REFRAINS in ANCIENT GREEK POETRY a Dissertation Presented

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

REFRAINS in ANCIENT GREEK POETRY a Dissertation Presented REFRAINS IN ANCIENT GREEK POETRY A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Simon Peter Burris May 2004 © 2004 Simon Peter Burris REFRAINS IN ANCIENT GREEK POETRY Simon Peter Burris, Ph.D. Cornell University 2004 What do refrains contribute to ancient Greek poetry? Modern scholarship has usually limited its treatment of ancient Greek refrains to considerations of their external associations. The tendency has been to explain refrains, both individually and as a formal type, by reference to assumed origins for the refrain form and its use in primitive song, for which we have little or no evidence. By contrast, I have attempted to explain the refrain form as an established feature within the ancient Greek poetic tradition. I am interested in two questions. First, what do individual refrains contribute to the individual poems in which they appear? Second, what literary refrain tradition is indicated by the surviving examples? Obviously the answering of one question involves the answering of the other. Before an examination can be made of individual refrains in context, there are some general questions that must be asked. In CHAPTER 2, I examine the treatment of refrains by ancient Greek scholarship. This involves examining the scholarly terminology associated with refrains, especially the term †c·jkflk. In CHAPTER 3 I test the commonly held hypothesis that refrains are sung by a chorus in response to stanzas provided by a soloist. In CHAPTER 4 I address the question of the often assumed relationship between sub-literary song and the refrains in surviving Greek poetry. I do this by investigating ritual cries and their use both within and outside the context of formal refrains. Once these general questions have been addressed, we may consider individual refrains in context. Since, as I shall argue, refrains find their most natural “home” in the monostrophic and triadic structures of non-dramatic lyric, I begin there in CHAPTER 5. Then I examine refrains in the antistrophic context of dramatic lyric in CHAPTER 6. I conclude my examination with the refrains of bucolic hexameters in CHAPTER 7. As it happens, this order coincides (very broadly speaking) with chronological order and thus reflects what I shall argue is the development of a continuous refrain tradition in ancient Greek poetry. BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH Simon Peter Burris was born in Nacogdoches, Texas on March 4, 1970. He entered the University of Texas at Austin in 1988 and was awarded a B.A. in Classics in 1992. In 1993 Mr. Burris married Miss Lori Ann Dutschmann of Waco and moved to Iowa City to attend the University of Iowa Writers’ Workshop. In 1995 he was admitted as a graduate student in Classics at Cornell University, and began work on his dissertation in 1999. In 2001, Mr. Burris accepted a temporary teaching position at Luther College in Decorah, Iowa, where a son, Owen Hugh, was born in 2002. iii To Lori. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Many others contributed to the success of this dissertation. First I must express my gratitude to Hayden Pelliccia for his help throughout my association with Cornell University’s Department of Classics. His careful criticism of my work has led me to make many improvements and to avoid many pitfalls. Many thanks to the other members of my committee: Kevin Clinton, Judith Ginsburg and Jeffrey Rusten. Without their help this dissertation would not have been possible. Thanks also to Joseph Reed, in whose class the earliest incarnation of this dissertation made its appearance; to Alan Nussbaum; to Pietro Pucci; to Danuta Shanzer; to Frederick Ahl; to David Mankin; and to the Lane Cooper Foundation for its support in the form of a fellowship for the year 1999-2000. Special thanks to Charles Britain for his generous comments and encouragement; to Nancy Sokol and the other administrative staff for their invaluable help; and to my colleagues and students at Luther College for their friendship and support. Finally, I thank my wife, Lori, for her constant patience. All mistakes are my own. v TABLE OF CONTENTS Biographical Sketch page iii Dedication iv Acknowledgments v 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 ANCIENT SCHOLARLY TREATMENT OF REFRAINS 14 3 PERFORMANCE OF REFRAINS 43 4 EXTERNAL ASSOCIATIONS 54 5 REFRAINS IN NON-DRAMATIC LYRIC 63 6 REFRAINS IN DRAMATIC LYRIC 124 7 REFRAINS IN BUCOLIC 165 Appendix: Refrain in Dithyramb 183 Bibliography 192 vi CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION In his book on repetitive forms in modern poetry, Laury Magnus almost despairs at offering a definition for the term “refrain”: So self-evident a device as the refrain turns out to be difficult to define... The obvious definition that might describe the refrain simply as the set of a poem’s repeated lines or parts