. Negative environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in this regard.

It is considered that, because of the peripheral location of the site and the distance of the site from local services and facilities, any development of the area will not help reduce distances travelled by local residents and will not promote, encourage or facilitate walking, cycling or the use of public transport. Negative environmental impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

It is considered that residential development of the overall site could not be effected without some damage or detriment to the area and without exceeding environmental capacity.

Mitigation Required Not Applicable

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

081(n) + +/- o o + o o + o o ? - o - - - - +

Nature of Impact General positive and negative environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints There are no constraints to development of the site in landscape capacity terms.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the area in question is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as an area of medium to low landscape sensitivity to development and as an area identified as an ‘Area with Potential’ for development. It is considered that residential development of the site could take place without detriment to landscape character, local distinctiveness and the scenic value of the area.

The site is located to the east of Fenwick, directly adjacent to the settlement boundary. With the site being limited in size and scale, it is considered that any sensitive residential development of the site would respect be in keeping with the existing urban form of the village, its settlement pattern and identity. Positive environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in regard to this issue.

It is considered that, because of the peripheral location of the site and the distance of the site from local services and facilities, any development of the area will not help reduce distances travelled by local residents and will not promote, encourage or facilitate walking, cycling or the use of public transport. Negative environmental impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

Mitigation Required Medium to low density housing is recommended in the lower lying areas with the establishment of a mature urban edge to preserve the rural setting.

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

081(o) + +/- o o +/- o o - o o ? - o - - - - -

Nature of Impact General negative and neutral environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints The northern part of the site in question is not identified in the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, as an area suitable for residential development. Development of this northern portion of the site is not considered acceptable in landscape capacity terms.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, the southern portion of the site located directly adjacent to Skernieland Road is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as an area of low landscape sensitivity to development and as an ‘Area Most Suitable for Development’. In principle, the development of this southern portion of the area for residential purposes is considered acceptable in landscape capacity terms. The northern part of the site in question is not identified in study as an area suitable for residential development and development of this portion of the site is not considered acceptable with regard to landscape capacity. With regard to the overall site, both positive and negative environmental impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

The site is located to the north of the existing settlement boundary and it is unlikely that, because of its size, scale and peripheral location, any residential development of the site would respect or contribute to the improvement of the existing urban form of the town, its settlement pattern or identity. Negative environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in this regard.

It is considered that, because of the peripheral location of the site and the distance of the site from local services and facilities, any development of the area will not help reduce distances travelled by local residents and will not promote, encourage or facilitate walking, cycling or the use of public transport. Negative environmental impacts could also therefore be experienced in this regard.

Mitigation Required Not Applicable

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

081(p) + +/- o o + o o + o o ? - o - +/- - - +

Nature of Impact General positive and negative environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints None

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the area of land in question is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as an area of low landscape sensitivity to development and as an ‘Area Most Suitable for Development’. It is considered that residential development of the site could take place without detriment to landscape character, local distinctiveness and the scenic value of the area.

The site is located to the south of Laigh Fenwick, directly adjacent to the settlement boundary. With the site being limited in size and scale, it is considered that any sensitive residential development of the site would be in keeping with the existing urban form of the village, its settlement pattern and identity. Positive environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in regard to this issue.

Mitigation Required Medium to low density housing is recommended with the establishment of a mature urban edge to preserve and enhance the rural setting of the village and the adjacent Fenwick Water Valley.

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

095(g) + +/- o o + o o - o o ? - o - - - - +

Nature of Impact General neutral or negative environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints The extreme western part of the site in question is not identified in the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, as an area suitable for residential development. Development of this portion of the site is not considered acceptable in landscape capacity terms. This western portion of the site is identified in the Study as an Indicative Landscape Area for the creation of a landscape buffer between the settlement and the M77. Laigh Fenwick West Tree Preservation Order is in force on the north eastern part of the site.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the major part of the area in question is identified as an area of medium to low landscape sensitivity to development and as an area identified as an ‘Area with Potential’ for development. In principle, the development of this larger part of the overall area for residential purposes is considered acceptable in landscape capacity terms. The extreme western part of the site is not identified in the study as an area suitable for residential development and development of this area is not considered acceptable in landscape capacity terms, being identified as an Indicative Landscape Area for the creation of a landscape buffer between the settlement and the M77. However, overall, positive environmental impacts would be experienced with regard to landscape character. The site is located to the east of Laigh Fenwick, directly adjacent to the settlement boundary and extending to the M77 road. However, the site is physically isolated from Fenwick with no access being afforded between the site and the existing road network and it is considered that residential development of the site would not be in keeping with the existing urban form of the village, its settlement pattern and identity. Consequently, it is not possible to integrate and link any development of the site with the existing adjacent built up area. Negative environmental impacts are therefore likely to be experienced in regard to this issue.

It is considered that, because of the peripheral location of the site and the distance of the site from local services and facilities, any development of the area will not help reduce distances travelled by local residents and will not promote, encourage or facilitate walking, cycling or the use of public transport. Negative environmental impacts are therefore likely to be experienced in this regard.

Mitigation Required Some medium to low density housing could be accommodated within this area providing this was well integrated into the existing settlement and screened from the M77.

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

104(a) + +/- o o + o o + o o ? - o - +/- - - +/-

Nature of Impact General positive and negative environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints There is a Tree Preservation Order pertaining to the eastern portion of the site.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

The easternmost portion of the site lies within the existing settlement boundary of Laigh Fenwick and has not been subject to scrutiny as part of the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council. The central and western portions of the site lie outwith the settlement boundary and have been assessed accordingly. In this regard, the central portion of the area of land in question is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as an area of low landscape sensitivity to development and as an ‘Area Most Suitable for Development’. The western part of the site, lying adjacent to the M77 road, has not been identified in the study as an area where development would be acceptable in landscape capacity terms. It is considered that both positive and negative environmental impacts would be experienced with regard to landscape character, were the whole of the area to be developed.

The site is located to the south east of Laigh Fenwick and extends to the M77 road. With the site being limited in size and scale, it is considered that any sensitive residential development of the site would be in keeping with the existing urban form of the village, its settlement pattern and identity, integrating and linking in with the existing residential development to the east. Positive environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in regard to this issue.

It is considered that residential development of the site could not be effected without some damage or detriment to the area. However, it is unlikely that the environmental capacity of the site will be exceeded. Both positive and negative environmental capacity impacts would therefore be experienced in this regard.

Mitigation Required A small area of potential development is recommended, enclosed to the west by woodland planting or buffer landscape between the edge of the settlement and the M77. Any development should avoid damage to any of the trees covered by the TPO which relates to the area.

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

104(b) + o o o - o o +/- + o ? - o + + - - +/-

Nature of Impact General positive and neutral environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints The whole area is covered by Tree Preservation Order TPP/30/1985

The site is located within the settlement boundary of Fenwick and is currently developed for nursing home purposes. Having previously been developed, redevelopment of the site for housing would not result in any soils being degraded. and, being located close to the town centre and local facilities, development of the area would positively facilitate walking and cycling and reduce use of the private car for locally based shopping and recreational purposes.

It is considered that a sensitive redevelopment of the site would have a positive environmental impact and respect existing urban form and townscape. However, comprehensive redevelopment could seriously impact on the landscape character and appearance of the site, the whole area being covered by a Tree Preservation Order. Both positive and negative landscape impacts would therefore be experienced in this regard.

It is considered that, subject to the trees within the area remaining unaffected, a sensitive residential development of the site could possibly be effected without damage or detriment to the area and without exceeding environmental capacity.

Mitigation Required It should be ensured that the trees within the site should remain unaffected by any future redevelopment of the area.

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

112(a) + +/- o o - o o - o o ? - o - - - - -

Nature of Impact General negative environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints The site is not identified in the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, as an area suitable for residential development. The site is, indeed, identified in the study as an Indicative Landscape Area for landscape treatment as a buffer zone, helping screen the village from the M77.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

The site is located to the north of the existing settlement boundary and it is unlikely that, because of its size and scale and location, any residential development of the site would respect or contribute to the improvement of the existing urban form of the town, its settlement pattern or identity. Negative environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in this regard.

It is considered that, because of the peripheral location of the site and the distance of the site from local services and facilities, any development of the area will not help reduce distances travelled by local residents and will not promote, encourage or facilitate walking, cycling or the use of public transport. Negative environmental impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

Mitigation Required None

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

112(b), CD095 + +/- o o - o o - o o ? - o - +/- - - - and CD183

Nature of Impact General negative and neutral environmental impacts.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

The site is located to the north west of the existing settlement boundary and it is unlikely that, because of its size and scale and location, any residential development of the site would respect or contribute to the improvement of the existing urban form of the town, its settlement pattern or identity. Development would bring the built up area significantly closer to the new upgraded M77 motorway and negative environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in this regard. It is considered that, because of the peripheral location of the site and the distance of the site from local services and facilities, any development of the area will not help reduce distances travelled by local residents and will not promote, encourage or facilitate walking or cycling. However, being located near a bus route, the development could encourage and facilitate the use of public transport. Both positive and negative environmental impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

It is considered that residential development of the overall site could not be effected without damage or detriment to the area or without exceeding environmental capacity. Negative environmental capacity impacts would therefore be experienced in this regard

Mitigation Required Not Applicable

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

132(a), 144(a), + +/- o o - o o - o o ? - o - + - - - CD120(a) and CD197

Nature of Impact General negative and neutral environmental impacts.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

The site is located to the west of the existing settlement boundary and it is unlikely that, because of its location, any residential development of the site would respect or contribute to the improvement of the existing urban form of the town, its settlement pattern or identity. Development would bring the built up area significantly closer to the new upgraded M77 motorway and negative environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in this regard.

It is considered that, because of the proximity of the site to the central part of the village, any development of the area will help reduce distances travelled by local residents and will encourage and facilitate walking or cycling. Being located close to a bus route, the development could also encourage and facilitate the use of public transport. Positive environmental impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

Mitigation Required Not Applicable

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

132(b), + +/- o o + o o + o o ? - o - +/- - - + 144(b), CD120(b) and CD198

Nature of Impact General positive and negative environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the area in question is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as an area of medium to low landscape sensitivity to development and as part of a larger area identified as an ‘Area with Potential’ for development. It is considered that residential development of the site could take place without detriment to landscape character, local distinctiveness and the scenic value of the area.

The site is located to the north of Laigh Fenwick, directly adjacent to the settlement boundary. With the site being limited in size and scale, it is considered that any sensitive residential development of the site would be in keeping with the existing urban form of the village, its settlement pattern and identity. Positive environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in regard to this issue.

Mitigation Required Some medium to low density housing could be accommodated within this area providing this was well integrated into the existing settlement and screened from the M77.

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

174 + +/- o o + o o + o o ? - o - - - - +

Nature of Impact General positive and negative environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints None

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

It is considered that, because of the peripheral location of the site and the distance of the site from local services and facilities, any development of the area will not help reduce distances travelled by local residents and will not promote, encourage or facilitate walking, cycling or the use of public transport. Negative environmental impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

Mitigation Required Medium to low density housing is recommended in the lower lying areas with the establishment of a mature urban edge to preserve the rural setting.

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

216(b) + +/- +/- o - o + + o o ? - o - - - - +/-

Nature of Impact General negative and neutral environmental impacts.

Northern parts of the site lie within an area of flood risk and there are a number of protected trees (TPOs) along the eastern boundary of the site.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

The northern portion of the area is low lying and at risk from flooding. Consequently there may be a risk of negative impacts affecting the water environment in this particular part of the site.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the area of land in question has not been identified as an area where residential development would be acceptable in landscape capacity terms. The development of the site could have an adverse environmental impact on landscape character, local distinctiveness and the scenic value of the area and negative environmental impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard. The site is, however, a brownfield redevelopment site and development of the area could positively assist in the regeneration of a degraded environment. The site is located to the south of Laigh Fenwick, directly adjacent to the settlement boundary. With the site being limited in size and scale, it is considered that any sensitive residential development of the site would respect and be in keeping with the existing urban form of the village, its settlement pattern and identity. Positive environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in regard to this issue.

It is considered that, because of the peripheral location of the site and the distance of the site from local services and facilities, any development of the area will not help reduce distances travelled by local residents and will not promote, encourage or facilitate walking, cycling or the use of public transport. Negative environmental impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

It is considered that residential development of the site could not be effected without some damage or detriment to the area. However, with the introduction of appropriate mitigation measures it is considered that development of the area could take place without exceeding environmental capacity. Both positive and negative environmental impacts would therefore be experienced in this regard.

Mitigation Required A flood risk assessment requires to be carried out.

KILMAURS

Ref. No. Site Location Site Suggested By

004(g) Land to South of Irvine Road Hope Homes Scotland, Watson Terrace, Drongan KA6 7AB

008 Land to South of Irvine Road Mr John Malcolm, McLean Gibson Partnership, Cathcart House, 20 Cathcart Street, Ayr KA7 1BJ

009 Land at Jockston Farm Mr Stephen Edwards, 3 Wallacetown Avenue, Kilmarnock KA3 6BH

010 Land adjacent to 4 Mill Avenue Mr Stephen Edwards, 3 Wallacetown Avenue, Kilmarnock KA3 6BH

018 Land at Millholm Market Garden Mr E.E. Flannigan, Town House Country House, 56 Byron Street, Glasgow G11 6LZ

024 Land at Millholm Market Garden Ms Carolynne Sutherland, Dickie Homes, Burnfield Avenue, Glasgow G46 7TT

035 Land at Standalane Mr Chris Dobson, Ayrshire Design, 1 Hestan Place, Kilmarnock KA3 2JR

038 Land to South of Irvine Road Mr and Mrs Barry Devlin, 9 Allsop Court, Kilmaurs, KA3 2LZ

044 Land between 9 and 11 Kilmarnock Road Mr and Mrs J. Coltart, The Stables, Tour, Kilmaurs KA3 2NN

063 Land at Millholm Market Garden Mr. James Malcolm, Alexander Morton Homes, High Langmuir Farm, Kilmaurs, KA3 2PG

064 Land to West of Millholm Market Garden Mr. James Malcolm, Alexander Morton Homes, High Langmuir Farm, Kilmaurs, KA3 2PG

065 Land to South of Irvine Road Mr. James Malcolm, Alexander Morton Homes, High Langmuir Farm, Kilmaurs, KA3 2PG

066 Land at High Langmuir Mr. James Malcolm, Alexander Morton Homes, High Langmuir Farm, Kilmaurs, KA3 2PG

067 Land at High Langmuir Mr. James Malcolm, Alexander Morton Homes, High Langmuir Farm, Kilmaurs, KA3 2PG

081(k) Land West of Crosshouse Road Alexander Morton Homes, High Langmuir Farm, Kilmaurs, KA3 2PG

081(l) Land at Viewfield Farm Alexander Morton Homes, High Langmuir Farm, Kilmaurs, KA3 2PG

083 Land at Millholm Market Garden Mr Alistair Landells, Dawn Homes Ltd, 220 West George Street, Glasgow G2 2PG

084 Land at Towerhill Mr Alistair Landells, Dawn Homes Ltd, 220 West George Street, Glasgow G2 2PG

086(e) Land at Crofthead Road Hope Homes Scotland Ltd, per McInally Associates Ltd, 6 Newton Place, Glasgow G3 7PS

088 Land at Irvine Road Warren Consultants, Milngavie Enterprise Centre, Ellangowan Court, Milngavie, Glasgow G62 8PH

095(e) Land at Habbieauld Road Mr. Andrew Walters, Atkins, Clifton House, Clifton Place, Glasgow G3 7YY

113 Land at Crosshouse Road Design Practice, 10 Lynedoch Crescent, Glasgow G3 6EQ

114 Land at Crofthead Road Taylor Associates, 17 Barns Street, Ayr KA7 1XB

143 Land at High Langmuir Mr and Mrs J Murray, per Montague Evans, 37 Melville Street, Edinburgh EH3 7JF

148 Land at Fenwick Road Mr and Mrs W Crawford, 14 Seaford Street, Kilmarnock KA1 2DA

172 Land at Standalane Taurus Construction, per Mr D. Harley, 21 Smillie Place, Kilmarnock KA2 0LY

221(a) Land West of Crosshouse Road Councillor Suggestion at Member’s Seminar

221(b) Land to South of Irvine Road Councillor Suggestion at Member’s Seminar

CD003 Land at Fenwick Road Mr and Mrs W Crawford, 14 Seaford Street, Kilmarnock KA1 2DA

CD066 Land at High Langmuir Mr B Allan, Kirk View, 69 Clarehill Road, Moira, Craigavon, Co. Armagh, Northern Ireland BT67 0PD

CD067 Land at Towerhill Dawn Homes Ltd, per Mr Alistair Landells, 220 West George Street, Glasgow G2 2PG

CD076 Land at Crofthead Road Mr Barry Devlin, per Munro Architects, 23 Portland Road, Kilmarnock KA1 2BT

CD142 Land at Standalane Mr D Harley, per Strutt and Parker, 28 Melville Street, Edinburgh EH3 7HA

CD184 Land at Irvine Road Warren Consultants, Milngavie Enterprise Centre, Ellangowan Court, Milngavie, Glasgow G62 8PH

CD220 Land at Crofthead Road Hope Homes Scotland Ltd, per Mr Scott Graham, McInally Associates Ltd, 6 Newton Place, Glasgow G3 7PS

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

004(g) and + - o o + o o + o o ? - o - - - - + CD184

Nature of Impact General negative or neutral environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints The site is classed by the Macaulay Land Use Institute as Class 3(2) Locally Important Good Quality Agricultural Land.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. However, the development would result in the loss of areas of good quality locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the area of land at Crofthead is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as an area of low landscape sensitivity to development and as an area identified as an ‘Area Most Suitable for Development’. It is considered that residential development of the site could take place without detriment to landscape character, local distinctiveness and the scenic value of the area.

It is considered that any residential development of the site would be considered acceptable in terms of urban form, settlement pattern and identity, and positive environmental impacts are therefore likely to be experienced in regard to this issue.

It is considered that, because of the peripheral location of the site and the distance of the site from local services and facilities, any development of the area will not help reduce distances travelled by local residents and will not promote, encourage or facilitate walking, cycling or the use of public transport. Negative environmental impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

Mitigation Required Any development should enhance the ‘village street’ and entrance experience to the village on its western approaches. Any residential developed of the site should be for medium to low density housing, with the lower density elements being located on the western and southern edges of the site.

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

008 and 088 + - o o + o o + o o ? - o - - - - +

Nature of Impact General negative or neutral environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints The site is classed by the Macaulay Land Use Institute as Class 3(2) Locally Important Good Quality Agricultural Land.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. However, the development would result in the loss of areas of good quality locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

It is considered that, because of the peripheral location of the site and the distance of the site from local services and facilities, any development of the area will not help reduce distances travelled by local residents and will not promote, encourage or facilitate walking, cycling or the use of public transport. Negative environmental impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

009 + - o o - o o - o o ? - o - - - - -

Nature of Impact General negative environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the area of land in question is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as an ‘Area Not Suitable for Housing Development’ and as part of a larger ‘Landscape Strategy Area’ where conservation of the landscape quality and character of the area is recommended to preserve the setting of the village and the adjacent conservation area, as well as preserving the rural separation of Kilmaurs and Kilmarnock.

The site is classed by the Macaulay Land Use Institute as Class 3(2) Locally Important Good Quality Agricultural Land.

The suggested development site is extremely large and is of a size and scale which is not commensurate with the size and scale of the settlement within which it is proposed. It is considered that any residential development of the site would not be considered acceptable in terms of urban form, settlement pattern and identity. In addition, development of such a large area would result in increased coalescence, both in physical and visual terms, of the settlement of Kilmaurs with Kilmarnock. Significant negative environmental impacts are therefore likely to be experienced in regard to this issue.

It is considered that, because of the peripheral location of the site and the distance of the site from local services and facilities, any development of the area will not help reduce distances travelled by local residents and will not promote, encourage or facilitate walking, cycling or the use of public transport. Negative environmental impacts will also therefore be experienced in this regard.

It is considered that residential development of the site could not be effected without serious and significant damage and detriment to the area and without exceeding environmental capacity. Negative environmental capacity impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

Mitigation Required None

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

010 + - o o - o o - o o ? - o - - - - -

Nature of Impact General neutral or negative environmental impacts.

The site is classed by the Macaulay Land Use Institute as Class 3(2) Locally Important Good Quality Agricultural Land.

The suggested development site small and suitable for the development of one house or possibly two houses only. It is considered that development of the site would not be considered acceptable in terms of urban form, settlement pattern and identity, the suggestion being considered to represents an unacceptable extension to the existing settlement boundary. Negative environmental impacts are therefore likely to be experienced in regard to this issue.

It is considered that, because of the peripheral location of the site and the distance of the site from local services and facilities, any development of the area will not help reduce distances travelled by local residents and will not promote, encourage or facilitate walking, cycling or the use of public transport. Negative environmental impacts will also therefore be experienced in this regard.

It is considered that residential development of the site could not be effected without damage or detriment to the area although the development could be implemented without exceeding environmental capacity. Both positive and negative environmental capacity impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

Mitigation Required None

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

018 + - o/- o +/- o o + o o ? - o - - - - +/-

Nature of Impact General negative or neutral environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study commissioned by the Council, the eastern portion of the area of land in question is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as an ‘Area Not Suitable for Housing Development’ and as part of a larger ‘Landscape Strategy Area’ where conservation of the landscape quality and character of the area is recommended to preserve the setting of the village and the rural separation of Kilmaurs and Kilmarnock. This eastern portion of the area is not considered appropriate for future residential development in landscape capacity terms.

The north westernmost portion of the site is classed by the Macaulay Land Use Institute as Class 3(2) Locally Important Good Quality Agricultural Land.

The south eastern portion of the area is low lying and at risk from a 1 in 100 year flooding event

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study commissioned by the Council, the western portion of the area of land in question is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as part of a larger area of higher landscape sensitivity to development. However, this larger area is also identified as an ‘Area with Limited Potential for Development’. In principle, the development of the western portion of the site for residential purposes is considered acceptable in landscape capacity terms. The eastern portion of the area of land in question is identified within the Study as an ‘Area Not Suitable for Housing Development’ and as part of a larger ‘Landscape Strategy Area’ where conservation of the landscape quality and character of the area is recommended to preserve the setting of the village and the rural separation of Kilmaurs and Kilmarnock. This eastern portion of the area is not therefore considered appropriate for future residential development in landscape capacity terms. Both positive and negative landscape capacity impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard. The south eastern portion of the area is low lying and at risk from a 1 in 100 year flooding event. Consequently there may be a risk of negative impacts affecting the water environment.

The site is located to the north east of Kilmaurs, directly adjacent to the settlement boundary and the eastern portion of the site is already developed for market garden purposes. With the site being limited in size and scale, it is considered that any sensitive residential redevelopment of the site would respect be in keeping with the existing urban form of the village, its settlement pattern and identity. Positive environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in regard to this issue.

It is considered that, because of the peripheral location of the site and the distance of the site from local services and facilities, any development of the area will not help reduce distances travelled by local residents and will not promote, encourage or facilitate walking, cycling or the use of public transport. Negative environmental impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

It is considered that residential development of the site could not be effected without some damage or detriment to the area. Development could take place, however, without exceeding environmental capacity. Both positive and negative environmental capacity impacts would therefore be experienced in this regard.

Mitigation Required The establishment of a mature urban edge to preserve the rural character and setting of the village is recommended.

A Flood Risk Assessment of the site requires to be carried out.

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

024 + - o/- o +/- o o + o o ? - o - - - - +/-

Nature of Impact General positive and negative environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the eastern portion of the area of land in question is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as an ‘Area Not Suitable for Housing Development’ and as part of a larger ‘Landscape Strategy Area’ where conservation of the landscape quality and character of the area is recommended to preserve the setting of the village and the rural separation of Kilmaurs and Kilmarnock. This eastern portion of the area is not considered appropriate for future residential development in landscape capacity terms.

The south eastern portion of the area is low lying and at risk from a 1 in 100 year flooding event. The western portion of the site is classed by the Macaulay Land Use Institute as Class 3(2) Locally Important Good Quality Agricultural Land.

It is considered that, because of the peripheral location of the site and the distance of the site from local services and facilities, any development of the area will not help reduce distances travelled by local residents and will not promote, encourage or facilitate walking, cycling or the use of public transport. Negative environmental impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

It is considered that residential development of the site could not be effected without some damage or detriment to the area. Development of the site could, however, be achieved without exceeding environmental capacity. Both positive and negative environmental capacity impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

Mitigation Required The establishment of a mature urban edge to preserve the rural character and setting of the village is recommended.

A Flood Risk Assessment of the site requires to be carried out.

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

035, 172 and + - o o + o o + o o ? - o - +/- - - + CD142

Nature of Impact General positive or neutral environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints The site is classed by the Macaulay Land Use Institute as Class 3(2) Locally Important Good Quality Agricultural Land.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. Positive impacts would be experienced in so far as landform is concerned. However, the development would result in the loss of areas of good quality locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the area of land at Standalane is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as an area of low landscape sensitivity to development and as an area identified as an ‘Area Most Suitable for Development’. It is considered that residential development of the site could take place without detriment to landscape character, local distinctiveness and the scenic value of the area.

The site is located to the north of Kilmaurs, directly adjacent to the settlement boundary. With the site being limited in size and scale, it is considered that any sensitive residential development of the site would be in keeping with the existing urban form of the village, its settlement pattern and identity. Positive environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in regard to this issue.

It is considered that, because of the peripheral location of the site and the distance of the site from local services and facilities, any development of the area will not help reduce distances travelled by local residents and will not promote, encourage or facilitate walking or cycling. However, being located near a bus route and the railway station, the development could encourage and facilitate the use of public transport. Both positive and negative environmental impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

Mitigation Required Development should enhance the main access road. Low to medium housing density is recommended with a buffer area of tree planting provided along the railway line.

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

038,114 and + - o o + o o - o o ? - o - - - - - CD076

Nature of Impact General negative environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints The site is classed by the Macaulay Land Use Institute as Class 3(2) Locally Important Good Quality Agricultural Land.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. Positive impacts would be experienced in so far as landform is concerned. However, the development would result in the loss of areas of good quality locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

The suggested development site represents a narrow strip of land which extends deeply into the surrounding countryside. It is considered that any residential development of this site, in isolation, would not be considered acceptable in terms of urban form, settlement pattern and identity, and negative environmental impacts are therefore likely to be experienced in regard to this issue.

It is considered that, because of the peripheral location of the site and the distance of the site from local services and facilities, any development of the area will not help reduce distances travelled by local residents and will not promote, encourage or facilitate walking, cycling or the use of public transport. Negative environmental impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

It is considered that residential development of the site could not be effected without damage or detriment to the area and without exceeding environmental capacity. Negative environmental capacity impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

Mitigation Required Not Applicable

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

044 + - o - - o o + o - ? - o - +/- - - -

Nature of Impact General negative environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the area of land in question is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as part of a larger area identified as an ‘Area Not Suitable for Housing Development’ and as part of a larger ‘Landscape Strategy Area’ where conservation of the landscape quality and character of the area is recommended to preserve the setting of the village and the rural separation of Kilmaurs and Kilmarnock.

The southern half of the site is a Listed Wildlife Site. The western half of the site is recognised by the west of Scotland Archaeological Service as being of archaeological interest.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. Positive environmental impacts would be experienced in this regard. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned. With half of the site comprising a Listed Wildlife Site, negative impacts will be experienced with regard to habitats and species. Similarly, negative impacts will be experienced with regard to the historic environment, with a major portion of the site falling within an area of archaeological interest.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the area of land in question is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as part of a larger area identified as an ‘Area Not Suitable for Housing Development’ and as part of a larger ‘Landscape Strategy Area’ where conservation of the landscape quality and character of the area is recommended to preserve the setting of the village and the rural separation of Kilmaurs and Kilmarnock. Development of the area of land in question has not therefore been identified as an area where residential development would be acceptable in landscape capacity terms. The development of the site would have a significant adverse environmental impact on landscape character, local distinctiveness and the scenic value of the area and negative environmental impacts will undoubtedly therefore be experienced in this regard.

It is considered that a sympathetic residential development of the site could be considered acceptable in terms of urban form, settlement pattern and identity. Positive environmental impacts are therefore likely to be experienced in regard to this issue.

It is considered that, because of the peripheral location of the site and the distance of the site from local services and facilities, any development of the area will not help reduce distances travelled by local residents and will not promote, encourage or facilitate walking or cycling. The location of the site on a main bus route may, however. facilitate the use of public transport. Negative environmental impacts will also therefore be experienced in this regard.

It is considered that residential development of the site could not be effected without damage and detriment to the area and without exceeding environmental capacity. Negative environmental capacity impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

Mitigation Required Not Applicable

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

063 and 083 + +/- o/- o - o + + o o ? - o - - - - +/-

Nature of Impact General negative or neutral environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the area of land in question is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as part of a larger area identified as an ‘Area Not Suitable for Housing Development’ and as part of a larger ‘Landscape Strategy Area’ where conservation of the landscape quality and character of the area is recommended to preserve the setting of the village and the rural separation of Kilmaurs and Kilmarnock.

