B a R O M E T E R Bulgaria’S Political Parties Year 16, Issue 1, January-March 2016

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

B a R O M E T E R Bulgaria’S Political Parties Year 16, Issue 1, January-March 2016 Georgi Karasimeonov (Ed.) B A R O M E T E R Bulgaria’s Political Parties Year 16, Issue 1, January-March 2016 The migrant crisis was one of the main topics that shaped the political situation in the coun- try. This will be one of the greatest challenges the government will face in the following days and months. The shutting down of the so called Balkan route might lead to redirecting the migrant flow towards Bulgaria. The government is undertaking preventive measures to guard our southern border and, if needed, reinforcements from the Bulgarian Army will be sent. GERB’s government stands stable. The internal party’s mobilisation is at its highest and shows support for the government. Despite the criticism from the opposition, neither BSP and MRF, nor DSB can be viewed as a serious alternative to GERB at this point of time. Prime Minister Borisov confirmed his foreign policy positions, acknowledging the significance of the state with regard to the migrant crisis and the protection of the external border of the EU. The Reformist Bloc continues to exist more in theory than in practice. The processes of division within it are now more and more visible after the decision of the DSB to become an opposition party. Currently the struggle of the parties in the bloc is for the trademark Reformist Bloc and which one of them will keep it. This is one of the reasons why DSB’s stance is so indeterminate – on one hand to be in opposition and, on the other, to remain in the parliamentary group. Probably the RB will dissolve ultimately with the nearing of the presidential elections. An internal party priority of the BSP is the forthcoming congress at the beginning of May. It seems that the main battle will be between the present leader Mihail Mikov and Kornelia Ninova. The congress will be of great importance for BSP, and will show whether the party can manage to emerge from political stalemate which it has been experiencing for the sec- ond consecutive year. Imprint Orders All texts are available online Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung www.fes.bg 97, Knjaz Boris I St. Commercial use of all media The views expressed in this publication published by the Friedrich- are not necessarily those of the Responsible: Ebert-Stiftung (FES) is Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung or of the Regine Schubert, Director not permitted without the organization for which the author works. Office Bulgaria written consent of the FES. Analyses B AROMETE R 1/2016 1 CONTENTS 1. Political Situation .....................................................................................................................................2 1.1. Domestic policy ................................................................................................................................2 1.2 Foreign policy and European policy ..................................................................................................3 1.3. Migrant crisis ...................................................................................................................................4 2. State and development of the main political parties .................................................................................5 2.1. Trends in the parliamentary represented parties supporting the government ...................................5 2.1.1. GERB ............................................................................................................................................5 2.1.2. Reformist Bloc ...............................................................................................................................6 2.1.3. Patriotic Front ..............................................................................................................................7 2.1.4. ABV ..............................................................................................................................................8 2.2. Trends in the parliamentary opposition ..............................................................................................9 2.2.1. BSP….. .........................................................................................................................................9 2.2.2. MRF ............................................................................................................................................10 2.2.3. BDC ............................................................................................................................................12 2.2.4. “Ataka” ......................................................................................................................................13 2.3. Positions of the parties on foreign and European policy ....................................................................13 3. Public opinion ........................................................................................................................................14 4. Main Conclusions and forecasts….. .......................................................................................................15 2 B AROMETE R 1/2016 1. Political situation and the Civil Procedure Code, leading to fast and efficient litigation. 