DOCSLIB.ORG

Constructing Campus Conflict June2014.Indd

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Constructing Campus Conflict June2014.Indd Challenging the Right, Advancing Social Justice CONSTRUCTING CAMPUS CONFLICT Antisemitism and Islamophobia on U.S. College Campuses, 2014 MAY 2007–2011 Senior Editor Chip Berlet Managing Editor Debra Cash Associate Editor Maria Planansky Political Research Associates (PRA) is a social justice think tank devoted to supporting movements that are building a more just and inclusive democratic society. We expose movements, institutions, and ideologies that undermine human rights. Copyright ©2014, Political Research Associates Political Research Associates 1310 Broadway, Suite 201 Somerville, MA 02144-1837 www.politicalresearch.org design by rachelle galloway-popotas, owl in a tree 2014 CONSTRUCTING CAMPUS CONFLICT Antisemitism and Islamophobia on U.S. College Campuses, 2007–2011 Senior Editor Chip Berlet Managing Editor Debra Cash Associate Editor Maria Planansky INTRODUCTION ON CAMPUSES ACROSS THE UNITED STATES, there are Jewish and Muslim students who experience bigotry. At times they feel intimidated and do not express their actual political, religious, or philosophical views in the classroom. In some cases, they do not feel safe when crossing the campus commons. At the same time, these are not the daily experi- they places where physical threats are commonplace. How can we explain these apparently contradictory realities? That was the challenge behind this study. Politi- cal Research Associates believes both antisemitism and Islamophobia as phenomena exist on campuses, and in this Antisemitism and Islamophobia on college campuses are manifested in a complex set of interactions among a - the Middle East. Campuses, of all places, should be environments that invite open dialogue. Nonetheless, at times debates about the Middle East escalate into confrontations laced with Islamophobic or antisemitic statements. These confrontations sometimes boil over from rhetorical debates to physical confrontations. News accounts can bigotry in these situations. We have attempted to trace many of the historical tendencies that have converged on - have turned to a number of scholars for their perspectives on the broader meaning of these debates and on the ways has played out in campus life, with often distressing results. PRA had researchers conduct face-to-face, telephonic, and e-mail interviews with students, faculty, adminis- - als, not composites. Even a cursory glance at this report, however, reveals it to be a composite in the sense that it is a montage. We highlight a range of voices and opinions. This is intentional. - sentence or sentiment and claim it represents (and therefore discredits) the entire report. That would be unfortu- - CONSTRUCTING CAMPUS CONFLICT, 2007-2011 <<< PAGE 4 >>> WWW.POLITICALRESEARCH.ORG Rashomon- - appear that two or more unrelated incidents had occurred. administrators feel about it. In an arena of intense ideological, political, religious, and philosophical struggle we of- further research. This study argues that antisemitism and Islamophobia can and should be challenged on college a way that, in the long run, will ameliorate aggression, intimidation, and assaults on campus—which are never ap- Note: CONSTRUCTING CAMPUS CONFLICT, 2007-2011 <<< PAGE 5 >>> WWW.POLITICALRESEARCH.ORG CONTENTS INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................... 4 SETTING THE SCENE .................................................................................................. 8 Exploring Antisemitism .............................................................................................................. 11 Exploring Islamophobia ............................................................................................................. 29 How Islamophobia and Antisemitism Interact on Campus .......................................... 37 Paths Forward ................................................................................................................................ 41 PROFILES AND PORTRAITS ................................................................................... 42 Campus Pro!les University of California at Berkeley .................................................................................. 43 Boston College ........................................................................................................................ 51 Brandeis University ................................................................................................................ 53 Columbia University .............................................................................................................. 57 University of California at Irvine ........................................................................................ 61 McGill University ..................................................................................................................... 64 Temple University and George Mason University ...................................................... 66 University of Massachusetts at Amherst ........................................................................ 70 University of Miami ................................................................................................................ 73 University of New Mexico .................................................................................................... 75 University of Oregon ............................................................................................................. 79 Wayne State University......................................................................................................... 82 Pro!les of Key Organizations Anti-Defamation League ..................................................................................................... 86 American Jewish Committee ............................................................................................. 87 Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) ............................................................. 88 College Republicans .............................................................................................................. 89 Hillel Foundation for Jewish Campus Life ..................................................................... 90 Islamic Society of North America ..................................................................................... 