CD/REG/02 Schedule of Proposed Changes and Modifications to the Aligned Core Strategies Publication Version

Broxtowe Borough, Gedling Borough and City - Schedule of Proposed Changes and Modifications to the Aligned Core Strategies Publication Version

June 2013

This page is intentionally blank

Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

Introduction

The following schedule details all proposed changes to the Greater Nottingham Broxtowe Borough, Gedling Borough & Nottingham City Aligned Core Strategies since the publication in June 2012.

• Those proposed changes that are purely typographical/grammatical corrections, updating of dates and status of documents or are making changes to the text to clarifying meaning without changing the context are set out in dark grey type. • Those changes which are more significant or are responding to comments from consultees are shown in bold . • For clarification, where text has been changed, deleted text is shown as struck through and additional text shown underlined .

The changes which were as a result of the Government announcement on the preferred route for HS2 and the insertion of a proposed site at Toton have been subject to consultation in Broxtowe between 18 February and 3 April 2013. These changes are prefixed with the number M in the ref column, while all other changes that are proposed to the document are prefixed with the letter C in the ref column and have not yet been consulted upon. Further consultation will be undertaken on these changes and any others which are a result of the examination after the hearing sessions.

1 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

Reference Main Source of Ref point in doc section change Details Reason C1 Guide to this Intro and Officers Text will be updated when it comes to adoption. At this point (submission) the Updated document Section 1 text is to be removed. information C2 1.1.1 Intro and Consultee Change text at para 1.1.1: In response to Section 1 "… the next 15 years between 2011 and 2028 " consultee comments C3 1.1.2 Intro and Officers Text amended to read RS being revoked Section 1 "Previously, 5 authorities had been working to produce Aligned Core Strategies. However, following the election of the coalition government and their decision to abolish Regional Strategies, including the Regional Plan, all the authorities have re-examined how they will meet their housing requirements and progress their Local Development Frameworks." C4 1.1.3 Intro and Officers Text amended to read RS being revoked Section 1 "Broxtowe, Erewash, Gedling and Nottingham City Councils have reviewed the evidence for the area’s objective assessment of housing needs, including full consideration of the Government’s 2008-based Household Projections. As a result of this exercise, the Councils have concluded that the housing provision, as proposed through the Regional Plan, is supported by available evidence, and remains the appropriate level of housing provision to plan for in the plan area . Broxtowe, Gedling and Nottingham City have therefore prepared this new aligned and consistent planning strategy for their part of Greater Nottingham which is referred to throughout this document as the plan area, and is shown on Map 1.1. Although Erewash Borough Council was is unable to publish its Core Strategy at the same time as the other Councils and has therefore as a result is proposing to published a separate Core Strategy slightly later in the summer, the methodology and outcome of the review of the evidence for the area’s objective assessment of housing needs is shared ."

2 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

Reference Main Source of Ref point in doc section change Details Reason C5 1.1.6 Intro and Officers Replace para 1.1.6 with the following new para Clarification Section 1 "Broxtowe, Gedling and Nottingham City Councils will outline their approaches to the more detailed delivery of the Aligned Core Strategies in subsequent Development Plan Documents

As well as issues of strategic importance covering the whole plan area, the three Council areas making up the Aligned Core Strategies each has its own local issues and priorities (see sections 2.7 to 2.9). The policies of the Aligned Core Strategies have therefore been written in such a way as to address the strategic common issues, and provide a sufficiently flexible framework for subsequent Development Plan Documents, in which Broxtowe Borough, Gedling Borough and Nottingham City Councils will outline their locally distinct approaches to the more detailed delivery of the Aligned Core Strategies. " C6 1.1.11 Intro and Officers Add in missing word in 2nd sentence – "a key aim ... ” Legibility Section 1 C7 1.1.12 Intro and Officers Text amended to read RS being revoked Section 1 "The preparation of the Aligned Core Strategies have taken into account the Government’s East Midlands Regional Plan (2009), which was is the Regional Strategy (RS). However, on the 6th July 2010 the Secretary of State announced the revocation of Regional Strategies. On the 20th March 2013 the Secretary of State laid in Parliament a statutory instrument to revoke the Regional Strategy for the East Midlands. This came into force on 12th April 2013 as such the East Midlands Regional Plan no longer forms part of the Development Plan. However, it is Although Regional Spatial Strategies are in the process of being abolished it is the Councils’ view that much of the evidence base on which they East Midlands Regional Plan relied rely is still relevant. "

3 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

Reference Main Source of Ref point in doc section change Details Reason C8 1.1.13 Intro and Officers Text amended to read RS being revoked Section 1 "The Regional Plan covers the period to 2026, and sets out the number of new homes which will have to be built in each Council area, together with guidance on how to provide for new jobs and work places, and a ra nge of environmental matters. In addition, in March 2012 the government has published the National Planning Policy Framework which replaces Planning Policy Statements (PPSs);, Planning Policy Guidance notes (PPGs) and some circulars. These factors have This has been taken into account in the development of the Aligned Core Strategies." C9 1.1.15 Intro and Officers Delete "The ” for the Greater Nottingham Retail Study Consistency Section 1 C10 1.1.15 Intro and Officers Remove "Lowland Derbyshire Biodiversity Action Plan, 2011 ” Not considered Section 1 relevant to the plan area, other Derbyshire references retained as still appropriate as have cross boundary issues C11 1.3.4 Intro and Officers In the last line delete "guidance ” Under the new regs, Section 1 DPDs are policy and SPDs are guidance C12 1.3.4 & 1.3.8 Intro and Consultee Amendments to para 1.3.8 In response to Section 1 "Waste and Minerals Development Plan Documents will be prepared by consultee and County Counc il which comments and will need to be in conformity with the Regional Strategy (until it is result of the RS abolished). ” being revoked And move following text from para 1.3.8 to after 1.3.4 "tThe Development Plan Documents produced by the Councils will form the ‘Statutory Development Plan’ for the area when all are completed.”

4 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

Reference Main Source of Ref point in doc section change Details Reason C13 1.3.8 (new ref) Intro and Officers Amendment to paragraph 1.3.9 by deleting existing text and replacing Clarification Section 1 with the following text

"It is the go vernment’s intention to allow local communities to also create their own local Neighbourhood Plans setting out how they wish their local area to develop. Provided such a plan, where produced, is in line with the National Planning Policy Framework, with th e strategic vision for the wider area set by the local authority in the Local Plan (including development needs), and with other legal requirements, local people will be able to vote on it in a referendum. If the plan is approved by a majority of those who vote, then the policies it contains take precedence over existing non -strategic policies in the Local Plan for that neighbourhood. The government has introduced a system of neighbourhood plans which can be produced by parish and town councils and designated neighbourhood forums in areas without parish councils. Government has set out legislation and regulations 1 on how Neighbourhood Plans must be prepared. Parish and town Councils or neighbourhood forums may choose to prepare such plans but must take account of national planning policy and be in general conformity with the strategic policies in the Local Plan 2 including any development requirements. The Neighbourhood Plan is subject to independent scrutiny and provided it meets certain tests including being in general conformity with strategic policies set out in the Local Plan, then it must be put to a local referendum to be decided by a majority vote. If the Neighbourhood Plan is adopted by the Council then it becomes part of the development plan for the area that will provide the basis for making planning decisions. "

and add the following footnotes "1 Under the The Localism Act 2011 and the Neighbourhood Planning (General) Regulations 2012 SI 2012 no. 637 " and "2 Strategic policies include all the policies contained in the Aligned Core Strategies together with other strategic policies set out elsewhere in the Local Plan to be determined by the individual Councils. "

5 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

Reference Main Source of Ref point in doc section change Details Reason C14 1.3.8 (new ref Intro and Consultee New section after neighbourhood planning paragraph In response to 1.3.9 & 1.3.13) Section 1 consultee “Minerals and Waste Development Plan Documents comments Joint Waste Development Plan Documents are being prepared by Nottingham City Council and Nottinghamshire County Council. The County Council is also preparing Minerals Development Plan Documents for its geographic area including Broxtowe and Gedling. Coal reserves are present in Broxtowe west of Nottingham City’s administrative boundary, and in the centre and north west of Broxtowe Borough. The City Council intends to deal with minerals matters for its area in its Land and Planning Policies Development Plan Document, which will include site allocations and development management policies.

It is recognised that there are a number of matters surrounding minerals, and in particular coal, that will need to be addressed within the City Council’s Land and Planning Policies Development Plan Document and these include:

• The designation of Minerals Safeguarding Areas (MSAs) – MSAs will be defined on the Policies Map and relevant supporting policies will set out the Minerals Consultation Areas based upon these. Areas of surface coal have been identified in the west area of the City and these will be considered for safeguarding; • Prior extraction – there will be policy ensuring prior extraction takes place where feasible and viable; • Applications for new minerals workings – there will be policy setting out the environmental criteria against which planning applications will be assessed; • Reclamation – policy will set out that worked land should be reclaimed at the earliest opportunity; • Former mining hazards – there will be policy setting out the need to address land instability arising from former minerals workings and associated mining legacy / hazards, including collapse of shallow mine workings, collapse of mine entries, gas emissions from coal mines, transmission of gases into adjacent properties, coal mining subsidence and water emissions from coal mine workings; • Site allocations – all of the above issues will be taken into consideration in the site assessment and site allocation process. This will include strategic sites

6 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

Reference Main Source of Ref point in doc section change Details Reason that have been identified in the Core Strategy, but will be allocated in the Land and Planning Policies Development Plan Document.

Where surface coal resources or mining legacy issues are present on the strategic sites included in this plan, they are referred to in Appendix A. Until the new policies in the Land and Planning Policies Development Plan Document are adopted, the City Council will continue to rely upon the existing minerals policy in the adopted Local Plan (2005), along with the guidance provided in the National Planning Policy Framework and extant Minerals Policy Guidance.

Due to the built up nature of Nottingham City, it is not proposed to make any provision for aggregates extraction across the plan period. Should proposals emerge, individual applications will be considered on their merits ." C15 1.4.3 Intro and Officers Reference to Options for Consultation in 2nd sentence should be “Options” Correction Section 1 C16 1.4 3 Intro and Officers Text refers to Publication Draft policies, should be Publication Version Correction Section 1 C17 1.5.1 Intro and Officers 5th line: remove surplus bracket before “(The”. Also amend date for when Correction & Section 1 decision on designation on SPA is likely from "December 2012 " to "Spring updated information 2013 " C18 1.5.2 Intro and Officers 8th line: “Nnitrogen” remove capital Consistency Section 1 C19 1.5.3 Intro and Officers “Nnitrogen” remove the capital Consistency Section 1 C20 1.5.5 Intro and Officers 6th line: Delete “to ” Correction Section 1 C21 1.6.1 Intro and Officers Amend 2nd line to read: Correction Section 1 “… it they meets...”

7 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

Reference Main Source of Ref point in doc section change Details Reason C22 2.1.2 Section 2 Officers Amend text to read RS being revoked (not V&O) "The most relevant guidance, policies and strategies is included in the recently published Government planning policy is set out in the National Planning Policy Framework which was published in March 2012 and the East Midlands Regional Plan (which is the Regional Strategy) ." C23 2.1.3 Section 2 Officers Amend text to read RS being revoked (not V&O) "The East Midlands Regional Plan (2009) includeds a Sub-Regional Strategy for the Three Cities area (which covers the Derby, Leicester and Nottingham areas). It provideds a strategic spatial development framework for the area. Although now abolished, the evidence that supported it remains relevant. The government has given clear indication that all the Regional Strategies throughout are to be abolished. However, although the government is in the process of abolishing the East Midlands Plan, it remains part of the development plan until abolished, and the evidence supporting it will remain relev ant. " C24 2.2.2 Section 2 Officers Revised population figures inserted using Office for National Statistics 2011 Updated (not V&O) Census, Crown Copyright to read information

"The three local authorities of Broxtowe, Gedling and Nottingham making up the plan area have a population of 531,700 528,700 (Greater Nottingham including the part of Ashfield, Erewash and , has a population of 786,900 784,100 )..." - footnote amended as well

8 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

Reference Main Source of Ref point in doc section change Details Reason C25 2.2.5 Section 2 Officers Amend the text of the para to update population figures using Office for Consistency (not V&O) National Statistics 2011 Census, Crown Copyright and other minor corrections to read

"The main built up area of Nottingham (including Long Eaton in Erewash and in Rushcliffe), has a population of about 563,000 559,700 . There are two Sub Regional Centres within Greater Nottingham, Hucknall and Ilkeston, both important towns with their own identity and economic roles. Hucknall, with a population of 32,200 32,100 , is in , but will extend into Gedling Borough once the proposed Sustainable Urban Extensions are implemented. Ilkeston is wholly within Erewash Borough and has a population of 38,100 38,600 . ..." C26 2.2.6 Section 2 Officers Lower case for “(see Gglossary)” Consistency (not V&O) C27 2.2.7 Section 2 Officers Revised employment figures inserted to read Updated (not V&O) information "Economic activity and employment rates in the plan area are relatively low – 71 72 % of people of working-age are economically active and 64 65 % in employment (73 74 % and 66 68 % respectively for Greater Nottingham), compared with 76% and 70% nationally..."

and Footnote also updated C28 2.2.8 Section 2 Officers/Consultee Amend para 2.2.8 to read: Clarification (not V&O) "… such as Eastwood. There are a wealth of listed buildings, conservation areas, scheduled ancient monuments and registered historic parks and gardens, which all contribute to its quality of life, local distinctiveness and sense to place . There are a range of heritage assets which reflect the history of the plan area from the medieval period through to the industrialisation of the Victorian era. These have created a historic environment which has helped shape the area and contributed to the quality of life, local distinctiveness and sense of place. These assets include a wealth of Listed Buildings, Conservation Areas, Scheduled Ancient Monuments, Registered Parks and Gardens along with other assets including those yet to be identified. Work is needed to protect, preserve and enhance them especially those which

9 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

Reference Main Source of Ref point in doc section change Details Reason are deemed to be ‘at risk ’. …The area …" C29 2.2.8 Section 2 Officers Add “a network of public libraries, ” after “…Art Exchange galleries” Request made from (not V&O) City Library Services C30 2.2.8 Section 2 Officers 3rd sentence, remove comma after “monuments,” Correction (not V&O) C31 2.2.9 Section 2 Officers Revised population figures inserted to read Updated (not V&O) information "The population of the area rose by 43,500 42,500 (8.7% ), between 2001 and 2010 2011 (53,100 52,400 or 7.2% within Greater Nottingham) due to natural growth in the population, people living longer, international migration, and the growth in student numbers."

and footnote updated C32 2.2.9 Section 2 Officers Change document title in footnote to “Forecast of Population and Households Correction (not V&O) for Nottinghamshire and Derbyshire Authorities Controlled to New Dwelling Figures ” M33 2.2.11 Section 2 Officers At the end of the paragraph add Proposed HS2 (not V&O) route and station "In January 2013 the Secretary of State for Transport announced that the preferred ‘Y’ route for High Speed Two rail network (HS2) will pass through the plan area with a hub station at Toton Sidings to serve the East Midlands. This will significantly reduce journey times from the plan area to other areas including London and several Core Cities, and will improve connections to stations in Europe via HS1. HS2 is expected to be operational by 2032, which although outside of the plan period will encourage investment and job creation in the plan area during the plan period, bringing significant benefits in terms of sustainable transport and economic development. "

10 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

Reference Main Source of Ref point in doc section change Details Reason C34 2.2.17 Section 2 Officers Amend text to read Correction (not V&O) "... In particular, Nottingham City has a large proportion of smaller homes (37% having 4 rooms or fewer compared with 31% for the Pplan Aarea as a whole), and more social rented accommodation (33% compared to 24% for the Pplan Aarea as a whole). House price to income ratios are lower for the northwest of Greater Nottingham, but high for the south eastern part, giving rise to affordability problems" C35 2.2.18 Section 2 Officers Amend text of the last sentence to “... and some of the former council To clarify that (not V&O) owned outer estates, which have a restricted range of house types and reference to sizes, such as Clifton.” Clifton is in terms of housing type, not households. C36 2.2.21 Section 2 Consultee Amend justification text of Para 2.2.21 to read: In response to (not V&O) consultee "... ,whereas for men in Nottingham it is 3 years less than the national comments figure (78.2 years at birth). Arboretum ward in Nottingham City has male life expectancy more than 8 years below the national average14. These lower life expectancy figures reflect factors such as the numbers of overweight and obese adults, and the numbers of deaths caused by circulatory diseases . However, there are parts of the plan area, particularly Nottingham City where there are significant gaps in life expectancy between the most and least deprived communities, ranging in some cases up to ten years. Deprivation also means that, on average, life expectancy in Nottingham is three years less than in England (which is 78.2 years at birth). The causes of that lower life expectancy are due in the main to a higher than average prevalence of three diseases; cardiovascular heart disease, cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (lung disease). Lifestyle risk factors contribute to all of these. Smoking, low levels of exercise, obesity, high alcohol consumption and poor mental wellbeing also contribute to ill health. " C37 2.2.24 Section 2 Officers Amend text to read Correction (not V&O) "An area to the north of the plan area has been identified as having the characteristics of a Special Protection Area (see glossary) for Wwoodlark and Nnightjars. This area is under consideration for formal inclusion in the

