DOCSLIB.ORG

Species Summary

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Acacia jennerae LC Taxonomic Authority: Maiden Global Assessment Regional Assessment Region: Global Endemic to region Synonyms Common Names Racosperma jennera (Maiden) Pedley COONAVITTRA WATTLE English Upper Level Taxonomy Kingdom: PLANTAE Phylum: TRACHEOPHYTA Class: MAGNOLIOPSIDA Order: FABALES Family: LEGUMINOSAE Lower Level Taxonomy Rank: Infra- rank name: Plant Hybrid Subpopulation: Authority: In the past the species has commonly been confused with Acacia microbotrya; their ranges overlap in the Burakin–Trayning area in Western Australia. A. jennerae is normally distinguished by its straighter phyllodes with more numerous glands and its funicle (Orchard and Wilson 2001). General Information Distribution Acacia jennerae is endemic to Australia, distributed from near Kununoppin in Western Australia, through South Australia and the Northern Territory to Wilcannia in New South Wales, and the Simpson Desert in far south-west Queensland (Orchard and Wilson 2001). Range Size Elevation Biogeographic Realm Area of Occupancy: Upper limit: 900 Afrotropical Extent of Occurrence: Lower limit: 60 Antarctic Map Status: Depth Australasian Upper limit: Neotropical Lower limit: Oceanian Depth Zones Palearctic Shallow photic Bathyl Hadal Indomalayan Photic Abyssal Nearctic Population Total population size is not known but it was recently collected in 2002. Total Population Size Minimum Population Size: Maximum Population Size: Habitat and Ecology A tall shrub or tree that has the habit of a small mallee eucalypt that is sporadic in arid and semi-arid areas. It grows in mallee and savannah woodland. System Movement pattern Crop Wild Relative Terrestrial Freshwater Nomadic Congregatory/Dispersive Is the species a wild relative of a crop? Marine Migratory Altitudinally migrant Growth From Definition Shrub - large Perennial shrub (>1m), also termed a Phanerophyte (>1m) Tree - large Large tree, also termed a Phanerophyte (>1m) Threats There are no major threats known to this widespread species. Past Present Future 13 None Conservation Measures This species is known to occur within protected areas across its range. Most notably it is known from the Simpson Desert Regional Reserve and West MacDonnell National Park. It is not listed as Threatened under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act). It is listed as rare under the National Parks & Wildlife Act (South Australia 1972) and Least Concern in the Northern Territory (Northern Territory Government 2007). The seeds for this species have been collected as part of the Millennium Seed Bank project. Seeds are located at: Wakehurst Place, Royal Botanic Gardens Kew (UK) and Kings Park & Botanic Garden, Perth (Australia). In Place Needed 4 Habitat and site-based actions 4.4 Protected areas 5 Species-based actions 5.7 Ex situ conservation actions 5.7.2 Genome resource bank Countries of Occurrence PRESENCE ORIGIN Year Breeding Non- Passage Possibly ExtinctPresence Native Introduced Re- Vagrant Origin Round Season breeding migrant extinct uncertain Introduced uncertain only season only Australia New South Wales Northern Territory Queensland South Australia Western Australia General Habitats Score Description Major Importance 2 Savanna 1UnsetSuitable 2.1 Savanna - Dry1Unset Suitable 3 Shrubland 1UnsetSuitable 3.8 Shrubland - Mediterranean-type Shrubby Vegetation1Unset Suitable Species Utilisation Species is not utilised at all Purpose / Type of Use Subsistence National International 13. Pets/display animals, horticulture It is used as an accent, theme and patio tree, in parking medians, streetscapes, and any setting where an evergreen, flowering trees is needed (Arid Zone Trees 2010). IUCN Red Listing Red List Assessment:(using 2001 IUCN system) Least Concern (LC) Red List Criteria: Date Last Seen (only for EX, EW or Possibly EX species): Is the species Possibly Extinct? Possibly Extinct Candidate? Rationale for the Red List Assessment A. jennerae is a widespread species through most inland states of Australia in arid and semi-arid environments. There are no known identifiable threats to this species, it is known to occur within protected areas and its seeds have been stored as an ex situ conservation measure. It is therefore listed here as Least Concern. Reason(s) for Change in Red List Category from the Previous Assessment: Genuine Change Nongenuine Change No Change Genuine (recent) New information Taxonomy Same category Genuine (since first assessment) Knowledge of Criteria Criteria Revisio and criteria Incorrect data used Other Same category but previously change in criteria Current Population Trend: Stable Date of Assessment: 07/09/2010 Name(s) of the Assessor(s): Malcolm, P. Evaluator(s): Notes: % population decline in the past: Time period over which the past decline has been measured for applying Criterion A or C1 (in years or generations): % population decline in the future: Time period over which the future decline has been measured for applying Criterion A or C1 (in years or generations): Number of Locations: Severely Fragmented: Number of Mature Individuals: Bibliography A.E. Orchard and A.J.G. Wilson, 2001, Mimosaceae, Acacia part 1, Flora of Australia Volume 11A, , ABRS, Canberra Arid Zone Trees, 2010, Arid Zone Trees07-09-2010, , , Arizona Commonwealth of Australia, 1999, Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act)10 June 2010, , , Kodela, P.G. and Haden, G.J., 2002, Acacia, Flora of New South Wales. Revised Edition, G.J. Harden, , University of New South Wales Press Ltd., Sydney Maslin, B.R., 1985, Acacia, Flora of Central Australia, J. Jessop, , Reed Books PTY Ltd, Sydney Northern Territory Government, 2007, The Classification of Wildlife of the NT – January 2007, Natural Resources, Environment, The Arts and Sport07 July 2011, , , Whibley, J.E., 1986, Mimosoideae, Flora of South Australia, J.P. Jessop and H.R. Tolken, , South Australia Government Printing Division, Adelaide.
Recommended publications
  • Palatability of Plants to Camels (DBIRD NT)