1.1 Domestic policy Another government shuffle was con- The first quarter of 2016 was especially dy- ducted at the beginning of February. The namic both from a foreign political aspect Minister of Education Prof. Todor Tanev re- and from domestic policy plan. A major signed upon the request of the Prime Min- influence on the political situation in the ister Borisov. The cause for the resignation country was played by the more complex was the new educational school plans an- relations in the ruling coalition, which led nounced by the ministry, which triggered a to DSB with leader Radan Kunev becoming scandal related to the interpretation of his- opposition. The continuing migrant flow torical events – more particularly the peri- and the crisis situation close to the Bulgar- od of the Ottoman rule of the country. The ian state borders heightened the fears of Prime Minister Borisov said that he would the public and raised the risks to national allow the Reformist Bloc to propose the security. candidacy of the new minister of education. The fact of DSB becoming an opposi- DSB refused to take part in the nego- tion party was provoked by the resignation tiations on the appointment of the new of the Minister of Justice Hristo Ivanov at minister of education. The other parties the end of last year. Ivanov resigned after in the Reformist Bloc (RB) united around the vote in parliament on the amendments the candidacy of the Deputy Prime Minis- to the Constitution which reflected on the ter Meglena Kouneva. She was approved legal system reform. Hristo Ivanov insisted by parliament with only five ballots differ- that the majority of the members of the ence between those in favour and those college of judges should come from the against her candidacy. Kouneva’s candidacy judge’s circle, so that the true independ- received firm support only from GERB and ence of the court can be guaranteed, and half of the votes of her own political group such were the recommendations made by - the Reformist Bloc. The opposition parties the Venice Commission. However, this did BSP, MRF and “Ataka” and some MPs from not happen and the MPs gave their support the Patriotic Front, which is part of the rul- to ABV’s draft. Hristo Ivanov accused the ing majority, declared in advance that they incumbents of lack of political will for real would not give their support for her. The reform of judicial power. voting on Kouneva’s candidacy showed that The new Minister of Justice Ekaterina the government relies on a fragile balance Zaharieva said that she is determined to of the support of flexible majorities at the continue the judiciary reform with a faster expense of various compromises, most of pace and to see it through. Before taking which, however, remain hidden to the gen- this post Zaharieva was chief of cabinet of eral public. the President Rosen Plevneliev and Deputy In the middle of February BSP and MRF Prime Minister in the two caretaker cabinets tabled the first motion for a vote of no con- appointed by the president. Zaharieva an- fidence on the government’s healthcare nounced that it would be a priority for her policy. The opposition accused the Health to pass the Law on the Judiciary System, the Minister Peter Moskov that his inconsistent procedure codes – Penal Procedure Code actions and authoritarian work style have B AROMETE R 1/2016 3 resulted in creating chaos in the sector. As ally by the Prime Minister, based on unclear expected the vote of no confidence was motivation. Many of the representatives of not passed. Only BSP, MRF and “Ataka” the opposition pointed out that by doing were in favour, while 135 MPs from the so the Prime Minister is trying to clear his ruling majority expressed their support for image in the eyes of the European partners the government. The group of the Bulgar- of Bulgaria. The cancellation of the public ian Democratic Centre (BDC) abstained. procurements commenced after Borisov Nonetheless, the problems in the sector was asked the question during a meeting remain unsolved. The professional organi- with the Bulgarian community in London as sations refused to sign the annual frame- to “whether he sees Delyan Peevski when work agreement, which goes to show that he looks into the mirror.” The issue of the the contradictions within the profession are connections between Borisov and Peevski is serious,
Recommended publications
  • KAS MP SOE Redebeitrag AM En
    REPORT Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung MEDIA MONITORING LABORATORY February 2015 Media under their own momentum: www.fmd.bg The deficient will to change www.kas.de Foundation Media Democracy (FMD) and KAS. In summary, the main findings, by the Media Program South East Europe of areas of monitoring, include: the Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung (KAS) present the joint annual report on the MEDIA DISCOURSE state of the Bulgarian media environment in 2014. The study summarises the trends Among the most striking images in the coverage of socio-political constructed by Bulgarian media in 2014 was developments in the country. During the the presentation of patriotism as the monitored period dynamic processes sanctuary of identity. Among the most unfolded – European Parliament elections watched television events during the year and early elections to the National turned to be the Klitschko-Pulev boxing Assembly took place, three governments match. The event inflamed social networks, changed in the country’s governance. morning shows, commentary journalism. It was presented not simply as boxing, but as The unstable political situation has also an occasion for national euphoria. Such affected the media environment, in which a discourse fitted into the more general trend number of important problems have failed of nourishing patriotic passions which to find a solution. During the year, self- through the stadium language, but also regulation was virtually blocked. A vast through the media language, are easily majority of the media continued operating mobilised into street and political forms of at a loss. For many of them the problem symbolic and physical violence against with the ownership clarification remained others (Roma, refugees, the sexually and unresolved.
