DOCSLIB.ORG

Determining Priority in Dry Epee

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Determining Priority in Dry Epee Determining Priority in Dry Epee Written by Walter Green One of the great contributions of electric fencing to the management of competitions was the introduction of electric epee fencing in the 1930s. No more did the jury have to congregate around the fencer and examine his uniform for the various marking agents used. No more did they have to use a pencil to cross out hit marks that were already adjudicated. And no more did the President of the Jury have to determine which hit landed first. But, even today, not all epee is fenced electrically. So if you do fence dry epee (scored by judges visually sighting arrests), how do you determine what is a hit (materiality) and which hit has priority (validity)? The first question, whether the hit is a hit (and thus is material) is answered in the same way as in foil. The judges and the referee watch for arrests and vote as to whether or not a touch arrived. Although epee in the classical period did use chalk, dye, tin-tack points, and points d'arret to ensure that a hit could be seen, foil during the same period did not, and did not suffer appreciably from relying on visual assessment only. The second question as to the validity of the material hit is more difficult. The rules of epee establish that the first material hit has priority and is the valid hit for which a touch is awarded. This leads to four possible situations: (1) Only one of the two fencers lands with a material hit, as indicated by Yes votes by the judges and referee. If only one hit arrives, that hit must have priority and be the valid touch. (2) Both fencers arrive with material hits, as indicated by Yes votes by the judges and referee, but one hit is obviously in advance of the other. In this case the referee's judgment as to which is first determines the valid hit and award of the touch. (3) Both fencers arrive with material hits, as indicated by Yes votes by the judges and referee, and the referee cannot determine which hit landed first. In this case, the referee may ask the judges which hit landed first in their opinion and be guided by their comments. Alternatively, the referee may award a touch to both fencers for a simultaneous hit. (4) Both fencers arrive with material hits, as indicated by Yes votes by the judges and referee, and it appears clearly that both hits arrived simultaneously, or so close to simultaneously that the eye could not distinguish (this is the source of the 1/25 second Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/5234816 Published: 10/19/2010 timing for electric epee simultaneous hits). The referee awards a touch to both fencers for a simultaneous hit. The intent of epee is to simulate the duel with the sharp dueling sword. In the duel of the late 1800s and early 1900s, a hit which drew blood and was significantly ahead of an opponent's action could be counted on to stop the action, by either the hit fencer withdrawing or by the seconds intervening. The simultaneous hit represents the case when both duelists had already committed to the attack and both were wounded. Given the intent of the weapon, the referee should not over-analyze the simultaneous hit. If it is close enough that you cannot determine a difference, it would have been close enough to draw blood from both duelists. The simultaneous hit represents an important tactical tool in epee, with differing applications in pool bouts, direct elimination, and one-touch pools unique. As a referee you should develop the ability to assign priority and award touches quickly and correctly to ensure that fencers in dry competitions have a fair and enjoyable bout. Walter Green is a Maitre d'Armes (Fencing Master) certified by the Academie d'Armes Internationale. He teaches modern competitive and classical fencing, historical swordplay, bayonet fencing, and Asian martial arts swords at Salle Green ( http://www.sallegreen.com ), the fencing school he operates in Glen Allen, Virginia. Maitre Green also trains fencing coaches through the Pan American Fencing Academy ( [http://panamfencing.com] ). He serves as a Head Examiner for the certification of professional fencing coaches for the United States Fencing Coaches Association, and chairs the USFCA's Club Committee. Copyright 2010 by Walter G. Green III. All rights reserved. Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/5234816 Published: 10/19/2010.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Concealment of Violence in the History of Fencing: Semantics, Codification, and Deterritorialization
    The Philosophical Journal of Conflict and Violence Vol. II, Issue 2/2018 © The Authors 2018 Available online at http://trivent-publishing.eu/ The Concealment of Violence in the History of Fencing: Semantics, Codification, and Deterritorialization Elise Defrasne Ait-Said Cognition and Action Group (UMR 8257, Université Paris-Descartes), France Abstract: Depending on historical periods and individual perspectives, fencing has been defined in various ways. Indeed, fencing has been regarded as an art, and/or a science, and/or a sport, and/or a game. This paper shows that those various attempts to define fencing throughout history are strategies aiming to conceal the founding violence of fencing (although these strategies do not prevent the emergence of further forms of violence). The study demonstrates that these strategies pertain to semantics, to regulation and codification of fencing, and to more recent phenomena which are linked to the deterritorialization of the practice of fencing. Keywords: Jules Barbey d'Aurevilly; Gilles Deleuze; Roger Caillois; Deterritorialization; Duelling; Fencing; Game; History; Sport; Violence. The PJCV Journal is published by Trivent Publishing. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0) license, which permits others to copy or share the article, provided original work is properly cited and that this is not done for commercial purposes. Users may not remix, transform, or build upon the material and may not distribute the modified material (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) The Concealment of Violence in the History of Fencing: Semantics, Codification, and Deterritorialization Elise Defrasne Ait-Said Cognition and Action Group (UMR 8257, Université Paris-Descartes), France Abstract: Depending on historical periods and individual perspectives, fencing has been defined in various ways.
