DOCSLIB.ORG

Recreation and Travel Management

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Recreation and Travel Management Recreation and Travel Management Introduction The Northern Great Plains offers a variety of recreational experiences and unique grassland and forest settings. Use and interest in recreating and travelling on public lands are increasing. Mixing recreational use with other public desires, such as livestock grazing, coal, oil and gas production and the needs of wildlife, is a continuing challenge for Forest Service managers. Direction for recreation, public access and travel would be provided in the three revised management plans. In addition, a new method for describing scenic quality, called the Scenery Management System (SMS), has been applied to these public lands as a way of developing landscape character goals and scenic integrity objectives. Recreation Opportunity Spectrum (ROS) designations have been determined for units where they are not currently available. Travel is associated with nearly every activity on National Forest System (NFS) lands. Travel management is a tool that facilitates the movement of people and products. As use of NFS lands increases, travel management will become more complex and important as a tool to mitigate impacts on various resources and to coordinate uses. The Forest Service works closely with all user groups to maintain multiple travel and recreation opportunities and to identify where these activities can continue. Laws, Policy and Direction Forest Planning Regulation 36 CFR 219.21 requires evaluation of the recreation resource including ROS, supply of developed recreational facilities, off-highway vehicle-use opportuni- ties and scenic integrity objectives (SIO). Scenic integrity objectives are a part of the new SMS and similar to Visual Quality Objectives (VQOs), which were formerly used. Key Indicators • Acres by Recreation Opportunity Spectrum • Acres by scenic integrity objective • Capacity levels at developed recreation sites • Change in opportunity for dispersed recreation activities • Acres available by permitted travel type. Recreation Affected Environment In the current management plans, ROS is addressed in general terms in the goal statements of management area prescriptions. Little to no specific analysis exists concerning what the best mix of ROS classification should be to serve the public need. Except for some management areas on the Dakota Prairie Grasslands, there are no specific decisions concerning what the ROS class should be in each management area. Chapter3: Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences 3- 193 The current management plans generally address scenic integrity objectives in each management area prescription as an objective that can not be exceeded. Except in a few cases, no specific SIO is assigned to areas. The Custer and Nebraska National Forest Land and Resource Management Plans provide for additional trail construction. The Medicine Bow Land and Resource Management Plan also provides for additional trail construction, although no trails are planned for construction on the Thunder Basin National Grassland. No additional developed recreation sites are identified in the three management plans. The Nebraska National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan was amended in February 1988 to include management of the Congressionally designated Soldier Creek Wilderness and Pine Ridge National Recreation Area. In August 1988, the Nebraska National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan was again amended to provide additional emphasis on the recreation program. This amendment identified a priority on developing a grassland interpretive center at Wall, South Dakota, construction of developments near unique areas, increasing the number and quality of day-use and camping facilities, and a need for barrier-free facilities. Although the Medicine Bow Land and Resource Management Plan did not do so, the other two management plans did identify areas where motorized vehicle use is restricted. See the Travel Management section for further information on current travel restrictions. Developed and Dispersed Recreation Opportunities (Information in this section comes from A Summary of the Northern Great Plains Recreation Market Assessment, 1997, (1-8). This document is on file in at the Forest Supervisor's Office in Chadron, Nebraska.) Introduction and Overview None of the units under review are nationally significant recreational destinations. However, many do receive significant visitation, often from people in nearby states or Canadian provi- nces. Some units attract many visitors travelling to other primary destinations. Often these units lie near or within major highway corridors. For instance, the Buffalo Gap National Grassland, with Interstate 90 near its northern boundary, lies adjacent to both Badlands National Park and the Black Hills of South Dakota. Travellers often visit the Buffalo Gap National Grassland on their way to South Dakota's badlands or Black Hills, or major attractions, such as