    [Show full text]
  • Information As of August 1, 2016 Has Been Used in Preparation of This Directory
    Information as of August 1, 2016 has been used in preparation of this directory. PREFACE The Central Intelligence Agency publishes and updates the online directory of Chiefs of State and Cabinet Members of Foreign Governments weekly. The directory is intended to be used primarily as a reference aid and includes as many governments of the world as is considered practical, some of them not officially recognized by the United States. Regimes with which the United States has no diplomatic exchanges are indicated by the initials NDE. Governments are listed in alphabetical order according to the most commonly used version of each country's name. The spelling of the personal names in this directory follows transliteration systems generally agreed upon by US Government agencies, except in the cases in which officials have stated a preference for alternate spellings of their names. NOTE: Although the head of the central bank is listed for each country, in most cases he or she is not a Cabinet member. Ambassadors to the United States and Permanent Representatives to the UN, New York, have also been included. Key To Abbreviations Adm. Admiral Admin. Administrative, Administration Asst. Assistant Brig. Brigadier Capt. Captain Cdr. Commander Cdte. Comandante Chmn. Chairman, Chairwoman Col. Colonel Ctte. Committee Del. Delegate Dep. Deputy Dept. Department Dir. Director Div. Division Dr. Doctor Eng. Engineer Fd. Mar. Field Marshal Fed. Federal Gen. General Govt. Government Intl. International Lt. Lieutenant Maj. Major Mar. Marshal Mbr. Member Min. Minister, Ministry NDE No Diplomatic Exchange Org. Organization Pres. President Prof. Professor RAdm. Rear Admiral Ret. Retired Sec. Secretary VAdm.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulgaria 2016 International Religious Freedom Report
    BULGARIA 2016 INTERNATIONAL RELIGIOUS FREEDOM REPORT Executive Summary The constitution provides for freedom of religion and conscience. The law requires religious groups to register to be eligible for certain benefits, including the right to receive state funding, operate schools and hospitals, and receive property tax exemptions. The constitution recognizes Eastern Orthodox Christianity as the country’s “traditional” religion, and the law exempts the Bulgarian Orthodox Church from the registration requirement. In September the National Assembly passed a law restricting the wearing of face-covering garments in public places. In July the Supreme Cassation Court vacated the guilty verdict of one Muslim leader charged with spreading Salafi Islam and hatred of other religious groups. In February the Pazardjik District Court started a trial against 14 Roma Muslims for propagating antidemocratic ideology and incitement to war and aiding foreign fighters. Minority religious groups, including Jehovah’s Witnesses, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (Mormons), and Muslims reported incidents of harassment and hostile rhetoric by members of some political parties and said the government failed to prosecute religiously motivated attacks against their members. Schools banned the wearing of religious symbols, including the hijab and cross, and some local governments continued to deny requests to construct new mosques or repair old ones. The Supreme Cassation Court suspended the Muslim community’s restitution claims, pending review of whether it was the rightful successor to confiscated properties. Minority groups reported discrimination and prejudice from local authorities in certain municipalities. Mormons and Jehovah’s Witnesses reported physical assaults and harassment against members of their communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulgaria 2013 Human Rights Report
    BULGARIA 2013 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Republic of Bulgaria is a parliamentary democracy. The constitution vests legislative authority in the unicameral National Assembly (Narodno Sabranie). A coalition government headed by a prime minister led the country. Observers characterized the parliamentary elections in May as complying “with the fundamental freedoms of expression, association, and assembly” but also noted pervasive allegations of vote buying and a lack of transparency. Authorities maintained effective control over the security forces. Security forces committed human rights abuses, including excessive use of force, arbitrary arrest, and harassment and intimidation. There were allegations of unlawful wiretapping. The marginalization of the Romani minority remained the country’s most pressing human rights problem. The continued deterioration of the media environment and increase in media self-censorship due to corporate and political pressure were also problematic. Corruption continued to be a drag on the government’s capabilities and undermined public and business confidence in the judiciary and other government institutions. Other human rights problems included overcrowding and harsh conditions in prisons and detention facilities. There were also long delays in the judicial system; reports of abuse of wiretapping; religious discrimination and harassment; harsh conditions in refugee centers; violence and discrimination against women; violence against children; increasing online anti-Semitism; trafficking in persons; discrimination against persons with disabilities; discrimination against members of the Romani and Turkish ethnic minorities; and discrimination against lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) persons and persons with HIV/AIDS. The government took steps to prosecute and punish officials in the security services and elsewhere in the government who committed abuses, but their actions were insufficient, and impunity was a problem.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Delegations to the Seventieth Session of the General Assembly