The southernmost part of area is at risk flooding.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study commissioned by the Council, the area of land in question is identified within the Study as an ‘Area Not Suitable for Housing Development’ and as part of a larger ‘Landscape Strategy Area’ where conservation of the landscape quality and character of the area is recommended to preserve the setting of the village and the rural separation of Kilmaurs and Kilmarnock. The area is not therefore considered appropriate for future residential development in landscape capacity terms. Negative landscape capacity impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard. The southernmost part of area could also be at risk from a 1 in 100 year flooding event. Consequently there may be a risk of negative impacts affecting the water environment on this particular part of the site.

The site is located to the north east of Kilmaurs, directly adjacent to the settlement boundary and is already developed for market garden purposes. With the site being limited in size and scale, it is considered that any sensitive residential redevelopment of the site would respect be in keeping with the existing urban form of the village, its settlement pattern and identity. Positive environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in regard to this issue.

It is considered that, because of the peripheral location of the site and the distance of the site from local services and facilities, any development of the area will not help reduce distances travelled by local residents and will not promote, encourage or facilitate walking, cycling or the use of public transport. Negative environmental impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

It is considered that residential development of the site could not be effected without some damage or detriment to the area. However development could take place without exceeding environmental capacity.

Mitigation Required None

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

064 + - o o + o o - o o ? - o - - - - -

Nature of Impact General negative environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints The northern portion of the site is classed by the Macaulay Land Use Institute as Class 3(2) Locally Important Good Quality Agricultural Land.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, the area of land in question is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as part of a larger area of higher landscape sensitivity to development and within an area identified as an ‘Area with Limited Potential for Development’. It is considered that residential development of the site could take place without detriment to landscape character, local distinctiveness and the scenic value of the area.

The site is located to the north east of Kilmaurs, directly adjacent to the settlement boundary but without any direct access to the surrounding road network. Consequently, it is not considered that any residential development of the site would respect and be in keeping with the existing urban form of the village, its settlement pattern and identity. Negative environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in regard to this issue.

It is considered that, because of the peripheral location of the site and the distance of the site from local services and facilities, any development of the area will not help reduce distances travelled by local residents and will not promote, encourage or facilitate walking, cycling or the use of public transport. Negative environmental impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

It is not considered that residential development of the site could be effected without damage or detriment to the area or without exceeding environmental capacity. Negative environmental capacity impacts would therefore be experienced in this regard.

Mitigation Required Not Applicable

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

065 and + - o o - o o +/- o o ? - o - - - - - 221(b)

Nature of Impact General neutral and negative environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the area of land in question has been identified as an area where residential development would not be acceptable in landscape capacity terms.

The site is classed by the Macaulay Land Use Institute as Class 3(2) Locally Important Good Quality Agricultural Land.

A planning application for 3 houses at this site was granted 14/12/04

Although the suggested development site is small, it is considered that development of the site would not be considered acceptable in terms of urban form, settlement pattern and identity, the suggestion being considered to represents an unacceptable extension from the existing settlement boundary. However, development would constitute an acceptable infill development between an access road to a new adjacent development and the development itself. Both positive and negative environmental impacts are therefore likely to be experienced in regard to this issue.

It is considered that, because of the peripheral location of the site and the distance of the site from local services and facilities, any development of the area will not help reduce distances travelled by local residents and will not promote, encourage or facilitate walking, cycling or the use of public transport. Negative environmental impacts will also therefore be experienced in this regard.

It is considered that residential development of the site could not be effected without damage or detriment to the area or without exceeding environmental capacity. Negative environmental capacity impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

Mitigation Required None

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

066 and + - o o + o o + o o ? - o - - - - + CD066

Nature of Impact General neutral and negative environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints Site constraints include the proximity to higher ground. Medium to low density 1 to 2 storey housing would be suitable.

The site is classed by the Macaulay Land Use Institute as Class 3(2) Locally Important Good Quality Agricultural Land.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the area of land in question is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as part of a larger area of medium to low landscape sensitivity to development and as part of an area identified as an ‘Area with Potential’ for development. It is considered that residential development of the site could take place without detriment to landscape character, local distinctiveness and the scenic value of the area.

The site is located to the north west of Kilmaurs, directly adjacent to the settlement boundary. Access to the site could be gained from the adjacent housing area to the south east and, because of the relative small size of the site, it is considered that any residential development of the site could respect and be in keeping with the existing urban form of the village, its settlement pattern and identity. Positive environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in regard to this issue.

It is considered that, because of the peripheral location of the site and the distance of the site from local services and facilities, any development of the area will not help reduce distances travelled by local residents and will not promote, encourage or facilitate walking, cycling or the use of public transport. Negative environmental impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

It is considered that residential development of the site could be effected without damage or detriment to the area or without exceeding environmental capacity. Positive environmental capacity impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

Mitigation Required None

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

067 and 143 + - o o +/- o o + o o ? - o - - - - +/-

Nature of Impact General negative environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the northern portion of the area of land in question has not been identified as an area where residential development would be acceptable in terms of landscape capacity. Development of this northern portion of the site is not considered acceptable from the landscape capacity point of view.

The site is classed by the Macaulay Land Use Institute as Class 3(2) Locally Important Good Quality Agricultural Land.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, the southern third of the area of land in question is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as part of a larger area of medium to low landscape sensitivity to development and as part of an area identified as an ‘Area with Potential’ for development. In principle, the development of the southern portion of the area for residential purposes is therefore considered acceptable in landscape capacity terms. The northern portion of the site, comprising two thirds of the area of land in question has not been identified as an area where residential development would be acceptable in terms of landscape capacity. Development of this northern portion of the site is not considered acceptable from the landscape capacity point of view.

The site is located to the north west of Kilmaurs, directly adjacent to the settlement boundary with direct access to the adjacent residential area to the south and to the minor public road to the north. It is considered that any residential development of the site could respect and be in keeping with the existing urban form of the village, its settlement pattern and identity. Positive environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in regard to this issue.

It is considered that, because of the peripheral location of the site and the distance of the site from local services and facilities, any development of the area will not help reduce distances travelled by local residents and will not promote, encourage or facilitate walking, cycling or the use of public transport. Negative environmental impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

It is not considered that residential development of the northern part of the site could be effected without some damage or detriment to the area or without exceeding environmental capacity. Both positive and negative environmental capacity impacts would therefore be experienced with regard to the development of the overall site.

Mitigation Required Not Applicable

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

081(k) , 086(e) + - o o + o o + o o ? - o - + - - + and 221(a)

Nature of Impact General positive, negative and neutral environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints The site is classed by the Macaulay Land Use Institute as Class 3(2) Locally Important Good Quality Agricultural Land.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. Positive impacts would be experienced in so far as landform is concerned. However, the development would result in the loss of areas of good quality locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the area of land in question is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as part of an area of low landscape sensitivity to development and within an area identified as an ‘Area Most Suitable for Development’. It is considered that residential development of the site could take place without detriment to landscape character, local distinctiveness and the scenic value of the area.

The site is located to the south of Kilmaurs, directly adjacent to the settlement boundary and to the Kilmarnock / Glasgow railway line. Access to the site can be afforded from Crofthead road in the north and from the Crosshouse Road to the south. It is considered that any sensitive residential development of the site would be in keeping with the existing urban form of the village, its settlement pattern and identity. Positive environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in regard to this issue.

Mitigation Required Medium density housing is recommended with pockets of higher density internal to the site.

Part of this area should be allocated for the provision of hard and soft public space around the station with links to the village centre. Formal screening and buffer planting is recommended along the railway line and the establishment of a mature, urban edge character would be required to preserve the rural setting and character of the village. Care needs to be taken with the design, location and visibility of recreation space on the edge of the village so as not to alter the rural landscape character of the area.

Any development of the site should include an expanded park and ride facility in connection with the adjacent railway station.

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

081(l) + - o o + o o + o o ? - o - - - - +

Nature of Impact General neutral and negative environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints The site is classed by the Macaulay Land Use Institute as Class 3(2) Locally Important Good Quality Agricultural Land.

The site is located to the north east of Kilmaurs, directly adjacent to the settlement boundary with potential access from the Kilmaurs / Stewarton Road. It is considered that any sensitive residential development of the site could respect and be in keeping with the existing urban form of the village, its settlement pattern and identity. Positive environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in regard to this issue.

It is considered that, because of the peripheral location of the site and the distance of the site from local services and facilities, any development of the area will not help reduce distances travelled by local residents and will not promote, encourage or facilitate walking, cycling or the use of public transport. Negative environmental impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

Mitigation Required The establishment of a mature urban edge to preserve the rural character and setting of the village is recommended.

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

084 + - o o +/- o o - o o ? - o - + - - +/-

Nature of Impact General negative and neutral environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the south western portion of the area of land in question has not been identified as an area where residential development would be acceptable in landscape capacity terms.

The site is classed by the Macaulay Land Use Institute as Class 3(2) Locally Important Good Quality Agricultural Land.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. Positive impacts would be experienced in so far as landform is concerned. However, the development would result in the loss of areas of good quality locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study commissioned by the Council, the area of land in question, with the exception of the south western portion of the site, is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy an area of low landscape sensitivity to development and an area identified as an ‘Area Most Suitable for Development’. In principle, the development of this major part of the area is considered acceptable for residential purposes in landscape capacity terms. The south western portion of the area of land in question has not been identified in the study as an area where residential development would be acceptable in landscape capacity terms. Both positive and negative environmental impacts on landscape character could therefore be experienced in this regard.

The site is large and located to the south of Kilmaurs, directly adjacent to the settlement boundary and to the Kilmarnock / Glasgow railway line. Access to the site can be afforded from Crofthead road in the north and from the Crosshouse Road to the south. It is considered that the development of such a large area would not be in keeping with the existing urban form of the village, its settlement pattern and identity. Negative environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in regard to this issue. However, it is considered that the development of a reduced area, comprising the eastern part of the site, could be considered more acceptable in terms of respecting urban form.

It is considered that residential development of the overall site could not be effected without damage or detriment to the area and without exceeding environmental capacity. However, the development of a reduced area, comprising the eastern part of the site, could be considered more acceptable, particularly in terms of respecting urban capacity. Both positive and negative environmental capacity impacts would therefore be experienced in this regard.

Mitigation Required Any development should be restricted only to the easternmost portion of the site in the field adjoining the railway line.

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

095(e) + - o o - o o + o o ? - o - - - - -

Nature of Impact General negative and neutral environmental impacts.

The site is classed by the Macaulay Land Use Institute as Class 3(2) Locally Important Good Quality Agricultural Land.

It is considered that, because of the peripheral location of the site and the distance of the site from local services and facilities, any development of the area will not help reduce distances travelled by local residents and will not promote, encourage or facilitate walking, cycling or the use of public transport. Negative environmental impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

It is considered that residential development of the site not could be effected without damage or detriment to the area or without exceeding environmental capacity. Negative environmental capacity impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

Mitigation Required Not Applicable

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

113 + - o o - o o - o o ? - o - - - - -

Nature of Impact General negative and neutral environmental impacts.

The site is classed by the Macaulay Land Use Institute as Class 3(2) Locally Important Good Quality Agricultural Land.

The site is located to the south of Kilmaurs and occupies a narrow strip of land situated between the Crosshouse Road and the Kilmarnock / Glasgow railway line. Development of the area would be isolated from the main settlement and is not capable of satisfactory integration with the village. It is therefore considered that any residential development of the site will not respect or be in keeping with the existing urban form of the village, its settlement pattern and identity. Negative environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in regard to this issue.

It is considered that, because of the peripheral location of the site and the distance of the site from local services and facilities, any development of the area will not help reduce distances travelled by local residents and will not promote, encourage or facilitate walking, cycling or the use of public transport. Negative environmental impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

It is considered that residential development of the site could not be effected without damage or detriment to the area. Negative environmental capacity impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

Mitigation Required Not Applicable

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

148 and + o o o - o o - o o ? - o - - - - - CD003

Nature of Impact General positive and negative environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the area of land in question is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as part of a larger area identified as an ‘Area Not Suitable for Housing Development’ and as part of a larger ‘Landscape Strategy Area’ where conservation of the landscape quality and character of the area is recommended to preserve the setting of the village and the rural separation of Kilmaurs and Kilmarnock.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of redevelopment while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. Positive environmental impacts would be experienced in this regard. The site is presently occupied by a dwelling house and any redevelopment of the site would not affect agricultural land quality.

The site is located to the east of Kilmaurs and is physically divorced from the existing settlement. It is therefore not possible to integrate the site with the village in physical terms. It is therefore considered that any residential redevelopment of the site will not respect or be in keeping with the existing urban form of the village, its settlement pattern or identity. Negative environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in regard to this issue.

It is considered that, because of the peripheral and isolated location of the site and the distance of the site from local services and facilities, any development of the area will not help reduce distances travelled by local residents and will not promote, encourage or facilitate walking, cycling or the use of public transport. Negative environmental impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

It is considered that residential development of the site could not be effected without damage or detriment to the area in environmental terms. Negative environmental impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

Mitigation Required None

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

CD067 + - o o +/- o o - o o ? - o - + - - -

Nature of Impact General neutral or negative environmental impacts

Potential Environmental Constraints In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the south western portion of the area of land in question has not been identified as an area where residential development would be acceptable in landscape capacity terms.

The whole site is classed by the Macaulay Land Use Institute as Class 3(2) Locally Important Good Quality Land.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. Positive impacts would be experienced in so far as landform is concerned. However, the development would result in the loss of areas of good quality locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

The site is large and located to the south of Kilmaurs, directly adjacent to the settlement boundary and to the Kilmarnock / Glasgow railway line. Access to the site can be afforded from Crofthead road in the north and from the Crosshouse Road to the south. It is considered that the development of such a large area, wrapped around a greenfield site not under the control of the respondent, would not be in keeping with the existing urban form of the village, its settlement pattern and identity. Negative environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in regard to this issue.

Development of the site for residential purposes will increase the generation of waste produced by residents of the area and will not, in itself, contribute to efficient waste management. Similarly, increased air pollution from increased exhaust emissions from vehicles generated by the development is likely to occur and new street lighting may well increase light pollution. Increases in energy consumption as a result of the development will also occur. Consequently, development will have negative environmental impact insofar as waste reduction, pollution and energy consumption is concerned. Without any details of the proposed development being provided, the environmental effects of the proposal on design quality remain unknown. It is considered that residential development of the overall site could not be effected without some damage or detriment to the area and without exceeding environmental capacity. Negative environmental capacity impacts would therefore be experienced in this regard. Consequently, in terms of its impact on the environment, the site is not considered suitable for inclusion as a potential housing site in the local plan alteration.

Mitigation Required None

Further Environmental Assessments

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

CD220 + - o o + o o + o o ? - o - + - - +

Nature of Impact General positive, negative and neutral environmental impacts.

Potential Environmental Constraints The site is classed by the Macaulay Land Use Institute as Class 3(2) Locally Important Good Quality Agricultural Land.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. Positive impacts would be experienced in so far as landform is concerned. However, the development would result in the loss of areas of good quality locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the area of land in question is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as part of an area of low landscape sensitivity to development and within an area identified as an ‘Area Most Suitable for Development’. It is considered that residential development of the site could take place without detriment to landscape character, local distinctiveness and the scenic value of the area.

The site is located to the south of Kilmaurs, directly adjacent to the settlement boundary and to the Kilmarnock / Glasgow railway line. Access to the site can be afforded from Crofthead road in the north. It is considered that any sensitive residential development of the site would be in keeping with the existing urban form of the village, its settlement pattern and identity. Positive environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in regard to this issue.

It is agreed that, in terms of its environmental impact the site should continue to be identified as part of a larger housing development opportunity site in the local plan alteration.

Mitigation Required Medium density housing is recommended with pockets of higher density internal to the site.

Any development of the site should include an expanded park and ride facility in connection with the adjacent railway station.

Further Environmental Assessments

LUGTON

Ref. No. Site Location Site Suggested By

CD030(a) Land to South East of Lugton Mr G Marshall, per Mrs Greta Roberts, 8 main Road, Waterside, Kilmarnock, KA3 6JB

CD055 Land to North of Railway Line (1) Mr G Woods, per Mr SIR Ash, ASH Architectural, 6 Balgonie Drive, Paisley PA2 6HH

CD127 Land to North of Railway Line (1) Mactaggart and Meikle, per Mr A Aitken, Colliers CRE, 39 George Street, Edinburgh EH2 2HN

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

CD030(a) + +/- o o ? o o - o o ? - o - - - - -

Nature of Impact General negative and neutral environmental impacts.

Potential Environmental Constraints None

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

It is considered that residential development of the site would not help consolidate, enhance and contribute to the improvement of the existing urban form of this part of the settlement, its settlement pattern or identity. Negative environmental impacts are therefore likely to be experienced in regard to this issue. Because of its location adjacent to a rural community with no existing community services or facilities, it is not considered that development of the area will in any way reduce journey length or the need for travel or help promote, encourage or facilitate walking, cycling or the use of public transport. Negative environmental impacts are therefore also likely to be experienced in this regard.

Mitigation Required None

Further Environmental Assessments

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

CD055 + +/- o o ? o + - o o ? - o - - - - -

Nature of Impact General negative and neutral environmental impacts.

Potential Environmental Constraints None

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

Lugton has not been included as an area of study in the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council. It is therefore considered that the development of the site would have an unknown or unclear environmental impact on landscape character, local distinctiveness and the scenic value of the area. It is accepted that the area of land in question represents an area of brownfield land, previously used for railway purposes and, in this regard, redevelopment of the area would help regenerate a degraded environment.

Stretching out into the countryside along the main Glasgow / Kilmarnock railway line, it is considered that residential development of this extremely narrow site would not, in any way, help consolidate, enhance and contribute to the improvement of the existing urban form of this part of the settlement, its settlement pattern or identity. Negative environmental impacts are therefore likely to be experienced in regard to this issue. Because of its location adjacent to a rural community with no existing community services or facilities, it is not considered that development of the area will in any way reduce journey length or the need for travel or help promote, encourage or facilitate walking, cycling or the use of public transport. Negative environmental impacts are therefore also likely to be experienced in this regard.

Mitigation Required None

Further Environmental Assessments

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

CD127 + +/- o o ? o o - o o ? - o - - - - -

Nature of Impact General negative and neutral environmental impacts.

Potential Environmental Constraints None

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

It is considered that residential development of the site would not help consolidate, enhance and contribute to the improvement of the existing urban form of this part of the settlement, its settlement pattern or identity. Development of such a large site as proposed would also more than double the size of the settlement, destroying its essentially rural character and nature. Significant negative environmental impacts are therefore likely to be experienced in regard to this issue. Because of its location adjacent to a rural community with no existing community services or facilities, it is not considered that development of the area will in any way reduce journey length or the need for travel or help promote, encourage or facilitate walking, cycling or the use of public transport. Negative environmental impacts are therefore also likely to be experienced in this regard.

Mitigation Required None

Further Environmental Assessments

MOSCOW

Ref. No. Site Location Site Suggested By

CD081 Land at Hemphill Farm Mr J Seaton, Hemphill Farm, Moscow, Galston KA4 8PP

CD172 Land at Dykescroft Farm Mr A Thompson, per Smiths Gore, 12 Bernard Street, Edinburgh, EH6 6PY

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

CD081 + +/- o o ? o o - o o ? - o - - - - -

Nature of Impact General negative and neutral environmental impacts.

Potential Environmental Constraints None

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

Moscow has not been included as an area of study in the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council. It is therefore considered that the development of the site would have an unknown or unclear environmental impact on landscape character, local distinctiveness and the scenic value of the area.

Mitigation Required None

Further Environmental Assessments

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

CD172 + +/- o o ? o o - o o ? - o - - - - -

Nature of Impact General negative and neutral environmental impacts.

Potential Environmental Constraints None

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

It is considered that residential development of the site, located to the east of the burn which forms a strong and defensible boundary to the settlement and which separates the site from the settlement itself, would not help consolidate, enhance and contribute to the improvement of the existing urban form of the settlement, its settlement pattern or identity. Significant negative environmental impacts are therefore likely to be experienced in regard to this issue. Because of its location adjacent to a rural community with no existing community services or facilities, it is not considered that development of the area will in any way reduce journey length or the need for travel or help promote, encourage or facilitate walking, cycling or the use of public transport. Negative environmental impacts are therefore also likely to be experienced in this regard.

Mitigation Required None

Further Environmental Assessments

STEWARTON

Ref. No. Site Location Site Suggested By

004(j) Land at Dunlop Road Hope Homes Scotland, Watson Terrace, Drongan KA6 7AB

004(k) Land to South of Dalry Road Hope Homes Scotland, Watson Terrace, Drongan KA6 7AB

015 Land to North of Kilwinning Road Howie of Dunlop, per Lawrence McPherson Associates, The Atrium, 6 New Road, Ayr, KA8 8EX

029 Land to South of Lainshaw House Fernhaven Ltd., per Conroy Laurie, Turnberry House, 175 West George Street, Glasgow G2 2LB

045 Land at Nether Robertland Mr Stephen Black, Atrium Homes, 39/41 John Finnie Street, Kilmarnock KA1 1BL

054(a) Land to rear of Crusader Crescent William Smith, per Dale and Marshall, 18 Wallace Street, Galston KA4 8HP

054(b) Land at Lainshaw House Walled Garden, William Smith, per Dale and Marshall, 18 Wallace Street, Stewarton Galston KA4 8HP

069 Land at Low Peacockhill Mr W Smith, per DTZ Pieda Consulting, One Edinburgh Quay, 133 Fountainbridge, Edinburgh EH3 9QG

081(r) Land off Kirkford Alexander Morton Homes, High Langmuir Farm, Kilmaurs, KA3 2PG

086(d) Land at Dunlop Road Hope Homes Scotland Ltd, per McInally Associates Ltd, 6 Newton Place, Glasgow G3 7PS

097 Land at Draffen East Mrs Diane Fraser, per Barton Willmore Partnership, 12 Alva Street, Edinburgh EH2 4QG

129 Land at Lainshaw Farm Munro Architects, 23 Portland Road, Kilmarnock KA1 2BT

138 Land at Lainshaw Mr William Smith, per Montague Evans, 37 Melville Street, Edinburgh EH3 7JF

142(a) Land at Merrygreen Place D Wallace and John Dickie Homes, per Montague Evans, 37 Melville Street, Edinburgh EH3 7JF

142(b) Land to North of Glasgow Road D Wallace and John Dickie Homes, per Montague Evans, 37 Melville Street, Edinburgh EH3 7JF

164 Land to North of Glasgow Road Dickie and Moore Ltd, per Lawrence McPherson Associates, The Atrium, 6 New Road, Ayr KA8 8EX

171 Land to at Holmhead Farm, North of Glasgow Town and Country Landscape Contractors, Holmhead Road Farm, Old Glasgow Road, Stewarton

179 Land at Peacockbank, Stewarton Messrs D K S Smith, Peacockbank Farm, Stewarton KA3 3EA

204 Land to South West of Stewarton Grant Murray, 30 Bell Street, Glasgow, G1 1LG

232(a) Land at Dunlop Road Councillor Suggestion at Member’s Seminar

232(c) Land at Lainshaw Councillor Suggestion at Member’s Seminar

CD004 Land at Lainshaw Estate (1) Travis Homes Ltd, 32 Oaks Road, Great Glen, Leicestershire LE8 9EG

CD005 Land at Lainshaw Estate (2) Travis Homes Ltd, 32 Oaks Road, Great Glen, Leicestershire LE8 9EG

CD043 Land at Low Peacockhill Mr William Smith, 8 Loanhead Street, Kilmarnock KA1 3AU

CD070 Land at Draffen East Mrs Diane Fraser, per Barton Willmore Partnership, 12 Alva Street, Edinburgh EH2 4QG

CD086 Land at Braehead John Dickie Homes, per Ms Ruth McCarey, James Barr, 226 West George Street, Glasgow G2 2LN

CD087 Land at Southwood John Dickie Homes, per Ms Ruth McCarey, James Barr, 226 West George Street, Glasgow G2 2LN

CD091 Land to South Of Stewarton (1) Taylor Woodrow Developments Ltd., per Ms Fiona Campbell, Turley Associates, 80 St Vincent Street, Glasgow G2 5UB

CD092 Land to South Of Stewarton (2) Manor Kingdom, per Ms Fiona Campbell, Turley Associates, 80 St Vincent Street, Glasgow G2 5UB

CD123 Land at Lainshaw Mr and Mrs W Smith and Mr T Smith, per Montague Evans, 37 Melville Street, Edinburgh EH3 7JF

CD124 Land at Braehead Mr D F Wallace, per Montague Evans, 37 Melville Street, Edinburgh EH3 7JF

CD129(a) Land at North Stewarton (1) Tulloch Homes Ltd, per Halliday Fraser Munro, Stanhope House, Stanhope Place, Edinburgh EH12 5HH

CD129(b) Land at North Stewarton (1) Tulloch Homes Ltd, per Halliday Fraser Munro, Stanhope House, Stanhope Place, Edinburgh EH12 5HH

CD154 Land to North of Glasgow Road Dickie and Moore Ltd, per Lawrence McPherson Associates, The Atrium, 6 New Road, Ayr KA8 8EX

CD175 Land at Low Peacockhill Mr W Smith, per DTZ Pieda Consulting, One Edinburgh Quay, 133 Fountainbridge, Edinburgh EH3 9QG

CD219 Land at Dunlop Road Hope Homes Scotland Ltd, per McInally Associates Ltd, 6 Newton Place, Glasgow G3 7PS

Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

004(j) and + +/- o o + o o + o o ? - o - +/- - - + 232(a)

Nature of Impact General positive and neutral environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints None

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the area of land in question is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as part of a larger area of low landscape sensitivity to development and as part of an area identified as an ‘Area Most Suitable for Development’. In principle, the development of the area for residential purposes is therefore considered acceptable in landscape capacity terms. It is considered that residential development of the site could take place without detriment to landscape character, local distinctiveness and the scenic value of the area.

The site is located to the north of Stewarton, directly adjacent to the settlement boundary. Access to the site can be afforded either from the new development site located immediately to the south or directly from the main Stewarton / Dunlop road to the east. It is considered that a sensitive residential development of the site would be in keeping with the existing urban form of the village, its settlement pattern and identity. Positive environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in regard to this issue.

It is considered that, because of the peripheral location of the site and the distance of the site from local services and facilities, any development of the area will not help reduce distances travelled by local residents and will not promote, encourage or facilitate walking or cycling. However, being located near a bus route and within easy access of the Stewarton railway station, the development could encourage and facilitate the use of public transport. Both positive and negative environmental impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

It is considered that residential development of the site could be effected without damage or detriment to the area and without exceeding environmental capacity.

Mitigation Required None

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

004(k) and + - o o + o o + o o ? - o - - - - + 015

Nature of Impact General negative and neutral environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints With the exception of the south westernmost portion of the area, the site is classed by the Macaulay Land Use Institute as Class 3(2) Locally Important Good Quality Agricultural Land.

Comments and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. Positive impacts would be experienced in so far as landform is concerned. However, the development would result in the loss of an area of good quality locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the area of land in question is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as part of a larger area of low landscape sensitivity to development and as part of an area identified as an ‘Area Most Suitable for Development’. In principle, the development of the area for residential purposes is therefore considered acceptable in landscape capacity terms. It is considered that residential development of the site could take place without detriment to landscape character, local distinctiveness and the scenic value of the area.

The site is located to the east of Stewarton, directly adjacent to the settlement boundary. Access to the site can be afforded either from Dalry Road to the north or from Kilwinning Road to the south. It is considered that a sensitive residential development of the site would be in keeping with the existing urban form of the village, its settlement pattern and identity.

It is considered that residential development of the site could be effected without damage or detriment to the area and without exceeding environmental capacity.

Mitigation Required The area is low lying area with shelterbelts and mature woodland capable of providing an established setting for new development and enhancing the existing urban edge / environs of the cemetery. There is a row of beech trees along the Dalry Road boundary of the site which, although not statutorily protected, is nevertheless considered worthy of retaining as a feature of any future development.

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

029 + +/- - o - o o - o o ? ------

Nature of Impact General negative environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the area of land in question is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as part of a larger area identified as an ‘Area Not Suitable for Housing Development’. Conservation of the landscape quality at the estate landscape of Lainshaw House should be effected. The mature woodland and shelter belts provide an attractive landscape setting when approaching the town from the south west along the B769 road.

Much of the northern parts of the site are at risk of flooding.

The south eastern corner of the site is classed by the Macaulay Land Use Institute as Class 3(2) Locally Important Good Quality Agricultural Land.

The site is located to the south of Stewarton in a location remote and isolated from the existing settlement boundary. It is not considered that any residential development of the site could respect and be in keeping with the existing urban form of the village, its settlement pattern and identity. In addition, physical and visual integration between the site and the settlement cannot be achieved. Negative environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in regard to this issue.

It is not considered that residential development of the overall site could be effected without damage or detriment to the area or without exceeding environmental capacity. Negative environmental capacity impacts would therefore be experienced in this regard.