Yellowstone National Park, farther west. The same can be said about the Little Missouri National Grassland. Interstate 94 crosses that unit near Medora, North Dakota. Other major highways traversing the planning area units include Highway 83 going through the Fort Pierre National Grassland, Highway 85 through the Little Missouri National Grassland and Highway 2 through the Nebraska National Forest. Also used is a generalized north-south travel corridor, referred to as a Heritage Corridor, from Interstate 80 in Nebraska to Interstate 90 in South Dakota. Facilities, such as trails and trailheads, campgrounds and picnic grounds, continue to be built or improved on the units under review. These facilities will likely increase recreational use, especially from people living within short driving distances of the facilities. Presently there is little outfitter guide activity on any of the planning units, although in recent years several inquiries have been received requesting information about outfitter guiding on the grasslands. 3-194 Chapter3: Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences Dakota Prairie Grasslands Grand River and Cedar River National Grasslands The Grand River and Cedar River National Grasslands comprise about 162,000 acres in northwestern South Dakota and southwestern North Dakota. Although these units contain no developed campgrounds, camping and picnicking do occur. Autumn finds a fair number of hunters in search of wild game, including pronghorn antelope, sharp-tailed grouse and deer. Prairie dog viewing and shooting are also popular. Some warm-water fishing is available on small reservoirs on the units, and limited river floating is available during high-water seasons. Shadehill Reservoir, managed by the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, lies adjacent to Grand River National Grassland, and offers camping, picnicking and fishing opportunities. On average, about 14,700 Recreation Visitor Days occurred on these two grassland units each year between 1992-96, with hunting at the top of the list of activities. Little Missouri National Grassland The Little Missouri National Grassland is the largest national grassland in the country. It contains rugged badlands topography, which attracts tourists. Tourists especially visit Theodore Roosevelt National Park. The three units of this national park lie within the boundaries of the Little Missouri National Grassland. Nearby Medora, North Dakota, an historic, recreated cowboy town, is a major regional tourist attraction. The large Missouri River dam, Lake Sakakawea, a major recreational resource, lies nearby to the north and east. The unit is named after the Little Missouri River, one of the longest undammed rivers in the United States. It provides scenic canoeing opportunities in the spring when water flows are up. In the winter, snowmobiling is popular on and along the river. The Little Missouri River is a state designated scenic river. Mixed-grass prairie dominates the region, although other interes- ting plant communities thrive in isolated locations, including ponderosa and limber pine, cottonwood draws and riparian forests, and upland woodlands. Fossils and geologic formations are common. Wildlife, which attracts hunters and others, abounds, including prairie dogs, falcons, eagles, deer and bighorn sheep. The Little Missouri National Grassland offers the only elk and bighorn sheep hunting in the state. Camping is spread across the unit. Three developed campgrounds and three picnic grounds are maintained. By 1998, the Maah Daah Hey Trail stretched more than 120 miles. Other shorter trails include the Summit (4.5 miles long), the Long X (8.5 miles long) and the Little Missouri Snowmobile (22 miles long). Large, remote, unroaded tracts can still be found on the Little Missouri National Grassland, although oil and gas explora- tion has resulted in many roads advancing into previously unroaded areas over the past 25 years. Motorized Travel/Viewing Scenery is the single most popular recreation category on the unit, including travel on I-90 and Highway 85 through the grassland. Hunting categories (Big Game, Upland Game, Small Game and Waterfowl), added together, are more popular than Motorized Travel/Viewing Scenery. Camping and Hiking/Horseback Riding are also quite popular. This grassland experienced on average about 95,900 Recreation Visitor Days each year between 1992- 1996. Chapter3: Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences 3- 195 Sheyenne National Grassland The Sheyenne National Grassland comprises about 70,000 acres in southeastern North Dakota. It is a remarkable unit if only because it represents
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Analysing Data on Protected Areas Work in Progress