of lines neglects important semantic characteristics of the device. The most compelling of these is that of intrusion: the refrain disrupts or retards the development of the poem. Such intrusion results from the refrain’s segmentation of the poem, from the way in which it “slices through” poetic utterance while maintaining its own distinct identity — a consistency of personality which renders it distinct from the stanza or strophe and which, despite possible material alterations, does not essentially change.1 Magnus’ point is that refrains are identified and classified as such because of the impression made upon the sense of the audience, rather than because of any particular formal characteristic. The refrain is “self-evident”; it “[maintains] its own distinct identity”; it has a “consistency of personality”. True, this effect is brought about by means of repetition, but the repetition may not be strictly verbatim: there may be “material alterations” from one instance to the next. The unit of verse to which the refrain is attached is not necessarily fixed: it may be either “stanza or strophe”. To what degree do these units of non-refrain verse have an independent existence? “Strophe” would imply (at least in the context of Greek lyric poetry) a unit of verse with a life of its own, one to which any refrain could justly be considered additive; “stanza” has no such connotation, and conceivably could apply to any group of lines “[resulting] from the refrain’s segmentation of the poem”. We have, then, two obstacles to any attempt to define the term “refrain”: the apparent ability for refrains to depart from strictly 1 Magnus (1989) 46. 1 2 verbatim repetition, and the variety of metrical contexts in which they may be found. Magnus is interested, of course, in the refrains of modern poetry, which are often much more variable in content and more sophisticated in formal and thematic functionality than the refrains of ancient Greek poetry. But his basic complaint is applicable to our subject. Greek refrains tend not to exhibit variation within individual poems, but there are several such cases with which we shall have to deal. More important is the difficulty of metrical context. One cannot, for example, offer a definition for Greek refrains such as “lines or parts of lines repeated within each strophe”. What would be done with the refrains of Pindar Paean 2 and 4, both of which are repeated with each triad? What of the refrains of antistrophic lyric in drama? And what of the refrains of astrophic and stichic verse, such as we find in the continuous hexameters of bucolic?2 That these are refrains is, as Magnus says of refrains in general, self-evident, and any definition of “refrain” for the purposes of this study must include them. §1 Definition and corpus I propose the following as a working definition of “refrain” for ancient Greek poetry. “Refrains” are lines or portions of lines that are repeated regularly in a poem, and which are separated by and distinct from intervening material. At this point it is desirable to distinguish what we are calling “refrains” from two other formal types: Homeric repetitions and what I shall call “appended 2 Wilamowitz (1925) 265 denies the name “refrain” for Thyrsis’ song in Theocritus 1, but his reasons for so doing seem to be (1) the dissimilarity between Thyrsis’ refrain and those of German and Roman folk song, and (2) the lack of a strophic structure for the song. This second reason stems, no doubt, from Wilamowitz’ earlier efforts to correct a 19th century fad of looking for “strophic responsion” in Greek bucolic and using this as a basis for textual criticism. Cf. Wilamowitz (1906) 137. 3 cries”. Besides limiting the corpus to be examined for this study, the distinction will occasion some useful discussion concerning the qualities of the refrain form. Repeated phrases and lines are common enough in Homer that they may be regarded as a distinctive aspect of his style.3 Indeed, if we are correct in taking the Iliad and Odyssey as products (ultimately) of an oral poetic tradition, repetition would seem to have been indispensable to their composition and performance.4 The evident adaptation of inherited oral compositional methods, including formulaic repetition, to what would otherwise be called high literary ends, stands as a singular achievement of the Homeric poems.5 Thus we may say with confidence that repetitions of phrase and line are essential to Homeric poetry. This is not the case with the refrains of lyric and bucolic, in whose composition formulaic methods do not seem to have played a part. Whereas we cannot imagine an Iliad or an Odyssey without frequent repetitions of whole lines, we can point to the overwhelming majority of lyric and bucolic poems that do not feature refrains.6 All this does not of itself prove that Homeric repetitions — no matter their determination by the requirements of composition — are never meant to produce an effect similar to that produced by the refrains of lyric and bucolic.