Mitigation Required Not applicable

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

045 +/- +/- -/o o - o o - o o ? - o - +/- - - -

Nature of Impact General negative or neutral environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the area of land in question is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as part of a larger area identified as an ‘Area Not Suitable for Housing Development’ and as part of a larger ‘Landscape Strategy Area’ where conservation and enhancement of the landscape quality within the valley of the Annick Water by woodland planting and improvements to public access are recommended.

Part of the area is low lying and at risk from a 1 in 100 year flooding event.

There are various public Rights of Way which run through the area.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that a significant proportion of the site is physically incapable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. The remainder of the site could, however, be developed without major landform works being required. Both negative and positive environmental impacts would be experienced in this regard. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would also have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned. With part of the area being low lying and at risk from a 1 in 100 year flooding event, development of this part of the site may also have a negative impact on the water environment.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the area of land in question is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as part of a larger area identified as an ‘Area Not Suitable for Housing Development’ and as part of a larger ‘Landscape Strategy Area’ where conservation and enhancement of the landscape quality within the valley of the Annick Water by woodland planting and improvements to public access are recommended. It is considered that residential development of the site could not take place without detriment to landscape character, local distinctiveness and the scenic value of the area.

The site is a large site which is located to the east of Stewarton, directly adjacent to the existing settlement boundary. It is considered that the size and scale of residential development proposed would not respect or be in keeping with the existing urban form of the village, its settlement pattern and identity. Negative environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in regard to this issue. It is considered that, because of the peripheral location of the site and the distance of the site from local services and facilities (with the exception of Stewarton Academy), any development of the area will not help reduce distances travelled by local residents and will not promote, encourage or facilitate walking, cycling or the use of public transport. However, the existence of various Rights of Way through the area may encourage or facilitate walking, especially for recreational purposes. Overall, both positive and negative environmental impacts may therefore be experienced in this regard.

Mitigation Required A Flood Risk Assessment of the site requires to be carried out.

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

054(a) ,138, + - o o - o o - - o ? ------232(c) and CD123

Nature of Impact General negative environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the area of land in question is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as part of a larger area identified as an ‘Area Not Suitable for Housing Development’. It is recommended that the landscape quality of the Estate Woodlands of Lainshaw House, comprising this larger area, should be conserved. The mature woodland and shelter belts provide an attractive landscape setting when approaching the town from the south west on the B769 road.

There is a public Right of Way running through the centre of the site.

The site is classed by the Macaulay Land Use Institute as Class 3(2) Locally Important Good Quality Agricultural Land.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the area of land in question is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as part of a larger area identified as an ‘Area Not Suitable for Housing Development’. It is recommended that the landscape quality of the Estate Woodlands of Lainshaw House, including this particular area, should be conserved. The mature woodland and shelter belts are considered to provide an attractive landscape setting when approaching the town from the south west on the B769 road. It is considered that residential development of the site could not take place without significant detriment to landscape character, local distinctiveness and the scenic value of the area.

Located to the south west of Stewarton, adjacent to the existing settlement boundary, it is not considered that a sensitive residential development of the site could respect and be in keeping with the existing urban form of the village, its settlement pattern and identity. Negative environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in regard to this issue.

It is considered that, because of the peripheral location of the site and the distance of the site from local services and facilities, any development of the area will not help reduce distances travelled by local residents and will not promote, encourage or facilitate walking, cycling or the use of public transport. However, the existence of the Right of Way through the area may encourage or facilitate walking, especially for recreational purposes. Overall, however, negative environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in this regard.

Mitigation Required Not Applicable

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

054(b) + +/- o/- o - o o - o o ? - o - - - - -

Nature of Impact General negative or neutral environmental impacts.

There is an area of Ancient Woodland which is also protected by TPO around the edges of the site.

A public right of way runs along the northern boundary of the site.

The northern part of the site is classed by the Macauley Land Use Institute as Class 3(2) Locally Important Good Quality Agricultural Land.

The southernmost parts of the site lie within an area of flood risk.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is generally physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. However, the development would also result in the loss of an area of good quality locally important agricultural land and thus have a negative environmental impact on that portion of the site. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the remainder of the site, development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Overall, development would therefore have both positive and negative environmental impacts with regard to the protection and use of soils. The southernmost parts of the site lie within an area of flood risk and development may therefore have a negative environmental impact on the water environment.

The site is not identified in the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, as an area suitable for residential development.

The site is located in an isolated rural location to the south west of the settlement boundary of Stewarton. The site has no direct linkages with the existing residential areas of the town and cannot be integrated with the existing settlement. It is considered that development of the site would not, therefore, be acceptable in terms of urban form, settlement pattern and identity. It is considered that, because of the remote location of the site and the distance of the site from local services and facilities, any development of the area will not help reduce distances travelled by local residents and will not promote, encourage or facilitate walking, cycling or the use of public transport. Negative environmental impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

Development of the site for residential purposes will increase the generation of waste produced by residents of the area and will not, in itself, contribute to efficient waste management. Similarly, increased air pollution from increased exhaust emissions from vehicles generated by the development is likely to occur and new street lighting may well increase light pollution. Increases in energy consumption as a result of the development will also occur. Consequently, development will have negative environmental impact insofar as waste reduction, pollution and energy consumption is concerned. Without any details of the proposed development being provided, the environmental effects of the proposal on design quality remain unknown. It is considered that development of the site could not be effected without damage or detriment to the area and without exceeding environmental capacity.

Mitigation Required Not Applicable

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

069, 081(r), + +/- o o + o o + o o ? - o - - - - + CD043 and CD175

Nature of Impact General neutral and negative environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints None

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, the area of land in question, with the exception of a small area in the south east corner of the site, is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as part of a larger area of higher landscape sensitivity to development. However, this larger area is also identified as an ‘Area with Limited Potential for Development’. In principle, the development of the site for residential purposes is considered acceptable in landscape capacity terms. It is considered that residential development of the overall site could take place without detriment to landscape character, local distinctiveness and the scenic value of the area.

The site is located to the south of Stewarton, directly adjacent to the settlement boundary. It is considered that a sensitive residential development of the site would be in keeping with the existing urban form of the village, its settlement pattern and identity.

It is considered that, because of the peripheral location of the site and the distance of the site from local services and facilities, any development of the area will not help reduce distances travelled by local residents and will not promote, encourage or facilitate walking, cycling or the use of public transport. Negative environmental impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

It is considered that residential development of the site could be effected without damage or detriment to the area and without exceeding environmental capacity.

Mitigation Required None

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

086(d) + +/- o o + o/- o + o o ? - o - + - - +/-

Nature of Impact General positive, negative and neutral environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints The southern part of the site lies within the existing settlement boundary of Stewarton and relates to an area specifically safeguarded in the plan for open space purposes.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the area of land in question is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as part of a larger area of low landscape sensitivity to development and as part of an area identified as an ‘Area Most Suitable for Development’. In principle, the development of the area for residential purposes is therefore considered acceptable in landscape capacity terms. It is considered that residential development of the site could take place without detriment to landscape character, local distinctiveness and the scenic value of the area.

The southern part of the site lies within the existing settlement boundary of Stewarton and relates to an area specifically safeguarded in the plan for open space purposes. Loss of this part of the site will have a potential negative environmental impact on land reserved for recreation and amenity uses.

The site is located to the north of Stewarton, directly adjacent to the settlement boundary. Access to the site can be afforded either from the new development site located immediately to the south or directly from the main Stewarton / Dunlop road to the east. It is considered that any sensitive residential development of the site would be in keeping with the existing urban form of the village, its settlement pattern and identity. Positive environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in regard to this issue.

It is considered that, because of the peripheral location of the site and the distance of the site from local services and facilities, any development of the area will not help reduce distances travelled by local residents and will not promote, encourage or facilitate walking or cycling. However, being located near a bus route and within easy access of the Stewarton railway station, the development could encourage and facilitate the use of public transport. Both positive and negative environmental impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

It is considered that residential development of the site could be effected without damage or detriment to the area and without exceeding environmental capacity.

A planning application has been lodged with the Council in respect of the proposed development and a decision is pending.

Mitigation Required The area lying within the existing settlement boundary should remain undeveloped for housing purposes but retained as recreational or amenity open space.

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

097 and + +/- o o + o o + o o/- ? - o - - - - +/- CD070

Nature of Impact General negative and neutral environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints There are no constraints to development of the site in landscape capacity terms with the exception of the northern portion of the area to the rear of existing houses which is identified in the Landscape Study as an Indicative Landscape Area for buffer zone / screening purposes. The south eastern part of the site is identified by the West of Scotland Archaeological Service as being of archaeological interest.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, most of the area of land in question is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as an area of medium to low landscape sensitivity to development and within an area identified as an ‘Area with Potential’ for development. In principle, with the exception of the south eastern corner of the site and an area to the rear of existing houses in the north, the development of this area for residential purposes is considered acceptable in landscape capacity terms. It is considered that, overall, residential development of the site could take place without detriment to landscape character, local distinctiveness and the scenic value of the area.

The site is located to the south east of Stewarton, directly adjacent to the settlement boundary. It is considered that a sensitive residential development of the site would be in keeping with the existing urban form of the village, its settlement pattern and identity. Positive environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in regard to this issue. With the south eastern part of the site being identified by the West of Scotland Archaeological Service as being of archaeological interest, development of this portion of the site will have a negative environmental on the historic environment. The remainder of the site, outwith this area will remain unaffected by this designation.

It is considered that, because of the peripheral location of the site and the distance of the site from local services and facilities, any development of the area will not help reduce distances travelled by local residents and will not promote, encourage or facilitate walking or cycling. However, being located near a bus route and within easy access of the Stewarton railway station, the development could encourage and facilitate the use of public transport. Both positive and negative environmental impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

It is considered that residential development of the site could be effected without some damage or detriment to the area. It is considered that development of the area could be carried out without exceeding environmental capacity. Both positive and negative impacts will therefore be experienced in this regard.

Mitigation Required Any development should avoid any adverse impact on the site of archaeological interest which pertains to the site.

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

129 + - o o +/- o + - o o ? - o - +/- - - +/-

Nature of Impact General negative and neutral environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints The northern boundary of the site is covered by Tree Preservation Order TPO/8/1984. A right of way is located within the site running in a general north south direction. The smaller southern portion has not been identified in the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, as an area where residential development would be acceptable in landscape capacity terms. With the exception of the south westernmost portion of the area, the site is classed by the Macaulay Land Use Institute as Class 3(2) Locally Important Good Quality Agricultural Land.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. Positive impacts would be experienced in so far as landform is concerned. However, the development would result in the loss of an area of good quality locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, the larger northern part of the area of land in question is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as an area of medium to low landscape sensitivity to development and within an area identified as an ‘Area with Potential’ for development. In principle, the development of this area for residential purposes is considered acceptable in landscape capacity terms. The smaller southern portion has not been identified in the study as an area where residential development would be acceptable in landscape capacity terms. Both positive and negative environmental impacts on landscape character could therefore be experienced in this regard. It is, however, considered that residential development of the northern portion of the site could take place without detriment to landscape character, local distinctiveness and the scenic value of the area.

The site is located to the west of Stewarton, directly adjacent to the settlement boundary and access to the site can be afforded from the Kilwinning Road to the north of the site. It is considered that residential development of the site, which would constitute a n extensive ribboning of development along a minor road into the countryside, would not be in keeping with the existing urban form of the village, its settlement pattern or identity. Negative environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in regard to this issue.

It is considered that, because of the peripheral location of the site and the distance of the site from local services and facilities, any development of the area will not help reduce distances travelled by local residents and will not promote, encourage or facilitate walking or cycling. However, the existence of the Right of Way through the area may encourage or facilitate walking, especially for recreational purposes. Both positive and negative environmental impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

It is considered that residential development of the site could not be effected without damage or detriment to the area. However, the size of the proposed development site is such that it could be developed without exceeding environmental capacity. Both positive and negative impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

Mitigation Required The existing woodland and trees along the northern boundary of the site provides an enhanced setting for the area and should be preserved and integrated into any housing proposals. Any development of the area should avoid damage to any of the trees covered by the TPO which are located within the site and protect and maintain the right of way which runs through the area.

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

142(a) + +/- o o + o o + o o ? - o - - - - +

Nature of Impact General negative and neutral environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints There are no constraints to development of the site in landscape capacity terms with the exception of the eastern edge of the area to the rear of existing houses which lies outwith the area considered appropriate for development.

There is a TPO along the site’s south western boundary.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, most of the area of land in question is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as an area of medium to low landscape sensitivity to development and within an area identified as an ‘Area with Potential’ for development. In principle, the development of this area for residential purposes, with the exception of the easternmost edge of the site, is considered acceptable in landscape capacity terms. It is considered that, overall, residential development of the site could take place without detriment to landscape character, local distinctiveness and the scenic value of the area.

The site is located to the north of Stewarton, directly adjacent to the settlement boundary. It is considered that a sensitive residential development of the site would be in keeping with the existing urban form of the village, its settlement pattern and identity. Positive environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in regard to this issue.

It is considered that, because of the peripheral location of the site and the distance of the site from local services and facilities, any development of the area will not help reduce distances travelled by local residents and will not promote, encourage or facilitate walking or cycling. However, being located near a bus route and within easy access of the Stewarton railway station, the development could encourage and facilitate the use of public transport. Both positive and negative environmental impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

It is considered that residential development of the site could be effected without damage or detriment to the area and without exceeding environmental capacity.

Mitigation Required Potential height constraints and sloping ground mean that single storey, medium to low density housing would be more suitable. Landscape enhancement and integration of the urban edge with the adjacent East Burn is recommended.

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

142(b) + +/- o o/- + o o - o o ? - o - - - - -

Nature of Impact General negative environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints There are TPOs located to the north western corner and along the south eastern boundary of the site.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, most of the area of land in question is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as an area of medium to low landscape sensitivity to development and within an area identified as an ‘Area with Potential’ for development. In principle, the development of the larger part of this this area for residential purposes is considered acceptable in landscape capacity terms. It is considered that, overall, residential development of the site could take place without detriment to landscape character, local distinctiveness and the scenic value of the area.

The site is located to the north of Stewarton, directly adjacent to the settlement boundary. The site is a backland development site, located to the rear of existing houses along Old Glasgow Road but with no means of access to Glasgow Road itself or the wider road network. It is therefore considered that, because of the access situation, the site is not developable. Consequently, it is not considered that residential development of the site could be in keeping with the existing urban form of the village, its settlement pattern and identity. Negative environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in regard to this issue.

It is considered that residential development of the site could not be effected without damage or detriment to the area and without exceeding environmental capacity.

Mitigation Required Not Applicable

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

164 and + +/- o o + o o - o o ? - o - - - - - CD154

Nature of Impact General negative and neutral environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints None

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, the area of land in question is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as part of a larger area of higher landscape sensitivity to development. However, this larger area is also identified as an ‘Area with Limited Potential for Development’. In principle, the development of the site for residential purposes is considered acceptable in landscape capacity terms. It is considered that, overall, residential development of the site could take place without detriment to landscape character, local distinctiveness and the scenic value of the area.

It is considered that residential development of the site could not be effected without damage or detriment to the area and without exceeding environmental capacity.

Mitigation Required Not Applicable

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

171 + +/- o o - o o - o o ? - o - - - - -

Nature of Impact General negative environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the area of land in question is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as an ‘Area Not Suitable for Housing Development’ and as part of a larger ‘Landscape Strategy Area’ where conservation of the area of Lowland Hill is recommended to preserve the setting of the town.

It is considered that residential development of the site could not be effected without damage or detriment to the area and without exceeding environmental capacity.

Mitigation Required Not Applicable

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

179 + +/- o o - o o - o - ? - o - - - - -

Nature of Impact General negative environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, with the exception of the northernmost portion of the site, the area of land in question is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as an ‘Area Not Suitable for Housing Development’ and as part of a larger ‘Landscape Strategy Area’ where conservation of the area of Lowland Hill is recommended to preserve the setting of the town.

With the exception of the south westernmost portion of the area, the site is classed by the Macaulay Land Use Institute as Class 3(2) Locally Important Good Quality Agricultural Land.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the northern portion of the area of land in question, comprising only a small part of the overall site proposed for development, is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy an area of higher landscape sensitivity to development. However, this area is also identified as an ‘Area with Limited Potential for Development’. In principle, the development of this part of the site for residential purposes is therefore considered acceptable in landscape capacity terms. The remaining part of the area, comprising the majority of the site, is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as an ‘Area Not Suitable for Housing Development’ and as part of a larger ‘Landscape Strategy Area’ where conservation of the area of Lowland Hill is recommended to preserve the setting of the town. Development of this part of the site would not be considered appropriate for development in landscape capacity terms. It is considered that residential development of the overall site could not, therefore, take place without significant detriment to landscape character, local distinctiveness and the scenic value of the area.

The site is located to the south of Stewarton, directly adjacent to the settlement boundary. The site is extremely large and capable of accommodating far in excess of the number of houses that may realistically be required to meet the needs of Stewarton in the period of the local plan. It is considered that because of the large size and scale of the site in relation to the size and scale of the existing settlement, residential development of the site would not be in keeping with the existing urban form of the village, its settlement pattern or identity. Significant negative environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in regard to this issue.

It is considered that residential development of the site could not be effected without damage or detriment to the area and without exceeding environmental capacity.

Mitigation Required Not Applicable

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

204 + - o o +/- o + - o o ? - o - +/- - - -

Nature of Impact General negative and neutral environmental impacts.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the larger, southern portion of the site has not been identified as an area where residential development would be acceptable in landscape capacity terms.

A public right of way runs between the two southern fields. With the exception of the south westernmost portion of the area, the site is classed by the Macaulay Land Use Institute as Class 3(2) Locally Important Good Quality Agricultural Land.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. Positive impacts would be experienced in so far as landform is concerned. However, the development would result in the loss of an area of good quality locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, the smaller, northern part of the area of land in question (occupying approximately 1/3 of the site) is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as an area of medium to low landscape sensitivity to development and within an area identified as an ‘Area with Potential’ for development. In principle, the development of this area for residential purposes is considered acceptable in landscape capacity terms. The larger southern portion has not been identified in the study as an area where residential development would be acceptable in landscape capacity terms. Both positive and negative environmental impacts on landscape character could therefore be experienced in this regard. It is, however, considered that residential development of the northern portion of the site could take place without detriment to landscape character, local distinctiveness and the scenic value of the area.

The site is located to the west of Stewarton, directly adjacent to the settlement boundary and access to the site can be afforded from the Kilwinning Road to the north of the site. It is considered that residential development of the site would not be in keeping with the existing urban form of the village, its settlement pattern or identity. Negative environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in regard to this issue.

It is considered that, because of the peripheral location of the site and the distance of the site from local services and facilities, any development of the area will not help reduce distances travelled by local residents and will not promote, encourage or facilitate walking or cycling. However, the existence of the Right of Way through the area may encourage or facilitate walking, especially for recreational purposes. Both positive and negative environmental impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

It is considered that residential development of the site could not be effected without damage or detriment to the area or without exceeding environmental capacity. Negative impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

Mitigation Required Not Applicable

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

CD004 + +/- o/- o - o o - o o ? - o - - - - -

Nature of Impact General negative environmental impacts

Potential Environmental Constraints The northern part of the site is classed by the Macaulay Land Use Institute as Class 3(2) Locally Important Good Quality Land. The southern part of the site is at risk of a 1 in 100 year flood event. The site is within the Lainshaw Woods TPO.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. The northern part of the site is classed by the Macaulay Land Use Institute as Class 3(2) Locally Important Good Quality Land. While development on the remainder of the site would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils, the development of that area would not result in the loss of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned. With the southern part of the site being at risk of a 1 in 100 year flood event it is considered that development of this part of the site will have a negative impact on the water environment.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the site is not identified as an area suitable for residential development. Development of the site is not therefore considered acceptable in landscape capacity terms and it is not considered that residential development of the site could take place without detriment to landscape character, local distinctiveness or the scenic value of the area. Development of the area could also negatively impact on the trees covered by the TPO which pertains to the area.

Mitigation Required None

Further Environmental Assessments

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

CD005 + +/- o/- o - o o - o - ? - o - - - - -

Nature of Impact General negative environmental impacts

Potential Environmental Constraints The northern part of the site is classed by the Macaulay Land Use Institute as Class 3(2) Locally Important Good Quality Land.

The site is at risk of 1 in 100 year flood event. The site is in within an area of Ancient Woodland. The site is within the Lainshaw Woods TPO

The site includes a Category B Listed Building: Lainshaw House and contains a site of archaeological interest as identified by the West of Scotland Archaeological Service.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. The northern part of the site is classed by the Macaulay Land Use Institute as Class 3(2) Locally Important Good Quality Land. While development on the remainder of the site would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils, the development of that area would not result in the loss of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned. With the southern part of the site being at risk of a 1 in 100 year flood event it is considered that development of this part of the site will have a negative impact on the water environment.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the site is not identified as an area suitable for residential development. Development of the site is not therefore considered acceptable in landscape capacity terms and it is not considered that residential development of the site could take place without detriment to landscape character, local distinctiveness or the scenic value of the area. Development of the area could also negatively impact on the area of ancient woodland located within the site and the trees covered by the TPO which pertains to the area as well as the listed buildings land site of archaeological interest located within the area.

Mitigation Required None

Further Environmental Assessments

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

CD086 and + +/- o o +/- o o + o o ? - o - - - - +/- CD124

Nature of Impact General neutral and negative environmental impacts

Potential Environmental Constraints The site includes the Merryhill, Stewarton TPO on its western boundary, the Old Glasgow Road, Stewarton TPO to the south and a small part of the Eastburn, Stewarton TPO to the north. In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the easternmost and central portions of the area of land in question have not been identified as areas where residential development would be considered acceptable in landscape capacity terms.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is generally physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. The site is however, bisected by a burn which runs in a north / south direction through the area. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, most of the area of land in question located to the west of the burn which bisects the site is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as part of a larger area of medium to low landscape sensitivity to development and as part of an area identified as an ‘Area with Potential’ for development. The easternmost portion of the site to the east of the burn is identified as an ‘Indicative Area with Limited Potential’ for development. In principle, the development of both these areas for residential purposes is therefore considered acceptable in landscape capacity terms. The easternmost and central portions of the area of land in question have not been identified as areas where residential development would be considered acceptable in landscape capacity terms. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as landscape character is concerned. Development of the area could also negatively impact on the trees covered by the TPOs which pertain to the area.

It is considered that residential development of the site could possibly take place in a form that would respect the existing urban form of the settlement, its settlement pattern and identity. Positive environmental impacts are therefore likely to be experienced in regard to this issue. It is not considered that development of the area will in any way reduce journey length or the need for travel and its peripheral location is unlikely to help promote, encourage or facilitate walking, cycling or the use of public transport. Negative environmental impacts are therefore also likely to be experienced in this regard.

Development of the site for residential purposes will increase the generation of waste produced by residents of the area and will not, in itself, contribute to efficient waste management. Similarly, increased air pollution from increased exhaust emissions from vehicles generated by the development is likely to occur and new street lighting may well increase light pollution. Increases in energy consumption as a result of the development will also occur. Consequently, development will have negative environmental impact insofar as waste reduction, pollution and energy consumption is concerned. Without any details of the proposed development being provided, the environmental effects of the proposal on design quality remain unknown. The site could be at risk from flooding and the environmental effects of any development of the site on the water environment presently remain unknown.

It is considered that residential development of parts of the site could possibly be effected without damage or detriment to the area and without exceeding environmental capacity. Other parts would not be considered so acceptable. Both positive and negative environmental capacity impacts would therefore be experienced in this regard.

Mitigation Required

Further Environmental Assessments

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

CD087 + +/- o o +/- o o - o o ? - o - - - - -

Nature of Impact General negative environmental impacts.

Potential Environmental Constraints In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the north eastern portion of the area of land in question has not been identified as an area where residential development would be considered acceptable in landscape capacity terms.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is generally physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, the westernmost and southern portions of the area of land in question is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as part of a larger area identified as an ‘Indicative Area with Limited Potential’ for development. In principle, the development of these areas for residential purposes is therefore considered acceptable in landscape capacity terms. The north easternmost portion of the area of land in question has not been identified as areas where residential development would be considered acceptable in landscape capacity terms. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as landscape character is concerned.

Development of the site for residential purposes will increase the generation of waste produced by residents of the area and will not, in itself, contribute to efficient waste management. Similarly, increased air pollution from increased exhaust emissions from vehicles generated by the development is likely to occur and new street lighting may well increase light pollution. Increases in energy consumption as a result of the development will also occur. Consequently, development will have negative environmental impact insofar as waste reduction, pollution and energy consumption is concerned. Without any details of the proposed development being provided, the environmental effects of the proposal on design quality remain unknown. The site could be at risk from flooding and the environmental effects of any development of the site on the water environment presently remain unknown.

It is not considered that residential development of the site could be effected without damage or detriment to the area and without exceeding environmental capacity. Negative environmental capacity impacts would therefore be experienced in this regard.

Mitigation Required None

Further Environmental Assessments

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

CD091 + +/- o o +/- o o - o o ? - o - - - - -

Nature of Impact General negative environmental impacts.

Potential Environmental Constraints In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the westernmost portion of the area of land in question has not been identified as an area where residential development would be considered acceptable in landscape capacity terms.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, the area of land in question, with the exception of the westernmost portion of the site, is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as part of a larger area of higher landscape sensitivity to development. However, this larger area is also identified as an ‘Area with Limited Potential for Development’. In principle, the development of this part of the site for residential purposes is considered acceptable in landscape capacity terms without detriment to landscape character, local distinctiveness and the scenic value of the area. The westernmost portion of the area of land in question has not been identified as an area where residential development would be considered acceptable in landscape capacity terms. Consequently, development of the overall site would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as landscape considerations are concerned.

The site is located to the south of Stewarton, directly adjacent to the settlement boundary but divorced from the main body of the settlement by an intervening burn. Consequently, it is not considered that the area can be well integrated with existing development in the town. It is therefore considered unlikely that a sensitive residential development of the site could be achieved while respecting existing urban form, settlement pattern and identity. Development of the overall site would therefore have a negative environmental impact in so far as urban form is concerned. It is considered that, because of the peripheral location of the site and the distance of the site from local services and facilities, any development of the area will not help reduce distances travelled by local residents and will not promote, encourage or facilitate walking, cycling or the use of public transport. Negative environmental impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

It is considered that residential development of the site could not be effected without damage or detriment to the area and without exceeding environmental capacity.

Mitigation Required None

Further Environmental Assessments

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

CD092 + +/- o o +/- o o - o o ? - o - - - - -

Nature of Impact General negative environmental impacts.

Potential Environmental Constraints The Cragston, Stewarton and the Waterhead, Stewarton TPO’s bound the site at its northern and southern boundaries.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the southern portion of the area of land in question has not been identified as an area where residential development would be considered acceptable in landscape capacity terms.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, the northern part of the area of land in question is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as part of a larger area of medium to low landscape sensitivity to development and as part of an area identified as an ‘Area with Potential’ for development. The southern portion of the area has not been identified as an area where residential development would be acceptable in landscape capacity terms. Consequently, development of the overall area would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as landscape character, local distinctiveness and the scenic value of the area is concerned. Development of the area could also negatively impact on the trees covered by the TPO’s which pertain to the area.

The site is located in a peripheral location and it is not considered that development of the area would relate to or respect the existing urban form of the settlement. Development of the overall site would therefore have a negative environmental impact in so far as urban form is concerned. It is considered that, because of the peripheral location of the site and the distance of the site from local services and facilities, any development of the area will not help reduce distances travelled by local residents and will not promote, encourage or facilitate walking, cycling or the use of public transport. Negative environmental impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

Overall, residential development of the site could not be effected without damage or detriment to the area and without exceeding environmental capacity. Consequently, in terms of its impact on the environment, the site is not considered suitable for inclusion as a potential housing site in the local plan alteration. The area should remain undeveloped in order to preserve the rural setting of the settlement.

Mitigation Required None

Further Environmental Assessments

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

CD129(b) + +/- o o +/- o o - o o ? - o - - - - -

Nature of Impact General negative environmental impacts.

Potential Environmental Constraints The eastern boundary of the site includes the Eastburn, Stewarton TPO.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the western portion of the area of land in question has not been identified as an area where residential development would be considered acceptable in landscape capacity terms.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, the eastern part of the area of land in question is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as part of a larger area of medium to low landscape sensitivity to development and as part of an area identified as an ‘Area with Potential’ for development. The western portion of the area has not been identified as an area where residential development would be acceptable in landscape capacity terms. Consequently, development of the overall area would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as landscape character, local distinctiveness and the scenic value of the area is concerned. Development of the area could also negatively impact on the trees covered by the TPO which pertains to the area.

Mitigation Required None

Further Environmental Assessments

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

CD219 + +/- o o + - o + o o ? - o - +/- - - -

Nature of Impact General negative environmental impacts.

Potential Environmental Constraints The site includes a large area of protected open space.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, the area of land in question is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as part of a larger area of low landscape sensitivity to development and as part of an area identified as an ‘Area most suitable for development’. Consequently, development of the overall area would have both positive environmental impacts in so far as landscape character, local distinctiveness and the scenic value is concerned.

