DOCSLIB.ORG

B Cvt Final Phase I ESA Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
B Cvt Final Phase I ESA Report Exhibit B C V T Chosen Valley Testing Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report: Proposed Transit Bus Hub 400 Commerce Drive, SE Kasson, Minnesota CVT #11111.17.ENV Prepared for: SEMCAC- Dodge County March 8, 2017 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ MINNESOTA IOWA WISCONSIN TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................1 2.0 INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................................2 2.1 Purpose .....................................................................................................................2 2.2 Scope of Work .........................................................................................................2 2.3 Limiting Conditions .................................................................................................2 2.4 Limitations of the Report .........................................................................................2 3.0 PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT .............................................................3 3.1 Description of Subject Property ...............................................................................3 3.1.1 Physical Location and Description of Subject Property ..............................3 3.1.2 Environmental Setting .................................................................................4 3.1.2.1 Topography ......................................................................................4 3.1.2.2 Soils..................................................................................................4 3.1.2.3 Regional Geology ............................................................................4 3.1.2.4 Hydrogeology ..................................................................................4 3.1.2.5 Wetlands ..........................................................................................4 3.2 Site Inspection of Subject Property..........................................................................5 3.2.1 Current Uses of Subject Property ................................................................5 3.2.2 Past Uses of Subject Property ......................................................................5 3.2.3 Exterior and Interior Site Observations of Subject Property .......................5 3.2.3.1 Hazardous Substances and Petroleum Products ..............................5 3.2.3.2 Hazardous Wastes ............................................................................5 3.2.3.3 Underground/Aboveground Storage Tanks .....................................5 3.2.3.4 Drums and Containers......................................................................5 3.2.3.5 PCB-Containing Equipment ............................................................6 3.2.3.6 Solid Waste ......................................................................................6 3.2.3.7 Drains and Sumps ............................................................................6 3.2.3.8 Wastewater/Storm Water .................................................................6 3.2.3.9 Wells ................................................................................................6 3.2.3.10 Pits, Ponds, and Lagoons ...............................................................6 3.2.3.11 Dry-Cleaning Operations ...............................................................6 3.2.3.12 Emergency Generators ...................................................................6 3.2.3.13 Air ..................................................................................................6 3.2.3.14 Other Physical Evidence of Contamination ...................................7 3.2.3.15 Asbestos Containing Materials ......................................................7 3.3 Surrounding Property Site Inspection ......................................................................7 3.3.1 Current Uses of Surrounding Property ........................................................7 3.3.2 Surrounding Property of Potential Environmental Concern ........................7 Page 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 3.4 Historic Conditions of Subject Property and Surrounding Property .......................7 3.4.1 Current and Prior Ownership and Tenants...................................................7 3.4.2 Chain-of-Title ..............................................................................................8 3.4.3 Interviews .....................................................................................................8 3.4.4 Aerial Photographs.......................................................................................8 3.4.5 Sanborn Fire Insurance Rate Maps ..............................................................9 3.4.6 Historic Topographic Maps .........................................................................9 3.4.7 City Directories ............................................................................................9 3.5 Regulatory Agency Review ...................................................................................10 3.5.1 Environmental Databases Review .............................................................10 3.5.2 Regulatory Agency Contact .......................................................................17 3.6 Findings and Conclusions ......................................................................................17 3.6.1 On-Site Recognized Environmental Conditions ........................................17 3.6.2 Off-Site Recognized Environmental Conditions .......................................17 3.6.3 Professional Declaration ............................................................................17 4.0 REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................18 Page 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS FIGURES FIGURE 1 SUBJECT PROPERTY LOCATION MAP FIGURE 2 SUBJECT PROPERTY MAP APPENDICES APPENDIX A ENVIROSITE CORPORATION REPORT AND DESCRIPTION OF DATABASES APPENDIX B HISTORICAL AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS APPENDIX C HISTORICAL CITY DIRECTORIES APPENDIX D SITE QUESTIONNAIRE APPENDIX E SITE PHOTOGRAPHS APPENDIX F WETLANDS INVENTORY MAPS APPENDIX G SCOPE OF WORK APPENDIX H CURRICULUM VITAE Page 3 400 Commerce Drive Southeast, Kasson, Minnesota Chosen Valley Testing Project #6-11111 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Chosen Valley Testing, Inc. (CVT) was retained by SEMCAC (CLIENT) to conduct a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) at the property located at 400 Commerce Drive Southeast in Kasson, Minnesota. The purpose of the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment was to evaluate whether current or historical activities on or near the subject property may have resulted in significant contamination by hazardous materials or wastes, also known as a "Recognized Environmental Condition" (REC), as well as identify, to the extent feasible pursuant to the processes described in ASTM Standard E 1527-05, RECs in connection with the property. The Phase I Environmental Site Assessment was performed in accordance with ASTM Standard E 1527-05. The Phase I ESA was authorized by the CLIENT on February 23rd, 2017. The subject property is a vacant grass lot consisting of approximately 1.8 acres. The subject property has been vacant since at least 1949. The site is located in the northeast quarter of the southwest quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 33, Township 107 North, Range 16 West in the city of Kasson, Minnesota. The subject property is accessed via Commerce Drive Southeast from the west. The subject property is surrounded by vacant land and farmland to the west, north, and east and by commercial and government buildings to the south. A Regional location map is provided as Figure 1. A site map of the subject property is provided as Figure 2. Mr. Matt Gikas of Chosen Valley Testing conducted a visual inspection of the subject property on March 2, 2017. Photographs attached in this report were taken on March 2, 2017 and are presented in Appendix E. Weather conditions at the time of the inspection were cloudy with a temperature of approximately 35 degrees Fahrenheit. Curricula Vitae for personnel involved in the assessment are presented in Appendix H. Dodge County is categorized as having a “High Average Radon Potential” by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, with median concentrations of indoor radon gas at or above 4.0 picocuries/Liter (pCi/L), which is the acceptable level. Radon testing was not conducted during this investigation. According the US Fish and Wildlife Service’s Wetlands on-line mapping program, there are no wetlands on the subject property. The nearest wetlands are approximately 460 feet northwest of the subject property. A copy of the Wetlands Inventory Map is provided in Appendix F. The data file evaluation portion of the assessment was completed by Envirosite Corporation. The Envirosite report reviewed 139 government databases for sites in the vicinity of the subject property. The subject property was not listed in these government databases. There were 49 listings in these databases for properties within 1 mile of the subject property. These sites did not appear to pose a REC to the subject property. These sites are listed in the Envirosite Report dated February 7th, 2017, which is provided as Appendix A. Page 1 400 Commerce Drive Southeast, Kasson, Minnesota
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Zumbro River Comprehensive Watershed Management Plan
    Greater Zumbro River Watershed Comprehensive Watershed Management Plan Waterside Chats Summary Summary The Greater Zumbro River Watershed Partnership hosted “Waterside Chats” in three communities throughout the watershed in October and November 2019. Waterside Chats were held on October 24th, 2019 at the Zumbro Valley Recreation Club in Mantorville, November 7th, 2019 at the Community Center in Mazeppa and November 14th, 2019 at the Sportsman’s Club in Lake City. The public was asked to attend the Waterside Chats to learn about the issues that had been identified by local partners and to provide feedback with their local knowledge of the watershed. Each Waterside Chat began with an overview presentation by the local SWCD or County Staff which included a summary of the One Watershed, One Plan program and plan development process, a summary of what has been accomplished, and information on how the public can participate. Following the overview, Barr Engineering summarized the priority resources and issues that had been identified in local and state plans, studies, reports, state agency feedback, and resident surveys. Initial results of the prioritization of these issues identified by a survey of watershed residents and ranked by the policy committee, planning workgroup and technical advisory group was also shared to aid in the table conversations (see figure 1 below). Following the presentation, attendees were broken into small groups. Each small group discussed a series of questions to provide their input and feedback on the list of priority issues to be addressed in the 10-year scope of the plan. Comments were captured by a facilitator from the planning partnership, summarized, and reported out to the large group.