Recommended publications
  • James Russell Lowell - Poems
    Classic Poetry Series James Russell Lowell - poems - Publication Date: 2012 Publisher: Poemhunter.com - The World's Poetry Archive James Russell Lowell(22 February 1819 – 12 August 1891) James Russell Lowell was an American Romantic poet, critic, editor, and diplomat. He is associated with the Fireside Poets, a group of New England writers who were among the first American poets who rivaled the popularity of British poets. These poets usually used conventional forms and meters in their poetry, making them suitable for families entertaining at their fireside. Lowell graduated from Harvard College in 1838, despite his reputation as a troublemaker, and went on to earn a law degree from Harvard Law School. He published his first collection of poetry in 1841 and married Maria White in 1844. He and his wife had several children, though only one survived past childhood. The couple soon became involved in the movement to abolish slavery, with Lowell using poetry to express his anti-slavery views and taking a job in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania as the editor of an abolitionist newspaper. After moving back to Cambridge, Lowell was one of the founders of a journal called The Pioneer, which lasted only three issues. He gained notoriety in 1848 with the publication of A Fable for Critics, a book-length poem satirizing contemporary critics and poets. The same year, he published The Biglow Papers, which increased his fame. He would publish several other poetry collections and essay collections throughout his literary career. Maria White died in 1853, and Lowell accepted a professorship of languages at Harvard in 1854.
    [Show full text]
  • James Russell Lowell Among My Books
    JAMES RUSSELL LOWELL AMONG MY BOOKS 2008 – All rights reserved Non commercial use permitted AMONG MY BOOKS First Series by JAMES RUSSELL LOWELL * * * * * To F.D.L. Love comes and goes with music in his feet, And tunes young pulses to his roundelays; Love brings thee this: will it persuade thee, Sweet, That he turns proser when he comes and stays? * * * * * CONTENTS. DRYDEN WITCHCRAFT SHAKESPEARE ONCE MORE NEW ENGLAND TWO CENTURIES AGO LESSING ROUSSEAU AND THE SENTIMENTALISTS * * * * * DRYDEN.[1] Benvenuto Cellini tells us that when, in his boyhood, he saw a salamander come out of the fire, his grandfather forthwith gave him a sound beating, that he might the better remember so unique a prodigy. Though perhaps in this case the rod had another application than the autobiographer chooses to disclose, and was intended to fix in the pupil's mind a lesson of veracity rather than of science, the testimony to its mnemonic virtue remains. Nay, so universally was it once believed that the senses, and through them the faculties of observation and retention, were quickened by an irritation of the cuticle, that in France it was customary to whip the children annually at the boundaries of the parish, lest the true place of them might ever be lost through neglect of so inexpensive a mordant for the memory. From this practice the older school of critics would seem to have taken a hint for keeping fixed the limits of good taste, and what was somewhat vaguely called _classical_ English. To mark these limits in poetry, they set up as Hermae the images they had made to them of Dryden, of Pope, and later of Goldsmith.