    [Show full text]
  • NWFC MEMBER HANDBOOK Updated 5-1-18 Table of Contents
    ASPIRE - INSPIRE - PERSPIRE NWFC MEMBER HANDBOOK Updated 5-1-18 Table of Contents ABOUT NWFC 7 OUR MISSION 7 ABOUT US 7 NONPROFIT 7 Fred Meyer Community Rewards & AmazonSmile 7 Employer matching 7 Personal donations 7 Areas of support include 8 BRIEF HISTORY 8 CLASSES 9 YOUTH: AGES 4-13 9 Youth Intro to Fencing 9 Mini Fencers (Ages 4-6) 9 Youth One (Ages 7-12) 9 Youth Two (Ages 7-12) 9 1 ASPIRE - INSPIRE - PERSPIRE Youth Two With Lessons 9 Homeschool 9 ADULT: AGES 13+ 10 Adult Intro to Fencing 10 Evening Epee 10 CORE = COmpetitive + REcreation 10 COMPETITIVE: AGES 14+ 10 TERM COMMITMENTS 10 Youth Two with Lessons & Competitive 10 ACTIVITIES BEYOND CLASSES 12 OPEN BOUTING 12 PRIVATE LESSONS 12 CAMPS 13 International Foil and Epee Winter Camp 13 Youth Camp - 5 days - summers 13 International Foil and Epee Camps - summer, 6 days plus tournament 13 Pre Nationals Camp - 5 days, the week before Summer challenge 13 Adult Camp - November, 3 days and Memorial Day weekend, 3 days 13 EVENTS 13 Fencing Soiree evenings 13 Game Nights 14 Star Wars Nights - December 14 Armory Clinics 14 MEMBERSHIP 15 BENEFITS 15 REQUIREMENTS 15 US Fencing Membership 15 RESIDENT MEMBERSHIPS 15 SPECIAL MEMBERSHIPS 16 Guest 16 2 ASPIRE - INSPIRE - PERSPIRE Associate 16 CODE OF CONDUCT 16 Sportsmanship 16 Scoring/Referees 17 No Discrimination 17 Payments 17 Physical Safety 17 COMMUNICATION AND ONLINE RESOURCES 18 NWFC COMMUNICATION 18 COACHES CORNER 18 Fencer evaluations: Twice a year, fencers schedule time with their coach to review progress, set training and competition goals, and map out future plans.
