Niangua River WATERSHED INVENTORY and ASSESSMENT This Information Is Based on the Niangua River Watershed Inventory and Assessment Prepared by Robert G

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Niangua River WATERSHED INVENTORY and ASSESSMENT This Information Is Based on the Niangua River Watershed Inventory and Assessment Prepared by Robert G Niangua River WATERSHED INVENTORY AND ASSESSMENT This information is based on the Niangua River Watershed Inventory and Assessment prepared by Robert G. Schulz Fisheries Biologist Missouri Department of Conservation Camdenton, Missouri For additional information contact Ron Dent West Central Regional Fisheries supervisor 2010 South Second St. Clinton, MO 64735 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This Inventory and assessment has been a team effort extending back to 1989. Numerous Fisheries Management personnel have made significant contributions including: Ron Dent, Kevin Richards, Chris Vitello, Craig Fuller, Phil Rockers, Joe Burns, Brian Miller, Jennie Wright, Tony Botello, Ben Henderson, Carl Wakefield, and Mike Bayless. Personnel from other current MDC divisions, including Forestry, Wildlife, Protection, Natural History and Design and Development have also provided invaluable assistance in this effort. The Missouri Department of Natural Resources, Missouri Agency, and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service also made many databases available and provided special assistance. INTRODUCTION Water is the ultimate integrator. Water quality and biodiversity in aquatic ecosystems are reflections of the environmental quality of the watershed, the subsurface geohydrology, and the atmosphere. Land use and land cover in the watershed, and terrestrial and airborne pollution problems all impact water quality. Water is a universal solvent. It carries dissolved gases, nutrients, and minerals, and at least trace amounts of almost every substance it comes in contact with, from the air to the ground, and into streams and groundwater aquifers. Although the primary focus of this inventory and assessment is aquatic habitats and communities, we have attempted to view the Niangua Watershed as an ecosystem. The land, air, and water are inter-connected and must be managed with mutual consideration. The creation of this document was considered a secondary objective of our planning effort for the Niangua Watershed. Our primary objective was to thoroughly inventory and organize information about the watershed for day-to-day use and for future planning. DATA INVENTORY AND MANAGEMENT The inventory for this document included compilation of a large amount of data and creation of twenty-four databases (Table 1). These databases have been incorporated in a Geographical Information System (GIS) featuring ArcView ® software. Databases were structured to be as compatible as possible with available source databases, yet satisfy our needs. Data was obtained from numerous sources in various formats including hard copies of reports and computer printouts, database files and ASCII text files, and from personal communication. In order to easily determine whether sites described by legal description are located within the watershed, a diagram showing the sections within the watershed was created (Appendix A). Unique, four-character labels were assigned to each site including a letter code (A-Z) that is unique for each feature (e.g. A = animal waste point source). These labels are used to locate sites on maps, and can be used to relate records in multiple databases. Site labels were frequently included in the records extracted from these databases to create tables. In order to obtain UTM coordinates and produce maps, sites were plotted on 7.5 minute topographic maps and marked with the site labels. Then Missouri Department of Conservation’s (MDC) Design and Development Division digitized these sites with AutoCad ® software to produce layers for each feature. These layers were combined with layers including streams, roads, county boundaries, and other layers as necessary. MDC’s Design and Development Division provided the Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) coordinates for each site and they were added to the watershed database files. These were used to create XY. event tables in ArcView ®, to produce coverages for each feature, and to create most of the maps in this document. Many of the databases must be updated periodically to add new information (e.g. Section 404, permits and fish