    [Show full text]
  • Zumbro River Watershed HSPF Model Development Project Report
    Zumbro River Watershed HSPF Model Development Project Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, One Water Program Prepared for: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency FINAL May 12, 2014 wq-iw9-20n This page is blank to facilitate double-sided printing Page | ii Zumbro River Watershed HSPF Model Development Project Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, One Water Program FINAL Prepared for: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency May 12, 2014 This page is blank to facilitate double-sided printing Page | iv Zumbro River Watershed HSPF Model Development Project May 2014 Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, One Water Program FINAL TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction .............................................................. 15 1.1 Project Background and Objectives ................................. 15 1.2 Project Scope ..................................................................... 15 1.3 Scope of Report ................................................................. 16 2 Characteristics of the Zumbro River Watershed ....... 17 2.1 Physical Characteristics .................................................... 17 2.2 Impairments and Pollution Prevention ........................... 19 3 Model Development .................................................. 21 3.1 Overview of the Hydrological Simulation Program - FORTRAN (HSPF) ........................................................... 21 3.2 Model Inputs ..................................................................... 22 3.2.1 Climate ....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Zumbro River Watershed: Water Plans
    Zumbro River Watershed: Water Plans The Zumbro River Watershed encompasses Dodge, Goodhue, Olmsted, Rice, Steele, and Wabasha Counties. Each county has developed a 10-year rotating comprehensive local water management plan (LWMP) in order to improve water quality within Minnesota. The water plans are comprised of a set of concerns the counties have described as a priority, along with how they intend to effectively manage them. This document contains two parts: (1) A comparison of management goals from each county (2) A summary of all county water plans in the watershed including priority concerns, goals and objectives, and actions related to nutrient management. Water Plans: Dodge County LWMP 2006-2015 amended 2011 Goodhue County LWMP 2010-2020 Olmsted County LWMP 2013-2023 Rice County LWMP 2004-2014 amended 2010 Steele County LWMP 2007-2016 amended 2011 Wabasha County LWMP 2008-2012 Zumbro River Watershed 1 Water Resources Center January 2014 Minnesota State University, Mankato, MN Water Plan Evaluation Concern Dodge Goodhue Olmsted Rice Steele Wabasha Conservation BMPs Coordination/Partnership Education Groundwater Shoreland Management SSTS/ISTS Surface Water Technical/Financial Assistance Erosion Control Feedlot Compliance Municipal Wastewater Sediment Watershed-based Approach Wetlands Monitoring Priority Pollutants Seek Funding Stormwater Management TMDL - Impaired Water Wellhead Protection Abandoned Wells Development Concerns Nutrient Management Drainage Management Manure Management Plan Concerns addressed in County Water Plan associated
    [Show full text]
  • Trout Unlimited
    Trout Unlimited MINNESOTAThe Official Publication of Minnesota Trout Unlimited - June 2015 MNTU Photo Contest Winners! Vermillion River Update MNTU Photo Contest Winners Book Review - Sea Winter Salmon Summer Volunteer Opportunities! And Lots More! without written permisssion of Minnesota Trout Unlimited. Trout Minnesota of permisssion written without Copyright 2015 Minnsota Trout Unlimited - No Portion of this publication may be reproduced reproduced be may publication this of Portion No - Unlimited Trout Minnsota 2015 Copyright Brook Trout Biology In Southeast Minnesota ROCHESTER, MN ROCHESTER, PERMIT NO. 281 NO. PERMIT Chanhassen, MN 55317-0845 MN Chanhassen, PAID P.O. Box 845 Box P.O. U.S. POSTAGE POSTAGE U.S. Non-Profit Org. Non-Profit Minnesota Trout Unlimited Trout Minnesota Trout Unlimited Minnesota Council Update MINNESOTA The Voice of MNTU Time to Fish By JP Little, Minnesota Council Chair On The Cover elcome to the 2015 summer and spawning and generally ignoring us Minnesota Trout Unlimited humans. A few steelhead even decided A pasture in the habitat improvement statewide newsletter. Sum- that our flies were worth taking – ‘twas section of Pickwick Creek (Trout W mer has broken out all over the great a glorious day. Brook) in Winona County at first light. state of Minnesota, and ‘tis the season Photo by Bruce Adelsman, MNTU to enjoy our many, many miles of trout I would like to welcome Dean Campbell 2015 Photo Contest Winner. streams. From Southeast to Central to as the incoming President of the Twin the North Shore, we have countless op- Cities chapter, and thank Mark John- portunities to chase trout and wild steel- son for his service to the Twin Cities head.
