DOCSLIB.ORG

This Rating Chart Is a Guide to Determining Your Play Level. for More Information, Please Consult with the Club Staff

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
This Rating Chart Is a Guide to Determining Your Play Level. for More Information, Please Consult with the Club Staff This rating chart is a guide to determining your play level. For more information, please consult with the club staff. GROUND-STROKES NET PLAY RATING RETURN OF SERVE SERVE (forehand and backhand) (volleys and overheads) 1.0 This player is just starting to play tennis 1.5 This player has been introduced to the game, however has difficulty playing the game due to a lack of consistency rallying and serving. 2.0 - Can get the ball in play but lacks - Tends to position in a - In singles, reluctant to come - Incomplete service control, resulting in inconsistent manner to protect to the net. motion. rallies. weaknesses. - In doubles, understands the - Toss is inconsistent. - Often chooses to hit forehands - Inconsistent return. basic positioning - Double faults are instead of backhands. - Comfortable only with the common. forehand volley; avoids backhand volley and overhead. 2.5 - Can rally consistently 10 balls in - In singles, consistent when - Becoming at ease at the net - Attempting a full service a row, especially on the forehand, returning towards the middle in practice but uncomfortable motion on the first serve. with an arched trajectory over the of the court. in a game situation. - First serve in net when the objective is to hit to a - In doubles, difficulty inconsistent (less than partner at moderate speed. returning cross-court to start 50%). the point. - Uses an incomplete motion to ensure a steady second serve. 3.0 - Able to rally consistently 10 balls - Can control the direction of - Very consistent on forehand - Full motion on both in a row on forehands and the ball in both singles and volley with easy balls, serves. backhands. doubles, when receiving a inconsistent on backhand - Able to achieve more - Able to maintain the rally when serve of moderate pace. volley. than 50% success on first receiving high, short or wide balls, - Overall has difficulty with low serve. assuming the ball is received at a and wide balls. - Second serve much moderate pace, especially on the - Can smash easy lobs. slower than first serve. forehand stroke. 3.5 - Able to move the opponent - Can return fast serves or - Becoming confident at net - Can vary the speed or around the court or hit harder well-placed serves with play; can direct FH volleys; direction of first serve. when receiving easier balls. defensive actions. controls BH volley but with - Can direct second serve - Can execute approach shots with - On easy second serve, can little offense. to opponent's weakness some consistency (more than return with pace or directional - general difficulty in putting without double faulting on 50%). control. volleys away. a regular basis. - Can approach the net in - Can handle volleys and doubles. overheads that require moderate movement. 4.0 - Able to develop points with some - Difficulty in returning spin - In singles, comfortable at - Can vary the speed and consistency by using a reliable serves and very fast serves. following an approach shot to direction of the first serve. combination of shots. - On moderately paced the net. - Uses spin. - Erratic when attempting a quality serves, can construct the point - In doubles, comfortable shot, when receiving fast or wide through hitting a good shot or receiving a variety of balls and balls, and when attempting exploiting an opponent's converting to offensive passing shots. weakness. positioning. - In doubles, can vary returns - Can poach on weak returns effectively on moderately of serve. paced serves. - Able to put away easy overheads. 4.5 - Can use a variety of spins. - Off first serves, can defend - When coming to the net after - Aggressive first serve - Beginning to develop a dominant consistently but very serving, consistently able to with power and spin. shot or good steadiness. inconsistent (less than 30%) put the first volley in play but - On second serve - Erratic when attempting a quality when attempting an without pace or depth; frequently hits with good shot in two of the following aggressive return. however, inconsistent when depth and placement situations: receiving fastballs, wide - In doubles, has difficulty trying to volley powerful or without double faults. balls, and in passing shot (less than 50%) returning a angled returns. - Can serve and volley off situations. first serve at the feet of the - Close to the net, can finish a first serves in doubles, but incoming serve and volleyer. point using various options experiences some including drop volley, angle inconsistency. volley, punch volley. 5.0 - Able to maintain a consistent - Periodically succeeds (50%) - In doubles, after the serve, - First serve can win rally, 10 balls in a row on faster at aggressive return off fast has a good, deep crosscourt points outright, or force a balls. first serves using dominant volley. weak return. - Very steady strokes or has a shot (forehand or backhand). - Overhead can be hit from - Second serve can dominant shot. - In doubles can return at the almost any position. prevent the opponent - Periodically succeeds (50%) feet of serve and volleyer. from attacking. when attempting a quality shot - Serve and volleys on when receiving fast or wide balls, first serves in doubles and in passing shot situations. with consistency. 