    Palatability of Plants to Camels (DBIRD NT)

    Technote No. 116 June 2003 Agdex No: 468/62 ISSN No: 0158-2755 The Palatability of Central Australian Plant Species to Camels Dr B. Dorges, Dr J. Heucke, Central Australian Camel Industry Association and R. Dance, Pastoral Division, Alice Springs BACKGROUND About 600,000 camels (Camelus dromedarius) are believed to inhabit the arid centre of Australia, mainly in South Australia, Western Australia and the Northern Territory. Most of these camels are feral. A small camel industry has developed, which harvests selected animals for domestic and export markets, primarily for meat. Camels can eat more than 80% of the common plant species found in Central Australia. Some plant species are actively sought by camels and may need to be protected. METHOD Observations of grazing preferences by camels were made periodically for up to 12 years on five cattle stations in Central Australia. Where camels were accustomed to the presence of humans, it was possible to observe their grazing preferences from a few metres. Radio transmitters were fitted on some camels for easy detection and observation at any time. These evaluations were used to establish a diet preference or palatability index for observed food plants. Table 1. Palatability index for camels Index Interpretation 1 only eaten when nothing else is available 2 rarely eaten 3 common food plant 4 main food plant at times 5 preferred food plant 6 highly preferred food plant 7 could be killed by camel browsing More information can be obtained from the web site of the Central Australian Camel Industry Association http://www.camelsaust.com.au 2 RESULTS Table 2.
  • Legumes of Wallace Desert Gardens

    Legumes of Wallace Desert Gardens

    Bulletin of The Desert Legume Program of The Boyce Thompson Southwestern Arboretum and The University of Arizona Volume 18, Number 2 August 2006 Legumes of Wallace Desert Gardens Pamela Slate standing relationship between our Desert Gardens reviews and Botanic Coordinator organizations, one I see growing ever approves appropriate on-site Wallace Desert Gardens stronger year after year.” projects of mutual benefit. Wallace Desert Gardens is a Matthew B. Johnson non-profit foundation [(502(c)(3) In the mid-1980’s, the Program Manager and Curator under IRS rules] that was created in Wallace’s moved, complete with their Desert Legume Program 1993, well after much of the garden plant collection, from a Paradise was established. Its mission was Valley acre to a Scottsdale The virtues of desert legumes written by HB, as he was fondly subdivision where they purchased captured the attention of H.B. and known, to reflect the original intent of numerous acre-plus lots. At the time, Jocelyn M. Wallace when they first the foundation: HB had “no idea it would be bigger learned of the Desert Legume than a two-acre garden.” Although Program (DELEP) in 1989, about a Wallace Desert Gardens is a he “knew nothing of desert plants year after the program was founded collection of the world’s deserts when he moved to Arizona” in the at the University of Arizona. They plants located at an elevation of early 1980’s, they quickly became his understood the importance of some 2400 feet. Founded by passion. Today the garden legumes’ potential applications H.B.
  • Synoptic Overview of Exotic Acacia, Senegalia and Vachellia (Caesalpinioideae, Mimosoid Clade, Fabaceae) in Egypt