92 Muslim Student Association (MSA) .................................................................................. 93 Young America’s Foundation ............................................................................................. 93 CONSTRUCTING CAMPUS CONFLICT, 2007-2011 <<< PAGE 6 >>> WWW.POLITICALRESEARCH.ORG Pro!les of Individuals Je"rey Blankfort ...................................................................................................................... 95 Alan Dershowitz ...................................................................................................................... 96 Norman Finkelstein................................................................................................................ 97 David Horowitz ........................................................................................................................ 99 Amir Abdul Malik Ali ............................................................................................................ 100 Daniel Pipes ............................................................................................................................ 101 Alison Weir: If Americans Knew ....................................................................................... 103 Interviews with Leaders in Challenging Campus Bias Talking to Student Leaders Joel Pratt, Hillel President, University of Colorado at Boulder .................... 105 Mohammad Azimi, MSA President, University of Colorado at Boulder .........................................................................106 Faith on Campus: Bridge Builders Eboo Patel .......................................................................................................................107 Charles Cohen............................................................................................................... 108 April Rosenblum .......................................................................................................... 112 Mohammad Ja`far Mahallati ................................................................................... 114 THE CAMPUS DILEMMA ...................................................................................... 117 The Middle East as Flashpoint ............................................................................................... 117 The Distortions Of The Media Lens ...................................................................................... 117 Is There A Role For The U.S. Government? ......................................................................... 118 Timeline: The U.S. Department of Education and the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights ............................................................................................................................. 119 RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................................... 123 ENDNOTES ............................................................................................................... 125 SETTING THE SCENE There is no hierarchy of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Pennsylvania State University Schreyer Honors College
    THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF JOURNALISM STORIES FROM THE FRONT LINES: FEMALE FOREIGN CORRESPONDENTS IN WAR ZONES JENNIFER CONNOR SUMMER 2011 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a baccalaureate degree in Journalism with honors in Journalism. Reviewed and approved* by the following: Tony Barbieri Foster Professor of Writing and Editing Thesis Supervisor Martin Halstuk Associate Professor Honors Adviser * Signatures are on file in the Schreyer Honors College. ABSTRACT The purpose of this thesis is to examine the experience of women who cover war and conflict zones, with a special focus on those reporting in Iraq and Afghanistan. When western female war correspondents work in male-dominated cultures and situations of war, they encounter different challenges and advantages than male war correspondents. The level of danger associated with the assignments these women take on is evaluated in this thesis. Anecdotes from female war correspondents themselves, combined with outside analysis, reveal the types of situations unique to female war correspondents. More women choose to follow the story and witness history in the making by covering today‟s war and conflict zones. This trend parallels the greater presence of women in newsrooms, today. This thesis will shed light on what it means to be a female reporting on and working in dangerous conditions. i TABLE OF CONTENTS Part 1. Introduction……………………………………………………………………………....1 Part 2. Dealing with Danger……………………………………………………………………...6
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4 the Right-Wing Media Enablers of Anti-Islam Propaganda
    Chapter 4 The right-wing media enablers of anti-Islam propaganda Spreading anti-Muslim hate in America depends on a well-developed right-wing media echo chamber to amplify a few marginal voices. The think tank misinforma- tion experts and grassroots and religious-right organizations profiled in this report boast a symbiotic relationship with a loosely aligned, ideologically-akin group of right-wing blogs, magazines, radio stations, newspapers, and television news shows to spread their anti-Islam messages and myths. The media outlets, in turn, give members of this network the exposure needed to amplify their message, reach larger audiences, drive fundraising numbers, and grow their membership base. Some well-established conservative media outlets are a key part of this echo cham- ber, mixing coverage of alarmist threats posed by the mere existence of Muslims in America with other news stories. Chief among the media partners are the Fox News empire,1 the influential conservative magazine National Review and its website,2 a host of right-wing radio hosts, The Washington Times newspaper and website,3 and the Christian Broadcasting Network and website.4 They tout Frank Gaffney, David Yerushalmi, Daniel Pipes, Robert Spencer, Steven Emerson, and others as experts, and invite supposedly moderate Muslim and Arabs to endorse bigoted views. In so doing, these media organizations amplify harm- ful, anti-Muslim views to wide audiences. (See box on page 86) In this chapter we profile some of the right-wing media enablers, beginning with the websites, then hate radio, then the television outlets. The websites A network of right-wing websites and blogs are frequently the primary movers of anti-Muslim messages and myths.