5.5 This player has developed a game style, which is recognizable as either an all court player, an aggressive baseliner, a serve and volleyer, or a retriever. Has developed good anticipation either technically (can read toss on serve, body position…) or tactically (can read opponents tendencies in specific situations). Has no major weaknesses and can counterattack effectively against a hard ball, wide ball or in passing shot situations. Capable of competing in "open" category provincial level tournaments. Ability to use specific shots in order to exploit opponent's weakness: drop-shot, lob, angle, moonball… 6.0 These players will generally not need a rating. Rankings or past rankings will speak for themselves. The 6.0 player typically has & had intensive training for national tournament competition at the junior level and collegiate levels and has obtained a provincial 7.0 and/or national "open" ranking. The 6.5 player has extensive international "open" level tournament experience at the entry professional level (challenger or satellite experience). The 7.0 is a world class professional tennis player. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • WTT . . . at a Glance
    WTT . At a glance World TeamTennis Pro League presented by Advanta Dates: July 5-25, 2007 (regular season) Finals: July 27-29, 2007 – WTT Championship Weekend in Roseville, Calif. July 27 & 28 – Conference Championship matches July 29 – WTT Finals What: 11 co-ed teams comprised of professional tennis players and a coach. Where: Boston Lobsters................ Boston, Mass. Delaware Smash.............. Wilmington, Del. Houston Wranglers ........... Houston, Texas Kansas City Explorers....... Kansas City, Mo. Newport Beach Breakers.. Newport Beach, Calif. New York Buzz ................. Schenectady, N.Y. New York Sportimes ......... Mamaroneck, N.Y. Philadelphia Freedoms ..... Radnor, Pa. Sacramento Capitals.........Roseville, Calif. St. Louis Aces................... St. Louis, Mo. Springfield Lasers............. Springfield, Mo. Defending Champions: The Philadelphia Freedoms outlasted the Newport Beach Breakers 21-14 to win the King Trophy at the 2006 WTT Finals in Newport Beach, Calif. Format: Each team is comprised of two men, two women and a coach. Team matches consist of five events, with one set each of men's singles, women's singles, men's doubles, women's doubles and mixed doubles. The first team to reach five games wins each set. A nine-point tiebreaker is played if a set reaches four all. One point is awarded for each game won. If necessary, Overtime and a Supertiebreaker are played to determine the outright winner of the match. Live scoring: Live scoring from all WTT matches featured on WTT.com. Sponsors: Advanta is the presenting sponsor of the WTT Pro League and the official business credit card of WTT. Official sponsors of the WTT Pro League also include Bälle de Mätch, FirmGreen, Gatorade, Geico and Wilson Racquet Sports.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Limb Kinematics During the Topspin Double-Handed Backhand Stroke in Tennis
    38th International Society of Biomechanics in Sport Conference, Physical conference cancelled, Online Activities: July 20-24, 2020 UPPER LIMB KINEMATICS DURING THE TOPSPIN DOUBLE-HANDED BACKHAND STROKE IN TENNIS Nicholas A. Busuttil1, Machar Reid2, Molly Connolly2,3, Ben J. Dascombe4 & Kane J. Middleton1 Sport and Exercise Science, School of Allied Health, Human Services, and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia1 Game Insight Group, Tennis Australia, Melbourne, Australia2 Institute for Health and Sport, Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia3 Applied Sport Science and Exercise Testing Laboratory, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Newcastle, Ourimbah, Australia4 The purpose of this study was to compare non-dominant wrist kinematics during tennis double-handed backhand strokes in players using either an eastern or continental grip position. Trajectory data for two grips (eastern & continental) and depths (deep & short) were captured for sixteen sub-elite right-handed tennis players using a 12-camera Vicon motion capture system (250 Hz). The eastern grip demonstrated significantly faster horizontal racket head velocities compared to the continental grip. However, no differences were observed in accuracy or spin rate between grips (p > 0.05). In the non-dominant upper limb for the continental condition, elbow flexion was smaller while wrist extension was larger throughout the swing. Collectively, these data suggest that the continental grip may place the wrist in a position that is more vulnerable to overuse injury. KEYWORDS: ulna, wrist, kinematics, grip, tennis. INTRODUCTION: Acute wrist pain is among the most common issues reported by elite and recreational tennis players, and it is a likely result of the wrist being the first major upper limb joint to absorb ball impact forces (Stuelcken, Mellifont, Gorman, & Sayers, 2017; Elliott, 2006).