    [Show full text]
  • Competition Rules and Regulations
    Competition Rules and Regulations as at 1 January 2017 4 COMPETITION RULES - 01 GENERAL ASPECTS COMPETITION UIPM COMPETITION RULES AND REGULATIONS as at 1 January 2017 table of CONTENTS COMPETITION RULES 01MP - General Aspects Pg. 6 02MP - Fencing Pg. 30 03MP - Swimming Pg. 52 04MP - Riding Pg. 62 05MP - Laser-Run Pg. 80 06UIPM - Biathle Pg. 108 07UIPM - Triathle Pg. 116 EQUIPMENT REGULATIONS 01MP - General Aspects Pg. 123 02MP - Fencing Pg. 124 03MP - Swimming Pg. 138 04MP - Riding Pg. 140 05MP - Laser-Run Pg. 144 6 COMPETITION RULES - 01 GENERAL ASPECTS COMPETITION 01 GENERAL ASPECTS ABBREVIATIONS BAD Business Affairs Delegate NF National Federation CCh Continental Championships NTO National Technical Observer CISM Conseil Internationale du OG Olympic Games Sport Militaire PWR Pentathlon World Ranking EB Executive Board TC Technical Committee FOP Field of Play TD Technical Delegate HQ Headquarters TM Technical Meeting IJ International Judges UIPM Union Internationale de IOC International Olympic Pentathlon Moderne Committee WCC World Cup Competition LOC Local Organising Committee WCF World Cup Final Mins minutes WCh World Championships MD Medical Delegate YOG Youth Olympic Games MP Modern Pentathlon UIPM COMPETITION RULES AND REGULATIONS as at 1 January 2017 7 PART A MODERN PENTATHLON - CONTENTS COMPETITION RULES - 01 GENERAL ASPECTS COMPETITION 1.1 SPHERE OF APPLICATION 1.2 1 Age Groups 2 Calculating age AGE GROUPS 1.3 1 The Five Disciplines 2 Disciplines in Youth Competitions THE EVENTS 1.4 1 The Official UIPM Competitions in 3 OG
    [Show full text]
  • Fencing Club By-Laws: Ranking System
    Fencing Club By-Laws: Ranking System Ranks are marked by colored bands beneath the shoulder patch. Testing occurs on individual occasions as determined by the Head Instructor. Members wishing to test can do so only if the Head Instructor offers to perform the testing. If a member wishes for a testing, the candidate cannot bring the request to the Head Instructor's attention, but must instead convince a member in good standing of at least the rank he/she wishes to test for (and at least the 2nd rank) to act as a sponsor on his/her behalf. This sponsor is also responsible for making sure the candidate is adequately prepared for the rank testing. When the testing occurs, all actions requiring 2 people will be performed by the candidate and her/his sponsor. The Head Instructor (the tester) will direct the actions and observe so as to score the candidate. The candidate should not be penalized for mistakes made by the sponsor; instead, the Head Instructor should ask them to repeat the action. Each rank confers upon the fencer a set of permissions to accompany their new rank. First Rank – Yellow Band - Beginning Foil Requirements: A) Length of attendance: Minimum attendance time before testing: 15 practices, with discretion for those with previous experience B) Candidate should have participated in at least two assaults previously with instructors. The Testing: The purpose of the 1st rank testing is for the candidate to demonstrate the knowledge and ability needed to fence safely with the foil in a bout. A) Candidate must demonstrate the following skills/techniques: Notice, all techniques should be done from a proper guard, attacks should be done with a properly executed lunge, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Fencing Association
    United States Fencing A level 6 rating requires a passing score on the written exam and a demonstrated proficiency at a level equivalent to the finals of a Association “B” rated competition. Fencing Officials Commission A level 5 rating requires a passing score on the written exam and a demonstrated proficiency at a level equivalent to the first round National Referee Examination of an Open North American Cup competition. A level 5 rating Study Guide must be earned before subsequent ratings can be earned. A level 4 rating requires a demonstrated proficiency at a level March 2000 equivalent to the Direct Elimination round of 128 of an Open North American Cup competition. Information A level 3 rating requires a demonstrated proficiency at a level equivalent to the Direct Elimination round of 32 of an Open These are the study questions used to prepare for the North American Cup competition. written test for the USFA National Referee Class 5 rating. A level 2 rating requires a demonstrated proficiency at a level Questions for the written examinations are chosen from equivalent to the Direct Elimination round of 8 of an Open North those listed here. The Fencing Officials Commission American Cup competition. strongly recommends that Referee candidates study the A level 1 rating requires a demonstrated proficiency at any level USFA Fencing Rules prior to taking an examination. The of an Open North American Cup competition. questions in the Study Guide are presented in the order of the relevant rules. If a candidate is unable to find the For mo re information contact Bill Oliver, Fencing Officials ANSWER to a specific question in the Rules, an FOC Commission Examiner may be consulted.