    The OECD is developing a method to report a more detailed and harmonised account of countries’ terrestrial and marine protected areas. It applies a harmonised methodology to data from the World Database on Protected Areas. Analysing data on protected areas WORK IN PROGRESS CONTACT Head of Division Nathalie Girouard [email protected] Senior Economist Ivan Haščič [email protected] Statisticians Alexander Mackie [email protected] and Sarah Sentier [email protected] Communications Clara Tomasini [email protected] Image credits: Dormitor Park by Thomas Maluck, Flickr/CC licence. UNSDG. Perereca de folhagem Moisés Silva Lima Flickr/CC Licence. Icon TheNounProject.com http://oe.cd/env-data 2 December 2016 International goals Methodology THE WORLD DATABASE ON PROTECTED AREAS The OECD is developing an improved method to The OECD’s indicators are based on data Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) generate more detailed indicators on protected from the World Database on Protected Areas and its World Commission on Protected areas, both terrestrial and marine, for countries (WDPA), which is a geospatial database of Areas (WCPA). across the world. terrestrial and marine protected areas. The WDPA is updated monthly. It contains The WDPA is managed by the United information on more than 200 000 It applies a harmonised methodology to data Nations Environment Programme’s World protected areas. from the World Database on Protected Areas. Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP- WCMC) with support from the International CATEGORIES OF MANAGEMENT By 2020, conserve at least 10 per cent of coastal and The World Database on Protected Areas lists z Ia Strict Nature Reserve marine areas, consistent with national and international protected areas designated at national (IUCN z Ib Wilderness Area law and based on best available scientific information.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 11 the Natural Ecological Value of Wilderness
    204 h The Multiple Values of Wilderness USDA Forest Service. (2002).National and regional project results: 2002 National Chapter 11 Forest Visitor Use Report. Retrieved February 1,2005. from http:Nwww.fs.fed.usl recreation/pmgrams/nvum/ The Natural Ecological Value USDA Forest Service. (200 1). National und regional project results: FY2001 National Foresr ViorUse Report. Retrieved February 1,2005, from http:llwww.fs.fed.usI of Wilderness recreation/pmgrams/nvum/ USDA Forest Service. (2000).National and regional project results: CY20a) Notional Fowst Visitor Use Repor?. Retrieved February 1,2005, from http://www.fs.fed.usl recreation/programs/nvud H. Ken Cordell Senior Research Scientist and Project Leader Vias. A.C. (1999). Jobs folIow people in the nual Rocky Mountain west. Rural Devel- opmenr Perspectives, 14(2), 14-23. USDA Forest Service, Athens, Georgia Danielle Murphy j Research Coordinator, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia Kurt Riitters Research Scientist USDA Forest Service, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina J. E, Harvard Ill former University of Georgia employee Authors' Note: Deepest appreciation is extended to Peter Landres of the Leopold Wilderness Research Institute for initial ideas for approach, data. and analysis and for a thorough and very helpful review of this chapter. Chapter I I-The Natural Ecological Value of Wilderness & 207 The most important characteristic of an organism is that capacity modem broad-scale external influences, such as nonpoint source pollutants. for self-renewal known QS hcaltk There are two organisms whose - processes of self-renewal have been subjected to human interfer- altered distribution of species, and global climate change (Landres, Morgan ence and control.
    [Show full text]
  • National Areas32 State Areas33
    NEBRASKA : THE COR NHUSKER STATE 43 larger cities and counties continue to grow. Between 2000 and 2010, the population of Douglas County—home of Omaha—increased 11.5 percent, while neighboring Sarpy County grew 29.6 percent. Nebraska’s population is becoming more racially and ethnically diverse. The most significant growth has occurred in the Latino population, which is now the state’s largest minority group. From 2000 to 2010, the state’s Latino population increased from 5.5 percent to 9.2 percent, growing at a rate of slightly more than 77 percent. The black population also grew from 3.9 percent to 4.4 percent during that time. While Nebraska’s median age increased from 35.3 in 2000, to 36.2 in 2010 — the number of Nebraskans age 65 and older decreased slightly during the same time period, from 13.6 percent in 2000, to 13.5 percent in 2010. RECREATION AND PLACES OF INTEREST31 National Areas32 Nebraska has two national forest areas with hand-planted trees: the Bessey Ranger District of the Nebraska National Forest in Blaine and Thomas counties, and the Samuel R. McKelvie National Forest in Cherry County. The Pine Ridge Ranger District of the Nebraska National Forest in Dawes and Sioux counties contains native ponderosa pine trees. The U.S. Forest Service also administers the Oglala National Grassland in northwest Nebraska. Within it is Toadstool Geologic Park, a moonscape of eroded badlands containing fossil trackways that are 30 million years old. The Hudson-Meng Bison Bonebed, an archaeological site containing the remains of more than 600 pre- historic bison, also is located within the grassland.