collections). This process will hopefully be facilitated by increased coordination between agencies to maintain databases in compatible formats and to improve accessibility. The MDC Fisheries Biometrics and two multi-agency groups, the Missouri Resource Assessment Project (MoRAP) and the Missouri Spatial Data Information System (MSDIS) are addressing this problem. LOCATION The Niangua River (NR) is a sixth order tributary of the Osage River in west central Missouri. It originates in northern Webster County, at the confluence of its East and West Forks, about 7 miles north of Marshfield. In this document, the mouths of the Niangua and Little Niangua rivers are considered to be where they originally joined the Osage River before the Lake of the Ozarks was created. The mouths of all inundated tributaries to the Niangua and Little Niangua rivers are considered to be at the pre-inundated locations. The river meanders 120 miles to the north where it joins the Osage River (Osage Arm, Lake of the Ozarks, Figure 1). The largest tributary of the NR is the Little Niangua River (LNR), a fifth order stream which drains about one third of the entire watershed. The LNR originates in central Dallas County, near the town of Pumpkin Center. It meanders to the north and east 59 miles before joining the NR near stream mile 6 (SM 6). The lower 21 miles of the NR and lower 10 miles of the LNR were inundated in 1931 by Lake of the Ozarks (LOZ). The Niangua Watershed includes portions of six counties. Since only 500 acres of Benton County is within the watershed and includes negligible population and development, it is not included on many of the enclosed tables. The most detailed maps (Appendix B) divide the watershed into three subwatersheds as described below. The relative position of the three subwatersheds are shown in Figure 2. Figure 1. Base map of the Niangua River Watershed with stream names and springs. Figure 2. Lower Niangua, Upper Niangua, and Little Niangua River sub-watersheds. GEOMORPHOLOGY Physiographic Region/Geology/Soil Type The Niangua Watershed lies in the Salem Plateau subdivision of the Ozark Plateau physiographic region. The watershed is underlain with several hundred feet of Ordovician and Cambrian rock, largely dolomite (Harvey et al., 1983). The edges of the watershed lie in Jefferson City-Cotter dolomite, while streams cut into progressively older Roubidoux, Gasconade, and Eminence formations (MDNR, 1984). There is considerable subsurface movement of water in the watershed through solution dissolved channels in the fractured and jointed dolomite. As a result, karst features such as caves, sinkholes, losing streams, and springs are abundant. Streams which incise into the middle or lower Gasconade have well sustained base flows even during dry periods, due to ample groundwater supplies (MDNR, 1984). Streams which incise into the Roubidoux formation are frequently losing streams and sinkholes are common (Harvey et al., 1983). Soils in the watershed are classified as residual, alluvial, colluvial, and loess (Harvey et al., 1983). Residual soils consist primarily of material weathered from cherty dolomite, dolomite, and sandstone, and occur on the surface of steep slopes. When they develop in uplands from Roubidoux formations, and Jefferson City - Cotter dolomites, an impervious fragipan usually occurs 18 to 24 inches below the surface. Colluvial soils, which are soils deposited on lower valley slopes by erosion from more elevated sites, are limited in abundance. Alluvial soils are those transported by streams and deposited on level or gently sloping areas in flood plains. They range in size from silt to gravel. Loess soils are silty, windblown material which commonly occur on ridgetops. Watershed Area The watershed area of the entire watershed is 1,040 square miles. The LNR watershed is 320 square miles, which is approximately one-third of the drainage of the entire watershed. Watershed areas for all fourth order and larger streams and some third order streams are shown in Table 2. The watersheds of fourth order streams are delineated in Figure 3. Approximately 500 acres of the Niangua Watershed is within Benton County, 164,000 within Camden County, 279,000 within Dallas County, 49,000 within Hickory County, 96,000 within Laclede County, and 69,000 within Webster County. Stream Order Stream order was determined from 7.5 minute topographic maps for all streams in the watershed. The NR has two fifth order and 14 fourth order tributaries. The LNR has