Included as an integral part of the site is the Cocklebie Park area, currently in active recreational and playing field use, and an adjacent area of land currently safeguarded for additional recreational use in the adopted East Ayrshire Local Plan. The proposed development of the site would result in the loss of these areas and it is considered that significant negative impacts will be experienced in so far as the protection open green spaces are concerned.

Although the site is located in a peripheral location, it is considered that the site can be well integrated with the surrounding area with connections through the new Dalry Road development and from Dunlop Road. It is also considered that a sensitive development of those areas not currently reserved for recreational use would relate to and respect the existing urban form of the settlement. It is not considered that this would be the case if the recreational areas were to be developed as proposed. However, development of the overall site as proposed would have a negative environmental impact in so far as urban form is concerned. It is considered that, because of the peripheral location of the site and the distance of the site from local services and facilities, any development of the area will not help reduce distances travelled by local residents and will not promote, encourage or facilitate walking, cycling or the use of public transport. Being located on a bus route could, however, facilitate increased use of public transport. Both positive and negative environmental impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

Development of the site for residential purposes will increase the generation of waste produced by residents of the area and will not, in itself, contribute to efficient waste management. Similarly, increased air pollution from increased exhaust emissions from vehicles generated by the development is likely to occur and new street lighting may well increase light pollution. Increases in energy consumption as a result of the development will also occur. Consequently, development will have negative environmental impact insofar as waste reduction, pollution and energy consumption is concerned. Without any details of the proposed development being provided, the environmental effects of the proposal on design quality remain unknown. Overall, residential development of the site could not be effected without damage or detriment to the area and without exceeding environmental capacity. Consequently, in terms of its impact on the environment, the site is not considered suitable for inclusion as a potential housing site in the local plan alteration. The area should remain undeveloped in order to preserve the rural setting of the settlement.

Mitigation Required None

Further Environmental Assessments

BACKGROUND INFORMATION: APPENDIX 13D: SEA OF M74 LINK CORRIDOR SETTLEMENT SITES

AUCHINLECK

Ref. No. Site Location Site Suggested By

073(c) Land to East of Sorn Road Mr. John Dick, Northkirk Ltd., 14 Walnut Road, Kilmarnock KA1 2HF

075(c) Land to South of Highhouse Bing Dumfries Estate, per Bryce Associates Ltd., 6 Newton Place, Glasgow, G3 7PR

108 Lands to the North and East of Auchinleck Councillor Neil McGhee, Member Services, London Road, Kilmarnock

122(a) Land to South of Barony Road Omnivale Ltd, per GVA Grimley, 34 Melville St, Edinburgh EH3 7HA

122(b) Land to East of Barony Road Omnivale Ltd, per GVA Grimley, 34 Melville St, Edinburgh EH3 7HA

208 Land to West of Coal Road Mr Valentine Bennet, per Lawrence McPherson Associates, The Atrium, 6 New Road, Ayr KA8 8EX

209(a) Land to North and West of Arran Drive Councillor Suggestion at Member’s Seminar

235 Land to North of Templeton Roundabout Committee Decision to Include the Site in the Plan

CD041 Land to West of Arran Drive Meichan and Cox, per Roy Mitchell Design Limited, 1 Glenbervie, Glenbervie Business Park, Larbert FK5 4RB

CD042 Land to West of Arran Drive Meichan and Cox, per Roy Mitchell Design Limited, 1 Glenbervie, Glenbervie Business Park, Larbert FK5 4RB

CD060 Land to North and West of Arran Drive Meichan and Cox, per Roy Mitchell Design Limited, 1 Glenbervie, Glenbervie Business Park, Larbert FK5 4RB

CD065 Land to West of Arran Drive Mr B Sloan, per Mr S Mackay, DPP, The Hatrack, 144 St Vincent Street, Glasgow, G2 5LQ

CD099 Land to South of Barony Road Omnivale Ltd, per Mr A McCafferty, Andrew McCafferty Associates, Burn House, Collessie, Fife KY15 7RQ

CD103 Land to North of Auchinleck Academy Land Futures Scotland Ltd, per Ms C Fowler, Keppie Planning, 160 West Regent Street, Glasgow G2 4RL

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

073(c) + +/- o o + o o + o o ? - o - + - - +

Nature of Impact General neutral or positive environmental impacts.

Potential Environmental Constraints None

Comment and Recommendations In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the area of land in question is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as part of a larger area of low landscape sensitivity to development and within an area identified as an ‘Area Most Suitable for Development’. In principle, the development of the area for residential purposes is considered acceptable in landscape capacity terms. The development will therefore help respect landscape character of the wider area, protecting more sensitive landscapes elsewhere in the community from development.

The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

The site is located to the rear of existing housing and directly adjacent to an existing brownfield site within the settlement boundary which has potential for residential redevelopment. It is considered that a comprehensive joint development of the site, in conjunction with the adjacent brownfield site, would facilitate an effective and marketable development of the overall area. Access to the site could be taken through the redevelopment site or directly from Sorn Road, thus respecting existing urban form and settlement pattern.

The site in question is within walking distance of Auchinleck town centre and the local primary school, and is located directly opposite Auchinleck Academy. It is therefore considered that, while development of the area would not reduce the need for travel or journey length, such development should help promote, encourage or facilitate walking or cycling. Being located in close proximity to Auchinleck railway station and adjacent to a bus route, the development will also encourage and facilitate the use of public transport. Positive environmental impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

Overall, residential development of the site could be effected without damage or detriment to the area and without exceeding environmental capacity.

Mitigation Required None

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

075(c) + +/- o o - - o - o - ? - o - +/- - - -

Nature of Impact General negative environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints The whole area comprises part of the Dumfries Estate Historic Garden and Designed Landscape Area and the southern tip of the site comprises an area of Ancient Woodland. In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the major portion of the area of land in question has been identified as an area where residential development would not be acceptable in terms of landscape capacity. Development of the bulk of the site is not, therefore, considered acceptable from the landscape capacity point of view.

Comment and Recommendations In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, only the westernmost corner of the area of land in question is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as an ‘Area with Potential’ for development. In principle, the development of this small area for residential purposes is therefore considered acceptable in landscape capacity terms. However, the largest portion of the site is not considered suitable for development from the landscape capacity point of view and development of the area would have a negative impact on the landscape character of the area, local distinctiveness and scenic value.

The site is located south of the existing settlement boundary of Auchinleck but is physically separated from the existing built up area of the town by the intervening Auchinleck Bing. Because of this separation, it is not considered that development of the site for housing purposes would consolidate, enhance or contribute significantly in any way to the improvement of the existing urban form of the town, its settlement pattern or identity. Negative environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in this regard.

While the site in question is within walking distance of Auchinleck town centre, the site is remote from Auchinleck primary school and Auchinleck Academy. It is therefore considered that, while development of the area would not reduce the need for travel or journey length development of the site could possibly encourage walking and cycling to the town centre for shopping purposes but is unlikely to facilitate walking to local schools. Being located some distance from a bus route, development of the site is also unlikely to encourage the use of public transport by local residents. Consequently, both positive and negative environmental impacts may be experienced in this regard. With the whole area comprising part of the Dumfries Estate Historic Garden and Designed Landscape Area, any development of the site will also have a significant negative impact on the historic environment. Negative environmental impacts will also be experienced with regard to any development encroaching onto or otherwise affecting the area of Ancient Woodland located within the site and other areas of woodland in the site which are considered important for recreation and amenity.

Development of the site for residential purposes will increase the generation of waste produced by residents of the area and will not, in itself, contribute to efficient waste management. Similarly, increased air pollution from increased exhaust emissions from vehicles generated by the development is likely to occur and new street lighting may well increase light pollution. Increases in energy consumption as a result of the development will also occur. Consequently, development will have negative environmental impact insofar as waste reduction, pollution and energy consumption is concerned. Without any details of the proposed development being provided, the environmental effects of the proposal on design quality remain unknown. Overall, it is considered that residential development of the site could not be effected without damage or detriment to the area and without exceeding environmental capacity.

Mitigation Required Not Applicable

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

108 +/- +/- o o +/- o o +/- o o/- ? - o - - - - -

Nature of Impact General negative environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints There are two pit shafts along the northern boundary of the area, three along the eastern boundary and one in a central location within the site. There are two public Rights of Way which cross the area and the area contains a site of archaeological interest as identified by the West of Scotland Archaeological Service.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the southern portion of the area of land in question (approximately 1/3rd of the site area) has been identified as an area where residential development would not be acceptable in terms of landscape capacity. Development of the southern portion of the site is not, therefore, considered acceptable from the landscape capacity point of view.

Comment and Recommendations The site has a capacity for housing far in excess of anything that may be required to meet housing demand for Auchinleck in the period of the local plan and beyond. A small potion of the site, located to the rear of the houses facing Sorn Road, which is free from the constraints detailed above, is considered appropriate for housing purposes, in environmental terms (See comments on site 073(c) detailed above).

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, the northern and central portions of the area of land in question (approximately 2/3rds of the area) are identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy an area of low landscape sensitivity to development and an area identified as an ‘Area Most Suitable for Development’. In principle, the development of these parts of the area for residential purposes is considered acceptable in landscape capacity terms, protecting more sensitive landscapes elsewhere in the community from development. With the southern part of the site not being suitable for development in landscape terms, the development of the overall site will have both negative and positive environmental impacts insofar as landscape character is concerned. Because of its peripheral location it is also considered that any development of the site will not reduce the need for travel or journey length and will not significantly promote, encourage or facilitate walking, cycling or the use of public transport,.

The site is located to the north east of the existing settlement boundary but cannot easily be physically integrated with the existing built up area of the town due to the continuous built up urban edge along this part of the settlement boundary, Because of the physical separation of most of the area of land in question from the existing settlement, it is unlikely that any residential development of the major part of the site would consolidate, enhance or contribute significantly in any way to the improvement of the existing urban form of the town, its settlement pattern or identity. Some improvement of the westernmost portion of the site adjacent to Sorn Road may, however, be acceptable in terms of the urban form. Both positive and negative environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in this regard. Negative environmental impacts may also be experienced with respect to the historic environment, due to the site of archaeological interest which is located within the area.

Mitigation Required Any development within the site should be limited to that part of the site located directly to the rear of the house fronting Sorn Road, as indicated in Site 73(c) above.

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

122(a), CD099 + +/- o o +/- o + + o - ? - o - +/- - - +/-

Nature of Impact General negative environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints The western portion of the site is located within the Dumfries Estate Historic Garden and Designed Landscape.

Comment and Recommendations In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the western portion of the area of land in question, lying outwith the settlement boundary, is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as part of a larger area of medium to low landscape sensitivity to development and as part of an area identified as an ‘Area with Potential’ for development. In principle, the development of this western portion of the area for residential purposes is therefore considered acceptable in landscape capacity terms. The eastern part of the site lies within the existing boundary of the settlement. However, with the western portion of the site being located within the Dumfries Estate Historic Garden and Designed Landscape, development of this area would have a negative environmental impact on the historic environment.

The site is located to the south west of Auchinleck, partly within and partly outwith the settlement boundary and it is considered that a sensitive residential development of the site could help consolidate, enhance or contribute to the improvement of the existing urban form of the town, its settlement pattern or identity. Positive environmental impacts could be experienced in this regard.

The site in question is within walking distance of Auchinleck town centre. It is considered that, while development of the area would not reduce the need for travel or journey length, such development should help promote, encourage or facilitate walking or cycling. Being located in close proximity to Auchinleck railway station and adjacent to a bus route, the development will also encourage and facilitate the use of public transport. Positive environmental impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

It is considered that residential development of the site could not be effected without some damage or detriment to the area. However, development could take place without exceeding environmental capacity.

Mitigation Required The design of any development should fully respect the design and integrity of the Historic Garden and Designed Landscape within which it is located.

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

122(b) o o o o o o o - - o ? - o - +/- - - +/-

Nature of Impact General neutral or negative environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints Two pit shafts are located adjacent to the south east boundary of the site.

Comment and Recommendations The site is located within the settlement boundary of Auchinleck and comprises a purpose built parking area adjacent to the Barony Road and Highhouse Industrial Estates. Any development of the site would respect existing landform but the existence of two pit shafts on the site would indicate that the site has been previously undermined. Both positive and negative impacts would be experienced in this regard. Having already been developed for car parking purposes, development of the site for housing would not result in any soils being degraded and, being located close to the town centre and local facilities, development of the area would minimise journey length and positively facilitate walking and cycling and reduce use of the private car for locally based shopping and recreational purposes. However, any housing development would be isolated in the centre of an area used for industrial purposes and the development would be unlikely to respect existing urban form or townscape.

The site in question is within walking distance of Auchinleck town centre. It is considered that, while development of the area would not reduce the need for travel or journey length, such development should help promote, encourage or facilitate walking or cycling for certain journeys. Being located in close proximity to Auchinleck railway station and adjacent to a bus route, the development will also encourage and facilitate the use of public transport. Both positive and negative environmental impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

Mitigation Required Not Applicable

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

208, CD060 + +/- o o - o o - o o ? - o - - - - -

Nature of Impact General negative or neutral environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints The site is identified as urban fringe in the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas commissioned by the Council and is not identified as being appropriate for housing development in landscape capacity terms.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

With the site not being identified as being suitable for development in landscape terms, it is also considered that development of the area for housing will have a negative environmental impact insofar as landscape character is concerned.

The site is located to the east of the existing settlement boundary but cannot easily be physically integrated with the existing built up area of the town, being separated from the existing built up area by the existing main Dumfries / Glasgow railway line and the former minerals railway line, which is scheduled for reinstatement in the near future, which bound the site on two of its three sides. Also, because of the physical separation of the area of land in question from the existing settlement, it is unlikely that any residential development of the site would consolidate, enhance or contribute significantly in any way to the improvement of the existing urban form of the town, its settlement pattern or identity. Negative environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in this regard. Because of its peripheral location at the eastern end of the settlement, it is also considered that any development of the site will not significantly promote, encourage or facilitate walking, cycling or the use of public transport.

It is considered that residential development of the site could not be effected without damage or detriment to the area and without exceeding environmental capacity.

Mitigation Required Not Applicable

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

209(a) + +/- o o +/- o o - o o ? - o - +/- - - -

Nature of Impact General negative and neutral environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study commissioned by the Council, the eastern portion of the site is recommended for landscaping in order to improve the setting of Auchinleck and reduce the prominence of new development within the landscape.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that site is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. Positive environmental impacts will therefore be experienced in so far as landform is concerned. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would also have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study commissioned by the Council, the western half of the area of land in question is identified as an ‘Area with Potential’ for development. In principle, the development of this western portion of the area for residential purposes is therefore considered acceptable in landscape capacity terms. However, the remaining eastern portion of the site is recommended for landscaping in the report in order to improve the setting of Auchinleck and reduce the prominence of new development within the landscape. Overall, both positive and negative environmental impacts will be experienced in terms of impact on the landscape and on landscape character.

The site is located on the north western edge of Auchinleck and because of its large size and the limited opportunities for direct access between the site and the existing adjacent residential area, it is unlikely that any residential development of the site would consolidate, enhance or contribute significantly in any way to the improvement of the existing urban form of the town, its settlement pattern or identity. Negative environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in this regard. It is also considered that development of the overall site will not reduce the daily travel needs of local residents or reduce distances travelled by residents of the area. The area is, however, located directly adjacent to Auchinleck Academy and in close proximity to the local primary school. Despite its peripheral location, it is therefore considered that development of the site could help encourage and facilitate walking and cycling. The westernmost portion of the area is also located alongside a major bus corridor. Both positive and negative impacts would therefore be experienced with regard to travel and public transport. Without any details of the proposed development being provided, the environmental effects of the proposal on design quality remain unknown.

Residential development of the overall site is unlikely to be considered acceptable when assessed against all of the environmental objectives and criteria used in the assessment process. Consequently negative impacts may be experienced in this regard.

Mitigation Required

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

235, CD041, + +/- o o + o o + o o ? - o - + - - + CD065

Nature of Impact General positive and neutral environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints None

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that site is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. Positive environmental impacts will therefore be experienced in so far as landform is concerned. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would also have would have minor impact on the landscape character of the area, local distinctiveness and scenic value.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study commissioned by the Council, the area of land in question is identified as an ‘Area with Potential’ for development. In principle, the development of the area for residential purposes is therefore considered acceptable in landscape capacity terms and in terms of impact on landscape character, local distinctiveness and scenic value.

The site is located on the western edge of Auchinleck and because of the potential opportunities for direct access between the site and the existing adjacent residential area, it is considered that any residential development of the site would possibly help consolidate, enhance and contribute to the improvement of the existing urban form of the town, its settlement pattern or identity. Positive environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in this regard. It is considered that development of the overall site will not reduce the daily travel needs of local residents or reduce distances travelled by residents of the area. The area is, however, located in close proximity to Auchinleck Academy and the local primary school. Despite its peripheral location, it is therefore considered that development of the site could help encourage and facilitate walking and cycling. The area is also located alongside a major bus corridor. Both positive and negative impacts would therefore be experienced with regard to travel and public transport. Without any details of the proposed development being provided, the environmental effects of the proposal on design quality remain unknown.

Residential development of the overall site is likely to be considered acceptable when assessed against all of the environmental objectives and criteria used in the assessment process. Consequently positive impacts with regard to overall environmental capacity may be experienced in this regard.

Mitigation Required None

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

CD042 + +/- o o +/- o/- + +/- o o ? - o - +/- - - -

Nature of Impact General negative environmental impacts.

Potential Environmental Constraints There are two pit shafts along the northern boundary of the area and one along the south eastern boundary of the site. There is one public right of way which crosses the area.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the central part of the area of land in question has not been identified as an area where residential development would be acceptable in landscape capacity terms.

Comment and Recommendations In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, that part of the area of land in question located to the east of Sorn Road is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as part of a larger area of low landscape sensitivity to development and within an area identified as an ‘Area Most Suitable for Development’. The western part of the area of land in question is identified partly as an ‘Area with Potential’ for development and partly as an ‘Area with Limited Potential’ for development. In principle, the development of these particular portions of the area for residential purposes is therefore considered acceptable in landscape capacity terms. However, the major portion of the central portion of the site is recommended for landscaping in the report in order to improve the setting of Auchinleck and reduce the prominence of new development within the landscape. Development of this central portion of the site would not, therefore, be considered acceptable in landscape terms and, overall, development of the whole site would have both positive and negative landscape impacts.

The topography of the land in question is such that it is generally physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

That part of the site to the east of Sorn Road is located to the rear of existing housing and directly adjacent to an existing brownfield redevelopment site within the existing settlement boundary which has potential for residential redevelopment. It is considered that a comprehensive joint development of that portion of this part of the site directly adjoining Sorn Road, in conjunction with the adjacent brownfield site, would facilitate an effective and marketable development. Access to the site could be taken through the redevelopment site or directly from Sorn Road, thus respecting existing urban form and settlement pattern (See assessment of site 073(c) and 108 above).

The site in question is within walking distance of Auchinleck town centre, the local primary school and Auchinleck Academy. Indeed, part of the central portion of the site comprises the Academy playing fields. It is considered that residential development of this particular area would have a significant negative impact of an area of open space important for recreation and amenity. Development of the overall site, while not reducing the need for travel or journey length, may well encourage and facilitate walking and cycling and, being located adjacent to a bus route, may also encourage the use of public transport by local residents of any development.

The site as a whole is located along the whole of the western and northern boundaries of the existing settlement boundary but, with the exception of that part of the site located immediately to the east of Sorn Road, cannot easily be physically integrated with the existing built up area of the town due to the continuous built up urban edge along these boundaries. Because of the physical separation of most of the area of land in question from the existing settlement, it is unlikely that any residential development of the major part of the site would consolidate, enhance or contribute significantly in any way to the improvement of the existing urban form of the town, its settlement pattern or identity. As stated above, some improvement of the portion of the site directly adjacent to Sorn Road may, however, be acceptable in terms of the urban form. Both positive and negative environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in this regard.

With the exception of that portion of the site to the rear of the houses fronting Sorn Road, it is considered that residential development of the site could not be effected without damage or detriment to the area and without exceeding environmental capacity. Bearing in mind the large size and scale of the site, which could accommodate far in excess of the number of houses that require to be accommodated within Auchinleck during the local plan period, it is therefore considered that the overall site is not suitable for inclusion as a potential development site in the local plan alteration.

Mitigation Required Any development within the site should be limited to that part of the site located directly to the rear of the house fronting Sorn Road.

Further Environmental Assessments

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

CD103 + +/- o o - o o - o o ? - o - +/- - - -

Nature of Impact General negative environmental impacts.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

The site is located to the north of the existing settlement boundary but cannot easily be physically integrated with the existing built up area of the town, being separated from the existing built up area by the playing fields attached to Auchinleck Acadamy. Also, because of the physical isolation of the area of land in question from other existing built up areas within the settlement, it is unlikely that any residential development of the site would consolidate, enhance or contribute significantly in any way to the improvement of the existing urban form of the town, its settlement pattern or identity. Negative environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in this regard. Development of the site may, however, encourage and facilitate walking and cycling in some circumstances, particularly to the nearby primary and secondary schools. Being located adjacent to a bus route, development of the area may also encourage the use of public transport by future residents of the area.

It is considered that residential development of the site could not be effected without damage or detriment to the area and without exceeding environmental capacity. Consequently, in terms of its impact on the environment, the site is not considered suitable for inclusion as a potential housing site in the local plan alteration. The area should remain undeveloped in order to preserve the rural setting of the settlement.

Mitigation Required None.

Further Environmental Assessments

CATRINE

Ref. No. Site Location Site Suggested By

004(a) Land to East of Mauchline Road Hope Homes Scotland, Watson Terrace, Drongan KA6 7AB

006 Land at Industrial Estate, Newton Terrace Catrine Community Council, per Ms. Linda Warmington (Chairperson), 24 St. Cuthbert Street, Catrine, KA5 6SW

058 Land at Catrineshaw Farm Mr David Innes, Development Planning Partnership, The Hatrack, 144 St. Vincent Street, Glasgow G2 5LQ

070(g) Land to West of Mauchline Road Sir Claud Hagart-Alexander, per DTZ Pieda Consulting, 28 Drumsheugh Gardens, Edinburgh EH3 7RN

071(a) Land at Catrine Holm Orchard Homes (Scotland) Ltd, Glenshamrock Farm, Auchinleck, KA18 2NA

071(b) Land at Fourfields Orchard Homes (Scotland) Ltd, Glenshamrock Farm, Auchinleck, KA18 2NA

086(g) Land to East of Mauchline Road Hope Homes Scotland Ltd, per McInally Associates Ltd, 6 Newton Place, Glasgow G3 7PS

094, Land to North of former Ballochmyle Hospital David and Robert Shaw, per Shepherd and Wedderburn, 155 St Vincent Street, Glasgow G2 5NR

101(d) Land to North of Catrineshaw Farm Councillor George Smith, Member Services, London Road, Kilmarnock

101(e) Land to West, South and East of Catrineshaw Councillor George Smith, Member Services, London Farm Road, Kilmarnock

101(f) Land at Mill Square Councillor George Smith, Member Services, London Road, Kilmarnock

128 Land at Croftfoot Farm Mr McKerrow, Croftfoot Farm, Catrine

158 Land at Catrineshaw Farm DTA, Elizabeth Court, 4 Stuart Street, The Village, East Kilbride G74 4NG

199 Land to East of Catrine James Kennedy, James Kennedy & Son, Daldorch Farm, Catrine, KA5 6NA

211(a) Land at Mill Square Councillor Suggestion at Member’s Seminar

211(c) Land at Catrineshaw Farm Councillor Suggestion at Member’s Seminar

CD013 Land at Catrine Holm Mr Bryson, per Mr J Mair, Stairhill Architectural Services, Stairhill, Mauchline, KA5 5HN

CD075 Land to North of former Ballochmyle Hospital David and Robert Shaw, per Shepherd and Wedderburn, 155 St Vincent Street, Glasgow G2 5NR

CD116 Land at Catrineshaw Farm Adams Partnership per Mr S Mackay, Development Planning Partnership, The Hatrack, 144 St. Vincent Street, Glasgow G2 5LQ

CD167 Land to East of Mauchline Road Gartmore Properties Ltd, per Ms Elaine Hamilton, James Barr, 226 West George Street, Glasgow G2 2LN

CD224 Land to East of Mauchline Road Hope Homes Scotland Ltd, per McInally Associates Ltd, 6 Newton Place, Glasgow G3 7PS

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

004(a), 086(g) +/- - - o - o o - o o ? - o - - - - - and CD224

Nature of Impact General negative or neutral environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints The area lies adjacent to the Catrine Burn and is at risk from a 1 in 100 year flooding event.

There is a pit shaft located midway along the western boundary of the site

The site is classed by the Macaulay Land Use Institute as Class 3(2) Locally Important Good Quality Agricultural Land.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. However, the existence of a pit shaft on the site would indicate that past mining activity may have taken place in the area. Both positive and negative environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in this regard.

Development of the area would result in the loss of an area of good quality, locally important agricultural land and would consequently have a negative environmental impact in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned. With the area being at risk from flooding, development of the site would also not be acceptable in terms of the water environment.

The site is located to the east of the existing settlement boundary but cannot easily be physically integrated with the existing built up area of the town, being separated from the existing built up area by the Catrine Burn which is considered to form a strong, defensible boundary to the existing settlement in environmental and general planning terms. Also, because of the physical separation of the area of land in question from the existing settlement, it is unlikely that any residential development of the site would consolidate, enhance or contribute significantly in any way to the improvement of the existing urban form of the town, its settlement pattern or identity. Negative environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in this regard. Because of its peripheral location at the eastern end of the settlement, it is also considered that any development of the site will not significantly promote, encourage or facilitate walking, cycling or the use of public transport.

It is considered that residential development of the site could not be effected without damage or detriment to the area and without exceeding environmental capacity.

Mitigation Required Not Applicable

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

006 + o o o o o + + + o ? - o - +/- - - +

Nature of Impact General neutral or positive environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints The site is designated as a safeguarded industrial area in the adopted East Ayrshire Local Plan.

Comment and Recommendations The site is located within the settlement boundary of Catrine and comprises a former industrial area. Having previously been developed for industrial purposes, redevelopment of the site for housing would not result in any soils being degraded. While development of the area would not reduce the need for travel or journey length, such development should help promote, encourage or facilitate walking or cycling, particularly for locally based shopping and recreational purposes.

Regeneration and restoration of the presently degraded site would have a positive environmental impact. Any housing development would also be located adjacent to an existing residential area and it is considered that a sensitive development would positively respect existing urban form and townscape.

It is considered that residential development of the site could be effected without damage or detriment to the area and without exceeding environmental capacity.

Mitigation Required None

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

058 and + +/- o o - o o - o o ? - o - - - - - 211(c)

Nature of Impact General neutral or negative environmental impacts.

A public Right of Way runs along the eastern and southern boundaries of the site.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

With the area not being considered suitable for development in landscape terms, the development of the site will have a negative environmental impact on the landscape character of the area. The site is located adjacent to the existing settlement boundary of Catrine but physical integration with the existing built up area of the town may be difficult to achieve due to constrained access. It is unlikely that any residential development of the site would consolidate, enhance or contribute significantly in any way to the improvement of the existing urban form of the town, its settlement pattern or identity. Without any details of the proposed development being provided, the environmental effects of the proposal on design quality also remain unknown.

Because of its peripheral location at the southern end of the settlement, it is considered that any development of the site will not significantly promote, encourage or facilitate walking, cycling or the use of public transport.

It is considered that residential development of the site could not be effected without damage or detriment to the area and without exceeding environmental capacity.

Mitigation Required Not Applicable

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

070(g) + +/- o o + o o - o o ? - o - - - - -

Nature of Impact General neutral or negative environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints The site does not have any direct road frontage and cannot be accessed from the local road network.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, the area of land in question is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as an area of higher landscape sensitivity to development. However, this area is also identified as an ‘Area with Limited Potential for Development’. It is considered that residential development of the site could take place without detriment to landscape character, local distinctiveness and the scenic value of the area.

The site is located directly adjacent to the existing settlement boundary of Catrine but cannot easily be physically integrated with the existing built up area of the town, there being no direct access or linkages to the site from the existing surrounding road network. Also, because of the lack of access between the site and the existing settlement, it is unlikely that any residential development of the site would consolidate, enhance or contribute significantly in any way to the improvement of the existing urban form of the town, its settlement pattern or identity. Negative environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in this regard. Because of the lack of any access connections with the existing settlement, it is also considered that any development of the site will not be able to promote, encourage or facilitate walking, cycling or the use of public transport. Without any details of the proposed development being provided, the environmental effects of the proposal on design quality remain unknown.