    [Show full text]
  • How the Court Surface Is Affecting the Serve-And-Volley Tristan Barnett
    How the court surface is affecting the serve-and-volley Tristan Barnett Strategic Games www.strategicgames.com.au 1. Introduction The modern version of the game (official name of Lawn Tennis) as we recognize it today was designed and patented by Major Walter Clopton Wingfield in 1873. Two years later in 1875, the official rules of the game were drawn up by Marylebone Cricket Club, and two years later in 1877, Wimbledon began on a grass surface as the first official championships. All four grand slam events have been played on a grass surface. Wimbledon is the only grand slam event played on a grass court today and has always been played on a grass court surface. The French Open began in 1891 on a grass surface and remained on grass until 1928 when the surface was changed to clay. The US Open began in 1881 on a grass surface; until it was changed to clay from 1975-1977 and from 1978 has been played on a hard court surface. Finally, the Australian Open began in 1905 on a grass surface and remained on grass until 1988 when the surface was changed to a hard court. There has been a change in the proportion of tournaments played on different court surfaces from 1877 to 2010. Firstly, for the first 14 years of the game, all tournaments (grand slam and non grand slam) were played on grass. Secondly, for the first 101 years of the game all tournaments were played on the natural surfaces of grass and clay. Thirdly, according to the ITF, until the early 1970’s, the majority of tournaments were played on grass including three out of the four grand slams.
    [Show full text]
  • Player Perceptions and Biomechanical Responses to Tennis Court Surfaces: the Implications to Technique and Injury Risk
    PLAYER PERCEPTIONS AND BIOMECHANICAL RESPONSES TO TENNIS COURT SURFACES: THE IMPLICATIONS TO TECHNIQUE AND INJURY RISK Submitted by Chelsea Starbuck, to the University of Exeter as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Sport and Health Sciences September 2014 This thesis is available for Library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this thesis which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other University. (Signature) ……………………………………………………………………………… 1 Abstract Elite tennis players are required to perform on a variety of tennis court surfaces which differ in mechanical characteristics, such as friction and hardness, influencing their performance and risk of injury. To understand the influence of surfaces on performance and injury risk, three studies were conducted to investigate tennis players’ perceptions and biomechanical responses during tennis-specific movements on different court surfaces. In study 1, tennis players perceptions of acrylic and clay courts were identified following a thematic inductive analysis of semi-structured interviews (n = 7) to develop of a series of visual analogue scales (VAS) to quantify perceptions during studies 2 and 3. Perceptions of predictability of the surface and players’ ability to slide and change direction emerged, in addition to anticipated perceptions of grip and hardness. Study 2 aimed to examine the influence of court surfaces and prior clay court experience on perceptions and biomechanical characteristics of tennis-specific skills.