    [Show full text]
  • DELIBERATE DIFFERENCES Progressive and Conservative Campus Activism in the United States
    A REPORT PUBLISHED BY POLITICAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATES DELIBERATE DIFFERENCES Progressive and Conservative Campus Activism in the United States by Pam Chamberlain PRA POLITICAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATES ABOUT POLITICAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATES Political Research Associates (PRA) is an independent, nonprofit research center that exposes and challenges the Right and larger oppressive movements, institutions, and forces. PRA provides accurate applied research and useful analytic tools to inform and support progressive activism that promotes equality and justice. ABOUT THE AUTHOR Pam Chamberlain is a researcher at PRA. Political Research Associates 1310 Broadway, Suite 201 Somerville, MA 02144 Tel: (617) 666-5300 Fax: (617) 666-6622 [email protected] www.publiceye.org August, 2004 © 2004, Political Research Associates ISBN: 0-915987-18-x When referencing this document, we recommend the following citation: Chamberlain, Pam. Deliberate Differences: Progressive and Conservative Campus Activism in the United States. Somerville, Mass.: Political Research Associates, 2004. Design by Hird Graphic Design Cover photos by: top, Lonny Shavelson/www.photowords.com. and bottom, Jim West, Impact Digitals Acknowledgements eliberate Differences: Progressive and Conservative Campus Activism is a publication of DPolitical Research Associates (PRA). In every sense, this report has been a collabo- rative effort from its inception. Jean Hardisty, President Emerita of PRA, originally con- ceived the Campus Activism Project as an extension of earlier PRA work on conservative campus groups. The PRA staff team—Nikhil Aziz, Chip Berlet, Shelly Harter, Tom Louie, Namorya Nelson, and Palak Shah—all lent their creativity, talent, and careful attention to the many stages of the project. Chip and Nikhil, in particular, contributed to our understanding of social movement theory and its application to campus activism.
    [Show full text]
  • Spencer Sunshine*
    Journal of Social Justice, Vol. 9, 2019 (© 2019) ISSN: 2164-7100 Looking Left at Antisemitism Spencer Sunshine* The question of antisemitism inside of the Left—referred to as “left antisemitism”—is a stubborn and persistent problem. And while the Right exaggerates both its depth and scope, the Left has repeatedly refused to face the issue. It is entangled in scandals about antisemitism at an increasing rate. On the Western Left, some antisemitism manifests in the form of conspiracy theories, but there is also a hegemonic refusal to acknowledge antisemitism’s existence and presence. This, in turn, is part of a larger refusal to deal with Jewish issues in general, or to engage with the Jewish community as a real entity. Debates around left antisemitism have risen in tandem with the spread of anti-Zionism inside of the Left, especially since the Second Intifada. Anti-Zionism is not, by itself, antisemitism. One can call for the Right of Return, as well as dissolving Israel as a Jewish state, without being antisemitic. But there is a Venn diagram between anti- Zionism and antisemitism, and the overlap is both significant and has many shades of grey to it. One of the main reasons the Left can’t acknowledge problems with antisemitism is that Jews persistently trouble categories, and the Left would have to rethink many things—including how it approaches anti- imperialism, nationalism of the oppressed, anti-Zionism, identity politics, populism, conspiracy theories, and critiques of finance capital—if it was to truly struggle with the question. The Left understands that white supremacy isn’t just the Ku Klux Klan and neo-Nazis, but that it is part of the fabric of society, and there is no shortcut to unstitching it.