11 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

Reference Main Source of Ref point in doc section change Details Reason designation process." C38 2.3.2 Vision & Officers Amend text to read Add reference to Objectives the digital “and supported by a high quality high capacity digital infrastructure infrastructure network. , but It also includes …” required. C39 2.3.4 Vision & Officers Amend text to read Consistency with Objectives the use of the term “Much of this growth is sustainably accommodated within the existing main “main built up area” built up area of Nottingham which has assisted in reducing the need to travel, in the 1 st and 2 nd made the most of existing infrastructure and has driven the regeneration of sentence parts of the urban area. The main built up area of Nottingham has been expanded, and new development is creating successful communities, well integrated into the urban area, and with excellent connectivity to the wider city, especially the City Centre and other job opportunities.” C40 2.3.5 Vision & Consultee 2.3.5 additional text … In response to Objectives consultee "These developments are responsible for raising the city’s position in comments the national retail rankings and have enhanced its role as the region’s principal shopping and leisure destination" C41 2.3.5 Vision & Officers Delete the comma after “gateway,” Correction Objectives C42 2.3.6 Vision & Consultee Amend paragraph 2.3.6 to read In response to Objectives consultee "The Sustainable Urban Extensions in Gedling adjoining the Sub comments Regional Centre of Hucknall (which is in Ashfield District) are now successful neighbourhoods in their own right, but well integrated into Hucknall and have contributed to Hucknall 's the town's vibrant local economic and retail roles." C43 2.3.9 Vision & Officers Remove capital for “Ccities” Correction Objectives

12 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

Reference Main Source of Ref point in doc section change Details Reason M44 2.3.9 Vision & Officers Add text after the first sentence Proposed HS2 Objectives route and station "A HS2 hub station to serve the East Midlands is nearing completion at Toton in Broxtowe. Associated infrastructure including convenient sustainable public transport access to link the station to the rest of Greater Nottingham is complete or planned. Development in the vicinity of the proposed HS2 station at Toton has maximised opportunities for the local community and the regional and national economy. " C45 2.3.10 Vision & Consultee Amend end of first sentence of para 2.3.10 to read Clarification Objectives "…, whilst the historic environment, both urban and rural is valued and protected and where necessary has been enhanced . …" C46 2.3.11 Vision & Consultee Amend text at para 2.3.11 In response to Objectives consultee “… improvements to schools and aca demies , academies, further comments education establishments and universities now giving them…” C47 Spatial Vision & Officers Amend text to read Consistency objective ii Objectives “The main built up area of Nottingham” M48 Spatial Vision & Officers add after the words ‘Nottingham Science Park’ Proposed HS2 objective iii Objectives route and station "… and development in the vicinity of the proposed HS2 hub station at Toton ." C49 Spatial Vision & Consultee Amend Para 2.4.1iv to read In response to objective iv Objectives consultee "To create the conditions for the protection and enhancement of a comments balanced hierarchy and network of City, town and other centres, providing for retail, employment through economic growth and retail development. The provision of innovative and efficient shopping, leisure, tourism and local services of a scale appropriate to the centres position in the hierarchy will be promoted in addition to social and other appropriate uses, …"

13 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

Reference Main Source of Ref point in doc section change Details Reason C50 Spatial Vision & Officers Amend text to read Correction objective iv Objectives "… To facilitate the redevelopment of both the Broadmarsh and Victoria Shopping Centres within the City Centre and improvements to the vitality and viability of the town centres of Arnold and Beeston. will see significant development and enhancement with its role changed from Ddistrict Ccentre to a Ttown Ccentre..." C51 Spatial Vision & Consultee Amend spatial objectives: viii In response to objective viii Objectives consultee "…and by improving access to cultural, sport and leisure and lifelong comments learning activities." C52 Spatial Vision & Consultee Amend spatial objective ix to read In response to objective ix Objectives consultee “…community, and leisure and sport facilities…” comments C53 Spatial Vision & Consultee Objective 2.4.1 - ix amended to read In response to objective ix Objectives consultee “…new schools (eg at Top Wighay, north of Hucknall) and academies , comments academies, further education establishments and universities , and to meet…”

C54 Spatial Vision & Officers Add full stop at the end of the objective Correction objective ix Objectives M55 Spatial Vision & Officers Add at the end of the paragraph Proposed HS2 objective x Objectives route and station "Sustainable transport options linking the proposed HS2 hub station to the rest of Greater Nottingham will be explored including a NET extension. " C56 2.5.4 Section 2 Officers 2nd line: “their Core Strategies” rather than “its Core Strategy” Correction (not V&O) C57 2.5.5 Section 2 Officers 1st line: Delete “of the” Correction (not V&O)

14 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

Reference Main Source of Ref point in doc section change Details Reason C58 2.7.1 Section 2 Officers Population figure updated following census 2011 data release, text amended Updated (not V&O) to read: information

"Broxtowe has a population of 111,800 109,500 (mid 2010 estimate 2011 census ) and …" M59 2.7.4a Section 2 Officers Add new paragraph after 2.7.4 Proposed HS2 (not V&O) route and station "The preferred location for a HS2 hub station at Toton will significantly improve the accessibility of the Borough to London and several Core Cities both in Britain and in mainland Europe. It will make the area attractive to inward investment, will lead to significant job creation and will add to the sustainability of appropriate mixed use development in close proximity to the station. The details and mix of uses will be determined through the Borough’s site specific Development Plan Document. " C60 2.7.5 Section 2 Officers Remove the word “cut” on the last line as “Beeston Canal” is the correct name Correction (not V&O) C61 2.7.7 Section 2 Officers 2nd line: Delete “visitor ” Correction (not V&O) C62 2.7.9 Section 2 Consultee Amend para to read In response to (not V&O) consultee "In the borough there are 144 Listed Buildings, 15 Conservation Areas, 7 comments An cient Monuments, 10 SSSIs and 140 other Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation (SINCs) 151 Listed Buildings (6 Grade I, 9 Grade II* and 136 Grade II), 6 Scheduled Ancient Monuments, 15 Conservation Areas, 10 SSSIs and 143 Sites of Importance to Nature Conservation (SINCs) . However, some of these heritage assets are at risk, with 3 Listed Buildings, 1 Scheduled Ancient Monument and 4 Conservation Areas included on the national Heritage at Risk Register ." C63 2.7.10 Section 2 Officers 4th line, Add “Plan” after “Centre”. Correction (not V&O) C64 2.7.11 Section 2 Officers Amend text to read Correction (not V&O) "… Beeston Business Park in March 2012 and, being immediately adjacent to the train station, it is well placed to attract new enterprises."

15 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

Reference Main Source of Ref point in doc section change Details Reason C65 2.7.11 Section 2 Officers Last line: Add “it” before “is” Correction (not V&O) C66 2.7.14 Section 2 Officers Amend text to read Updated (not V&O) information "Average property prices in Broxtowe at just below £1504,000 (October- December 2012 September 2011 ) show a steep drop of approximately £15,000 from the same time in 2010 and are lower than the county averages for both Derbyshire and Nottinghamshire. ..." C67 2.7.15 Section 2 Officers Amend text to read Updated (not V&O) information "At the 20011 census 7.2 6.8 % of the borough’s population was of ethnic origin with the largest BME groups being Indian and Chinese." C68 2.7.15 Section 2 Consultee Amend text Para 2.7.15 In response to (not V&O) consultee "… in particular high proportions of South East Asian international comments students, as both…" C69 2.7.17 Section 2 Officers 1st line of “The Environment” bullet: Comma rather than semi-colon after Correction (not V&O) “place”? C70 2.8.1 Section 2 Officers Updated population figure inserted, text amended to read Updated (not V&O) information "Gedling Borough is a mix of urban and rural with around 80% of 113, 200 113,500 residents living in the Greater Nottingham suburbs of Arnold and Carlton."

Footnote also updated C71 2.8.3 Section 2 Officers 3rd sentence add “as” inserted before “designated MLAs” Correction (not V&O) C72 2.8.3 Section 2 Officers Last sentence refers to SPA. Should reflect other references – decision to be Correction (not V&O) made “… in 2012 in spring 2013 at the earliest” .

16 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

Reference Main Source of Ref point in doc section change Details Reason C73 2.8.4 Section 2 Consultee & Amend last sentence in paragraph 2.8.4 to read In response to (not V&O) Officers consultee "Newstead Abbey Park, once home to Lord Byron, includes a number of comments heritage assets such as the Grade I Listed Abbey and Boundary Wall and is a major feature in the North of the Borough. There are 188 lListed Buildings in the Borough (6 Grade I, 15 Grade II* and 167 Grade II), 9 Scheduled Ancient Monuments and 4 Registered Parks and Gardens. However some of these heritage assets are at risk, with 3 Listed Buildings (including Newstead Abbey) and 1 Scheduled Ancient Monument included on the national Heritage at Risk register ." C74 2.8.6 Section 2 Officers Insert comma after “equivalent,” Correction (not V&O) C75 2.8.8 Section 2 Officers Lower case for “Ttown Ccentre” for consistency Consistency (not V&O) C76 2.9.1 Section 2 Officers Revised population figures inserted using Office for National Statistics 2011 Updated (not V&O) Census, text amended to read information

"Nottingham City is one of the eight Core Cities in England. The City is a very compact and high-density urban area, with a population of 306,700 305,700 and an area of only 7,461 hectares. .."

Footnote also amended C77 2.9.7 Section 2 Consultee Amend justification text at 2.9.7 to … In response to (not V&O) consultee "There are 8 Local Nature Reserves (LNR) totalling 140.1ha , 64 SINCs comments and 3 SSSIs in the City . “

17 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

Reference Main Source of Ref point in doc section change Details Reason C78 2.9.11 Section 2 Officers Revised employment and population figures inserted and slight corrections, Updated (not V&O) text amended to read information

"Unemployment in the city was 14,677 13,595 (6.6 6.1 %) in March October 2012, a rate which had increased sharply from the previous year increased in the past two years but declined steadily since the beginning of 2012 . This compares poorly with 3.6 3.1 % for the rest of the Pplan Aarea (Broxtowe & Gedling) . Between October 2010 and September 2011 July 2011 and June 2012 only 56.8 60 % of 16-64 year old people living in the City were in employment. This figure is affected by the number of students, but, even allowing for this, it is low compared to 73.6 73.1 % for the rest of the Pplan Aarea."

Footnote also amended C79 2.9.13 Section 2 Consultee Amend justification text 2.9.13 to read: In response to (not V&O) consultee “…City Hospital, the Universities, Lenton Lane,” comments C80 2.9.15 Section 2 Consultee Amend text of para 2.9.15 to In response to (not V&O) consultee “… including a large proportion of foreign international students and comments post graduates. …” C81 Section A text Other Officers Lower case for “Ccity" "Ttown Ccentre” for consistency Consistency C82 Section A text Other Officers Insert text "A Presumption in Favour of Sustainable Developmen t" Correction

18 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

Reference Main Source of Ref point in doc section change Details Reason C83 New Policy A Officers New policy and justification text on the Presumption in favour of In light of NPPF sustainable development based on the model policy produced by the Planning Inspectorate. Policy and justification to read:

"Policy A: Presumption in Favour of Sustainable Development 1. A positive approach will be taken when considering development proposals reflecting the presumption in favour of sustainable development contained in the National Planning Policy Framework. The relevant Council will always work proactively with applicants jointly to find solutions which mean that proposals can be approved wherever possible, and to secure development that improves the economic, social and environmental conditions in the area. 2. Planning applications that accord with the policies in the Local Plan (and, where relevant, with polices in Neighbourhood Plans) will be approved without delay, unless material considerations indicate otherwise. 3. Where there are no policies relevant to the application, or relevant policies are out of date at the time of making the decision, then planning permission will be granted unless material considerations indicate otherwise – taking into account whether:

a) any adverse impacts of granting permission would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits, when assessed against the policies in the National Planning Policy Framework taken as a whole; or b) specific policies in that Framework indicate that development should be restricted.

Justification text

3A.1.1 The Government’s National Planning Policy Framework recognises that sustainable development is about change for the better. It is about positive growth, making economic, environmental and social progress for this and future generations. To achieve sustainable development, economic, social and environmental gains should be sought jointly. They are mutually dependent.

19 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

Reference Main Source of Ref point in doc section change Details Reason 3A.1.2 In line with Government policy advice, the Councils have adopted a positive approach in seeking to meet the objectively assessed development needs of the area. The policies in the Aligned Core Strategies provide a clear framework to guide development that creates positive, sustainable economic growth, therefore following the presumption in favour of sustainable development, enabling proposals that accord with the plan objectives to be approved without delay. This policy is therefore at the heart of decision taking when assessing planning applications.

3A.1.3 There may be instances where the plan is silent or in future years, policies become out of date. To enable the Councils to continue to take a sustainably positive approach to decision making, applicants will need to assist by submitting evidence to demonstrate how the benefits of a proposal outweighs any adverse impacts. In this way economic, social and environmental responsibilities can continue to be met without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs and well-being. " C84 Policy 1.1 Policy 1 Consultee Amend text of Policy 1.1: In response to Delete last sentence "The onus will be on developers to justify robustly consultee why full compliance with policy requirements is not viable or feasible ." comments And add “…energy use, unless it can be demonstrated that compliance with the policy is not viable or feasible. ” C85 Policy 1.4 Policy 1 Officers Lower case for “Ccarbon Ddioxide” Consistency C86 Policy 1.6 Policy 1 Consultee Amend policy 1.6 to read: In response to consultee "Development will be supported which adopts the precautionary comments principle, proposals that avoids areas of current and future flood risk, and which does not increase the risk of flooding elsewhere and, where possible reduces flood risk, adopting the precautionary principle, will be supported ." C87 Policy 1.8 Policy 1 Consultee Delete the words within the urban area in Policy 1.8 In response to consultee comments

20 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

Reference Main Source of Ref point in doc section change Details Reason C88 Policy 1.8 Policy 1 Consultee Policy 1.8 Correct typing error, add “be ” at 1.8 to read In response to consultee "… the following factors will be taken into account…" comments C89 Policy 1.8 and Policy 1 Officers Use capitals for “eException tTest” to accord with term used in NPPF Consistency 1.9 C90 Policy 1.10 Policy 1 Consultee Amend text of Policy 1.10 to read In response to consultee "All new development should incorporate measures to reduce surface comments water run-off whilst managing surface water drainage in a sustainable manner and the implementation of Sustainable Drainage Systems should be incorporated into all new developments wil l be sought unless …" C91 3.1.1 Policy 1 Officers Insert “and ” between policy 10 and policy 11 Correction C92 3.1.6 Policy 1 Officers 9th line: Add comma after “groups,” Correction C93 3.1.6 Policy 1 Consultee Amend para 3.1.6 In response to consultee "…promote waste minimisation and recycling. There is evidence that comments climatic change will effect health globally and alter the patterns of morbidity and mortality in the UK. Some groups…." C94 3.1.7 Policy 1 Consultee Amend text in 3rd sentence of Para 3.1.7 to read In response to consultee "… However, development of or affecting historic heritage assets, comments which …" C95 3.1.9 Policy 1 Officers Put "Zero Carbon" in quote marks and add "(see glossary) ", (glossary term for Correction & Zero Carbon also added) - see later in schedule. clarification C96 3.1.10 Policy 1 Officers Zero Carbon but in quote marks Correction C97 3.1.14 Policy 1 Consultee Amend first sentence of justification text 3.1.14 to read In response to consultee "Some parts of the urban area are also prone to flooding from surface comments water runoff, including steep sided sites where it is particularly important to manage surface water run off to reduce flood risk to others ."