    [Show full text]
  • Simulation of a Badminton Racket a Parametric Study of Racket Design Parameters Using Finite Element Analysis
    Simulation of a Badminton Racket A parametric study of racket design parameters using Finite Element Analysis. Master's thesis in Applied Mechanics ELIAS BLOMSTRAND MIKE DEMANT Department of Applied Mechanics CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY G¨oteborg, Sweden 2017 MASTER'S THESIS IN APPLIED MECHANICS Simulation of a Badminton Racket A parametric study of racket design parameters using Finite Element Analysis. ELIAS BLOMSTRAND MIKE DEMANT Department of Applied Mechanics Division of Solid Mechanics CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY G¨oteborg, Sweden 2017 Simulation of a Badminton Racket A parametric study of racket design parameters using Finite Element Analysis. ELIAS BLOMSTRAND MIKE DEMANT © ELIAS BLOMSTRAND, MIKE DEMANT, 2017 Master's thesis 2017:52 ISSN 1652-8557 Department of Applied Mechanics Division of Solid Mechanics Chalmers University of Technology SE-412 96 G¨oteborg Sweden Telephone: +46 (0)31-772 1000 Cover: Illustration of a smash sequence for a badminton racket. Chalmers Reproservice G¨oteborg, Sweden 2017 Simulation of a Badminton Racket A parametric study of racket design parameters using Finite Element Analysis. Master's thesis in Applied Mechanics ELIAS BLOMSTRAND MIKE DEMANT Department of Applied Mechanics Division of Solid Mechanics Chalmers University of Technology Abstract Badminton, said to be the worlds fastest ball sport, is a fairly unknown sport from a scientific point of view. There has been great progress made to get from the old wooden rackets of the 19th century to the light-weight high performance composite ones used today, but the development process is based on a trial and error method rather than on scientific knowledge. The limited amount of existing studies indicate that racket parameters like shaft stiffness, center of gravity and head geometry affect the performance of the racket greatly.
    [Show full text]
  • Tennis-NZ-Roll-Of-Honour V3.Pdf
    Tennis New Zealand 2012 HonourRoll of Contents New Zealand Tennis Representatives at the Olympic Games 2 ROLL OF HONOUR New Zealand Players in the final 8 at Grand Slams 2 New Zealand Players in finals at Junior Grand Slams 3 New Zealand in Davis Cup 4 Tennis New Zealand New Zealand Davis Cup Statistics 8 honours the achievements of all New Zealand in Fed Cup 10 the players and administrators National Championships 13 listed here... New Zealand Indoor Championships 16 New Zealand Residential Championships 16 BP National Championships 17 Fernleaf Butter Classic 17 Heineken Open 17 ASB Classic 18 National Teams Event for the Wilding Shield and Nunneley Casket 19 New Zealand Junior Championships 18u 20 National Junior Championships 16u 23 National Junior Championships 14u 24 National Junior Championships 12u 26 National Junior Championships 15u 27 National Junior Championships 13u 27 New Zealand Masters Championships 27 National Senior Championships 28 National Primary/Intermediate Schools Championships 38 Secondary Schools Tennis Championships 39 National Teams Event 16u 40 National Teams Event 14u 40 National Teams Event 12u 41 National teams Event 18u 41 Past Presidents and Board Chairs 42 Life Members 42 Roll of Honour 1 New Zealand Tennis Representatives at the Olympic Games YEAR GAMES NAME EVENT MEDAL 1912 Games of the V A F Wilding Men’s Singles Bronze Olympiad, Stockholm (Australasian Team) (Covered Courts) 1988 Games of the XXIV B J Cordwell Women’s Singles Olympiad, Seoul B P Derlin Men’s Doubles (K Evernden & B Derlin) K G Evernden
    [Show full text]
  • Tennis Study Guide
    TENNIS STUDY GUIDE HISTORY Mary Outerbridge is credited with bringing tennis to America in the mid-1870’s by introducing it to the Staten Island Cricket and Baseball Club. In 1880 the United States Lawn Tennis Association (USLTA) was established, Lawn was dropped from the name in the 1970’s and now go by (USTA). Tennis began as a lawn sport, but later clay, asphalt and concrete became more standard surfaces. The four most prestigious World tennis tournaments include: the U.S. Open, Australian Open, French Open, and Wimbledon . In 1988, tennis became an official medal sport. Tennis can be played year round, is low in cost, and needs only two or four players; it is also suitable for all age groups as well as both sexes. EQUIPMENT The only equipment needed to play tennis consists of a racket, a can of balls, court shoes and clothing that permits easy movement. The most important tip for beginners to remember is to find a racket with the right grip. The net hangs 42 inches high at each post and 36 inches high at the center. RULES The game starts when one person serves from anywhere behind the baseline to the right of the center mark and to the left of the doubles sideline. The server has two chances to serve legally into the diagonal service court. Failure to serve into the court or making a serving fault results in a point for the opponents. The same server continues to alternate serving courts until the game is finished, and then the opponent serves.