    [Show full text]
  • In Their Own Words: Voices of Jihad
    THE ARTS This PDF document was made available from www.rand.org as CHILD POLICY a public service of the RAND Corporation. CIVIL JUSTICE EDUCATION Jump down to document ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT 6 HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit research NATIONAL SECURITY POPULATION AND AGING organization providing objective analysis and PUBLIC SAFETY effective solutions that address the challenges facing SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY the public and private sectors around the world. SUBSTANCE ABUSE TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY Support RAND TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE Purchase this document WORKFORCE AND WORKPLACE Browse Books & Publications Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Learn more about the RAND Corporation View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non-commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see RAND Permissions. This product is part of the RAND Corporation monograph series. RAND monographs present major research findings that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND monographs undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity. in their own words Voices of Jihad compilation and commentary David Aaron Approved for public release; distribution unlimited C O R P O R A T I O N This book results from the RAND Corporation's continuing program of self-initiated research.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf Anti-Defamation League
    ghs15-1_cv_ghs15-1_cv 8/7/2019 2:35 PM Page 2 COLOR IS FOR APPROXIMATION ONLY – DO NOT USE FOR COLOR APPROVAL JOURNAL OF HATE STUDIES JOURNAL OF HATE J OURNAL OF H ATE S TUDIES Volume 15, No. 1 15, No. Volume 1 - 278 Pages 2019 Gonzaga University I NSTITUTE FOR H ATE S TUDIES E NGAGING WITH C OMMUNITIES FOR J USTICE Gonzaga Institute for Hate Studies | Spokane, WA 99258-0043 | 509.313.3665 www.gonzaga.edu/hatestudies Volume 15 2019 Number 1 Journal of Hate Studies Gonzaga University Institute for Hate Studies Copyright © 2019 By Gonzaga University Institute for Hate Studies The Journal of Hate Studies is published by the Gonzaga University Institute for Hate Studies. The purpose of the Journal is to promote the sharing of interdisciplinary ideas and research relating to the study of what hate is, where it comes from, and how to combat it. The Institute for Hate Studies operates under the auspices of Gonzaga University in Spokane, Washington. The views expressed in the Journal are those of the authors and should not be attributed to the Institute for Hate Studies, Gonzaga University, the institutions with which the authors are affiliated, or the editors. The Journal welcomes unsolicited manuscripts (including essays and shorter pieces) and suggestions for improving the Journal. Manuscripts and other communications should be sent to Director, Gonzaga University Institute for Hate Studies, Gonzaga University, Spokane, WA USA 992580099. For more information about the Gonzaga University Institute for Hate Studies and the Journal of Hate Studies, please visit www.gonzaga.edu/ hatestudies.
    [Show full text]
  • Jaco Three Views of His Secrets
    26 bassplayer.com /january2016 Jaco Three Views of his secreTs By e.e. Bradman About hAlf An hour into the new documentary Jaco, there’s a scene that reflects a cru- cial aspect of the Jaco Pastorius legend. It’s the fall of 1975, and Blood, Sweat & Tears drummer Bobby Colomby has flown a virtually unknown Jaco from Ft. Lauderdale to New York to record his debut with jazz luminaries Hubert Laws, Herbie Hancock, Don Alias, Wayne Shorter, and Lenny White. The product of those sessions, the soulful, eclectic stunner simply titled Jaco Pastorius, would shake the bass world to its foundations, of course, but the album cover—with its bold lettering across a no-nonsense black & white portrait by Don Hunstein—might suggest that the unsmiling young maestro was overly serious about making a good first impression. That wasn’t true at all. “It was wild,” says Return To Forever drummer Lenny White of the sessions in October 1975. “Basically, we would play, do a take, and go outside and play basketball.” “We could have done it on bicycles with microphones, and he would have played it perfectly,” remembers producer Colomby, still impressed four decades later. Far from nervous, in fact, 23-year-old Jaco was natural, relaxed, and in his element. “I walked into the studio, and Jaco’s eyes were lit up because he had found home—this was the level he belonged on,” recalls trombonist/musical direc- tor Peter Graves. These quintessential Pastorius hallmarks—soul- ful virtuosity, athletic showmanship, and superhu- man technique, with confidence to burn—are central bassplayer.com / january2016 27 CS JACO JEFF YEAGER Robert Trujillo themes of Jaco.