21 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

Reference Main Source of Ref point in doc section change Details Reason C98 3.1.14 Policy 1 Consultee Amend last sentence of justification text 3.1.14 to read In response to consultee "…For development on brownfield sites, new developments should aim comments to reduce the rate of runoff from the sites. As a minimum, f For development on greenfield sites, the aim should be to reduce or maintain surface water runoff where possible or maintain runoff levels compared to those present prior to development." C99 Policy 1 Policy 1 Consultee Amend monitoring indicator to In response to Monitoring consultee arrangements "Number of developments incorporating SuDS" comments C100 Policy 1 Policy 1 Officers Amend "SUDS" to "SuDS" in monitoring arrangements for consistency Correction Monitoring through the document and how the EA refer to these arrangements C101 Policy 2.1 Policy 2 Officers/Consultee Amend text to read In response to consultee “… adjoining the main built up area of Nottingham” comments C102 Policy 2.2c) i) Policy 2 In response to Amend text to read In response to consultee consultee comments "Awsworth, Brinsley, Eastwood (including parts of Giltbrook and comments Newthorpe) and Kimberley (including parts of Nuthall and Watnall), in Broxtowe; …" C103 Policy 2.3 Policy 2 Consultee Delete the word "phased and " In response to consultee comments C104 Policy 2.3a) Policy 2 Officers Amend text to read “…adjoining the main built up area of Nottingham” Consistency of the use of the term

22 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

Reference Main Source of Ref point in doc section change Details Reason C105 Policy 2.3 Policy 2 Officers Revised housing figures from trajectories for sites (Broxtowe, Gedling & Updated City) information

Broxtowe figures amended to read

"2011-2012 250 2013 to 2018 1,600 2018 to 2023 2,250 2,300 2023 to 2028 2,050 2,000

Gedling figures amended to read

2011-2012 500 550 2013 to 2018 2,000 2,200 2018 to 2023 2,850 2023 to 2028 1,900 1,650

Nottingham City figures amended to read

2011-2012 1,050 950 2013 to 2018 4,500 4,400 2018 to 2023 5,900 5,950 2023 to 2028 5,700 5,850" C106 Policy 2.3aiii) Policy 2 Officers Change housing figure to "up to 600". Updated information C107 Policy 2.3 (b) i Policy 2 Consultee Change housing figure to "up to 600". In response to (NPL) consultee comments M108 Policy 2.3 Policy 2 Officers Add Proposed HS2 route and station "iii) A strategic location for growth in the vicinity of the proposed HS2 station at Toton, in Broxtowe with appropriate mix of development to be determined in the site specific Development Plan Document. "

The remainder of the numbering to this section of the policy would be amended to follow this.

23 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

Reference Main Source of Ref point in doc section change Details Reason M109 Policy 2.4 Policy 2 Officers Add new Proposed HS2 route and station "4b) Land in the vicinity of the proposed HS2 station at Toton in Broxtowe; "

The remainder of the numbering to this section of the policy would be amended to follow this. C110 Policy 2.5 Policy 2 Consultee Amend text of Policy 2.5 to read In response to consultee "Retail, health, social, leisure and cultural development will be located in comments or on the edge of the City Centre, as set out in Policy 5 , and the Town Centres of Arnold and Beeston." C111 Policy 2.5 Policy 2 Officers Lower case for “Ttown Ccentre” for consistency Consistency C112 Policy 2.6.a.ii Policy 2 Officers Add space between A52(T) and Clifton Correction C113 Policy 2.6b) Policy 2 Consultee Amendments to text to read In response to consultee "b) Other schemes with no committed funding but which remain are also comments important to the delivery of the Core Strategy include:..."

"A52 Junction Improvements (in Rushcliffe Borough between A6200 Derby Road and Bingham );” M114 Policy 2.6c) Policy 2 Officers Add new Proposed HS2 route and station "6c) National and local schemes which will have significant economic and sustainable transport benefits to the plan area if implemented include-

i) High Speed Rail 2 (HS2) ii) HS2 hub station at Toton to serve the East Midlands iii) Extension to NET to serve the new HS2 hub station "

The remainder of the numbering to this section of the policy would be amended to follow this.

24 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

Reference Main Source of Ref point in doc section change Details Reason C115 Policy 2.6c) Policy 2 Consultee Add bullet point to Policy 2.6 In response to consultee “vi) Hucknall Town Centre Improvement Scheme (Ashfield District) ” comments C116 Policy 2.6 a) Policy 2 Officers Amend numbering so that schemes in criteria a) and b) following same Consistency with and b) numbering (ie a i), ii) & iii) and b) other policy numbering formatting C117 Policy 2 Policy 2 Consultee Delete second sentence after 'strategic locations'. In response to footnote consultee "Key Settlements are also ‘strategic locations’ and will deliver housing comments throughout the plan pe riod . " C118 3.2.4 Policy 2 Officer Text amended to read Consistency

"… The Council has resolved that where possible these will be prepared in the form of nNeighbourhood pPlans." C119 3.2.5 Policy 2 Officers 1st line: Reference should be to part 3(c) rather than 3(d). Correction C120 3.2.6 Policy 2 Consultee Amend Para 3.2.6 In response to consultee "…regeneration challenges present. It is phased Housing provision comments varies across the plan period on the basis of likely delivery timescales, taking into account infrastructure delivery and a recovering housing market. In addition, the housing level proposed takes account of what is considered to be…." C121 3.2.6 Policy 2 Officers Amend text to read “…continuing in-migration to the area Greater Nottingham , Clarification albeit at a lower level…”. C122 New para Policy 2 Consultee New para 3.2.6a In response to 3.2.6a consultee "New government Household Projections based on the 2011 Census are comments expected to be published in 2014, and by this time economic circumstances may have stabilised somewhat. Should the new Household Projections indicate that the Councils’ assumptions underpinning housing provision are no longer appropriate, the Core Strategies will be reviewed. "

25 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

Reference Main Source of Ref point in doc section change Details Reason C123 3.2.7 Policy 2 Officers Amend text to read RS being revoked

"The housing provision for the plan area equates to that previously included in the East Midlands Regional Plan which remains part of the Development Plan for the area It required the plan area to provide a minimum of 34,800 new homes between 2006 and 2026, as part of a Greater Nottingham minimum housing provision figure of 60,600. The Regional Plan figures have therefore been used as the basis of extending the plan period to 2028, by adding two years of provision to the 2026 figures and subtracting the completions between 2006 and 2011, to give the housing provision figure of 30,550 for 2011 to 2028 as illustrated in table 2.1. The evidence underlying this housing provision for the plan area has been reviewed, including full consideration of the Government’s 2008-based Household Projections, and it is considered to meet the full objectively assessed housing needs of the area. " C124 3.2.8 Policy 2 Officers Add a comma after “and,” Correction C125 3.2.8 Policy 2 Officers 5th/6th line: add “it ” before “should”. Correction C126 New para Policy 2 Consultee New paragraph 3.2.8a and footnote In response to after 3.2.8a "Due to factors including the current economic downturn, the lead in consultee time required to bring forward development on strategic sites, and in comments some cases the requirement for infrastructure to be in place prior to development, the delivery of housing across the plan period is expected to be lower in the early part of the plan period. Housing delivery will build up thereafter due to a return to more normal market conditions and the commencement and build out of the strategic sites. This is reflected in the table included at Policy 2.3. The figures in the table are not upper limits to development, they represent the anticipated rate of housing completions, and will be used by the councils to determine the level of their 5 year supply of deliverable housing sites. (Each council’s anticipated housing completions for all the years over the plan period are set out in the ‘Plan – Annual Housing Target’ row of the housing trajectories in Appendix C). Whilst it is recognised that a more even level of housing delivery across the plan period would be preferable in terms of matching supply against identified need, there is clear evidence that the current economic circumstances, slow housing delivery and suppressed demand for

26 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

Reference Main Source of Ref point in doc section change Details Reason housing justify the approach. (See Greater Nottingham Housing Market and Economic Prospects’ report, GL Hearn, 2012)." Add new footnote after penultimate sentence of first para above "The 5 year land supply will be calculated as follows: the anticipated housing delivery can be found by using the ‘Plan – Annual Housing Target’ for the appropriate period. Any shortfall (or overprovision) is taken into account by adding (or subtracting) proportionately from each remaining year of the trajectory. The relevant supply in each year making up the 5 year period is then added together. A 5% buffer can then be added to give the 5 year plus 5% housing figure for which each Council is required to ensure sufficient specific developable sites are identified. An example of the calculation is contained in the Housing Background Paper Addendum, 2012."

C127 3.2.9 Policy 2 Officers Amend text to “within the existing main built up area of Nottingham” Consistency M128 3.2.9 Policy 2 Officers Add after ‘Field Farm’ Proposed HS2 route and station "… , and development in the vicinity of the proposed HS2 station at Toton " C129 3.2.10 Policy 2 Consultee Amend last sentence of para 3.2.10 to read In response to consultee "… whilst Ashfield District Council is also proposing a sustainable comments urban extension strategic site on brownfield land to the south of Hucknall."

C130 3.2.13 Policy 2 Consultee Amend paragraph 3.2.13 to read In response to consultee "These include are Top Wighay Farm (where the allocation has been comments expanded to include part of land that was previously safeguarded), Gedling Colliery/Chase Farm (Gedling), and the Eastside, Southside and Waterside Regeneration Zones (Nottingham City). In addition, North of Papplewick Lane (Gedling) was previously designated as safeguarded land (see glossary) and the precise scale of development is still under discussion ." C131 3.2.17 Policy 2 Officers 2nd sentence reads “defined in site a specific” should be “defined in a site Correction specific”

27 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

Reference Main Source of Ref point in doc section change Details Reason C132 3.2.17 Policy 2 Officers 5th line: Cossall needs adding to the list of settlements not listed in policy 2. Correction Text amended C133 3.2.19 Policy 2 Officers Amend text to read Consistency

“the main built up area of Greater Nottingham” M134 3.2.19 Policy 2 Officers Add in the justification following the words ‘employment development’ Proposed HS2 route and station "… subject to confirmation of land required for access and other arrangements associated with the proposed HS2 station, and " M135 3.2.19 Policy 2 Officers Add the following to replace the existing last sentence- Proposed HS2 route and station "... This strategy therefore performs best in terms of deliverability, sustainability and meeting local housing needs. The proposed HS2 station at Toton will add significantly to the transport and economic sustainability of this area for new development. This strategy therefore performs best in terms of deliverability, sustainability, maximising opportunities for economic development, job creation and contributing to local housing needs. " M136 3.2.21 Policy 2 Officers Add after ‘Boots campus’ Proposed HS2 route and station "… and land in the vicinity of the proposed HS2 station at Toton ." C137 3.2.24 Policy 2 Officers Amend 3rd sentence of paragraph 3.2.24 onwards to read clarification

"The redevelopment of Gedling Colliery/Chase Farm is a key strategic si te on the urban edge of Nottingham and is identified as a broad location for future development. The current economic difficulties mean that comprehensive development is not considered achievable in the short term but the site remains available and suitab le regeneration priority for Gedling Borough Council but it is acknowledged that there are challenging delivery issues for this former colliery site which means delivery is unlikely within the plan period. However the site is identified in the Aligned Core Strategies as a potential future site on which delivery will be explored subject to economic conditions and funding availability ." C138 3.2.25 Policy 2 Officers 4th/5th lines: delete “also ” after “have” and before “traditional” Correction C139 3.2.31 Policy 2 Officers 2nd sentence says “compliment ” but should be “complement ” Correction

28 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

Reference Main Source of Ref point in doc section change Details Reason C140 3.2.33 Policy 2 Officers 3rd/4th lines other DPDs need mentioning here for clarification, Correction “Supplementary Planning Documents, Development Management policies , Masterplans or other DPDs ” C141 3.2.33 Policy 2 Consultee Amend justification text of Para 3.2.33 to read In response to consultee "The role of the City Centre will be is expected to be supported and comments enhanced in line with its regional status, as set out in policy 5, and in particular through improvements and development at the Broadmarsh and Victoria Centres." C142 3.2.33 Policy 2 Officers Lower case for “Ttown Ccentre” and “Ddistrict Ccentre” Consistency C143 3.2.34 Policy 2 Consultee Amend para 3.2.34 to read In response to consultee "Upgrading existing infrastructure and providing new infrastructure will comments therefore be aimed at reducing the need to travel, especially by private car, however, it is recognised in rural areas there may be limited alternatives available ." C144 3.2.34 Policy 2 Officers 5th line: Should be “people's ” Correction C145 3.2.36 Policy 2 Officers Last few words need rewording to correct English, should read “… Correction contingency site if development elsewhere is not be delivered as planned.” C146 3.3.2 Policy 3 Officers Add the word “the ” before “relative importance of different green belt Correction purposes” C147 3.3.3 Policy 3 Officers Delete “or indicating locations for ” Correction M148 3.3.3a Policy 3 Officers Add new paragraph 3.3.3a Proposed HS2 route and station "In Broxtowe Borough the Green Belt will be amended to allow for the long term construction of the proposed HS2 station at Toton and a mixed use development in the vicinity of it including access arrangements, a NET extension and mixed use economic and housing development. Amendments to the Green Belt will be undertaken as part of the Allocations DPD when issues associated with HS2 are clear. " C149 3.3.5a Policy 3 Consultee Add additional para 3.3.5a to read In response to consultee "The Councils will set out their policies on development in the Green comments Belt in their Development Plan Documents."

29 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

Reference Main Source of Ref point in doc section change Details Reason C150 Policy 4.1b) Policy 4 Consultee Amend 4.1b) policy text (after figures for each district) to read: In response to consultee “The level of development of office floorspace will be kept under review. comments If it appears likely that the provision of undeveloped floorspace will falls …” C151 Policy 4.1b) Policy 4 Officers Use “5 years” rather than “five years” for consistency Consistency M152 Policy 4.1e) Policy 4 Officers add after ‘Top Wighay’ Proposed HS2 route and station "… land in the vicinity of the proposed HS2 station at Toton (Broxtowe) …" C153 Policy 4.1hii) Policy 4 Officers Amend text to read Clarity

"retaining good quality existing employment sites ..." C154 Policy 4, Policy 4 Officers Delete 2nd “2009 ”. Correction footnote C155 3.4.6 Policy 4 Consultee Add new sentence to justification text para 3.4.6 after 1st sentence In response to consultee "... This can include sites in adjoining local authority areas, for example comments the Rolls Royce site in the Hucknall part of Ashfield District, which will serve the employment needs of the conurbation as a whole. " M156 3.4.6 Policy 4 Officers Add before ‘East Midland Airport’ Proposed HS2 route and station "… the proposed HS2 hub station at Toton and ..." C157 3.4.19 Policy 4 Consultee and Amend para 3.4.19 of the justification text to read: In response to officers consultee "Based on policy recommendations from the Employment Land Study, comments and existing employment land and premises will be protected which Local clarification Development Documents will protect existing employment lands and premises which:

• Safeguards well-located land that continues to meet the needs of modern businesses (for instance by having good access to the transport network and labour markets, and being premises capable of economic reuse), especially larger sites that may be considered strategically important sites ."

30 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

Reference Main Source of Ref point in doc section change Details Reason C158 3.4.22 Policy 4 Officers Change “to reskilling” to “reskill ” Correction C159 3.4.22 Policy 4 Consultee At end of para 3.4.22 add In response to consultee "There is strong evidence that increasing employment and prosperity comments across the social gradient will also contribute to improving health and wellbeing and reducing inequalities."

C160 3.4.23 Policy 4 Officers 2nd line: Delete “(including food production )” as unnecessary Correction C161 3.4.22 Policy 4 Officers 6th line: Delete the comma after “development,” Correction C162 3.4.24 Policy 4 Officers Replace “criterion ” with “criteria ” Correction C163 Policy 5.1a.ii) Policy 5 Consultee Amend text of Policy 5.1a.ii to read In response to consultee "Safeguarding the Primary Shopping Frontages as the focus for City comments Centre retail development to reinforce the north-south and east-west shopping patterns and connect the main retail destinations in the City ;"

C164 Policy 5.1d.iii) Policy 5 Officers Replace “providing ” with the additional text “promoting a ” to make it Clarification clear that this will be part of a development scheme (rather than being provided by the Council). C165 Policy 5.1g) Policy 5 Consultee Replace 5.1.g bullet point In response to consultee "Exploiting the rich historic, cultural and high quality built environment comments to attract visitors and tourists, supported by the development of appropriate facilities, and promoting events, markets and attractions . Preserving and enhancing the rich historic, cultural and high quality built environment, recognising the positive contribution it makes to local character and distinctiveness and utilising its potential to attract visitors and tourists, supported by the development of appropriate facilities, events, markets and attractions ."

31 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

Reference Main Source of Ref point in doc section change Details Reason C166 3.5.1 Policy 5 Consultee Amend justification text of para 3.5.1 to read In response to consultee "Significant change is planned to the City Centre over the Core Strategy comments period with large scale retail de velopment at the Broadmarsh Centre with improvements and development at the Broadmarsh Centre and the Victoria Centre. Development at the Broadmarsh Centre will be complemented by a new Midland Rail Station/NET interchange and other development in the Southside Regeneration Zone (see Policy &) improving the important ‘Gateway’ to the City Centre. This development in the south of the City Centre will be balanced by redevelopment of the Victoria Centre in the north to help maintain the strong north -south r etail patterns. In addition to this…" C167 3.5.3 Policy 5 Consultee Amend justification text of para 3.5.3 to read In response to consultee "The Greater Nottingham Retail Study indicates that during the Core comments Strategy period there will be sufficient increased spending capacity across the City Centre’s catchment area to support significant new comparison shopping floorspace. However due to the continuing effects of the recession, the Study may overstate retail capacity available over the plan period. Retail capacity projections will need to be updated and monitored, and a review of the Greater Nottingham Retail Study will be a priority, with its findings informing the City Council’s Land and Planning Policies Development Plan Document. The study t reats the Broadmarsh centre redevelopment as a commitment, and indicates additional capacity over and above this for 30,200 square metres at 2021, rising to 58,400 square metres at 2026."