one fifth order and six fourth order tributaries. Table 2 lists all third order and larger streams in the Niangua Watershed. Table 3 lists the total mileage of third order and larger streams, and the portions inundated by LOZ and Lake Niangua. Channel Gradient Stream gradients were determined for all third order and greater streams from the 7.5 minute topographic maps shown in Figure 4 and a table of elevations and average gradients is presented in Appendix C. Gradient plots were also created, but they are not included in this document. The average gradient of the Lower Niangua River is 3.9 feet per mile, the Upper Niangua River is 5.4 feet per mile, and the Little Niangua River is 9.4 feet per mile. Figure 3. Watersheds of fourth order streams within the Niangua River Watershed. Figure 4. 7.5 topographic maps that include the Niangua Watershed. Table 2. Stream code, name, order, length, watershed area, and location for third order and larger streams within the
Recommended publications
  • LUE RD the Voice of ASM Since 1934 June2009 Volume 76, Ho
    LUE RD The voice of ASM since 1934 June2009 Volume 76, Ho . 2 The Audubon Society of Missouri Missouri's Ornithological Society Since 1901 THE AUDUBON SOCIETY OF MISSOURI Officers Regional Directors Jim Zellmer*+, President (2010) Lisa Berger+ (2011) 2001 NE 4th St., Blue Springs, MO Springfield (417) 881-8393 64014, (816) 228-3955 JoAnn Eldridge+ (2011) [email protected] Kearny (816) 628-4840 Bruce Beck*+, Vice-President (2010) Larry Lade+ (2009) 230 CR 466; Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 St. Joseph (816) 232-6125 (573) 785-3871 [email protected] Terry McNeely+ (2010) Jameson, MO (660) 828-4215 Pat Lueders*+, Treasurer (2010) 4 79 Sherwood Drive June Newman+ (2009) St. Louis, MO 63119; (314) 779-1372 Carrollton (660) 542-0873 plleuders4 [email protected] Bill Reeves+ (2010) Laura Gilchrist*+, Secretary (2010) Farmington 7606 NW 73rd Ct Ruth Simmons+ (2011) Kansas City MO 64152-2385 Kansas City (816) 746-8973 lagi. [email protected] Mike Thelen+ (2009) University City, (314) 862-6642 Honorary Directors Clare Wheeler+ (2010) Richard A. Anderson, St. Louis** Lake Ozark & Canton (573) 365-2951 Nathan Fay, Ozark** Leo Galloway, St. Joseph Chairs Jim Jackson, Marthasville Josh Uffman, Rare Bird Alert Lisle Jeffrey, Columbia** Ferguson, MO Floyd Lawhon, St. Joseph** (314).387 .8037 Patrick Mahnkey, Forsyth** [email protected] Rebecca Matthews, Springfield Sydney Wade, Jefferson City** Bill Clark, Historian Dave Witten, Columbia** 3906 Grace Ellen Dr. John Wylie, Jefferson City** Columbia, MO 65202 (573) 474-4510 Dr. David Easterla, 2006 Recipient June Newman, Membership of the Rudolph Bennitt Award Carrollton, MO 64633 Paul E. Bauer, 2004 Recipient ofthe (660)542-0873 Rudolph Bennitt Award + Board Position * Executive Committee Member **Deceased Page i THE BLUEBIRD THE BLUEBIRD The Bluebird Editor: Bill Eddleman*+, 1831 Ricardo Drive, Cape Girardeau, MO 63701, (573) 335-1507, eddlemanw@s be global.
    [Show full text]
  • Big Niangua River Trail Starts at Ha Ha Tonka Big Niangua State Park
    The Big Niangua River Trail starts at Ha Ha Tonka Big Niangua State Park. The first four miles are lake and require paddling. The kayak steps and launch rail provide a safe and For a river float try an upriver access. convenient way to access the Big Niangua River Trail and the Lake while protecting the shoreline from erosion. At Ÿ Distances River Trail the upper end of the cove Missouri’s 12th largest spring § Whistle Bridge to Ha Ha Tonka 13.3 miles flows into the lake. Ha Ha Tonka Spring has an average § Mother Nature’s Family Side to Ha Ha Tonka 11.7 output of 48 million gallons of water a day. On the south The Indigenous Osage People named this miles side of the cove, all that remains of a grist mill is the stone raceway and an old mill stone. Take State Highway D to river the Niangua § Mother Nature’s Wild Side to Ha Ha Tonka 9.5 Tonka Spring Road; turn left from the spring parking lot at which translates to miles the Lakeside Picnic Shelter to reach the kayak steps. Big Winding Stream of Many Springs. § Casa de Loco to Ha Ha Tonka 6.2 miles Ÿ The Lake of the Ozarks and Niangua River are public waterways available for fishing and boating. However, the Spencer Creek and Bank Branch join with the Niangua River shoreline and stream bank above the high waterline is in this area. These two spring-fed creeks can be navigated privately owned. Trespass laws do apply. Be considerate a short distance.