    UNITED NATIONS ST /SG/SER.C/L.624 _____________________________________________________________________________ Secretariat Distr.: Limited 18 December 2015 PROTOCOL AND LIAISON SERVICE LIST OF DELEGATIONS TO THE SEVENTIETH SESSION OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY I. MEMBER STATES Page Page Afghanistan......................................................................... 5 Chile ................................................................................. 47 Albania ............................................................................... 6 China ................................................................................ 49 Algeria ................................................................................ 7 Colombia .......................................................................... 50 Andorra ............................................................................... 8 Comoros ........................................................................... 51 Angola ................................................................................ 9 Congo ............................................................................... 52 Antigua and Barbuda ........................................................ 11 Costa Rica ........................................................................ 53 Argentina .......................................................................... 12 Côte d’Ivoire .................................................................... 54 Armenia ...........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights in Bulgaria in 2014
    HUMAN RIGHTS IN BULGARIA IN 2014 Annual report of the Bulgarian Helsinki Committee April 2015 2 The Bulgarian Helsinki Committee is an independent non-governmental organisation for the protection of human rights. It was founded on 14 July 1992. This report was produced with the support of the Open Society Institute – Budapest and the Oak Foundation. Human Rights in Bulgaria in 2014 Sofia, March 2015 The report can be freely quoted upon condition that the source is acknowledged. Authors: The report was written by: Antoaneta Nenkova, Atanas Atanasov, Desislava Ivanova, Gergana Yancheva, Dilyana Angelova, Elitsa Gerginova, Zhenya Ivanova, Iliana Savova, Kaloyan Stanev, Krassimir Kanev, Margarita Ilieva, Radoslav Stoyanov, Slavka Kukova, Stanimir Petrov, Yana Buhrer Tavanier. The access to information section is based on materials provided by the Access to Information Programme. English language editor: Desislava Simeonova Publisher: Bulgarian Helsinki Committee 7 Varbitsa Street, 1504 Sofia, Bulgaria Tel. 3592 944 0670 www.bghelsinki.org BULGARIAN HELSINKI COMMITTEE HUMAN RIGHTS IN BULGARIA IN 2014 3 Table of contents 1. POLITICAL DEVELOPMENTS IN BULGARIA IN 2014 ................................................................... 4 2. RIGHT TO LIFE, PROTECTION FROM TORTURE, INHUMAN AND DEGRADING TREATMENT ... 6 3. R IG H T TO LIBERTY AND SECURITY O F P E R S O N ........................................................................ 13 4. INDEPENDENCE OF THE JUDICIARY AND FAIR TRIAL .............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly Security Council Seventieth Session Seventy-First Year Agenda Item 120 Revitalization of the Work of the General Assembly
    United Nations A/70/732–S/2016/139 General Assembly Distr.: General 22 March 2016 Security Council Original: English General Assembly Security Council Seventieth session Seventy-first year Agenda item 120 Revitalization of the work of the General Assembly Letter dated 9 February 2016 from the Permanent Representative of Bulgaria to the United Nations addressed to the President of the General Assembly and the President of the Security Council In accordance with Article 97 of the Charter of the United Nations and the joint letter dated 15 December 2015 from the President of the General Assembly and the President of the Security Council, I have the honour to transmit a letter by Daniel Mitov, Minister for Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Bulgaria, conveying the decision of the Government of Bulgaria to nominate Ms. Irina Bokova, current Director General of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, for the position of Secretary-General of the United Nations (see annex). I would kindly ask for your assistance in circulating the letter among the States Members of the United Nations as a document of the General Assembly and of the Security Council. (Signed) Stefan Tafrov Ambassador Permanent Representative 16-04583 (E) 300316 *1604583* A/70/732 S/2016/139 Annex to the letter dated 9 February 2016 from the Permanent Representative of Bulgaria to the United Nations addressed to the President of the General Assembly and the President of the Security Council Letter dated 9 February 2016 from the Minister for Foreign Affairs of Bulgaria addressed to the President of the General Assembly and the President of the Security Council In accordance with Article 97 of the Charter of the United Nations and in response to the joint letter of the President of the General Assembly and the President of the Security Council dated 15 December 2015 (A/70/623-S/2015/988), I have the honour to inform you that the Government of the Republic of Bulgaria has decided to nominate Ms.