    Synoptic Overview of Exotic Acacia, Senegalia and Vachellia (Caesalpinioideae, Mimosoid Clade, Fabaceae) in Egypt

    plants Article Synoptic Overview of Exotic Acacia, Senegalia and Vachellia (Caesalpinioideae, Mimosoid Clade, Fabaceae) in Egypt Rania A. Hassan * and Rim S. Hamdy Botany and Microbiology Department, Faculty of Science, Cairo University, Giza 12613, Egypt; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: For the first time, an updated checklist of Acacia, Senegalia and Vachellia species in Egypt is provided, focusing on the exotic species. Taking into consideration the retypification of genus Acacia ratified at the Melbourne International Botanical Congress (IBC, 2011), a process of reclassification has taken place worldwide in recent years. The review of Acacia and its segregates in Egypt became necessary in light of the available information cited in classical works during the last century. In Egypt, various taxa formerly placed in Acacia s.l., have been transferred to Acacia s.s., Acaciella, Senegalia, Parasenegalia and Vachellia. The present study is a contribution towards clarifying the nomenclatural status of all recorded species of Acacia and its segregate genera. This study recorded 144 taxa (125 species and 19 infraspecific taxa). Only 14 taxa (four species and 10 infraspecific taxa) are indigenous to Egypt (included now under Senegalia and Vachellia). The other 130 taxa had been introduced to Egypt during the last century. Out of the 130 taxa, 79 taxa have been recorded in literature. The focus of this study is the remaining 51 exotic taxa that have been traced as living species in Egyptian gardens or as herbarium specimens in Egyptian herbaria. The studied exotic taxa are accommodated under Acacia s.s. (24 taxa), Senegalia (14 taxa) and Vachellia (13 taxa).
  • Kalannie Region

    Kalannie Region

    Botanical name Acacia daphnifolia Meisn. Synonym: microbotrya var. borealis E. Pritzel, Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 35: 300 (1904). Common name Northern Manna Wattle. Characteristic features Bushy shrubs or small trees, often forming dense clonal clumps by root suckers. Phyllodes normally oblanceolate, straight to shallowly falcately recurved, widely spreading, glaucous to sub-glaucous, with one longitudinal nerve on each face, apices obtuse to acute (sometimes acuminate); glands normally single (rarely 2). Heads globular, showy, arranged in short racemes, the raceme axes and peduncles appressed hairy. Pods moniliform to sub-moniliform, 7-8 mm wide. Seeds large; funicle encircling seeds in a single fold and drying red- brown. Flowering around autumn. Description Note. Acacia microbotyra is a somewhat variable species and is in need of critical revision. The description here applies only to plants occurring within the Kalannie region. Habit. Bushy, +/- rounded shrubs or +/- obconic small trees mostly 2-4 m tall with crowns 2-5 m across, often forming dense clonal clumps by root suckers, dividing at ground level into 2-4 main trunks (6-9 cm in diameter at breast height) or with a single trunk (about 11 cm diameter at ground level) to about 1 m before branching, crowns on oldest plants occupying 20-30% of the total plant height, Bark. Grey, thin and hard, shallowly longitudinally fissured with fine transverse fractures, exfoliating in short strips on oldest trunks, smooth on upper branches. Gum. Sometimes exuded from the trunks and/or branches. Branchlets.
  • Riparian Condition of the Salt River Waterway Assessment in the Zone of Ancient Drainage

    Riparian Condition of the Salt River Waterway Assessment in the Zone of Ancient Drainage