    [Show full text]
  • East Osage River Watershed Inventory and Assessment
    EAST OSAGE RIVER WATERSHED INVENTORY AND ASSESSMENT Prepared by Alex L. S. Schubert Missouri Department of Conservation West Central Region-Fisheries Division Clinton, MO November 30, 2001 Acknowledgments Thank you's are in order to numerous individuals who provided assistance on this document. Thanks to Mike Bayless and Tom Groshens for information gathering and the compilation of numerous tables, and to Ron Dent for his guidance on, and editing of early drafts of this document. Mike was also a tremendous help in getting me started and making final changes to this document. Thanks to Bill Turner for the guidance he provided throughout this process. Thanks to Mark Caldwell for assistance with ArcView GIS software, his assistance in the field, and his dedication to providing the best data and information possible in GIS format. Thanks to Del Lobb for extensive help throughout the draft process. Thanks also to Missouri Department of Conservation, Missouri Department of Natural Resources, Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and U.S. Geological Survey personnel and to other contributors too numerous to mention. Executive Summary The East Osage River Basin is found in central Missouri in the Missouri counties of Osage, Maries, Cole, Pulaski, Miller, Camden, Morgan, Benton, and Hickory and encompasses 2,474.52 mi2. This basin has been divided into two 8-digit hydrologic units (HUCs) and fourteen 11-digit HUCs. Lake of the Ozarks was formed in 1931 in the western half of the East Osage River Basin. Geomorphology This basin lies within a dissected plateau known as the Salem Plateau and is represented by four of Missouri’s natural divisions.
    [Show full text]
  • Caves of Missouri
    CAVES OF MISSOURI J HARLEN BRETZ Vol. XXXIX, Second Series E P LU M R I U BU N S U 1956 STATE OF MISSOURI Department of Business and Administration Division of GEOLOGICAL SURVEY AND WATER RESOURCES T. R. B, State Geologist Rolla, Missouri vii CONTENT Page Abstract 1 Introduction 1 Acknowledgments 5 Origin of Missouri's caves 6 Cave patterns 13 Solutional features 14 Phreatic solutional features 15 Vadose solutional features 17 Topographic relations of caves 23 Cave "formations" 28 Deposits made in air 30 Deposits made at air-water contact 34 Deposits made under water 36 Rate of growth of cave formations 37 Missouri caves with provision for visitors 39 Alley Spring and Cave 40 Big Spring and Cave 41 Bluff Dwellers' Cave 44 Bridal Cave 49 Cameron Cave 55 Cathedral Cave 62 Cave Spring Onyx Caverns 72 Cherokee Cave 74 Crystal Cave 81 Crystal Caverns 89 Doling City Park Cave 94 Fairy Cave 96 Fantastic Caverns 104 Fisher Cave 111 Hahatonka, caves in the vicinity of 123 River Cave 124 Counterfeiters' Cave 128 Robbers' Cave 128 Island Cave 130 Honey Branch Cave 133 Inca Cave 135 Jacob's Cave 139 Keener Cave 147 Mark Twain Cave 151 Marvel Cave 157 Meramec Caverns 166 Mount Shira Cave 185 Mushroom Cave 189 Old Spanish Cave 191 Onondaga Cave 197 Ozark Caverns 212 Ozark Wonder Cave 217 Pike's Peak Cave 222 Roaring River Spring and Cave 229 Round Spring Cavern 232 Sequiota Spring and Cave 248 viii Table of Contents Smittle Cave 250 Stark Caverns 256 Truitt's Cave 261 Wonder Cave 270 Undeveloped and wild caves of Missouri 275 Barry County 275 Ash Cave
    [Show full text]
  • Big Niangua River Trail Starts at Ha Ha Tonka State Park
    The Big Niangua River Trail starts at Ha Ha Tonka State Park. The first four miles are lake and require paddling. Big Niangua The kayak steps and launch rail provide a safe and conve- For a river float try an upriver access. nient way to access the Big Niangua River Trail and the lake Ÿ Distances while protecting the shoreline from erosion. At the upper River Trail end of the cove, Missouri’s 12th largest spring flows into § Whistle Bridge to Ha Ha Tonka 13.3 miles the lake. Ha Ha Tonka Spring has an average output of 48 § Mother Nature’s Family Side to Ha Ha Tonka 11.7 million gallons of water a day. On the south side of the miles The Indigenous Osage People named this cove, all that remains of a grist mill is the stone raceway § Mother Nature’s Wild Side to Ha Ha Tonka 9.5 and an old mill stone. Take State Highway D to Tonka river the Niangua miles Spring Road; turn left from the spring parking lot at the which translates to Lakeside Picnic Shelter to reach the kayak steps. § Mozark Club to Ha Ha Tonka 6.2 miles Big Winding Stream of Many Springs. Ÿ The Lake of the Ozarks and Niangua River are public waterways available for fishing and boating. However, the Spencer Creek and Bank Branch join with the Niangua River shoreline and stream bank above the high waterline is in this area. These two spring-fed creeks can be navigated privately owned. Trespass laws do apply. Be considerate a short distance.