    [Show full text]
  • 1ST QUARTERLY ACTIVITY REPORT 2015 by Nils Muižnieks
    Strasbourg, 27 May 2015 CommDH(2015)11 1ST QUARTERLY ACTIVITY REPORT 2015 by Nils Muižnieks Commissioner for Human Rights 1 January to 31 March 2015 Presented to the Committee of Ministers and the Parliamentary Assembly CONTENTS 1. Overview........................................................................................................3 2. Missions and Visits ........................................................................................4 3. Reports and continuous dialogue ................................................................10 4. Themes........................................................................................................13 5. Other Meetings ............................................................................................14 6. Co-operation with national human rights structures ....................................16 7. European Court of Human Rights................................................................16 8. Communication and Information work .........................................................18 9. Next three months........................................................................................21 10. Observations and reflections .......................................................................22 2 1. Overview During the period under review, I was invited to discuss the situation of fundamental rights in the European Union (EU) at hearings in the Danish parliament and the European Parliament, as well as at a conference organised in Brussels by the Centre
    [Show full text]
  • May 2009 May 2009
    May 2009 May 2009 SUMMARY SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION: A GENERAL PERSPECTIVE 2 I. INTRODUCTION: A GENERAL PERSPECTIVE 2 II. BULGARIA IN THE EUROPEAN UNION: THE CHALLENGE OF II. BULGARIA IN THE EUROPEAN UNION: THE CHALLENGE OF RESPONSIBILITY 9 RESPONSIBILITY 9 II.1. BULGARIA IN THE EUROPEAN UNION: The road towards accession II.1. BULGARIA IN THE EUROPEAN UNION: The road towards accession II.2. JUSTICE AND HOME AFFAIRS: The heart of the crisis II.2. JUSTICE AND HOME AFFAIRS: The heart of the crisis II.3. THE WEAKNESS OF THE BULGARIAN ADMINISTRATION: Overcoming the II.3. THE WEAKNESS OF THE BULGARIAN ADMINISTRATION: Overcoming the lack of administrative capacity lack of administrative capacity III. THE EUROPEAN UNION AND BULGARIA: A TEST FOR EUROPEAN III. THE EUROPEAN UNION AND BULGARIA: A TEST FOR EUROPEAN SOLIDARITY 55 SOLIDARITY 55 III.1. THE SUSPENSION OF EU FUNDS TO BULGARIA: An unprecedented III.1. THE SUSPENSION OF EU FUNDS TO BULGARIA: An unprecedented decision decision III.2. THE MISMANAGEMENT OF EU FUNDS: To preserve European solidarity III.2. THE MISMANAGEMENT OF EU FUNDS: To preserve European solidarity III.3. ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL REFORMS: Achieving European living standards III.3. ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL REFORMS: Achieving European living standards IV. BUILDING A DYNAMIC PARTNERSHIP 77 IV. BUILDING A DYNAMIC PARTNERSHIP 77 IV.1. STRENGHTENING DIALOGUE: Enhanced cooperation between the European IV.1. STRENGHTENING DIALOGUE: Enhanced cooperation between the European Commission, Member States and the Bulgarian government Commission, Member States and the Bulgarian government IV.2. BULGARIA IN THE EU: Setting up a national European agenda IV.2.