    [Show full text]
  • Rochester Water Primer 2013
    Rochester Water Primer 2013 Chapter 3 - Rochester’s Natural Water Features With the exception of about 660 acres of the southern portion of the airport property, Rochester lies within the South Fork Zumbro River watershed. That means that everything that is left on the land surface in Rochester has the potential to be washed into the South Fork of the Zumbro River after each rainstorm or snowmelt. A watershed is defined as all the land area that drains to a waterway. The boundaries of a watershed are based on topography. The highest elevations surrounding a water body become the boundaries or Source: Zumbro Watershed Partnership watershed divides. It is easy to imagine how the Continental Divide in the Rocky Mountains can separate flow from the Pacific to the Atlantic Oceans, but even flatter areas like Rochester have divides. They are represented by the black watershed boundaries shown on the map above. The Zumbro Watershed drains about 297,000 acres and is made up of three smaller subwatersheds, Watershed Features one for each tributary: the South Fork, the Middle Fork, and the North Fork. A common misconception is that water flows from north to south, or from the top of a map to the bottom. That’s not true. Water always runs downhill from divides; it does not follow a certain direction on a map. Look at the Zumbro River: it starts flowing from west to east, but then turns north before heading east again before it empties into the Mississippi River. These direction changes provide clues about how the glaciers formed our topography and the elevation changes in our watershed.
    [Show full text]
  • Delineation Percentage
    Lake Superior - North Rainy River - Headwaters Lake Superior - South Vermilion River Nemadji River Cloquet River Pine River Rainy River - Rainy Lake Little Fork River Mississippi River - Headwaters Leech Lake River Upper St. Croix River Root River Big Fork River Mississippi River - Winona Upper/Lower Red Lake Kettle River Mississippi River - Lake Pepin Mississippi River - Grand Rapids Mississippi River - La Crescent Crow Wing River Otter Tail River Mississippi River - Reno Mississippi River - Brainerd Zumbro River Redeye River Upper Big Sioux River Mississippi River - Twin Cities Snake River Des Moines River - Headwaters St. Louis River Rum River Lower Big Sioux River Lower St. Croix River Cottonwood River Minnesota River - Headwaters Cannon River Mississippi River - St. Cloud Long Prairie River Lake of the Woods Lower Rainy North Fork Crow River Mississippi River - Sartell Lac Qui Parle River Buffalo River Wild Rice River Minnesota River - Mankato Sauk River Rock River Redwood River Snake River Chippewa River Watonwan River Clearwater River East Fork Des Moines River Red River of the North - Sandhill River Upper Red River of the North Blue Earth River Red River of the North - Marsh River Roseau River Minnesota River - Yellow Medicine River Le Sueur River Little Sioux River Bois de Sioux River Cedar River Lower Minnesota River Pomme de Terre River Red Lake River Lower Des Moines River Upper Iowa River Red River of the North - Tamarac River Shell Rock River Two Rivers Rapid River Red River of the North - Grand Marais Creek Mustinka River South Fork Crow River Thief River Winnebago River Upper Wapsipinicon River 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% %Altered %Natural %Impounded %No Definable Channel wq-bsm1-06.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality Trends at Minnesota Milestone Sites