    [Show full text]
  • Types of Poems
    Types of Poems poemofquotes.com/articles/poetry_forms.php This article contains the many different poem types. These include all known (at least to my research) forms that poems may take. If you wish to read more about poetry, these articles might interest you: poetry technique and poetry definition. ABC A poem that has five lines and creates a mood, picture, or feeling. Lines 1 through 4 are made up of words, phrases or clauses while the first word of each line is in alphabetical order. Line 5 is one sentence long and begins with any letter. Acrostic Poetry that certain letters, usually the first in each line form a word or message when read in a sequence. Example: Edgar Allan Poe's "A Valentine". Article continues below... Ballad A poem that tells a story similar to a folk tale or legend which often has a repeated refrain. Read more about ballads. Ballade Poetry which has three stanzas of seven, eight or ten lines and a shorter final stanza of four or five. All stanzas end with the same one line refrain. Blank verse A poem written in unrhymed iambic pentameter and is often unobtrusive. The iambic pentameter form often resembles the rhythms of speech. Example: Alfred Tennyson's "Ulysses". Bio A poem written about one self's life, personality traits, and ambitions. Example: Jean Ingelow's "One Morning, Oh! So Early". Burlesque Poetry that treats a serious subject as humor. Example: E. E. Cummings "O Distinct". Canzone Medieval Italian lyric style poetry with five or six stanzas and a shorter ending stanza.
    [Show full text]
  • Christology and the Marian Kontakia of Saint Romanos the Melodist
    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Master's Theses Theses and Dissertations 1983 Christology and the Marian Kontakia of Saint Romanos the Melodist Andrew. Plishka Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses Part of the History of Christianity Commons Recommended Citation Plishka, Andrew., "Christology and the Marian Kontakia of Saint Romanos the Melodist" (1983). Master's Theses. 3386. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses/3386 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 1983 Andrew. Plishka CHRISTOLOGY AND THE MARIAN KONTAKIA OF SAINT ROMANOS THE MELODIST by Andrew Plishka A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Loyola University of Chicago in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts November 1983 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to express my heartfelt thanks to those who helped in the preparation of this paper. First, I am deeply indebted to Father Patout Burns, S.J., Father Eamon R. Carroll, 0. Carm., and Father Earl Weis, S.J. for their criticisms and suggestions throughout the course of my work. A special thank you to Pat Krutsch for sacrificing her time to type the paper. Finally, thanks to my family and most especially to Stephany for their love, support and patience.
    [Show full text]
  • Hum 110: Reading Lyric Poetry
    Hum 110: Reading Lyric Poetry Steps People Take When Reading a Lyric Poem: 1. Read the poem aloud without stopping. If you don't know a word, circle it but keep going. 2. Paraphrase the poem. I usually do this next to each stanza in the margins to make sure I am noticing how the argument builds. At the end summarize what the overall argument or message was. What is the poet trying to convince you is true or worth believing? 3. Look up any unknown words in the OED. Look up any unknown allusions in the Oxford Classical Dictionary or a comparable companion to classical literature. 4. Diction: characterize the type of language. Is battle language used, romantic, animal, high, low, etc. How does the type of language relate to the argument? 5. Speaker: who is speaking and to whom? Characterize the speaker. 6. Figures of Speech: put a * or mark by figures of speech (similes, metaphors, implied metaphors--see below). Spend time listing the associations of the things being compared. What do we learn from the comparison? 7. Theme: drawing on the type of language used and the argument of the poem, do you see it related to any themes we have discussed so far in class? How does the presentation of those themes differ from previous works we have read? Can you make sense of the changes using historical or cultural information? 8. Form and Meter: is the poem in a particular form or meter? (e.g. sapphics or dactylic hexameter--see below) 9. Genre: based on the information on the other side of this sheet, take a stab at in what genre your lyric poem was written.