32 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

Reference Main Source of Ref point in doc section change Details Reason C168 3.5.4 Policy 5 Consultee Amend justification text of para 3.5.4 to read In response to "Development proposals at the Broadmarsh and Victoria Centres, and consultee the reoccupation of vacant floorspace, are key priorities for City Centre comments retailing . Current proposals for the Victoria Centre redevelopment indicate proposed comparison floorspace of 30,000 square metres. Both schemes These proposals, together with the redevelopment of the Broadmarsh Centre will also deliver further convenience shopping and leisure opportunities. Assuming that both the Broad marsh and Victoria Centres are developed as currently envisaged, and trading fully by 2017, based on the Greater Nottingham Retail Study there will be limited capacity for further major comparison retail development prior to 2021. If fully implemented, the two development schemes could accommodate growth in comparison retailing expenditure over a significant part of the plan period, so further major retail development will only be appropriate if evidence demonstrates the additional shopping floorspace growth can be accommodated. Once both schemes are committed, the focus of retail development will therefore be on the refurbishment, rationalisation and consolidation of the wider City Centre retail offer." C169 3.5.5 Policy 5 Consultee Amend justification text of para 3.5.5 to read In response to consultee "Protecting and enhancing the City Centre’s retail and leisure functions comments is the best defence against the potential impact of out -of -town out of centre shopping or leisure developments, and their attendant threats to the City Centre’s vitality and viability. The National Planning Policy Framework continues to see City Centre in centre and then edge of centre developments as being preferable, and the evidence suggests no need to identify or plan for additional out -of -town out of centre comparison retail development." C170 3.5.10 Policy 5 Consultee Amend text of para 3.5.10 to read: In response to consultee "Nottingham’s historic, cultural and high quality built environment is a comments unique asset for the conurbation, which makes a positive contribution to the local character and distinctiveness of the city Centre, and has the potential to which could make a more significant contribution to the economic well being of the conurbation…"

33 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

Reference Main Source of Ref point in doc section change Details Reason C171 Policy 6.2 Policy 6 Consultee Amend Policy 6.2 to read In response to consultee "The boundaries of centres and the identification of sites for main town comments centre uses to meet identified need will be defined in site specific Development Plan Documents. The boundaries of centres, primary shopping areas and the identification of sites for main town centre uses to meet identified need will be defined in Site Specific Development Plan Documents. Development on identified sites should be appropriate in scale and nature to the role and function of that centre and of the area it serves." C172 Policy 6.3 Policy 6 Consultee Amend policy text to read In response to consultee A Nnew Centres of Neighbourhood Importance to serve the new comments sustainable communities y at the Waterside Regeneration Zone (Nottingham City) and at Local Centre at Gedling Colliery/Chase Farm (Gedling), if development commences in the plan period, will be required. New retail development at these locations will be expected to consolidate and strengthen the network and hierarchy of centres and not harm the viability and vitality of existing centres. C173 Policy 6.3 Policy 6 Consultee Start last sentence of Policy 6.3 as a new section of Policy 6 (ie number In response to 6.4 and amend numbering of existing sections 4, 5 and 6). consultee comments C174 Policy 6.4b) Policy 6 Officers Lower case for “Ttown Ccentre” Consistency (6.5b)) C175 Policy 6.5 (6.6) Policy 6 Officers Lower case for “Ddistrict” and “Ttown Ccentre” Consistency

34 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

Reference Main Source of Ref point in doc section change Details Reason C176 Policy 6.6 Policy 6 Consultee Amendments to Policy 6.6 In response to (6.7) consultee Policy 6.6 deleted comments

"Development of retail and leisure uses in out -of and edge -of -centre locations will need to demonstrate suitability through a sequentia l site approach and also provide a robust assessment of impact on nearby centres. Subsequent Development Plan Documents will determine the need to set thresholds for the scale of main town centre development in edge -of and out -of centre locations."

and replaced with

"Main town centre uses should be located in centres. Development should be appropriate in scale and nature to the role and function of the centre. If no suitable sites are available in centres then edge-of-centre locations should be used, and only if there are no suitable sites will out of centre sites be considered. Proposals for edge of centre and out of centre sites should satisfy the sequential test and show how the development will not have an adverse impact on any centre. Subsequent Development Plan Documents will set thresholds where impact assessments will be required for main town centre development in edge of and out of centre locations. " C177 3.6.1 Policy 6 Officers/Consultee 6th line: Reference should be to Map 3.1 rather than 3.2. Lower case for Correction and in “Ttown Ccentre” and “Llocal” for consistency response to consultee

35 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

Reference Main Source of Ref point in doc section change Details Reason C178 3.6.2 Policy 6 Consultee Amend para 3.6.2 text to read In response to consultee “…This approach is reaffirmed by the National Planning Policy comments Framework, which requires local authorities to develop a sequential approach towards accommodating new retail and town centre development within, or adjoining its centres apply a sequential test to accommodating new main town centre uses, requiring proposals to be located in town centres, then in edge of centre locations and only if suitable sites are not available should out of centre sites be considered .” C179 3.6.3 Policy 6 Consultee Amend text of para 3.6.3 to read: In response to consultee "The National Planning Policy Framework also requires Councils to comments demonstrate through Development Plan Documents how they can meet identified needs for main town centre uses. In achieving this, Councils will be guided by evidence from their Retail Needs Studies. These provide detailed data on the level of need for comparison and convenience floorspace both within identified centres and also across local authority areas as a whole, and will be regularly reviewed to inform future planning decisions ." C180 3.6.3 Policy 6 Consultee Add new sentence to the end of this paragraph to read In response to consultee "This evidence in conjunction with a clear definition of primary and comments secondary frontages, will be used to assist the defining of the extent of town centres, primary shopping areas and the identification of sites for main town centre uses to meet identified need. " C181 3.6.5 Policy 6 Officers 1st-3rd lines: Amend commas to “Large new communities, mainly on urban Correction extension sites, are proposed, and, to meet their needs...” C182 3.6.6 Policy 6 Officers Lower case for “Town Ccentre” to start of sentence Consistency C183 3.6.6 Policy 6 Officers Remove “town ” from second sentence in the paragraph to clarify that Clarification offices of appropriate scale could be suitable in District and Local Centres. C184 3.6.7 Policy 6 Officers 5th line: Remove Stapleford from the list of centres as not specifically Correction mentioned in the policy

36 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

Reference Main Source of Ref point in doc section change Details Reason C185 3.6.9 Policy 6 Consultee Amend justification text of para 3.6.9 to read: In response to consultee "... methods of travel. Proposals for out of centre or edge of centre retail comments development and main town centre uses will therefore be required to strongly demonstrate both a sequential approach to its their location and how it they will not have an unacceptable significant adverse impact on the vitality and viability of nearby centres, or on existing, committed and planned public and private investment in a centre or centres in the catchment area of the proposals undermine regenerative activities within them ." C186 Policy 7.1.g Policy 7 Officers 1st line: Replace with capital “L” for “local” Consistency C187 Policy 7.2 Policy 7 Officers 2nd line: Add “to” before “above”. Correction C188 Policy 7.2 Policy 7 Officers 3rd line, delete end of sentence Correction

“,or adopted Masterplans ” C189 Policy 3.7.1 Policy 7 Consultee Amend text at the end of justification text 3.7.1 to read In response to consultee "… Where remediation of sites is proposed practical sustainable comments remediation technologies should be incorporated where applicable ." C190 3.7.3 Policy 7 Officers Amend last sentence to read Correction

"Given the economic circumstances prevailing in the short term, this is likely to involve an approach emphasising on the development of key sites, and on capitalising on their locational advantages, not only with regard not only to the proximity of the City Centre, but also to the ease of access to renewable energy networks." C191 3.7.4 Policy 7 Officers 1st/2nd lines amend text to read “The combined sites of the Boots Campus (in Correction both Broxtowe and Nottingham City) and adjacent Severn Trent land (solely within Broxtowe) cross the administrative boundary therefore a partnership approach to its development is being pursued.” C192 3.7.5 Policy 7 Consultee Add to end of the bullet point of para 3.7.5: In response to consultee • "Where relevant, addressing issues in relation to equalities matters comments and health and wellbeing ." C193 3.7.7 Policy 7 Officers 7th line: Comma before “, for instance,” rather than after it Correction

37 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

Reference Main Source of Ref point in doc section change Details Reason C194 Policy 7 – Policy 7 Officers Bullet point 1 and 2 merged to read Correction monitoring arrangements "Site specific Allocations Development Plan Document " C195 Policy 8.1 Policy 8 Consultee Amend Policy 8.1 text to read: In response to consultee “Residential development should maintain, provide and contribute to a comments mix of housing tenures, types and sizes in order to create mixed and balanced sustainable, inclusive and mixed communities” C196 Policy 8.2 Policy 8 Officers 2nd sentence amend to “emphasis on ” rather than “emphasis of ” Correction C197 Policy 8.4e) Policy 8 Consultee Amend policy text 8.4e) to read In response to consultee "… the need to redress the housing mix within areas of concentration of comments student households and Houses in Multiple Occupation" C198 Polivy 8.7 Policy 8 Officer Amend policy text 8.7 to read Clarification

"In the case of larger phased developments the level of affordable housing will be considered on a site by site basis ..." C199 3.8.1 Policy 8 Consultee Amend text to read In response to consultee "… In addition, improving the quality of housing conditions and design comments can have substantial impacts on improving health inequalities..." C200 3.8.2 Policy 8 Officers 6th line: Add comma after “areas,”. Correction C201 3.8.3 Policy 8 Consultee Delete para 3.8.4 and amend justification text 3.8.3 to read In response to consultee "…it is therefore important that new developments provide a range of comments types of housing , including housing likely to be attractive to older persons ." C202 3.8.4 Policy 8 Consultee Delete para 3.8.4 In response to consultee "Emerging older pe rsons research indicates that a majority of the comments elderly population interviewed would wish to remain in housing that they currently occupy for as long as possible. Respondents to surveys have also indicated that if they had to move to properties in the fut ure their aspirations would include 2 bedroom bungalows or purpose built ‘retirement villages’. "

38 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

Reference Main Source of Ref point in doc section change Details Reason C203 3.8.7 Policy 8 Officers 1st/2nd lines: Amend the three inverted commas as are the wrong way Correction around. C204 3.8.8 Policy 8 Consultee Amend para 3.8.8 to read In response to consultee "The number of full-time students attending universities in the area has comments increased considerably in recent years. The process of change brought about by increased numbers of students living in private rented households households and Houses in Multiple Occupation (HMOs) has altered the residential profile of some neighbourhoods dramatically, and has led to unsustainable communities and associated amenity issues. to communities becoming unbalanced . This problem is most acute within Nottingham City, and in order to help address this some of the problems related to increased concentrations of students living within neighbourhoods , the City Council has adopted its Building Balanced Communities Supplementary Planni ng Document, which provides further guidance on the provision of student housing. It has also introduced an Article 4 Direction that will mean from 11 March 2012 planning permission will be required requires planning permission to be obtained before converting a family house (C3 Dwellinghouse) to a House in Multiple Occupation with between 3 and 6 unrelated occupiers sharing facilities basic amenities (C4 HMO), thereby enabling it to better manage the future growth and distribution of C4 HMOs across the City . The policy approach to considering planning applications for student accommodation, C4 HMOs and larger ‘sui generis’ HMOs with 7 or more occupiers sharing facilities basic amenities these changes of us e will be set out in its site specific Development Plan Document." C205 3.8.11 Policy 8 Officers Affordable housing table updated to show 2012 Update (added column Updated and figures) and amended text to para 3.8.11 to read: information including change "… outlined in the East Midlands Regional Plan . A further Affordable relating to the RS Needs update was undertaken in 2012. The need levels …" being revoked

Addition column shows figures "Broxtowe 535 Gedling 301 Nottingham City 444 " of "Potential level of net affordable housing need per annum (2012 update) " and amend footnote to add "and 2012"

39 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

Reference Main Source of Ref point in doc section change Details Reason C206 new 3.8.11a Policy 8 Officers New para 3.8.11a added to explain about the updated Affordable Needs Updated Update 2012 to read information

"The 2012 update found increased levels of need in the Housing Market Area (albeit that need had declined in Gedling). This is largely due to the housing market conditions prevailing at the time, in particular the lack of availability of mortgage finance meaning it is more difficult for households to access the housing market (house prices themselves are lower in real terms than in 2009, and interest rates on mortgages are also at historically low levels). As economic conditions and access to credit improve, affordability will also improve towards the level identified in the 2009 needs update. This demonstrates the volatility of affordable housing need, and highlights uncertainties associated with projecting annual need assessed at one point in time over the plan period. For this reason, the Councils consider the monitoring of need should be undertaken on the basis of the Affordable Housing Needs update 2009, because these figures reflect a period of more buoyant housing market conditions, rather than the 2012 information. Affordable housing need will be monitored and kept under review, and a full review of the Strategic Housing Market Assessment will be undertaken after the production of government Household Projections based on the results of the 2011 Census, which are expected to be published in 2014. " C207 3.8.12 Policy 8 Officers Amend first sentence to read Updated information "The 2009 Nottingham Core Strategic Housing Market Area Assessment findings equate ..." C208 3.8.13 Policy 8 Officers Add “Given the …” at the start of 3 rd sentence Correction C209 Policy 8 Policy 8 Oficers Amend 2nd monitoring target to read Clarification monitoring "Provision of affordable housing (6,725 for monitoring purposes – made up of 1845 in Broxtowe, 1450 in Gedling and 3430 in Nottingham City )" C210 Policy 8 Policy 8 Officers Delete comma after “by”, in the box for the second indicator Correction monitoring C211 Policy 8 Policy 8 Officers Delete “Intermediate rent ” as this is part of “Intermediate housing” Correction monitoring

40 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

Reference Main Source of Ref point in doc section change Details Reason C212 Policy 9.3a) Policy 9 Consultee Amend text in policy 9.3a) to read In response to consultee "… protection of the natural, built and … historical historic comments environment…" C213 Policy 10.1.d Policy 10 Officers Amend text to read “to meet evolving demands changing needs of occupiers Correction …” C214 Policy 10.2 Policy 10 Consultee Amend text of Policy 10.2 to read as follows: In response to consultee 2. additional criteria between f & g: comments "g) the ground conditions of the site, including that arising from land instability or contamination, together with the mitigation/remediation proposed or required. " C215 Policy 10.5 Policy 10 Officers last line: Add a full-stop at the end of the sentence. Correction C216 3.10.4 Policy 10 Officers 2nd line Delete “and” after “Green Belt” Correction C217 3.10.5 Policy 10 Officers Add additional sentence after the 2nd sentence to read Clarification

“However it is recognised that it can be difficult to achieve these standards on smaller schemes therefore the policy offers some flexibility to deal with this. ” C218 3.10.7 Policy 10 Officers 3rd line: Add comma after “methodology” Correction C219 3.10.9 Policy 10 Officers Amend text to “the main built up area of Nottingham” Consistency C220 Policy 11.2c) Policy 11 Consultee Text of policy 11.2c) to read In response to consultee “… such as Sherwood Forest, other ancient or mature woodland …” comments C221 Policy 11.2e) Policy 11 Officers/Consultee Amend text to read In response to consultee "e) prominent Llisted Bbuildings and Scheduled Monument " comments C222 Policy 11.3e) Policy 11 Consultee Spilt bullet point e) with new bullet point starting In response to “Where there is a loss in whole …” and renumbering of bullet points as consultee a result comments C223 Policy 11.3a) Policy 11 Officers Capitalise Conservation Areas to read "… existing and planned Cconservation Consistency Aareas …" C224 Policy 11.3e) Policy 11 Officers/Consultee 1st line: Add “is ” after “environment”. In response to consultee comments

41 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

Reference Main Source of Ref point in doc section change Details Reason C225 3.11.1 Policy 11 Officers/Consultee 4th line capitalise Listed Buildings, World Heritage Sites, Historic Parks In response to and Gardens and Scheduled Ancient Monuments to read "Designated consultee Hheritage assets include Llisted Bbuildings, Conservation Areas, comments Wworld Hheritage Ssites, historic Registered Pparks and Ggardens and Sscheduled Aancient Mmonuments." C226 3.11.1 Policy 11 Officers Line 3, “Heritage” should have small “h” for consistency – replace with Correction “heritage” C227 3.11.3 Policy 11 Consultee Amend para 3.11.3 to read In response to consultee "…considered to be particularly important to the plan area as a whole ." comments C228 3.11.4 Policy 11 Officers Amend 2nd sentence of justification text 3.11.4 to read In response to consultee “…When considering sites of potential archaeological importance, comments including those as identified on in the Historic Environment Record for the area, the Local Authority will …” C229 3.11.6 Policy 11 Officers/Consultee Amend text to read In response to consultee "This could include bringing an historic listed historic building back…" comments C230 3.11.7 Policy 11 Officers Last sentence, amend to “approach to the maintenance” Correction C231 3.11.9 Policy 11 Consultee Delete last sentence of Policy 11 justification text 3.11.9 and replace with In response to consultee "In these rare cases steps should be taken to ensure that the asset is comments fully recorded prior to it being lost. "