    Water Quality Trends for Minnesota Rivers and Streams at Milestone Sites Five of seven pollutants better, two getting worse June 2014 Author The MPCA is reducing printing and mailing costs by using the Internet to distribute reports and David Christopherson information to wider audience. Visit our website for more information. MPCA reports are printed on 100% post- consumer recycled content paper manufactured without chlorine or chlorine derivatives. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 520 Lafayette Road North | Saint Paul, MN 55155-4194 | www.pca.state.mn.us | 651-296-6300 Toll free 800-657-3864 | TTY 651-282-5332 This report is available in alternative formats upon request, and online at www.pca.state.mn.us . Document number: wq-s1-71 1 Summary Long-term trend analysis of seven different water pollutants measured at 80 locations across Minnesota for more than 30 years shows consistent reductions in five pollutants, but consistent increases in two pollutants. Concentrations of total suspended solids, phosphorus, ammonia, biochemical oxygen demand, and bacteria have significantly decreased, but nitrate and chloride concentrations have risen, according to data from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency’s (MPCA) “Milestone” monitoring network. Recent, shorter-term trends are consistent with this pattern, but are less pronounced. Pollutant concentrations show distinct regional differences, with a general pattern across the state of lower levels in the northeast to higher levels in the southwest. These trends reflect both the successes of cleaning up municipal and industrial pollutant discharges during this period, and the continuing challenge of controlling the more diffuse “nonpoint” polluted runoff sources and the impacts of increased water volumes from artificial drainage practices.
    [Show full text]
  • Chrosomus Erythrogaster Andc. Eos (Osteichthyes: Cyprinidae) Taxonomy, Distribution) Ecology a Thesis Submitted to the Faculty O
    CHROSOMUS ERYTHROGASTER AND C. EOS (OSTEICHTHYES: CYPRINIDAE) TAXONOMY, DISTRIBUTION) ECOLOGY A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA By Gary Lee Phillips IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Pegree Granted June, 1968 FRONTISPIECE. Male Chrosomus erythrogaster in breeding color, headwaters of the Zumbro River, Dodge County, Minnesota, 4 June 1966. Photograph by Professor David J. Merrell of the University of Minnesota. 47?-a•4 V gir irck 4r4.4- 1,1! IL .1, 74ko2,4,944,40tgrAt skr#9 4.e4 riff4eotilired‘ ik tit "ital.:A-To 4-v.w.r*:ez••01.%. '.or 44# 14 46#41bie. "v1441t..4frw.P1)4iiriiitalAttt.44- Aiihr4titeec --N. 1 4r40•4-v,400..orioggit kf)f 4y 4:11 to_ r •ArPV .1 1 "11(4% tk eat'n'ik\Nthl haf ilif -7b111,6 10t 11*4 * A Aver44, wr. • 4‘4041:Nr 0141 -at 1,10,71mr--,• 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ACKNOWLEDGMENTS SYNONYMY AND NOMENCLATURE METHODS AND MATERIALS DISTRIBUTION 23 Geographical Distribution ................... 23 Ecological Distribution ......,....•.....,.. 24 Distribution in Minnesota ............. 27 VARIATION 38 Reliability of Measurements •.*****••••••** 4 • * 38 Sexual Variation •.. 53 Ontogenetic Variation •••• • • • • • •••• 61 Geographical Variation .................. ft ft. 72 Interpopulation Mean Character Differences • • * 77 Anomalies 83 REPRODUCTION 86 Schooling BehaviOr, ....................- 86 , 000,. W.4,41 , 87 .Spawning ,Behavior. , ,10041.4100 .......„......... 00 90 Breeding Color .. Breeding Tubercle ......................,. 93 Sex Ratios ... ............... ..,. 97 Sexual cycles ' , .-•,................ ... 99 ft 99 Fecundity ... ft ft ft ft 0 ft S OlkOodt*40o,OWOOsoo•O*00-Ito , 41,* 111: Hybridization 40. 0.41400**************0.0 DIET 1.28 The Digestive Tract .....................