    [Show full text]
  • Defining Wilderness Within IUCN
    Article for the International Journal of Wilderness, to be published in 2009 Defining wilderness in IUCN Nigel Dudley, Cyril F. Kormos, Harvey Locke and Vance G. Martin The IUCN protected area classification system describes and defines a suite of protected area categories and management approaches suitable for each category, ranging from strictly protected “no-go” reserves to landscape protection and non-industrial sustainable use areas. Wilderness has its own protected area category under IUCN’s classification system, Category Ib, which describes the key objectives of wilderness protection and, more importantly, identifies the limits of what is and is not acceptable in such areas. At the 2008 World Conservation Congress, a new edition of management guidelines for the IUCN categories (Guidelines for Applying Protected Area Management Categories, Dudley 2008) was published following long consultation. Guidance for wilderness protection is now more detailed and precise than in the previous 1994 edition, and as a result will help further the application of this category around the world. We describe the revisions to the new guidelines generally, and some of the implications for wilderness protected areas specifically. Wilderness areas and protected areas The term “wilderness” has several dimensions: a biological dimension, because wilderness refers to mainly ecologically intact areas, and a social dimension, because many people – from urban dwellers to indigenous groups – interact with wild nature, and all humans depend on our planet’s wilderness resource to varying degrees. A wilderness protected area is therefore an area that is mainly biologically intact, is free of modern, industrial infrastructure, and has been set aside so that humans may continue to have a relationship with wild nature.
    [Show full text]
  • Host Hotel: Line and the 103Rd Meridian
    This conference will be field surveying near the intersection of the Nebraska/South Dakota state Host Hotel: line and the 103rd Meridian. Westerner Motel 300 Oak Street #2248 Chadron, NE 69337 308.432.5577 A limited number of rooms have been reserved until July 31st for PSAN attendees. Hosts: Phil Curd & Jerry Penry BADLANDS NATIONAL PARK This year’s summer conference will be held a little later in the year and prior to Labor Day weekend to provide surveyors and their families an opportunity to combine it with an extended vacation to nearby sites or the Black Hills. The conference will consist of field surveying in a very remote and scenic area, yet vehicle accessible site. Attendees will have the opportunity to search for and rehabilitate a variety of monuments consisting of large state line mileposts, section corners, and closing corners dating back to 1882. A nearby astronomical station placed in 1874 to aid in deter- mining the initial state line boundary survey will also be uncovered. The culmination of this search will enable the group to collectively locate the Terminal Monument where the 103rd Meridian intersected the Nebraska/South Dakota state line. This famed line is also the western boundary of the historic Pine Ridge Reservation and the western bound- ary of the 6th Principal Meridian surveys in South Dakota. Chadron has a large variety of nearby sites including the Museum of the Fur Trade, Toadstool Geologic Park, Hudson- Meng Education & Research Center (archaeological site), Fort Robinson, and scenic Chadron State Park. Chadron is located just 50 miles from the southern edge of the Black Hills which offers an endless variety of other places to ex- plore on this extended holiday weekend.