    [Show full text]
  • RESPECT of the FENCING PHRASE Opponent’S Blade, Fails to Find It (Dérobement), the Right of Attack Passes to the Opponent
    he most common causes of confusion and dispute in foil matches are Tcovering or substitution of the target and the allocation of points when both fencers have registered hits. The sections of the rules given here - EXTENSION FOIL OF THE VALID TARGET and VALIDITY OR PRIORITY OF THE HIT - govern A DOUBLE HIT GUIDE those situations and are reproduced unedited and unamended. Covering the target (t.79), the attack (t.83 to t.85) and the parry (t.86) are clearly defined. The procedure for applying those definitions to a match is given under rule t.89. The full rules of fencing are available from the British Fencing website as a downloadable pdf: (https://www.britishfencing.com/the-fie-rulebooks/) EXTENSION OF THE VALID TARGET 2. In order to judge the correctness of an attack the 1. At foil, it is forbidden to protect the following points must be considered: t.79 target area or to substitute another part of the body for the target area, by covering it a) The simple attack, direct or indirect (cf. t.10), is (cf. t.158-162, t.165, t.170); any hit scored by the correctly executed when the straightening of the arm, fencer at fault is annulled. the point threatening the valid target, precedes the SUBSTITUTION initiation of the lunge or the flèche. a) If, during the fencing phrase, there is protection or substitution of a valid surface, the fencer at fault will be b) The compound attack (cf. t.10) is correctly executed st penalised as specified for offences of the 1 group when the arm is straightened in the presentation of the (cf.
    [Show full text]
  • January 2020
    BRITISH FENCING MAGAZINE JANUARY 2020 NEW GBR WORLD CHAMPIONS PP4-9 OLYMPIC TEAM MANAGER INTERVIEW PP11-12 DEVELOPMENT UPDATE PP20-26 THE SWORD International Round Up January 2020 | 2 WELCOME TO THE SWORD 4 REPORTS Spotlight on Virginia Bailey, 29 INTERNATIONAL ROUND UP Gilliver Claims First Title as Projects and Programmes Manager Coutya Defends at the 2019 32 REVIEWS Wheelchair Fencing World Championships The Sword Refresh Review of “This is Fencing” by Ziemowit “Ziemek” Great Britain Returns from World Maximising opportunities for Wojciechowski Veterans Championships with Scouts and Leaders th Four Titles 16 Century Rapier Referee Development – Treatise Published 11 FEATURES Bridging the Gap between the 34 OBITUARY An Interview with British Home Nations and British Fencing’s Olympic Team Fencing Harry Jones 1931–2019 Manager 27 ROUND UP 35 RESULTS Jen Bathurst Retires Evie Millar Joins BF Team 14 YOUTH Nominations for BF Honours and GB Youth International Awards 2020 REPORT Development GBR Begin Youth International 17 COACHING Season on Form P6 The Value of Athlete Profiling GBR’S NEW WORLD CHAMPIONS. PHOTOS: VARIOUS Competition Fencing: What are we trying to achieve here? 20 DEVELOPMENT REVISISTING – what makes youth sport fun? Editor: Safeguarding Hotline: Cover photo: Overseas airmail £26 – direct Karim Bashir, British Fencing Liz Behnke, Equality and GBR’s New World Champions from HQ. Contributions are 1 Baron’s Gate, Safeguarding Manager Montage, Various. welcome. Photographs should 33–35 Rothschild Road, M: 07526 003030 include the names of those London W4 5HT British Fencing accepts no pictured and the photographer. T: 020 8742 3032 Typeset by: responsibility for the contents E: [email protected] JS Typesetting Ltd of advertisements and reserves Views expressed in The Sword T: 01656 788551 the right to refuse inclusion.