    [Show full text]
  • CLAS 0210 Class 23-2011.Pdf
    CLAS 0210 Sport in the Ancient Greek World Class 23 Monday 31 October 2011 What happened if you won? Part II: Victory Poetry Epinicean Poetry From ca. 530 - 430 BC… Hymns for an athlete’s victory in the games were included in the festivities. Composed for the occasion by a professional writer Chanted to musical accompaniment (lyre) — by the poet himself or by a chorus of young men The victor himself (or family and friends, or his sponsoring town) paid the expenses of commissioning a song “upon the victory” — epi + nike [“victory”] = epinikia [Epinicean odes] Famous epinicean poets Among many famous names, the great three are: Simonides Bacchylides Pindar More of Pindar’s work has chanced to survive: The 4 books of Epinicean Odes — Olympians (14 odes) Pythians (12 odes) Nemean (8 odes) Isthmian (9 odes) Pindar Born 518 B.C. His poems can be dated… from the Olympic and other victory lists First poem: Pythian Games 498 B.C. Last poem: Pythian Games 446 B.C. (at age 72) … so Pindar’s poems span the first half of 5th cent. B.C. Arranged by: importance of each games importance of the event importance of the victor Pindar’s poems were written for the full range of events But he does not describe victories in the manner of a sports reporter: He does pay attention to the particular event in which the victory was won, by his choice of imagery or myth (e.g., Pelops’ chariot race) Pelops and Hippodameia Who were the victors for whom Pindar wrote? Were they a fair cross-section? We know many of their names from the victors’ lists Most are from wealthy and locally influential families From all over the Greek world, but especially (17/45) in the Greek west (the “new world”) Pindar portrays his relations as personal and equal Music Musical notation preserved on stone inscriptions or in papyrus manuscripts, like this: To view Greek musical manuscripts and hear them: http://classics.uc.edu/music/yale/index.html Basic Constituents of an Epinician Ode • Proclamation of victory, with factual details (e.g., victor’s name.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Untranslatability and the Greek Chorus in Virginia Woolf and H.D
    Untranslatability and the Greek Chorus in Virginia Woolf and H.D Laura McClure (University of Wisconsin) DRAFT Reading and Retranslation Colloquium University of Iowa March 30, 2019 In “The Task of the Translator,” Walter Benjamin argues that the act of translation is not a process of finding equivalencies but rather of rendering “that which lies beyond communication . the unfathomable, the mysteries, the ‘poetic’” (253). Benjamin wrote this essay in 1921 during an important period of classical reception and critical reflection about literary translation, particularly of Greek tragedy, facilitated in large part by modernist poets and writers such as Ezra Pound, Richard Aldington, Virginia Woolf, and H.D. New texts, commentaries, and bilingual editions helped to reveal the mysteries of ancient Greek, previously the domain of upper-class men, to these non-specialists. Gilbert Murray, for instance, made the work of Euripides available to a wide audience: first to classical scholars and students of Greek through the Oxford Classical Text edition of the plays; to a non-specialist audience through his translations; and finally through his productions of his translations on the professional stage in collaboration with Granville Barker, beginning in 1904.1 Bilingual editions such as J. W. Mackail’s Select Epigrams from the Greek Anthology, first published in 1890, and the Loeb Classical Library series, founded in 1911 by James Loeb, helped to circulate Greek texts to a broad audience and played a formative role in the literary productions of H.D. and Virginia Woolf. The image of the translation as a fragment of a Greek vase further attests to the influence of popular Hellenism on Benjamin: Fragments of a vessel that are to be glued together must match one another in the smallest details, although they need not be like one another.