    [Show full text]
  • Nebraska National Forests and Grasslands
    USDA Forest Service | Region 2 Nebraska national Forests and Grasslands http://www.fs.usda.gov/nebraska OUTREACH NOTICE CIVIL ENGINEER GS-0810-07/09/11 The USDA Forest Service, Nebraska National Forests and Grasslands, is seeking a candidate for Civil Engineer, GS-0810-07/09/11. This is a full time permanent position, located in Chadron, Nebraska. The purpose of this Outreach Notice is to inform prospective applicants of this upcoming opportunity. Please apply to this position using the USAJOBS link below by July 12, 2019. (Select Chadron, NE). https://fsoutreach.gdcii.com?id=0F552B1C47B045D4884812E2D86079F7 Description of duties associated with this position: The primary duties of this position are to provide professional engineering input into the interdisciplinary planning process for natural resource development activities involving engineering projects. Examples include: Develops and modifies civil engineering plans and specifications for new construction or to improve utility, quality, appropriateness, and appearance of construction. Prepares or reviews Environmental Analysis, Environmental Impact Statements, and special reports with regard to new or improved engineering construction. Coordinates with other resource area specialists to complete environmental documents and clearances. Reviews on-the-ground feasibility layout of transportation planning and reviews and certifies adequacy of all road locations made. Is responsible for contract compliance on assigned projects. Manages real property assets and inventories. Serves as Engineering Representative (ER) or Contracting Officer's Representative (COR) providing technical advice, recommendations and suitable alternatives to the Contracting Officer and Forest Officials. Qualification Requirements: Those who are interested must meet the qualification requirements for the GS-0810 series that is covered by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Nebraska National Forests and Grasslands Bessey Ranger District
    Nebraska National Forests and Grasslands Bessey Ranger District Lead Forestry Technician (Fire Engine Operator) GS 0462-6 The Nebraska National Forests and Grasslands will be hiring a Lead Forestry Technician (Fire Engine Operator) GS-0462-6 position in the near future. The duty station for this position will be in Halsey, Nebraska on the Bessey Ranger District. About the Position This position is an Assistant Engine Captain for a Type 6 wildland engine module. The incumbent will supervise up to three seasonal or permanent part-time crew members when the Engine Captain is away. The program of work is wildland fire activities such as suppression, preparedness, prevention, hazardous fuels reduction, and prescribed fire. The units of Nebraska National Forests and Grasslands typically average about 30 fires per year on the Forest. Our engine crews enjoy good working relationships with our cooperators and provide mutual aid assistance on an additional 10 or so fires during a typical season. The modules are very active year-round and take advantage of opportunities for off-forest fire assignments and prescribed fire details. The modules support a forest-wide hazardous fuels treatment program of approximately 2,000 acres per year. While the person hired for each of these positions will work directly for the Engine Captain, the District Fire Management Officer provides oversight for the overall programs. The Bessey Fire Crew is known for being energetic and competent. We assist other resource areas when our schedule allows. Look for the vacancy announcement shown above for these positions on http://www.usajobs.gov/. The “How to Apply” tab will provide additional information.
    [Show full text]
  • Antarctica's Wilderness Has Declined to the Exclusion of Biodiversity
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/527010; this version posted January 22, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Antarctica’s wilderness has declined to the exclusion of biodiversity Rachel I. Leihy1, Bernard W.T. Coetzee2, Fraser Morgan3, Ben Raymond4, Justine D. Shaw5, Aleks Terauds4, and Steven L. Chown1 1School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Victoria 3800, Australia. 2Global Change Institute, University of the Witwatersrand, WITS 2050, Johannesburg, South Africa. 3Landcare Research New Zealand, Private Bag 92170, Auckland Mail Centre, Auckland 1142, New Zealand. 4Australian Antarctic Division, Department of the Environment and Energy, 203 Channel Highway, Kingston, Tasmania 7050, Australia. 5School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Queensland 4072, Australia. Recent assessments of the biodiversity value of Earth’s dwindling wilderness areas1,2 have emphasized the whole of Antarctica as a crucial wilderness in need of urgent protection3. Whole-of-continent designations for Antarctic conservation remain controversial, however, because of widespread human impacts and frequently used provisions in Antarctic law for the designation of specially protected areas to conserve wilderness values, species and ecosystems4,5. Here we investigate the extent to which Antarctica’s wilderness encompasses its biodiversity. We assembled a comprehensive record of human activity on the continent (~ 2.7 million localities) and used it to identify unvisited areas ≥ 10 000 km2 (1,6-8) (i.e. Antarctica’s wilderness areas) and their representation of biodiversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Nebraska National Forest Oglala National Grassland Pine Ridge Ranger District Map