"… In these cases steps should be taken to ensure that the assets are appropriately recorded before they are damaged or destroyed." C232 Policy 11 Policy 11 Officers In the table, “Heritage assets” should be lower case – replace with “heritage Consistency Monitoring assets ” as that has been used in most places arrangements C233 Policy 12.1 Policy 12 Consultee Amend second sentence of Policy 12.1 to read In response to consultee "In particular, where there is an evidenced need , new or improved comments community facilities…" C234 Policy 12 2a) Policy 12 Officers Lower case for “tTown cCentre” for consistency Correction C235 3.12.1 Policy 12 Officers 2nd line: Apostrophe after the “s” in “Councils’”, rather than before it. Correction

42 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

Reference Main Source of Ref point in doc section change Details Reason C236 3.12.2 Policy 12 Officers Amend text to “…population where there is a spatial element to their location legibility in the conurbation demand for these services.” C237 3.12.3 Policy 12 Officers 6th line: Comma rather than semi-colon after “community”. Correction C238 3.12.5 Policy 12 Officers 2nd line: “...its their continued use as community facility facilities ...”, rather Correction than the singular C239 3.12.8 Policy 12 Officers 1st line: amend to “include ” rather than “includes”. Correction C240 3.12.8 Policy 12 Consultee Amend Para 3.12.8 to read In response to "... health centres GP surgeries , GP practices, community pharmacies " consultee comments C241 Policy 13.1b) Policy 13 Officers Amend policy text to read Correction

"new cultural and tourism facilities of more local importance will be located in or adjoining town or district centres, or improving existing facilities will be improved ;" C242 3.13.1 Policy 13 Officers Add to end of final sentence, “for instance, the City Council is seeking Clarification funding opportunities to develop a new Central Library in the City Centre. ” C243 3.13.4 Policy 13 Officers 3rd line: correct title is “New Art Exchange” Correction C244 3.13.4 Policy 13 Officers last line: Delete “and/or catchment ” as in this context “population” and Correction “catchment” are the same thing. Add “the ” before “population”. C245 Policy 14.2 Policy 14 Consultee Amend policy 14.2 second sentence to read: In response to consultee “… The effective operation of the highway network and, its ability to comments provide sustainable transport solutions or support economic growth should not be compromised” C246 Policy 14.3 Policy 14 Officers Amend text to read “… transport networks to serve new development , in Clarification particular”. C247 Policy 14.3c) Policy 14 Officers 2nd line, add “facilities ” after “cycling”. Clarification C248 Policy 14.3d) Policy 14 Consultee Amend text of Policy 14 3 d) to read In response to consultee "Network Management measures then highway capacity enhancement comments to deal with severe impacts arising from residual car demand where the initiatives required under points (a) to (c) above are insufficient to avoid significant additional car journeys”

43 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

Reference Main Source of Ref point in doc section change Details Reason C249 Policy 14.4 Policy 14 Consultee Amend the order within policy 14.4 to read: In response to consultee “There will be a level of iteration between the stages of the hierarchy comments above to ensure their effective delivery having regard to the role and function of the highway network and the implementation of the approach will have regard to the needs of people with mobility difficulties.” C250 3.14.3 Policy 14 Officers 3rd line, comma after “and”, rather than before Correction C251 3.14.3 Policy 14 Officers Amend text for last sentence to “…for instance at Ppark and Rride or Ttram Consistency stops.” C252 3.14.6 Policy 14 Officers Amend text to read Correction

"This will be key to the sustainable delivery of Core Strategy objectives, and will require the commitment and close cooperation between the Highway Authorities, the three Highway Agency and other transport providers. " C253 3.14.11 Policy 14 Officers Last line, add “district ” after “town”. Correction C254 3.14.12 Policy 14 Consultee Additional justification text to be added before para 3.14.12: In response to consultee "The Strategic Road Network (SRN) of motorways and trunk roads plays comments an important role in supporting the economy of Greater Nottingham. The emphasis on sustainable measures will assist in safeguarding the operation of the SRN but proposed growth in Greater Nottingham will give rise to cumulative impacts on the SRN. The committed A453 improvement will improve the operation of this key gateway into Greater Nottingham. Other elements of the SRN will be safeguarded chiefly through measures at key junctions, including network management and localised capacity improvements. The local authorities in the area and the Highway Agency will work together to examine the cumulative impacts of development on strategic routes across the area with a view to identifying appropriate route measures that can be brought forward to support growth. " C255 Policy 14 Policy 14 Officers Add “town ,” before “district” in the first “Indicators” box. Correction monitoring arrangements

44 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

Reference Main Source of Ref point in doc section change Details Reason C256 Policy 14 Policy 14 Consultee Add new bullet point to the Delivery column In response to monitoring “Consultation with the local Highway Authorities ” consultee arrangements comments C257 Policy 15.4c) Policy 15 Consultee Amend text to read In response to consultee "c) A52 Junction Improvements (in Rushcliff e Borough between A6200 comments Derby Road and Bingham );" C258 Policy 15.5a) Policy 15 Officers Add “Borough ” after “Erewash”, Consistency C259 Policy 15.5f) Policy 15 Consultee Add bullet point to Policy 15.5 In response to consultee “f) Hucknall Town Centre Improvement Scheme (Ashfield District) ” comments M260 Policy 15.5 Policy 15 Officers Add at the end of 5. Local and National schemes which will impact on Proposed HS2 the plan area if implemented include: route and station

"f) HS2 hub Station at Toton to serve the East Midlands; and g) Extension to NET to serve the new station " C261 Policy 15.6 Policy 15 Consultee Policy 15.6 amend text to read In response to “Further transport infrastructure schemes are likely to emerge through consultee Local Transport Plan reviews, preparation of route strategies by the comments Highways Agency, through Transport Assessments for development sites and subsequent Development Plan Documents. C262 3.15.1 Policy 15 Officers 4th line: Delete the “the ” before “Policy 2”. Correction C263 3.15.1 Policy 15 Officers 5th line: Reference should be to points “3” only, rather than “1 and 2 ”. Correction C264 3.15.2 Policy 15 Consultee In the first sentence amend text to read In response to “… no currently available funding some of which have nevertheless consultee have been or are included …” comments C265 3.15.3 Policy 15 Officers Line 1, add “or long-time delivery timescales ” to refer to the longer term Clarification delivery timescales for “High Speed Rail” C266 Monitoring Policy 15 Officers “Highways” (plural) Agency in the “Delivery” box Correction arrangements for Policy 15

45 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

Reference Main Source of Ref point in doc section change Details Reason C267 Policy 16.4 Policy 16 Consultee Reword Policy 16.4 to state In response to “… Exceptions may be made if the park or open spa ce is shown to be consultee underused or undervalued, the development is a small part of the Green comments Infrastructure network and will not be detrimental to its function, or the development is a use associated with parks and open spaces or if none of the above apply the park or open space is shown to be underused or undervalued .

C268 3.16.2 Policy 16 Officers 6th line: Reference should be to paragraph 3.17.3 rather than 3.17.4 Correction C269 3.16.3 Policy 16 Consultee Amend text in para 3.16.3 to read In response to consultee “…river corridors provide the opportunity to help tackle climate change comments through energy production and flood attenuation where appropriate …”

C270 3.16.3 Policy 16 Consultee Add to para 3.16.3 justification text at In response to consultee "…energy production and flood protection where appropriate . All water comments courses in and adjacent to new developments provide opportunities to create enhanced green corridors including the potential for opening up culverted water courses ." C271 3.16.6 Policy 16 Consultee Add addition text to justification text at para 3.16.6 In response to consultee … healthy lifestyle and contribute to health improvement through comments increasing physical activity and improving mental wellbeing, … C272 3.16.7 Policy 16 Consultee Reword justification of the last sentence to para 3.16.7 In response to consultee “…provided the loss can be mitigated or compensated replaced by comments equivalent or better provision in a suitable location. C273 3.16.9 Policy 16 Officers 1st/2nd lines: delete “A variety of approaches will be used in...delivering a Clarification strategic approach ” and replace with “A strategic approach will be used in the protection of Green Infrastructure ”

46 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

Reference Main Source of Ref point in doc section change Details Reason C274 Policy 16 Policy 16 Consultee Amend the monitoring indicator relating to the quality of open spaces by In response to Monitoring adding the following indicators consultee arrangements comments "● Number of SINCs under positive conservation management, using Single Data List indicator 160 ● Number of Local Nature Reserves with a management plan in place ”

C275 Monitoring Policy 16 Officers Replace “S106s” with “S106” Correction arrangements for Policy 16 C276 Plan 3.3 Diagrams Officers ‘Sub Regiona l Green Infrastructure Corridors ’ changed to ‘Strategic Green Correction Infrastructure ’ C277 Policy 17.1 Policy 17 Officers Delete “the ” on the 1st line so reads “bBiodiversity will be increased over the Correction Core Strategy period …” C278 Policy 17.1b) Policy 17 Officers/Consultee Amend text to read “b) ensuring that fragmentation of the Green In response to Infrastructure network is avoided wherever appropriate possible and consultee improvements to the network benefit biodiversity, including at a comments landscape scale, through the incorporation of existing habitats and the creation of new habitats” C279 Policy 17.1e) Policy 17 Consultee Amend policy text 17.1e) to read In response to “… as a minimum firstly mitigate or and if not possible, compensate at a consultee level equivalent to the biodiversity value of the habitat lost” comments

C280 Policy 17.2 Policy 17 Consultee/ Officer Amend the text of policy 17.2 by deleting In response to consultee "… the designation of further protected sites will be pursued " and comments/ replace with "… further sites will be designated where they meet the clarification relevant national or local criteria ." C281 Policy 17.3 Policy 17 Consultee Amend policy text to read: In response to consultee Development on or affecting other, non-designated sites or wildlife comments corridors with biodiversity value will only be permitted where it can be demonstrated that the there is an overriding need for the development outweighs any harm caused by for the development and that adequate mitigation measures are put in place.

47 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

Reference Main Source of Ref point in doc section change Details Reason C282 3.17.1 Policy 17 Consultee Add new text to the end of paragraph 3.17.1 to read In response to consultee "...and also recognises the need to prevent the loss or deterioration of comments irreplaceable habitats such as ancient woodland ."

C283 3.17.2 Policy 17 Officers Delete the word “legally ” in 2nd line Correction C284 3.17.4 Policy 17 Consultee Add new text to the first sentence of paragraph 3.17.4 to read In response to "...and these could include brownfield as well as Greenfield sites ." consultee comments C285 3.17.5 Policy 17 Officers/Consultee Amend justification text 3.17.5 as suggested to read “Proposed In response to development should particularly seek to contribute towards delivery of consultee the Local Biodiversity Action Plan objectives for habitats and species. comments The Nottinghamshire Local Biodiversity Action Plan identifies priority wildlife habitats …” C286 3.17.5 Policy 17 Officers 5th line, “sets” rather than “to set”. Correction C287 3.17.5 Policy 17 Officers 8th line, Delete comma after “habitats”. Correction C288 3.17.5 Policy 17 Consultee Add new text to the end of paragraph 3.17.5 to read In response to consultee "Where development of land is proposed that is known or likely to be comments used by European protected and other species, further guidance is available from Natural England’s website. " C289 Policy 17 Policy 17 Consultee Amend the monitoring indicator relating to retaining area of biodiversity In response to Monitoring important: consultee arrangements comments (Retain Areas "Number of incidents of unmitigated loss of SINCs due to development " of and replace with "Net change in the area of SINCs " Biodiversity Importance )

48 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

Reference Main Source of Ref point in doc section change Details Reason C290 Policy 17 Policy 17 Consultee Amend the monitoring indicator relating to retaining area of biodiversity In response to Monitoring important: consultee arrangements comments (Improve "Number of SSSIs in a favourable condition " and replace with "Number management of SINCs under positive conservation management, using Single Data of biodiversity List indicator 160 " sites) and also add

"Number of Local Nature Reserves with a management plan in place " C291 Policy 17 Policy 17 Officers Add “Development Plan Documents ” to the Delivery column as these are also Clarification Monitoring a delivery mechanism arrangements C292 Section D: Other Officers 4th line, “Appendices ” rather than “Appendix ”. Correction Making it happen, Page 115 C293 Section D Other Officers Amend “Including ” to “included ” Correction making it happen C294 Policy 18.4 Policy 18 Officers 3rd/4th lines replace “or ” with “such as in ” Legibility C295 3.18.2 Policy 18 Officers 2nd line, delete comma after “facilities” Correction C296 3.18.3 Policy 18 Officers Line 6, remove “(see Glossary) ” as unnecessary reference Correction C297 3.18.4a Policy 18 Consultee Add addition justification text para after 3.18.4a In response to consultee "Transport modelling identifies that any issues arising at a strategic comments level can be managed via mitigation measures such as improved public transport and Smarter Choices packages to accommodate delivery of the quantum and distribution of development set out in the Aligned Core Strategies. However local interventions will be necessary. These local interventions will depend on the final agreed developments and their configuration as set out in DPD and master-plans as appropriate which will be informed by wider route strategies prepared by the Highway Agency and local authorities. " C298 3.18.5 Policy 18 Officers Delete “be” in the first sentence after “are” and before “identified” Legibility

49 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

Reference Main Source of Ref point in doc section change Details Reason C299 Monitoring Policy 18 Officers “Reports ” rather than “Reviews ” in the “Indicator” box. Correction arrangements Policy 18 C300 Policy 19.3 Policy 19 Consultee Amend policy text 19.3 In response to consultee "… either individually or collectively" comments C301 3.19.1 Policy 19 Consultee Add sentence to justification text 3.19.1 In response to consultee “Contributions from one or more developments may be pooled where comments appropriate, subject to adherence to future restrictions on pooling of developer contributions. ” C302 3.19.1 Policy 19 Consultee Add text to the end of justification text of para 3.19.1 In response to "… When negotiating developer contributions, consideration will be consultee given to changes in economic conditions over time and scheme comments viability . C303 3.19.2 Policy 19 Officers Bullet point 8 after “including” add “libraries ,” and bullet point 9 delete Correction “(including libraries )”“ C304 3.19.3 Policy 19 Officers 1st sentence – delete the first sentence “The ability to put in place a Update Community Infrastructure Levy (2010) came into force on 6 April 2010 ”. And instead start 2 nd sentence (now 1 st sentence) “Community (CIL) allows …” C305 3.19.4 Policy 19 Officers 2nd line, reference should be to appendices A and B, rather than B and C. Correction C306 3.19.5 Policy 19 Officers Amend text to read “… Supplementary Local Development Plan Documents Correction …” C307 Page 126 Appendix A - Officers Amend site area text to replace “125ha ” with “126ha” Correction Boots C308 Page 126 Appendix A Officers Add text to housing unit info: "1,150 (550 in Broxtowe, upto 600 in Clarification - Boots Nottingham" C309 Page 126 Appendix A - Officers Within summary assessment change “Electricity - no known abnormal Updated Boots requirements .” To “Install a new transformer at Boots Primary and a new information circuit from there to Nottingham .” Within further work section add “Further dialogue with Western Power .” C310 Page 126 Appendix A - Officers Within flooding section amend text to replace “1:100 hundred ” with “1 in 100 ” Consistency Boots

50 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

Reference Main Source of Ref point in doc section change Details Reason C311 Page 126 Appendix A - Officers Within flooding section amend text to “site specific strategic Fflood Rrisk Correction Boots Aassessment” C312 Page 127 Appendix A - Officers Delete “confirmed in ” after “tbc” Consistency Boots C313 Page 127 Appendix A Consultee Add new text to contamination summary: "Permitted waste site present In response to - Boots at Harrimans Lane and Heat and Power Plant present on site. " Add new consultee text to further work under contamination: "Potential on and off site comments pollution mitigation measures to be considered as proposals emerge with further dialogue with the Environment Agency. " C314 Page 127 Appendix A Officers Category for “Heritage Assets ” added. New text added in summary Updated - Boots assessment: “Several high quality Listed Buildings on site. ” New text information added in further work: “Further dialogue with English Heritage as proposals emerge to preserve and enhance heritage assets. Strategy for reuse and conversion/adaptation costs required as part of detailed master-plan. ” Under ‘other’ text deleted – “Strategy for r euse and conversion/adaptation costs required as part of detailed master -plan. ” C315 Page 131 Appendix A - Officers Amend title to "Field Farm, North Of Stapleford (Broxtowe)" Clarification Field Farm C316 Page 132 Appendix A - Officers Add text to end of transport summary assessment "No further highway Updated Field Farm improvements will be funded by the Highways Agency ." Add text to end of information transport further work section "Further dialogue with the Highways Agency required regarding access to A52 and A453 "