    [Show full text]
  • 046-049 Trujillo.Indd 46 22/10/14 08:32 Chitarre 343 47 Foto Di Sergio Gualtieri
    46 chitarre 343 robert trujillo di Fabio Fraschini funk metal bass hero Anche quest’anno la Warwick ha organizzato il suo Bass Camp in quel di Markneukirchen, sede della fabbrica, nella ex-Germania dell’Est. Grande protagonista dell’evento Robert Trujillo, pioniere del basso funk metal con i thrasher Suicidal Tendencies, fondatore dei seminali Infectious Grooves e poi al fianco di Ozzy Osbourne e dei Metallica. Per l’occasione il bassista californiano, insieme al suo amico Armand Sabal-Lecco, Ken Shalk dei Candiria, Benji Webbe degli Skindred e altri ospiti, ha pensato bene di far tremare il palco dell’Open Day facendo rivivere un’altra delle sue creature: i Mass Mental. Siamo andati a incontrarlo e malgrado qualche piccolo intoppo (anche la perfetta macchina organizzativa teutonica ogni tanto si inceppa!) eccoci nel suo tour bus a chiacchierare serenamente di musica e altro… a prima domanda è per il progetto Mass concerto di oggi è una specie di riunione dai tempi del Mental. Come hai conosciuto Armand Giappone, quindi, dal 1999… (a questo punto irrompe Sabal Lecco e che piani futuri hai per Ken Shalk, il batterista dei Mass Mental in cerca questa band? delle t-shirt della band, Robert me lo presenta, viene Ho conosciuto Armand nel 1993, stavamo da Brooklyn, NY, ed è il batterista dei Candiria, band Lfacendo delle foto per le corde Dean Markley, siamo che Robert ama particolarmente e che ha contattato diventati amici e abbiamo iniziato a scrivere insieme. I per sostituire Brooks Wakerman già in tour con i Bad Mass Mental nascono in quel periodo durante il quale Religion).
    [Show full text]
  • How Its Jewish Communal Fund Supports Anti-Muslim Hate Groups
    The Shame of the UJA-Federation of New York HOW ITS JEWISH COMMUNAL FUND SUPPORTS ANTI-MUSLIM HATE GROUPS NOVEMBER 28, 2018 The Jewish Communal Fund (JCF), the funding arm of the UJA-Federation of New York (UJA-Federation), has for years funded a host of anti-Muslim hate groups—contributing more than $2 million to six such groups just in 2013-2017. While JCF is understandably proud of its funding of numerous community, health, and other such organizations, it seems decidedly reluctant to call public attention to its support for these Islamophobic groups. We call upon the JCF to make a firm, public commitment to stop contributing to these anti-Muslim groups and to others that share their ideology. Introduction Today, Islamophobia and anti-Arab racism, which have long histories in the U.S., are more blatant and dangerous than ever. After more than a decade of post-9/11 Bush and Obama administration policies of surveillance and deportation of Muslims, the current Administration under President Trump is greatly accelerating anti-Muslim policies. In this context, Muslims and those perceived as Muslims are facing increased Islamophobic attacks, including threats to mosques and Muslim community centers, harassment of women in hijab, and other public attacks, beatings, shootings, and arson. We need to oppose Islamophobia and anti-Muslim hate in all its forms. We know that many Jewish organizations have joined Muslim communities to challenge Islamophobia. Being true partners requires that our words are consistent with our actions, which is why we are particularly concerned that the funding arm of a major Jewish organization has for years funded a host of anti-Muslim hate groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Militant About “Islamism”
    Pipes-final 12/7/04 5:57 PM Page 38 Militant about “Islamism” Daniel Pipes wages “hand-to-hand combat” with a “totalitarian ideology.” b y JANETTASSEL “It is a mistake to blame Islam, ichard pipes, Baird re- a religion 14 centuries old, for the at North American universities—“a kind search professor of history, of Consumer Reports,” he says, “for stu- recounts in his recent book, evil that should be ascribed to dents, parents, alumni, and legislators” Vixi, that when Daniel, his militant Islam, a totalitarian to air perceived biases and inaccuracies. first child, was born in 1949, This is yet another irritant to critics like he felt as if he himself were ideology less than a century old. Rashid Khalidi, Said professor of Arab Rbeing reborn. To mark the event he even Militant Islam is the problem, but studies and director of the