    [Show full text]
  • Of the Niangua River Basin, Missouri
    Freshwater Mollusk Biology and Conservation 21:19–27, 2018 Ó Freshwater Mollusk Conservation Society 2018 REGULAR ARTICLE A SURVEY OF THE FRESHWATER MUSSELS (MOLLUSCA: BIVALVIA: UNIONIDA) OF THE NIANGUA RIVER BASIN, MISSOURI Stephen E. McMurray*, Joshua T. Hundley1, and J. Scott Faiman Missouri Department of Conservation, Central Regional Office and Conservation Research Center, Columbia, MO 65201 USA ABSTRACT During 2007 and 2008, we surveyed freshwater mussels with timed searches at 35 sites in the Niangua River basin, an Osage River tributary in west-central Missouri. Our objective was to determine the distribution, species richness, and abundance of freshwater mussels in the basin. We observed a total of 714 live individuals from 20 species, including the Missouri endemic and species of conservation concern Lampsilis brittsi. The mean catch per unit effort (live mussels/person-hour) was 12 with values ranging from 0 to 144. Eurynia dilatata was the most abundant species (387 individuals observed, relative abundance ¼ 54.2%), but all other species were present at much lower numbers. Eurynia dilatata and Venustaconcha ellipsiformis were the most commonly encountered species, both occurring at 24 sites. Our observation of 20 species is lower than historical richness in the basin (32 species), and nearly all species were formerly more widely distributed in the basin based on the occurrence of weathered and subfossil shells. Together with low catch per unit effort at most sites, these data suggest a sharp decline in mussel populations throughout the basin over the last few decades. This decline is cause for concern, but the causes are unknown. KEY WORDS: freshwater mussel, Unionida, survey, Missouri INTRODUCTION endangered species (Epioblasma triquetra), are reported The freshwater mussel fauna of Missouri is diverse but historically from the Niangua River basin (Table 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Rivers: Revised November 2008; Caves: Revised July 2007; Trails: Revised March 2010; High Adventure: Revised September 2007
    Everything you need to know about more than 90 of the best camps in the region Including more than 60 High Adventure opportunities Images courtesy of: http://signal.baldwincity.com/news/2011/oct/20/local-boy-scouts-troop-remained-busy-during-summer/ http://i4.ytimg.com/vi/obn8RVY_szM/mgdefault.jpg http://www/sccovington.com/philmont/trek_info/equipment/tents.htm This is a publication of Tamegonit Lodge, the Order of the Arrow lodge affiliated with the Heart of America Council, BSA. Updated: December 2012 Additional copies of this publication are available through the Program Services Department at the Heart of America Council Scout Service Center 10210 Holmes Road Kansas City, Missouri 64131 Phone: (816) 942-9333 Toll Free: (800) 776-1110 Fax: (816) 942-8086 Online: www.hoac-bsa.org Camps: Revised December 2012; Rivers: Revised November 2008; Caves: Revised July 2007; Trails: Revised March 2010; High Adventure: Revised September 2007 HOAC – Order of the Arrow – ON THE LOOSE RIVERS – Page 1 Welcome to the adventures which the scenic rivers in southern Missouri offer. In the next pages many rivers are described, both in general and by specific sections. You will also find within this section a compilation of many public outfitters, which regularly provide all necessary equipment for a canoe trip. The river sections that are profiled are probably not the exact sections of river that you will float if you rent your canoes and equipment form an outfitter. Each outfitter has “normal” floats that you may choose from, and few, if any, of these floats will match with the sections profiled in On The Loose, or with the sections any other outfitter would float! After spending some time with the River Section of On The Loose, I feel that you will agree there are many more rivers, which can be floated than the ones commonly mentioned (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Stream Stewardship Trust Fund
    Stream Stewardship Trust Fund Old and New Programs Annual Report January 1 through December 31, 2017 Dedicated to Improving Missouri Stream Conservation TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................... 3 Missouri Conservation Heritage Foundation’s Stream Stewardship Trust Fund ............................. 4 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers District Map ................................................................................... 5 MDC Unit Map ............................................................................................................................... 6 MDC Regions Map .......................................................................................................................... 