Mitigation Required Not Applicable

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

071(a) + +/- - o +/- o o - o o ? - o - - - - -

Nature of Impact General negative environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints The area is low lying and at risk from a 1 in 100 year flooding event.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the area northern section of the area of land in question, adjacent to the sewage works, has not been identified as an area where residential development would be acceptable in landscape capacity terms.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned. Negative impacts on the water environment would be experienced because of the potential risk of the site flooding.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, the southern portion of the area of land is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as an area of low landscape sensitivity to development and as an area identified as an ‘Area Most Suitable for Development’. In principle, the development of the southern part of the area for residential purposes is therefore considered acceptable in landscape capacity terms. Medium density housing would be considered appropriate. In so far as the overall site is concerned, with the northern part of the site not being considered acceptable for development in landscape capacity terms, both positive and negative environmental impacts will be experienced in terms of impact on the landscape and on landscape character.

The site is located to the south of the River Ayr and directly adjacent to the existing settlement boundary of Catrine but, because of the poor access between the site and the existing settlement, it is unlikely that any residential development of the site would consolidate, enhance or contribute significantly in any way to the improvement of the existing urban form of the town, its settlement pattern or identity. Negative environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in this regard. Because of the lack of any direct access connections with the central core of the existing settlement, it is also considered that any development of the site will not be able to promote, encourage or facilitate walking, cycling or the use of public transport. Without any details of the proposed development being provided, the environmental effects of the proposal on design quality remain unknown.

Mitigation Required Not Applicable

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

071(b) +/- +/- o o +/- o o - o o ? - o - - - - -

Nature of Impact General negative or neutral environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the northern section of the area of land in question has not been identified as an area where residential development would be acceptable in landscape capacity terms.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that the southern portion of the site is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. The northern portion of the site is, however, steeply sloping and significant earthworks would be required in order to facilitate any development. Both positive and negative environmental impacts will therefore be experienced in so far as landform is concerned. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would also have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, the southern portion of the area of land is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as an area of low landscape sensitivity to development and as an area identified as an ‘Area Most Suitable for Development’. In principle, the development of the southern part of the area for residential purposes is therefore considered acceptable in landscape capacity terms. In so far as the overall site is concerned, with the northern part of the site not being considered acceptable for development in landscape capacity terms, both positive and negative environmental impacts will be experienced in terms of impact on the landscape and on landscape character.

The site is located at the south west extremities of Catrine but, because of poor access between the site and the existing settlement, it is unlikely that any residential development of the overall site would consolidate, enhance or contribute significantly in any way to the improvement of the existing urban form of the town, its settlement pattern or identity. Negative environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in this regard. Because of its peripheral location, it is also considered that any development of the site will not be able to promote, encourage or facilitate walking, cycling or the use of public transport. Without any details of the proposed development being provided, the environmental effects of the proposal on design quality remain unknown.

It is considered that residential development of the site could not be effected without some damage or detriment to the area. Development could, however, take place without exceeding environmental capacity. Consequently both positive and negative impacts may be experienced in this regard.

The southern portion of the site is sufficiently low to be viewed from an elevated position from the southern entry to the town and strengthening of the existing adjacent tree belt would be beneficial to visual amenity. It is considered that residential development of the site could not be effected without damage or detriment to the area and without exceeding environmental capacity.

Mitigation Required In terms of its environmental impact, it is not considered that the entire site should be identified as a potential housing site in the local plan alteration. Any development that may be considered appropriate should be limited only to the southern portion of the area.

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

094, CD075 + +/- o o/- - o o - o o ? - o - - - - -

Nature of Impact General negative or neutral environmental impacts.

The site is bounded on its eastern, northern and western boundaries by areas of Ancient and Semi Natural Woodland with a strip of ancient woodland traversing the central part of the area in a north south direction.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the area of land in question is such that it is physically capable of redevelopment while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. Positive environmental impacts would be experienced in this regard. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would also have both positive and negative environmental impacts with regard to the protection and use of soils.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the area of land in question is not identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as an area suitable for housing development. In principle, the development of the area for the purposes proposed is not considered acceptable in landscape capacity terms and it is not considered that development of the site could take place without detriment to landscape character, local distinctiveness and the scenic value of the area.

The site is located to the north west of Catrine and is physically divorced and isolated from the existing settlement. It is therefore not possible to integrate the site with the settlement in physical terms. It is considered that any residential redevelopment of the sites will not and can not respect or be in keeping with the existing urban form of the settlement, its settlement pattern or identity. Negative environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in regard to this issue.

It is considered that, because of the isolated location of the site and the distance of the site from local services and facilities, any development of the area will not help reduce distances travelled by local residents and will not promote, encourage or facilitate walking, cycling or the use of public transport. Negative environmental impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

Mitigation Required Not Applicable.

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

101(d) + +/- o o +/- o o - o o ? - o - + - - +/-

Nature of Impact General negative and positive environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the southern and central sections of the area of land in question have been identified as areas where residential development would not be acceptable in landscape capacity terms. The assessment states that these areas should remain undeveloped in order to preserve the rural setting of the settlement.

There is a public right of way running along the south western boundary of the site.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, the northern portion of the area of land in question is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as an area of medium to low landscape sensitivity to development and as part of a larger area identified as an ‘Area with Potential’ for development. In principle, the development of the northern portion of the area for residential purposes is therefore considered acceptable in landscape capacity terms. In so far as the overall site is concerned, with the southern part of the site not being considered acceptable for development in landscape capacity terms, both positive and negative environmental impacts will be experienced in terms of impact on the landscape and on landscape character. The site is located on the south eastern edge of Catrine and because of its size and the limited opportunities for direct access between the site and the existing adjacent residential area, it is unlikely that any residential development of the overall site would consolidate, enhance or contribute significantly in any way to the improvement of the existing urban form of the town, its settlement pattern or identity. Negative environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in this regard. It is also considered that development of the site will not reduce the daily travel needs of local residents or reduce distances travelled by residents of the area. However, despite its peripheral location, it is considered that any development of the site will help encourage and facilitate walking, cycling and the use of public transport, the southern portion of the site being located within easy walking distance of the primary school and the northern portion of the site in close proximity to an existing bus route. The existence of a right of way along the south western boundary of the site will also help facilitate walking for residents of the area. Without any details of the proposed development being provided, the environmental effects of the proposal on design quality remain unknown.

It is considered that residential development of the overall site is unlikely to be considered acceptable when assessed against all of the environmental objectives and criteria used in the assessment process. However, the northern part of the site is considered to respect landscape capacity and development of this portion of the site could be considered acceptable in environmental capacity terms. Consequently both positive and negative impacts may be experienced in this regard.

Mitigation Required Any development that may be considered appropriate should be limited only to the northern portion of the area.

A new woodland edge to the area should be provided to integrate the area with its rural setting.

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

101(e) + +/- o o - o o - o o ? - o - - - - -

Nature of Impact General negative or neutral environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the area of land in question has not been identified as an area where residential development would be acceptable in landscape capacity terms. The assessment states that these areas should remain undeveloped in order to preserve the rural setting of the settlement.

There is a public right of way running along the north eastern boundary of the site.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

The site is located to the rear of the primary school and extends deeply into the surrounding countryside. It is not considered that development of the area would relate to or respect the existing urban form of the settlement. Because of its extremely peripheral location, it is also considered that any development of the site will not help reduce distances travelled by local residents and will not promote, encourage or facilitate walking, cycling or the use of public transport.

Mitigation Required Not Applicable

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

101(f) and + + o o o + o + + + ? - o - + - - + 211(a)

Nature of Impact General positive environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints The site is located within the Catrine Outstanding Conservation Area.

The trees along the northern boundary of the site are covered by a Tree Preservation Area.

The westernmost part of the site is identified by the West of Scotland Archaeological Service as being of archaeological interest.

Comment and Recommendations The representation relates to the allocation of the site of the former mill premises in the centre of the town for amenity open space purposes in the local plan, reserving the portion of the site directly adjoining Mill Square for retail purposes.

The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development for open space and retail purposes while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. Development for open space purposes would conserve the quality of soils on the site, and would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have a positive environmental impact in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned. The development would also positively protect and enhance a centrally located green space which is important for amenity purposes. The proposed uses would also positively respect existing urban form, townscape and the historic environment of the Catrine Conservation Area, within which the site is located.

Being located in a highly accessible, central location, it is considered that development of the area for the purposes proposed would relate positively to, and fully respect the existing urban form of the settlement. Because of its central location, it is also considered that any development of the site will significantly help reduce distances travelled by local residents and will promote, encourage and facilitate walking, cycling or the use of public transport.

Development of the eastern portion of the site for retail purposes will increase the generation of waste produced but the area retained for open space purposes will not be affected in this regard. Similarly, increased air pollution from increased exhaust emissions from vehicles generated by the retail development is likely to occur and new street lighting may well increase light pollution. Increases in energy consumption as a result of the development will also occur. No such impacts will, however, be experienced as a result of the open space area being retained. Consequently, development will have both positive and negative environmental impacts insofar as waste reduction, pollution and energy consumption is concerned. Without any details of the proposed development being provided, the environmental effects of the proposal on design quality remain unknown.

Overall, retail and open space development of the site could be effected without damage or detriment to the area and without exceeding environmental capacity. Consequently, in terms of its impact on the environment, the site is considered suitable for inclusion as a potential retail and amenity open space site in the local plan alteration

Mitigation Required None

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

128 + +/- o - - o o - o o ? - o - - - - -

Nature of Impact General negative environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the area of land in question has been identified as areas where residential development would not be acceptable in landscape capacity terms. The area should remain undeveloped in order to preserve the rural setting of the settlement.

The southern portion of the site is located within the Nether Heilar Provisional Wildlife Site.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

With the southern portion of the site being located within the Nether Heilar Provisional Wildlife Site, development of the area would have an adverse impact on habitats and species of recognised local importance. In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the area of land in question has not been identified as an area where residential development would be acceptable in landscape capacity terms. The development of the site would therefore have a significant adverse environmental impact on habitats and species, landscape character, local distinctiveness and the scenic value of the area.

The site is located to the rear of houses fronting St. Cuthbert’s Street but is physically isolated from the main body of the settlement, with access to the area being afforded form the minor rural road linking Catrine and Sorn. It is not considered that development of the area would relate to or respect the existing urban form of the settlement. Because of its extremely peripheral location, it is also considered that any development of the site will not help reduce distances travelled by local residents and will not promote, encourage or facilitate walking, cycling or the use of public transport.

Overall, residential development of the site could not be effected without damage or detriment to the area and without exceeding environmental capacity.

The area should remain undeveloped in order to preserve the rural setting of the settlement.

Mitigation Required Not Applicable.

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

158 + +/- o o +/- o o - o o ? - o - +/- - - +/-

Nature of Impact General neutral or negative environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the southern and central sections of the area of land in question have been identified as areas where residential development would not be acceptable in landscape capacity terms. These areas should remain undeveloped in order to preserve the rural setting of the settlement. There is a public right of way running through the southern portion of the site.

The site is located on the south eastern edge of Catrine and because of its large size and the limited opportunities for direct access between the site and the existing adjacent residential area, it is unlikely that any residential development of the site would consolidate, enhance or contribute significantly in any way to the improvement of the existing urban form of the town, its settlement pattern or identity. Negative environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in this regard. It is also considered that development of the overall site will not reduce the daily travel needs of local residents or reduce distances travelled by residents of the area. Parts of the area are, however, located close to the local primary school and within easy reach of the town centre. Despite its peripheral location, it is also considered that development of the more accessible parts of the site could help encourage and facilitate walking, cycling and the use of public transport, the southern portion of the site being located within easy walking distance of the primary school and the northern portion of the site in close proximity to an existing bus route. The existence of a right of way along the south western boundary of the site will also help facilitate walking for residents of the area. Both positive and negative impacts will be experienced with regard to travel and public transport. Without any details of the proposed development being provided, the environmental effects of the proposal on design quality remain unknown.

Development of the site for residential purposes will increase the generation of waste produced by residents of the area and will not, in itself, contribute to efficient waste management. Similarly, increased air pollution from increased exhaust emissions from vehicles generated by the development is likely to occur and new street lighting may well increase light pollution. Energy consumption as a result of the development will also occur. Consequently, development will have negative environmental impact insofar as waste reduction, pollution and energy consumption is concerned. Residential development of the overall site is unlikely to be considered acceptable when assessed against all of the environmental objectives and criteria used in the assessment process. However, the northern part of the site is considered to respect landscape capacity and development of this portion of the site could be considered acceptable in environmental capacity terms. Consequently both positive and negative impacts may be experienced in this regard.

Mitigation Required A new woodland edge to the area should be provided to integrate the area with its rural setting. Any development that may be considered appropriate should be limited only to the northern portion of the area.

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

199 + +/- o o - o o - o o ? - o - +/- - - -

Nature of Impact General negative environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the area of land in question has been identified as areas where residential development would not be acceptable in landscape capacity terms. The area should remain undeveloped in order to preserve the rural setting of the settlement.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the area of land in question has been identified as areas where residential development would not be acceptable in landscape capacity terms. The area should remain undeveloped in order to preserve the rural setting of the settlement. Negative environmental impacts would be experienced in terms of impact on the landscape and on landscape character.

The site is located to the south east of Catrine and is physically divorced and isolated from the settlement. Consequently, it is unlikely that any residential development of the site would consolidate, enhance or contribute in any way to the improvement of the existing urban form of the town, its settlement pattern or identity. Negative environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in this regard. Because of its peripheral and isolated location, it is also considered that any development of the site will not help reduce distances travelled by local residents and will not promote, encourage or facilitate walking, cycling or the use of public transport.

Mitigation Required Not Applicable

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

CD013 + +/- - o +/- o o - o o ? - o - - - - -

Nature of Impact

Potential Environmental Constraints The area is low lying and at risk from a 1 in 100 year flooding event.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the western section of the area of land in question has not been identified as an area where residential development would be acceptable in landscape capacity terms.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned. Negative impacts on the water environment would be experienced because of the potential risk of the site flooding.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, the eastern portion of the area of land is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as an area of low landscape sensitivity to development and as an area identified as an ‘Area Most Suitable for Development’. In principle, the development of the eastern part of the area for residential purposes is therefore considered acceptable in landscape capacity terms. Medium density housing would be considered appropriate. In so far as the overall site is concerned. With the western part of the site not being considered acceptable for development in landscape capacity terms, both positive and negative environmental impacts will be experienced in terms of impact on the landscape and on landscape character.

It is considered that residential development of the site is unlikely to be considered acceptable, in overall terms, when assessed against all of the environmental objectives and criteria used in the assessment process and consequently exceeds environmental capacity. Consequently, in terms of its impact on the environment, the site is not considered suitable for inclusion as a potential housing site in the local plan alteration. The area should remain undeveloped in order to preserve the rural setting of the settlement.

Mitigation Required

Further Environmental Assessments

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

CD116 + +/- o o - o o - o o ? - o - - - - -

Nature of Impact General negative environmental impacts

Potential Environmental Constraints In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the area of land in question has not been identified as an area where residential development would be acceptable in landscape capacity terms. The assessment states that the area should remain undeveloped in order to preserve the rural setting of the settlement.

There is a public right of way running through the site along the farm access road from John Street.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

Mitigation Required

Further Environmental Assessments

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

CD167 + +/- o o + - o - o o ? - o - - - - -

Nature of Impact General negative environmental impacts.

Potential Environmental Constraints In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the northernmost part of the area of land in question has not been identified as an area where residential development would be acceptable in landscape capacity terms.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, the majority of the area is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as an area of higher landscape sensitivity to development. However, this area is also identified as an ‘Area with Limited Potential for Development’. It is considered that residential development of the site could take place without detriment to landscape character, local distinctiveness and the scenic value of the area.

The site is located directly adjacent to the existing settlement boundary of Catrine but cannot easily be physically integrated with the existing built up area of the town, constituting an essentially backland development with no direct access or linkages between the site and the existing settlement. Access to the site can also only be afforded from the northernmost part of the site, through an area which is currently used as a playground area. Development of the site would therefore result in the loss of a valuable area of public green open space, with consequent negative environmental impacts. Also, because of the lack of access between the site and the existing settlement, it is unlikely that any residential development of the site would consolidate, enhance or contribute significantly in any way to the improvement of the existing urban form of the town, its settlement pattern or identity. Negative environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in this regard. Because of the lack of any access connections with the existing settlement, it is also considered that any development of the site will not be able to easily promote, encourage or facilitate walking, cycling or the use of public transport. Without any details of the proposed development being provided, the environmental effects of the proposal on design quality remain unknown.

Mitigation Required None.

Further Environmental Assessments

COALHALL

Ref. No. Site Location Site Suggested By

CD002 Land at Coalhall Mr Robert Kyle, RB Woodlands Ltd, 3 The Square, Cumnock, KA18 1BQ

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

CD002 + +/- o o ? o o - o - ? - o - - - - -

Nature of Impact General negative environmental impacts.

Potential Environmental Constraints There are three pit shafts located in the centre of the site. The area contains a site of archaeological interest as identified by the West of Scotland Archaeological Service.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

Coalhall has not been included as an area of study in the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council. The rural location of the site would, however, indicate that the site could be sensitive in landscape terms. However, it is considered that, in the absence of any detailed study into the landscape effects of the proposed development, the impacts of residential development on landscape character, local distinctiveness and scenic value remain unknown.

It is considered that residential development of the size and scale proposed would not help consolidate, enhance and contribute to the improvement of the existing urban form of this small rural settlement, its settlement pattern or identity. Negative environmental impacts would therefore be experienced in regard to this issue. Because of its location adjacent to a rural community with no existing community services or facilities (with the exception of the local Gateside Inn), it is not considered that development of the area will help minimise distances travelled or promote, encourage or facilitate walking, cycling or the use of public transport. Negative environmental impacts will therefore be experienced in this regard.

It is considered that residential development of the site could not be effected without damage or detriment to the area and without seriously exceeding the environmental capacity of the area to accommodate the size and scale of development proposed. Consequently, in terms of its impact on the environment, the site is not considered suitable for inclusion as a potential housing site in the local plan alteration. The area should remain undeveloped in order to preserve the rural setting of the settlement.

Mitigation Required None

Further Environmental Assessments

CRONBERRY

Ref. No. Site Location Site Suggested By

170 Land to North of Riverside Gardens Miss Helen Flemming, per Kilpatrick and Walker, 4 Wellington Square, Ayr KA7 1EN

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

170 + +/- o o ? o + - - o ? - o - - - - +/-

Nature of Impact General negative environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints None

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

The area was not included in the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council and no independent assessment has been made as to whether the area of land in question is acceptable for development in landscape capacity terms. However, because of its highly visually prominent location when viewed especially from the nearby A70 Trunk Road, it is considered that development of the site could have a adverse environmental impact on the landscape character, local distinctiveness and the scenic value of the area. The precise landscape impacts remain, however, unknown. It is accepted, nevertheless, that development of the area would help to positively regenerate the existing degraded environment surrounding the settlement.

The site represents the extension of the linear settlement into the surrounding countryside and it is not considered that development of the area would relate to or respect the existing urban form or townscape of the settlement. Because of the isolated location of Cronberry, it is also considered that any development of the site will not help reduce distances travelled by local residents and will not promote, encourage or facilitate walking, cycling or the use of public transport.

Overall, residential development of the site could not be effected without some damage or detriment to the area. The development could, however, take place without exceeding environmental capacity. Both positive and negative impacts would be experienced in this regard.

Planning permission for the erection of four dwellings on that portion of the site lying to the north west of the Riverside Gardens road has recently been granted by the Council. It is agreed that the settlement boundary will be amended to include the new housing development that is proposed.

Mitigation Required Some structure / screen planting should be carried out on the south eastern side of the site to soften the impact of the development.

CUMNOCK

Ref. No. Site Location Site Suggested By

073(b) Land to North of Holmhead Hospital Mr. John Dick, Northkirk Ltd., 14 Walnut Road, Kilmarnock KA1 2HF

075(a) Land to South West of Auchinleck Road Dumfries Estate, per Bryce Associates Ltd., 6 Newton Place, Glasgow, G3 7PR

075(b) Land to North East of Auchinleck Road Dumfries Estate, per Bryce Associates Ltd., 6 Newton Place, Glasgow, G3 7PR

086(b) Land at Drumbrochan Hope Homes Scotland Ltd, per McInally Associates Ltd, 6 Newton Place, Glasgow G3 7PS

086(c) Land off Cameron Crescent Hope Homes Scotland Ltd, per McInally Associates Ltd, 6 Newton Place, Glasgow G3 7PS

184(a) Land to South of Rigg Road Councillors Eric Ross and William Crawford, per Member Services, London Road Headquarters, Kilmarnock

184(b) Land to the North and South of Cairn Road Councillors Eric Ross and William Crawford, per Member Services, London Road Headquarters, Kilmarnock

184(c) Land to rear of Kerr and Smiths Garage Councillors Eric Ross and William Crawford, per Member Services, London Road Headquarters, Kilmarnock

184(d) Land to South of Skares Road Councillors Eric Ross and William Crawford, per Member Services, London Road Headquarters, Kilmarnock

213(c) Land to North and South of Skares Road Councillor Suggestion at Member’s Seminar

213(d) Land at Skerrington Farm Councillor Suggestion at Member’s Seminar

233 Land to the East of Craigens Committee Decision to Include Site in the Plan

234 Land at Glengyron Committee Decision to Include Site in the Plan

CD023(ii) Land to North of Craigens Road Orchard Homes (Scotland) Ltd, per Michael S Evans, Ty Newydd, 11 Murchie Drive, Prestwick KA9 2ND

CD138 Land to South West of Auchinleck Road Dumfries Estate, per Bryce Associates Ltd., 6 Newton Place, Glasgow, G3 7PR

CD218 Land at Drumbrochan Hope Homes Scotland Ltd, per McInally Associates Ltd, 6 Newton Place, Glasgow G3 7PS

CD246 Land to South West and North East of Committee Decision to Include Site in the Plan Auchinleck Road

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

073(b) + +/- o o +/- o o - o o ? - o - - - - +/-

Nature of Impact General negative and positive environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the northern portion of the site running alongside the Rigg Road and the southernmost portion of the area of land to the west of the former Holmhead Hospital have not been identified as areas where residential development would be acceptable in landscape capacity terms. These particular portions of the area are not considered appropriate for residential development in landscape capacity terms.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, the central portion of the area of land in question is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as part of a larger area of medium to low landscape sensitivity to development and as part of an area identified as an ‘Area with Potential’ for development. In principle, the development of this central area for residential purposes is therefore considered acceptable in landscape capacity terms. The northernmost and southernmost portions of the site are not considered suitable for development in landscape terms. Overall, the site is therefore considered to have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as landscape character is concerned.

The site is located to the north of the built up area of Cumnock, extending as far as the Rigg Road. It is considered unlikely that any residential development of the site would necessarily consolidate, enhance or contribute significantly in any way to the improvement of the existing urban form of the town, its settlement pattern or identity. Development of the site would also contribute to the physical and visual coalescence of the settlements of Cumnock and Auchinleck. Negative environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in regard to both these issues. It is also considered that, because of the peripheral location of the site, any development of the area will not help reduce distances travelled by local residents and will not promote, encourage or facilitate walking, cycling or the use of public transport.

It is considered that residential development of the overall site could not be effected without damage or detriment to the area and without exceeding environmental capacity. Consequently, in terms of its impact on the environment, the overall site is not considered suitable for inclusion as a potential housing site in the local plan alteration. However, it is considered that an appropriate development, respecting the environmental capacity of the site, could be achieved subject to appropriate mitigation measures being put into place.

Mitigation Required A broad band of new boundary planting should be introduced along the northern portion of the site running alongside the Rigg Road as a buffer zone between any new development and the open countryside, and for screening purposes. Similarly, new planting should be introduced within the southernmost portion of the area of land to help integrate any development with the existing urban edge.

Single storey, medium to low density development would be preferred in order to respect existing topography and the sloping nature of the site.

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

075(a), CD138 + - o o + o o - o - ? - o - +/- - - +/-

Nature of Impact General negative and positive environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints The western portion of the site is classed by the Macaulay Land Use Institute as Class 3(2) Locally Important Good Quality Agricultural Land.

The site is located within the Dumfries Estate Historic Garden and Designed Landscape.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. However, the development would result in the loss of an area of good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the area of land in question is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as an area of low landscape sensitivity, the development of which may be beneficial to the wider settlement. The area is also identified as an ‘Area Most Suitable for Development’. It is considered that residential development of the site could take place without detriment to landscape character, local distinctiveness and the scenic value of the area.

With the site being located within the Dumfries Estate Historic Garden and Designed Landscape, development of the area could also have an adverse environmental impact on the historic environment.

The site is located to the north west of the built up area of Cumnock, to the south west of the Auchinleck Road. It is considered unlikely that any residential development of the site would necessarily consolidate, enhance or contribute significantly in any way to the improvement of the existing urban form of the town, its settlement pattern or identity. Development of the site would also contribute to the coalescence of the settlements of Cumnock and Auchinleck. Negative environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in regard to both these issues. It is also considered that, because of the peripheral location of the site, any development of the area will not help reduce distances travelled by local residents and will not promote, encourage or facilitate walking or cycling. However, being located on a major bus route, the development could encourage and facilitate the use of public transport. Both positive and negative environmental impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

It is considered that residential development of the overall site could not be effected without some damage or detriment to the area. The development could, however, take place without exceeding environmental capacity. Both negative and positive environmental capacity impacts could therefore be experienced.

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

075(b) + +/- o o +/- o o +/- o o ? - o - +/- - - +/-

Nature of Impact General positive and negative environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the northern portion of the site running alongside the Rigg Road has been identified as areas where residential development would not be acceptable in landscape capacity terms. This particular portion of the area is not considered appropriate for residential development in landscape capacity terms.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, the major portion of the area of land in question is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as part of a larger area of medium to low landscape sensitivity to development and as part of an area identified as an ‘Area with Potential’ for development. The northernmost portion of the site is not considered suitable for development in landscape terms. Overall, the site is therefore considered to have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as landscape character is concerned.

It is considered that residential development of the overall site could not be effected without damage or detriment to the area. However, it is considered that an appropriate development, respecting the environmental capacity of the site, could be achieved subject to appropriate mitigation measures being put into place.

Single storey, medium to low density development would be preferred in order to respect existing topography and the sloping nature of the site.

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

086(b), CD218 + +/- o o - o o - o o ? - o - +/- - - -

Nature of Impact General neutral or negative environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the area of land in question has not been identified as an area where residential development would be acceptable in terms of landscape capacity. The area should remain undeveloped to preserve the setting of the settlement. Development of the site is not, therefore, considered acceptable from the landscape point of view.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

The site is a large site, capable of accommodating far more houses than may be required in Cumnock for the period of the local plan. It is considered that such a large scale residential development as proposed could not be accommodated in such a way as to respect the existing urban form of the town, its settlement pattern and identity. Negative environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in regard to this issue.

Because of the peripheral location of the site, any development of the area will not necessarily help reduce distances travelled by local residents but proximity to local primary schools could help encourage walking and cycling.

It is considered that residential development of the overall site could not be effected without some damage or detriment to the area and without exceeding environmental capacity.

Mitigation Required Not Applicable

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

086(c) + +/- o/- o o o o + o o ? - o - +/- - - +/-

Nature of Impact General positive and neutral environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints Part of the site could be considered to be at risk from flooding.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

The site is located directly adjacent to the Glaisnock Water and part of the area could be at risk from flooding. A fllood risk assessment of the site may be required to ascertain the extent of any particular problems in this regard.

The site in question is located within the existing settlement boundary of the town and it is considered that any development of the area can be well integrated with surrounding development in such a way as to respect existing urban form, settlement pattern and identity. With the proximity of the site to facilities within nearby Netherthird, while development of the area would not reduce the need for travel or journey length, it is considered that development of the site will encourage and facilitate walking and cycling. Other facilities are more remote and will necessitate journeys by private car. Both positive and negative environmental impacts will be experienced with regard to these issues.

Overall, residential development of the site could be effected without damage or detriment to the area. Development could, however, take place without exceeding environmental capacity. Both positive and negative environmental impacts will be experienced in this regard

Mitigation Required A flood risk assessment of the site requires to be carried out.

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

184(a) + +/- o o +/- o o +/- o o ? - o - +/- - - +/-

Nature of Impact General neutral or negative environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints The northernmost portion of the site is not considered suitable for development in landscape terms.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, the major portion of the area of land in question is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as part of a larger area of medium to low landscape sensitivity to development and as part of an area identified as an ‘Area with Potential’ for development. In principle, the development of this area for residential purposes is therefore considered acceptable in landscape capacity terms. The northernmost portion of the site is not considered suitable for development in landscape terms. Overall, the site is therefore considered to have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as landscape character is concerned.

The site is located to the north of the built up area of Cumnock, extending as far as the Rigg Road. It is considered unlikely that any residential development of the site would necessarily consolidate, enhance or contribute significantly in any way to the improvement of the existing urban form of the town, its settlement pattern or identity. Development of the site would also contribute to the physical and visual coalescence of the settlements of Cumnock and Auchinleck. Negative environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in regard to both these issues. It is also considered that, because of the peripheral location of the site, any development of the area will not help reduce the need for travel or journey length by local residents and will not promote, encourage or facilitate walking, cycling or the use of public transport.