C317 Page 132 Appendix A - Officers Under utilities change text from "Electricity - Additional 33KV Circuits and new Updated Field Farm 33kV primary substation at Watnall Required " to "Electricity - No abnormal Information requirements " C318 Page 131 Appendix A - Officers Change “Requirements ” to “requirements ” Correction Field Farm C319 Page 132 Appendix A - Officers Additional text added to Green Infrastructure Clarification Field Farm “Within the Greenwood Community Forest.” C320 Page 132 Appendix A - Officers Category for “Heritage Assets " added. New text added in summary Updated Field Farm assessment: “Site is not within a designated Conservation Area and has information no impact upon a designated Conservation Area or heritage assets. ”

51 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

Reference Main Source of Ref point in doc section change Details Reason C321 Page 132 Appendix A Officers/Consultee Amend Indicative Assessment to read "No major irresolvable In response to - Field Farm constraints to development have been identified. Jjoint meetings with consultee the Environment Agency and Severn Trent have identified a need for an comments holistic approach to fluvial, surface water and waste water drainage including recommendations from the Pitt Review which are being to be addressed through the progression of the planning application. As part of the processing of the planning application it has been identified that 6% of the site comprises Grade 2 Agricultural Land and 33% Grade 3a which amounts to 10.8 hectares. There are two individual and woodland Tree Preservation Orders which were confirmed in 2012 and extensive open areas of the site are to be retained to allow recreational use and to allow some habitat to encourage barn owl feeding." C322 Page 132 Appendix A Consultee Category for "Other " added. Next text "Potential surface coal reserves In response to - Field Farm and coal mining legacy issues ". New text under further work "Further consultee review and dialogue with Coal Authority " comments C323 Page 134 Appendix A Officers Amended plan to show updated pedestrian route. Correction - Field Farm C324 Page 134 Appendix A Consultee Amend text in "Other" to read: "Underlying coal strata and coal mining In response to - Field Farm legacy issues." Add text to further work "Further dialogue with the Coal consultee Authority". comments M325 Appendix A Officers Insert new schedule for the proposed site at Toton - see later in this Proposed HS2 - HS2/Toton report for full details route and station C326 Page 135 Appendix A Officers Under Electricity delete "Addition al 33KV Circuits and new 33KV primary Updated - Awsworth substation at Watnall. Potentially – additional 33KV Circuits and new 33KV Information primary substation in the Stapleford area. Reserved site available. " Replace with "Electricity - Additional 33/11KV primary required at Watnall. Depending on phasing of this and other sites reinforcement further up the network may be required by upgrading an existing Bulk Supply Point. New primary at Watnall included in Western Power programme to be implemented by 2015 ." C327 Page 136 Appendix A Consultee Amend contamination summary: "Areas of previously used land and , In response to - Awsworth landfill and waste transfer station present." consultee comments

52 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

Reference Main Source of Ref point in doc section change Details Reason C328 Page 136 Appendix A Officers/Consultee Category for “Heritage Assets ” added. New text added in summary Updated - Awsworth assessment: “3 Listed buildings are present in Awsworth ” New text Information added in further work: “Further dialogue with English Heritage as proposals emerge to preserve and enhance heritage assets. ” C329 Page 136 Appendix A Officers Combine two 'other' categories into one section. Correction - Awsworth C330 Page 136 Appendix A Officers/Consultee Add text to second sentence of Indicative Assessment: "An area of In response to - Awsworth former landfill to the south west of the settlement will not impede consultee delivery of the amount of new development proposed for Awsworth with comments several options available to deliver Awsworth Core Strategy housing numbers ." C331 Page 136 Appendix A Officers Within Indicative assessment replace “…but opportunities for earlier delivery Clarification Indicative - Awsworth on several sites with existing planning permission …” with “but opportunities Assesment for earlier delivery on several sites with existing planning permission or allocated for housing in the adopted Broxtowe Local Plan ." C332 Page 138 Appendix A - Officers Delete “Electricity - Additional 33kV Circuits and new 33kV primary substation Updated Brinsley at Watnall. Potentially - additional 33kV Circuits and new 33kV primary information substation in the Stapleford area. Reserved site available ” Change to “Electricity - Additional 33/11kV primary and circuits in the Eastwood area. Depending on phasing of this and other sites reinforcement further up the network may be required by upgrading an existing Bulk Supply Point” Delete “Included in Western Power programme to be implemented by 2015. ” C333 Page 138 Appendix A - Consultee Amend summary assessment of Health facilities to " Existing residents In response to Brinsley register at Eastwood, and Underwood." consultee comments C334 Page 139 Appendix A - Officers Amend text to read Clarification Brinsley “Within the Proximity to Greenwood Community Forest and proximity to the Erewash valley.” C335 Page 139 Appendix A Officers Category for “Heritage Assets ” added. New text added in summary In response to - Brinsley assessment: “There is one Conservation Area within Brinsley and 2 consultee Listed buildings in the area, in addition to Brinsley Headstocks. " New comments text added in further work: “Further dialogue with English Heritage as proposals emerge to preserve and enhance heritage assets. ”

53 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

Reference Main Source of Ref point in doc section change Details Reason C336 Page 139 Appendix A Consultee Amend text in "Other " to read: "Alluvium deposits and coal strata and In response to - Brinsley coal mining legacy issues "." Add text to further work "Further dialogue consultee with the Coal Authority ". comments C337 Page 139 Appendix A - Officers Within indicative assessment replace “…but opportunities for earlier delivery Clarification Brinsley on several sites with existing planning permission …” With “but opportunities for earlier delivery on several sites with existing planning permission or allocated for housing in the adopted Broxtowe Local Plan. " C338 Page 139 Appendix A Officers/Consultee Add sentence to the end of the first paragraph of the Indicative In response to - Brinsley assessment as follows "Areas to the west of Brinsley are visually consultee prominent, include a Mature Landscape Area and several Sites of comments Importance for Nature Conservation. The amount of development proposed in the Core Strategy can be accommodated without adversely impacting on these areas. " C339 Page 141 Appendix A - Officers Delete “Electrici ty - Additional 33kV Circuits and new 33kV primary substation Updated Eastwood at Watnall Potentially - additional 33kV Circuits and new 33kV primary information substation in the Stapleford area. Reserved site available ” Change to “Electricity - Additional 33/11kV primary and circuits in the Eastwood area. Depending on phasing of this and other sites reinforcement further up the network may be required by upgrading an existing Bulk Supply Point. ” Delete “Included in Western Power programme to be implemented by 2015. ” C340 Page 141 Appendix A Officers Amend flooding text to " However the Beavale Brook, and River Erewash and Clarification - Eastwood Giltbrook are are located to the north, and west and east of the settlement respectively” C341 Page 141 Appendix A - Officers Amend flooding text to “Nnorth” and “Wwest” Correction Eastwood C342 Page 142 Appendix A - Officers Amend text to Correction Eastwood "Within the Close to Greenwood Community Forest and proximity to the Erewash Valley. Large SINC located to the southwest, smaller SINC's to south and east." [apostrophe deleted in SINC]

C343 Page 142 Appendix A Consultee Add text to contamination summary: "In proximity to a Waste Transfer In response to - Eastwood Station and Household Waste Recycling Station ." consultee comments

54 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

Reference Main Source of Ref point in doc section change Details Reason C344 Page 142 Appendix A Officers Category for “Heritage Assets ” added. New text added in summary Updated - Eastwood assessment: “Scheduled Ancient Monument present at Greasley and . information Conservation Area and 20 Listed Buildings in Eastwood. ” New text added in further work: “Further dialogue with English Heritage as proposals emerge to preserve and enhance heritage assets. ” C345 Page 142 Appendix A Consultee Amend text in "Other - further work to read: "Underlying coal strata and In response to - Eastwood coal mining legacy issues "." Add text to further work "Further dialogue consultee with the Coal Authority ". comments C346 Page 143 Appendix A Officers Within indicative assessment replace “…but opportunities for earlier delivery Clarification - Eastwood on several sites with existing planning permission …” with “but opportunities for earlier delivery on several sites with existing planning permission or allocated for housing in the adopted Broxtowe Local Plan. " C347 Page 145 Appendix A - Officers Delete “Electricity - Additional 33kV Circuits and new 33kV primary substation Updated Kimberley at Watnall Potentially - additional 33kV Circuits and new 33kV primary information substation in the Stapleford area. Reserved site available ” Change to “Electricity - new 33/11kV primary at Watnall required. Included in Western Power programme to be implemented by 2015. ” Delete “Included in Western Power programme to be implemented by 2015. ” C348 Page 145 Appendix A - Officers Additional text added Clarification Kimberley “The Gilt Brook runs to the west of Kimberley. ” C349 Page 146 Appendix A - Officers Remove apostrophes – change “SSSI’s ” to “SSSIs ” and "SINC’s ” to “SINCs” Correction Kimberley C350 Page 145 Appendix A Officers Category for “Heritage Assets ” added. New text added in summary Updated - Kimberley assessment: “There are two Conservation Areas within Kimberely and information 13 Listed Buildings in the area. ” New text added in further work: “Further dialogue with English Heritage as proposals emerge to preserve and enhance heritage assets. ” C351 Page 146 Appendix A Officers Amend text in "Other - further work" to read: "Underlying coal strata and In response to - Kimberley coal mining legacy issues "." Add text to further work "Further dialogue consultee with the Coal Authority ". comments C352 Page 146 Appendix A - Officers Within indicative assessment replace “…but opportunities for earlier delivery Clarification Kimberley on several sites with existing planning permission …” with “but opportunities for earlier delivery on several sites with existing planning permission or allocated for housing in the adopted Broxtowe Local Plan. "

55 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

Reference Main Source of Ref point in doc section change Details Reason C353 Page 148 Appendix A - Consultee Clarify information on site ownership for North of Papplewick Lane site to Clarification Papplewick amend information under ownership/developer to read "willing owners Lane positively engaged for majority of the site" . C354 Page 148 Appendix A - Consultee Amend Strategic Site Schedule for the North of Papplewick Lane site with Clarification Papplewick regards to summary assessment of transport. Amend 2nd sentence to read Lane 'Site to be accessed via 2 of either Delia, Dorothy, Alison and Marion Avenues "or via Papplewick Lane, depending on whether the site is developed as one or two phases ." C355 Page 148 Appendix A - Officers Delete “Electricity - Additional 33kV circuits and new 33kV primary substation Updated Papplewick required at Westville. ” Change to “Electricity – Update required to existing information Lane 33/11vK primary at Calverton, may also require new 33/11kV primary in the area. Depending on phasing new Bulk Supply Point may be required. ” Delete “Works to substation programmed by Central Networks for completion by 2015. ” C356 Page 149 Appendix A - Consultee Amend Strategic Site Schedule for the North of Papplewick Lane site with Clarification and Papplewick regards to summary assessment of education. Amend 1st sentence to add update Lane the words "subject to an assessment demonstrating that the anticipated pupil yield cannot be accommodated in the existing school system through the extension or improvement of existing schools" . C357 Page 149 Appendix A Officers Category for “Heritage Assets ” added. New text added in summary Updated - assessment: “Proximity to Site of Special Scientific Interest ("Quarry information Papplewick Banks"), Conservation Areas at Linby and Papplewick, Scheduled Lane Ancient Monuments, Historic Parks and Gardens at Newstead Abbey and Papplewick Hall, Listed Buildings present in and around Linby and Papplewick. ” New text added in further work: “Further dialogue with English Heritage as proposals emerge to preserve and enhance heritage assets. ” C358 Page 152 Appendix A Officers Site area amended from “26.9ha ” to “35.6ha ” Correction - Top Whighay Farm

56 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

Reference Main Source of Ref point in doc section change Details Reason C359 Page 152 Appendix A - Officers Delete “Electricity - Additional 33kV circuits and new 33kV primary substation Updated Top Whighay at Westville. ” Change to “Electricity –Uprating Hucknall to 40MVA required. information Farm Depending on phasing a new Bulk Supply Point may be required. Uprating works programmed by Western Power for completion by 2015. ” Delete “Works programmed by Central Networks for completion by 2015 ” C360 Page 153 Appendix A - Officers Change “SINCS ” to “SINCs ” Correction Top Whighay Farm C361 Page153 Appendix A Officers Category for “Heritage Assets ” added. New text added in summary Updated - Top assessment: “Proximity to Site of Special Scientific Interest ("Quarry information Whighay Banks"), Conservation Area at Linby, Scheduled Ancient Monuments, Farm Historic Parks and Gardens at Newstead Abbey and Papplewick Hall, Listed Buildings present in and around Linby. ” New text added in further work: “Further dialogue with English Heritage as proposals emerge to preserve and enhance heritage assets. ” C362 Page 156 Appendix A Officers/Consultee Updated plan inserted. Amended to correct site boundary, clarify extent Correction - Top of proposed housing and employment areas. Whighay Farm C363 Page 157 Appendix A - Officers Delete “Electricity - no abnormal requirements. ” Change to “Updating of Updated Bestwood existing 33/11kV primary at Calverton required may also need a new 33/11kV information Village primary in the area. Depending on phasing a new Bulk Supply Point may be required ” “Further dialogue with Western Power and Severn Trent when phasing details emerge .” C364 Page 157 Appendix A Consultee Amend text in contamination summary: "No abnormal requirements. In response to - Bestwood Bestwood landfill and various waste licences present ." Add text to consultee Village further work: "Appropriate desk top studies/further investigation as comments required ." C365 Page 158 Appendix A Officers Category for “Heritage Assets ” added. New text added in summary Updated - Bestwood assessment: “Conservation Area, Scheduled Ancient Monument and information Village Listed Buildings present in and around Bestwood Village. ” New text added in further work: “Further dialogue with English Heritage as proposals emerge to preserve and enhance heritage assets. ”

57 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

Reference Main Source of Ref point in doc section change Details Reason C366 Page 158 Appendix A Consultee New category of "Other " added. New text "Potential coal mining legacy In response to - Bestwood issues ". New text added to further work "Further review as detailed consultee Village proposals emerge and further dialogue with the Coal Authority ." comments

C367 Page 160 Appendix A - Officers Delete “Electricity - no abnormal requirements.” Change to “Updating of Updated Calverton existing 33/11kV primary at Calverton required may also need a new 33/11kV information primary in the area. Depending on phasing a new Bulk Supply Point may be required” Add “Further dialogue with Western Power and Severn Trent when phasing details emerge.” C368 Page 162 Appendix A - Officers Green Infrastructure change text to “Alternative Natural Green Space”. Correction Calverton C369 Page 162 Appendix A Consultee Amend contamination summary: " No abnormal requirements. Proximity In response to - Calverton to landfill sites, Calverton Colliery and several sites with waste consultee management licences. " Add text to further work: "Appropriate desk top comments studies/further investigation as required ." C370 Page 162 Appendix A Officers Category for “Heritage Assets ” added. New text added in summary Updated - Calverton assessment: “Proximity to Scheduled Ancient Monuments. information Conservation Area and Listed Buildings present in and around Calverton. ” New text added in further work: “Further dialogue with English Heritage as proposals emerge to preserve and enhance heritage assets.” C371 Page 162 Appendix A Consultee New category of "Other " added. New text "Potential coal mining legacy In response to - Calverton issues ". New text added to further work "Further review as detailed consultee proposals emerge and further dialogue with the Coal Authority ." comments C372 Page 165 Appendix A - Officers Delete “Electricity - no abnormal requirements .” Change to “Updating of Updated Ravenshead existing 33/11kV primary at Calverton required may also need a new 33/11kV information primary in the area. Depending on phasing a new Bulk Supply Point may be required ” Add “Further dialogue with Western Power and Severn Trent when phasing details emerge .” C373 Page 166 Appendix A Officers Category for “Heritage Assets ” added. New text added in summary Updated - assessment: “Proximity to Historic Park and Garden at Newstead information Ravenshead Abbey. Special Character Area between Sheepwalk Lane and Road (A60). Listed Buildings present around Ravenshead. ” New text added in further work: “Further dialogue with English Heritage as proposals emerge to preserve and enhance heritage assets. ”