    [Show full text]
  • * Materials Not Availablefrom Other
    DOCUMENT RESUI.ME ED 127.308 SP 010 345 AUTHOR Van.Oteghen, Sharon L., Ed.; And Others TITLE Tennis-Badminton-Squash, June 1976-June 1978.NAGWS Guide. INSTITUTION American Alliance for Health, PhysicalEducation,-and Recreation, Washington, D.C. NationalAssociation for Of 0 Girls and ,Women in Sport. PUB DATE 76 NOTE 232p. - AVAILABLE FROM American Alliance for Health, PhysicalEducation, and ,Recreation, Promotion Unit, 1201 16thSt N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036 (No pricequoted) EDRS PRICE 11F-$0.83 Plus Postage. HC Not Availablefrom EDRS. DESCRIPTORS Athletics; Guidelines; *Guides; *Tennis;*Womens Athletics IDENTIFIERS Badminton; *Squash , ABSTRACT The National. Association for Girlsand Women in Sport- (NAGWS) publishes ten biennial andtwo annual guides for 22 sports. Guides contain informationon NAGWS or NAGWS-approved playing rules,. officials' ratings in most sports,articles on coaching techniques and organizaticn, regulations governingAIAW National Championships in applicable sports, bibliographies,and special featureA: A section -of each guide presents informationabout NAGWS and the services it offers teachers, coaches, administrators,and players. This NAGWS guide for tennis, badminton, andsquash is one of the biennial publications and follows the organizationdescribed above. It contains articles on the variousaspects of, tennis, nine articleson aspects of badminton, and. four articlesabout squash. Special features include study questions forthe Ratings Examinations and officiating techniques in tennisand badminton. (DMT) *********************************************************************** Documents acquired by,ERIC includemany informal unpublished - *materials not availablefrom othersources. ERIC makes every effort* *to obtain the best 'copy available. Nevertheless, items of.margimal * * reproduCibility are often encountered andthis affects the, quality * * of the microfiche and hardcopyreproductions ERIC makes available * * via the ERIC Document ReproductionService (EDRS). EDRS is not * * responsible for the quality of the originaldocument.
    [Show full text]
  • Laykold® Gel Product Brochure
    APT PROUDLYINTRODUCES GEL The revolutionary new cushion court system Asphalt/Concrete Primer .1 Laykold Gel .2 Wearcoat .3 Bond Coat .4 Laykold Filler .5 Laykold Topcoat .6 Line Primer and White Line Paint .7 6 7 5 4 3 2 1 SPORTS AND LEISURE SYNTHETIC SURFACE SPECIALISTS www.aptasiapacific.com.au • 1800 652 548 James Sheahan College, Orange, NSW GEL Laykold® Gel is a revolutionary, technologically advanced, seamless cushioned court system manufactured utilising 60%+ renewable resources. The all-weather court surface offers East Fremantle Lawn Tennis Club, WA a wide variety of benefits to all ages and ability. From recreational to professional athlete, Laykold Gel provides up to 17% force reduction enhancing player performance by reducing joint impact and body fatigue. The chemistry is complex but the result is simple. The evolution of sports equipment over the last The fact is most of the world’s most prominent 30 years has been remarkable. Tennis racquets tennis tournaments are STILL being played on surface have become lighter, with far less vibration systems that were developed during the tennis boom of the 1970’s, which lack the advancement of transfer to the forearm and elbow. Even tennis today’s modern technology. Fortunately, Advanced racquet string holes have been adjusted for Polymer Technology (APT) has been working hard to increased racquet speed and power. Athletic bring modern chemistry and innovation to the tennis apparel is utilising lighter weight, moisture surface. wicking fabrics, some of which even provide UV protection. Modern materials are being used to APT is using its chemical expertise to develop modern construct balls with more consistent bounce and tennis surfaces and is helping the game of tennis catch improved aerodynamics.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes for Meeting July 25, 2017