It is considered that residential development of the overall site could not be effected without damage or detriment to the area. Development could take place, however, without exceeding environmental capacity. It is considered that an appropriate development, respecting the environmental capacity of the site, could be achieved subject to appropriate mitigation measures being put into place.

Mitigation Required A broad band of new boundary planting should be introduced along the northern portions of the site running alongside the Rigg Road as a buffer zone between any new development and the open countryside, and for screening purposes. Similarly, new planting should be introduced within the southernmost portion of the area of land adjacent to the former Holmhead Hospital, to help integrate any development with the existing urban edge.

Single storey, medium to low density development would be preferred in order to respect existing topography and the sloping nature of the site.

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

184(b) + +/- o o o o +/o + o o ? - o - - - - +

Nature of Impact General negative and positive environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints None

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

The area in question is located within the existing settlement boundary of the town and comprises two separate areas, one on either side of Cairn Road. The northern area comprises a brownfield redevelopment site and the southern area a greenfield site. Development of the northern site will have a positive environmental impact by removing an area of degraded land. This will not apply to the southern area.

It is considered that any development of these two areas can be well integrated with surrounding development in such a way as to respect existing urban form, settlement pattern and identity. With the sites being peripheral to the settlement, it is not considered that development of the sites will reduce the need for travel or journey length or encourage and facilitate walking, cycling or the use of public transport. Negative environmental impacts will be experienced with regard to these issues.

Development of the sites for residential purposes will increase the generation of waste produced by residents of the area and will not, in itself, contribute to efficient waste management. Similarly, increased air pollution from increased exhaust emissions from vehicles generated by the development is likely to occur and new street lighting may well increase light pollution. Increases in energy consumption as a result of the development will also occur. Consequently, development will have negative environmental impact insofar as waste reduction, pollution and energy consumption is concerned. Without any details of the proposed development being provided, the environmental effects of the proposal on design quality remain unknown.

Overall, residential development of the site could be effected without damage or detriment to the area and without exceeding environmental capacity.

Mitigation Required None

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

184(c) + +/- o o o o o + o o ? - o - +/- - - +

Nature of Impact General positive and negative environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints None

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

The area in question comprises a greenfield site located within the existing settlement boundary of the town. It is considered that any development of the area can be integrated with surrounding development in such a way as to respect existing urban form, settlement pattern and identity. With the site being peripheral to the settlement, it is not considered that development of the sites will generally reduce journey length or the need for travel. However, the site is located in close proximity to the local secondary school which may encourage walking or cycling to the Academy. Both negative and positive environmental impacts will be experienced with regard to these issues.

Overall, residential development of the site could be effected without damage or detriment to the area and without exceeding environmental capacity.

Mitigation Required None

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

184(d) +/- +/- o o - o o - o o ? - o - - - - -

Nature of Impact General negative environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints There are 2 pit shafts located within the northern portion of the site.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is generally physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. However, the existence of two pit shafts on the site would indicate that the site has been previously undermined. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as landform and the protection and use of soils is concerned.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the area of land in question has not been identified as an area where residential development would be acceptable in terms of landscape capacity. The study recommends that the area should remain undeveloped to preserve the setting of the settlement. Development of the site is not, therefore, considered acceptable from the landscape point of view.

The site is physically divorced from the existing built up area of Cumnock, being located to the west of the main Cumnock by-pass. It is considered that any residential development of the site would not, in any respect consolidate, enhance or contribute significantly in any way to the improvement of the existing urban form of the town, its settlement pattern or identity. Significant negative environmental impacts would be experienced in regard to this issue. It is also considered that, because of the remote location of the site from the settlement, any development of the area will require increased distances to be travelled by local residents and will not promote, encourage or facilitate walking, cycling or the use of public transport.

It is considered that residential development of the site could not be effected without significant damage or detriment to the area and without exceeding environmental capacity.

Mitigation Required Not Applicable

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

213(c) +/- +/- o o - o o - o -/o ? - o - - - - -

Nature of Impact General negative and neutral environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints There are 2 pit shafts located within the northern portion of the site. The northern most field to the north of Skares Road is contained within the Dumfries Estate Gardens and Designed Landscapes.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is generally physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. However, the existence of two pit shafts on the site would indicate that the site has been previously undermined. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as landform and the protection and use of soils is concerned.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the area of land in question has not been identified as an area where residential development would be acceptable in terms of landscape capacity. The study recommends that the area should remain undeveloped to preserve the setting of the settlement. Development of the site is not, therefore, considered acceptable from the landscape point of view.

It is considered that residential development of the site could not be effected without significant damage or detriment to the area and without exceeding environmental capacity.

Mitigation Required Not Applicable

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

213(d) + +/- o o - o o - o o ? - o - +/- - - -

Nature of Impact General negative environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the area of land in question has not been identified as an area where residential development would be acceptable in terms of landscape capacity. The study recommends that the area should remain undeveloped to preserve the setting of the settlement.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is generally physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. However, the existence of two pit shafts on the site would indicate that the site has been previously undermined. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as landform and the protection and use of soils is concerned.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the area of land in question has not been identified as an area where residential development would be acceptable in terms of landscape capacity. The study recommends that the area should remain undeveloped to preserve the setting of the settlement. Development of the site is not, therefore, considered acceptable from the landscape point of view.

The site is located on the southern extremities of Cumnock with access to the site being taken from the adjoining housing estate. It is considered that any residential development of the site would not consolidate, enhance or contribute significantly in any way to the improvement of the existing urban form of the town, its settlement pattern or identity. Negative environmental impacts would be experienced in regard to this issue. Because of its peripheral location, it is considered that any development of the site will not help reduce distances travelled. Located directly adjacent to the local primary school and close to local shops, development of the site will help promote, encourage or facilitate walking, cycling or the use of public transport.

It is considered that residential development of the site could not be effected without significant damage or detriment to the area and without exceeding environmental capacity.

Mitigation Required Not Applicable

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

233 + +/- o o + o o +/- o o ? - o - + - - +

Nature of Impact General neutral or positive environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints None

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the area of land in question is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as an area of low landscape sensitivity to development and an area identified as an ‘Area Most Suitable for Development’. In principle, the development of the area for residential purposes is considered acceptable in landscape capacity terms. It is considered that residential development of the site could take place without detriment to landscape character, local distinctiveness and the scenic value of the area.

The site is located directly to the east of the playing fields serving the settlement of Craigens which separates the proposed development site from the existing built up area of the settlement. It is considered that, because of this separation, the development of the site would not significantly contribute to the improvement of the existing urban form of the community, settlement pattern and identity. Integration of the proposed development with the adjacent recreational area could, however, help to link the development with the settlement. Access to the site could be taken directly from Craigens Road, which also facilitates access to the existing settlement, thus respecting existing urban form and settlement pattern. Both positive and negative impacts could therefore be experienced in so far as respecting urban form is concerned.

The site in question is within walking distance of the Netherthird shops and other facilities, including the local primary school. Development of the site could therefore encourage and facilitate walking and cycling and, being located adjacent to a bus route, may encourage the use of public transport by local residents of any development. Because of its peripheral location in respect of other facilities, the development itself is unlikely to reduce the need for travel and journey length.

Overall, residential development of the site could be effected without damage or detriment to the area and without exceeding environmental capacity.

Mitigation Required None

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

234 + +/- o o - o o - o o ? - o - - - - -

Nature of Impact General negative environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints None

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is generally physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the area of land in question has not been identified as an area where residential development would be acceptable in terms of landscape capacity. The study recommends that the area should remain undeveloped to preserve the setting of the settlement. Development of the site is not, therefore, considered acceptable from the landscape point of view.

It is considered that residential development of the site could not be effected without significant damage or detriment to the area and without exceeding environmental capacity.

Mitigation Required Not Applicable

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

CD023(ii) + +/- o o +/- o o - o o ? - o - +/- - - -

Nature of Impact General negative environmental impacts.

Potential Environmental Constraints In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the western half of the area of land in question has not been identified as an area where residential development would be acceptable in landscape capacity terms.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study commissioned by the Council, the eastern portion of the area of land in question is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as an area of higher landscape sensitivity to development. However, the area is also identified as an ‘Area with Limited Potential for Development’. In principle, the development of this particular portion of the site for residential purposes is, therefore, considered acceptable in landscape capacity terms. With the western half of the area of land in question not being identified as an area where residential development would be acceptable in landscape capacity terms, development of the overall site is likely to have both positive and negative impacts on landscape character, local distinctiveness and scenic quality. With part of the site lying within an area of flood risk, negative environmental impacts will be experienced in so far as the water environment is concerned.

The proposed development would constitute a ribboning of development along a public road in a general rural location. It is considered that this form of residential development in its prominent roadside location would not help consolidate, enhance and contribute to the improvement of the existing urban form of Craigens, its settlement pattern and identity. The proposed site is also proposed in a location which is physically separated from the settlement by Craigens Road itself. Negative environmental impacts are therefore likely to be experienced in regard to this issue. Because of its peripheral location, it is not considered that development of the area will reduce the need for travel and journey length. Development of the site may, however, encourage and facilitate walking and cycling in some circumstances, particularly to the nearby primary school and local shops. Being located adjacent to a bus route, development of the area may also encourage the use of public transport by future residents of the area. Both positive and negative environmental impacts are therefore likely to be experienced in this regard.

It is considered that residential development of the site could not be effected without some damage or detriment to the area or without exceeding environmental capacity. Negative impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard. Consequently, in terms of its impact on the environment, the site is not considered suitable for inclusion as a potential housing site in the local plan alteration. The area should remain undeveloped in order to preserve the rural setting of the settlement.

Mitigation Required None

Further Environmental Assessments

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

CD 246 + +/- o o +/- o o - o -/o ? - o - +/- - - +/-

Nature of Impact General negative and positive environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints The western portion of that part of the site to the south west of Auchinleck Road is classed by the Macaulay Land Use Institute as Class 3(2) Locally Important Good Quality Agricultural Land.

The portion of the site located to the south west of Auchinleck Road is located within the Dumfries Estate Historic Garden and Designed Landscape.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the northern portion of that part of the site to the north east of Auchinleck Road running along the southern side of the Rigg Road has been identified as areas where residential development would not be acceptable in landscape capacity terms. Similarly, the northernmost field comprising that portion of the site located to the south west of Auchinleck Road is not identified as suitable for development in terms of landscape impact. These particular portions of the area are not considered appropriate for residential development in landscape capacity terms.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. However, the development of that portion of the site to the south west of Auchinleck Road would result in the loss of an area of good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils in that particular portion of the site is concerned.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the southernmost field of that part of the area lying to the south west of Auchinleck Road is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as an area of low landscape sensitivity, the development of which may be beneficial to the wider settlement. This particular part of the area is also identified as an ‘Area Most Suitable for Development’. It is considered that residential development of the site could take place without detriment to landscape character, local distinctiveness and the scenic value of the area.

With specific regard to that portion of the site located to the north east of Auchinleck Road, the major portion of the area of land in question is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as part of a larger area of medium to low landscape sensitivity to development and as part of an area identified as an ‘Area with Potential’ for development. As stated above, the northernmost portion of the site is not considered suitable for development in landscape terms. Overall, this particular portion of the site is therefore considered to have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as landscape character is concerned.

With that portion of the site lying to the south west of Auchinleck Road being located within the Dumfries Estate Historic Garden and Designed Landscape, development of this particular part of the area could also have an adverse environmental impact on the historic environment. However, it is accepted that this particular peripheral portion of the Historic Garden and Designed Landscape is remote from Dumfries House itself and is now divorced from the main body of the designated landscape area by the Cumnock / Auchinleck bypass which has fragmented the area. Any adverse impact of the proposed development on the historic garden and designed landscape is therefore likely to be minimal in extent.

The site is located to the north west of the built up area of Cumnock, to the south west and north east of the Auchinleck Road. It is considered unlikely that any residential development of the site would necessarily consolidate, enhance or contribute significantly in any way to the improvement of the existing urban form of the town, its settlement pattern or identity. Development of the site would also contribute to the coalescence of the settlements of Cumnock and Auchinleck. Negative environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in regard to both these issues. It is also considered that, because of the peripheral location of the site, any development of the area will not help reduce distances travelled by local residents and will not promote, encourage or facilitate walking or cycling. However, being located on a major bus route, the development could encourage and facilitate the use of public transport. Both positive and negative environmental impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

Mitigation Required Mixed 1 to 2 storey, medium to low density housing would be suitable with integrated landscape management and enhancement of the area to tie in with existing woodland along the River Lugar and the areas of Ancient Woodland located along the northern boundary of that part of the area lying to the south west of Auchinleck Road. Supplementary planting along the northern boundaries of the site would also help screen the development when viewed from Auchinleck and minimise any visual coalescence of the communities iof Cumnock and Auchinleck that might otherwise be experienced.

DRONGAN

Ref. No. Site Location Site Suggested By

004(d) Land to North of Mill O’Shield Road Hope Homes Scotland, Watson Terrace, Drongan KA6 7AB

072 Land to North of Watson Terrace Mr. J. Sutherland, Kraigshield Homes Ltd., The Kraigs, 176 Mill O’Shield Road, Drongan KA6 7BA

086(i) Land at Mill O’Shield Farm Hope Homes Scotland Ltd, per McInally Associates Ltd, 6 Newton Place, Glasgow G3 7PS

198(a) Land at Littlemill Road Gartmore Properties Ltd, per James Barr, 226 West George Street, Glasgow G2 2LN

198(b) Land at Littlemill Road Gartmore Properties Ltd, per James Barr, 226 West George Street, Glasgow G2 2LN

207(a) Land at Mill O’Shield Road Councillor T Farrell, Members Services, London Road, Kilmarnock

207(b) Land at Watson Terrace Councillor T Farrell, Members Services, London Road, Kilmarnock

207(c) Land at Littlemill Road Councillor T Farrell, Members Services, London Road, Kilmarnock

CD048 Land to North of Arran View Mr M. L. Veitch, Auldbyres Farm, drongan KA6 6HG

CD165 Land at Littlemill Road Gartmore Properties Ltd, per James Barr, 226 West George Street, Glasgow G2 2LN

CD170 Land to East of Littlemill Road Residence Scotland Ltd., per James Barr, 226 West George Street, Glasgow G2 2LN

CD193 Land to East of Littlemill Road The Windyridge Group, per Mr D Wardrop, White Young Green, 4 Chester Street, Edinburgh EH3 7RA

CD196 Land at Drongan Mains The Windyridge Group, per Mr D Wardrop, White Young Green, 4 Chester Street, Edinburgh EH3 7RA

CD225 Land at Mill O’Shield Farm Hope Homes Scotland Ltd, per McInally Associates Ltd, 6 Newton Place, Glasgow G3 7PS

No Number Land at Martnaham Way Full Council, East Ayrshire Council, Meeting on 6 Allocated December 2007

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

004(d), 207(a) + - o o + o o + o o ? - ? - +/- - - + and CD225

Nature of Impact General positive and negative environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints The site is classed by the Macaulay Land Use Institute as Class 3(1) Prime Quality Agricultural Land.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. However, the development would result in the loss of an area of prime quality agricultural land. Consequently, development would have negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, the land in question is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as part of a larger area of medium to low landscape sensitivity to development and as part of an area identified as an ‘Area with Potential’ for development. It is considered that residential development of the site could take place without detriment to landscape character, local distinctiveness and the scenic value of the area.

The site is located to the west of Drongan, to the south of and adjacent to a recently completed new residential development. It is considered that any residential development of the site would consolidate, enhance and contribute to the improvement of the existing urban form of the town, its settlement pattern or identity, integrating and linking in with the existing residential development to the north. Positive environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in regard to this issue.

It is considered that, because of the peripheral location of the site, any development of the area will not help reduce distances travelled by local residents and will not promote, encourage or facilitate walking or cycling. However, being located near a bus route, the development could encourage and facilitate the use of public transport. Both positive and negative environmental impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

It is considered that residential development of the site could be effected without damage or detriment to the area and without exceeding environmental capacity.

Mitigation Required None

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

072 and + +/- o o + o o + o o ? - o - +/- - - + 207(b)

Nature of Impact General positive and negative environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints The western portion of the site is classed by the Macaulay Land Use Institute as Class 3(2) Locally Important Good Quality Agricultural Land.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. However, the development would result in the loss of an area of good quality locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, the area of land in question is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy an area of low landscape sensitivity to development and an area identified as an ‘Area Most Suitable for Development’. It is considered that residential development of the site could take place without detriment to landscape character, local distinctiveness and the scenic value of the area.

The site is located to the north of Drongan, to the west of and adjacent to a recently completed new residential development. It is considered that any residential development of the site would consolidate, enhance and contribute to the improvement of the existing urban form of the town, its settlement pattern or identity, integrating and linking in with the existing residential development to the east. Positive environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in regard to this issue.

Mitigation Required Landscape boundary planting will be required along the northern and western boundaries of the site to soften the new urban edge.

Mixed two storey development of medium density incorporating new landscape features would be appropriate.

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

086(i) + - o/- o +/- o o +/- o o ? - o - +/- - - +/-

Nature of Impact General negative environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the major southern and western portions of the area of land in question have not been identified as areas where residential development would be acceptable in terms of landscape capacity. Development of these parts of the site is not, therefore, considered acceptable from the landscape capacity point of view.

Parts of the area are low lying and at risk from a 1 in 100 year flooding event.

Part of the site contains an area of archaeological interest as identified by the West of Scotland Archaeological Service.

The northern half of the site is classed by the Macaulay Land Use Institute as Class 3(2) Locally Important Good Quality Agricultural Land. However, the southern portion of the site is classed by the Institute as Class 3(1) Prime Quality Agricultural Land.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. However, the development would result in the loss of areas of both prime quality and good quality locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

Parts of the area are low lying and at risk from a 1 in 100 year flooding event an this may impact adversely on the water environment on these particular areas. The larger part of the area remains unaffected by this issue.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, the eastern part of the area of land in question is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as an area of medium to low landscape sensitivity to development and an area identified as an ‘Area with Potential’ for development. In principle, the development of this eastern portion of the area for residential purposes is therefore considered acceptable in landscape capacity terms. The remainder of the area of land in question has not been identified as an area where residential development would be acceptable in landscape capacity terms. It is therefore considered that the development of the site would have both negative and positive environmental impact on landscape character, local distinctiveness and the scenic value of the area.

It is considered that any residential development of the overall site would not consolidate, enhance and contribute to the improvement of the existing urban form of the town, its settlement pattern or identity. However, the eastern portion of the site is located adjacent to a recently completed new residential development. Both positive and negative environmental impacts are therefore likely to be experienced in regard to this issue.

It is considered that, because of the peripheral location of the site, any development of the area will not help reduce distances travelled by local residents and will not promote, encourage or facilitate walking or cycling. However, being located near a bus route, the eastern part of the development could encourage and facilitate the use of public transport. Both positive and negative environmental impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

It is considered that residential development of the overall site could not be effected without some damage or detriment to the area and without exceeding environmental capacity. Consequently, in terms of its impact on the environment, the overall site is not considered suitable for inclusion as a potential housing site in the local plan alteration. However, it is considered that an appropriate, smaller development, respecting the environmental capacity of the site, could be achieved without detriment to the area in environmental terms. Both negative and positive environmental capacity impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

Mitigation Required Any development should be restricted to the eastern parts of the site.

Landscape boundary planting will be required along the southern and western boundaries of that portion of the site considered appropriate for development in order to soften the new urban edge.

A Flood Risk Assessment of the site requires to be carried out.

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

198(a) , 207(c) + - o o - o o - o o ? - o - +/- - - - CD165(a) and CD196(a)

Nature of Impact General negative environmental impacts.

The site is classed by the Macaulay Land Use Institute as Class 3(1) Prime Quality Agricultural Land.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. However, the development would result in the loss of an area of prime quality agricultural land. Consequently, development would have negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the area of land in question has not been identified as an area where residential development would be acceptable in terms of landscape capacity. The study recommends that the area should remain undeveloped to preserve the setting of the settlement. Development of the site is not, therefore, considered acceptable from the landscape point of view.

The site is located to the south of the built up area of Drongan and it is considered unlikely that any residential development of the site would consolidate, enhance or contribute significantly in any way to the improvement of the existing urban form of the town, its settlement pattern or identity. Development of the site would extend the built up area of Drongan beyond the natural horizon, within which the settlement is contained. Significant negative environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in regard to both this issue. It is also considered that, because of the peripheral location of the site, any development of the area will not help reduce distances travelled by local residents and will not promote, encourage or facilitate walking or cycling. However, being located on a bus route, the development could encourage and facilitate the use of public transport. Both positive and negative environmental impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

Mitigation Required Not Applicable.

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

198(b), + - o o - o o - o o ? - o - +/- - - - CD165(b) and CD196(b)

Nature of Impact General negative environmental impacts.

The site is classed by the Macaulay Land Use Institute as Class 3(1) Prime Quality Agricultural Land.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. However, the development would result in the loss of an area of prime quality agricultural land. Consequently, development would have negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the area of land in question has not been identified as an area where residential development would be acceptable in terms of landscape capacity. The study recommends that the area should remain undeveloped to preserve the setting of the settlement. Development of the site is not, therefore, considered acceptable from the landscape point of view.

Mitigation Required Not Applicable.

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

CD048 + - o o/- - o o - o o ? - o - - - - -

Nature of Impact General negative environmental impacts.

Potential Environmental Constraints The whole site is classed by the Macaulay Land Use Institute as Class 3(2) Locally Important Good Quality Land. There is also a small area of Ancient Woodland located in the south west segment of the site.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. However, the development would result in the loss of an area of locally important, good quality agricultural land. Consequently, development would have negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

The site is located in a peripheral location on the edge of Drongan and constitutes a significant extension of development into the open countryside. It is not considered that development of the area would relate to or respect the existing urban form of the settlement. Because of its extremely peripheral location, it is also considered that any development of the site will not help reduce distances travelled by local residents and will not promote, encourage or facilitate walking, cycling or the use of public transport.

Mitigation Required None

Further Environmental Assessments

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

CD 170 +/- +/- o/- o +/- o + - o o ? - o - + - - +/-

Nature of Impact Both positive and negative environmental impacts

Potential Environmental Constraints There are seven pit shafts located to the north of the site, 5 pt shafts located in the centre and four pit shafts are located to the south.

The south of the site is classed by the Macaulay Land Use Institute as Class 3(1) Prime Quality Agricultural Land.

The centre of the site is at risk from a 1 in 100 year flood event

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, with the exception of the north western part of the site, the area of land in question has not been identified as an area where residential development would be acceptable in landscape capacity terms.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform. However, the number of pit shafts located throughout the site would indicate that the area has been heavily undermined and, consequently, development of the area may not be appropriate or practical and would possibly involve significant rehabilitation of the area. Both positive and negative environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in this regard. Development of the area to the south of the Taiglum Burn would also result in the loss of an area of prime quality agricultural land. While development on the northern portion of the site would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, development in this area would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned. The location of an identified area flood risk within the site is also likely to have an adverse environmental effect in so far as the water environment is concerned.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, with the exception of the north westernmost part of the site, the area of land in question has not been identified as an area where residential development would be acceptable in landscape capacity terms. The development of the majority of the site would have an adverse environmental impact on landscape character, local distinctiveness and the scenic value of the area. The north western corner of the site is, however, identified in the landscape study as an area of higher landscape sensitivity to development but also as an ‘Indicative Area with Limited Potential’ for development. Any development in this particular portion of the site would therefore be considered acceptable in landscape terms. The development of the overall area would have both negative and positive environmental impacts in so far as landscape issues are concerned. Development of the area would also result in the restoration of a brownfield, former mine site and would have a positive impact in so far as regenerating degraded environments is concerned.

The site is located to the east of Littlemill Road, the main road linking Drongan and Patna, which currently forms a strong defensible boundary to the settlement. It is considered that residential development of the site would not help consolidate, enhance and contribute to the improvement of the existing urban form of the settlement, its settlement pattern or identity. However, because of its location in close proximity to local retail, educational and other community facilities it is considered that development of the area will help minimise distances travelled and promote, encourage or facilitate walking and cycling. The location of the site in close proximity to a main bus corridor may also help facilitate the use of public transport. Positive environmental impacts are therefore likely to be experienced in this particular regard.

Overall, residential development of the site could not be effected without some damage or detriment to the area and without exceeding environmental capacity. Consequently, in terms of its impact on the environment, the site is not considered suitable for inclusion as a potential housing site in the local plan alteration. The area should remain undeveloped in order to preserve the rural setting of the settlement.

Mitigation Required

Further Environmental Assessments

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

CD193 +/- +/- o/- o - o + + o o ? - o - + - - +/-

Nature of Impact General negative environmental impacts

Potential Environmental Constraints There are seven pit shafts located to the north of the site, 5 pit shafts located in the centre and four pit shafts are located to the south.

The south of the site is classed by the Macaulay Land Use Institute as Class 3(1) Prime Quality Agricultural Land.

The centre of the site is at risk from a 1 in 100 year flood event

Mitigation Required

Further Environmental Assessments

LOGAN

Ref. No. Site Location Site Suggested By

CD023(i) Land to South of Glenmuir Road Orchard Homes (Scotland) Ltd, per Michael S Evans, Ty Newydd, 11 Murchie Drive, Prestwick KA9 2ND

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

CD023(i) + +/- o o ? o o - o o ? - o - +/- - - -

Nature of Impact General negative or neutral environmental impacts

Potential Environmental Constraints None.

The site is located to the south of the existing settlement boundary, separated from the main body of Logan by Glenmuir Road, the main approach to the settlement from the A70 Cumnock / Muirkirk road. It is not therefore considered that the development could be positively and physically integrated with the existing main built up area of the village. It is also considered unlikely that any residential development of the site would consolidate, enhance or contribute significantly in any way to the improvement of the existing urban form of the town, its settlement pattern or identity. Negative environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in this regard.

It is considered that any development of the area will not help reduce the need for travel or journey length although the proximity of the site to local retail and primary school facilities could well encourage or facilitate walking, cycling and reduce the use of the private car. Some positive environmental impacts could be experienced regarding this issue although negative impacts would be experienced in so far as the use of other, more remote facilities are concerned. The location of the site along a bus route could also facilitate the use of public transport. Positive environmental impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

It is considered that residential development of the site could not be effected without damage or detriment to the area or without exceeding environmental capacity. Consequently, in terms of its impact on the environment, the site is not considered suitable for inclusion as a potential housing site in the local plan alteration. The area should remain undeveloped in order to preserve the rural setting of the settlement.

Mitigation Required None.

Further Environmental Assessments

MAUCHLINE

Ref. No. Site Location Site Suggested By

070(a) Land at Mauchline Mains Sir Claud Hagart-Alexander, per DTZ Pieda Consulting, 28 Drumsheugh Gardens, Edinburgh EH3 7RN

070(b) Land at Alexander Terrace Sir Claud Hagart-Alexander, per DTZ Pieda Consulting, 28 Drumsheugh Gardens, Edinburgh EH3 7RN

070(c) Land at Catrine Road, Welton Road Sir Claud Hagart-Alexander, per DTZ Pieda Consulting, 28 Drumsheugh Gardens, Edinburgh EH3 7RN

070(d) Land to North West of Station Road Sir Claud Hagart-Alexander, per DTZ Pieda Consulting, 28 Drumsheugh Gardens, Edinburgh EH3 7RN

070(e) Land at Haugh Road Sir Claud Hagart-Alexander, per DTZ Pieda Consulting, 28 Drumsheugh Gardens, Edinburgh EH3 7RN

070(f) Land to South East of Station Road Sir Claud Hagart-Alexander, per DTZ Pieda Consulting, 28 Drumsheugh Gardens, Edinburgh EH3 7RN

081(f) Land to West of Kilmarnock Road Alexander Morton Homes, High Langmuir Farm, Kilmaurs, KA3 2PG

081(g) Land to North West of Station Road Alexander Morton Homes, High Langmuir Farm, Kilmaurs, KA3 2PG

081(h) Land to South East of Station Road Alexander Morton Homes, High Langmuir Farm, Kilmaurs, KA3 2PG

081(i) Land to East of Kilmarnock Road Alexander Morton Homes, High Langmuir Farm, Kilmaurs, KA3 2PG

081(j) Land to East of Tarbolton Road Alexander Morton Homes, High Langmuir Farm, Kilmaurs, KA3 2PG

099(a) Land to North of Mauchline Stewart Milne Holdings, Kestrel House, 3 Kilmartin Place, Tannochside Business Park, Uddingston, G71 5PH

099(b) Land to West of Kilmarnock Road Stewart Milne Holdings, Kestrel House, 3 Kilmartin Place, Tannochside Business Park, Uddingston, G71 5PH

099(c) Land to North of Ayr Road Stewart Milne Holdings, Kestrel House, 3 Kilmartin Place, Tannochside Business Park, Uddingston, G71 5PH

101(c) Land between Welton Road and Sorn Road Councillor George Smith, Member Services, London Road, Kilmarnock

107(a) Land to North of Mauchline Mr J Dick, Northkirk Ltd., 14 Walnut Road, Kilmarnock KA1 2HF

107(b) Land to West of Kilmarnock Road Mr J Dick, Northkirk Ltd., 14 Walnut Road, Kilmarnock KA1 2HF

CD179 Land at Catrine Road, Welton Road Lynch Developments, per Ms Alison Hurd, Warren Consultants, Milngavie Enterprise Centre, Ellangowan Court, Milngavie, Glasgow G62 8PH

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

070(a) + - o o +/- o o + o o ? - o - + - - +/-

Nature of Impact General positive and negative environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the north eastern half of the area of land in question is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as an ‘Area Not Suitable for Housing Development’ and as part of a larger ‘Landscape Strategy Area’ where conservation of the landscape quality and character of the area is recommended to preserve the setting of the village.