58 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

Reference Main Source of Ref point in doc section change Details Reason C374 Page 168 Appendix A - Officers Delete “Electricity – Additional 33kV Circuits and new 33kV prima ry substation Updated Stanton Tip at Watnall planned works by Western Power by 2015. ” Change to “Electricity information – no abnormal requirements” “Further dialogue with Western Power as proposals emerge. ” C375 Page 169 Appendix A Officers Category for “Heritage Assets ” added. New text added in summary Updated - Stanton assessment: “Site is not within a designated Conservation Area and has information Tip no impact upon a designated Conservation Area or heritage assets. ” C376 Page 172 Appendix A - Officers Delete “Electricity - Reinforcement of existing 33kV circuits and two existing Updated Waterside 33kV primary Substations. ” Change to “Electricity - A new Bulk Supply Point is information required in the city centre to relieve load from 3 existing points. A further primary substation may be required depending on phasing and final loads. ” C377 Page 174 Appendix A Consultee Add text to contamination summary "Proximity to Enviroenergy, In response to - Waterside Eastcroft Energy from Waste Plant and Clinical Waste Plant ." Add text consultee to further work section "Appropriate desk top studies/further comments investigation as required to address contamination and pollution control issues ." C378 Page 174 Appendix A Officers Category for “Heritage Assets” added. New text added in summary Updated - Waterside assessment: “Proximity to Station Conservation Area and Colwick Hall information and remains of Church and grave yard of John the Baptist, several Listed Buildings and structures present in the area” New text added in further work: “Further dialogue with English Heritage as proposals emerge to preserve and enhance heritage assets. ” C379 Page 178 and Appendix A - Officers Within Indicative Assessment change “Through out ” to “Throughout ” Correction 179 Southside C380 Page 179 Appendix A - Officers Within Electricity section delete “Reinforcement of existing 33kV circuits and Updated Southside two existing 33kV primary Substations. ” Change to “Electricity – A new Bulk information Supply Point is required in the city centre to relieve load from 3 existing points. A further primary substation may be required depending on phasing and final loads. Opportunities for connection to District Heating Network ” Add to further work “Early dialogue with Western Power required re phasing, depending on planned works investment costs may be met by Western Power ” C381 Page 179 Appendix A - Officers Add new text to utilities summary: "Waste Water – no abnormal requirements Updated Southside depending on phasing. Water Supply – no abnormal requirements depending information on phasing. Gas – no abnormal requirements. IT – no abnormal

59 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

Reference Main Source of Ref point in doc section change Details Reason requirements. "

C382 Page 179 Appendix A Consultee Add text to contamination summary: " Proximity to Enviroenergy, In response to - Southside Eastcroft Energy from Waste Plan and Clinical Waste Plant. " Add text to consultee further work: "Site specific investigations as detailed proposals emerge comments to address pollution control issues. " C383 Page 179 Appendix A Officers Category for “Heritage Assets ” added. New text added in summary In response to - Southside assessment: “Incorporates part of the Station Conservation Area and consultee adjoins the Canal Conservation Area, several Listed Buildings present. ” comments New text added in further work: “Further dialogue with English Heritage as proposals emerge to preserve and enhance heritage assets. ” C384 Page 182 Appendix A - Officers Within electricity section delete “Reinforcement of existing 33kV circuits and Updated Eastside two existing 33kV primary Su bstations ” Changed to “Electricity – A new Bulk information Supply Point is required in the city centre to relieve load from 3 existing points. A further primary substation may be required depending on phasing and final loads. ” C385 Page 182 Appendix A - Officers Waste Water section change ‘requires ’ to ‘required ’ Correction Eastside C386 Page 183 Appendix A Consultee Add text to contamination summary: "Proximity to Enviroenergy, In response to - Eastside Eastcroft Energy from Waste Plant and Clinical Waste Plant ." consultee comments C387 Page 183 Appendix A Officers Category for “Heritage Assets ” added. New text added in summary In response to - Eastside assessment: “Proximity to 4 Conservation Areas and several Listed consultee Buildings. ” New text added in further work: “Further dialogue with comments English Heritage as proposals emerge to preserve and enhance heritage assets. ” C388 Page 183 Appendix A - Officers In indicative assessment change “Through out ” to “Throughout ” Correction Eastside C389 Page 189 Appendix B Officers Midland Mainline Speed Improvements and Electrification. "No commitment " Updated Midland changed to "Listed as a priority scheme by Govt awaiting funding approval. " information Mainline Funding source changed from "tbc " to "Central govt via Network Rail. " Lead changed from "tbc " to "Network Rail ". Timescale for delivery changed from "tbc " to "6-10 years " C390 Page 189 A52 Appendix B Consultee Updated information on A52 improvements In response to

60 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

Reference Main Source of Ref point in doc section change Details Reason consultee LA "RBC NCC relevant to all" comments Description "A52 Junction Improvements ( within Rushcliffe between A6200 Derby Road and Bingham) " Progress "Planning Application /No commitment" Estimated Cost "15,000 - 18,000 " Funding Source "tbc Developer/CIL/HA " C391 Page 189 M1 Appendix B Consultee Additional row for M1 junction improvements In response to junctions consultee Nature Important Strategic comments Infrastructure Category Transport LA BBC Relevant to all Description/Infrastructure Requirements Junction modification/traffic management M1 junctions 25, 26 and 27 (also relevant to Erewash and Ashfield which are outside the plan area) Progress No commitment Est. Cost £k tbc Funding Source Developer/CIL/HA Lead HA Timescale (years) 0-5 tbc C392 Page 189 Appendix B Officers "No commitment" changed to "funding secured" . Est cost changed from Updated Eastside "4,000 5,000" to "5,000" , funding secured new text added "5,000" , funding information source changed from "S106 LTP" to "TIF 2" . Timescale changed from "tbc" to "0-5" C393 Page 191-197 Appendix C Officers Trajectories within Appendix C amended to take account of updated Correction information

See separate section showing replacement trajectories for each Council.

Footnotes for Gedling and Nottingham City amended

Gedling

Footnotes

“** All suitable sites have been included to give a theoretical maximum

61 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

Reference Main Source of Ref point in doc section change Details Reason number of dwellings that can be provided in Gedling Borough. This theoretical figure is 8,330 dwellings (i.e. 12.97% higher than the housing target of 7,250). The ann ual projected completions have then been reduced by 12.97% to provide annual completions projections to deliver the housing target of 7,250. Final proposed figures are shown in Policy 2. ”

“** All suitable sites have been included to give a theoretical maximum number of dwellings that can be provided in Gedling Borough.

Past completions figure is 275 for 2011/12. The annual projected completions for the urban area and villages for 2012-2028 have then been reduced to provide annual completions projections to deliver the housing target of 7,250.

Final proposed figures are shown in Policy 2.

Proposed figures in Policy 2 add up to 7,243 dwellings. Additional 7 dwellings have been added to windfall allowance figure (in 2027/28) to round total up to 7,250 dwellings. ”

Nottingham City

“Although windfall sites are not included until after the first ten years, it is very likely, based on the City’s past performance, that a significant number of windfall sites will come forward and be developed before then. This wi ll provide a contingency against lack of delivery of housing on other sites. ”

C394 Page 200 Appendix D Officers Add “A” at the start of Gedling's first “Priority”. Correction C395 Page 201 Appendix D Consultee Add ticks to Policies 1-8, 13 and 16 In response to consultee comments

62 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

Reference Main Source of Ref point in doc section change Details Reason C396 Page 204 Appendix E Consultee Polices ENV14 & ENV15 status amended to saved (Yes) with the In response to following reason adding consultee comments "NPPF (paras 132 -141) applies Policy guidance goes beyond that contained within NPPF " C397 Page 208 Appendix E Officers Amend text to read "…ENV15 New Development in a Cconservation Aarea Correction ..." C398 Page 208 Appendix E Officers Amend text for policies to read "ENV18 Demolition of a lListed bBuilding, Correction ENV19 Extension or alteration of a lListed bBuilding, ENV20 Change of use of a lListed bBuilding, ENV21 Setting of a lListed bBuilding" C399 Page 210 Appendix E Officers “Briefs” remove the apostrophe with regard to H2 Correction C400 Page 215 Appendix E Officers Replace “Links” with “links” in the reason for Policy H1 and H5 Correction C401 Page 215-220 Appendix E Officers Schedules updated to remove reference to PPG/Ss. Correction/Update C402 Page 219 Appendix E Officers Amend title to "NE1 Nature Conservation - SSSIs" Correction C403 Glossary, Glossary Officers Amend text to read “Authority Monitoring Report (AMR): Part of the Local Correction AMRs Plan. A report submitted to the government produced by local planning authorities assessing the progress and effectiveness of their Local Plan.” C404 Glossary, Glossary Officers Replace “Article 4 Directions” with Article 4 Direction”. As the term was given Correction Article 4 in the plural, but the definition is in the singular. Directions C405 Glossary, B2 Glossary Officers Add “an ” before “industrial process”. Correction C406 Glossary, BAP Glossary Officers Start with “An” rather than “is an” Correction C407 Glossary, Glossary Officers Addition text added to term to read Clarification Centres of Neighbourhood "Centres of Neighbourhood Importance: These typically consist of a parade of Importance shops which serve a local community, and may include a small supermarket ." C408 Glossary, Glossary Officers Replace “s106” with “S106” Consistency Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) C409 Glossary, Glossary Officers Start term with “Items” rather than “Are Items” Correction Comparison Goods C410 Glossary, Glossary Officers Start term with “Everyday” rather than “Are everyday” Correction Convenience

63 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

Reference Main Source of Ref point in doc section change Details Reason Goods

C411 Glossary, Glossary Officers At the end, “areas ” rather than “Area ”, to match the actual entry). Correction Countryside C412 Glossary, Glossary Officers Remove the reference to “the London Plan ” as has no relevance to the Core Update Development Strategies. Also move the text “It is the government’s clear policy intention to Plan revoke the regional strategies outside of London, subject to the outcome of the environmental assessments that are currently being undertaken. ” to the term “Regional Plan/Regional Spatial Strategy” as this text relates more to that term C413 Glossary, Glossary Consultee New Glossary entry: In response to Economic consultee Development Economic Development: Development, including those within the B Use comments (new term) Classes, public and community uses and main town centre uses (but excluding housing development). C414 Glossary, EM Glossary Officers Add “Plan/” after “Regional” (to match the actual entry). Correction Regional Plan C415 Glossary, Glossary Officers Amend title to "Employment sSector" Consistency Employment Sector C416 Glossary, Edge Glossary Officers In the 2nd line, amend to “from “ rather than “of ” Correction of Centre C417 Glossary, Glossary Officers Use lower case for “Pplan Aarea” and at the end of the term, use “section ” Consistency Greater rather than “para ” Nottingham C418 Glossary, Glossary Officers Amend title to "Heritage aAsset" Consistency Heritage Asset C419 Glossary, High Glossary Officesr Amend title to "High Technology iIndustry" Correction Technology Industry C420 Glossary, Glossary Consultee Add new glossary entry: In response to Houses in consultee Multiple “Houses in Multiple Occupation – Use Class C4 and larger ‘sui generis’ comments Occupation residential units with 7 or more occupiers sharing basic amenities. ” (new term)

64 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

Reference Main Source of Ref point in doc section change Details Reason C421 Glossary, IDP Glossary Officers Amend to “Sets” with a capital at the start Consistency C422 Glossary, Glossary Consultee New Glossary entry: In response to Legal consultee Compliance "Legal Compliance: As part of the process of preparing a Core Strategy, comments (new term) the document is examined by the Planning Inspectorate to make sure that it is legal and sound. A plan is considered legal when it complies with the various regulations that govern how it should be prepared. Key issues the Inspector will look at include: • Whether it is in the Local Development Scheme; • Whether community consultation was carried out in accordance with the Statement of Community Involvement; • Whether the requirements of the relevant Regulations have been followed; • Whether the appropriate notifications have been made; • Whether a Sustainability Appraisal assessing social, environmental and economic factors has been done and made public; • Whether the Aligned Core Strategy has regard to the Sustainable Community Strategies for the areas it covers; and • Whether the requirements of the Duty to Cooperate have been met " C423 Glossary, Glossary Officers Remove “s” from “Local Plans”. Consistency Local Plans C424 Glossary, Main Glossary Officers Amend the text to read “The contiguous main built up area of Nottingham” and Consistency Built Up Area add "(Rushcilffe) " and "(Erewash) " after “West Bridgeford” and “Long Eaton” of Nottingham for clarification. C425 Glossary, Main Glossary Officers Amend title to read "Main Town Centre uUses" Consistency Town Centre Uses C426 Glossary, Glossary Officers Capitalise “nNeighbourhood pPlans” Consistency NPPF C427 Glossary, Glossary Officers Capitalise and Remove “s” from “nNeighbourhood pPlans” Consistency Neighbourhood Plans C428 Glossary, Glossary Officers Amend text to read “made under the 1990 Town & Country Planning Act, as Correction Neighbourhood amended by the 2011 Localism Act Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act Plans 2004 ” C429 Glossary, PINS Glossary Officers Remove capital “S” in “Ssound” as not necessary, also add abbreviation of Consistency

65 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

Reference Main Source of Ref point in doc section change Details Reason “PINS ” C430 Glossary, Glossary Consultee Add new glossary entry: In response to Primary consultee Shopping “Primary Shopping Area: Defined area where retail development is comments Area (new concentrated (generally comprising the primary and those secondary term) frontages which are adjoining and closely related to the primary shopping frontage). ” C431 Glossary, Glossary Officers Amend text to read “Primary frontages are likely to Consist of …” Consistency Primary Shopping Frontage C432 Glossary Glossary Officers Amend text to read “The contiguous main built up area of Nottingham …” Consistency (Principal Urban Area (PUA)) C433 Glossary, Glossary Officers Amend text to read RS being revoked Regional Plan/Regional "Strategic plan for the Region that Development Plan Documents hadve Spatial to be in general conformity with. The East Midlands Regional Plan (RSS) Strategy was issued in March 2009 . The East Midlands Regional Plan was (RSS) adopted in March 2009 and on the 6th July 2010 the Secretary of State announced the revocation of Regional Strategies. On the 20th March 2013 the Secretary of State laid in Parliament a statutory instrument to revoke the Regional Strategy for the East Midlands. This came into force on 12th April 2013 as such the East Midlands Regional Plan no longer forms part of the Development Plan ." C434 Glossary, Glossary Officers Amend text to read RS being revoked Regional Plan/Regional "Part of the former RSS. Aimed to integrate land-use planning and Spatial transport planning to steer new development into more sustainable Strategy locations, reduce the need to travel and enable journeys to be made by (RSS) more sustainable modes of transport." C435 Glossary, Glossary Officers Amend title to "Rural aAreas" Consistency Rural Areas

66 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

Reference Main Source of Ref point in doc section change Details Reason C436 Glossary, Glossary Officers Amend title to "Rural eException sSites" Consistency Rural Exception Sites C437 Glossary, Glossary Officers Amend text to "Land outside of Main Urban Areas and Named In response to Safeguarded Settlements specifically excluded from the Green Belt but safeguarded consultee Land (White from development unless a future local plan is adopted that allocates it comments Land) for development ." C438 Glossary, Glossary Officers Amend title to “Suitable Alternative Natural Green Spaces” Consistency SANGS C439 Glossary, Glossary Officers Amend text to “Secondary frontages pProvide…” Consistency Secondary Shopping Frontage C440 Glossary, Glossary Officers Replace “s106” with “S106” throughout term (3 occasions) Consistency Section 106 Agreement (s106) C441 Glossary, Glossary Officers Use “or ” rather than “of ” in the 1st line Correction Sequential Test/Approach C442 Glossary, SSSI Glossary Officers Amend to read “A sites designated by …” Consistency

C443 Glossary, SPA Glossary Officers Amend to read “An Aarea which have has …” Consistency

C444 Glossary, Glossary Consultee Delete glossary term "Soundness tests" and replace with term for In response to Soundness "Soundness" consultee (new term) comments "Soundness tests: Criteria which the Aligned Core Strategy must meet if it is to be found sound by the Planning Inspectorate. Only Core Strategies which pass the test of soundness can be adopted. "

Add new glossary entry:

“Soundness: As part of the process of preparing a Core Strategy, the document is examined by the Planning Inspectorate to make sure it is

67 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

Reference Main Source of Ref point in doc section change Details Reason legal and sound. There are four 'tests of soundness' - ‘positively prepared’, ‘justified’, ‘effective’ and ‘consistent with national policy’ as explained in paragraph 182 of the NPPF.

"Positively prepared - the plan should be prepared based on a strategy which seeks to meet objectively assessed development and infrastructure requirements, including unmet requirements from neighbouring authorities where it is reasonable to do so and consistent with achieving sustainable development.

Justified - the plan should be the most appropriate strategy, when considered against the reasonable alternatives, based on proportionate evidence.