Middle East quit smoking. Institute at Columbia University, who And, in a sense, with the birth of moderate Islam is the solution.” calls the Campus Watchers “intellectual Daniel, Richard Pipes was indeed reborn, �daniel pipes thugs”; Juan Cole, professor of history at perhaps even cloned. Daniel ’71, Ph.D. ’78 the University of Michigan, deems the (early Islamic history), is what old-timers project “cyberstalking.” “Crude Mc- would call a chip o≠ the old block. Both are essentially loners, Carthyism” and “totalitarianism” are among the less vitriolic non-belongers (the subtitle of Vixi is Memoirs of a Non-Belonger), terms used by other scholars to describe Campus Watch. In ad- and fighters. Pipes the elder, the fiercely anti-communist cold- dition, Pipes is now in his final year as a director of the federally warrior, head of President Ford’s Team B (formed to evaluate the funded U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Against Our Better Judgment: the Hidden History of How the U.S. Was
    Against Our Better Judgment The hidden history of how the U.S. was used to create Israel ALISON WEIR Copyright © 2014 Alison Weir All rights reserved. DEDICATION To Laila, Sarah, and Peter CONTENTS Aknowledgments Preface Chapter One: How the U.S. “Special Relationship” with Israel came about Chapter Two: The beginnings Chapter Three: Louis Brandeis, Zionism, and the “Parushim” Chapter Four: World War I & the Balfour Declaration Chapter Five: Paris Peace Conference 1919: Zionists defeat calls for self- determination Chapter Six: Forging an “ingathering” of all Jews Chapter Seven: The modern Israel Lobby is born Chapter Eight: Zionist Colonization Efforts in Palestine Chapter Nine: Truman Accedes to Pro-Israel Lobby Chapter Ten: Pro-Israel Pressure on General Assembly Members Chapter Eleven: Massacres and the Conquest of Palestine Chapter Twelve: U.S. front groups for Zionist militarism Chapter Thirteen: Infiltrating displaced person’s camps in Europe to funnel people to Palestine Chapter Fourteen: Palestinian refugees Chapter Fifteen: Zionist influence in the media Chapter Sixteen: Dorothy Thompson, played by Katharine Hepburn & Lauren Bacall Works Cited Further Reading Endnotes ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am extremely grateful to Katy, who plowed through my piles of obscure books and beyond to check it; to Sarah, whose design so enhanced it; to Monica, whose splendid work kept things together; and to the special, encouraging friends (you know who you are) who have made this all possible. Above all, I am profoundly grateful to the authors and editors who have produced superb work on this issue for so many years, many receiving little personal gain despite the excellence and dedication of their labors.
    [Show full text]
  • Election 2020 Page 3
    AUGUSTOCTOBER 2019 2020 ELECTION 2020 PAGE 3 We’ve Got You Covered This Election PAGE 3 Maestro Michael Tilson Thomas Talks AboutAncient Two Mysteries New Shows, A Heartwarming Music, CookingRevealed and on More New Season of PAGE 7 Secrets of the Dead Call the Midwife PAGE XX PAGE X CONTENTS 2 3 4 5 6 7 VIRTUAL EVENTS + NEWS + NOTES RADIO SCHEDULE RADIO SPECIALS + PASSPORT TV HIGHLIGHTS + PERKS PODCASTS LISTINGS Our virtual events What’s happening Your guide to What's new and Watch more with Your guide come to you. at KQED? radio shows. recommended. KQED Passport. to broadcast television. Changes in On KQED Distribution Thank you to members who responded to our message about the change in print distribution published in our September issue. Changes will take effect with the November issue. We appreciate your input and will do our best to accommodate your request. We intend to provide those who responded with an update by mid-October. Any questions about the publication should be directed to [email protected]. If you won’t be receiving On KQED in print, please remember that the magazine remains available to all members — with added online-only features — at kqed.org/onkqed. You'll find clickable links; a separate, downloadable radio schedule and listing of television programs and repeat times. VIRTUAL EVENTS Ballots & Brews Tuesdays in October at 6:00pm En Español, Thursday, October 6, at 6:00pm Want to get informed before voting on the 2020 ballot? Join KQED for a live online series that will educate, entertain and inspire civic participation.
    [Show full text]