    Nebraska National Forest United States Department of Agriculture Oglala National Grassland Forest Service Pine Ridge Ranger District Travel Analysis Report 2008 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Table of Contents INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 1 Background ................................................................................................................................. 1 Process ........................................................................................................................................ 2 Products......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Kaibab National Forest
    United States Department of Agriculture Kaibab National Forest Forest Service Southwestern Potential Wilderness Area Region September 2013 Evaluation Report The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TTY). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Cover photo: Kanab Creek Wilderness Kaibab National Forest Potential Wilderness Area Evaluation Report Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 1 Inventory of Potential Wilderness Areas .................................................................................................. 2 Evaluation of Potential Wilderness Areas ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Wilderness Fire Management in a Changing World
    STEWARDSHIP Wilderness Fire Management in a Changing World BY CAROL MILLER everal strategies are available for reducing accumu- results from either human or natural causes, and the man- lated forest fuels and their associated risks, including agement objective is to stop the spread of the fire and S naturally or accidentally ignited wildland fires, man- extinguish it at the least cost (USDA and USDI 2001). In agement ignited prescribed fires, and a variety of mechanical some cases, concerns about firefighter safety and suppres- and chemical methods (Omi 1996). However, a combina- sion costs will result in a less aggressive suppression tion of policy, law, philosophy, and logistics suggest there is response to a wildfire, with features of the landscape being a more limited set of fuels man- used to allow fire to burn within a designated area. WFU is agement activities that are the management of naturally ignited wildland fires to pro- appropriate in wilderness (Bryan tect, maintain, and enhance resources in predefined areas 1997; Parsons and Landres 1998; outlined in fire management plans (USDA and USDI 2001). Nickas 1998). Naturally ignited The management objective is to allow fire, as nearly as pos- wildland fires is the commonly sible, to function in its natural ecological role. In some cases, preferred fuels management strat- certain suppression tactics might be used with WFU to pro- egy in wilderness (Miller 2003), tect life, property, or specific values of concern. Recently, with management-ignited pre- there has been discussion about effectively dissolving the scribed fire being considered in distinction between wildfire and WFU, and managing all some cases (Landres et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Terrestrial Ecological Systems and Natural Communities of Nebraska
    Terrestrial Ecological Systems and Natural Communities of Nebraska (Version IV – March 9, 2010) By Steven B. Rolfsmeier Kansas State University Herbarium Manhattan, KS 66506 and Gerry Steinauer Nebraska Game and Parks Commission Aurora, NE 68818 A publication of the NEBRASKA NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM NEBRASKA GAME AND PARKS COMMISSION LINCOLN, NEBRASKA TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1: Introduction ..................................................................................… 1 Terrestrial Ecological System Classification…...................................................... 1 Ecological System Descriptions…………............................................................. 2 Terrestrial Natural Community Classification……………………………….….. 3 Vegetation Hierarchy………………………….………………………………… 4 Natural Community Nomenclature............................................................…........ 5 Natural Community Ranking..;……………….……….....................................…. 6 Natural Community Descriptions………….......................................................... 8 Chapter 2: Ecological Systems of Nebraska.………………………………… 10 Upland Forest, Woodland, and Shrubland Systems…………………………….. 10 Eastern Upland Oak Bluff Forest……….……………………………….. 10 Eastern Dry-Mesic Bur Oak Forest and Woodland……………………… 12 Great Plains Dry Upland Bur Oak Woodland…………………………… 15 Great Plains Wooded Draw, Ravine and Canyon……………………….. 17 Northwestern Great Plains Pine Woodland……………………………… 20 Upland Herbaceous Systems…………………………………………………….. 23 Central Tall-grass Prairie………………………………………………..
    [Show full text]