    [Show full text]
  • Fencing Club Bylaws
    Page 1 Fencing Club By­Laws: Ranking System Ranks are marked by colored bands beneath the shoulder patch. Testing occurs on individual occasions as determined by the Head Instructor or respective test proctor. Members can take a test when the test proctor offers to perform the testing. If a member wishes to take a rank exam, the candidate can request to take the test. The candidate should also approach a member in good standing of at least the rank he/she wishes to test for (and at least the 2nd rank) to act as a sponsor on his/her behalf. This sponsor is also responsible for making sure the candidate is adequately prepared for the rank testing. When the testing occurs, all actions requiring 2 people will be performed by the candidate and her/his sponsor. The test proctor will direct the actions and observe so as to score the candidate. The candidate should not be penalized for mistakes made by the sponsor; instead, the test proctor should ask them to repeat the action. Each rank confers upon the fencer a set of permissions to accompany their new rank. First Rank – Yellow Band ­ Beginning Foil ​ ​ Requirements: A. Length of attendance: one semester of consistent attendance (about 15 practices, with discretion for those with previous experience) B. Candidate should have participated in at least two bouts with instructors. The Testing: st The purpose of the 1 rank testing is for the candidate to demonstrate the knowledge and ability needed to​ ​ fence safely with the foil in a bout. 1. Candidate must demonstrate the following skills/techniques: Note: All techniques should be done from a proper guard, attacks should be done with a properly executed lunge, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Schools and Masters of Fence
    This is a reproduction of a library book that was digitized by Google as part of an ongoing effort to preserve the information in books and make it universally accessible. https://books.google.com SchoolsandmastersoffencefromtheMiddleagestoeighteenthcentury EgertonCastle ■ . _> i SCHOOLS SCHO & MASTERS WITH OF FENCE. JLLUSi EGERTON CASTLE. G. BELL AND SONS. 1885. S* r SCHOOLS AND MASTERS OF FENCE FROM THE MIDDLE AGES TO THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY I SCHOOLS AND MASTERS OF FENCE FROM THE MIDDLE AGES TO THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY WITH A SKETCH OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE ART OF FENCING WITH THE RAPIER AND THE SMALL SWORD AND A BIBLIOGRAPHY OF THE FENCING ART DURING THAT PERIOD ILLUSTRATED WITH REPRODUCTIONS OF OLD ENGRAVINGS AND CARBON-PLATES OF ANCIENT SWORDS BY EGERTON CASTLE, M. A. Con Brcvetto di Nomina a Maestro di Scherma LONDON GEORGE BELL AND SONS, YORK STREET COVENT GARDEN 1885 \The right of translation is reserved.] ' -- /. .j 1 j -1FEB35 CHISWICK PRESS :— C. WHITTINGHAM AND CO., TOOKS COURT, CHANCERY LANE. INSCRIBED TO BARON DE COSSON AND CAPTAIN A. HUTTON, IN RECOLLECTION OF MANY PLEASANT HOURS SPENT, WITH THE FORMER AMONG OLD BOOKS AND OLD ARMS, WITH THE LATTER IN THE FENCING ROOM, FOIL IN HAND. PREFACE. WORK of this kind must necessarily contain a great deal of" mere compilation, but considering that so little has been written on the subject, and that the early books of Fence are so difficult to find and really such tiresome reading to anyone who seeks intelligible i) information in their pages, I venture to hope that — however sketchy and superficial — this book may prove of some interest to lovers of ancient arms as well as to the votaries of the fencing school.
    [Show full text]
  • SQG6-Fencing-Theory
    The Swordsman’s Quick Guide Series part six Fencing Theory Guy Windsor In Memory of Julian Clark While I was writing this booklet my friend Julian, a lifelong fencer whose input would have made it all the better, succumbed to cancer. He would no doubt have responded to this with more praise than it deserves and an apt quote from a classical text. So long, old friend. Table of Contents The Swordsman’s Quick Guide Series Introduction 3 Introduction 4 Doctrine, Strategy, Tactics 6 Time 7 Measure 10 Guards 11 Actions 12 Combinations 16 Mechanics 16 Additional Theoretical Elements 20 Conclusion 21 Thanks and Credits 23 Further reading 23 The Swordsman’s Quick Guide Series Introduction Hello, and welcome to The Swordsman’s Quick Guide series of booklets on various aspects of life in general and training historical swordsmanship in particular. My name is Guy Windsor, and I have been working on historical European swordsmanship, mostly from medieval and renaissance Italian sources, since the early 1990s. In 2001 I opened my first proper school, and have been making my living as an instructor and writer on this topic ever since. Each instalment is intended to put my key ideas about a single subject together in one place for easy reference, and so they are not specific to one weapon, style, or system. As such, they should also be useful to most other martial artists. In many cases, I cover the specific systems in detail in one or another of my books. For Fiore’s longsword techniques, you will probably find my The Medieval Longsword and Advanced Longsword, Form and Function useful.