    Looking after all our Department of Water water needs Government of Western Australia Riparian condition of the Salt River Waterway assessment in the zone of ancient drainage Water resource management series Report No. WRM 46 www.water.wa.gov.au January 2008 Riparian condition of the Salt River Waterway assessment in the zone of ancient drainage Australian Government Funded by the Avon Catchment Council, the Government of Western Australia and the Australian Government through the Natural Heritage Trust and the National Action Plan for Salinity and Water Quality AVON RIVERCARE PROJECT Department of Water Water resource management series Report No. WRM 46 January 2008 Department of Water 168 St Georges Terrace Perth Western Australia 6000 Telephone +61 8 6364 7600 Facsimile +61 8 6364 7601 www.water.wa.gov.au © Government of Western Australia 2007 January 2008 This work is copyright. You may download, display, print and reproduce this material in unaltered form only (retaining this notice) for your personal, non-commercial use or use within your organisation. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, all other rights are reserved. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the Department of Water. ISSN 1326-6934 (pbk) ISSN 1835-3592 (pdf) ISBN 978-1-920947-95-8 (pbk) ISBN 978-1-921094-84-2 (pdf) Acknowledgements Kate Gole, Department of Water Northam, gratefully acknowledges the funding provided by the Department of Water, the Avon Catchment Council and the State and Australian Governments, through the Natural Heritage Trust and the National Action Plan for Salinity and Water Quality.
  • Sites of Botanical Significance Vol1 Part1

    Sites of Botanical Significance Vol1 Part1

    Plant Species and Sites of Botanical Significance in the Southern Bioregions of the Northern Territory Volume 1: Significant Vascular Plants Part 1: Species of Significance Prepared By Matthew White, David Albrecht, Angus Duguid, Peter Latz & Mary Hamilton for the Arid Lands Environment Centre Plant Species and Sites of Botanical Significance in the Southern Bioregions of the Northern Territory Volume 1: Significant Vascular Plants Part 1: Species of Significance Matthew White 1 David Albrecht 2 Angus Duguid 2 Peter Latz 3 Mary Hamilton4 1. Consultant to the Arid Lands Environment Centre 2. Parks & Wildlife Commission of the Northern Territory 3. Parks & Wildlife Commission of the Northern Territory (retired) 4. Independent Contractor Arid Lands Environment Centre P.O. Box 2796, Alice Springs 0871 Ph: (08) 89522497; Fax (08) 89532988 December, 2000 ISBN 0 7245 27842 This report resulted from two projects: “Rare, restricted and threatened plants of the arid lands (D95/596)”; and “Identification of off-park waterholes and rare plants of central Australia (D95/597)”. These projects were carried out with the assistance of funds made available by the Commonwealth of Australia under the National Estate Grants Program. This volume should be cited as: White,M., Albrecht,D., Duguid,A., Latz,P., and Hamilton,M. (2000). Plant species and sites of botanical significance in the southern bioregions of the Northern Territory; volume 1: significant vascular plants. A report to the Australian Heritage Commission from the Arid Lands Environment Centre. Alice Springs, Northern Territory of Australia. Front cover photograph: Eremophila A90760 Arookara Range, by David Albrecht. Forward from the Convenor of the Arid Lands Environment Centre The Arid Lands Environment Centre is pleased to present this report on the current understanding of the status of rare and threatened plants in the southern NT, and a description of sites significant to their conservation, including waterholes.
  • The Biological Survey of the Eastern Goldfields of Western Australia the Biological Survey of the Eastern Goldfields of Western Australia

    The Biological Survey of the Eastern Goldfields of Western Australia the Biological Survey of the Eastern Goldfields of Western Australia

    THE BIOLOGICAL SURVEY OF THE EASTERN GOLDFIELDS OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA THE BIOLOGICAL SURVEY OF THE EASTERN GOLDFIELDS OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA Part I INTRODUCTION AND METHODS by Biological Surveys Committee Western Australia 1984 Front Cover Landsat image of south western sector of the Eastern Goldfields in the region south of Southern Cross. Wheatfields occupy the western portion. Courtesy Lands and Survey Department. © Western Australian Museum, 1984 ISSBN: 0 7244 9970 9 PT 1: 0724499717 PT 2: 0 7244 9972 5 Published by the Western Australian Museum, Frands Street, Perth, Western Australia 6000. Printed in Western Australia by Advance Press Pty Ltd. BioI. Survey of the E. Goldfields of W.A. Pt. 1. Intra. CONTENTS Abstract 1 Introduction . Objectives................. .. 6 Aims 7 Methods 9 Design 9 Vegetation and Floristics 10 Vertebrate animals 11 Acknowledgements 15 References 15 BioI. Survey of the E. Goldfields of W.A. Pt. 1. Intro. Abstract This part is the first in a series that will describe the biological survey of the Eastern Goldfields District of Western Australia. It deals specifically with the background, aims and objectives of the survey and outlines the methods used to document vegetation, soils, flora and verteprate fauna at numerous sample sites representative of this heterogeneous region. The Eastern Goldfields District (266,000 km') was selected for survey for the following reasons because: there had been no previous detailed survey of the biota of the District, which is a region of considerable interest in that it lies between the mesic South West and arid Eremaean regions; extensive areas of vegetation have remained relatively unmodified since European settlement; the need to evaluate the adequacy of existing conservation reserve systems; pressure to release more land for clearing for cereal crops in south-western and southern parts of the district.
  • Rangelands, Western Australia