    [Show full text]
  • Clean Water Fund Expenditure Report
    z c Clean Water Fund Expenditure Report January 2012 Legislative Charge Minn. Statutes § 114d.50, subd. 4c A state agency or other recipient of a direct appropriation from the Clean Water Fund must compile and submit all information for proposed and funded projects or programs, including the proposed measurable outcomes and all other items required under Section 3.303, subdivision 10, to the Legislative Coordinating Commission as soon as practicable or by January 15 of the applicable fiscal year, whichever comes first. Authors Estimated cost of preparing this report (as Myrna Halbach required by Minn. Stat. § 3.197) Alexis Donath Total staff time: 55 hrs. $1,388 Kurt Soular Production/duplication $63 Total $1,451 Contributors / Acknowledgements Linda Carroll The MPCA is reducing printing and mailing costs Jennifer Crea by using the Internet to distribute reports and information to wider audience. Visit our web site Editing and Graphic Design for more information. Paul Andre MPCA reports are printed on 100% post-consumer Scott Andre recycled content paper manufactured without Jerome Davis chlorine or chlorine derivatives. Beth Tegdesch Cover photo: Scott Andre Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 520 Lafayette Road North | Saint Paul, MN 55155-4194 | www.pca.state.mn.us | 651-296-6300 Toll free 800-657-3864 | TTY 651-282-5332 This report is available in alternative formats upon request, and online at www.pca.state.mn.us Document number: lrp-f-1sy12 Contents Introduction ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Map of Zumbro River State Water Trail and Facilities
    M Reads A STATE WA TER TRAIL GUIDE T O THE ZUMBR O AND WHITEWA TER RIVERS Landing I 61 S Goodhue 9 S Carry-in Access River Mile 10 I Public lands 9 25 WISCONSIN S 760 63 10 35 S Trailer Access Rapids FOREST BOUNDARY I Out of State land Upper Mississippi River P Rest Area Dam Bellechester 4 Wildlife and Fish Refuge P NORTH BOUNDARY FOREST Wabasha I GOODHUE CO. WABASHA CO. WABASHA Watercraft Campsite Fishing Pier 16 White Willow Tr No Facilities Campsite Parking 30 W.M.A. = Wildife Management Area out R Oak Center Campground Drinking Water Brook I 0 1 2 3 4 Miles 755 V 61 24 E Private Campground Outfitter Dumfries 60 Pool #4 0 1 2 3 4 Kilometers W.M.A. 2 Kruger Unit R Zumbro Lock & Dam #4 3 W.M.A. 15 Spring R 24 6 I 52 Goodhue V 81 portage 7 PioneerState E Midland Junction Trail 17 Alma Covered 60 Funk Ford R 10 Bridge N Park Tiedemann F ry Slough or BearValley 19 S l o u g h th W.M.A. Pine 5 Upper Mississippi 20 River Wildlife and 58 18 Fish Refuge FOREST BOUNDARY Kellogg Cr West Albany Creek eek 35 10 4 Gorman 70 30 84 11 25 Mazeppa river 0 F ork 1 3 level Theilman ZUMBRO Zumbro Bottoms Unit Forest Mills gauge 750 60 65 Woodbury 60 Zumbro Falls 42 W.M.A. Zumbrota portage 61 60 FOREST BOUNDARY 50 ro Mazeppa 52 mb Kellogg-Weaver Z u W 60 7 2 Dunes S.N.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Work Plan