    Watertown Town Council Administration Building 149 Main Street Watertown, MA 02472 Phone: 617-972-6470 ELECTED OFFICIALS: Mark S. Sideris, Ad Hoc Committee On Victory Field, Phase 2 Council President Approved Minutes for Meeting July 25, 2017 Vincent J. Piccirilli, Jr., Vice President To: John Flynn, Town Clerk From: Vincent J. Piccirilli, Jr., Chair Michael F. Dattoli, Cc: Members of the Ad Hoc Committee On Victory Field, Phase 2 Councilor At Large Town Council Aaron P. Dushku, School Committee Councilor At Large Michael J. Driscoll, Town Manager Susan G. Falkoff, Dr. Deanne Galdston, School Superintendent Councilor At Large Anthony Palomba, Councilor At Large Following are the minutes (with attachments) of the fourth meeting of the Ad Hoc Committee On Victory Field, Phase 2 held on July 25, 2017 that Angeline B. Kounelis, were approved as amended at the meeting on August 7, 2017. District A Councilor Lisa J. Feltner, District B Councilor Kenneth M. Woodland, District D Councilor Victory Field Phase 2 ad hoc Committee – Meeting Minutes July 25, 2017 AD HOC COMMITTEE ON VICTORY FIELD PHASE 2 PHILIP PANE LOWER CONFERENCE ROOM, GROUND FLOOR ADMINISTRATION BUILDING TUESDAY, JULY 25, 2017, 7:00 PM MINUTES APPROVED AS AMENDED AUGUST 7, 2017 1. Call to Order The Chair, District C Councilor Vincent J. Piccirilli, Jr., called to order the fourth meeting of the Ad Hoc Committee on Victory Field, Phase 2, at 7:00 pm in the Lower Conference Room, Ground Floor, Administration Building. Committee members present: Councilors Anthony Palomba (Vice-Chair) and Vincent Piccirilli; Neighborhood/Key Stakeholder Representatives Elliot Friedman, Anne Korte, Elodia Thomas, Mark Leonard; and Michael Lahiff, Athletic Director; Steven Magoon, Director of Community Development and Planning; and Peter Centola, Recreation Director.
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary of Tennis Terms
    Glossary of Tennis Terms • A o Ace: a service point won by the server because the receiver doesn’t return, or even touch, the ball. Advantage (or ad) court: left-hand side of the court. o Advantage (or Ad): the point played after deuce, which if won, ends the game. o Advantage set: a set that can only be won when one opponent has won six games and is two games clear of their opponent. o All: term used when both players have the same number of points from 15-15 (15-all) to 30- 30 (30-all). When the score is 40-40 the term is deuce. o All-court player: someone who is equally comfortable playing from the baseline, mid-court and net. o Alley: (see tramlines.) o Approach shot: a shot used by a player to pin their opponent behind the baseline so that they can run to the net for a volley. • B o Back court: area behind the court between the baseline and the back fence. o Backhand: shot struck by holding the racquet in the dominant hand but swinging the racquet from the non-dominant side of the body with the back of the dominant hand pointing in the direction the ball is being hit. (See also two-handed backhand.) o Backspin: spin imparted on the underside of the ball causing it to revolve backwards while travelling forwards. Used in slice and drop shots. o Backswing: component of the swing where the racquet is taken back behind the body in preparation for the forward motion that leads to contact with the ball.
    [Show full text]
  • Settling Disputes
    SETTLING DISPUTES Disagreements between players on line calling and scoring are common within competitive tennis. When disputes occur within official competitions it’s important that they are handled in a fair, consistent and efficient manner. The following steps detail how to settle disputes. LINE CALLS This involves a player making a subjective decision which ultimately could have a big effect on the outcome of the match. This a hot issue particularly for Juniors who for many reasons, often do not accurately see the ball in relation to lines. Witnessed Line Calls If an referee or court supervisor witnesses a blatantly incorrect call, they can go on-court and tell the player that the incorrect call, was an unintentional hindrance to his/her opponent and the point will be replayed, unless it was a point-ending shot and therefore the point will be awarded to the opponent. In the case of matches played on a clay court, the point is awarded to the opponent regardless of whether it is a point-ending shot or not. Unwitnessed Line Call Dispute (non-clay courts): • Ask the player whose call it was, if they are sure of their call. o If yes, the call stands. o If no, then the point should be replayed. • If you think it would be beneficial to have the match supervised (and this is possible), have the Supervisor stay on the court for the remainder of the match. Advise players that he/she will correct any clearly incorrect calls. • If it is not possible to allocate an adult to supervise the match, you should watch the next few points from off the court and then keep a discreet but watchful eye on the rest of the match.
    [Show full text]