Effective - the plan should be deliverable over its period and based on effective joint working on cross-boundary strategic priorities; and

Consistent with national policy - the plan should enable the delivery of sustainable development in accordance with the policies in the Framework. " C445 Glossary, Glossary Officers/Consultee Add additional glossary term: “Student Households: Households which Additional term Student can claim student council tax exemption including those within halls of added for Households residence." clarification (new term) C446 Glossary, Glossary Officers Rename title to “Sustainable Urban Drainage System (SUuDS)” as this is the Correction SuDS more widely used title. Also alter text to “… new and existing developments with respect to of surface water drainage discharge” C447 Glossary, SPD Glossary Officers Amend term to “Supplementary Planning Document (SPD): A Ddocuments Correction which adds further detail to the policies in the Local Plan. They c Can be used to provide further guidance for development on specific sites, or on particular issues, such as design, and capable of being a material consideration in planning decisions but does are not form part of the development plan.” for clarify. C448 Glossary, Glossary Officers Remove the source as not provided this detail elsewhere for other terms ie Correction Sustainable delete “(Source DCLG) ” Communities

68 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

Reference Main Source of Ref point in doc section change Details Reason C449 Glossary, SCS Glossary Officers Delete “the ” before “economic”. Correction C450 Glossary, Glossary Officers Amend to “proposals” the second line to give the correct term Correction Town Centre C451 Glossary, Glossary Officers Amend term to “Windfall Site: A Ssites which have has not been specifically Correction Windfall Site identified as available in the Local Plan process. They nNormally comprises a previously-developed sites that have has unexpectedly become available.” C452 Glossary Zero Glossary Officers Add to the glossary term for “Zero Carbon”. Zero Carbon: High Clarification Carbon - new standards of energy efficiency for the fabric of new buildings to reduce term regulated emissions so when coupled with other carbon reduction measures, including the provision of renewable energy generation ideally on site (or off site) to reduce carbon emissions to zero. The definition excludes a requirement to mitigate emissions from energy- using equipment inside the home, such as televisions and washing machines collectively known as unregulated emissions. C453 Key Diagram Diagrams Officers • ‘Main Built up Area’ added Updated • ‘North of Stapleford’ after Field Farm added information • ‘Change Sub Regional Green Infrastructure’ to ‘Strategic Green Infrastructure’ • Key amended to “Area of Future Housing and Employment Development (if Development Commences in the Plan Period) • Key amended to "Key Settlements Identified for Growth" • Toton site added to the diagram • Proposed HS2 preferred route and station added to the diagram

69 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

Amendments to Diagrams

The following diagrams have been amended and details of the changes are described below with the replacement diagrams shown later in this document. All other documents remain as they were originally published in June 2012.

Plan 3.3 Green Infrastructure in Greater Nottingham

Change: ••• ‘Sub Regional Green Infrastructure Corridors’ title changed to ‘Strategic Green Infrastructure’

Appendix A: Field Farm

Changes: ••• Amended plan to show updated pedestrian route.

Appendix A: Toton

••• Plan inserted ••• Schedule inserted

Appendix A: Top Whighay Farm

Changes: ••• Boundary has been corrected and correct distribution of proposed uses.

Key Diagram

Changes: ••• ‘Main Built up Area’ added ••• ‘North of Staplefor d’ after Field Farm added ••• ‘Chang e Sub Regional Green Infrastructure’ title to ‘Strategic Green Infrastructure ’ ••• Key amended to ‘Area of Future Housing and Employment Development (if Development Commences in the Plan Period) ’ ••• Key amended to ‘Key Settlements Identified for Growth ’ ••• Toton added with Orange square (Employment) and red border (Sustainable Urban Extensions and other Strategic Sites) ••• HS2 Preferred Route and HS2 Proposed Station Hub added to the diagram

70 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

71 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

72 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

73 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

74 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

75 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

New Schedule

The new schedule for the Land in the Vicinity of the Proposed HS2 Station at Toton to be inserted into Appendix A within the Broxtowe section along with the diagram.

Land in the vicinity of the proposed HS2 station at Toton (Broxtowe)

Site Summary ACS Designation Strategic Location Timescale 6 -15 years Site Area Approx 73 ha Housing Units To be determined through the Broxtowe Allocations Development Plan Document. Employment Uses To be determined through the Broxtowe Allocations Development Plan Document. Other Uses Open space and additional land for community facilities including education and limited local retail provision. Ownership/Developer Planning Application submitted on part of the land. Willing owners positively engaged to meet the needs of HS2.

IDP Constraints/Requirements Summary Infrastructure Summary Assessment Further Work Integrated transport package required. Requirement Internal roads layout to be prepared. for a subsidised bus service incorporating Banks Further discussions with NET to ensure no conflict with the park Road estate, Stapleford, Beeston and the City Centre. and ride facility. Access improvements to the strategic road network to Commence dialogue with HS2 to ensure no conflict with access include new access points off Toton/ Stapleford Lane. arrangements including alternative access to the station and Transport Transport modelling undertaken for a location west of safeguarded extended tram to HS2 station. Toton/Stapleford Lane for up to 1000 homes has Ongoing dialogue with highway authorities and Highways Agency been carried out. This indicates that the following to confirm detailed requirements as set out in the Transport mitigation works may be required including: Background Paper Addendum May 2013.

76 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

Infrastructure Summary Assessment Further Work A52 (T)/B6003 junction (Bardills Roundabout): • Third traffic lane on the A52 (T) east approach • A 3 lane circulatory carriageway connecting the A52 (T) east approach to the A52(T) west exit • A 3 lane exit of the A52 (T) west exit • Extension to the A52(T) west approach • M1 Junction 25 • Additional 60m lane on the A52(T) east off-slip to provide dedicated left turn along with extended 3 lane provision Mitigation impacts to the following County Road junctions: • Stapleford Lane / Darley Avenue • Stapleford Lane / Woodstock Road and • Stapleford Lane / Swiney Way. Travel Planning with the following objectives: • Achieve the minimum number of car movements to and from the development, • Reduce the need to travel to and from the site, • Address the access needs of site users, by supporting walking cycling and public transport, • Provide adequately for those with mobility difficulties. Public Transport Support: • Contribution to fund extension of existing bus services Safeguarding NET extension: • NET route safeguarded through the site

77 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

Infrastructure Summary Assessment Further Work Road Safety Audit.

Electricity – overhead power lines to be rerouted underground beneath the roads on site and a new terminal pylon located in the SW corner of the site. Western Power have been consulted and have no Opportunities for extension to existing CHP facilities. objection in principle to doing this.

Further work required to confirm most appropriate Utilities WWTW. Further dialogue with Western Power and Severn Trent as Water supply – no abnormal requirements subject to detailed proposals emerge phasing. There is no objection in principle form Severn Trent to the planning application for 775 homes on the west of Toton Lane IT – No abnormal requirements. Site within Flood Zone 1. No significant flood risk. No significant risk for fluvial sources and therefore no Flooding and specific mitigation required. Ongoing dialogue with the Environment Agency to ensure suitable Flood Risk Potential increase in surface water run off requiring mitigation methods are adopted. mitigation from attenuation storage and on site SuDS provision. Planning application contains a site for a medical centre. Further Health Land set aside for health facilities if required dialogue with PCT/CCG. Contributions to be agreed as part of S106 discussions. Detailed assessment of education requirement Proceed with development of a Master plan for the education Education suggests development would generate a need for a provision. Continued dialogue with the council, education Provision new primary school and extended secondary school authority, developers and the planning department regarding S106

78 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

Infrastructure Summary Assessment Further Work provision would be required. Land has been set aside contributions. for a nursery school if required. Emergency No abnormal requirements Further dialogue as plans are finalised. Services

Waste No known abnormal requirements. Further dialogue as plans are finalised. Management Good range of town centre facilities available at Further details to be developed as part of ongoing discussions. Stapleford Town Centre. Excellent potential (NET) Community Local centre to be created incorporating offices, pub, access to range of facilities at Beeston and Services restaurant/pub, education space, medical plot, limited local retail Nottingham City Centre. Land set aside for a provision and day nursery. community building if required. Extensive Green Infrastructure to be provided. Potential loss of hedgerows, damage to retained trees during construction, loss of roosting opportunities and bird migration patterns, degradation of local nature Green reserve through increased public activity from Strategy to protect/enhance and or relocate as part of ongoing Infrastructure development. studies. Opportunities to extend GI network. Opportunities for creation of new green infrastructure and swales which could offset negative impacts. Increased long term opportunities for wildlife and biodiversity and habitat creation. Potential contaminants from former agricultural uses on the site. Gas monitoring over a 3 month period and topsoil chemical tests Contamination Potential impact on the human receptors on the site should be carried out to further inform remediation strategy. from contaminants from Toton Sidings, the sewage works and the electricity substation. Heritage Assets No significant heritage issues.

79 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

Infrastructure Summary Assessment Further Work

Following HS2 announcement strong potential for Strategy and detailed assessment of HS2 requirements required positive social-economic benefits for the wider area. to be incorporated into Masterplan. Commencement of Other No significant demolition issues associated with the discussions as detailed proposals of HS2 emerge. Joint-working development. with HS2 and NET.

Indicative Assessment

This strategic location is a green field site close to the existing urban area with existing links to Stapleford Town Centre and potential excellent future transport links to Nottingham City Centre and the rest of the UK/Europe. The site can be developed to reflect garden city principles and maintain the separate identities of Stapleford and Toton. Delivery is expected to be within 6-10 years of the plan period. A planning application has been submitted for land on the west side of Toton Lane and is under consideration and negotiations have reached an advanced stage. No irresolvable constraints have been identified. If built development takes place on the east of Toton Lane then this should be to the South of the proposed NET route, with this route and park and ride used as a long term defensible Green Belt boundary. The announcement from HS2 to locate their preferred station at Toton strongly contributes to the strategic importance of the site. Continued joint working with NET, the Highways Agency and the commencement of dialogue with HS2 will be essential.

80 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

Trajectories

The trajectories for the three Council have also been updated and replacement ones are shown in this document. Please also note revised footnotes for Gedling and Nottingham City.

81 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

Broxtowe 1000

900

800

700

600

500 Dwellings 400

300

200

100

0 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28

Past Completions (net) Total Projected Completions (net) PLAN - Annual Housing Target

82 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2011/28

Past Completions (net) 0

Boots/Severn Trent 80 80 80 105 105 25 25 25 25 550

Field Farm 50 100 100 100 100 450

Awsworth Allocations 30 33 33 30 30 30 30 30 246

Awsworth SHLAA sites 1 19 18 25 27 14 104

Brinsley allocations 11 11 11 11 11 21 21 21 21 22 161

Brinsley SHLAA sites 3 10 3 1 1 5 5 5 6 39

Eastwood allocations 30 30 30 30 30 40 39 39 39 39 346

Eastwood SHLAA sites 98 17 73 94 123 123 126 100 80 51 47 22 954

Kimberley allocations 10 10 10 10 11 53 53 53 53 263

Kimberley SHLAA sites 1 30 18 13 32 32 16 36 44 45 40 6 8 8 8 337

Nottingham Urban Area allocations 26 26 26 26 26 174 174 174 174 174 1000

Nottingham Urban Area SHLAA sites 40 63 101 85 90 98 64 175 213 206 161 79 11 11 12 13 13 1435 Other sites deliverable by 2028 (taken from Strategic Housing Land 0 Availability) - in urban area Other sites deliverable by 2028 (taken from Strategic Housing Land 1 1 2 Availability) - other villages

Windfall allowance after 10 years 60 60 60 60 60 300

Demolitions 0 0 -33 0 0 0 0 -2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -35

Total Projected Completions (net) 140 113 239 314 371 380 320 497 524 492 463 320 422 426 427 390 314 6152

Cumulative Completions 0 113 352 666 1177 1557 1877 2374 2898 3390 3853 4173 4595 5021 5448 5838 6152

PLAN - Annual Housing Target 140 110 320 320 320 320 320 460 460 460 460 460 400 400 400 400 400 6150

PLAN - Housing Target (cumulative) 140 250 570 890 1210 1530 1850 2310 2770 3230 3690 4150 4550 4950 5350 5750 6150 6150

MONITOR - No. dwellings above or below cumulative housing target 0 3 -78 -84 -33 27 27 64 128 160 163 23 45 71 98 88 2

MANAGE - Annual housing target taking account of past/projected completions 362 384 402 414 422 414 418 427 420 407 394 383 395 389 376 351 312

83 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

Gedling 1000

900

800

700

600

500 Dwellings 400

300

200

100

0 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28

Past Completions (net) Total Projected Completions (net) PLAN - Annual Housing Target

84 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2011/28

Past Completions (net) 275 275

Top Wighay Farm 40 40 40 40 40 100 140 140 140 140 140 1000

North of Papplewick Lane 15 60 90 90 90 90 90 75 600

Gedling Colliery/Chase Farm 0

Bestwood Village 30 2 10 25 60 53 50 53 50 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 47 1010

Calverton 16 33 70 77 41 37 14 6 151 335 335 335 269 100 63 40 40 1962

Ravenshead 42 27 25 100 7 3 14 55 96 80 77 36 562 Other sites deliverable by 2028 (taken from Strategic Housing Land 183 204 261 459 350 237 182 238 210 133 83 63 50 50 1 1 2705 Availability) - in urban area Other sites deliverable by 2028 (taken from Strategic Housing Land 4 16 11 20 4 13 8 33 74 60 40 20 20 20 20 363 Availability) - other villages

Windfall allowance after 10 years 40 40 40 40 47 207

Demolitions 0

Total Projected Capacity (net) ** 282 377 696 522 433 398 515 711 828 740 644 609 440 354 311 274 8134

Total Projected Completions (net) 258 341 628 475 391 363 462 606 673 593 513 501 371 294 262 244 6975

Cumulative Completions 275 533 874 1502 1977 2368 2731 3193 3799 4472 5065 5578 6079 6450 6744 7006 7250 7250

PLAN - Annual Housing Target 275 275 440 440 440 440 440 570 570 570 570 570 330 330 330 330 330 7250

PLAN - Housing Target (cumulative) 275 550 990 1430 1870 2310 2750 3320 3890 4460 5030 5600 5930 6260 6590 6920 7250

MONITOR - No. dwellings above or below cumulative housing target 0 -17 -116 72 107 58 -19 -127 -91 12 35 -22 149 190 154 86 0

MANAGE - Annual housing target taking account of past/projected completions 426 436 448 455 442 439 444 452 451 431 397 364 334 293 267 253 244 0

Footnotes ** All suitable sites have been included to give a theoretical maximum number of dwellings that can be provided in Gedling Borough. Past completions figure is 275 for 2011/12. The annual projected completions for the urban area and villages for 2012-2028 have then been reduced to provide annual completions projections to deliver the housing target of 7,250. Final proposed figures are shown in Policy 2. Proposed figures in Policy 2 add up to 7,243 dwellings. Additional 7 dwellings have been added to windfall allowance figure (in 2027/28) to round total up to 7,250 dwellings.

85 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

Nottingham City

Housing Trajectory - Nottingham City (net completions)

2,500

2,000

1,500

1,000

500

0 2001/2 2002/3 2003/4 2004/5 2005/6 2006/7 2007/8 2008/9 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28

Past Completions Projected completions (net) PLAN - Annual Housing Target

86 Schedule of Changes & Modification - Submission Version 2013

2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2011/28 Past Completions 422------Waterside (3,000) 6 35 29 30 162 308 303 500 677 508 427 2,985 Boots Campus (600) 100 100 100 100 100 100 600 Stanton Tip (500) 41 62 62 62 63 63 63 84 500 Other sites deliverable by 2028 744 1,014 1,348 898 867 879 1,159 1,093 950 642 636 554 415 276 395 400 12,271 (taken from Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment) Windfall allowance 100 100 100 100 100 150 150 180 180 180 180 190 1,710 Demolitions -239 -269 -288 -178 -30 -30 -30 -30 -30 -30 -30 -30 -30 -30 -30 -30 -1,334 Projected completions (net) - 505 745 1,060 720 937 955 1,264 1,192 1,191 1,086 1,226 1,169 1,228 1,266 1,116 1,071 16,732

Cumulative Completions 422 927 1,672 2,733 3,453 4,390 5,344 6,609 7,801 8,992 10,078 11,304 12,473 13,701 14,967 16,083 17,154 17,154

PLAN - Annual Housing Target 475 475 880 880 880 880 880 1,190 1,190 1,190 1,190 1,190 1,170 1,170 1,170 1,170 1,170 17,150 PLAN - Housing Target (cumulative) 475 950 1,830 2,710 3,590 4,470 5,350 6,540 7,730 8,920 10,110 11,300 12,470 13,640 14,810 15,980 17,150 17,150 MONITOR - No. dwellings above or below cumulative housing target -53 -23 -158 23 -137 -80 -6 69 71 72 -32 4 3 61 157 103 4 4 MANAGE - Annual housing target taking account of past/projected completions 1,009 1,046 1,082 1,106 1,109 1,141 1,160 1,181 1,171 1,169 1,165 1,179 1,169 1,169 1,150 1,091 1,067 -

Although the deliverable sites are those included in the Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (SHLAA), other sites may be identified in the course of the preparation of the Local Plan (Land and Planning Policies document). Likewise, the Local Plan preparation process may result in some of the SHLAA sites not being taken forward as allocations.

Purpose-built student units (dwellings) are included in the figures, including the Aligned Core Strategies strategic allocation, in line with current Department for Communities and Local Government definitions

87