    [Show full text]
  • Late Medieval and Early Modern Fight Books History of Warfare
    Late Medieval and Early Modern Fight Books History of Warfare Editors Kelly DeVries (Loyola University Maryland) John France (University of Wales, Swansea) Michael S. Neiberg (United States Army War College, Pennsylvania) Frederick Schneid (High Point University, North Carolina) VOLUME 112 The titles published in this series are listed at brill.com/hw Late Medieval and Early Modern Fight Books Transmission and Tradition of Martial Arts in Europe (14th–17th Centuries) Edited by Daniel Jaquet, Karin Verelst and Timothy Dawson LEIDEN | BOSTON Cover illustration: Huter, Jörg Wilhalm: Fechtkunst – BSB Cgm 3711, [S.l.], 1523, fol. 19v. With kind permission of the Bayerische Staatsbibliothek, Munich. <urn:nbn:de:bvb:12-bsb00064546-3>. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Jaquet, Daniel, editor | Verelst, Karin, editor | Dawson, Timothy (Timothy George) editor. Title: Late medieval and early modern fight books : transmission and tradition of martial arts in Europe (14th–17th centuries) / edited by Daniel Jaquet, Karin Verelst and Timothy Dawson. Other titles: Transmission and tradition of martial arts in Europe (14th–17th centuries) Description: Leiden ; Boston : Brill, [2016] | Series: History of warfare ; volume 112 | Includes bibliographical references and index. Identifiers: LCCN 2016019488 (print) | LCCN 2016024081 (ebook) | ISBN 9789004312418 (hardback : alk. paper) | ISBN 9789004324725 (E-book) Subjects: LCSH: Fencing—Early works to 1800. | Swordplay—Early works to 1800. | Hand-to-hand fighting—Europe—Early works to 1800. | Martial arts—Europe—History. Classification: LCC U860 .L37 2016 (print) | LCC U860 (ebook) | DDC 355.5/480902—dc23 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2016019488 Want or need Open Access? Brill Open offers you the choice to make your research freely accessible online in exchange for a publication charge.
    [Show full text]
  • “Can We Learn Martial Arts Through Books?”: the Revival of Korean
    Acta Periodica Duellatorum volume 8, issue 1 (2020) – DOI 10.36950/apd-2020-012 “Can We Learn Martial Arts Through Books?”: The Revival of Korean Fight Books Through Transmission and Reconstruction Bok Kyu Choi Korean Institute for Martial Arts [email protected] Abstract: Fight books can be defined as texts specialising in the theories of martial arts and the instruction of techniques (for future generations) based on actual experience of real fighting and training. According to this definition, today’s efforts to reconstruct classical martial arts based upon historic fight books, in both East and West, are attempts to resurrect something extinct. Traditional East Asian martial artists, however, often argue that there are substantial limits in the reconstruction process of, for example, medieval European martial arts given the discontinuity of embodied knowledge, especially when compared to the Asian arts’ presumed strong transmission from generation to generation without interruption. Both seem quite different, but they share the epistemological assumption that authentic archetypes of martial arts did exist at some point in the past and believe it possible to transmit or reconstruct them in the present. This paper examines the limitations to the hypothesis of the existence of martial arts archetypes by examining the discourse surrounding the inherited tradition of the Muyedobotongji in Korea. The authors of the Muyedobotongji successfully synthesised and standardised contemporary East Asian martial arts and shared that knowledge from the perspective of Joseon1 in the late eighteenth century. Now, after 200 years, we must do our part to breathe new life into it for this era. Keywords: martial arts studies, fight books, invented martial arts, tradition, authenticity, Korean martial arts I.
    [Show full text]