7 SSTF Service Area Map ................................................................................................................... 8 2017 Old Program Accomplishments .............................................................................................. 9 Fees Collected and Impacted Resources ......................................................................................... Table 1. Overview of old program fee collection and allocation timeline ...................................... 2017 New Program Accomplishments .......................................................................................... 10 SSTF Program Receipts .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Scale Resource Selection Of
    MULTI-SCALE RESOURCE SELECTION OF NIANGUA DARTERS IN THE OSAGE RIVER BASIN, MISSOURI _______________________________________ A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Graduate School University of Missouri-Columbia _______________________________________________________ In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science _____________________________________________________ by JACOB D. A. FAULKNER Dr. Craig P. Paukert, Thesis Supervisor MAY 2015 The undersigned, appointed by the dean of the Graduate School, have examined the thesis entitled Multi-scale resource selection of Niangua darters in the Osage River basin, Missouri Presented by Jacob D. A. Faulkner, a candidate for the degree of Master of Science, and hereby certify that, in their opinion, it is worthy of acceptance. ______________________________________ Dr. Craig P. Paukert ______________________________________ Dr. Joshua J. Millspaugh ______________________________________ Dr. Michael A. Urban ______________________________________ Dr. Douglas C. Novinger ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First and foremost I would like to thank my advisor Dr. Craig P. Paukert for this opportunity as well as his guidance and patience throughout this project. I would like to thank my committee members: Drs. Douglas C. Novinger, Joshua J. Millspaugh, and Michael A. Urban for their insight that undoubtedly improved the resulting product. I would like to thank my field technicians Travis Schepker and Scott Childers for their unwavering effort throughout field data collection. I would like to thank the graduate students and faculty within the Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, specifically: Jonathan Spurgeon, Landon Pierce, and Emily Pherigo for occasional field assistance and intellectual input that helped to improve this research. I would like to thank Thomas Bonnot for statistical guidance and advice. I would like to thank Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Fiery Fork Conservation Area Management Plan  Page 3
    2014 Fiery Fork Conservation Area Management Plan Page 3 OVERVIEW • Official Area Name: Fiery Fork Conservation Area, # 8103 • Year of Initial Acquisition: 1981 • Acreage: 1609 acres • County: Camden • Division with Administrative Responsibility: Forestry • Division with Maintenance Responsibility: Forestry • Statement of Purpose: Fiery Fork Conservation Area was purchased in 1981 as a multiuse area for the public to experience nature and unique natural features, observe forest management, and have access to public fishing and hunting opportunities. Fiery Fork CA will emphasize sustainable management of Missouri’s forest, fish, and wildlife resources and provide opportunity for all citizens to use, enjoy and learn about these resources. Fiery Fork’s forest will be actively managed utilizing appropriate silvicultural techniques. Natural communities such as glades, woodlands, springs and fens will be managed to preserve biodiversity and create wildlife habitat. Furthermore aquatic and visual resources will not be compromised. Finally the enjoyment and use of the area by the public will remain a high priority. Fiery Fork Conservation Area will serve as a benchmark example of how a publicly owned forest can be highly productive for timber production, wildlife and the surrounding community. A. Strategic Direction 1) Restore natural communities, namely woodlands, glades, savannas and fens. 2) Manage the forest and natural community resource, utilizing sustainable forest management practices and Best Management Practices (BMP’s) to prevent erosion. 3) Correct fish and sediment passage issues on area streams to promote recovery efforts for the federally threatened Niangua Darter. 4) Maintain adequate public access for fishing, hunting, wildlife viewing and general recreation. B. Desired Future Condition The desired future condition of Fiery Fork Conservation Area (CA) is a diverse woodland/forest landscape with glades, springs and fens.