    [Show full text]
  • English Metres
    Cornell University Library The original of tliis bool< is in tine Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924026355879 Cornell University Library PE 1509.S92 English metres. 3 1924 026 355 879 Copyright ^A^ 1922 By William Strunk, Jr. CONTENTS Chapter I: The Nature of Verse 7 Chapter II : Metrical and Free Verse 13 Chapter III: The Line and the Foot 17 Basic Feet 20 Number of Feet 24 Excess and Defect 24 Substitutions 26 The Caesura 30 Final Stress 31 Pinal Pause 32 Chapter IV: Rhyme 33 Chapter V: The Chief Metres of English Verse 38 Continuous Metres Iambic Tetrameter Couplet 38 Trochaic Tetrameter Couplet 39 Iambic Pentameter Couplet (Heroic Couplet) 39 Blank Verse 40 Dactylic Hexameter 45 Terza Hima 46 Stanzas The Ballad Stanza 47 Iambic Tetrameter Quatrains 47 Iambic Pentameter Quatrains 47 Ottava Rima 48 The Spenserian Stanza 49 The Pindaric Ode 50 The Sonnet 50 Chapter VI: Relations between Sound and Sense 54 Exercises 60 3 PREFACE The aim of this book is to provide a brief explanation of the nature of English verse and of the means used to analyze and describe it, together with a description and history of the more frequent metrical forms. The ex- amples are for the greater part from poems common- ly studied in courses in English and American literatiure. It has seemed best to recognize that many points in met- rical theory are still debatable. The method of marking scansion that has been employed is, of com'se, only one of many, but is that which, on the whole, most commends itself to the writer.
    [Show full text]
  • Oedipus Rex in Translation
    Oedipus Rex in translation Overall, this play is a good example of: . Dramatic irony – audience knows more than actors . Selective nature of dramatic episodes The Freytag Pyramid 1. Exposition or Introduction 2. Complication and Development 3. Crisis or Climax 4. Falling Action 5. Denouement, Resolution, or Catastrophe Scene Action Purpose Prologue Problem #1 Both the earth and the Exposition women are barren, as there is a plague. Problem #2: Murder of Laius, the former go, must go. Parados Terror continues and the plague Exposition – drama intensifies continues. There is an appeal to the goddess, Athena. Good gods versus bad goods seen in the elements of wind and lightning Strophe This is the movement of the chorus. Antistrophe Episode 1 Ironic: stranger is nearby (Oedipus) Creus leaves. Enter Tiresais, the Complication prophet. Tiresias vs. Oedipus. T. says: “You are polluted.” Yet. Tiresias know Oedipus’ parents. Yet T’s riddle is evasive Stasimon 2 Choragos is a spokesperson for the chorus, which itself acts as a group- actor. Antistrophe “Man” Strophe Conscience of Oedpius Antistrophe Changes to be produced. Episode 2 Creon to Choragos. “Why have I Exposition extended been accused?” Oedipus vs. Creon: O. wants him dead or gone. Jocasta enters: What caused this dispute? Kommos or Only exile should be given to Creon, Dirge #1 Choragos urges. Antistrophe 1 Chorus talks to Jocasta Antistrophe 2 Jocasta, Oedipus and chorus continue with their historical narrative of Laius’ retinue and the surviving servant. Next, Oedipus mentions drunken man in at the Corinth feast, who tells him that his current father is not his real father.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalexis and Anceps in Pindar: a Search for Rhythmical Logic Pearson, Lionel Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Summer 1974; 15, 2; Proquest Pg
    Catalexis and Anceps in Pindar: A Search for Rhythmical Logic Pearson, Lionel Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Summer 1974; 15, 2; ProQuest pg. 171 Catalexis and Anceps in Pindar: A Search for Rhythmical Logic Lionel Pearson HE PRESENT STUDY had its origin in an attempt to understand the Trhythmical pattern of Pindar's dactylo-epitrite odes.1 Dactylic rhythm is in 4-time (what Aristoxenus calls the tcoc AbYOC or 2:2 ratio) and trochaic or iambic is in 3-time (the 8£7TAacwc AbYOC or 2:1 ratio), and when Greek lyric poetry appears to combine these rhythms it may be thought to be alternating between 4-time and 3-time, an alternation or p-~Taf1oA~2 which ancient musicians would understand and to which they would respond without difficulty. It might seem to follow that a dactylo-epitrite ode offers alternation between 4-time (dactylic) and 7-time (epitrite), the 4:3 ratio. But here difficulties arise. It should first be noticed that Aristoxenus specifically rejects 7-time, the E7T'TacTJp-ov P-EY€()OC, and the 4:3 ratio, saying it is irrational and unrhythmic,3 though he does not deny, it seems, that epitrite feet occasionally occur (this is what he appears to say in a fragment quoted by Michael Psellus).4 We may be inclined to 1 Some of the argument of this article was presented orally in papers to the Classical Section of the Philological Association of the Pacific Coast at Gonzaga University in Novem­ ber 1970 and to the Institute of Classical Studies, University of London, in February 1972.