The site is classed by the Macaulay Land Use Institute as Class 3(2) Locally Important Good Quality Agricultural Land.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. However, the development would result in the loss of areas of good quality locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, the south western half of the area of land is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as an area of low landscape sensitivity to development and as an area identified as an ‘Area Most Suitable for Development’. In principle, the development of this south western half of the area for residential purposes is considered acceptable in landscape capacity terms. The rest of the area of land in question has not been identified as an area where residential development would be acceptable in terms of landscape capacity. It is therefore considered that the development of the site would have both negative and positive environmental impact on landscape character, local distinctiveness and scenic value of the area.

It is considered that any residential development of the overall site would help consolidate, enhance and contribute to the improvement of the existing urban form of this part of the town, its settlement pattern and identity. Positive environmental impacts are therefore likely to be experienced in regard to this issue.

While development of the area would not reduce the need for travel or journey length, it is considered that, because of the proximity of the site to the town centre and to the local primary school, any development of the area will help promote, encourage or facilitate walking or cycling. Positive environmental impacts are therefore likely to be experienced in this regard.

Mitigation Required Any development should be restricted to the south western half of the site.

Existing boundary planting should be retained and enhanced.

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

070(b) and + - o o +/- o o +/- o o ? - o - +/- - - +/- 101(c)

Nature of Impact General negative or neutral environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, with the exception of a small portion of land lying directly adjacent to Alexander Terrace, the area of land in question is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as an ‘Area Not Suitable for Housing Development’ and as part of a larger ‘Landscape Strategy Area’ where conservation of the landscape quality and character of the area is recommended to preserve the setting of the village. Development of the larger part of this area for housing purposes is not, therefore, considered acceptable in landscape capacity terms.

The site is classed by the Macaulay Land Use Institute as Class 3(2) Locally Important Good Quality Agricultural Land.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. However, the development would result in the loss of areas of good quality locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, the portion of land lying directly adjacent to Alexander Terrace is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as an area of higher landscape sensitivity to development. However, this area is also identified as an ‘Area with Limited Potential for Development’. In principle, the development of this small portion of the area for residential purposes is therefore considered acceptable in landscape capacity terms. The rest of the area of land in question has not been identified as an area where residential development would be acceptable in terms of landscape capacity. It is therefore considered that the development of the site would have both negative and positive environmental impact on landscape character, local distinctiveness and scenic value of the area.

It is not considered that residential development of the overall site would help consolidate, enhance and contribute to the improvement of the existing urban form of this part of the town, its settlement pattern or identity. Development would take the form of a narrow development to the rear of existing houses which would be out of keeping with the style of development elsewhere in the vicinity. However, development along Alexander Terrace may be considered acceptable in terms of urban form. Both positive and negative environmental impacts are therefore likely to be experienced in regard to this issue.

While development of the area would not reduce the need for travel or journey length, it is considered that, because of the proximity of the site to the town centre and to the local primary school, any development of the area will help reduce distances travelled by local residents and will promote, encourage or facilitate walking or cycling for these purposes. Journeys for other purposes are not likely to be reduced, with reliance continuing to be placed on the private car for travel. Both positive and negative environmental impacts are therefore likely to be experienced in this regard.

It is considered that residential development of the overall site could not be effected without some damage or detriment to the area and without exceeding environmental capacity. However, it is considered that an appropriate, smaller development, respecting the environmental capacity of the site, could be achieved without detriment to the area in environmental terms. Both negative and positive environmental capacity impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

Mitigation Required Any residential development of the area should be strictly limited to the central part of the area directly adjoining the existing estate road.

Although the development would be clearly seen from the northern approach to the town on the A743, views could be enhanced by continuing the line of existing mature trees on the adjacent eastern boundary.

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

070(c) and + - o o +/- o o +/- o o ? - o - +/- - - +/- CD179

Nature of Impact General neutral or negative environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, with the exception of the northern portion of the site lying adjacent to Welton Road, the area of land in question is not identified as an area suitable for residential development. Development of the larger part of this area for housing purposes is not, therefore, considered acceptable in landscape capacity terms. The site is classed by the Macaulay Land Use Institute as Class 3(2) Locally Important Good Quality Agricultural Land.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. However, the development would result in the loss of areas of good quality locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, the northern portion of the site lying directly adjacent to Welton Road is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as an area of higher landscape sensitivity to development. However, this area is also identified as an ‘Area with Limited Potential for Development’. In principle, the development of this northern portion of the area for residential purposes is therefore considered acceptable in landscape capacity terms. The rest of the area of land in question has not been identified as an area where residential development would be acceptable in terms of landscape capacity. It is therefore considered that the development of the site would have both negative and positive environmental impact on landscape character, local distinctiveness and the scenic value of the area

It is considered that any residential development of the overall site would be unlikely to help consolidate, enhance and contribute to the improvement of the existing urban form of this part of the town, its settlement pattern and identity. However, a limited development along Welton Road, supplementing the existing adjacent residential development site located within the existing settlement boundary, may be considered acceptable in terms of urban form. Both positive and negative environmental impacts are therefore likely to be experienced in regard to this issue. Development of the area would not reduce the need for travel or journey length. Also, because of its peripheral location, it is not considered that development of the area will help promote, encourage or facilitate walking or cycling. However, location of the site adjacent to an existing major bus route may well facilitate the use of public transport by residents of the area. Both negative and positive environmental impacts are therefore likely to be experienced in this regard.

It is considered that residential development of the overall site could not be effected without some damage or detriment to the area and without exceeding environmental capacity. Consequently, in terms of its impact on the environment, the overall site is not considered suitable for inclusion as a potential housing site in the local plan alteration. However, it is considered that an appropriate, smaller development to the north of the site, respecting the environmental capacity of the area, could be achieved without detriment to the area in environmental terms. Both negative and positive environmental capacity impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

Mitigation Required Existing hedges and scrub should be retained and enhanced to improve the existing and future growth in settlement boundary.

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

070(d) and + +/- o o + o o + o o ? - o - + - - + 081(g)

Nature of Impact General neutral or negative environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study commissioned by the Council, the area of land in question is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as an area of low landscape sensitivity to development and as an area identified as an ‘Area Most Suitable for Development’. It is considered that residential development of the site could take place without detriment to landscape character, local distinctiveness and the scenic value of the area.

The site is located outwith the settlement boundary of Mauchline and is almost completely surrounded by residential and other developments. It is considered that any residential development of the site would consolidate, enhance and contribute to the improvement of the existing urban form of the town, its settlement pattern or identity, integrating and linking in with surrounding developments. Positive environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in regard to this issue.

While development of the area would not reduce the need for travel or journey length, it is considered that, because of the proximity of the site to the town centre and other local facilities, any development of the area will help promote, encourage or facilitate walking or cycling to these facilites. Being located close to a bus route, the development could also encourage and facilitate the use of public transport. Positive environmental impacts are therefore likely to be experienced in this regard.

Mitigation Required Development should relate to the ‘village like’ character of the site and its surroundings and would benefit from some landscape structure planting on the boundary with the farm. Medium to low density housing would be considered appropriate.

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

070(e) ? +/- o o o o + + o o ? - o - +/- - - +/-

Nature of Impact General positive and negative environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints The site is a former sandstone quarry which has been infilled.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform. However, the area constitutes a former sandstone quarry which has been infilled and could be liable to subsidence. The suitability of the site for development requires to be proven and at present this suitability remains unknown. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

Being located within the existing settlement boundary, the site has not been assessed as part of the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study commissioned by the Council. However, development of the site would help regenerate the environment of the area which is currently degraded. Positive environmental impacts would be experienced in this regard.

The site is located within the settlement boundary of Mauchline and is surrounded on three sides by residential and business developments. It is considered that any residential development of the site would consolidate, enhance and contribute to the improvement of the existing urban form of the town, its settlement pattern or identity, integrating and linking in with surrounding developments. Positive environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in regard to this issue.

While development of the area would not reduce the need for travel or journey length, it is considered that, because of the proximity of the site to the town centre, any development of the area will help promote, encourage and facilitate walking or cycling for retail purposes. Journeys for other purposes are not likely to be reduced, with reliance continuing to be placed on the private car for travel. Both positive and negative environmental impacts are therefore likely to be experienced in this regard.

It is considered that residential development of the site could possibly be effected without damage or detriment to the area although problems may be experienced regarding the suitability of the site for any type of physical development. It is considered that the development of the site would respect environmental capacity. Both positive and negative environmental impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

Mitigation Required The site requires to be proved suitable for physical development in terms of its stability.

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

070(f) + +/- o o - o o + o o ? - o - +/- - - -

Nature of Impact General negative or neutral environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the area of land in question is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as an ‘Area Not Suitable for Housing Development’ and as part of a larger ‘Landscape Strategy Area’ where conservation of the landscape quality and character of the area is recommended to preserve the setting of the village. The fields are important as they allow long views from the south east part of the town and have a village like character.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the area of land in question has not been identified as an area where residential development would be acceptable in terms of landscape capacity. The study recommends that the area should remain undeveloped to preserve the setting of the settlement. Development of the site is not, therefore, considered acceptable from the landscape point of view.

The site is located to the south of the built up area of Mauchline and is surrounded to the north, east and west by residential development. It is considered that any residential development of the site could well consolidate, enhance and contribute to the improvement of the existing urban form of the town, its settlement pattern or identity, integrating and linking in with surrounding developments. Positive environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in regard to this issue.

Development of the area would not reduce the need for travel or journey length and it is considered that, because of the peripheral location of the site, any development of the area will not help promote, encourage or facilitate walking or cycling. However, being located on a bus route, the development could encourage and facilitate the use of public transport. Both positive and negative environmental impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

Mitigation Required Not Applicable

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

081(f) + - o o +/- o o +/- o o ? - o - + - - +/-

Nature of Impact General positive and negative environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the northernmost portion of the area of land in question is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as an ‘Area Not Suitable for Housing Development’ and as part of a larger ‘Landscape Strategy Area’ where conservation of the landscape quality and character of the area is recommended to preserve the setting of the village. Development of this northern area for housing purposes is not, therefore, considered acceptable in landscape capacity terms.

The trees along the north western boundary of the site are covered by Tree Preservation Order TPO/3/1996

The site is classed by the Macaulay Land Use Institute as Class 3(2) Locally Important Good Quality Agricultural Land.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. However, the development would result in the loss of areas of good quality locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the northernmost portion of the area of land in question is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as an ‘Area Not Suitable for Housing Development’ and as part of a larger ‘Landscape Strategy Area’ where conservation of the landscape quality and character of the area is recommended to preserve the setting of the village. In the Study, the central portion of the site is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as an area of higher landscape sensitivity to development. However, this area is also identified as an ‘Area with Limited Potential for Development’. In addition, the southernmost portion of the area of land in question is identified within the Study as an area of medium to low landscape sensitivity to development and as an ‘Area with Potential’ for development. In principle, the development of both the southern and central portions of the area for residential purposes is therefore considered acceptable in landscape capacity terms. Development of the northern area for housing purposes is not, however, considered acceptable. It is therefore considered that the development of the site would have both negative and positive environmental impact on landscape character, local distinctiveness and the scenic value of the area

It is considered that any residential development of the overall site would be unlikely to help consolidate, enhance and contribute to the improvement of the existing urban form of this part of the town, its settlement pattern and identity. However, a limited development in the central and southern portions of the site may be considered acceptable in terms of urban form. Both positive and negative environmental impacts are therefore likely to be experienced in regard to this issue. Development of the area would not reduce the need for travel or journey length and, because of its peripheral location, it is not considered that development of the overall area will help promote, encourage or facilitate walking or cycling. However, location of the site adjacent to an existing major bus route may well facilitate the use of public transport by residents of the area. Both negative and positive environmental impacts are therefore likely to be experienced in this regard.

It is considered that residential development of the overall site could not be effected without some damage or detriment to the area and without exceeding environmental capacity. Consequently, in terms of its impact on the environment, the overall site is not considered suitable for inclusion as a potential housing site in the local plan alteration. However, it is considered that an appropriate, smaller development on the central and southern portions of the site, respecting the environmental capacity of the area, could be achieved without detriment to the area in environmental terms. Both negative and positive environmental capacity impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

Mitigation Required Both the central and southern portions of the area are considered suitable for medium to low density housing development. Single storey houses set back from the road would be most suitable within the central portion of the site. It is considered that the agricultural setting of the northernmost portion of the site should be retained as part of the northern entry to the town.

Any development of the site should avoid damage or disturbance to the trees along the north western boundary of the site which are covered by Tree Preservation Order TPO/3/1996.

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

081(h) + +/- o o - o o + o o ? - o - +/- - - -

Nature of Impact General neutral or negative environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the area of land in question is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as an ‘Area Not Suitable for Housing Development’ and as part of a larger ‘Landscape Strategy Area’ where conservation of the landscape quality and character of the area is recommended to preserve the setting of the village. The fields are important as they allow long views from the south east part of the town and have a village like character.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the area of land in question has not been identified as an area where residential development would be acceptable in terms of landscape capacity. The study recommends that the area should remain undeveloped to preserve the setting of the settlement. Development of the site is not, therefore, considered acceptable from the landscape point of view.

Mitigation Required The mature native species scrub land of this area should be enhanced with improved recreational access. The fields are important as they allow long views from the south east part of the town and have a village like character.

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

081(i) and + - o o +/- o o + o o/- ? - o - +/- - - +/- 107(a)

Nature of Impact General negative or neutral environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints The site is identified as being of archaeological interest by the West of Scotland Archaeological Service. There is a public Right of Way running along the eastern boundary of the site.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, with the exception of the southern portion of the site lying to the rear of the Garden Centre on Kilmarnock Road, the area of land in question is not identified as an area suitable for residential development.

The site is classed by the Macaulay Land Use Institute as Class 3(2) Locally Important Good Quality Agricultural Land.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. However, the development would result in the loss of areas of good quality locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, the southern portion of the site lying directly behind the Garden Centre on Kilmarnock Road is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as an area of higher landscape sensitivity to development. However, this area is also identified as an ‘Area with Limited Potential for Development’. In principle, the development of this southern portion of the area for residential purposes is therefore considered acceptable in landscape capacity terms. The rest of the area of land in question has not been identified as an area where residential development would be acceptable in terms of landscape capacity. It is therefore considered that the development of the site would have both negative and positive environmental impact on landscape character, local distinctiveness and the scenic value of the area

It is considered that residential development of the site could help consolidate, enhance and contribute to the improvement of the existing urban form of this part of the town, its settlement pattern and identity. Positive environmental impacts are therefore likely to be experienced in regard to this issue. Because of its peripheral location, it is not considered that development of the area will help reduce distances travelled or promote, encourage or facilitate walking or cycling. However, location of the site adjacent to an existing major bus route may well facilitate the use of public transport by residents of the area. Both negative and positive environmental impacts are therefore likely to be experienced in this regard.

With the site being identified as being of archaeological interest by the West of Scotland Archaeological Service, some negative impacts may be experienced in so far as the historic environment is concerned.

It is considered that residential development of the overall site could not be effected without some damage or detriment to the area. However, it is anticipated that the site could be developed without exceeding environmental capacity. Consequently, it is considered that both positive and negative environmental impacts could be experienced in this regard.

Mitigation Required The archaeological interest of the site should be protected from any adverse effects of the development proposed.

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

081(j) + +/- o o + o o + o o ? - o - +/- - - +

Nature of Impact General neutral or positive environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints None

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study commissioned by the Council, the area of land in question is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as an area of low landscape sensitivity to development and as an area identified as an ‘Area Most Suitable for Development’. It is considered that residential development of the site could take place without detriment to landscape character, local distinctiveness and the scenic value of the area.

Development of the area would not reduce the need for travel or journey length and, because of its peripheral location, it is not considered that development of the overall area will help promote, encourage or facilitate walking or cycling. However, location of the site adjacent to an existing major bus route may well facilitate the use of public transport by residents of the area. Both negative and positive environmental impacts are therefore likely to be experienced in this regard.

Mitigation Required None

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

099(a) + +/- o o - o o - o o/- ? - o - +/- - - -

Nature of Impact General negative environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the area of land in question is not identified as an area suitable for residential development. The major portion of the area of land is also identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as an ‘Area Not Suitable for Housing Development’ and as part of a larger ‘Landscape Strategy Area’ where conservation of the landscape quality and character of the area is recommended to preserve the setting of the village. Development of this area for housing purposes is not, therefore, considered acceptable in landscape capacity terms.

The northern boundary of the site lies within an area of Ancient Woodland. There is a public Right of Way running along the south eastern boundary and part of the western boundary of the area.

The westernmost part of the site is identified by the West of Scotland Archaeological Service as being of archaeological interest.

With the exception of the northern portion of the area, the site is classed by the Macaulay Land Use Institute as Class 3(2) Locally Important Good Quality Agricultural Land.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. The development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site and would result in the loss of an area of good quality, locally important agricultural land in the southern portion of the area closest to the town. Development of the northern portion of the site would not involve the development of land considered worthy of protection in terms of its agricultural quality. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the area of land in question has not been identified as an area where residential development would be acceptable in terms of landscape capacity. The study recommends that the area should remain undeveloped to preserve the setting of the settlement. Development of the site is not, therefore, considered acceptable from the landscape point of view.

The site is located to the north of Mauchline and development of the area would extend the built up area over the rim of the natural bowl within which the town is located, into the open countryside. It is not considered that any residential development of the site would consolidate, enhance and contribute to the improvement of the existing urban form of the town, its settlement pattern or identity. Significant negative environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in regard to this issue.

Development of the area would not reduce the need for travel or journey length and, because of its peripheral location, any development of the area will not help promote, encourage or facilitate walking or cycling. Being located close to a bus route, the development could, however, encourage and facilitate the use of public transport. Both positive and negative environmental impacts are therefore likely to be experienced in this regard.

With the westernmost part of the site being identified by the West of Scotland Archaeological Service as being of archaeological interest, development would have a negative environmental impact on the historic environment on this particular part of the area. It is considered that residential development of the overall site could not be effected without damage or detriment to the area and without exceeding environmental capacity. Negative environmental capacity impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

Mitigation Required Not Applicable

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

099(b) and + - o o + o/- o + o o ? - o - + - - + 107(b)

Nature of Impact General neutral or positive environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints The trees along the north western boundary of the site are covered by Tree Preservation Order TPO/3/1996

The site is classed by the Macaulay Land Use Institute as Class 3(2) Locally Important Good Quality Agricultural Land.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. However, the development would result in the loss of areas of good quality locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the northern portion of the site is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as an area of higher landscape sensitivity to development. However, this area is also identified as an ‘Area with Limited Potential for Development’. In addition, the southernmost portion of the area of land in question is identified within the Study as an area of medium to low landscape sensitivity to development and as an ‘Area with Potential’ for development. In principle, the development of both the southern and northern portions of the area for residential purposes is therefore considered acceptable in landscape capacity terms It is therefore considered that the development of the site would have a positive environmental impact on landscape character, local distinctiveness and the scenic value of the area.

It is considered that any residential development of the site would be considered acceptable in terms of urban form and positive environmental impacts are therefore likely to be experienced in regard to this issue. While development of the area would not reduce the need for travel or journey length, it is considered that, because of the proximity of the site to the town centre, any development of the area will help encourage and facilitate walking or cycling. Being located on a bus route, the development could also encourage and facilitate the use of public transport. Positive environmental impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

Mitigation Required None

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

099(c) + - o o + o o + o o ? - o - + - - +

Nature of Impact General positive environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints The site is classed by the Macaulay Land Use Institute as Class 3(2) Locally Important Good Quality Agricultural Land.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. However, the development would result in the loss of areas of good quality locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study commissioned by the Council, the area of land in question is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as an area of medium to low landscape sensitivity to development and as an area identified as an ‘Area with Potential’ for development. It is considered that residential development of the site could take place without detriment to landscape character, local distinctiveness and the scenic value of the area.

Mitigation Required None

MUIRKIRK

Ref. No. Site Location Site Suggested By

041 Land at former bing site Mr Joseph M. Smith, Orra Developments Ltd, 27 Crofthead Street, Strathaven, ML10 6BB

xxx Land at Crossflat Road Councillor J Kelly, Members Services, London Road, Kilmarnock

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

041 + + - o o o + + o - ? - o - + - - +

Nature of Impact General positive environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints The site is a former bing site and there may be possible problems of contamination relating to the area.

The site lies within an area of recognised flood risk and the whole of the area lies within a site of archaeological interest as defined by the West of Scotland Archaeological Service.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform. However, the area comprises the site of a former bing which has been removed. No soils are located on the site and the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have a positive environmental impact in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

The site is located within the settlement boundary of Muirkirk and is surrounded on two of its three sides by residential or business developments. It is considered that any residential development of the site would consolidate, enhance and contribute to the improvement of the existing urban form of the town, its settlement pattern and identity, integrating and linking in with surrounding developments. Positive environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in regard to this issue.

The site lies within an area of recognised flood risk and the whole of the area lies within a site of archaeological interest as defined by the West of Scotland Archaeological Service. Negative environmental impacts could therefore well be experienced with regard to both the water environment and the historic environment.

While development of the area would not reduce the need for travel or journey length, because of the proximity of the site to the town centre, any development of the area will help encourage and facilitate walking or cycling. Being located on a bus route, the development could also encourage and facilitate the use of public transport. Positive environmental impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

Subject to the site being proved suitable for physical development in terms of contamination, it is considered that residential development of the site could be effected without damage or detriment to the area and without exceeding environmental capacity. Positive environmental capacity impacts would therefore be experienced in this regard.

Mitigation Required A study will require to be undertaken to ascertain whether or not there is any contamination of the site from past industrial activity in the area.

A flood risk assessment of the site requires to be carried out.

Any development of the site should seek to avoid any damage to its archaeological interest.

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

xxx + +/- o o + o o + o o ? - o - + - - +

Nature of Impact General positive environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints None

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study commissioned by the Council, the area of land in question is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as an area of medium to low landscape sensitivity to development and as an area identified as an ‘Area with Potential’ for development. It is considered that residential development of the site could take place without detriment to landscape character, local distinctiveness and the scenic value of the area.

Mitigation Required None

NEW CUMNOCK

Ref. No. Site Location Site Suggested By

073(a) Land at Polquheys Road Mr. John Dick, Northkirk Ltd., 14 Walnut Road, Kilmarnock KA1 2HF

168(a) Land to South of Afton Bridgend Mr W Young, Nia Roo, Castlemains Farm, New Cumnock

168(b) Land to South of Pathhead Mr W Young, Nia Roo, Castlemains Farm, New Cumnock

175 Land at Muirfoot Farm Kilndbuild Ltd., per Nicoll Design, 184 Main Street, Prestwick, KA9 1 PG

223(c) Land at Knockshinnoch Farm Councillor Suggestion at Member’s Seminar

227(a) Land to West of Pathhead Councillor Suggestion at Member’s Seminar

227(b) Land at Running Track, Castle Councillor Suggestion at Member’s Seminar

227(c) Land to North of Castlemains Avenue Councillor Suggestion at Member’s Seminar

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

073(a) +/- +/- o o +/- o o + o o/- ? - o - +/- - - +/-

Nature of Impact General positive or neutral environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints The easternmost portion of the site is not considered suitable for development in landscape terms.

Eastern part of the site is identified by WoSAS as being of archaeological importance.

There is a pit shaft located along the northern boundary of the area.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. However, there is a pit shaft located along the northern boundary of the area, indicating that the area may have been previously undermined. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as landform and the protection and use of soils is concerned.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, the major portion of the area of land in question is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as part of a larger area of medium to low landscape sensitivity to development and as part of an area identified as an ‘Area with Potential’ for development. In principle, the development of this area for residential purposes is therefore considered acceptable in landscape capacity terms. The easternmost portion of the site is not considered suitable for development in landscape terms. Overall, the site is therefore considered to have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as landscape character is concerned.

The site is located to the north of Pathhead in New Cumnock and is bordered by residential developments to the west and south. It is considered that any residential development of the site would consolidate, enhance and contribute to the improvement of the existing urban form of the town, its settlement pattern and identity, integrating and linking in with surrounding developments. Positive environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in regard to this issue.

With the eastern part of the site being identified by West of Scotland Archaeological Service as being of archaeological importance, the historic environment of this part of the site will be adversely affected by any future development. Both positive and negative environmental impacts are therefore likely to be experienced in this regard insofar as the overall site is concerned.

Development of the area would not reduce the need for travel or journey length and it is considered that, because of the peripheral location of the site, any development of the area will not promote, encourage or facilitate walking or cycling. Being located close to a bus route, the development could, however, encourage and facilitate the use of public transport. Both positive and negative environmental impacts are therefore likely to be experienced in this regard.

It is considered that residential development of the site could not be effected without some damage or detriment to the area. Development of the site would, however, respect environmental capacity. Both positive and negative environmental impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

Mitigation Required The design of any development should respect the existence of the pit shaft on the northern boundary of the site. The West of Scotland Archaeological Service should be contacted for advice prior to any development plans for the site being drawn up.

Any development should be limited to the western and central portions of the site to respect the landscape character of the area.

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

168(a) - +/- o o - o o - o o ? - o - +/- - - -

Nature of Impact General negative environmental impacts.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is steeply sloping and it is considered that the site is not physically capable of development without substantial land engineering works being carried out. Negative environmental impacts will therefore be experienced in so far as landform is concerned. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both a positive and negative environmental impact with regard to the protection and use of soils.

The site is located at the south eastern edge of New Cumnock and is bordered by residential developments to the west and south. However, It is considered that any residential development of the site would not be able to link in with these existing developments and that development would not consolidate, enhance and contribute to the improvement of the existing urban form, settlement pattern or identity. Negative environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in regard to this issue.

Development of the area would not reduce the need for travel or journey length and it is considered that, because of the peripheral location of the site, any development of the area will not promote, encourage or facilitate walking or cycling. Being located close to a bus route, the development could, however, encourage and facilitate the use of public transport. Both positive and negative environmental impacts are therefore likely to be experienced in this regard.

Mitigation Required Not Applicable

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

168(b) + +/- o o + o o +/- o o ? - o - +/- - - +

Nature of Impact General neutral or negative environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints None

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both a positive and negative environmental impact with regard to the protection and use of soils.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, the area of land in question is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as an area of medium to low landscape sensitivity to development and as an area identified as an ‘Area with Potential’ for development. In principle, the development of this area for residential purposes is therefore considered acceptable in landscape capacity terms. The site is therefore considered to have positive environmental impacts in so far as landscape character is concerned.

The site is located to the north west of New Cumnock, to the rear of houses facing Pathhead and directly to the north of the Dumfries / Glasgow railway line. It is considered that any residential development of the site would consolidate, enhance and contribute to the improvement of the existing urban form of the town, its settlement pattern and identity. However, it is difficult to integrate and link the development in with the existing adjacent residential development. Both positive and negative environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in regard to this issue.

Development of the area would not reduce the need for travel or journey length and it is considered that, because of the peripheral location of the site, any development of the area will not promote, encourage or facilitate walking or cycling. Being located close to a bus route, the development could, however, encourage and facilitate the use of public transport. Both positive and negative environmental impacts are therefore likely to be experienced in this regard.

Mitigation Required None

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

175 + +/- o/- o + o o + o o ? - o - +/- - - +/-

Nature of Impact General positive or neutral environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints The northern boundary of the site lies within a recognised area of flood risk.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

The northern and eastern parts of the site are identified as being at risk of flooding. Negative environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in these areas in so far as the water environment is concerned.

The site is located to the north east of New Cumnock, to the east of a newly completed housing development to the rear of houses facing Mansefield Road and directly to the north of the Dumfries / Glasgow railway line. It is considered that any residential development of the site would consolidate, enhance and contribute to the improvement of the existing urban form of the town, its settlement pattern or identity, integrating and linking the development with the existing adjacent residential development. Positive environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in regard to this issue.

Development of the area would not reduce the need for travel or journey length and it is considered that, because of the peripheral location of the site, any development of the area will not promote, encourage or facilitate walking or cycling. However, being located near the New Cumnock Railway Station, the development could encourage and facilitate the use of public transport. Both positive and negative environmental impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

Overall, residential development of the site could be effected without damage or detriment to the area and without exceeding environmental capacity. However, a flood risk assessment of the site requires to be carried out. Both positive and negative environmental impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

Mitigation Required A flood risk assessment of the site requires to be carried out.

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

223(c) + +/- o o - o + - o o/- ? - o - - - - -

Nature of Impact General negative environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints The western part of the site lies within an area of archaeological interest, there is a public right of way along the northern and eastern boundary of the site and there is a mine shaft on the southern boundary of the site.