    [Show full text]
  • The State of Missouri's Streams
    The State of Missouri’s Streams Summary of Chemistry Data, 1993-2010 Featuring over 75,000 volunteer-collected measurements Acknowledgements The Missouri Stream Team Watershed Coalition would like to thank Dan Obrecht and Tony Thor pe, University of Missouri Se- nior Research Asso ciates, for compilation and interpretation of the Stream Team volunteer water quality data and creation of this report. Their expertise in working with volunteer data was instru- mental in creating a publication that truly showcases volunteer ef- forts while de scribing water quality across the state. We would also like to thank the staff of the Missouri Stream Team Program at Mis- souri Department of Con servation and Missouri Department of Natural Resources for their guidance and assistance in this process. Appreciation is also given to Stream Team volunteers who have dedicated their time to monitoring our state’s streams and playing an ac tive role in protecting our state’s water resources. This project was funded through a grant from the Missouri Department of Conservation. Current River Table of Contents Stream Team Chemistry Data 2 Monitoring Water Chemistry 3 Regional Water Quality 6 Dissolved Oxygen (DO) 7 Temperature 8 Chloride 9 Nitrate 10 Ammonia 11 Phosphate 12 Turbidity 13 pH 14 Conductivity 15 Site Assessments 16 Missouri Stream Team Associations 17 Stream Team #327 1 Stream Team Chemistry Data Missouri Stream Team has trained over Rather than producing a report featuring a small 5,700 water quality volunteers since 1993. percentage of sites in the program, all of the available data were used and regional comparisons were made This report features dissolved oxygen, temperature, for each of the water quality parameters.
    [Show full text]
  • Missouri Regional Condition 2 Seasonal Restrictions for Activities
    Missouri Regional Condition #2 to Nationwide Permits Seasonal Restrictions for Activities Proposed in Fish Spawning Areas Listing Criteria Noted at Bottom of Table Listing Length ID Stream Name Downstream Boundary (From) Upstream Boundary (To) Closure Period County Criteria (Miles) the tributary (Unnamed Creek ⑦) confluence the upstream MDC boundary (Taberville 1 Baker Branch 15 May - 15 July 2,4,5 4.4 St. Clair immediately downstream of CR-SW 1075 Prairie CA) 2 Barren Fork ① its mouth (confluence with Tavern Creek) MO-17 15 March - 15 June 2,4 2.9 Miller 3 Barren Fork ② its mouth (confluence with Sinking Creek) CR-A-D 15 Nov. - 15 Feb. 6 3.4 Shannon 4 Bass Creek its mouth (confluence with Turkey Creek) US-63 15 May - 15 July 2,5,7 4.4 Boone 5 Bear Creek RT-A the south section line (6, 33N, 24W) 15 March - 15 June 2,4 10.5 Cedar, Polk 6 Beaver Creek Bull Shoals Lake (654' AMSL) MO-76 15 March - 31 July 2,4 24.3 Taney 7 Big Buffalo Creek Lake of the Ozarks (660' AMSL) its headwaters 1 April - 30 June 2,5 10.8 Benton, Morgan its source (convergence of Cane Creek & 8 Big Cane Creek the Missouri-Arkansas border 1 March - 15 June 2,7 4.2 Butler Little Cane Creek) 9 Big Creek its mouth (confluence with St. Francis River) MO-143 15 March - 15 June 5,6 12.3 Wayne, Iron 10 Big Piney River its mouth (confluence with Gasconade River) MO-17 15 March - 15 June 2,4,6,7 84.8 Pulaski, Phelps, Texas the upstream MDC boundary (Leadwood Jefferson, Washington, 11 Big River its mouth (confluence with Meramec River) 15 March - 15 June 2,6 108.4 Access) St.
    [Show full text]