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUAL ACTIVITY REPORT 2015 by Nils Muižnieks, Commissioner For
    Strasbourg, 14 March 2016 CommDH(2016)7 ANNUAL ACTIVITY REPORT 2015 by Nils Muižnieks, Commissioner for Human Rights of the Council of Europe Presented to the Committee of Ministers and the Parliamentary Assembly CommDH(2016)7 CONTENTS Foreword by the Commissioner ....................................................................................................3 1 Country visits ........................................................................................................................5 1.1 Introduction....................................................................................................................5 1.2 Visits ..............................................................................................................................5 1.3 Missions.......................................................................................................................21 1.4 Continuous Monitoring.................................................................................................23 2 Thematic activities ..............................................................................................................25 2.1 Introduction..................................................................................................................25 2.2 Freedom of expression and media freedom................................................................25 2.3 Human rights of immigrants, refugees and asylum seekers........................................26 2.4 Children’s rights...........................................................................................................28
    [Show full text]
  • Bulgarian Parliamentary Elections: a Final Look at the Parties and the Polls
    Bulgarian parliamentary elections: a final look at the parties and the polls blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2014/10/03/bulgarian-parliamentary-elections-a-final-look-at-the-parties-and-the- polls/ 03/10/2014 Bulgaria will hold parliamentary elections on 5 October, following the resignation of the country’s government in July. Ahead of the vote, Stuart Brown gives an overview of the background to the elections, each of the main parties and some of the opinion polling on the likely results. On Sunday, Bulgaria will hold parliamentary elections for the second time in less than 18 months. The elections were called after the Bulgarian government, led by Plamen Oresharski, resigned in July, with a caretaker administration fronted by Georgi Bliznashki taking over in the interim. Oresharski’s government had only entered office in May 2013, but had suffered a series of problems in its short time in power. This was the second time the Bulgarian government had resigned in the last two years, following the collapse of Boyko Borisov’s government in February 2013. Background to the 2014 elections The current period of political instability in Bulgaria can be traced back to a series of mass protests against Borisov’s government in 2013, chiefly over the issue of high electricity prices. Borisov, the leader of the largest centre-right party in Bulgaria, GERB, is a controversial figure, who has faced a number of allegations of corruption since winning power in 2009. As a result of the scale of the protests, he opted to stand down as Prime Minister, with new elections being called for May 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • The Difficult Cooperation: Romania and Bulgaria's Foreign Policy
    The Difficult Cooperation: Romania and Bulgaria’s Foreign Policy Exchanges and Infrastructural Projects after a decade in the EU Kaliakra’s Stronghold, Southern Dobrouja (photo: IvanGeoPetrov) Digital booklet By Vladimir Mitev 1 Cordial thanksgiving to Aurelian Giugăl, Emanuel Copilaș and Ronald Young, to the Institute for Economy and International Relations and to all the other people and organisations who have supported the preparation and publishing of this digital book © Baricada, A-specto, Gândul, PS News, Ionita’s, Bilten (for their respective texts) What is not specified as copyrighted belongs to the Bridge of Friendship blog and Vladimir Mitev. It is made available and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Rousse 2017 2 Contents Introduction………………………………………………..……………………………….…4 A. Infrastructure Development….…...…………………….....…….………………………..7 A.1. Romania and Bulgaria walk in different directions on cross-border collaboration (by Vladimir Mitev, Bilten)...............................................................................................................9 A.2. The Bridge of Friendship and Great Romano-Bulgaria (by Sorin Ionița, Ionița`s Blog).16 B. Foreign Policy Exchanges…………….………………………………………………….18 2016: Romanian failed initative for NATO fleet in the Black Sea…….…………….........20 B.1. The failure of Iohannis in Sofia (by Vladimir Mitev, A-specto)……………………...…20 B.2. How Romania passed the distance from “a NATO fleet in Black Sea” to “a stupidity” (by Andrei Luca Popescu, Gândul)……………………………………………………………….27 2017: The initiative for the creation of a Black Sea EU region………………….....…….34 B.3. Lyubomir Kyuchukov: Europe must have a strategy for the region of Black Sea, the only European sea which has remained “ownerless” (by Vladimir Mitev)…………………….....34 B.4. Georgi Pirinski: Romania and Bulgaria can initiate the development of a macroregional strategy for the Black Sea region (by Vladimir Mitev)…..………….…………………….…39 B.5.
    [Show full text]