    [Show full text]
  • Structural Patterns in Pindar's Seventh Olympian Ode
    STRUCTURAL PATTERNS IN PINDAR'S SEVENTH OLYMPIAN ODE by J. H. Barkhuizen (University of the Orange Free State) In studying the structural forms of the myths in Pin dar's odes, we note that the most conspicuous characteristic of his poetical art is the way in which he moves from the present, which he is now celebrating in song, to the mythical past, a world in which he loved to dwell.l Bowra2 refers to 'the apparent insouciance with which he sometimes introduces a myth', and: 'He seems almost to slide into it through some superficial association of words or ideas.' This method of formal transition from reality to myth by means of the so-called archaic associative way of thinking is typical of Pindar's structural forms; it is also neatly described by Viljoen3 as 'die van punt tot punt aanknopende denkvorm en glydende oorgange in gedagte'. One4 illustration will suffice: in his First Olympian Ode, dedicated to Hieron of Syracuse, winner in the horse-race, Pindar closes his praise of Hieron with the following lines: 5 M!l7tEt os oi KA.so~ f:v ~:;Mvopt Auoou TisA.ono~ anotKi!f. (23-24) And his fame shines among strong men where Lydian Pelops went to dwell. 6 The word TisA.ono~ thus chimes the keynote of the myth of Pelops and Tantalos, which follows, introduced by the familiar device of the relative pronoun: 7 Auoou TisA.ono~ anotKi!f. 'L"OU !lEyacr9EVll~ f:pacrcra'L"O ratUOXO~ TiocrEtOUV (25-26) Pelops, whom the mighty shaker of the earth once loved, even Poseidon 1.
    [Show full text]
  • A Formal, Often Ceremonious Lyric Poem That Addresses and Often Celebrates a Person, Place, Thing, Or Idea
    § A formal, often ceremonious lyric poem that addresses and often celebrates a person, place, thing, or idea. Its stanza forms vary. § Pindaraic Ode- the original model. § This ode was named after an ancient Greek poet, Pindar, who began writing choral poems that were meant to be sung at public events. It contains three triads; strophe, antistrophe, and final stanza as epode, with irregular rhyme patterns and lengths of lines. § After this original one things got more and more informal and more fun. Happy the man, whose wish and care Sound sleep by night; study and easy, A few paernal acres bound, Together mixed, sweet recreation; Content to breathe his native air, And innocense, which most does please, In his own ground. With meditation. Whose herds with milk, whose fields with Thus let me live, unseen, unknown; bread, Thus unlamented let me die; Whose flocks supply him with attire, Steal from the world, and not a stone, Whose trees in summer yield him shade, Tell where I lie. In winter fire. Blest, who can unconcernedly find Hours, days, and years slide soft away, In health of body, peace and mind, Quiet by day § https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kbJcQYVtZMo § Socks § Tomatoes § Maize § A tuna in a market § Requirements § Must have at least 3 stanzas § Must contain literal imagery § Must contain at least one example of a metaphor Or a simile (figurative imagery) § Must use rhyme in some way (not necessarily end rhyme) § Must have an example of purposeful alliteration that draws Attention to an idea you think is important § Last stanza must express a thematic idea of value § Must use lofty language (for ode) § Must contain at least 20 lines For more help: http://www.powerpoetry.org/resources/writing-ode-poem.
    [Show full text]