    Rangelands, Western Australia

    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
  • Growth of Legume Tree Species Growing in the Southwestern United States

    Growth of Legume Tree Species Growing in the Southwestern United States

    Growth of Legume Tree Species Growing in the Southwestern United States Ursula K. Schuch1 and Margaret Norem2 Plant Sciences Department1 and Desert Legume Program2 University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721 Abstract Vegetative shoot growth of eleven legume tree species growing under field conditions in the Southwestern United States in Arizona were monitored over two periods of twelve months. Species included plants native to the Southwestern United States, Mexico, South America, and Australia. Based on shoot extension and branch differentiation species could be grouped into three categories. Fast growing legumes included Acacia farnesiana, A. pendula, Olneya tesota, Parkinsonia floridum, and Prosopis chilensis. Intermediate growth rates were monitored for A. jennerae, A. salicina, and A. visco. Slow growing species in this study included A. stenophylla, P. microphylla, and P. praecox. No buds, flowers, or pods were observed for P. microphylla, O. tesota, and P. chilensis during the study. Of the remaining species those native to the Americas flowered in spring and those native to Australia flowered in fall or winter. Introduction Southwestern landscapes, characterized by a semiarid climate and poor soils, rely on many native and non- native legume species for shade and aesthetic value. Desirable traits of trees for desert landscapes include fast growth, drought tolerance, and resistance to biotic stresses. In addition, cultivated trees are prized for showy flowers, little or no litter, lack of spines, and an upright growth habit (Dimmitt, 1987). Of the 11 species used in this study, six are commonly planted in the northern Sonoran Desert at low and mid elevations. The other species are used in the same area to a lesser extent, although they grow well in a semi-arid climate.
  • For Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution Manuscript Draft

    For Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution Manuscript Draft

    Elsevier Editorial System(tm) for Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution Manuscript Draft Manuscript Number: MPE-15-437R1 Title: Integration of complete chloroplast genome sequences with small amplicon datasets improves phylogenetic resolution in Acacia Article Type: Research Paper Keywords: integrative systematics; whole chloroplast genome; Acacia; ExaBayes; RAxML Corresponding Author: Ms. Anna Williams, Corresponding Author's Institution: Kings Park and Botanic Garden First Author: Anna Williams Order of Authors: Anna Williams; Joseph T Miller; Ian Small; Paul G Nevill; Laura M Boykin Abstract: Combining whole genome data with previously obtained amplicon sequences has the potential to increase the resolution of phylogenetic analyses, particularly at low taxonomic levels or where recent divergence, rapid speciation or slow genome evolution has resulted in limited sequence variation. However, the integration of these types of data for large scale phylogenetic studies has rarely been investigated. Here we conduct a phylogenetic analysis of the whole chloroplast genome and two nuclear ribosomal loci for 65 Acacia species from across the most recent Acacia phylogeny. We then combine this data with previously generated amplicon sequences (four chloroplast loci and two nuclear ribosomal loci) for 508 Acacia species. We use several phylogenetic methods, including maximum likelihood bootstrapping (with and without constraint) and ExaBayes, in order to determine the success of combining a dataset of 4,000 bp with one of 189,000 bp. The results of our study indicate that the inclusion of whole genome data gave a far better resolved and well supported representation of the phylogenetic relationships within Acacia than using only amplicon sequences, with the greatest support observed when using a whole genome phylogeny as a constraint on the amplicon sequences.
  • Species List

    Species List

    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
  • Desert Channels, Queensland

    Desert Channels, Queensland

    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.