    Attachment A Project Work Plan Doc Type: Contract MPCA Use Only Swift #: 89268 CR #: 8070 Project Title: West Fork Des Moines River Major Watershed Project Phase II 1. Project Summary: Organization: Heron Lake Watershed District (HLWD) Contractor Contact Name: Jan Voit Title: District Administrator E-mail: [email protected] Address: PO Box 345 Heron Lake, MN 56137 Phone: 507-793-2462 Fax: 507-822-0921 Subcontractor(s)/Partner(s): Organization: University of Minnesota Extension Project manager: Barb Radke, Leadership and Civic Engagement Address: 863 30th Ave SE Rochester, MN 55904 Phone: 507-995-1631 E-mail: [email protected] and Project manager: Karen Terry, Watershed Education Program Address: 46352 State Highway 329 Morris, MN 56267 Phone: 320-589-1711 E-mail: [email protected] MPCA contact(s): MPCA project manager: Katherine Pekarek-Scott Title: Project Manager Address: 1601 East Highway 12, Suite 1 Willmar, MN 56201 Phone: 320-441-6973 Fax: 320-214-3787 E-mail: [email protected] Project information Latitude/Longitude: 43.556/-94.956 County: Murray, Nobles, Cottonwood, Jackson, Lyon, Pipestone, and Martin Start date: 03/26/2015 End date: 06/30/2018 Total cost: $175,000.00 Full time equivalents: 2.59 www.pca.state.mn.us • 651-296-6300 • 800-657-3864 • TTY 651-282-5332 or 800-657-3864 • Available in alternative formats e-admin9-38 • 12/2/13 Page 1 of 6 Major watershed(s): Statewide Kettle River Miss Rvr – GrandRpds Rainy Rvr – Baudette So Fork Crow River Big Fork River Lac Qui Parle River Miss Rvr –Headwaters Rainy Rvr – Black Rvr Lower St.
    [Show full text]
  • Class G Tables of Geographic Cutter Numbers: Maps -- by Region Or
    G4127 NORTHWESTERN STATES. REGIONS, NATURAL G4127 FEATURES, ETC. .C8 Custer National Forest .L4 Lewis and Clark National Historic Trail .L5 Little Missouri River .M3 Madison Aquifer .M5 Missouri River .M52 Missouri River [wild & scenic river] .O7 Oregon National Historic Trail. Oregon Trail .W5 Williston Basin [geological basin] .Y4 Yellowstone River 1305 G4132 WEST NORTH CENTRAL STATES. REGIONS, G4132 NATURAL FEATURES, ETC. .D4 Des Moines River .R4 Red River of the North 1306 G4142 MINNESOTA. REGIONS, NATURAL FEATURES, ETC. G4142 .A2 Afton State Park .A4 Alexander, Lake .A42 Alexander Chain .A45 Alice Lake [Lake County] .B13 Baby Lake .B14 Bad Medicine Lake .B19 Ball Club Lake [Itasca County] .B2 Balsam Lake [Itasca County] .B22 Banning State Park .B25 Barrett Lake [Grant County] .B28 Bass Lake [Faribault County] .B29 Bass Lake [Itasca County : Deer River & Bass Brook townships] .B3 Basswood Lake [MN & Ont.] .B32 Basswood River [MN & Ont.] .B323 Battle Lake .B325 Bay Lake [Crow Wing County] .B33 Bear Head Lake State Park .B333 Bear Lake [Itasca County] .B339 Belle Taine, Lake .B34 Beltrami Island State Forest .B35 Bemidji, Lake .B37 Bertha Lake .B39 Big Birch Lake .B4 Big Kandiyohi Lake .B413 Big Lake [Beltrami County] .B415 Big Lake [Saint Louis County] .B417 Big Lake [Stearns County] .B42 Big Marine Lake .B43 Big Sandy Lake [Aitkin County] .B44 Big Spunk Lake .B45 Big Stone Lake [MN & SD] .B46 Big Stone Lake State Park .B49 Big Trout Lake .B53 Birch Coulee Battlefield State Historic Site .B533 Birch Coulee Creek .B54 Birch Lake [Cass County : Hiram & Birch Lake townships] .B55 Birch Lake [Lake County] .B56 Black Duck Lake .B57 Blackduck Lake [Beltrami County] .B58 Blue Mounds State Park .B584 Blueberry Lake [Becker County] .B585 Blueberry Lake [Wadena County] .B598 Boulder Lake Reservoir .B6 Boundary Waters Canoe Area .B62 Bowstring Lake [Itasca County] .B63 Boy Lake [Cass County] .B68 Bronson, Lake 1307 G4142 MINNESOTA.
    [Show full text]