This site is not within an existing settlement and is relatively isolated in the rural area.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. However, the area comprises part of the former Knochshinnock Colliery and there is a pit shaft located along the southern boundary of the area, indicating that the area may have been previously undermined. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as landform and the protection and use of soils is concerned.

The site comprises part of the former Knockshinnock Colliery site and development could be considered to help regenerate a degraded former industrial environment. However, with the western part of the site lying within an area of archaeological interest, development of this part of the site may well have a negative impact on the historic environment.

The Leggate and Bank Glen area has not been made the subject of study in the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council. The site does, however, occupy an elevated position which is highly visible over a wide area and development of the site is unlikely to be acceptable in landscape terms.

The site is located in an isolated rural location, physically divorced from the nearest rural settlement of Leggate which lies to the north of the area. It is considered that any residential development of the site would not consolidate, enhance or contribute in any way to the improvement of the existing urban form of the Leggate, its settlement pattern or identity. Negative environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in regard to this issue.

It is considered that, because of the remote location of the site, any development of the area will not help reduce distances travelled by local residents and will not promote, encourage or facilitate walking or cycling or the use of public transport. Negative environmental impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

Overall, residential development of the site could not be effected without damage or detriment to the area and without exceeding environmental capacity. Negative environmental impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

Mitigation Required Not Applicable

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

227(a) +/- +/- o o - o o - o o ? - o - +/- - - -

Nature of Impact General neutral and negative environmental.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. However, parts of the site are low lying and some land raising may be required to facilitate any future development. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both a positive and negative environmental impact with regard to landform and the protection and use of soils.

The site is located to the north west of New Cumnock, in a highly visually prominent position to the north of the A76 road. It is not considered that residential development of the site would consolidate, enhance and contribute to the improvement of the existing urban form of the town, its settlement pattern or identity. Negative environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in regard to this issue.

Development of the area would not reduce the need for travel or journey length and it is considered that, because of the peripheral location of the site, any development of the area will not promote, encourage or facilitate walking or cycling. Being located close to a bus route, the development could, however, encourage and facilitate the use of public transport. Both positive and negative environmental impacts are therefore likely to be experienced in this regard.

Mitigation Required Not Applicable

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

227(b) + +/- - o + - o + o o ? - o - + - - +/-

Nature of Impact General positive and negative environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints This site lies within an area of flood risk.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both a positive and negative environmental impact with regard to the protection and use of soils.

Being located within the existing settlement boundary of New Cumnock, the site has not been made the subject of study in the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study commissioned by the Council. However, the site comprises the town’s running track and it is considered that residential development of the site could take place without detriment to landscape character, local distinctiveness and the scenic value of the area. However, development of the area would involve the loss of a recreational facility for the town and would have a negative environmental impact on existing green spaces important for recreation and amenity. The site is also located at the confluence of the River Nith and the Afton Water, and lies within an area of recognised flood risk. Negative impacts could therefore be experienced in so far as the water environment is concerned.

The site is located on Castle in New Cumnock, and occupies a central position within the community. It is considered that any residential development of the site could help consolidate, enhance and contribute to the improvement of the existing urban form of the town, its settlement pattern and identity. Positive environmental impacts are therefore likely to be experienced in regard to this issue.

While development of the area would not reduce the need for travel or journey length, it is considered that, because of the central location of the site, any development of the area will help reduce distances travelled by local residents and will promote, encourage and facilitate walking and cycling. Also, being located along a bus route, development could encourage and facilitate the use of public transport. Positive environmental impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

Mitigation Required A flood risk assessment requires to be carried out.

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

227(c) + +/- - o + o o + o - ? - o - +/- - - +/-

Nature of Impact General positive and negative environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints This site lies within an area of flood risk and there is an archaeological site on the land.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both a positive and negative environmental impact with regard to the protection and use of soils.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council, the area of land in question is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as an area of low landscape sensitivity, the development of which may be beneficial to the wider settlement. The area is also identified as an ‘Area Most Suitable for Development’. It is considered that residential development of the site could take place without detriment to landscape character, local distinctiveness and the scenic value of the area.

The site is located to the east of New Cumnock, to the rear of houses facing Castlemain Avenue. It is considered that any residential development of the site could help consolidate, enhance and contribute to the improvement of the existing urban form of the town, its settlement pattern and identity and positive environmental impacts could possibly be experienced in regard to this issue. However, the site lies within an area of recognised flood risk and negative impacts could therefore be experienced in so far as the water environment is concerned. With the area being of archaeological interest, development of the area could also well have a negative impact on the historic environment.

Development of the area would not reduce the need for travel or journey length and it is considered that, because of the peripheral location of the site, any development of the area will not promote, encourage or facilitate walking or cycling. Being located close to a bus route, the development could, however, encourage and facilitate the use of public transport. Both positive and negative environmental impacts are therefore likely to be experienced in this regard.

It is considered that residential development of the site could not be effected without some damage or detriment to the area. However, with appropriate mitigation, development could be effected without exceeding environmental capacity. Both positive and negative environmental capacity impacts would therefore be experienced in this regard.

Mitigation Required A flood risk assessment requires to be carried out.

OCHILTREE

Ref. No. Site Location Site Suggested By

001 Land at Glebe Road Mr J. Millar, 15 Burnock Street, Ochiltree, KA18 2NP

004(h) Land at Watson Farm Hope Homes Scotland, Watson Terrace, Drongan KA6 7AB

086(l) Land at Highfield View Hope Homes Scotland Ltd, per McInally Associates Ltd, 6 Newton Place, Glasgow G3 7PS

CD056 Land to South of Main Street Orchard Homes (Scotland) Ltd, per Michael S Evans, Ty Newydd, 11 Murchie Drive, Prestwick KA9 2ND

CD125 Land to West of Ochiltree Dawn Homes Ltd., per Mr A Landells, 220 West George Street, Glasgow G2 2PG

CD200 Land to North of Main Street Mr and Mrs R Morrison, 68 Main Street, Ochiltree KA18 2PB CD201 Land to North of Main Street Mr M Smith, 74 Main Street, Ochiltree KA18 2PB

CD202 Land to North of Main Street Mr C Watson, 60 Main Street, Ochiltree KA18 2PB

CD203 Land to North of Main Street Mr G Crockatt, 58 Main Street, Ochiltree KA18 2PB

CD223 Land at Highfield View Hope Homes Scotland Ltd, per McInally Associates Ltd, 6 Newton Place, Glasgow G3 7PS

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

001 - +/- o o - o o - o o ? - o - - - - -

Nature of Impact General negative or neutral environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints The suggestion is to develop the site for one house only and the proposal to build a house on the site has previously been the subject of a formal planning application refused by the Council, a decision that was subsequently upheld on appeal.

The site is located at the northern edge of Ochiltree and is bordered by residential developments to the south and west. However, It is considered that any residential development of the site would not be able to link in with these existing developments and that development would not consolidate, enhance and contribute to the improvement of the existing urban form, settlement pattern or identity. Negative environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in regard to this issue.

Development of the area would not reduce the need for travel or journey length and it is considered that, because of the peripheral location of the site, any development of the area will not help promote, encourage or facilitate walking, cycling or the use of public transport. Negative environmental impacts are therefore likely to be experienced in this regard.

Mitigation Required Not Applicable

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

004(h), 086(l) + +/- o o - o o + o o ? - o - +/- - - + and CD223

Nature of Impact General neutral or positive environmental impacts.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

The site is located to the west of Ochiltree, to the north of the newly completed housing development at Watson Farm. The proposed development would represent a possible third phase to the development. It is considered that any residential development of the site would consolidate, enhance and contribute to the improvement of the existing urban form of the town, its settlement pattern and identity, integrating and linking the development with the existing adjacent residential development. Positive environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in regard to this issue.

Development of the area would not reduce the need for travel or journey length and it is not considered that any development of the area will help promote, encourage and facilitate walking and cycling. However, being located close to a bus route, development could encourage and facilitate the use of public transport. Both positive and negative environmental impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

Overall, residential development of the site could be effected without damage or detriment to the area and without exceeding environmental capacity.

Mitigation Required None

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

CD056 +/- +/- o o + o o - o o ? - o - + - - +/-

Nature of Impact General negative environmental impacts.

Potential Environmental Constraints None

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is sloping in nature, particularly in that portion of the site adjoining the A70 road. Consequently, it is considered that this portion of the site is not physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. In overall terms, both positive and negative environmental impacts will be experienced in this regard. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study commissioned by the Council, the area of land in question is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as an area of low landscape sensitivity to development and as an area identified as an ‘Area Most Suitable for Development’. It is considered that residential development of the site could take place without detriment to landscape character, local distinctiveness and the scenic value of the area.

The site is located to the south of the existing settlement boundary but cannot easily be physically integrated with the existing built up area of the town. Also, because of the particular location of the area of land in question, it is unlikely that any residential development of the site would consolidate, enhance or contribute significantly in any way to the improvement of the existing urban form of the town, its settlement pattern or identity. Negative environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in this regard.

While development of the area would not reduce the need for travel or journey length, it is considered that any development of the area will help promote, encourage and facilitate walking and cycling. Also, being located close to a bus route, development could encourage and facilitate the use of public transport. Positive environmental impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

Development of the site is unlikely to reduce the need for travel and journey length but it may, however, encourage and facilitate walking and cycling in some circumstances, particularly to local shops, the Community Centre and the nearby primary school. Being located adjacent to a bus route, development of the area may also encourage the use of public transport by future residents of the area.

Mitigation Required

Further Environmental Assessments

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

CD125 + +/- o o - o o - o o ? - o - +/- - - -

Nature of Impact General negative environmental impacts.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

It is considered that residential development of this peripheral site would not help consolidate, enhance and contribute to the improvement of the existing urban form of the settlement, its settlement pattern or identity. Negative environmental impacts are therefore likely to be experienced in regard to this issue. It is also not considered that development of the area will in any way reduce journey length or the need for travel or help promote, encourage or facilitate walking or cycling, except possibly to the local shops, Community Centre and primary school which are located nearby. Journeys to other facilities will undoubtedly still require the use of the private car. The location of the site along a bus route may, however, possibly facilitate increased use of public transport. Both positive and negative environmental impacts are therefore also likely to be experienced in this regard.

Mitigation Required None

Further Environmental Assessments

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

CD200, + +/- o o o o o ? ? o ? - o - +/- - - + CD201, CD202 and CD203

Nature of Impact General neutral, unknown and positive environmental impacts.

Potential Environmental Constraints None.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

The area of land in question comprises an area of land in various ownerships, located to the rear of a series of existing properties. The degree to which residential development of this site would consolidate, enhance and contribute to the improvement of the existing urban form of the settlement, its settlement pattern or identity remains, in the absence of any detailed plans for the area, unclear and unknown. Similarly the effects of any development on building character and townscape also remain unknown.

It is not considered that development of the area will in any way reduce journey length or the need for travel or help promote, encourage or facilitate walking or cycling, except possibly to the local shops, Community Centre and primary school which are located nearby. Journeys to other facilities will undoubtedly still require the use of the private car. The location of the site close to a bus route may, however, possibly facilitate increased use of public transport. Both positive and negative environmental impacts are therefore also likely to be experienced in this regard.

It is considered that residential development of the site could be effected without damage or detriment to the area and without seriously exceeding the environmental capacity of the area.

Mitigation Required None

Further Environmental Assessments

RANKINSTON

Ref. No. Site Location Site Suggested By

No Number Land at Littlemill Place Full Council, East Ayrshire Council, at meeting on 6 Allocated December 2007

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

No Number + +/- o o ? o o ? o o ? - o - +/- - ? + Allocated

Nature of Impact General neutral environmental impacts.

Potential Environmental Constraints None

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

Rankinston has not been included as an area of study in the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council. The rural location of the site would, however, indicate that the site could be sensitive in landscape terms. However, it is considered that, in the absence of any detailed study into the landscape effects of the proposed development, the impacts of residential development on landscape character, local distinctiveness and scenic value remain unknown.

It is not considered that development of the area will in any way reduce journey length or the need for travel or help promote, encourage or facilitate walking or cycling, except possibly to the local Community Centre and primary school which are located nearby. Journeys to other facilities will undoubtedly still require the use of the private car. The location of the site close to a bus route may, however, possibly facilitate increased use of public transport. Both positive and negative environmental impacts are therefore also likely to be experienced in this regard.

It is considered that residential development of the site could be effected without significant damage or detriment to the area and without seriously exceeding the environmental capacity of the area to accommodate the size and scale of development proposed. Consequently, in terms of its impact on the environment, the site is considered suitable for inclusion as a potential housing site in the local plan alteration.

Mitigation Required None

SINCLAIRSTON

Ref. No. Site Location Site Suggested By

182(a) Land at Muirston Farm Mr J Wylie, per Visuplan, 199 Obree Avenue, Kings Meadow, Prestwick KA9 2NT

182(b) Land at Muirston Farm Mr J Wylie, per Visuplan, 199 Obree Avenue, Kings Meadow, Prestwick KA9 2NT

195 Land East of Sinclairston W. Young and Sons, Polquhairn Farm, Sinclairston, KA18 2RT

CD161 Land to North of Sinclairston (1) Messrs Morrison, per Hendersons, East Netherton, Milnathort, Kinross KY13 0SB

CD169 Land to North of Sinclairston (2) Residence Scotland Ltd, per Ms Elaine Hamilton, James Barr, 226 West George Street, Glasgow G2 2LN

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

182(a) + +/- o o ?/- o o - o o ? - o - - - - -

Nature of Impact General negative and neutral environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints No identified constraints.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

Sinclairston has not been included as an area of study in the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council. Landscape impacts therefore remain unknown or unclear. The highly visually prominent rural location of the site in close proximity to the B7046 road would, however, indicate that the site could be sensitive in landscape terms and could have an adverse environmental impact on landscape character, local distinctiveness and the scenic value of the area.

It is considered that residential development of the site would not help consolidate, enhance and contribute to the improvement of the existing urban form of the settlement, its settlement pattern or identity. Negative environmental impacts are therefore likely to be experienced in regard to this issue. Because of the isolated location of Sinclairston from all local facilities, it is not considered that development of the area will help minimise distances travelled or promote, encourage or facilitate walking, cycling or the use of public transport. Negative environmental impacts are therefore also likely to be experienced in this regard.

It is considered that residential development of the site could not be effected without damage or detriment to the area or without exceeding environmental capacity.

Mitigation Required Not Applicable

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

182(b) + +/- o o ?/+ o o - o o ? - o - - - - -

Nature of Impact General negative and neutral environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints No identified constraints

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

Sinclairston has not been included as an area of study in the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council. Landscape impacts therefore remain unknown or unclear. However, the location of the site away from general view of users of the B7046 road would, however, indicate that the development of the site could be acceptable in landscape terms and would not necessarily have any significant adverse environmental impact on landscape character, local distinctiveness and scenic value of the area.

It is considered that residential development of the site could not be effected without damage or detriment to the area or without exceeding environmental capacity.

Mitigation Required Not Applicable

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

195 + +/- o - - o o - o o ? - o - - - - -

Nature of Impact General negative and neutral environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints The site comprises an area of Ancient Woodland

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

Sinclairston has not been included as an area of study in the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council. The highly visually prominent rural location of the site in close proximity to the B7046 road would, however, indicate that the site was sensitive in landscape terms. This is reinforced by the site comprising an area of Ancient Woodland. It is therefore considered that the development of the site would have an adverse environmental impact on landscape character, local distinctiveness and the scenic value of the area.

It is considered that residential development of the site could not be effected without damage or detriment to the area or without exceeding environmental capacity.

Mitigation Required Not Applicable

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

CD161 + +/- o o ? o o - o o ? - o - - - - -

Nature of Impact General negative and neutral environmental impacts.

Potential Environmental Constraints None

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

Mitigation Required None

Further Environmental Assessments

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

CD169 + +/- o o ? o o - o o/- ? - o - - - - -

Nature of Impact General negative environmental impacts

Potential Environmental Constraints The south west of the site is within an area of Ancient Woodland.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

Sinclairston has not been included as an area of study in the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, commissioned by the Council. It is therefore considered that the development of the site would have an unknown or unclear environmental impact on landscape character, local distinctiveness and the scenic value of the area. With the south west portion of the site comprising an area of Ancient Woodland, it is considered that development within this area will impact adversely on the historic environment. Both positive and negative environmental impacts will therefore be experienced for the site as a whole in so far as the historic environment is concerned

Mitigation Required None

Further Environmental Assessments

SORN

Ref. No. Site Location Site Suggested By

004(i) Land at Catrine Road Hope Homes Scotland, Watson Terrace, Drongan KA6 7AB

086(k) Land at Catrine Road Hope Homes Scotland Ltd, per McInally Associates Ltd, 6 Newton Place, Glasgow G3 7PS

101(a) Land at Catrine Road Councillor George Smith, Member Services, London Road, Kilmarnock

101(b) Land at Fir Park Councillor George Smith, Member Services, London Road, Kilmarnock

111 Land to East of Sorn Mr and Mrs G Young, per McSherry Halliday, Bank Chambers, 42 Bank Street, Kilmarnock KA1 1HA

121 Land at Dalgain Farm Mr T. L. Clark, per Dale and Marshall, 18 Wallace Street, Galston KA4 8HP

135 Land to South of River Ayr to South East of Michael S. Evans, ‘Ty Newydd’, 11 Murchie Drive, Kings Sorn Meadow, Prestwick KA9 2ND

145 Land to South of River Ayr to South East of Dalgarven Homes, Dalgarven House, 55 Maryborough Sorn Road, Prestwick, KA9 1SW

173 Land at Old Avenue Mr Alan Todd, Pipework Systems, 33 West Donington Street, Darvel KA17 0AW

CD037 Land to South of River Ayr to South East of Collington Homes, per Michael S. Evans, ‘Ty Newydd’, 11 Sorn Murchie Drive, Kings Meadow, Prestwick KA9 2ND

CD159 Land at Dalgain Farm Mr T. L. Clark, per Hendersons, East Netherton, Milnathort, Kinross KY13 0SB

CD226 Land at Catrine Road Hope Homes Scotland Ltd, per McInally Associates Ltd, 6 Newton Place, Glasgow G3 7PS

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

004(i), 086(k) + +/- o o - o o + o o ? - o - + - - +/- 101(a) and CD226

Nature of Impact General neutral or negative environmental impacts.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

The site is located outwith the settlement boundary of Sorn and it is considered that any residential development of the site would consolidate, enhance and contribute to the improvement of the existing urban form of the town. In particular, development of the site would help integrate and link the existing housing along the Catrine Road with the main built up area of the village, thereby reinforcing settlement pattern and urban form. Positive environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in regard to this issue.

Development of the area would not reduce the need for travel or journey length. However, it is considered that, because of the proximity of the site to local facilities, any development of the area will help promote, encourage and facilitate walking or cycling. Being located close to a bus route, the development could also encourage and facilitate the use of public transport. Positive environmental impacts are therefore likely to be experienced in this regard.

It is considered that residential development of the site could not be effected without some damage or detriment to the area. Development could, however, take place without exceeding environmental capacity. Both positive and negative impacts would therefore be experienced in this regard.

Mitigation Required None

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

101(b) + +/- o o o - o +/? +/? o ? - o - + - - +/-

Nature of Impact General positive and neutral environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints The area is low lying and at risk from a 1 in 100 year flooding event.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the area of land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site concerned. Development for open space purposes would not conserve the quality of soils on the site, but would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both a positive and negative environmental impact in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned. The development would, however, result in the loss of a centrally located green space which is important for amenity purposes. It is considered that a sensitive redevelopment of the site could positively respect existing urban form and townscape, although, in the absence of any detailed design proposals, the precise impacts remain unclear or unknown.

It is considered that residential development of the site could not be effected without some damage or detriment to the area. Development could, however, take place without exceeding environmental capacity. Both positive and negative impacts would therefore be experienced in this regard.

Mitigation Required

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

111 + +/- o/- o - o o + o o ? - o - +/- - - +/-

Nature of Impact General neutral or negative environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints Part of the area is low lying and at risk from a 1 in 100 year flooding event.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

The site is located outwith the settlement boundary of Sorn and it is considered that any residential development of the site would consolidate, enhance and contribute to the improvement of the existing urban form of the town. Integration of the site with the existing housing development opportunity site to the west would, in particular, facilitate development of the existing site and ensure integration with the main built up area of the village This, in turn, would reinforce settlement pattern and urban form. Positive environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in regard to this issue.

Part of the area is low lying and at risk from a 1 in 100 year flooding event. Some negative impacts could be experienced on the affected part of the site in so far as the water environment is concerned.

Development of the area would not reduce the need for travel or journey length. However, it is considered that, because of the proximity of the site to local facilities, any development of the area will help promote, encourage and facilitate walking or cycling for some journeys. Being located close to a bus route, the development could also encourage and facilitate the use of public transport. Both positive and negative environmental impacts are therefore likely to be experienced in this regard.

Because of the proximity of the site to the central area of the village and the local facilities it contains, any development of the area will help reduce distances travelled by local residents and will encourage and facilitate walking or cycling. Positive environmental impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

Development of the site for residential purposes will increase the generation of waste produced by residents of the area and will not, in itself, contribute to efficient waste management. Similarly, increased air pollution from increased exhaust emissions from vehicles generated by the development is likely to occur and new street lighting may well increase light pollution. Increases in energy consumption as a result of the development will also occur. Consequently, development will have negative environmental impact insofar as waste reduction, pollution and energy consumption is concerned. Without any details of the proposed development being provided, the environmental effects of the proposal on design quality remain unknown. The site could be at risk from flooding and the environmental effects of any development of the site on the water environment presently remain unknown.

It is considered that residential development of the site could possibly not be effected without some damage or detriment to the area. However, it is considered that development would not exceed environmental capacity. Both positive and negative environmental capacity impacts would therefore be experienced in this regard.

Mitigation Required A Flood Risk Assessment of the site requires to be carried out.

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

121 + +/- o/- o + o o - o o ? - o - - - - -

Nature of Impact General negative environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints The area is low lying and the southern and eastern portions of the site are at risk from a 1 in 100 year flooding event.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, the area of land in question is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as part of a larger area of medium to low landscape sensitivity to development and as part of an area identified as an ‘Area with Potential’ for development. In principle, the development of this area for residential purposes is therefore considered acceptable in landscape capacity terms.

It is considered that the site is capable of accommodating a large scale residential development that would be detrimental to, and incompatible with the character and appearance of the settlement. The development would also represent an unacceptable extension of the settlement into the open countryside along the River Ayr. In addition, the site is located outwith and totally detached from the settlement boundary of Sorn and it is considered that any residential development of the site could not consolidate, enhance or contribute to the improvement of the existing urban form of the village. Because of its physical separation from the existing settlement, integration of the site with the village would not be possible and its development would not, in any way, reinforce settlement pattern and urban form. Significant negative environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in regard to this issue.

Development of the site for residential purposes will increase the generation of waste produced by residents of the area and will not, in itself, contribute to efficient waste management. Similarly, increased air pollution from increased exhaust emissions from vehicles generated by the development is likely to occur and new street lighting may well increase light pollution. Increases in energy consumption as a result of the development will also occur. Consequently, development will have negative environmental impact insofar as waste reduction, pollution and energy consumption is concerned. Without any details of the proposed development being provided, the environmental effects of the proposal on design quality remain unknown. The site could be at risk from flooding and the environmental effects of any development of the site on the water environment presently remain unknown.

It is considered that, because of the peripheral and isolated location of the site, any development of the area will not help reduce distances travelled by local residents and will not promote, encourage or facilitate walking, cycling or the use of public transport. Negative environmental impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

Mitigation Required Not Applicable

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

135 + +/- o/- o - o + + o o ? - o - +/- - - +/-

Nature of Impact General positive or neutral environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints The eastern portion of the site is at risk from a 1 in 200 year flooding event.

A public right of way runs along the northern boundary of the site.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

The site is located outwith the settlement boundary of Sorn and it is considered that any residential development of the site would consolidate, enhance and contribute to the improvement of the existing urban form of the village and help reinforce settlement pattern and urban form. Positive environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in regard to this issue. The site is also a brownfield redevelopment site and the development of the area for residential purposes would restore and regenerate a degraded environment. Positive environmental impacts would be experienced in this regard. However, part of the site could also be at risk from flooding and both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the water environment is concerned, could be experienced in this regard.

Development of the area would not reduce the need for travel or journey length. However, because of the proximity of the site to the central area of the village and the local facilities it contains, any development of the area will help reduce distances travelled by local residents and will encourage and facilitate walking or cycling. Walking may also be encourage as a result of the public right of way which runs through the site, linking the settlement with the upper reaches of the river. Positive environmental impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

It is considered that residential development of the site could possibly not be effected without some damage or detriment to the area. It is however considered that development of the site could be effected without exceeding environmental capacity. Both positive and negative environmental impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

Mitigation Required A Flood Risk Assessment of the site requires to be carried out.

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

145 and + +/- o/- o - o + + o o ? - o - +/- - - +/- CD037

Nature of Impact General neutral or negative environmental impacts.

Potential Development Constraints The eastern portion of the site is at risk from a 1 in 100 year flooding event.

A public right of way runs along the northern boundary of the site.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

The site is located outwith the settlement boundary of Sorn and it is considered that any residential development of the site would consolidate, enhance and contribute to the improvement of the existing urban form of the village and help reinforce settlement pattern and urban form. Positive environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in regard to this issue. The site is also a brownfield redevelopment site and the development of the area for residential purposes would restore and regenerate a degraded environment. Positive environmental impacts would be experienced in this regard. However, part of the site could also be at risk from flooding and both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the water environment is concerned, could be experienced in this regard.

Mitigation Required A Flood Risk Assessment of the site requires to be carried out.

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

173 + +/- o o - o o - o o ? - o - - - - -

Nature of Impact General neutral or negative environmental impacts.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

The site, as suggested, is extremely large and is considered capable of accommodating far in excess of the number of houses required to meet the housing needs of Sorn for the local plan period. Development of the site would therefore be detrimental to, and incompatible with the character and appearance of the settlement. The development would also represent an unacceptable extension of the settlement into the open countryside. In addition, with the extremely peripheral location of the site, it is considered that any residential development of the site could not consolidate, enhance or contribute to the improvement of the existing urban form of the village. Because of its relative separation from the existing settlement, integration of the site with the village would not be possible and its development would not, in any way, reinforce existing settlement pattern. Significant negative environmental impacts are likely to be experienced in regard to this issue.

Development of the site for residential purposes will increase the generation of waste produced by residents of the area and will not, in itself, contribute to efficient waste management. Similarly, increased air pollution from increased exhaust emissions from vehicles generated by the development is likely to occur and new street lighting may well increase light pollution. Increases in energy consumption as a result of the development will also occur. Consequently, development will have negative environmental impact insofar as waste reduction, pollution and energy consumption is concerned. Without any details of the proposed development being provided, the environmental effects of the proposal on design quality remain unknown. The site could be at risk from flooding and the environmental effects of any development of the site on the water environment presently remain unknown.

It is considered that residential development of the site could not be effected without significant damage or detriment to the area and without exceeding environmental capacity. Negative environmental capacity impacts would therefore be experienced in this regard.

Mitigation Required Not Applicable

Site Ref No Environmental Criteria

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

CD159 + +/- o/- o + o o - o o ? - o - +/- - - -

Nature of Impact General negative environmental impacts.

Potential Environmental Constraints The area is low lying and the southern and eastern portions of the site are at risk from a 1 in 100 year flooding event.

Comment and Recommendations The topography of the land in question is such that it is physically capable of development while respecting existing landform and the geology of the site. While development would not improve, conserve or upgrade the quality of soils on the site, the development would not result in the loss of areas of prime quality or good quality, locally important agricultural land. Consequently, development would have both positive and negative environmental impacts in so far as the protection and use of soils is concerned.

In the Landscape Assessment of Potential Development Areas Study, the area of land in question is identified within the Study’s landscape capacity hierarchy as part of a larger area of medium to low landscape sensitivity to development and as part of an area identified as an ‘Area with Potential’ for development. In principle, the development of this area for residential purposes is therefore considered acceptable in landscape capacity terms.

It is not considered that development of the area will in any way reduce journey length or the need for travel but, because of the proximity of the site to the central area of the village and the local facilities it contains, any development of the area will encourage and facilitate walking or cycling in certain circumstances. Other journeys will still require to be made by private car. Both positive and negative environmental impacts could therefore be experienced in this regard.

Development of the site for residential purposes will increase the generation of waste produced by residents of the area and will not, in itself, contribute to efficient waste management. Similarly, increased air pollution from increased exhaust emissions from vehicles generated by the development is likely to occur and new street lighting may well increase light pollution. Increases in energy consumption as a result of the development will also occur. Consequently, development will have negative environmental impact insofar as waste reduction, pollution and energy consumption is concerned. Without any details of the proposed development being provided, the environmental effects of the proposal on design quality remain unknown. The site could be at risk from flooding and the environmental effects of any development of the site on the water environment presently remain unknown.

Mitigation Required Not Applicable

Further Environmental Assessments